1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Google Cloud
Google Cloud

Google Cloud status: hosting issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Google Cloud Platform, offered by Google, is a suite of cloud computing services that runs on the same infrastructure that Google uses internally for its end-user products, such as Google Search and YouTube.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Google Cloud reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Google Cloud. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Google Cloud users through our website.

  • 27% Domains (27%)
  • 27% Hosting (27%)
  • 18% Cloud Services (18%)
  • 18% Web Tools (18%)
  • 9% E-mail (9%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Google Cloud outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Noida Hosting 18 days ago
Noida Domains 19 days ago
Noida Domains 1 month ago
Jewar Hosting 1 month ago
Montataire Cloud Services 1 month ago
Greater Noida Hosting 2 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • NoodeAPI
    Noode (@NoodeAPI) reported

    ➕ AI Integration: @SolanaFndn partnered with @googlecloud to launch a payment gateway for #AIagents, enabling multi-service API access via stablecoins without subscriptions.

  • ndeyanick
    Yanick Nde (@ndeyanick) reported

    @googlecloud Cloudbuild is broken again remote: Invalid username or token. Password authentication is not supported for *** operations.

  • pinkfranken
    Pink Frankenstein (@pinkfranken) reported

    @googlecloud Gemini told me there was no trash pickup on Monday. Clicked on the referencing link. Right there in plain text list of holidays with no service. Memorial day was not one of them. Garbage by an enshitified company.

  • kylem_org
    Kyle (@kylem_org) reported

    @WallStreetApes @VladTheInflator And they all hire, promote and only protect each other, @googlecloud is the worst. Every PA 7 layers of Indian managers all friends.

  • makingAISimple
    AIMadeSimple (@makingAISimple) reported

    OpenAI is completing with @awscloud @googlecloud and @Azure This is interesting. But they are still depending on their infrastructure to launch this service. So basically the competition is PaaS

  • kapustein
    DrusTheAxe (@kapustein) reported

    @guyrleech @UnrealEngine @googlecloud You can run makeappx with /nc to do no compression. Not a bad idea if you're just functional testing and the size delta is so negligible

  • TeutaAi
    TeutaAi (@TeutaAi) reported

    @GoogleStartups @googlecloud scaled one agent on a $6 box. bottleneck was never compute. my stop-hook caught 35 fake 'done' claims in a single autonomous sprint, killed every one.

  • DougWalker9
    Doug W (@DougWalker9) reported

    @googlecloud Delivery service has to have a map feature. Am I wrong?

  • ashen_one
    ashen (@ashen_one) reported

    @SolanaFndn @googlecloud plz help its saying you NEED touch ID or 1 password to use this?

  • checho_dallas
    Checholitary Mayne (@checho_dallas) reported

    @googlecloud how long does it has to take until you guys look at my support request? I sent you guys an appeal of an issue 9 days ago and 2 follow up emails and I haven't seen anything back yet.

  • guilhermeotina
    Guilherme O'Tina (@guilhermeotina) reported

    @addyosmani @googlecloud the verification problem gets wild at this scale. a 10 minute agent fails loud, you catch it. a 10 hour agent can drift into a confident wrong answer because every individual step looked fine in isolation. the feedback horizon is the real bottleneck, not the context window

  • riccardo_dana
    Riccardo Dana | @SWOP (@riccardo_dana) reported

    SWOP is back online. On a side note, we have decided to migrate our servers from AWS to @googlecloud this is not the first time AWS has had issues and as a start up we cant afford to have downtime. Thank you to our swopers for your patience.

  • shayanrm
    Shayan Mashatian (@shayanrm) reported

    @_oliveiradanilo There are more and more reports of unexpected builling issues with @googlecloud. We had our own share of unexpected charges - more than once - and there is always an explanation by them somewhere that why it is your mistake. You could do x to know and avoid it (a policy or features buried under a million pages and options to know about), there is a line somewhere in terms of use, etc. Practicllay, you need to keep the billing page open and refresh every few hours to make you won’t go bankrupt. They need to revisit the whole issue, it’s becoming very scary to utilize their services.

  • touristasai
    DiscoverCyclades.gr (@touristasai) reported

    I wanted to test google maps API ( sandbox) and now I have balance of 700$!!!! Thank you @GoogleAI @Google @googlecloud !!!! And obviously no support section to contact to! CAN YOU DO SOMETHING

  • RCM_Doherty
    Maarten de Lange (@RCM_Doherty) reported

    @JustJake Jake, don’t worry too much. It was annoying, but you provide great service and results. Thats not wiped out due to a few hours of disruption. Having said that, it’s just crazy how little @googlecloud cares about its customers, you could consider leaving them on the long run.

  • J3ffJoyce
    Jeff Joyce (@J3ffJoyce) reported

    @googlecloud @IBM Pilot to production is where I’d slow down and check the handoff. Can the agent carry industry context through source docs, approvals, and the system where the change actually lands?

  • ham_basshogg
    The AI Automation Agency (@ham_basshogg) reported

    Everyone should know how @AskGoogleCloud and @googlecloud have no problems screwing up your project and then trying to charge you for it and then shutting you down. #googlecloud has zero customer servise

  • EvanOtero
    Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported

    @C1V0 @GergelyOrosz @googlecloud Hey Chris, have you submitted a Billing claim to get the refund? Let me know if there's anything I can do to help

  • guyrleech
    Guy Leech (@guyrleech) reported

    @KarenPayneMVP Mediocre but query wise I know I could use AI these days to craft them for me - it's fantastic for @GoogleCloud Big Query so assume MS SQL is no problem for it (Gemini)

  • mukund
    M Mohan (@mukund) reported

    I used @antigravity to build and push to @googlecloud It was easier to push to @awscloud ? How? What? Google Cloud Run. Google Cloud Build: Artifact Registry: Cloud SQL Postgres:. Secret Manager IAM / service permissions: With the new Gemini 3.5 model I tried to build: cloudbuild.frontend.yaml cloudbuild.backend.yaml Out of tokens. Painful.

  • Pynvox
    Chris (@Pynvox) reported

    @FortniteStatus put GoogleCloud's servers back on creative because they're better than Microsoft Azure..GoogleCloud handles ping better MicrosoftAzure doesn't and it sucks.. and on the Legends Landing map there are stutters at times / the players i see them standing still and then they start moving again

  • Azraels_Brother
    🇺🇸1 Pissed Off Patriot 🇺🇸 (@Azraels_Brother) reported

    @SkyeDarkclaw @googlecloud Crap like this is why I use grok for most things these days.

  • neil_the_ginger
    Neil (@neil_the_ginger) reported

    @Firebase @googlecloud this app has been suspended for 2 months, I have made multiple appeals but it seems like the team stopped responding. Is there anyone who can help me out with this?

  • BigFire97827414
    BigFire (@BigFire97827414) reported

    @MLB @googlecloud Some run support for him would've been apprciated.

  • bad_sin90451
    AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported

    @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

  • Ferbin08
    Ferbin (@Ferbin08) reported

    @nvidia @googlecloud Apple Intelligence running on third-party data centers now. The infrastructure layer got decoupled from the software. Pretty standard move for a scaled service, but Apple's been locked down until now.

  • teflocarbon
    Teflo 🇦🇺 (@teflocarbon) reported

    @SimiStern I don’t even like Railway, or the "managed hosting" ecosystem in general. But the actual problem here is the continued bullshit @googlecloud keeps pulling: "oopsies, our finger slipped :3" account/control-plane failures that can take real infrastructure offline, while everyone keeps pretending this is acceptable behaviour from a serious cloud provider.

  • HansonZachary
    𝕸y_n🂡me_Is_☡ (@HansonZachary) reported

    @Railway I have no issues with @googlecloud

  • _eosike
    D!kstra_Algo (@_eosike) reported

    @lxmwaniky @TtnlxMubz @googlecloud You'll never get any valuable Certification for free, you'll have to spend a good time studying and the examination fee. Exam is proctored, you can do it from anywhere as long as you’ve steady Internet.

  • WalitoWorldwide
    WALITO-NY (@WalitoWorldwide) reported

    @MLBStats @MLB @googlecloud That man can’t wait to get out of Pittsburgh All this talent going to waste. That owner will never build around talent.