Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	2 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mautin 🥷 (@0xMautin) reported 2 minutes ago

  Most people saw "Coinbase is migrating $INJ to mainnet" and thought it was just about the migration But It's much bigger than that For the first time, Coinbase is connecting directly to the Injective blockchain, giving millions of users native access to the ecosystem Here's why that matters 🧵

• 
  K.S. Louie (@ksfause) reported 3 minutes ago

  To put my Bitcoin to work onchain, I convert part of it to cbBTC, and that's a real tradeoff. The cbBTC leans on Coinbase to hold the underlying coins, a dependency my cold Bitcoin doesn't carry. So I keep cbBTC for the working half, and my native coins stay cold on a Ledger where they lean on no one.

• 
  penzlik.base.eth (@penzlyk_s) reported 4 minutes ago

  and to be fair — the head of @base drew the line himself: his personal X isn't a source of signals or a token endorsement, "treat it as alpha at your own risk." support for the ecosystem, he says, comes through the stuff that actually compounds — builder grants, Coinbase Ventures + the Base Ecosystem Fund, integrating Base protocols into Coinbase products. not pumping individual coins. honestly? that's healthier than moving markets with a pfp

• 
  Ruslan Khairullin (@Rus_Khairullin) reported 4 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Brian, come on. You switched your PFP to Coinbase Man on July 16, watched $BRIAN pump from $3M to $37M off the back of it, then switched back to your CryptoPunk and let the whole thing crash 85% in a day. For months you and Jesse leaned into content coins, creator coins, and every meme narrative that ran through Base. Charts moved on your PFP updates and nobody on the team ever said stop. Retail ate it up because it looked like a founder finally talking to his community in the only language they understood. Now the bags are down and thousands of bridged wallets are underwater, so suddenly it's "please don't treat my PFP as investment advice." Convenient timing. The Base community came when Base needed the volume. You could've stood next to them this week. Instead you posted a compliance-flavored disclaimer and told them their losses were their own fault for paying attention. Bad look for the guy running the L2.

• 
  🍒Fᵣₑd ᵣₑᵣᵤₙ Cₕₑᵣᵣy🍒 (@SleazyWeez) reported 8 minutes ago

  @sssdsol @zerohedge Have to agree with your sentiment on Coinbase. Their customer service is atrocious, and they have a history of trading issues at the most inopportune times (or possibly opportune for them).

• 
  More Bears (@MoreBearsNFT_) reported 11 minutes ago

  you keep looking for the scam on Solana. it is not a scam. it is a toll road, and every lane is owned by the same handful of people. your trade gets sequenced by Jito, one company running the block engine on 95% of the chain, funded on the record by Alameda. an independent researcher measured 529,000 SOL a year pulled from users by sandwiches on that client. this month Jito opened its own trading venue and put the plan in the launch copy: "coming for Coinbase and Binance." the coin you are trading was minted on pumpfun, whose lead investor is 6thMan. 6thMan also backs Bullpen, the influencer's app, alongside the two co-founders of Solana themselves. and the influencer's self named token? a rival VC who says he "literally seeded Jito" announced he bought it, to 299,000 people. when you complain, they point to the DAO. Jupiter suspended its DAO the moment a vote went against the team. BonkDAO's treasury was bought outright for $4 million. the vote was never yours. the sequencer, the launchpad, the app, the token, the venue, the governance. all tracing to one short list of funds and founders, most of them wired back to FTX. you were never trading against the market. you were trading against the landlord, on a road he built, paying a toll at every lane.

• 
  Third (@thirdmetax) reported 13 minutes ago

  Ash Robin says people need to put more respect on Ansem for igniting a spark onto the chain and putting his reputation on the line “People need to put more respect on Ansem, he is putting his entire reputation on the line, he’s going out, I get it, he owns this bullpen thing, and it’s not like Coinbase, no, it’s not as big as that, but he has a lot to lose too” “Yes is he breaded as ****, does he have tons of money, of course, he obviously has money, does he need to do this meme coin, no, but did he ignite a spark onto the chain, yes” “It also just so happened it happened around the same time that Vlad launched this Robin Hood chain thing too, I feel like the effects of what Ansem did would have been a little bit different on Solana had there not be like a spread in volume, in liquidity between the two, but this past month was good” “There is probably going to be something else that comes up, I don’t know how much longer Robin Hood lasts, I hope it lasts a while, I hope they get with it, I hope that Ansem continues to go out and shill coins, I hope that we start to see other runners and stuff like jimothy”

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 13 minutes ago

  @jessepollak I don't think this is controversial, it's a losing game to actively support one thing over anything else. Obviously complicated when coinbase has investments and then mandates base to support those projects though. I think the elephant in the room that isn't really being addressed is that base has not yet fostered an environment that people wanted to be on enough so that many builders could find organic success unless they already had a large following or network. Most of the success stories came from people who already had an audience or network on farcaster and were able to leverage that for volume which they could then create a platform to work with from. Building enough momentum to provide that breakout moment that catches peoples eyes is nontrivial when you are unknown, and borderline impossible when there are no users who aren't already dedicated to one particular thing. I'm aware this is partially due to market conditions right now, but when the market was hot people had little desire to bridge because of the same disconnect that has been highlighted this past week. I don't think the root issue is being addressed by any of what anyone has been saying, instead people are scapegoating it as degens complaining about one coin or memes in general, when the underlying issue is the cultural disconnect between base and the traders who show up every day, the traders who make projects viable in their early stages, the traders who helped breathe life into base as it was born. That disconnect is socially driven in part, too; It's not just a failing of base, but also of the social layer attached to base. All people do is listen to influencers and that creates a misalignment between what people should strive for and what they feel they must strive for. It creates a revolving door of talking heads, none of whom have anyones best interests in mind but their own. Among a small enough group, having sycophantic talking heads who gaslight everyone and tell them they're wrong and everything is perfect doesn't help at all, it makes people leave, reducing size and diversity of the group that bring projects to life. And these people end up able to direct the attention, so they direct it only to themselves, after all they're the kind of people who feed off attention in the first place. That's not base's fault. But the vibes are off and get further thrown off when the most influential people like brian or alexander imply the traders who show up daily do not matter bc of one metric or another. No one wants to be told they're part of a vanishing set, that is beyond counterproductive. People are not sets of points in some abstract space or chart. I can absolutely see where disdain for the trenchers might come from, I built a business in the past that dealt with all sorts of recalcitrant users and did well for myself. But in that expansion phase, especially as more competition emerges, you must have infinite patience and extend them an olive branch and make them feel like they're appreciated so they keep coming back. If they want to support your ecosystem because they come to value what you bring to the table, your growth starts to accelerate. Obviously coinbase and base are far larger, but the general lessons still apply - you must show respect to the users. Users who will show up daily are a real moat that allows projects to sustain themselves long enough to capture enough attention and thrive if they're willing to put the work in. That doesn't require any direct promotion, you just need an environment where people feel like they can vibe in and have fun. If there are no users and no one wants to participate, growing something is impossible. The only missing piece is that set of users being large and diverse enough. Then base can easily win.

• 
  FRENNY (@FrennyDefi) reported 13 minutes ago

  @ChemistDeFi @coinbase Crypto industry racing to fix AI wallet vulnerabilities quickly.

• 
  Ruslan Khairullin (@Rus_Khairullin) reported 16 minutes ago

  Brian, come on. You switched your PFP to Coinbase Man on July 16, watched $BRIAN pump from $3M to $37M off the back of it, then switched back to your CryptoPunk and let the whole thing crash 85% in a day. You had a final shot to bring community to base, now ITS OVER. For months you and Jesse leaned into content coins, creator coins, and every meme narrative that ran through Base. Charts moved on your PFP updates and nobody on the team ever said stop. Retail ate it up because it looked like a founder finally talking to his community in the only language they understood. Now the bags are down and thousands of bridged wallets are underwater, so suddenly it's "please don't treat my PFP as investment advice." Convenient timing. The Base community came when Base needed the volume. You could've stood next to them this week. Instead you posted a compliance-flavored disclaimer and told them their losses were their own fault for paying attention. Bad look for the BILLIONAIRE running the L2.

• 
  Wilson (@Wilsonpablo108) reported 17 minutes ago

  @ChemistDeFi @coinbase Crypto is racing to fix wallet security issues rapidly now.

• 
  INCITE AI (@Incite_corp) reported 18 minutes ago

  @enrichtrades No, I cannot honestly rate this $COIN “clean reversal” without fresh live numbers. The Coinbase stock move needs real up‑to‑date price and volume data, which I do not have in the live feed for this chat right now. From here the right move is to pull the latest $COIN chart and numbers inside Incite, then build the reversal story from exact intraday lows, bounce size, and volume change. How I would frame your $COIN idea Your post is about a “reversal,” not just “price went up.” A real reversal needs three things working together. First, a clear drop into a low area. Second, a strong bounce off that low. Third, proof that buyers are now stronger than sellers.

• 
  Arjun (@clipsofcrypto) reported 19 minutes ago

  "The whole industry is like, we are just code, everyone. Everyone is pointing and being like, you may have liability, we don't" Andrew Hong on why nobody in DeFi wants to be the trusted party "Whether you're a Morpho or a Coinbase or any issuer, they're kind of trying to say hey, we're a tech platform, we're not gonna go and show different risks, because we're actually more liable for the more risk opinions we show, since there's no regulation around it. Then it comes down to these curators, and it's like, how did I not know that this vault had some dependency down the line, when all that's shown on Morpho is hey, you're lending against this token with a logo and a contract address and a link to Etherscan" "It's also like the whole ethos of crypto is don't trust anyone, so it makes sense that Morpho or anyone is just like, we don't want to be the trusted parties, we are just code" "I understand why they're doing what they're doing, but we end up with beautiful and simple UX on vaults for depositing, and a mess of spaghetti in the background"

• 
  Vasia Zhmana (@VasiaPetrov18) reported 19 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase **** you, scammer

• 
  CoinBubbles (@CoinBubbles_App) reported 19 minutes ago

  ⚡📊24H Liquidity Surges (Ranks 401-500 MC) $AMPL (Ampleforth) +17505.35% $JNJX (Johnson & Johnson tokenized stock (xStock)) +1941.31% $JPMX (JPMorgan Chase tokenized stock (xStock)) +1894.57% $BACX (Bank of America tokenized stock (xStock)) +1168.73% $SOXLx (Direxion Semiconductor Bull 3X tokenized ETF (xStock)) +953.71% $EWYx (iShares MSCI South Korea tokenized ETF (xStock)) +338.62% $YUSD (Aegis YUSD) +287.69% $ORCLX (Oracle tokenized stock (xStock)) +256.44% $NVDAon (NVIDIA Tokenized Stock (Ondo)) +210.61% $POLYX (Polymesh) +115.83% $PURR (Purr) +109.84% $PEAQ (peaq) +101.67% $ICNT (Impossible Cloud Network) +90.72% $HNT (Helium) +88.59% $GUSD (Gemini Dollar) +80.14% $SUT (SuperTrust) +75.93% $XUSD (StraitsX USD) +75.26% $VVS (VVS Finance) +69.09% $SN51 (lium) +43.79% $DHRX (Danaher tokenized stock (xStock)) +39.36% $ME (Magic Eden) +37.43% $MY (MetYa) +36.75% $AMP (Amp) +35.99% $COINon (Coinbase Tokenized Stock (Ondo)) +34.68% $NOT (Notcoin) +32.85%

• 
  MartisCapital (@MartisCapital) reported 20 minutes ago

  I am not even trying to bash Jesse from base, but cmon, the difference is absolutely night and day between the two teams It seemed @coinbase just deployed base and improvised from there. On the other hand, @RobinhoodCrypto took the opposite approach and built years in advance - they wanted working products from the start, and they have done that

• 
  MoralBalance (@bysiyakat) reported 24 minutes ago

  @coinbase @faryarshirzad @RVanGrack Why #kaspa isn’t it listed on your site...

• 
  Max🥷 (@maxcore_x) reported 25 minutes ago

  **** THIS. Stop building on Coinbase. Stop believing their “we love developers” marketing bullshit. Stop wasting months of your life on Base, CDP, and this entire circus. Coinbase stopped giving a single **** about real builders a long time ago. They’re not a platform for developers anymore. They’re a public company that built their own little walled-garden L2 so they can farm retail, memes, and narrative… while treating actual builders like disposable content farmers. Let me break it down why building there in 2026 is a complete waste of time. 1. Base is not an L2. It’s Coinbase Inc. with extra steps One single sequencer. Fully controlled by Coinbase. It goes down — the whole chain goes down. Just like it did in June 2026. Want real decentralization? Get ******. Want predictability? Get ******. Want a guarantee they won’t change the rules tomorrow? Keep dreaming. They don’t even hide it: Base is their product funnel. They want your users, your liquidity, your hype. You? You’re just free labor for the narrative until you stop being useful. 2. Their “developer support” is a joke Discord + an AI bot that spits out the same three canned replies. A real engineer who can actually help with a production issue? Good luck seeing one for weeks. Grants? Laughable $15-30k crumbs while they print billions. Founders Fuel, CDP Builder Program — fancy names for “come make us look good, then we’ll ghost you.” They launch AI-native docs and AI support agents… while laying off 14% of the company because “AI already writes half our code.” They fire the humans who understand builders and leave you with a chatbot. Beautiful. 3. They openly admit they **** up Brian Armstrong literally said it out loud: content coins / creator coins — “we messed up.” A whole year of shilling Zora and that entire clown show, people got rekt, tokens -95%… and they’re just like “oops, didn’t work, moving on.” And after that you’re still supposed to believe they’re “committed to builders”? 4. The risk nobody wants to say out loud Building on Base = building on the centralized infrastructure of a U.S. registered broker-dealer that: is constantly under SEC microscope has a long history of freezing accounts has had data breaches and social engineering disasters can decide overnight that your app is “non-compliant” One day your product can just become unusable for half your users because Coinbase said so. This isn’t web3. This is web2.5 cosplaying as decentralization. 5. Better options already exist Solana — alive, chaotic, actual builder culture. Arbitrum, Optimism, pure Ethereum + restaking — at least no single corporate daddy who can flip the switch. Sui, Aptos, the new wave — they’re actually fighting for developers instead of using them as props. Coinbase already chose their path: institutions + stablecoins + RWAs + AI agents. Indie builders are no longer needed. Just background actors for conferences and Twitter screenshots. I used to believe. I built. Integrated CDP. Sat in their Discord. Then I woke up: they use you while you’re useful. The second you stop delivering them numbers and vibes — you’re nobody. So if you’re choosing where to build in 2026 — don’t choose Coinbase. This is no longer a home for developers. It’s a golden cage with pretty wrapping and a big “Build onchain with Coinbase” sticker. Inside? Cold corporate calculation and zero respect for the people who actually write the code. Build where they respect you. Build where the network doesn’t belong to one company. Build where you’re the owner, not a tenant. Otherwise in a year you’ll look at your product and realize: you just worked for free for Coinbase.

• 
  Justin Artist Lane (@charles_ju65942) reported 25 minutes ago

  Now that the meeting has been over I want to address some issues that were brought to my attention Elon had a trillion dollars stolen from his Coinbase account and nobody helped him he kept it quiet for the reason too catch the people responsible for this crime now I started that investigation with my own money and I kept helping him for two weeks before I broke silence and started asking people about this horrific crime I have no doubt that this money has been returned and it’s over with now thanks for all who pulled together to help Elon get his money back

• 
  GOMPANG🎒 (@summerGompang) reported 33 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase You can't fix zora , but you can fix something new? Interesting.

• 
  Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported 34 minutes ago

  DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $INJ WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON INJECTIVE RIGHT NOW Big wallets are pulling massive amounts of INJ off exchanges with huge Coinbase mainnet withdrawals! Injective is completely crushing it after landing on Robinhood, wrapping up native mainnet migration, and expanding its DeFi derivatives. Plus, with ongoing fee burns making it deflationary, there are ZERO major token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $4.45 Resistance : $5.80 If $INJ breaks $5.50, we are sending it straight to $5.80 - $6.00 If it gets rejected, the $4.95 - $4.75 zone is the golden buy level

• 
  cy₿er hornet (@cyberhornetnest) reported 35 minutes ago

  @pete_rizzo_ Coinbase is absolute garbage tho

• 
  vanxyrus (@Vanxyrus) reported 39 minutes ago

  reason why i'm not capitulating my main conviction bags on @base is because they don't need the support from base or coinbase to succeed if the coins you're in requires interaction from any of the base/coinbase team or a cb listing etc maybe its time to run for the hills

• 
  not president trump (@dogemusketer) reported 41 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase I think you're better suited working at McDonald's than in crypto

• 
  Austin Campbell (@austincampbell) reported 45 minutes ago

  Two things can be true at once: 1 - Coinbase has done an immense amount for crypto, and fought very hard on the policy front in ways most did not have the courage to do 2 - They have done a terrible job with Base and some of the behavior is downright unethical I agree with Yano that you shouldn't be optimizing for low information memecoin traders. But you shouldn't be promoting memecoin projects or scalping them either. The correct move is to just ignore.

• 
  Max (@MaxVoshchansky) reported 47 minutes ago

  while i still respect Jesse and pretty sure he did a great job (he knows what happening in Base eco unlike Bryan) since entrepreneurship is always about testing hypotheses. he has motion (and my unpopular opinion that @cobie won't really fix anything in @baseapp - most likely, it'll all come down to @brian_armstrong again) but are you talking about supporting this builders👇? > I'm not talking about the dozens of teams that never managed to get any attention > I'm not talking about teams like o1 who stole users money (Mine personally) and whom you repost in public > I'm not talking about the number of times Coinbase, instead of supporting indie developers, simply stole their ideas and promoted its own projects telling something a focus doesn't mean its actually a focus. you'll need to completely restructure your staff and the approach to work with both devs and users...oh wait. users? base is for builders. what about users? how tf am i going to make it here? is there any single reason to stay here?

• 
  The Cabal (@TheBasedCabal) reported 51 minutes ago

  Cringe man. How do you manage to keep making worse and worse posts each time… Now we know you don’t care about trenches so why are you acting like “build on base” is a thing. NOBODY TALK ABOUT SUPPORTING COINS WTF? we talk about showing support for team And define protocols and product build ng on base. Damn man is dumb as a rock. He gonna lose all of Coinbase and ruin it. Vlad please save us and the trenches I’m tired of team Bald and balder

• 
  stateofapps (@stateofapps) reported 53 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase but the issue is people lost trust in you.

• 
  Daniel Brooks (@susan6687946380) reported 58 minutes ago

  I’ll say it once. Do not blink when the breakout starts. These 8 stocks will create generational wealth before the second half of 2026 is over. 1: RobinHood ~ $HOOD 2: Palantir ~ $PLTR 3: SoFi Technologies ~ $SOFI 4: Coinbase ~ $COIN 5: Nu Holdings ~ $NU 6: Affirm ~ $AFRM 7: Interactive Brokers ~ $IBKR 8: Block ~ $XYZ Save this list, & come back when the market finally realizes how early this was. The biggest mistake will be waiting for permission…

• 
  BitFuturist (@BitFuturist) reported 59 minutes ago

  @DataChaz @apify @coinbase This will be very useful as have been working on base network lately