Telstra outages and service status in Ayton, Queensland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Ayton, Queensland

The chart below shows the number of Telstra reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Ayton, Queensland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Telstra Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mr musk ⭐️🇺🇸🚀 (@Mrmuskh4l5l) reported 10 minutes ago

  @c__future6 This is how the whole thing started when I sent $500 for a VIP Telstra Tesla membership card and never got the Tesla I won! That was my fault and now you’re trying to make this my fault I would think two guys working for Elon Musk would be a little bit smarter than this.

• 
  Hugh Jebawlsak 🇦🇺 (@WillHammer77) reported 10 minutes ago

  @newscomauHQ So is Telstra! Go **** yourselves Zionist shills.

• 
  xroadie (@xroadie) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BassonBrain @Starlink But an iPhone can connect to the phone network via the starlink wifi….without Telstra

• 
  Johnny KO’d (@JohnnyKod9) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Telstra are you having network problems in Footscray Victoria?

• 
  enz (@enz2g) reported 17 minutes ago

  @joey8bitz @1WeakGuttedDog Using the network doesn’t mean they get the same priority and boost speeds are also capped otherwise there would be no benefit going with Telstra and paying more. I get what you’re trying to say but your comprehension is terrible.

• 
  Greg Ryan (@GregRya98533841) reported 21 minutes ago

  @shoebil57672266 I see Albanese as the same as Telstra. Offering better deals for new customers only. **** the rest of the loyal long term members. N

• 
  rob2511 (@KymRob25112) reported 21 minutes ago

  Telstra....missed your recharge message because the service has been so fuckung bad for weeks that people's personal SOS devices haven't been working. Have been hotspotting with Optus device.

• 
  Madmike (@madmike888X) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Telstra Don’t you update this page ever?? NBN Telstra down si. E 6am

• 
  enz (@enz2g) reported 27 minutes ago

  @joey8bitz @1WeakGuttedDog Holy **** you’re dumb. Boost is a budget provider, they are never going to give you the same PRIORITY as you’d get with Telstra otherwise the people that pay twice the amount would be getting the same service No one with boost is expecting the same speeds and priority

• 
  Chad (@OTheChad) reported 27 minutes ago

  @mynameiskiiiid @TheKouk Structural deficit? Mate, let's get this straight.Australia's structural budget issues blew out post-GFC and especially under recent big-spending governments — not from Howard paying down $96b in inherited debt while running surpluses. Howard left the budget in strong shape with low debt and a Future Fund seeded. Today's deficits (still projected around 1% of GDP with net debt heading to ~20%+) come from exploding recurrent spending: NDIS, aged care, welfare, and public sector bloat — not a lack of 'productivity policy' from the 90s/00s. Howard-era asset sales (Telstra etc.) shifted assets to private hands where they often delivered better efficiency and innovation — exactly what boosts productivity. Privatisation and microeconomic reforms in the 80s-90s drove Australia's strong productivity surge in the late 90s/early 00s. Blaming today's slump on "record low infrastructure spending" 25-30 years ago is the real stretch. Recent productivity stagnation (labour productivity near flat since ~2016-17, weakest in decades) has clear modern drivers:Services shift — healthcare, education, public admin (non-market sectors) now dominate and have abysmal productivity growth. Faster broadband, transport, and training matter — but governments have poured billions into infrastructure since then (and states still do). The constraint isn't some 1990s "under-spend"; it's getting value for money, avoiding waste, and prioritising high-return projects over recurrent blowouts. Private sector dynamism, competition, and sensible tax settings deliver productivity far more reliably than more government "facilitation" funded by structural deficits. You know what actually restricts productivity policy? Promising endless spending while ignoring incentives, efficiency, and evidence. Structural deficits today crowd out future options through higher interest and taxes — not the other way around." This keeps it punchy, factual, and directly dismantles the causal link while flipping the deficit argument.