Telstra outages and service status in Prospect, South Australia

Problems in the last 24 hours in Prospect, South Australia

The chart below shows the number of Telstra reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Prospect, South Australia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Prospect, South Australia

The most recent Telstra outage reports came from the following cities: Adelaide.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Adelaide	Phone	8 days ago
Adelaide	E-mail	8 days ago
Adelaide	Phone	11 days ago
Adelaide	Phone	12 days ago
Adelaide	Phone	14 days ago
Adelaide	Phone	15 days ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telstra Issues Reports Near Prospect, South Australia

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Prospect and nearby locations:

• 
  STEVE FISCHER (@STEVEFI14205588) reported 4 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @VooDooRoo @LPOGroup So many LPO's think that they may earn money only to close down the track. There are plenty of Telstra licensed shops with similar tales.

• 
  Adam Fitzgerald (@AdamJFitzgerald) reported 5 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  I have a @Telstra Bigpond email address (for years) but ever since getting a new @SamsungMobile Galaxy S10, I can't get my bigpond email to work on the App at my local Telstra Shop, that there's a glitch with this, and there's nothing I can do, but webmail. Is this true? Help! 😕

• 
  John Smith (@andrewt392021) reported 8 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  On Saturday night I have caught a glimpse AFL game.The Ukrainian colors on the score line were a reminder of what virtue signaling POS the AFL is. Almost as bad as Telstra putting stay safe stay home 💩on the mobile devices !

• 
  AzsaWild (@AzsaWild) reported 16 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @Telstra Belong is the worst. I've never had the run around so much. Hours of nonsense even lies. Money lost because of Belong's incompetence and the nerve to tell a customer to cancel they're card! Rude af

• 
  David Fingleton (@Fingies) reported 18 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @Telstra Thanks, unfortunately @kayosports don’t respond/actually do anything to help/resolve the issue. Just blame the ISP @kayosports_help

• 
  Kurtis Eichler 📰 😷 (@ByEichler) reported 25 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Then I received a call this morning and attempted to do this for 30 minutes and my phone number is still listed on this loser’s account. So bad. Stressful and @Telstra is hopelessly inept

• 
  STEVE FISCHER (@STEVEFI14205588) reported 28 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @safm_adelaide Might want to say to Mark Soderstrom that having some tolerance, patience & understanding around mobile phone issues might be needed. Particularly when @Telstra pay to advertise on the show literally 10 minutes after his beef about customer service on air 😳 🙄

• 
  Michael / Mind Health not Mental Health (@Michael61058663) reported 28 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @delmaclifton OMG Delma, Telstra are so frustrating, even when you go in store the treatment can be quite poor. My big pond drops out all the time, getting over them!!!

• 
  Rem.0112 (@0112Rem) reported 28 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  6g software, use WiFi , ..... I just ...... but I could tell you, a whole Australia having Telstra air, and all the CBD having free WiFi signal

• 
  Ken Mah (@kenmaharchitect) reported 29 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Our pm is doing a good job with fostering good relations with countries around the region including our pacific neighbours. But? Why do we have to pay Telstra, a private company, to help keep Huawei out? This is not fair competition, it has anti China components and unnecessary.

• 
  Anika Johnstone (@spokenly_) reported 33 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @Telstra Internode with telstra doing the provisioning. First scheduled appt they never knocked despite us being home all day, second didn’t show up. We took 2 days off work to accomodate and can’t do again.

• 
  anthony ashton (@bloodhoundau) reported 37 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @verbaliza @Optus I used to have that with @Telstra what a mob of c. Ill never do business with them again

• 
  Fresh PrinceofBelair (@trimbowlme) reported 44 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @SeeArePe @iiNet @acccgovau @Telstra @VodafoneAU Ours is def not that bad but the dropping in and out is annoying. Speed is great when it's on but drops out for a few minutes each time multiple times a day

• 
  Richard (@Richardshouse) reported 51 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Note to the scammers calling & pretending to be "Telstra Security Services" "ATO legal department" etc Folks you can't run a voice based scam calling operation IF YOUR CALLERS CANT EVEN SPEAK CLEAR ENGLISH At least learn to pronounce the ******* words #australia #scam #stupid

• 
  Just_BeL (@HeReTTiK) reported 51 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Of molecular cells these ***** are in China now their not in Australia their now based in China I can't even get out of bed today iv got a headache and my whole body is heavy I kid you not they ate trying to kill me you published my private number ***** why ? #telstra #help

• 
  sportsindustry (@footyindustryAU) reported 55 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @johnsonleung @oethesaint @Tenash921 My understanding is that the afl website and associated network are Telstra assets. Telstra recieves all the advertising profit.

• 
  LeighKay (@leighkay881) reported 55 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @Telstra There is a damaged pit (manhole lid completely collapsed) on corner of Winston Ave and Albert St Clarence Gardens. Been like this for a number of weeks now. Have tried the 13 22 03 number of time and call drops after saying "report damage". Photos to follow.

• 
  Alan Cramer (@alancramer) reported 55 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Further to this, you can't speak to anyone at @Telstra Plus. When you call, you tell the AI that you want to speak to someone relating to Telstra Plus and are put through to Disconnections. Must be hoping that those poor souls can save the customer from walking.

• 
  legoman Adelaide (@Legoman_adel) reported 57 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  Looking forward to another day of @Telstra not being able to support their own customers when issues arise. So far wasted 2 days, was told I would get a call back and still waiting. How hard can it be? 🤔 next step ombudsman.

• 
  Teresa LaRocca (@effielarocca) reported 57 minutes ago from Adelaide, South Australia

  @Telstra 1/2. 2,weeks ago I suggested we switch from @Optus to Telstra, up our speed to 50mps as your bundle seemed better than Optus. Now we have no internet (which seemed to work on an Optus network) and yesterday my sister lost her job. She has 2 weeks left of her job and now

Telstra Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kai (@kai_h) reported 4 minutes ago

  @no1historychick Telstra are never going to move you to a new plan unless you ask, especially when the newer plans are cheaper and have more data.

• 
  aneko violet (@AnekoExe) reported 4 minutes ago

  Why ******** is there princess bubblegum from adventure time on the side of the Telstra phone box???

• 
  Sue Davis (@Sueberry2) reported 8 minutes ago

  @blu_boys @Optus Go Aldi...roll over data, plans from $23, Telstra network, and currently double data on some plans for 6months if you start up before the end of September 2026.

• 
  outsider (@outsider2040) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Urquie_Coffs @TonyShepherd4 Of course he left a measly surplus after selling off Qantas Telstra airports and many other government assets. Can be done once but never again so it pumped his numbers up big time. Other than that he pulled in some small tax receipts from massive mining boom.

• 
  Roller D (@RollerD3) reported 13 minutes ago

  "Something went wrong" @Telstra The biggest POS company in Australia. Its Mind boggling how **** the sim card activation process it. ******* useless.

• 
  leki ⚔️ (@mkfilko) reported 14 minutes ago

  $BRUN and $SHAZ are the two small cap neoclouds people keep putting in the same bucket. Somewhat similar market caps, both Nasdaq listed this year, both with an NVIDIA story attached. I think both provide compelling reasons to invest your money into, however, I do believe BRUN is the superior neocloud. I will present the facts as they are and sprinkle some commentary in it. You can use the facts to decide which is better for you. TL;DR at the bottom. Start with contract book versus actual revenue. Q2 2026, same quarter, both companies: > $BRUN revenue: $31.1M, up ~270% YoY > $SHAZ revenue: $1.9M, up ~412% YoY > $BRUN total contract value: $1.9B > $SHAZ total contract value: $8.8B $SHAZ carries 4.6 times the contract book on about one sixteenth of the revenue. Put differently, $BRUN's backlog is roughly 15 times its current annualized run rate. $SHAZ's is closer to 1,100 times. $SHAZ management guides first material revenue to Q4 2026. $BRUN has six sites in production today, took ARR from $30M at the end of 2025 to $145M by June, and reaffirmed roughly $400M exit ARR. A contract book is a claim while revenue is the confirmation of that claim. $BRUN has so far managed to prove that it is able to convert the contract book better than $SHAZ. Moving to the balance sheet, which is where $SHAZ shines > $SHAZ ended Q2 with roughly $1.9B in cash against $BRUN's $134.7M as of August 12. It has raised about $2.2B since December 2025, including a $1.6B oversubscribed round in June. On funding capacity this is not close, and $SHAZ wins it decisively. > The NVIDIA arrangement. Six years, $4.88B, up to 40,000 GB300 GPUs on NVIDIA's DSX AI factory design, 72MW in Australia, with NVIDIA taking product revenue plus a share of cloud revenue on supported capacity. Management describes the guaranteed pricing as a floor rather than a ceiling. $BRUN has no equivalent. This is the strongest single item in the $SHAZ file and anyone comparing the two has to concede it. Next, counterparty/customer quality: On April 1 $SHAZ announced a five year, $1.25B AI cloud infrastructure agreement, roughly 8,200 B300 GPUs deployed in Australia. The counterparty is ESDS Software Solution, an Indian cloud and managed services provider. ESDS is a real company. Five data centers in India, 2,501 customers as of FY26, growing revenue at a 28% CAGR. Using its own most recent disclosed accounts: > ESDS FY26 revenue: Rs 472 Cr, roughly $54M > ESDS FY26 profit after tax: Rs 121 Cr, roughly $14M > Annual obligation under the $SHAZ contract: ~$250M The yearly payment is about 4.7 times the counterparty's entire annual revenue and roughly 18 times its net profit. ESDS filed a Rs 720 Cr IPO in India on August 28, which raises roughly $82M against a five year obligation of $1.25B. Nothing here requires assuming bad faith by anyone. It requires asking how a company earning $14M a year funds $250M a year, and that question does not yet have a public answer. ESDS was not named on the $SHAZ Q2 call. When compared to $BRUN's own customer book: $BRUN's weaknesses are the concentration of their revenues. The top three customers were about 76% of 2025 revenue, with RunPod alone, a private GPU cloud platform, at about 45%. Both figures fell hard from 2024 on revenue that more than doubled, so concentration is getting lower. However, I think there is still room for improvement here. The quality side. The largest new contract signed is Thinking Machines Lab, roughly $470M over three years for about 5,000 GPUs, which implies around $3.60 per GPU hour. Mira Murati's lab raised $2B at a $12B valuation and has been reported in talks at a materially higher one since. That is a counterparty that can fund a $470M commitment out of capital already raised. Additionally there are the two agreements sitting in the Q2 10-Q, which are the part I find most useful because the cash terms are filed rather than announced: > June 8 agreement, 240 GPU servers, three year initial term, total consideration ~$207.6M. Structure: $18.97M prepaid before services commence, a further $37.94M on the commencement date, then ~$3.69M a month. That is about 27% of contract value collected at or before day one, and the first $18.97M was already sitting in customer deposits at June 30. > July 9 order form, 192 servers and 1,536 B300 GPUs, 48 month term, total contract value ~$222.5M. A prepayment equal to 25% of contract value, approximately $55.6M, not refundable, due in installments through service start. Two contracts, roughly $430M combined, each with a quarter of the money committed before a GPU is deliveredKaros on the call: > "We obtain prepayment on every deal we close." Average prepayment is 22% of TCV, and that single design choice runs a counterparty credit test automatically, at signing, on every contract. A $1.25B agreement under this structure would require roughly $275M wired before a single rack is energized. A counterparty that cannot post it never becomes backlog in the first place. Guckel confirmed what has actually been collected: > "we held $128.4 million in total customer deposits" $34.9M current, $93.5M long term, against compute scheduled for 2026 and 2027 delivery. So $BRUN's book is concentrated and its largest customer is a reseller, both fair criticisms. It is also a book where the customers have already wired a fifth of the money. Backlog funded in cash is a different asset class from backlog that has only been announced. Onto leadership, which is where most of my confidence actually comes from. On paper, $SHAZ has the more directly relevant development resume. James Manning has built and monetized more than 300MW of energy and compute infrastructure across Pennsylvania, Georgia, Texas and Australia, and founded a Nasdaq listed digital infrastructure company before this one. Nick Hughes-Jones ran 100 modular data centers across 200MW. The board is genuinely credentialed: Andrew Penn AO, former Telstra CEO, chairs it, and Western Union's chief legal officer sits on it. Anuj Goel joined as CFO from a 20 year Macquarie career running technology for APAC. Commercially they have people out of IBM, Microsoft, Rackspace and Equinix. This is not a shell. Three things still separate the two teams for me. > Tenure and continuity. $SHAZ's chief executive took the role in January 2026, its chairman arrived in May, its chief legal officer inside the last year, and its CFO in August. Board average tenure is roughly 0.6 years. That is a leadership team assembled over about twelve months, now asked to deliver 212MW. $BRUN's is the same group twice: Karos and Georgakopoulos both built Blue Fire Capital, both went to Galaxy Digital when it was acquired, and both left together to build this. Second company, same bench, and Georgakopoulos has been COO since April 2024. > They were the demanding customer before they were the vendor. Karos was MD and Head of Electronic Trading at Galaxy Digital and an executive committee member, and before that co founded and ran Blue Fire Capital across six countries and thirteen data centers. Karim Ali, the CIO, spent close to twenty years in performance sensitive infrastructure, built ultra low latency trading networks across four continents on microwave, millimeter wave and global fiber, and led a FedRAMP certification. In high frequency trading, latency and downtime hit the operator's own P&L the same day. This team ran compute as a cost center where failure was expensive to them personally, then went and sold it. That is a different instinct from developing a site and leasing it out. > Financing sits inside the company. Erik Guckel holds a PhD in Chemical Engineering from Illinois alongside a Chicago MBA, has closed over $2B in corporate transactions, managed a $3B debt portfolio, and secured funding for first of a kind facility construction. Karos has a derivatives and mathematical background and a track record monetizing billions in credit facilities. On the Q2 call he worked the prepayment against capex arithmetic live rather than passing it to the CFO, which is pretty damn impressive Both teams have now had one quarter to show what they do with a promise. $BRUN's first print as a public company came in at $31.1M with guidance reaffirmed. $SHAZ reported $1.93M against roughly $7.54M expected, a miss of about 75%, and moved first material revenue to Q4. I acknowledge that one quarter proves very little on its own. However, it is still the only head to head delivery test either team has actually run. Apart from the balance sheet mentioned earlier, $BRUN is also arguably weaker in its share structure and governance risks (dual-edged sword): Applying a governance screen to $SHAZ means applying the same screen to $BRUN. It has a dual class structure, roughly 50M Class A against 29.5M Class B. It had a related party loan from its own CEO, since repaid at closing. A director received a 336,000 share consulting grant that fully vested inside one quarter. And 7,875,000 CEO earnout shares plus sponsor and SPV earnouts all hit their price targets and vested within a single quarter of listing. These are ordinary **** era structures on both sides. Neither company is a governance exemplar What I am watching next: The NVIDIA financing gap is the strongest argument for $SHAZ, and $BRUN management spent a meaningful portion of the Q2 call signalling they are working on the same thing. Karos, on the AI Cloud Partner program: > "It's a well-known publicized program with NVIDIA, and obviously NVIDIA's investment grade. At the appropriate time, we can get into more details on that." Later, on the $500B consortium: > "And same with the AICP. We think that that program will continue to get extremely interesting, and I think we're going to have a plentiful amount of optionality currently and go forward." Guckel, separately: > "We continue to innovate on financing structures beyond the equipment financing approach used to date and expect to provide additional color and progress on this over the next quarter." And on the relationship itself: > "together, we are exploring deployments at scale that could meaningfully expand our footprint" None of that is signed. Management is definitely teasing a NVDA-linked financing structure during the call. But the specific advantage $SHAZ holds today is the specific advantage $BRUN is signalling it is negotiating, with a next quarter timeline attached to it, from a company NVIDIA already granted exemplar status and audits cluster by cluster. TL;DR: $SHAZ has the better balance sheet and the better NVIDIA arrangement, today, and neither of those is a small thing. $BRUN has sixteen times the revenue, a contract book that customers have already funded a fifth of in cash, six sites in production, and a counterparty filter built into how it signs deals. Between a large announced book and a smaller collected one, I think the collected one is a safer and yet equally asymmetric. Thanks for reading!

• 
  moey🇺🇾🇵🇸 (@_mqey) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Telstra @ezzh_ FIX MY ******* WIFI ****

• 
  ❗️’〽️®️🌀↩️ERℹ️↪️🔀💤©️ (@maccaburbsvoice) reported 22 minutes ago

  @howardw46 @Telstra You can’t just be stopping all the time at every pissant station. The service stops enough at key stations and mostly stops at nearly all.

• 
  Just following up!! (@jonooee) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Telstra I’m 5 minutes from Parliament House in Canberra and I don’t have the signal strength on my phone to stream the live Liverpool game from the UK. You lot are a ******* scam. Waste of money. National carrier my fat *** #telstra #rubbish #scam

• 
  Advice from an Aussie🇦🇺 (@Sheldone) reported 25 minutes ago

  A new group has formed at the socialising table. Apparently someone got a funny meme because they’re passing the phone around. This kind of corporate bullshit will be the reason why the mobs will take down Telstra first.