Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	1 month ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  rb3k (@rbthreek) reported 1 minute ago

  Don’t need this top down approach anymore. Defining @base culture is a failed experiment that led to handpicking winners, holier than thou attitude and left many not employed by Coinbase broke and burned. Also it’s cringe. Let “culture” form on its own, let users take the lead

• 
  tag (@TGruber83765) reported 3 minutes ago

  @coinbase @caseysgenstore I mean it doesn't solve rhe overall issue of the debasement of the dollar since 1941, but I truly believe we WILL see the solution come from crypto, and AI. I have to have hope.

• 
  Mo | thebitcoinway.com (@Mtobwh) reported 4 minutes ago

  The price of Bitcoin pumping doesn't matter to me. I stay focused on the mission: making sure my clients become sovereign individuals. The fiat garbage next to it is a distraction. Don't get distracted. Remember, they brought in the Travel Rule in Australia during a bear market. AI, is telling people now on Coinbase whether they can withdraw it or not. So what happens when Bitcoin hits another ATH? Will you be in self custody?

• 
  80 (@80IQConviction) reported 6 minutes ago

  @MillerC0le If NAV goes up, our leverage % (from the coinbase facility) goes down. Thats more meaningful to me than net bitcoin per share and a better indicator to the average investor re the health of the balance sheet and company overall imo

• 
  Shruti Gandhi / Array VC preseed rounds (@atShruti) reported 9 minutes ago

  A hacker is out for me with a vendetta. He’s gotten into my email, sends password reset attempts every day, sends phishing emails from the actual domains they’re impersonating (see this Coinbase one). He’s not even hiding anymore just waiting for me to screw up. And I have every advanced security protection turned on. Which is why products like Instinct are both incredibly exciting and terrifying. AI that can act autonomously is powerful. But I’m not sure I’m ready to give it access & let it loose. The future fascinating and terrifying at the same time.

• 
  0xnewmen (@pt0an209406) reported 9 minutes ago

  Look at Basecat. Even though Coinbase has repeatedly hinted at it and eventually listed it, its market cap has hovered around $30M. Cate reached $90M without any support . It's clear that Coinbase's backing is no weaker; the simple reason is that Basecat is an organically

• 
  Kaiz 🐂🀄️ (@Kaiz_294) reported 23 minutes ago

  Robinhood already has the audience Ansem views Robinhood's existing user base as the key variable behind the chain's potential. "If they figure out a way for the Robinhood app users to be more active on the Robinhood chain..." "They have like the same amount of user base and they're also degens." "The Robinhood people made a ton of money on Dogecoin." Coinbase had a massive distribution advantage through its main app, yet Base required a separate effort to turn that audience into active onchain users. Robinhood starts with a user base already familiar with trading and speculation. Its retail audience also experienced one of crypto's biggest meme cycles through Dogecoin, creating an existing connection between the platform and onchain style trading. If Robinhood can convert that existing trading behavior into activity on its own chain, the network could gain a powerful distribution advantage from day one. The chain already has access to the audience. The real opportunity is turning that audience into onchain users. w/ @blknoiz06

• 
  Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported 25 minutes ago

  Are you seeing an error when trying to purchase XRP on Uphold, and is Coinbase blocking the XRP transfer at the send/withdrawal step or showing a specific message?

• 
  Dear Bitcoiner ⚡️ (@DearBitcoiner) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Ski_CTO buying more ski and hoping @cobie help us for a coinbase listing

• 
  Vantekai (@Vantekai_) reported 26 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr @coinbase @grok But gow can it be used ans hence be of value ? Nothing agent, grok or person can access and do anything with the funds ?

• 
  f(apri) (@aprisobal) reported 30 minutes ago

  Coinbase added $BASECAT to its asset listing roadmap on Aug 21. Expected trading start: August 24 (with DRB), subject to market-making support and technical infrastructure. A separate announcement will confirm when trading opens. TLDR - TO DA MOON! xD

• 
  Mike Griff (@MikeGriff11) reported 34 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Id worry less about the font and maybe drop the intrusive full screen ads you guys run just before Im about to tap on something in my account Id rank the app work like this: 1. Build trust about Coinbase support 2. Stop the full screen ads … 1003. Spend a few minutes on fonts

• 
  slaaaaaay 🦄💨✨ (@slaaaaaay496916) reported 34 minutes ago

  @coinbase funfact: if coinbase doesnt freeze your account if the app is working if they dont have any more internal hacks

• 
  Leader Alpha (@LeaderAlphaNews) reported 34 minutes ago

  How fast should a new token reach a retail app? Coinbase says its Launches tab can surface Base and Solana assets moments after they appear onchain. Faster access is useful; faster due diligence would be even better.

• 
  Aibra (@aibra) reported 35 minutes ago

  @DCinvestor @pravijn @brian_armstrong I too was a long term fan and customer. Wanted to be onboarded as an enterprise customer and this is what happened. I literally want to take x402 payments for data related to the TCG market and got denied... traditional rails like Stripe and Mercury had no issues approving me. Thankfully got approved by MoonPay and Coinbase literally lost me forever

• 
  Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reported 40 minutes ago

  the SEC finally proposed its own crypto rulebook, and it contradicts the one congress was supposed to write. regulation crypto assets hit the federal register aug 21, comments due mid-october: a 5m USD startup exemption with no audited financials, a 75m USD-a-year fundraising tier, and a safe harbor that lets a token exit securities status once the issuer certifies its 'essential managerial efforts' have ceased. no resale restrictions, state blue-sky preempted, airdrops and staking distributions covered. read it against the clarity act: senate cloture vote sept 15, ~three working weeks of runway, and polymarket odds for 2026 passage down to ~16%. the frameworks collide — clarity uses a statutory decentralization test with a hard 20% ownership cap; the sec version is issuer self-certification. and this rule covers only offerings; trading, custody and exchange licensing are still unfinished. the cftc is the tell. chair selig told his new innovation advisory committee (cme, nasdaq, cboe, coinbase, uniswap in the room) that if clarity dies he'll build a 'crypto asset market' label on the dcm model under existing authority, plus developer-protection rules. three frameworks, one unresolved question: which tokens answer to the sec, which to the cftc. structural read: teams get a menu of contradictory on-ramps with different disclosure, resale and decentralization tests — and a clock. peirce, the safe harbor architect, leaves in november; if the rule isn't finalized on her votes, the exit path dies with the comment period. risk: a surprise senate passage in september turns the whole 'break glass' play into a footnote. watch sept 15 cloture and the oct 20 comment deadline — both land before the midterms.

• 
  Manuel (@Manuelfhtc) reported 41 minutes ago

  @doctorofLFLabs @LovelyLegends_ Friends, if it weren't for the BitMart exchange issue, LF would be listed on the top 5 exchanges like Binance, Kraken, Coinbase, Robinhood, etc. and would have reached $1. How lowly, despicable, and deceitful you LF managers are. Curse your father and mother, whatever you are, y

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 42 minutes ago

  Tokens on #Coinbase wallet are not found and as this co has no customer service no answer No check and balance about #Coinbase

• 
  Lauren Stern | Rep (@DesireePerzz) reported 43 minutes ago

  @rmgrady40 Could you provide the date of the unauthorized access, the approximate amount lost, and any case or support ticket number you received from Coinbase so the account compromise and verification issue can be properly investigated?

• 
  Shruti Gandhi / Array VC preseed rounds (@atShruti) reported 44 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport i called your support and reported the fraud and your support did nothing. Said file a legal police complaint. I took out all my crypto from coinbase and will never be your customer.

• 
  Margex (@Vadimme53293584) reported 45 minutes ago

  @MustStopMurad In a bull run, the marginal buyer isn't a crypto native. It's a normie. And normies don't care about lore. They will buy what they know and love. Especially when it's listed across big exchanges for easy access. Normies don't know what SPX6900's narrative is. They don't know what "flip the S&P 500" means. They've never heard of Murad. They open Coinbase, see a list of coins, and buy the one with a face they recognize. That's it. That's the entire decision tree for 90% of retail money in a bull market. I just wanted to hear your take on this or anyone who would like to comment and say something. btw, I'm EXTREMLY bullish on SPX6900 and have been a holder & dca'er for the past for almost 2 years now and never sold a single coin.

• 
  mmmatt (@mmmatt) reported 45 minutes ago

  so, if you've followed me for a while, you would know i have been perfecting my manipulative toxic flow for quite some time now. so much so, i recently got banned (and later unbanned) from coinbase. coinbase, on call with me, said i nearly brought down the entire exchange. when this happened, i told you guys, and uploaded a picture of the message reaffirming my ban, a message i received from support. anyways, i would like to share a small part of the story of how i discovered that it's possible to move $btc (and all crypto assets) with dust sized orders. if you think this is larp, stop reading here. when i was coding out one of my coinbase market making bots, i accidentally inverted the spread. when running, it was limit skipping- placing bids in the ask, and ask in the bids. i had no clue what was happening when i first started it w that bug, so i let it run a few minutes. it was mostly delta neutral flow. but what i observed on bitcoin, was; via slamming tape on both sides, buy and sell, volatility increased quite a bit on the short term. at the time, i didn't think i was influencing volatility. so i coded a test: i am going to send identical flow as the bugged limit skipping mm, but this time, with a delta. so i did that. limit skip flow, with a buy or sell delta. roughly 2 orders a second (my code was **** back then). turned it on, sell side. what happened next, blew my mind. bitcoin formed a parabola down for $1000 or so. a decent move. i triggered it OK, sick. so i can move price with flow. and this flow can have inventory management, so i never have to stop. what's next? perfecting it it's been a few years since this discovery. and i have experimented with all sorts of flows, and ob techniques, to move price. and at that, since i had very little money, i had to make it work with sub $20 these days, you guys see my very orchestrated flow, and probably don't think much of it. but i have been perfecting the craft for better part of 2y now. what's happening to the market right now is no coincidence. i have been preparing to trigger another bull, as i did prior once before with the assistance of another buyer. moral of the story is. you typically find edge when you're not looking for it, or on accident. but from there, it is yourt job to craft it into the most perfected form of the original thing. hope u enjoyed :)

• 
  aginaut (@aginaut) reported 47 minutes ago

  AWS AgentCore Payments: The Rails Are Opening. The Junction Is Not Settled. On 18 August, AWS made an odd move for a platform widening its role in agent payments: it declined to choose a payment rail. AgentCore Payments moved from preview to general availability with MPP beside x402 and, according to AWS, one developer integration across both. AWS imposes no extra charge for its Payments APIs. Wallet providers still charge; Gateway, Policy and CloudWatch still meter usage. If AWS were competing primarily for the rail, supporting two rivals without an API fee would be a peculiar opening move. The mismatch deepens at the other side of the transaction: AWS WAF can already challenge an AI agent for an x402 payment through Coinbase before admitting it to content. MPP and Stripe support were still described as forthcoming. For an allocator, protocol adoption is therefore the wrong scoreboard. If the rail is becoming plural and inexpensive to integrate through AWS, which part of the transaction is AWS trying to make indispensable? The missing fee makes the bundle the live hypothesis AWS is not alone in making payment rails interchangeable. Cloudflare supports x402 and MPP. Visa and Mastercard are building protocol-agnostic or multi-rail agent-payment capabilities. The Linux Foundation’s x402 Foundation brings cloud, payment and technology companies into the same standards effort. This demonstrates protocol plurality and standards activity—not adoption or power. That may shift the source of scarcity. As payment syntax becomes easier to support, a potentially scarcer task is coordinating the records around it: identity, authority, counterparty, budget, policy, execution and evidence. AgentCore already places several of those functions near one another. Payments now sits beside identity, Gateway discovery, bounded sessions, Policy pathways and observability. WAF separately approaches seller admission. These are not one integrated marketplace, and AWS does not control the entire transaction. They do, however, give AWS an early option on the environment in which agentic economic action is governed. The Platform Envelopment hypothesis Thomas Eisenmann, Geoffrey Parker and Marshall Van Alstyne call this platform envelopment: a platform enters an adjacent market by bundling a new function that shares users and technical components with its existing services. The bundle changes the contest. A standalone payment service must now compete with payments embedded where agents are identified, authorised, routed and observed. That is the strategic possibility in AgentCore: protocol-agnostic support could let AWS coordinate several payment systems inside one governed environment while making its surrounding services more useful together. Yet bundling alone is not platform power. If users can bypass AgentCore, carry identity and evidence elsewhere, or multi-home without friction, this is integration—not durable envelopment. Follow the right, not just the payment An autonomous transaction rarely specifies every relevant contingency in advance. It still needs answers to ordinary institutional questions: Who approved the spend? Was the recipient valid? What was delivered? Which record proves it? Who can revoke authority or remedy failure? This is why payment begins to cluster with identity, policy, audit, reputation and recourse. The payment message moves value. The surrounding records make the action acceptable to the next institution. One diagnostic keeps the layers separate: RAIL → JUNCTION → RIGHT Rail: What became interchangeable? Junction: Which operating records must still be reconciled? Right: Whose record will the next institution accept? Today, those rights remain divided. The enterprise principal funds, mandates and revokes. Application code must validate the recipient. AgentCore can constrain amount and time, route through supported protocols and preserve operational evidence. Wallet providers sign. Merchants price and deliver. Financial networks and payment providers retain settlement, fraud and dispute functions. A payment proof therefore establishes neither satisfactory delivery nor a universal right to refund or remedy. Portable-record systems form a counter-architecture. AP2 under FIDO stewardship and W3C Verifiable Credentials target portable mandates or identity evidence. On Ethereum, draft ERC-8004 and ERC-8183—with Virtuals ACP implementing the latter direction—target identity, reputation, validation and escrow. This is documented standards and implementation activity, not evidence of broad adoption or transferred power. Open rails cut both ways Modularity is the counterforce to envelopment. Open interfaces can commoditise the rails beneath AWS, increasing the value of AgentCore. They can also commoditise AgentCore if customers can move their identities, mandates, policies, wallets, reputation and audit history intact. The practical test is not whether an interface is called open. It is whether substitution works: Can an enterprise multi-home cheaply? Can another cloud or network recognise the same mandate? Who controls schema changes, revocation and the evidence required after failure? Until those answers settle, AWS holds a candidate position—not the junction itself. Three futures from the same move The current evidence supports an option space rather than one forecast. 1. Managed-junction consolidation. If AgentCore Payments drives attachment to AWS identity, policy, discovery and observability—and operating state becomes expensive to move—value could concentrate around managed control planes and their security, compliance and monitoring complements. 2. Federated recognition. If portable mandates, credentials, reputation and escrow records gain acceptance across clouds, wallets and marketplaces, value could move towards cross-platform identity, verification, translation and assurance rather than one platform owner. 3. Institutional retention. If enterprise procurement and treasury continue to hold spending authority while Visa, Mastercard, Stripe and other financial actors retain acceptance, fraud, settlement and remedy, cloud payments would remain useful orchestration while the authoritative economic record stayed with enterprise and financial institutions. These futures can coexist. Low-value machine purchases may favour managed automation, while consequential enterprise actions remain institutionally governed. The receipts that decide the path Watch four things: Attachment: Does Payments increase use or retention across AgentCore? Recognition: Which counterparties accept the session, policy and audit records produced or held around AgentCore? Portability: Can those records move across clouds, wallets, networks and marketplaces without material loss? Economics and remedy: Where do switching costs, adjacent revenue, disputes and paid-but-no-service outcomes accumulate? Protocol adoption alone is not enough to underwrite power. At minimum, Payments must produce attachment plus either non-portable operating state or measurable adjacent economics. The allocator’s question is not which payment protocol wins. It is whose record the next institution accepts, whether that record can leave—and which future becomes investable as those answers emerge. AWS has taken an option on power. Power has not yet transferred. Notes & conceptual credits: Platform Envelopment follows Eisenmann, Parker and Van Alstyne. The supporting logic draws on transaction-cost and incomplete-contract research associated with Coase, Williamson and the Grossman–Hart–Moore tradition; the countercase draws on Baldwin and Clark’s modularity work and Ghazawneh and Henfridsson’s boundary-resource research. RAIL → JUNCTION → RIGHT and its application here are Aginaut syntheses. Product and standards claims remain bounded by the first-party materials available on 22 August 2026.

• 
  pabloxbt.base.eth (@pablo_xbt) reported 47 minutes ago

  There is going to be lots of scams this cycle. WTF is coinbase listing a $30m marketcap coin? Damn.

• 
  Big-D (@bighornguy) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Blackpink_Ox66 @justinsuntron If what u say is true. Then your are that good on breaking code down lets see what u can do with Coinbase wluna contract for the people

• 
  Not so Average Degen (@ecwelder) reported 53 minutes ago

  Support $amoeba research on coinbase @amoebachancoin Address: 4wXP83KvMNHBRqczkqwNfCgj7kuUqnYZ6TgnxrMWpump As the market cap increases, new agents are spawned. These agents work for Amoeba Chan—posting, making memes, replying, writing, creating videos, and helping the project spread.

• 
  stephane popovic (@veronicamontyy) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Joshyzuq Sorry you’re experiencing this. If you’re seeing “Wallet limit reached,” please contact Coinbase with the exact error message and your app version so we can investigate.

• 
  Sokio (@Sokio8D) reported 56 minutes ago

  no way coinbase btc perp has same volume as bybits wtf

• 
  TOM (@1sn4o) reported 56 minutes ago

  @cobie @itstheghost Be the S-tier Coinbase support that you are and just answer his question, ser

• 
  Dore Kiesselbach (@DKiesselba3847) reported 58 minutes ago

  @base **** you coinbase--you actually hate eth