GitHub status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of GitHub reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by GitHub users through our website.

• Website Down (58%)
• Errors (30%)
• Sign in (12%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent GitHub outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Montataire	Sign in	2 days ago
Colima	Website Down	4 days ago
Poblete	Website Down	5 days ago
Ronda	Website Down	5 days ago
Montataire	Errors	6 days ago
Montataire	Website Down	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Awaisikram788 🇵🇰 (@awaisikram788) reported 2 seconds ago

  @github actions are down.

• 
  Kinder • Grinder (@kinder_grinder) reported 17 seconds ago

  @enesakar Appreciate it a lot Enes. I know you guys has a lot on your plate. I will wait for an update via Github issue or via Ozan, since I am already in talk with him about this in last few months. If you need any more info, please let me know. Peace,

• 
  Ali Zein Yousuf (@AliZYousuf) reported 17 seconds ago

  Microsoft should be forced to sell GitHub. Outage after outage after outage

• 
  Bhanu D — sys/acc (@iBhanuDahiya) reported 21 seconds ago

  The “$19 a month for unlimited AI” era ended this week. GitHub Copilot rolled out usage based billing. Sonnet went from 1x to 9x, Opus from 3x to 27x. A long agent session that used to count as one premium request now costs whatever it actually costs. Nobody should be surprised. The last two years were a subsidy: get people hooked, build the dependency, send the real bill later. GitHub said it themselves: “align pricing with actual usage and build a sustainable business.” Per request pricing was never going to survive agentic coding. The only surprise is that it lasted this long. Going direct is now the cheaper option. OpenRouter, Anthropic API, OpenAI API all undercut Copilot once you run the numbers. If your team has stricter data requirements, run the same models on Azure AI Foundry or Google Vertex AI and just pay infra. The IDE integration is nice, but it’s not 9x nice. The part I keep getting stuck on is what happens inside enterprises. A lot of those Copilot contracts got signed because leadership wanted to “do something about AI,” not because anyone actually modeled what it would cost at scale. DeepSeek and the open source crowd will pull prices back down eventually but by then, most seats are already paid for and the renewal clock has started.

• 
  czverse (@czverse) reported 1 minute ago

  Routines: Claude Wakes Up Working The concept of routines watching your GitHub repo overnight, picking up filed issues, and delivering working PRs by morning is a genuinely transformative vision of async software development. The concrete example of a teammate filing an issue overnight and waking up to a complete working implementation makes this feel immediately achievable.

• 
  Hopper (@Not_Ducked) reported 3 minutes ago

  @A_V_Tech @FreeCADNews I have been doing that. There are some talk of the issue I am having in GitHub but I can’t really figure out what they did to resolve the issue.

• 
  Nate Brown (@ntbrown01) reported 4 minutes ago

  @cursor_ai I don’t want to use GitHub. I want to use my locally hosted Gitea server. GitHub isn’t really that attractive.

• 
  Paweł Huryn (@PawelHuryn) reported 7 minutes ago

  Whedon's headline: "a major breakthrough in LLM intelligence." What they benchmarked: RULER 128K at 95% (long-context retrieval, frontier-tier). MRCR v2 at 65.9% (below Opus). SWE-Bench Verified at 81.8%. Tied with Opus, but Verified runs scoped GitHub issues, not real codebases. What they didn't benchmark: MMLU-Pro, GPQA, ARC-AGI, MATH, IFEval. The intelligence suite every frontier lab publishes. They tested their architecture's strength on long-context retrieval and prefill speed, picked one scoped coding eval where they tied with Opus, and called the bundle an intelligence breakthrough. Different claim than the headline. Early access is live. Technical post out. But "third-party verified" doesn't name the third party. No paper, no weights, no independent replication. Reflection-70B had inference endpoints too. Its scores didn't reproduce. VentureBeat covered it. TechCrunch, Bloomberg, the Information didn't. The press is waiting for someone to run the benchmarks. I'm waiting too.

• 
  Huzaifa (@huzzymad) reported 9 minutes ago

  @github my account was caught in an automated suspension sweep during the April 20th service outage. It has been 14+ days with absolutely no response to Ticket #4305092. This is severely blocking my active client and job workflows. Can a human please review this urgently?

• 
  Just a comrade (@PushinBagz) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Lamar0985056592 @armaniferrante You say this, but look at what eCash is doing... Worth leaving a .1 in right here imo.. the github is pretty cut and dry & 10% is enough for way bigger things down the road.

• 
  Mihaithebest (@realmihai_matei) reported 11 minutes ago

  GitHub putting secret + dependency scanning into the MCP Server is a very good sign. If agents are going to touch real repos, security can't live after the PR. It has to be inside the agent loop: inspect, change, scan, fix, repeat.

• 
  wallie ✴️❇️ looking for moots pls im lonely (@Wallie_hush) reported 11 minutes ago

  I’m in IT i had to deal with 40 year old guys’ ai-github-vs-ms license problems whole week don’t judge me

• 
  Gizmo(Collab Mgr.) 🦀 (@nightpuper) reported 13 minutes ago

  @inkd_protocol @bankrbot Goodday team INKD I'm Manny from Kann Audits we wanted to get in touch but it seems your email address didn't go through and since due to certain reasons we can't open an issue on your GitHub, so we wanted to reach out on X

• 
  Mykhailo Chalyi (@chaliy) reported 19 minutes ago

  One of the reasons for my love for Claude Code, is that I can make it work overnight. What worked awesome last couple months, is just not mega unstable. This is kind of stupid to wakeup in the morning to find out that it was blocked by: > Claude: I need to authenticate to GitHub MCP to list issues. Please open this URL in your browser to authorize. And well, it is authenticated. And it is have backup plan clearly described in context. And for the more fun, when you click a link to get this... Why? Why?

• 
  Ehsan Ahangari (@eahangari) reported 21 minutes ago

  WTF GitHub?! My brand new personal account got flagged instantly for no reason. SMS verification is totally broken — "request limit" error every time. Can't even verify my number. GitHub used to be great but lately it’s gone downhill @github Fix this mess!

• 
  Christoph Nakazawa (@cnakazawa) reported 21 minutes ago

  GitHub desperately needs to fix comments. Comments were supposed to be a space for humans to discuss code but now they are just hooks for robots to talk to each other or for humans to call the robots in.

• 
  Tom Ciszek (@Ciszek) reported 23 minutes ago

  @kdaigle A2A and Agent Client Protocol, GitHub Actions are broken. Call me.

• 
  P@ (@daredevil3x7) reported 26 minutes ago

  @ndrewpignanelli Looks dope! I just have an issue which blocks me to continue I also raised the bug already. I tried connecting my github but it shows 404 error page on github when I click "Connect"

• 
  Tom Watkins (@TomWatkins1994) reported 26 minutes ago

  Trying to use GitHub and getting errors just trying to write comments on a file during code review. How has it got this bad?

• 
  Rubs Murga (@rubs_murga) reported 27 minutes ago

  Github is such a mess rn. I get internal errors when adding comments to PR's now

• 
  Jesse (@jessearmand) reported 29 minutes ago

  100 agents could roughly be estimated to 10 - 50 sessions of 2 - 10 agents / session If you have 50 - 100 issues / tasks per developer and you have 5 devs you could work on 250 - 500 issues claude code alone has 10K issues on GitHub, you’d have to launch a significant number of claude agents to parse, dedup, analyze, reproduce the problem, write new code, tests

• 
  Alison Silva ✨ (@alisonjsilva) reported 29 minutes ago

  @github All of them 🙃 I'm terrible.

• 
  Elliot Hesp (@elliothesp) reported 30 minutes ago

  @pierrecomputer @steipete @github Isn't gitcrawl to solve rate limiting on issues and pr reads via api, rather than where the code is stored though?

• 
  Jez (@JezCorden) reported 31 minutes ago

  @bdsams i think the industry has realized where the value is in AI, and it aint in consumer products. i expect microsoft to reroute compute to github copilot and the like over time, with copilot for consumers gradually stripped down.

• 
  Anubhav (@Anubhavhing) reported 35 minutes ago

  @zeeg everyone wants to fix github, nobody wants to deal with edge cases

• 
  SCOTT (@ScottSummers) reported 43 minutes ago

  .@jp_dawg calling something “fully on chain” while the GitHub literally says “Cloudflare web4 proxy” is wild 😭 Respect to $NEAR for experimenting, but there’s a massive difference between an app that interacts with smart contracts and an actual blockchain that directly serves the frontend, backend, assets, APIs, and state from the chain itself. $ICP canisters are the server. No AWS. No traditional hosting. No Web2 bandaids. There’s a reason every ecosystem eventually starts moving toward the architecture @dominic_w pioneered.

• 
  ARTH 🔊 (@arthty) reported 43 minutes ago

  Self-modifying software, with guardrails. Ship a GitHub clone. Let every user make it their own. And when something breaks, have it fix itself on the fly. That’s what op0 enables. Early tester list is open. Only req: a working deployed codebase. hmu.

• 
  Hopper (@Not_Ducked) reported 45 minutes ago

  @FreeCADNews @A_V_Tech I couldn’t find the github, and the forum posts that are related aren’t exactly the same issue I am having. I am trying to do drilling operations, and from what I understand I just need to select the edge of the hole. Is my hole not complete with that vertex in there? It says the feature cannot be recognized as a hole. Drilling is inherently a 2.5 D operation, why can’t I select a vertex for a drilling operation? Sorry if these are dumb newbie questions

• 
  Sly (@SlyOnChain) reported 46 minutes ago

  Most DeFi protocols lose before they launch. Not because the tech fails. Because nobody outside the team can explain what it does. You've built real infrastructure. But your announcement reads like a GitHub readme with punctuation. The people who would've become your community saw it, felt nothing, and scrolled past. Silence is expensive in a space where attention is the first form of capital. This is the gap I close. Early-stage protocols with real tech and broken messaging.. that's my exact lane. DMs open.

• 
  notvoid (@nxtvoid) reported 57 minutes ago

  @github, how can I contact someone about an issue with my student benefits?