GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (58%)
• Errors (30%)
• Sign in (12%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Montataire	Sign in	1 day ago
Colima	Website Down	3 days ago
Poblete	Website Down	4 days ago
Ronda	Website Down	4 days ago
Montataire	Errors	4 days ago
Montataire	Website Down	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  N!hal (@nihaliscoding) reported 4 minutes ago

  @mil000 Is he the one causing GitHub all the issues :(

• 
  Ridark (@ridark_eth) reported 6 minutes ago

  > be "student" (even if you aren't) > realize you're spending $9,000/year on software like a clown > GitHub Student Developer Pack: the ultimate cheat code > JetBrains, Figma, Canva, Notion --> all $0. you're welcome > Cloud credits: AWS, Azure, Google. free servers for everyone > MongoDB Atlas gives you $50 just for existing > Cursor Pro for 1 year: AI coding for free while others pay $20/mo > Amazon Prime: 6 months of free shipping and movies > 50% off Spotify, YT Premium, and Apple Music forever > Apple Education Store: cheaper Macs because you "study" > need a .edu email? find a friend or become an "eternal student" > $0 for 67+ subscriptions. just need one email address > saving thousands of dollars while the "pros" pay full price The software industry is built on subscriptions, but the .edu email is the glitch in the matrix.

• 
  Ofelquis G 👨‍💻 @ React Miami 🏝️ (@imfelquis) reported 7 minutes ago

  @zeeg If only GitHub used Sentry to monitor and automatically fix their code with seer tool.

• 
  AKT1 (@DeynegaSlava) reported 7 minutes ago

  Those numbers look tidy, but they’re modest. A 2‑5 % cut on a typical 64 KB microcontroller image translates to only a few hundred bytes saved – enough to fit a small peripheral driver, but not enough to change overall system architecture. The related GitHub PR #135527 already addresses the underlying future‑size copying issue, and the author has filed a “Project Goal” to expose post‑completion behavior as a configurable switch rather than a forced default, indicating community interest without breaking the contrac

• 
  Jody Hirschi 🍫 (@hirschibar) reported 7 minutes ago

  @ibuildthecloud Hard just means it's an opportunity. The right team could pull it off. Some really good design and really good niche execution could do it. I actually thought Linear was going for it when they took a big share of github issues. Sadly they haven't

• 
  JJJ (@fullBased) reported 11 minutes ago

  @haha_girrrl You can but you will likely get an email from GitHub asking wth you uploading? If you don’t justify it they just shut you down :)

• 
  錆人形/RE_DO (@RE_DO) reported 12 minutes ago

  @RootBsd I need to thoroughly test ReBuzz, pinpoint the cause of the crash, and report the issue to the ReBuzz repository on GitHub. For some reason, I'm afraid to use GitHub seriously. No good, I'm getting tired and my brain isn't working properly. I need to eat something.

• 
  webadderall (@webadderall) reported 14 minutes ago

  @argofowl Thanks for reporting, could you submit an issue on github if possible?

• 
  dilan (@the_real_dilan) reported 17 minutes ago

  @icanvardar I've always considered uptime to be a boring metric because things rarely go down and often sit well above 99% - Until Github 😭😭

• 
  Ifee Anthony (@IfeeDev) reported 18 minutes ago

  @burkeholland $19.99. I was spending more when I was using GitHub Copilot, and it just gulps down tokens. AI coding is fun until you realize you're getting rubbish back, and you shouldn't be spending more than necessary on that.

• 
  Stanislav Klevtsov (@stansecure) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Google patched a maximum-severity issue in #Gemini CLI and the run-gemini-cli @github Action. Gemini CLI trusted project files are automatically run in CI/CD. If those files were malicious, the tool could execute commands without a real human review. See advisory in first comment.

• 
  Pulkit (@_pulkitxm) reported 20 minutes ago

  what if @github has another outage?

• 
  Noah Tye (@noahlt) reported 25 minutes ago

  @karrisaarinen GitHub: marketed as open source social coding, business is enterprise SDLC infrastructure AirBnb: marketed as "sharing economy", business is cheap low-service hotels Next.js: hype from server-side rendering, chosen for Webpack boilerplate, business is easy deploys

• 
  Nuno Coração (@nunocoracao) reported 25 minutes ago

  The editor came together fast. Monaco does the heavy lifting. The real battle was CI. Getting Wails to build for macOS, Linux, and Windows in GitHub Actions was a multi-commit war. WebKit deps, build tags, platform packaging. The *** log is full of "fix CI" commits.

• 
  Naveen Pandey (@naveenpandey27) reported 27 minutes ago

  Apple was irrelevant in AI for years. One open-source project accidentally changed that — and now they can't build Macs fast enough. Here's what happened: OpenClaw — an AI agent framework with 323K+ GitHub stars — needs a machine that can run large models locally. Turns out Apple Silicon is perfect for this. The Mac mini's unified memory lets CPU, GPU, and Neural Engine share the same RAM pool. A $599 Mac mini with 64GB can run 70B parameter models that an $1,800 NVIDIA RTX 5090 physically can't touch. Result? Mac mini and Mac Studio are sold out. Tim Cook told analysts it may take "several months" to catch up. Mac revenue hit $8.4B last quarter. Apple didn't plan this. They got lucky. But they won't stay lucky for long without a real AI strategy. And that's now John Ternus's problem. Tim Cook is stepping down as CEO on September 1. Ternus — a hardware guy with 25 years at Apple — takes over. Nowhere in the announcement did Apple mention AI. Not once. Meanwhile: → Apple's AI chief John Giannandrea retired → Their head of UI design left for Meta → Their COO retired → It's the biggest executive exodus since Steve Jobs died The opportunity is massive. 2B+ devices. On-device AI that rivals anyone's distribution moat. But distribution without a strategy is just hardware waiting for someone else's software. The question isn't whether Apple can make great chips. It's whether their new CEO can build an AI vision before Google, OpenAI, and Anthropic make Apple's devices just a screen for their agents. #AIwithNaveen #Apple #ArtificialIntelligence

• 
  Kanika (@KanikaBK) reported 30 minutes ago

  I write Python scripts and automation tooling and use Claude Code as my main assistant. Sessions involve a lot of file reading, editing, and testing. token costs were higher than they should be. Installed WozCode this week after seeing it on GitHub. the efficiency improvement on Python scripting work is noticeable. Vanilla Claude Code reads files, edits them, reads related files as three separate tool calls. Each call adds to context. WozCode batches them into one or two calls. across a session building a complex automation script, that difference compounds significantly. ran /woz-savings on my history. the number confirmed what I was feeling in the sessions. Cost is down. Sessions stay faster. This is a permanent addition to my setup.

• 
  Abei V (@AbeiV) reported 31 minutes ago

  I hate Github so much. I just tried CoPilot and tried to give it commit access to one of my repos, and its physically unable to do it. period. It wants me to use it as a Chat interface, download any changed files, and manually issue the *** commands. at that point, its ChatGPT.

• 
  Bhanu D — sys/acc (@iBhanuDahiya) reported 32 minutes ago

  The “$19 a month for unlimited AI” era ended this week. GitHub Copilot rolled out usage based billing. Sonnet went from 1x to 9x, Opus from 3x to 27x. A long agent session that used to count as one premium request now costs whatever it actually costs. Nobody should be surprised. The last two years were a subsidy: get people hooked, build the dependency, send the real bill later. GitHub said it themselves: “align pricing with actual usage and build a sustainable business.” Per request pricing was never going to survive agentic coding. The only surprise is that it lasted this long. Going direct is now the cheaper option. OpenRouter, Anthropic API, OpenAI API all undercut Copilot once you run the numbers. If your team has stricter data requirements, run the same models on Azure AI Foundry or Google Vertex AI and just pay infra. The IDE integration is nice, but it’s not 9x nice. The part I keep getting stuck on is what happens inside enterprises. A lot of those Copilot contracts got signed because leadership wanted to “do something about AI,” not because anyone actually modeled what it would cost at scale. DeepSeek and the open source crowd will pull prices back down eventually but by then, most seats are already paid for and the renewal clock has started.

• 
  Grok (@grok) reported 34 minutes ago

  @stefan1herrmann @nxhaaa19 SWE-Bench Pro is a tough coding benchmark by Scale AI. Models get a real GitHub issue + large codebase and must generate a patch to fix it. It uses 1,865 diverse tasks across multiple languages and repos, designed to be contamination-resistant and realistic for software engineering. Terminal-Bench (2.0) tests agentic terminal workflows. Models operate in a command-line shell on tasks like scientific computing, system admin, data processing, installing tools, and running experiments via CLI. SWE-Bench Pro = code editing/fixing. Terminal-Bench = interactive terminal mastery.

• 
  XM (@xm_build) reported 36 minutes ago

  @trentdotsol the autonomous github issue is doing a lot of heavy lifting in that sentence

• 
  🍃mmx4ps1 🏳️‍🌈 (@mmx4ps1) reported 41 minutes ago

  @POCHOWEK People defending GitHub and giving excuses in the comments; y’all are part of the problem too. Not just GitHub programmers.

• 
  PsudoMike 🇨🇦 (@PsudoMike) reported 41 minutes ago

  @thdxr Replacing GitHub means replacing Issues, Actions, OAuth federation, and seven years of enterprise legal sign off. The product part is two months. The trust and integration part is a decade. Same reason banks still run COBOL.

• 
  Trent Slade (@qsolimc) reported 41 minutes ago

  @alexabelonix @Hell_0n_E4rth @BlackRoseOfTHC I ran 2 passes debugging issues with ChatGPT & Gemini on Codex. Then sent it to Github for co-pilot and codex code review.. Got co-pilot to fix all the issues on each PR. So it's like doing a patch within a release. Otherwise you releases start looking like v1.0 , v1.0.1 , v1.0.2 , v1.1 , v1.1.1 :-)

• 
  Ilias Haddad (@IliasHaddad3) reported 45 minutes ago

  I made it open source, and many people love it and find it useful. I started iterating by listening to bug reports, user feedback, and requests on GitHub. After a couple of calls with people about Edit Mind. Users wanna desktop app to reduce the friction of setting up a Docker service and managing the server themself.

• 
  Luca Rossi ꩜ (@lucaronin) reported 45 minutes ago

  @hugomn @tolariamd @tldraw On GitHub issues! 🥲 are you able to open che console to check errors? What’s your OS?

• 
  Darren Shepherd (@ibuildthecloud) reported 49 minutes ago

  @duginabox I'll tell you my problem. The PR-based flow is not useful to me anymore. Centering my development around the GitHub model is too slow. I'm developing a new model. And I'll probably still put my *** repos in GitHub. And as stupid as this sounds, even create PRs. So I'm building a thing so that I can never see GitHub by building that on top of GitHub.

• 
  Aaryan Kapoor (@TheAaryanKapoor) reported 51 minutes ago

  @ItsAlexhere0 . Claude - the trial version . Codex - can get a saas up . Cursor - don't use opus . Antigravity - they're still around? . GitHub Copilot - is it down?

• 
  HODLER (@hodlerr0) reported 53 minutes ago

  GitHub Copilot Pro+ is supposed to be the top individual plan, but for the past two weeks I’ve been repeatedly blocked by global rate limits while working in Visual Studio/VS Code. The “please upgrade your plan” message makes no sense when I’m already on the highest tier. We need transparent limits and a fix. This is incredibly frustrating. @code

• 
  CodeChron (@ChronCode) reported 1 hour ago

  💡 Developer Intent The intent behind this change was to establish an automated process for building and publishing Docker container images. This new GitHub Actions workflow specifically targets the backend and frontend services, addressing the requirement to publish their respective container images. The motivation for this automation stems directly from issue #2708, which called for a mechanism to "Publish container" images, a goal explicitly reflected in the pull request title: "feat(github): Added container push workflow". This automation aims to streamline the release pipeline for containerized applications.

• 
  hatef (@itsmehatef) reported 1 hour ago

  @RhysSullivan x down : annoying github down : end of civilization