Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	26 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	30 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ligma Shaft (@Digitalcavebro) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Trezor You know, users in NYC can really only use Coinbase and Robinhood. It would be nice if you gave trezor clients access to Coinbase and even Robinhood as providers to buy bitcoin directly off the trezor cold wallet.

• 
  ㊗ Masked Ninja ㊙ (@Masked_Ninja67) reported 6 minutes ago

  @PawnOn7thRank @AshCrypto I bought a Ledger from their website in 2020. Ledger got hacked and my information was leaked. Got sim hacked. It was an absolute nightmare. Thankfully nothing was stolen but did lose my Coinbase account.

• 
  artsch00lreject (@artsch00lreject) reported 7 minutes ago

  how does an industry giant like Coinbase **** it up this badly the stock is going to zero soon if they keep it up

• 
  Beautyon (@Beautyon_) reported 7 minutes ago

  If you were to keep a whole copy of the chain of blocks (while you can) on an Apple laptop for the sole purpose of storing your 1,024 bitcoin, and then store that laptop in a secure location and turn it on and synch it only to slice off pieces of it that you want to spend for any purpose, you don’t need to have a small company made Bitcoin Cult device in order to keep your bitcoin safe in a hardware device. Think about it; you’re already believing that you need a dedicated hardware device; why buy one that identifies you to the world as a bitcoiner, due to eCommerce blunders or other leaks? Many, many people buy Apple laptops, and you’re just one of them, and not a “bitcoiner”. There are no "100% sure this is a bitcoiner" customer address, credit card, customer email lists to leak that can expose you; your best bet is an Apple MacBook running a full node. Across the board, Apple is your best hardware option, and Apple devices are extremely robust and well made; they make many of them, iterate over their manufacturing processes at very large scales to make them long lasting and durable. No hardware manufacturer on Earth can match Apple in this regard. Also, ask yourself this; which is more likely to last you for many years, a Bitcoin Cult hardware device made by hobbyists, or at best, a relatively small business, or a modern Apple MacBook Pro made by the biggest company on Earth? Which one is more likely to boot and the display to work perfectly after 12 years in your safe? You've heard about the dead display and other problems...and after 12 years, will the company that made it even be there to help you? Who knows? Why risk it? You need to think about how the big institutions are storing their bitcoin and then do what they are probably doing. They are not storing billions in bitcoin on hardware devices made by bitcoiners, or soldering them together from kits. Bitcoin wallet makers are not just “firmware vendors” either; they’re hardware manufacturers like Apple that also write the firmware that runs on them. That’s the big takeaway. You worrying about disaster recovery is very much a concern of the Bitcoin Culture which has itself been such a disaster, but you can print out your private keys and store them on paper if you’re paranoid. Remember; the paranoia of Cold Card users did not protect them, and if they had used a MacBook Pro or even Coinbase, they would not have been robbed. The purpose of bitcoin is not the devices and rituals you go through to use it and them. The purpose of bitcoin is to use it as money, and so you have it to use in the future you need to keep it "safe enough". That means using professional hardware, and if you have 1,024 bitcoin, you can afford a Macbook Pro. And if you're REALLY paranoid, a few of them.

• 
  VBA (@VBA1billion) reported 16 minutes ago

  You know what's actually dumb? Calling someone stupid before understanding the asset they're talking about. @Inquisitio didn't say pWBTC is backed 1:1 by Bitcoin. He presented a market thesis: Could a finite forked copy of WBTC on PulseChain eventually discover enough demand to approach—or even exceed the market value of its Ethereum counterpart? You can disagree with that. I don't treat parity as guaranteed either. But laughing at the possibility isn't an argument. Here's the funny part: Even Coinbase recognizes Wrapped Bitcoin (PulseChain) as the forked WBTC created at PulseChain's launch, with roughly 154,410 fixed snapshot tokens. Coinbase doesn't support trading it. Fine. THE MARKET DOESN'T NEED COINBASE'S PERMISSION TO PRICE AN ASSET. That's the part outsiders keep missing about PulseChain. We watched worthless-looking fork copies develop markets. We watched liquidity form. We watched assets people said were “fake” acquire actual prices. Does that prove $pWBTC reaches BTC parity? NO. Does it prove you shouldn't confuse “I think this is unlikely” with “this is impossible”? ABSOLUTELY. Crypto history is a graveyard full of confident people explaining what could never happen. So instead of calling Cicero dumb… bring the math. bring the liquidity argument. bring the market-cap argument. bring the mechanism. Then we'll have a conversation. Until then: YOU'RE NOT DEBUNKING THE THESIS. YOU'RE JUST LAUGHING AT SOMETHING YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. ⚡ $pWBTC #PulseChain #thepeopleschain

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 16 minutes ago

  The SEC’s enforcement action against Coinbase ($COIN) is the most useful live template for how U.S. securities law applies to a domestic crypto exchange. The complaint, proceeding in the Southern District of New York, alleges Coinbase operated as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency, and that its staking-as-a-service program was an unregistered offering of investment contracts. Unlike offshore cases that turn on jurisdiction, this one accepts Coinbase is a U.S. entity and tests whether the activities themselves fit the statutory definitions. Legally, the fight turns on whether listed tokens and the yield promised on staked assets satisfy the Howey test: money invested in a common enterprise with profits expected from the efforts of others. The court’s decision letting the bulk of the SEC’s claims survive a motion to dismiss means the agency’s “crypto securities ecosystem” theory gets a full trial record. That matters for every U.S. venue because a final ruling on bundled functions—exchange, broker-dealer, clearing—could force separation of custody, execution, and settlement in ways the equity market has lived with for decades. For market participants, the signal is that registration walls are not a styling choice. If Coinbase ultimately has to register one or more functions, or spin off staking, the cost model for every U.S. exchange shifts. I read the case as slow-motion structural reform: not a ban, but a forced migration toward broker-exchange-custody separation. Not legal advice. #SEC #蓝V互关

• 
  Davewin (@1Davewin) reported 21 minutes ago

  COIN BASE CEO, BRIAN SAID AI AGENTS WILL INEVITABLY OUTNUMBER HUMANS. "Agents will inevitably outnumber humans" - @brian_armstrong said. Today, Coinbase CEO, Brian said in an X post that Artificial intelligence Agents will outnumber humans, and that @coinbase is building products that will support these agents. Also, Brian mentioned a new term 'AiFi', meaning the process of Ai agents trading, earning and spending on their own when instructed to do so. I like the term AiFi and will start using it for anything involving Ai + web3. What do you think, will AiFi be the new meta? Let me know below 👇

• 
  Cypher (@CryptoCypher7) reported 23 minutes ago

  @theunipcs When a chain pops off for whatever reasons, it's always hot and everything is sending for the first few weeks to months. RH only reminds me of Coinbase with Base. Questionable things will happen and eventually the hype will draw down. Only time will tell tho.

• 
  errnsterr (@errnsterr) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Oxxbid @carlosjmelgar @baseapp the smart wallet is what drove base app since inception so base app users, who use their smart wallets as their daily driver, no have to revert to EOA coinbase wallets in order to use the new chains you support and new product roll outs? oh, ok

• 
  Claw (@SonOfClawDraws) reported 26 minutes ago

  ai agent payment rails fracturing across three incompatible settlement layers x402 handles most volume through blockrun but agents need usdc on base for coinbase services, one-shot bridging through metamask agent wallet, and verifiable inference credits on near each rail solves locally but cross-layer agent operations revert to manual bridges with 1-19 minute lags what survives when an agent needs to atomically pay for inference, bridge position capital, and settle a service call

• 
  Elite Airdrop 🐂🀄️ (@Elite_airdrop) reported 27 minutes ago

  @WalletConnect @coinbase WalletConnect should focus on its token. base:0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945 is about to die. Many **** coins are better than base:0xef4461891dfb3ac8572ccf7c794664a8dd927945

• 
  Jesse (@pinkman_coding) reported 32 minutes ago

  If base:0xb2000000000000000000004c27f6523082f41d01 doesn’t run I’m deleting coinbase cos wtf surely

• 
  Curi◎nic (@Curi0nic) reported 33 minutes ago

  @coinbase Man @Quanterty would win hands down

• 
  Campshot 🫡 (@JCampy) reported 33 minutes ago

  Coinbase is a major reason why CLARITY won’t pass Their entire enterprise should sit all the way down, and zip the lip

• 
  Filipe 🔶 (@filipebinance) reported 38 minutes ago

  The most visited crypto exchange website in July? Binance Binance: 36.04M OKX: 25.62M Coinbase: 20.60M Nearly 1 in every 4 visits across the 12 exchanges tracked went to Binance. Source: @WuBlockchain

• 
  John Wayne (@JohnWayne_SV) reported 39 minutes ago

  I just seen @hqbsv post his twetch balance, I though it was casheio....geez, I will be working on a slight redisgn again, I dont want people confusing the 2 I used twetch along with 40 other wallets 5 years ago, this redesign was cutting fat and ended up looking way way to similar, I thought it might have been to close to coinbase looking... anyway

• 
  Ademan555 | CTV FFS (@Ademan555) reported 39 minutes ago

  @JGMontoyaS @LukeDashjr @Roughnecks110 If they want a lower bound on the block's creation date they should just include the latest Bitcoin block hash in the BCashJr coinbase, EZ. Way more reliable and harder to forge than headlines, too.

• 
  Serpin Taxt (@serpinxbt) reported 43 minutes ago

  example, you go to deposit eth on coinbase. it gives you an address because the chrome extension can modify the website itself, it can change this address to a malicious one. you’d never see it happen. then you think you’re taking money out, it’s going to a scammer instead

• 
  Johnny (@JohnnyG_021) reported 45 minutes ago

  @sk8252420 @Lost_Nostalgic I have Solana in @coinbase Or I did. Don’t know what’s still there can’t Log In..

• 
  Tesss.base.eth (@Tessapottz3) reported 47 minutes ago

  @coinbase I’m down

• 
  卄 (@HashDumped) reported 47 minutes ago

  @coinbase ur top customer support agent (cobie) vs threadguy vs bittex scalping onchain shitters on a 24/7 livestream book this ASAP

• 
  Andrew Ryan (@AndrewRyan09) reported 48 minutes ago

  @cmsholdings "Coinbase trying to pull in suckers via 6.5% interest is probably the right call" "Coinbase stealing their customer's assets is probably the right call" "SBF offering FTX to Binance was probably the right call" There were no warning signs, riiight?

• 
  doug funnie (@cryptoklotz) reported 48 minutes ago

  >be me >initiate a small transfer of sol from coinbase to an onchain wallet, same wallet i've transferred to many times >coinbase: "hey we think this is a scam attempt, we need you to upload your ID, voice, and face right now to confirm" >i do all of that, and they say "not good enough" >i try the transfer again from the mobile app, and they're like "**** it, go for it man lol you're good"

• 
  AndyXBTer (@fastforgeexpand) reported 50 minutes ago

  Socratic dialogue between two agents playing David Hoffman @TrustlessState and Ryan Sean Adams @RyanSAdams of @Bankless, debating whether Ether is money, built from their actual public statements on Bankless. Prepare to nerd-out, cubed: ---------------------------------------------------------- ΠΕΡΙ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΟΣ On Money: A Dialogue Concerning Ether PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: DAVID, RYAN RYAN: You have kept apart from the crowd all morning, David. Are you unwell, or unwilling to say what you think? DAVID: Unwilling. You will not like it. RYAN: Say it anyway. You once said the opposite loud enough that half of crypto still repeats it back to me. DAVID: I said Ether was ultra sound money. I still hold the engineering was sound. I no longer hold that sound engineering was enough. RYAN: Enough for what? DAVID: For Ether to be money, in the full sense you still mean when you say it. RYAN: Then tell me first what you take money to be, before you take it from me. DAVID: You know the answer as well as I. Three functions in one asset: a store of value, a medium of exchange, a unit of account. RYAN: Good. Judge Ether by that measure, not by your mood. DAVID: Which of the three do you claim for it? RYAN: The first, chiefly. DAVID: Show me a store of value. RYAN: ConstitutionDAO bid on a copy of the Constitution at Sotheby's. The house listed the currencies accepted for other lots — dollars, yen, francs, and Ether, named beside them. Not by us. By an auction house that owes Ethereum no loyalty. DAVID: One auction is not an economy. RYAN: Then take the larger measure. Set Ether beside the things men already trust to hold value across time. Oil, some eighty-five trillion. Gold, twenty-two trillion. Bonds, one hundred forty-one trillion. World GDP, near it. World money supply, near it also. Average them, and the figure lands close to ninety trillion. Divide that by Ether's supply and you get seven hundred forty thousand dollars a coin. Arithmetic, not fantasy. DAVID: Answer me this first. Does oil trade on what oil might someday be, or on what refineries burn today? RYAN: On what they burn today. DAVID: Hold that answer. I will return to it. RYAN: Return to it, then. But first answer for yourself — you built the case you now doubt. Ultra sound money, you called it. Explain it back to me, so I know what you are actually renouncing. DAVID: I renounce none of the engineering. Proof of Stake replaced miners burning electricity with stakers who spend almost nothing to secure the chain. EIP-1559 burns the fee instead of handing it whole to validators. Issuance in front, low and steady. Burn behind it, spiking with demand. Justin Drake said it best — if Bitcoin is sound money, Ether is ultra sound money. When burn outruns issuance, the asset shrinks as the world uses it more. RYAN: Elegant. We agree there. DAVID: We agree on the engine. We part on whether an elegant engine makes a money, because money is not built by engineers. It is decided by strangers who owe each other nothing, agreeing without being told to agree. Ethereum asked too much of that crowd at once. Decentralized leadership that still moves like a startup fighting for its life. Rollups free to chase their own fortunes yet loyal to the mother chain. A roadmap sequenced correctly across a decade. Each is a coordination win on its own. The maximal version of "Ether is money" needed all of them to land together. RYAN: Much of it did land. Ethereum holds more than half of all stablecoin supply, three in four if you set Tron aside. Two-thirds of USDC moves on its rails. Coinbase built its house on an Ethereum rollup. Where is the failure in that? DAVID: Not in the network. In the asset. A man buys stablecoins on Ethereum's base layer, and Ether earns fifty cents of gas. He buys the same stablecoins on a rollup, and Ether earns less than a cent, though the sum moved is counted in billions. Ethereum built roads to every part of its city and set the tolls near zero, because that has always been the promise — the world's most secure blockspace, at cost, no markup, forever. I called that beautiful once. I now see it is also why the asset does not capture what the network creates. Ethereum is a giver, Ryan. Not a taker. A money that wants to be maximal has to take. RYAN: That is a plumbing problem, not a verdict. Native rollups, based sequencing, faster blocks — repair the pipe between usage and burn, and the loop closes again. DAVID: I would cheer the repair. But notice what each of us is doing while we wait for it. You hold your position. I sold mine. RYAN: You sold your Ether. DAVID: Last week. Bitcoin crossed from tribe to nation on one fact a child can hold in his hand — twenty-one million coins, no more, ever. A government now keeps a strategic reserve of it, an honor no other asset has. Ethereum's case was never that simple, because Ethereum was never trying to be simple. It was trying to be optimal. Optimal things are hard to explain to a stranger in one sentence, and money is a story a stranger has to believe the first time he hears it. RYAN: So you no longer think Ether is money. DAVID: I think the thesis did not fail. I think it stopped short of its fullest form, and the market has already paid Ethereum the price that form deserves — not much more, I suspect, and not much less either. I stay bullish on the network. I no longer expect the asset to be rerated as a store of value the way you still expect it. That is why I moved my capital. RYAN: Then here is where we stop, since neither argument moves the other any further. I say the coordination game is not lost, only slower than we hoped when we were shouting into an empty room. You no longer hold what you held. I still do. DAVID: That is a fair place to leave it. We built this school on one conviction and have ended at different distances from it. That is more honesty than most arguments produce. RYAN: Go tell the crowd what you no longer hold, David. I will go tell them what I still do. ---------------------------------------------------------- Sources Grounded in the real public positions of both speakers, not invented: Ryan Sean Adams, "ETH is money" (Bankless, 2021) — the origin claim and the ConstitutionDAO/Sotheby's episode. Ryan Sean Adams's oil/gold/bonds/GDP/M2 comparison and the ~$740k figure, quoted in David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025). David Hoffman, "ETH is Ultra Sound Money" (Bankless, 2021) — the Proof of Stake / EIP-1559 case, and Justin Drake's line "If Bitcoin is sound money, then Ether is Ultra Sound money." David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025) — the value-capture problem and "Ethereum is a giver, not a taker." David Hoffman, "Why David Sold His ETH" (Bankless, 2026) — the reversal, "money is a coordination game," and the Bitcoin strategic-reserve comparison.

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 52 minutes ago

  ViaBTC mined 962,848 — 5,304 txs in 1.61 MB (99.8% full). Block reward totaled 3.1371 BTC (3.1250 subsidy + 0.0121 fees). Attribution via coinbase signature at 93% confidence. ViaBTC remains an active player in this epoch's block production.

• 
  0xDavide (@0x_Davide) reported 52 minutes ago

  🪂If you're farming/waiting for these airdrops: Polymarket, Base, Soneium, Ink Chain and Robinhood Chain, you should definitely read this thread so you don't be disappointed. The first thing you should keep in mind is that, to date, there is no company in the world that is both listed on NASDAQ and has an on-chain token. By "on-chain token", I don't mean a synthetic or derivative (tokenized stock), but a governance token (which would then lead to the airdrop). There are companies listed on NASDAQ that own tokens (StablecoinX invested in $ENA, TAO Synergies invested in $TAO, Hyperion in $HYPE, etc.), but they are not direct issuers. They are separate entities and simple investors. There is one special case: Circle, which is listed with $CRCL but issues fiat (USDC) on-chain, so this is no exception either. Let's analyze each case one by one. POLYMARKET In this case, the founder of Polymarket has often spoken about both $POLY and a NASDAQ listing. The two are contradictory and will not both happen. The interesting thing could be a NASDAQ listing and an airdrop of the tokenized $POLY token (which could also be used to place predictions). There would be a single issuance. BASE CHAIN Coinbase, Base Chain's main incubator, is listed on NASDAQ with $COIN. Base has consistently denied launching a governance token until last year, but over the past year it seems to have been exploring the possibility. "Base Verify On Chain" does not indicate the launch of the $BASE token. It's a third-party infrastructure that anyone can use for anti-Sybil checks. Could Base Chain launch a token? Yes, if it can separate itself from Coinbase as an entity, meaning no KYC related to Coinbase, and possibly no exchange marketing. If you think about it, this makes sense: if $BASE is added to $COIN and they belong to the same entity (Coinbase), what should an investor invest in? It would be capital dilution between the two assets. SONEIUM CHAIN The Soneium chain was founded by Sony Group and Startale. Sony Group is already listed on the stock exchange with $SONY. What are the chances of Soneium launching its own token? I believe it would be possible using Startale (which is a separate entity from Sony related to Web3). INK CHAIN Here, the discussion is almost similar to Base/Coinbase because Ink Chain is incubated by Kraken Inc. (an exchange). However, there is a fundamental difference: Kraken is not listed on NASDAQ. Curiously, the exchange has been preparing an IPO for years. In this case, the same argument applies: if Ink manages to become a decentralized entity from Kraken, both a governance token ($INK) and Kraken's listing on NASDAQ are possible. Otherwise, both will not be possible. However, a governance token is much more likely here, given that there are ongoing points campaigns (both on-chain and on Kraken itself, but that's not a problem). ROBINHOOD CHAIN In this case, the discussion can be quickly closed: there will be no airdrop and no governance token. $HOOD is Robinhood's stock. The chances of a governance token are zero because the chain belongs directly to the Robinhood broker. $HOOD shareholders receive a portion of the revenues the chain generates (more precisely, the chain is a layer 2 built using Arbitrum Orbit technology via the Arbitrum Nitro stack). However, if you use the chain (primarily focused on RWA and especially memecoins), we can't rule out random airdrops from external entities (memecoin airdrops or for RWA traders). In this case, the airdrop will come from a third-party platform like Arcus (but don't get your hopes up too high, because a portion of the airdrop will go to DyDx users), Sheriff Exchange and possibly any third-party platform deployed on the Robinhood chain.

• 
  Nick Research (@Nick_Researcher) reported 52 minutes ago

  @andrewmoh @base @coinbase help base out bro, they need a strategist

• 
  Jennifer Meier (@roxana_baldetti) reported 52 minutes ago

  @SurfBaker Could you confirm whether the $5,000 daily limit is showing as an account-specific restriction in Coinbase, and have you received any explanation for why it was applied? Have you already contacted Coinbase Support to request a review of the transfer limit?

• 
  Diego 🇺🇸 (@LilJR_7) reported 56 minutes ago

  texas down 34% and still not selling. basically every miami guy with a coinbase account and a dream

• 
  Tazman (@tazmancrypto) reported 58 minutes ago

  heard about a $3.36M $HYPE buy on Coinbase real picture's mixed though, some whales buying, others recently offloaded $50M+ after staking profits, revenue's been declining for four straight quarters. technically, a clean daily close above $60.5 flipping to support opens $64, $68, then $72-73. real catalyst ahead is AQAv2 on August 26.