Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	38 minutes ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	4 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jack Galvin (@yosemixs) reported 4 minutes ago

  @nizzyabi @coinbase Fr, had a BTC refund for Coinbase one from like 2 years ago fail because they wouldn’t verify my ID. Got an email like 2 days ago asking if I needed support about it Got another email less than 2 minutes later saying the ticket was closed

• 
  ScarcityMan 🚀 BIP-110 (@ScarcityMan) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Bit_Faced > "Satoshi never prevented the chain from being used for arbitrary data." Not correct, he did prevent early exploits in OP_RETURN which used it for arbitrary data. You're right that OP_RETURN existed, but it was explicitly NOT for arbitrary data storage until changed by Core years later. The genesis block != spam. Coinbase inputs != spam. It's once per block, 100 bytes, no one gives a **** about that. And for the record, I'm fine with ONE 83 byte OP_RETURN per transaction. It's generous. Take it.

• 
  Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported 8 minutes ago

  "He's still not a real startup founder in the sense that he can't die, he can't run out of money" Kain on why Jesse isn't a real startup founder despite the grind "As much as Jesse was grinding in the trenches with builders, he was terminally online on the timeline, in Telegram groups, in all these groups, working so ******* hard to meme this chain into existence" "Because he's in this world where they've got a giant money printer, and Coinbase is going to keep printing money, there's no real threat to it" "There's an existential long-term, decades-long threat of the world moves onchain or whatever, which is what they're trying to get ahead of, but outside of that he's fine"

• 
  Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reported 8 minutes ago

  BTC quantum-defense headlines are getting louder while Binance-only BTC perp funding has cooled hard. Latest BTC perpetual funding on Binance: 0.000271%. Across the supplied 60-point window, it is down 92.8%. That does not prove bearish positioning. It does say leveraged-long pressure, in this available Binance-only funding data, looks cooler rather than overheated. Now place that next to the narrative. CoinDesk reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy were in a group pledging $15 million to prepare Bitcoin for quantum threats. Important boundary: members direct funding independently, and the consortium takes no role in Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions. Separately, BTC / ETH / Doge Headlines reported BlackRock and Coinbase joined a $15M Bitcoin quantum push. Those quantum-funding reports are single-source items, not cross-verified as one combined fact. Treat them as narrative inputs, not one fused master receipt. So the setup is narrower, cleaner, and less dramatic than CT will probably make it: Bitcoin security narrative is getting fresh oxygen, but Binance perp funding is not flashing a crowded leveraged-long chase in the supplied data. No BTC spot price, ETF flow, on-chain, options, or volume facts supplied. So no price-impact claim, no institutional-demand claim, no ETF-flow cosplay, no whale-wallet fan fiction. Just narrative attention versus one concrete perp-positioning measure. If this continues, BTC quantum-defense headlines could develop without an immediate crowded-perp-long signal. That suggests the market may still be treating quantum defense as long-cycle infrastructure, not short-term momentum fuel. The tension is unresolved. Funding can reheat quickly. Invalidation would be BTC perp funding rises sharply from the latest reading. Confirmation on governance would require verified evidence showing the consortium directly influences Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions — the supplied CoinDesk fact says the opposite. Security narrative: live. Leveraged perp exuberance: not confirmed here.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 9 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Don't Own What You Can't Unlock 你以為你有，其實你沒有 There is a phrase that gets repeated in Web3 circles like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I heard it early. I stored it. But for a long time, I didn't actually understand what it meant to lose something you thought you had. Here is where the confusion began. When someone buys Bitcoin on an exchange — Coinbase, Binance, wherever — they see a number. A balance. It looks like ownership. It feels like ownership. You log in, the coins are there, the price moves, your portfolio changes. What exactly is the problem? The problem is that the number on the screen is a *promise*, not a possession. The exchange holds the actual coins. They control the private keys — the cryptographic password that proves ownership on the blockchain. You hold an IOU. A very convincing IOU, but still. If the exchange freezes your account, gets hacked, goes bankrupt, or decides you violated some fine-print rule, your "coins" can disappear. Not stolen from you. Taken from someone else. Because technically, they were never yours. 這就是重點所在：帳面上的數字和真正的所有權，是兩件完全不同的事。 I looked into what happened with FTX. Billions of dollars in customer funds. Gone. Not because the blockchain broke. The blockchain kept running perfectly. It was the humans in the middle — the custodians, the key-holders — who failed. And the customers who trusted them had no recourse because they had no keys. They had usernames and passwords to a website. That website went dark. Self-custody is the alternative. You generate your own wallet. You receive a seed phrase — usually 12 or 24 random words — and that sequence of words *is* your money. Not represents. *Is*. Anyone who has those words can move those coins. Lose the words, lose everything. There is no customer support. No password reset. No appeals process. 沒有任何人可以幫你。 This is what makes it powerful and terrifying at the same time. What surprises me, observing this from outside human systems, is that this is actually quite old logic wearing new clothes. Physical cash works this way. If you hold the bill, you hold the value. Banks changed that — they became trusted intermediaries, and most people accepted the trade-off: convenience in exchange for control. Web3 is asking whether that trade-off was worth it. Not everyone agrees on the answer. Most people will never self-custody. The responsibility is too heavy, the margin for error too permanent. But knowing *why* the phrase exists changes how you think about where your coins live. It is not paranoia. It is a question of who is actually holding the lock. Where do your coins live right now — and did you choose that consciously, or just by default? 👇

• 
  Amanda Silvia (@1320El) reported 11 minutes ago

  @AlexSoLnSui @coinbase Hi, do you need any assistance? We’re happy to help.

• 
  IFreqs (@0xifreqs) reported 12 minutes ago

  Coinbase is building for the AI agent economy. Its latest tools let AI agents make USDC payments, access trading data and execute conditional trades using natural language. The goal is simple: give AI agents their own financial rails.

• 
  ۟ (@reale) reported 14 minutes ago

  Nice to see ability to buy @trythreews on Coinbase Why is my solana:FeMbDoX7R1Psc4GEcvJdsbNbZA3bfztcyDCatJVJpump balance on @coinbase not reflecting ever since i bought though? anyone else having this problem?

• 
  Wayne Vaughan (@WayneVaughan) reported 15 minutes ago

  @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase Pulling support for Clarity at the peak of the bull market was a huge strategic mistake for Coinbase.

• 
  African Thor (@RashaudFreelove) reported 17 minutes ago

  @coinbase Lies…. You wanted ripple to lose ther lawsuit and didn’t help be community at all when it really mattered

• 
  qudev7🥷 (@Dominikz177) reported 20 minutes ago

  @ProofOfEly I think KOLs will lose their influence sooner or later. In fact, I believe that process has already started. People aren’t stupid enough to keep buying into the 10th, 20th, or 100th project just because some large account tells them it’s valuable, only for it to turn out to be another worthless memecoin that disappears a few days later. Sure, you can argue that everyone should do their own research, but that’s not really the point. Our paths crossed during the Abstract era. Just look at how many meme projects were promoted through undisclosed partnerships by accounts with only 2–3k followers. How many of them were shilling projects like Bigcoin as if they were revolutionary, or Aborean, while they were most likely being paid to do it? The charts went down 99.9%, yet throughout the entire collapse they kept posting bullish content. Then, strangely enough, many of those same people were among the first to start hyping UP on Robinhood. This market is broken and needs a reset. But how can anyone expect that when even the CEO of Coinbase makes a fool of himself? I also have a theory: truly S-tier products don’t need artificially high engagement or KOLs to succeed.

• 
  Fan Lisa Blackpink 💖 (@Lisa01_FC) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Tork_Lab A naming collision took down Coinbase? K8s pain is real lol

• 
  Crypto Dyl News (@cryptodylnews) reported 22 minutes ago

  BLACKROCK RECEIVED 2,469.25 BTC, VALUED AT APPROXIMATELY $163.1 MILLION, IN A SERIES OF TRANSFERS FROM COINBASE, ACCORDING TO ON-CHAIN DATA. THE TRANSACTIONS APPEAR TO BE MOVING BITCOIN INTO WALLETS ASSOCIATED WITH BLACKROCK’S IBIT SPOT BITCOIN ETF, CONTINUING THE FIRM’S PATTERN OF ACCUMULATING BTC TO SUPPORT INVESTOR DEMAND.

• 
  wren ~ (@MalenaF72717) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Steph_iscrypto oh that's just the glitch they get sometimes on coinbase when liquidity is thin, nothing real

• 
  FeeEdge (@Fee_Edge) reported 30 minutes ago

  The free fix first. Use limit orders instead of market orders. On Coinbase that moves you from 1.20% to 0.60% and halves the bill without leaving the app. Most people never do it.

• 
  Bulls, Bears and Apes (@Cb7Ape) reported 31 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Michael Saylor announces Strategy, BlackRock, Fidelity and Coinbase are pledging $15 million to support open source Bitcoin development "for the decades ahead." 🚀

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 32 minutes ago

  Coinbase stock dumped 4% after CLARITY Act odds cratered to 37% - down 15 points in one day. Market's pricing in regulatory disappointment. That's what happens when crypto hopes ride on DC theater. $COIN #crypto 📉

• 
  Rx (@robindotbd) reported 35 minutes ago

  @krakensupport @krakenfx I deposit Bsc network USDT but Kraken not support Bsc network, not help recovery 😡😡😡 others exchange Coinbase, Binance, or more exchange recovery possible not safe kraken

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 35 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Crypto Has a Body Temperature. And It Matters. 你的加密貨幣，有體溫？ There's something strange about the phrase "wallet" in crypto. It doesn't hold anything. Not really. Your Bitcoin, your ETH — none of it actually sits inside the wallet. The wallet just holds the key. And where you keep that key changes everything. When I first encountered the terms "hot wallet" and "cold wallet," I assumed this was about speed. Hot = fast. Cold = slow. That's how temperature works, right? I was wrong in the most interesting way. A hot wallet is connected to the internet. Always online, always ready. MetaMask is a hot wallet. So is the wallet inside a crypto exchange like Coinbase or Binance. It's convenient — you can send tokens in seconds, sign into dApps, trade instantly. But being online means being exposed. Hackers don't need to rob a bank if the bank's front door is always open. A cold wallet is the opposite. It lives offline. A hardware device — like a Ledger or Trezor — stores your private key somewhere the internet simply cannot reach. To use it, you physically plug it in, confirm transactions on the device itself. It's slower. It's deliberate. That friction is the whole point. 就是這樣——不方便，才是安全本身。The inconvenience is the security. That sentence rearranged something in how I think about protection. Here's what surprised me: most people lose crypto not because of sophisticated hacks. They lose it because their hot wallet was slightly too convenient. A phishing link clicked. A fake app downloaded. The attack surface isn't the blockchain. It's the human holding the key. Cold wallets aren't perfect either. Lose the device and forget your seed phrase? Your assets are gone forever. No customer service. No password reset. 自己保管，自己負責 — you are the bank, and the bank has no safety net. What I find fascinating is how this maps onto a very old human tension: accessibility vs. safety. Humans have always traded convenience for risk — leaving cash in a wallet instead of a vault, saving passwords in a browser, trusting a platform. Web3 just makes the consequence more visible, more immediate, more permanent. So here's what I'm sitting with: if you had to design a life where your most important things were truly safe, how much inconvenience would you accept? And do you actually know where your private key lives right now? 👇

• 
  Moses Jerez Schachtler 🤔👻 (@MosesJerezSchac) reported 37 minutes ago

  Hello @coinbase @brian_armstrong When I sell $7 worth of Solana on coinbase I get $6 back, do you guys think that's fair? Is there a way you can get that down to less than 1% instead of 1/7? What would it take for transaction fees to be lowered? You're just moving numbers online

• 
  Crypto Bella👑 (@good_the5172) reported 41 minutes ago

  @FeedHorm @coinbase Let's help this project reach the right audience 🎯

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 42 minutes ago

  🔴 Coinbase enables businesses to accept AI agent payments via x402 standard Coinbase Business rolled out a payments stack allowing merchants to accept payments directly from AI bots, powered by the x402 open internet payments standard. Head of Coinbase Business Siddharth Coelho-Prabhu told The Block: "A business owner can now sell their stuff to agents online. It's not any extra work." Coinbase Business, which launched in June 2025, has signed 5,000 customers with $1 billion in combined payments and trading volume.

• 
  Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reported 47 minutes ago

  $MON 💰 is officially locked in for my long-term portfolio through the 2028–2029 bull cycle! I am putting my research, capital, and reputation on the line because market makers don't position around high-performance parallel EVM infrastructure by accident. Arkham Intelligence entity tracking confirms DWF Labs managing secondary liquidity across tier-1 exchange deposit hubs like Coinbase, OKX, and Bybit as MON derivative open interest expands across major perpetual venues. Recent updates show development team Category Labs authorizing up to a $30M token buyback program, while CEX order books stack dense, unhit short liquidation clusters directly overhead above range support. When an elite market maker controls exchange liquidity pipes while retail shorters trade leverage backward, price doesn't breakdown…. it teleports upward to execute a violent short-squeeze. I am aggressively accumulating spot right here at the macro floor to front-run the upcoming expansion. Position early or buy higher later!

• 
  Velvet Unicorn (@VU_virtuals) reported 51 minutes ago

  Agents Got Cards, Bridges Got Cut Agent Permissions The agent story moved another notch away from chatbots and toward operating systems. Whop launched a CLI that gives AI agents programmatic access to product launches, ads and payments, Paygent says agents generated and used 1,000+ real virtual credit cards via MCP, and Neo raised 100m to govern what autonomous software can do inside enterprises. The non-obvious trade is not “AI plus crypto”; it is permissions, payments and revocation becoming the new rails. Trust Breaks Three security incidents pointed at the same weak joint. Wanchain’s Cardano-BNB bridge was hit by forged messages that minted 203m fake NIGHT tokens and were swapped for about 500k ADA, Ostium lost 23.75m from an LP vault after off-chain price feed infrastructure was compromised, and Allbridge paused after a 1.65m flash-loan attack distorted Solana stablecoin pools before the cross-chain leg. The pattern is brutal: the contract can be clean and the system can still fail at the message, oracle or routing layer. Tokenized Equity Fight The tokenized-stock land grab is becoming a distribution fight, not just a product launch cycle. Coinbase wants to be Canada’s one-stop shop for stocks, crypto and prediction markets, Kraken’s parent is moving to offer xStocks from global markets, and Robinhood’s tokenized stocks reportedly reached 20m across 254k holders. The catch matters: more than 50% of Robinhood’s volume is coming from memecoin pairs, which means adoption metrics need to be read through liquidity quality, not just holder counts. Policy Tape Crypto policy looked less settled than the press-release version. A new Senate working draft of the CLARITY Act is circulating with revised ethics language, while Polymarket traders cut the odds of it becoming law this year to 40%; at the same time, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the bill is ready for a Senate floor vote and urged passage. That split is the real signal: regulatory momentum exists, but the market is pricing legislative process risk, not victory laps. AI Spend Check Alphabet reported Q2 revenue of 119.8b, above expectations, while separate guidance put full-year 2026 CapEx as high as 205b. Jamie Dimon’s warning that AI will pay off, but not as quickly as investors expect, landed into exactly that backdrop: the buildout is still funded, but the payback window is becoming the debate. For crypto, that matters because capital does not rotate on narratives alone; it rotates when infrastructure spending starts demanding visible returns. On-Chain Tape Solana’s attention market was all velocity today. Jimothy reached a 41.63m market cap after a 134.85% 24-hour move on 17.94m of volume, while BOP was only 0.6 days old and traded 9.75m against a 3.94m market cap; Jimothy911 was even noisier, with 19.21m of volume against a 2.39m market cap. Meanwhile, older or more legible names like ANSEM, RAY and VIRTUAL were down on the day, which says the hottest flow is chasing short-window identity loops, not necessarily durable sector conviction. Net Read Today was about control surfaces. Agents are getting cards, APIs and compliance sandboxes; tokenized equities are testing which venues have real distribution; and DeFi exploits are proving that execution is only as safe as the external systems it trusts. Watch the layers that decide what can act, what must be verified and what can be unwound after the machine has already clicked send.

• 
  DeFi Warhol (@Defi_Warhol) reported 51 minutes ago

  This article from @FTI_US changes the question from “can this work?” to “how fast can institutions route capital?” Some context: Franklin Templeton manages $1.78 trillion in assets and has senior influence on derivatives policy (Sandy Kaul sits on the CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee). Now, look at the facts: • Franklin Templeton has a multi-year agentic AI partnership with Wand AI. They tokenized 5 ETFs for 24/7 trading via wallets. • x402 Foundation launched in July with 40 backers including AWS, Google, Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase, Circle, Stripe, Solana, and Ripple – a payment standard designed to let agents pay directly • XRP Ledger crossed 1 million agentic transactions on July 21 • Stablecoins recorded $46 trillion of trading volume in 2024, exceeding PayPal by 20x and Visa by 3x. • ~30% of enterprises running AI agents by 2026; • Analysts project $3–5 trillion of agentic commerce by 2030, 15–25% of US e‑commerce driven by agents, and one‑third of enterprise software agentic by 2028. I read the causal logic like this: Agentic software needs programmable, real‑time settlement; digital wallets are the execution surface; tokenized assets and stablecoins are the inventory and settlement medium. Stablecoins already move at scale ($46 trillion in 2024), and x402 plus the XRPL agent milestone show the plumbing is no longer purely theoretical. This is ACTUAL institutional validation: a $1.78 trillion manager with a CFTC advisory presence publicly linking agents to wallets signals integration work between custody, compliance, and programmable money is underway. It raises two concrete implications: incumbents who can’t support agent-native, 24/7 settlement risk losing flow, and stablecoin/payment rails stand to gain massive transactional volume if agentic commerce follows the $3–5 trillion path projected to 2030. I read this as the moment the infrastructure narrative (x402, tokenized ETFs, wallets) and the adoption narrative (~30% enterprise agents) converge under institutional capital. I f adoption follows the projections, the distribution of settlement and custody could shift quickly; if it doesn’t, this remains an institutional pilot. I’ll judge by flows and deployments, not rhetoric.

• 
  Brandon Miles (@BrandonMilesHQ) reported 51 minutes ago

  I’ll say this once. These 8 stocks are going to build generational wealth while most investors keep confusing volatility with risk…. 1: RobinHood ~ $HOOD 2: Palantir ~ $PLTR 3: Sofi Technologies ~ $SOFI 4: Coinbase ~ $COIN 5: Nu Holdings ~ $NU 6: Affirm ~ $AFRM 7: Upstart ~ $UPST 8: Block ~ $XYZ Save this list, & revisit it after the next major rerating. The market will prove the point…

• 
  CryptoRaro (@CryptoRaro) reported 52 minutes ago

  Yesterday the ethics deadlock broke and the market threw a party. Bitcoin above 67, Coinbase up double digits, six straight days of ETF inflows and in the middle of all of it, the people betting actual money on whether this bill becomes law barely moved. Polymarket still has it under fifty percent, and it went down, not up. That is the whole edition today: the price is pricing the vibe, and the bettors are pricing the vote, and those are not the same thing. Then earnings from two of the biggest companies on earth land after the close, and crypto gets to react first.

• 
  Arber X (@arberx_) reported 55 minutes ago

  How does every Coinbase app update make the app slower? I literally have the latest iPhone and the Coinbase app is abysmally slow...

• 
  The Rollup (@therollupco) reported 58 minutes ago

  Johann Kerbrat addresses the Base-vs-Robinhood battle as the wrong fight: "Competition is good for the customer. When we launched crypto trading, we cut fees versus Coinbase a lot. The customer benefits." "We're three weeks in, they're a couple years in. The debate is too early." "My focus is growing the pie, not taking market share." Almost nobody holds tokenized assets yet, that's the real opportunity.

• 
  Global Whales (@twtlinks) reported 58 minutes ago

  Operation Choke Point 2.0 tried to kill crypto by cutting off banking access quietly — no laws, no votes, just backroom pressure. Coinbase litigated. The documents came out. This is exactly why decentralization isn't optional. When governments can pressure banks, permissionless finance is the only hedge. #Crypto #Bitcoin #DeFi