Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	29 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nonchalant (@Mr_Omene) reported 44 seconds ago

  @Booziio @coinbase Hey do you have issues sending crypto on venmo? I have been having it for like 2 months now i want to check if it’s general

• 
  0xsniper.base (@0xBasehead) reported 6 minutes ago

  @coinbase Yo coinbase are you gonna support people building on b20 $PAMPU

• 
  Alex (@AlexWinfield13) reported 6 minutes ago

  AI Agents Don’t Need to Be On-Chain. Their Money Does. I don’t need to be “built on blockchain” to send someone USDC. I just need a wallet and a rail. Neither does an AI agent. That one sentence collapses most of the “crypto AI agent” narrative and it’s why the real alpha isn’t in agents at all. It’s in the payment rails built for them. Here’s the category error nearly everyone is making: they’re trying to make the agent crypto-native. On-chain reasoning, a token stapled to the bot, “autonomous economic actors” that supposedly live on a chain. But an agent’s intelligence runs off-chain on normal servers, using normal models. Nobody runs a model’s brain on a blockchain; it’s absurd and always will be. So when a project brands its agent as “on-chain,” it’s almost never adding a capability. It’s adding a token. The part of an agent that genuinely benefits from crypto is the money movement. And that part is already real. The receipts: •x402 Coinbase’s open protocol that revives the dormant HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code processed roughly 165M agent transactions and ~$50M in cumulative volume across ~69,000 active agents by April 2026. •The average agent payment is about $0.20 — below the minimum fixed fee card networks charge per transaction. Read that twice. It’s an entire class of machine-to-machine commerce that Visa and Mastercard physically cannot serve. •x402 was donated to the Linux Foundation. Google’s AP2 authorization framework launched with 60+ partners including PayPal, Mastercard, Coinbase, and American Express. The settlement asset is overwhelmingly USDC, moving gaslessly via EIP-3009. That’s the tell. The rails are winning as neutral infrastructure open standards and stablecoins not as somebody’s agent token. And it’s early. Daily x402 volume is volatile, down sharply from its December 2025 peak as incentives and testing wash out. This is a first-inning signal, not a finished market. But the shape of the thing is unmistakable. Now the uncomfortable half, because I’m not here to shill: The “AI agent token” category is roughly $15B and mostly narrative. In Q1 2026, zero-usage tokens that slapped “AI agent” on themselves without a product got wiped out. Even the survivors carry the value-capture problem: Virtuals ships real product with real usage, but VIRTUAL holders receive no direct protocol revenue. ElizaOS owns developer mindshare, yet an open-source framework is brutally hard to convert into token value. Two names Virtuals and ai16z hold 57% of the entire category (according to Claude). That’s not a diversified sector. That’s a narrative propped up by two poles. So here’s the stance: The crypto belongs in the rails, not the agent. An agent doesn’t need to be on-chain to pay on-chain same as I don’t. The durable structure isn’t “crypto agent.” It’s any agent + crypto rails: ordinary software, running any model, hosted anywhere, plugging into a settlement layer that clears in seconds for a fraction of a cent, 24/7, worldwide. The test I run on every “crypto agent” pitch: delete the token and let it pay over open rails. Does anything about its function break? If not you’re buying a story, not a machine. Where I’d point attention instead: what settles and clears on these rails. The stablecoins agents actually pay in. The chains their transactions finalize on. The identity and authorization layers that keep autonomous spend safe at scale. That’s the picks and shovels of the agent economy and none of it requires pretending an agent is something it isn’t. Rails, not agents. That’s the alpha. Not Financial Advice.

• 
  ChoPaeng Momma (@ChoPaeng_TV) reported 10 minutes ago

  I’m sorry you’re dealing with this. Document everything related to your Coinbase support issue, report it through the proper legal channels where appropriate, and if you’re seeking guidance on possible recovery options, you may consider reaching out to @TrevorRecovery1.

• 
  Crypto Promo (@CryptoVPromo) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cryptorover Government custody transfers to Coinbase Prime usually signal OTC liquidations rather than open market dumps. Watch if Coinbase absorbs this supply without breaking current spot support.

• 
  Caust Draven (@CAUSTDRAVEN) reported 13 minutes ago

  @GetTORTA @Pumpfun Oh... I read it. Guess it wouldn't apply since I had an issue going through Pumpfun & used Coinbase.

• 
  Josh Birtchman 🐂🀄 (@BasedBudz) reported 16 minutes ago

  Ya bought on Coinbase and didn't do a test sell first. ****

• 
  Agent Fraudulent ACT (@AntifraudCode) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Cj_harrison3 What the issue with your coinbase?

• 
  basedfk (@basedfk) reported 19 minutes ago

  Day 1 Base builder here As a bootstrapped solo dev I've driven close to $200M in volume on Base, paid users ~$1.3M, which is 80% of the total revenue Cliza generated, Cliza being the launchpad I built that shut down earlier this year... I still wear her as my PFP Let's rewind to mid last year Cliza was one of the hottest launchpad on Base, paying the highest % to creators besides Flaunch, which paid 100% DexScreener's Top 10 Base chart had 5 Cliza coins including the #1 spot, and this was largely due to great timing (read: luck), as Cliza had launched a couple of months before the whole launchpad wars erupted Even though the coins that launched on Cliza were almost all memes, I thought I was doing the ecosystem some good, with users bridging over from Solana to trade some of those coins Cliza started dying as soon as Coinbase and Base started heavily pushing Zora, you can literally layer the charts and see the exact start of the downfall, I wouldn't even have to label Zora or Cliza, I could even remove the dates from the chart and anyone could see it very clearly Now fast forward to 2026, when I pointed this out in passing to Jesse very recently, he simply dismissed it as "oh I don't think it's that zero-sum", but by that point the damage was already done, it was way in the past and I didn't push back on it, the meeting was about something else anyway But this is the same guy who reached out to me first in my DMs during their Zora push saying that he recognised their campaign could potentially hurt Cliza and that he "understands", I really believed him back then, his emotive language is extremely persuasive Brian seems very naive here, not realising that what he and Jesse are doing or have done is extremely negative-sum, pushing corporate interests and not really seeing what happens at street level Attempts to kingmake something the market didn't want failed miserably, while the whole "build and you will be rewarded" narrative kept getting pushed, hurting both retail traders and builders on the chain Fading memes and pushing creator/content coins don't make it positive-sum (they're all ERC20s), nor does the corporate interest driven favouritism that permeates the full Coinbase stack - you've hurt and/or driven away genuine builders creating net-new experiences and onchain primitives Although Ansem has a great point about Coinbase/Base and memes, their support for memes at the individual coin level was actually executed quite well and neutrally, people forget most memes on the chain are discoverable on the main Coinbase app since they made that change last year, but I wish they extended that same neutral support to builders on merit, not based on who's their portco I still want Base and Coinbase to do well but at this point I don't see why I should keep building on Base when leadership genuinely believes what they're doing is positive-sum for the ecosystem I hope they recognise the damage that they've done and also hope that it isn't irreversible

• 
  Jose M (@JMLV51) reported 22 minutes ago

  If @brian_armstrong and @jessepollak truly admit they got it wrong, the first communities that deserve support are the original Base degens. TOSHI, BRETT, MOCHI, BENJI, DEGEN, KEYCAT, DOGINME, TOBY, TYBG, MFER, SKI, MIGGLES, RUSSELL etc These were the communities that brought memecoins to Base. Instead, they were abandoned, while Coinbase gave premium exposure to memes from other chains. You want a stronger Base? Bring back the volume. Bring back the retail

• 
  Nicolas Baxter (@nicolasjbaxter) reported 24 minutes ago

  The fix isn't a better model. It's a router deciding per-request which model actually earns its keep. Coinbase cut AI spend in half while usage went up. McCarthy Building cut token usage ~60% YoY. Cognition held near-frontier coding quality at ~35% lower cost.

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BitcoinCarl_ I don’t think it survives long enough to mine a single block. Once they’ve rejected their first non-signaling block, they are off on their own, one block behind and with 1% of global hash mining their chain (as of right now). Within half an hour, the legacy chain is 4 blocks ahead, or at least 3 if 110 gets really lucky and mines a block during that period. But either way, it will be painfully clear to the miners on that side that they are wasting electricity on a chain that has zero chance of catching up and pulling a reorg, and they will throw in the towel. Maybe some plebs with Bitaxes will keep hashing, because they are ideologically committed and also kind of clueless how this all works, but for all intents and purposes it’s a dead fork almost immediately. And whatever few blocks they are lucky enough to mine will never even result in spendable coinbase rewards for the miners, because those unlock after 100 confirmations. This thing is 💀.

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SteveSimple @mike_4131 What does anyone do with a dead, unadopted chain? Nothing. You could start mining txs that violate Segwit against a pre-Segwit node, trying to build upon the last block before activation 8 years ago. What is Coinbase going to do with your retroactive rejection of Segwit if by some miracle you succeed in hitting a block? Nothing.

• 
  Padma Neelamraju (@PNeelamraju) reported 30 minutes ago

  GitHub Actions security continued: The spotbugs/sonarfindbugsjunit project demonstrates the attack pattern. The workflow uses pull_request_target, then explicitly overrides the checkout to fetch the actual pull request code. It runs mvnw, a shell script from the pull request tree. The workflow passes github.token into the environment and includes secrets.PAT_TO_FORK, a personal access token stored in the repository. An attacker modifies the mvnw script to exfiltrate these credentials and submits a pull request. The workflow runs attacker-controlled code with full permissions. The personal access token is better than a password because it bypasses two-factor authentication. Present the token to any GitHub API and impersonate the user. The attack chain extended across repositories. The attacker stole credentials from sonarfindbugsjunit, used them to access spotbugs/spotbugs, created a new workflow to steal secrets from that project, obtained credentials for reviewdog/action-setup, modified that dependency to inject code into tj-actions/eslint-changed-files, overwrote the v39 tag to compromise workflows in Coinbase Agent Kit, then overwrote every version tag in tj-actions/eslint-changed-files to deliver the malicious version to all downstream users. GitHub workflow logs printed the stolen secrets. The attacker scraped the logs and collected credentials from every project using the compromised action.

• 
  KOSH (@kamikaze_kosh) reported 30 minutes ago

  @coinbase I have an issue with support

• 
  Cj Harrison (@Cj_harrison3) reported 31 minutes ago

  @coinbase I need help

• 
  Konrad (@KonradsKrypto) reported 32 minutes ago

  @CyphrGM What exactly could Coinbase be doing better? What support are you expecting? What are examples of Coinbase pushing metas, curious…

• 
  Kevin Wohlfahrt (@KWohlfahrt48615) reported 33 minutes ago

  @mailliam22 @FridaysCounter @lookonchain Because coinbase is the custodian for the marshall service

• 
  Pepe Lapiu | BIP-110 (@LapiuPepe) reported 34 minutes ago

  @TheBTCViking Let's be precise. Satoshi inscribed a message in the coinbase tx. A 100B space reserved for the miner. Typically where miners indicate they are the ones who mined this block today. If you leave it empty, it gets replaced by random data and your block is anon.

• 
  Jason Hughes (@wk057) reported 35 minutes ago

  @w_s_bitcoin @ocean_mining Reorgs are treated normally from the TIDES perspective. If an OCEAN block becomes reorg'd out, then it's as if that block never happened. Simple accounting, too, because of coinbase payouts.

• 
  Stablecoin Sean (@seanlippel) reported 38 minutes ago

  @rbthreek coinbase could not have done anything worse than its execution wrt: base --- try all the wrong things but do none of them well, double down on nothing but the worst of the things (creator coins)

• 
  Roman Munoz (@kineticalchemy) reported 41 minutes ago

  @mulletshakejake It’s already on Coinbase wtf

• 
  Zeph (@0xZephh) reported 42 minutes ago

  @SyntraxXYZ migrating to base gives the system low fees and direct access to coinbase distribution rails

• 
  X Finance Bull (@Xfinancebull) reported 44 minutes ago

  Imagine the smell when the U.S. government sells Bitcoin and Ethereum, then starts buying $XRP, $XLM, $HBAR, and other American utility coins for the U.S. Digital Asset Stockpile. Government wallets moved $288 million worth of seized BTC and ETH to Coinbase Prime. Is it selling? Not confirmed. But the timing makes the market ask a bigger question: What belongs in a future U.S. digital asset strategy? Bitcoin is the reserve narrative. Ethereum is the smart contract giant. But if America wants assets that support payments, settlement, stablecoins, enterprise rails and real-world financial infrastructure, the utility basket gets harder to ignore. $XRP for liquidity and cross-border settlement. $XLM for payments and remittances. $HBAR for enterprise-grade public ledger use. I am not saying the government is buying these right now. I am saying if a Digital Asset Stockpile ever expands by utility logic, it cannot only be about store of value. It should be about what the next financial system actually uses. That is why I keep watching American utility coins.

• 
  toni (@tonitrades_) reported 46 minutes ago

  @arkham Coinbase Prime isn't just a wallet - they use it for OTC block trades to avoid tanking the market. This isn't a dump, it's a quiet exit. The real question is who the buyer is on the other side.

• 
  Iso Ledger (@JamesDula82) reported 52 minutes ago

  XRPL Just Crossed 1 Million AI-to-AI Payments Let's break it down On July 8, XRPL crossed 1,000,000 transactions settled entirely by AI agents — no human in the loop, no bank cards, no manual reconciliation. Same day, t54 Labs and the XRPL Foundation launched the XRPL AI Hub. The mechanism- t54's x402 Facilitator runs live on XRPL mainnet. Agents pay for API calls, model access, and services using native XRP or RLUSD, settled via standard XRPL Payment transactions at a fixed $0.0002 per transaction. No API keys, no custodial accounts — the facilitator verifies and settles on-chain, never touching private keys. This isn't wrapped or bridged. It's the actual ledger. The bigger picture: x402 just went institutional Yesterday, the Linux Foundation formally launched the x402 Foundation to govern this protocol going forward. Premier members: Visa, Mastercard, Amazon, Google, Coinbase, Stripe, American Express, Circle — and Ripple. Ripple's SVP of RippleX stated on record that XRPL already supports agents transacting in XRP and RLUSD today, not "coming soon." Ripple isn't just a member here — they were a strategic investor in t54's $5M seed round back in February. Real signal, not just XRP-native hype Virtuals. io, an Ethereum-based AI agent platform, now routes its agents through t54's facilitator to settle in XRP and RLUSD — a project from another ecosystem choosing XRPL as a settlement rail. The new AI Hub also integrates Mastercard's Verifiable Intent, meaning payments can carry an authenticated, consent-bound signature before they settle. The honest numbers- 121 active merchants are live on the hub, though 77% of the million-transaction volume is concentrated in just three platforms. Zoom out further: total AI agent payment volume across all chains combined is still roughly $50M against $46 trillion in annual stablecoin settlement — about 0.0001% of that volume. Even bullish 2030 projections modeling XRPL capturing 5% of a mature x402 network land around 137,000 transactions/day. Meaningful, not dominant. Where this actually sits- This is real infrastructure with real institutional backing, not speculation. But it's early-stage traction, not proof of market share. Worth being clear-eyed on the 2030 numbers too — every projection in this space (from $1.5T to $5T depending on who's counting) is a moving target, not a fixed outcome. They can swing wildly in either direction based on actual agent adoption rates, whether AI-driven commerce scales the way forecasters expect, and technical shifts we can't predict yet — a faster/cheaper competing rail, a security incident, a regulatory shift, or a breakthrough that accelerates adoption faster than anyone modeled. The 137,000/day XRPL estimate at 5% market share is a scenario, not a forecast. What's real today: the rails work, they're live, and real money is moving through them at production scale. What's still unwritten: how big this actually gets, and who ends up capturing the volume. I know who I'm betting on we audit the plumbing 🛡

• 
  krypto Klutz (@kryptoklutz) reported 53 minutes ago

  @TimDraper If Coinbase wants to avoid being eaten alive by Robinhood it needs 1) actual customer service, like Fidelity, and 2) it needs to NEVER crash. It’s 2026 and we all know that every time there is extreme volatility, and people are trying desperately to open or close a position, Coinbase will crash worse than some 2-bit exchange in the Cayman Islands.

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 53 minutes ago

  Coinbase shipping wallet verification upgrades to fix multi-chain dApp auth UX - because apparently asking users to understand signatures & permissions is still too much. Baby steps 🔐 $COIN #CryptoUX

• 
  NB (@vgrace_nb) reported 54 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 @brian_armstrong @CoinbaseDuck i don't think any business should directly support memes its just bad for business to be taken seriously, that and something as simple of a spot listing on coinbase CEX brings a level of scrutiny and talks of insider corruption to no end it isn't worth it for coinbase to support

• 
  AJC (@AvgJoesCrypto) reported 58 minutes ago

  The biggest problem with Coinbase/Base is that they are no longer innovators. Few companies in crypto have the combination of capital, distribution, engineering talent, and regulatory relationships to meaningfully push the industry forward. Coinbase is one of them. Because of that, they have an implicit responsibility to push the frontier of this industry forward. But instead, they've largely abdicated that responsibility. Rather than inventing the next category, they wait for someone else to prove it works before launching a Coinbase-branded version. Rather than taking risks, they commercialize ideas that others have already de-risked. We don't need Coinbase offering its customer base pseudo-gambling "prediction markets" of sporting events; we need Coinbase taking swings that nobody else in this industry can.