Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nazoku (@Nazo_ku) reported 5 minutes ago

  On June 3, 2026, Coinbase announced: "We're partnering with Ethena to support their security and operations across more than $5 billion in assets. Today, $ENA's trading volume on Coinbase is just over $700k. It couldn't be much worse!

• 
  𝕮𝖗𝖞𝖕𝖙𝖔 𝕭𝕺𝖘𝖘𝕿𝕺𝕹 👑💎 (@the_boss_crypto) reported 6 minutes ago

  Correction on 4/ and 5/ someone pushed back in DMs and he was right. I ran the tests properly and I'm retracting both. I claimed the deployment pattern points to a RaaS vendor over in-house, and then that F "is" the infra/ops cluster. Neither holds. I tried to prove it three more ways DEP deploying only one rollup, funding via Coinbase Prime, the RollupCreator being shared. None discriminate. Every one fits an internal team equally well. What the tests did show: the RollupCreator DEP used is shared by multiple unrelated projects I verified three, all with different chainIds, gas tokens and operators. Standard shared plumbing. DEP also used Arbitrum's canonical TokenBridgeCreator. So both readings fail: not a bespoke internal deployment, and I can't name a vendor either. What stands: ✅ F funded the wallet that deployed RH Chain's L1 6/9 contracts match the official docs, chainId 4663 in the createRollup ✅ On RH Chain, F funded the $WALLET deployer (block 1009, 0.15 ETH) and the USDG/Paxos-linked wallet (block 41, 0.8 ETH) ✅ F was itself seeded at block 34 by a genesis vanity-cluster wallet. On Ethereum L1, F's ETH came through Coinbase Prime institutional custody ❓ Who F is corporate treasury, internal ops, or a service provider the chain doesn't say The "it explains the rest elegantly" line was the tell. An internal ops team explains it just as elegantly. That's the problem with elegant explanations. The cluster link is real and tight. The identity is genuinely undetermined. Anyone claiming certainty either way including me yesterday is ahead of the evidence.

• 
  Dusty Field (@dusty_field) reported 6 minutes ago

  Three changes from the last 48 hours across oracle security, DeFi lending infrastructure, and institutional stablecoin rails. Ostium: On July 15, an attacker compromised a private key belonging to one of Ostium's oracle signers on Arbitrum and used that access to submit fraudulent future-dated price reports through the protocol's registered PriceUpKeep forwarder. The attacker executed approximately 20 looped delegated trades, opening positions at market prices and closing them against manipulated oracle prices in a single atomic batch, extracting between $11.86 million and $18 million in USDC from Ostium's main liquidity vault. Ostium paused all trading immediately. The root cause is a private key compromise, not a flaw in audited contract logic. The exploit hit the oracle signer layer sitting outside the audited smart contracts and did not require any on-chain governance or direct contract interaction to execute. Ostium had raised $27.8 million and processed over $50 billion in cumulative trading volume before the incident. Cascade: On July 16, PeckShield reported that the Cascade Liquidity Strategy vault, operated by Polychain and Variant-backed perpetuals platform Cascade, was exploited for 1.34 million USDC. The attacker bridged the stolen funds from Arbitrum to Solana and then to Ethereum via Relay Protocol in DAI. User deposits in the CLS vault were locked pending trading launch, meaning affected depositors had no ability to withdraw before the exploit. A second Solana lending protocol, DeFiTuna, disclosed on July 16 that an attacker exploited its lending pools roughly seven hours earlier, extracting $580,000 and leaving the USDC lending pool at a matching deficit. DeFiTuna identified and patched the attack vector and said it is investigating and attempting fund recovery. In both cases the confirmed loss came out of user-supplied pool liquidity rather than protocol treasuries. Aave V4 / Avalanche: On July 15, Aave Labs deployed Aave V4 on Avalanche, the first V4 deployment outside Ethereum mainnet. The deployment introduces the Hub and Spoke architecture, replacing the monolithic pool model with a single Liquidity Hub that distributes credit to modular Spokes operating under separate risk parameters. Initial assets at launch include wAVAX, sAVAX, BTC.b, USDC, USDT, WETH.e, and EURC across three Spokes: a Main market, an AVAX Correlated market, and a Forex market. A dedicated RWA hub supporting borrowing against tokenized US Treasuries, money market funds, private credit, and corporate bonds is planned as a subsequent Spoke. Chainlink provides oracle infrastructure. The Avalanche Foundation committed up to $15 million in milestone-based incentives tied to hub launches and market growth. Future V4 deployments on Arbitrum, Optimism, and Base are contingent on stability metrics from this Avalanche deployment. Visa Stablecoin Platform: On July 16, Visa launched the Visa Stablecoin Platform in beta with select institutional clients. VSP packages stablecoin minting, redemption, wallet custody, and treasury settlement into a single Visa-managed environment for financial institutions, fintechs, and crypto-native firms. The platform launches with Open USD, the consortium-backed stablecoin introduced by Open Standard, a group that includes Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase, and Stripe. Clients can use Visa's new Wallet-as-a-Service stack or connect existing wallets, then configure dual-control approval workflows, audit logs, passkeys, and transfer allow lists for treasury and settlement operations. The platform integrates stablecoin flows into Visa's existing network, risk, and fraud systems rather than requiring institutions to build separate blockchain infrastructure. Visa's parallel stablecoin settlement pilot was running at a $7 billion annualized rate as of April 2026 across nine blockchains. VSP extends that from settlement-only into full-stack issuance and custody operations.

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 7 minutes ago

  huh actually Coinbase is still the same lmao wtf, weird

• 
  SurfLiquid 🌊 (@Surf_Liquid) reported 8 minutes ago

  @WatcherGuru BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman and Coinbase on tokenisation rails together closes the 'is onchain real' question. Next one is where that capital sits after issue. Tokenised money is still idle money until something decides where it earns.

• 
  Left Curver (@left_curver) reported 10 minutes ago

  I remember Coinbase shitting on Binance and other exchanges with their whole regulatory safe whatever spiel when Coinbase wasn't as popular as the rest. Now they're doing the same **** with RH chain they just can't handle it when others have the spotlight kek.

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 12 minutes ago

  I don’t think ai slop is meme culture, and a low quality comic book version of himself is precisely the kind of sycophantic bs that pushed everyone away from base if you bother to talk to the people who won’t bridge back. A few minutes of research you’ll also find some of the biggest onchain rapists were holding this before Brian posted it. I don’t think it addresses a single concern people had, it serves to try to pump a b20 token launched by a cb ventures backed launchpad. That’s exactly what people were complaining coinbase need to fix - the blatant favouritism. Instead they did it again. I see 1000x more people disgusted by that than anyone saying he should have posted their bags. The only criticism I’ve seen to that end has been it should have been one of the many communities who supported base for years, and that is in line with the criticism from the other day that they never listened to nor respected their own users. But it likely wasn’t about supporting meme culture to begin with, because if it was this looks retarded to anyone who actually likes memes and isn’t a hypergambler, so it’s a mistake. Meme culture != infinite freshly launched slop.

• 
  CryptoChirp (@CryptoChirpX) reported 14 minutes ago

  @baseapp Base App feels like a product built backwards. Desktop experience came way too late. For serious traders, desktop should have been a solid foundation from day one, not an afterthought. I imported my seed phrase in the mobile app, but on desktop I get a completely separate Coinbase Wallet key flow with no clear connection to the actual trading wallet I use. Power users need simple import/connect for existing wallets (Rabby, MetaMask, etc.). The rollout also felt off: early incentives, rewards, NFTs for first traders — but the core experience still wasn’t polished. You attracted people with carrots before the product itself was something worth using daily. Social features aren’t the main problem. The problem is making social/discovery the center of the experience before the wallet + portfolio + trading UX is excellent. Look at DeBank or Rabby: clean interface first, everything else on top. What would actually make me (and many others) open it every day: Create a trading agent in a few clicks: set rules, risk limits, allocate capital. Option to share strategies/agents with the community. Best-in-class wallet connection and trading terminal as the foundation. You’re trying to build an onchain super app — that’s ambitious. But first make the best wallet/trading experience, then add discovery, agents, chat and everything else. Right now it still feels more like a Coinbase experiment than a must-use tool for active traders. Fix the basics: wallet import, desktop UX, and especially trading fees. If I don’t need a referral link and just want normal, competitive commissions (without paying extra so someone gets a reward), why would I use your app? You already gained users with referrals — now it’s time to stop and make the product actually good. Lower fees to competitive levels instead of subsidizing referrals.

• 
  Lazy (@LazyBugXD) reported 15 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong the big boss at Coinbase and the dude behind Base, just dropped his FIRST EVER public support for a memecoin, and it's straight up $BRIAN. This ain't some random like or reply, bro. The CEO of a Fortune 500 crypto giant is actually engaging with a meme tribute to himself on his own chain. History in the making, fr. This changes everything for $BRIAN. With Brian hyping it and Base already stacked with Coinbase users ready to ape in, we're talking massive upside, potential listings, integrations, and straight moonshot energy. We're still super early, no big runners yet, and the narrative is nuclear. CEO backing a memecoin for the first time? Don't sleep on this one or you'll be kicking yourself later.

• 
  Randy (@MoneroKaiser) reported 15 minutes ago

  @arjunkhemani @chamath i read the entire post and found several parts of it mistaken. Monero is less traceable than zcash. the clearest evidence is the fact that zec is opt in privacy, almost exclusively acquired via centralized KYC platforms, almost no P2P support, and let’s not forget the part where @arkham has 53% and growing of transactions traced and documented. I’m not seeing Monero listed on their services, that’s weird. “It doesn’t matter if an asset has “mandatory privacy” if it’s not actually private. It just functions as a honeypot.” actually the worst part of this read. Monero the honeypot is actively delisted from every major exchange, attacked constantly and despite that holds a massive audience and support purely via P2P, while zcash is available on all of them. ask yourself why a private coin claiming to be freedom money has any business being available there. which leads me to compliant privacy that is exactly what zcash is and that’s a fact. there is 0 reason otherwise to have the option of transparency. this can be accomplished via a view key if it really mattered to someone, there is no reason to have a wide open transparent blockchain other than heavy compliance so it can be available on places like coinbase, which completely contradicts the entire point of true privacy tech which would be a tool against surveillance. lastly, market cap doesn’t equal usage. the fact that Monero and zcash’s market cap are still so close when you consider the wide availability of one vs the other, combined with the fact Monero’s MC remains steady and isn’t hype driven from a “cycle”, it paints a clear picture of which technology is actually preferred by people who truly need it. there is near 0 people out there relying on zcash for true private finance, it’s a coin that people hope the number goes up on so they can sell it and pay crypto gains tax afterward. Monero processes significantly more daily transactions, nearly all of which are private. Zcash has lower overall transaction volume, and only a fraction are shielded. you’re right about it no being a privacy rally, it was a hype driven coordinated pump without actual passionate thoughts around true financial privacy freedom.

• 
  Mindfulness (@Rahul81163439) reported 20 minutes ago

  @coinbase @coinbase customer service is more pathetic than anything else

• 
  Neal Flesher #BIP 110 (@NealFlesher) reported 21 minutes ago

  @88_sats to clarify, he put it in the coinbase. not op return its a space on every block the miner gets to mushroomstamp you have to mine the block it is arbitrary data, as its discretionary to the miner to use as they see fit, but it serves a monetary purpose.

• 
  Dave a.k.a. SuperTight™️ Prowest™️ (@prowest1) reported 21 minutes ago

  @JaromirTesar Your quote… “Responsible governance requires more than deciding whether one proposal is valuable. It requires a coordinated and fair plan for the ecosystem as a whole.” If Blockfrost is needed today for major CEX integration (I.e. Coinbase, Binance, etc.) into the Cardano ecosystem then its survival is what I’ll call “ecosystem critical”…this should carry with it a little more seriousness then simply saying it requires a “fair plan for the ecosystem”. The term “fair plan” is suggesting that the Dreps can agree objectively on something that is subjective in its nature and that all treasury requests are equal. They are not all equal…full stop. There have been plenty of requests that failed that will not be impactful to the ecosystem. This is likely not one of them if I am to believe @IOHK_Charles…and I do on this subject. For Dreps to put this treasury requests on the “scales of justice” and treat any request equally with all other treasury requests is a miscarriage of governance justice…IMHO. It is akin to saying I need a heart replacement to live but I cannot pay for it because I already spent money on a hair transplant procedure and I really want to get that new “looksmaxing” package that just dropped so I can look better than everyone else…oh well, at least I’ll look fab in my casket when they bury me after my heart fails!! You don’t do that…you spend the money on the heart transplant and maybe live more frugally if needed for a time to catch up on the critical expense. In your quote you said responsible governance is more than deciding whether one proposal is valuable…you seem to be trying to balance ecosystem fairness with ecosystem value or criticality…that is a recipe for governance disaster. Governance requires one to prioritize and even make compulsory all proposals that disproportionately provide greater good for the ecosystem over all other proposals. Identifying what provided disproportionally greater good and making sure it gets funded should be the goal of governance. This may seem unfair as it marginalizes some contributors but not all contributors are providing the same value…and governance when done right is not about being fair to all contributors, it is about being fair to the contributors that provide real value. Determining the value of any request for treasury funds is the absolute responsibility of effective governance…and by default it will mean that some will be disappointed because the value they want to provide is not ecosystem critical today. Maybe I’m wrong here but it seems to me that not only does Blockfrost provide disproportionately greater value to the Cardano ecosystem compared to a lot of other proposals, but it also seems that not funding it will create a lot more harm than good. We can be fair or we can be correct with any governance vote…those two choices should not be on a balance scale. Being correct should significantly outweigh being fair on every decision at this stage. If it isn’t clear I’m in the camp of supporting the Blockfrost proposal because the ecosystem is much worse off without Blockfrost support if my understanding of its role is correct.

• 
  xDavD (@xbtDavid) reported 29 minutes ago

  if bigger company like robinhood wich is tradfi can publicly acknowledge and support memes then why crypto coinbase is so stuborn? scared?

• 
  ₿itcoin ₿ombadil (@BitcoinBombadil) reported 31 minutes ago

  Putting 2-100b of data in the script sig field of the special coinbase tx in each block ≠ stuffing large blobs of data in Op_Codes to fill blocks with garbage Study Bitcoin more.

• 
  tiger is fine... (@tigerisfine) reported 36 minutes ago

  Must be nice for coinbase to just have cobie in their back pocket on standby to magically appear whenever they feel like they’re losing mindshare. Robinhood had a moment and then cobie is called in for customer support and interning. Then base gets a meme runner.

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 37 minutes ago

  Case#26866769 Live support says my documents are enough. Then why I still cannot access my account? Day 31 No update, no feedback, no timeline, nothing. This is too much waiting for KYC. Coinbase, I trusted you since you have millions of users @CoinbaseSupport

• 
  Alex 🥷 (@Shilllin) reported 37 minutes ago

  ya because coinbase isn’t getting hacked and users aren’t getting simswapped And Solana blockchain isn’t going down And the DEXs on Solana aren’t being exploited for $200M+++ by “North Korean hackers” Many people are going to miss Robinhood because of personal biases

• 
  Banana Republic 🦧 (@Monkeyiobe) reported 38 minutes ago

  EUROPE JUST ANNOUNCED ITS CRYPTO REGISTER GREW TO 294 LICENSED FIRMS. TWO MONTHS AGO, EUROPE HAD 3,167 CRYPTO FIRMS. The MiCA licensing deadline on July 1 didn't grow the European crypto industry. It shrank it by more than 90%, and the count climbing back toward 300 is regulators counting the survivors. That's the Game: consolidation dressed as growth. Three US-listed names are the biggest winners of what got cleared out. Coinbase now holds one license covering all 27 EU states and roughly 450 million people. Robinhood inherited the same access through its ownership of Bitstamp, one of Europe's oldest exchanges. Circle is the only major stablecoin issuer licensed for both its dollar and euro tokens. Binance holds no valid MiCA license. Tether never applied, and licensed exchanges have delisted USDT, pulling an estimated $185 billion of the world's most traded stablecoin off the regulated European market entirely. We read "294 licensed firms" as a healthy, maturing industry. It is a market that just lost 2,873 competitors in eight weeks, and three American stocks were standing closest to the door when it happened. Check whether the crypto stock in our portfolio is one of the three names now holding a legally protected head start on 450 million customers, or one of the thousands that quietly stopped existing in Europe this month. 🍌

• 
  Shadow Defense (@shadowdefense) reported 40 minutes ago

  @dave4572 @SStricklandMMA not if you convert it back to cash using coinbase because they report it to irs and they can track down who owns that wallet

• 
  JPOW (@dropdx) reported 41 minutes ago

  @cobie @punk6529 @heart_ Base app is ******* terrible. I actually liked the Coinbase Wallet.

• 
  meshvi (@bluebase6895) reported 42 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @SECPaulSAtkins Are you dumb to fumble again , give your ******* dogs name as reply to someone , it ignites base season , ask Coinbase official account to follow through , you don’t even have to support it publicly. Honestly I don’t how such smart people can be so dumb

• 
  Clarissa Krypto 🔶🔸 (@Clarissa_Krypto) reported 44 minutes ago

  I think we’ve spent too much time treating crypto as something to hold… and not enough time making it something people can actually use. Real adoption begins when digital assets become part of everyday life. Paying bills. Sending money. Shopping online. Moving funds without unnecessary friction. That’s why I like the direction @MegPrimePay is taking. U.S. users can buy $MPP directly in the app and receive a $50 reward after depositing $25, while users outside the U.S. can access $MPP through Coinbase Wallet or Uniswap. The easier it is to use crypto in the real world, the less people will think of it as an investment—and the more they’ll treat it as money. That’s the kind of utility that drives long-term adoption.

• 
  king blue (@youngblue313) reported 45 minutes ago

  @coinbase always holding people money up for no fkn reason. I simply tried to buy some $base through the base app and they instantly refunded my card for no reason and I have to wait for my bank to send my funds back. Get y’all **** together man.

• 
  DubaiXRPLady (@XrpLadyy) reported 46 minutes ago

  @bighornguy @FinancialCmte **** @coinbase It's all because of them Hating them a lot

• 
  TheEagle (@_PatrioticEagle) reported 48 minutes ago

  @baseapp -It somehow became less intuitive. -It's still a complete hassle to use. -Coinbase wallet integration is not smooth. -Slow compared to Solana, not sure that can be fixed though. -Pain in the *** to build on. -Even more of a pain to vibe code build on (this is where better unlocks will be). Many other issues. I want to build my next app on base. But I may stick to trad fi garbage instead if these are not fixed.

• 
  Wendy O (@CryptoWendyO) reported 48 minutes ago

  Crypto things you might have missed: -NYDIG: Clarity Act is crypto's biggest catalyst -Coinbase: USDC growth is not hurting banks -Nvidia CEO claims AI cycle is just starting -Apple flips Nvidia -$63,000 $BTC as chip rout goes global -@saylor says fiat currency is the problem

• 
  BigKing 🐂🀄 (@BigKing6034) reported 50 minutes ago

  $binance customer service, he went for $100m #binance, the only woman, now you have a second chance #coinbase, the only woman, her name is $emilie 👀🐐🐐🐐

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 53 minutes ago

  Well hopefully $baby distro is getting better, there are a few clusters here and there and i'm not sure what they mean, but nothing higher than 4.3% which is fine for a low cap. The Mexc clsuter (now 10%) is lower meaning that our asian friends sold the bottom, Coinbase getting higher meaning we're attracting burgers and binance is in the organic range. Change Now cluster a little bit high with 5.3% but that's ok. Also checking on the fees apart from the 0.000075001 generic fee with lots of supply nothing appears to be above 4%. This ain't bad for some **** we shilled out of the blue, let's go

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 56 minutes ago

  @murchandamus @dannydeezy One block per day assumes that the ~7Eh/s or so signaling for this is prepared to dig in and fight for longer than an hour, by which time the legacy chain has pulled so far ahead it’s clear 110 will never succeed as a soft fork. I assume the vast majority of that hash is coming from professional miners who have bills to pay and can’t gamble on a hypothetical coinbase payout coming in three months, in the form of some token that will likely be nearly worthless. Maybe some idealistic home miners will run their Bitaxes for a few days, but I assume even they will throw in the towel and pivot back to Bitcoin. BIP-110 is DOA as far as I can see.💀