Gmail Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  tootiewitdabootyy (@dabrattoot2) reported 43 seconds ago

  I’m the type to login in yo Gmail **** that

• 
  Dennis H (@authorityvortex) reported 2 minutes ago

  We're running; 25 cold emails sent and approx the same number of warm-up emails. Our warm up system involves emailing real people real questions that yield a 50%+ reply rate. No fake warm up pools where you email other spammers with damaged domain reputations. This is why you fail, your warm up system literally burns your domains at a rapid pace and you all comply. We email real people with Gmail, Yahoo, Microsoft, whatever addresses spread over the entire world, self-hosted, non-self hosted, shared hosts, you name it. Yet you are all emailing people who all use identical setups at Instantly, and you think Google and others won't notice??? All at a rate of 30/day and you think using a different hook in the actual message is gonna make a difference? And I thought I was stubborn. Google took PBNs down with much less information and you think it can't connect a few dots when it comes to inboxes. Oh my god! I'm not joking here at all, you're better of switching off your warm-up entirely if you can't think of a better solution and just gradually scale your volume.

• 
  Rajesh Kumar (@therjrajesh) reported 4 minutes ago

  A man was about to delete his 15-year-old Gmail account. Reason? 400 spam emails every day. • Fake receipts • Phishing scams • Extortion emails • Endless junk He moved his cursor to Delete Account. Then a coworker stopped him. "Don't delete your Gmail. Fix what attackers are exploiting." She showed him 22 overlooked Gmail settings that dramatically reduced spam. Most people never touch them. Here's the playbook. 🧵

• 
  CELiNE :: topup & piloting services 🪻 (@celinestia) reported 5 minutes ago

  ⠀⠀ HEARTOPIA — NEW EVENT PACKS 🐳 ⠀⠀ 🪼 CALL OF WHALES 🪼 ⠀⠀ 🪼 gilded acorn pack : IDR. 77.000 🪼 premium gilded acorn pack : IDR. 168.000 🪞 via login gmail/facebook 🪞 invoice apple 100% no sensor 🪞 payment avail QRIS & e-wallet #bealanja hato gamg junior full ⠀⠀

• 
  Blogangster (@AsjadAamir) reported 9 minutes ago

  Do not buy aged accounts from this d*ckhead @der_jenny082 . This scum bag is not refunding me. His gmail didn’t even login to my browser. He is not even replying me on telegram.

• 
  Kyle Pullman (@kylepullman) reported 10 minutes ago

  Hey @Google / @googlecalendar I find it incredibly frustrating that when someone proposes a new time in a Google Calendar invite, when it comes to my Gmail account, I can't see the proposed time. I have to go to the actual invite on the calendar app to see what time they are proposing. Seems like an easy fix to include the proposed time in the email notification?

• 
  Mason explains 10-Kfiling (@ydat1ci031792) reported 13 minutes ago

  I'm a student and my personal Gmail with Gemini Pro subscription was suspended for "shared login" – but I'm the only user. I've appealed 3 times, all auto-rejected. Can a real human please review my case? Happy to provide any proof. @Google @GoogleWorkspace

• 
  Lefty Foshizzle ⚔️ (@Lefty_Foshizzle) reported 16 minutes ago

  Another great tip of the weekend from @richontech Tech… To cut down on spam email there is a setting in most mail clients where you can turn off remote image loading. It was tough to find on my Gmail client so I actually had to go to the desktop Gmail application to be able to do it. The secret is that when they load those images, it sends back a code to the email originator that it has been accessed which means that email address is live so it is going to continue to spam and re-spam that address.

• 
  Michel Lieben (@MichLieben) reported 20 minutes ago

  You can turn a raw list of names into verified emails without ever logging into a single data provider. Start with the problem. You've built a list of people to reach: names, companies, maybe a LinkedIn link. What you're missing is the one thing you need to contact them, their email. Finding it is enrichment. No single provider has everyone. Each one builds its database its own way, so one covers a big slice of your list and has nothing on the rest. Bet everything on one tool and you leave half your list on the floor. So you don't. You stack providers cheapest to most expensive and run them in order. The cheap one clears most of the list for pennies. Everyone it misses falls to the next provider, then the next. The expensive aggregator only ever touches the few names nobody else could find. That's the waterfall. Each source catches what the one above it dropped, and your cost stays low because the priciest tool barely runs. Verify every email before you send. Skip it and it costs you: a dead address bounces, and enough bounces train Gmail to file you under spam. An unverified guess is worse than an empty cell. Set it up once in Claude Code, the provider order and a spend cap, then point the agent at your list. It runs the whole cascade, verifies every address, stops at your cap, and gives you one clean file. Every row comes back with the email, the source that found it, and whether it cleared verification. The few nobody could place get flagged, so you skip them and move on. Starting it was the only part that needed you.

• 
  BhunuIsLive (@Bhuneshwar763) reported 21 minutes ago

  Hey Sir Feature Suggestion for @thefundedroom 🚀 I would like to suggest a feature that could be very beneficial for both creators and users. Currently, referrals only work through referral links. The problem is that many users already have an account on the platform. If they want to support a creator and purchase an account through them, they often can't do so because they have already signed up. A better solution would be to introduce Creator Codes. For example, my creator code could be: BHUNU When a user purchases an account, they could simply enter the creator code at checkout. It wouldn't matter how or when they originally signed up. The purchase would automatically be attributed to that creator. This would provide several benefits: ✅ Existing users could support their favorite creators without creating a new account. ✅ Users would not need to create a new Gmail account just to use a referral link. ✅ Creators could easily track how many customers purchased through their code. ✅ Creators could provide better support and guidance to users who joined through them. Another advantage is that you wouldn't need to offer discounts all the time. Users could simply use the creator code to support their preferred creator. Then, whenever there is a festival, special event, or promotional campaign, you could directly apply any discount or special offer to those creator codes. This would make the system simple, flexible, and easy for everyone to use. Many platforms already use similar systems successfully, including brokers and trading platforms such as Exness, and others. It is simple, user-friendly, and much more convenient than requiring users to sign up again through a referral link. I believe this feature would greatly improve the referral system and create more opportunities for creators while making the process easier for customers.

• 
  Sameeir (@samb911) reported 23 minutes ago

  @DealsDhamaka Indont remember the login used .what to do.all gmail tried.and all personal email.none has the perplexity pro.

• 
  Patrick (@revealingimpact) reported 24 minutes ago

  Warning: Google’s Broken Support System & Irresponsibly Designed Family Link Parental Feature is Enabling a New Wave of Ransomware Attacks tl;dr - Google created a feature capable of transferring near-total control of an account, failed to place meaningful guardrails, verification, or intelligent abuse detection around it, and provides virtually no effective recovery support once it is weaponized. That combination has created a prolific new form of consumer account ransomware: attackers steal an authenticated session, convert the victim’s account into a supervised child account, install themselves as the controlling parent, and then extort the victim using the threat of permanent account loss and mass identity theft. This just happened to a family member. He used the same Gmail account for nearly his entire adult life, and it became the central identity behind almost everything he did online. His email history, Google Photos, Drive files, gaming accounts, password resets, subscriptions, and years of personal information were all connected to it. He is not temporarily “locked out.” Unless Google intervenes, the account is permanently lost and now controlled by someone else. The initial compromise appears to have started with common information stealing malware, A/K/A "Stealers". Stealers extract browser data such as cookies, saved credentials, and active session tokens. A stolen session is especially dangerous because the attacker may not need to know the password or defeat two-factor authentication. They are operating through a browser session that Google already considers authenticated. The attacker then abuses Google’s own account management features. They change the victim’s date of birth, so the adult account appears to belong to a child, trigger the Family Link supervision process, and add an attacker-controlled Google account as the parent. From there, they can reset the password, terminate the victim’s sessions, and establish themselves as the trusted authority over the account. That abuse is serious on its own, but Google’s support and recovery failures are what make this vector exceptionally dangerous. In a functioning recovery system, the legitimate owner would be able to report the compromise, verify years of account ownership, reverse the fraudulent supervision change, and remove the attacker. Instead, victims are pushed into automated recovery flows that often defer to the attacker-controlled “parent” account. There is frequently no meaningful escalation path, no competent human review, and no practical way to challenge the fraudulent change. In other words, this is not merely an account takeover technique. It is a permanent account-destruction technique made possible by Google’s inability or unwillingness to support its own users. The attacker exploits the feature, but Google’s recovery model completes the attack. Without that failure, this would be a recoverable security incident rather than the permanent loss of someone’s digital identity. Google's lack of underlying controls is also difficult to defend. An account that has used the same adult birthdate for ten years should not suddenly be converted into a supervised child account without extensive verification. A new Family Link parent should not be able to immediately reset credentials and displace the established owner. Changes with this level of impact should require step-up authentication, confirmation through long-standing recovery channels, delayed activation, prominent alerts, and a rollback mechanism that the newly added parent cannot override. The consequences extend far beyond Gmail. Once the attacker controls the primary email address, they can reset passwords for other services, impersonate the victim, access private files and photos, target contacts, distribute malware, and recover accounts across the victim’s digital life. Any passwords, payment data, or notes stolen during the original infostealer infection may create additional losses. AI is making the surrounding ecosystem worse by lowering the cost of creating convincing fake applications, download pages, advertisements, support sites, and social-engineering material. Less capable criminals can now launch higher-volume campaigns against ordinary users rather than focusing only on large corporate targets. Smaller ransom demands and individual account theft can still be highly profitable when repeated at scale. The most disturbing part is that this could happen to almost anyone. Google has spent years encouraging people to use one account as their email provider, cloud archive, photo library, identity provider, and recovery mechanism for the rest of their online lives. When a company creates that level of dependence, it also assumes a responsibility to provide competent recovery when its own features are abused. Right now, Google is failing that responsibility. Until it adds stronger controls and a real human escalation process, Family Link remains an extraordinarily high-impact account-takeover vector capable of permanently separating people from their entire digital lives. Please fix this @Google @TeamYouTube

• 
  the early bird; electric boogaloo (@fedlarper2_0) reported 25 minutes ago

  bait bait bait bait Twitter: 3 Discord: 3 Instagram: 2 Facebook: - 0 Snapchat: - 1 (NEVER used) TikTok: - 0 Twitch: - 1 Steam: - 1 YouTube: - 2 Spotify: 1 Pinterest: 1 (Genuinely used once a year) Reddit: 0 (deleted it because its a ******* terrible site) Gmail: 8 Telegram: 0

• 
  Julian Goldie SEO (@JulianGoldieSEO) reported 25 minutes ago

  Google just made three paid features free in one update. Most people scrolled right past it. Here's what actually changed: ✔ Personalized AI image generation pulled from your Gmail, Photos, and Search — is now free for US users (was locked behind a paid plan). ✔ A new fast image model is rolling into the Gemini app, Search, Photos, and NotebookLM at once. ✔ A brand-new video tool lets you edit clips using plain language instead of software, no timeline required. ✔ Students 18+ in Indonesia, Japan, the UK, and Brazil get a free Gemini upgrade through July. ✔ Camera-to-image generation is now live globally on Android and iOS. Free tiers used to mean "watered down." Not anymore. Save this. You'll know exactly which Gemini features cost nothing before your feed catches up. Want the SOP? DM me.

• 
  J-Rob (@J_Rob1) reported 25 minutes ago

  Ain’t none of yall hit the Gmail…if it’s a problem with sovereignty…I can solve that 👍