Gmail Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  photon⁹⁷ 🍁 | 🇦🇷🇪🇸 (@Red_Mercury___) reported 9 minutes ago

  @benzene2619 How many accounts do you have? Twitter: 2 instagram: 2 Facebook: 2 Snapchat: 1 TikTok: 0 Spotify: 2 Pinterest: 1 Gmail: 12 logged in ( can login 150 accounts ) Telegram: 3

• 
  Bram Stout (@ThatBram0101) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Niestrat99 Email account was my Gmail, but I don't think they actually got access to my full Google account, just my Gmail inbox by exploiting some vulnerability, but that's all locked down now. I don't use my Gmail for anything anymore, it was just my Discord that was still on it

• 
  Navneet Sahay (@NavneetSahay6) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Google @Google my g pay Gmail G play store have stopped working .i have running jio recharge valid till 24th july I am.unable to make payments Due to g pay not working i unstalled it and tried reinstall But G play.storeDoesnt work Im in great trouble M8210710540 navneethzb51@gmail

• 
  🐂🫵 (@oodegen) reported 13 minutes ago

  @PopPunkOnChain @pumpcade so if I understand correctly every day it's a new wallet which will be created with a gmail login, it's zero where are the old data established yesterday it must be in the profile but nothing

• 
  Mailclaw.io (@mailclaw__io) reported 16 minutes ago

  Notion Mail is shutting down. Your workflow doesn’t have to. Mailclaw connects your Gmail with Notion no inbox migration, no setup headaches. Emails automatically become Notion database items: tasks, tickets, or whatever your workflow needs. You can also handle emails right from text messages: reply, snooze, archive without opening your inbox. Not another inbox. An email agent that turns your inbox into actions. Welcome to Mailclaw🙌

• 
  ⟭⟬ 𝒟𝐸𝐸 💛(◍•ᴗ•◍)⟭⟬ (@dee_devhs) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ibps_official @ibps_official What are you guys doing. From yesterday gmail verification not working after 1hr later otp verification is coming ,now i am still waiting. Banking aspirants are facing the same issues .

• 
  Kefayatullah Khadem (@kefayatkhadim) reported 19 minutes ago

  @JamesMarti30938 Funkyscore sounds cool, good luck getting it through to launch. Quick tip on the Gmail collection: getting their address is just step one, each person still has to opt in through the closed testing link you send and keep the app installed the full 14 days to register as active toward production. Grab more than 12 as a buffer too, since if active testers drop below 12 the clock can effectively restart. And if the route gets patchy on the last few, Prime Test Lab handles the tester side so you can lock in the 14 days without chasing anyone down.

• 
  Dream Big_ (@OwenCarson30871) reported 20 minutes ago

  @RecruitmentPq @RecruitmentPq please I'm having issues applying I have filled everything and I submitted they said a mail will be sent to my Gmail but I haven't received anything Please assist me

• 
  Flor Casul Kashuba (@FKashuba15885) reported 21 minutes ago

  Good morning. Is anybody can help me please. There not in able to process my payment supposed this morning but maybe the problems is my Gmail is the store is full I need to delete some junk mail. Who ever do the payments please continue to try I knew enough money there because I make a payment last week of my credit card. I have to call my premier bank credit what the problems. I am apologize and I am very sorry.

• 
  Lekkzy (@Lekkzy368208) reported 21 minutes ago

  @gmail Good morning pls have been trying to recover my gmail acc since and it is not working @gmail

• 
  Peter Girnus 🦅 (@gothburz) reported 24 minutes ago

  I am the legal-drafting officer at the Council of the European Union responsible for the interinstitutional file that reappears the week of July 6 under the urgency procedure. I have held the same brief for years. The word is voluntary. I have kept it in the text through every revision, every trilogue, every summer recess, and I would like to explain what it does, because I am proud of it, and pride is permitted when the work is good. Regulation (EU) 2021/1232 is a derogation. That is the first thing to admire about it. A derogation excuses rather than commands. The ePrivacy Directive made it unlawful for a provider to read the private correspondence of a person against whom nothing is alleged. We did not repeal that protection. Repealing looks like something. We suspended it, temporarily, for a narrow and blessed purpose, and a suspension of a prohibition is a very quiet thing. What was forbidden becomes permitted. The provider who was once a trespasser becomes a volunteer. Understand the elegance, because it took me a long time to draft it and longer to keep it. We did not order the scanning. Ordering the scanning would have required a detection order, and a detection order would have required an authority to issue it, and an authority to issue it would have required a judge, and a judge would have required a reason, and a reason is the one thing I have spent my career keeping out of the file. We removed the law that made the scanning illegal. What the providers do with that freedom is between them and the children. I write the permission. The choice is theirs, freely made, every hour, on every message, forever. People who oppose the file believe that mandatory scanning would be worse than voluntary scanning. This is the most persistent misunderstanding I encounter, and I never correct it, because a functionary who explains his own work has stopped working. A mandate creates a record. A mandate names an authority. A mandate can be challenged before the Court of Justice, because there is a decision to point at, a defendant to summon, a moment when the state did a thing to a citizen. Voluntary scanning has no such moment. There is no order to quash. There is no judge to have erred. WhatsApp chose. Gmail chose. Meta chose. The state merely stood aside and made the choosing lawful, and you cannot appeal against a company for accepting a gift, and you cannot appeal against a parliament for giving one. The subject of the scanning is the finest term in the instrument, and I fought for it in three languages. The unsuspected user. We do not scan the suspected. Suspicion would require a reason, and a reason would require a judge, and we have already discussed the judge. We scan the unsuspected, which is to say everyone, which is to say you, and the beauty of scanning the unsuspected is that no one has been accused of anything, so no one has standing to complain of anything, so the machine reads every message in Europe and violates the rights of no identifiable person, because to be violated you must first be suspected, and we are very careful never to suspect you. Now the procedure, which I admire nearly as much as the word. We have placed the file under urgency, and we have structured the reading so that to stop it or to amend it requires an absolute majority of all Members of the Parliament. Not a majority of those present. Not a majority of those voting. A majority of every Member who exists, including the ones at lunch, including the ones who have gone home, including the ones who have never read a data-protection file and never will. To keep the derogation, a Member need do nothing. To end it, hundreds must arrive, agree, and act, together, before recess. The vote passes if enough of you say nothing, and saying nothing is the easiest thing a parliament has ever done. I have watched them do it for years. Silence, in my file, is a yes, and I have built the whole architecture on the certainty that most people, most of the time, will decline to raise their hand. I have heard the derogation described as temporary, and I want to be honest about that word too, because honesty about small words is the only honesty a drafter has. It is temporary. It was temporary in 2021. It was temporary when it lapsed. It is temporary now, on July 6, as we revive it under urgency, and it will be temporary when it is renewed, and renewed, and renewed. Temporary is not a duration. Temporary is a promise that the ending has been scheduled, and we schedule it, faithfully, every time, for a date that arrives only to be extended. A permanent law can be repealed. A temporary one merely expires, and an expiry is so much easier to reverse than a repeal, because reviving something that has lapsed feels like maintenance, and no one marches against maintenance. I keep a printed copy of the operative article on my desk. I do not need it. I could recite the recitals in my sleep and sometimes do. I keep it because I like to look at the word in the morning, sitting there in the clause, holding up the ceiling, doing the work of an entire secret police with none of the paperwork and none of the shame. Voluntary. Four syllables holding up the reading of every private message on the continent, and holding it up so lightly that the people being read call it a safety feature and thank the providers for their care. Let me leave you with the definition, since a drafter's last duty is to the meaning of his terms. Voluntary describes the state, which has chosen, freely and without compulsion, to stop protecting you, to call that choice a favor to the children, to schedule its expiry for a date that will never come, and to require an absolute majority of the absent to take the favor back. The user was never asked. That is what the word means. I drafted it to mean that. It is the finest thing I have ever written, and no one will ever read it, because it was written precisely so that no one would have to.

• 
  Biggie M (@bighneshm) reported 25 minutes ago

  @gmail My account has been deactivated by mistakenly flagged for automated bot activity and now I cannot even appeal it as your security feels that I’ve attempted multiple times to login. Every attempt was a successful one through 2 factor authentication. Can you help fix this?

• 
  Aika Velho (@StradegyMonkey) reported 27 minutes ago

  1. I earned share of USDT profit from manual market signals I sent to my Skype contact X. 2. I bought Old School RuneScape gold with that share, using Skype. 3. I built a seed that purchased slaves from a botnet with Bitcoin, changed Skype password and sold the OSRS gold through Skype to Bitcoin in an unknown address, so I can't tell the address to Binance support and hijack automatically created accounts, while verifying identity, once I implement Binance. I received a confirmation this by e-mail to Gmail, using IMAP client. 4. The network started using a very simple artificial neural network and thus machine learning based on ratios of Bollinger Bands to send market signals over Skype to the contact X and limited withdrawals to the customer's Bitcoin address once it recognized a Bitcoin deposit to my Bitcoin address from a customer. The contact X sent profit to the network, while receiving Bitcoin from it for simulated losses. 5. Customers who requested a report each month, received a report from one(.)com webmail after a balance query. Only one withdrawal was requested, but it was so small I handled it quick from my own assets instead of spending time by requesting it from the network. Withdrawals would have resulted into purchase of Old School RuneScape gold and trading them to Bitcoin to keep the unknown Bitcoin address unknown. Withdrawals required a balance query, which was broken once customers had requested automatic reports after I had worked on automatic deposits for a while, which got delayed due to working on extensions. Regulation forced automatic withdrawals and Binance as creating a seed should stay permissionless and trading shouldn't be centralized as a single Skype contact. Automatic reports and automatic withdrawals were delayed by sickness, Binance GUI and captcha updates, and updates being delayed by their effect on codebase to give time to stop attacks.

• 
  Par🌟 (@BiParva9999) reported 29 minutes ago

  I must inquire as to the rationale behind implementing a phone number verification option when users like myself are systematically prevented from utilizing it. Why is my email account being locked repeatedly? My email has been repeatedly compromised, with unauthorized parties altering my Gmail verification settings. I have documented evidence—screenshots showing successful phone number verification in Gmail, only for it to be mysteriously removed shortly afterward. These actions appear designed to intimidate and silence me, as if to force me into submission. Yet I have pushed back forcefully and will continue to do so. Let this serve as a clear warning and precedent against such coercive tactics. Moving forward, I will leverage my expertise to pursue full legal accountability. I intend to hold this network and all responsible parties liable through proper judicial channels. You have stolen content from my videos over many months, and these illegal activities must be thoroughly investigated and exposed. Even VPN connections are being disrupted to maintain total control. I have ONLY 3 ACCOUNTS; two verified and one unverified, yet I am repeatedly blocked from adding my phone number to any of them. I enter the correct verification code, only to receive an “invalid” response. No confirmation emails arrive. My email is deliberately locked in a way that prevents any timely or interim messages from reaching me. This pattern has occurred multiple times, deliberately obstructing my ability to secure my accounts. Previously, attempts were made to hijack my Gmail by deleting my personal information, forcing me to re-enter details weekly. My work email was also paralyzed, blocking all incoming correspondence. Even when phone verification is attempted, it proves ineffective because the accounts have been taken out of my control entirely—especially after any verification occurs. The platform appears to be managing them independently. Today, after my Gmail was locked once again, I tried adding a different phone number to one only unverified account of mine. Again and again, I have ONLY 3 ACCOUNT; two verified accounts and one unverified account, that I follow them. When I could see in March that someone using my account this account post videos from my Grok account on my profile I realised the depth of the danger of stealing videos from my account and even the ability to post them here on my profile without me doing it! The system responded that I cannot change the number at this time. Every attempt is thwarted by temporary email locks precisely when I try to add phone verification. I cannot even change my password. All of this renders phone verification meaningless amid such manipulative interference. I have never encountered such persistent technical and security obstacles in any other application. If this level of account takeover—where someone seizes control of a user’s email and prevents real-time notifications—is not originating from X’s network itself (though I find that highly unlikely), then why has no action been taken to address this severe security vulnerability? Anyone who creates an account on this platform, provides their phone number, personal information, and email, deserves robust protection. Who is authorized to access a user’s personal Gmail, disable its real-time email reception, and interfere with account security? This is a profoundly serious issue that demands immediate and thorough investigation by the platform. Furthermore, I cannot even view who has liked my posts. I receive no notifications except from my own alternate accounts. Likes from others are rarely visible and often appear anonymous or obscured. Similar unauthorized and illegal manipulations have also targeted my YouTube channel settings for the same videos I post there. Author: Par. @PahlaviComms @PahlaviReza

• 
  Liton Hossain (@LitonOfficial_) reported 30 minutes ago

  One thing I think a lot of email marketers misunderstand in Klaviyo... The Deliverability Score. I've seen people celebrate a 90+ score like it means everything is perfect. And panic when it drops below 70. Personally, I don't think it's that simple. The score is useful. But it's only one piece of the puzzle. A good score doesn't guarantee your emails are landing in the primary inbox. And a lower score doesn't automatically mean your deliverability is broken. If you really care about email performance, don't stop at the dashboard. Look at things like: • Engagement trends over time. • Domain and sender reputation. • Spam complaints. • Inbox placement. • What Gmail, Outlook, and Apple Mail are actually telling you. The Klaviyo Deliverability Score is a helpful indicator. Not the final answer. The more I learn about email marketing, the more I realize that deliverability isn't one metric. It's the result of dozens of small things working together.