NBN outages and service status in Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory

Problems in the last 24 hours in Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory

The chart below shows the number of NBN reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NBN Issues Reports Near Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Nhulunbuy and nearby locations:

• 
  Ricky🏄🏼‍♂️ (@galumay) reported 41 minutes ago from Nhulunbuy, Northern Territory

  So, back haul taken out again, no phones or NBN since y’day afternoon.just got mobile service back.

NBN Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Spider Mother Gwen (@GwenMotherS) reported 4 minutes ago

  @ClioAite Could be a nbn formating issue call ur provider and check something hasnt gone sideways with ur modems formatting or connection to the wider nbn network

• 
  Garfield C. Reynolds (@GarfieldR1966) reported 7 minutes ago

  @NBN_Australia sure enough this problem still isn’t resolved. Outage page has been showing us as facing network degradation all week. Regular dropouts and slow connectivity. Will you ever fix this???

• 
  Kevin Metcalfe (@KevinMe49077436) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AlanBixter Why, we spent a fortune on the NBN, just go to the countries news service and watch it there.

• 
  Melanie Usher (@mjgal) reported 10 minutes ago

  Scheduled power outage and NBN outage. It’s a very Amish Monday morning.

• 
  Jess 🤍💚 (@matildaismine) reported 11 minutes ago

  @1RogerWoodward @RoguestGypsy @Telstra Dude it's not wide spread for nbn... it's telstras mobile service... only very few are having issues with nbn

• 
  🇳🇬Inemesit Affia 07037900827................🇳🇬 (@inemesitaffia) reported 13 minutes ago

  @edcruzX @cb_doge @Starlink It's cheaper than the NBN solution

• 
  Upside (@Antiwoke7777) reported 14 minutes ago

  @MrsS2023 We got sick of nbn and starlink has not let us down

• 
  Wal (@wally_waldo83) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Batman2242 A big part of our productivity problem is that starting from the 2010's more of our spending now goes to megatech platforms that extract Australian revenue without the old local multiplier. When $100 went to Ford or Holden, a retailer or a local media company, a large portion recycled through local wages, suppliers, property, logistics and tax. Now when $100 goes to a global ad platform, streaming service or cloud provider much more can disappear offshore through IP, reseller fees and related party charges with far less local employment or supplier spend despite the use of infrastructure like NBN and roads. So government keeps importing demand and taxing workers harder to fund services while more private spending leaks offshore to low local footprint platforms. That extraction is not productive for our economy and is increasingly an issue, especially when profits are being offshored and Australian taxpayers are unfairly carrying the burden.

• 
  The Policy Guy (@negativevortex_) reported 17 minutes ago

  @OzHempRocks @MarkoMatvikov 1/3 The latent, already eligible scenario Well, welcome to the world of whacky PBO estimations, eh? Let me see – so PBO are not to be trusted to estimate NBN, NDIS, Snowy 2.0, nuclear (etc) – but we trust them here? I see.... Let’s look at their stats and I’ll explain them to you for your benefit. This is how you come to quote the ‘uptake’ figure. See embedded table. So here is the 26% quoted as being ‘eligible’, or what you call uptake. But here is where that gets problematic. 1. Your optimum scenario relies on someone having $0 income. They’re not even filing an ITR! The $0 scenario does not apply to PBO modelling, as they’re not in that cohort at C, which drives D & then E. 2. Of greater relevance - of that 26%, this cohort includes any permutation of incomes for couples, the overwhelming majority of whom: a. Are eligible but earning in the same tax brackets (eg $45K and $75K, or $80K and $130K, or $200K and $200K) and hence receive no benefit at all, or b. Are in different tax brackets but are both at the lower end of the income scale (eg one at $40K the other at $60K – moderates out to $50K apiece saving $500) c. Are in different tax brackets, earning good incomes, but where the disparity is insignificant (eg one at $75K, the other at $150K – a saving of $1200) Of the ‘eligible’ pool of 26% of tax filers or 16% of the population, most of them receive $0 benefit as they ARE eligible but are both in the same tax bracket (2a). A large proportion end up with ‘something, but not material’. Before anyone jumps down my throat, consider this – the ALP’s WATO policy due to commence 2027 is $250 per person, so either; - ON does intend to continue WATO, which just further piles the burden on the tax system or - ON rescinds this, and most people (90% of income tax filers) are actually worse off. See example 2b above. They’d be no better off. So, I presume ON will inherit the (dubious) WATO and add IS (income splitting) into the mix. We just end up with a ludicrously over-engineered tax system. Punchline - we end up with between 1-3% of the population who receive a material benefit. It is probably closer to 2.5% of the voting population. Many parents will think they are eligible but end up receiving nothing. Which is the essence of populist policy. Let me be honest – the ALP WATO is fairer, simpler, and better. So, you either inherit it and over-engineer the system or discard it and wear the ire of the population. Or take my advice and engineer a far better, fit for purpose, future proofed model.

• 
  M H (@Woah2026X) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Starlink @SpaceX If you are in a city or suburb with good NBN or 5G, this is a terrible deal. If you are in a remote rural area with no other options, it's a great service - but you should expect to pay $139/month, not $75, and you must remember to return the dish if you cancel.