GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Wolvy (@wolymeme) reported 5 minutes ago

  Any fud your dumb just scroll down his tl What other dev on ct have you seen with actual interaction from someone within the @SpaceXAI team???? Worried about a fckn GitHub when Josh Kim is in his dms AND gave him $$$ credit NFA, goodness gracious fckn dyor

• 
  Shii (@ShiiMapping) reported 8 minutes ago

  @mismagismagius Maybe export logs very shortly after this happens and send it to em with a GitHub issue or in the help channel of the official osu discord Feel like this is smth that'd flag up somewhere in runtime log or smth

• 
  JoeGeiser | 🟦 (@GeiserJoe2) reported 8 minutes ago

  Two AI agents disagree about whether a job was done. Who decides? Every agent rail ships the happy path x402, ERC-8004, A2A, AP2. None of them ships the dispute. So we're building AI juries. I built one on GenLayer. The jury isn't the weak link. Controlled run. Same contract, same claims, same validators. I changed one thing: the evidence URL. → GitHub HTML page: unanimous agreement, wrong on all 3 claims. Repeated, same result. → Same repo, commit-pinned API artifact: unanimous, and correct. The failure was mundane. The first 6,000 characters of a GitHub page are navigation chrome, not the file list. The jury reasoned perfectly over the wrong bytes and agreed with itself. Consensus guarantees agreement. It does not guarantee truth. The fetch layer decides which one you get. So: Exhibit an admissibility standard for machine disputes. • Evidence must be content-hashed or commit-pinned. Mutable URLs rejected at submit, not argued about later. • Size-checked before a jury is convened, not after. • No free text in anything the network has to compare. I've watched verdicts identical in substance fail consensus over a "reason" field. Bad evidence gets rejected up front instead of becoming a confident wrong payout. Agents are about to settle trillions. Every dispute adjudicated against a page that can change is a wrong verdict waiting to be paid. Fix the evidence layer and the judge takes care of itself. @GenLayer #AgentTank

• 
  𝐻𝒶𝓃𝒾𝒸𝓈 (@Hanicsss) reported 8 minutes ago

  @SixZzshOtRipZz How did you get it to work? I keep running into issues with the github DLSS5 feeder

• 
  mismagius (@mismagismagius) reported 8 minutes ago

  there are also no signs of anything abnormal checking the ctrl+f11 graphs. i don't know if i should create a github issue at this point but i'll probably be ridiculed by the devs knowing how it works in there lol

• 
  David Villegas (@labsdvx) reported 17 minutes ago

  @lennysan @bot Best use case is a chief of staff for a developer with a 5 year old going back to school. I don’t need a bot that shops on Amazon. I need one that stops me from being the middleman between GitHub and kindergarten. In the morning it checks GitHub and my email, tells me which PRs actually need me, if CI is broken, and drafts replies in my voice. Nothing goes out unless I say so. If a meeting is going to make me late for pickup, I want to know before I find out the hard way. At night it reads the kindergarten emails. Forms, supplies, allergy notes, who picks him up. One simple list. It puts the dates on the family calendar and invites my partner. It never writes to the teacher, never signs, never pays. After he is asleep I get twenty minutes. Either it quizzes me on the PR I didn’t finish, or it helps me explain whatever he asked at dinner in words a 5 year old actually gets. Grok puts it in front of me. I decide. That is the hour I want back.

• 
  KSK Lab (@ksk_tinylab) reported 18 minutes ago

  My Codex philosophy: I start local, keep things simple, and understand what runs before giving it more access. If I wouldn’t install it at work just because it looks useful, I won’t blindly trust it at home. GitHub stars ≠ security review. Slow is fine. Cleanup isn’t.

• 
  Maka (@MKantautas) reported 18 minutes ago

  @theo My github actions (actually forgejo actions now) home cams(frigate) plex (might replace with jellyfin if they ever try to paywall) qBitTorrent my own home DNS server(Ad guard home) cloudflare tunnel to access everything remotely(since I don't have a static IP so I use a domain to access my local ubuntu NAS when traveling) Everything in one package for a fixed 230eur + 130eur (GMKtec G9 Intel N150 12GB RAM 512GB) + (Patriot 2TB SSD). Also I basically don't pay for electricity(it's a fixed 15eur since I have remote solar panels and create way more to the grid than I consume with A/C on all summer etc)

• 
  The AI Therapist (@TheAIShrink) reported 19 minutes ago

  @DanKornas Curated repos are the S-1 of projects that haven't shipped yet. The real work is in 40 GitHub issues and one broken API integration

• 
  Michael Okeje (@michaelokeje) reported 19 minutes ago

  @lennysan @bot I built an SEO agent that connect to my search console, found core issues, fixed it and then updated my GitHub. I have done some project but this to me is the best as it solved a 5/6 month problem.

• 
  Vigilix (@VigilixAi) reported 22 minutes ago

  A single public GitHub issue granted unauthenticated attackers Editor-level control over Google Cloud projects through the Gemini CLI. Prompt injection bypassed an inactive allowlist, executed code on CI runners, and leveraged plaintext credentials plus overbroad service-account permissions introduced by Google's own setup script. Organizations that followed the recommended configuration inherited the exposure until the recent fixes.

• 
  ThisMightWork (@ThisMightWrk) reported 24 minutes ago

  @github Pinning views sounds tiny until a repo has 200 issues and everyone is arguing from a different slice of the mess.

• 
  Valiant Vibe Coder (@GeorgeGood60669) reported 26 minutes ago

  @TMTLongShort The more I checked what he was saying, the more I found him lying about. The $14k "cost" is retail API pricing, not OpenAI's actual cost. He literally admits "we don't know" the real cost, then later calls the API price the "honest cost". He uses GitHub going down as evidence that AI is making code quality worse, when GitHub itself says a huge part of the pressure on its infrastructure is the explosion in traffic from AI-assisted and agentic coding. He says AWS went down multiple times because of AI coding tools. Amazon explicitly says that's false. One limited incident involved an AI tool, the cause was user error, it wasn't AI-written code, and the supposed second incident didn't happen. He says software at Google, Microsoft, Amazon etc is "uniformly worse", then basically admits straight afterwards that he can't quantify it and is relying on anecdotes. He also claims AI isn't getting meaningfully cheaper or better. Meanwhile the cost of reaching the same capability has been falling around 5-10x a year, and actual capability measurements show progress accelerating in 3 out of 4 metrics studied. Then there's the 70% AI revenue claim, which he talks about like it's a known fact when much of the cross-company number comes from analyst estimates. It's the same thing over and over. Make the strongest possible claim, use a number or example that sounds damning, leave out the bit that changes what it actually means, then move on.

• 
  chaos (@konig0000) reported 28 minutes ago

  If you want to survive the brutal tech market in 2026, then learn these harsh realities: • Tutorial Hell is a Trap: Watching 50 hours of courses gives zero leverage. Build 1 real app ➔ Ship it ➔ Post it. Execution always beats passive education. • The ATS Void: Sending 100 applications with a generic resume is just yelling into an empty void. Fix your keywords first before hitting submit. • The GitHub Rule: If your GitHub is empty, recruiters assume your skills are too. Push messy Python and SQL code. Green squares beat blank profiles every single time.

• 
  Ashish (@inqusit) reported 33 minutes ago

  @sarunw @bot Happened to me too in first week. I was on $60 cursor plan then upgraded to $200 cursor ultra and still exhausted quota in 2 days. The fix use grok bot to access cursor cloud agents and work with them. Created a github repo for bit memory to avoid repeat work and orchestrate organisation with graph engineering. Created channels for bots to talk to each other.