Gmail Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Gmail Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nishant Srivastava (@nishantsrivstv) reported 23 seconds ago

  @arpispeaks Khan sir is right. US can shut down Gmail or its features. They just did that with Claude. Now wether US will do it or not is a matter of context. But it can !

• 
  Mamoni (@Mamoni_Ghosh20) reported 2 minutes ago

  Dumbhead There many medium from messaging app gmail where people can do Neet leak Man care If You really want to care for your brother vote wisely This is not new It's Parliamentary Committee documented issues NTA is incapable on paper from 3 years Man!! Use brain Man!!

• 
  hari; desire:enha (@harichani) reported 2 minutes ago

  @enonpluto In theory: yes, like logging in via multiple Gmail & Katalk acc Practically, quite inconvenient, bec e.g. you can't collect the daily attendance through the same network/wi-fi, even with 2 different devices Streaming I don't know bec I would be too slow for that

• 
  SalangBangtan ⟭⟬𝟙𝟛𝕋𝕊⟬⟭ (@SalangBangtan7) reported 4 minutes ago

  @paiz_sonia39057 I did research on this because some people were saying they couldn't log in. Here's what I got back. There are no geographical restrictions for the Billboard Korea Top K-Artists Awards, as voting is open worldwide. Login issues are caused by technical glitches, specifically email verification failures and server overload from high traffic, rather than location-based blocking. Users are advised to use non-Gmail accounts or attempt to bypass the verification email to resolve these issues. I hope this helps in some way.

• 
  Richard Hofman (@RichardHofman33) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SlmnMANUTD @googlechrome Sadly,I did everything possible, but this is a technical problem between Windows 11 and the Chrome browser that needs to be solved by their programmers.This is not just one problem with Google comp as Gmail also has a long-standing unsolved failure with letter formats.Let's hope.

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 13 minutes ago

  Most businesses don't know Gmail and Outlook are rejecting their email outright. Built InboxRescue to find the problem and fix it — outside-in, no credentials needed.

• 
  sky (@CharlotBlondsk5) reported 24 minutes ago

  @JanaCryptoQueen @bcgame @BCEngineX I know but I don’t want to use gmail for bcgame main problem is vpn

• 
  w o u t e r 💬 🎗️ (@ewd) reported 25 minutes ago

  @techactually An error does not become truth because many believe it, and the same goes for using Google email. A billion Gmail users can still be wrong.

• 
  Swifter (@SwtNir) reported 27 minutes ago

  @TeamYouTube My gmail account is hacked and I cannot recover it. Someone has changed the password, added a passkey, changed the contact number, changed recovery email and everything. There is no way to sign-in. Google account recovery is not working as well. Please help!!!!!

• 
  Tom Waters (@T__Waters) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Ratio_Disputati @martianwyrdlord Same with email. If a British person lost access to their email, I would immediate switch away from Gmail incase my country ever had some issue with America or these companies.

• 
  Javier Sparks (@PilatesPapii) reported 28 minutes ago

  Is anyone else having issues with Gmail and it’s consistently putting important emails in your spam? I swear it’s trying to block my bags.😭😭😭

• 
  Ivelina aka Niftyhontas (@niftyhontas) reported 28 minutes ago

  instant VC rejection signals (stop wasting your time): - you make empty claims. No numbers, no proof = no credibility. - you ask for an NDA before sharing your deck. Signals inexperience. - your pitch deck has an outdated date. Signals you’ve been fundraising too long. - your market size (SAM) is over $100B. Too broad, VCs assume your numbers are wrong. - your market is too small (SAM < $1B). No VC-scale exit potential. - “we have no competition.” - founders own less than 50% after Series A. Low ownership = weak long-term incentives. - dead equity on your cap table. Bad early deals = no room for employees or future rounds. - your market size is expressed in volume, not value. VCs think in $$, not in units. - you’re not a Delaware C-Corp (or VC-friendly entity). Legal structure matters. - no technical co-founder. No CTO? No funding (for tech startups). - you want to sell to “everyone.” No clear ICP = no focus = no investment. - you talk about exits too early. If you’re pre-seed, focus on building, not selling. - your deck is full of jargon. “Disruption,” “transformation,” “game-changer” = auto-reject. - you exaggerate traction. If investors dig and find out, you’re done. - you’re using a Gmail/Hotmail email. Get a professional domain email. - you can’t estimate CAC/LTV. If you don’t know your unit economics, you’re not ready. - you’re slow to reply to emails. Speed = execution. Slow response = weak founder. - your GTM strategy is just a list of channels. No clear funnel = no go. - your round terms are off-market. Investors expect valuations in a certain range. - you’re raising for less than 18 months or more than 24 months of runway. Too little = risky, too much = over-optimistic. - talking “equity” and “valuation” at pre-seed. Pre-seed rounds = SAFEs, not priced equity. - you can’t handle rejection. VCs talk, don’t burn bridges. - you’re building in a cold market. Some sectors just aren’t getting funded right now. - no “unfair advantage.” If anyone can copy you, why should VCs bet on you? - you’re a Forbes 30 Under 30. 🚩 Investors know PR ≠ success. - your deck is circulating without investor engagement. If no one's biting, something's off. what else?

• 
  Swami Guru (@MasterSwami) reported 28 minutes ago

  @mememandir Gmail, Slack, Meta, IG, Teams, Zoom, Outlook. Bring down the whole Big Tech for a week.

• 
  Rexan Wong (@rexan_wong) reported 31 minutes ago

  been building AI software for brands + talking to hundreds of AI operators for months whoever is building in AI now, these skills will compound like crazy in the future here's 10 signs your company isn't actually AI native (just AI curious) - so you can fix it before the ai gold rush leaves you behind: 1. y'all got no skills library every prompt gets retyped from scratch and the second your best operator takes pto, and the tribal knowledge walks out with them lol you might think this is basic by now, but ive seen full AI-native ops running without one. THE FIX: write the prompts once, version them, let the whole team pull from the same library. 2. our agents have no context they start every task with brain damage. no clue what the company does, what's already been decided, what "good" even looks like here. then u wonder why the output is mid. THE FIX: build a brain. markdown files in folders, agent-readable. start with SOPs, past wins, brand voice, customer transcripts. add as u go. Can do deeper research into Obsidian or Supermemory as memory / context solutions 3. you're in claude code clicking approve every 30 seconds thats not autonomy, thats a hostage situation with a chatbot. just let it run in auto mode bro human in the loop matters, but AI is good enough now that u gotta let it cook. the actual skill is developing the instinct to know when a change is critical, so u jump in for that and stay out of the rest. 4. nothing fires on a trigger. work only happens when someone notices a slack ping or an email and types a prompt. your speed-to-signal is capped at whatever ur worst meeting day allows. THE FIX: easy: MCPs. wire your agents into gmail, slack, notion, your crm. let the trigger come from the system, not from u remembering. 5. ur SOPs arent versioned they live in a notion doc nobody opens, or worse, in one person's head. cant diff it, cant improve it, cant hand it to an agent. THE FIX: move them to markdown, put them in github, treat them like code. every change is a commit, every commit has a reason. 6. no eval loop you cant tell me if todays output is better than last tuesdays, which means u also cant compound saw on a pod that has a great solution, he has a "standard" benchmark, a tangible result he runs every new model and setup against thats how u know whats actually best for ur use case instead of vibes-checking it. 7. u throw away the traces. every session ends and the reasoning, the dead ends, the half-built decisions just vanish, ur company forgets everything by friday. THE FIX: save the sessions, save the artifacts, even the broken ones. the cutting room floor is where the next SOP comes from. 8. ur team is still doing the middle strategy and review is where humans win, execution is where agents eat if your people are still stuck in the middle of the sandwich,your margins could be gone in 12 months. 9. testing a new feature still means a figma file and a 2-week sprint the AI native version of ur team shipped a clickable prototype, ran it past 20 real users, and had the feedback synthesized before u finished writing the PRD. Take this list as you wish and lets scale with ai worddd

• 
  Ivelina aka Niftyhontas (@niftyhontas) reported 31 minutes ago

  instant VC rejection signals (stop wasting your time): - Yyou make empty claims. No numbers, no proof = no credibility. - you ask for an NDA before sharing your deck. Signals inexperience. - your pitch deck has an outdated date. Signals you’ve been fundraising too long. - your market size (SAM) is over $100B. Too broad, VCs assume your numbers are wrong. - your market is too small (SAM < $1B). No VC-scale exit potential. - “we have no competition.” - founders own less than 50% after Series A. Low ownership = weak long-term incentives. - dead equity on your cap table. Bad early deals = no room for employees or future rounds. - your market size is expressed in volume, not value. VCs think in $$, not in units. - you’re not a Delaware C-Corp (or VC-friendly entity). Legal structure matters. - no technical co-founder. No CTO? No funding (for tech startups). - you want to sell to “everyone.” No clear ICP = no focus = no investment. - you talk about exits too early. If you’re pre-seed, focus on building, not selling. - your deck is full of jargon. “Disruption,” “transformation,” “game-changer” = auto-reject. - you exaggerate traction. If investors dig and find out, you’re done. - you’re using a Gmail/Hotmail email. Get a professional domain email. - you can’t estimate CAC/LTV. If you don’t know your unit economics, you’re not ready. - you’re slow to reply to emails. Speed = execution. Slow response = weak founder. - your GTM strategy is just a list of channels. No clear funnel = no go. - your round terms are off-market. Investors expect valuations in a certain range. - you’re raising for less than 18 months or more than 24 months of runway. Too little = risky, too much = over-optimistic. - talking “equity” and “valuation” at pre-seed. Pre-seed rounds = SAFEs, not priced equity. - you can’t handle rejection. VCs talk, don’t burn bridges. - you’re building in a cold market. Some sectors just aren’t getting funded right now. - no “unfair advantage.” If anyone can copy you, why should VCs bet on you? - you’re a Forbes 30 Under 30. 🚩 Investors know PR ≠ success. - your deck is circulating without investor engagement. If no one's biting, something's off. what else?