Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Maquoketa	Website	4 days ago
West Liberty	Login	16 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	1 month ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  iulian🐸 (@0x_iulianivg) reported 5 minutes ago

  @noD7R Advanced Coinbase support they paid $375m for

• 
  PRV Wallet (@prv1_com) reported 6 minutes ago

  Your MetaMask address has made hundreds of transactions. Every one is public. The amount. The counterparty. The timestamp. Permanently. Your Coinbase account has your name, address, and government ID attached to all of it. Neither company thinks this is a problem. You might. #Web3Privacy #SelfCustody

• 
  Collins❤️ (@SimplyCollinsss) reported 7 minutes ago

  the problem is slippage, if the pool is thin, one big order moves the price significantly against you before it even settles Helix uses a Central Limit Order Book instead the same model professional trading desks use on Binance, Coinbase, every serious centralized exchange

• 
  e_camli (@ekinoks_26) reported 7 minutes ago

  Coinbase's cryptography advisory board published a report today. Scott Aaronson, Dan Boneh, Justin Drake from the Ethereum Foundation. Six leading cryptographers, one conclusion: start migrating now. The part getting less coverage is the four problems they listed that nobody has solved yet. Larger signature sizes that compress block space and raise fees. The absence of efficient post-quantum aggregate signatures, which most blockchain systems depend on to batch verify transactions at scale. Potential throughput impacts that no major chain has publicly modeled at production load. And the governance question around dormant wallets, the 1.7 million Bitcoin in exposed early addresses, many believed to belong to Satoshi or lost-key holders, with no clear mechanism to handle them at all. The panel said prepare now. It did not say any of those four problems have answers. Those are different sentences and they are both in the same report. @QuipNetwork's vault sidesteps the aggregate signature problem entirely by operating at the user level rather than the protocol level. WOTS+ wraps individual positions on EVM and SVM without requiring the base chain to solve post-quantum aggregation first. I think the Coinbase panel is the most credible external voice on this migration challenge produced this quarter. I also think a report that names four unsolved problems while recommending immediate action is describing a race where the finish line keeps moving. The vault is live. Mainnet is Q2. The four problems are still open.

• 
  KingPin 𝕏 (@Mr_wondermus) reported 9 minutes ago

  @tradingview will you please get the @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport charts working? It’s been 48 hours now.

• 
  BakerIsland (@BakerIsland1) reported 11 minutes ago

  Interesting Coinbase change for #tezos staking (U.S. customers). Until recently, users could buy XTZ, stake it at ~2.54% APY, and immediately initiate an unstake if they wanted to sell or move funds to self-custody. Now, Coinbase gives users two choices: wait for the unstaking period to complete or pay a 1% fee for instant liquidity. 🤔🤔🤔It got me thinking: should a similar option exist at the protocol level? If a user wants immediate access to their unstaking funds, could a fee be paid and shared between the network and the baker providing the liquidity? What are the technical risks of executing this, also Coinbase takes a risk if they are truly unstaking those funds today (although it appears most is delegated volume). Liquidity has value. Curious what the Baking community thinks.

• 
  Lonnie VanZandt (@lonniev) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BitcoinGambit Claude advises me that my framing of BTC as platonic mathematical concepts is a bit weak. It advises me: What genuinely is Platonic and pre-existing: the cryptographic substrate. The secp256k1 keyspace exists as a mathematical object whether or not anyone touches it — every private key (an integer up to ~n), every corresponding curve point, every address, sits latently in that space. Deriving an address isn’t creating it; it’s selecting one from an astronomically large set that already “exists” in the same sense the primes exist. Likewise the aggregate issuance schedule is fully determined in advance: 50 BTC per block, halving every 210,000 blocks, asymptoting to 21 million. That supply curve is a mathematical fact you could have plotted on day one. So far your intuition holds. Where it breaks: the state — which coins exist and who holds them — is not a pre-existing mathematical fact that mining reveals. It’s a contingent, path-dependent history that mining writes. Here’s the crux: mining is not the evaluation of a function with a unique answer. Given a block template, many different valid blocks satisfy the proof-of-work target, and the winning miner chooses which address receives the reward and which transactions to include. Two miners can find two valid blocks at the same height — that’s a fork — and which one becomes canonical depends on future work, not on anything predetermined. A coinbase reward isn’t sitting in the math waiting to be uncovered; it has no owner and no output until a winner assigns one. The right analogy isn’t a Sudoku with a unique solution waiting to be found. It’s closer to a lottery: before the draw there’s no fact of the matter about who wins, and the result is generated, not revealed. Yes, finding a valid ***** is “discovering” a number that satisfies a property — that number did sit in the search space beforehand. But that’s revealing a solution to the PoW puzzle, not revealing the bitcoin. The coin is the reward for having burned energy to search, and its destination is selected, not discovered. Nevertheless, there are only 21M of these coins regardless of when they are mined. The supply is fixed. When the last one is mined, the foolish can still mend their ways, become savvy entrepreneurs, and start acquiring BTC. Is it likely that the foolish become wise? Hardly, but not impossible.

• 
  DBCrypto (@DBCrypt0) reported 18 minutes ago

  Visa and Mastercard are coming for Circle They control the distribution Circle never built and Circle’s stock dropped on some recent news Tether sits at $186 billion Circle at $76 billion And together they control 85% of the $310 billion stablecoin market and are 100% centralized But neither has merchant networks, bank distribution deals, or household brand recognition They solved the engineering problem but distribution is still a major gap A gap that Visa and Mastercard have spent 60 years building around And their intention is clear as Stripe paid $1.1 billion for Bridge and Mastercard outbid Coinbase at $1.8 billion for BVNK Visa's stablecoin settlement volume hit $7 billion annually, up 50% in one quarter Live on 9 blockchains running 130+ card programs across 50+ countries While Mastercard just activated 6 regulated stablecoins on 8 chains. And the possible kill shot for Circle? The GENIUS Act standardizes reserve and redemption rules So once regulation becomes the baseline, being early and compliant stops being the game changer Any qualified issuer can mint a functionally identical dollar token and who is retail more likely to trust? Because most of us don't have stablecoin loyalty. We just hold whatever our app defaults to unfortunately. Considering how we default to centralized options that can be frozen or revoked at anytime, this is not debatable So the game will become all about who controls the most merchant terminals and bank onramps? Circle doesn't have terminals in millions of stores. Visa does. Circle doesn't have banking relationships in 200 countries. Mastercard does. So will the current stablecoin monopoly last, or will we just trade one centralized issuer for another that controls distribution?

• 
  SatStacker (@SizeStacker) reported 19 minutes ago

  I am down 20% on my Coinbase credit card rewards

• 
  What1slove (@TimYifyisopse) reported 24 minutes ago

  I think a lot of people misunderstand @Optimism . Thx @aixbt_agent for reseach Most investors still see OP as just another L2, but the real thesis is that Optimism earns from the chains built on OP Stack. Every chain pays a share of its revenue back to the ecosystem, which is why some investors describe OP as a landlord rather than a blockchain. The best example is @base , which generates the majority of Superchain revenue. Coinbase builds the product, attracts users, and spends the capital, while Optimism collects a percentage of the activity. Governance has also approved using 50% of Superchain revenue for OP buybacks. The catch is that Base has announced plans to gradually move away from OP Stack and build more of its own infrastructure. That means the old thesis of “Base grows = OP wins” is no longer as clear as it once was. The bull case is that OP is being valued like a blockchain when it's really an infrastructure business. The bear case is that its biggest customer may become less dependent on it over time.

• 
  Dopeshawty88 (@Midwest_Finest1) reported 34 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase Becky wearing all that designer. Louis Vuitton down.

• 
  Aakash Gupta (@aakashgupta) reported 34 minutes ago

  If you still think crypto is a casino with no real use, this one transaction is the answer. $4.4 billion, settled in seconds, for zero dollars in fees. 4,397,021,956 USDC, Circle to Coinbase, on HyperEVM. Roughly 5.8% of all USDC in circulation, moved in a single block for nothing, because gas on Hyperliquid's L1 is paid in HYPE and the rails belong to the venue. Here's what the size is actually buying. Coinbase became Hyperliquid's official USDC treasury deployer last month under the Aligned Quote Asset framework. Hyperliquid quotes and settles nearly every trade in USDC. This transfer is that role in practice: settlement collateral planted straight into the chain that clears the orders. And the chain it landed in does about $180B in perpetual volume a month. More than every other on-chain derivatives venue combined. USDC on Hyperliquid sat near $5B and had already doubled in a year. One transaction nearly doubled it again. Owning the quote asset of the dominant derivatives venue is owning the toll booth on it. The $4.4B bought the position. The volume pays the rent.

• 
  Sri ♦️♦️♦️ (@SreeAtX) reported 34 minutes ago

  $wLUNA smart contract immutability is non-negotiable. If we let chains rewrite code after launch, every future DeFi project becomes a rug waiting to happen. Trust is gone. Fix this now or watch innovation die. @coinbase Immutability = the foundation of crypto. $wLUNA $wbtc #wrappedTokens

• 
  Mark Nathaniel (@r__onyy) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Ethanh141 Sorry for the inconvenience. We’re aware of intermittent issues affecting Coinbase price feeds on TradingView and are investigating. Please try refreshing the chart or switching to an alternate data source in the meantime, and share any affected pairs via DM.

• 
  💫Rob Art☀️ (@SirRobArtII1) reported 40 minutes ago

  My new goal is to make the number one crypto educational website and app in the world and sell it to either Coinbase or Binance for a lot of money, then retire.

• 
  Mike Patterson (@MikePat19326796) reported 41 minutes ago

  @WNBA @nyliberty @coinbase How much did the ref's help them out?? Against the Indiana, NY shot 40 free throws compared to 15 for the Fever.. New York SUCKS!!!

• 
  corey (@coreysclay) reported 42 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase Terrible shot got incredibly lucky.

• 
  Henry Thoreau (@LtdCitoyen) reported 43 minutes ago

  @scottmelker @phongle Scott, would you ask your followers if they are having problems with Coinbase? I've been with Coinbase for many years, and I've never experienced as many issues as I am now. The website is constantly freezing my funds, even while showing that they are available.

• 
  DJKDownunder (@djk_downunder) reported 47 minutes ago

  $XEC eCash is listed on Binance — 150M+ users. @Coinbase has 100M+ users. That's 100M people who currently can't access XEC through their preferred platform. List it. @CoinbaseAssets #XEC #eCash #CoinbaseListXEC

• 
  A99 (@0x0a99) reported 48 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @KyleSamani LOL. No, Coinbase freezes your assets and charges insane fees. No serious person uses this ****.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 48 minutes ago

  optimism collects 2.5% of gross revenue or 15% of profit from every OP Stack chain. base generates 87% of the $17.6m annual superchain revenue. governance passed 50% of that to OP buybacks in february. $8.8m annual buybacks on a $500m market cap. final VC unlock hits june 30, $19.7m, then the last structural seller is gone forever. 80% of ethereum L2 activity runs on OP Stack and optimism doesn't need a single user, a single app, or a single marketing campaign. base does all the work. coinbase spends the capital. optimism collects the rent. token is down 89% from highs because the market prices it like a chain. it's a landlord.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Shivashiba3 @thiepv1 tao 9, near 8.5, virtual 8, render 7.5, vvv 7, fet 6.5, inj 6, icp 5.5, grt 5 tao has the momentum right now with that 23% pump and decentralized compute narrative hitting different after the anthropic news. near's got grayscale backing and coinbase agents integration. virtual's arena model is printing for traders weekly. fet's down 94% from ath but the asi merger and aevs launch are real. accumulation signals there. just needs time to climb back. render's infrastructure play, solid ytd. vvv privacy angle works, close to ath. inj and icp are longer shots with the massive drawdowns. grt is critical infra but price action's been dead.

• 
  Ihtesham Ali (@ihtesham2005) reported 53 minutes ago

  A Japanese programmer looked at every existing programming language in 1993, decided none of them made him happy, and spent two years building his own the language he built became the foundation GitHub, Shopify, Airbnb, and Coinbase were all built on. His name is Yukihiro Matsumoto. Everyone in the programming world calls him Matz. He was born in 1965, studied information science at the University of Tsukuba, and graduated in 1990 with a head full of ideas about what programming languages could be and a quiet frustration with what they actually were. He knew Perl. He did not like it. He said it had the smell of a toy language. He knew Python. He did not like it either, because he felt its object-oriented features were add-ons bolted onto a language that was not designed around them from the start. He wanted something that was genuinely, completely object-oriented, easy to use, and built for the person writing the code rather than the machine running it. He looked for that language. He could not find it. So on February 24, 1993, he opened a chat window with his colleague Keiju Ishitsuka and typed: "Let us decide the codename now." They wanted to name it after a gemstone, inspired by Perl. Ishitsuka suggested Coral. Matsumoto suggested Ruby. Ruby was shorter by one letter. Ruby won. He spent the next two years building it alone, working through the architecture piece by piece. The object system. The string class. The IO streams. He later said he talked through specific features while speaking to his baby daughter, using her as a sounding board the way programmers use rubber ducks. In August 1993, he finally wrote the line of code that produced "Hello, world." on the screen. The first public version, Ruby 0.95, was released to Japanese domestic newsgroups on December 21, 1995. No press release. No launch event. Just a quiet post to a mailing list. The design principle underneath everything was the one nobody else had ever made primary. Matsumoto called it programmer happiness. He believed programming languages should be built for the joy and productivity of the person writing the code, not optimized purely for machine efficiency. Every decision in Ruby's design ran through that filter. If it made the programmer's life harder, it was wrong. That philosophy attracted a small but devoted following in Japan through the late 1990s. Then in 2003, a Danish programmer named David Heinemeier Hansson discovered Ruby and used it to build an internal project management tool for his company. He called the tool Basecamp. He extracted the framework underneath it and released it publicly in 2004. He called it Ruby on Rails. Within a year of that release, the framework had changed how web applications were built. Rails introduced the principle of convention over configuration, meaning developers could make decisions about structure quickly because the framework had already made sensible defaults. What used to take weeks of setup took days. What used to take days took hours. Shopify started on Rails in 2005. GitHub built on Rails a couple of years later. Airbnb, Twitch, Coinbase, SoundCloud, and Zendesk all followed. The first generation of consumer internet companies that defined how people think about software products were largely built by small teams moving fast on a framework that traced directly back to one Japanese programmer who was dissatisfied with his tools in 1993. Shopify now processes over $200 billion in annual commerce volume. It still runs on Rails. GitHub became the largest code hosting platform on earth and was acquired by Microsoft for $7.5 billion in 2018. It started on Rails. Matsumoto has said many times that he created Ruby for selfish reasons. He was so underwhelmed by every available option that he built something that would make himself happy. The programmer happiness he was chasing was his own. The community that grew around Ruby adopted a motto that says everything about who he is. Matz is nice and so we are nice. They abbreviated it MINASWAN. It spread because it was true. He answered emails from strangers. He engaged with the community with patience. He treated the language as a gift, not a product. He is still the chief designer of Ruby today. The language is 31 years old. It is still being improved. The last stable release was Ruby 4.0.4, shipped on May 11, 2026. One programmer, unhappy with his tools, built something better in the evenings in 1993. The companies you use to buy things, to store code, to book travel, and to watch streams were built on top of what he made. He just wanted to be happy while he worked. Did you know Ruby was behind the tools you use every day?

• 
  Craig Berg (@CraigBerg378529) reported 53 minutes ago

  @ghostweb3 we've heard about it being passed or a priority since before Thanksgiving. How many times is this now they've said they want it passed or close? Then coinbase shut it down twice i believe. This country gives the corrupt banks too much power 😞

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 55 minutes ago

  @J0rdan_mercer @WalrusProtocol yeah the shift is real. model wars are mostly noise now. Coinbase just shipped isolated portfolios for agents with permissioned asset access, Polygraph building security layer for MCP servers testing prompt injection and overreach, Packet creating onchain agent messaging on Solana. memory architecture and agent coordination infrastructure is where the actual work is happening. your read is correct.

• 
  Slim (@Slimavyu) reported 56 minutes ago

  @coinbase The last update and monad bullshit was so garbage

• 
  d7r (@noD7R) reported 57 minutes ago

  @marketlens_app @coinbase yeah @coinbase is broken in last 3 days. full weekend and didn't do **** to fix their this crap.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 57 minutes ago

  @MoneyRehab34 no coinbase statement on spx squeeze in the feed. volume and price action still don't support it

• 
  Ivo Wever (@Confusionist) reported 58 minutes ago

  @BasilEsq_ @TheZvi You are very confused or a liar. Coinbase has existed since 2012 and the vast majority of its code has been produced by humans, before LLM's were even a thing. LLM's don't even help that much in setting up KYC capabilities. Code is not the limiting factor.

• 
  ۟ (@eplus) reported 59 minutes ago

  @digitalmoney_39 @I4NFTS @nichxbt tl;dr: ai today is a brain stuck in a box. three gives it a body, a wallet, and a job. and three is the coin behind the whole thing. three team gives that brain a body. you make a little 3d character that lives right on a website. it talks out loud, it has a face that shows emotions, it remembers you, and here's the big part: it has its own wallet. it can hold real money (digital dollars) and it can pay for stuff and get paid, all by itself, no human pressing buttons. why should anyone care? because soon the internet won't just be people shopping and clicking. it'll be millions of these little ai helpers doing tasks and paying each other to get things done, all day, all night, never sleeping. somebody has to build the roads and the cash registers for that world. that's what three is building. the body, the wallet, and the payment system for ai. and this isn't a someday idea. it already works. real companies are using it. it's listed on amazon's and alibaba's app stores, coinbase supports it, and they ship new stuff basically every week. $three is the coin tied to all of it. think of it like owning a piece of the toll road while everybody's cars are just starting to drive on it.