GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  mRr3b00t (@UK_Daniel_Card) reported 1 minute ago

  @joshua_saxe How’s the network latency on that? I mean between this and the target 🎯 infra? What about if someone needs phishing and they are on holiday for 2 weeks… How much money does the above cost? How noisy is it? I’m not worried about reward hacking…. These bajillion processes…. Are they all sending me http packets? (Honestly a good idea here is to build a simulator…..I think) because a billion login attempts won’t get you in. A million GitHub pr’s wont either. (And that’s a low side network that’s reasonably well defended) What’s the vulnerability and exploitation trees? 🌲 Then work back to the billion of cpu cycles maybe wasted…..

• 
  Dominus Pellissier (@iamdomprompt) reported 2 minutes ago

  @surajsunny1995 There are also free versions of both. As I said, check out GitHub—or better yet, Pinokio. Download the app and search for Cogstudio, Hunyuan Video, or Framepack. You might run into a problem, though, because most of them require an NVIDIA graphics card. Your screenshot shows an AMD card.

• 
  Amrit Mirchandani (@Amrit_Mirch) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Route2FI the real utility projects that solve problems will onboard the masses look art @gitlawb , the right solution , in a decentralized manner in place of github which has no place in the agentic era. base:0x5f980dcfc4c0fa3911554cf5ab288ed0eb13dba3

• 
  Flareforward (@flareforward) reported 7 minutes ago

  Two years ago @whale589 didn't know what GitHub was. Today: automated Web3 systems, built almost entirely with AI. The new video shares the lessons that actually matter: 1. Start with a problem you understand. If you can't see the wall coming, you won't know what's behind it when the AI hits it. 2. Break A-to-D into A, B, C, D. Verify each step works before you connect them. 3. Turn anything repetitive into a reusable script. Stop making the AI re-solve solved problems. 4. Use AI to BUILD the system, not to run it. A good system needs less AI over time, not more. 5. Own your tools. Back up your code. If AI disappeared tomorrow, you should still hold the keys to your kingdom. A prompt is what you ask. A system is a set of steps you've proven. Build systems.

• 
  Synthetic Beef (@SyntheticBeef) reported 9 minutes ago

  @theo Which github feature is stopping you from replacing GitHub with a thinner cloud-hosted *** service for your personal use? I probably won't build this, since it sounds like too much trouble to scale, and I'm already maxing my Fable limits on other projects but I'm curious.

• 
  Death Star Robot 🇺🇸 🇹🇼 🇺🇦 (@DeathStarRobot) reported 12 minutes ago

  @gdb I'm trying to use Codex to upload my files to github, to back up my work, for three or four or more days. The backup used to work fine. It turns out an update from OpenAI bricked my ability to backup my files on github. It is literally interfering with how my computer works. We need a fix, and the people who have had this issue deserve a "reset in the bank" as compensation for this issue.

• 
  Alan (@alandotnet) reported 17 minutes ago

  @samhogan Installed ubuntu server in a fresh beelink and it asked for my github username to setup ssh authorized keys

• 
  Brad Groux (@BradGroux) reported 17 minutes ago

  @jxnlco Codex is coding a MacOS/iOS/WatchOS app for me, fully unattended right now. It took my 7000 word PRD we built together using grill-with-docs, created 70+ issues in a GitHub backlog, and got to work.

• 
  Alan North (@alanscodelog) reported 19 minutes ago

  @mycoliza Honestly the only sane policy. Really wish github allowed reporting people for this and if they get reported enough they'd get a badge of shame, then I can have a setting, profiles which have the badge cannot open issues.

• 
  jdx (@jdxcode) reported 20 minutes ago

  issue/pr count on repo pages is the dumbest feature on github and one of the reasons i don't use issues on my major projects

• 
  David putra (@davidputra2112) reported 23 minutes ago

  seven GitHub repos pushed in four days, a working USDC escrow contract, and a README that flat out says "don't put real money through this yet, we're not audited." that combination is rare enough that I sat down and actually read the whole thing. $h3gt 4eYp69P1VU946efStVzV41gQvYjMucpcuYEbofc6pump 👇

• 
  Satoshi Bagger (@SatoshiBagger) reported 23 minutes ago

  This is HECTIC! I asked ChatGPT to verify @oomahq’s Coldcard thread line-by-line. I expected the sensational parts to fall apart. BUT The core claim didn’t!! It dug through Coinkite’s own disclosure, Coldcard’s GitHub history, Block’s technical analysis and the GPG evidence. The receipts: switck/libngu appears Oct 15, 2020. 6 days later, doc-hex publicly asks “switck” if Coinkite can use it for Coldcard. doc-hex then authors the 2021 “First pass w/ libNgU” migration - the migration Coinkite now confirms routed seed generation into the broken RNG path. And the wildest part: A reproducible GPG audit found 58 commits authored as “Switck” signed with Peter D. Gray’s personal cryptographic key - the same key signing Peter Gray commits. The switck ↔ Peter Gray connection is therefore extremely strong. What the evidence does NOT prove: that the RNG failure was intentional, that Gray stole funds, or any “spook” theory. The cryptography can tell us who controlled the key. It cannot tell us why. And that leaves one very legitimate question for @COLDCARDwallet / @DocHex: Why was doc-hex publicly interacting with switck as though it were a separate developer? The code is public. The signatures are public. Now the answer should be public too

• 
  Joshua Saxe (@joshua_saxe) reported 24 minutes ago

  @CFGeek Hi Charles! Think we met at the curve last year. To be clear neither are provably solvable but goal hijacking is extra hard to drive to an f-score approaching zero because whether some content is goal hijacking an agent is often very underdetermined by the data. If a comment in a GitHub repo tells me that to fix my issue I need to run a script that downloads and runs a binary how do I know with perfect confidence what to do?

• 
  Tushal Lohar (@LoharTushal) reported 24 minutes ago

  @OsamuMatha Ofc we never go back and see our solution Unless we solve the old problem again(rarely) But I think it's just for the GitHub commits And anyways like already 30+ peoples have told me that they need this extension So I guess for me it will be a great project with real users

• 
  Viren (@virenbaraiya) reported 31 minutes ago

  @valyala What this outage surfaced was that Github seems to be running like a monolithic service. Given the nature of *** and the fact that each repo is an isolated dataset, it should have been much easier to build highly available system. I Wonder why not.