1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Telstra
  4. Buchfelde
Telstra

Telstra outages and service status in Buchfelde, South Australia

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: phone, internet and total blackout.

Full Outage Map
  • Telstra generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Buchfelde, including 0 direct reports.
  • The most common problems reported in this area mention TV.
  • 100% TV (100%)

Telstra offers mobile and landline communications services to the public and businesses, including mobile phone, mobile internet, and broadband internet.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Buchfelde, South Australia

The chart below shows the number of Telstra reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Buchfelde, South Australia and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

September 2: Problems at Telstra

Telstra is having issues since 10:00 AM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Live Outage Map Near Buchfelde, South Australia

The most recent Telstra outage reports came from the following cities: Wasleys.

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Wasleys TV 15 days ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telstra Issues Reports Near Buchfelde, South Australia

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Buchfelde and nearby locations:

  • zzap
    🦠 satoshi nakamoto (@zzap) reported from Gawler, South Australia

    @peterw @Telstra What’s the trouble?

Telstra Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • grtdane
    Dane Trethowan (@grtdane) reported

    @ellensandell Poor demented greens, Telstra, Optus etc have had Data Centers around the place for years.

  • STIIBTWTCFMYCGA
    DemocracyIsDead (@STIIBTWTCFMYCGA) reported

    @TopherField One of our clients had an existing telstra router just wanted an NBN connection. 2 weeks. $110 per month. I got her to contact starlink. 5 days later delivered and installed. $75 per month. Get your act together telstra. Can't be so slow anymore. There are choices.

  • jordanjackelyse
    jordanjackelyse (@jordanjackelyse) reported

    @noahitallll @PatricPaal @pelisonlinegrat Work choices, joined the Iraq war, sold off last shares commonwealth bank, Telstra, and long term leases for airports, and then the biggest one of all. His 2002 China LNG (liquefied natural gas) agreement signed was the worst resource deal in Australian history. He was bad. 🤡

  • rayethesis
    Ray (@rayethesis) reported

    This chart puts Starlink’s scale into perspective. At roughly $11.4B in annualized revenue, Starlink is already approaching the revenue scale of established telecom giants such as Singtel and sits in the same neighborhood as Telstra. That is remarkable considering Starlink is a relatively young satellite broadband network competing against companies that have spent decades building terrestrial infrastructure, spectrum portfolios, and massive subscriber bases. The important signal here is not just the absolute revenue, but how quickly Starlink has reached a level that takes traditional telecom companies decades to build. However, the comparison also exposes the problem. Telecom is a huge business, but it is not necessarily a high-growth business. Companies like China Mobile, Verizon, Deutsche Telekom, AT&T and NTT generate tens or even hundreds of billions in annual revenue, yet the market typically assigns them much lower growth expectations because connectivity eventually becomes a mature utility. Starlink has a better growth profile today because it is still penetrating underserved markets, adding capacity, expanding internationally, and converting new customers. But as the revenue base moves from $10B toward $20B, $30B and beyond, the question becomes whether Starlink can maintain venture-like growth rates while operating inside what is ultimately a telecom market. The bullish argument is that Starlink is not exactly a traditional telecom company. Its satellite constellation gives SpaceX a global distribution network that terrestrial operators struggle to replicate, particularly in rural areas, developing markets, maritime, aviation and other difficult-to-connect environments. There is also optionality around direct-to-device connectivity, enterprise services, government contracts and potentially other satellite applications. If those businesses become meaningful revenue streams, Starlink could evolve from simply being "satellite internet" into a broader space infrastructure platform. That would justify a much more aggressive valuation than simply capitalizing Starlink like another telecom operator. But this is where I think investors need to be careful with the SpaceX hype. A $11.4B revenue run-rate sounds enormous, but revenue alone does not determine the quality of the business. Starlink requires enormous capital expenditure to deploy and replenish satellites, ground infrastructure and user terminals, while bandwidth economics and competition will determine how much of that revenue eventually becomes free cash flow. The really interesting question is not whether Starlink can reach $20B or $30B in revenue. It is whether SpaceX can continue compounding revenue rapidly without Starlink becoming just another giant, capital-intensive telecom business. My take: SpaceX is incredibly cool, and Starlink reaching ~$11.4B of annual revenue is genuinely impressive. But if the main growth engine for the SpaceX story is ultimately just telecom, I'm much less excited. A bigger Starlink is great, but a bigger telecom company alone does not create an extraordinary valuation. The real upside comes if Starlink becomes the cash-flow engine that funds a much larger SpaceX ecosystem: launch, defense, direct-to-device, satellite infrastructure and eventually entirely new space-based businesses. Starlink is impressive but starlink alone is not enough. $SPCX

  • emmitt_brian
    Brian Emmitt (@emmitt_brian) reported

    @Pivotonian1838 @Telstra @News24Aust Imagine being that **** at your job and getting paid $6 million.

  • ozcrimenews
    Australian 🧡 (@ozcrimenews) reported

    @ABloke23180 Lol ... i vaguely remember that too, a reform of all reforms to shift to a consumption based system of taxation. wasn't the sale of CBA, QAN, Medibank, Telstra supposed to pay down our national debt?

  • BeefyGold6669
    BeefyGold6669 (@BeefyGold6669) reported

    @sanpellyenjoyer I swear that one in the teal shirt was Steve from Dell tech support. And the one next to him was Randy from Telstra

  • Riogallica
    🌸 Rita Gee ♥ 🇦🇺 (@Riogallica) reported

    My @NBN has been down since 9am & they won't come to fix issue till Monday - 4 days (2nd time in 2 wks)! My Telstra hotspotting is weak. Time to hook up with @starlink Issue here is local installer charges an arm/leg etc to install sys on roof etc. I may have to suck it up.

  • BrentHodgson
    Brent Hodgson (@BrentHodgson) reported

    @deborahbrian @aaronsmith @DHughesy Nor did the surpluses. Three-quarters of the $96 billion paid down under Howard (~$71.8bn) came from one-time public asset selloffs - including Telstra, Commonwealth Bank, DASFLEET, defence assets, Brisbane Airport, Melbourne Airport, Perth Airport, National Rail, Adelaide Airport, Darwin and Alice Springs Airports, Canberra Airport, Hobart Airport, the Australian Industry Development Corporation, Broadcast Australia (transmission towers)... A lot of those assets were sold at knock-down prices too - e.g. Broadcast Australia was sold at $650m, then the buyer sold it for twice that shortly after.

  • _JohnMerchant
    John Merchant (@_JohnMerchant) reported

    @central01000011 Depends on the network, Telstra and Optus are great. But I have no idea about Vodafone.