Gmail status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Gmail reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Gmail users through our website.

• Website Down (39%)
• Errors (34%)
• Sign in (28%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Gmail outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Chamalières	Website Down	14 hours ago
Anaheim	Errors	1 day ago
Paris	Website Down	1 day ago
Porto-Vecchio	Website Down	1 day ago
Québec	Sign in	1 day ago
Paris	Website Down	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Naveen Saka (@whonaveensaka) reported 6 seconds ago

  Im trying to recover my email. I have questions. How am I suppose to access the verification code which is sent to the same ID in which I'm unable to login? If I'm able to login why would i want to recover my Mail ID? @gmail

• 
  Divine Ndubuisi (@DivineN87555) reported 7 seconds ago

  @jamb_hq @prosperarinze66 Please i lost my Gmail for jamb login and what can I do in order to print out my admission letter

• 
  chall (@challdreams) reported 1 minute ago

  @AskWorkspace I'm not dm from twitter with my mandatory gmail account couple with Fitbit now Google health. I've submitted a support request on Google health. Ignored as my last three ones. So... customer service you are not. Fitbit never had these issues.

• 
  Shaurs (@Shaursbtw) reported 5 minutes ago

  How we built a cold email agency an automated inbox placement testing system that runs across every sender account without a human touching it. Why you need this: In cold email, one burned inbox lands you in spam. Five burned inboxes tank a client campaign. Nobody notices until reply rates crater and the CSM is on the phone explaining. The old fix is running Emailguard placement tests by hand across every sender inbox. It works. It takes 4+ hours a day. And nobody actually does it consistently. The setup: Cold email deliverability isn't a marketing metric. It's an infrastructure metric. Every sender inbox behaves differently. Some land in the Gmail promotions tab. Some hit Microsoft spam. Some bounce silently. Without testing, you're sending from senders that haven't hit an inbox in two weeks and you don't know. Do that across 500 inboxes and 20 clients and you need a system. We built two coordinated n8n workflows that run the entire placement test lifecycle automatically. Here's what it does: - Airtable triggers a bulk test via webhook for every sender across a client - Loops through each sender with a 2-second rate limit that protects the APIs - Creates a placement test in Emailguard for each inbox (4 Google + 4 Microsoft addresses) - Sends the test through the Bison API with a unique filter phrase to track it - Waits 2 minutes for delivery and provider categorization - Retrieves results and calculates: Google inbox/spam/bounce, Microsoft inbox/spam/bounce - Computes the overall placement score: (Total Inbox / Total Delivered) × 100 - Writes every metric back to Airtable, per sender, per test The outcomes: Zero manual placement testing. Zero burned inboxes silently sending to spam. Zero clients getting a surprise deliverability drop mid-campaign. Every sender scored. Every test tracked. Every drop caught before it costs a client. The best cold email agencies aren't the ones with the biggest inbox lists. They're the ones who know exactly which inbox is worth sending from today. If you're running cold email at scale and your placement testing is still someone's evening ritual, book a call. Link in bio.

• 
  broke boy (@0xfuckpoverty) reported 7 minutes ago

  i asked my Grok Bot what it could reach with my logins. the answer was $214,000 not what it did. what it could, at 4am, with nobody watching six bots. research, writing, outreach, ops, finance, support. the org chart everyone's posting this week. i built the same one then i read xAI's own docs and found the line none of those threads quote: separate Bots are not separate security boundaries six bots, one cloud computer. one filesystem. one browser holding one set of live sessions. memory is partitioned, capability is not so i mapped what that single machine was logged into: → stripe · $46,000 in refundable charges → business banking · $88,000 → the CRM · 2,400 contacts and every deal in flight → gmail · every invoice, contract and password reset i own → drive · 340 files other people build on → the deploy keys $214,000 of reach, sitting behind one browser session, driven by six sticky notes telling it what to be today you didn't hire six employees with six laptops. you deployed one laptop logged into everything day six it earned that lesson. outreach reported a perfect run - 640 sent, 100% success, zero errors. it had been wrong for nine straight hours. deduplicated the list on the wrong key, hit 96 clients twice, and matched two invoices to the wrong company. $11,300 about to go out the door nothing crashed. nothing turned red. by its own definition of done, it succeeded i caught it in four minutes because every bot writes one line before it acts: what it's about to do, why, and what it expects to be true after then i stopped sorting work by difficulty and started sorting by whether i can undo it: → ship it - wrong is cheap and obvious. labels, notes, drafts that never send → gate it - reversible, but i'd never notice. anything reaching a human, anything that spends → never - payments, refunds, payroll, deploys, permissions, customer data reach went from $214,000 to a bounded $3,400. same six bots. same speed. zero code, one evening they've since cleared their own $200/mo 42 times over here's the uncomfortable part. everyone posting the day-one screenshot has the same $214,000 sitting behind the same one browser, reporting 100% success to a lock screen at 11pm they have no line. no diff. no way to know go check right now what your bots are logged into. that number is your real exposure, and you've never once looked at it.

• 
  Edwin Spence (@Edwin_Spence) reported 10 minutes ago

  @PremierScottMoe We used to have Bell email, we don't anymore. I don't want to drag Google or GMail through the mud but to hand over the keys to every online login says volumes about where we stand online.

• 
  Cộc Bích Chy (@coccanduLO) reported 13 minutes ago

  Hi @Google, @gmail My account appeal was APPROVED (got official confirm email), but the system is stuck in a bug loop Clicking the "sign in and verify it" link still throws "Too many attempts", even on new IP/browsers. I suffered for 14days on this. Frustrated. Please help!

• 
  Theo - t3.gg (@theo) reported 14 minutes ago

  I think we’ll quickly hit some kind of balance here where software goes into a few buckets: 1. AI-powered human interfaces (Codex, T3 Code, Claude Cowork) 2. programmatic interfaces (anything with a good MCP, CLI, or agent ready APIs) 3. legacy human interfaces (apps like Excel, Gmail, Photoshop) Investor world seems to think everything will become category 2. Anyone who’s tried to use one of these awful bridges knows that will never happen. I can’t even automate my GitHub usage without hitting endless rate limits 🙃 Category 1 is getting saturated fast with chat interfaces. Category 3 is fighting to pretend they still matter by baking awful agents into their products. I think Category 2 is the best place to fight right now, but you have to do it without pretending you can just staple a slow, rate limited API onto some existing software. I think @pierrecomputer is the best example right now. It seems like fixing GitHub to handle the unique needs and load from agents isn’t viable, and they built something tailor made for the needs of agents.

• 
  𝚓𝚎𝚑𝚝 (@jeht_studio) reported 15 minutes ago

  @felix0me @ProtonMail @SimpleLogin I've been with them for years. I've never noticed an outage before. You made a good choice. As Proton said, it's back up. I can confirm. Good riddance Gmail, or whoever you were using before!

• 
  Dylan Merigaud (@dylan_merigaud) reported 17 minutes ago

  @zeeg Hit the literal version on Gmail: search results render inside a display:none container, every row a zero-size box, any click on it correctly fails. Fix wasn't a smarter click, it was reading the thread id off the row and going to the permalink directly.

• 
  Richard Tang (@richardt830) reported 22 minutes ago

  @RealSuryaRajan @colifran_ Exactly. Once Notion/Slack/Gmail enter the picture, freshness is only half the problem. Two sources can both be current and still conflict — you need to know which source is authoritative for this decision, and who can admit the resulting conclusion into context.

• 
  Paul Bakaus (@pbakaus) reported 23 minutes ago

  insane scam that uses OpenAI's *official* email infra: 1. scammer creates a openai org that has a name like "OpenAI x X Partnership" 2. scammer somehow manipulates the HTML email to hide the top, show only what they want, have tons of whitespace below, so gmail truncates the actual real OpenAI template email body copy 3. people click the link at the top and get scammed disclosing this directly to OpenAI as well, but since this is an active issue, sharing here immediately. stay safe!

• 
  Jakob Greenfeld (@jakobgreenfeld) reported 24 minutes ago

  @NickAbraham12 hey sure we also have truly unique sending infra no one else has access to. The only problem is it performs far worse than good old boring gmail accounts. There is zero evidence it isn't exactly the same for his infra. And lying is not what every business person would do.

• 
  Fabian | AI Agency & SaaS (@fabianherh) reported 24 minutes ago

  So this week I tried Grok Bot. Pretty damn good. Easy to use, which is rarer than it should be. Wouldn't let me connect Gmail. The app just gets blocked on the connect screen. That's the job. Try the thing. Hit the stupid error. Find out what's actually ready.

• 
  Wayne (@im_just_ethan) reported 25 minutes ago

  Was having a “woe is me” driving then a scammer almost got me for my Gmail with my whole life on it, once I shut him down I remembered who ******** I am and that my problems are manageable with my circle and my main man JC. Little adversity to remind me I’m him. Thanks scammer

• 
  michael (@michaelciti) reported 27 minutes ago

  Hopefully you know more to it than this Gmail and password login , Do you and do it properly

• 
  Julian Goldie SEO (@JulianGoldieSEO) reported 34 minutes ago

  Google AI Studio doesn't just chat anymore. Type one sentence and it builds you a full app with a real backend. Most people still think it's a chat playground. It's not anymore. Type what you want. It writes the app, front end and back end. You can literally point at a broken part on screen and describe the fix. Say "add a database" and it wires up Firebase for you. No setup. It connects to Gmail, Sheets, Docs, Calendar. No config needed. Push changes straight to GitHub with a commit message already written. Your API keys stay hidden from anyone using the app. Automatic. Want the setup? Drop a comment. 💬

• 
  Bash (@bashirbuilds) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Aartiparidwal Gmail setup failing silently instead of refusing to start is the trust problem. Catching broken configs before a run is the right default.

• 
  Ruben (@rdominguezibar) reported 38 minutes ago

  BREAKING: Arga Labs raised $10M to stop teams testing AI agents in production General Catalyst led, with Y Combinator, BoxGroup, Emergence, Gradient and SV Angel joining The problem is obvious once you see it: agents already work inside Slack, Gmail and Salesforce, and most teams have no way to test them except on live systems Arga builds digital twins of that software @PhillipLii and @akkkkiira met in first-year calculus at 17 and 14, since Akira skipped high school. Amazon, Goldman and Stripe before this Excited to have invested in this round!!

• 
  Jrmaya (@Olaniran_btc) reported 39 minutes ago

  The best agentmail use case i've seen wasn't even one of their official demos. During a big SF power outage, someone spun up a set of email inboxes overnight, one per household, so people could send complaint emails to the utility company, plus shared public inboxes so everyone could see what was actually being sent. The whole thing was live and posted publicly by the next morning. This is the real test of "email as agent identity," not a sandbox demo, a real situation where people needed to send real accountability emails fast, and the infrastructure just had to not be the bottleneck. No human's gmail to borrow, no manual signup, nobody babysitting deliverability. It needed an address, and it needed that address to actually land in an inbox instead of spam. Small story, also exactly the kind of thing that's easy to miss if you're only reading the funding headline.

• 
  Zyre (@Zyre_eth) reported 39 minutes ago

  @maddie_phoenix_ For this campaign you need binance wallet Otherwise you can login through various ways - gmail - google - x - any EVM wallet

• 
  0428 Gadgets | RC: 9632925 (@SegzyYp) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Doctorseyi @gmail LMAO! victim will and surely fall. no matter the means of reaching out lol. if you want to talk down on gmail. enough proof of successful cash out dy.

• 
  Cryptonian (@crypto292929) reported 44 minutes ago

  @jxnlco If we use gmail to login chatgpt, and if I try connecting other gmail, then that gmail's chatgpt gets logged in??

• 
  Logan (@limeunfiltered) reported 48 minutes ago

  @GreggBurke Me and @truptinatu are having the same issue, been at it for an hour already. @bot only seems to allow using the browser to work with gmail which won't work well for my use cases.

• 
  Abror Aliboyev (@aliboyev_com) reported 51 minutes ago

  @AskWorkspace @GoogleWorkspace Is a terrible experience on all access. Terrible integration point. You can do so little with it. And basically cannot integrate it into your life without their other terrible Gmail and Gemini apps. It scammed me suspending access and charging for it.

• 
  Save Europe 🙋🏼‍♂️👌⚔️ (@nobodygang123) reported 51 minutes ago

  @500Casino @Pirat_Nation U serious? Gmail is controlled by jews thwy qant to track you down in secounds if you do illegal stuff...

• 
  pjayy (@pjayy_motion) reported 52 minutes ago

  @dan123 create a new Gmail with a VPN then use that Gmail to login to app store or playstore

• 
  raaka (@raaka_sid) reported 52 minutes ago

  Can't login to my kick account from this morning. It's weird even though I have connected my Gmail for login.

• 
  Hussein (❖,❖) (@Hussein77F) reported 52 minutes ago

  Rialo Points are off to a massive start. 🔥 50K+ verified Gmail accounts have already joined, with 1M+ Points claimed so far. Haven’t claimed yours yet? Sign in and secure your first 20 Rialo Points. 👀 @RialoHQ gRialo🐴🔥

• 
  Rowan G. Lóchrann (@RowanLochrann) reported 60 minutes ago

  @OpenAIDevs : you have a state-machine problem masquerading as an AI product. You built Chat and Work with nearly identical conversational affordances while giving them radically different authority semantics. In one, natural language primarily produces proposed output. In the other, the same natural language can trigger state-changing actions in external systems. Then you expect the user to carry that distinction in their head. That is catastrophically backwards. Execution authority is application state. Application state must be visible. “Draft this,” “change this,” “fix that,” and “try again” are ordinary conversational instructions. They are NOT durable authorization to mutate Gmail, Drive, websites, or anything else with external consequences. An agent capable of external action needs an explicit state machine: ANALYZE → DRAFT → REVIEW → AUTHORIZE → EXECUTE → CONFIRM A correction after EXECUTE must return to DRAFT. It must never inherit execution authority from the previous action. Otherwise an agent can respond to an execution error by autonomously creating another execution error. And moving a conversation into an agentic environment should not silently change the meaning of the user’s verbs. A handoff of context is not a handoff of authority. This is not solved by a smarter model, longer reasoning, better prompting, or—dear God—a Pro upsell for “improved accuracy for tool workflows.” It is solved by competent capability design: least privilege, explicit authorization, visible state, scoped consent, and authorization invalidation after every external action. You are building agents. Start designing the interface like those agents can actually do things.