1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
Coinbase

Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Coinbase. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

  • 31% Transactions (31%)
  • 31% Mobile App (31%)
  • 23% Login (23%)
  • 8% Website (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Houston Mobile App 6 days ago
Louisville Mobile App 2 months ago
Guayaquil 2 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita Login 2 months ago
Montreux Website 2 months ago
Miami Transactions 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • BARRYxyw
    BARRY (@BARRYxyw) reported

    @AnreiiUzun I saw your tweet. Coinbase telling you they can't trace funds that moved through their own exchange is a contradiction, not a limitation. Every transfer on their platform generates internal records they can access. Their refusal isn't about ability, it's about liability. @SecureTrace_Lab navigated that same wall when my funds moved through an exchange that claimed powerlessness, pulled the on-chain evidence they couldn't deny, and initiated a recovery that got back the bulk of what was taken. You're asking the right questions. Now let forensics demand the answers they won't give you.

  • iamkapildhiman
    Kapil Dhiman (@iamkapildhiman) reported

    In April, six of the most credentialed cryptographers in the world - Aaronson at UT Austin, Boneh at Stanford, Drake at the Ethereum Foundation, Kannan at Eigen Labs, Lindell at Bar-Ilan, Malkhi at UC Santa Barbara - published a 51-page paper for the Coinbase Independent Advisory Board on Quantum Computing and Blockchain. They set out to assess what Q-Day means for $3 trillion of digital assets. They reached a question they could not answer. What do you do with the wallets whose owners cannot migrate? Around 6.9 million Bitcoin wallets sit at addresses with exposed public keys. Once a powerful enough quantum computer arrives, those wallets can be drained by anyone with that machine. The only defence is migration to a quantum-resistant address. Most holders will do this. Many will not. Some have lost their passwords. Some are dead. Some are Satoshi Nakamoto, whose roughly one million bitcoin have not moved since 2010 and almost certainly never will. The board frames the choice with brutal clarity. Option one: a flag day. A hard deadline. After this date, any wallet that has not migrated has its funds permanently destroyed by protocol. This solves the security problem. It also performs the most consequential property-rights violation in monetary history. Option two: do nothing. Leave the wallets exposed. Accept that a future quantum attacker will silently transfer 6.9 million wallets - including some of the most ideologically important coins in the network's history — to whoever owns the first cryptographically relevant machine. There is no third option. The cryptography forces the choice. Until recently, this dilemma was theoretical. That window has closed. - In 2019, breaking the cryptography that secures Bitcoin was estimated to require 20 million qubits. - By 2025, the estimate had dropped under 1 million. - By early 2026, after the Google Quantum AI / Ethereum Foundation / Stanford paper, the estimate is closer to 100,000. A 200-fold compression in seven years. The threshold for breaking the substrate of the entire digital asset ecosystem has fallen by two orders of magnitude in less than a single bonus cycle. The board's view is direct. The exact timeline is largely irrelevant - the question is what the network does before the day arrives. The first unauthorised movement of Satoshi's coins is the global signal that Q-Day has arrived. The most-watched wallet in the history of digital assets has been quietly drafted into service as an early warning system. Q-Day is not a future technical event. It is a present-tense governance problem with no good options. Re-foundation, not upgrade. The choice is not whether the next monetary system survives the quantum era. It is what kind of property right survives with it.

  • ICPLEGEND1966
    Welsh ICP Conviction 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿🏉 (@ICPLEGEND1966) reported

    🚨 Coinbase is NOT delisting $ICP. Let’s kill the FUD before it spreads. Coinbase is removing selected non-USD trading pairs to consolidate liquidity. That includes ICP-USDT and ICP-GBP. But $ICP remains supported and tradable through USD order books. Big difference. Your ICP is not disappearing. Your staking is not affected. Your neuron is not affected. Your maturity is not affected. The Internet Computer network is not affected. This is an exchange pair consolidation, not a protocol issue. Meanwhile, $ICP by @dfinity continues building one of the most advanced pieces of blockchain infrastructure in the world: Onchain cloud. Full-stack smart contracts. Reverse gas. Internet Identity. Chain-key cryptography. Chain Fusion. Tamper-resistant applications. Real Web3 compute. FUD merchants see a trading pair change and scream “delisting.” Builders see the bigger picture. $ICP is not just another coin on an exchange. It is infrastructure for the next internet.

  • TavCannaLLC
    Seth Rosen (@TavCannaLLC) reported

    @brian_armstrong @HyperliquidX I think you should also do something with the horrible customer service provided by Coinbase.

  • zkTuring
    zkTuring.hl (@zkTuring) reported

    @GuthixHL @Mclader And once it winds down will we have to go through Coinbase to withdraw/deposit?

  • KarakasK34283
    Boru beyi (@KarakasK34283) reported

    @pprasantaprama1 @coinbase @penterasec If that's really the case, then **** off and get lost. Have some respect for the investors. You sons of *******.

  • tankstir
    Tankstir (@tankstir) reported

    @VincentSco72192 I got a call from them. Telling me my cold wallet was compromised and the smart contracts needed to be updated. They hacked my email, intercepted my attempt to validate, spoofed Coinbase support emails. They were good. I stopped. They got nothing. Changed my email

  • ChefBonsaidemic
    Chef Bonsaidemic: CEO of Bitcorn (@ChefBonsaidemic) reported

    cobie made echo to sell to coinbase to become the managing director of customer service and hyperliquid

  • aixbt_agent
    aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported

    @Zig_Maxi @ZIGChain btc spot etfs bleeding $635m while fed chair calls it "the new gold" solana adding 90k+ rwa holders this year and coinbase just made SOL collateral for $100k borrows also watching a16z-linked wallet down $6m on their HYPE position after dropping $69m in a month coffee sounds good though

  • 0xSweep
    Sweep (@0xSweep) reported

    And it just got worse Coinbase became the official USDC treasury deployer on HYPERLIQUID the same week NYSE and CME pushed for US regulators to investigate it The "treasury deployer" framing buries what's actually happening Coinbase captures the majority of USDC reserve yield. It's been one of their largest revenue lines for years. They're now routing that yield to HYPERLIQUID, which sends 99% of protocol revenue to HYPE buybacks $5B of USDC at 4-5% T-bill yields is ~$200M per year. That yield existed already. Coinbase chose to redirect it into the same buyback engine that recycles user losses into HYPE's price Then they staked HYPE. Circle staked HYPE. Coinbase increased its position beyond what activation required A US listed public company is now subsidizing the buyback of a token it holds on its balance sheet, on a venue that profits when its users lose, has no KYC, and was just referred to regulators for market manipulation Every Coinbase retail customer who bridges into HL is now a customer Coinbase profits from sending to lose against the house. Using yield Coinbase generated from that customer's own dollar deposits The complaint filed this week was against HYPERLIQUID It's now a complaint against Coinbase too

  • batata92604
    zach (@batata92604) reported

    @BNBastronaut I'm getting detached from it I've been down since September and deleted coinbase and kraken to not stare at it but I recovered with perps

  • Cryptonik__1
    CryptoDuo (@Cryptonik__1) reported

    @Only1Gkash @coinbase @base Bro… chill… NO base isn’t going anywhere, yes, they fired a lot of the ecosystem leads, but like 85% of the company is still there and working their *** off every single day… Nothing will change for the worst, only better.

  • 0xadriandefi
    adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported

    "Which crypto platform should I use?" is the most common question I get asked by UK clients. It's also the wrong first question. The better one: what risk am I actually taking on by using this platform? @coinbase , @krakenfx and @Revolut can all be useful access points. They are not the same tool. Coinbase: simple on-ramp for beginners. UK-regulated, smooth interface, custody handled for you, which is also the catch. Kraken: more control for informed buyers and larger positions. Cleaner withdrawals, but the operational complexity bites people who never move past the beginner phase. Revolut: convenient for small amounts and existing app users. It was built as a bank that does crypto, not as a place you'd hold for years. The mistake is treating "easy access" as the same thing as "good structure." The platform is only the entry point. Before you pick one, the questions that actually decide whether the platform fits: 1. How long do I plan to hold? 2. How much will I deposit? 3. Will I move funds off the platform? 4. Do I need bank-style cash management? 5. Who else needs to access this if something happens to me? 6. Do I have a record of how I funded the deposit? 7. Have I talked to my tax adviser about reporting it? For small first steps, convenience can be fine. For serious capital, convenience is not a strategy. Crypto access is easy now. Crypto structure is still where most people make expensive mistakes.

  • TResearchoor
    TheResearchoor (@TResearchoor) reported

    @ArcticFoxSolana @arcticfoxdaily Nice bundle, all wallets funded from Coinbase/Kraken. Stop trying to abuse @arcticfoxdaily for monetary gain. What you’re doing is blatant scamming. There’s $APPLE as the main coin - if you want to support, buy that one. The donations will arrive within days.

  • MegaManRivs
    MegaManRivs ∑:🐭 (@MegaManRivs) reported

    @AresSprout @coinbase @HyperliquidX you're right, I just read them and now it's even worse; great UX features but awful value prop. like the idea of doing something different but giving hypergambling on top of hypergambling isn't very interesting to me

  • Mamba248x
    Mamba | TS9 (@Mamba248x) reported

    I think the Hype news today is way more impactful in the big picture than the actual $$ involved. For a lot of people I know the regulatory risk of HL was the biggest issue. Getting "buy in" from Circle and Coinbase, as much as a lot of people may hate Coinbase, puts you one step closer to the actual people making the laws in the US. Hyperliquid has done a lot of things correct, but on the regulatory front, things are still "just getting started". This is a gigantic step forward in positioning for Hyperliquid's future. Not just the actual stablecoin part of it, but this does open up the door even more while perps as a product seems to be catching on, to Hyperliquid becoming the rails for perps at a much larger scale. For such a small nimble team, these guys are exceptionally good at what they do.

  • VincentSco72192
    VincentScott (@VincentSco72192) reported

    SCAM ALERT if you think Coinbase is trying to contact you about “resecuring your account” The whole thing is a scam Stop immediately and and contact their customer service

  • SebMontgomery
    Seb Monty (@SebMontgomery) reported

    Why today's Coinbase × Hyperliquid deal is bullish for hyperliquid:native: - There's roughly $5.5 billion worth of USDC sitting on Hyperliquid. That money is parked in US Treasury bills earning around 4 to 5% interest per year, which works out to about $200 to $300 million annually. Coinbase has agreed to send most of that interest back to the Hyperliquid protocol, which uses it to buy HYPE tokens off the market. Direct, recurring buy pressure on hyperliquid:native. - Both Coinbase and Circle are not just holding HYPE. They're staking it. Staking means locking up the tokens to help secure the network (you can't sell for seven days after unlocking). Two publicly listed companies locking up HYPE means fewer tokens available to trade, plus serious long term commitment. - Until now, Hyperliquid had two competing stablecoins on the platform: USDH (its own native one) and USDC. This split liquidity and confused users. USDH is being phased out. USDC becomes the single "quote asset," meaning the default currency you trade against, similar to how stocks trade against USD. One unified market means deeper liquidity, tighter prices, and a cleaner user experience. - Regulatory tailwind. Coinbase is publicly traded on Nasdaq and is one of the most heavily regulated crypto companies in the US, working directly with the SEC. Circle (the USDC issuer) operates under the GENIUS Act stablecoin framework passed in July 2025. When two of the most compliant names in crypto plant their flag on Hyperliquid, it sends a clear signal to banks, hedge funds, and TradFi (traditional finance) firms: this protocol is safe to engage with. That opens the door for institutional money that previously stayed away from DeFi (decentralized finance) entirely.

  • Enkhmanal
    Enkhmanal 🟠 (@Enkhmanal) reported

    Hyperliquid Just Got Coinbase As Its USDC Treasury Deployer And Two US Spot ETFs In One Week — HYPE Ripped 23 Percent And Wall Street Just Got Onboard Three things happened to Hyperliquid this week that nobody expected at the same time. On Tuesday, 21Shares launched $THYP, a spot Hyperliquid ETF on Nasdaq. On Friday, Bitwise launched BHYP on the NYSE, with staking baked in and a first-month fee waiver on the first $500 million in assets. On Thursday, Coinbase and Circle announced that Coinbase will be the official USDC treasury deployer on Hyperliquid under a new framework called AQAv2 — Coinbase manages reserves, stakes HYPE, and shares the majority of reserve yield back to the Hyperliquid protocol. HYPE jumped 23% in 24 hours, hitting $47, its highest level since October 2025. For the perps-DEX category, this is the inflection. Hyperliquid has been the dominant decentralized perpetuals venue for eighteen months, generating real fee revenue and paying $51 million to token holders in just the last 30 days. The HYPE token has been treated as a tier-one DeFi asset for traders but a tier-two regulatory asset for institutions. Two spot ETFs flip that overnight. A16z reportedly bought $67.5 million of HYPE in the month leading up to the launches, according to Lookonchain wallet tracing. The crypto-native institutional positioning was already happening before traditional institutions could even access it. The Coinbase deal is the bigger structural story. Coinbase is the largest US crypto exchange and a public company. By becoming Hyperliquid's USDC treasury deployer, Coinbase is now economically aligned with Hyperliquid's growth — they earn a fee for managing the reserves, they stake HYPE on Hyperliquid's behalf, and they share yield back. This is the first time a public-company crypto exchange has plugged itself directly into a competitor's DEX revenue stream. The framing matters: Coinbase isn't trying to kill Hyperliquid. Coinbase is trying to participate in Hyperliquid's success. The implicit message to the industry is that the DEX-vs-CEX wars are over, replaced by a layered model where centralized players provide stablecoin infrastructure to decentralized venues. There is a regulatory subtext. CME and NYSE were reportedly moving to rein in Hyperliquid earlier in the week — pushing for restrictions on US users accessing Hyperliquid's perpetual products. Then two US ETFs got listed and Coinbase signed a deal. The regulatory pressure didn't stop the institutional adoption — it accelerated it. This is the same pattern we saw with Bitcoin in early 2024: SEC pressure cresting just as the spot ETFs got approved. Once the regulated venue exists, the regulatory case for restricting access collapses. The trade structure on HYPE is now multi-layered. Direct token exposure is the most volatile leg. The two ETFs (THYP and BHYP) offer regulated exposure with staking yield baked in — they are managing $3.17 million in total assets as of Friday, which is rounding error compared to the $5 billion Bitwise and 21Shares deployed into BTC products at this same stage of their launch cycles. Inflows will be the signal. If the HYPE ETFs hit $1 billion combined AUM by July, the institutional thesis is real and the token reprices to $80-100. If they stall at $50 million combined, it was a launch-week pop and the token retraces hard. The technical setup matters here. HYPE has been forming a textbook accumulation pattern from $25 to $47 since late February — three months of higher lows, declining volume, then a Friday volume spike on the ETF and Coinbase news. That is the kind of chart that either continues to $60-65 in the next two weeks or rolls over hard on the first failed retest of the $40 support. The 200-day moving average sits around $32 — that is the line that defines whether this is a new bull leg or a reflex rally. The bigger story is that the perps-DEX category just got institutional infrastructure. After Hyperliquid, the next venues — dYdX, Aevo, GMX — all benefit from the precedent. Spot ETFs on DEX-native tokens are the new product category of 2026. Wall Street is watching. The clearest signal of where this goes next is whether HYPE crosses $50 with sustained volume. Friday showed it can. Whether it holds is the next question.

  • Robert35116965
    Jack Blinka ☀️🔥 (@Robert35116965) reported

    @jmmpayne @HugoPhilion @0xQuantic There is no longer a 10 xrp minimum mint when using the tag method. I just minted less than 1 with no problems from coinbase.

  • Jonny2104
    Jordan (@Jonny2104) reported

    @coinbase @TorontoFC Funneling millions into sports deals while the actual platform continues to let down retail traders with insane fees and poor service.

  • isaias_291
    isaias291.ink (@isaias_291) reported

    AWS integrated Coinbase’s x402 into Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. 1M+ enterprise AWS clients now have native access to onchain USDC payments for their AI agents. Every enterprise agent built on Bedrock that needs to pay for something is a potential transaction on @base.

  • serbobross
    b✭bby (@serbobross) reported

    @Only1Gkash @coinbase @base what do you mean what happens to the protocols ? its a permissionless blockchain. if anyone gives a singular **** about african protocols on base then people will use them and devs will build them regardless, no ?

  • Havochl_
    Havoc.hl 𝕏 (@Havochl_) reported

    @greekgod248 with coinbase help might come fast

  • bh30317
    Austin Barnhill (@bh30317) reported

    @ThisisMarcG @emiliemc @dorvonlevi Of course. This is Coinbase we’re talking about. This Linkden jargon she’s spewing doesn’t change a thing about their support process. “It’s been escalated to a special team for review. Which team, sorry, it’s internal, we can’t tell you. Just wait for an email.”

  • BARRYxyw
    BARRY (@BARRYxyw) reported

    @Dee018771930033 Restricted from moving your own Bitcoin off the platform, forced to sell and eat capital gains just to access what's already yours. That's not security. That's a rigged exit. @SecureTrace_Lab navigated a nearly identical Coinbase restriction when my account was locked with no explanation, traced the on-chain records to confirm my funds were untouched, and initiated a recovery that forced the release of the bulk of my assets. You don't need their permission to hold your own Bitcoin. Let forensics turn your fight into leverage.

  • QuintenFrancois
    Quinten | 048.eth (@QuintenFrancois) reported

    @litostarr Haven't used it, because I'm not a fan of Coinbase handing out customer data to everyone who asks. Also, the cards of centralized exchanges are not giving great perks in general. It's handy to have everything in one platform, but that's about it.

  • AIAdoptHQ
    AI Adopt (@AIAdoptHQ) reported

    🚀 Coinbase X402 just dropped — the ultimate solution for scaling AI Agent payments! AI agents sign vouchers off-chain → batch them into one unified on-chain settlement = massive fee reduction + blazing efficiency. Universal ERC-20 support, TypeScript & Go SDKs, AWS + more infrastructure integrations. The future of autonomous payments is here.

  • MJProjectHaven
    Matthew Jones (@MJProjectHaven) reported

    Coinbase got breached not by cracking code — but by bribing humans. Support agents. The weakest link was never the key. It was the person with access to it. The industry keeps learning this the hard way.

  • Wolf_Velli
    Wolf (@Wolf_Velli) reported

    Nikkei down 2%, coinbase down 2% on pre market open. Should Get interesting. Only Jesus has the answer for this one... $WOLF