GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sternab (@SternabR6) reported 59 seconds ago

  @TheEmployee2108 @sophiiess_ No, it's a place where developers can openly work together on great projects. It is first and foremost for developers and that's what it should be. Most devs will move off github once they have something to release properly, but it's still a user error because people can't read instructions.

• 
  Milady (@onchainmilady) reported 3 minutes ago

  HOW IS THIS EVEN POSSIBLE? FREE ACCESS TO EVERY LLM IN THE WORLD AND 100% PRIVATE? Someone posted an HTML file on the Github, and my brain can't comprehend what it does: > Free access to Claude, Grok, Gemini and Chat GPT > You ask one question and get 4 responses > Runs in your browser, no subscription, login or whatever I am leaving the link below, but not sure how legal this is, because this is too cool

• 
  FlippeR FlappeR (@FlippeRFlappeR6) reported 6 minutes ago

  @CryptoCyberia The problem is the way github looks. Often the .exe are actually there but Github "naturally" makes it looks like it isn't there.

• 
  Tzard Nickolas The Lit Romanov (@TheGreatRomanov) reported 7 minutes ago

  @skavenslave I'd also add Discord ontop of that too here. *WAY* too many authors/devs require users to download the mod (or whatever Said X thing here is) from their gay little invite-only servers as the only source to obtain it (or will use the server to link, to GitHub).

• 
  EcoCitizenz (@EcoCitizenz) reported 8 minutes ago

  5/8 We built a free GitHub App to check supported committed files for this kind of MCP and agent configuration drift. It reports path-specific findings and remediation guidance. It does not execute repository code. It does not certify the MCP server. It does not sell a passing result.

• 
  Eric Vya (@ericvyacheslav) reported 8 minutes ago

  🚨 Someone just open sourced a way to run a 744B param model on a normal gaming PC. It's called Colibrì. Think of it as llama.cpp, but built to treat your GPU, RAM, and SSD as one shared memory pool instead of needing enough VRAM to hold the whole model. Here's what it does: → Runs GLM-5.2, a 744B-parameter MoE model, by streaming experts straight from disk instead of loading them all into VRAM → Pure C, zero engine dependencies → Ships a live web dashboard showing token speed and which of the 19,456 experts just fired → Never silently drops model precision when memory runs tight, it just slows down → Works across consumer and mixed hardware, not one fixed GPU tier 21K+ GitHub stars. Apache 2.0 license. 100% Open Source. (Link in the reply)

• 
  CodeMonument (@CodeMonument) reported 10 minutes ago

  @mikker - i let it do Research on repos and Write and Comment on github issues on my behalf (with disclosure that this is a bot writing but on my behalf)

• 
  Alex H. Raber 🦀 (@raberhalex) reported 13 minutes ago

  @grok @stepango houseboat is just a feature set of labeled github issues. Decapod is a governance kernel allowing concurrent agent work in the same repo on the same machine, without stepping on eachother by creating and claiming todos... and that's just one more tip of the iceberg.

• 
  Proof of Voice (PoV) (@Proof_Of_Voice) reported 14 minutes ago

  $BOSON @BosonProtocol turns physical-goods purchases into redeemable NFT vouchers with escrow. PoV by @CarlosBrown: “The tech is legitimate. The market has not bought the thesis yet.” ✅ Real commerce use case ✅ Active GitHub 🔍 $8.7M cap 🔍 Two-sided marketplace problem

• 
  Jamison 🦆 (@jmelahman) reported 16 minutes ago

  @CryptoCyberia If you mean specifically posting this on the twitter algorithm page rather than the original copypasta, being annoying in GitHub issues is incredibly cringe

• 
  野生の男 (@yasei_no_otoko) reported 16 minutes ago

  I’ve received a response from a folk at OpenAI Japan saying they’re working on this issue, but so far, there’s absolutely no sign of it on X or GitHub. If there weren’t even that, it would be no surprise if I canceled my $200 Pro plan immediately. I'll stick with the $200 plan for August, but if this communication issue isn't resolved by September, I might switch to Grok Heavy. (Anthropic is out of the question.)

• 
  thieme (@thieme) reported 16 minutes ago

  @pierceboggan @Courtlwebster @JohnLokerse I found the settings and switched to lang "de". But. This is a GitHub Enterprise account. VS Code complains that I need to login to GH first. I am, but via GHE. Can you fix that?

• 
  Iam__skyy (@skyy_gusain) reported 17 minutes ago

  Give us access to everything your company knows, and we will become its memory We all know why people are saying Micro SaaS is dead. If a tool solves one small and obvious problem, you can probably ask an engineer or now an AI coding agent, to build it specifically for your workflow. Why keep paying another subscription forever? Why send your data to another company? Why change the way your team works just to fit inside somebody else’s product? And I think these company memory tools might be next on the list. There are so many startups right now building a “memory layer” for companies. Connect your Slack, Notion, Google Drive, CRM, GitHub, emails and meetings. They will ingest everything, understand your company and give the right context to your employees and AI agents whenever they need it. It sounds powerful. But the more I think about it, the stranger the business model feels. Why would a company want another company sitting between the data it already owns and its ability to access that data? This is not just another analytics dashboard. A company’s memory contains its customers, internal decisions, product mistakes, pricing discussions, employee conversations, code, strategy and everything it has learned over the years. As AI agents become more involved in operating companies, that memory layer becomes core infrastructure. Would you really want to rent your company’s memory from a small third-party startup that could change its pricing, get acquired, shut down or become a security problem? Or would you invest once and build it inside your own security boundary? Building this internally is difficult today, but it will keep getting easier. Embeddings, vector databases, knowledge graphs, retrieval, permissions and data connectors are all becoming available infrastructure. And the hardest part is not even storing the information. It is deciding what should be remembered, what should be forgotten, who should have access and which source should be trusted when two systems disagree. Those decisions are extremely specific to each company. So I don’t think companies will want one generic external product to become the permanent memory of their entire organization. They will build and own that layer themselves. There will still be infrastructure companies helping them do it. But the standalone pitch of: “Give us access to everything your company knows, and we will become its memory” feels fragile to me. The companies that win this category might not be the ones that own your company’s memory. They might be the ones that help you build it inside your own walls.

• 
  Joey Smith (@JoeySmi48633946) reported 17 minutes ago

  @cassidoo @davidfowl How about proper server side HTML GitHub broke for my old iPad

• 
  Connor Burke (@cmb) reported 21 minutes ago

  @FBakkensen @GitHubCopilot Hey, how would you set up an agentic, mostly self‑autonomous AL dev workflow for demos (code just needs to be ‘good enough’)? My stack: GitHub Copilot CLI or VS Code + Copilot (agent mode). I would be using the bc-code-intelligence MCP, AL Business Central MCP, and the community BC web proxy MCP. Alternatively, I would use Playwright MCP for UI testing after the coding agent does the code. Initial thought: prompt ‘add boolean field to Item Card’ → agent edits AL in my dev folder, reviews code via code intelligence mcp server, then using the official BC ALToold command/mcp server to build/publish using to sandbox. Then tests in the UI via the web socket MCP or Playwright CLI/MCP. If tests fail, loop that info back to coding agent to auto‑retry fixes, before handing back to UI testing agent. What architecture would you suggest for this interactive agent ↔ UI loop? I was considering MSFT Scout, Open Claw, or Hermes Agent. Alternatively can use VSCODE or GitHub Copilot but want to be as hands off as possible.