Gmail Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  RH Fardin (@rh_fardin) reported 45 seconds ago

  @jasonfried Email with stages is obvious in hindsight. Gmail trained everyone to use unread as a broken task manager.

• 
  Solomon Not Grundy 𓃵 (@adedayo355) reported 52 seconds ago

  @CynthiaIfu68220 @GloWorld See ehn Once you enter the phone number otp, instead of typing your Gmail, just choose their sign in with google or apple option (google is easier though) That’s how I just did it

• 
  haven (@b_haven59) reported 2 minutes ago

  What's your bounce rate? Don't know? That's the problem. Bounces are the loudest signal you send Gmail. Cross 3% and inbox placement falls off a cliff. Verify every list before it hits your sequencer. Costs $9 per 1,000 leads. A dead domain costs you 3 weeks.

• 
  SpaceTechRocks (@Okitwist) reported 6 minutes ago

  @NaithanJones @micahsays Like the average person cares about that … people give their data to all kind of companies all the time , and spacex which litterally deals with government defense secrets regularly is where you draw the line . Meanwhile you don’t even think Gmail, ChatGPT or Claude are an issue 🙄

• 
  L. Gibson (@lincarmelcita) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Ravensfell And Yahoo email updated itself without my permission. They made it look like Gmail, which I also use. But it is slow. I am not happy.

• 
  Arhaan Gupta (@ArhaanGupta21) reported 10 minutes ago

  @bcherny Claude Code Gmail connector: /mcp reports auth success, then fetching tools fails every time. {"type":"not_found_error","message":"Server not found"} 5 attempts over ~2h, same thing. OAuth completes fine, so it's not the creds.

• 
  Singular Innovation (@SingularAgency_) reported 13 minutes ago

  Most businesses don't have a data problem. They have a data location problem — quotes in Gmail, pipeline in a spreadsheet, ops notes in Slack. Consolidate the sources first. Then the agents have something to act on.

• 
  Anjan (@anjanps5) reported 14 minutes ago

  @clairevo @openclaw I used to do the same - all my claws have their own identities. I kept running into a series of Gog issues for Gmail connectors and just could not resolve. So thought of going down the eve route.

• 
  Predacle (@predacle) reported 17 minutes ago

  I'm sick of Google's constant privacy grab. Signing into gmail now means auto signin into Chrome. And they make your life miserable if you try to prevent it. Also, NO I WILL NOT TAKE A SELFIE. This denigrating practice has to stop. If this ever becomes mandatory I will switch.

• 
  Owoniyi Uthman (@OwoniyiU) reported 19 minutes ago

  @FabianB58246501 That's a great development sir, kudos to the new registrar and all the staff entirely. Please changing of Gmail for those who made error during initial registration of UTME and monopolizing DE registration to only Headquarters and Zone centres are also issues. May God help you.

• 
  Bobby Gadzooks (@TimeBobby3) reported 20 minutes ago

  @infosec_james 100% and completely practical for elderly parents who get confused why Google on tv would ask them to sign in when they signed into gmail 4 days ago from their laptop. I know mom, it’s stupid, let’s get the book out snd sign you in.

• 
  Owizzle (@WillyB_303) reported 21 minutes ago

  Guys, I think 1X is in deep trouble. I've been thinking about their "developer platform," and I don't think it makes much sense. I get the 10 second pitch. Do a Guy Kawasaki era Apple play. But this feels different. The original Apple was only $3,800 in today's dollars. And the original Mac only cost $7,700 in today's dollars. And both of those came right after recessions, whereas today we're heading into one. Each of these products was also a "bicycle for the mind." A pre-AGI robotic humanoid is a far cry from that -- in fact, it's not a bicycle, or even a force multiplier of any kind. It's essentially a just less-capable stunt double that eats electricity instead of food and can't heal itself. Which brings into question the nature of what actually is supposed to be "developed" in the first place and how those developers expect to be compensated... ie generalized skills? Speciality (SME) skills? Integrations with Gmail, et al? If that's the case... what does the $25,000 (my assumed final cost to consumers after taxes and other fees/accessories) ACTUALLY BUY YOU? Am I supposed to be willing to pay an extra monthly fee to access individual skills - like doing the laundry or loading the dishwasher, because they did a rev-share deal with some developers to teach it those skills? And what about loading the dishwasher? An Additionally, the move feels both like a) a direct pivot away from retail customers, b) a tacit admission that there is no real consumer demand for humanoid robots, and c) an acknowledgement that the World Model doesn't really work at all yet. Because if it did, I'd expect a $25K humanoid to come with most of the the generalized skills of an average 8 year old human (I have one of those already pours his own nightly zyrtec, helps load the dishwasher, and helps with laundry btw). So in the end, I just don't know what developers can be expected to sell. My assumption, sadly, is that this isn't actually about developing anything -- it's about putting off as long as possible the moment everyone's actually afraid of: Actually going to market anything. Which brings me to my ultimate point: If you look carefully, I think you might notice a pattern here: Name an audience. Raise money on hype. Set a deadline for g2m. Build a prototype. Approach deadline. Announce a major breakthrough that unlocks a new audience. Raise even more money on more hype. Set a deadline for g2m. Build a prototype. Approach deadline... "I see what you mean," you might say. "But what's the problem?" To that, I might simply reply "You know what the problem is." Time to start thinking about doing something really different, before it's too late, if you ask me. But maybe this is exactly what they intended all along? PS: I think they could get funded. But imo, that would just create some very angry investors who end up paying $1B+ to see later what I already see now.

• 
  Dominic Woodman (@dom_woodman) reported 25 minutes ago

  @suganthan So if you’re on apple I made a cli that agents can work with apple mail and then it avoids most of them. You need gmail login for creating drafts for replying to emails but other than that you avoid 90% of it

• 
  LeadAce — Autonomous sales for Claude Code (@leadace_so) reported 26 minutes ago

  16 out of 16 direct sends pass DMARC alignment after the fix. But 15 of 33 forwarded copies fail on the same day. info@ that forwards to a founder's Gmail breaks the DKIM signature, and the sender cannot do anything about it.

• 
  Adi Leviim | Building SaaS Products (@adileviim) reported 32 minutes ago

  we built auto tagging that sorts every conversation into one of five buckets: coding, writing, research, math and science, business. no custom tags, no way to add a sixth category. that was a deliberate constraint, not a v1 shortcut we meant to fix later. the first version we prototyped let people create their own tags, unlimited, freeform, like gmail labels. it demoed great and died in real use. within two weeks test users had eleven overlapping tags for the same handful of topics, 'work stuff', 'job', 'career', all meaning roughly the same thing to the same person on different days. a tag system with infinite categories quietly becomes a tag system with zero categories, because nothing gets filed the same way twice. five fixed buckets forced consistency we couldn't get any other way. a coding conversation is always coding, no matter what mood the user was in when they had it. that consistency is the entire value of automatic tagging, if the same kind of chat can land in a different bucket depending on nothing, the feature isn't saving anyone time, it's just adding a layer of noise between them and search. the tradeoff is real and we don't pretend it isn't. someone doing legal research or medical writing gets folded into research or writing whether they like the label or not, and a few people have asked for narrower categories. we said no, on purpose, because the moment you add a sixth bucket you're on the road to fifty, and the whole point was to stop that road before it starts. the lesson generalizes past tagging. any time you're building automatic classification, the number of categories matters more than how smart the classifier is. a great model sorting into too many buckets still produces a mess a human has to clean up. a dumb model sorting into a small, well chosen set produces something people actually trust enough to stop thinking about.