Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	16 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	20 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AlphaOnChain (@alphaforchain) reported 4 minutes ago

  Coinbase just rolled out access to nearly 4,000 US stocks for UK users — 24/5 trading, zero commission. Same expansion playbook as Kraken's xStocks and Robinhood's international push. Every major crypto platform is racing to become a global brokerage, not just stay a crypto exchange. The "everything app" land grab just added another major market.

• 
  Tyler Cole (@SystematicT96) reported 5 minutes ago

  Coinbase holds over 950,000 BTC on their balance sheet. Let that **** sink in for a minute.

• 
  Michael Fischer (@Holden_Rye_) reported 6 minutes ago

  The Quantum Deadline Thesis If Bitcoin eventually needs quantum-resistant cryptography, vulnerable coins will need to be moved to new addresses/scripts. The exact technical response is still debated, so I’d soften the paper’s claim that every coin necessarily must move in exactly one particular way. But the larger point is strong: Institutions can coordinate migrations much more easily than millions of individual Bitcoiners. Imagine Coinbase or another major custodian controls coins for 5 million customers. They don’t need 5 million people to understand quantum cryptography and individually secure their BTC. The custodian can upgrade its infrastructure and migrate huge amounts of BTC systematically. Native Bitcoin is different. You’ve got people with hardware wallets. Paper backups. Old wallets. Forgotten coins. Dead owners. Inheritance problems. People who haven’t touched Bitcoin in 15 years. So when a major security migration eventually becomes necessary: Custodial Bitcoin can move like an army. Self-custodied Bitcoin has to move like millions of civilians. That’s the asymmetry you’re pointing at. And there’s a nasty consequence: if vulnerable native coins fail to migrate while institutional coins do, the percentage of surviving accessible Bitcoin controlled through institutions could increase without institutions buying another satoshi.

• 
  OneFactor (@onefactormeme) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ashrobin the problem is that these big cos (like coinbase) have legal teams telling them they can't do 4, 5 and 6.

• 
  Brukes 🟥 (@breu73) reported 7 minutes ago

  @ChadSteingraber • @XRP_Alerts claims Goldman Sachs is fully operational on the XRP Ledger for production use, not pilots, signaling accelerating institutional adoption and a “filling pipeline.” • No credible public evidence or official announcements support Goldman Sachs using XRPL directly; recent SEC 13F filings show the bank fully exited its $153.8M XRP ETF holdings in Q1 2026. • Replies to the post label it false or unverified, aligning with broader XRPL growth in RWAs and tokenization from other institutions, while Goldman shifted focus to crypto equities like Circle and Coinbase.

• 
  2poyDev (@2poyDev) reported 7 minutes ago

  A week ago I broke down what @TheIndexFi is actually building and what the comps are worth. Now I zoomed out further: I went to see what was happening inside the top chains right when their top runners were being born. Dug through Solana and Base, and it's the same two-act relay on both: the FDV bar always gets broken by a meme, but the meme is never who takes the height after. Act one, the runner. The meme breaks the psychology, because a meme doesn't have to justify its price with a product. $BONK was born on the ashes of FTX and on Dec 14, 2023 became the first Solana meme to break $1B. $BRETT took $1B in June and touched $2B on Dec 1, 2024. $CASHCAT plays this role on RH: a $229M bar on day 12 of trading, and a listing on @RobinhoodApp already on day 38. BONK waited 355 days for its exchange, BRETT made it to $2B with no Binance or Coinbase at all. Nobody ever got rails this fast. Act two, the meta ram. Once the bar is raised, the height goes to the protocol that rides the chain's main meta. Nobody built Base for AI agents: the meta flew in from outside, and Virtuals became its face on the chain. The token had been trading since December 2023 and spent the whole summer lying around at a $20-90M FDV. In October the team rolled out the agent launchpad, the same weeks GOAT set the AI-agent market on fire, and by November the meta arrived on Base in full force. By Jan 2 VIRTUAL was worth ~$4.6B: a 96x from October and more than double runner BRETT's bar. Now look at RH. And here's the difference: Base caught its meta by accident, RH was built around its meta from day one. Tokenized stocks are literally the point of Robinhood's chain. There's no shortage of launchpads here, but exactly one ticker is building for the main meta: $INDEX. The token already trades and costs pennies, $12M. And their treasury builder, the thing that pays holders dividends in actual stocks, went live days ago. Volumes are still a joke, but Virtuals' launchpad was empty in October too. The same setup: the product is already alive, the token isn't yet. Im holding $CASHCAT and $INDEX. The cat keeps ramming the chain's psychological FDV bar, and $INDEX can become the gainer that rams the tokenized-stocks meta the way $VIRTUAL once rammed the AI-agent meta. Any AI-agent meta veterans in the feed? Be honest does this look like October Virtuals or am I reaching?

• 
  SpiceXR 🍡 (@0xspicexr) reported 10 minutes ago

  Right but the thing is @RobinhoodApp had 24M+ users before they launched a single block. the app, the stablecoin, the memes, all of that works because distribution was already solved most dead chains don’t have that. they were built as developer infrastructure, not consumer products. no captive user base to activate. you can copy the features but you can’t copy the distribution moat coinbase understood this early w @base. stripe is doing it w @tempo. both had distribution before they had a chain. that’s the pattern so the chains w/ a real shot at this playbook are the ones attached to existing consumer products e.g. exchanges, neobanks, payment apps. you can’t copy the playbook without the distribution. that’s why most chains aren’t following suit

• 
  CodeMonkey Mike (@mikeneder) reported 10 minutes ago

  Look at what 2021 actually did. Akita Inu launched February 1st, went down down down to a 120 thousand dollar market cap, and then printed a god candle all the way to 3 billion. No Coinbase. No Binance. No tier 1 listing. Just an Inu and a bull run. Now put that next to what is coming. The Robinhood chain is going to pull in serious liquidity, and the people holding right now are the early ones. If a token on the Robinhood chain gets listed in the Robinhood app in a parabolic bull run, 10 or 20 billion is not a moon boy number. It is what already happened once without any of those advantages. Could CashCat and $IF get there? That is the question I keep coming back to. #crypto #memecoins

• 
  Donald S Pritt Jr (@PrittJr) reported 10 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @LeaderJohnThune Terrible post . Coinbase also force sells your crypto without the owners consent

• 
  🟧Zak Fvckman (@ZakFvckman) reported 11 minutes ago

  @HamlinWeb3 @AiFiCorp @coinbase Stop doing the evil, brother. You may help the scammers...You know it is not true.

• 
  Sunday (@Fire_Godness) reported 11 minutes ago

  Tokenized US stocks are coming to Base via Coinbase, and the framing matters: Jesse isn't pitching a new feature, he's pitching market access. About 4 billion people globally have no broker at all, so the real bet is trillions in walled-off assets becoming composable onchain.

• 
  Leighton (@lay2000lbs) reported 12 minutes ago

  @lex_node feel like Coinbase killed it when they pulled support in January to fight about stablecoin yield?

• 
  Base.Build.eth 🟦 (@Anilbhai9999) reported 18 minutes ago

  @CryptoLakhan In my coinbase wallet this page didn’t working It’s not adject manage your verification

• 
  Incredible_Lee (@ErnestL1995) reported 20 minutes ago

  Dear @binance and @coinbase, A Nigerian Igbo adage says" when an elder refuses to give a child something by lifting the said gift up, his hands will eventually grow weak & he will bring down the hand for the child to take she gift. List @PiCoreTeam I wan use pi sales take marry

• 
  severino (@severino_wm) reported 24 minutes ago

  don't have short memory brian ****** up with the trenches last month, we can send this $shitcoin to millions recieve a lot of coinbase stock and nuke that **** remember, coinbase is trash

• 
  Jen 🌮🌯 (@jroebuck) reported 26 minutes ago

  The first thing I built using agentic coding was a new ecommerce advertising system. I named it M0DAL. Here’s how it works - you can embed a widget on any owned page on your website or blog and sell products directly in an advertising unit. This widget is hosted on Coinbase blockchain Base, it has an agentic protocol x402 for MCP connectivity and alternative payment( crypto and fiat ) options. I used Privy for payment infra ( owned by Stripe ). The x402 integration allows agents to buy from any widget or a collection of widgets. You can embed an affiliate program into this widget to incentivize direct payments to creators as well. I only used Claude Code for this and I built it last November. A large brand could run with this and leverage the tech easily. All of this is technically possible now. Why doesn’t it exist? Huge tech orgs block widgets like this from working in their ecosystem. You have to use their advertising networks and their gateways so they can keep the power and money. Places like Substack don’t support this because they want to take a cut of creator revenue. So strategically the ability to reward your customers directly today instead of paying Meta a chunk of your CAC exists. The distribution edge is what’s needed that isn’t owned by a large tech org. Why am I telling you this.. A) systems thinkers can make anything with agentic coding.. B) I do believe media is going to change substantially and innovations like this are in development everywhere because blockchain and agentic tools are open sourced and easy to use… C) Stripe owns Tempo, Privy and are looking at buying OpenRouter… think about an agentic marketplace and a payments tool merging with PayPal - which they are also looking to purchase and you just need them to buy EBay and a new creator marketplace is here.. Agentic media is coming.. it’s a good time to test new models in your acquisition funnels..

• 
  Coach Jv (@CoachJv0yao) reported 28 minutes ago

  @StevenG43114152 @beyond_broke Don’t support Coinbase you need to set up a good decentralized wallet and back it up to web 3 to avoid cyber attack and crypto hack. If you’re interested let me know so we can get started.

• 
  MBA_Bitcoiner (@MBA_Bitcoiner) reported 28 minutes ago

  @MiKeThEwReNcH8 @BitcoinVeterans Average person who doesn’t want to go deep down this rabbit hole is okay with starting out at Coinbase or Fidelity. If they want to move further, then great, if not, then that’s fine too imo.

• 
  Alessandro Ottaviani (@AlexOttaBTC) reported 29 minutes ago

  Another self-custody company 🚨 on risks to lose your funds Imagine to tell tomthe average tradifi investors that has a portfolio in an investing account, or in a Bank, or in Coinbase “Please update your BTCPayServer to 2.4.2 by going to Admin Dashboard -> Server -> Maintenance -> Update & verify the 2.4.2 version string in the footer.”

• 
  DmoneyJ (@Dmoneyacct) reported 30 minutes ago

  @coinbase why tf it takes well over a week before I can access funds when I do a bank deposit? You already took the money from my account, let me access my damn funds.

• 
  Mike Silagadze🛡 (@MikeSilagadze) reported 31 minutes ago

  After a conversation with @jdetychey I have a better understanding of his position. I’d like to write it down to make sure I got it right. Having a high percentage of $ETH staked introduces a number of problems and acts as a centralizing force. Specifically, if staked ETH crosses some threshold, say 50%, then it creates a strong incentive for the remaining 50% to stake to avoid dilution. At that point staking yield becomes nominal for all. It’s reasonable to expect that stakers will prefer the largest and most liquid staking options and so will opt for the largest LST or largest centralized staking entities. Solo stakers are harmed in this scenario because they are, in most countries, paying taxes on nominal ETH yield and so their ROI becomes negative. This pushes them out of the market further centralizing the chain. LSTs that accumulate a large percentage of ETH staked introduce tail risk because they become too big to fail. In the case of a major compromise the chain may be forced to fork. This brings us to the other risk which is that in the case of very high percent of ETH staked the social layer (i.e. holders of non staked ETH) are not large enough in number to prevent bad actors from causing harm. For example of a large centralized staking entity decides to censor or fork the chain (e.g. Coinbase in the of some dispute over USDC.) Is that correct? Anything I got wrong @jdetychey? To be clear, I don’t agree with all of this, but I think all these are totally reasonable points and have merit.

• 
  wale.moca 🐳 (@waleswoosh) reported 36 minutes ago

  Two things are funny about this. First, Coinbase said they would do monthly ICOs and basically stopped after Monad. Second, a Coinbase employee confirmed that if you transfer your Monad tokens to a self-custody wallet and sell- *cough* I mean deploy them in DeFi from there, it still counts as if you're holding your full allocation and you get premium access to future ICOs

• 
  James Brummett (@JamesBrumm70) reported 37 minutes ago

  Coinbase Wallet Support Says I Have To Pay $850.00 To Withdraw $22,000. Bunch Of BullShit! Crooks And Scammers And Liars.

• 
  Coinbase Support (@CoinbaseSupport) reported 38 minutes ago

  Knowing about these two types of issues can save you real time: Platform-side → Something affecting Coinbase systems broadly. The status page should show it. Support likely can’t speed it up, you’ll just need to wait it out. Account-side → Something specific to your account that actually needs a human. This is when you contact support.

• 
  Pymstr (@pymstr_) reported 40 minutes ago

  5 chains. 2 stablecoins. 7 ways to log in. → Ethereum, Base, Polygon, Arbitrum, BNB → USDC, USDT → Google, Email, SMS, Apple, MetaMask, WalletConnect, Coinbase One integration. The customer picks the path. 1% flat across all of it.

• 
  Joseph Pawlak (@CoherentGuitar6) reported 40 minutes ago

  @CoinGapeMedia @coinbase @brian_armstrong Hopefully banks will embrace crypto and not undermine it. Their lobbyists were working overtime to keep their 0% savings rates intact. With a business model so against the customer, no wonder they need to destroy the competition at all cost!!!

• 
  Tails (@EatTradeSleep) reported 46 minutes ago

  dear Brian from Coinbase, @brian_armstrong i’m not even going to pretend i’m here to “build a relationship” or “collab” with you. i’m here to beg. you currently have 14 billion dollars worth of airdrops FOURTEEN at this point, you’re basically running a small financial institution 😭 (literally) and somehow, despite the fact that there are billions of beautiful little airdrops sitting in your wallet, i am out here fighting for my life without one. i have checked your wallet. i have checked it again. i have refreshed it. i have stared at it long enough to start questioning my life choices. this is the wallet of a man who clearly has too many airdrops. and this is the wallet of a man who could change my life with literally one click. i’m not asking for two. i’m not asking for three. i’m not even asking for one of the “good ones.” give me the airdrop that you think is ugly. give me the one nobody wants. give me the one with that’s afraid to amplify memecoins. give me the one that looks like he hasn’t slept since 2021. I WILL TAKE HIM. i will love him. i will protect him. i will give him a warm place in my wallet. i will introduce him to everyone as “my airdrop.” i will never sell him. okay maybe i’ll think about selling him. but i won’t. probably. Brian, you have billions. i have zero. this is not financial advice. this is a humanitarian crisis. i am simply asking you to redistribute some of your wealth. one airdrop. that’s all. one tiny little drip of the faucet. one bald businessman. one unemployed looking Jesse pollak. please. i have done everything a respectable man should do. i have liked the tweets. i have replied. i have supported the culture. i have watched from the sidelines. i have admired the Base summers from afar like a peasant looking through the window of a billionaire’s house. but now i have decided to abandon all shame. i am begging publicly. in front of everyone. with absolutely zero dignity left. Brian, please. look into your heart. look into your wallet. look at those billions in airdrop funds staring back at you. then look at me. a humble man. a broken man. a man who simply wants to become an airdrop recipient. you don’t need 14. you only need 13. i don’t need 12. i only need 1. the math is literally perfect. 14 - 1 = 13 13 for you. 1 for me. everybody wins. i’m even willing to call it a charitable donation. you can put “helped a financially irresponsible man acquire a jpeg” on your résumé. tma, i am not above begging. i am below begging. i have entered a new socioeconomic class called professional airdrop beggar. please save me. give me one. i promise to behave. probably. thank you for your consideration. i will be checking the wallet every 4 minutes. respectfully, your future airdrop recipient 🫡

• 
  AA ⚡️ (@AAStack) reported 48 minutes ago

  @DavidBranscum @coinbase Jajajaja **** i didnt pick that up

• 
  Nick (@hasty_nick) reported 53 minutes ago

  @coinbase I am trying to do the KYC to verify my account after you mistakenly flagged my transfer as a scam. Your mobile app runs so slow it is basically unusable. I am not a scammer I just want to transfer my SOL to an external wallet. Please help.

• 
  SonyPlaystation (@sonypstation) reported 56 minutes ago

  @noosphere888x2 So that 54 BTC UTXO has an anonymity score of 1 after the first round. He should probably keep mixing until that 54 BTC UTXO gets broken into many small pieces. But it would be funny if he only did this 1 round and then sold it on Coinbase.