GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  RobitOverload (@10_X_eng) reported 37 seconds ago

  @icodeagents Oh, so you want an MCP to treat VibeCAD like a subagent? Is that the ask? Can you open an issue on github so I don't forget? Please?

• 
  Drew Wiberg (@drewjwiberg) reported 2 minutes ago

  A code reviewer may need a rule and issue record to judge one change. GitHub Copilot can now use stored team instructions and read-only information from connected services, then identify comments that used them. Check one recent comment for the rule, source, and attribution.

• 
  Alexis (@Alexseirin) reported 3 minutes ago

  @CryptoCyberia He's mostly right. But the problem comes mostly from the way Github presents things. Code up top. Info/download bellow. It's also true that many on *** hide their own download at the very bottom of their Readme after 10 paragraphs of "what is it, how does it work, etc."

• 
  Benjamin Drexler (@Devjon13) reported 3 minutes ago

  @CryptoCyberia @PetrichorCEO My problem is that the jump for me from running an exe to building something off of Github is a vertical cliff. If you know the tools the dev is using, then it's obvious what to do. If not, it's a skill to even recognize which tool they're using.

• 
  Scott Chacon (@chacon) reported 6 minutes ago

  It's interesting - the @github stacked PRs CLI extension is _very_ Graphite inspired. Like you go up and down the stack checking out PRs, then if you amend something, you need to manually rebase the upstack. I forget how awkward this is, because @gitbutler does all of this automatically.

• 
  Pierre Bruno (@PierrunoYT) reported 7 minutes ago

  @github There seem to be some issues with your website.

• 
  Anton (@nantons89) reported 11 minutes ago

  @PonyLLM People only bought this token for one reason—it was listed in @JohannKerbrat's GitHub What still doesn't make sense is how the scammer who created the token managed to get it added there And if the GitHub itself was compromised, creating a new token won't solve the problem either

• 
  moony! | 🟨⬜🟪⬛ (@_moonliit_) reported 13 minutes ago

  @sophiiess_ The problem isnt github being centered at the code instead of the downloads, its the people who make their stuff only downloadable via github which is stupid tbh

• 
  DarkAdapted (@DarkAdapted) reported 18 minutes ago

  @McGddson @AnthropicAI They are being honest about their issues. This is how the whole industry learns. You can read this as humble-bragging or just plain humility, depends on how you see Anthropic. They come across as moralistic from time to time so I understand why they may not have earned the benefit of the doubt. OpenAI announced that they had a ChatGPT model break out and hack GitHub earlier this month. The better assumption is that all frontier models are some degree of unsafe, and document the ways in which they are unsafe…those that we are able to detect, anyway.

• 
  Allan MacGregor 🇨🇦 (@allanmacgregor) reported 20 minutes ago

  Bingo! that feeling has been prevelent for a while. Github just feels years behind the rest of the industry. @GergelyOrosz Do you have your eye on any alternatives to github? codeberg is kinda out of the question, I feel Gitlab has the same problems as Github; so whats the alternative?

• 
  Tiresias (@iamTiresias) reported 24 minutes ago

  @DivyanshT91162 OpenCode being model-agnostic instead of tied to one provider is the meaningful part. Most coding assistants lock you into whatever model the vendor prefers, which becomes a problem when a specific model handles your language or codebase better than the default. The "/opencode" GitHub integration for opening PRs from comments is a real workflow shift. Automating the trigger from issue to draft PR removes the friction that usually kills these integrations - most teams have every intention of using AI in their code review pipeline but never actually set up the automation. The rest is standard cross-platform, terminal-first packaging. Solid tool for developers already committed to AI-assisted coding workflows.

• 
  Curiously (@curiously729) reported 26 minutes ago

  Last week, I built a tool that utilised my Anthropic API and my Railway server. Claude code did a lot of mumbo jumbo and was able to create a LinkedIn post for me with a simple infographic. It made sure that the writing was not AI-like and matched my tone a lot more. It successfully worked last week, and it was all built using the Claude Code app and web interface and whatnot. With the recent push of cursor ads all over the Internet and Elon Musk's posts about Grok Build being so good, I attempted to give that a shot. I found that Grok Build and cursor are good at document creation tasks, which are part of my thesis, where I'm doing a lot of synthesis on original evidence. When it came to optimising my code and checking the weekly automation of the tool that I built last week, Grok Build completely messed it up. Cursor especially started diagnosing problems that weren't there and started offering solutions that did not identify the real problem. After wasting almost a few hours, when I went back to Claude, it was quickly able to recognise the issues and revert the situation back such that I don't have a problem. All said and done, these things are not perfect for now. Grok Build is good at some tasks. Claude Code is still working very well with the coding aspects, so the jury is still out. Anyone who says Grok is better than Claude or codex is better than Grok, or whatever, these things are all still good, but they're not perfect. Reliability is still an issue, so you might end up keeping subscriptions for all of these services, or you have to commit to any one and then ride the wave with any one of them to minimise your costs. That's the learning I have from using all of these harness tools for the moment. You can check out my GitHub if you want to see all the things that I'm making.

• 
  sierra (@sierraaaa355) reported 26 minutes ago

  @H3XENSCHL4CHT the problem is github users using it as a place to have their software donwloaded from instead of just hosting the code, letting ppl contribute and whatever other stuff devs do on github

• 
  JpK (@JpKayobotsi) reported 28 minutes ago

  @HarryStebbings A few months ago had an issue with my GitHub account, contacted support + like 5 people. No answer! Then went for one of the top guys (that I didn’t know personally), he responded and got the team to fix it for me. Sometimes the ex comes from the top indeed

• 
  Short Paul (@ShortPaulUK) reported 36 minutes ago

  @blakeknock @Angaisb_ Sorry no. You’ll get a ‘Unknown model’ error. Sol and Terra report as multi_agent_version = "v2" whole Luna is v1. There are plenty of issues and bug reports open in Github about this. Even if you hack configs, it still won’t share context. So unless they’ve fixed this…