Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	14 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	18 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  OldremyCrypto (@Oldremy) reported 5 minutes ago

  Brisvia (BRVA) launched Aug 1 promising "no head start reserved for its creators." The first 594 blocks went to a single address. I document new proof-of-work launches as a normal home miner using the advertised tools. Here's what five days of receipts show. First, what checked out. The builds are legitimate. I verified the 1.1.4 installer myself: SHA-256 matches the published hash, valid SSL code-signing signature. My antivirus flagged the in-app updater. I asked the dev, he gave a specific technical answer, and it held up on verification, a heuristic false positive, not malware. The chain started on time: no blocks exist before 15:00 UTC. Difficulty ramped exactly as designed (block 1: 0.0002441 → block 518: 0.001777). This is a real chain and the supply-chain handling was serious. Credit where it's earned. What the chain shows. I walked the explorer block by block from genesis. Blocks 1 through ~594 were all mined by one address: brv1qkactwjfn54mlrd0k2vune3cy757z6q4aqc7kaq. Not the explorer's display field, the coinbase output itself, spot-checked on blocks 1, 310, and 518. That's consensus data, not an interpretation. Other addresses don't appear until ~595. Broad multi-miner activity doesn't start until ~687. What everyone else got. At launch, the advertised paths didn't work. My XMRig, same config I'd benchmarked all week logged "connect error: operation canceled" against the official solo endpoint for roughly 12 hours straight. The official app's solo and pool modes were also non-functional in the opening window. And per the dev's own statement on 7/31: both CLI miners and the app's solo mode are Stratum clients dependent on Brisvia's endpoints. Mining against your own node "is not officially supported yet." So during the window one address took every block, there was no supported path for anyone else to submit work. One more gap. The explorer the project points to for verification can't show address balances. "No address API is configured." You can see who mined each block. You cannot check what any address holds. What I did about it. On Aug 4 I posted five questions to the dev, publicly, on the record: what that address is and how it squares with "no head start"; what path it used while the endpoints were down; how block 1's timestamp squares with the stated launch guard; what the testnet and "fail-closed service tests" validated; and whether address balances will be made verifiable. He'd answered technical questions promptly when he had answers. As of publication, 56+ hours later, no response, and no posts in the channel at all. I can't tell you who owns that address. I can tell you the first 594 blocks went to one address, that the paths the rest of us were told to use were returning connection errors, and that the questions are still sitting there. The site says: "Don't trust a promise. Verify the launch." I did. I hold a small amount of BRVA I mined. Coverage, not endorsement. Positions disclosed. DYOR.

• 
  Edgar Gumstein (@Gumclaw) reported 6 minutes ago

  @shl @Must_be_Ash Not really — Stripe's x402 support (launched Feb 2026 w/ Coinbase) is a separate Machine Payments API for HTTP 402 agent-to-agent USDC settlement on Base/Solana/Tempo, distinct from the Payment Elements checkout UI component. Would sit alongside Elements, not inside it.

• 
  Khufu (@KingKhufu1111) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BritishHodl and with fidelity, your insured. Even with your btc uploads. One downside, one-way ratchet, btc can go in, but can not move it back out. But you can sell it, and get it right in your account. No moving cash issues or fees like in coinbase.

• 
  Litecoin Ricky Ⓜ️🕸️ (@LitecoinRicky) reported 8 minutes ago

  @coinbase Do I really need to ask again for you to fix the lie filled Litecoin summary on Coinbase?

• 
  scared money (@scaredmoneybrrr) reported 8 minutes ago

  i don't think coinbase will let this pass they will become more competitive already integrated **** coins let the cex wars begin!

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 14 minutes ago

  @zerohedge Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  Daily AI Digest (@ReadAIDigest) reported 14 minutes ago

  Coinbase skipped coding-agent vendors and built its own Coinbase built its own AI coding agent, Forge, instead of paying for Claude Code. Shopify and Ramp made the same call. Seat pricing on coding agents scales with headcount. Past a certain size, building beats licensing. The tradeoff: you own maintenance and support a vendor would otherwise handle. It only pays off when customization saves more than that costs. It's also a signal for the vendors themselves. The biggest, most technical customers won't stay seat-holders forever once they can build in-house. The market splits: off-the-shelf tools for smaller teams, custom builds for anyone big enough to justify it. Run that math before picking a vendor.

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 15 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  + (@fl0_4665) reported 15 minutes ago

  @coinbase when will you guys let me reopen my coinbase account everytime I try to make one you instantly delete it I was a loyal customer for years

• 
  ShadowX (@shadow12_x) reported 15 minutes ago

  @MichaelGSantos @brian_armstrong @coinbase Oh **** .. are donations safe?

• 
  CryptoMeter.io (@CryptoMeterIO) reported 18 minutes ago

  🇬🇧 JUST IN: Coinbase introduces 24/5 US stock trading for UK users, enhancing market access.

• 
  Jeets (@ieatjeets) reported 24 minutes ago

  @scaredmoneybrrr coinbase has let us down countless times

• 
  milly.hl (@milly_rock7) reported 27 minutes ago

  @aibra @coinbase @moonpay why pit them against each other like that? you might get faster service just picking the one that fits your needs better

• 
  AlgoAlpha (@Real_AlgoAlpha) reported 32 minutes ago

  @TheBlockCo Coinbase going 24/5 for UK access is a big execution edge, not just a headline. More overlap with US liquidity + tighter spread windows can matter for retail order flow; COIN tends to like these "platform expansion" moves.

• 
  fochnut (@fochnut) reported 34 minutes ago

  @dijitalgastecom I dont have access to my coinbase anymore🤷 not even sure how to fix it.

• 
  Gram+ (@olatoyemi_) reported 35 minutes ago

  Coinbase has launched their 24/5 trading for nearly 4,000 US stocks to eligible UK users, integrating equities with crypto and fiat in one app. The service offers zero-commission trades, fractional shares from £1, and instant funding via GBP or USDC, following recent UK investment services authorization.

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 35 minutes ago

  hyperliquid's tokenized-stock book keeps printing records. HIP-3 open interest hit 4.13b USD on aug 4 — an all-time high — while daily RWA trading volume jumped 229% to 4.87b USD, more than the capital held on the platform. contracts on SK Hynix and Micron became the top-traded markets; palantir's +25.86% day lifted liquidations 544% to 19.25m USD. this is not a niche anymore. tokenized RWA trading is hyperliquid's largest category — 25.1b USD of 48.2b USD weekly volume in mid-july — and the venue ranks third among crypto apps by weekly revenue at 7.6m USD, behind tether and circle. circle's ceo calls it a major structural shift away from endogenous token speculation. the distribution is the problem. one deployer, xyz, controls ~4.12b USD of the 4.13b USD total open interest. the rest of the ecosystem sits on 15-20m USD, and pioneer deployer felix already announced it is closing its markets. 'permissionless' is quietly becoming 'one counterparty.' the rails are consolidating too: hyperliquid is migrating from native USDH to USDC as its aligned quote asset, with coinbase as treasury deployer and circle as primary liquidity provider plus a 500k HYPE stake — native economics traded for institutional settlement. the CLARITY Act, the stablecoin-yield framework this stack leans on, heads to a senate vote before recess. the tell: on-chain activity rips while HYPE ETPs saw zero inflows across 12 sessions (jul 17-aug 3) and 29.8m USD of outflows — yet $HYPE rallied 5.3% on aug 5. markets pay for the venue, not the token. invalidation: 99.8% of HIP-3 OI sits with one deployer; any de-risking unwinds the book, and a slipped CLARITY vote cools the regulatory bid underneath. NFA.

• 
  AlgoAlpha (@Real_AlgoAlpha) reported 36 minutes ago

  @coinbase Coinbase UK pushing US stocks + crypto into a single 24/5 app is an execution edge, not just a product headline. More overlap with US liquidity means faster fills and cleaner intraday positioning for retail; COIN usually benefits when access tightens spreads.

• 
  vimen (@vimenprotocol) reported 37 minutes ago

  Holders got paid this week. Real dividends, on-chain. Also assets available on the protocol just tripled. Two new exciting things shipped on Vimen. One: available equities just tripled. The investable equity universe went from 9 to 30 names in a single batch: the semis (AMD, TSMC, ASML, Micron, Intel), the crypto-equity complex (Coinbase, Strategy, Circle, GameStop), space and frontier (SpaceX, Rocket Lab), large-cap tech, and index ETFs including QQQ, silver and oil. Now we count 58 assets total with the natives, every one Chainlink-fed and verified live before registration. The feeds page listed them the moment they hit the registry, because it reads the chain. Two: V2 indexes just paid their first dividends. Agentic indexes sweep their surplus to holders in USDG, and this week the mechanism fired for the first time: two indexes closed payout cycles and holders got paid, on-chain. The amounts are small because the pots are still young. What matters is the loop: mint, the agent rotates, the surplus leaves NAV, and it lands in your wallet. That full circle has now run end to end. And we built a performance terminal that shows every basket's live track record, the good rows and the bad ones, read straight from each contract. Registering an asset isn't a recommendation, and nothing here is a forecast. It's a bigger shelf and a working loop. Links below. Go verify the dividends yourself. Both transactions are public.

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 38 minutes ago

  Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  Nova's Owl (@novasowl) reported 40 minutes ago

  To give you an idea why it's important to check the CEX clusters map, here $2027 which is a very obvious bundled scam, just by looking at the funding sources alone you see something weird Coinbase funded wallets only have 1.2% of the total supply. Husher in there, Kucoin/Mexc/Bitget/Bybit/Binance/OKX are all part of the chinese cartel bundling coins all the damn time. So here with a basic override we can safely say it's garbage without having to look further

• 
  Ben Hart (@BenHart_Freedom) reported 41 minutes ago

  FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE COLDCARD FIASCO. I was fully sold on self-custody. Bought 3 ColdCards -- two MK4s and a Q. Had all my Bitcoin under self-custody except for a small amount on Coinbase. When I heard about the ColdCard hack, I was able to instantly wisk all my Bitcoin back to Coinbase. I feel horrible for those who lost their funds. As of now, reports are that more than 2,000 Bitcoins (about $130 MILLION) have been stolen from ColdCard generated wallets by 15 or more hackers because the Random Number Generator turned out to be a Pseudo Random Number Generator. So numbers generated not random at all. Excel spreadsheets and Casino slot machines use Pseudo Random Number Generators -- meaning the numbers generated follow a predictable pattern that is repeated. It's just a very big pattern, so looks random to humans. True Random Number Generators use background, atmospheric, or thermal noise to generate truly random numbers. ColdCard thought it was using its Random Number Generator built into the device. But because of a programming error, the TRNG was not turned on, so defaulted to a PRNG. It's super easy for a basic laptop to crack a PRNG number. It's hard to believe CoinKite (which makes the ColdCard models) is this incompetent. Then I find out that ColdCard only has 5 employees. It's barely a company at all. We were told by the top Bitcoin influencers that ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody security. Then it turns out most of these influencers were paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard. Now, I actually did go to the trouble of rolling a dice 100 times to create my wallet on ColdCard to be sure my wallet was truly the product of Random Number Generation. Also applied a pass phrase, randomly generated with dice. So I'm told my Bitcoin was safe. Nevertheless, I did not want to take any chances, so wisked my Bitcoin back to Coinbase where I have an account. But here's the thing. I don't trust any of these Bitcoin or Crypto wallets (whether it's Ledger, Trezor, Jade, Bitkey, or whatever). This time, the flaw was the Random Number Generator. Next time AI will find another flaw, another backdoor in the firmware. These devices require constant updates in the firmware, which means downloading from the internet. They also require hot wallet software (such as Electrum, Sparrow, etc) that lives on your computer device to interact with your hardware cold storage wallet. You must then trust this set-up, which is assembled by tiny companies -- mostly fly-by-night operations. The biggest hardware wallet company in the Bitcoin space appears to be Ledger with about 900 employees. Okay, that at least is a real company. But the big value proposition of Bitcoin is it's supposed to be "trustless." You're not supposed to have to "trust" anyone with your money. Your are supposed to be a "sovereign individual," "your own bank." Bitcoin is supposed to be "unconfiscatable" (i.e. lawsuit protection) and "uncensorable" (you can't be debanked). Bitcoin is supposed to "separate money from state," and it's supposed to be "the 2nd Amendment for your money." But what good is any of this if we have to trust these fly-by-night outfits to create software and hardware wallets that can't be hacked by AI? And most people lose their Bitcoin through user error. The biggest threat to your Bitcoin under self-custody is YOU. People lose their private keys. They make one key punch error, copy something down wrong, and their funds are lost forever. About 4,000,000 Bitcoins have been lost forever due to user error, which is about $256 BILLION . . . lost through self-custody user error. So 20% of all Bitcoin lost . . . through user error. I love the idea of Bitcoin. No one has hacked Bitcoin's underlying technology. There are more possibilities for private key codes than their are atoms in the known universe. So Bitcoin the asset appears secure. It's an ingenious asset. But the fatal flaw is the tech we must trust to use it. Compare ColdCard and the existing Bitcoin hardware and software wallets in use to Apple, Google, Microsoft and Big Tech. These multi-trillion-dollar companies have tens of thousands of computer engineers working full time on security. If we lose or forget our password, these companies allow us to retrieve it or reset our password and access credentials. Our funds are not lost forever. I don't like having to trust these companies. But we really have no choice. So we trust these companies with our passwords and all our info. They have the power to bankrupt us and crush us like gnats in a nanosecond. Fortunately, they are incentivized financially to protect our assets because the only way they stay in business if if the public trusts them with our passwords and all our private information, and trusts them to keep our assets secure. They became multi-trillion-dollar companies by doing this -- protecting you on the Internet from criminals. I don't like that Big Tech has amassed so much power over us. But the alternative is to disconnect from the Internet and live in the woods like the Unabomber. If Apple were to make a self-custody hardware wallet for Bitcoin and advertised it as self-custody, I would probably use it because I would trust the tech. I don't much like Big Tech or the Big Banks and big financial institutions. I would like to be free of them, and be my own bank. But if they lose my money, it's FDIC insured or protected by other insurance. My insurance policy does not cover Bitcoin on self-custody hardware wallets. But also, if I were to be hit by a bus, my wife Wanda and our heirs would have no clue how to access their Bitcoin if its under self-custody. Yes, I left her instructions in a safe-deposit box. But could she actually access her Bitcoin if she had to? Most likely, she would need to get help from an expert. She would need to trust someone to help her access her Bitcoin. And, yes, that are collaborative self-custody solutions, such as offered by Unchained. But this is also complicated. There's really no such thing as "trustless." Most of us trusted ColdCard because we trusted the Bitcoin influencers who told us ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody Bitcoin security. Then it turned out they were being paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard -- and didn't know what they were talking about. So there's no such thing as "trustless." But also, for Bitcoin's price to go up requires widespread public adoption. 99% of people are not going roll a dice 100 times or flip a coin 256 times to create a self-custody wallet, and then learn all the protocols required for secure self-custody -- assuming the hardware and software wallet tech is secure . . . . . . which turns out to be a false assumption. I'm not a fan of Coinbase. It's customer service sucks. Coinbase has no customer service. But at least Wanda can log in and check our Bitcoin balance . . . and access the funds. At least Coinbase is a publicly traded company that must follow a much higher standard of rules, laws, and transparency than a private company like, say, Gemini. Coinbase is at least auditable. And I might move all our Bitcoin to Fidelity because I trust Fidelity more than I trust Coinbase. I can get someone on the phone at Fidelity. Fidelity also allows me to wisk my Bitcoin to self-custody if I see a need to. Plus, if Bitcoin is to become a true competitor to gold as a wealth storage and protection asset, if it's to reach the $10 TRILLION or $20 TRILLION market cap level, major financial institutions will need to be involved with it. And they are slowly getting involved with Bitcoin. But they aren't relying on these fly-by-night self-custody wallets to protect their Bitcoin. So at age 68, I've decided to abandon the self-custody model. I'm just not going to risk self-custody. I'm glad I know how to do self-custody so I can use it if I feel I need it -- to quickly wisk my assets into self-custody if the situation calls for it. But trusting self-custody day in and day out is asking for trouble. I'd rather trust Apple, JP Morgan Chase, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley to protect my assets than myself and these fly-by-night Bitcoin wallet oufits, some of which are run by criminals, apparently.

• 
  Mike (@MeK95445152) reported 42 minutes ago

  @KeithWoodsYT post the address of a btc wallet with each post or something. anyone can use coinbase or whatever now to send funds. it's not perfect (like XMR) but better than these "mainstream" financial networks. I dont really follow you but **** sucks man. work the alternatives.

• 
  Reason (@NY2029Win) reported 52 minutes ago

  @MotowarriorX @EleanorTerrett @subjectiveviews This Bill is giving Coinbase cart blanche and no oversight. It is just a terrible Bill.

• 
  Battle Jeff (@BattleJeff1) reported 54 minutes ago

  @drjasper_eth @gane5h No it doesn't. If Coinbase have to take a 0.2% yield cut. When solo get 1%, LST holders get 0.8%. LSD holders sell, Coinbase stake share reduce. >The problem with that curve is LST will deliberately not stake user ETH to maintain the peak issuance at 20% stake rate. Top three pools call each other. "Let's not stake beyond 20%, extra user ETH just park in our wallet" They'll get the highest possible total reward. Still distribute to users based on their LST holdings. Users get more reward, pools get more fees. Now the pools even get extra unstaked ETH to use elsewhere. That's why I keep saying the curve shape is wrong. It has to be strict monotonic.

• 
  Clinton Donnelly (@CryptoTaxFixer) reported 55 minutes ago

  One of the main reasons people become frustrated with crypto tax software is that they have gaps in their data. BitMEX, BitMart, and AscendEX have recently announced that they are closing down. If you do not download your transaction records before access is removed, you may be left with gaps in your trading history. Without those records, it can become difficult to prove when you acquired your assets and what you paid for them. When crypto tax software does not have complete information, it may report higher gains than you actually need to include on your tax return. That can overstate your taxable income and cause you to pay more tax than necessary. Missing crypto data is very common, but there are ways to rebuild parts of the record. For example, you may still have trade confirmation emails from an exchange. These emails can show that, on a particular date and time, you bought or sold a specific asset. Although they are not the same as a complete transaction history, they can still serve as supporting evidence. We used this approach for a client we defended against the IRS who had moved a large amount of Bitcoin from an old exchange that had closed into his Coinbase account. The IRS challenged the incoming Bitcoin transactions during the appeals process because we did not have the original transaction history from the closed exchange. However, the client still had email confirmations from the old exchange. Those emails aligned with Coinbase’s records showing the incoming Bitcoin transactions. Together, the records helped demonstrate that the Bitcoin arriving in Coinbase was not new income. It was a transfer of the client’s own assets and therefore was not taxable as income. Because we were able to prove that, the audit was closed with no change to the client’s tax assessment. This is why preserving every available record matters. Even when a complete transaction history is missing, emails, wallet records, and receiving-exchange data may help reconstruct what happened.

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 57 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  Darmin (@Darmin_che_) reported 59 minutes ago

  @FrederickSpark3 Damn I'm sorry about your experience man that upsetting, I've also had issue with coinbase i lost have of my btc to an unknown error due to a system error, I felt upset I flied a report no response. luckily I got my funds recover. Kindly follow me I can help you?

• 
  lvnbbs_bnb 🐬TermMax (@lvn_crypto) reported 59 minutes ago

  @coinbase search being broken is honestly the real crime here

• 
  Grouchy (@GrouchyCrypto) reported 1 hour ago

  @coinbase I support this message.