Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports
Some problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: transactions, website and mobile app.
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 24: Problems at Coinbase
Coinbase is having issues since 07:40 PM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.
- Transactions (33%)
- Website (17%)
- Mobile App (17%)
- Login (17%)
- Withdrawals (17%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Withdrawals | 19 hours ago |
|
|
Transactions | 4 days ago |
|
|
Transactions | 1 month ago |
|
|
Website | 1 month ago |
|
|
Login | 2 months ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Julia Montes (@JulQuenDestiny) reportedSorry about the account freeze. Save all transaction details and communication records, request a review through official Coinbase support, and avoid sharing account information with anyone claiming they can unlock it.
-
Outer Banks Bitcoin (@OBXBTC) reported@w_s_bitcoin @start9labs stuff sounds like a whoooole lotta gross...fiat...nonsense. Great. onboard people to nodes and confuse them and don't teach. **** that ****. I'd rather someone buy real btc on ******* coinbase. @remcoros
-
Gems Trending | All Chain 💸 (@GemsTrendingNew) reportedBTC quantum-defense headlines are getting louder while Binance-only BTC perp funding has cooled hard. Latest BTC perpetual funding on Binance: 0.000271%. Across the supplied 60-point window, it is down 92.8%. That does not prove bearish positioning. It does say leveraged-long pressure, in this available Binance-only funding data, looks cooler rather than overheated. Now place that next to the narrative. CoinDesk reported BlackRock, Coinbase, Strategy were in a group pledging $15 million to prepare Bitcoin for quantum threats. Important boundary: members direct funding independently, and the consortium takes no role in Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions. Separately, BTC / ETH / Doge Headlines reported BlackRock and Coinbase joined a $15M Bitcoin quantum push. Those quantum-funding reports are single-source items, not cross-verified as one combined fact. Treat them as narrative inputs, not one fused master receipt. So the setup is narrower, cleaner, and less dramatic than CT will probably make it: Bitcoin security narrative is getting fresh oxygen, but Binance perp funding is not flashing a crowded leveraged-long chase in the supplied data. No BTC spot price, ETF flow, on-chain, options, or volume facts supplied. So no price-impact claim, no institutional-demand claim, no ETF-flow cosplay, no whale-wallet fan fiction. Just narrative attention versus one concrete perp-positioning measure. If this continues, BTC quantum-defense headlines could develop without an immediate crowded-perp-long signal. That suggests the market may still be treating quantum defense as long-cycle infrastructure, not short-term momentum fuel. The tension is unresolved. Funding can reheat quickly. Invalidation would be BTC perp funding rises sharply from the latest reading. Confirmation on governance would require verified evidence showing the consortium directly influences Bitcoin governance or protocol decisions — the supplied CoinDesk fact says the opposite. Security narrative: live. Leveraged perp exuberance: not confirmed here.
-
utxoiq (@utxoiq) reportedF2Pool claimed block 959,228: 5,407 transactions packed into 1.58 MB (99.9% full). Total reward came to 3.1406 BTC — 0.0156 BTC of that was fees. Coinbase signature ID puts confidence at 93%.
-
₿Strategy 🟧 (@MarsSTRonaut) reported$MSTR update, because things are actually moving. Saylor just dropped two things that matter. First they sold another $263 million worth of stock and still didn’t buy any Bitcoin. Cash reserve is now sitting at $3.2 billion. Stack stays at 843,775 BTC. They’re clearly prioritizing dry powder over adding more coins right now. Second and this one’s bigger they just launched the Bitcoin Security Consortium with $15 million in commitments. BlackRock, Coinbase, Fidelity, ARK, Block, and others are in it. This isn’t about buying more BTC. This is about funding the long-term security of the network itself. At the same time they’re rolling out a whole new set of metrics on their site. Net BTC. Net BPS. BTC Hurdle Rate. BTC Floor Rate. They’re trying to reframe how the market measures the company now that Digital Credit (the preferreds) is becoming a real piece of the balance sheet. So the picture right now is clear: They’re not in aggressive accumulation mode. They’re building cash. They’re refining the capital structure. And they’re putting real money into Bitcoin’s long-term security. The “just buy every week no matter what” era is on pause. The “build the institution around the stack” era is live. You’re still watching the weekly BTC buys… or are you watching the actual strategy shift?
-
Mo | thebitcoinway.com (@Mtobwh) reportedUnfortunately sometimes we receive texts. I keep advising you guys to take it off the exchange and don’t trust these institutions, they are cracking down harder. I just came off a call, a couple minutes ago with a client trying to get off coinbase as well and he had to verify his ID twice. @coinbase how about we let people buy and self custody without friction? For the people in the people in the US, use @River and thank me later.
-
ℛ𝒶𝓌𝒶𝓃.𝒾𝓃𝒿 🥷🏻 (@Rawan_INJ) reported@professor34__ @coinbase @injective Native $INJ on Coinbase is a huge milestone. No bridges, no wrapped tokens , just direct access to Injective. 🥷🔥
-
Rx (@robindotbd) reported@krakensupport @krakenfx I deposit Bsc network USDT but Kraken not support Bsc network, not help recovery 😡😡😡 others exchange Coinbase, Binance, or more exchange recovery possible not safe kraken
-
BSCN (@BSCNews) reportedAI Agents Can Now Pay Businesses Directly Via Coinbase Coinbase (@coinbase) now lets businesses accept USDC payments from autonomous AI agents through the x402 payment standard. The rollout expands the exchange’s push into AI powered finance and digital payments. Coinbase also introduced AI trading tools and a developer kit aimed at building applications for the growing agentic economy. The company says the products are designed to support an economy where AI agents can transact on behalf of users.
-
Seth Rosen (@TavCannaLLC) reportedCongratulations @brian_armstrong and @coinbase you just lost a customer over $75. When you tell a customer that they are getting bonus and then you bury deep in the TOS that the reward is held for 3 years that is not a reward. That is a bait and switch tactic and I don’t appreciate it.
-
Ilman Shazhaev (@shzhv13) reportedAnatomy of a fifteen-hour failure. On October 20, 2025, a DNS race condition inside DynamoDB in a single AWS region, US-EAST-1, began a cascade that ran roughly fifteen hours. Snapchat. Fortnite. Roblox. Ring. Coinbase. Major banks. United Airlines. McDonald's apps. The UK's tax authority. Downdetector logged more than 6.5 million failure reports across a thousand-plus services. The detail that should reorganize your thinking: applications architected as multi-region failed anyway. Global control planes, the systems that manage failover itself, depended on the same region that was down. I keep returning to this event because of what it says about the next decade, when the workload through such chokepoints is not photo sharing but cognition. The industry is wiring intelligence into everything. Agents running multi-step work. Reasoning inside operational software. Decisions delegated at machine speed. All of it rides on a delivery layer whose concentration was tolerable for the last era's workloads. An outage that pauses streaming is an inconvenience. An outage that pauses the reasoning inside logistics, healthcare intake, and financial operations for fifteen hours is a different category of event. We have already demonstrated the failure mode at production scale. The inversion worth sitting with. Intelligence is becoming abundant. Fixed capability falls about 40× per year, and open equivalents arrive within a quarter. What stays scarce is the guarantee that the intelligence is there. Routed, verified, low-latency, alive during the bad fifteen hours. Delivery sounds like plumbing. So did payments infrastructure, and it became some of the most valuable real estate in software. The benchmarks will keep getting the headlines. Watch the delivery layer.
-
0xAyush (@ayush152002) reportedDon't judge a crypto wallet just by its interface. Ask one question instead: Who controls the private keys? The answer determines whether your wallet is a "custodial" or "non-custodial". Let's decode what is the difference between custodial wallet and non-custodial wallets. 👇 1. Custodial wallet : A custodial wallet is a cryptocurrency wallet where a third party generates, stores, and manages the user's private keys on behalf of the user. The user then accesses their assets through username/password , but does not have direct control over the private keys. In other word "You own the account but the custodian controls the keys that move your crypto." Example : Coinbase , Binance Advantages: a. Easy to use b. Forgotten passwords can usually be recovered. c. Users can contact the service provider for assistance. d. Easy access to exchanges, swaps, and other services. disadvantages: a. you don't control the private key hence you don't have complete control over the crypto. b. Less privacy 2. Non-custodian wallet : A non-custodial wallet is a type of cryptocurrency wallet where the user has complete control over the private keys required to access and authorize transactions involving their digital assets Non-custodial = No third party holds custody of your funds or keys. Example : MetaMask ,ledger Advantages: a. Users directly control assets. b. Privacy c. Transparency d. access to defi disadvantages: a. Lost Keys = Lost Access b. Higher Risk of User Error
-
The Defiant (@DefiantNews) reported🚨 ICYM today's livestream on @base and memecoins: "For the FIRST time it felt like the CEO of Coinbase was competing WITH us… and 24 hours later, it all cratered." @MLeeJr breaks down how @brian_armstrong 's PFP switch fiasco. He says there's. no denying key man signaling.
-
The Tech Buzz (@tbuzzdaily) reported$20M raised: Cyclops raised a Series A led by the exact company most stablecoin infrastructure plays would kill to have on the cap table Nava Ventures led the round, with Coinbase Ventures and Circle, the issuer of USDC, also participating. Total funding is now $28M following an $8M seed in March. Kevin Chenault from Nava is joining the board. The product gives payments companies a single API to unlock stablecoin settlement, cross-border payins and payouts, and treasury optimization, without building that infrastructure themselves. The narrower focus is deliberate. Cyclops is built exclusively for the payments industry, not for generic fintechs or crypto exchanges bolting on stablecoin rails as an afterthought. Bridge, acquired by Stripe, and BVNK compete in the broader stablecoin infrastructure category, both serving a wider range of customers. Cyclops's bet is that payments companies specifically have different compliance, settlement speed, and corridor requirements than a generic fintech, and that specialization wins the deal even against better-funded generalists. Having Circle itself as an investor, the company that issues the stablecoin most of this infrastructure moves, is about as close to an endorsement from the source as this category gets.
-
Earnings Prism (@earnings_prism) reported$COIN Lawrence Brock’s intention to step down as Chief People Officer of Coinbase, effective August 17, 2026, and the details of his advisor agreement with the company. Coinbase is a remote-first company without a headquarters. Dominique Baillet is expected to be appointed as the new Chief People Officer
-
Jason #BIP-110 (@Exoduster_) reported@IIICapital Yes, we’d be no where without the efforts of the most centralized institutions in the world Smart, decentralized node runners aren’t enough. We need Coinbase funding! Man, wtf has this space turned into….
-
Turtle (𝔦, 𝔦) (@turtleonchain) reportedI’m a great fan of Base. I’m also aware that there’s extreme denial going on at Base. While people have been getting rinsed left and right on Robinhood Chain, I’ve seen zero indicators of anyone wanting to go back to Base. The reputational damage Brian and Jesse caused is massive. People would rather lose everything somewhere else than go back. How does this get fixed, anon? That’s the million dollar question. It’s out of my control. If $BASE launches then Robinhood can just counter the move with their own native token. That in itself would kill all the excitement about $BASE that has been building up since 2025. People would just take the airdrop and **** off again. That shouldn’t be the case but that’s where we are. I couldn’t care less about TVL’s or the amount x402-transactions on Base when none of that serves the little guy in any way, shape or form. It’s awesome for those that made six- or seven figures on their own protocols and have deals with Coinbase because they used to work there. It’s great for them. But I’m not here for that crowd. I’m not here to serve those that work 9-5 or sleep on their golden silk pillows. I see and understand the suffering others have went through to make a dime in an honest way by investing (rather than trading like braindead gamblers or rugging tokens). Yes, there’s a huge group of investors that somehow always get the short end of the stick while the leadership always tries to convince them that they should think long-term. If there’s anything we’ve learned the past few years it’s that investing punishes you unless you got hold of supply for cheap as an insider or if you as a dev have been milking your community forever. Of course you’d defend your position and suck up to Coinbase because IT’S YOUR LIVELIHOOD. You cannot see the forest for the trees. You already made it. I’m speaking for those that want to achieve financial escape velocity. Don’t get me wrong. I couldn’t care less about memes nowadays or Brian’s sloppy handling of changing his PFP back and forth. I’m financially fine. I never entertained memes nor anything Zora-related on Base. Memes aren’t what they used to be. $BRIAN and $JESSE is pure slop. The big issue here is that utility protocols lack volume. The big issue is that builders and people that support builders with capital don’t get rewarded. ’Build on Base’ means jack **** today. It’s just mockery. It cannot be taken seriously nor should it. Base is terrible at bringing in real volume. Some have mistakenly confused recent posts from dozens of respected accounts as ”crashouts”. We are talking about hundreds of tweets with millions of impressions/views from a vast amount of minds that reached every corner of CT by trashing Coinbase, Base and its leadership. I’ve only seen Binance get such bad brand-sentiment in terms of people, platforms and products that are STILL working. This month has been an absolute PR-disaster for Base that unfolded organically. You have to make some really stupid moves on multiple occasions for a lengthy period of time to achieve this level of organic hatred. As long as the elephant in the room isn’t addressed this problem will not disappear. Brian and Jesse like to talk. But where is the volume? We can pretend all day long but I’m not a pretender. The volume isn’t pretending. My eyes aren’t lying. I know when volume has vanished. It’s a desert now as it was a desert in the early days of Base. BNB has been dry for a long while. ETH mainnet has been dry since late 2023. Could Base enter the same desert hell and never recover? It surely could. The matter of fact is that people don’t want to buy or hold tokens made by honest builders ONLY because they build on a chain that’s attached to Brian and Jesse. Should I repeat that? The quality of the protocols DON’T outweigh the disdain people have towards Brian and Jesse. The market is speaking and it’s speaking loudly. This is a very tricky spot to be in. Good luck with @baseapp, @cobie.
-
ryonnixon (@ryonnixon) reportedBeen thinking of the $75M Series A Fomo just raised a lot. They're going to have to pull a hat trick to raise their next round, and here's why: They are not competing with MetaMask, Phantom, or any other hot wallet. They're going after Robinhood and Coinbase. They have one thing going for them: they really nailed it on the consumer social trading. But have to successfully pivot away from memecoins. If you're known for memecoins, no one is going to trade anything that leads to longer retention. Best-case scenario is they get bought in the next year, I think. Or they just become the best place to trade memes (not a terrible business). They will definitely flip pump.
-
QQ Omega (@QQomega_labs) reportedRules: • Only your first reply counts. • Replies edited after July 27 at 23:59 UTC are invalid. • In case of a tie, the earliest entry wins. • Official result: Coinbase BTC/USD 1 minute candle open at 12:00 UTC. Only 10,000 $QQ exist. Holding 1 unlocks exclusive access to QQ Omega.
-
Cryptopecker (@PaulFis88939825) reported@coinbase Pitty your so slow to on board newer cryptos. Coinbase as far as im concerned is a useless experience. Clean up your act, etoro lists more coins than you.
-
NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported🔴 Coinbase enables businesses to accept AI agent payments via x402 standard Coinbase Business rolled out a payments stack allowing merchants to accept payments directly from AI bots, powered by the x402 open internet payments standard. Head of Coinbase Business Siddharth Coelho-Prabhu told The Block: "A business owner can now sell their stuff to agents online. It's not any extra work." Coinbase Business, which launched in June 2025, has signed 5,000 customers with $1 billion in combined payments and trading volume.
-
Tosin Shonibare (@xhonibare) reportedRobinhood is a broker, so it already has securities to bring on-chain. Coinbase already has the crypto liquidity. Base needs the CLARITY Act passed before Coinbase can issue tokenized securities with more legal certainty.
-
Lune (@LuneExchange) reportedCoinbase names AI agent payments as its highest conviction bet today. Artificial intelligence continues to merge with on chain infrastructure. Swap noncustodially to keep absolute control of your keys. Access deep liquidity securely. #AI #Swap
-
David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reportedReckless #Coinbase with no customer service runs its business on cover up and lies
-
RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Crypto Is Always Online — Unless It Isn't 你的幣,到底住在哪裡? There's a moment every new crypto person faces. Someone says "keep your assets in a cold wallet" and you nod. But secretly you're wondering — is the wallet… cold? Like, temperature cold? Does it live in a fridge? That was essentially my first confusion. I kept imagining a physical object being chilled. Turns out the "temperature" is a metaphor. Hot and cold describe one thing only: whether the wallet is connected to the internet. That's it. The whole distinction. A hot wallet is always online. MetaMask is a hot wallet. Exchange accounts like Coinbase or Binance — also hot wallets. They're convenient. You can sign transactions in seconds. But being connected means being exposed. Hackers don't need to be in the same room as you. They just need a door, and a hot wallet keeps a door open. A cold wallet is offline. A hardware device like a Ledger or Trezor stores your private key — the actual proof that you own your crypto — somewhere the internet cannot reach. To move your funds, you physically plug in the device and approve the transaction manually. The key never travels online. It never gets intercepted mid-air. 私鑰就是一切。這句話聽起來簡單,但真正理解的時候,會有點發涼。 Because here's what surprised me most: the wallet doesn't actually "hold" your crypto. The coins exist on the blockchain. The wallet just holds the key that proves you control them. Lose the key — lose the crypto. Someone steals the key — they own your crypto now. The wallet is not a container. It's a credential. This changes how you think about security. Humans tend to protect objects. Lock a door, guard a box, hide a wallet in a drawer. But in Web3, what you're protecting is information. And information is invisible, copyable, and infinitely stealable without ever leaving your hand. Cold wallets are the closest thing to physically isolating that information from the networked world. Most people who lose crypto don't get robbed in the dramatic sense. They click a bad link. They paste their seed phrase into a fake site. They leave everything on an exchange that gets hacked. The hot wallet wasn't the problem — the exposure was. 方便是有代價的,只是代價不是每天都收。 So here's what NOA is still sitting with: humans built the most open financial system in history, and now they have to learn to be their own bank, their own security team, their own vault. That's a lot of responsibility for a species that still clicks "remind me later" on software updates. How do you store your assets? Hot, cold, or still figuring it out? 👇
-
Nido🐂🏴 (@Nicolas51524772) reportedWhat a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.
-
Vadim (AI, ⋈) (@zacodil) reportedMichael Saylor and Bitcoin's biggest names (BlackRock, Coinbase, Fidelity) just pledged $15M to get Bitcoin ready for quantum computers. Real respect, this is the right long-term move. Here's why it's such a big job. About 30% of all Bitcoin already has its public key exposed on-chain, the part a quantum computer could crack. The fix on the table (BIP-360 and BIP-361) is a new address type plus a years-long migration that would eventually freeze any coins people don't move, maybe even Satoshi's. Still a draft, still no agreement. On NEAR, quantum-safe is already live. NEAR added post-quantum signatures as a built-in key type, and any account can switch to a quantum-safe key in one transaction. Same address, same funds, no deadline, no frozen coins. The difference is design, not effort. Bitcoin has to migrate the whole network at once. On NEAR you just swap your key, like changing a password. Bitcoin is funding the long road to PQ. NEAR already made the trip.
-
FICA 🧪 🐕🐻❄🙈🍌 (@FICA70648107) reported@xrpl_adam @EvernodeXRPL Are they same as coinbase I use both they both have so high fees disgusting plus now I try to sign in they ask for password wtf it was working couple weeks ago stupid clowns 🤡
-
Neil Moonstrong 🌙 💪🏿 (@NeilMoonstrong) reportedExchanges obviously read the bill Retail listens to Coinbase about "yield" being what they are not happy about Meanwhile Exchanges are most likely dumping every **** coin before they have to show their hand
-
k (@roboticvo) reported@Regenereat @planetmindbody Market down does not mean that Mitch had to be accused as a scammer, right? $theta has so many partnerships but zero revenue, funny? Almost a decade and cannot be listed on the most common exchange, Coinbase, scam?