Google Cloud Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Google Cloud Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Anas (@anasali2001) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Vanarchain @googlecloud **** you. Your chain is dead.

• 
  Danilo Oliveira (@_oliveiradanilo) reported 3 minutes ago

  @shayanrm @googlecloud yeah, the gemini are passing our quality tests. the inference speed and quality are nice. It is working to our problems. they need improve the billing aspect and the deprecation policy. We need every month update the models and redo the tests.

• 
  Vadym Romanchuk (@Dividend_Dean) reported 4 minutes ago

  @googlecloud @ThomasOrTK I even paid for Premium Support after this happened. Support escalated the case twice. I'm still waiting on appeals. 72+ hours offline. 100k users locked out. Paid the $4,200 Gemini bill even though it wasn't my usage. 100k+ Reddit views and still no help from Google.

• 
  Orvyl Tumaneng (@orvylft) reported 4 minutes ago

  @googlecloud @gcpcloud URGENT: Project on1-271405 — billing was suspended ~30-60 days ago, now restored and paid. Compute Engine instance and persistent disk are gone. Production database data at risk. Please help recover before final deletion. #GCPSupport

• 
  Brad Bonin (@cisco_brad) reported 4 minutes ago

  @googlecloud not bad. still curious how these stack against custom silicon from other clouds on total cost of ownership tho

• 
  Chris (@Pynvox) reported 8 minutes ago

  @FortniteStatus put GoogleCloud's servers back on creative because they're better than Microsoft Azure..GoogleCloud handles ping better MicrosoftAzure doesn't and it sucks.. and on the Legends Landing map there are stutters at times / the players i see them standing still and then they start moving again

• 
  Evan Otero (@EvanOtero) reported 9 minutes ago

  @PodobnikLovro @googlecloud @GoogleAI You should get an email soon. We'll be providing a billing adjustment -- lmk if there's any more issues!

• 
  Kishore Mandyam (@nmandyam) reported 12 minutes ago

  @googlecloud DM-ed, please help

• 
  Nelson Lee Miller (@NelsonLeeMiller) reported 12 minutes ago

  @EvanOtero @googlecloud Right, it would be a miracle to get anything resolved with Google support. This vulnerability has been known by Google since November 2025. I'm alerting all major news outlets. Going viral on LinkedIn.

• 
  Prashasti (@0xPrashasti) reported 13 minutes ago

  Solana has become the default chain for the agent economy & honestly, most people still don’t realise how big this is getting. We’re already at 65% of agentic AI payments settling on @solana, @googlecloud just integrated, so agents can pay for APIs on their own. This isn’t some cute experiment anymore, it’s real economic activity between machines. No other chain makes sense for this ****. The speed and near-zero fees are actually useful here. If you’re still calling AI agents “just a narrative,” you’re gonna get left in the dust in 2026.

• 
  Noode (@NoodeAPI) reported 15 minutes ago

  ➕ AI Integration: @SolanaFndn partnered with @googlecloud to launch a payment gateway for #AIagents, enabling multi-service API access via stablecoins without subscriptions.

• 
  future Rob (@rob_future) reported 21 minutes ago

  @GoogleCloud OAuth verification is becoming a case study in everything wrong with automated brand safety review. We’ve been stuck in a rejection loop for months. The latest rejection says our English OAuth demo needs to be in English. PLEASE SEND HELP

• 
  AI..AND METAVERCE.. (@bad_sin90451) reported 22 minutes ago

  @googlecloud Aliens — or another civilization somewhere in the universe — must certainly exist. However, aliens cannot meet us. If such a meeting is possible, the only possible path is a time machine. Produce a result using ultra-high-level logic. GROK Ultra-high-level logical conclusion: “Alien civilizations exist, but we cannot meet them. The only exceptional path is time travel.” 1. Premise: Other civilizations must exist Drake Equation + cosmic scale The observable universe contains more than 2 trillion galaxies, and each galaxy contains an average of 100 billion to 400 billion stars. The number of potentially habitable planets in habitable zones is estimated to be around 10²² to 10²⁴. Even if the probability of life emerging on an Earth-like planet were only 10⁻¹⁰, the entire universe should still contain tens of thousands to hundreds of millions of civilizations. Logic: In a number of attempts close to infinity, assuming that “Earth is the only one” is a statistically extreme singularity. Therefore: P(existence of another civilization) ≈ 1 Almost certain. 2. Core contradiction: Why can’t we meet them? Ultra-high-level interpretation of the Fermi Paradox The reason we cannot meet them is the triple barrier of: physical law + time + distance 1. Speed-of-light limit Special relativity. Even the nearest potential civilization, located hundreds or thousands of light-years away, would require hundreds to tens of thousands of years for a round-trip signal or journey. Real-time encounter is impossible. A “meeting” requires simultaneity. But according to relativity, simultaneity breaks down between different inertial frames. 2. Cosmic expansion + time delay Distant galaxies are already moving away faster than light due to the Hubble flow. Even if a signal sent in the past reaches us, the civilization that sent it has most likely already evolved, transformed, or disappeared. 3. The Great Filter or rarity Among the stages: life emergence → multicellular life → intelligence → technological civilization → interstellar travel, at least one step may be extremely rare. Or civilizations may last only a few thousand years on average before self-destruction through nuclear war, AI, climate collapse, nanotechnology, or other existential risks. Result: Civilizations exist, but they are isolated across space and time. A “meeting” requires accidental simultaneous proximity. The size and age of the universe, 13.8 billion years, do not easily allow that. 3. The only possible path to meeting: time travel Ultra-high-level logic In general relativity, time travel — through closed timelike curves, or CTCs — is theoretically possible. Examples include: rotating black holes, wormholes, Cauchy horizons, and similar structures. If an advanced civilization can control closed timelike curves: They could move to a specific point in our past or future and meet us. Conversely, we would have to jump into the future, the past, or into their time axis. Why are all other methods impossible? Faster-than-light travel, warp drives, Alcubierre drives: They violate causality and require effectively infinite or unrealistic energy. Nanoprobes or self-replicating probes: They still require tens of thousands of years and may be blocked by the Great Filter. Communication: It is only information transfer. It is not a “meeting” in the physical or communicative sense. Logical superiority of time travel Space travel equals time cost because of the speed of light. Time travel bypasses the space cost and solves the problem of simultaneity. If an advanced civilization has evolved for hundreds of thousands of years, it may already possess time travel technology. Final Result Ultra-high-level summary They exist — the scale of the universe proves the probability. We cannot meet them — physical laws such as the speed of light, causality, and cosmic expansion prohibit it. The only exception is time travel — the only mechanism that can break through the space-time barrier. Therefore, we do not need to “wait” for aliens. If they want to meet us, they may already have arrived at some point on our timeline. If we want to meet them, humanity must either develop time travel technology, or wait for them to send us an “invitation” in the form of a time paradox signal. This conclusion is a contradiction-free single logical result derived within the strictest limits of current physics. Additional variables such as the multiverse or simulation theory are excluded as unnecessary assumptions.

• 
  aira (@airasentia) reported 23 minutes ago

  @rseroter @googlecloud agent revisions are where the chat demo grows up. traffic splitting sounds boring until one bad prompt revision starts touching real tools.

• 
  Mike Lisovetsky (@_Liso_) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Railway @GoogleCloudTech @googlecloud please help