NBN outages and service status in North Arm Cove, New South Wales

Problems in the last 24 hours in North Arm Cove, New South Wales

The chart below shows the number of NBN reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in North Arm Cove, New South Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near North Arm Cove, New South Wales

The most recent NBN outage reports came from the following cities: Port Stephens.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Port Stephens	Wi-fi	28 days ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NBN Issues Reports Near North Arm Cove, New South Wales

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in North Arm Cove and nearby locations:

• 
  Reglfr41 (@zeilstrareinder) reported 20 minutes ago from Port Stephens, New South Wales

  @carly_solstice Trouble is NBN isn't up to it over our way.

• 
  The Hon. Bob Baldwin (@bobbaldwinmp) reported 28 minutes ago from Port Stephens, New South Wales

  They should have progressed the original Opal wirless network. 4 & 5g eat all of the NBN solutions Waste of $$

NBN Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Richie_Night Owl (@richardmelb05) reported 5 minutes ago

  Our nbn internet/phone service isnt working. A @Optus techician was sent to my home to find out why we dont have nbn internet. He told me there is something wrong with the fibre optic internet cable. The cable brings the internet to our home.

• 
  Nicholas Gilbert (@gilbongw) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AlboMP @narendramodi Operating 7/11 stores, NBN linesmen and service stations. Hey but what about your electrict vehicles as you put it? You buy everythink from China, that’s a bit unfair to Indja.

• 
  Cdbrown (@BrowntownBrew) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Batman2242 @JMarshall63666 That's just a stupid old lie. The concept was determined by an independent cost benefit analysis which determined upgrading to fibre provided the best benefit for the cost based on existing and concept tech. Libs destroyed the plan and the economics of the #nbn

• 
  VISION 🇦🇺 (@Vision_iii) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Ryantlon @MarkDiStef How can land prices go down? Council contributions are up, electrical infrastructure costs are up, sewer/water infrastructure costs have more than doubled, NBN costs are up. Council/state requirements are significantly more. Cities are landlocked with land become more and more scarce. Impossible for land cost to go down. As to deregulation, what deregulation? They introduced the regulated design process and you now need to get a PCA who asks for a BCA report from a BCA consultant who demands fire penetration reports, fire engineering reports, facade reports, wind reports, waterproofing reports and waste reports. And that’s just BCA. A task that was previously performed by one consultant now needs at least 8.

• 
  Mark A (@MarkA5859) reported 15 minutes ago

  I really am angry the LNP rooted the NBN. Now I have to seriously consider Musk’s Starlink for my Internet especially since both Telstra & Optus have & are having issues.

• 
  Doug (@Doug39270057204) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Batman2242 And starlink actually works. Our nbn connection is garbage.

• 
  Marty (@Martywa467) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Prowerock1 @VoteLewko @Starlink I myself ended up with a Telstra 5G modem also. It just shows that NBN was not the way to go. Even back when they decided to go with NBN it was obvious it was dated technology and for Australia it has never delivered the service it needs.

• 
  Russell Drysdale :We Stand With Albo,Labor & Aust (@Russputin2) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Juzira You really should get Full fibre NBN History does not support that view, except in Hansons micro fringe cult & within Murdochs LNP Crime Org.

• 
  jimmy jimmy (@sandeep05639313) reported 22 minutes ago

  0x84badd07170efb50f5068dd10618bd0b99379557 nbn i urgent 5000 $ plz help

• 
  The Policy Guy (@negativevortex_) reported 23 minutes ago

  @OzHempRocks @MarkoMatvikov 1/3 The latent, already eligible scenario Well, welcome to the world of whacky PBO estimations, eh? Let me see – so PBO are not to be trusted to estimate NBN, NDIS, Snowy 2.0, nuclear (etc) – but we trust them here? I see.... Let’s look at their stats and I’ll explain them to you for your benefit. This is how you come to quote the ‘uptake’ figure. See embedded table. So here is the 26% quoted as being ‘eligible’, or what you call uptake. But here is where that gets problematic. 1. Your optimum scenario relies on someone having $0 income. They’re not even filing an ITR! The $0 scenario does not apply to PBO modelling, as they’re not in that cohort at C, which drives D & then E. 2. Of greater relevance - of that 26%, this cohort includes any permutation of incomes for couples, the overwhelming majority of whom: a. Are eligible but earning in the same tax brackets (eg $45K and $75K, or $80K and $130K, or $200K and $200K) and hence receive no benefit at all, or b. Are in different tax brackets but are both at the lower end of the income scale (eg one at $40K the other at $60K – moderates out to $50K apiece saving $500) c. Are in different tax brackets, earning good incomes, but where the disparity is insignificant (eg one at $75K, the other at $150K – a saving of $1200) Of the ‘eligible’ pool of 26% of tax filers or 16% of the population, most of them receive $0 benefit as they ARE eligible but are both in the same tax bracket (2a). A large proportion end up with ‘something, but not material’. Before anyone jumps down my throat, consider this – the ALP’s WATO policy due to commence 2027 is $250 per person, so either; - ON does intend to continue WATO, which just further piles the burden on the tax system or - ON rescinds this, and most people (90% of income tax filers) are actually worse off. See example 2b above. They’d be no better off. So, I presume ON will inherit the (dubious) WATO and add IS (income splitting) into the mix. We just end up with a ludicrously over-engineered tax system. Punchline - we end up with between 1-3% of the population who receive a material benefit. It is probably closer to 2.5% of the voting population. Many parents will think they are eligible but end up receiving nothing. Which is the essence of populist policy. Let me be honest – the ALP WATO is fairer, simpler, and better. So, you either inherit it and over-engineer the system or discard it and wear the ire of the population. Or take my advice and engineer a far better, fit for purpose, future proofed model.