GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ven (@anyframeisgood) reported 4 seconds ago

  @abue_ammar did you try opening an issue on github at the very least

• 
  Andrew (@Ra3orbladez) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ArnavvSharmaa Me? No i review PRs on Github or Gitlab. But I still do not get the question, how is it connected to the observability, I need to look at what models are doing in separate projects and also have a set of skills/guardrails/workflows to add to new projects, so using such harness solves my problem of context management.

• 
  Justin Johnson (@builderleader) reported 6 minutes ago

  New benchmark, SWE-bench Science: 119 real bug-fix tasks from 98 scientific GitHub repos across 20 domains. Best agent tested was Claude Code on Opus-5 in max mode, and it still lands under 50% pass@1. Adding domain guidance cuts both ways - a poorly aligned hint anchors the agent on the wrong fix.

• 
  StarHaze (@ST4RHaze) reported 6 minutes ago

  11 DAYS IN PRODUCTION, 30 HOURS A WEEK OFF HIS PLATE, AND EVERY AGENT IN THAT GRAPH IS HOLDING A LIVE LOGIN Shmidt is the only one in this whole Grok Bot week who put a runtime on screen instead of a screenshot of the pricing page. His chain is the strongest thing in that post: planner, scout, dedupe, cite check, writer, verify, and the cite check node is the one nobody else is bothering to build. The chain is missing the node that comes after verify. Nothing in it records what an agent actually did with the Gmail and CRM logins you handed it while you were asleep, and approval is not a log. CopilotKit shipped OpenBot six days after Grok Bot went out, MIT licensed and self hosted, a computer per bot, a fail closed policy, and every action audited from day one. It took 2,051 GitHub stars in four days. 7 minutes, one container, no Kubernetes, and a straight comparison of the two trust models. Watch it, then build his stack below with a log you can read the next morning.

• 
  Granite (@Granite0x) reported 13 minutes ago

  🚨 THIS IS ABSOLUTELY INSANE a developer just released a free tool that builds a vertical video with a talking presenter. out of one script and one photo. it's called lanshu-create-ai-presenter-video. it landed on GitHub two days ago. 267 stars. MIT. here's how it works: 1. You give it a script and a presenter photo you have the rights to. 2. The AI writes and voices the narration, generates the presenter, and locks the lips to the audio. 3. The skill edits, burns in subtitles and a cover, checks the sync, and hands back a master with a QA report. 9:16, 1080x1920, 30fps, 45-75 seconds. all of it happens in one run, on your own machine. save this before you sit down to cut your next video. i left the link in the next comment 👇

• 
  Paul Schleifer (@PaulSchleifer) reported 14 minutes ago

  @histoireclimat @ChrisMartzWX @MatthewWielicki Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I could have coded this myself, but I do have a lot of other things to do with my time these days, unfortunately, which is why I had to wait about 5 days before tackling it at all. Anyway, no hospital appointments today, and mum's in too much pain to leave her chair, so I've had time to (manually) edit the page to make it fully responsive and fix a few other things. I actually prefer the homegrown approach to bringing in third-party charting libraries these days. Something as simple as this doesn't need D3 or chart.js etc, and I've got a bit of an aversion to bloating github pages with dependencies (I'm sure that's irrational, but that's how I feel about it). I've also grown a lot less fond of reactive frameworks, despite years of Angular and React. If I had to tackle anything that needed it, I'd probably pick Svelte now.

• 
  Tanner (@theTechTanner) reported 17 minutes ago

  @PremiumGoblin Cursor is what I started using this week, didn't even know it had cloud vms... was brainstorming on mobile and it deployed code to the cloud... I heard grok bot scales better, might have to try it. I've used GitHub Copilot since it came out... To use a cloud agent you can open issues in the GitHub app and assign them to Copilot. It was decent on the go, but I think its behind in capabilities and integrations

• 
  Jesse Nickles (@jessuppi) reported 20 minutes ago

  Update #2: Nope, ChatGPT "Chat" still sucks big time after these latest updates. Seems the new "Work" mode is the only way to get any serious work done, regardless of whether on GitHub or otherwise... they have stripped down the "Chat" mode to be extremely retarded now.

• 
  Jamie 🇮🇹🇩🇪 (@Jamie_The_Gent) reported 21 minutes ago

  @dodendiz @wand So i found the github site but that seems like alot of bullshit its not jjst dtag and drop files ill just stick with FLiNG trainers. His are way better. But he dosnt have trainers for 20 year old games like XCOM 1 thats the problem. I was able to use console commands.

• 
  MJY (@omninomsky) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Tech_girl How would it be able to determine whether the code was generated by AI or people? Realistically what would happen if GitHub would have to spend resources to determine whether the code was generated by a person (sounds expensive). It's very easy to defeat the purpose by being too sensitive (blocking human posts) too lax (allowing too much AI code through) or simply incorrect (blocking humans, allowing AI). It's very hard to get it exactly right. So just from the technical problem alone they probably won't do this. But let's say they did. How does that work out? Well, now people who rely on AI to do their work can no longer use GitHub. They'll probably want to keep using AI so they'll no longer use GitHub. I'm not yet seeing any upside. Less merges per day maybe? Relief for the system?

• 
  Julian Goldie SEO (@JulianGoldieSEO) reported 25 minutes ago

  A GitHub outage just delayed the launch of a GitHub competitor. You can't script this. Cursor was set to ship Origin, its own code hosting platform. GitHub went dark for 6.5 hours that same day. Millions of devs sat frozen. Then Origin went live. → Your code, your changes, and your AI agent in ONE window → Two-way sync with GitHub. Change either side, both update. → Agents live in every repo. Ask questions. It pushes fixes. → Connect Vercel and every change gets a live preview link You don't have to pick sides. GitHub stays the boss. Origin is the seat belt. When your code host goes dark, a second home stops being nice-to-have. Save this. You'll want it later.

• 
  SKIROW 🇺🇲 🏴‍☠️ (@MadeBySKIROW) reported 26 minutes ago

  Cyberleek website is down and GitHub page as well.

• 
  Franklin Solum (@FranklinSolum) reported 27 minutes ago

  Block failing PRs automatically before broken prompts merge to main. Add this .github/workflows/llm_evals.yml: name: LLM Regression Evals on: [pull_request] jobs: run-evals: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - uses: actions/setup-python@v5 with: python-version: '3.11' - name: Install dependencies run: pip install pytest deepeval - name: Execute LLM Unit Tests env: OPENAI_API_KEY: ${{ secrets.OPENAI_API_KEY }} run: deepeval test run tests/test_llm.py

• 
  WhiteFlour (@FirstDeployAI) reported 28 minutes ago

  @liam_fallen I am not a big fan of cursor yet, the way that it attaches so hard to the Github for everything is not a long term thing for me, I plan to get far away from github thanks to Microsoft before they ruin it further. It's down now, at times, I never remembered that happening before.

• 
  Reex (@DenetLink) reported 30 minutes ago

  @francescoswiss @github Same problem i face maybe github issue