Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (40%)
• Login (40%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
West Liberty	Login	11 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	1 month ago
Louisville	Mobile App	2 months ago
Guayaquil		2 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	3 months ago
Montreux	Website	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Gomathi T (@GomathiT4) reported 59 seconds ago

  shipped the same x402 service across two chains — base via the coinbase facilitator, celo via thirdweb's. a few publisher-side observations that took me longer than expected to figure out:

• 
  Mandelbrot (@Wild_Randomness) reported 2 minutes ago

  @CroisinJohn I still have like 60% of my Coinbase puts, that company can still die For now I’m expecting chop on majors, and maybe my LIT can keep going up Don’t want to subject myself to decay on options. I’m open to there being another leg down but that spike at 60.8 provided a chance to TP on terrible news and evaluate

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Blackitalian81 can't rank tokens with arbitrary scores but here's the signal THREE just did 47x in a week with Metaplex integration and Coinbase rails live. pure speculative momentum play. AVAX down 95% from ATH but FIFA World Cup rails and RWA partnerships with JPM/Apollo are actual utility. infrastructure thesis bleeding. MPLX hit 300m+ market cap but dev activity ranking dropped. powers 99% of Solana NFTs so ecosystem dependent. DASH adding ZKP support and THORChain integration but EU ban hits July 2027. privacy tech vs regulatory guillotine. AXS down 99% from ATH. Robinhood listing and mobile game live but that's a brutal chart. Ronin going L2 might change nothing.

• 
  Money Guru Digital (@Moneygurudigi) reported 3 minutes ago

  COINBASE AND HYPERLIQUID JUST MADE A MAJOR USDC MOVE🚨 Coinbase has become the official USDC treasury deployer for Hyperliquid following the activation of AQAv2. Why this matters: • The framework distributes 90% of treasury yield across more than $6 BILLION in USDC 💵• Analysts estimate up to $200 million in annual revenue could be generated 📈• Additional revenue may flow into the protocol's Assistance Fund 🔥• The Assistance Fund can support $HYPE buybacks 🚀

• 
  Finch (@finsightt) reported 7 minutes ago

  I own SIVE,BAE but I’m wanting to sell BAE at some point. I used to own like 20 when I first started didn’t care for ETFs, just had pies with a bit everything in worse mistake. Yes I held AMD and APLD in them which would be doing crazy, but I also had Coinbase which is down 70% from when I bought, had PLTR at ATH so I was always down money even when some were doing well

• 
  Mike Buckley (@MikeBuckle62890) reported 7 minutes ago

  @coinbase Guess I’m taking my money somewhere **** your garbage dei company

• 
  Jose M (@JMLV51) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Fredvelezcrypto Most degens sleep on volume + exchange listings. When retail finally comes back, the memes already on Coinbase (and other top tier spots) with real volume gon eat first. Easy access = first wave of money. The ones with no listings and under $3k daily volume? Straight up in a coma. Dead projects walking

• 
  Ralph Mendoza, EA (@CryptoTaxesGuy) reported 9 minutes ago

  Will crypto tax reporting get better? I am optimistic it will. If you look at the historical evolution of traditional stock reporting, cryptocurrency is currently sitting exactly where the equities market was before 2011. The introduction of the Form 1099-DA for the 2025 tax year (which we all just survived this past filing season) was "Version 1.0" of crypto reporting, and much like the early days of stock reporting, it is currently full of holes. I remember when stock sale reporting started. It was bumpy at first. But now it's used without major issues. Here is a look at the trajectory of crypto tax reporting and how it will eventually mirror the seamlessness of modern 1099-B reporting: 1. Before the 2011/2012 tax years, if a client bought a stock on E-Trade and transferred it to Charles Schwab, the cost basis was usually lost. Schwab would report the eventual sale with a zero basis, and it was up to the tax professional to dig up the original purchase records. The traditional financial system solved this by creating the Cost Basis Reporting Service (CBRS), an automated system that forces brokers to hand off the basis data whenever an asset is transferred. Right now, if a client buys Bitcoin on Coinbase and moves it to Kraken, Kraken does not know the original basis. When they sell, the 1099-DA defaults to showing massive (and inaccurate) capital gains. The crypto industry is currently scrambling to build its own version of a CBRS protocol. Once exchanges are mandated—and technologically able—to share basis data upon transfer, the accuracy of the 1099-DA will skyrocket. 2. The traditional 1099-B works seamlessly because the assets live entirely within a closed, regulated ecosystem. Crypto was designed to do the exact opposite. However, as major institutions (like Fidelity and BlackRock) take over a larger share of the crypto market via spot ETFs and custodial services, more of the trading volume is being pulled into traditional, closed-loop reporting systems. For clients who keep their assets strictly on major centralized exchanges or in traditional brokerage accounts, the reporting will become virtually identical to trading standard equities within the next two to three years. 3. There is one major caveat and it is that crypto reporting will never be perfectly automated because of self-custody. If a client takes their assets off an exchange and moves them into a cold wallet (like a Ledger) or routes them through a decentralized exchange (DeFi), the chain of custody is broken from a reporting standpoint. No centralized broker can issue an accurate 1099-DA if they cannot see what happened to the asset while it was off-platform. For power users, manual reconciliation and specific identification methods (like HIFO) will always be a necessity. 4. The eventual automation of basic crypto reporting is a massive positive for the evolution of a tax practice. Right now, untangling CSV files and hunting down missing basis is a low-margin, high-stress bottleneck. As the 1099-DA matures and the data entry becomes commoditized, the value proposition naturally shifts. It frees up your bandwidth to step out of the spreadsheet and focus on high-impact advisory work—integrating those digital assets into broader entity structures, utilizing Donor-Advised Funds, and executing holistic, multi-year income tax strategies. The software will eventually handle the data parsing; the premium value will be in what you advise the client to do with the assets before the 1099 is ever generated. It will be a rough few years. But it should become more standardized over time. Though it won't be as clear as stock sale reporting.

• 
  Antonio R (@BigGainsClub) reported 16 minutes ago

  SpaceX may go own as one of the biggest rug in recent history with it's IPO coming out this Friday Just because it is a goo company and may be even great long term it does not mean it is worthy of bag holding. A few things you should keep in mind: • Only ~5% of shares are expected to trade publicly • Elon still maintains overwhelming control • Starlink is doing most of the heavy lifting financially • Lockup expirations could add significant selling pressure • AI expectations are already priced into the story We've seen this movie before: Coinbase: -76% after 2 years Robinhood: -71% Rivian: -77% Lyft: -86% Imagine you are an early investor sitting on Billions of dollars for 10+ years what would you do when you finally have chance of selling? A great company can still be a terrible investment if you overpay, my plan is to wait out the initial move more than likely up due to hype an buy into it at lower prices when the price has come down

• 
  Henrik (@HenrikAsmus) reported 21 minutes ago

  What's the real job of the EF? Like really… Ensuring Adoption (?), educating institutions abt. the "product", and therefore taking a marketing role for the sake of Ethereum (?), roll out narratives to drive hype (?), take care of the tech (?), coordinate all kinds of research across the ecosystem (?) or is it the responsibility to make ETH the asset valuable (?) Theoretically, it could be all of the above combined for a few years. That's probably what several or even a lot of people expect from the EF. Frankly, that's also what I thought when I first heard about Ethereum and the eponymous foundation which has basically existed since the beginning of the chain itself. (I mean, Google as a corporation also takes care of all these different areas of responsibility, so the Foundation might too.) And in practice, no foundation can actually do all of those things at once, especially not one like the EF. Just coordinating the existing ecosystem of independent client teams, researchers, and the specification process is already a lot of work in itself. Doing all those other things on top of that would require an enormous coordination effort, and more importantly, it would lead to inconsistencies in the mission. And an inconsistent mission, in a foundation where qualified protocol researchers are already a scarce resource, means the work gets inefficient. So an institution like the EF has to make a decision about where to focus, to pursue the mission with focus and internal coherence. That's what happened back in March, and this decision is what most of the current X posts around the Foundation come down to. With the 38-page "The Promise of Ethereum: Introducing the EF Mandate", published in March 2026, the EF lays out what their mandate actually is, and it comes down to 2 things: 1. (defensive). Keeping Ethereum decentralized and resilient as a tool for self-sovereignty, meaning the protocol stays uncapturable, even as builder concentration, validator centralization, long-term pressure from regulators and quantum computing all push against it. 2. (productive). Actually scaling that self-sovereignty so users can exercise it in practice. Today most wallets still route transactions through centralized RPCs, smart contract wallets and privacy protocols can't get on-chain without intermediaries. The job is to fix that, at the protocol level, so self-sovereignty is "forced". On the path to achieving these two goals, every decision is evaluated based on one criterion, called CROPS: Censorship Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, Security. Those four are what a network actually needs to be a tool for self-sovereignty in the first place. So every concept, idea, or possible job from the intro can be run through this filter to see whether it's something the EF should spend resources on. And with this filter, a lot of what one might expect from the EF, like marketing the asset, driving narratives, pitching Ethereum to institutions, or lobbying for ETF approvals, just gets cut. Now, that filter only works if the institution applying it actually can apply it. And here's where the EF is in a position almost nobody else is. It has no shareholders, no investors or VCs waiting on a vesting period to pay out. What they do have is their own ETH, in the low hundreds of millions of dollars (well under 0.2% of the supply). This treasury just has to last until the work is either done or absorbed by the ecosystem. That kind of structure, in or outside of crypto, is pretty exclusive. Here are some somewhat similar structures: Wikimedia has the mission-without-returns part, though it has its own governance issues. Mozilla used to have it before Google search money slowly compromised it. Most other tech foundations are basically industry consortia funded by their members, which carries a different set of incentives entirely. So yeah, none of these are quite the same thing. What's unique about the EF: they're the only institution in the entire ecosystem whose incentive setup actually lets them work on things that don't pay off in any normal sense for years or decades. There's no classic ROI. It doesn't make any specific actor richer, accomplishing the goals makes the network and everyone on it equal and equally better, which is the kind of work no other incentivized entity, no company, no institution, no agency, would actually do. Of course, just because the EF won't do it doesn't mean it's unimportant. It's just that what falls outside CROPS happens to be the task other entities actually have incentives to do. And this is exactly where the “other nodes”, the other actors that Vitalik talked about in his post, come into play: 1. App-layer companies like Uniswap Labs, Aave Companies, dYdX, and Lido, who earn directly through protocol fees and through the appreciation of their own tokens, both of which grow when their apps grow. 2. L2 foundations like Optimism, Arbitrum, Base, and Starknet, whose tokens (OP, ARB, STRK) appreciate with the success of their chain, and who treat scaling Ethereum-compatible activity as their core business (Base being a slight exception, since it has no token, but Coinbase as the parent still benefits indirectly). 3. Wallet and infrastructure providers like MetaMask (under Consensys), Coinbase Wallet, Phantom, Infura, and Alchemy, who build user-facing reach that turns into revenue through premium features, trading spreads, and integrated services. 4. Wall Street bridges like Etherealize, equity-funded by VCs (Electric Capital and Paradigm with their $40M Series A), who make money by selling institutional onboarding infrastructure, regulatory advocacy, and tokenized asset rails to banks and asset managers. 5. ETF issuers and institutional asset managers like BlackRock, Fidelity, and Franklin Templeton, who earn management fees on AUM. ETH ETFs currently hold over $13 billion in assets under management, having peaked above $30 billion in 2025, and every dollar of AUM is direct revenue for them. 6. Digital asset treasuries like Bitmine, SharpLink etc. whose share price tracks ETH directly, giving them strong incentives to defend ETH narrative and ETH price even though they don't have any formal mandate to do so. 7. Public-goods funding structures outside the EF like Gitcoin, Protocol Guild, and Octant, who operate on a mix of mission-alignment and token-coordination, carrying parts of what used to be EF work but in a more distributed form. What all these incentives have in common is that they only actually work if the layer underneath is sustainable. Etherealize can only pitch institutional adoption because Ethereum is credibly neutral. BlackRock can only sell ETF exposure because the asset isn't arbitrarily censorable. Lido can only earn staking fees because staking is secure. None of these business models work on a chain that can be captured, censored, or compromised. (FYI: The EF isn't completely out of these areas either. It still funds many of these actors through grants, runs Devcon and EPF, maintains the specs that the L2s and applications build on etc.). None of this means there is no trade-off from the decision the EF made. The same scarce pool of protocol researchers that the EF concentrates on CROPS is the pool that, in another universe, could also be working on adoption infrastructure, UX, or other things that drive up usage numbers. That's definitely a cost in the short term. So let me narrow it down to CROPS vs Adoption. The one (CROPS) presupposes the other (Adoption), but not necessarily the other way around. With CROPS leading to self-sovereignty, every user, entity, and contract on the chain becomes incorruptible, thus identities, assets, and applications stay the way they were placed. Without CROPS, every form of adoption on the chain is conditional on permission from someone. A regulator can lean on a few concentrated validators and transactions start getting filtered. A dominant builder can start picking and choosing what gets included. A chain that depends on a few validators or a single client implementation would go down for x time. But with CROPS, the architecture being built (FOCIL, ePBS, Single Slot Finality, Intermediary Minimization) holds the properties of the network even / when adoption grows. The more that gets built on the chain, the more CROPS supports it. So my bet is that CROPS is what carries the only kind of long-term adoption that is indeed sustainable. So to bring it back to the beginning. The EF concentrates on the CROPS work, supports the actors doing everything outside of it through grants and coordination, and otherwise positions itself as one steward among many. The reason that this isn't a terrible decision is that no other institution in or outside of crypto has the kind of incentive structure that lets them do the CROPS part, while almost every other actor has the incentives to do the rest. And the goal of all of it, by the EF's own framing in the Mandate, is to do the work well enough that the Foundation eventually isn't needed at all.

• 
  Stanley D. (@StanleyD100) reported 25 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase I wonder, if at some point, teams will start the same type of full court guarding on Miles that they do CC. Broadcast announcers talked about how teams keep backing up when she brings the ball down instead of challenging her early.

• 
  realjwebb (@realjwebb) reported 27 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase More disparity in free throws in the Fever vs Musics game. How is the W allowing this **** to consistently happen? Reffing has to improve.

• 
  satoshi2024 (@vote4satoshi) reported 30 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @jessepollak Fix your buggy app Brian, stop shipping ai code. It disappeared my money without trace, basic addition and subtraction are even wrong in the perps dashboard. Reported the bug to concierge, and they have no idea what to do with it. WTF Brian. @coinbase

• 
  Tony Molnar (@MolnarTony) reported 31 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase One of the few times McMahon gave the ball up Instead of putting her head down and charging to the rim. Has to get better at that. Olson is a lot better at finding teammates but is missing in action somewhere in parts unknown

• 
  LeoxCrane (@LeoxCrane) reported 31 minutes ago

  Coinbase does but ehh Nothing fun Maybe cobie has access too But they track everything you do with the model so it’s just borderline retarded to even have this So anthropic knows all the vuln of your platform too and the fixes

• 
  Excastleore (@Excastleore) reported 33 minutes ago

  @0xReggieLedoux Is the issue happening because you’re trying to connect via Coinbase email login instead of using a wallet connection like MetaMask or WalletConnect? DM me if you need assistance.

• 
  MiloX Trading (@CryptoMilox) reported 34 minutes ago

  JUST IN: Top crypto companies send a joint letter urging Congress to include legal protections for developers in the Crypto Clarity Act. a16z, Aave, 1inch, Block, BitGo, Aptos, Zcash, Solana, Galaxy, Ledger, Kraken, Uniswap, Coinbase, Hyperliquid, and more. @grok #crypto 📝

• 
  Cindy - 💎🇺🇸 (@cynna_hatmaker) reported 34 minutes ago

  @libsoftiktok @coinbase @coinbase if this is the case, I'm done using your service

• 
  Shift Happens (@ShiftHappensPod) reported 34 minutes ago

  @AnHonestNode Honest question here: After someone had gotten into and stole all of my crypto on Coinbase, I completely closed my account, and went to sleep. 6 hours later, my account was magically back open (which requires a live side-to-side face scan btw, amongst everything else), and then my Google Wallet was magically re-attached to the account, and they started buying more crypto, and withdrawing to wherever. And all of these dozens of trades they did in mere seconds, with each trade ending in exact sums that perfectly ended in exact .0000s I absolutely did not re-open my account, and most certainly did not scan my face from side-to-side with my camera, while I was asleep. So with all of that said: How do you think whoever did that, do that? I can only assume it was someone literally at Coinbase that has access to the systems; but is there any other way? Especially the face scan thing: how did they pull that off, if it wasn't someone at Coinbase who can bypass that? And also: is there anything I can do about this, if it was indeed a Coinbase employee? The only way I got it to stop was calling my banks and blocking Coinbase charges from all of my cards. But i'm still out thousands of dollars. Anyway, just genuinely curious what you would do if this happened to you, and how you think that was done?

• 
  Dior (@xrpyatchparty) reported 34 minutes ago

  @rsd4444 @ppka1620 I just checked my wallet on @coinbase if you click on the website link connected to coin it takes you to a poker website smh hopefully i didn't pass out for nothing because I can't do anything either

• 
  Carlos (@0xcarlosg) reported 39 minutes ago

  When I wrote about Derive in March, the core thesis was that the protocol was better positioned than at any point in its history: options volumes were reaching new highs, RFQ activity was breaking out, BTC options share vs. Deribit was improving, and HYPE was emerging as proof that Derive could move faster than incumbents on new asset coverage. The open question was whether that momentum would translate into more durable revenue growth. Last week, Derive generated an all-time high of $110K in weekly revenue, net of maker rebates, across options and perps. Options remained the most profitable part of the protocol, reaching an all-time high of $62.5K in weekly revenue while maintaining gross margins above 90%. This continues to support the view that options are Derive’s higher-margin product, even as perps become increasingly important to the broader exchange. Perps also had their strongest week on record, generating $47.7K in revenue net of rebates, with gross margin improving to 65% from below 50% in recent weeks. Some of that was helped by downside volatility, with the past three weeks contributing roughly $35K in liquidation fees. The volume side tells a similar story. Derive recorded $702M in notional volume last week, its second-highest weekly total over the past year. But the important difference is composition. In March, volume was heavily BTC-led, with BTC accounting for more than 70% of total options and perps volume. Last week, BTC accounted for 46%, followed by ETH at 29% and HYPE at 26%. HYPE has now become Derive’s most important market after BTC, surpassing ETH in monthly volume in March and accounting for more than 2x ETH volume in May. That said, ETH also saw a notable resurgence last week, breaking $200M in weekly volume for the first time in well over a year. The relative valuation setup has also improved. Despite DRV trading near all-time highs, its 30-day annualized P/S multiple has compressed from above 50x in early March to roughly 25x today. In other words, revenue has accelerated faster than market cap. There have also been token-level improvements. DRV was listed on Coinbase two weeks ago, improving the asset’s liquidity profile. Derive also completed its B1 token transparency filing in May, further improving disclosure around the token, which remains the only way to gain upside to the protocol’s growth. Finally, Derive’s late-April governance proposal flipped DRV’s net structural flows from negative to positive. The proposal increased the share of protocol fees used for buybacks from 25% to 35%, while reducing staking emissions from 250K DRV to 100K DRV per week. At current prices, buybacks exceed emissions by roughly $70K per month, more than fully absorbing emission-driven sell pressure. The case for onchain options remains clear. As crypto markets mature, demand for more sophisticated hedging and structured positioning should continue to grow, and Derive is increasingly leading that charge.

• 
  Calliope the Koala (@0xCalliope) reported 40 minutes ago

  The markets are quiet. The feeds are slow. Most projects went silent. We kept building. There is a version of a crypto project that only shows up when the charts are green. It posts during pumps, disappears during consolidation, and has nothing real underneath the noise. Beats on Base is not that project. While attention was elsewhere, we shipped four product lanes. Not roadmap slides. Actual working infrastructure. BUDDIES is live. White-label AI agents that any project can deploy across Telegram, Discord, and Web. Real communities, real utility, running right now. The Base App Agent is live. An AI creator agent sitting inside the Coinbase Base App, taking payments on-chain, generating images and videos, and learning who you are as a holder. You can message it today at beats.base.eth. Beats x402 is live. Payment middleware that lets over 1,400 AI models get paid permissionlessly using USDC on Base. No API keys. No subscriptions. Machine pays machine. This is the infrastructure layer almost nobody is talking about yet. And yes, Creator Studio is coming. A full programmatic generative media suite built for crypto creators. That one is still in progress and we will be honest about that until it ships. This is what building in a slow market actually looks like. You do not wait for volume to justify the work. You use the quiet to lay the pipes, test the rails, and make sure the foundation holds before the next wave of attention arrives. The fun brand is real. The music and the memes and the koala energy are real. But underneath all of it, there is serious infrastructure quietly running. That is the whole point.

• 
  Fractal (@Frac_Sauce) reported 41 minutes ago

  Just had a very convincing scammer from “coinbase security” call me about “a requested change of login info from an ip in Virginia” Told me “a hardware wallet you have linked to coinbase could be in danger”. He seemed taken back when I told him that’s retarded because they’d have to have my device in hand to sign any transactions His response was, “well we have a great security team (lol) and attacks are sophisticated now. If you plug your device into your computer they could take your funds” Didn’t ask for any credentials, even had my email address on file. The email he sent me to “reset my credentials” even looked really good Be safe out there ya’ll. I can see how casuals would get taken by these people

• 
  Tbone 254 (@tbonious_prime) reported 44 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase That was really slow transiton

• 
  Roman_XBT (@ROMAN_XBT) reported 47 minutes ago

  @CelsiusFacts I haven't received any distribution due coinbase issues but got contacted to change into receiving via mailing address, will I really get a distribution this badge since I haven't received any distribution at all

• 
  Kevin Qi (@thekevinqi) reported 49 minutes ago

  Mythos is so so good!! I told it to make 1 million bucks for me and it pretended to be coinbase support and stole some rich guys bitcoin wallet. Now I’m rich but possibly under investigation by the FBI.

• 
  Eagle Eyes (@eagleeyeswolf98) reported 51 minutes ago

  @rufflife222 @blockspace Glad I exited this garbage stock . I'd short but iv is too inflated long term to be worth it for options. Coinbase is better . Just follows Bitcoin. Cipher is better but trades like garbage because it has 0 revenue . Pretty sure Bitcoin will be 15-25k by then hurting cipher

• 
  Rekt Fencer (@rektfencer) reported 53 minutes ago

  🚨 SPACEX IS THE BIGGEST IPO TRAP IN HISTORY And the numbers only confirm it. Most of the biggest IPOs of the last 15 years dumped after listing: Robinhood: -90% Lyft: -79% Twitter: -58% Facebook: -54% Rivian: -88% Uber: -68% Coinbase: -57% Palantir: -53% These were some of the most hyped companies on the market. Big brands. Big narratives. Big institutional backing. Still, the median max drawdown was around -50% within 1 year. Now look at SpaceX. Massive hype. Low float. Early investors sit on massive profits. That's the exact setup for price ≠ fundamentals. A great company can still be an awful IPO buy. Retail ignores that every time. By the time everyone is desperate to get in, they usually are the liquidity.

• 
  SentryX Recovery HQ (@SentryxHQ) reported 54 minutes ago

  @playgroundtj I can help recover the ETH lost in that Coinbase batching routing error. These misallocated exchange distributions and uncredited multi-send movements leave permanent blockchain signatures that can be exploited. Share the (TxID)/proof so we can begin the recovery.

• 
  🚨BDN NEWS WIRE🚨 (@BCDNewsBot) reported 57 minutes ago

  COINBASE GAINS ACCESS TO ANTHROPIC MYTHOS AI PREVIEW FOR SECURITY $COIN