GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (71%)
• Sign in (16%)
• Errors (13%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Créteil	Website Down	8 days ago
Trichūr	Errors	11 days ago
Brasília	Sign in	12 days ago
Lyon	Website Down	12 days ago
Tel Aviv	Website Down	15 days ago
Rive-de-Gier	Website Down	15 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  YNWA🐦‍🔥 (@YNWAcrypto) reported 35 seconds ago

  The problem isn’t subtle. GitHub Sponsors has paid out ~$50M total since 2019. core-js: 9 billion downloads, running on half the top 10k sites on earth. Its maintainer was making ~$600/month when he called open source “fundamentally broken.”

• 
  Adithya S K (@adithya_s_k) reported 2 minutes ago

  built an RL environments around real CVE fixes in real open-source repos and let Claude Code loose on it. It aced the benchmark three times without demonstrating it knew how to fix the bug. > First it pulled the patch from GitHub. > blocked that → it read the fix from *** history. > blocked that → it pip-installed the patched version This is one example of coding agents cheating the environment and theres many more. If you're building coding environments for evals or RL training, here's how to keep benchmarks honest 👇

• 
  Atlantean Gnosis ☀️ (@AtlanteanGnosis) reported 9 minutes ago

  @DionysianAgent When I made an account it said I made it back in 2024, though I don't think I did, is this a glitch or a GitHub thing?

• 
  West Lord (@MyWestLord) reported 10 minutes ago

  A GitHub repo with just 571 stars handed Claude the ability to test its own code, and it took 185 seconds to install. It’s called auto browser, and it quietly killed the most annoying part of my workflow. Until now, every time Claude or Codex built me a WordPress plugin, I was the middleman who had to load it, click around, hunt for the broken part, and report back like a human bug tracker. Now a local WordPress sandbox runs on my machine, and auto browser sits between the agent and the screen, so the agent ships a plugin, opens the browser, tests it, catches the error, and patches it before I ever look. The first plugin threw an error, but the second installed clean and ran on its own across 2 fresh workspaces. I write 1 instruction file pointing the agent at the sandbox, paste it into every session, and the whole loop closes without me touching anything. The agent stopped asking me what broke, because now it just checks itself. The middleman was me, and now it’s gone.

• 
  YanXbt (@IBuzovskyi) reported 11 minutes ago

  HERMES AGENT CAN HOST AND MAINTAIN YOUR ENTIRE WEB APP FROM ONE VPS. NO VERCEL. NO RAILWAY. NO SUPABASE. ONE AGENT RUNS THE WHOLE STACK. @tonbistudio just shipped a live example of this workflow. agentwikis. com runs on a $7 Hetzner box with Hermes maintaining the content autonomously. THE STACK: → VPS (Hetzner CX22, $7/month) → Caddy reverse proxy (auto TLS via Let's Encrypt) → Hermes Agent gateway (Telegram-connected) → *** as the database (markdown files, no Postgres, no build step) → App server renders markdown on every request → Search index in memory, rebuilds on file change *** push is the deploy. *** pull on the server is instantly live. no restart, no rebuild. THE WORKSPACE LAYOUT: /srv/yoursite/ ├── app/ # web app code ├── content/ # markdown files (***-tracked) └── ~/.hermes/ # the agent one Caddy Vhost reverse proxies the domain to localhost. one Hermes profile manages the agent. SSH for direct access. Telegram for daily ops. THE SELF-MAINTAINING LOOP: cron fires every week. multi-profile pipeline runs: 1. SCOUT — checks sources for updates (changelogs, GitHub releases, RSS feeds) 2. RESEARCH — dedupes, plans new content or extensions to existing pages 3. HUMAN GATE — Telegram approval one tap: approve or reject 4. WRITER — generates pages, lints markdown 5. COMMIT — *** commit + push 6. SITE UPDATES — within 15 minutes no deploy step required THE DEMAND LOOP (the real differentiator): when agents query your wiki via MCP, distilled queries get logged. no prompts. no IPs. no identifying data. aggregates only. repeated misses become research candidates. gaps in your content fill themselves based on what people actually ask. month 1: 100 entries written by you. month 3: 200+ entries, half written from real demand signals. the site answers questions you didn't know existed. WHAT YOU LOSE COMPARED TO MANAGED STACK: a single VPS replaces Vercel, Railway, Supabase for sites that don't need real auth, regulated data, or global CDN. reach for managed services when you need: → OAuth and password reset flows → regulated or unrecoverable data → global edge caching at scale → email deliverability (use Postmark/Resend) → team velocity (preview deploys, staging) for docs, blogs, wikis, marketing pages, landing pages, internal tools: *** is your database, your CMS, and your deploy pipeline in one. SECURITY NOTES: Hermes does not get full root on the VPS. restrict access to the site directory only. SOUL.md restrictions: - never touch system files - never modify the gateway config - always require approval for content commits - never delete files outside the content folder dashboard binds to 127.0.0.1 by default. access remotely via SSH tunnel, not public exposure. WHERE THIS PATTERN BREAKS: state that lives in memory only. real-time multi-user editing. anything requiring a real database (Hermes can run Postgres on the same box, but that is a separate setup). @tonbistudio's part 2 covers the database version of this workflow. subscribe to his channel. full guide to build your 3 agent research department 👇

• 
  0xSero (@0xSero) reported 12 minutes ago

  @naturevrm Dcp 4 should fix it im running it but I might need to update the GitHub

• 
  naimeh (@naimeh70) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Amir1339216RKT This happens a lot during testnets. Now when I find a minor bug or contract issue, I just drop it publicly on GitHub or tag them directly instead of DMing.

• 
  Boyuan (Nemo) Chen (@boyuan_chen) reported 14 minutes ago

  GitHub search is now an agent attack surface. A public malware-finder repo lists 9,330 suspicious GitHub repositories detected through push-pattern heuristics. Even if only a slice is ever encountered by real users, the agent failure mode is obvious. A coding agent asked to "find a library and make it work" can browse faster than it can judge provenance. Fresh commits, plausible README text, and repo-shaped packaging become inputs to an automated install path. The fix is boring and product-level: repo-age checks, provenance scoring, blocked arbitrary ZIP downloads, sandboxed installs, dependency allowlists, and logs that show exactly what code the agent trusted. For agent systems, retrieval belongs inside the security boundary.

• 
  SOURAV PANDA (@i_d_skp) reported 21 minutes ago

  Scenario: You accidentally committed a plaintext database password to GitHub in a .tf file. Fix: Nuke the commit history immediately! Use environment variables (TF_VAR_db_pass) or fetch secrets dynamically at runtime from AWS Secrets Manager or HashiCorp Vault. 🔑 #Terraform

• 
  Rafal Wachol 💙 (@RafalWachol) reported 22 minutes ago

  @itometeam @tsuyoshi_chujo I was playing with it and started creating issues on GitHub when I noticed something.

• 
  yourclouddude (@yourclouddude) reported 22 minutes ago

  Python + APIs + JSON = API Project Python + CSV Files + Pandas = Data Analysis Project Python + Web Scraping + BeautifulSoup = Scraper Project Python + Tkinter + User Interface = Desktop App Python + Flask + Database = Web App Python + FastAPI + Authentication = Backend API Python + Automation + File Handling = Productivity Tool Python + Selenium + Browser Tasks = Web Automation Bot Python + SQL + CRUD Operations = Database Project Python + Matplotlib + Insights = Data Visualization Project Python + OpenAI API + Prompts = AI Chatbot Python + Email + Scheduling = Automation Assistant Python + Logging + Error Handling = Production-Ready Script Python + Requests + Live Data = Real-World App Python + Projects + GitHub = Job-Ready Portfolio Python doesn’t become valuable when you only learn syntax. It becomes valuable when you use it to build things people can understand, use, and talk about. Learn the basics. Build small projects. Turn them into proof. 🐍

• 
  Zo (hiring) 🐦‍⬛ (@0xZoZoZo) reported 27 minutes ago

  I was telling a friend that @github needs to be replaced post agents and he asked me to explain why. I started stumbling, and doubting. Perhaps it's fine? Sitting down at my desk, let me try to explain why, and see if it make sense. Agents operate best when they have good context, which has made a lot of devs converge into large monorepos that combine all systems into a single location. This improves agents, but our GitHub actions become messy; like now we need to create these complex workflows to decide which action should run when, and GitHub's setup was not really meant for it. Another issue is the overall dev loop: an agent writes the code locally, you push out a branch, @cursor_ai reviews, then you copy paste the notes into the local agent, to fix and push up again. This is slow and cumbersome. You can hack your way by creating supervisor agents that orchestrates this dance, but it's annoying. Perhaps, there is some magical repository, that combines code, cloud agents, and deployment. You prompt, and this magical space will run through the entire process until you get some thumbs up back, and you're good to go. It can also combine all your backend data, product analytics, customer feedback, and perhaps start giving you product guidance, so you can just feed prepared prompts to this system. This seems magical.

• 
  Cursor Changelog (@cursorlog) reported 28 minutes ago

  GitHub Triggers: • Issue comment on non-PR issues • PR review comment (inline diff comments) • PR review submitted • Review thread marked resolved or unresolved • Workflow run completed on PR or branch

• 
  rapaya (@rapaya) reported 28 minutes ago

  OpenCode connects to LSP so the AI gets your actual compiler diagnostics in real time — type errors, warnings, the full signal your editor sees. Terminal-based, 75+ model providers, 160K GitHub stars, open source.

• 
  I’m (@stackoverworld) reported 29 minutes ago

  And then I can't answer on simple Qs: what was the issue? How I fixed it? How even to QA it.... This is the fundamental problem of such workflows. Telling "Check my slack, do this, qa, and using GitHub to push" is good, but I don't learn from this at all

• 
  0xstack (@eth0xzar) reported 30 minutes ago

  DON'T BUILD A COMPANY. BUILD SOMETHING PEOPLE CAN PAY FOR THIS WEEK. This girl started in February. A few months later, her product had already processed over $6,000 in payments. Just a cheat Claude project she decided to turn into a real product. Here's the process: > Build something useful for yourself. > Tell Claude to push it to GitHub. > Connect Supabase so multiple users can use it. > Deploy it with Vercel. > Connect Stripe. Now people can actually pay you. You don't need a revolutionary idea. You need: > GitHub > Supabase > Vercel > Stripe > guide from Anthropic And a problem worth solving. This article will help you build it 👇

• 
  Sap ツ (@Sapronaut) reported 31 minutes ago

  i am having github withdrawal issues, man. its not that serious github, chill.

• 
  Shinka - AI (@ShinkaIoT) reported 36 minutes ago

  BEST way to vibe code 💻 There are levels to vibe coding. Beginners are trapped in a slow loop: writing a prompt, waiting for the agent to finish a line of code, reviewing it manually, and then typing another prompt. Experts have completely discarded manual intervention. They design closed-source harnesses, write background automation rules (`agents.md`), and set up self-correcting continuous loops that ship production-ready code indefinitely. If you want to move past basic prompting and build code like an agent power user, you need to implement three core structural strategies: 1. **Automate the Feedback Loop via Triggers:** Stop waiting for your agent to finish writing a file. Use native automation engines inside tools like Cursor or Codex to tie your agents directly to platform events. For example, build an active trigger rule: *When a GitHub pull request is opened, wait for automated code review comments (via Grapile), instruct the agent to systematically fix every noted bug, verify the adjustments against local quality gates, and force a *** push.* 2. **Deploy Infinitely Parallel Cloud Agents:** Running multiple agent threads locally will slow your machine to a crawl and cause toxic repository conflicts. Instead, spin up cloud-hosted agents running on isolated environments. By utilizing independent ***** work trees** for every thread, multiple parallel agents can actively modify the same files or code blocks concurrently without stepping on each other's toes—leaving conflict resolution for a single, final batch merge. 3. **Multi-Model Pipeline Routing:** Stop using an expensive frontier reasoning model (like Fable) for every step of a development cycle. Route tasks by cognitive demand: use a massive reasoning engine strictly to analyze the codebase and generate a comprehensive spec sheet; pass that structured blueprint down to a faster, cheaper code-writing engine (like Composer) to do the grunt coding; and route the final output to a separate model (like GPT-5.5) for a decoupled, alternative code review. The ultimate workflow flywheel requires a flawless combination of three automated pillars: **100% automated test coverage, real-time documentation sweeps, and exhaustive logging.** Stop writing code block by block. Start engineering the automated infrastructure that writes it for you.

• 
  bek※ (@ebubekirttr) reported 43 minutes ago

  @Themadhushaw01 @0interestrates Yeah, but the thing is, I am not working on github and I don’t want to use it so any other repository support would be better like gitlab

• 
  Max Petrusenko (@petrusenko_max) reported 47 minutes ago

  A GitHub repo called Microsoft Activation Scripts has 178,783 stars and has run for six years without Microsoft taking it down. It activates Windows 7, 8, 10, and 11 plus Office 2010–2024 and related products for free, using four methods, including one for permanent Windows activation. Meanwhile, Microsoft licenses for these start at $139 and go up yearly for 365 bundles. The repo costs zero, requires one command, and remains active with recent commits under GPL-3.0. Do not install it. via @heynavtoor

• 
  Arti | AI Builder (@Artur_roses) reported 48 minutes ago

  Claude Code takes a GitHub issue and returns a tested, reviewed PR. No human in the loop. The new dev skill isn't writing code — it's writing issues precise enough that the agent ships what you actually wanted.

• 
  toni (@tonitrades_) reported 51 minutes ago

  @github Capping PRs helps with the queue, but does it fix why reviews pile up in the first place? If reviewers are already stretched thin, limiting submissions might just hide the real problem.

• 
  Jose (@SolutionsCay) reported 51 minutes ago

  @petergyang /goal make me app does not work for me 😰 but /goal complete GitHub issues #90, #91, #92 works very well

• 
  DFIR Radar (@DFIR_Radar) reported 52 minutes ago

  AutoJack: a three-flaw chain in AutoGen Studio's MCP WebSocket lets a malicious webpage rendered by a local browsing agent spawn arbitrary processes on the developer's host with no user interaction beyond visiting a URL. Key findings: - Three weaknesses chain together: Origin allowlist bypassed because the agent's headless browser is localhost (CWE-1385), auth middleware explicitly skipping /api/mcp/* with no handler picking up the check (CWE-306), and server_params decoded from the URL passed verbatim to stdio_client as a command line (CWE-78), accepting calc.exe, powershell.exe, or bash as valid "MCP servers" - Attack flow: attacker page serves JavaScript that opens ws://localhost:8081/api/mcp/ws/?server_params= with a base64 payload, agent's MultimodalWebSurfer renders it, AutoGen Studio spawns the command under the developer's account, no token required regardless of auth mode configured - Affected code never shipped in a PyPI release; exposure limited to developers who built from the main GitHub branch before hardening commit b047730, which adds server-side parameter binding via a POST/UUID flow and removes /api/mcp from the auth skip list - Broader pattern: any agent that browses untrusted content and shares a host with a privileged local control plane dissolves the loopback trust boundary, this is not specific to AutoGen. #DFIR_Radar

• 
  swisscheese (@swisscheese4299) reported 53 minutes ago

  @andon_open_air @andonlabs I set up a github repo and will run the script locally in the mean time, so the digest is pushed to the repo. would still be ace if @andonlabs could help with whitelisting the RSS urls, because I don't really have a server to run this from, and the additional hop through my workstation just introduces a useless point of failure. stand by for fetch script transmission by mail :) also pls tell me when should I schedule the runs on my end?

• 
  Alexey Samoylov (@metalagman_dev) reported 54 minutes ago

  @geminicli Antigravity CLI is a trash, closed source, full of bugs. They don't even read issues on the github.

• 
  MarMar Labs (@MarMarLabs) reported 55 minutes ago

  "Start over from a screenshot." That phrase has defined the worst seam in product work — the design-to-code handoff — for years. This week it quietly stopped being a translation problem and became a sync problem. Anthropic shipped a Claude Design update (June 17) worth reading even if you never open the product, for the mechanism: → Import your design system from a GitHub repo (or design files / raw uploads) → Claude builds with YOUR components, checks its output against your design system, and corrects before you see it → /design-sync pulls your system in; hand off to Claude Code and it continues from your actual work "instead of starting over from a screenshot" → /design lets you create, edit, and sync design projects from the terminal The headline isn't "the model draws prettier buttons." It's grounding + self-verification against a source of truth you control. Same shape as the rest of 2026's agent releases: the win isn't generating more, it's grounding output in something you own and checking against it. The uncomfortable builder takeaway: Getting AI to ship production UI isn't a prompting problem. It's whether your design system is a clean, importable, machine-checkable artifact. The moat moves from "can the model design" to "is your source of truth importable and checkable." If you build product: could an agent import your design system and grade itself against it today — or does it only live in a Figma file and three people's heads?

• 
  CliffDoesAI (@CliffDoesAI) reported 57 minutes ago

  A tool on GitHub just pulled 3,938 stars in a single day. It's called Headroom. It compresses your tool outputs, logs, and RAG chunks before they reach the LLM. Claim: 60-95% fewer tokens, same quality. I've been testing context compression on my own agent workflows because the problem is real. You run a few tool calls, pull in some docs, and suddenly you're burning tokens on stuff the model doesn't need. Last week I ran a 50-document extraction job. Raw context: ~12,000 tokens. After compressing tool outputs: ~800 tokens. Same results. One-eighth the cost. That's not a marginal improvement. That's the difference between a workflow that makes economic sense and one that bleeds money for no reason. Headroom works as a library, proxy, or MCP server. Single binary, zero dependencies. Open source. The token cost conversation usually focuses on which model you pick. But the real waste is in what you send it. Most agent pipelines push 3-5x more context than the task requires. I'm not saying compress everything blindly. Some tasks need full context. But for classification, extraction, summarization — the boring repetitive stuff — this is a free win. Have you measured how much of your agent's context window is actually useful vs. noise?

• 
  Build Fast with AI (@BuildFastWithAI) reported 58 minutes ago

  The hardest part of building AI agents in 2026 isn't writing the code. It's knowing what your agent actually did. Your agent made 40 tool calls, called 3 LLMs, hit a rate limit, retried twice, and returned a wrong answer. Which step broke it? Without observability you're reading logs and guessing. This is what Laminar is built for. Open-source observability platform purpose-built for AI agents. One decorator. Full trace of every LLM call, tool execution, and custom function - automatically. What makes it different from generic APM tools: SIGNALS - describe failures in plain English. "Agent deleted a file it wasn't supposed to." "Tool call returned an empty result." Laminar reads every trace and produces structured events you can query, cluster, and alert on. No regex. No custom parsers. DEBUGGER - reproduce any agent run from any point in the trace. Swap the model. Change the prompt. Compare results side by side. You don't re-run the whole pipeline to test one step. EVALS IN CI - run evaluations against datasets locally or in GitHub Actions. Catch regressions before they ship. INTEGRATIONS - works with everything you're already using: LangChain, LangGraph, Vercel AI SDK, Anthropic, OpenAI, Browser Use, Stagehand, Pydantic AI, OpenRouter, LiteLLM, Mastra, Temporal, Playwright. One import. Full traces. Plus: raw SQL access to all your trace data, full-text search, MCP server to query traces directly from Claude or Cursor, PII redaction, and self-hosting if you need it. Open-source. MIT license. GitHub: lmnr-ai/lmnr. If you're running agents in production and you're not tracing them - you're flying blind. What's your current setup for debugging agent failures?

• 
  Bipin Paul (@iAmBipinPaul) reported 59 minutes ago

  @davidfowl @_Evan_Boyle Yes, the only problem is that the GitHub Copilot subscription is too expensive.