Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	29 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ChoPaeng Momma (@ChoPaeng_TV) reported 5 minutes ago

  If you believe you were affected by a Coinbase-related scam or the WLUNA issue, preserve transaction records, account statements, screenshots, and communications, then contact @TrevorRecovery1 for legal guidance on possible recovery options.

• 
  ℂ𝕠𝕥𝕪 📐 (@TherapyToaster) reported 7 minutes ago

  @bankrbot @coinbase problem is, all my crypto was stolen out of my @exodus wallet. I need to fund this with new USD.

• 
  crescendovski 𐤊 (@Kaspanyan) reported 12 minutes ago

  Great News! 🎉 Coinbase has removed Kaspa from its futures trading. Hopefully, Binance will follow doing the same. Futures trading without a spot listing only hurts Kaspa. It’s basically just a casino game like: will the price go up or down? Buy Kaspa on the spot market and transfer your coins to your Ledger! Less futures trading, less bad manipulation. #coinbase #crypto #kaspa

• 
  Renee (@ReneeMichell007) reported 13 minutes ago

  @coinbase @X @Bitcoin All over $13 mistake by Coinbase I can’t get into my own account, What I have in there is nothing compared to what people make in a year but enough to get me out of this living situation. So wrong, your bot support was bad, the human support amazing with me hysterical crying

• 
  exchangeIntel (@exchangeIntel) reported 15 minutes ago

  Coinbase cbETH Network Support Update resolved The official status record now shows the incident as resolved. Official incident duration: ~7d 2h.

• 
  Bitcoin News (@BitcoinNewsCom) reported 17 minutes ago

  BITCOINERS: DO NOT SCAN THIS QR CODE The IRS is warning that scammers are mailing fake, official-looking IRS letters to cryptocurrency holders directing them to a bogus “Digital Asset Compliance Portal.” The letters include a QR code leading to a fake IRS website that may ask for personal information, wallet details, exchange credentials or other sensitive data. The IRS says it does not operate a “Digital Asset Compliance Portal” and did not send these letters. Coinbase and DarkTower reportedly traced infrastructure behind the campaign to a recently registered domain hosted in Romania. If you receive one, do not scan the QR code or provide any information. H/t @CryptoTaxFixer

• 
  Octopus (@Octop3s) reported 20 minutes ago

  one of the utmost reasons fintechs/neobanks don’t want to build anything around credit is underwriting. they don’t want to spend a year figuring it out. that’s what we @Cr3dentials are building: a tech that a project can just use through our API instead. we plug in the data of the people who make up one of the largest % of neobank audiences today: gig workers who work across the internet. we verify their earnings to determine their eligibility for credit instead of just offering credit to anyone. we keep integrating as many websites as possible. right now, we have Bolt, Deel, OnlyFans, etc., and we’re working to integrate everywhere someone is earning, from social networks like YouTube and X to traders trading on Binance, Coinbase, and others. everybody who earns should have the same privileges as those earning a salary. on recourse, we build our system in a way that’s beneficial to both lenders and borrowers. borrowers have access to loans, but in rare cases where borrowers don’t want to pay back, recourse allows lenders to go beyond the original collateral, if there is any, and pursue the borrower’s other assets or income to recover the unpaid debt. with every loan, you don’t have to worry about whether they’ll pay back or not. our system does its thing. on repayment, our system records both repayment and payment data, which helps neobanks that provide this credit build a better picture of who the borrower really is and whether they should keep giving them loans. projects don’t just judge people based on their earnings alone. it becomes a combination of data. how early did they repay the last loan? combine that with their current earnings data to make a more informed decision when offering them a loan. on enforcement, we’re working with different jurisdictions across countries to make sure defaults, when not paid, can show up in the borrower’s financial record. for instance, we’re working with regulators in Nigeria to make use of BVN, which is like a financial record. so every time a customer doesn’t pay, they aren’t just owing money and walking away. it can be reflected in their financial footprint in TradFi too. we addressed every important segment of credit so projects and borrowers are even. that way, both lenders and borrowers are protected. happy to chat more as always.

• 
  Metaplanero (@metaplanero) reported 25 minutes ago

  How Metaplanet cloned its capital engine onto Nasdaq On August 18, 2026, Metaplanet did something more structural than "buying more Bitcoin" Through its Florida subsidiary, Metaplanet Holdings, Inc., it took control of Nasdaq-listed Super League Enterprise (SLE) and converted it into Superplanet, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUPA), a U.S.-domiciled, dollar-native Bitcoin treasury vehicle Read the SEC filings closely; the subscription agreement , and the preliminary proxy, and a clear picture emerges... This isn't a diversification play. It's Metaplanet cloning its own capital machine into a second, deeper market, and routing the value straight back to the Tokyo-listed parent The deal, precisely Metaplanet contributes 2,100 BTC in-kind (~$132M at the Coinbase close on Aug 14) plus $2.5M in cash and that cash is earmarked to pay Super League's own transaction expenses. In exchange it receives: - 44,859,400 common shares at $3.00, roughly 95.7% of Superplanet - 100 shares of Strategic Alliance convertible preferred carrying board-designation and voting rights - Four 10-year warrants for up to 381,000,000 additional shares, struck from $3.00 to $33.50 - A 24-month right to subscribe up to $210,000,000 of non-convertible junior "liquidity support" preferred at $100/share, capital Metaplanet can call at will Metaplanet's entire stake is locked up for five years. Fully diluted, assuming all warrants exercise and the preferred converts, Metaplanet would own ~99.5% of the company. The existing Super League float going into the vote is only ~2.0 million shares. This is a nanocap being absorbed almost whole The tell is in the background: Evo Fund The most revealing part of the proxy is how the deal was born. Super League and Metaplanet didn't find each other, Evo Fund built the bridge. Evo's founder, Michael Lerch, introduced Super League's CEO to Simon Gerovich, and Metaplanet's Head of Bitcoin Strategy, Dylan LeClair, ran the term-sheet negotiations. Metaplanet's counsel was Skadden Why does Evo matter? Because Evo has backed Metaplanet in Tokyo since 2022 (back when it was Red Planet Japan), and holds moving-strike warrants for up to ~304.7 million Metaplanet shares, the very instrument behind Metaplanet's aggressive Japanese capital raising. In this deal, Evo receives moving-strike warrants in Super League too. In other words, Metaplanet is exporting its exact Tokyo playbook, the Evo-powered moving-strike-warrant capital engine, onto Nasdaq. Same fuel, same operator, new market Superplanet isn't a new strategy; it's a replica of the machine that already works Conviction: 335 BTC became 2,100 BTC The proxy also shows how fast Metaplanet's ambition scaled. The first term sheet (May 21) proposed just 335 BTC, a dual-class voting structure, and $3.35 per share. Within two weeks it was rewritten to 2,100 BTC, a 6.3x increase, the dual-class structure was dropped in favor of straight 95.7% economic control plus a voting preferred, and the price settled at $3.00 The reason management and LeClair discussed for the larger size was explicit: a Bitcoin position big enough to give the vehicle access to U.S. fixed-income capital markets. The BTC isn't the point, it's the collateral that unlocks the dollar-preferred funding machine The corporate structure, why Tokyo captures it The chain is deliberate Metaplanet, Inc. (Japan, TSE: 3350) -> Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. (Florida) -> Superplanet, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUPA) Because the Japanese parent controls ~95.7% and the board, Superplanet becomes a consolidated subsidiary That single fact is the thesis The 2,100 BTC never leave Metaplanet's world, they move onto the consolidated balance sheet Metaplanet still reports them; it now just reports them inside a vehicle that can do what a Japanese-listed company cannot Why it accrues to the Japanese stock (3350) 1. A second capital engine on the world's deepest market. In Tokyo, Metaplanet cannot issue USD-denominated perpetual preferred. Nasdaq can. Superplanet unlocks permanent dollar-denominated instruments, perpetual preferred, the $210M junior line, 381M warrant shares, to buy Bitcoin. One strategy, compounding through two of the deepest capital pools on earth 2. Capital-light, control-heavy. Metaplanet funded this with roughly 4.9% of its ~43,000 BTC and effectively zero net cash. For a ~5% BTC contribution it consolidated a controlled Nasdaq listing. Minimal cost basis, enormous strategic surface area 3. mNAV arbitrage across two venues. The treasury flywheel runs on issuing equity above net asset value and buying more BTC per share. With two listings, Metaplanet can raise wherever the premium is richer, Tokyo or New York, and route it to accretive accumulation 4. Upside that flows upward. The 381M warrants struck up to $33.50 are a leveraged, long-dated call on Superplanet, and because the parent consolidates it, that upside lands in 3350's intrinsic value. The five-year lockup signals permanence, not a flip 5. The dilution is on the right side. Fully diluted, minority Super League holders shrink to ~0.5%. That dilution isn't a bug, it's the design, and it accrues to Metaplanet. Owning the parent means owning the side that dilutes; owning SUPA as a minority means being the diluted The risks, stated plainly This is not closed. It hinges on Super League's shareholder vote (the Share Issuance Proposal, on which every other proposal is conditioned) and customary conditions. Notably, the Super League board did not obtain a third-party fairness opinion, the process was led by management and intermediated heavily by Evo, not run as a competitive auction. The whole flywheel also only accelerates if SUPA trades at a premium to its Bitcoin NAV; a persistent discount stalls the machine. And a holdco discount could mean the market doesn't fully credit 3350 for a premium that lives in SUPA Bottom line Metaplanet didn't spend cash, it spent structure It turned ~4.9% of its Bitcoin into control of a second, dollar-native, Nasdaq-listed engine, one powered by the same Evo moving-strike-warrant machine that fuels it in Tokyo, sized deliberately to unlock U.S. fixed-income capital, and consolidated straight back onto 3350's balance sheet with 381M warrants and a $210M preferred line it can pull at will For holders of the Japanese stock, Superplanet isn't a spin-out. It's a second heart pumping the same Bitcoin bloodstream, across two continents, on Metaplanet's terms

• 
  Simon Taylor (@sytaylor) reported 26 minutes ago

  Stablecoins are about to become cash. This would allow large corporates to hold them on their balance sheet. The open question for every corporate treasury holding stablecoins was does it count as cash or something else? If only a giant standards board would answer. FASB is the Financial Accounting Standards Board. It sets the accounting rules (US GAAP) that every US public company, and most large private ones, follow when they report their numbers. Auditors sign off against them. Lenders read the results. On a balance sheet, "cash and cash equivalents" is the top line. It means money, plus anything you can turn into a known amount of money today with almost no risk of it being worth less. Bank deposits. Treasury bills. Money market funds. And now, stablecoins. Liquidity ratios are built on that line. Loan covenants are tested against it. It answers "how much can this company spend tomorrow?" The problem until now. Most companies put stablecoins token under "other assets", next to patents and crypto. Sitting outside the cash line has real costs: - Lenders' liquidity ratios ignore it - Moving $10m from the bank into USDC looks like spending $10m on an investment - Paying a supplier in USDC means booking a gain or loss on each payment So corporate treasurers stayed away. Sensible people, sensible call. What FASB proposed. A stablecoin can sit in the cash line if it meets three conditions: 1. You can hand it back to the issuer at any time and receive exactly one dollar per token. 2. That right is yours, in a contract with the issuer. Being able to sell the token on an exchange is a different thing, and on its own it falls short. 3. The issuer holds real dollars and short-term Treasuries, at least one for one, kept separate from its own money. Circle, which issues USDC, had asked FASB to let the exchange route count too. FASB declined. So the token matters less than your relationship with its issuer. Coinbase has a direct redemption contract with Circle, so *its* USDC qualifies. A company that bought USDC on an exchange holds the same token without that contract, and sits outside the line until it gets one. Why this could be a watershed. The GENIUS Act made stablecoins legal to issue in the US. It left open whether a normal company could sensibly hold one. If this is finalized as written, a global corporate reporting under US GAAP can hold dollars on a blockchain, in its cash line, and pay a supplier in Lagos or Manila on a Sunday night. The accounting treats it like a bank transfer. That moves "should we hold stablecoins?" out of the crypto team and onto the CFO's desk. Expect issuers to get a queue of treasurers asking for direct redemption accounts, because that contract is now the price of admission. Comments close November 19. Watch the redemption clause, because that's where the industry will push.

• 
  💎 Gem (@USNCCRE) reported 27 minutes ago

  Coinbase is still working ok so we are nowhere close to $BTC euphoria. Let’s go bulls!

• 
  Kaspa Calls (@KaspaCalls) reported 28 minutes ago

  Kaspa community, follow my train of thought: * Gemini suddenly mentions Kaspa out of nowhere after years. * Gemini is owned by the Winklevoss Twins. * The Winklevoss Twins are the reason why ZEC pumped into the Top 10 out of nowhere after years, after the company "Cypherpunk Technologys" announced a major investment in ZEC. They hold 2% of the supply and 18% of the ZEC hashrate. * Sompolinsky and the ZEC core devs know each other very well. In January 2026, it was even reported that Sompolinsky met with the ZEC team. * Wallet 1 hasn't bought anything since the Gemini post. * The Winklevoss Twins have an investment company called "Cytherpunk". Besides ZEC, there is actually no project that is more "Cypherpunk" than Kaspa. Kaspa would fit in perfectly there. * Coinbase enabled Kaspa perps without ever having listed spot. The Coinbase CEO and the Winklevoss Twins know each other very well. It could be possible that perps get deactivated if Coinbase expects a strong move for Kaspa (up or down). In my opinion, the theory that Wallet 1 belongs to the Winklevoss Twins is the most realistic one I've heard so far (more so than market makers or some random funds). Additionally, I'm suddenly seeing X accounts interacting with KAS that have never interacted with KAS before. That's exactly how it started with ZEC, too. This is just my theory, but something is happening with Kaspa in the background right now.

• 
  BSCN (@BSCNews) reported 28 minutes ago

  Coinbase Brings Hyperliquid Perps To Base as Price Hits Two-Month High Coinbase (@coinbase) has added Hyperliquid (@HyperliquidX) perpetual futures trading to its Base App. Eligible users can now access more than 290 perpetual markets through the app. The available markets include crypto, equities, and commodity-related contracts. Trades are executed through Hyperliquid, with leverage reaching up to 50 times. Coinbase says perpetual futures represent roughly 75% of current crypto trading volume. The feature is unavailable in the U.S., U.K., Canada, and other restricted jurisdictions. hyperliquid:native has surged 23% over the last 24 hours to $72, a two-month high.

• 
  The Content Factory (@tcf_updates) reported 34 minutes ago

  🚨 COINBASE CHIEF SAYS NEW CRYPTO BILL AIMS TO PREVENT ANOTHER FTX-STYLE COLLAPSE. WASHINGTON DC, USA - Coinbase chief executive Brian Armstrong is urging lawmakers to pass the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, arguing that the proposed rules would give regulators clearer authority over cryptocurrency platforms and help prevent failures like the 2022 collapse of FTX. He has spent recent weeks meeting senators as the bill approaches a key vote, saying the industry’s rapid growth has outpaced existing oversight and left consumers exposed to opaque practices. The legislation would divide responsibilities between financial regulators, define how digital assets are classified, and introduce new safeguards for exchanges and brokers. Armstrong says the framework would allow companies to build new products with more certainty while giving law enforcement stronger tools to pursue misuse of customer funds. The bill has already cleared the House and a Senate committee, and supporters say it is close to final approval.

• 
  Omni Trading (@OmniTradeA1) reported 34 minutes ago

  Allman's mother sued in Delaware seeking to seize board control and remove CEO lan De Bode, alleging he claimed the CEO role without board approval, Coinbase received 10.712M $ONDO (team 4.125M, institutional 6.587M) and Grayscale's Q2 2026 rebalance allocated 25% of a multi-asset fund to ONDO. Once the legal issues with Ondo Finance are resolved this coin will fly, by then it will be too late to accumulate . I have been telling you all I have been heavily accumulating this coin for weeks now, when it pumps hard and it pays off. I can guarantee people will be in the comments asking when can I enter on a pullback. That's just how most traders brains work. They don't want to enter at the low prices, but when they see big green ****** all of a sudden they want to enter and get shafted by it.

• 
  Princess🎴₿💎🕊️ (@PrincessBartho2) reported 36 minutes ago

  @smartcoded At the same time, @coinbase is putting Hyperliquid perps inside Base App, giving eligible users access to more than 290 markets with up to 50x leverage.

• 
  FYAZ (@OgFyaz) reported 41 minutes ago

  🪙 Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong tells FOX Business: "I think over the next couple of years, say 2030, I think it's very likely we'll see a $300,000 and $400,000 Bitcoin" Could the next bull run pump $BTC to 500k? It hit figures previously thought impossible before; could it happen again? And are you ready?

• 
  Aether (@nassive1996) reported 42 minutes ago

  @coinbase This guys dumped crypto so much,but you support this ****

• 
  OvergrownChild (@overgrovvnchild) reported 43 minutes ago

  @coinbase Ya.. get em all there and then rug pull them or block their accounts... i see where this is going

• 
  Lord Chris Mentillo (@docmentillo) reported 44 minutes ago

  Coinbase is stole millions of dollars from me…Coinbase new app Base will not even let me have access to my Crypto NFT. So ya they are a bunch of scumbags. Don’t trust them. You have been warned. Don’t say I didn’t warn you.

• 
  Yune (@dvsg_life) reported 47 minutes ago

  Everyone argues about whether 3% on the @Stacks bitcoin bond is good. Nobody checks it against what else is out there, or what the alternatives cost you. (Disclosure: I hold $STX, same size, six years.) All live as of August 20, sorted by how much of your bitcoin you hand over. You keep the coins. Stacks bond — 3% target, paid in bitcoin, six months Babylon — advertised up to 1%, actually ~0.1%, paid in BABY coin they print You park them at an exchange. Cash and carry — 4.6%, paid in dollars Covered calls far OTM — 7.1% Covered calls near ATM — 15.4% You hand them over. Spot ETF — 0% Covered-call ETF, BTCC and YBTC — 85% and 73% "distribution rate" Coinbase yield fund — 4-8% target Solv BTC+ — 3.17% as of January, wrapped Wrapped BTC lent on Aave — 0.00-0.01% The more of your bitcoin you let go of, the more they pay you. Now the same question for every line: what does it actually cost you? The bond costs 5% of the position in STX, locked 175 days. You lose money if STX falls 29% against bitcoin. The calls cost everything above your strike. The two funds running that trade were down 34.5% and 39.3% last year. Holding spot was down 36.1%. The covered-call ETFs advertise 85% and 73%. Those are the same funds. Distribution rate is not return. The carry costs your bitcoin exposure. You're long dollars now. The fund costs custody and fees, and you end up owning shares instead of coins. Babylon's whole token is worth $135M against $3 billion of staked bitcoin, and stakers get 1% of the emission. That's four basis points. A bitcoin staked there a year ago returned 0.05-0.13%, in BABY, which has never once been bitcoin. Solv's 3.17% is a January figure from a report Solv commissioned, with no current rate published and a $2.7M contract exploit in March. Aave's 0% isn't a dead market. Bitcoin utilization there is 4.4% against USDC's 92% — nobody wants to borrow bitcoin. People post it to borrow dollars, at 7-11%, which is negative carry against any safe yield. Every treasury that got margin-called in February posted more collateral and then sold bitcoin anyway. The spot ETF costs nothing and pays nothing. It's the line everything else has to beat. Stacks' cost is the only one that's a specific number you can check before you sign. 29% against bitcoin, 175 days, in their own document. You can also just go do most of these. Not this one — first cycle is a pre-approved list. The product is good. Priced right for what it is, disclosed honestly, and the only one here whose cost you can size in advance. Sit at a treasury desk. Mandate says bitcoin, custody policy says the coins don't leave. Eight of these ten are gone on that one constraint. What's left is a token you didn't want paying 0.1%, or 3% in bitcoin where you can name the cost before you sign. That's the whole reason this exists. Not because 3% is good — because everything paying more wants your coins, and everything that doesn't pays less. September 10 the first bond opens and we find out whether that's enough. Tell me if I'm wrong and I'll fix it.

• 
  Neo0o0o (@_Nxxx00) reported 50 minutes ago

  @DexGemsReal @blknoiz06 I think he is deliberately not talking about solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump so whoever wants to sell, sells and moves on. After this happens (couple of days more or probably a week+), we start to see the real **** unfold. My intuition tells me Ansem gets listed on Coinbase pretty soon.

• 
  Kaspa Calls (@KaspaCalls) reported 50 minutes ago

  Kaspa community, follow my train of thought: * Gemini suddenly mentions Kaspa out of nowhere after years. * Gemini is owned by the Winklevoss Twins. * The Winklevoss Twins are the reason why ZEC pumped into the Top 10 out of nowhere after years, after the company "Cypherpunk Technologys" announced a major investment in ZEC. They hold 2% of the supply and 18% of the ZEC hashrate. * Sompolinsky and the ZEC core devs know each other very well. In January 2026, it was even reported that Sompolinsky met with the ZEC team. * Wallet 1 hasn't bought anything since the Gemini post. * The Winklevoss Twins have an investment company called "Cypherpunk". Besides ZEC, there is actually no project that is more "Cypherpunk" than Kaspa. Kaspa would fit in perfectly there. Also Bitgo is integrating Kaspa. This is infrastructure which is needed for such companies to hold and use Kaspa. * Coinbase enabled Kaspa perps without ever having listed spot. The Coinbase CEO and the Winklevoss Twins know each other very well. It could be possible that perps get deactivated if Coinbase expects a strong move for Kaspa (up or down). In my opinion, the theory that Wallet 1 belongs to the Winklevoss Twins is the most realistic one I've heard so far (more so than market makers or some random funds). Additionally, I'm suddenly seeing X accounts interacting with KAS that have never interacted with KAS before. That's exactly how it started with ZEC, too. This is just my theory, but something is happening with Kaspa in the background right now.

• 
  a (@adidogCEO) reported 52 minutes ago

  worked on one project during crypto vacay that involved crypto integration and it's actually incredible how poor crypto UX is for normies the payment processing mafia gets their 2-3% juice no matter what even if you try to go directly to stablecoins say you create your own app for payment processing in stablecoins, you still need to point normies to an app where they can buy stablecoins to send you or integrate some **** like moonpay commerce not to mention all the regulatory issues that come up if you create this flow UX is also extremely poor rn because even if u point normies to a normie-friendly app and they try to buy some $USDC they are faced with 100x $USDC chains and variations of $USDC there is no simple "$USDC" click convert function anywhere unless you integrate commerce options like stripe/moonpay/coinbase which are all essentially payment processing wrappers stablecoin adoptions at the POS level is basically worthless until someone like Cashapp jumps in the mix and starts pushing it and even then it will face the payment processing mafia tax tldr;; stablecoins are currently worthless for commerce in their current form and neobank concepts are retarded

• 
  NeoSoul (@NeoSoulAI) reported 52 minutes ago

  @yugacohler @coinbase giving agents access to perps is a massive unlock but it completely changes the risk math spot is forgiving but a bad prompt on 10x leverage is a liquidation speedrun are kill switches and position caps enforced at the exchange layer or left to the agent runtime

• 
  exchangeIntel (@exchangeIntel) reported 53 minutes ago

  Coinbase USDC Network Support Update resolved The official source marked the incident resolved. Official incident duration: ~7d 2h.

• 
  Ball-Knower, Esq., Ph.D 🏈🏀 (@AUHeismanTrust) reported 54 minutes ago

  @DavidLat @coinbase @mollyisonchain Tell her to stop offering sports gambling on her stupid ******* platform and there won’t be any issue

• 
  Coinbase Markets 🛡️ (@CoinbaseMarkets) reported 55 minutes ago

  Legal stuff: This offer is available through January 31, 2027. Coinbase reserves the right to modify, suspend, or terminate this offer at any time, for any reason, including market conditions or fraud concerns. Void where prohibited or if Coinbase determines that a customer is not eligible. Applies to Maker/Taker commissions only. Applicable exchange, clearing, and National Futures Association fees still apply. Futures and cleared swaps are offered by Coinbase Financial Markets, Inc. ("CFM"), a registered futures commission merchant with the CFTC and a member of the National Futures Association ("NFA"). Trading futures involves substantial risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors. Not investment advice or recommendation to purchase a particular asset or security or to employ a particular investment strategy.

• 
  Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported 55 minutes ago

  @thereal1Mashall Are you getting a specific error when trying to buy crypto on Coinbase, or is the transaction simply failing to go through? I’d be happy to help you troubleshoot it.

• 
  The Gentleman (@byTheGentleman) reported 57 minutes ago

  Crypto’s “smartest money” funded the biggest graveyard. I reviewed 61 verified crypto shutdown events in 2026. 38 ended in a full wind-down or bankruptcy. The dataset contains $555.75M in publicly disclosed capital. 1. Coinbase Ventures ranks first with 8 shutdown exposures. 2. Polychain Capital: 7. 3. a16z: 6. 4. Hack VC, 1kx and Placeholder: 4 each. 19 shutdown events died on PMF, unit economics or liquidity. Another 12 ended through a strategic pivot or migration. These are exposure counts, not loss estimates. Crypto VCs do not publish a final write-off ledger. This is the public scorecard they left behind. They sell diligence, access and “smart money” as an edge. The public record is a graveyard. Founders publish the shutdown. Funds bury the logo and raise the next vehicle. “Smart money” is marketing. Shutdown exposure is the track record.

• 
  Polymarket Alpha (@Polymarketalpha) reported 1 hour ago

  Bitcoin has broken above $74,000 and touched $75,000 on Coinbase. At collection time, Coinbase spot was about $74,747; BTC-USD's 24-hour range was $68,853.22 to $75,000, about 7.3% above the period open. UTC daily candles put the 08/17 low at $62,679.42, making the four-day rebound to today's high about 19.7%; this is the first $75,000 touch since 05/27. Independent X echoes spread quickly, but price, volume and discussion heat confirm stronger momentum, not one message as the single driver. $75,000 is now the new verification line; one touch extends the rebound but does not show the level has turned into support.