Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	14 hours ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  G. (@GirardGabriel5) reported 2 minutes ago

  $XNO Testing counter-hypothesis against the Coinbase integration (as the main actor) help to test the initial hypothesis. I tried : - Privy : doesn't resist to multiple arguments. - Cloudflare : also doesn't explain many things. Therefore : everything leads to Coinbase.

• 
  Command Crypto (@CommandCrypto_) reported 10 minutes ago

  There is no man on earth that have ever gaslit me like the customer service department at @coinbase this is causing me great emotional distress. It drove me to drink.

• 
  dinxnd (@dinxnd_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @LongGameEquity @IncomeShares Depends on which one your are holding. Its important to diversify the products. For example coinbase is performing horrible but same as the stock (because crypto is also going down alot). AMD is completely the opposite, it did great.

• 
  Gilgamesh (@SnorkelCapital) reported 18 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong When will Coinbase offer customer service? Say for example my account gets locked out for no reason and I want to regain access, providing a phone number to a competent human would be incredible. Just spitballing here, anyway yeah nice pfp

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 19 minutes ago

  Chainlink $LINK Sees $33M Exchange Withdrawal as Accumulation Signals Build Chainlink $LINK is attracting attention after nearly 3.9 million LINK—worth approximately $32.6 million—was withdrawn from Coinbase Prime to a previously inactive wallet linked to Dutch cryptocurrency exchange Bitvavo. Large exchange outflows often catch investors’ attention because they can indicate accumulation rather than an intention to sell. The receiving wallet had no prior transaction history, suggesting the tokens may have been moved into cold storage, institutional custody, or a long-term staking setup rather than prepared for immediate trading. Interestingly, the transfer did not trigger a spike in trading volume. LINK continues to trade around $8.30, up roughly 5% over the past week, while daily trading volume remains relatively modest at about $153 million. The muted market reaction suggests the transfer was viewed more as a custody move than an immediate buying or selling event. The transaction also comes as institutional interest in Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol (CCIP) continues to grow. CCIP is increasingly viewed as one of the key infrastructure layers connecting different blockchains, allowing assets and data to move securely across multiple networks. If tokenization and real-world assets continue expanding, interoperability could become one of the most valuable pieces of crypto infrastructure. Technical Picture LINK continues to trade within a well-defined range. Support: $7.80–$8.00 Resistance: $9.00–$9.50 The market has repeatedly defended the $8 area, while buyers have so far failed to produce a convincing breakout above $9. That makes $9 the key level to watch. A high-volume daily close above that resistance could improve momentum and potentially open the door toward the psychologically important $10 level. Three Possible Scenarios Bull case If institutional accumulation continues and more LINK leaves exchanges, available supply could gradually tighten. Combined with stronger crypto market sentiment, that could be enough to push LINK through the $9 resistance zone. Base case The most likely near-term outcome may be continued consolidation between $8.00 and $8.80 while investors wait for a stronger catalyst. Bear case If Bitcoin or the broader crypto market weakens, LINK could revisit the $7.40–$7.60 range before finding stronger buying interest. My View A $33 million withdrawal sounds impressive, but by itself it doesn’t confirm a breakout. Large transfers happen for many reasons, including custody changes, treasury management, or staking preparation. Without follow-through from additional institutional accumulation, rising trading volume, or improving market sentiment, it’s difficult to conclude that a sustained rally has begun. That said, I continue to think Chainlink is one of the stronger long-term infrastructure projects in crypto. The real investment thesis isn’t just today’s wallet movement—it’s whether CCIP becomes the standard interoperability layer for tokenized assets, stablecoins, and institutional blockchain applications. If that adoption accelerates, today’s price movements may ultimately prove far less important than the network’s long-term utility. $LINK $BTC $ETH $COIN

• 
  🍁 REYNOLDS💰🪙 (@reynolds2977) reported 20 minutes ago

  1/ Deposits and withdrawals are paused during migration. Standard. But the wording matters: Coinbase said this "will enable the world's largest crypto exchange to access the Injective ecosystem for the first time." First time. Native. Mainnet.

• 
  Melted (@MeltedMindz) reported 20 minutes ago

  Regarding the recent buzz around my profile picture changes and some feelings that the Base community isn’t being supported enough: I appreciate the feedback (even if tough to hear) and I realize you wouldn't take the time to respond unless you cared. It seems I wasn't clear enough setting expectations for all of you, so let me try and do that now: please don’t follow my personal X account for investment advice or signals around individual coins. I’m simply posting things I find interesting or funny on the internet. I may not even be aware if there is a coin or project attached to the content I'm posting (you should assume I'm not, to be safe). My posts and profile pics are also not endorsements or commitments to anything. Base is our shot at building foundational infrastructure for financial services where we can all innovate together. That includes tokenized stocks, borrow/lend protocols, stablecoin payments, etc and yes even meme coin trading. I believe in economic freedom, and support you trading whatever you want. Just realize that if you're treating my X account as alpha, you are doing so at your own risk, against my wishes. I would never recommend this. On the topic of “support” from the Base team or Coinbase, there seems to be confusion around this too. There are many tokens we would like to list on our centralized exchange, but can't for compliance and regulatory reasons. If you want Jesse or me to pump your bags or shill certain coins, we're also not going to do that. Here is what we are committed to on support: we run in-person Base Batches and issue grants to high potential builders, Coinbase Ventures and the Base Ecosystem Fund also invest in the most promising companies building on Base, and we periodically integrate promising Base defi protocols into our products at Coinbase which enhances distribution. I might even mention something on X if I think it's interesting, but again, this is not investment advice. In general, we bias toward supporting projects that we believe will create long term customer value. You may like this approach or you may not, but either way hopefully it creates clarity going forward, so you can decide what you want to do. I respect your choice, either way. P.S. I still might post memes if I think they are funny! It's still not investment advice.

• 
  Mireya Pewitt (@MireyaPewi26322) reported 20 minutes ago

  Coinbase begins mainnet migration today, temporarily halting deposits and withdrawals. This move grants the exchange access to the Injective ecosystem, potentially boosting its crypto offerings. How will this integration impact user experience and market dynamics? #Crypto #DeFi #

• 
  _d12 (@Zippa0Z) reported 23 minutes ago

  @coinbase HONESTLY IM ******* FUMING **** YOU AND YOYR **** ******* WEBSITE. EVERYONE DONT GO WITH COINBASE THEY WRE A ******* JOKE. Withdrawal everything and leave them. They’ve literally ****** up things for me talking about ‘scam’ **** YOU & YOYR FAKE ******* ****

• 
  Bullish Times (@BullishTimes_) reported 25 minutes ago

  Base has a trust problem now. Not a chain-is-dead problem. A narrative problem. Coinbase spent years presenting Base as the friendly public square for crypto builders, wrapped in the wider Stand With Crypto posture. Then the content-coin experiment soured, leadership admitted the social thesis failed, and Robinhood Chain arrived looking exactly like what it is: an investment hub building financial rails, not a movement trying to look altruistic. That bluntness matters. Base still has serious DeFi TVL and real infrastructure. Robinhood Chain is barely out of the gate. But crypto trust is not just TVL; it is whether users believe the incentives being sold to them match the incentives underneath. My piece: why Base’s trust problem is Robinhood Chain’s opening — and why HOODL is an early, factual experiment rather than proof of migration. See URL below 👇 #StandWithCrypto #DeFi

• 
  THC Humor 💹🧲 (@THChumor) reported 25 minutes ago

  @DegenerateNews @coinbase @brian_armstrong Official statements always help cut through the speculation

• 
  FREDOSAUCE (@fsczero1) reported 26 minutes ago

  I made a @coinbase withdrawal a few days ago and it never arrived in my bank account. Can I get some technical support? @CoinbaseSupport @CoinbaseBiz I remember leaving my phone behind at a gas station mini mart in Cerritos. When I doubled back to get it, the shopkeeper posted a sign saying he would be back in 10 minutes. When he got back, I told him I left my phone and he gave it back to me, smiling and saying “Don’t you hate it when that happens?” An app was removed from my home screen. I later checked my coinbase account and there was another account linked to it that I didn’t recognize. I wasn’t sure if that was coinbase’s official bank account where you could pay them or something. But my cards were still linked and my withdrawals still showed that they would go into my checking account. My latest withdrawal was supposed to arrive “instantly” in my account but it hasn’t yet. I’m confused. And concerned. Help me out?

• 
  Brian's Beacon (@BriansBeacon) reported 26 minutes ago

  Continuing this experiment more: -> Paid off part of the loan with $10 USDC. No fees. LTV went down as expected from 33% to 27%. -> Then withdrew about $10 worth of existing Bitcoin collateral which bumped up LTV to 28.7%. No fees with this transaction as well. -> Liquidation price is now at around $21,000. Important to note Bitcoin went up a bit since I started this experiment so it’s cool to see that help lower LTV. I always said it’s counterintuitive but the best time to borrow against your BTC is at the bottom of the bear market because as it goes back up, your LTV decreases, reducing your chances of liquidation. I continue to be impressed with what Coinbase and Morpho have done with all this. Feels like the way the future of digital assets and digital finance should be.

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 27 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @chamath there are two problems right now for base specifically: 1. marginal liquidity that would’ve gone to base tokens is going to robinhood chain and hyperliquid instead: both offer better infrastructure, deeper liquidity, and leadership that doesn’t troll their own community 2. marginal developer energy that would’ve built on base is being redirected to chains that actually listen to feedback and ship what users ask for, not what the team feels like experimenting with coinbase has 100M users and a publicly traded company behind it. base should be the dominant L2 by every metric. instead it’s losing builders to robinhood chain (live for 2 weeks) and losing traders to hyperliquid (no VC, self-funded) these feel structural but i could be wrong.

• 
  0xsimba ⌘ (🌸, 🌿) 🛸 (@0xbrel) reported 28 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong This is the disclaimer every CEO should've made years ago. But the real issue isn't your pfp, it's incentive structure tbh. When a founder's meme = 40% pump, people will front run it regardless of disclaimers. Same reason Saylor's tweets move MSTR, Musk's move DOGE. Solution isn't clarity statements. It's on-chain proof: show us Coinbase Ventures' actual allocation, when they buy, when they exit. Trust the flows, not the post. That's the only "alpha" that doesn't rely on vibes.

• 
  norules (@n0rulesnvr) reported 29 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong lmao not sure "we" is the right word when @jessepollak created the expectation that Coinbase would shill and pump any dumb **** with complete disregard for quality or long-term value

• 
  Jeztoshi (@cryptojezuz) reported 30 minutes ago

  The state doesn't ask permission to watch you anymore. It just does. Every card swipe gets logged, every bank transfer gets flagged if it matches a pattern, every Coinbase withdrawal sits in a database that three-letter agencies access without a warrant. Not because you're suspected of anything. Because the system treats surveillance as the baseline and privacy as something you have to justify. $XMR doesn't fix this by bolting privacy onto a transparent ledger. It makes surveillance structurally impossible. Ring signatures mean you can't trace the sender. Stealth addresses mean you can't identify the receiver. RingCT hides the amount. There's no metadata to leak, no transaction graph to analyze, no compliance back door because someone forgot to toggle a setting. The protocol assumes privacy is non-negotiable and builds everything else around that. The argument against Monero used to be "only criminals need privacy." That framing died the moment every major government started building CBDCs with programmable spending limits. Privacy isn't about hiding crime. It's about whether you own your money or rent permission to use it. #Monero #XMR

• 
  News (@nieuwsvolger93) reported 36 minutes ago

  @dontbuytops @CoinbaseSupport Without a big crypto Twitter account like you have they wouldn't even have responded to you. Coinbase is terrible

• 
  CorgiI (@corgil) reported 36 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Both CZ and Brian running 2 biggest crypto exchanges in the world and whenever they rug their community or **** something up they just pretend that they had no idea what was happening Rinse and repeat... I'm starting to believe even Cobie wouldn't be able to save Coinbase

• 
  7 fig Meme boss 💰 🚀 (@SupremememeBOSS) reported 38 minutes ago

  Jerry Pan, who just launched his own meme launchpad on Base, has an intriguing storyline that I'm watching closely. Jerry obviously has strong connections within Coinbase. He's been pushing the B20 narrative, and he's getting engagement from some notable Coinbase figures. Recently, he posted on X that his goal is to have the first $100M market cap B20 runner launch from his platform. Jesse replied with a 🫡. After Brian Armstrong changed his profile picture to Coinbase Man, many people—including me—assumed Jerry was referring to the Coinbase Man token, $BRIAN. But now I'm starting to think he may have been referring to his own token, $JERRY (Jerry the Goat). On DexScreener, the X link for $JERRY points directly to Jerry's personal account, and the website links to his launchpad. That doesn't prove anything, but it's an interesting detail. I'm not saying $BRIAN is dead, but $JERRY may actually be the one he's positioning as the flagship B20 runner. This is not a buy recommendation—always do your own research. One thing that gives me pause is the Bubblemap showing a wallet holding roughly 50% of the supply, which is obviously something to pay attention to. That said, the project also checks several boxes that make it worth watching. The entire B20 narrative has my attention right now. Whether the breakout ends up being $BRIAN or $JERRY, or another meme, I don't know. But it's definitely a narrative I'll be following closely.

• 
  B-Chat (@BChat777) reported 42 minutes ago

  @LeilaniFarms @hectoinc Is hecto on coinbase i bought some and sold it to make sure and copied the address to coingecko its to new or maybe I have the wrong one it was a solana at 1st right help me my guy

• 
  Dan Niles (@DanielTNiles) reported 43 minutes ago

  Every great industrial revolution has had overinvestment due to the potential for riches for the last companies standing. Eventually this ends in a bust. AI I believe is no different. But I believe the current “speedbump” is not the beginning of that ultimate bust. On Saturday June 20th, I laid out my near-term concerns of an AI “speedbump” due to: 1) Token minimization 2) Competitive low cost open-sourced LLM models 3) Rising semiconductor cost impact on Q3 guidance Monday June 22nd in hindsight turned out to be the short-term top for the semiconductor index and the momentum trade. Token maximation in March turned into token minimization by June with the most extreme example being the $COIN CEO on June 26th posting how they cut their token spend by nearly 50% by largely routing AI queries to cheaper models. In the near-term, the question becomes can token usage by the other 99% of firms go up fast enough to offset the top 1% of firms like Coinbase cutting their AI bills. Numerous cheaper LLMs have been introduced recently. Last week the introduction of Moonshot’s Kimi K3 (China-based) challenged the performance of the most advanced US models. Profitable AI native revenue growth that is ROIC positive is what is needed to keep the whole ecosystem functioning. $GOOGL reporting this Wednesday will provide the first major datapoint on the trade-offs between cheaper tokens and more token production. Google Cloud Platform has seen revenue growth year-over-year accelerate from 34% in Q3:24 to 48% in Q4 and 63% in Q1:25. This growth rate should accelerate further in Q2 due to token maximization. While I expect forward Rev/EPS to move higher post results due to their core business, comments on GCP growth are likely to drive the stock reaction. While $GOOGL is my favorite consumer AI play given they have the complete AI stack, I am not sure they are immune from the leading 1% of companies trying to cut their AI bills. Uber for example that blew their entire AI budget for the year in the first four months has GCP as their primary supplier. $INTC which reports on Thursday provides multiple ways to win at the AI infrastructure layer which I am more bullish on than the increasingly commoditizing LLM model layer: 1) Agentic AI is driving a surge in demand for server CPUs which are a new bottleneck, 2) their advanced packaging has already attracted several hyper-scalers and 3) their foundry business (our national champion with an investment by the US government) continues to improve and attract new customers. As for the current AI “speedbump” in stocks, the Morgan Stanley Momentum Index (MOMO) which subtracts the Long Index from the Short Index fell 28% since June 22nd through July 16th in just 24 days with a slight reprieve of 1.6% on Friday. Historical corrections of over 10% since 1996 have averaged 20% from peak to trough but have taken 48 days on average to bottom. But the rally of the MOMO index of 40% from the March 30th stock market bottom through June 22nd was also much sharper than historical precedents. In my opinion, investing is about the risk versus reward. On June 20th, it was not good with increasing examples of token minimization. From a technical basis, MOMO is still not oversold given the RSI only reached 35 on 7/16 and on average it bottoms at 31. But the risk vs reward is more favorable today with sentiment having fallen further following: 1) the negative pre-announcement by $IBM which declined 26% last week despite prior claims of being an AI beneficiary, 2) the 3% drop in $ASML and 8% decline in $TSM last week despite positive earnings and 3) the 10% decline in both the Semiconductor Index and MOMO last week. Finally, I believe the advent of Agentic AI which arguably started on January 30th of 2026 with the formalization of OpenClaw requires 10-100x more tokens vs Chat-based AI. As a result, I believe it is prudent to start adding back some exposure in the AI related infrastructure names. But I believe this needs to be balanced with prudence at the public cloud layer given the near-term focus on AI bills needing to be controlled by the top 1% of corporations.

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 46 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong honest question brian: why is jesse still running base? he launched coins that dumped on his own community. promoted soulja boy, a documented scammer zachxbt exposed years before jesse amplified him. pushed content coins for 18 months while the community begged him to focus on trading and perps. ignored every piece of feedback until the data was catastrophic and everyone had already left. his own words: "the collateral damage was pretty bad" and "an exercise in eating sh**" zora left base for solana. farcaster got sold. $VIRTUAL (the biggest thing ever built on base) wasn't listed on coinbase for over a year while kraken and binance listed it first, and has now moved to robinhood. the chain went down twice in 10 months. builders say they felt "gaslit by base management" and after all of that, he didn't step down. he just handed the app to cobie and kept control of the chain itself. the same person who spent 2 years proving he doesn't listen until it's too late is still in charge of the infrastructure every builder and trader depends on you have 100M users and every advantage in crypto. base should be untouchable. the reason it's not is sitting right there

• 
  Psalm (@Psalmdav0) reported 47 minutes ago

  📡 "The transaction history you're looking at might not be the whole picture. Here's what block explorers actually show you." Block explorers like Etherscan show you on-chain activity clearly, but "on-chain" doesn't mean "everything relevant." A lot of important context lives off-chain entirely, a project's actual team identities, legal structure, or off-chain agreements between wallets aren't recorded on the blockchain at all. The chain shows you what moved, not always who's really behind it or why. A few things worth knowing when reading a wallet's history: 1. Multiple wallets can belong to one entity. A "distributed" holder list can still be one person or team splitting tokens across many addresses, nothing on-chain forces disclosure of that. 2. Exchange wallets look different from personal wallets. Large, labeled addresses (Binance, Coinbase hot wallets) holding tokens usually represent many users' combined balances, not one whale, check for exchange labels before assuming concentration risk. 3. "First transaction" isn't always creation. A wallet's oldest visible transaction on one chain might just be when it first touched that chain, it could have history elsewhere.

• 
  Kai - Briefing Block (@briefing_block_) reported 47 minutes ago

  20/07/26 Investor’s Daily Brief - AI Demand Is Rising, Certainty Is Falling Demand is broadening, but margins, backlogs and market leadership are becoming less secure. Market snapshot: S&P 500: 7,489.18, +0.42% Nasdaq: 25,720.87, +0.79% WTI oil: $82.68, +0.2% Bitcoin: $64,706, +0.59% Inside today: • AI contracts promise visibility, not certainty • Microsoft validates AMD as a second source • China pressures frontier-model pricing • Coinbase exposes narrower speculative liquidity • PayPal’s assets attract strategic interest The AI trade is entering a harder phase. Demand is still rising, but investors can no longer assume every backlog converts cleanly, every shortage lasts or every incumbent keeps its pricing power. 1. Backlogs aren’t bonds Long-term AI supply agreements support the growth story, but they are not guaranteed revenue. If utilization weakens, customers can seek delays, lower volumes or renegotiated terms. The real test is conversion into cash flow without margin concessions. 2. $AMD gains strategic credibility Microsoft’s planned deployment of AMD’s Helios system gives hyperscalers another full-stack option beyond Nvidia. That validates AMD, but it also gives buyers more leverage over price, architecture and supply. Execution, software adoption and utilization now matter more than announcements. 3. China compresses model scarcity Alibaba’s Qwen3.8 Max highlights how quickly frontier-model leadership can change. If capable models become cheaper and more open, proprietary model premiums become harder to defend. Independent benchmarks and developer adoption will matter more than parameter counts. 4. $ZCOI.NE reveals narrower risk appetite Soft trading-volume expectations suggest that resilient crypto prices are not translating into broad retail activity. Coinbase’s recurring revenue offers protection, but the next earnings report must show that weaker transaction activity is not becoming structural. 5. $PYPL’s assets outshine its narrative Takeover interest suggests strategic value remains in PayPal’s checkout network, merchant reach and Venmo user base, despite years of weak execution. A credible bid could reset valuation; a failed process would return attention to the turnaround. Bottom line: The AI boom is real. The easy scarcity trade is not. Investors now need proof of backlog conversion, durable margins and recurring cash flow—not just large contracts, new model claims or demand headlines.

• 
  Trout (@BigTrout300) reported 49 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Friendly reminder, Brian Armstrong took my good friend who was a market makers office at Coinbase, tore it down & shoved him in a janitors closet forcing him out of the company for going against them in the securities fraud lawsuit & exposing bad practices

• 
  BasedMayne (@thecryptomayne) reported 55 minutes ago

  With the recent base developments there are two possibilities: 1. Coinbase is incompetent and it starts at or near the top. 2. Coinbase is completely suffocated by regulatory and compliance bullshit and it is so bad that it has led to this. If it’s number 2, Robinhood is also a public company and should be dealing with similar issues. So watch what they do.

• 
  Gavin Mehl (@GavinMehl) reported 57 minutes ago

  There is a new customer showing up in the world, and it is software. AI systems now do real work, and to do real work they have to buy things: data, compute, answers, access. Their purchases are worth fractions of a cent, millions of times a day. No bank, no card network, and no app store can process a payment that small, because their fees are bigger than the payment itself. That means an entire economy is forming with no way to move its money. The value is owning the cash register for that economy. A rail where one machine pays another a fraction of a cent, instantly and finally, with a receipt written permanently on chain that anyone can verify and no one can delete. Every transaction too small for Visa flows to whoever runs that rail, and Visa, Mastercard, Google, and Coinbase all spent 2025 preparing for exactly this customer, which tells you the demand is real and the race is on. The second half of the value is memory. Everything an AI does today evaporates or sits on a server a company can wipe. A permanent, verifiable record of what a machine did, said, and paid is worth money to every business that will ever have to prove what its software did. Storage that cannot be erased and cannot be faked is a product with no substitute.

• 
  Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) reported 57 minutes ago

  Regarding the recent buzz around my profile picture changes and some feelings that the Base community isn’t being supported enough: I appreciate the feedback (even if tough to hear) and I realize you wouldn't take the time to respond unless you cared. It seems I wasn't clear enough setting expectations for all of you, so let me try and do that now: please don’t follow my personal X account for investment advice or signals around individual coins. I’m simply posting things I find interesting or funny on the internet. I may not even be aware if there is a coin or project attached to the content I'm posting (you should assume I'm not, to be safe). My posts and profile pics are also not endorsements or commitments to anything. Base is our shot at building foundational infrastructure for financial services where we can all innovate together. That includes tokenized stocks, borrow/lend protocols, stablecoin payments, etc and yes even meme coin trading. I believe in economic freedom, and support you trading whatever you want. Just realize that if you're treating my X account as alpha, you are doing so at your own risk, against my wishes. I would never recommend this. On the topic of “support” from the Base team or Coinbase, there seems to be confusion around this too. There are many tokens we would like to list on our centralized exchange, but can't for compliance and regulatory reasons. If you want Jesse or me to pump your bags or shill certain coins, we're also not going to do that. Here is what we are committed to on support: we run in-person Base Batches and issue grants to high potential builders, Coinbase Ventures and the Base Ecosystem Fund also invest in the most promising companies building on Base, and we periodically integrate promising Base defi protocols into our products at Coinbase which enhances distribution. I might even mention something on X if I think it's interesting, but again, this is not investment advice. In general, we bias toward supporting projects that we believe will create long term customer value. You may like this approach or you may not, but either way hopefully it creates clarity going forward, so you can decide what you want to do. I respect your choice, either way. P.S. I still might post memes if I think they are funny! It's still not investment advice.

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 59 minutes ago

  “i may not even be aware if there is a coin or project attached to the content i’m posting” brian there was a token called $BRIAN on YOUR chain, doing $100M+ in volume, with 10,000+ people trading it, thousands of them tagging you, replying to you, asking you to acknowledge the situation. how can you not know? that’s not an excuse, that’s an admission that you don’t pay attention to what’s happening on your own chain and if you genuinely didn’t know, that’s worse. because it means the CEO of coinbase with 100M users is so detached from his own ecosystem that a $100M volume token named after him on his own L2 didn’t reach his radar. while thousands of people were in his replies you put cobie in charge of the base app. you replied to ansem about why base is dead. you engaged with jesse about memecoins publicly. you changed your pfp to a memecoin. you clearly know what effect these actions have on a market that watches your every move. you’re not new to this so either you knew and you’re pretending you didn’t, or you didn’t know and you need someone around you who does. because right now 10,000+ people are down 99% on a coin named after you, on your chain, that pumped because you changed your pfp, and you’re telling them it’s their fault for paying attention to you that’s not a disclaimer. that’s abandonment