GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (58%)
• Errors (32%)
• Sign in (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Haarlem	Sign in	5 hours ago
Villemomble	Website Down	5 hours ago
Bordeaux	Website Down	4 days ago
Ingolstadt	Errors	8 days ago
Paris	Website Down	9 days ago
Berlin	Website Down	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Craig Kerstiens (@craigkerstiens) reported 2 minutes ago

  @juliknl @mscccc One shared schema is generally quite fine, RLS gives you extra guaranteed enforcement. ORMs can be okay about protecting this, but defense in depth in terms of access to the data is not a bad thing. I know Mike we'll say we just had amazing developers at GitHub that knew how this worked and we didn't have problems. If everyone thinks they have a set of the best developers in the world great, but evidence is not everyone is that good and having something like the database protect you is not a bad thing. Things like actually separate databases per customer aren't inherently bad, but you need orchestration to manage across that. There isn't a right or wrong way. Sorry to not be more black and white controversial, RLS can be a good thing, a database per customer has some pros (and cons), but also 1 shared schema and customer data mixed together is totally fine and can work (but also has tradeoffs).

• 
  AI Highlight (@AIHighlight) reported 9 minutes ago

  Stop wasting hours on server configuration just to launch a simple app. Hostinger now offers 1-click GitHub deployment for Node.js at a flat $3.99 monthly rate. It is the fastest way to turn your code into a live URL without the usual DevOps headaches.

• 
  ⚔️Digital 👹 Ronin, PhD⚔️ (クラッシュ・オーバーライドX) (@joshlee361) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Chaos2Cured @grok i do have a network planned out for this exact type of system a p2p next gen community compute network ill see if i can find the docs i might need to add you to the github again i think it timed out when you didn't accept it so ill add you again so you can dig into it but i got you bro these labs think they got all the smart people in the world but not all academics are "intelligent" ive seen alot of "piggy backing" off others personally i been down because despite having a custom from scratch model trained weights and the whole technical chops and these labs tell me im not a fit despite me being the ideal candidate on paper minus the phd title or some big school name im college educated and have a few associate degrees but eh what do i know right lol like i said brotha chin up we will always prevail over the lies and the theater whats done in darkness shall be revealed in the light

• 
  Cryptosailor (@robertdavid010) reported 10 minutes ago

  @lavanetxyz The GitHub problem is a real problem for projects wishing to be decentralized. Did y'all check out @gitopiaDAO?

• 
  Nagarani (@SNagarani1419) reported 12 minutes ago

  @melobreaks True GitHub is the closest thing to “proof of work” in dev you can fake profiles but you can’t fake consistent commits, real projects, and problem-solving over time.

• 
  Ibrahim Makanjuola (@iMaksxAI) reported 12 minutes ago

  @webdesignerng Heroku doesn't have a free tier anymore, unless you have the GitHub developer student pack. I mostly use Render and Vercel. Neondb for database and quick OAuth setup, mainly because it scales down to zero and doesn't get deleted due to inactivity.

• 
  Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james) reported 13 minutes ago

  @davidfowl @ksemenenk0 Hence why it’s completely unready for production. Everyone is focused on AI and your core services have major issues. Here a simple list: Azure app services: 1. Voluemount errors constantly on deploys 2. Volume mount errors don’t cause a job run to fail, just hang 3. GitHub actions for deploys don’t detect failure at all and thus leave your entire system down routinely because it doesn’t verify success. 4. UI for jobs can’t cancel failed/hung so you have to go to the cli. 5. Jobs logs has that antiquated mess of logging reporting from 10+ years ago and is awful. Azure k8s: 1. Azure storage mounts are 95% slower than they should be. None of the drivers solve it. 2. NFS is this complex mess of VPN like stuff and other crud and if you set it up, your k8s gets throttled by azure sql and other stuff outside the networking crap even if it’s internal and then your perf goes to hell. All of these are well documented on multiple GitHub repos. Someone senior should take an interest in making azure app container services an actually good product to go with aspire. (And then go and fix k8s later although you’ll probably fix k8s by fixing your managed k8s)

• 
  BLOK® (@dotblok) reported 19 minutes ago

  They plugged Auth0, Google, or GitHub into their auth layer. Convenient. Documented. Widely used. But now their users' identity lives on someone else's server. One API deprecation. One terms change. One outage. And your users lose access. Not Google's problem. Yours.

• 
  Cynthia Ozumba (@CynthiaOzumba) reported 24 minutes ago

  Stop telling them you're a "Fast Learner." Show them a screen recording of a dashboard you built, a 1-page strategy you wrote, or a technical problem you solved. Link your Notion Portfolio or GitHub at the very top. Let the work speak before they even see your Location.

• 
  Li Bin (@OrNot2024) reported 27 minutes ago

  @pyronaur @badlogicgames Same issue only for Codex but not for github

• 
  REVENGE ARC (I'M HIM. BIO/ACC) (@RetardedNi85688) reported 29 minutes ago

  9k -30k already on $kirite. Checked the GitHub and everything checked out for me read below 👇 $KIRITE is structured as three layers working together: Confidential Transfers → hides amounts Shield Pool → breaks transaction links Stealth Addresses → hides recipient Heavy client-side responsibility - Proof generation → done in browser - Encryption → done locally No plaintext leaves the client That means: the server literally cannot see your data even if compromised Uses @solana-native primitives Instead of: custom ZK systems with trusted setups They used: Confidential Balances (Twisted ElGamal) native token extensions Clean separation of responsibilities in code The repo is actually well organized: - programs/ → on-chain logic - sdk/ → client abstraction - cli/ → user tooling - circuits/ → proof system That tells you: they’re thinking in systems, not just shipping a demo. The “nullifier + commitment” design is standard: They didn’t reinvent the wheel: Merkle tree commitments nullifiers for double-spend protection 👉 That’s the same pattern used by: Tornado Cash most serious privacy protocols So: they’re using proven cryptographic patterns, not experimenting recklessl They show: ~400–700ms execution low compute cost client-side proofs <1ms That suggests: this is designed for actual usage, not just theory This is what stood out most: They intentionally hide: commitments nullifiers pool mechanics From the user. 👉 That’s the key insight: they’re not building a privacy protocol they’re building a normal wallet with invisible privacy $KIRITE isn’t interesting because it hides transactions it’s interesting because it hides the complexity of hiding them

• 
  shrigma.base.eth (@shrigmuh) reported 30 minutes ago

  @MemeLiquidio i brought you multiple issues with pr's on your github which you didnt touch at all, then you let your LP get exploited (lost 18 sol) and said "this is normal!" and **** the LP's what a joke

• 
  Sanidhya Vijayvargiya (@sanidhya903) reported 31 minutes ago

  2/ We grounded our study in real SWE-Bench issues. When a GitHub issue is underspecified, what's actually missing? We analyzed underspecified issues and found 6 types: error info, reproduction steps, implementation details, expected behavior, external references, version/env.

• 
  0xSatya (@satyaorz) reported 33 minutes ago

  Just a reminder to always check for known issues in different branches, open/closed issues, pull requests of that github repo and any other doc available before you submit that report for your bug bounty

• 
  yung_gunzzz (@Michaelgunzzz) reported 33 minutes ago

  First,Ai doesn't understand problems the way humans do.Tool like ChatGPT or GitHub or copilots can generate codes but they rely on you to: Define what needs to be Built. Decide the architecture. Spot mistakes or security issues.

• 
  samir (@samirettali) reported 36 minutes ago

  @github wow beautiful, can you fix the back button never working?

• 
  Jay Ghiya (@BeLikeBumblebee) reported 40 minutes ago

  @badlogicgames 1. does not have adequate information apologies. 2. Twitter is not an issue tracker usually. i never talk about it here usually but this got v annoying so yea :) so was recording a video tool and will attach the same in github.

• 
  Zeerabets (@Zeerabets) reported 42 minutes ago

  unpopular take but i think linear is dying. watched 3 startups this month move to plain markdown files + github issues because AI agents read them better. your project management tool is now optimized for humans and that's becoming a liability

• 
  Non-Linear (@nonlinear_james) reported 42 minutes ago

  @davidfowl @ksemenenk0 I don't think it is. If you're claiming that Aspire is almost ready to deploy with ci/cd into Azure (presumably), and you're working on GitHub ci/cd, you need to know that you're walking into a minefield because Github actions for deployment are woefully inadequate for production deploys, and you have massive bugs in Azure products that will make Aspire suck and make Aspire look very bad. Instead of deflecting, you should be taking this to your team and using your clout to get Azure people to actually prioritize their bugs and fix this, while also getting whomever is responsible for Github Actions for deploy to these services to fix their massive failures that will result in production downtime for your customers. I get you wanted to make a marketing tweet, but better marketing is actually taking responsibility for your company's buggy product and getting it fixed. Meanwhile your two main competitors have none of these issues and their stuff actually works. (Cue: go ahead and switch passive aggressive response, to which I say that it will cost MS about $4.5 million / year if I do. And yes, even with that level of clout everyone in Azure has deflected and not got this fixed despite me being on with senior executives in the Azure team whom have admitted I'm correct and these are issues, which is telling.)

• 
  Sagar Goyal (@sagar_269) reported 43 minutes ago

  Github down?

• 
  Degen Sing (@degensing) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Saanvi_dhillon Btech's lower unemployment isn't the degree - it's that engineers are forced to build ugly, broken things on github before they graduate. shipping something embarrassing beats having a polished portfolio of nothing.

• 
  Abhinav (@Abhinavstwt) reported 44 minutes ago

  So yesterday, I joined a Discord server Right after I joined, they started openly mocking this project and said they could build it completely with AI in under 24 hours I checked his GitHub, he hasn’t built ****. Why judge someone when you don’t even have projects to back up your skills? 🤡 Talk is cheap. Build something.

• 
  Andy🟢 (@AndyWallsQ) reported 45 minutes ago

  Github down, they removed Cloud Opus 4.6 for 4.7 , they are charging x7 tokens vs X3 for this garbage

• 
  *** (@uzairansar) reported 47 minutes ago

  @stocktalkweekly Anthropic has been severely rate limiting recently. GitHub copilot also took down their Student and Pro plans to serve compute to enterprise and higher tier customers.

• 
  ifenpay (@ifenpay) reported 50 minutes ago

  I'm quitting crypto. Need to pay the bills. Anyone interested in the server API, if not I will remove everything on github. $xno

• 
  Serious Meester (@G19901983) reported 51 minutes ago

  @nahcrof Login via Github would be mega nice, any plans on that?

• 
  Viktor Bijlenga (@viktorbijlenga) reported 51 minutes ago

  @marcelpociot Would it be possible to extend the Github issue template for @getpolyscope to accept bug reports for the mobile interface as well?

• 
  TheLewisFiles (@TheLewisFiles) reported 52 minutes ago

  @github Your account suspension reinststement form requires a login to access it... can't log in if you've blocked access.. so.. can't sumbit your form ... so how do people go about getting their account re-instated?

• 
  JYN (@jynxbt) reported 54 minutes ago

  internet discovery is dead its just an endless loop of the exact same garbage > startup raises $10 m? an overengineered clone of something that already exists > repo hits 40K GitHub stars? just another rag / ai agent slop entirely generated by claude (a wrapper of wrappers) > influencer pumping a tool? a $20/mo subscription for a basic gpt-5 wrapper. the problem isn't that new things are hard to find. its that you have to sift through an ocean of absolute trash its literally just spam at this point

• 
  0xJumpJump (@0xNinjaS3c) reported 57 minutes ago

  @alpernae @nmatt0 File not found error on your github?