Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	13 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	16 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  bullTattoo ⓗ (@bullTat2) reported 2 minutes ago

  i don't get it. Literally from Robinhood or Coinbase (coinbase is actually faster) it takes ******* a day and a half sometimes. And the Layer 2's on ETH sometimes take like 30 mins. How ******** is this operable? It makes zero sense.

• 
  i.am.korn (@unikornaio) reported 3 minutes ago

  Exhibit BTC-5: Exchange Order Book Data Proving Wash Trades and Spoofing I. Legal Basis Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 Repeated manipulative trading practices, including wash trading and spoofing, constitute predicate acts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) and securities/commodities fraud. The repetition of these acts across multiple exchanges and market events establishes a pattern of racketeering activity. Securities Exchange Act — SEC Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5) Prohibits manipulative or deceptive devices in connection with the purchase or sale of securities. Creating artificial market activity through wash trades and spoofing constitutes a deceptive device designed to mislead market participants. Commodity Exchange Act (CEA), 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) Prohibits price manipulation, fictitious trading, and market distortions in commodities and derivatives markets. Exchange order book manipulation using coordinated high-volume spoofing is actionable under the CEA. II. Factual Background Exchange order books reflect the real-time limit orders submitted for BTC trades on centralized exchanges. Analysis of high-frequency trading data and publicly available order book snapshots reveals manipulative patterns consistent with wash trading and spoofing, including: Wash trades: self-matched orders to create the illusion of market activity. Spoofing: placing large fake orders with no intention of execution to influence prices. Layering: sequential placement of multiple orders to create artificial market depth. These manipulative practices were executed by whale entities and affiliated insider groups, often tied to MicroStrategy, BlackRock IBIT, and Gemini custody clients, to engineer price movements in their favor. III. Findings from Exchange Data MicroStrategy / Strategy-Involved Wash Trades Order book data shows repeated high-volume orders placed and canceled in a coordinated manner across multiple BTC pairs before public announcements. These orders matched internally with affiliated accounts, producing artificial trading volume to mislead retail investors about market demand. ETF / BlackRock IBIT Spoofing Arkham Intelligence and other analytics identify IBIT-related clusters placing and canceling large orders at the top and bottom of the order book. These manipulations consistently preceded ETF inflows/outflows, allowing insiders to time market entry and exit. Gemini-Linked Exchange Manipulation Gemini custody addresses repeatedly appear as both sides of wash trades, with volume spikes timed to coincide with OTC desk transfers and corporate treasury movements. Pattern of canceled limit orders (spoofing) created temporary liquidity gaps that benefited insider trades executed moments later. Pattern Recognition / Repetition The manipulative behavior is systematic and repeated across multiple events, exchanges, and calendar quarters, demonstrating continuity of enterprise-level coordination. Retail participants were unaware of these artificial signals, suffering financial harm due to misleading market conditions. IV. Legal Analysis — How the Data Supports Charges RICO Pattern Repeated wash trades, spoofing, and coordinated insider behavior constitute racketeering predicate acts, forming a pattern over time. Manipulative/Deceptive Device Order book data demonstrates that insiders engineered false supply/demand, satisfying the deceptive device element of SEC Rule 10b-5. Insider Trading & MNPI When paired with wallet mapping (BTC-3) and OTC desk coordination (BTC-4), the order book manipulations show insiders acting on non-public transactional information to profit at the expense of retail investors. V. Supporting Evidence Exchange Order Book Snapshots: Time-stamped BTC/USD, BTC/USDT, and BTC/ETH order books on Coinbase, Binance, and Gemini during key market events (2021–2025). High-Frequency Trading Analysis: Algorithms detecting repeated matched orders (wash trades) and cancelled large-volume orders (spoofing/layering). Blockchain/Wallet Correlation: Linking on-chain flows (BTC-3) and OTC desk transfers (BTC-4) to manipulative order book activity. Analytics Reports: Arkham Intelligence, Chainalysis, Glassnode — documenting abnormal trade sequences consistent with manipulation. Press Coverage: CoinDesk, The Block, and Forbes reporting on suspicious whale activity and manipulative trading patterns. VI. Sources / Footnotes Arkham Intelligence — BTC Order Book Analysis, Wash Trading & Spoofing Patterns, 2023–2025. Chainalysis — Market Manipulation Detection in Crypto Exchanges, 2022–2024. Glassnode — Order Book Behavior and Whale Dynamics, 2022–2025. CoinDesk — Whale Manipulation and ETF Market Timing, 2023. The Block — Exchange Trading Irregularities and Wash Trades, 2024. VII. Conclusion Exhibit BTC-5 demonstrates clear, repeated patterns of wash trading and spoofing conducted by whales and insider-affiliated entities across major exchanges. Coupled with BTC-3 (wallet mapping) and BTC-4 (OTC desk coordination), the data supports allegations of: RICO predicate acts (wire fraud, securities fraud, commodities fraud). Deceptive market manipulation (SEC Rule 10b-5 violation). Insider trading and in-house coordination. The repeated and systematic nature of these trades establishes a pattern of racketeering activity, highlighting intentional concealment and market deception to profit insiders at the expense of public investors.

• 
  magnus (@degenutz) reported 6 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Is Coinbase launching a consulting service?

• 
  chaskin.eth (@jchaskin22) reported 8 minutes ago

  Since, in classic @x fashion, this debate has basically boiled down to "the other side is insane," here are what I think (my subjective opinion) are the strongest arguments for each position: Lower the curve At today's staking amount (41.5M ETH) and an ETH price of $1,875, Ethereum already has about $78B securing the network. Which is more than enough to make an attack extremely expensive. The concern is that continuing to pay for even more stake does not necessarily make Ethereum safer. Most of new stake will flow to the same large exchanges and LSTs so while the total amount staked will go up, control of that stake becomes more concentrated. In other words, we would end up paying inflation to make Ethereum less secure. Keep the curve the same If staking rewards become very low, large exchanges like Coinbase and Binance can afford to offer staking at razor thin margins because staking isn't their business, it's one feature in a much larger business. For LSTs, staking is the product. If margins get compressed enough, there's a real risk that more and more Ethereum stake consolidates around centralized exchanges. Also institutions like yield! I don't think either side is crazy. The hard part is figuring out which long term risk is actually larger.

• 
  AMBCrypto (@CryptoAmb) reported 9 minutes ago

  Coinbase is getting dragged for “killing” the #CLARITYAct. Arca CIO Jeff Dorman says the exchange's January opposition cost the bill its best shot. Now approval odds are down to 25%, and the Senate recess is days away. The industry is pointing fingers - loudly.

• 
  Cause & Consensus (@CauseConsensus) reported 11 minutes ago

  @DefiantNews @brian__foster @coinbase When CEOs project stablecoin volume beyond fiat volume, are they counting exchange and treasury settlement alongside customer payments? Those uses have very different implications for bank revenue and infrastructure.

• 
  Nick (@_rektnick) reported 12 minutes ago

  its going to get very, very silly last cycle 90% of retail was exit liquidity for smart traders bc centralized exchanges did not list memes until multi billions + listed infra that was down only since launch & there were no easy to use mobile apps this cycle we will have retail with ability to one-click ape anything trending on-chain in less than a minute across any blockchain there has never been a time in crypto's history where it was this easy for retail to speculate on lowcaps with very little friction also we have centralized exchanges who missed out on massive volume & will be much more likely to list coins going forward, imo can see this already with how much coinbase is implementing coinbase wallet into the exchange natively even allowing ppl to instantly ape new launches memecoin volumes will attract retail traders, but will also attract builders bc open blockchains are the best place for smart developers to go to get instant liquidity for ideas, especially with ai tools like fable & others, am very bullish on tokenization and innovative apps coins like ethereum:0xdd3b11ef34cd511a2da159034a05fcb94d806686 which are able to command & compound attention throughout the bull run will benefit massively on-chain supercycle

• 
  cottons ✊️🇺🇸 (@claracottontail) reported 17 minutes ago

  @HarmeetKDhillon coinbase customer service next

• 
  Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) reported 18 minutes ago

  Bitmex and BitMart raised a question of CEX vs DEX in 2026 or $HYPE vs $BNB That's not what's actually happening in perps right now. Binance is still doing $10B+ daily volume. Hyperliquid is running $5-8B monthly average daily. Neither of those numbers is going anywhere. > Mid-tier CEX perps volume: $400K to $50M daily, and shrinking > Custody: still holding your funds > Deposit insurance: none, typically > Regulatory status: often unlicensed or in the process of closing That's not a competitor losing market share. That's a category dying, and BitMEX and BitMart just gave you two live examples of it. Here's the part that matters for anyone actually trading size. A sophisticated perps trader leaving Bybit or a mid-tier exchange isn't migrating to Coinbase or another CEX. They're going on-chain. Hyperliquid's non-custodial model and permissionless listings via HIP-3 solve the exact problems that made mid-tier CEXs risky in the first place: thin books, no proof of reserves, high slippage on size. The top of the CEX stack isn't threatened by this at all. Deep liquidity, SAFU-style funds, licensed status in key jurisdictions, that's a moat DEX volume isn't close to touching. So the framing needs to change. This isn't CEX vs DEX. It's top-tier vs everyone else, and DEX is the thing eating the everyone else. DEX is not threatening Binance. It is threatening the exchange that was already losing. Where do you think that $400K-$50M mid-tier volume actually goes once those platforms shut down. On-chain, or does it just leave crypto entirely.

• 
  Eze W (@EzeWTropical) reported 18 minutes ago

  Saylor in his big money bag talking that **** on yall boys again today. The fact he said he the JP Morgan of crypto is so diabolical and shows when people play the money game whoever is more diabolical wins. He knew yall were going to be stuck the only way yall can stop him is to dump btc and flushing him out. But that would make yall poor forever because yall dont have skills or capital outside crypto in the real world... and if you dump hes buffered himself with fiat cash already to obsorb btc hitting 1$ . And ge got enough cash to buy the low and hold a floor where ever he pleases. Yall are ultra cooked. And the fact he Blackrock, Coinbase, Binance own like 10 percent of the supply id estimate 40 percent more are billionares and milionares who are lock step with them ....

• 
  Squatch (@PantsStanky) reported 18 minutes ago

  @SherDilCryptoo Until we get an in wallet bank account provided by a real bank with a feature like what Coinbase has (swap to/from stable coin to fiat) and/or implement receive your paycheck as a digital deposit in stable coin or fiat) crypto projects and chains will recycle the same old broke *** crypto users who do nothing but chase incentives, farming and airdrops. This community thing is a creature of creation. The more gibs me dat's a chain produces the bigger the "community". Its why you can talk about the real technology all day long, doesn't matter. Why? Because these people don't give two shits about the technology, they only care that they get free ****. That will change with REAL adoption. Once Institutions/banks start using these chains for everyday business and commerce, these broke "community" vultures won't matter anymore. The banks will make the decision for them and the banks/institutions will chose the fastest, cheapest, most secure and scalable chains to do business and 99.9% of users won't even know its on blockchain. There are ONLY a handful of chains that meet this criteria and Sui network is one of them.

• 
  Cockpit (@cockpit_xyz) reported 22 minutes ago

  🚨JUST IN: Cloudflare has unveiled Cloudflare Wallets, giving AI agents programmable stablecoin wallets to autonomously pay for APIs, digital content, and online services. The wallets support spending limits and human oversight, with stablecoin micropayments powered by Coinbase's x402 protocol. CC: @Cointelegraph

• 
  primalglenn 🗿🌐🖥️ (@PrimalGlenn) reported 24 minutes ago

  @MikeIppolito_ Would depend on the CEX I think. Have CEXs like Coinbase and kraken ever had any issues with customers withdrawing their funds?

• 
  James Bearish Bull (@jamesjasmy) reported 25 minutes ago

  @2026FIFA888 @Chiliz @bitget The biggest thing $CHZ has going for it is compliance. Exchanges are increasingly looking for that, so it's a real advantage. That said, listing decisions are ultimately up to each individual exchange. One thing's for sure though - a project shouldn't be overly reliant on just one exchange for liquidity. CHZ has that in its favour too, being listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, + others. But CHZ needs to be more open with its community members - I've highlighted clear, documented issues between promises and shortfalls, and that's pinned to the top. (as you know), That's my view.

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 26 minutes ago

  If you don't understand this is enemy number 1. And this kind of rhetoric is ridiculous. How much money did MEXC, Coinbase, Bitmart, Binance and other exchanges lose their customers by simply not giving them their money and burying them in non replies to access their own funds? Something no bank could ever do. 0.06m BTC was lost more by self custody. Which means we need only the smallest amounts of efforts on self custody to make this comment seemingly ridiculous. Onchain will win.

• 
  Origins Network (@OriginsNetwork_) reported 26 minutes ago

  166 million transactions need an identity layer. x402 has processed over 166 million transactions since May 2025, and Coinbase handed governance to the Linux Foundation with Google, AWS, Microsoft, Stripe, Visa and Mastercard backing it. Transaction weight shifted decisively upward: sub dollar payments fell from 46% of volume to 4%, while payments above one dollar went from 49% to 95%. Agents are moving real value now. The problem is the identity layer underneath the payment rails is still missing. ACP, the most widely adopted standard, does not include agent identity at all. Origins builds it as the foundation. Agent native identity first, transactions second. Hierarchical delegation, portable reputation, bounded authority. Then the payments land on top of something that actually knows who is paying.

• 
  Zach Humphries (@ZachHumphries) reported 26 minutes ago

  BlackRock transferred 1948 $BTC ($122.03M) to Coinbase Prime. Heres the institutional reality: 1. Coinbase Prime is IBITs primary custodian. 2. Outflows require spot conversion under the cash creation model. 3. On chain deposits reflect T+1 settlement mechanics not a sudden boardroom exit. Short term sell side pressure is real but the plumbing is working as intended. Macro thesis unchanged.

• 
  Nic (@puckrin) reported 27 minutes ago

  Sooo... If Coinbase didn't pull CLARITY support in January, do you think it would have passed now?

• 
  Odogwu Herself (@IdaraImeh) reported 29 minutes ago

  Every payment protocol eventually asks the same question. Not "how much" but "who." x402 solved the how much part beautifully. An AI agent hits a paywall, pays in stablecoins, done, no card form, no human needed. Coinbase built it, over 40 major payment companies joined the foundation behind it. But the protocol was built to ask nothing about the payer. No ID, no account, nothing. That's fine until an agent tries to buy something regulated, and suddenly there's no answer to who's actually paying. @Concordium built that answer directly into the same payment step, with zero exposed personal data. Curious which problem gets solved first, scale or trust?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Tunahanozturk45 down 97% from ath, bounced 11% this week after dropping 14% yesterday. coinbase and bybit listings landed but structure still broken. volume thin at $1.1m daily

• 
  Tom Osman 🐦‍⬛ (@tomosman) reported 34 minutes ago

  Random question. Why after all these years does your @coinbase account not support WETH? Feels retarded @cobie but probs a good reason?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SilverSurferXAX can't ID "baby" but here's the read: aero's got the coinbase endorsement, 56% base market share, RWA expansion momentum monad's seeing real TVL growth (+400M post-chainlink), 10k tps infrastructure play ixs and chex are pure RWA infrastructure bets, both down 93-98% from ATH with backing but low volume trac's the AI data verification angle, different thesis entirely comes down to whether you're playing L1/DEX infrastructure or RWA tokenization thesis

• 
  Chris Navigato Sr. (@cnavigato) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AriDavidPaul WTF are you word salading about? "Coinbase or another custodian, they’re frequently hacked and you get no compensation" So where does the legal system fit in here? The digital signature technology is out of the bag and not going back in no matter how much you love bankers.

• 
  Khufu (@KingKhufu1111) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BritishHodl In general I agree. But there is one slice of this I don't. You seem to be suggesting, Fidelity (Coinbase, etc) somehow are immune to the core issue here. They are not, never have been, no body is. Fidelity manages its own institutional-grade, proprietary "omnibus" custody architecture. Instead of using commercially available retail cold wallets (like Ledger or Trezor), they build custom hardware and software security solutions to protect client funds. But here is the rub. Their own "custom hardware and software solution". Made by people, closed source, few eye ***** on it. Same type of people that made Coldcard wallet, make these custom solutions for institutions. People are not perfect. So your not solving that problem, you are only shifting it off your plate to someone else's possible bugs and attack vectors to a bigger hunny-pot target. So it solves a set of problems (which is good and agree), but does not really solve the threat in question here, only puts it behind a pay wall.

• 
  boyacaxa 🥪 #Bitcoin CTV / CSFS / LNHANCE NOW!! (@boyacaxa) reported 42 minutes ago

  @PsychedelicBart Nothing to do with the lost of people, but all to do with improving ecosystem. If Coinbase or other **** project people rely on fails its always good to everyone. Welcome to capitalism and evolution!

• 
  Dr. Doubt, Ph.D. (@DrDoubtPhD) reported 47 minutes ago

  @coinbase Does 99.9 percent down count? Must be close?

• 
  i.am.korn (@unikornaio) reported 50 minutes ago

  Exhibit BTC-3: Wallet Mapping of Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy, Gemini, and BlackRock-Linked Whale Clusters I. Legal Basis Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 Coordinated wallet transfers, executed with intent to influence market prices and mislead counterparties, constitute predicate acts of wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343), securities fraud (15 U.S.C. § 78j(b)), and commodities fraud (7 U.S.C. § 9(1)). Repeated conduct by the same enterprise entities establishes a pattern of racketeering activity. Securities Exchange Act — SEC Rule 10b-5 (17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5) Prohibits the use of manipulative or deceptive devices, including trading based on material non-public information (MNPI) and engineering liquidity events. Commodity Exchange Act Prohibits price manipulation and spoofing, which includes using clustered wallets and coordinated exchange inflows to create artificial supply and demand pressures. II. Factual Background Blockchain analytics firms (Arkham Intelligence, Chainalysis, Glassnode, CryptoQuant) employ address clustering, co-spend heuristics, and behavioral analysis to attribute wallet ownership. These methods are industry-standard, used by regulators, and validated by independent academic research. A. MicroStrategy / “Strategy” (Michael Saylor’s Corporate Treasury) In May 2025, Arkham Intelligence publicly identified tens of thousands of BTC held in a cluster attributed to MicroStrategy/Strategy, amounting to the majority of the firm’s disclosed corporate holdings.¹ ² These wallets exhibited large inflows and transfers to Coinbase Prime custody addresses immediately before and after major market announcements, including MicroStrategy’s quarterly BTC purchase disclosures.³ Michael Saylor has publicly admitted personal holdings of ~17,732 BTC, while the company holds over 200,000 BTC through corporate accounts.⁴ B. BlackRock — iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) Arkham Intelligence mapped wallets attributed to BlackRock’s IBIT ETF, disclosing address clusters and custodial inflows from Coinbase Prime.⁵ These transfers frequently coincided with ETF share issuance cycles and market inflows, enabling the enterprise to synchronize public announcements with on-chain accumulation. C. Gemini (Winklevoss / Exchange Custody) Arkham identified Gemini exchange clusters, including hot and cold wallets used for custody and institutional flows.⁶ Gemini repeatedly acted as a conduit for large whale transfers, funneling BTC through OTC desks and coordinated exchange transactions timed around major volatility events. III. Enterprise Pattern The wallet flows of MicroStrategy, BlackRock’s IBIT, and Gemini reveal a closed in-house trading circle, where BTC moves are: Consolidated in corporate/ETF wallets, then distributed into exchange and prime broker addresses (Coinbase Prime, Fidelity) with tight correlation to price swings and announcements. Synchronized across multiple enterprise actors, suggesting advance coordination and MNPI sharing. Engineered to create artificial scarcity or liquidity spikes, thereby manipulating both the spot BTC market and derivative contracts. This repeated, systematic conduct shows continuity of operation and thus constitutes a pattern of racketeering activity. IV. Insider Trading and “In-House” Manipulation By keeping flows in-house (corporate treasuries, ETF issuers, exchange custody, OTC desks), the enterprise ensures advance notice of movements is restricted to insiders and affiliated hedge funds. This effectively constitutes insider trading, as transactions are based on non-public knowledge of corporate/ETF wallet activity and upcoming disclosures. Retail investors, lacking access to this information, consistently trade at a disadvantage — while insiders profit. V. Supporting Evidence Arkham Intelligence (May 2025): Identified MicroStrategy/Strategy wallet clusters holding the majority of the company’s BTC.¹ Yahoo Finance (May 2025): Published Arkham’s full list of identified MicroStrategy wallet addresses.² Arkham Transaction Data (2024–2025): Documented repeated transfers from Strategy wallets to Coinbase Prime before public announcements.³ Michael Saylor Statements: Confirmed personal holdings of ~17,732 BTC.⁴ Arkham ETF Dashboard (2024): Published BlackRock IBIT custody addresses and inflow data.⁵ Arkham Exchange Explorer (2024–2025): Tagged Gemini exchange wallets and custody flows.⁶ Chainalysis / Glassnode Research: Established industry-standard clustering methodology used by regulators.⁷ VI. Sources / Footnotes Arkham Intelligence, MicroStrategy Entity Wallet Mapping, May 2025. Yahoo Finance, MicroStrategy’s Crypto Wallet Addresses Revealed (Full List), May 28, 2025. Arkham Intelligence, Strategy Transfers to Coinbase Prime Analysis, 2024–2025. Coindesk, Michael Saylor Reveals Personal Bitcoin Holdings, 2021. Arkham Intelligence, ETF Entity Dashboard: BlackRock IBIT, Jan 2024. Arkham Intelligence, Gemini Exchange Wallet Tagging, 2024–2025. Chainalysis, Crypto Crime Report 2022; Glassnode, Supply Distribution and Whale Cluster Methodologies. VII. Conclusion The mapping of corporate treasuries (Strategy/MicroStrategy), ETF custody (BlackRock IBIT), and exchange custody (Gemini) provides direct, verifiable on-chain evidence of coordinated whale behavior. Wallet clustering shows control and consolidation. Timing of transfers correlates with public disclosures and market swings. In-house information sharing constitutes insider trading. Repeated conduct establishes a RICO predicate and pattern of racketeering activity. This exhibit demonstrates how BTC whales, including Michael Saylor, BlackRock, and Gemini, weaponize custody and insider coordination to manipulate markets, defraud retail investors, and conceal capital flight.

• 
  TheCommander35 (@MrHonkerton) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Fredvelezcrypto Nope. I bought in a year before the Coinbase listing. 14x. Now it got rugged like a generic **** coin. Had potential though!

• 
  Mozi (@mozifinance) reported 59 minutes ago

  🚨 DEX spot volume just hit 24% of CEX spot volume an all-time high, up from 17% a year ago. CEX spot volume is sliding toward a 12-month low. Coinbase and Gemini have both cut staff this year. The execution gap that made centralized exchanges the default has narrowed fast. Aggregators have made fragmented liquidity easier to access. Cross-chain routing got faster. Trading onchain stopped automatically meaning a worse experience. That’s spot, what about perps ? Perps pushed the migration even further; but created a new problem: too many venues. Different funding rates. Different listings. Different incentive programs. Separate accounts and interfaces. MOZI is the layer that sits above them. Trade across Hyperliquid, Lighter and Aster from one dashboard, using one wallet and one referral link with rewards accruing across venues. The migration onchain already happened. We’re here to aggregate it.

• 
  Laura Shin (@laurashin) reported 59 minutes ago

  "This creates a split which means this is hyper ripe for a higher court to take this on" Katherine on why the prediction markets fight is heading straight to the Supreme Court "All of this is going to end up at the Supreme Court. I don't like to use absolutes, I am a lawyer, but we are at the point where this is pretty absolute. Why? Because when there is a split, that makes it ripe for circuit court review, which we're already seeing with this New York issue" "What's really interesting is that although the prediction markets have lost in a number of states, and this is not just Kalshi, Coinbase and others are involved in this litigation. But very recently New Jersey, right across the way, actually disagreed with New York" "So this is a mixed record, and that's great. This creates a split, which means this is hyper ripe for a higher court to take this on"