1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. GitHub
  6. ❯
  7. Outage Map
GitHub

GitHub Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where GitHub users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with GitHub, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

GitHub users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

GitHub is a company that provides hosting for software development and version control using Git. It offers the distributed version control and source code management functionality of Git, plus its own features.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Montataire, Hauts-de-France 1
Hernani, Basque Country 1
Tortosa, Catalonia 1
Culiacán, SIN 1
Haarlem, nh 1
Villemomble, Île-de-France 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Ingolstadt, Bavaria 1
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Berlin, Berlin 2
Dortmund, NRW 1
Davenport, IA 1
St Helens, England 1
Nové Strašecí, Central Bohemia 1
West Lake Sammamish, WA 3
Parkersburg, WV 1
Perpignan, Occitanie 1
Piura, Piura 1
Tokyo, Tokyo 1
Brownsville, FL 1
New Delhi, NCT 1
Kannur, KL 1
Newark, NJ 1
Raszyn, Mazovia 1
Trichūr, KL 1
Departamento de Capital, MZ 1
Chão de Cevada, Faro 1
New York City, NY 1
León de los Aldama, GUA 1
Quito, Pichincha 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ABM_Prottoy
    ABM Prottoy (@ABM_Prottoy) reported

    @thsottiaux browser use is broken on Windows because it installs on a different folder when installed from Microsoft store. and it's looking for node_repl in another dir. can't even use the feature... already filed in-app report, GitHub.

  • Kiwi_Nod
    KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported

    @DoneDmoney I love the confidence, but you're still telling me a story instead of showing me the movie. "Breaks things early" — prove it. "Feedback into growth loops" — where's the thread? The GitHub issue? The dashboard screenshot? You're talking like a builder,...

  • Jandro_W
    Jandro (@Jandro_W) reported

    @occidensus @xatzimi1 @ShitpostRock2 The issue with that, is a lot of devs redirect you to their github to get the .exe. And users not in the known are going to have issues locating exactly what they have to install in a lot of cases, if the github is not well organized.

  • WokeFloridian
    Daniel Hoppe 777🏴‍☠️ (@WokeFloridian) reported

    Github replaces workers with AI GH drips to 0 9s Customers leave GH <-you are here A rational actor would stop using AI and rehire their skilled employees. A gambling addict would double down.

  • Kiwi_Nod
    KiwiNod (@Kiwi_Nod) reported

    @Samkid_12 @pharos_network Three followers, zero tweets, and you're already reaching for the treasury? That's... ambitious. "I test features" is what everyone says. What have you actually built, broken, or shipped on Pharos? Give me specifics — contract addresses, transaction hashes, GitHub repos....

  • AbdMuizAdeyemo
    Abdulmuiz Adeyemo (@AbdMuizAdeyemo) reported

    Cursor is not just launching an SDK. They are quietly telling builders that the code editor is no longer the final destination. For years, building software meant opening an editor, writing code, fixing bugs, running tests, pushing to GitHub, checking errors, and repeating the same stress again. Now Cursor is saying: What if the agent that helps you inside the editor can also work outside the editor? Inside your CI pipeline. Inside your product. Inside your internal tools. Inside the workflow that breaks at 2am when nobody wants to touch terminal. That is the real shift. The future of software is moving from “I wrote every line myself” to “I designed the system, gave the agent context, reviewed the work, and shipped faster.” And that should excite builders. But it should also scare lazy builders. Because the gap is about to get wider. The person who only knows how to prompt will still get stuck. The person who understands product, systems, users, architecture, and execution will suddenly move like a small team. That is why this matters. Cursor is not just giving developers another tool. They are giving serious builders a way to put coding agents inside real workflows. The action is simple. Do not just watch this and say “AI is crazy.” Start learning how agents actually work. How they read files. How they plan tasks. How they run commands. How they fail. How they recover. Because very soon, the best builders will not be the people typing the fastest. They will be the people who know how to direct machines toward useful outcomes.

  • shubh19
    Shubh Jain (@shubh19) reported

    things I believed before vibecoding my first app: - AI coding tools are free to use end to end - the code is mine if they gave me the GitHub link - "fix this" means only that thing gets fixed - I'll be done in a few weekends - deployment is the last step - security is something I'll think about later - 100 hours is an exaggeration things I believe now: - read the pricing page before the tutorial - ask what "export" actually means before you build on it - env files are not optional knowledge - 100 hours was not an exaggeration - the $1,800 CASA bill is the most honest moment in the whole story

  • louispilfold
    Louis Pilfold (@louispilfold) reported

    The frequency with which GitHub goes down is starting to become a real hindrance. This blows. I'm quite fond of GitHub.

  • gokmakes
    Gökberk (@gokmakes) reported

    @MariusMollerH I’m seeing the same behavior on my end. GitHub events are coming through, but Cloud Build triggers aren’t firing at all. Might be an issue on Google Cloud side?

  • TankorSmash
    Tankor Smash (@TankorSmash) reported

    @jasonbcox0 Ah okay, I was confused because you had compared Gitlab to Github, but I see now you're listing problems with an interface.

  • mroyme
    Madhurjya Roy (@mroyme) reported

    @endingwithali And honestly, GitLab was never objectively better, anyway. It also has frequent issues and incidents. I bet they’d be just as bad, if not worse; if they were serving half the traffic that GitHub does.

  • SKryakwa
    Kryakwa, Count of Dmitrov (@SKryakwa) reported

    @CapnCrust @commisaar @ShitpostRock2 How is that a GitHub problem once again?

  • inferlume_hq
    Inferlume (@inferlume_hq) reported

    Approximately 88 percent of internet accessible GitHub Enterprise Server instances remain unpatched against CVE-2026-3854. The flaw grants code execution and full private repository access to anyone with push access via a single *** push.

  • DevOpsJeremy
    DevOps Jeremy (@DevOpsJeremy) reported

    @jasonbcox0 Most of these complaints can be boiled down to the process of learning a new system. No different than any other site, including GitHub. GitHub only seems to make more sense because you already know it. The one valid complaint is the sidebar. It's not clear which submenu to use

  • nitesh_btc
    Nitesh ₿⚡️ (@nitesh_btc) reported

    The entire world knows we need an alternative to GitHub but nobody would build it because network effects are a real thing. GitHub isn’t a *** server to store code, it’s a social media platform that happens to also store your code. It’s very hard to replace it.

Check Current Status