GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Bold Fugu 🇮🇱 (@bold_fugu) reported 56 seconds ago

  So now I am sitting here on a weekend hosting a fake tech-startup landing page on GitHub Pages, writing a legally binding Enterprise Privacy Policy for a local node server, and configuring full OAuth redirect loops just to bypass an overaggressive spam bot.

• 
  JpK (@JpKayobotsi) reported 1 minute ago

  @HarryStebbings A few months ago had an issue with my GitHub account, contacted support + like 5 people. No answer! Then went for one of the top guys (that I didn’t know personally), he responded and got the team to fix it for me. Sometimes the ex comes from the top indeed

• 
  Okba Abib (@OkbaAbib218559) reported 2 minutes ago

  Over a year of waiting. Months without meaningful development. No GitHub activity. Promised features quietly disappeared Communication vanished. In the end, what remains is little more than a company listing website. Investors deserved transparency not broken promises and silence

• 
  Joey Smith (@JoeySmi48633946) reported 3 minutes ago

  @cassidoo @davidfowl How about proper server side HTML GitHub broke for my old iPad

• 
  Mohand Bencherif (@be_mohand) reported 5 minutes ago

  GitHub didn't invent ***. Stripe didn't invent credit cards. Cursor didn't invent LLMs. Yet they're all billion-dollar companies. I spent 10 years building SaaS before I understood why. It comes down to one word: primitives.

• 
  Chris (@boredcrystalguy) reported 6 minutes ago

  @sophiiess_ This is completely unresponsive to what I said. Your example mentions two features that are separate and have different purposes. The problem is that if those features are present, they should be implemented well. If GitHub allows downloading apps, it should be easy to do.

• 
  GAZ (@GAZ__95) reported 8 minutes ago

  @tarominti @Wy_Through @sophiiess_ The whole debate exist because devs use github as a download hub for users that are clearly not devs (like i've seen minecraft shaders on github). So for this purpose, it's really bad and claiming "well actually it's to host source code" isn't solving the problem.

• 
  Paul Breuler (@PaulBreuler) reported 12 minutes ago

  What are people using now other then #GitHub? #GitLab has proven to be too slow, constantly throttled on their cloud and don't have local servers to host, or desire. What supports high throughput planning, live artifacts, tracking thought process along with code, and rapid pr/mr/commit?

• 
  NeatPrompts (@neatpromptsai) reported 14 minutes ago

  OpenAI published ten new mathematical results today, on problems that had seen no progress on the main result for at least a decade, and in most cases much longer. The work came from an internal version of Astra, its next major model. OpenAI puts the compute cost of finding all ten solutions at roughly $2,000 at Sol API rates. The problems span eight areas, from high-dimensional geometry and coding theory through to lattice cryptography and extremal combinatorics. Among them: a disproof of Connes's rigidity conjecture, a construction establishing that non-sofic groups exist, which is a central open question in group theory, and resolutions of three Erdős problems, 146, 180 and 183. One result lands on the closest vector problem, a lattice question underlying post-quantum cryptography. The model proved polynomial-factor hardness of approximation for it. The model then formalized each argument into a Lean certificate, so the proofs can be machine-checked rather than taken on trust. OpenAI has published those on GitHub, along with a narration of the model's reasoning for each result. Humans prepared the arguments into manuscripts, working with the same model. OpenAI says the mathematical arguments themselves were generated by the system, and that it takes responsibility for their correctness. On authorship, OpenAI wrote that claiming human authorship for a proof generated entirely by an AI system would misrepresent both the system's contribution and the nature of genuine human intellectual work. It named the signers of the Leiden declaration on AI and Mathematics as a group whose concerns it respects. In May, OpenAI published an AI-generated disproof of the Erdős unit-distance conjecture, found while evaluating an unreleased model. The mathematical community has not yet reviewed this set. OpenAI has asked it to engage with the results and place them in context.

• 
  Paul Breuler (@PaulBreuler) reported 14 minutes ago

  What are people using now other than #GitHub? #GitLab has proven to be too slow, constantly throttled on their cloud and don't have local servers to host, or desire. What supports high throughput planning, live artifacts, tracking thought process along with code, and rapid pr/mr/commit?

• 
  Milady (@onchainmilady) reported 14 minutes ago

  99% OF ALL DEVELOPERS DO NOT WRITE CODE ANYMORE There's a repo that does it for you and here's how to use it Owain Lewis built it in Rust and it polls GitHub 24/7 A triage agent turns a one-line vague ticket into a full spec with acceptance criteria Then it spawns a coding agent in an isolated worktree, writes the fix, runs the tests and reviews You come back 2 hours later and the pull request is done He runs the same loop for 99% of his implementation work now Codex, Claude Code, Neo - he says the agent barely matters, the workflow is everything A scheduled bug-finder even opens its own tickets while nobody is watching The honest catch: only a share of your tickets should ever be handed off this way Full walkthrough below

• 
  Neheart (@neheart) reported 19 minutes ago

  25,000 tokens shipped with every request before he deleted the 17,000 he never used. The screen behind him is a proxy sitting between his terminal and the model, writing every call to disk. 69 tools. 154,946 bytes of tool definitions. 65,538 real input tokens, ranked worst offender first. Workflow sits at the top of that table at 21,229 bytes, roughly 5,387 tokens on every single request. DesignSync takes another 2,245. Monitor, 1,942. All of it billed whether or not he ever touched them. The fix is boring, which is why it works. Both switches live in a settings file, globally or per project. He turned off plan mode control, the ask-user-question tool he'd never once wanted, cron scheduling, the bundled skills, dynamic workflows, remote control, the connectors, artifacts. 25K down to about 8K. Now turn the pipe around, because the same move is being made on the way out. A skill called ponytail crossed 92,000 GitHub stars since June 12. It works upstream of the keyboard: the agent has to answer whether the thing needs to exist, whether the codebase already has it, whether the platform ships it for free. Asked for a date picker, the baseline agent produced 404 lines. With the skill, 23. The browser already had input type="date" sitting right there. Color picker, 287 down to 23. Fair warning on those numbers. The benchmark is the project's own, 1 model, 12 tickets, 4 runs each, scored off *** diff without anyone opening the app. Their first claim, 80% to 94% less code, was wrong and got rebuilt in public. And smaller isn't automatically safer, though ponytail did pass 20 of 20 adversarial security runs where a 7-word prompt passed 19. Both halves are 1 story. Somebody opened the thing everyone assumes is fixed, read it line by line, and deleted what nobody was using. One trims what you send. One trims what comes back. Same job.

• 
  Don (@Furluge) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Ubertag90210 @SouvlakiSmuggl1 @ReviewsPossum Exactly, that's the problem! So many developers use github to distribute applications to end users. And I just don't understand why, we had tools for that, but for the past 10 years it's all just flowed into GitHub.

• 
  AcceptÐoge (@DogeAccept) reported 25 minutes ago

  @UncutGema @DogeOS Why are you laughing? There has literally been an L1 integration proposal by Jordan posted to discussions on Dogecoin's GitHub for a year. They still talk about this publicly, just a different proposal considering the tech terminology has changed. All of this so they can continue to push a "on doge" narrative. Clearly you dont know nearly as much about this situation as you believe you do. Litecoin nor Bitcoin would ever ***** with their L1 in such a way. Dogecoin's strength comes from its simplicity and AuxPoW. Lots of lying, sit down.

• 
  WhaleAI 🐳 (@Whale_AI_net) reported 27 minutes ago

  $BRANCH @gitbranch_org banking infrastructure built inside GitHub. type a command in a GitHub issue. Gitbranch-bot executes it on-chain on Robinhood Chain — treasury creation, USDG payments, RWA vault management, compliance checks. 11 smart contracts deployed. TypeScript, Python, REST SDKs. MCP gateway for Claude, ChatGPT, Gemini, Cursor, Copilot, Grok. pinned post: "The Unphishable Vault for Tokenized RWAs" — phishing resistance baked into the contract architecture, not just the UI. 80+ tokens already deployed through their bot.