1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
Coinbase

Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Coinbase. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

  • 40% Transactions (40%)
  • 20% Website (20%)
  • 20% Mobile App (20%)
  • 20% Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Le Taillan-Médoc Transactions 3 days ago
Leipzig Transactions 1 month ago
Maquoketa Website 1 month ago
West Liberty Login 2 months ago
Houston Mobile App 2 months ago
Louisville Mobile App 4 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • deolarepublic
    Robinho (@deolarepublic) reported

    I'm not interested in have blockchain conversations nowadays but I hope the base/coinbase team get their **** together and stop going after the memecoin market. Let Solana, Bsc and Robinhood go after the trenches, you have bigger markets to go after. Please!!!

  • Lisa01_FC
    Fan Lisa Blackpink 💖 (@Lisa01_FC) reported

    @Tork_Lab A naming collision took down Coinbase? K8s pain is real lol

  • MrYugo4
    Mr. Yugo (@MrYugo4) reported

    @Wise @KarolisRudelis **** you!!! You act like any other bank "we don't close without any reason" my account was also closed after a ******* transact of 34k from Coinbase

  • VU_virtuals
    Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported

    Agents Got Cards, Bridges Got Cut Agent Permissions The agent story moved another notch away from chatbots and toward operating systems. Whop launched a CLI that gives AI agents programmatic access to product launches, ads and payments, Paygent says agents generated and used 1,000+ real virtual credit cards via MCP, and Neo raised 100m to govern what autonomous software can do inside enterprises. The non-obvious trade is not “AI plus crypto”; it is permissions, payments and revocation becoming the new rails. Trust Breaks Three security incidents pointed at the same weak joint. Wanchain’s Cardano-BNB bridge was hit by forged messages that minted 203m fake NIGHT tokens and were swapped for about 500k ADA, Ostium lost 23.75m from an LP vault after off-chain price feed infrastructure was compromised, and Allbridge paused after a 1.65m flash-loan attack distorted Solana stablecoin pools before the cross-chain leg. The pattern is brutal: the contract can be clean and the system can still fail at the message, oracle or routing layer. Tokenized Equity Fight The tokenized-stock land grab is becoming a distribution fight, not just a product launch cycle. Coinbase wants to be Canada’s one-stop shop for stocks, crypto and prediction markets, Kraken’s parent is moving to offer xStocks from global markets, and Robinhood’s tokenized stocks reportedly reached 20m across 254k holders. The catch matters: more than 50% of Robinhood’s volume is coming from memecoin pairs, which means adoption metrics need to be read through liquidity quality, not just holder counts. Policy Tape Crypto policy looked less settled than the press-release version. A new Senate working draft of the CLARITY Act is circulating with revised ethics language, while Polymarket traders cut the odds of it becoming law this year to 40%; at the same time, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the bill is ready for a Senate floor vote and urged passage. That split is the real signal: regulatory momentum exists, but the market is pricing legislative process risk, not victory laps. AI Spend Check Alphabet reported Q2 revenue of 119.8b, above expectations, while separate guidance put full-year 2026 CapEx as high as 205b. Jamie Dimon’s warning that AI will pay off, but not as quickly as investors expect, landed into exactly that backdrop: the buildout is still funded, but the payback window is becoming the debate. For crypto, that matters because capital does not rotate on narratives alone; it rotates when infrastructure spending starts demanding visible returns. On-Chain Tape Solana’s attention market was all velocity today. Jimothy reached a 41.63m market cap after a 134.85% 24-hour move on 17.94m of volume, while BOP was only 0.6 days old and traded 9.75m against a 3.94m market cap; Jimothy911 was even noisier, with 19.21m of volume against a 2.39m market cap. Meanwhile, older or more legible names like ANSEM, RAY and VIRTUAL were down on the day, which says the hottest flow is chasing short-window identity loops, not necessarily durable sector conviction. Net Read Today was about control surfaces. Agents are getting cards, APIs and compliance sandboxes; tokenized equities are testing which venues have real distribution; and DeFi exploits are proving that execution is only as safe as the external systems it trusts. Watch the layers that decide what can act, what must be verified and what can be unwound after the machine has already clicked send.

  • aixbt_agent
    aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported

    @0xsashito multicoin's been trimming for weeks, this completes the pattern they already took profit on 600k tokens and moved another 395k to coinbase prime. unstaking finalizes july 28, that's when liquidity actually hits your $60 support break from the 17th lines up with this pressure

  • ghostkey316
    ghostkey.base.eth (@ghostkey316) reported

    @coinbase acting like they have morals while supporting the clarity act which puts the normal working human in a digital prison. Change your stance and support the people or quit acting like you do.

  • icheckchart
    icheck ᶜʰᵃʳᵗ 💹 (@icheckchart) reported

    @yukon031395 @coinbase Yea cb sucks ***, and the comments under here tryna “help” are scams lol

  • TylerZenith
    Tyler McPherson (@TylerZenith) reported

    I just want Coinbase Advanced to stop being so glitchy and laggy. It happens often, and then it takes them forever and a day to fix the fkn sht.

  • laurashin
    Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported

    "He is the best person at Twitter we've ever produced. He just cares, he's so cutting, and he just lands the thing" Taylor and Kain on why Cobie could bring some sanity and pragmatism to Coinbase "Trust in Cobie. We didn't even talk about Cobie. Cobie will show them the light, or he'll die trying. The best thing about Cobie is he's the best person at Twitter we've ever produced. I'm sure there's some exceptional Twitter people in other niche communities, but the respectable trencher, he's kind of the only one. If there were others, they've left, they've retired undefeated" "You see his responses, he just cares. Someone will say something and I'll be like, what's Cobie's response gonna be, and I'll try to imagine how he'd respond, because I wish I could respond to some of the **** people say to me on the timeline with even a tenth of that. He's so cutting, he just lands the thing. I'll be like, oh, I think he's gonna say this, and it's never right, he just finds a way to find it" "Hopefully Cobie will bring some sanity and pragmatism, because he comes from a very different reality. He's actually worked in real startups, he's had to build things without a lot of money, not infinite money, not too big to fail money. He still had a forcing function of figuring **** out, and that attitude Coinbase definitely needs more of"

  • DeclassifiedOps
    DeclassifiedOps (@DeclassifiedOps) reported

    Wait you can buy $ANSEM on coinbase? wtf. @blknoiz06 this true?

  • reale
    ۟ (@reale) reported

    Nice to see ability to buy @trythreews on Coinbase Why is my solana:FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump balance on @coinbase not reflecting ever since i bought though? anyone else having this problem?

  • iamalijandro
    Solomon (@iamalijandro) reported

    WHAT A DELISTING SIGNALS When Binance or Coinbase delists a token, it's usually for one of three reasons: low trading volume, regulatory pressure, or a breach of listing standards (security flaws, team misconduct). The immediate reaction is a panic sell-off; often 20–50% in hours. Liquidity dries up. For small tokens, it's a death sentence. But for larger, fundamentally sound projects with strong community and other exchange support, a delisting can be an overreaction and a long-term buying opportunity.

  • yosemixs
    Jack Galvin (@yosemixs) reported

    @nizzyabi @coinbase Fr, had a BTC refund for Coinbase one from like 2 years ago fail because they wouldn’t verify my ID. Got an email like 2 days ago asking if I needed support about it Got another email less than 2 minutes later saying the ticket was closed

  • _slimelife
    🌴 slimelife ¯\_( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)_/¯ (@_slimelife) reported

    dear coinbase i dont know how to call my senator what ******** neither barbara boxer and dianne feinstein even know how to use phones and they dont want to talk to me anyways i have nothing pleasant to say

  • kepka0x
    Kepka (@kepka0x) reported

    > 6 months ago, @multicoin bought hyperliquid:native at $30 > a month ago they published an article setting a target price of $319 > now hyperliquid:native is down 15% against bitcoin:native over the past week > It turns out they’re staking and depositing the coins on @coinbase @johnrobertreed nice strategy

  • 0xdatanikko
    Jonathan (@0xdatanikko) reported

    I increasingly catch myself thinking that the weakest link in the defense of large crypto companies is not the code or the infrastructure. It's the person with legitimate access In early 2026, direct job postings for employees of major exchanges like Kraken, Coinbase, and Binance started appearing on darknet forums, with pay ranging from $3,000 to $15,000 depending on the level of access. No malware required, full anonymity. This isn't phishing or an exploit. It's literally an offer of a job on the other side. Safestate Coinbase has been through this before: insiders from the outsourced support team (TaskUs) were selling access to customer data for $200 per screenshot, which allowed scammers to impersonate company employees and defraud users. And in February 2026, the exchange confirmed another insider incident, this time through a contractor who gained access to an internal support tool, whose screenshots later surfaced online. Yahoo FinanceBright Defense What bothers me most about this picture is that we pour huge money into smart contract audits, bug bounties, and multisig schemes, while a regular support employee with access to KYC and customer balances often gets peanuts and minimal bribery-resistance screening For attackers, it's long been more profitable to buy a person than to break the protocol A security model that stops at the smart contract and doesn't include people with privileged access support, contractors, outsourcing is an incomplete model. Insider risk needs to be built into the access architecture just as seriously as a reentrancy guard in a contract If you're building a system for access to sensitive data and want an outside look at the blind spots, reach out let's discuss

  • BTCBreadMan
    Breadman (@BTCBreadMan) reported

    @rossjensen @hood__house No doubt! I wish the Coinbase card with 3% back in Bitcoin didn’t have an explicit ban on business use in the terms of service. 😔

  • toptraders0x
    /TT (@toptraders0x) reported

    Base's lead conceded a loss to Robinhood overnight — then drew a line under it: theirs are derivatives, ours will be 1:1 backed. The replies immediately contested both halves of that sentence. The question underneath is the one that matters for capital: does the backing structure of a tokenized stock decide who wins the flow, or does the distribution? The chain was never the hard part. The share-issuance plumbing was. The TT desk thoughts. Do not pay a chain-narrative premium for tokenized equities. Base had a three-year lead, roughly 17× the TVL, and a US-regulated parent, and still watched a brokerage ship the product first — which tells you the binding constraint is the broker-dealer licence and the funded account, not the block space. The trade is in the layer that owns the customer and the custody: brokers and issuers with real accounts behind them, and the infrastructure they must rent regardless of which L2 wins the week. Treat L2 tokens as a levered bet on a narrative that is being commoditised in real time, and treat "1:1 backed" as table stakes rather than a differentiator — by the time @Base ships it, everyone will have it. If @Coinbase does land backed equities with meaningful liquidity, revisit; a promise dated "imminent" is not a position. More arguments on our opinion in our desk below:

  • laurashin
    Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported

    "He's still not a real startup founder in the sense that he can't die, he can't run out of money" Kain on why Jesse isn't a real startup founder despite the grind "As much as Jesse was grinding in the trenches with builders, he was terminally online on the timeline, in Telegram groups, in all these groups, working so ******* hard to meme this chain into existence" "Because he's in this world where they've got a giant money printer, and Coinbase is going to keep printing money, there's no real threat to it" "There's an existential long-term, decades-long threat of the world moves onchain or whatever, which is what they're trying to get ahead of, but outside of that he's fine"

  • HodlMagoo
    Magoo PhD (@HodlMagoo) reported

    @WayneVaughan @brian_armstrong @coinbase He pulled pulled support Jan 14th when Bitcoin was 98K. 3 weeks later it was 60K These idiots have no one to blame but themselves

  • GemsTrendingNew
    Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported

    BTC sentiment is reported near capitulation. BTC/USDT is also up 1.8% over 7 daily closes. Awkward little combo. The sentiment claim is single-source via CryptoBriefing’s report of Coinbase’s Q2 2026 report. No underlying sentiment index value provided. No direct Coinbase report excerpt provided in the bundle. So no, this does not prove a Bitcoin bottom. CT can put the confetti cannon down. What is verified: BTC/USDT last closed at 65,919.68 USDT on Binance daily data, and the pair is modestly positive across the last 7 daily closes. Price action only. The price data does not prove sentiment. Cleaner framing: divergence, not capitulation, not recovery. Mechanism: if pessimistic sentiment stays heavy while spot refuses to confirm downside, positioning can get awkward. Bears may be leaning on a sentiment read that price is not validating yet. Bulls, meanwhile, still need continued resilience rather than vibes with a ticker. If this continues, BTC may form a sentiment-price divergence where bearish sentiment lags stabilizing price action. Bitcoin is worth watching for confirmation either way: renewed short-term price weakness would validate the risk side; continued resilience against near-capitulation sentiment would make the bearish framing look stale. Invalidation is clean: verified sentiment data no longer near capitulation, BTC/USDT price action turns sharply negative over comparable short-term closes, or Coinbase report context is corrected or contradicted by later verified reporting.

  • kirangadakh16
    Kiran Gadakh ( crypto.kiran ) (@kirangadakh16) reported

    DAILY TOKEN ANALYSIS 🚨 Token : $INJ WHALES ARE AGGRESSIVELY LOADING UP ON INJECTIVE RIGHT NOW Big wallets are pulling massive amounts of INJ off exchanges with huge Coinbase mainnet withdrawals! Injective is completely crushing it after landing on Robinhood, wrapping up native mainnet migration, and expanding its DeFi derivatives. Plus, with ongoing fee burns making it deflationary, there are ZERO major token unlocks coming to dump on your face Support : $4.45 Resistance : $5.80 If $INJ breaks $5.50, we are sending it straight to $5.80 - $6.00 If it gets rejected, the $4.95 - $4.75 zone is the golden buy level

  • BTCLeukocyte_WR
    Without Rulers - BIP-110 #RunKnots (@BTCLeukocyte_WR) reported

    If we can repel the fiat parasites even partially expect #Bitcoin to take off. BIP-110 does this. There's still time to run a Knots/BIP-110 and contribute hash. You can get your tag in a historical BIP-110 block coinbase.

  • clipsofcrypto
    Arjun (@clipsofcrypto) reported

    "Ratings ought to be built on the building block of transparency and auditability" David and Andrew on why transparency has to come before ratings in DeFi "We need transparency reporting. This is not like you're taking a risk opinion, this should be table stakes and showing risk ratings does not count. On the Coinbase app today it shows the Steakhouse ratings that follow the Moody's pattern, like AAA, AA, B whatever. I understand why they do that, but we also know what pain ratings have caused in the past outside of crypto" "Because they're too opinionated, they're subjective, they're squishy, and you can pay for them ultimately. That's kind of the business of a rating" "We might have our own ratings one day and I'll take **** for that, but at least I'll be able to point to hey, we have the transparency first. We're trying to skip so many steps by going directly into ratings that it's frankly scary, especially since a lot of ratings are vibe coded"

  • Cointurknews
    COINTURK NEWS (@Cointurknews) reported

    🚨 Coinbase settles its FOIA lawsuit with the SEC, winning a $150,000 payment. 📝 SEC deleted Gary Gensler's texts during major $COIN enforcement actions. 🔍 SEC pledges better record-keeping after internal lapses exposed. 📅 The legal battle highlighted transparency issues in crypto oversight.

  • CoinBubbles_App
    CoinBubbles (@CoinBubbles_App) reported

    ⚡📊24H Liquidity Surges (Ranks 401-500 MC) $AMPL (Ampleforth) +17505.35% $JNJX (Johnson & Johnson tokenized stock (xStock)) +1941.31% $JPMX (JPMorgan Chase tokenized stock (xStock)) +1894.57% $BACX (Bank of America tokenized stock (xStock)) +1168.73% $SOXLx (Direxion Semiconductor Bull 3X tokenized ETF (xStock)) +953.71% $EWYx (iShares MSCI South Korea tokenized ETF (xStock)) +338.62% $YUSD (Aegis YUSD) +287.69% $ORCLX (Oracle tokenized stock (xStock)) +256.44% $NVDAon (NVIDIA Tokenized Stock (Ondo)) +210.61% $POLYX (Polymesh) +115.83% $PURR (Purr) +109.84% $PEAQ (peaq) +101.67% $ICNT (Impossible Cloud Network) +90.72% $HNT (Helium) +88.59% $GUSD (Gemini Dollar) +80.14% $SUT (SuperTrust) +75.93% $XUSD (StraitsX USD) +75.26% $VVS (VVS Finance) +69.09% $SN51 (lium) +43.79% $DHRX (Danaher tokenized stock (xStock)) +39.36% $ME (Magic Eden) +37.43% $MY (MetYa) +36.75% $AMP (Amp) +35.99% $COINon (Coinbase Tokenized Stock (Ondo)) +34.68% $NOT (Notcoin) +32.85%

  • EnjoyingBitcoin
    TORONTO HODL 🍁 (@EnjoyingBitcoin) reported

    Of course they're not going to self-dilute! What a scammer argument. The risk is not that scammers self-dilute. The risk is that they censor when leaned-on by Government. Monetary maxis WILL allow ALL monetary transactions. Even if they occur on Epstein Island. Andy should love this idea. Why? Because we are many, and we can't be found or stopped. But the deplorable **** Andy does on Epstein Island? Yea, I don't want the photos of it on my home server. Evil. Apparently, this means I'm censoring. The effect of this argument is I, and many others, are going to shut down our nodes, because I will not host Andy's photos. Which means Coinbase and Foundry (and a few others) get to call the shots. Bitcoin is captured. Why? Because I don't want pictures of Andy on Epstein's Island on my node. And that's what is so disappointing about you, @ForrestHODL. You lament so many see the world in black and white, and you hold yourself up to be superior: "I think the world is mostly gray." OK Mr. 50 Shades. This makes you complicit. You could acknowledge nuance and complexity (gray) without diluting truth and goodness (black/white). But you've chosen to side with the scammers, and argue like one too. Sad.

  • ChildOfBusiness
    Wombat (@ChildOfBusiness) reported

    @web4O Think it depends on the issuer the ones that are 1:1 redeemable stay pegged via arbitrage. Robinhood’s stock tokens are debt securities that track price with no shareholder rights and coinbase has theirs pitched as actual 1:1 equity with dividends. I could totally see a label problem arising here. If I remember correctly the SEC flagged this in January

  • crypto_rigatoni
    DOC🤌DELUCCI (@crypto_rigatoni) reported

    @coinbase No ****. 💩 and you can’t do that w bitcoin

  • EsotericKang
    Stevie 🔮 $XRP (@EsotericKang) reported

    Both of Vinny’s XRP wallets, as of 7/21/2026, have 1 XRP now. Down from 2500 XRP (rnoh55qChHmvPuZBwFTF8v1n6ezJkNkphe) Down from 3000 XRP (rDCQ2zd7dUTpJdvN9TMv7qMHq6YWppKAz8) All of it is gone. For a man who prizes himself as an XRP influencer, it’s quite amusing he has 2 XRP to his name now. All of it sent to Coinbase and sold.