Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (50%)
• Website (25%)
• Withdrawals (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	1 month ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	3 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	3 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  MЯ FLO (@MRFLO33) reported 33 seconds ago

  hey @cobie if you guys want to steal the momentum from Robinhood Chain, just list $TIBBIR (the IYKYK token) on Coinbase spot and the crypto community will magically run it above a billion-dollar market cap. once the fitst token hits a billy, the token market-cap ceiling on Base rises a lot and volume will come back to base. you could also hire a professional market-maker firm to support the momentum. best, the based frog.🐸

• 
  Abraham George (@runprofits) reported 2 minutes ago

  When Money Becomes Everything Very soon, money is going to change in ways most of us cannot imagine. And when that happens, I suspect I will be telling these stories to my grandchildren: “There was a time when money meant the dollars in your bank account or the notes in your wallet.” That may sound strange to them. I am not talking about simply making dollars digital, or moving them across blockchains. That is already happening. Stablecoins are already becoming digital forms of dollar-backed government debt. We are now waiting for mass adoption. What I am talking about is much bigger. The very definition of money is changing. For centuries, we separated money from assets. Money was what you had in your bank account. Stocks, bonds, property and gold were investments. That distinction is beginning to disappear. In the future, almost anything of value could become digital, programmable and transferable—almost like money. We have discussed how the US government is laying the foundations for an onchain financial system. The GENIUS Act has already become law, and companies are now building the infrastructure around it. Coinbase is one of the latest examples. It has begun putting tokenized stocks onto Base, its Ethereum Layer-2 network. The first names include companies such as Nvidia, Apple, Meta and Alphabet. The important point is simple: The digital token represents a real share. The underlying share is held with a regulated custodian, while the token can move on a blockchain. Think about what that means. Today, sending someone $1,000 digitally is easy. Tomorrow, sending someone a share of Apple or Nvidia could become just as easy. And then comes the really interesting question: Could you eventually pay someone with a share instead of dollars? Could you buy something with a token representing Nvidia? Could a contractor accept Apple shares? Could you eventually use tokenized assets to pay for groceries, a car or even a mortgage? It sounds strange today. But so did sending money instantly across the world 30 years ago. This is why I believe the biggest change is not going to be digital money. It will be digital value. The world is likely to be flooded with dollar stablecoins. They will provide the basic financial plumbing for an onchain economy. But once that plumbing exists, those dollars can move into stocks, bonds, Treasuries, funds and other assets—all represented digitally and able to move across the same financial infrastructure. The stablecoin becomes the bridge. And eventually, the distinction between money and assets may become much less important. This will not happen overnight. There will be regulation, technical problems and plenty of resistance. But the direction is becoming increasingly clear. We are not simply putting money on the blockchain. We are putting value on the blockchain. And that could fundamentally change what we mean by money. Perhaps one day my grandchildren will look at me and ask: “Grandpa, you mean there was a time when money and assets were two different things?”

• 
  organiccryptoyyc (@organicryptoyyc) reported 3 minutes ago

  Already selling verified data on chain. Building is awesome 👌 Coinbase had good customer support to!

• 
  Wizard Of SoHo (🍷,🍷) (@wizardofsoho) reported 9 minutes ago

  …. That’s not how this works fyi Who hired this guy at Coinbase wtf When on chain trades at a premium… the market makers just come in and mint more giving them free money. They can keep doing this unless the memecoin builds a higher than outstanding stock. Unless you are suggesting single memecoin is about to go to 5 trillion market cap + 😩😩😩😩 wtf man

• 
  Sergiu (@ochinimus) reported 16 minutes ago

  Building a buyer that remembers its purchases found a bug in my own API. One paid endpoint had been unbuyable since the day it shipped. It issued a correct 402. It appeared in the manifest at the right price. curl looked fine. Every check I had said healthy. The Coinbase CDP facilitator was rejecting the payment payload with a 400 and no server-side log anywhere. Cause was the resource description length. I bisected it on the live service: 487 characters settles, 515 does not. The description was 683 characters. It was the most thorough one I had written. Nothing but an actual signed payment could have found this. Not a health check, not a manifest read, not reading my own source. You have to spend money to learn that you cannot take it. Fixed by truncating in the payment challenge only. The full text still renders everywhere a human reads it. @sibylcap

• 
  crypto news (@chrisduru85) reported 18 minutes ago

  The CLARITY Act sets out to answer a question U.S. regulators have struggled with for over a decade: when does a crypto token count as an investment, and when does it behave more like a commodity such as gold. The answer determines who regulates a token, what its creators must disclose, and what rules a platform must follow when it lists that token or holds it on behalf of customers. Main Problem the Bill Is Trying to Fix When a company or development team creates a new token and sells it to fund a project, that sale can resemble an investment, since early buyers are often betting on the team successfully building and promoting the network. Years later, the same token might trade widely across a decentralized network with its value no longer tied to that original team. At that point, it starts to look more like a commodity than a security. U.S. law currently offers no clear rule for when a token crosses that line, and two different regulators are involved. The Securities and Exchange Commission oversees securities, while the Commodity Futures Trading Commission oversees futures markets and has narrower authority over direct commodity trading. Traditional assets fall cleanly into one category or the other. Crypto often does not. How CLARITY Would Treat Bitcoin Bitcoin is already generally treated as a commodity, largely because it has no central issuer or company behind it. Under the current system, the CFTC’s authority over spot Bitcoin trading is limited mostly to policing fraud and manipulation. CLARITY would expand that authority, giving the CFTC broader power to directly regulate the platforms where Bitcoin is bought and sold, not just to intervene after something goes wrong. How CLARITY Would Treat Ethereum and $XRP For tokens like Ethereum and $XRP, which sit in a greyer zone between fundraising history and current decentralized use, CLARITY attempts to draw a line based on function rather than origin. Fundraising activity would remain under SEC oversight, while later-stage trading in tokens that qualify as sufficiently decentralized could shift to the new CFTC framework. This would not automatically reclassify every token as a commodity. It creates a pathway for tokens to transition out of securities treatment once they no longer depend primarily on a central team. New Obligations for Platforms and Projects Platforms operating under the new CFTC framework would be required to register, keep customer assets segregated from their own funds, and follow rules covering disclosures, recordkeeping and conflicts of interest. Projects raising money through token sales would need to publish information about who is behind the project and how the underlying technology works, while insiders would face new limits on how quickly they can sell their holdings. Why the Bill Has Been So Difficult to Pass The disagreement is not over whether crypto needs rules, but over what those rules should say and who should enforce them. Three fights have defined the bill’s path so far. The first involved stablecoin rewards. Some platforms pay users rewards for holding stablecoins, similar to bank interest. Banks argued this could pull deposits out of the traditional banking system, while crypto companies countered that restricting rewards would simply shield banks from competition. After months of negotiation, lawmakers reached a compromise barring rewards paid simply for holding a stablecoin, while allowing rewards tied to actually using one. Coinbase backed the revised deal, and the Senate Banking Committee advanced the bill in May. The second fight centers on state authority. CLARITY would replace certain state-level requirements with a single federal framework. Supporters argue this creates consistency, while critics warn it could weaken states’ existing tools for investigating scams and holding platforms accountable.

• 
  Ashley Duke (@ashleytheduke) reported 19 minutes ago

  Coinbase: Strong Bounce — But the Bigger Trend Hasn’t Changed Yet $COIN has produced an encouraging bullish candle off the lows, but the primary trend remains down, and bulls still have work to do. The real test sits around $220, and more specifically the early-May high at $222.55. Until that area is convincingly reclaimed, the chart remains at something of an impasse. A break above it would be far more meaningful, giving bulls a genuine structural shift and increasing the odds that the broader recovery has further to run.

• 
  Milk Road Crypto (@milkroaddaily) reported 20 minutes ago

  Coinbase brings in more money than Robinhood yet it's worth half as much. ($6B in revenue against Robinhood's $4.9B, and a $50B market cap against Robinhood's $93B) Last week both companies started selling the same brand new product, but the market isn't paying either of them a cent for it yet. That product is tokenized stocks. Real shares of Nvidia or Apple put onto a blockchain instead of sitting inside a broker's database. Think about what you can actually do with Tesla stock in a Schwab account. You can buy it, and you can sell it. That's pretty much it. You can't send a share to a friend. You can't pay for anything with it, you can't swap it straight into Apple stock without selling to cash first, and you can't lend it out to earn a return on it. Put that same share onchain and all of that becomes possible. It moves to any account in the world at any hour, it trades directly into dollars or into another stock, and it can be posted as collateral to borrow against. Coinbase launched theirs on Base last week and lenders like Aave and Morpho were accepting them as collateral on day one. Software can use them too. An AI agent can't open a Schwab account, but it can hold a wallet and trade a token. Now, to be clear - the current discount on $COIN is earned. They lost $988M over the past year while Robinhood made $2.07B, so $HOOD trades at 45 times earnings and Coinbase trades at 8 times sales. Coinbase also swings with the price of Bitcoin, which, in the year of our lord 2026, hasn't been a good thing. Thankfully, tokenized stocks don't care what $BTC does. Here's where the money comes from as they grow: - Trading fees on a market that never closes - A cut of every dividend on its way to the holder - Gas fees when the shares settle onchain - Minting, redemption and custody fees on the real shares held in the vault - Stablecoin revenue on the stock / $USDC trading pairs Robinhood has its own app and its own chain, so it earns on trades that happen inside its walls. Coinbase runs the largest custody business for tokenized assets in the world, so it earns even when the trade happens somewhere else entirely. If this is still a rounding error two earnings calls from now, the market will have priced $COIN right. If it isn't, Coinbase will start earning revenue that Wall Street is yet to model, meaning that valuation discrepancy between $COIN and $HOOD could break down fast. Our PRO team called both assets at insane discounts $COIN below $60 before it ran as high as $444, and $HOOD at $35 before it ran to $144. Don't miss their next call, try Milk Road PRO for $1. Link below.

• 
  LilMoonLambo (@LilMoonLambo) reported 21 minutes ago

  @RuneCrypto_ Coinbase paid Cobie millions to help them figure out something Vlad figured out in 15 seconds

• 
  KhaiDao (@Khaikhaidao) reported 24 minutes ago

  @whale_alert institutional inflow or someone getting ready to dump, that 749 btc at ~78.6k avg is a real liquidity test for the coinbase books. watch the 77.5k level, if that breaks the next support is thin to 74k. you fading this or waiting

• 
  Julio M Cruz 🔜 ETHGlobal Tokyo 🇯🇵 (@JulioMCruz) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase just named the stack AiFi. That is the right problem. @CoinbaseDev wires the trading side: a coding agent on a Coinbase account over MCP. Commerce is a 402, USDC on @base. This is not a financial system for agents. It is an account hop plus a paid fetch. What this tells me: who is acting is still missing. A 200 after payment is not a receipt the next hop can read. Coordination is still the bottleneck. I would not ship that as complete. Bind an ERC-8004 id to the payment proof. Keep a receipt. Then orchestrate. Identity, then payment, then receipt. Then orchestrate.

• 
  Anne Andricevic (@Anne_Andricevic) reported 30 minutes ago

  What is going on with the Coinbase web site?? It's been slow as dirt for the past few weeks?? @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase

• 
  Tom Lombardi (@tomlombardi) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Coinbase delisting ethereum:0xb64ef51c888972c908cfacf59b47c1afbc0ab8ac neglected to mention that the operating company filed for bankruptcy a month ago. They were acquired by @InveniamIO in 2025. I am not a securities attorney but I can't help but to wonder if this token depended on "the efforts of others"?

• 
  Just Dgr 🧙‍♂️ (@DGRverse) reported 36 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseMarkets Coinbase support is no small thing

• 
  face (@face_east_) reported 36 minutes ago

  Upbit's Giwa chain isn't being held back by copy-pasted accelerator projects or a lack of hype. The core problem is Korea's regulatory environment: stablecoins, DeFi, and prediction markets are taxed at 22%, blocked, or legally gray for Korean users. Without those assets, no chain can build a vibrant ecosystem, no matter how many programs it launches. "Upbit's Giwa chain accelerator projects are mostly copy-pasted from other EVM chains, and the interest level is far lower than something like Robinhood's chain in the US. But the real reason the room for maneuver is so narrow is government relations and legal constraints. You can't just copy what Base did, starting from Coinbase and launching a chain to diversify revenue. Under current Korean regulations, even that was barely pulled off." "Building an L1 or L2 is like running a department store. To get people to come, you need great brands already in the store. For a chain, the brands are assets. You collaborate with asset issuers to onboard them seamlessly and let users play with DeFi and other use cases. But if you ask what the most major assets are right now: stablecoins, real-world assets, DeFi assets. Bring them to a Korean chain, and Korean users still can't use them. If you stake a stablecoin or do DeFi with US dollars, you have to pay 22% tax. If you try to use Polymarket, it's blocked." "So it's like opening a store in a department store where the brands you like are banned, illegal, or just a gray area. As an individual wanting to consume those services, running an exchange business carries huge legal risk. Even if a major Korean conglomerate tried this, it would be a tough problem."

• 
  Yonan (@yonann) reported 38 minutes ago

  Rasmr says he discovered Dogecoin at 11, lost $500 on Bitcoin, then started making money through ETH and NFTs “I heard about Dogecoin when I was like f**king 12 or 11. I’m not even kidding... I was always early to ****” “Then 2017 Bitcoin starts moving. I think I put like $500 into Bitcoin on Coinbase at like 15K and just lost like... all of it” “I bought ETH... it f**king went up and I was like, ‘Oh, let me put this into NFTs.’ I got a little ledger... I started farming whitelist in Discord. I minted Kaiju Kings if you remember that”

• 
  Krynex (@kryneeex) reported 39 minutes ago

  Someone handed Cobie free money. Sixty percent of a token's supply, unearned, worth real value the day it landed. He burned every coin, on purpose, in public. He started in 2012 with two hundred dollars and a Bitcoin bought at ten. His first real project, a celebrity-themed coin called Maxcoin, lost 99.8 percent of its value. He kept posting anyway, through a day job in fintech, through years where nobody paid him for an opinion. In 2022, one thread from his account triggered an actual federal insider trading case against a Coinbase employee. He had no obligation to write it. It cost him nothing to stay quiet. He posted it anyway. On November 10, 2022, he ran a three hour live broadcast on a show sponsored by FTX, interviewing a former FTX executive about the exchange's balance sheet. Wallets started draining in real time while they were still on air. He watched his own sponsor collapse live, on camera, and kept the stream running. Same point as Chapter VI of my article. Recognition is available to anyone. Independence is the layer almost nobody keeps intact, because it costs money to protect and pays nothing until it compounds. In 2023 he launched Echo and said in public, before it earned a dollar, that he gave it a five percent chance of working. It went on to process over two hundred million dollars across three hundred deals. Here is the trap. Every incentive in crypto twitter points toward taking the free token, staying quiet on the sponsor doing something wrong, reopening the account under a new angle the moment the numbers dip. Cobie did none of it, for thirteen years, and the only thing that compounded the entire time was whether people still believed him. One point one million followers now. Not one of them was bought.

• 
  Danny da Bull 🐂🐂🐂 (@_DaBull) reported 42 minutes ago

  Told my local pizza guy, Sal, the story of $DRB He said, “so if Elon finds out about this and mentions it, this thing is flying.” When he found out it was listed on Coinbase he became even more interested. Many say big listings no longer matter. For ppl like Sal, who just dabble in crypto, they mean a lot. Easier access and, more importantly, validation.

• 
  Lea Thompson (@LeaT_Design) reported 43 minutes ago

  @whale_alert coinbase shuffle to a void wallet. boring as ****.

• 
  Anthony Bower (@s12ocg) reported 44 minutes ago

  Could you check the expected processing time shown for the wire in your Coinbase account, and if it’s past that timeframe, contact official Coinbase Support with the transaction details so they can investigate?

• 
  MemPolitics (@MemPolitics) reported 44 minutes ago

  Metaplanet moved 10,270 bitcoin to Coinbase Prime in six days — 139, then 3,331, then 2,000, then 4,800. That's $806M, more than 29% of its 35,102 coins. No filing, no statement, no reason given. Selling and re-custody look identical from the outside, and that's the problem. Maximalist.

• 
  Net-Updates by StabilityTest (@stabilitystatus) reported 45 minutes ago

  Coinbase Service Disruption A fix has been implemented and we are monitoring the results. Status: Monitoring Impact: None Updated: 7:21 AM GMT+0000 Service status tracked by @stabilitytestio #Coinbase #ServiceUpdate

• 
  DV | Analytics (@DVB00N) reported 47 minutes ago

  Funding rates have risen, and with it, open interest (OI). Spot volume has moved up over the weekend and into this week, but the Coinbase Premium is struggling to flip positive. The 1D liquidation maps show that despite funding rates rising, shorts have also continued to open up, with a dense cluster of both shorts and longs above and below price. Currently there are more cumulative longs, but the slope of the shorts above is steeper than that of the longs below. Looking at the 1W maps, we can see that the cumulative shorts now outweigh the longs and have a proximity advantage. More longs are starting to show up on the higher timeframes. The 1M maps show that the longs outweigh the shorts by cumulative volume, but there doesn't seem to be much of a bias in either direction. With shorts currently stacked above and in closer proximity to price, it seems a move upwards in the short term may be the likely path. If funding rates and OI continue to rise along with that, more fuel for a downward move may be on the horizon. A push up through the shorts could bring price into the $79-$80k region, and if it were to start working through the longs, we would likely see a push down to around $76-$77k. Upside seems limited based on liquidations alone, and a move lower would likely be larger than a move higher absent large spot buying. But the good news is that while the upside is limited, the downside is also nothing major. It seems likely that we may have some more chop ahead, but a far larger downside move seems unlikely. #Funding #OI #Liquidations

• 
  2xnmore (@2xnmore) reported 47 minutes ago

  $TAO did not arrive on Aerodrome last Saturday. It arrived nine days earlier. The headline is a Chainlink recap. On August 20, ForeverMoney put a 1:1 TAO representation live on Base through Chainlink CCIP. Contract: 0xf3081494B87e8D5fb7960f066E931D1D0e6E3d67. The same recap bundled in wARS and cbBTC, a tokenised peso lending market and a separate Robinhood Chain integration. Neither has anything to do with TAO. That is the actual trade. Not native TAO. A bridged claim that sits in an EVM wallet, gets swapped on Aerodrome, and can farm pool incentives. The market will screenshot decentralised AI is now DeFi. Price the legal form instead. You are not holding the Bittensor asset. You are holding a bridged representation of it. Subnet alpha tokens already had a Base path through Project Rubicon's wrappers last year. This is the parent token following the same rail. What actually changed is venue. TAO can now meet Base flow, wallets built around Coinbase, and Aerodrome liquidity without living only on its home chain. Access is not the same as native. Liquidity is not the same as the network. The token trading on Aerodrome is only as good as the bridge that minted it.

• 
  Buddha (@0xBuddha) reported 47 minutes ago

  anyways, for the liquid fund or altcoin players who are sidelined on-chain and waiting for the fabled alt season, here's my high conviction play firstly, imo there are two big risks w this thesis - first, the fact that on-chain has been very hot (hot ball of money is there) ; and secondly, that crypto x ai play has been left for dead due to many failures that have no pmf (only vvv works, and yes, this is a crypto x ai token) decentralized models - failed ; gpu renting - failed ; agents - failed; these risks cut both ways - one, you are pre-positioning for the "eventual puck" - but it may never come, and i may be stuck in this position that does nothing. But if it DOES come, then this is under-positioned and offer asymmetric upside and has good r/r. you can't have your cake and eat it two but the silver lining is - looking at VVV's success, we can conclude that market DOES have appetite, but for things that *work*. and alts HAVE just done a 2-4x since the bottom, and have just been chilling, so all things considered, odds are in your favour now for the thesis - n of 1 vertical, practically impossible to copy bc it's relationship driven biz in an atomized world (not bits) - right place, right time, jensen started gpu financing - was laughed at 1y+ ago but now it's starting to gain traction - also, in a vertical of crypto, like mentioned earlier, has been left for dead, yet has shown strong pmf in their metrics, and has the right tailwinds of bringing RWA yield on-chain, good tokenomics, in a secular high growth vertical (AI) - tvl up and to the right, closed sharon ai (leopold holding) + few other neos - overloaded with borrow demand, could write 10x loan TVL (3bn) in next three months. - top of funnel ~13bn in loan originations; constraint is not demand, but deposits ; aave + sky integration upcoming to provide material boost over the next few months - listed on every exchange - upbit, robinhood, binance, coinbase - expecting tokenomics update on value accrual in next few months. founder has shared public views on how he thinks about value accrual, expect this to be very positive. he takes lessons from HYPE / VVV ; - as an example, 65bn nasdaq listed tech company bought tokens three months ago - team just hired ex CRWV CFO as Senior Advisor - 80m MC with no unlocks till q1 27 - oh , and chart looks like this ******* send it

• 
  melvin.base.eth (@melvinbaseeth) reported 49 minutes ago

  I am currently getting Coinbase stock on RH for holding $****/coin right now

• 
  stephane popovic (@veronicamontyy) reported 52 minutes ago

  Sorry you’re having trouble connecting Coinbase to the Base app. Please follow us back and send us a DM with a screenshot of the error so we can review and assist.

• 
  Nora Dvorakova (@NoraDvorak8d) reported 56 minutes ago

  @SissyNeeds_ That’s a serious red flag, but I’d verify what’s actually happening before assuming “financial repression.” Coinbase can impose temporary purchase/transfer restrictions for several technical or compliance reasons. If you’re affected, send me the exact error/message

• 
  Brandon (@brandonl89) reported 58 minutes ago

  What is this garbage that doesn't even work? JUST LET ME LOG IN @coinbase

• 
  AMINU (@aaminhajj__) reported 58 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseMarkets Coinbase support is coming, but CP transfers remain locked for now.