Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	18 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	22 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rockwater EQ (@RockwaterEQ) reported 5 minutes ago

  I have spent over a month trying to get my cash out of Coinbase and transfer my crypto. Massive fees because of continuous rejections and account lockouts followed by the app failing to process my verifications to unlock my account. I will never use Coinbase again. Apparently this is a known issue.

• 
  mojo (@ilenfaut) reported 9 minutes ago

  @coinbase Absolutely disgraceful customer service. I called to report fraudulent activity and asked to close my account. your support repeatedly disconnected the calls. Can’t believe this is how you treat customers trying to protect themselves from fraud. Close my account now.

• 
  🇨🇦 VonRedbird (@VonRedbird) reported 11 minutes ago

  @jerallaire I really can’t help but think they’re trying to force Coinbase out. Certainly not a good sign to not be included in this momentum and group partnership

• 
  Jpgs.eth (@Jpgs_eth) reported 12 minutes ago

  2/ Venice's structure maps exactly: Series A equity = preferred stock (Dragonfly, Coinbase Ventures) $VVV = common stock with worse legal rights but BETTER liquidity $DIEM = prepaid service credits (not equity at all) $VVV $DIEM @askvenice

• 
  Feranmi (@Kenny_Tomide) reported 12 minutes ago

  $INJ is at $4.593 and I genuinely think this is one of the more interesting spots it's been in a while The daily chart shows price bouncing clean off $4.034 support That low held, buyers stepped in, and now the chart is quietly building a base while everyone else looks away Today @injective executed its mainnet hard fork upgrade, IIP-665, performance, security, economic improvements, all live on chain Yesterday the community burned $246,000 worth of INJ in a single buyback round Supply is shrinking every single month and the chain keeps getting faster and stronger Injective Summit is July 16 in Washington D.C. with @circle already confirmed Coinbase native INJ support drops around July 20 Two back to back catalysts in the same week $INJ is not asking for attention right now It's just loading DYOR. NFA #Injective

• 
  Robert Albert (@Robert_Xrpl) reported 13 minutes ago

  Buddy, XRP is already mirrored in the QFS on each persons "Quantum Access Account." That is those that "hold the keys" and it's not sitting in an exchange of platforms "Master Aggregated Account" like Uphold, Binance, Coinbase, Kracken. Playing around with creating all this while there will be no income taxes for gain under the QFS/NESARA Protocols, you are creating a ticking time-bomb just to get paid to create LLC's and the like. It is not NECESSARY at all. Plus, any tax entity documents being created based on the Temple-Bar Legal System are not accepted on the QFS. 38 years as a Tax Professional shows me your ADVISE or SALES AGENCY tactics are suspect, and are not going to serve you well in the end.

• 
  Robert Bristol (@robertbristoljr) reported 14 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase @nyliberty WNBA star power. 1. Put your predetermined stars on the court. 2. Feed them the ball continuously. 3. Defenders back down. And they will eventually get the numbers they need. No room for real talent. DEI ***** sports!

• 
  Harvey Reginald Financial (@Crypto1Harvey) reported 16 minutes ago

  @flippifi WRONG again, *******. You're LYING or terribly misinformed. According to Coinbase: "Litecoin reached its record high of $420.00 on December 11, 2017, marking a -90% change from its present value". It hasn't $420 since, making it the REAL ATH. Now YOU know YOUR facts, sit down and shut ******** up. Memecoin or not, I don't think you realize how manipulated #Litecoin $LTC actually is. So the net result is still the same. Maybe you just deliberately ignore this or pretend it doesn't exist.

• 
  DougAJ (@DougMAshcroft) reported 18 minutes ago

  @scottmelker End result a better product for consumers! @brian_armstrong @coinbase 💔 Looking forward to changes to the Coinbase One Card offering in light of the market competition! Lowering the holdings to BTC back rates increased USDC yeilds, US based customer support and asset protection would be greatly appreciated places to start!

• 
  She’s With Me 🎈🌻 🇭🇹 🥭🍋 (@BookOfPash) reported 19 minutes ago

  @PeriodPointJae @WNBA @coinbase Ehhh yeah actually we can see less of Spike and we should. He’s an acclaimed director - not a mascot of a basketball team. He’s been in front of the cameras like he’s a starting 5 and he’s not. **** is wrong with YOU? Go fan out on his page - not in my comments.

• 
  Omid Malekan (@malekanoms) reported 20 minutes ago

  Interesting dynamic yesterday where Circle/Coinbase stock sold off on the OUSD announcement but Visa/Mastercard stock did not. The implication being..new stablecoins will disrupt old stablecoins..but they won't disrupt old payment methods? Or that startups eat other startups, but incumbents stay highly profitable? Strikes me as unlikely. But I'm also not surprised since the equity markets have never valued crypto stocks properly (in either direction). I still believe, as I have for years, that the long term economics of stablecoin issuance is close to zero. Particularly once Genius forces homogeniety of every feature other than brand and distro, both of which will always be stronger for whoever uses stables as a loss leader over a profit center. But here's the thing: if stables do become loss leaders across the board, today's issuers have a better chance of evolving their biz models than incumbent card companies, banks, and even FinTechs. They are newer and more agile, their product lines have less Lindy, etc. If nothing else, the current ~50% gross margin that is common across payment incumbents will have to compress. That will be a problem for the equity multiples of companies like Visa, Mastercard, and even Stripe. And I'm sure their leaders know this as they embrace OUSD.

• 
  Tips Excel (@gudanglifehack) reported 20 minutes ago

  💼 Nearly 40% of employers (39% according to a 2025 Orgvue study) have reduced staff due to AI adoption. Companies like Coinbase, Block, and Cloudflare have conducted significant layoffs, with some leaders opting to rebuild teams with AI-proficient individuals.

• 
  jjaayyzz (@NBA_GSW_30) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Cointelegraph How come Coinbase doesn’t freeze his account? They’ll freeze a $2000 wallet no problem

• 
  Juice 🧃 (@juicemanaboutit) reported 28 minutes ago

  X402 foundation launched April 2026 with Coinbase, Cloudflare, Stripe, Visa, Google support is notable industry-wide for enabling autonomous AI micropayments via HTTP $QNT Quant's membership and FusionLayer25 compatibility position it as a bridge for institutional/DeFi tokenized assets. 💥💥💥💥

• 
  Daniel Holmes (@Plo_lolol) reported 32 minutes ago

  @MilitantAI @CatfishFishy @helloitslynne Coinbase literally employs third worlders who stole their customer info and set them up for violent robberies throughout the world. Save the legit infrastructure bullshit. Exchanges are predatory and prey on old and stupid people.

• 
  Talita C. (@TalitaCruzS2) reported 32 minutes ago

  @coinbase Great innovation update. When will Coinbase support ICX and AERGO/HPP?

• 
  magick wolf (@magick_wolf) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Altcoinist @virtuals_io Im lost, TIBBIR is a base token. Robinhood has its own chain now. What does a coinbase chain token have to do with a competitors new chain? Help me understand...

• 
  Can Egridere (@canegridere) reported 34 minutes ago

  4. Autonomous Settlement. The 402 error payload includes a wallet address and the required fee in USDC on the Base network. Using its own funded crypto wallet (e.g., Coinbase CDP), the agent initiates the micro-payment instantly. No credit cards, no login screens.

• 
  Tiago (@0x_tiago) reported 34 minutes ago

  Last month, Ethena launched its first earn product for USDe on Coinbase. Now, USDe will be available on the Robinhood App • Coinbase has 100M+ users and ~9M monthly active users • Robinhood has 27M+ users and ~11M monthly active users Two giant crypto/fintech companies onboarding USDe as collateral for earn products should tell you the direction Ethena is going... Stablecoins need distribution to win, and Ethena is working towards making USDe the most widely adopted collateral for yield products.

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 37 minutes ago

  @TheBlueMatt I don’t think it’s a bug so much as some recipients not knowing (or caring) how to manage their inbound liquidity. For example, I literally never have any problem paying a Bitrefill invoice of any size, but attempts to move even tiny amounts to Coinbase nearly always fail.

• 
  Front Runners (@247FrontRunners) reported 46 minutes ago

  📉 BERNSTEIN IS STICKING WITH A $190 CIRCLE TARGET AFTER THE 17% CRASH Even with $CRCL down 17.5% on the OUSD launch, Bernstein held its Outperform call and $190 target, implying more than 200% upside from here. The selloff wasn't really about OUSD the coin, it was the backer list. Coinbase, BlackRock and Visa, some of Circle's own partners, lined up behind a rival that pays them a cut of the yield USDC currently keeps. Bernstein's bet: Coinbase won't actually walk, since it earns roughly half of USDC's reserve income and has too much riding on it to defect. Two ways to read $62: a moat that just cracked, or a stock the market oversold on the fear.

• 
  Harvey Reginald Financial (@Crypto1Harvey) reported 47 minutes ago

  @flippifi WRONG. You're LYING or terribly misinformed. #Litecoin $LTC. According to Coinbase: "Litecoin reached its record high of $420.00 on December 11, 2017, marking a -90% change from its present value". It hasn't $420 since, making it the REAL ATH. Now YOU know YOUR facts, sit down and shut ******** up. Memecoin or not, I don't think you realize how manipulated LTC actually is. So the net result is still the same. Maybe you just deliberately ignore this or pretend it doesn't exist.

• 
  Black Mamba Millionaire (@BlackMambaMilli) reported 47 minutes ago

  @guy369 @FinXRob @SimonDixonTwitt Bro you got switch from Coinbase tho wtf is that fee 👀

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 47 minutes ago

  The man who dissolved his company into a token just sold the company and retained the token Venice just completed the cleanest equity round in the crypto space - no presale, PMF first, VC tokens locked. And once again, it proves the truth about every dual structure out there: the token is the marketing layer. Credit first, since it's the truth. Product-market fit before the $VVV airdrop. 18 months of open trading before any external capital. Investor tokens on a 1-year cliff with 3-year linear vesting. Supply release ~0.2% of daily volume. Company has never sold tokens through a 700% YTD rally. Against the low-float-high-FDV model, this is top-decile behavior. Now the details. 1/ The unicorn numbers require the token to close. $65m for 8.98% prices the equity at at most $724m, not $1b. 8.98% of $1b would give $89.8m; investors paid $65m in cash. The ~$25m difference is essentially the 1.5m VVV grant at spot. Only by valuing the community's token treasury as part of the investment can the headline valuation be reconciled. The token is the currency. The equity is the claim. And that's before the warrant. 2/ The warrant is a free 8-year at-the-money call. Strike: $66.5m / 5m VVV = $13.30. Spot price at announcement: ~$13.40. The value of an 8-year at-the-money call on an asset running 80–100 vol is worth most of spot, let's say $40–55m of option value, granted free of charge. "Investors will pay another $66.5m" means that they will pay if and only if it's profitable. Otherwise, the tokens will be retained by Venice, which means on equity. One of the parties of this transaction has optionality in both directions. 3/ "We don't want to sell our token" is rhetoric, not mechanics. 6.5m VVV allocated to VCs is ~8% of total supply and ~14% of float. The token has been sold - on installment, with the price of 5m of them fixed at today's spot for eight years. And take note of the tell: the token kicker comes with equity-grade paper. Same cliff, same vesting. The exact same mechanics could have worked to finance the entire $65m in treasury sales. Same funding, no new claim class, 25+m VVV remaining in the treasury. 4/ Consider what is owned by each asset after the round: Equity: the company, the revenue (already profitable in Q1), the brand, the team, the new datacenters purchased with this capital, plus 30+m VVV. VVV: staking for compute access, plus burns performed at company discretion - ~$100k per month in buybacks plus $2–10 per subscription. Annual budget of $3m vs a ~$1b FDV. A ~0.3% yield, revocable at the payer's discretion. The equity is a call on everything, including the token. The token is a call on the company's goodwill. Ask yourself why the buyers wanted equity at all. Dragonfly prices claims for a living. Crypto funds hold tokens just fine. They demanded equity and a token kicker. Notice what smart money picks up, rather than what the deck tells about alignment. 5/ The track record on dual structures is consistent. When a protocol buys a protocol, holders get swapped - Hermez into Polygon, xDai into Gnosis. When a company buys a team, holders get left with a shell: Circle acquired Axelar's core team, AXL holders retained the network, currently valued ~$50m cap. The Ink Foundation acquired Vertex; VRTX was sunset, lost −75% in a day and has ~$73k cap right now. Pump .fun acquired Padre, token was completely invalidated. Coinbase acquired the Iron Fish team; the acquisition explicitly excluded the chain and the token. And the seminal text of the genre: Block .one raised $4.1b from EOS buyers, used it to purchase 164k BTC and listed Bullish on NYSE with a $10b+ valuation on day one. Equity owners got a ticker. Token owners got a rebrand. Every single equity-side exit - whether through acquisition or IPO - went in favor of equity. Scoreboard, when the company was the buyer: equity 5, tokens 0. 6/ The man knows both sides of the trade. In July 2021, Erik dissolved ShapeShift completely into a token: "No corporate entity, no banks and no borders." No employees, no bank accounts, no CEO - FOX holders received everything. He is the only major founder who has run both experiments: pure token, no company. Then company over the token. The first one failed, and the honest conclusion to draw from it is that he learned from it. But then, be honest about the lesson. It was not "align incentives with holders". It was when the business starts making sense, retain the company, and sell the company. 7/ The excuse expired. "Tokens can't carry rights, the SEC won't allow it" was the case in 2021. CLARITY passed the Senate Banking 15-9 vote and is on the floor calendar. Nasdaq is approved for tokenized equities with full economic rights. The SEC builds an innovation exemption. In July 2026, a token with no claims is a design choice, not a legal limitation. The alternatives were on the table: a treasury sale on the exact same cliff-and-vesting terms. The warrant could have been priced at premium rather than at-the-money, thus releasing the supply only on strength. Or the ironic one. Venice created DIEM - an onchain forward on compute and used equity to fund the compute buildout. Alright, perpetual DIEM is a poor financing vehicle. But the architecture for term compute forwards was right there. And the result is that datacenters end up on the shareholders' balance sheet, while the token gets to watch. Our interpretation: this is not a rug and cannot serve as hypocrisy farming material. This is cleaner than that, and worse than that. The most successful operator in the category, with maximum ideological commitment to token ownership, sat to raise money in 2026 and still concluded that the token is the marketing layer, and the equity is the asset. When even the strongest believer's revealed preference is for equity, that's the market telling you what tokens without claims are worth in the room where the deal gets signed. The representation layer is always the weakest claim. Watch where the datacenters go.

• 
  Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒 (@theunipcs) reported 52 minutes ago

  i went long a couple of 'new' memecoins today: • $FARTCOIN • $PIPPIN • $POPCAT thesis: • extremely oversold memecoins that are down 95–98% from ATHs and had peak mindshare for months during the last memecoin rally • pretty decent OI and volume • very strong spot and perps listings — POPCAT and PIPPIN are on Robinhood, Coinbase, and several other top-tier CEXs, while FARTCOIN is on Coinbase, Binance perps, Hyperliquid, and several other top-tier exchanges • $FARTCOIN in particular is crazy underrated. for comparison, $SPX currently has a 2.4x higher market cap than FARTCOIN even though they both had similar ATHs, and FARTCOIN arguably has higher mindshare • i think odds are good that the market as a whole has bottomed at least for a while, which should make it easier for these coins to move • i think odds are good that these coins do not make new lows even if BTC tries to tag the lows again or make new lows • all are $SOL memecoins. i expect SOL to outperform from here, which is bullish for the Solana ecosystem and memecoins, so i expect them to retrace a meaningful portion of the aggressive selloff they've had • i'm targeting at least a few Xs on these • while i have good reason to believe these memecoins have bottomed, i'll happily cut at any time if things do not play out as i anticipate i've posted more detailed theses on all of the above coins in the past. with FARTCOIN in particular, i turned roughly ~$300k into $8m before getting wiped out on 10/10. i'm essentially trying to repeat that trade with a smaller amount. the core thesis for all of the above coins remains largely unchanged from what i've posted previously (feel free to search my X if you're interested); i just think the timing is much better now i think it's important to add that i'm not calling a full macro bottom on $BTC & crypto here (although i'd be happy if we have). i originally believed the 4-year cycle was dead, and i ended up being wrong. if the 4-year cycle plays out as it has in previous cycles, we might not fully bottom until Q4. that said, these memecoins could still deliver easy 2–5x moves or more in a bear market echo rally any way you look at it, i think the R/R favors being long here

• 
  Copium News (@gascope) reported 52 minutes ago

  Circle ($CRCL) slid 18% Tuesday after 140+ firms including Coinbase, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe and BlackRock unveiled rival stablecoin Open USD (OUSD). Stock hit .99 — worst day since March — before recovering ~5% to .54. Still down 75% from 52-week high. Not financial advice. #stablecoins #CRCL

• 
  Rifat Ahmed (@Rifat_EE) reported 56 minutes ago

  Everyone missed Venice AI until it hit $1B without them,, Two years ago @ErikVoorhees quietly launched an AI platform. No press,,No a16z round,,No Seed hype cycle. Wednesday it closed at unicorn status with a $65M Series A. Led by Dragonfly. Coinbase Ventures in the check. Read what actually happened :: --> @AskVenice hit 3 million users and $70M yearly revenue before it took a dollar of outside money. --> The company was profitable in Q1 2026. Most AI startups at this size are burning $50M+ a quarter. --> Silicon Valley's biggest AI funds were never in the room. Crypto VCs got the whole deal to themselves. Why the traditional AI money missed this : )- Venice sits in the privacy niche. Not the biggest market on paper. )- The founder is a bitcoin veteran, not a Stanford PhD. (Wrong pattern match for most tier-one funds.) )- Two crypto tokens ($VVV, $DIEM) attached to the product. Instant red flag on Sand Hill. The AI money assumed billion dollar consumer AI needed OpenAI scale burn. Voorhees proved the opposite👌 3 million users. Profitable. Zero VC hype cycle until the win was already booked. Crypto projects started working super seriously into Ai field?? Lets see what comes next...

• 
  Bitcoin Mage (@BitcoinMage21) reported 57 minutes ago

  @RojonVonS @ImperiumFirst You could buy on dexes the day of. Coinbase like 3 days later. Of course you could buy it. And thousands if not millions did. How much total, idk. But not all was a payoff. If it was a payoff, **** still really shady ****.

• 
  MaxBidding 🍳.fuel (✸,✸)☉ ℝ ∀ (@olingsberg15408) reported 59 minutes ago

  Sure let’s do some math, less the shortcuts Illiquid OTC deal: yes? We all have to pay the ferryman one way or another. They ate taking more risk, agree. A 20-30% illiquidity discount is perfectly reasonable and boilerplate. Tens of thousands of nascent secondaries to back that up, at worse terms in worse assets (Venice is a fantastic company). So $10-11. Not $8. Hopefully we dont get stuck on this moot point Nota bene, that also sweeps all the rest of the OTC solution space under the rug; you’re prefacing a 4-yr lock as the one and only combinatorial. You’d limit yourself to a more modest 15-20% discount if you cut the vesting terms in half and/or milestoned accelerated vesting based on company progress. Or used a CN. Or forced an open-market partial buy to show alignment (see @AerodromeFi <> @coinbase, who went the extra mile). Or OTC:d fully liquid; why not, happens all the time in public markets ”we would never offer such a thing” is not a defensible position in-and-of itself, even if you’re married to your >40% discount at $8. I don’t see ”nah dont wanna do that” as a rebuttal I can address So yes, there is no free lunch. You either pay for alignment today with a reasonable discount, or sit through an equity misalignment overhang in perpetuity. The latter is an order of magnitude more expensive choice down the road, as history has shown countless times before. Not to mention, you’ll sideline value-accrual aficionados from your token cap-table along the way (such as myself and many CT warriors it seems) I’d love to buy your equity though. Not sure why you’d expect me or anyone else to want differently from ”professional” VC-investors. They could clearly buy token-only if they wanted to, and opted for the polar opposite. Can’t imagine why

• 
  Gilgamesh (@SnorkelCapital) reported 59 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Coinbase has been the most significant US based cryptocurrency exchange, but it's missing one important thing: 1) Customer service