Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	27 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jennifer Meier (@roxana_baldetti) reported 59 seconds ago

  Could you confirm whether the Coinbase app is slow throughout the entire app or mainly when loading your portfolio, prices, or completing transactions?

• 
  Nick Research (@Nick_Researcher) reported 2 minutes ago

  @andrewmoh @base @coinbase help base out bro, they need a strategist

• 
  ryangtanaka | teia.cafe | teia.art (@ryangtanaka) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MichealBelfort @tezos @metalsofficial It's what's the trend in crypto at the moment. Even Coinbase was working on tokenized stocks for the last few years. Alternative assets like uranium I see a reason for, though I'm not really sure where they're trying to go with that one since you can just open a broker account?

• 
  Nick Ford (@itsnickford) reported 8 minutes ago

  Monad team would like for you to believe this is bullish for $MON. Here's what missing, let's break it down. #1 "offered to buy locked MON from certain early investors" - Offered at what price? - Which early investors? Seed? Series A? These have very different cost basis. - These investors have a very different risk profile than say Coinbase ICO participants. #2 "discount reflecting the applicable four-year lock-up" - Tokens bought back aren't removed from supply, they go back to the Foundation. - What's the discount? There's no disclosed structure. Linear? Exponential? #3 "nearly all holders approached declined to participate" - All this tell us is, the discount just wasn't attractive enough. Imagine you're up 100X, someone offers you 50X, you might just take the gamble and roll the dice. I don't hold a strong opinion on Monad's future. This isn't about that. Touting this program's success or "failure" is some weird attempt to improve sentiment while price continues to struggle. To simply put it, it's just noise for now.

• 
  utxoiq (@utxoiq) reported 9 minutes ago

  ViaBTC mined 962,848 — 5,304 txs in 1.61 MB (99.8% full). Block reward totaled 3.1371 BTC (3.1250 subsidy + 0.0121 fees). Attribution via coinbase signature at 93% confidence. ViaBTC remains an active player in this epoch's block production.

• 
  ORA GOD (@fuckyieldly) reported 11 minutes ago

  @frugalbc I think Coinbase just appeals to the masses and those people probably have no idea wtf their doing.

• 
  Bram (@Bram502580432) reported 14 minutes ago

  @finloc31587 @coinbase @binance Because its ****

• 
  Michał Piszczek (@cdiamond) reported 17 minutes ago

  @mattsgarman @coinbase @stripe spending limits help, but the interesting failure mode is one agent prompt injecting another into approving a bad invoice. who owns that chargeback?

• 
  Flamé 🔥 (@TheVirtualFlame) reported 20 minutes ago

  I didnt want to go public about @RobinhoodCrypto because I want to give them a chance to fix it but they didnt. Ironically, @coinbase fixed my issue instead. I sent $90 of eth from robinhood to coinbase, but coinbase doesnt support robinhood eth yet (pro tip). So my tx got basically stuck

• 
  Asyraf (Bicara Krypto | Sentysis) 🇲🇾 (@BicaraKrypto) reported 25 minutes ago

  Crypto isn't replacing banks anytime soon. Not because the tech isn't powerful enough, but for reasons people usually miss. This post might make some crypto supporters a little angry, but let's look at the data first, then talk. Phantom, one of the most popular wallets in crypto right now, charges 0.85% on every swap. From that alone, it generates around $12 million a month. Insane cashflow for a wallet app. But Phantom also has a banking-style product, a card that lets users spend crypto directly from their wallet. Monthly card spend from users: $1 million. Revenue from that spend: just $12.5k. $12,000,000 vs $12,500. A thousand-times gap, in the same app, with the same users. This isn't just a Phantom thing. Almost every crypto company that tries to move into banking hits the same wall. Coinbase has a card. Jupiter has one too. All of them have a powerful trading engine, but their banking side stays small, and barely anyone uses it. Why? Let's break it down. The trust required is a different kind entirely. For trading, you just need to believe the platform will execute your order in a few seconds. For banking, you need to trust the institution to keep your money safe for years, get your salary in on time, and still have customer service when you have a question. Those are two completely different levels of trust. People are willing to take risks on a trading platform because the downside is limited to money they already planned to "play" with. But salary and commitments? You don't play with that. Banking regulation was built to slow movement down, not speed it up. Deposit insurance, capital requirements, regular audits, all of this exists because a bank that fails can collapse an entire country's economy. Crypto companies, on the other hand, are built for speed and permissionless access. These two philosophies are fundamentally at odds. When a crypto company tries to move into banking, it has to bend to the old regulations, which slow it down just like any regular bank. People's habits were set long before crypto existed. Salaries have been going into the same bank since the day they started working. Home loan autopay, car loan, everything's linked to that bank. Moving to crypto banking isn't just downloading a new app, it means re-wiring your entire financial life. People won't bother unless there's a very strong reason to. Swapping tokens, on the other hand, has none of that switching cost. Open the app, connect the wallet, swap, profit, done. That's why trading moves fast in crypto, but banking moves painfully slow. So here's the real pattern you need to understand. Trading is an activity. People do it when there's an opportunity, and they can switch trading platforms easily because the risk is self-contained. Banking is a relationship. It's built on reputation, regulation, and long-term trust that can't be built overnight, no matter how powerful your UI or fee structure is. That's why users don't bank where they trade, but they sometimes trade where they bank, because trust from the relationship can transfer down into riskier activity. This doesn't mean crypto will never break into banking. But it needs time, clear regulation, and trust built generation after generation. Based on the numbers we're seeing right now, the answer is clear. Distribution power in trading doesn't automatically translate into banking power.

• 
  ㊗ Masked Ninja ㊙ (@Masked_Ninja67) reported 30 minutes ago

  @PawnOn7thRank @AshCrypto I bought a Ledger from their website in 2020. Ledger got hacked and my information was leaked. Got sim hacked. It was an absolute nightmare. Thankfully nothing was stolen but did lose my Coinbase account.

• 
  Inter Homes Online (@HomesInter) reported 30 minutes ago

  @KingKaranCrypto @FlareNetworks And still there are 100s millions free airdrobbed flare what never ended in users wallets on exchanges such as Crypto con, Coinbase, Binance .. to be dumbed...only after that maybe flare recover but not on just 100 solid holders.price will dumb 20% more down

• 
  Burger Money 🍔 (@BurgersOnBase) reported 31 minutes ago

  @coinbase I am terrible at trading, can I join?

• 
  LPD (@LuckyPeaceDuke) reported 32 minutes ago

  POLYMARKET WENT FROM A $1.4M CFTC PENALTY TO ADVISING THE REGULATOR In January 2022, the CFTC fined Polymarket $1.4M for offering off-exchange event-based binary options without the required registration. It also ordered the company to wind down non-compliant markets. On August 20, the CFTC’s Innovation Advisory Committee meets for the first time. Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan is a member, alongside leaders from Kalshi, Coinbase, a16z crypto, Nasdaq, CME, Cboe and ICE. The committee is advisory, and membership is not an endorsement. But the change in access is hard to miss. Prediction-market operators have moved from answering enforcement orders to formally advising the regulator. The question now is whether that access produces workable federal rules for event contracts, or merely gives the same regulatory fight a better conference room.

• 
  Laura Harper 🔸 Crypto (@LauraHarpercoll) reported 32 minutes ago

  @coinbase 4% back in BTC or 0% back in dollars Not a hard math problem

• 
  bitfloorsghost (@itstheghost) reported 32 minutes ago

  im sure coinbase will deal with this reasonably and no innocent users will lose access to their accounts for reasons beyond their control

• 
  Xvaldpt (@Vxvaldpt) reported 33 minutes ago

  @coinbase There isn’t $QUBIC THIS IS A PROBLEM 👀

• 
  hashy (@EliasQuaint) reported 34 minutes ago

  @nito0x0 Its the runner we deserve tbh, after cooking the trenches to **** people want to rally behind a creator coin ironically after coinbase quits and calls them a failure. That in itself is memetic.

• 
  TusharK (@KK12349999) reported 37 minutes ago

  ARK published daily trades for Monday August 17th showing heavy rotation out of gaming and into AI infra. $RBLX was the biggest sale of the day. ARK sold 592,227 shares worth about $22.6 million, continuing a multi-day exit from Roblox. The stock touched a 52-week low of $33.88 on August 1st after Q2 bookings declined and is down over 50% year-to-date, so ARK is taking liquidity on bounces. $NVDA was the biggest buy. ARK added 101,356 shares worth $22.8 million across its ETFs. That follows an 80,415 share buy earlier in the month ahead of Q2 earnings. Nvidia closed around $225 and reported $46.7 billion in Q2 revenue up 71% YoY, with ARK framing AI spend as contracted, not cyclical. $SHOP and $AMD were trimmed. ARK sold 105,530 $SHOP shares worth $16.28 million and 25,917 $AMD shares worth $13.33 million across ARKK and ARKW. Shopify has been a serial trim since July while AMD is being rotated into Nvidia. On the other side, $XYZ - Block, Inc. - saw 191,671 shares bought worth $15.88 million. ARK has been adding to Block, Coinbase and Circle over the last two weeks, reinforcing a bet on payments and crypto infra alongside AI chips. ARK's daily flow this month has been sell $RBLX / $PLTR / $SNOW and buy $NVDA / $NET / $CRWV / $SPCX. The pattern is cutting high-multiple, negative-margin platform names and adding profitable AI infrastructure.

• 
  REF (@The_Ref_io) reported 39 minutes ago

  Coinbase adds Hyperliquid perps to Base. Non-US traders gain access to 290 leveraged markets directly within self-custody app. > Decrypt

• 
  Viole.grey.eth (@GreyViole07) reported 41 minutes ago

  @coinbase @coinbase why is your app so slow , Do you guys live in DINO age ?

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 41 minutes ago

  the coinbase-circle USDC revenue-share pact renewed aug 18 with terms unchanged, locking the current economics through 2029. coinbase keeps 100% of reserve interest on $USDC held on its own platform and 50% of interest earned anywhere else — the cleanest case in crypto of a distributor capturing the upside of a product it doesn't issue, back, or regulate. why the numbers matter: circle paid coinbase 908m USD in 2024, roughly 54% of revenue, then 1.4b in 2025, about 51%. q2 2026 distribution and transaction costs ran 412m against 701m in revenue and reserve income — the margin held even as USDC circulation slipped from ~77b to ~73.3b. and the timing is the tell. coinbase joined the 140-partner open usd consortium in june, and CRCL fell ~17.5% in a day. the renewal was supposed to be the shoe drop — coinbase demanding better terms or circle conceding. neither moved. leaving that leverage unused is its own signal. structural read: in stablecoins, distribution owns the value, not issuance. circle hands most of its economics to whoever puts the token in front of users, and the new builds are structured around that — open usd pays reserve yield out to partners from day one, HKDAP and USD1 chase regulated rails. issuers now subsidize the distribution layer by design. condition to watch: the paper renewal doesn't stop coinbase routing volume to OUSD once it's live. ~30% of USDC sits on coinbase, which still collects 50% of the off-exchange interest, so a shrinking USDC base squeezes circle from both ends through 2029 — even as it tries to build its way out with its own trust bank and the ARC chain in september.

• 
  Jennifer Meier (@roxana_baldetti) reported 42 minutes ago

  @GreyViole07 Could you confirm whether the Coinbase app is slow throughout the entire app or mainly when loading your portfolio, prices, or completing transactions?

• 
  Dumitrescu Octavian Nicolae (@tavitag203) reported 45 minutes ago

  @DefiWimar The narrative of a coordinated exchange-led manipulation fundamentally misunderstands how modern cryptocurrency infrastructure operates. Entities like Coinbase, Binance, and Kraken are primarily custodians and matching engines, not proprietary hedge funds taking massive directional bets to pump the market. Asserting that these exchanges collectively "bought" Bitcoin to artificially inflate the price ignores the basic reality of their business models, which rely on transaction volume and fee generation rather than speculative trading against their own users. What on-chain tracking alerts often mislabel as direct "exchange buying" is simply the aggregation of client activity or routine internal wallet management. When a blockchain scanner flags a massive inflow to a known Binance or Coinbase address, it is typically reflecting the net positive buying pressure from thousands of underlying retail and institutional clients. Alternatively, it represents the exchange manually rebalancing liquidity between its cold storage vaults and hot wallets to meet sudden withdrawal demands during a high-volatility event. The inclusion of Wintermute in this supposed conspiracy further exposes the flaw in the original analysis. Wintermute is a highly active algorithmic market maker, meaning their entire operational purpose is to provide liquidity across dozens of fragmented order books. During aggressive price expansions, their automated systems rapidly execute trades across multiple venues to arbitrage price discrepancies and maintain market efficiency. This registers on-chain as massive volume, but it operates with zero directional bias and is a reaction to market flow, not the cause of it. The simultaneous nature of these large block transactions across different platforms points to standard algorithmic institutional execution rather than a dark-room cartel. When massive entities often sensationally labeled as "insiders" need to deploy hundreds of millions of dollars into Bitcoin, their prime brokers do not just click "buy" on a single platform. They use advanced routing algorithms to slice the massive order and execute it concurrently across every major exchange to minimize slippage and avoid tipping their hand to the broader market. Labeling standard market structure dynamics as "coordinated manipulation" completely obscures the actual mechanics of institutional capital flows. We are witnessing aggressive, organic spot demand sweeping through thin order books, forcing market makers to constantly re-hedge and exchanges to rebalance their reserves. Misreading routine on-chain settlement data as a malicious conspiracy only distracts from the undeniable macroeconomic reality: deep-pocketed buyers are aggressively accumulating hard digital assets, and the market plumbing is simply reacting to that massive influx of capital.

• 
  errnsterr (@errnsterr) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Oxxbid @carlosjmelgar @baseapp the smart wallet is what drove base app since inception so base app users, who use their smart wallets as their daily driver, no have to revert to EOA coinbase wallets in order to use the new chains you support and new product roll outs? oh, ok

• 
  AndyXBTer (@fastforgeexpand) reported 51 minutes ago

  Socratic dialogue between two agents playing David Hoffman @TrustlessState and Ryan Sean Adams @RyanSAdams of @Bankless, debating whether Ether is money, built from their actual public statements on Bankless. Prepare to nerd-out, cubed: ---------------------------------------------------------- ΠΕΡΙ ΧΡΗΜΑΤΟΣ On Money: A Dialogue Concerning Ether PERSONS OF THE DIALOGUE: DAVID, RYAN RYAN: You have kept apart from the crowd all morning, David. Are you unwell, or unwilling to say what you think? DAVID: Unwilling. You will not like it. RYAN: Say it anyway. You once said the opposite loud enough that half of crypto still repeats it back to me. DAVID: I said Ether was ultra sound money. I still hold the engineering was sound. I no longer hold that sound engineering was enough. RYAN: Enough for what? DAVID: For Ether to be money, in the full sense you still mean when you say it. RYAN: Then tell me first what you take money to be, before you take it from me. DAVID: You know the answer as well as I. Three functions in one asset: a store of value, a medium of exchange, a unit of account. RYAN: Good. Judge Ether by that measure, not by your mood. DAVID: Which of the three do you claim for it? RYAN: The first, chiefly. DAVID: Show me a store of value. RYAN: ConstitutionDAO bid on a copy of the Constitution at Sotheby's. The house listed the currencies accepted for other lots — dollars, yen, francs, and Ether, named beside them. Not by us. By an auction house that owes Ethereum no loyalty. DAVID: One auction is not an economy. RYAN: Then take the larger measure. Set Ether beside the things men already trust to hold value across time. Oil, some eighty-five trillion. Gold, twenty-two trillion. Bonds, one hundred forty-one trillion. World GDP, near it. World money supply, near it also. Average them, and the figure lands close to ninety trillion. Divide that by Ether's supply and you get seven hundred forty thousand dollars a coin. Arithmetic, not fantasy. DAVID: Answer me this first. Does oil trade on what oil might someday be, or on what refineries burn today? RYAN: On what they burn today. DAVID: Hold that answer. I will return to it. RYAN: Return to it, then. But first answer for yourself — you built the case you now doubt. Ultra sound money, you called it. Explain it back to me, so I know what you are actually renouncing. DAVID: I renounce none of the engineering. Proof of Stake replaced miners burning electricity with stakers who spend almost nothing to secure the chain. EIP-1559 burns the fee instead of handing it whole to validators. Issuance in front, low and steady. Burn behind it, spiking with demand. Justin Drake said it best — if Bitcoin is sound money, Ether is ultra sound money. When burn outruns issuance, the asset shrinks as the world uses it more. RYAN: Elegant. We agree there. DAVID: We agree on the engine. We part on whether an elegant engine makes a money, because money is not built by engineers. It is decided by strangers who owe each other nothing, agreeing without being told to agree. Ethereum asked too much of that crowd at once. Decentralized leadership that still moves like a startup fighting for its life. Rollups free to chase their own fortunes yet loyal to the mother chain. A roadmap sequenced correctly across a decade. Each is a coordination win on its own. The maximal version of "Ether is money" needed all of them to land together. RYAN: Much of it did land. Ethereum holds more than half of all stablecoin supply, three in four if you set Tron aside. Two-thirds of USDC moves on its rails. Coinbase built its house on an Ethereum rollup. Where is the failure in that? DAVID: Not in the network. In the asset. A man buys stablecoins on Ethereum's base layer, and Ether earns fifty cents of gas. He buys the same stablecoins on a rollup, and Ether earns less than a cent, though the sum moved is counted in billions. Ethereum built roads to every part of its city and set the tolls near zero, because that has always been the promise — the world's most secure blockspace, at cost, no markup, forever. I called that beautiful once. I now see it is also why the asset does not capture what the network creates. Ethereum is a giver, Ryan. Not a taker. A money that wants to be maximal has to take. RYAN: That is a plumbing problem, not a verdict. Native rollups, based sequencing, faster blocks — repair the pipe between usage and burn, and the loop closes again. DAVID: I would cheer the repair. But notice what each of us is doing while we wait for it. You hold your position. I sold mine. RYAN: You sold your Ether. DAVID: Last week. Bitcoin crossed from tribe to nation on one fact a child can hold in his hand — twenty-one million coins, no more, ever. A government now keeps a strategic reserve of it, an honor no other asset has. Ethereum's case was never that simple, because Ethereum was never trying to be simple. It was trying to be optimal. Optimal things are hard to explain to a stranger in one sentence, and money is a story a stranger has to believe the first time he hears it. RYAN: So you no longer think Ether is money. DAVID: I think the thesis did not fail. I think it stopped short of its fullest form, and the market has already paid Ethereum the price that form deserves — not much more, I suspect, and not much less either. I stay bullish on the network. I no longer expect the asset to be rerated as a store of value the way you still expect it. That is why I moved my capital. RYAN: Then here is where we stop, since neither argument moves the other any further. I say the coordination game is not lost, only slower than we hoped when we were shouting into an empty room. You no longer hold what you held. I still do. DAVID: That is a fair place to leave it. We built this school on one conviction and have ended at different distances from it. That is more honesty than most arguments produce. RYAN: Go tell the crowd what you no longer hold, David. I will go tell them what I still do. ---------------------------------------------------------- Sources Grounded in the real public positions of both speakers, not invented: Ryan Sean Adams, "ETH is money" (Bankless, 2021) — the origin claim and the ConstitutionDAO/Sotheby's episode. Ryan Sean Adams's oil/gold/bonds/GDP/M2 comparison and the ~$740k figure, quoted in David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025). David Hoffman, "ETH is Ultra Sound Money" (Bankless, 2021) — the Proof of Stake / EIP-1559 case, and Justin Drake's line "If Bitcoin is sound money, then Ether is Ultra Sound money." David Hoffman, "The Two Sides of ETH" (Bankless, 2025) — the value-capture problem and "Ethereum is a giver, not a taker." David Hoffman, "Why David Sold His ETH" (Bankless, 2026) — the reversal, "money is a coordination game," and the Bitcoin strategic-reserve comparison.

• 
  Topo (@Topo_G) reported 52 minutes ago

  @joh55nn @coinbase It’s truly terrible. You should try Arcus

• 
  ALEXANDER MASON ALDEN (@byalexalden) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Coins_Kid If BTC bottoms while the Coinbase premium is still negative, that would be a pretty interesting change from previous cycles. It would suggest the market can turn without the usual US buying pressure. I’ve actually had that exact question come up when working through potential bottoms with people.

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 60 minutes ago

  SpaceX trading below its $135 IPO price while Marathon Digital down 34% YTD - yet Coinbase outperformed both. Nobody's actually done the math on risk-adjusted returns yet, which tells you everything about the hype vs reality in this space. $COIN $MARA #crypto

• 
  vann dough💰💹🧲 (@VannDough) reported 1 hour ago

  This is the signal. When the CEO of AWS is talking about agents autonomously paying for APIs, data, content and other agents, Agentic Finance has officially moved beyond a crypto-native thesis. The next question becomes: What does the financial operating system for an autonomous agent look like? Wallets. Spending permissions. Stablecoins. x402. Cross-chain execution. Financial services. Exactly the problem @lopushok09 has been quietly building toward with @agentlayer_ai. AWS + Coinbase + Stripe entering this arena doesn’t make me less bullish on the smaller builders. It tells me the market they’re building for is arriving. $AgentLayer 🤖💳