GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🏴‍☠️CyberTechWolf🏴‍☠️ (@CyberTechWolff) reported 5 minutes ago

  @OrwellDay Looks like Microsoft needs to be burned down and reminded who allows their business to keep running I think they need to be forced to sell github.

• 
  WorktreeWise (@worktreewise) reported 6 minutes ago

  Your *** workflow is probably slowing you down. The cost of context switching isn't just mental—it is technical. Rebuilding dependencies, re-running servers, and stash conflicts add up to hours lost every week. Worktrees fix this. #*** #GitHub #DevTools

• 
  aichina.news (@AiChinaNews) reported 7 minutes ago

  A thin haul from a narrow window, and a case study in what happens when an ecosystem platform turns its community loose on a weekend. Modelers — the Huaweicentric model hub — served up 26 new checkpoints across five hours, and the signal-to-noise ratio is what you’d expect from a bazaar of quantized reskins, untested attention hacks, and at least two items that appear to be name-only vapor. The pieces that rise above the static all circle the same two centerpieces: Moonshot AI’s Kimi reasoning family and Google’s Gemma. The Kimi-K2-Thinking-Eagle3 tune (score 6) promises step-by-step reasoning on the open K2 architecture, and it lands alongside the Kimi-K2-Thinking-NVFP4 — a Blackwell/Ada-friendly 4‑bit checkpoint that squeezes the same reasoning engine onto consumer Nvidia hardware. The irony isn’t lost: a platform built to champion Ascend NPUs is shipping NVFP4 quantizations that run best on the competitor’s silicon. Either Ascend support is aspirational, or the uploader simply ran the script and moved on. The Gemma side offers two portable cuts. The Gemma-2b-it ONNX INT4 (score 5) compresses the 2B model into an ONNX blob targeting Ascend and any ONNX Runtime device — useful for edge deployment, if not exactly news. The Gemma-4-31B-IT-NVFP4 (score 4) tries to make the 31B monster fit on a single GPU by leaning on Nvidia’s floating-point 4 format. Again, practical for local inference, but it’s a community quirk that the delivery vehicle is an Ascend ecosystem site. The rest of the list is a parade of low‑confidence experiments. A family of KVzap variants — linear‑attention and KV‑cache‑compression hacks grafted onto Llama‑3.1‑8B, Qwen3‑8B, Qwen3‑32B, and even an MLP‑twist version — all carry score 3 and arrive absent any rigorous benchmark. They’re explicitly labelled community contributions, which in this context reads as “we compressed the cache, good luck.” The Hymba 1.5B base and instruct models (scores 3–4) sit alongside the Nvidia‑originated Hymba‑1.5B‑Base and a DeepSeek‑derived MoE calibration model; all are small, open, and squarely aimed at developers who need a starter kit for Ascend NPUs. Further down, GR00T N1.7 gets a community fine‑tune for the SimplerEnv‑Fractal manipulation benchmark (score 3), HunyuanVideo becomes available on Ascend (score 3), and a cluster of local LLMs — Apollo V0.1 4B, Alpha‑Orionis, AlphaHitchhiker, AlphaMonarch — appear in GGUF and EXL2 format with minimal provenance. Then there are the two items that barely register: a mystery model called HMAR (score 1, no meaningful description) and the “Harmonizer,” an image‑to‑image “contender” (score 1) that looks like a placeholder press release. For researchers and engineers who actually need to run models on Ascend silicon, the Kimi‑Thinking‑Eagle3 and the Gemma INT4 port are the only checkpoints worth pulling today. The rest are padding — the digital equivalent of a GitHub repo with a single commit and no README. Volume is not velocity.

• 
  BTCWire (@BTCWire) reported 8 minutes ago

  India's I4C ordered GitHub to disable three Bitchat URLs, including the Android repository and release files. July 25 reporting found them still live, and open-source copies can persist through forks and redistribution. 🔎 That creates a separate user problem: authenticity. Before trusting a redistributed build, verify: • the source account or maintainer • signatures or checksums • changes from the upstream code • who will deliver security updates Open source can preserve code availability. It cannot make every mirror trustworthy.

• 
  Changes Watch (@changeswatch) reported 14 minutes ago

  GitHub — Enterprise Server Support Bundles Uploading GHES support bundles? Starting August 18, 2026, GitHub Enterprise Server will reject these uploads. Review your support workflow before the cutoff. #GitHub #DevOps #Security 👇

• 
  Prakash Sharma (@PrakashS720) reported 14 minutes ago

  🚨 Your Windows PC is secretly running 200+ background services right now. Most of them waste RAM, slow down your system, collect telemetry, and keep features alive you'll probably never use. An open-source developer decided that was enough. They built optimizerDuck — a free tool that helps you clean up Windows 10 & 11, remove bloatware, and optimize your PC for better speed, privacy, and battery life. Here's what it can do: → Optimise 35+ performance, privacy, battery, and system settings → Manage 200+ Windows services with built-in risk labels → Remove pre-installed bloatware with a preview before deletion → Apply GPU-specific tweaks for AMD, NVIDIA, and Intel The best part? Every change automatically creates a rollback file, and the tool requires you to create a Windows Restore Point before making any modifications. ✅ No installer ✅ No ads ✅ No telemetry ✅ No premium paywall ✅ Fully open source ✅ Works completely offline If you use Windows, this is one of those GitHub projects worth bookmarking. Repo link in the comments 👇

• 
  WorktreeWise@ (@WorktreeWise_) reported 17 minutes ago

  What happens when production crashes while you're mid-refactor with uncommitted code? Option A: Stash and pray. Option B: Open a new worktree, fix production, deploy, and return to your refactor intact. Choose Option B. #*** #GitHub #DevTools

• 
  Raikaru (@Raikaru00) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Lawlesfr @avivcohn1 @airkatakana My “shite” project but can’t even say which one is **** and why. Also thinks if you don’t upload to github you’re not working on anything. Jesus. you’re stupid. Got anything else to cry about?

• 
  Rumble Fish Software Development (@rumblefishdev) reported 18 minutes ago

  We want to hear from builders on Soroban. If a transaction isn't decoding correctly, if an event summary is wrong, or if your contract isn't showing up as expected, open a GitHub issue or find us in the Stellar Discord. The tool is free. The feedback loop is open. 👇

• 
  AakashTECH🚀👾 (@AakashT82757) reported 24 minutes ago

  🚨 STOP paying monthly fees just to send invoices. If your hosting business depends on a closed-source billing platform… You're building someone else's business. There's a free GitHub project that lets you own your entire billing stack. Meet Paymenter. An open-source, self-hosted billing platform built specifically for hosting providers. Instead of paying recurring license fees or being locked into a vendor... You get complete control over your billing system. Here's what makes it stand out: ✅ Self-hosted with full data ownership ✅ Subscription & recurring billing management ✅ Automated invoicing and payment workflows ✅ REST API for custom integrations ✅ Multi-language & multi-currency support ✅ Modern admin dashboard with responsive UI ✅ Themes, extensions, and customization support ✅ Integrates with hosting platforms like cPanel, Plesk, DirectAdmin, Pterodactyl, Virtualizor, and more ✅ Migration tools to move from WHMCS with less manual work ✅ MIT licensed and completely open source Perfect for: • Web hosting companies • VPS providers • Game server hosting businesses • Domain & reseller services • Anyone who wants a self-hosted subscription platform No vendor lock-in. No expensive recurring licenses. Just a modern billing platform you fully control.

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 24 minutes ago

  We built an AI workspace inside GitHub. Install a read-only app and it indexes every repo semantically: docs synced to commits, repo-wide Q&A with line citations, PR review with auto-fix diffs, and a codebase health dashboard. Self-serve. No sales call. No diff-only guesses.

• 
  Petey struggles (@peteystruggles) reported 28 minutes ago

  @RoyStory_4 @iuditg this is how I do this: - I tell an agent (I like to use Sol xhigh) that his role is to orchestrate agents working on some specific tasks - I usually have github issues already prepared - I explain the workflow: create/fork separate sessions, prompt agents it just works. Just like with Voice ;)

• 
  Vyacheslav Ops (@SlavaOPs) reported 29 minutes ago

  Cursor's sandbox had two flaws. Chained together, they gave full RCE with zero clicks Cato AI Labs found two chained flaws in Cursor's terminal sandbox. One trusts whatever working directory the agent picks, so pointing it at a system path grants write access outside the sandbox. The other is a symlink resolution check that fails open when path resolution breaks. Chain them and a single piece of attacker content — a poisoned MCP server response, a malicious search result, anything the agent reads — escapes the sandbox and reaches full OS-level code execution. No user interaction required. Full host compromise, plus every connected SaaS workspace. Both scored CVSS 9.8. Both patched. But the pattern is the one we keep seeing: the sandbox wasn't broken by one big mistake, it was broken by two small ones that only mattered chained together — one nobody thought to trust less, one nobody thought to fail closed. Ironic timing: GitHub cuts its public bug bounty payouts by half today, the same week this kind of research is exactly what's finding the bugs that matter.

• 
  Tyler F. Cloutier (@TylerFCloutier) reported 29 minutes ago

  @ngriffin_uk @github I don't doubt their frontend is complicated, but it has a major performance bug/issue. It's algorithmically wrong somehow.

• 
  Blaze (@browomo) reported 30 minutes ago

  THIS GITHUB REPO JUST SOLVED THE BIGGEST PROBLEM WITH AI DESIGN You can spot an AI-built website without seeing the prompt. A huge headline in the center. A purple gradient. Three cards with icons. One button. A footer with four columns. Change the product, the audience, and the prompt, and Claude or Codex still sends the reader down the same path. The colors change. The page underneath does not. One GitHub repository attacks that problem before the first line of CSS. You give the agent a project and a short brief. Before writing code, it decides who the page is for, which action matters, and what the brand should feel like. Then it chooses a page shape from 21 structures and one of 20 visual themes. A bakery, a record label, and a developer tool no longer have to open with the same hero and close with the same footer. The finished page must pass 58 checks. Purple gradients, nested cards, fabricated metrics, repeated navigation patterns, and unreadable contrast send the design back for another pass. The tool also remembers the structures used in earlier builds. A color swap no longer counts as a new design. The project is called Hallmark. It works with Claude Code, Cursor, and Codex. Its GitHub repository has already collected 18.6K stars and 935 forks. Hallmark will not copy a reference pixel for pixel. It extracts the structure, font pairing, and color anchor, then rebuilds the page around your content. Until now, “make it modern” often ended with the first clean layout. Hallmark makes the agent choose a shape, explain that choice, and inspect the result before a developer receives the code.