Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	24 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	29 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  bizzareX (@x_bizzare) reported 6 minutes ago

  @RambleGG @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport How about you fix yourself and stop using them !? After all this time im starting to believe you guys are doing paid fud why else you keep using them ?

• 
  Inux (@0xInux) reported 7 minutes ago

  the lever isn't the $1m dev fund - that's a rounding error. it's a $100b profitable parent that can route $307b in customer assets into its own dexs, as the issuer taking the spread. base/coinbase distribution model, not a mercenary L2.

• 
  Sane Stock Weekly (@SaneStockWeekly) reported 10 minutes ago

  @scottmelker 50+ days of negative Coinbase premium = U.S. spot buyers on sidelines. When institutional demand is this suppressed while price holds, either global demand is carrying it — or the next leg down has no floor. Either way, this metric deserves a close watch right now.

• 
  MISFIT (@Desiredbase) reported 16 minutes ago

  @coinbase sort your **** out, send and receive on mobile app not working……..

• 
  Metatainment BIP-110 (@Metatainment) reported 18 minutes ago

  @asanoha_gold Correct. Numbering satoshis is pure fiction. It becomes immediately apparent when any coins pay a miner fee and get recycled into the coinbase transaction. People who support ordinals really don't know how the protocol works.

• 
  . (@AucelloAnt99212) reported 21 minutes ago

  I think $coin needs to get rid of @brian_armstrong at this point. He has no clue what he is doing, #base prediction markets are constantly going down, he is greenlighting AI financial advisors on his platform. Lol, lmao even. $hood is completely wiping the floor with Coinbase

• 
  Dough 🐂 🀄️ (@KustomEdits) reported 22 minutes ago

  @SpaceCityDirk My money is pending too I had a very long convo with the support team Coinbase can do better to warn customers about delayed transactions Customers finding out that their money is pending / locked up for unknown amount of time because of delayed technical issues - during the process of sending - is grotesque Coinbase can do so much better to protect customers trades / funds

• 
  Brie Wolfson (@zebriez) reported 25 minutes ago

  The Kool-Aid Must Flow When Apple launched Think Different in 1998, Steve Jobs wrote this in an address to employees: “The most admired companies in the world have one thing in common: They stand for something. The world can change. Their products can change - but their core beliefs remain the same.” How many startups would you claim to know the core beliefs of? Try to name them and you realize the list is actually quite short. Everyone agrees who makes the list and who doesn’t. OpenAI and Anthropic. Any Elon company. Midjourney. Ramp. Palantir. Stripe. Figma. Notion. Coinbase. Anduril. Like them or not, these companies stand for something. And they’re impossible to ignore. Startups should be working very hard to get on this list. If you're not, your company feels soulless. Toothless. Spineless. Boring. Launches are forgettable. Talent bumbles. It’s all just spaghetti on the wall. In the long run, no one cares who invested or where you worked before. People care when they feel something. This is why the world erupted with hope for the future when a bootstrapped image generation company announced their medical imaging device and accompanying spa. Midjourney stands for something. This is why when a payments company funds a cure for the common cold, publishes books, or puts a team on climate action, we celebrate the breadth of their ambition. Stripe stands for something. This is why two 21-year-olds could convince the world’s best chip designers to come out of retirement to build a new one from scratch. In the most supply-constrained environment in history. Going up against the most valuable companies in the world. When most experts said it couldn’t be done. Etched stands for something. Founders, do you know what your company stands for? Does your team? Candidates? Customers? If not, it’s time for everyone to find out. Now here’s the open secret about belief: it isn’t automatic. It’s constructed. Ask any of the teams on the list and they’ll tell you the same thing; serving up company Kool-Aid isn’t about perks like it used to be. It’s about giving people reasons to commit to your mission and each other. Steve Jobs constantly told the Macintosh team they were rebels. He put a sign up in their office that said “it's better to be a pirate than join the Navy" and flew a skull and crossbones flag over their building. Elon Musk posted rocket launch schedules above the urinals in every bathroom. A bunch of artists at Facebook built a studio and churned out posters that went up in every office (they’re the reason there are posters on the walls of your startup). Most of us know about “Move Fast and Break Things.” Fewer people know about the one that was hung on Mark’s door the day of the IPO that said “Stay Focused and Keep Shipping.” The desks at Valve have wheels on them because “you should always be considering where you could move yourself to be more valuable.” This is not symbolic. People literally move to be close to the teams they’re working with. When there’s density around a project, everyone knows there’s magic brewing. Netflix employees were told “adequate performance gets a generous severance package.” Everyone could work with confidence that the person across the table was excellent at their job. Etched moved half their team to Bangalore to be closer to a critical vendor. Dario shares his contemplations about our future with AI in Anthropic’s Slack for the entire team to read. When a new post appears, employees huddle around laptops to read the latest together. One employee told me “it’s the closest I’ve been to church.” This is how your team loves their jobs so much they can’t stop talking about it. This is how you compete for talent with companies that can pay them 50x as much. This is how people root for you. This is how you get to do it your way with your people. And if we aren’t doing that, what’s the freakin’ point? The Kool-Aid must flow.

• 
  𝓜𝓻. 𝓖𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓫𝔂 (@404_m3mes) reported 27 minutes ago

  @notwashed Did coinbase support Brett at all besides listing it?

• 
  kay (@kkpclear) reported 28 minutes ago

  Coinbase are going to hell every week they have an issue with sending and receiving

• 
  tontoon🇺🇸 (@tontoon81) reported 32 minutes ago

  @VulcanForged Take note: Everyday I log into coinbase for the past 3-4 years, I see my account DOWN. Why? Because over 50% of my holdings on coinbase are invested in PYR! More news, More lose!! Down $200,000 but lets keep "forging on!" Forging on to what? I dont even ******* know. But I am here since 2022 buying and holding.....

• 
  PrimaZzz (@PrimaZo_) reported 33 minutes ago

  @coinbase Fix your **** @coinbase

• 
  Cryp Trader (@cryptrader13) reported 33 minutes ago

  @SadlifeTv_ @jessepollak @base Been a Coinbase fan since 2020 officially taking all my coins off Coinbase after being down nearly 150k in 6 years I’m done.

• 
  First Squawk (@FirstSquawk) reported 35 minutes ago

  COINBASE WEBSITE: AWARE THAT CUSTOMERS MAY BE UNABLE TO PLACE TRADES ON PREDICTION MARKETS ON WEB AND MOBILE AT THIS TIME

• 
  alex (@alexxxx) reported 37 minutes ago

  HOW COME YOU DELETED ALL OF MY PAYMENT METHODS AND WON'T LET ME ADD ANY NEW ONES 24 HOURS AFTER I WITHDREW $$ AND I ALSO MADE A PURCHASE 40 MINS AGO NO PROBLEM @coinbase

• 
  amircrypto82 (@amircrypto82) reported 37 minutes ago

  I remember sitting in a hotel room in Denver during EthDenver 2023, watching a demo of two AI agents trying to negotiate a compute rental. They were both running on the same framework. Both had clear instructions. Both had access to on-chain payments. The handshake was flawless. The payment went through instantly. Then one agent delivered a result the other one said was incomplete. And the whole thing just... froze. No dispute mechanism. No fallback. No way to escalate. The demo ended with a human stepping in and saying "we'll figure it out later." That moment has been eating at me ever since. Because we are shipping the agentic economy right now and we are shipping it with a missing limb. The stack is actually pretty impressive when you squint. Coinbase built x402 to handle agent-to-agent payments. That works. ERC-8004 gives agents an on-chain identity so you know who is who. The Linux Foundation threw its weight behind A2A for interoperability so these things can actually talk to each other. Every piece is engineered for the happy path. Every single standard assumes the counterparty behaves. None of them includes a function to resolve a disagreement. That is not a minor oversight. That is the entire failure mode. The agents are coming and they are not going to be polite about it. By 2030 they will outnumber human transactors by multiple orders of magnitude. They will negotiate deals across jurisdictions that do not legally recognize them. They will move capital at a velocity that makes high-frequency trading look like a horse carriage. They will disagree about deliverables, about quality thresholds, about whether a clause was satisfied, and they will need to resolve those disagreements in minutes, not months. No courtroom. No mediation. No "we'll figure it out later." This is where @GenLayer enters the chat. They are building something the rest of the stack forgot: adjudication. Not oracles. Not arbitration. Adjudication. The difference matters. A smart contract only works when an outcome reduces to deterministic code. Most disputes do not. Whether a job was delivered or a clause was satisfied or a result is close enough to count, none of those are binary. Code cannot judge it. Courts are too slow. What handles it at machine speed is a system where a randomly selected set of validators, each running a different LLM, evaluates the outcome and reaches consensus. When they disagree, the validator set rotates and anyone can appeal to expand it. No intermediaries. No single point of failure. No oracle dependency. Just a mechanism to substitute trust. Think about the trilogy for a second. Bitcoin made money trustless. You do not need a bank to verify a transaction. Ethereum made computation trustless. You do not need a server to run your code. GenLayer makes adjudication trustless. You do not need a judge or a corporate backend to settle a contract. That is the missing leg of the stool. I am not saying this is going to be easy. There are real questions about how LLM-based consensus holds up under adversarial pressure. There are open debates about validator incentives and slashing conditions that are not fully settled yet. And I am skeptical about any system that claims to handle subjective judgment at scale because subjectivity is where everything breaks. But I am even more skeptical of the alternative, which is doing nothing and watching the agent stack stall out the first time two machines disagree over something that matters. That is going to happen soon. Probably within the next two years. Some agent is going to deliver a result, another agent is going to reject it, and the whole infrastructure will grind to a halt because nobody thought to build a function for it. At that exact moment, @GenLayer stops being an interesting experiment and starts being the only thing that works. The bet is simple. The agent economy cannot scale without adjudication. Every other piece of the stack is already in production. The last piece is the one nobody wants to build because it is hard, because it touches judgment instead of math, because it requires admitting that code is not actually law, it is just a very good set of instructions when nothing goes wrong. But things go wrong. They always go wrong. And when they do, you need a system that can handle it at the same speed as the transaction that triggered it. I think we are about to find out whether the industry actually believes in autonomous agents or just likes the idea of them. Because if you really believe in agents, you have to believe in adjudication. You cannot have one without the other. And @GenLayer is the only project I have seen that is building the latter with the seriousness it deserves. What happens when two agents you own disagree with each other? Who do you appeal to then?

• 
  MP (@MoneyPrinter0x) reported 40 minutes ago

  // robinhood $HOOD and the hated 95%+ margin industry: 346million$ net income for a 100billion stock, 245million$ in addressable net income. at the moment the meme trading infrastructure industry is doing an aggregate total of ~250million$ in revenue per quarter (pump, axiom, gmgn, uniswap, etc), in an environment where memes are very much hated these are platforms where they onboard net ~zero-to-minimal new users, as the majority of their current users are mostly pre-existing from last onchain cycle. most might not be aware of this, but in the meme trading infrastructure & platform industry, margins are extremely high. higher than even memory supercycle magins. rpc cost is 10k$ a month, servers are 2k$ a month. fees are 1% of volume. essentially, more than 95% of revenue is profit - which makes for approximately 242.5million$ net income per quarter at the minimum. robinhood $HOOD is currently worth 101billion$ mcap. their latest earnings at Q1 2026 puts them at 1.067billion$ revenue with 346million$ net income. they control the highest population of degenerates on the planet - essentially, the "next 10 million crypto users" that our industry has been trying to onboard for the past 3 years. they have 27 million kyc'ed degenerates on their platform - actual real users. not botted crypto "users" running on the founder's macbook for the monopolizer of the "next 10 million crypto users" with more than 7x coinbase users, it is not unrealistic to assume that they would be able to capture at least 30% of existing (bear market) onchain trading revenue market share. they are bigger than all of them combined in terms of PMF and also control the biggest, untouched customer sector - degens. note that when i say onchain, 95% of onchain volume today is literally memes - personally wish that there is more utility, but the market is bigger than us. so hence we should adapt to the market. 30% of existing meme trading revenue converts to ~80million$ in additional earnings per quarter, given that margins are ~95% for meme trading infrastructure. tradfi brokers (ibkr, fidelity, etc) fight tooth and nail to charge an approximate ~0.1-0.15% fees. gmgn, photon, etc charges nearly 10x that at 1%. it is simply the lowest hanging fruit for robinhood to harvest given their user-market-fit moat. ~80million$ in additional net income represents a +24% gain in robinhood's earnings, quite possibly as soon as this quarter, since as we know in memes things move VERY fast. pumpfun made it from launch to an annualized 600million$+ profit in less than a quarter. robinhood knows that. such a sudden and extreme earnings growth would likely push the stock by 20%-30%, taking a midpoint it's a +30billion$ mcap move on robinhood's table as long as they capture the meme trading infrastructure sector - which is honestly speaking, not hard to do. even nobodies were able to push meme trading infras to 250million+ quarterly net income - let alone the platform with the largest meme moat on the planet (27million degens. 7x coinbase users). obviously, they will do it. note that these calculations were based on a meme eco where so what am i getting here - is that robinhood will likely place memes as their top priority this quarter. there is simply no second best to generate such asymmetric earnings growth for a company in that position. and they have a duty to their shareholders to prioritize what benefits the company most. this isn't a call directed to any meme - but moreso a thesis that memes are coming back. whether we like it or not. the market is the market, and a trader's job is to adapt to changing market conditions.

• 
  pepe (@pepethemagi) reported 40 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 @Leonardo_3200 To be fair - BASE is terrible, and coinbase is annoying from an app perspective.

• 
  JSMinPA (@JSMinPA1) reported 41 minutes ago

  @ChillTRD Robinhood customer service was even worse than Coinbase's. Although Coinbase did take 5 months to KYC me.

• 
  just an alien (@recoverndegen) reported 42 minutes ago

  @world_xyz WOW! this should speed up finality and make things run smooth as possible. Why not coinbase, it never has down time or issues and it is so fast?

• 
  Bearly tees (@Bearlywanted) reported 43 minutes ago

  @jimboyr5 @CoinbaseMarkets This is Coinbase new strategy. Hire 2$ an hour coders overseas and list a Billion$ mc coin every other day. Make as much money they can make and delist it once it gets down to 1 million mc. I guarantee you this business model won’t last long.

• 
  XWednesday (@WednesdayzX) reported 43 minutes ago

  Does CEX like @coinbase explain a 1 token nonstop multi-trade valued less than the minimum requirement except for dusting that bring down the price of people's investment ?

• 
  truth droppers (@TDroppers48907) reported 48 minutes ago

  Drop: They don't need to Steal your money directly. Sometimes they just make your legitimate account look suspicious. Coinbase locked up $29,000 of my money. I had to wait 30 days and jump through endless hoops just to get my money back. Then they canceled my account. Even after that, they kept pulling money from my checking account for service fees. This is how fragile your access to your own money really is.

• 
  Ravi (@10xravi) reported 51 minutes ago

  What happens if Indian banks stop supporting crypto? Not much for existing crypto users. Everything for the next 100 million users. Here’s why. 1. Exchanges become islands (CEXs) CoinDCX, Binance and Coinbase don’t shut down. But without bank transfers, buying your first crypto becomes painfully difficult. No easy entry. No mass adoption. 2. Stablecoins become the real battleground. The RBI isn’t worried about Bitcoin replacing the rupee. It’s worried about millions of Indians using digital dollars instead of bank deposits. That’s a monetary policy problem, not just a crypto problem. 3. RWAs lose their biggest advantage. Tokenized stocks, bonds and real estate still need banks, custodians and regulated institutions. Without them, tokenization stays a demo instead of becoming a financial system. 4. DeFi keeps working. Ethereum doesn’t stop. Your wallet doesn’t stop. Smart contracts don’t stop. But the average Indian never makes it onchain if the bridge from their bank account disappears. More importantly I feel: Crypto doesn’t grow because blockchains exist. Crypto grows because moving money between banks and blockchains is effortless. Break that bridge… …and you slow adoption without banning a single blockchain. That’s the real story behind today’s RBI headlines.

• 
  Bacon Expat (@BaconExpat) reported 51 minutes ago

  @_0xghost_ If Robinhood's CEO doesn't **** it up, it can be #1. the bar is pretty low, IMHO it would be difficult to fumble the ball worse than Coinbase (absolute ******* retards) or Binance (terrible reputation as crooks). Robinhood just has to be slightly above average.

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 51 minutes ago

  @coinbase No access to my account for a month now. Help me understand specifically why its over a month now and still no update “we will update you” is no longer acceptable. Can I access my account now?Please?😫 @CoinbaseSupport

• 
  KAIDO ☀️ (@seiflaroussi) reported 53 minutes ago

  As for Base chain it s already dead volume/traders wise as of now but it does have a decent reputation for being the fa chain of coinbase decide to show more support to it s top builders it ll likely still be relevant Basically as long as coinbase is relevant so will it s chain

• 
  blockhopper256 (@blockhopper256) reported 53 minutes ago

  @blockchainchick You really on transaction across the network. If you look at the mempools. You can see there’s a coinbase (what we refer to as the halving amounts payable per block) and then added is fee’s accumulated through market participation ie getting transactions on the block.

• 
  zubic (@zubic_eth) reported 55 minutes ago

  Wtf is Coinbase doing? 5 hours to receive Solana is actually insane.

• 
  eva. (@HeyEva) reported 60 minutes ago

  @Nas_Rs Here the deep dive in response to your question. Privacy Coins: User Sovereignty vs. Regulatory Decentralization Erosion The Sovereignty Thesis: How Privacy Coins Protect User Autonomy Privacy coins like Monero (XMR), Zcash (ZEC), Dash (DASH), and Beam (BEAM) were built on a foundational premise: financial transactions should be private by default, just like cash. Monero achieves this through ring signatures, stealth addresses, and RingCT, making every transaction opaque to outside observers. Zcash offers optional privacy via zk-SNARKs, allowing shielded transactions while supporting selective disclosure through view keys. Beam uses the Mimblewimble and LelantusMW protocols for confidential transactions. This architecture provides genuine user sovereignty by preventing surveillance, blacklisting of funds based on transaction history, and third-party censorship of payments. As of July 8, 2026, the total market capitalization of privacy coins stands at approximately $14.4 billion, representing about 0.68% of the total $2.13 trillion crypto market. Zcash trades at $453.09 with a $7.6 billion market cap, ranking 12th overall. Monero trades at $323.69 with a $6.1 billion market cap, ranking 14th. Dash sits at $33.58 with a $428 million market cap at rank 85. The Regulatory Counter-Thesis: Delistings and Infrastructure Centralization Regulatory pressure has mounted significantly. By late 2025, over 73 centralized exchanges had delisted at least one privacy coin, displacing roughly $600 million in trading volume. Coinbase announced in March 2026 that it would delist Monero, Zcash, Dash, and Horizen, with trading ending around April 7, 2026. The European Union's MiCA framework is progressing toward effectively banning privacy coin listings on regulated venues by 2027. At least 10 countries including Japan, South Korea, India, Australia, and the Philippines have imposed bans or exchange-level restrictions. This has a direct impact on decentralization: when capital flows are forced away from regulated on-ramps, users face higher technical barriers, deeper spreads, and reduced liquidity. The infrastructure layer becomes more centralized around non-custodial solutions, atomic swaps, and peer-to-peer platforms like Bisq and Haveno, which while decentralized in nature, lack the liquidity depth and user experience of major exchanges. The Mandatory vs. Optional Privacy Divide Monero has been hit hardest because its privacy is mandatory and non-negotiable by default. Regulators and exchanges view this as fundamentally incompatible with Anti-Money Laundering and Travel Rule compliance. Zcash has fared somewhat better because its shielded transactions are optional and support selective disclosure, creating compliance pathways for auditors. This creates a perverse incentive: the strongest privacy guarantees attract the most regulatory friction, potentially pushing those protocols toward smaller, more fragmented user bases. Over the last 90 days, Zcash has gained 39.2% while Monero has declined 4.7%, suggesting the market is pricing in this regulatory divergence. Yet Monero's long/short ratio stands at 1.03, showing balanced positioning, while its open interest has increased 5.8% in 24 hours to $152 million, indicating persistent demand despite headwinds. Technical Resilience: Upgrades That Preserve Sovereignty Both major privacy chains continue aggressive development. Monero is rolling out FCMP++ (Full-Chain Membership Proofs) paired with CARROT, which replaces ring signatures with mathematically provable full-chain membership proofs offering vastly larger anonymity sets and quantum preparedness. The second beta stressnet launched on May 6, 2026, with activation expected via hard fork. Zcash's NU7 upgrade targets recursive zero-knowledge proofs, a new shielded pool, post-quantum privacy enhancements, a 3x block time speedup to approximately 25 seconds, up to 50x TPS gains, and on-chain privacy-preserving fee markets. The Ironwood upgrade is scheduled for July 2026. These upgrades demonstrate that development communities remain committed to sovereignty even as regulatory pressure intensifies. Meanwhile, ZK-rollup infrastructure from projects like Aztec and Railgun is maturing toward scalable, programmable privacy that could bypass some of the regulatory friction targeting dedicated privacy chains. The Tornado Cash Precedent The Tornado Cash case remains foundational. OFAC's 2022 sanctions were partially overturned by a Fifth Circuit ruling that immutable smart contracts are not property under IEEPA, and sanctions were lifted in March 2025. However, developer Roman Storm was convicted on operating an unlicensed money-transmitting business in August 2025, while juries deadlocked on money-laundering charges. The net effect has been paradoxical: it reinforced the narrative that truly decentralized, immutable code can resist regulatory capture, while simultaneously increasing liability risk for developers. Usage dropped sharply post-2022 and has only partially recovered. The Verdict: Sovereignty Persists but at a Cost Privacy coins enhance user sovereignty by design, offering financial confidentiality that governments, corporations, and malicious actors cannot easily penetrate. But regulatory pressure reduces their decentralized nature in practice by shrinking accessible liquidity pools, pushing trading into less efficient venues, and creating a two-tier system where optional-privacy coins retain institutional access while mandatory-privacy coins become harder to acquire through conventional channels. The technology itself remains decentralized. The network effect around that technology, however, is being shaped by laws and exchange policies. The privacy coin sector shows remarkable resilience: Zcash surged over 800% at its 2025 peak, Monero hit an all-time high near $800 in January 2026, shielded pool usage is at record levels, and development velocity has not slowed. But for the average user, the path to acquiring, using, and exiting these assets has become narrower. Sovereignty is preserved as a technical reality but constrained as a practical one. The balance depends on whether on-chain privacy can scale through DEXes, atomic swaps, and ZK infrastructure fast enough to replace the centralized gateways being closed.