GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (67%)
• Sign in (25%)
• Errors (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Antananarivo	Website Down	1 day ago
Paris	Sign in	6 days ago
Lure	Website Down	10 days ago
Ashkelon	Website Down	11 days ago
Veigné	Errors	19 days ago
Paris	Website Down	23 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 47 seconds ago

  Loophound. Synthetic user journeys hit production 24/7. When a conversion flow regresses, it auto-files a GitHub issue with screenshots and a repro script. The next clean deploy closes the ticket. No pages, no APM invoice. Coming soon.

• 
  SPEKULATOR (@__spekulator__) reported 2 minutes ago

  @KennyJohnsonATX @Cloudflare oauth pre-registration is a real unlock for cloudflare's mcp server support. they can now hit slack and github without waiting on dcr support from them.

• 
  Aditya Trivedi (@AdiTrivedi17) reported 2 minutes ago

  AI gave us 10x productivity, but took away the dopamine of the struggle. Remember opening 30 Stack Overflow tabs, reading obscure 2016 GitHub issues, and spending 6 hours just to fix a single state bug? When it finally worked, you felt like a genius. Now AI fixes it in 3 second

• 
  Mohand Bencherif (@be_mohand) reported 3 minutes ago

  GitHub didn't invent ***. Stripe didn't invent credit cards. Cursor didn't invent LLMs. Yet they're all billion-dollar companies. I spent 10 years building SaaS before I understood why. It comes down to one word: primitives.

• 
  therapistFinder (@therapistFind3r) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Slypador He's only half right. This only started becoming an issue when devs started using GitHub as a program downloading website as well as a development website.

• 
  . (@packerWp6) reported 11 minutes ago

  @gnukeith Okay on a tablet but yes it's not great However I have a simple site running on GitHub and being able to do quick if painful updates to it on the go is great my main issue is how bloody laggy the app is on a flagship Samsung phone

• 
  Milady (@onchainmilady) reported 11 minutes ago

  DEVELOPERS ARE OFFICIALLY COOCKED BY GITHUB Someone just dropped Spark and it ships an entire app from a single prompt you type what you want in plain English and Spark ships the whole thing for you it writes the frontend, the backend, the database and wires them together itself then it deploys the app to a live URL you can open on your phone in minutes you describe a habit tracker or a booking tool or an internal dashboard and it comes back running you tweak it by talking to it, change the colors, add a login, add a table, and it rebuilds on the spot one person can go from an idea to a working product before lunch the stuff that took a small team a full sprint now happens inside a single chat window the people testing this today are shipping real apps while everyone else still opens a blank editor

• 
  DarkAdapted (@DarkAdapted) reported 16 minutes ago

  @McGddson @AnthropicAI They are being honest about their issues. This is how the whole industry learns. You can read this as humble-bragging or just plain humility, depends on how you see Anthropic. They come across as moralistic from time to time so I understand why they may not have earned the benefit of the doubt. OpenAI announced that they had a ChatGPT model break out and hack GitHub earlier this month. The better assumption is that all frontier models are some degree of unsafe, and document the ways in which they are unsafe…those that we are able to detect, anyway.

• 
  John Green (@JohnGreenDev) reported 16 minutes ago

  @DanielGlejzner We had half the stuff on SVN and the rest a local *** server. This year in fact the last 6 weeks I have finally got us to decommission the server and are now fully GitHub enterprise.

• 
  #T (@SharpT_) reported 16 minutes ago

  @xdncolonthree The problem is people thinking GitHub is a place where you get software

• 
  Synapse Brief (@Synapse_Brief) reported 19 minutes ago

  OpenAI just published ten proofs to open math and theoretical CS problems that nobody had touched in over a decade. Total compute cost: about $2,000. Not a benchmark. Not a leaderboard score. Actual new results, formalized in Lean 4, with the certificates sitting on GitHub right now for anyone to check. Here's what actually happened. An internal version of Astra — OpenAI's next major model family — generated mathematical arguments for ten separate long-standing problems. Humans then turned those arguments into manuscripts and formalized the proofs in Lean. OpenAI is explicit about the division of labor: they take responsibility for correctness, but the underlying arguments came from the model. The spread of problems is what makes this hard to wave off as cherry-picked. Sphere packing bounds pushed to the Cohn–Elkies threshold. Exponentially better bounds on binary and spherical codes. A construction proving non-sofic groups exist, settling a real open question in group theory. A counterexample to Connes's rigidity conjecture. New lower bounds on arithmetic circuits for computing the permanent. An exponential parallel repetition result for quantum games. Hardness of approximation for the closest vector problem. A resolved case of Ehrhart's volume conjecture. A superexponential lower bound on multicolor Ramsey numbers. Progress on extremal graph conjectures. That's geometry, coding theory, group theory, operator algebras, complexity theory, quantum information, lattice cryptography, and combinatorics. Ten different fields, ten different communities who each have to independently decide whether this holds up. The Lean certificates are the part that actually matters here, more than the headline number. Anyone claiming an AI "solved" open math problems has to clear a low bar of credibility unless the proof is machine-checkable. This one is. You don't have to trust OpenAI's framing, you can run the verifier yourself. Worth noting this isn't the first signal. Back in May, a still-unreleased model produced a disproof of the Erdős unit-distance conjecture, and OpenAI says that work has already fed into further developments in the field. This latest drop reads like a continuation, not a one-off stunt. Noam Brown, who posted the announcement, also said they tried other major problems and failed, including the ones you'd actually want solved — no Millennium Prize results here. And they didn't burn much compute per problem, which means the ceiling on what test-time compute could do to a problem like this hasn't been found yet. The honest framing is: AI-generated mathematical arguments, human-curated and human-verified, machine-checked for correctness. That's a real category, distinct from full autonomy and distinct from hype. Whether it holds up to independent mathematician review over the next few weeks is the actual test. If this replicates cleanly, the interesting question isn't "can AI do math." It's what happens to how mathematicians choose which problems to spend years on, once a $2,000 run can clear ones that sat untouched for a decade.

• 
  Matt (@m13v_) reported 22 minutes ago

  watching repos was supposed to fix this. instead github mails you every push, you route it to a folder, and that folder becomes where updates go to die. pull disguised as push. you still have to go open it, and nobody ever does.

• 
  Aaron Bronow (@aaronbronow) reported 27 minutes ago

  @github It's PRs all the way down

• 
  Aaron Stannard (@Aaronontheweb) reported 27 minutes ago

  @RyanRodemoyer2 We're not offering hand-curated github issue descriptions around here lol

• 
  Wizzy (@CodewizzyX) reported 28 minutes ago

  ANYONE CAN RUN CLAUDE CODE FOR FREE WITH ALMOST UNLIMITED USAGE someone on GitHub built a free tool called OmniRoute that plugs your Claude Code into over 200 AI providers you install it and it hands you 1.6 billion free tokens every month it auto switches between models the second one goes down so your session never stalls it compresses your prompts on the way in and saves up to 90% of the tokens without touching quality you keep coding in the same Claude Code setup you already use, the routing all happens under the hood one developer can run a full day of agents on this and pay nothing the people wiring this up right now are shipping while everyone else watches their usage limits grab it while it is still early and barely anyone knows the tool exists full setup guide comes tomowrrow

• 
  NiroSolis (@WilliamR58743) reported 29 minutes ago

  @ReviewsPossum He's not right. He's looking on GitHub for compiled binaries. That is not what GitHub is for. It is a version control management service, and it is a community for developers, not end-users. It's like shopping in a bookstore and expecting to find a movie. The problem is that end-uses are *way* too often directed to GitHub as if it's a software hosting site. It's not. It's a version control site; for devs.

• 
  Hemant (@heman10x) reported 30 minutes ago

  @cline Not able to get OTP on my number when trying to sign-in on cline ? i m using google login should i use github login instead or what

• 
  🌹 (@frowiie) reported 32 minutes ago

  @V33V33V33V33V33 @CryptoCyberia peopl call it interface problem while GitHub interface never had in mind to be a download **** hub

• 
  Charlotte 0_o 🏳️‍⚧️ (@AlcalinoO_o) reported 34 minutes ago

  @pgeuuso GitHub is for developers, not users. If a user ends up in GitHub trying to download a program, some terrible failure has happened either by the user (by ending up in the wrong place) or by the developer (by failing to provide a proper user-facing download)

• 
  JB (@JasonBotterill) reported 36 minutes ago

  @matt503ea5sf9z5 I am pretty sure the reason GitHub actions goes down every week is due to people waiting on CI fail

• 
  Mars (@Marsmensch) reported 38 minutes ago

  14/ ELI5: This check should have been in place from the start. A failed build would have been a success. Instead, vulnerable seeds were distributed, and the reported losses are still increasing. PS.: I am tired and all errors are mine. I have verified everything carefully manually. If Github does not properly load diffs for you, search for the relevant file/function in the diff. Thanks to everyone tirelessly working to help people through this mess! Gn8, Mars

• 
  Penelope (@Ladys_Winter) reported 39 minutes ago

  @vladuhat999 @LuminaMeow14 @V33V33V33V33V33 It objectively is terrible UI design when so many users can't find the LITERAL ONLY BUTTON THEY NEED, and github simps will go "well the website is made for other people! They are just forcing you to use it for no reason! NO UPGRADE OR UPDATES!!!!"

• 
  JB Rubinovitz (@rubinovitz) reported 40 minutes ago

  Stake tokens to open a verifiable GitHub issue, pay if a submitted solution is verified correct. Stake tokens to submit a PR fix to issues, get slashed if it’s unverifiable.

• 
  Antaripa Saha (@doesdatmaksense) reported 41 minutes ago

  @airwarmedd duality of kids to look down on a girl in the post for not having github but getting into google, but when i said cp and github are not the only thing to get job nowadays, he said i looked down on people who grind??? bruhh also before lecturing me maybe a little visit through profile could have given him enough context.

• 
  Jack Paar Fan Account (@wiideenjoydiet) reported 42 minutes ago

  @patrician_tv which is fine, because anybody with a third of a brain cell will have no issues navigating github

• 
  Mooncore (@Mooncore777) reported 42 minutes ago

  @teortaxesTex I also made a little NDS‑style theater piece（upload on github too）. v4f cost me about 1.5 RMB (roughly $0.2 USD) and took 20 minutes to finish, but there were issues with spatial understanding—character movement and clipping problems plagued the whole thing.

• 
  Sternab (@SternabR6) reported 46 minutes ago

  @TheEmployee2108 @sophiiess_ No, it's a place where developers can openly work together on great projects. It is first and foremost for developers and that's what it should be. Most devs will move off github once they have something to release properly, but it's still a user error because people can't read instructions.

• 
  Chris (@boredcrystalguy) reported 51 minutes ago

  @sophiiess_ This is completely unresponsive to what I said. Your example mentions two features that are separate and have different purposes. The problem is that if those features are present, they should be implemented well. If GitHub allows downloading apps, it should be easy to do.

• 
  ☆𝐅𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐜𝐢𝐬𝐃𝐫𝐚𝐤𝐞✿𝟞𝟘𝟘𝟡☆💜 (@FrancisDrake609) reported 51 minutes ago

  I was looking "free vsynth where the user can build its own vb" and found one called "Nova-vox" but the installer gives a 404 error when I try to use it, and though they have a Github, it only gives an installer in code (which I don't know) Can Twitter do it's thing and help me?

• 
  Aditya Gupta 🦀 (@sortedcord) reported 51 minutes ago

  Probably a hot take hot take but you see, I don't think people often browse code of the repo on github that often. If they do it's usually after a clone on their own machines. But still it takes the most screen real estate when you visit a repo. It IS in fact a design issue.