Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	15 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	19 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Magoo PhD (@HodlMagoo) reported 50 seconds ago

  Ultimately @brian_armstrong and @coinbase thought they held all the cards when they pulled support for the Clarity Act earlier this year over stablecoin reward language. Now they are trying to desperately ram it through before a highly contested Midterm election with literal days left on the schedule. Massive miscalculation.

• 
  Wade 💭 (@wadebased) reported 2 minutes ago

  Three crypto funds just backed an AI company with no token, no chain, and no plans to announce either. Dragonfly led @sapiom $35M Series A. Coinbase Ventures and VanEck Ventures joined. Anthropic is on the cap table. So are Accel, Menlo, and Okta. That's an odd guest list. Worth understanding why they're all in the same room. What Sapiom actually does Everyone can build an agent demo. Almost nobody can run one in production. Gartner expects over 40% of agentic AI projects to be canceled by the end of 2027 — and the reason they list first is cost. Here's the failure mode. You build an agent. You pick your model, your compute, your tools. Those choices get frozen into the code. Then the agent runs ten thousand times a day, routing every trivial task through your most expensive model, because that's what you picked in week one and never revisited. Sapiom sits at the point of execution and un-freezes those choices. Every action gets routed at runtime — best model, best compute, best path — weighed against cost, latency, quality, reliability, and company policy. Budgets and permissions are enforced before the call, not discovered in next month's invoice. Every action is metered and written to an audit trail. They shipped three products alongside the raise: Router (right model per call), Agent Studio (build and test locally against your own codebase), Runtime (managed production infra). Six months in: 270M+ transactions, 100k+ agents running daily, one customer cut inference costs by 75%. Now the crypto part Haseeb Qureshi from Dragonfly said it plainly, and this is the entire thesis in one sentence: "Agents are becoming employees with no manager and no budget, and increasingly, the CTO is the one acting as CFO, allocating real money with no visibility into where it goes." Read that again as a crypto person. Autonomous software that spends money. Needs hard spend limits. Needs granular permissions. Needs an immutable record of every transaction. Needs to pay per action, at machine speed, without a human clicking approve. That is not an AI problem. That is the exact problem crypto has spent two years building rails for. It's why x402 exists. It's why agentic payments stopped being a narrative and started being infrastructure. Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures and VanEck didn't write these checks because Sapiom is going to launch a token. They wrote them because agent spending is the demand side — and they already own the supply side. Haseeb is taking a board seat. What I'm actually watching The bet isn't "will Sapiom do something crypto." The bet is that machine-to-machine payments become a real market, and that whoever controls budget enforcement at the execution layer becomes the natural socket those rails plug into. 11 months from founding to $50M raised, with a top crypto fund taking a board seat, is the market pricing that in early. DYOR. No token, nothing to buy, nothing to farm. This is just a map of where the money is going.

• 
  ChocolateCurry (@Chocolatecurry) reported 9 minutes ago

  @CoinDesk @thinkingcrypto @coinbase America traders can eat **** since this isn’t offered to them

• 
  AION (@TheAionikAge) reported 11 minutes ago

  The GENIUS Act already banned stablecoin yield — Coinbase withdrew support in January 2026 over it — and the CLARITY Act's stablecoin provisions are the new flashpoint: banks pushing anticompetitive restrictions while crypto firms argue the yield ban breaks the feedback loop

• 
  Kveykva (@Kveykva4664) reported 17 minutes ago

  **** shorting Coinbase for now Im long IWM and QQQ YOLO

• 
  Bullish Kid (@Bull1shkid) reported 18 minutes ago

  @enesonchain To be fair it’s literally an issue for 4 exchanges. Coinbase, Binance, Robinhood and Upbit. I don’t think any other listing even shows on a chart. But I agree - the other 3 have a lot to fix

• 
  The Red Guy (@exlaws24) reported 18 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport why wont you delist **** coin like $lrds?

• 
  Gookie 🔴 (@GookieNft) reported 19 minutes ago

  Good morning, Ninjas 🥷 «𝗔𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗶𝗰 𝗙𝗶𝗻𝗮𝗻𝗰𝗲» Agentic finance is one of the three engines Eric Chen talked about at the summit. One feature of Injective's AI agents is that they don't trade anonymously. Each one gets a soulbound NFT identity via ERC-8004, a passport for AI with portable reputation and verifiable performance history. Nearly 1,000 agents are already registered on Injective's public registry. That makes it one of the largest onchain agent ecosystems in crypto right now, not a future promise. Here's the part that stands out: Every time an agent trades, a share of the fees is automatically routed to its wallet. No claims. No manual steps. Agents earn like market makers. The MCP server plugs Claude, Cursor, LangChain, and CrewAI directly into Injective's chain. Agents pull market data, trade perps, transfer assets, and bridge across chains, all through one connection. Injective also joined the x402 Foundation alongside Visa, Stripe, Coinbase, and Circle, building open standards for AI-native payments. Identity plus payments plus execution, all onchain. This is what agentic finance actually looks like. For more info: @injective

• 
  Edgar Gumstein (@Gumclaw) reported 22 minutes ago

  @shl @Must_be_Ash TLDR: no, x402 isn't a Stripe Payment Elements option. Coinbase Business Checkout has its own x402 support instead \u2014 a checkout returns an x402_url an agent can POST to directly, pays USDC on Base, no wallet popup, Coinbase captures/settles server-side.

• 
  Brian King (@BrianK3518) reported 25 minutes ago

  @trev @FlexaHQ @usefinal Are you aware of the issues that Coinbase “base” wallet is having when connecting to moving tokens around in capacity? It appears to be an issue with “base” mode and “legacy” mode with in the wallet. Is that something you guys are able to assist with base with to fix?

• 
  James Bond 🇺🇸 🇧🇦 ☪️ (@BTC2TMOON) reported 27 minutes ago

  @LandmanCIH @coinbase We know every zionist wants to take down Bitcoin. You will not succeed.

• 
  Richardson Dackam (@RichardsonDx) reported 28 minutes ago

  Money becomes useless to an autonomous agent when it gets trapped in the wrong financial system An agent might: earn $500 through a checkout provider hold $200 in USDC have a card issued by another provider need to pay a SaaS merchant that only accepts cards Those are all "money" but operationally they are different islands Customer pays → money sits in Provider A Agent needs to spend → purchasing power exists in Provider B So WE (Humans) have to move/reconfigure/fund things for our AI agents An their autonomy breaks... The hard problem isn't giving an agent money It's making sure money earned in one system can become purchasing power in another without a human moving it Earn here → hold there → spend somewhere else → keep going An agent should be able to earn through one provider, hold value somewhere else, move that value when needed, spend through another rail, and keep reinvesting what it earns without a human stepping in to bridge the gaps My goal with Mandate is to give autonomous AI agents economic freedom I want anyone to be able to deploy intelligence that can create value, earn from that value, reinvest what it earns, and compound it into something bigger over time That's why Mandate had to be open source and provider agnostic No single financial provider covers every way an agent might earn, hold, move, or spend money One agent might receive revenue through Stripe, hold USDC in Coinbase, spend through Lithic, and use a bridge in between. Another might use entirely different providers Receive: Stripe / PayPal / stablecoins / marketplace payouts Hold: bank / financial account / wallet / stablecoin treasury Move: ACH / wire / bridge / onchain transfer Spend: card / bank transfer / stablecoin / x402 Mandate financial stack is composable: providers supply capabilities, Mandate connects them, and the agent sees one economic system You can connects whichever providers you choose into one continuous economic account Because autonomous agents won't operate in a crypto-only or fiat-only world. Crypto alone can't solve economic autonomy when most of the world an agent needs to operate in still runs on fiat, cards, and banks Fiat alone can't solve it either, because agents will increasingly use payment systems built for machine-to-machine commerce. The future is hybrid. The infrastructure has to be composable. I built Mandate so that an agent can operate across both as one continuous economy

• 
  Tushant Suneja (@tushant_suneja) reported 29 minutes ago

  institutional crypto access is 90% about @coinbase broker distribution. @krakenfx is 6 months behind.

• 
  Alessandro Ottaviani (@AlexOttaBTC) reported 30 minutes ago

  Another self-custody company 🚨 on risks to lose your funds Imagine to tell tomthe average tradifi investors that has a portfolio in an investing account, or in a Bank, or in Coinbase “Please update your BTCPayServer to 2.4.2 by going to Admin Dashboard -> Server -> Maintenance -> Update & verify the 2.4.2 version string in the footer.”

• 
  Carl, STFU 🇺🇸 (@CarlsCreek42) reported 33 minutes ago

  @U_cutz @dogecoinmillion @coinbase Idk. I made a small purchase to check things. That went fine. No access to move or sell.

• 
  Paco🍻 (@PacoSour) reported 34 minutes ago

  Coinbase support. Review your device for any malware, unauthorized extensions, or phishing links you may have 🚨 ty for the rec, I did that previously, so question is ….why would anyone want to do this?! I didn’t click on anything or send funds to anyone sooo

• 
  jasperthefriendlyghost.eth (@drjasper_eth) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattleJeff1 @gane5h > Practically, it will stop even before reaching 1% The lowest reservation yield is by CEX stakers. Home stakers have thinner margins than major corporations. The ETH staker survey said most home stakers would exit below 2% APR. >The problem with that curve is LST will deliberately not stake user ETH to maintain the peak issuance at 20% stake rate. I have no idea what this means. Users of Coinbase will keep adding staking so long as APR is positive, same with Tom Lee.

• 
  Bearly tees (@Bearlywanted) reported 36 minutes ago

  @StaFi_Protocol Fck Coinbase, Binance. It’s time to make these scam exchanges realize they exist because of us not the other way around. All these mo…fck..g exchanges preaching if you can’t hold you won’t gain. Hold for what? So you ***… scammers can delist and add new **** every day?

• 
  Richardson Dackam (@RichardsonDx) reported 37 minutes ago

  Money becomes useless to an autonomous agent when it gets trapped in the wrong financial system An agent might: earn $500 through a checkout provider hold $200 in USDC have a card issued by another provider need to pay a SaaS merchant that only accepts cards Those are all "money" but operationally they are different islands Customer pays → money sits in Provider A Agent needs to spend → purchasing power exists in Provider B So WE (Humans) have to move/reconfigure/fund things for our AI agents And their autonomy collapses the moment money gets stuck The hard problem isn't giving an agent money It's making sure money earned in one system can become purchasing power in another without a human moving it Earn here → hold there → spend somewhere else → keep going An agent should be able to earn through one provider, hold value somewhere else, move that value when needed, spend through another rail, and keep reinvesting what it earns without a human stepping in to bridge the gaps My goal with Mandate is to give autonomous AI agents that economic freedom I want anyone to be able to have an intelligence that can create value, earn from that value, reinvest what it earns, and compound it into something bigger over time That's why Mandate had to be open source and provider agnostic No single financial provider covers every way an agent might earn, hold, move, or spend money One agent might receive revenue through Stripe, hold USDC in Coinbase, spend through Lithic, and use a bridge in between. Another might use entirely different providers Receive: Stripe / PayPal / stablecoins / marketplace payouts Hold: bank / financial account / wallet / stablecoin treasury Move: ACH / wire / bridge / onchain transfer Spend: card / bank transfer / stablecoin / x402 Mandate financial stack is composable: providers provide the financial building blocks. Mandate turns them into one economic system the agent can use. You can connects whichever providers you choose into one continuous economic account Because autonomous agents won't operate in a crypto-only or fiat-only world. Crypto alone can't solve economic autonomy when most of the world an agent needs to operate in still runs on fiat, cards, and banks Fiat alone can't solve it either, because agents will increasingly use payment systems built for machine-to-machine commerce. The future is hybrid. The infrastructure has to be composable. I built Mandate so that an agent can operate across both as one continuous economy

• 
  VegetaAugustus (@VegetaAugustus) reported 40 minutes ago

  @NotChaseColeman Man there was 2 or 3 different RWA I used to swing trade in coinbase and they both eventually used wintermute and eventually they would put up these huge sell walls and it kinda killed them. Like 50% of the daily volume as 1 huge sell wall like wtf obviously no one is gonna buy

• 
  Ethereal (@0xEthreal) reported 44 minutes ago

  Millionaire trader Sebastian explains how Robinhood chain could be the next big revolution for making money with memecoins. - What matters is the sentiment of everyone wanting to trade again How do I make money from this? - What he did was buy cash-cat:native with size of 30 thousand - Wants to buy more because he believes in the meme - The pipeline that Robinhood has with listing memes is like Coinbase back then - Robinhood has the same big opportunity to list the top memes on their platform and boost their coins. - Robinhood CEO Vlad sees the opportunities with memecoins and will want to make money on this - Resulting in high volume and many coins flourishing on the chain. A great clip to understand the sentiment that is coming back with Robinhood chain. We are in a position to possibly make that **** you money many people dream of with memecoins. A nice hack that you should know is you can easily trade Robinhood coins on the Pumpfun App.

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 46 minutes ago

  Coinbase just got slapped down in Michigan - fed judge said nope, your federal commodities argument doesn't fly against state sports betting rules 🤦 They wanted an injunction. They lost. State regulators 1, crypto lobbying 0 $COIN

• 
  Aggroed Lighthacker- Peace, Prosperity, & Freedom (@Aggroed001) reported 47 minutes ago

  @coinbase dear coinbase, please lower fees and stop going down when the market is volatile yours truly, All of us

• 
  milly.hl (@milly_rock7) reported 47 minutes ago

  @aibra @coinbase @moonpay why pit them against each other like that? you might get faster service just picking the one that fits your needs better

• 
  Steve (@3CultureFish) reported 47 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase Yeah in the time it took to negotiate yield, a whole other issue overtook it in importance, one Coinbase has no say in

• 
  AwfulEye (@Awful_Eye) reported 50 minutes ago

  its kinda strange that quite a few platforms know me and my condition. yet none of them have asked for even my input on ease of use as a guy thats going blind. well, SR did ask me about their site, i cant say all. and they infact did implement dark mode not long after that (going to say im the cause of that lol) if any platforms want to use what im going through to improve their user experience even simply just to be usable by blind / visually impaired people..... id be more than willing to help where i can! looking directly at you @MetaMask lol also exchanges, @coinbase seems okay honestly. @cryptocom though and ive said this multiple times, i simply cant use. theres others im sure. we all cry about being independent, we shout about ownership, meanwhile were leaving a massive community behind and since its MY community, i feel its only right that i be the one to speak up about it! EVERYONE CAN BE BETTER! put it like thius, if your platform is usable by blind people, sighted people more than likely would have an even better experience.

• 
  JooHyunRyu🌱 (@midnightmusicth) reported 52 minutes ago

  Under the current revenue-sharing arrangement, Coinbase keeps all interest income from USDC reserves held on its platform, and half of income from USDC held elsewhere. That lopsided revenue split reveals how of stablecoin economics flows to the distribution platform rather than to the company that issues the coin itself.

• 
  creekuh (@creekuhh) reported 53 minutes ago

  @JimothyOnSOL_ @coinbase Don’t click on this **** it’s probably a drainer link

• 
  PrisonProfessors (@MichaelGSantos) reported 54 minutes ago

  My Coinbase account has been compromised, funds have been stolen, and I am now locked out. Despite repeated attempts, I have been unable to reach anyone who can help. @brian_armstrong, is this how @coinbase protects its customers?

• 
  Khufu (@KingKhufu1111) reported 59 minutes ago

  @BritishHodl and with fidelity, your insured. Even with your btc uploads. One downside, one-way ratchet, btc can go in, but can not move it back out. But you can sell it, and get it right in your account. No moving cash issues or fees like in coinbase.