NBN Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities in Australia where NBN users have reported problems and outages. If you are experiencing problems with NBN, please submit a report below.
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
NBN users affected:
Check Current Status
E-mail
The National Broadband Network (NBN) is an Australian national wholesale open-access data network project and offers landline phone and internet network.
Check Current Status
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Brisbane, QLD | 307 |
| Sydney, NSW | 244 |
| Melbourne, VIC | 183 |
| Adelaide, SA | 76 |
| Perth, WA | 53 |
| Gold Coast, QLD | 6 |
| Ballarat, VIC | 3 |
| Canberra, ACT | 3 |
| Rosalie Plains, QLD | 2 |
| Gawler, SA | 2 |
| Eden, NSW | 2 |
| Elizabeth, SA | 1 |
| Baradine, NSW | 1 |
| Innisfail, QLD | 1 |
| Upper Caboollure, QLD | 1 |
| Orange, NSW | 1 |
| Sunshine Coast, QLD | 1 |
| Camden West, NSW | 1 |
| Newcastle, NSW | 1 |
| Mount Gambier, SA | 1 |
| Greenmount, QLD | 1 |
| Cape Jervis, SA | 1 |
| Balwyn North, VIC | 1 |
| Stanmore, QLD | 1 |
| Darwin, NT | 1 |
| Lowood, QLD | 1 |
| Bordertown, SA | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
NBN Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
🇵🇸 a cat wearing a nice sweater 🇵🇸
(@shitty_witch) reported
@jacobtaber @aziz0nomics my issue is *also* with an organization working to facilitate immigration to illegal settlements. Israel "allowing" it is irrelevant to whether or not NBN should be protested. all apartheid should be protested.
-
🇵🇸 a cat wearing a nice sweater 🇵🇸
(@shitty_witch) reported
@jacobtaber @aziz0nomics my issue is *also* with an organization working to facilitate immigration to illegal settlements. Israel "allowing" it is irrelevant to whether or not NBN should be protested. all apartheid should be protested.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
🇵🇸 a cat wearing a nice sweater 🇵🇸
(@shitty_witch) reported
@jacobtaber @aziz0nomics my issue is *also* with an organization working to facilitate immigration to illegal settlements. Israel "allowing" it is irrelevant to whether or not NBN should be protested. all apartheid should be protested.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
🇵🇸 a cat wearing a nice sweater 🇵🇸
(@shitty_witch) reported
@jacobtaber @aziz0nomics my issue is *also* with an organization working to facilitate immigration to illegal settlements. Israel "allowing" it is irrelevant to whether or not NBN should be protested. all apartheid should be protested.
-
🇵🇸 a cat wearing a nice sweater 🇵🇸
(@shitty_witch) reported
@jacobtaber @aziz0nomics my issue is *also* with an organization working to facilitate immigration to illegal settlements. Israel "allowing" it is irrelevant to whether or not NBN should be protested. all apartheid should be protested.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
-
JB
(@JB4Israel) reported
@KenanPerry @motti_pinsky @YonahLieberman NBN isn’t violating Geneva49. Further, it’s clear you have not done your homework. •A special regime between Israel and the “palestinians” is set out in a series of agreements negotiated between 1993 and 1999 that are still valid – that govern all issues between them, settlements included. In this framework there is no specific provision restricting planning, zoning, and continued construction by either party. The “palestinians” and their allies cannot now invoke the Geneva Convention regime in order to bypass previous internationally acknowledged agreements.
Check Current Status