Telstra outages and service status in Avondale, New South Wales

Problems in the last 24 hours in Avondale, New South Wales

The chart below shows the number of Telstra reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Avondale, New South Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telstra Issues Reports Near Avondale, New South Wales

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Avondale and nearby locations:

• 
  xXxMiSsYmOnNxXx (@xXxMiSsYxXx1) reported 13 minutes ago from Morisset East, New South Wales

  @Telstra I'm am appalled by the was your Telco has been unable to rectify anything at all I've been going around in circles for 3 days now with your team The real issue begun early September yet here we still are today with no results 0 home wi-fi 0 phone

• 
  xXxMiSsYmOnNxXx (@xXxMiSsYxXx1) reported 27 minutes ago from Morisset East, New South Wales

  @Telstra has got to be the worst Telco Issues since early September ongoing past 3 days playing a game of tennis with your people 0 result no service at all

• 
  xXxMiSsYmOnNxXx (@xXxMiSsYxXx1) reported 60 minutes ago from Morisset East, New South Wales

  @Telstra 5 business days.. Are you joking? Our speed is 0.25mbps We should just suck it up & keep paying for this service? & Just maybe someone will call by mid next week Please bump me up to someone who could possibly phone today?

Telstra Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Lucy Graham (@montrosegraham) reported 52 seconds ago

  @ChinaSelect Australia has had two major telecommunications network failures. As a result of the Telstra failure, three people died, including a baby. One person died as a result of the Optus failure. No infrastructure should have any exposure to foreign adversaries.

• 
  Howard (@howardw46) reported 56 seconds ago

  @Telstra why is there very limited connection on the VLine service between Bairnsdale & Latrobe Valley? For most of the trip the train line is adjacent to the highway where connection is available.

• 
  K•A•N•E (@kanethesaint) reported 10 minutes ago

  @TallNupinks Belong is owned by Telstra and it's their cheaper mobile service with 5G - they have a $25 plan for unlimited calls & 10GB data. They have been reliable for me for a while!

• 
  Rohanc (@rohancct) reported 14 minutes ago

  Forget the Telstra outage, there should be a senate investigation into AFL Tables being down for hours.

• 
  Andrea J (@AndreaJ_Oz) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Telstra not sure if Boost is still under your remit, but connectivity issues as punishment for not setting up auto-recharge is not a good look.

• 
  Ivor B (@IvorB6) reported 22 minutes ago

  @danderfield 3/ one of the players who showed leadership following the Wayne Carey incident. Left his footy boots in the middle of Telstra Dome following Norths EF loss in 2005, notifying his retirement from the game.

• 
  Deeeezy (@Deeeeeezzy) reported 26 minutes ago

  I wouldn’t invest in Telstra. - $300M in growth just from increasing their mobile pricing on Post-Paid and Pre-Paid. - 11% pay rise for the CEO. - Loss of 30K mobile customers. Essentially they are lifting consumer pricing as a way to offset poor growth. Way too pricy.

• 
  Ray (@rayethesis) reported 26 minutes ago

  This chart puts Starlink’s scale into perspective. At roughly $11.4B in annualized revenue, Starlink is already approaching the revenue scale of established telecom giants such as Singtel and sits in the same neighborhood as Telstra. That is remarkable considering Starlink is a relatively young satellite broadband network competing against companies that have spent decades building terrestrial infrastructure, spectrum portfolios, and massive subscriber bases. The important signal here is not just the absolute revenue, but how quickly Starlink has reached a level that takes traditional telecom companies decades to build. However, the comparison also exposes the problem. Telecom is a huge business, but it is not necessarily a high-growth business. Companies like China Mobile, Verizon, Deutsche Telekom, AT&T and NTT generate tens or even hundreds of billions in annual revenue, yet the market typically assigns them much lower growth expectations because connectivity eventually becomes a mature utility. Starlink has a better growth profile today because it is still penetrating underserved markets, adding capacity, expanding internationally, and converting new customers. But as the revenue base moves from $10B toward $20B, $30B and beyond, the question becomes whether Starlink can maintain venture-like growth rates while operating inside what is ultimately a telecom market. The bullish argument is that Starlink is not exactly a traditional telecom company. Its satellite constellation gives SpaceX a global distribution network that terrestrial operators struggle to replicate, particularly in rural areas, developing markets, maritime, aviation and other difficult-to-connect environments. There is also optionality around direct-to-device connectivity, enterprise services, government contracts and potentially other satellite applications. If those businesses become meaningful revenue streams, Starlink could evolve from simply being "satellite internet" into a broader space infrastructure platform. That would justify a much more aggressive valuation than simply capitalizing Starlink like another telecom operator. But this is where I think investors need to be careful with the SpaceX hype. A $11.4B revenue run-rate sounds enormous, but revenue alone does not determine the quality of the business. Starlink requires enormous capital expenditure to deploy and replenish satellites, ground infrastructure and user terminals, while bandwidth economics and competition will determine how much of that revenue eventually becomes free cash flow. The really interesting question is not whether Starlink can reach $20B or $30B in revenue. It is whether SpaceX can continue compounding revenue rapidly without Starlink becoming just another giant, capital-intensive telecom business. My take: SpaceX is incredibly cool, and Starlink reaching ~$11.4B of annual revenue is genuinely impressive. But if the main growth engine for the SpaceX story is ultimately just telecom, I'm much less excited. A bigger Starlink is great, but a bigger telecom company alone does not create an extraordinary valuation. The real upside comes if Starlink becomes the cash-flow engine that funds a much larger SpaceX ecosystem: launch, defense, direct-to-device, satellite infrastructure and eventually entirely new space-based businesses. Starlink is impressive but starlink alone is not enough. $SPCX

• 
  afraid_au (@afraid_au) reported 27 minutes ago

  @LmDread @tarkov Telstra appears to have stabilised for Sydney. Which servers are you having issues with, and which ISP are you with?

• 
  Jo Christiansen (@JoChristianse13) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Riogallica @Starlink We have @Starlink. Telstra lied to my husband about the download speed, by saying it was slow, then when I cancelled them & said that we were getting Starlink, another person actually tried to talk me into getting Starlink through Telstra.🙄 We went to Starlink’s Website & a local starlink Contractor installed it for us - $106.36 + GST