Is GitHub down?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at GitHub. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.
-
Errors (46%)
-
Website Down (43%)
-
Sign in (10%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
| Errors | ||
| Sign in | ||
| Errors | ||
| Errors | ||
| Errors | ||
| Website Down |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
The Moisrex
(@the_moisrex) reported
@Salimp2009Salim @evernote But so far, the issues seem a better solution since I can gather my thoughts, discuss them, add sub-tasks for each issue, and I kinda liked how the old "Projects" part of the github worked, but the new beta version of Projects is just confusing as it doesn't work for repos.
-
The Moisrex
(@the_moisrex) reported
@Salimp2009Salim @evernote Oh no, that's not what I meant; Github and Gitlab have history of banning developers and their repositories from sanctioned countries. It's not like we can backup our "issues" and import it in another platform that easily (though bots can be created of course).
-
Francis Lavoie
(@_francislavoie) reported
@unHybrideEnExil @caddyserver @Tailscale If as you say the format of the ranges can be different per provider, then that's not really a burden the Caddy project should take on. We could make it pluggable, with the right design. Feel free to open an issue on Github if you have a proposal.
-
André Venâncio
(@andrevenancio) reported
@herokustatus @heroku are there any issues? I can't seem to connect a new heroku app to @github
-
Debbie O'Brien
(@debs_obrien) reported
@maxibanki @Netlify @github Yeah I tried that first but didn’t work for me. It just skipped the tests. (Unless I was missing something else). Then I read an issue and tried what was suggested. Then read a blog post and eventually Marcos sent me that line to add and it worked.
-
Immo Landwerth 🇩🇪 🇺🇦
(@terrajobst) reported
@dotMorten They do but it’s the minority. For my area, it’s less than 10 issues a month. The rate on GitHub is much higher. Maybe the dialog in VS could help users to file the issue on GitHub using their account information. However, this complicates that UI flow quite a bit.
-
Dr Lindsay Wells
(@_giantlindsay) reported
I'm talking private source control, not just telling students to put their work publicly on GitHub. Submit by making the marker a collaborator/giving them access. Students wouldn't be dumb enough to share their repo with each other, right? Or is that the main problem? [3/3]
-
surreal putrajayan 🏙️
(@fazleyff) reported
I'm searching up bots that have done so, but the issue is: 1. Some guides on GitHub are a bit vague, showing the code but not the other files they have in the code 2. Others were more clearer, but either posted random frames not in order, or stored every image on the server
-
Connor Jacobsen
(@cnnrjcbsn) reported
@karrisaarinen can it be easier to add a GitHub PR link to an issue if the branch name doesn't match the generated branch name from the issue?
-
.Morten 🇺🇦
(@dotMorten) reported
@terrajobst What I meant is the VS issue embeds the GitHub conversation and notifies the submitter of changes (but perhaps locks the conversation to happen on GitHub)
-
.Morten 🇺🇦
(@dotMorten) reported
@terrajobst I’ve quite a lot been told an issue I filed on GitHub that in my mind was totally an issue with the code on GitHub was a Vs tooling issue and asked to refile for VS (and surprising often yet again got it bumped back to GitHub)
-
always cutting stuff with car keys
(@fart) reported
love to try and figure out which dependency up the chain updated and broke something and all the search results and github issue replies are from a little lord fauntleroy dev *** lecturing people on pinning versions rather than explaining what ******** he did and why
-
Jed Bridges
(@JedBridges) reported
@EricFriedman Dang I really like that idea. Like a prettier GitHub portfolio? What we’re you thinking? Login with GitHub would be cool
-
Immo Landwerth 🇩🇪 🇺🇦
(@terrajobst) reported
@dotMorten Are you suggesting filing a feedback item in VS would create a GitHub issue instead?
-
Cruzito 📼
(@lysolosyl) reported
Solving problems in C? No problem. Using GitHub to submit my code? Yeah, this **** kinda tough
-
Ivo Ilić
(@TheIvoSon) reported
After spending all this time reading docs and GitHub issues to get this slick GH Action + Terraform + GCP pipeline I finally started building stuff out. I quickly realized what I needed was nowhere near the scope I had dreamed of.
-
Brad
(@beeradmoore) reported
@dotMorten @terrajobst Report system inside VS should either ask or detect if this is a VS bug or a .NET bug (where do msbuild reports go to? Should this also report MAUI bugs?) It does not have to file an issue on GitHub for you but at least link saying “.NET bugs should be filed…”
-
asanetargoss
(@asanetargoss) reported
Oh hey looks what's in my feed. Not feeling a strong urgency to do anything about it, but I can personally recommend Fraidycat for cross-site following without getting drowned in feeds or inboxes. Some parts are... down for maintenance... but there are easy workarounds on github
-
Immo Landwerth 🇩🇪 🇺🇦
(@terrajobst) reported
@dotMorten That’s what transferring on dev community is. It closes it there and links to a newly created issue on GitHub. But we can’t preserve user information because a dev community user is different from a GitHub user. As a result, the conversation, if there is any to begin with, dies.
-
Mousa Halaseh
(@MousaHalaseh) reported
@AhmadBawaneh1 I see. Well there's many projects that do the development elsewhere and use GitHub as a mirror or issue tracker only (think of the linux kernel/libcurl for example), the difference is: 1. whether that other place is also public or not. 2. Where are they merging into.
-
Andrew W
(@andreww_mtg) reported
@CT_Bergstrom the github thing is obvious nonsense and the obvious – and strong – rejoinder to my point is "well maybe they shouldn't have all that data" and yes, entirely fair, but that's not an open-source problem, that's a _regulation_ problem
-
Will
(@sdfwill) reported
@terrajobst It can be very confusing to know which repo to file an issue to on GitHub. I understand that’s where the actual work gets prioritized, but there has to be a better way from the tool.
-
🐤kazupon🐤
(@kazu_pon) reported
Dear all of you who support my OSS. I've been a little busy these days with moving house preparation 🏠🚚 Sorry, My response might be delayed for GitHub issues and PRs.
-
Patrick Dinh
(@pattlericker) reported
GitHub issues these days are like "Hey author, I use this open-source library for free (and very likely I earn $$$ from it) but it doesn't support my edge case. It's a huge loss of productivity for me, hence, can you please make it work ASAP?"
-
Immo Landwerth 🇩🇪 🇺🇦
(@terrajobst) reported
@dotMorten Maybe. However, in my experience there is little to no community on dev community around .NET. Even issues that weren’t transferred receive little commentary. The action is on GitHub. IOW, we could do what you suggest but I don’t think many people would benefit.
-
Godwin Alexander Ekainu 💙
(@godwinAekainu) reported
Take note that as a tech writer, your code on GitHub is the last resort if your article does not teach a reader or solve his tech problem properly.
-
Craig Barr
(@m0un10_) reported
@fwouts @linear I just followed the bouncing ball from my GitHub repo and found GitHub projects. Not looking to solve problems I don’t have.
-
Dan Bowen
(@danpbowen) reported
@BecomingDataSci @paulballen I believe Musk mentioned it would be like having it on GitHub and people can submit issues and whatnot, so everyone can see exactly the methods they're using to populate feeds and whatnot. I suppose the data that that code would operate on would still remain private.
-
Arnav Zedian
(@arnavzedian) reported
@heroku Please fix the GitHub integration
-
Immo Landwerth 🇩🇪 🇺🇦
(@terrajobst) reported
@MedoDomagoj @scalablecory Several reasons. One is that GitHub issues don't have enough metadata to store the data captured and we need a different backend to query it anyway so they ended up building their own system.