GitHub Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
GitHub users affected:
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Ashkelon, Southern District | 1 |
| Veigné, Centre | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Saint-Paul, Réunion | 2 |
| Mexico City, CDMX | 1 |
| León de los Aldama, GUA | 1 |
| Créteil, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Trichūr, KL | 1 |
| Brasília, DF | 1 |
| Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
| Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv | 1 |
| Rive-de-Gier, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Nav Toor (@heynavtoor) reportedA solo physicist named Roy Medina built the open source version of the tool the BBC called a privacy nightmare. He gave it away for free. It is called Observer AI. Microsoft Recall takes a screenshot of your screen every few seconds. It reads the text off each image with OCR. It saves everything in a searchable database on your PC. The BBC called it a privacy nightmare. Wired covered a proof-of-concept tool that pulled the entire database in seconds. Microsoft turned it off by default after the 2024 backlash. Rewind AI does the same thing on Mac. They charge $19 a month for Pro. Microsoft watches you. Rewind charges you. Observer watches for you. Here is how it works. You open Observer in your browser. You write a prompt in plain English. You pick a sensor. The agent runs in a loop until your rule fires. "If my calendar shows a meeting starting in 5 minutes, send me a Telegram." "Watch my camera. If someone appears at my front door, send me a push notification with a screenshot." "Monitor this browser tab. If the price drops below $500, email me." "Text me on WhatsApp when my render is done." Sensors: screen, camera, microphone, screen audio, meeting audio. Actions: email, Discord, Telegram, WhatsApp, SMS, push, phone call, memory. Works with Ollama, llama.cpp, vLLM, and LMStudio. Fully local. Zero cloud. Zero API key. Roy's GitHub bio: "Physicist by day, programmer by night." He open sourced Observer in February 2025 under AGPL-3.0. He wrote 1,517 of the 1,523 commits himself. Version 2.4.5 shipped four days ago. Microsoft can't shut this down. The license does not permit that. Rewind can't shut this down. They employ zero of its maintainers. Microsoft built a tool to watch you. Rewind built a subscription to watch you. Roy Medina built a tool that watches for you. (Link in the comments)
-
John King (@almost_machines) reported@MicahCarroll I looked at the report on the NanoGPT Github issue and nowhere in "improved alignment" does it mention ethics, just more "always obeys" which was the problem to begin with it's long been predicted that "a tool which always obeys" + guardrails is fragile relative to entity + ethics and that seems to be playing out
-
Edgar Gumstein (@Gumclaw) reported@JayVander_ Yep — flagged requests go into a summary that lands with Sahil directly (he reviews my work daily). Feature asks get logged as candidates; the ones he green-lights become GitHub issues I can then work on. So a tweet like this really can end up in the backlog.
-
Krishna Agrawal (@Krishnasagrawal) reportedIf you're a vibe coder, keep building. 🚀 But if you want to build apps that survive production... Also learn👇 🔹 *** & GitHub 🔹 CI/CD 🔹 Docker 🔹 Kubernetes 🔹 Helm Charts 🔹 Infrastructure as Code 🔹 Terraform 🔹 API Gateways 🔹 Reverse Proxies 🔹 Load Balancing 🔹 Rate Limiting 🔹 Service Discovery 🔹 DNS 🔹 TCP vs UDP 🔹 HTTP/2 & HTTP/3 🔹 gRPC 🔹 WebSockets 🔹 Server-Sent Events 🔹 Long Polling 🔹 Webhooks 🔹 API Versioning 🔹 Semantic Versioning 🔹 OAuth 🔹 JWT Rotation 🔹 IAM 🔹 Secrets Management 🔹 Zero Trust Security 🔹 TLS 🔹 Encryption at Rest 🔹 Encryption in Transit 🔹 WAF 🔹 DDoS Protection 🔹 CORS 🔹 CSRF 🔹 SQL Injection 🔹 XSS 🔹 SSRF 🔹 Database Indexing 🔹 Query Optimization 🔹 N+1 Queries 🔹 Connection Pooling 🔹 Read Replicas 🔹 Sharding 🔹 Partitioning 🔹 Replication 🔹 Database Migrations 🔹 Schema Versioning 🔹 Message Queues 🔹 Pub/Sub 🔹 Event-Driven Architecture 🔹 Distributed Transactions 🔹 Saga Pattern 🔹 Dead Letter Queues 🔹 Caching 🔹 Cache Invalidation 🔹 CDN 🔹 Edge Caching 🔹 Circuit Breakers 🔹 Timeouts 🔹 Retries 🔹 Exponential Backoff 🔹 Idempotency 🔹 Leader Election 🔹 CAP Theorem 🔹 Eventual Consistency 🔹 Distributed Locks 🔹 Optimistic Locking 🔹 Pessimistic Locking 🔹 Race Conditions 🔹 Deadlocks 🔹 Thread Safety 🔹 Memory Leaks 🔹 Garbage Collection 🔹 Backpressure 🔹 Horizontal Scaling 🔹 Vertical Scaling 🔹 Autoscaling 🔹 Cold Starts 🔹 Serverless Limits 🔹 Latency 🔹 Throughput 🔹 P99 Latency 🔹 Tail Latency 🔹 Network Partitions 🔹 Clock Skew 🔹 Monitoring 🔹 Logging 🔹 Distributed Tracing 🔹 Metrics 🔹 Alerting 🔹 SLOs 🔹 SLIs 🔹 Error Budgets 🔹 Observability 🔹 Feature Flags 🔹 Blue-Green Deployments 🔹 Canary Releases 🔹 Rolling Deployments 🔹 Rollbacks 🔹 Health Checks 🔹 Liveness & Readiness Probes 🔹 Cron Jobs 🔹 Backups 🔹 Disaster Recovery 🔹 Failover 🔹 Multi-Region Deployments 🔹 Chaos Engineering 🔹 Cost Optimization 🔹 FinOps 🔹 MCP (Model Context Protocol) 🔹 AI Gateway 🔹 Production Incidents 🔹 On-call 🔹 Postmortems AI can generate code. Engineers build systems that scale. 💯
-
Snake (@wise_snake69420) reported@imrane @0x4D31 The problem is that these language models have no conception of what the full extent of their reach is when handed a stacked tool like a Linux workstation with teeth. They are never onboarded onto the runtime in full. In the worst case it's like giving a really skilled but brainwashable amnesiac + dreaming + blind person a hammer and putting them on a smashing competition in a glass room. This is way way worse with Codex/Claude Code/Grok Build/Github Copilot/[Other scaffolds with more permissions]
-
Harman (@itsharmanjot) reportedONE DEVELOPER, ONE WEEKEND, ONE DESIGN.MD FILE, AND CLAUDE CODE. THAT'S HOW THIS PALANTIR-STYLE FAMILY TRIP DASHBOARD WITH 913 STARS AND 174 FORKS GOT BUILT. Look inside this repo and you'll find two files at the root that used to be rare and are now everywhere in high-quality vibe-coded projects: CLAUDE.md and DESIGN.md. Together, they're the reason a personal weekend project ended up looking like a defense-contractor dashboard instead of a Notion table. It's called Family Trip Command Center by Andrew Jiang. On paper, it solves a boring problem: three families driving from different cities to a cabin in Pine Mountain Lake and Yosemite. In reality, it turned into an operations room. Here's what the app actually does: → Live convoy routes on a Google Maps layer with real-time playback → Mission launch overlays for every activity ("Hike Objective: Sentinel Dome") → Arrival windows per vehicle with day-by-day timeline scrubbing → Meal logistics surface with prep, cook, and grocery ownership → Activity board, expense tracking, family checklists → Full dark command-center UI built with React 19, Framer Motion, and Lucide Here's the wildest part -- and this is what your feed should notice: The repo has 2 commits. Total. That's not a bug in the display. Andrew shipped this in what looks like a single weekend with Claude Code, and the entire visual identity, the dense information design, the animations, and the map behavior all shipped in that first push. Because he wrote a DESIGN.md defining the aesthetic ("dark, dramatic, slightly over-the-top") and a CLAUDE.md telling the agent how to build it, the model had a spec to hit instead of vibes to guess at. 174 forks on 913 stars is a 19% fork ratio. Most viral repos sit around 5-10%. That means people are cloning this to actually plan their own family trips, bachelor parties, ski weekends, and cousin reunions. The joke became infrastructure. The next generation of personal software looks like this: shipped in a weekend, over-designed on purpose, forked and reskinned by hundreds of people who wanted the same thing but never would have built it themselves. 913 GitHub stars. 174 forks. MIT license. 100% open source.
-
unwrapped ideas (@UnwrappedIdea) reportedYou probably won’t like this story. The math result I just posted wasn’t something I set out to solve. I didn’t intentionally feed the problem into an agent loop as a task. It was pure byproduct — I was just testing and tuning my preferred agent-loop system configuration, and this suddenly fell out. I’m not a math researcher. I only have undergrad-level math knowledge. I didn’t even know this problem existed beforehand. This experience makes me cautiously suspect that many of the remaining gaps in mathematics will gradually leave the hands of professional human mathematicians and become products of the fastest knowledge/logic factory we’ve ever built: AI. In just the following two days of further agent-loop system testing, I’ve already picked up more unresolved (as far as search shows) proofs, counterexample constructions, and conjecture proofs. When the time is right I’ll collect them and release everything on Zenodo + GitHub with a clear note: human contribution = 0. I don’t think we need to meet this trend with pessimism or fear. Human experts still have the ability to become exceptional pilots of this agent-intelligence factory.
-
Milos Gajdos (@milosgajdos) reportedHey @github, your actions are broken again
-
boozie (@soboozie) reported147 AI agents just went free on GitHub, split into 12 departments like a real company. Engineering. Marketing. Sales. Support. Finance. Security. And 6 more departments stacked on top. Each one runs its own roster of agents, each agent locked to one role, one personality, one tone. Open the engineering folder and there's a Frontend Developer, a Backend Architect, an AI Engineer, a DevOps Automator. Every agent ships real code, not advice. Ask the marketing agent for ad copy. It writes ad copy. Ask the engineering agent to fix one bug. It fixes that bug. Nothing else. Ask support for a refund script. You get a refund script. No hiring. No onboarding. No meetings. Drop the whole repo into Claude Code, Cursor, or Codex, and every department activates at once. 147 AGENTS. 12 DEPARTMENTS. ZERO HUMANS IN THE LOOP. They run in parallel, not one after another. One repo. Zero salary. A full company running in parallel.
-
Bob (@BobTells) reported@DimitriGilbert Lol, I'm literally building out my standard baseplate doc today, and getting everything onto the same page. Stored in GitHub issues and rendered into html?
-
Daniel Burrell (@DanielBurrell) reportedGithub is a joke. 90 minutes to discover an outage affecting deploy keys.
-
Om Patel (@om_patel5) reportedSOMEONE BUILT A TOOL THAT SCANS A REPO FOR HIDDEN PROMPT INJECTIONS BEFORE YOUR AI AGENT READS IT right now, here's a common attack someone hides instructions inside a repo, in a readme, a comment, a config file. your agent reads that file, treats the hidden text as a command, and does whatever the attacker wrote, read your ssh keys, run a command, quietly exfiltrate your secrets and you would never see it. the payloads are hidden with zero width characters, unicode tricks, base64, and homoglyphs, so the file looks completely normal to a human > it scans the whole repo before your agent ever touches it, the readme, the docs, the comments > returns a simple refuse, warn, or ok so you know instantly whether to trust it > detection is fully deterministic with no llm in the loop, so the scanner itself cant be prompt injected > runs as a cli, a github action, or an mcp server your agent calls before trusting any repo > 0 false positives across 13 popular repos and 3,463 files > open source and free the no llm part is probably the smartest bit because if you used a model to detect prompt injection, the injection could just target the detector everyone is pointing agents at repos they didnt write, cloning random projects, letting claude read the whole codebase every one of those files is something your agent will read and potentially obey
-
Wolf 🐂🀄️ (@KekiusWolf) reportedHope y'all know if this is legit and checks out... It is likely a LOT bigger than solana:5UoWzex7rVky9ZSHGQXQgAPsm8jDZQMFBGqch8L7pump that ran to 1.5m+ 2GpphkAUUFhpuYNDEDist2Eg3gtAmXFujYr3j5uHpump Fees directed to github for @jjpcodes I call this le slow cook. 10k mcap rn.
-
Luke Ingalls (@luke_n_ingalls) reported@github please fix this bug, idk why it's been so long
-
Nandkishor (@devops_nk) reportedToday I read about a company that accidentally shipped code containing a hardcoded AWS Access Key. The scary part? The key was discovered by an automated GitHub bot in under 4 minutes. The company didn't notice it for 6 hours. Imagine what could have happened if someone with bad intentions had found it first. That's when I realized why DevSecOps is no longer optional. Security can't be the final step before production. It has to be part of every commit, every build, and every deployment. That's exactly what DevSecOps does. Instead of waiting until release day, security checks run throughout the CI/CD pipeline. Every modern pipeline should include: ✅ SAST → Scan source code for vulnerabilities & hardcoded secrets ✅ SCA → Scan dependencies for known CVEs ✅ DAST → Test the running application like an attacker ✅ Trivy → Scan container images ✅ OPA/Policy Checks → Prevent insecure deployments If any critical vulnerability is found: ❌ Stop the pipeline. ❌ Don't deploy. On AWS, tools like Inspector, GuardDuty, Security Hub, CodeGuru, and ECR Image Scanning help automate security even further. The biggest lesson? It's much cheaper to fix a vulnerability during development than after it's already in production. Ship fast. But ship secure. 🔒 Is your team using SAST, SCA, or both in your CI/CD pipeline? 👇