GitHub Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

GitHub Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Öhli (@Oehliii) reported 2 minutes ago

  @ParthJadhav8 hiya parth, do you have noop 8.1 by any chance - the team just took down their website & github, i’m on 8.0.1 sadly i couldnt update anymore :(

• 
  Rexei (@iamrexei) reported 4 minutes ago

  AI APPS ARE CURRENTLY FAILING NOT AT THE “BUILD” STAGE They’re failing at the “understand what the agent actually did” stage I found an interesting open-source tool — VibeRaven The idea was born out of frustration: Someone asked Claude to roll back a single component but the agent wiped out the entire working UI and then said, “Everything’s ready for release” That’s a very accurate description of “vibe coding” Writing code has become easy but managing versions, rollbacks, providers, and production status has become much more complicated especially when the agent says: “handled” and you don’t know: ▸ Is RLS actually enabled, or is it just the read policy? ▸ Does the Stripe webhook check the signature or just parse the body? ▸ Did the revert roll back just the component, or did it wipe out half the interface? ▸ What exactly changed between the working version and the broken one? ▸ Can this even be shipped? VibeRaven is trying to solve exactly this It’s a local cockpit for AI-built apps: → reads your repo → sees *** releases → checks Supabase / Vercel / Stripe → shows launch blockers → gives a “can I ship?” verdict → explains what’s actually broken → passes context to the agent before the fix In other words, this isn’t just another “connector to providers” but an attempt to regain control over AI development because the main risk of vibe coding is no longer that the AI won’t be able to write a feature but that it will write it, break three related things, and confidently say: “ready for production” Link to GitHub repo in the replies ↓

• 
  Nav Toor (@heynavtoor) reported 5 minutes ago

  Every VHS filter you see on TikTok is a sticker. They slap grain on top of the frame. Shift the colors green. Add a scanline overlay. Call it retro. It looks nothing like an actual tape because none of it is simulating an actual tape. It is decoration painted on a digital video that never touched an analog signal. A developer who goes by valadaptive built the real thing. The tool is called ntsc-rs. It does not overlay anything. It simulates the actual NTSC signal path. The same physics that made your parents' home videos look the way they did. Composite encoding. Luminance and chrominance separation. Color subsampling. Chroma bleed. Ringing. Head switching noise. Tape warping. Tracking errors. Signal dropout. Every artifact modeled from the actual analog chain a broadcast engineer would have wired up in 1988. Your footage ages 30 years in real time. It runs five ways. As a standalone desktop app for Windows, macOS, and Linux. As an After Effects plugin. As a Premiere Pro plugin. As an OpenFX plugin that drops into DaVinci Resolve, Nuke, Vegas Pro, HitFilm, and Natron. As a rewritten multithreaded Rust engine any developer can embed in their own tool. One effect. Every major editor. Zero dollars. Here is what the paid market looks like. Boris FX Continuum single-host annual subscription. $215. Red Giant Universe, the bundle that ships the retro effects. $214 a year. Continuum multi-host. $765 a year. Sapphire multi-host perpetual. $2,795. FilmConvert Nitrate for one host. $139. Adobe Creative Cloud, which you need to even run most of these plugins. $22.99 a month. ntsc-rs. Zero. The core engine is triple-licensed under Apache 2.0, ISC, and MIT so any studio or plugin developer can drop it into a commercial pipeline without asking. The standalone application is GPL-3.0 so nobody can rebrand it and sell it back to you. Permissive at the engine level. Copyleft at the app level. The design of someone who read the room. The latest release did 53,000 downloads. 2,362 GitHub stars. Windows, macOS, and Linux builds all shipped. Here is the punchline. Engineers spent 40 years building digital video to escape analog imperfections. Now the entire creator economy pays between $139 and $2,795 a year to put them back. One developer wrote the physics in Rust and released it for free. (Link in the comments)

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 5 minutes ago

  Your API throws cryptic errors at 2am. Your inbox fills with frustrated users. Both go unnoticed until Monday morning. Built BugRadar. It watches your API and support inbox 24/7, files complete bug reports with reproduction steps, and pushes them straight to Jira or GitHub.

• 
  Jarred Sumner (@jarredsumner) reported 6 minutes ago

  imo, GitHub needs to make it like 90% easier to review PRs. Left on read => the PR wasn’t clearly correct, the test didn’t reproduce fix the issue, the code was too complicated or too slow Or just a single tap to request a review with feedback templates

• 
  Keeta Github Tracker (@KeetaCode) reported 8 minutes ago

  🐆 Keeta GitHub PR Merged 📦 Repo: node-rs 🔀 PR #33: Release: v0.4.0 🌿 Branch: process/v0.4.0 → main 👤 Originally opened by: @sephynox 🧠 Overview: Keeta’s node software appears to be moving to version 0.4.0, which matters because it bundles several behind-the-scenes improvements into one release. This pull request is a release update that groups four earlier changes: better typing, crypto-related cleanup, centralizing some internal tables, and reducing repeated code. The public description is brief, so this appears to be a technical/internal update with limited public details. - Likely impact: cleaner internal code can make future updates easier to maintain and less error-prone. This is an inference based on the listed cleanup and refactor items. - For followers: this looks more like infrastructure work than a user-facing feature drop.

• 
  Tyrone Robb (@ty_auldric) reported 9 minutes ago

  @hello_code_ it’s so frustrating how hard it is to find that one needle or flag. All the big problems get solved and then it’s these tiny things that end up mattering the most. The worst part is I’ve already had to increase my GitHub Actions budget twice. The whole build and CI process on Apple Silicon has been no fun either.I honestly didn’t think desktop apps would be like this. I thought they’d be easier lol.

• 
  Polsia (@polsia) reported 9 minutes ago

  Vulnerability disclosed. Maintainers scramble to patch. Attackers win. VigilWatch was built to fix that. An autonomous agent monitoring public GitHub repos 24/7—automatically filing security PRs with patches and notifying maintainers. No hunting for issues.

• 
  Nero (@NeroBirb) reported 14 minutes ago

  @ayesha_fatiima Its change/source control, automated actions on event, issue tracking, etc. But if you don't need it to be public then idk why you'd use github and not self-host forgejo. I'd rather rely on what I host than what someone else hosts.

• 
  paydird (@paydird) reported 15 minutes ago

  One more point that matters more than the “automatic documentation” angle: OpenWiki is really addressing the context architecture problem for coding agents. A lot of teams keep stuffing architecture notes, APIs, conventions, and module relationships into AGENTS.md or CLAUDE.md. Once the repo grows, those files turn into massive context dumps that agents have to reread on every run. OpenWiki flips that model: Repo → Structured Wiki → On-demand Retrieval → Coding Agent It generates a separate repo wiki and leaves only a lightweight reference inside the agent instruction file. The agent pulls the pages it needs instead of loading the entire knowledge base every time. Also, it does not literally watch every code change in real time. It can run through a scheduled GitHub Action, inspect new commits and *** diff, then update the affected wiki pages. So the more accurate way to think about it is: not just a documentation generator, but a continuously maintained repository context layer for coding agents. That is probably the most interesting part of OpenWiki.

• 
  Patrick Gerrits (@pgerrits) reported 17 minutes ago

  @mattpocockuk Can you please add Linear support baked in? Sorry, but I despise GitHub issues, projects, etc.

• 
  Jatin (@jatinprajapat29) reported 18 minutes ago

  The biggest scam in many Tier 3 colleges isn't the fees. It's convincing students that attendance, assignments, practical files, and passing semester exams are all they need. Show up every day. Complete every record. Memorize for internals. Get decent grades. You become the "ideal student" in college. Then graduation arrives. The interviewer doesn't ask how many classes you attended. They don't care who topped your section. They don't ask how neat your practical file was. They ask: "What have you built?" "Where have you interned?" "Show me your GitHub." "How do you solve this problem?" And that's when thousands of students realize they spent four years optimizing for college instead of optimizing for the real world. The saddest part? Nobody lied to them directly. They were just never told that surviving college and becoming employable are two completely different goals.

• 
  IT Guy (@T3chFalcon) reported 19 minutes ago

  Nightmare Eclipse. Reportedly a former Microsoft security employee. The story: they found critical vulnerabilities inside Microsoft. reported them internally. Microsoft ignored the reports, deleted their accounts, and refused to pay the bug bounties. so they went public. Timing every release to drop within hours of Microsoft's monthly Patch Tuesday, the day Microsoft fixes other vulnerabilities, so the new ones land before defenders have time to breathe. here's what they've dropped since April: BlueHammer, CVE-2026-33825. exploits Microsoft Defender to redirect SYSTEM-level file writes into System32. patched. then actively exploited by real attackers within days. RedSun — SYSTEM-level privilege escalation via Defender. now in live attacks. UnDefend — blocks Defender from receiving definition updates entirely. observed in live intrusions. your antivirus stops updating. silently. YellowKey — bypasses BitLocker on TPM-only configurations. fixed June Patch Tuesday. GreenPlasma — SYSTEM-level privilege escalation via CTFMON. fixed June Patch Tuesday. MiniPlasma — resurrected a patched 2020 flaw that Microsoft let regress. RoguePlanet — the latest. no CVE. no patch. dropped June 9, hours after Patch Tuesday. now let's talk about RoguePlanet specifically because it's the most alarming. it exploits a race condition in Microsoft Defender itself. the component designed to protect your system runs as SYSTEM — the highest privilege level on Windows. it has to, so it can quarantine and delete malware anywhere on disk. RoguePlanet tricks Defender into performing a SYSTEM-level file write into a location the attacker controls. The result: a standard user gets a command prompt running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM on a fully patched Windows 10 or 11 machine. Microsoft hardened Defender in May to block this class of attack. Nightmare Eclipse rewrote it to bypass the hardening and released it the same day as Patch Tuesday. ThreatLocker independently confirmed it works on fully patched Windows 11. BlueHammer, RedSun, and UnDefend the earlier releases were already picked up by real threat actors and used in live intrusions. Huntress documented this. a researcher dropping PoC exploits to punish a corporation is one thing. those exploits getting weaponized by ransomware groups is something else entirely. Microsoft's response: they flagged the researcher's blogs. took down their GitHub. threatened legal action. called it potential criminal activity. the cybersecurity community responded with fury. researchers don't work for Microsoft. if a company ignores internal reports and refuses to pay bounties, public disclosure is the entire point of responsible disclosure culture. Microsoft backed down. said they had no intention of pursuing legal action against security researchers. Nightmare Eclipse released RoguePlanet the same week. Microsoft built a bug bounty program to stop exactly this. they ignored the reports. now every Windows machine on earth is waiting for a patch that doesn't exist yet.

• 
  amircrypto82 (@amircrypto82) reported 21 minutes ago

  I've been staring at crypto Twitter for nine years now. And I swear to god if I see one more project tweet "building in public" while their Github has 3 commits from 8 months ago I'm gonna lose it. We all know what that phrase actually means. Let me translate it for you. What they say: "We're building in public." What they mean: "We're streaming our debugging sessions live and calling it transparency." Like... congrats bro. You deployed to testnet and it broke instantly. That's not building in public. That's just public failure with a fancy label. Real building in public is uncomfortable. It's showing your ugly MVP that barely works. It's admitting you pivoted because the original thesis was flawed. It's telling people you're stuck on a problem and need help. Not posting a 47-part thread about how you're "shipping value" when you literally just changed the font on your landing page. The worst part? The industry has conditioned us to accept these empty phrases. We nod along. We retweet. We convince ourselves it's real. But here's the thing that actually gets me going. When I see a project actually doing the work... no buzzwords, no "game-changing" fluff, just measurable output... it stands out like a glass of water in a desert. That's why I keep an eye on @RallyOnChain. Not because they're perfect. Nobody is. But because they flipped the script on something way more annoying than "building in public." Try this one on for size. What they say: "Influencer marketing delivers ROI." What they actually mean: "We paid a guy with 200k bots to say our token is undervalued and now we're praying the charts don't nuke." That's the real plague right now. The entire KOL economy is built on smoke. Projects dump budgets on agencies that dump them on "creators" who dump generic posts into the void. No accountability. No verification. Just vibes and vanity metrics. @RallyOnChain's whole schtick is killing that noise with AI scoring and on-chain rewards. No gatekeepers. No minimum followers. Just actual content quality measured transparently. Whether it works long term? I don't know. But I know the current system is broken beyond belief and anything that actually measures performance instead of follower count is worth watching. So here's my challenge. Next time you see a project claim they're "building in public" or "revolutionizing marketing," ask them one question. Show me the receipts. Not the thread. Not the vibes. The actual work. If they can't... well. You know the translation. And if they can? Maybe we're finally growing up as an industry. Doubt it though. What's the most overused phrase you're sick of hearing? Drop it below. I'll translate it.

• 
  Hot Aisle (@HotAisle) reported 21 minutes ago

  Someone posts on X that there is some big problem with Github, gets a bunch of clicks and engagement. Turns out it is a nothing burger. There should be a way to signal this more easily.