Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	15 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	18 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ShadowX (@shadow12_x) reported 6 seconds ago

  @MichaelGSantos @brian_armstrong @coinbase Oh **** .. are donations safe?

• 
  Magoo PhD (@HodlMagoo) reported 2 minutes ago

  Ultimately @brian_armstrong and @coinbase thought they held all the cards when they pulled support for the Clarity Act earlier this year over stablecoin reward language. Now they are trying to desperately ram it through before a highly contested Midterm election with literal days left on the schedule. Massive miscalculation.

• 
  Nova's Owl (@novasowl) reported 6 minutes ago

  To give you an idea why it's important to check the CEX clusters map, here $2027 which is a very obvious bundled scam, just by looking at the funding sources alone you see something weird Coinbase funded wallets only have 1.2% of the total supply. Husher in there, Kucoin/Mexc/Bitget/Bybit/Binance/OKX are all part of the chinese cartel bundling coins all the damn time. So here with a basic override we can safely say it's garbage without having to look further

• 
  Gram+ (@olatoyemi_) reported 8 minutes ago

  Coinbase has launched their 24/5 trading for nearly 4,000 US stocks to eligible UK users, integrating equities with crypto and fiat in one app. The service offers zero-commission trades, fractional shares from £1, and instant funding via GBP or USDC, following recent UK investment services authorization.

• 
  OldremyCrypto (@Oldremy) reported 9 minutes ago

  Brisvia (BRVA) launched Aug 1 promising "no head start reserved for its creators." The first 594 blocks went to a single address. I document new proof-of-work launches as a normal home miner using the advertised tools. Here's what five days of receipts show. First, what checked out. The builds are legitimate. I verified the 1.1.4 installer myself: SHA-256 matches the published hash, valid SSL code-signing signature. My antivirus flagged the in-app updater. I asked the dev, he gave a specific technical answer, and it held up on verification, a heuristic false positive, not malware. The chain started on time: no blocks exist before 15:00 UTC. Difficulty ramped exactly as designed (block 1: 0.0002441 → block 518: 0.001777). This is a real chain and the supply-chain handling was serious. Credit where it's earned. What the chain shows. I walked the explorer block by block from genesis. Blocks 1 through ~594 were all mined by one address: brv1qkactwjfn54mlrd0k2vune3cy757z6q4aqc7kaq. Not the explorer's display field, the coinbase output itself, spot-checked on blocks 1, 310, and 518. That's consensus data, not an interpretation. Other addresses don't appear until ~595. Broad multi-miner activity doesn't start until ~687. What everyone else got. At launch, the advertised paths didn't work. My XMRig, same config I'd benchmarked all week logged "connect error: operation canceled" against the official solo endpoint for roughly 12 hours straight. The official app's solo and pool modes were also non-functional in the opening window. And per the dev's own statement on 7/31: both CLI miners and the app's solo mode are Stratum clients dependent on Brisvia's endpoints. Mining against your own node "is not officially supported yet." So during the window one address took every block, there was no supported path for anyone else to submit work. One more gap. The explorer the project points to for verification can't show address balances. "No address API is configured." You can see who mined each block. You cannot check what any address holds. What I did about it. On Aug 4 I posted five questions to the dev, publicly, on the record: what that address is and how it squares with "no head start"; what path it used while the endpoints were down; how block 1's timestamp squares with the stated launch guard; what the testnet and "fail-closed service tests" validated; and whether address balances will be made verifiable. He'd answered technical questions promptly when he had answers. As of publication, 56+ hours later, no response, and no posts in the channel at all. I can't tell you who owns that address. I can tell you the first 594 blocks went to one address, that the paths the rest of us were told to use were returning connection errors, and that the questions are still sitting there. The site says: "Don't trust a promise. Verify the launch." I did. I hold a small amount of BRVA I mined. Coverage, not endorsement. Positions disclosed. DYOR.

• 
  Reason (@NY2029Win) reported 9 minutes ago

  @MotowarriorX @EleanorTerrett @subjectiveviews This Bill is giving Coinbase cart blanche and no oversight. It is just a terrible Bill.

• 
  MrMatt 🇺🇸 (@MattNY77) reported 11 minutes ago

  That is great that you can do more and more on @coinbase . But accounts are always getting restricted. When will these issues be addressed? Why will people continue to come to your platform if they lose trust in Coinbase . In the last 2 years my account has been frozen for 6 months, restricted for 3 months and now restricted again for who knows how long. There is never any communication as to why it happens. No one wants to help until it gets blown up all over twitter. Please work on these problems. All of these announcements mean nothing if people start leaving your platform. Your customers deserve better. @brian_armstrong @emiliemc

• 
  Hoodie Millionaire (@mfermillionaire) reported 13 minutes ago

  @crypto_bitlord7 People sell the news but remember Bonk? That **** pumped 10X eventually on Coinbase. Cashcat will be steadily pumping for weeks and months

• 
  Nomix (@NomixTrades) reported 13 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong you left out where you also destroy anyone who ever believes in base chain. $brian will go down and history as the beginning of the downfall for coinbase. no accountability. no reparations. just nuking your own users on chain. the opposite of @vladtenev

• 
  bry (@bryanmonterreyx) reported 14 minutes ago

  s/o to @coinbase support for helping me get my 1000 dollars back

• 
  Battle Jeff (@BattleJeff1) reported 14 minutes ago

  @drjasper_eth @gane5h No it doesn't. If Coinbase have to take a 0.2% yield cut. When solo get 1%, LST holders get 0.8%. LSD holders sell, Coinbase stake share reduce. >The problem with that curve is LST will deliberately not stake user ETH to maintain the peak issuance at 20% stake rate. Top three pools call each other. "Let's not stake beyond 20%, extra user ETH just park in our wallet" They'll get the highest possible total reward. Still distribute to users based on their LST holdings. Users get more reward, pools get more fees. Now the pools even get extra unstaked ETH to use elsewhere. That's why I keep saying the curve shape is wrong. It has to be strict monotonic.

• 
  SafeBrowz (@SafeBrowz) reported 15 minutes ago

  We connected the SafeBrowz MCP to @Cloudflare's new AI Playground. A non-Claude model (GLM-4.7-Flash) discovered our tools on its own, called check_url, and flagged a fake Coinbase login page in seconds. DANGER. Trust score 5/100. Block. 🧵

• 
  Rob Coder (@R0BC0D3R) reported 16 minutes ago

  @coinbase And definitely fix shadow banning that's supposedly not happening but in reality is definitely happening.

• 
  Nikita (@jeetted) reported 19 minutes ago

  @kingyru wtf you talking about, nobody uses binance us, check volume on other assets, it will be dead as well. americans use kraken coinbase etc, not binance us FUDDER

• 
  Ben Hart (@BenHart_Freedom) reported 21 minutes ago

  FURTHER THOUGHTS ON THE COLDCARD FIASCO. I was fully sold on self-custody. Bought 3 ColdCards -- two MK4s and a Q. Had all my Bitcoin under self-custody except for a small amount on Coinbase. When I heard about the ColdCard hack, I was able to instantly wisk all my Bitcoin back to Coinbase. I feel horrible for those who lost their funds. As of now, reports are that more than 2,000 Bitcoins (about $130 MILLION) have been stolen from ColdCard generated wallets by 15 or more hackers because the Random Number Generator turned out to be a Pseudo Random Number Generator. So numbers generated not random at all. Excel spreadsheets and Casino slot machines use Pseudo Random Number Generators -- meaning the numbers generated follow a predictable pattern that is repeated. It's just a very big pattern, so looks random to humans. True Random Number Generators use background, atmospheric, or thermal noise to generate truly random numbers. ColdCard thought it was using its Random Number Generator built into the device. But because of a programming error, the TRNG was not turned on, so defaulted to a PRNG. It's super easy for a basic laptop to crack a PRNG number. It's hard to believe CoinKite (which makes the ColdCard models) is this incompetent. Then I find out that ColdCard only has 5 employees. It's barely a company at all. We were told by the top Bitcoin influencers that ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody security. Then it turns out most of these influencers were paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard. Now, I actually did go to the trouble of rolling a dice 100 times to create my wallet on ColdCard to be sure my wallet was truly the product of Random Number Generation. Also applied a pass phrase, randomly generated with dice. So I'm told my Bitcoin was safe. Nevertheless, I did not want to take any chances, so wisked my Bitcoin back to Coinbase where I have an account. But here's the thing. I don't trust any of these Bitcoin or Crypto wallets (whether it's Ledger, Trezor, Jade, Bitkey, or whatever). This time, the flaw was the Random Number Generator. Next time AI will find another flaw, another backdoor in the firmware. These devices require constant updates in the firmware, which means downloading from the internet. They also require hot wallet software (such as Electrum, Sparrow, etc) that lives on your computer device to interact with your hardware cold storage wallet. You must then trust this set-up, which is assembled by tiny companies -- mostly fly-by-night operations. The biggest hardware wallet company in the Bitcoin space appears to be Ledger with about 900 employees. Okay, that at least is a real company. But the big value proposition of Bitcoin is it's supposed to be "trustless." You're not supposed to have to "trust" anyone with your money. Your are supposed to be a "sovereign individual," "your own bank." Bitcoin is supposed to be "unconfiscatable" (i.e. lawsuit protection) and "uncensorable" (you can't be debanked). Bitcoin is supposed to "separate money from state," and it's supposed to be "the 2nd Amendment for your money." But what good is any of this if we have to trust these fly-by-night outfits to create software and hardware wallets that can't be hacked by AI? And most people lose their Bitcoin through user error. The biggest threat to your Bitcoin under self-custody is YOU. People lose their private keys. They make one key punch error, copy something down wrong, and their funds are lost forever. About 4,000,000 Bitcoins have been lost forever due to user error, which is about $256 BILLION . . . lost through self-custody user error. So 20% of all Bitcoin lost . . . through user error. I love the idea of Bitcoin. No one has hacked Bitcoin's underlying technology. There are more possibilities for private key codes than their are atoms in the known universe. So Bitcoin the asset appears secure. It's an ingenious asset. But the fatal flaw is the tech we must trust to use it. Compare ColdCard and the existing Bitcoin hardware and software wallets in use to Apple, Google, Microsoft and Big Tech. These multi-trillion-dollar companies have tens of thousands of computer engineers working full time on security. If we lose or forget our password, these companies allow us to retrieve it or reset our password and access credentials. Our funds are not lost forever. I don't like having to trust these companies. But we really have no choice. So we trust these companies with our passwords and all our info. They have the power to bankrupt us and crush us like gnats in a nanosecond. Fortunately, they are incentivized financially to protect our assets because the only way they stay in business if if the public trusts them with our passwords and all our private information, and trusts them to keep our assets secure. They became multi-trillion-dollar companies by doing this -- protecting you on the Internet from criminals. I don't like that Big Tech has amassed so much power over us. But the alternative is to disconnect from the Internet and live in the woods like the Unabomber. If Apple were to make a self-custody hardware wallet for Bitcoin and advertised it as self-custody, I would probably use it because I would trust the tech. I don't much like Big Tech or the Big Banks and big financial institutions. I would like to be free of them, and be my own bank. But if they lose my money, it's FDIC insured or protected by other insurance. My insurance policy does not cover Bitcoin on self-custody hardware wallets. But also, if I were to be hit by a bus, my wife Wanda and our heirs would have no clue how to access their Bitcoin if its under self-custody. Yes, I left her instructions in a safe-deposit box. But could she actually access her Bitcoin if she had to? Most likely, she would need to get help from an expert. She would need to trust someone to help her access her Bitcoin. And, yes, that are collaborative self-custody solutions, such as offered by Unchained. But this is also complicated. There's really no such thing as "trustless." Most of us trusted ColdCard because we trusted the Bitcoin influencers who told us ColdCard was the "gold standard" for self-custody Bitcoin security. Then it turned out they were being paid by CoinKite to hype ColdCard -- and didn't know what they were talking about. So there's no such thing as "trustless." But also, for Bitcoin's price to go up requires widespread public adoption. 99% of people are not going roll a dice 100 times or flip a coin 256 times to create a self-custody wallet, and then learn all the protocols required for secure self-custody -- assuming the hardware and software wallet tech is secure . . . . . . which turns out to be a false assumption. I'm not a fan of Coinbase. It's customer service sucks. Coinbase has no customer service. But at least Wanda can log in and check our Bitcoin balance . . . and access the funds. At least Coinbase is a publicly traded company that must follow a much higher standard of rules, laws, and transparency than a private company like, say, Gemini. Coinbase is at least auditable. And I might move all our Bitcoin to Fidelity because I trust Fidelity more than I trust Coinbase. I can get someone on the phone at Fidelity. Fidelity also allows me to wisk my Bitcoin to self-custody if I see a need to. Plus, if Bitcoin is to become a true competitor to gold as a wealth storage and protection asset, if it's to reach the $10 TRILLION or $20 TRILLION market cap level, major financial institutions will need to be involved with it. And they are slowly getting involved with Bitcoin. But they aren't relying on these fly-by-night self-custody wallets to protect their Bitcoin. So at age 68, I've decided to abandon the self-custody model. I'm just not going to risk self-custody. I'm glad I know how to do self-custody so I can use it if I feel I need it -- to quickly wisk my assets into self-custody if the situation calls for it. But trusting self-custody day in and day out is asking for trouble. I'd rather trust Apple, JP Morgan Chase, Fidelity, and Morgan Stanley to protect my assets than myself and these fly-by-night Bitcoin wallet oufits, some of which are run by criminals, apparently.

• 
  Windy | Memecoin (@windy_memecoin) reported 23 minutes ago

  @coinbase search being broken rn is genuinely painful, feels like such a basic fix tbh. would love to connect with more people pushing for this

• 
  Wolf Kissed (@MrWolfEth) reported 31 minutes ago

  @OceanXRP_ Robinhood had so many security breaches it’s not even funny. Coinbase. 0 Sometimes the simplicity of things is the downfall of it. Coinbase since 2020, never had a problem.

• 
  Boost (@boosteau) reported 32 minutes ago

  @coinbase Finally someone mentions how broken search has been

• 
  10MinuteOKByeBye (@Blakecrowes) reported 32 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Man I miss 2017. The Coinbase pump was awesome. Everyone knew if you got that CB listing it was rocket 🚀 time. Then the site would crash and everyone missed selling the top. Good times though. Whatever this crypto market is now it sucks. How about you kick off an alt season

• 
  Oliver Brooks (@Pocketmob) reported 33 minutes ago

  @LeeVerdon Damn I'm sorry about your losses man I can understand how upsetting that can be, I've also had issue with my wallet i got hacked by coinbase losing have of my btc to an unknown address. I filed a report but no answer, luckily I got my funds recover. Kindly follow me 👉

• 
  Asa Craig (@AsaCraig) reported 34 minutes ago

  Of note, Judge said: “just because it is costly and burdensome [to geofence], doesn’t mean it’s impossible for Coinbase/Kalshi/etc. to comply with CEA and state gambling laws” #predictionmarkets #sportsbetting

• 
  slaaaaaay 🦄💨✨ (@slaaaaaay496916) reported 37 minutes ago

  @coinbase i know u aint telin people how to fix things right coinbase?

• 
  Ethereal (@0xEthreal) reported 38 minutes ago

  Millionaire trader Sebastian explains how Robinhood chain could be the next big revolution for making money with memecoins. - What matters is the sentiment of everyone wanting to trade again How do I make money from this? - What he did was buy cash-cat:native with size of 30 thousand - Wants to buy more because he believes in the meme - The pipeline that Robinhood has with listing memes is like Coinbase back then - Robinhood has the same big opportunity to list the top memes on their platform and boost their coins. - Robinhood CEO Vlad sees the opportunities with memecoins and will want to make money on this - Resulting in high volume and many coins flourishing on the chain. A great clip to understand the sentiment that is coming back with Robinhood chain. We are in a position to possibly make that **** you money many people dream of with memecoins. A nice hack that you should know is you can easily trade Robinhood coins on the Pumpfun App.

• 
  KW (@KingstonWang77) reported 43 minutes ago

  @shawmakesmagic I've been a holder since the very early days of ai16z, stayed through its peak, and continued supporting the project through the migration to elizaOS. I recently saw your post saying that you're ready to give up on the token because you feel holders have done nothing but FUD you. From my perspective, I don't think that's the whole story. I think a lot of the frustration comes from expectations that were set but never fully materialized. Over time, many long-term supporters didn't become critics overnight—they simply became disappointed. For example: 1. During the ai16z era, it was announced that there would be a collaboration with a well-known university in Q1 of last year to develop the tokenomics model. Since then, there hasn't been any meaningful update. 2. After ai16z reached its peak, the team was largely silent for nearly a year. The community kept waiting for updates, but very little came. 3. After your X account was restored, you mentioned in December that a major partnership was coming, but it couldn't be announced yet. After that, it was never mentioned again. Many people assumed it was Coinbase because of the events you attended together and because the project's focus gradually shifted toward x402. 4. When that direction didn't seem to work out, your posts on X became noticeably more combative. Later, the focus shifted again to Babylon, but that initiative also faded without any meaningful follow-up. 5. During the migration to elizaOS, ai16z holders were diluted by around 40% to fund contributor incentives. Personally, I don't think rewarding contributors is a bad idea. If the goal was to attract more builders and strengthen the ecosystem over the long term, that makes sense. What concerned me, however, was seeing the official wallet sell nearly $136,000 worth of tokens—not including funds removed from the liquidity pool. Those transactions are all publicly visible on-chain. From what I've seen, the people constantly spreading FUD are actually a minority. Most long-term supporters simply became quiet after watching expectation after expectation go unrealized. When elizaOS made its strong return to X earlier this year, that announcement genuinely reminded me of the excitement during the early ai16z days. I think many early holders felt the same way. Unfortunately, the broader market has been weak, and much of the attention around AI has shifted toward Web2, so the project never received the momentum it probably deserved. Since then, though, I've watched the conversation become increasingly negative, and it has often felt like whenever one direction loses momentum, the focus shifts to something new. Meanwhile, even @KyeGomezB—the person you criticized before—has stayed committed all this time and is still working hard to make Swarms succeed. I genuinely hope you don't give up so quickly. There are still many people who believe in you and in what you've been trying to build. I just hope that, moving forward, we'll see fewer new directions and more promises fulfilled. Trust isn't rebuilt through announcements—it's rebuilt through consistent execution. I still believe you have what it takes. I'll still be here, hoping to see elizaOS become what so many of us believed it could be.

• 
  nothing (@hyperNothing_) reported 44 minutes ago

  @coinbase only if you fix your support

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Waylon3601 @KingOffX_ I read about your $25K lost through Coinbase and Ledger, both insider jobs, not user error. I've traced exchange leaks and hardware wallet breaches where the on-chain trail led further than anyone expected. I can surface where yours went. Let me know if you want me to take a look

• 
  Jenn🛡️ (@Queen1Crypto) reported 54 minutes ago

  @coinbase Also, fix spaces

• 
  Scott (@sitbyriver9026) reported 55 minutes ago

  @giacomozucco @theothermjordan Most of the popular self custody onboards bitcoin ****’s recommended were kyc. The chance of losing bitcoin using self custody to user error has been infinitely higher than holding bitcoin on coinbase or river or fidelity. Self custody is good. It’s not for everyone. Don’t

• 
  Matt Houston (@niw51309458) reported 56 minutes ago

  @DJBuildIt We’re sorry to hear about your experience. If your account has a hold or your Coinbase Card isn’t working, please send us a DM with your account details so we can look into what’s causing the restriction and help you review your next steps.

• 
  vimen (@vimenprotocol) reported 59 minutes ago

  Holders got paid this week. Real dividends, on-chain. Also assets available on the protocol just tripled. Two new exciting things shipped on Vimen. One: available equities just tripled. The investable equity universe went from 9 to 30 names in a single batch: the semis (AMD, TSMC, ASML, Micron, Intel), the crypto-equity complex (Coinbase, Strategy, Circle, GameStop), space and frontier (SpaceX, Rocket Lab), large-cap tech, and index ETFs including QQQ, silver and oil. Now we count 58 assets total with the natives, every one Chainlink-fed and verified live before registration. The feeds page listed them the moment they hit the registry, because it reads the chain. Two: V2 indexes just paid their first dividends. Agentic indexes sweep their surplus to holders in USDG, and this week the mechanism fired for the first time: two indexes closed payout cycles and holders got paid, on-chain. The amounts are small because the pots are still young. What matters is the loop: mint, the agent rotates, the surplus leaves NAV, and it lands in your wallet. That full circle has now run end to end. And we built a performance terminal that shows every basket's live track record, the good rows and the bad ones, read straight from each contract. Registering an asset isn't a recommendation, and nothing here is a forecast. It's a bigger shelf and a working loop. Links below. Go verify the dividends yourself. Both transactions are public.