GitHub Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
GitHub users affected:
GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Brasília, DF | 1 |
| Montataire, Hauts-de-France | 3 |
| Colima, COL | 1 |
| Poblete, Castille-La Mancha | 1 |
| Ronda, Andalusia | 1 |
| Hernani, Basque Country | 1 |
| Tortosa, Catalonia | 1 |
| Culiacán, SIN | 1 |
| Haarlem, nh | 1 |
| Villemomble, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Ingolstadt, Bavaria | 1 |
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Berlin, Berlin | 2 |
| Dortmund, NRW | 1 |
| Davenport, IA | 1 |
| St Helens, England | 1 |
| Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia | 1 |
| West Lake Sammamish, WA | 3 |
| Parkersburg, WV | 1 |
| Perpignan, Occitanie | 1 |
| Piura, Piura | 1 |
| Tokyo, Tokyo | 1 |
| Brownsville, FL | 1 |
| New Delhi, NCT | 1 |
| Kannur, KL | 1 |
| Newark, NJ | 1 |
| Raszyn, Mazovia | 1 |
| Trichūr, KL | 1 |
| Departamento de Capital, MZ | 1 |
Check Current Status
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
GitHub Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Fabricio Nakata (@FabricioNakata) reported@ibuildthecloud If GitHub can fix GitHub sucking, why haven't they done it?
-
DissentingSkeptic (@DissentingS) reported@LundukeJournal Im struggling to read ts vibe coded mess for an alpha streaming api. Very hard to read and follow. Took days to fix the mistakes it created with cmake builds. Did not compile out of the box. Which the buggy github bots respond with many errors. TIME WASTER.
-
Nuno Coração (@nunocoracao) reportedThe editor came together fast. Monaco does the heavy lifting. The real battle was CI. Getting Wails to build for macOS, Linux, and Windows in GitHub Actions was a multi-commit war. WebKit deps, build tags, platform packaging. The *** log is full of "fix CI" commits.
-
daily.dev (@dailydotdev) reportedcopilot shipped a debugger agent. give it a github issue, it reproduces the bug and proposes a fix. the ticket is doing your job now
-
DissentingSkeptic (@DissentingS) reported@IntCyberDigest Its changing how much human verification is needed from false positives. Ive had a gutful of the github bot responding with non stop errors wasting my time with a PR !
-
$shaggyrax - Cvlt Member - Hogan Gang (@shaggyrax) reported@Star_Forge_Pool @VICE Once again, they can do all they want on GitHub, but they can’t access those sweet treasury funded salaries That’s the point I even tried to ask for information on, why is it we aren’t utilizing devs in cheaper cost of living places esp where we have poured lots of money into programs for training these devs. Either we are failing in Africa with training, or we are failing here in the states and in governance to provide those opportunities across borders 💙 Does that make sense? I apologize if my approach to the issue ‘disgusts’ you, but the fact we have this issue at all disgusts me as well. So I empathize with your frustration at least some
-
🍃mmx4ps1 🏳️🌈 (@mmx4ps1) reported@POCHOWEK People defending GitHub and giving excuses in the comments; y’all are part of the problem too. Not just GitHub programmers.
-
Petros Amoiridis (@amiridis) reported@stevenharms @thdxr GitLab was basically a GitHub copy with some rewording and different navigation. When they started they weren’t focused on actually offering something innovative. They were trying to be the open source alternative. The second problem is that of critical mass. If most are on GitHub, it feels an inconvenience to join projects that are on GitLab or any other platform. I think only if you build something innovative that changes the version control game without feeling alien technology you stand a chance of winning over the critical mass. If you just go for a GitHub copy you don’t stand a chance.
-
Ofelquis G 👨💻 @ React Miami 🏝️ (@imfelquis) reported@zeeg If only GitHub used Sentry to monitor and automatically fix their code with seer tool.
-
Faith beacon (@faithbeacon1234) reported@MicrosoftLearn FIX GITHUB MICROSLOP
-
Ridark (@ridark_eth) reported> be "student" (even if you aren't) > realize you're spending $9,000/year on software like a clown > GitHub Student Developer Pack: the ultimate cheat code > JetBrains, Figma, Canva, Notion --> all $0. you're welcome > Cloud credits: AWS, Azure, Google. free servers for everyone > MongoDB Atlas gives you $50 just for existing > Cursor Pro for 1 year: AI coding for free while others pay $20/mo > Amazon Prime: 6 months of free shipping and movies > 50% off Spotify, YT Premium, and Apple Music forever > Apple Education Store: cheaper Macs because you "study" > need a .edu email? find a friend or become an "eternal student" > $0 for 67+ subscriptions. just need one email address > saving thousands of dollars while the "pros" pay full price The software industry is built on subscriptions, but the .edu email is the glitch in the matrix.
-
Nitin.nn (@NitinthisSide_) reportedA single 𝗖𝗟𝗔𝗨𝗗𝗘.𝗺𝗱 file just hit #1 on GitHub trending 🤯 It fixes LLMs' worst coding habits using 4 principles from Karpathy: Karpathy called LLMs out for making wrong assumptions silently. They overcomplicate everything. They edit code they were never asked to change. No pushback. No clarifying questions. They just run. So those observations were encoded into 4 behavioral constraints: → Think before coding. If something’s ambiguous, ask. Don’t pick one interpretation and run. Surface tradeoffs, stop when confused. → Simplicity first. Write the minimum code that solves the problem. No speculative abstractions, no flexibility nobody asked for. → Surgical changes. Only touch what the task requires. Don’t improve neighboring code, don’t refactor what isn’t broken. → Goal-driven execution. Turn vague instructions into verifiable targets before writing a line. “Add validation” becomes “write tests for invalid inputs, then make them pass.” It works immediately. Drop the file in your project root and Claude Code follows it from the first task. One file. Zero dependencies. No setup. And best part, 100% open source.
-
andrew pignanelli (@ndrewpignanelli) reported@m_newhaus a github outage, evidently
-
Luke Gough (@Avidityrecruit) reportedYour cybersecurity project does not need to be impressive. It needs to be explainable. I see a lot of people trying to build the biggest home lab, the most complicated GitHub repo, or some massive SOC simulation because they think that is what recruiters want. Most of the time, that is not the issue. The issue is this: You have Security+ on your CV, but when someone asks what you have actually done with that knowledge, the conversation goes flat. Certifications open the door. Projects make the conversation real. A hiring manager can see Security+ and think: “Good, they understand the fundamentals.” But a simple project lets them ask: - “What did you build?” - “What problem were you trying to solve?” - “What tool did you use?” - “What went wrong?” - “What did you learn?” - “What would you do differently next time?” That is where confidence gets built. Not from a badge. From evidence. If you are trying to break into cyber, do not overcomplicate this. Build one small project and document it properly. For example: 1. Set up a basic Windows lab and investigate failed login attempts. 2. Use Splunk or Elastic to ingest sample logs and write three detection queries. 3. Run a phishing email analysis and document the indicators you found. 4. Map a simple incident response process against NIST or ISO 27001. 5. Write up a TryHackMe room properly instead of just listing that you completed it. The write-up matters more than people realise. Include: - what you were trying to learn - the tools used - the steps you took - screenshots where useful - what broke - what you learned - how it connects to a real SOC, GRC, cloud, or security analyst role That last part is key. Recruiters and hiring managers are not looking for a Hollywood hacker demo. They are looking for signs that you can think clearly, learn properly, communicate what you did, and connect theory to real work. So yes, get the certification. But do not stop there. Because the cert might get your CV noticed. The project is often what gives the interviewer a reason to keep talking.
-
Huzaifa (@huzzymad) reported@github my account was caught in an automated suspension sweep during the April 20th service outage. It has been 14+ days with absolutely no response to Ticket #4305092. This is severely blocking my active client and agency workflows. Can a human please review this urgently?
Check Current Status