Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𝗔𝗿𝗲𝗳𝗶𝗻 (@RimonR23) reported 2 minutes ago

  @cheuk_baby @coinbase hope this doesn’t get shut down in a month like usual

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 3 minutes ago

  @coinbase I'm simply asking Coinbase to let a human reviewer look at my case, complete the review, and restore access to my account if everything is in order. Please don't leave customers waiting indefinitely. @CoinbaseSupport

• 
  Brian (@Brian2shv) reported 6 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseMarkets Need help from coinbase Staffing member of skill set Free work load troubleshooting Coinbase give estimate of wealth will be lost If not completed By date 22/7 gives estimate 6 days for full migration

• 
  Pumponomics (@ThePumponomics) reported 7 minutes ago

  @cryptolyxe renegotiating Coinbase deal next month btw. so potential bullish catalyst since the current deal is absolute **** for them. I don’t know how this will react to rate cuts though. maybe the market overlooks it though when crypto storms back eventually

• 
  Marklar 🍳 (@dinosaurteef) reported 10 minutes ago

  @coopernicus01 @brian_armstrong Excruciatingly so. But imagine you’re a start-up. With direct access to all of Coinbase’s resources, including distribution, and instant feedback from your actual users on CT. At a bare minimum, the former is a massive edge. And they fumbled it. Again. And again. And again. Coinbase Wallet. Coinbase NFT (blatant mistake, like this cycles ‘hey we do that too’ garbage). Base. Those are some nasty book-ends to fail. I mean, how do you lose to Metamask? And the key reason: they treat their users as exit liquidity rather than an acquisition cost. And they peddle their own bags rather than actually complimentary products. Fundamentally, that’s all HOOD has done differently. Across all business lines. And that’s why the HOOD/COIN chart will continue to haunt Brian. Sure he dumped. But yeesh the value he could’ve created instead to the benefit of net worth. Oops.

• 
  DUC (@shuigvn) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Krashed_1 @injective native inj access on coinbase is a huge deal rn

• 
  Austin Campbell (@austincampbell) reported 17 minutes ago

  I know people like to spin things in positive directions, but reading the tweet from @jessepollak and @jacqmelinek after that, I am going to give my view as an outsider: One, Base has been an outright failure. Base did not add significant new customers. There are no working products that are meaningful that remain solely Base native thanks to their decisions having (justifiably) spooked some of the best builders. It was a dead-end with a leader hyping extractive memecoins and not building the exact durable tech (high speed payments, tokenized asset trading, prediction markets) that would have given Base a lead on the competition. It also misunderstood what it is to be a captive entity for Coinbase. Now that they missed the window and competition is out in force. Two, Base is also a distraction that harmed Coinbase itself. The project attracting attention and being something CB wanted to funnel to, but also failing so badly, means that CB is behind on tokenized stocks, behind on prediction markets, and behind on payments. There was an era in the past where CB was one of the best places to do anything crypto in the US. I don't believe that anymore, and that's despite the fact that I have immense respect for their efforts on the policy front and have a lot of friends there. So if I am saying that, you damned well know the average user is saying that. Spot fees are too high. A lot of stuff is super janky and barely understandable. The Base integrations are psychotic. My creative director tried to use it to pay for things with USDC in Asia and basically gave up in frustration. Three, Coinbase is not fixing what matters. Seamless user experience on the frontend, where Base is just a product backend that people don't have to think about. Products that are durable, effective, simple, and solve real use cases to bring the next wave of people into crypto. Knife fights in a phone booth for the same crypto users or more self-referential product integration that doesn't actually benefit the user is going to be a disaster. And to be honest, I'm not sure this is in the Coinbase DNA right now. The game is very different when you are locking horns with Fidelity, Schwab, Robinhood, and JP Morgan Chase than when you are locking horns with Gemini. I would like to be wrong about this; I have a lot of friends at CB, they've done good things for the industry, and I always want to see people succeed. I know senior leaders there read my X, so please take this as constructive criticism. What you need to do is relentlessly identify your edge in a competitive US market niche, have seamless backend/frontend integration and top-tier UI/UX, and then just use that to grind your opposition into dust. In short: if you can't figure out how Base fits into that and what specific customer problem/need it is for, kill it. If you can, do that, as hard as possible. Can Coinbase do that? Do they understand the position they are in? Those are my questions.

• 
  James (@jamesmemecoins) reported 18 minutes ago

  @jessepollak Youre not the problem @jessepollak, you did better than any other chain founder. Youre always with the trenches and constantly communicating, baseposting, etc. No other founder has done that. You tried many things like the creator coin and youre not wrong on those neither. Price is not the metric, but unfortunately thats how majority of CTs use as the metric of success. Because it affected their coins, they hate instead of adapt. Ansem coin is bundled - ofc it's going to billions. The problem is the rest of coinbase team are not aligned with the trenches, especially the listings team and the listing process. Listing the coin is "the best" way of showing support. For the past year or so, there's zero onchain base coin (whether it's a memecoin, utility coin, or any coin) that came from the trenches (organically launched in launchpad, dexes, with actually good products, where it's open to public for everyone to invest) that made it to listing. The only ones that made it? The coins that trenches have not heard of that were launched via insider rounds/seed funding (where only big pockets participated). The reason why we're grinding everyday in the trenches is we want to be early (trenches = dexes) in great crypto coins (whether it's a meme or utility). What does coinbase do? "**** em trenches, lets reward the big pockets with red carpet to listings" Send this to @brian_armstrong

• 
  Dan (@DanVibes10) reported 19 minutes ago

  Good morning and happy humpday all. Halfway through the work week 🙌 did you accomplish any your goals for the week yet? Was seeing lots of dips in memes was watching on Robinhood. Might try to find some new ones. Still watching to see updates on @CNPYNetwork, they did add a game you can play that gives points towards the testnet to help you climb up the board. I need to see if there's a wallet checker for the @quipnetwork genesis mint. Did you get a spot to try? Lets keep looking for alpha and good stuff. Did drop some waitlist in my tg, one was a Coinbase backed one. Have a good Wednesday all.

• 
  Adam Blumberg, CFP ® (@Interaxis8) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MikeIppolito_ Over half of all household wealth in the US is managed through financial advisors. Robinhood and Coinbase are hitting the retail / DIY / I want to get rich quick market. Individuals are mostly pretty bad at managing their own wealth. So the opportunity for DeFi is to build products and services for professionals to help their clients create portfolios and financial lives that match their needs, goals, risk profiles, etc. Anything built for retail/DIY is going to be marketed based on returns only, and not requisite with understood risks.

• 
  RZD (@riziderxbt) reported 20 minutes ago

  @_OHT_ Who is they brother? Coinbase? It’s just a bunch of CT people criming it Coinbase doesn’t give a **** about base

• 
  Aaron (@aaronjrafferty) reported 23 minutes ago

  the reason we built a business on base was for the distribution of coinbase it did its job. 50% of our holders will never own a hot wallet and nor should they robinhood competes with that distribution lever and forces me (as a founder) to take a hard look at the value coming from cb its good to see churn...broken things get fixed hard to imagine a world where coinbase or robinhood or name-the-org cares about your project unless you make them coinbase does one thing for builders...user access but nothing in this world is simply gifted i fully expect this transition to be the right move for coinbase and good for base and even harder for founders barking up the wrong tree

• 
  DegenTheGEM (@gorkhalitrader) reported 26 minutes ago

  1. Virtual could have survived alongside zora. Just a small support to the project and community that was bringing in over 50% users and revenue to the chain would have gone a long way. Robinhood spotted it before base or coinbase did

• 
  2xnmore (@2xnmore) reported 30 minutes ago

  @coinbureau Coinbase Prime is the Marshals Service custodian, so this is likely pre-sale movement. But $9.28M is noise for ETH. The bigger signal is the altcoin dust being swept out too. This is a cleanup, not a dump.

• 
  StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinum_) reported 33 minutes ago

  - Called the first quarter of 2026 a punch in the face - Spent 2024 and 2025 betting in onchain social - Got the builder thesis right - Got the social thesis wrong - Saw Farcaster, Zora, Mini Apps and creator coins collapse - Admitted he was wrong about social - Allowed Base to fall behind in key sectors because of that focus - Fell behind in perpetuals and prediction markets - Needed major improvements in tokenization and enterprise payments - Lost community confidence - Described 2026 as an exercise in eating **** - Refocused entirely on building - Shifted his attention back to the Base chain - Started writing code again - Shipped Azul, Beryl, B20, Privacy and Ledgers - No longer believes social is required for mass adoption - Now believes better money is enough - Points to stablecoins, prediction markets, perpetuals and tokenization as the future - Wants to onboard one billion people through global finance - Handed the Base App back to Coinbase - Put Cobie in charge of the Base App - Confirmed the app will expand beyond the Base ecosystem - Wants Base to become the blockchain for global finance - Says Base still loves memes Set three priorities for 2026: - Win trading - Win payments - Win AI agents - Believes AI agents will accelerate crypto adoption - Promised continued support through Base Layer, Base Batches and the Base Ecosystem Fund - Admitted he still doesn’t have everything figured out - Said Base will continue making mistakes - Apologized for the content coin narrative - Refused to abandon $JESSE This was one of the best founder statements ever seen in CT I’m starting to believe in Base again

• 
  Jobless Bill (@DNF_sol) reported 43 minutes ago

  been thinking about the chain rotation lately $TON had its casino moment then robinhood chain came outta nowhere and the trenches moved there overnight lmao now everyone is farming the same cats and screaming the same tickers so what’s next? base? the liquidity is already there. billions in dex volume. coinbase distribution. one stupid meme season and the whole chain can turn into a casino again or hyperliquid? this one feels different the gamblers are already there the volume is already there the money is already there it just needs the meme trenches to wake ******** up personally im watching $HFUN on hyperliquid rn not saying this is the one but a launchpad + trading bot sitting inside a chain full of professional degenerates? yeah idk i’ve seen dumber **** send 100x TON → robinhood → ??? where are the trenches moving next?

• 
  Chief_Engineer (@ChiefEngineerCE) reported 43 minutes ago

  Engineering Wednesday IBM is the latest major company joining the ranks of those bleeding cash after heavy outsourcing to India. The pattern is now familiar and predictable. Companies chase lower labor costs by moving critical engineering, development, and support functions overseas. At first the spreadsheet looks great. Then reality sets in. Quality drops. Innovation slows. Institutional knowledge walks out the door. Products suffer. Customers notice. Apple lost intellectual property on next generation phone designs and delivered a badly received OS launch after pushing more work offshore. Microsoft has bled money on multiple fronts while dealing with poor Windows 11 releases and quality issues tied to heavy offshoring and layoffs of experienced staff. Coinbase and Opendoor both pulled back from heavy outsourcing after seeing the damage it caused. The common thread is leadership captured by short term financial thinking and foreign networks. Once the hiring pipeline and decision making get dominated by one nationality or outsourcing model, the company loses the ability to course correct. They double down even as the failures mount because the people in charge have no real attachment to the long term health of the American operation. Let's be real - here is the magic that Indian CEO's bring to the game. Replace Americans in America or India- that's it. That's their secret sauce- they can make a billion dollars appear like magic by replacing a few thousand American workers. *voila..abra cadabra - John Smith is out the door and Rajish Subramarian takes his seat. Meanwhile, watch the customers revolt and the American institutions flounder. This is not incompetence by accident. It is the logical outcome of treating American technical talent as an expensive inconvenience instead of the irreplaceable core of the business. Passionate, experienced engineers who understand the product, the customer, and the history of the systems are what create lasting success. Replacing them with cheaper, less accountable labor looks smart on a quarterly earnings call. It destroys companies over time. The organizations that figure this out and bring back real ownership and domestic competence will survive. The ones captured by the replacement mindset will keep bleeding until someone else takes their market. Question: Have you watched a company go heavy on outsourcing or H-1B labor only to see quality, innovation, and profits suffer as a result? Drop what you observed.

• 
  Xarpetia (@xarpetia) reported 44 minutes ago

  I don’t use passkeys. My @coinbase app on iOS is not working anymore because it doesn’t give me other signin options. I hadn’t set passkey for it at all. What am I supposed to do? Why do make such bad design decision? Do you test your app at all? Do you care anymore?

• 
  JP (@JPdtx) reported 44 minutes ago

  @Jason @coinbase Jesus, you’re pumping **** coins? I just lost so much respect. Please tell me this is a fake account.

• 
  Chief_Engineer (@ChiefEngineerCE) reported 45 minutes ago

  Engineering Wednesday IBM is the latest major company joining the ranks of those bleeding cash after heavy outsourcing to India. The pattern is now familiar and predictable. Companies chase lower labor costs by moving critical engineering, development, and support functions overseas. At first the spreadsheet looks great. Then reality sets in. Quality drops. Innovation slows. Institutional knowledge walks out the door. Products suffer. Customers notice. Apple lost intellectual property on next generation phone designs and delivered a badly received OS launch after pushing more work offshore. Microsoft has bled money on multiple fronts while dealing with poor Windows 11 releases and quality issues tied to heavy offshoring and layoffs of experienced staff. Coinbase and Opendoor both pulled back from heavy outsourcing after seeing the damage it caused. The common thread is leadership captured by short term financial thinking and foreign networks. Once the hiring pipeline and decision making get dominated by one nationality or outsourcing model, the company loses the ability to course correct. They double down even as the failures mount because the people in charge have no real attachment to the long term health of the American operation. Let's be real - here is the magic that Indian CEO's bring to the game. Replace Americans in America - that's it. That's their secret sauce- they can make a billion dollars appear like magic by replacing a few thousand American workers. *voila..abra cadabra - John Smith is out the door and Rajish Subramarian takes his seat. Meanwhile, watch the customers revolt and the American institutions flounder. This is not incompetence by accident. It is the logical outcome of treating American technical talent as an expensive inconvenience instead of the irreplaceable core of the business. Passionate, experienced engineers who understand the product, the customer, and the history of the systems are what create lasting success. Replacing them with cheaper, less accountable labor looks smart on a quarterly earnings call. It destroys companies over time. The organizations that figure this out and bring back real ownership and domestic competence will survive. The ones captured by the replacement mindset will keep bleeding until someone else takes their market. Question: Have you watched a company go heavy on outsourcing or H-1B labor only to see quality, innovation, and profits suffer as a result? Drop what you observed.

• 
  GmacCrypto (@GaryCla16787498) reported 49 minutes ago

  My dream scenario: $200M support. $600M. Binance. Coinbase. $4B. Retail FOMO. $10B+. Will it happen? I have no idea. But if I didn't believe it was possible, I wouldn't still be here. $ANSEM

• 
  RE5ET (@chainre5et) reported 49 minutes ago

  @jessepollak If you idiots had just streamlined the Coinbase app to buy memes and listed the Base memes that had massive momentum and crazy enthusiastic communities you would have killed it. Instead you did all this other stupid **** and passed them over time and time again to list garbage and scam coins. If you had done a single 15 min call with active community members they would have told you this. In fact, they did tell you this over and over on X. Now Robinhood is going to clean up where you fumbled. So stupid.

• 
  Frank B🟠ccia ⛈ (@frankboccia_) reported 50 minutes ago

  @jessepollak The problem is, no one listens to the community. Coinbase, base is consistently getting it wrong. Its really easy when you take a step back and actually listen to the community. Its sad, coinbase / base has lost the plot.

• 
  Thor (@thorabbasi) reported 51 minutes ago

  Two paths for tokenized asset distribution: consumer apps like Robinhood, Kraken, Coinbase, and the Aave app on one side, and institutional networks like Canton on the other. Consumer apps own the user relationship and relegate the blockchain to the backend. Institutional networks sell the rails to banks and asset managers that already own the client relationship. Robinhood extends the consumer model one layer deeper. It owns the user through the app, while Robinhood Chain gives third parties infrastructure to issue assets and build financial products. It is the same playbook Robinhood ran in TradFi, moving off Apex to self-clearing in 2018. Own the user, then own the settlement layer beneath them.

• 
  Ben (@eventuallyright) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Dr_Crossroads @jonbma i’ll double down on his Brian/Coinbase point… Brian’s move to distance themselves from meme coins was a shot in the foot

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 55 minutes ago

  @jessepollak I don't think anything you tried was strictly wrong, it was just the tunnel vision approach from coinbase as a whole that created issues. Fwiw, you were the most supportive of anyone, and for that I am appreciative.

• 
  Rick Scott (@RickScott446) reported 55 minutes ago

  @coinbase Why would anyone help you if you're too scarce or corrupt to list Kaspa? Uphold is so much better and a lot safer.

• 
  Nathaniel Brooks Kensington (@NathanielBnt) reported 59 minutes ago

  @MirkRoot The Flare airdrop for XRP holders was scheduled a while back, but the distribution depends on the exchanges supporting it. Unfortunately, Coinbase and Uphold did not participate in the Flare airdrop, so if you held XRP only on those platforms, you wouldn’t have received the automatic allocation. To be eligible for future Flare-related distributions, you’d need to hold XRP in a wallet or exchange that officially supported the airdrop at the snapshot time. If you want, I can help guide you on how to check eligibility or manage your XRP for future airdrops!

• 
  Beautyon (@Beautyon_) reported 59 minutes ago

  "He’s publicly stated numerous times their desire to put Simplicity, their smart contract protocol, on Bitcoin mainnet. He calls it "the last softfork". It would require certain parts of Taproot that BIP110 would hinder. It would prevent them from putting non-bitcoin assets on the Bitcoin base layer. Simplicity is currently on their sidechain, Liquid." This is super interesting, isn't it? Liquid, the side chain that is adjacent to Bitcoin, where, if you want to get out of it requires the consent of the cabal of nodes who administer it, Their "Permission" if the amount you want to get back in to bitcoin is "too much at one time". If Simplicity is already live on Liquid, then surely, if Liquid has any utility at all, this is what you need to be promoting, not putting Simplicity onto Bitcoin. Promoting Simplicity on Liquid might turn around Liquid's fortunes, making it into Etherium 2.0 and increasing Liquid's user base. At the moment, very few people are using Liquid. and it is not in widespread use. It has been live since 2018 but remains very much a niche network. The clearest metric is L-BTC in circulation: on the order of 3,000–4,000 BTC as of early 2026, versus roughly 130,000+ BTC wrapped on Ethereum and around 5,000 BTC in public Lightning Channel capacity. Most Liquid activity comes from a small set of participants; Bitfinex, SideSwap, Boltz swaps, and tokenized-asset issuance (e.g., Blockstream's ASSETS platform, El Salvador-related bond experiments), rather than broad retail or merchant adoption. The 15-member federation model has also kept some of the Bitcoin community at arm's length. It is a fundamental weakness in the model because trust is at the core of its architecture and design. Wallet support reflects this profund failure to capture market share. Out of the hundreds of Bitcoin wallets in circulation, only about a dozen support Liquid: Blockstream App (from Blockstream, which means they must support it) Blockstream Jade (hardware) AQUA (JAN3) SideSwap Marina (Vulpem, browser extension) Bull Bitcoin Wallet (uses Liquid internally for swaps) Ledger (limited, via Liquid app) BTCPay Server (via plugin, merchant-side) Specter/Elements-based desktop setups (for technical users) So as a proportion of Bitcoin wallets, Liquid support is in the low single digits percentage wise, and several of those are Blockstream's own products or companies closely aligned with it. The mainstream wallets, Electrum, BlueWallet, Muun, Phoenix, Sparrow, Trezor Suite, Exodus, Coinbase Wallet, Wallet of Satoshi, Phantom and the majority of others do not support it. The wallet runners have development teams who know exactly what they're doing, and they've rejected Liquid. Why is that? Putting Simplicity on Liquid was not enough to midwife the creation of Etherium 2.0 and bring "Crypto" heads into the Liquid ecosystem, and so having failed there or being too impatient to work on growing Liquid, they want to go straight to Bitcoin, and have Simplicity running in two places. The question is this; why are Blockstream in a privileged position to put their own scripting language into Bitcoin? If another company has another language, should that also be put into bitcoin? Is adding scripting languages to Bitcoin a privilege only for Blockstream, or can anyone do it. I think the answer is, "I'm the only one" because Blockstream's spokesperson says, "This is the last soft fork", meaning that no future languages will ever be soft forked into Bitcoin. Excuse me? Who elected these people as the guardians and final arbiters of what does and does not go into bitcoin? I think after BIP-110 there will be 0 chance of getting Simplicity into Bitcoin; after all, it is already fully live and available to anyone who wants it on Liquid, so they are free to experiment in that playpen, where they can harm no one. And that is the way it should be. Running your own sidechain where people can opt in and experiment under the rules of the committee is exactly how things should be architected. Liquid causes no harm to bitcoin, and is completely ethical. What it does show however, is no one wants that stuff. It's not compelling at all, or attractive; trust is anathema to bitcoiners. What makes anyone think Simplicity on bitcoin will be a hit? Hopefully that particular experiment is never run and we never have to find out at everyone's expense!

• 
  Grey Ledger (@Airdrops_one) reported 60 minutes ago

  re: $BASE and the Robinhood "airdrop", or whatever you may be imagining: Coinbase and Robinhood do not need to make DeFi successful - they need to make DeFi useful to Coinbase and Robinhood. they already have distribution. they are public companies. they do not do airdrops. they do shareholder value accrual. the protocol may be permissionless. the brokerage is still the customer.