Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (50%)
• Website (25%)
• Withdrawals (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	1 month ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	3 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	3 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Pedro Peñaloza (@Pork_Piecvcb) reported 39 seconds ago

  Coinbase Premium Index just flipped green for the first time since May. Historically, that signals US institutional buying stepping back in as BTC eyes $80K support. Retail sold, whales accumulated? Classic setup. Bullish signal or bull trap? #Bitcoin

• 
  Rossium (@rossium) reported 4 minutes ago

  Update on Basecat I caught 2 pumps so far. The first one was pure luck and I walked away with ~1000%: $800K → $9M. The second was something I was expecting, so I went in with a bigger size and took ~200%: $10M → $30M. After that I decided to re-enter, expecting a slow grind toward $50M+. We got pretty close, but instead of reaching the target, it's been a nonstop bleed ever since. The Base has spawned a ton of shitters, spreading attention and liquidity away from the main runners in the last week. I made some money on BLUECHIP, but I still don't understand why they keep hurting their main runner. Most of the major catalysts are already behind us, with only smaller ones left. Still, this remains the only real Coinbase/Base bet (yeah, we've heard that 100 times), and I don't see why they'd suddenly stop pushing the network or decide to pump some other token instead. Added to my position and waiting for some positive momentum. Coinbase chart is straight down only. Are we burying Base again?

• 
  Frontrun (@0x_Frontrun) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Crypto_Nifto @coinbase @cryptocom Yes they know it’s a slow rug so they keep selling, not rocket science

• 
  Anthony Bower (@s12ocg) reported 10 minutes ago

  @morecuriousshit @coinbase Could you share the exact withdrawal error or message you’re receiving, and confirm whether the issue is affecting all withdrawals or only a specific asset or transaction?

• 
  Rise (@_rise) reported 10 minutes ago

  @sibeleth @cobie Cobie too busy with Coinbase support

• 
  Michelle ₿ Kirby $XRP💎 (@MichelleKirby9_) reported 14 minutes ago

  @janvalek Coinbase’s BTC ownership check uses a small-deposit “Satoshi test”; message signing is generally for supported EVM assets, not BTC. So the Ledger signing error is expected for BTC. Are you seeing the Satoshi-test option in Coinbase?

• 
  Finjobsly (@finjobsly) reported 17 minutes ago

  @rexsalisbury Same squeeze is showing up in hiring. PayPal, Block, and Coinbase have cut thousands of roles this year while ML/infra engineers at those same companies are clearing $350K+. It's reshaping who gets hired, not just who gets funded.

• 
  Nora Dvorakova (@NoraDvorak8d) reported 18 minutes ago

  @janvalek Hey, that sounds like a verification/signing issue between Ledger and Coinbase rather than the BTC itself. Don’t buy or send another BTC just to satisfy that screen yet, you could end up complicating things further

• 
  Bryan Ross (@bryanrosswins) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CryptoWendyO 1) better regulated on/off ramp rails 2) customer service 3) accountability (Coinbase is a public company) Sad but true, tradfi has advantages 🙈

• 
  TON of Patience (@Crabbycrabstick) reported 20 minutes ago

  1.33M BTC became 1.20M BTC in three months. That is a 10% drop in institutional exposure while the Coinbase Premium stayed negative for a record 93 days. CT keeps defending the institutional-bid thesis. The scoreboard keeps refusing to help.

• 
  asparagoid (@asparagoid) reported 20 minutes ago

  An open letter from a man who lost everything in $BASECAT Dear Brian, Jesse and Cobie I bought BASECAT because of what you did publicly. Jesse said that BASE would drive more distribution and visibility to selected assets and bring them capital/attention He promised the base trenches were coming back this year and that BASE was not going anywhere BASE APP repeatedly interacted with the BASECAT account, responded to posts naming BASECAT, used BASECAT in images, responded to posts asking what BRIAN intended to do with it and arguing that COINBASE should support the new flagship meme COBIE publicly declared that the BASE trenches were back COINBASE susbsequently listed BASECAT USD These actions came FIRST then my purchase FOLLOWED because I trusted you all I put SUBSTANTIAL money into BASECAT becasuse JESSE promised distribution, visibility, capital and attention. Because BASE announced the return of the BASE trenches. Because COBIE publicly endorsed it. And because COINBASE gave BASECAT direct exchange distribution and repeated interaction I am now down half a house as a result My complaint is that you repeatedly used your positions, accounts and reputations to amplify and create credibility and visibility for BASECAT and as a result led me to the slaughterhouse Also disgusting and embarassing is that CASHCAT is valued at ~$200M BASECAT came after, on the declaration of the return of the trenches, and despite your "best efforts" is worth less than 10% of CASHCAT I wonder what this means. But it certainly means that you do not value your most loyal users I trusted you. Let me ask you 3 simple questions 1) What was your repeated public engagement with BASECAT intended to achieve? Clue: people like me bought as a result 2) What responsibility do you accept for the mass purchases that followed? 3) Does your commitment to the BASE trenches continue now, or only on the first pump? You acted publicly. You made promises. I acted in response. You must take responsibility for this sequence I write this for all victims of BASECAT, the latest abandoned token BASE has pushed to retail then SLAUGHTERED them mercilessly

• 
  Anthony Bower (@s12ocg) reported 25 minutes ago

  @imtired2021 Could you let us know whether the unauthorized access is still occurring and whether you’ve already secured your email, revoked active sessions, and contacted Coinbase through its official support channel so the account can be investigated?

• 
  Imran (@lmrankhan) reported 25 minutes ago

  For those who used the internet in the early days, where we are with onchain today feels very familiar. Most consumers experienced the internet through walled gardens like aol, where content, social, messaging and distribution were bundled into one closed app. You could’ve used the web, but there wasn’t much to offer consumers. The night and weekenders were the ones experimenting and building with open web protocols at the time Then eventually the web outgrew aol, msn etc. and blew up the closed model. Anyone could build a site, reach users directly and build on internet protocols. This led to an explosion of commerce, social, marketplaces and new businesses. I think we’re approaching a similar point with onchain finance. Exchanges and brokerages are our version of financial walled gardens. Coinbase, Binance, Robinhood and trad brokers bundle custody, assets, liquidity, execution, distribution and the end user relationship all into one product. Onchain starts to unbundle each of those functions, e.g. tokenization/assets, liquidity, trading and lending, and they can now cross compose with any other protocol being built by anyone with access to the web. And all of the above are available to wallets, apps and now AI agents. Not saying we’re going to get millions of onchain finance apps like we did with websites. But instead, we could get millions of programmable financial products, markets and services, with wallets and AI agents deciding what to use automatically. I believe we’re headed in that direction, and our onchain front ends are likely our version of the modern browser.

• 
  Jan Válek (@janvalek) reported 30 minutes ago

  @alyanicheyeop @Ledger @coinbase It's not error in per se. Problem is that I didn't know that you need to send btc for wallet ownership transaction with same trx id. So my btc are on Coinbase, it just doesn't accept my ownership verification of the Ledger wallet. And if I tried signing message for verification then after selecting same account from which I send funds to coinbase it ends with this error, on Coinbase.

• 
  TrenchSweeper69 🇺🇸AF🪖 (@TrenchSweeper69) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Aetheron402 If you need some more bot/web-app creation skills, would be happy to help. I'm highly experienced in web3, mobile and Telegram bot/mini-app development. I actually began coding a x402 payment protocol a couple months ago, but coinbase bazaar wasn't populating my agent services for some reason. Seemed to be on Coinbase's end, at the time. Has this been resolved?

• 
  Imtired2021 (@imtired2021) reported 35 minutes ago

  @s12ocg @coinbase Yes, I have. What's more interesting is that the only active sessions were my own. I live alone. So only I can log in from my device

• 
  Josselin Caër | Ledger (@s44ocg) reported 37 minutes ago

  @janvalek Could you confirm whether Coinbase is getting stuck on the wallet-ownership verification when you try to send BTC from your Ledger, and are you seeing any specific error message on that screen?

• 
  sumdumgai (@bighatclub) reported 38 minutes ago

  @djsenior13 @DavidFBailey dear Isaiahnoob, please point out where the BIP 110 advocates ever claimed that it would stop any and all spam cold. Go ahead, we’ll wait. The point isn’t to stop all spam cold, although that would be nice of course. The point is to be *directionally* correct with spam policy and to institute a *culture of hostility* to spam. Which means that any efforts people have to go to to put spam on the Blake chain will be orders of magnitude easier on the Core chain. If you want to stay up at night coming up with clever ways to get spam into the Blake chain and spend the money to do it, have at it. Our miners will thank you for your payments. If nothing else it’s a waste of your time and money, and best case maybe it exposes a loophole that can be easily fixed without imposing onerous restrictions on monetary users. Either way, you play yourself. all of this “let’s attack and troll the Blake chain“ I am convinced is cope for being depressed because you realize your chain is entirely captured and controlled by an oligopoly of pro-spam miners. The only thing I’m unsure about is whether or not this realization is conscious or only subconscious, but I promise you, if you actually understand how bitcoin works (highly questionable), your subconscious mind at least understands it. To say nothing of the fact that you guys only want to attack/troll the Blake chain because you understand it’s actually a threat to your chain, unlike BCH and BSV. Both of those made bitcoin a worse form of money. Blake makes bitcoin a better form of money than your chain. Strange that you don’t hear Core chain retards constantly gloating about trolling those chains. Those chains are simply ignored. Because they’re not a threat. Unlike us. Your chain is cooked in the long run. It will still be valuable as digital gold for a time, which is, to be fair, useful. But as money? Lol. Done. Any aspirations about killing global money printers are completely dead on your chain, and to pretend otherwise is an absolute fantasy...in which I have every expectation your side fully intends to indulge. @David you are wise to be concerned about the cops coming and knocking, because I promise you at the end of the day this is the ultimate prize they are after: making it illegal for individual citizens (i.e. the pleb node runners) to run a bitcoin node. It will be made illegal, and of course, the pretext for banning it will be “objectionable material” on the chain. And the law will state that only “trusted partners” such as Strategy, Coinbase, Blackrock, etc will be permitted to run a bitcoin node, under close government regulation and supervision, of course. All of this is coming down the pike in a few years, and by that point AI monitoring of online activity will be so good that anyone who tries to spin up a rogue node will have their location pinpointed within a few minutes. Isiahnoob apparently think none of this is going to happen. The Core chain retards are drunk on their own hubris. That never ends badly, does it?

• 
  Ozmium (@ozonchain) reported 38 minutes ago

  @altagers It’s awful that baseposting itself went from being cool uplifting community nuance, to perceptually worse content than most usual shitposting and shilling on social media generally. I have my reasons to stay building on Base but the disappointment is felt, hard. They have the power to do the tiniest risks that can change the lives of so many builders for good, but I don’t think that’s their key direction. Building on Coinbase and Base since 2024. 🫩

• 
  TruthBeTold (@RuffledCanary) reported 39 minutes ago

  @QuintenFrancois The real problem is Bitcoin was hijacked from its original vision. L2's (Liquid/Lightning) are not how it was supposed to operate. With L2's it's no longer strongly decentralized, and can be attacked by large special interests (those who can influence Lightning hubs). Epstein files shows Epstein invested in Coinbase (about $3 million in 2014) and Blockstream (around $500,000), and donated to MIT’s Media Lab / Digital Currency Initiative. That lab later employed several Bitcoin Core developers. I was a big fan of Bitcoin until it was hijacked.

• 
  Mike P (@mikepat711) reported 42 minutes ago

  @G1ZM084 I just gave it 100 dollars and logged it into my Coinbase account on the web browser. It just uses the website. I don’t actually use Coinbase so I didn’t have any other money in there it’d be able to touch. Just an experiment with small money lol

• 
  Lies Or Liars (@Liesorliars) reported 44 minutes ago

  THE HYPOTHETICAL On 8 January 2018 Larry Summers asked Jeffrey Epstein how a large crypto holding might be moved without a clean sale. He set the problem out as minor for himself and major for a friend. Suppose you own 1 percent of a company whose cryptocurrency is worth a billion. There are restrictions on the ability to sell. Will a charity take it and give a reasonable valuation. Can you set up a foundation and donate it. Other options. A former Treasury Secretary was asking Epstein, in writing, whether a charity or a foundation could take restricted crypto at a usable valuation. The questions sit in a year when this network was already discussing crypto, Coinbase, and tax treatment. No donation or foundation from this note is shown in the available record. Source: DOJ Epstein Files Transparency Act release. Jmail Email Archive. larry-summers thread. January 8 2018.

• 
  explos1ve (@explosss1ve) reported 45 minutes ago

  HOLY SH*T, I GAVE GROK BOT $250 AND TOLD IT TO HUNT FUTURES SPREADS ACROSS 6 CEXs 24/7 Binance, OKX, Bybit, Kraken, Coinbase and Hyper all feed into one desk. Grok doesn’t care whether PEPE goes up or down. It waits until the same futures market drifts far enough apart across two exchanges, opens both sides, then gets out when the spread closes. > scan 6 CEXs → detect spread → verify depth + funding → long the cheap leg / short the expensive leg → wait for convergence → close both Minimum edge is 0.40%, and anything smaller gets ignored. Then the routes start firing: ETH between Coinbase and Hyper, WIF between Binance and Bybit, LTC between Kraken and OKX, ARB from Hyper to Binance. Then PEPE prints a 2.04% spread between Bybit and Coinbase and the bot pairs both sides immediately. No prediction. No “this coin is going 100x.” No sitting there praying the candle stays green. It is hunting disagreement between exchanges. By the end of the run: > 6 spreads settled > 5 wins / 1 loss > $250 → $365.54 That’s the part I can’t stop thinking about. Most people are trying to build an AI that knows where crypto goes next. I’d rather build one that makes money when two exchanges can’t agree on what crypto is worth.

• 
  Bobs Vagene (@BobsVageneSaars) reported 47 minutes ago

  @pogtrax @GMONEYPEPE @coinbase Just move the coins to a private wallet and tell coinbase and the government to go **** themselves.

• 
  Basedfrankie (@Basedforreal) reported 47 minutes ago

  Technicals: - debtreliefbot:native has tested the 40 million market cap on three separate occasions. Forming a huge consolidation channel in the time since it's launch. The 2.5 million floor has proven time and again it is an extreme area of demand. - A couple of weeks ago the chart popped from that same 2.5 million area. Putting in almost a 10x gain within days. Topping out at around 21 million before seeing a pullback. - Price has since popped again, this time to 25 million before again pulling back. - This period has formed a higher timeframe consolidation, showing up as an inverse H&S on the Daily, 4H and 1H timeframes. - Across the board the RSI's have cooled and are sitting in bullish territory. Perfect alignment with the overall chart structure. - The chart from a technical perspective is primed for the next leg towards ATH and beyond. It is likely that with the momentum of the @coinbase listing we could see that massive consolidation range be broken.

• 
  Joy Gajjar (@joy_gajjar27) reported 50 minutes ago

  BREAKING: Deribit to stop publishing daily Proof of Reserves (PoR) page on Sept 1st. 90% of customer assets already migrated to Coinbase custody. What's next for crypto transparency? #Deribit #ProofOfReserves

• 
  ray🧲💰 (@raycromusic) reported 55 minutes ago

  @SmartMoneyCrpto That’s why I also ditched fkn coinbase ! I do not know how they r still in business with this **** going on ! There’re so many good Cex out there . Why would you wanna choose coinbase in the first place !? 😎

• 
  vøv △ (@vovweb3) reported 56 minutes ago

  @coinbase finally, using $BTC for a down payment without selling

• 
  MSTrYoshee (@Cybercreationz0) reported 56 minutes ago

  Ondo just hit $1 billion in tokenized stock value locked. The token is still down 82% from its 2024 high. That's not a contradiction. It's a valuation lesson most traders skip. The numbers: - Market cap: ~$1.86B - Fully diluted value: ~$3.6B-$4.3B, once every token is out - Circulating supply: ~48.7% of total - Remaining supply unlocks linearly through 2029 What changed this week: - Ondo Stocks crossed $1.01B TVL on August 24, growing faster than its Treasury and stablecoin products - Coinbase launched its own tokenized stock product on Base the same day - ONDO pushed toward the top of a long-term descending price channel Reality check: usage growing does not mean the token captures that growth. Half of ONDO's supply hasn't even hit the market yet, and there's no clean mechanism tying protocol revenue back to holders. A well-funded competitor just showed up in the same lane. The business can win while the token dilutes against it. Market cap tells you what the market is paying today. FDV tells you what you're actually buying into. Most people only check the first number. This is not financial advice.

• 
  Jayson Aikens (@crytpodad1014) reported 58 minutes ago

  @lmrankhan It will come down to the ownership/rights of token holders and I think @coinbase slow approach to get things right will pay off in the long run. With @AerodromeFi to power it allllll