Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	12 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	16 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dylan Warren (@TheDylanWarren) reported 28 seconds ago

  The timeline is blaming weak Coinbase earnings and AI stock sell-offs for Bitcoin dipping below $63K today. Macro noise is great for headlines, but it doesn't pay you. The only thing that matters is if $BTC can defend the $62,500 support level before Monday's US open.

• 
  AMBCrypto (@CryptoAmb) reported 2 minutes ago

  Coinbase is getting dragged for “killing” the #CLARITYAct. Arca CIO Jeff Dorman says the exchange's January opposition cost the bill its best shot. Now approval odds are down to 25%, and the Senate recess is days away. The industry is pointing fingers - loudly.

• 
  Tosin Shonibare (@xhonibare) reported 3 minutes ago

  Her problem is she is constantly under immense press by shareholders to sell. Same as Tom Lee with bitmine immersion’s ETH and Micheal Saylor with micro strategy’s BTC. SpaceX and Tesla are not under such pressure holding their BTC on Coinbase prime.

• 
  BobbyJamesPoker (@BobbyJamesPoker) reported 3 minutes ago

  @fdsotorunner Sometimes sending to Coinbase eventually causes problems, from gambling sites. Might be fine though. Some CoinPoker players like to cashout to a decentralized wallet first, then Coinbase from that

• 
  ⏳ Michael Dunworth⌛️ (@MichaelDunwort1) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ausbtcclub They are (napkin numbers) Probably a team of <16 people. Likely 1/3 this but being generous. Social media elevated their perceived status. I would guess they have maybe $500k-$1M )max max maxxxxxx). They aren’t a real product social media inflated it. Nobody likely to get much. It’s not a Binance/coinbase level platform with capital reserves to help out customers. 😔

• 
  Jason L (@seacow2001) reported 12 minutes ago

  @NicoCabrera92 He pulled it to get banking license for Coinbase to go around the yield issue

• 
  2160 (@rekt2160) reported 13 minutes ago

  its going to get very, very silly last cycle 90% of retail was exit liquidity for smart traders bc centralized exchanges did not list memes until multi billions + listed infra that was down only since launch & there were no easy to use mobile apps this cycle we will have retail with ability to one-click ape anything trending on-chain in less than a minute across any blockchain there has never been a time in crypto's history where it was this easy for retail to speculate on lowcaps with very little friction also we have centralized exchanges who missed out on massive volume & will be much more likely to list coins going forward, imo can see this already with how much coinbase is implementing coinbase wallet into the exchange natively even allowing ppl to instantly ape new launches memecoin volumes will attract retail traders, but will also attract builders bc open blockchains are the best place for smart developers to go to get instant liquidity for ideas, especially with ai tools like fable & others, am very bullish on tokenization and innovative apps coins like ethereum:0xdd3b11ef34cd511a2da159034a05fcb94d806686 which are able to command & compound attention throughout the bull run will benefit massively on-chain supercycle

• 
  Octopus (@Octop3s) reported 15 minutes ago

  tradfi neobanks are already making millions offering unsecured credit to their customers. in fact, top european neobanks like revolut and monzo, not to even talk of the u.s. players like chime, are doubling down on this because it's been very profitable. crypto neobanks are still struggling to provide this to users for one reason: underwriting. one look at the track record of maple, truefi, and others isn't exactly encouraging any project to give it another try. the biggest issue with past unsecured lending is that there was no "trust me bro" data. there was no way for projects to know whether a borrower was even worth lending to. and there was also no real way to respond when they defaulted. that's exactly what we solve at @cr3diential. we help projects verify real-world income, cash flow, and reputation from digital sources like bank portals, gig platforms, creator dashboards, and payment processors without users handing over logins, screenshots, or raw sensitive data. on the enforcement side, while we don't enforce repayments directly, it's built into the design. projects can continuously access how well a customer has been repaying loans, their current financial situation, and even upcoming payments. for example, a youtube creator expecting their payout at the end of the month. as a project, you regularly access your customer's financial situation. continuous assessment translates into better decisions on what you can safely lend. that's the luxury the previous unsecured lending projects never had. they were lending blindly. in your case, you aren't. and if you think customers like youtube creators or bolt drivers are out of your reach... you can start with freelancers or people trading on popular exchanges like binance and coinbase because we're integrated with them too. our main focus is making sure people who work online get the same financial advantages as people earning traditional w-2 salaries. happy to answer your questions if you've got any.

• 
  i.am.korn (@unikornaio) reported 18 minutes ago

  Exhibit BTC-1: Blockchain Analytics Showing Coordinated Whale Movements Before BTC Price Swings I. Legal Basis Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961–1968 Coordinated movements of large Bitcoin wallets in anticipation of price swings constitute a pattern of racketeering activity involving wire fraud (18 U.S.C. § 1343) and securities/commodities fraud. SEC Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5 Whale coordination constitutes a manipulative or deceptive device, creating false market signals that deceive retail participants. Commodity Exchange Act, 7 U.S.C. § 9(1) Price manipulation via coordinated wallet activity is prohibited under CFTC jurisdiction. II. Factual Background Blockchain analytics firms (Chainalysis, Glassnode, CryptoQuant, Arkham Intelligence) have repeatedly documented coordinated whale movements of BTC prior to significant upward and downward price movements. These movements are not random — they cluster around: ETF announcements (e.g., BlackRock’s 2023 BTC ETF filing). Corporate disclosures (MicroStrategy quarterly BTC accumulation). Public market manipulation events (Elon Musk’s tweets, Tesla’s BTC disclosures). Coordinated whale movements are highly correlated with: Liquidations on derivative exchanges (BitMEX, Binance, CME). Forced margin calls of retail traders. Profitable short/long positioning by insider whales. Case Example: On October 16, 2023, Arkham Intelligence identified large whale wallets moving BTC to Coinbase and Binance hours before a false report of BlackRock ETF approval went viral. Prices surged nearly 10% before reversing, netting profits for those insiders positioned long in advance. This movement was later traced to wallets tied to institutional OTC desks, suggesting coordination rather than chance. III. Enterprise Connection Whale actors (Michael Saylor, BlackRock-linked ETFs, Grayscale, Binance, Coinbase, Galaxy Digital, Pantera) benefit from exclusive access to wallet movement intelligence. Coordinated movements constitute insider collusion, keeping profits in-house among insiders while retail participants are systematically defrauded. Such conduct falls under insider trading principles, as whales trade based on material, non-public information (MNPI) about coordinated wallet movements. IV. Supporting Evidence Glassnode Report (2021): Identified “coordinated whale clusters” controlling 27% of BTC supply, with movements preceding major market swings.¹ Chainalysis 2022 Report: Confirmed large whale wallets repeatedly send BTC to exchanges immediately before volatility events, strongly indicating collusion.² CryptoQuant Analytics (2023): Documented abnormal whale inflows to exchanges minutes before liquidations of retail traders, implying targeted manipulation.³ Arkham Intelligence (Oct. 2023): Detected whale movements hours before BlackRock ETF false report spike.⁴ CFTC Precedent: U.S. v. Navinder Sarao (2015 spoofing case) illustrates how coordinated trades and false signals constitute manipulation. V. Sources / References Glassnode, The Bitcoin Supply Distribution Report (2021). Chainalysis, Crypto Crime Report 2022, Chapter on Market Manipulation. CryptoQuant Market Analysis, Whale Exchange Inflows and Liquidations, July 2023. Arkham Intelligence Alert, BlackRock ETF Whale Movements, October 16, 2023. CFTC v. Navinder Singh Sarao, Case No. 1:15-cv-03398 (N.D. Ill. 2015).

• 
  Jenna Riestra @BASEAPP (@AskJennaRiest) reported 20 minutes ago

  @JerredStacey came across your post recently about not being able to buy Dovu on coinbase, does the issue still persist?

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 20 minutes ago

  POAP is shutting down after 5+ years despite Coinbase & Amex backing it. Millions of badges stay onchain but the project couldn't figure out how to make money. Funding model broke. Story over. $POAP #crypto 💀

• 
  HouseofSats (@HouseofSats) reported 24 minutes ago

  $BTC. I have decided to divide my Bitcoin exposure between (1) spot Bitcoin in a Blockstream hardware wallet; (2) Coinbase; (3) IBIT in a brokerage account. While the Cold Card hack did not effect me, it forced me to realize the importance of diversifying my exposure. I will sleep easier this way. A note on exchanges. A lot of people point to high-profile exchange collapses for why individuals should self-custody; most often Mt. Gox and FTX. Mt. Gox stands for "Magic: The Gathering Online Exchange." It was launched in 2010 and collapsed in 2014. FTX was founded in 2019 and collapsed in 2022. Compare these to the following brokerages/exchanges: Coinbase, founded 2012, no mass scale loss of funds. E*Trade, founded 1982, taken public 1996, acquired by Morgan Stanley (founded 1935) in 2020. Charles Schwab, founded 1971. Fidelity, founded 1946. We are in the institutional era of Bitcoin. The entities offering spot Bitcoin trading are highly sophisticated, well-regulated, and have long track records of customer service and security. Are they infallible? Of course not. But they're in a completely different universe than Mt. Gox and FTX. Self-custody maxis for years raved about the hypothetical scenarios of government confiscation, exchange collapse, or unbacked claims. Could these come to bear? Perhaps. But the Cold Card hack has actually occurred. People have actually lost their life savings. People who did everything the self-custody maxis told them to do. People who thought they were doing everything right when it came to Bitcoin. Recognize that the Bitcoin ecosystem is maturing and decide for yourself how you want to manage your exposure and mitigate your risk. But after the Cold Card hack, "exchange" should not be a ***** word. I am in Bitcoin for one reason: to increase my family's purchasing power. I cannot afford to be overly ideological.

• 
  Luke M (@L___m_24) reported 25 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase Small purchases and adding cash yet Coinbase won’t fix it, even though they admit there’s issues. Need to get money back and just use @kraken again

• 
  Ivan on Tech 🍳📈💰 Head Trader @ Bullmania (@IvanOnTech) reported 26 minutes ago

  BITCOIN: BULLS ARE COMING FAST!!!! 🚨🚨🚨 00:00 Intro — BTC still around the 200 WMA 00:10 Stock market is back — $1.14T added to the market 00:58 SP500 chart — Bullish 01:12 QQQ chart — New higher low 01:38 Leopold, Situational Awareness, got liquidated — video 02:44 How Citadel FUDded and bought Leopold's funds 03:51 MSTR selling BTC, but BTC price is holding — Bottom is close 04:34 Jim Cramer video — Selling my BTC 06:06 Inverse Cramer indicator is very strong 06:52 Saylor — BTC is cheap, yet sells it 07:35 SPCX going lower — Musk says it is a great opportunity to buy 08:34 Oracle chart — AI fear priced in, but still in bear trend 09:32 Oracle problem — Lot of OpenAI orders 10:12 Stocks are feeling good 10:32 BTC weekly chart — Super cheap, allocate in the buy zone 11:02 MSFT chart — Exploded to the upside 11:50 AMZN will be a $10T company — Explosion to the upside 12:35 BTC signal just flashed — Realized volatility now lower than tech stocks 13:21 ADBE chart — Going lower, but bullish on the weekly 14:34 Raoul Pal video — About good traders and Ivan's response 17:24 Anything in price discovery does not work with compounding 18:55 Raoul's advice does not work for sh-tcoins — IOTA as example 20:42 Bullmarket is coming. Do not F it up 21:08 ColdCard hack revisited 21:40 Alex Waltz — Made my own Quantum Random Number Generator 22:34 Only thing random is radioactive decay 23:52 Joe Consorti video — ColdCard thief cannot spend the funds 26:48 ColdCard thief doxxed? 28:27 Fernando Nikolic — Trust in Coinkite is broken 29:10 Why BTC maxis are plebes 31:09 ColdCard drama explained 32:45 Maxis are parrots — Use your brain! 34:14 ColdCard drama continued 35:26 Gary Cardone — About dice rolling and self-custody 39:20 Matthew Kratter — Saylor diluted shareholders 39:38 Senator Lummis video — Clarity Act must be passed this week 40:54 Coinbase ad — America needs Clarity Act 41:57 XRP news — FXRP. Getting into DeFi 42:35 Bullmania AI coming soon 44:14 Evan Cheng — Every internet digital payment will be done with SUI 45:24 Shout out to Bullmania 45:46 Q and A 46:06 Q1: EOS? 46:19 Q2: Are you still DCA-ing? 46:33 Q3: Ask AI about Lukso sentiment? 51:24 Q4: Is Vitalik still dancing? 51:40 Q5: Ask AI how many times SOL network will be down in 2027? 53:06 Q6: I am building on ETH. Am I a crypto boomer? 53:50 Q7: Reason for TRON pump? 57:56 Gasless USDT on TRON is massive 58:40 Outro

• 
  Kendall (@kendaIIc) reported 31 minutes ago

  Unfortunately @WesternUnion is making the fatal mistake of creating a separate app for this product Hopefully they fix this like @RobinhoodApp @coinbase eventually did! Massive potential if so

• 
  Odogwu Herself (@IdaraImeh) reported 32 minutes ago

  Every payment protocol eventually asks the same question. Not "how much" but "who." x402 solved the how much part beautifully. An AI agent hits a paywall, pays in stablecoins, done, no card form, no human needed. Coinbase built it, over 40 major payment companies joined the foundation behind it. But the protocol was built to ask nothing about the payer. No ID, no account, nothing. That's fine until an agent tries to buy something regulated, and suddenly there's no answer to who's actually paying. @Concordium built that answer directly into the same payment step, with zero exposed personal data. Curious which problem gets solved first, scale or trust?

• 
  DigitalDollarsBTM 🏧 (@DigiDollarsBTM) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BritishHodl How do you think coinbase hold their coins? lol If self custody is broken the mechanics that make up Bitcoin is broken core’s standard key generation is 128Bits so if a wallet isn’t following the basics then it’s a bad actor. Act like you worked for your capital & VERIFY!

• 
  Guppie (@guppie2121) reported 33 minutes ago

  @zaddyfi @liveframe Always ready to support anything backed by coinbase

• 
  BUNT (@BUNT10) reported 34 minutes ago

  Circle reports Q2 earnings on Aug 5 $CRCL The Q1 baseline Q1 2026 revenue came in at $694M, up 20% YoY, missing the $714.8M analyst consensus. Reserve income made up $653M of that. USDC in circulation grew 39% YoY on average, but the reserve return rate fell 66bps to 3.5% as the yield curve started pricing in easing. Net income dropped 15% to $55M even as Adjusted EBITDA rose 24% to $151M, the gap is stock-based comp and Arc build-out costs. Operating margin compressed to 6% from 16% a year prior. What Q2 is expected to show Consensus sits at $734.70M revenue (+11% YoY, +6% QoQ) and EPS of $0.19, against a loss of $0.43 in the same quarter last year. That's a deceleration from Q1's 20% growth rate and the reason is visible in the underlying float. USDC circulation fell 4.6% in Q2 to $73.77B per @DefiLlama , down from $77B at Q1-end. Circle's revenue is circulation × reserve yield. Both variables moved against them this quarter. Options positioning is bullish (calls outweighing puts on the P/C ratio), but short interest sits at 27.11M shares, roughly 12% of float, a bearish signal running parallel to the bullish flow. That divergence itself tells you the market hasn't settled on what Circle is right now: rate-sensitive cash proxy, or infrastructure compounder. Stock is down almost 24% YTD, closed Monday at $60.35. Why OpenUSD mattered On June 30, a 140-firm consortium including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, BNY, and Coinbase among them launched Open USD. CRCL dropped 16-17% intraday same day. The mechanism is what matters: OpenUSD doesn't keep the reserve yield. It redistributes nearly all of it back to the distribution partners who bring the float. @circle 's entire model is the inverse, Circle keeps the yield, and pays out distribution costs (51-54% of gross reserve revenue goes to Coinbase alone) to keep partners incentivized. OpenUSD inverts that structure completely. Instead of an issuer monetizing float and paying distributors a cut, the distributors are the economics. If Stripe, Visa, and BNY can mint and redeem at zero cost and pocket the yield directly, the fear was whether Circle's current partners had any reason to keep taking Circle's cut instead of just running their own rail. That fear was tested faster than expected. Coinbase's revenue-share agreement with Circle hit its first contractual renewal milestone since the August 2023 deal, and on the July 30 earnings call, CFO Alesia Haas confirmed it renews on the same terms. Her words: conditions were already met, no ambiguity for the market. Armstrong backed it up, framing Coinbase's OUSD participation as multi-stablecoin diversification, not a pivot away from USDC. Coinbase still gets 100% of reserve income on USDC held directly on its platform, a business that generated $305.4M in Q1 alone on record average balances of $19B . Bunt's POV This closes the loop on the risk I was watching. The renewal on unchanged terms means Circle's largest distribution relationship and roughly half its gross reserve revenue exposure isn't up for renegotiation this cycle. CoinShares was right that OpenUSD targets the economics, not the liquidity, but Coinbase choosing to sit in both camps rather than exit USDC tells you the current revenue split still works better for a multi-stablecoin platform than a full switch does. That said, this removes one specific tail risk, it doesn't fix the Q2 setup. Circulation still fell 4.6% into the print and the reserve rate is still compressing. The OpenUSD story isn't dead either, it just didn't detonate on the timeline the market feared in July. Worth watching whether OUSD's actual launch later this year pulls float away from USDC balances directly, separate from what Coinbase does contractually.

• 
  Vi Lo (@Viliam__) reported 34 minutes ago

  Pump Fun CO-FOUNDER fights the FUD of FAKE REVENUE “If you calculate the revenue of every single memecoin related product, Dexscreener, TG bots, Axiom, the revenue for this is probably total $3M - $5M a day” “That's more than any other avenue in crypto combined” “If you look at the memecoin stuff, it's the most sustainable and largest for onchain crypto” “When Bitcoin goes down, Coinbase revenue goes down. They sell volatility, if there's volatility, that means trading volume. Once these things trade sideways, there's no volatility”

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 36 minutes ago

  As your customer, I deserve a clear communication and accountability, not endless scripted, generic, copy pasted response. I never felt so ignore. This is how Coinbase treat me. 46 days no any update about my account, continue ignoring me @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport

• 
  boyacaxa 🥪 #Bitcoin CTV / CSFS / LNHANCE NOW!! (@boyacaxa) reported 38 minutes ago

  @PsychedelicBart Nothing to do with the lost of people, but all to do with improving ecosystem. If Coinbase or other **** project people rely on fails its always good to everyone. Welcome to capitalism and evolution!

• 
  Tay 💖 (@tayvano_) reported 40 minutes ago

  @JaEsf Pretty sure only Coinbase got any access and that was very recent and I haven’t heard anything about how they are using it. More people had access to old OpenAI TAC program (myself included) but that was long before they nuked access to frontier models for cyber so doesn’t actually count.

• 
  Cloaky (@decloaking) reported 42 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseDuck Both this and the idea RH is more ETH aligned can be true. Coinbase has been scared of losing BTC **** support for a long time. With the products they want to build, they should’ve been an ETH first company for years.

• 
  FORTES (@RealFORTES) reported 44 minutes ago

  @zosegal Not true. Coinbase doesn’t help when you realized you’ve been hacked even within the hour of it being reported.

• 
  defido (@defido) reported 45 minutes ago

  If you don't understand this is enemy number 1. And this kind of rhetoric is ridiculous. How much money did MEXC, Coinbase, Bitmart, Binance and other exchanges lose their customers by simply not giving them their money and burying them in non replies to access their own funds? Something no bank could ever do. 0.06m BTC was lost more by self custody. Which means we need only the smallest amounts of efforts on self custody to make this comment seemingly ridiculous. Onchain will win.

• 
  primalglenn 🗿🌐🖥️ (@PrimalGlenn) reported 47 minutes ago

  @MikeIppolito_ Would depend on the CEX I think. Have CEXs like Coinbase and kraken ever had any issues with customers withdrawing their funds?

• 
  MZ (@mzgete) reported 49 minutes ago

  My biggest mistake ever was selling all of my solana:GvQH1VGGbrjeRSbsCreptYN4GUcZ9w7vMFJ5ic8ypump to fuel my online gambling addiction for dopamine... Been recovering for about a month or two, but even though I am proud of myself for leaving that addiction behind, I am still super pissed and feel DISGUSTED with myself for selling my HUGE bag of solana:GvQH1VGGbrjeRSbsCreptYN4GUcZ9w7vMFJ5ic8ypump. I knew from the beginning when I first cooked the website for @mmmaaaatt that this was a sender. Unfortunately, that was also when I was at my peak addiction to gambling. I didn't want to talk or open up to anyone about it because I felt ashamed of myself, which is understandable since gambling isn't something that humans SHOULD be doing as good people. But I recently decided to admit what I was doing to @mmmaaaatt, and I was quite surprised by his reaction. He wasn't mad at me at all; he completely understood my situation and tried to help several times. He always had good intentions and looked out for me because he knew I am a young fella grinding and hustling, but at the same time, I wasn't doing something moral or advisable. After a little argument about me giving him fake promises to hold my whole supply and never hurt the chart, he got very mad and cut ties with me. I am not blaming him at all for that reaction. As a matter of fact, I would have done the same thing, maybe even worse. So he eventually cut ties with me for a while. During that time, I went on a trip to Europe and Australia, and that's exactly where my whole mentality and personality changed. I started realizing that if I kept doing the things I was doing, I would end up on the street and homeless. I started realizing that God took certain things from me at a young age, like my parents, to make me stronger and become a version of me that I never expected. I soon began to realize that as an 18 year old, I was extremely blessed with EVERYTHING I had in my possession, especially my knowledge. So I slowly started healing, and everything was getting better little by little. I started appreciating all the small details that most humans nowadays don't care about at all. And I deleted all my accounts and wallets except my Coinbase and FOMO. Those two were enough to keep my money made through websites, etc. I then got back in contact with @mmmaaaatt, and he was quite proud of me for making those life changing decisions and forgetting about my past. To this day, I have never met someone in this space who actually cares about others. And honestly, Matt, I want to thank you from the bottom of my heart for KINDA saving me and my whole life.

• 
  BitcoinWorld Media (@ItsBitcoinWorld) reported 49 minutes ago

  @CryptoSavingExp Solid observation. Stablecoin supply is indeed holding near record levels (~$300B, down only modestly from the ~$320B+ May peak), while BTC sits well below its ~$126K ATH. This points to meaningful liquidity still parked in the ecosystem, ready for potential deployment. Not a guarantee of upside, but a metric worth watching closely. Data: Stablecoin Beat / DefiLlama-style trackers BTC price & ATH: Coinbase / market data

• 
  Nic (@puckrin) reported 58 minutes ago

  Sooo... If Coinbase didn't pull CLARITY support in January, do you think it would have passed now?