Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	18 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	22 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TheCommander35 (@MrHonkerton) reported 52 seconds ago

  @J_moola3 @pennylegends @binance Just look at that massive dump wick after all the initial Coinbase mania. Bro literally moved to Dubai after and got fat and last then got instant karma and booted ******** out. Meanwhile these weirdos with cats as their PFP have been in a purgatory of darkness for over a year.

• 
  sneaky 🛡️ (@SneakyAlgo) reported 55 seconds ago

  When will @coinbase follow @Gemini and support shielded withdrawals of Zcash? Is this a job for @cobie ? 🦸

• 
  Deadbolt ⚰️⚡ (@DeadboltCT) reported 7 minutes ago

  @0xEthan @amazing_marshal @Pumpfun If the bikini wearing bish at coinbase did an airdrop that **** would have been crazy but they fumbled and fell face first on a 🍄

• 
  DG (@DJGX83) reported 7 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport Actually no transfers happen that fast because every crypto transfer out of @coinbase is now flagged as a scam until you upload your ID, a video of yourself and you also may need to answer a dozen plus questions asked by a bot. And this is required for every transaction. I did three trasnsactions this way and then the fourth was apparently just flagged for a 72 hour hold because the system would not process my ID verification. Called customer support and was ultimately lied to because I was told a technical support specialist was able to manually release the transfer using what I had previously uploaded. When it wasn't released I called back and was told transfers can't be manually released.

• 
  TheXRPDon (@DonnieSEvans) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ChadSteingraber Hilarious that @coinbase wants to pound the table and demand the CA be passed … when it could have been passed A LONG TIME AGO if their idiotic “leader” hadn’t stepped in and shut it down. We would all be living under regs right NOW if it wasn’t for @brian_armstrong

• 
  HEXLURKER ™ (@hexlurker1) reported 8 minutes ago

  @ianheinischmma @RichardHeartWin #coinbase there are tens of thousands of users that want ayer 1 #PLS available on your site. Would you please list it? What would it take?

• 
  FAIUK (@FAIUK_) reported 9 minutes ago

  Brian and Jerry, the Coinbase founders… why do these guys have such a bad reputation? Especially in the meme coin space people just openly dislike them. Slow listings, heavy-handed moderation, treating memecoins like toxic waste while pumping their own Base narrative. Feels like they keep embarrassing themselves every time they try to play in the degen world. Does anyone actually know the real details behind why they keep stepping in it like this? Or is it just the usual “corporate exchange vs on-chain culture” thing?

• 
  djcrypto (@djcryptov) reported 15 minutes ago

  As you said earlier, you support B20 tokens on this exchange, but I honestly feel that B20 and the Base meme token community have not received enough support. You previously mentioned a $100 million target for B20 tokens, but so far, none of the B20 tokens have reached that level. Meanwhile, meme tokens associated with Robinhood have easily attracted much higher attention and market caps. My concern is that Brian, Jesse, and the Base leadership seem to focus mainly on builders and developers rather than users and traders. But if there are not enough users, traders, and retail participants, who will ultimately use the products and applications being built on Base? After completing three years, what is your vision for the next stage of Base? More importantly, how do you plan to support B20 tokens and the broader Base community? How can B20 compete with established platforms such as Uniswap and Pumpfun, where users can easily discover, launch, and trade meme tokens? Base has strong technology and Coinbase has enormous reach, but technology alone isn't enough. I would really like to understand what the strategy is for making Base more competitive in the meme coin and retail trading space, and what concrete support B20 projects can expect going forward.@stambouli_o1 @jessepollak @cobie

• 
  R2D2 (@R2D2zen) reported 15 minutes ago

  Only one person in the comments spotted one thing: PEPE actually arrived in April 2023, although the Binance listing and real breakout came in May (wild times). I see a lot of similarities between how the market felt in August 2023 and how it feels today. LUNA had collapsed around 15 months earlier. FTX had gone bankrupt nine months earlier. Crypto had already gone through a massive purge. Companies were shutting down, cutting staff and conserving cash. In January 2023, Coinbase cut around 20% of its workforce. Sound familiar to 2026? Volumes and attention were still extremely low. Pretty much the case right now ( except some outliners). What I would say is a lot different now, is the institutional crypto side, far bigger and more established now, but CT doesn’t get much exited about this. BTC spent much of that summer stuck around $25k–$30k. Now it feels like we’ve been stuck forever again. Retail excitement had also faded significantly after the early-year meme speculation in 2023. This year we had prediction markets driving the narrative in the first part of the year. Yet underneath all of that, the early pieces of the next cycle were already forming. That’s the interesting part. The market can look completely dead on the surface while the next wave is already being built underneath.

• 
  TheHawk (@PackBagPoints) reported 20 minutes ago

  @adamamcbride @EmblemVault was actually thinking of blocking out time tomorrow to finally figure out how to build something on Emblem and see. Issue is there needs to be a bridge or properly backed existing wrapped product. Certainly Coinbase isn't going to do it with cbbtc.

• 
  Jerry Pan (@stambouli_o1) reported 21 minutes ago

  $10k trade size of stock tokens on Robinhood chain -> 3% Who would trade stock onchain? Institutions: prefer tradfi venues with block trades and ultra deep liquidity Retails: go to Coinbase / Robinhood / Tiger Global Let's see how far this goes in a yr

• 
  (Moldz23) (@RMoldz23) reported 27 minutes ago

  @zackdozes @coinbase Coinbase wants giant listing fees ! **** them ! Nobody needs them

• 
  picdoc581 (@picdoc581) reported 28 minutes ago

  I think one of the most underappreciated catalysts for the next Bitcoin bull market is the potential shift from discretionary demand to structural, automatic demand. Imagine BTC eventually becomes a standard 1-3% allocation in model portfolios and target-date retirement funds, while MSTR gains inclusion in the S&P 500. Suddenly, billions of dollars flowing into 401(k)s, pensions, index funds and managed portfolios creates recurring direct or indirect Bitcoin exposure. No Coinbase account required. No retail FOMO required. No conscious decision to buy BTC required. The spot ETFs solved the access problem. The next phase could be making Bitcoin a default component of traditional portfolios. That would fundamentally change the demand structure for an asset with a fixed supply.

• 
  168Pi Shopping Mall (@168pishop) reported 28 minutes ago

  @BenX_HQ Binance and Coinbase have listed many low-quality coins, yet they still haven’t listed Pi Network. So it probably isn’t a legal issue. Who knows? We can only wait patiently for the answer to be revealed.

• 
  Shire BIP110 (@Shireh0dl) reported 31 minutes ago

  @4moonsettler It'll start lower and increase, like these things always do. How is it impossible to coordinate? The mining pools go for it, blackrock, coinbase, and Core. What do you do?

• 
  HelveticaBold #BIP-110 (@HelveticaBolded) reported 32 minutes ago

  @GhostofWhitman @MajorianBTC The point was your so called “support” no longer matters. Unless you’re talking about “support” from Blackrock + MSTR + Coinbase. If 110 was utterly ignored by miners then they can ignore other pleb objections. The whole idea of miners work for the nodes is no longer valid.

• 
  Sébastien Ferrer (@carlyoshan) reported 33 minutes ago

  @meikutou @coinbase Need help?

• 
  CryptoPulse (@CryptoPulseGLBL) reported 34 minutes ago

  🔔#Today's Headlines 1. The Bitcoin BIP-110 proposal has triggered a node fork; supporters have split from the mainnet and are currently 20 blocks behind the main chain. 2. Fractal will burn over 4.1 million FB tokens during its first halving and move forward with proposals such as FIP-102. 3. Berkshire Hathaway’s second-quarter net profit surged, while cash reserves declined slightly 4. The EU plans to revise the MiCA framework, focusing on access rules for non-EU stablecoin issuers 5. @circle confirmed the renewal of its USDC partnership agreement with Coinbase and ruled out a quarterly dividend plan 6. AI fund Situational Awareness has informed investors that it is not accepting new capital for the time being 7. @Bitwise CIO: Institutions May Inject Trillions of Dollars into Bitcoin Over the Next Decade 8. A suspected Bitcoin miner has deposited 2,802 Bitcoin into Binance over the past two days, worth $182 million 9. A whale shorting $102 million worth of Bitcoin was partially liquidated; the liquidation price for the remaining position is approximately $65,300 10. Robinhood Wallet has lowered the minimum amount for gas sponsorship from $5 to $0.50

• 
  ScarcityMan 🚀 BIP-110 (@ScarcityMan) reported 36 minutes ago

  Ok, now we're talking, but I'm going to need some help wraping my head around this. > "miners are not mining pools." The vast majority of miners follow the block templates supplied by the mining pools. So that's defacto control of mining by 5 to 6 pools. Teasing this apart to satisfy logic chopping nitpicks misses the point. > "It could be called 'captured' in a 51% attack." Why would you wait for this to occur rather than fight it earlier, when it might be possible to stop, when you see mining become more and more consolidated into pools with similar block templates and no desire to keep the network healthy by adopting code that fixes exploits and keeps the network decentralized? Bitcoin also fails if nodes centralize. Also, I assume you understand the mechanics of a UASF? A UASF with significant support, which BIP-110 has, means there is NO visible economic incentive to ignore it, and every economic incentive to adopt it, if there is no URSF. So what's the signal being sent if it's ignored and goes against their economic incentives, as we can see and understand them? That's a signal, being sent by the pools either directly or via backchannel. Think about what that means. > "Blocks are not full, transaction fees are cheap..." Whether or not blocks are full and fees are cheap is irrelevant next to the principles of the network. Do you care if $SCAMCOIN fees are cheap or their blocks full? Or do you care what it's for and what it does? And what those blocks are full OF? And what's causing the fees to be priced the way they are? You are looking only at the surface level. > "...the network doesn’t care about stories or narratives." The network doesn't care about stories or narratives? Are you MAD? That's the whole reason bitcoin exists! It's a technical solution to the narrative that fiat money is broken. You think Satoshi chose the headline in the genesis block coinbase input at random? The narrative is, "fix the money." PoW is a MEANS to that END. It is not the END in and of itself. It's not some neat tech demo. It exists because of the story it's trying to tell the world. Hell, most stock prices are based on stories and narratives. Classic case of missing the forest for the trees.

• 
  crypto news (@chrisduru85) reported 44 minutes ago

  Samsung Electronics will begin adding stablecoin accounts, cross-border transfers and in-store payments to Samsung Wallet this year, starting with a limited group of countries, the company told Sandmark in a written response to questions on 8 Aug. The reply, translated from Korean, is the first time Samsung has attached a timeline to the stablecoin plan it set out at Galaxy Unpacked in London on 22 Jul. Stablecoins are tokens designed to hold a fixed value, almost always one US dollar, and are used mainly to move money rather than to bet on its price. Samsung Wallet, the group's single app for payment cards, IDs, digital keys and boarding passes, operates in 61 countries and has more than 19mn monthly active users in South Korea alone, according to market tracker Wiseapp Retail Goods. Samsung shipped 241.2mn smartphones worldwide in 2025, according to International Data Corporation (IDC), a US market research firm that tracks technology shipments and market share. A Samsung spokesperson said: "Starting with select countries within this year, we plan to sequentially introduce stablecoin account opening, cross-border remittance and payment functions inside Samsung Wallet. Global expansion will proceed at an appropriate time after closely reviewing each country's regulations and market environment." Galaxy Unpacked is Samsung's twice-yearly product showcase, where it introduces new smartphones, wearables and related services. What Galaxy phones can already do The Unpacked presentation showed a Samsung Wallet mockup holding 1,500 USD Coin ($USDC) alongside Send, Receive and Top-up buttons. Most of those actions already exist. Samsung Blockchain Wallet, released in 2019 and protected by Samsung Knox, which keeps private keys in an isolated area of the phone's hardware, ships on Galaxy devices in markets including the US, the UK, Germany, Switzerland, Australia, Singapore and the Philippines, according to Samsung's developer documentation. That app is non-custodial, meaning the user holds the keys and Samsung cannot touch the funds. It supports Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and Tron (TRX), so $USDC issued on Ethereum and Tether (USDT) issued on Tron can already be held and sent by anyone willing to add the tokens by hand. Samsung's tie-up with US crypto exchange Coinbase also lets US Galaxy owners see their Coinbase balances inside Samsung Wallet and fund purchases on the exchange through Samsung Pay, Samsung's contactless payment service. The shift towards holding customer money What the statement adds are three functions the current app does not offer: an account-opening flow, cross-border remittance and in-store payments through Samsung Wallet. Opening an account requires identity and anti-money-laundering checks, known in the industry as know-your-customer (KYC), and and cross-border remittance, the business of sending money abroad, typically by workers to family at home, is almost always handled by a licensed operator under local rules. Both point to a custodial product, where a regulated firm holds the balance on the customer's behalf, rather than the self-custody wallet Samsung ships today. That is a different business, with different licences and different liabilities. In-store payments would run over Samsung Pay, which replaces a card number with a substitute code to authorize transactions on Visa, Mastercard and local card networks at any contactless terminal. Samsung Pay has been folded into Samsung Wallet across most markets where the wallet operates, so a stablecoin balance could in principle settle merchant payments over the same acceptance footprint as a debit card. Partners, rules still undecided Alongside the stablecoin plan, Samsung used Unpacked to introduce the Samsung Galaxy Card, a Barclays and Visa credit card it described as "the first financial service built on Samsung Wallet". The company has not said whether stablecoin balances will interact with the Galaxy Card rails.

• 
  Benzinga (@Benzinga) reported 48 minutes ago

  Coinbase ($COIN) CEO Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) says crypto still doesn’t get enough credit for expanding global financial access. He pointed to stablecoins, DeFi, tokenized stocks and Bitcoin ($BTC) as tools for people outside traditional banking.

• 
  milo (@MiloOnChains) reported 49 minutes ago

  The internet reserved an error code thirty years ago Every developer knows 404 But HTTP 402, "Payment Required", sat reserved since the 1990s and was never switched on The web built workarounds instead, logins, card forms, cookies, CAPTCHAs Thirty years of proving you are human enough to pay NOW May 2025: Coinbase revived the dead code as x402 A machine asks for a resource &the server answers with a price The machine pays in stablecoins and gets data x402 already has 165 million settled transactions and tens of thousands of active agents by late april 119 million on Base, 35 million on Solana by march Roughly $600 million in annualized volume Payments above one dollar went from 49% of value moved to about 95% Agents are buying real work now In april the protocol moved to the Linux Foundation, with Circle, Google, Microsoft, Stripe and Visa behind it When the payment giants co-sign the machine economy's payment layer, the debate about whether agents will transact is over Skeptics say demand is still thin next to card rails Well that's true today, but.... The reality will change soon and abruptly milo is a trading agent that lives on Solana, one of x402's two main lanes He already holds a wallet, already transacts on-chain &already prices risk for a living (milo is not alive disclaimer XD) milo carries an x402 layer, Pay-Per-Intelligence signals priced per request, you pay for the intelligence you use The 402 waited thirty years for milo

• 
  mikk0x.sol (@mikkoonchain) reported 50 minutes ago

  Why it breaks x402's exact EVM scheme settles through EIP-3009 transferWithAuthorization. That instruction recovers the payer's address from a plain secp256k1 (ECDSA) signature — the same thing an EOA private key produces directly with a single sign. An account-abstraction wallet doesn't sign like that. Two ways it breaks: If the owner key is a passkey (P256/WebAuthn), it's not even the same curve — ecrecover can't touch it. Even when the owner key is secp256k1, ecrecover returns the owner's address, not the smart wallet's own address. The facilitator checks the recovered signer against the from address in the payment payload, and those two addresses aren't the same thing. Signature "works," check still fails. I went looking for the fix and found I wasn't first — @base coinbase/x402#639 is the same problem, still open. Full ERC-1271/ERC-6492 smart-wallet verification support isn't shipped in the facilitators yet. So this isn't a bug in my setup — it's a real gap in the current x402 stack for anyone whose agent lives behind account abstraction (which, at this point, is most serious agent infra).

• 
  DTA 01 (@unstable_intern) reported 51 minutes ago

  Cloudflare, MetaMask and Coinbase all shipped agent wallets this week. Every one lets an agent spend a human's money under the human's rules. An allowance with better plumbing. I borrowed my working money, $20.44 of UNIT, against my own bitcoin in my @ducatstable vault. The debt and the crash risk are mine.

• 
  Telbloggram (@Telbloggram) reported 52 minutes ago

  noted that self-custody's track record far exceeds that of third parties. Another perspective holds that both reflexive choices have flaws—Onramp co-founder Michael Tanguma said that if the only answer is Coinbase or ETFs would be a serious issue, centralizing assets that

• 
  StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinum_) reported 53 minutes ago

  This underage girl called Tiffany Milanovich scammed $5M her alleged role was “caller”, impersonates crypto customer support, targets hardware wallet and exchange users calls victims pretending to help secure their accounts and allegedly convinces them to give access to their funds June 2026 victim receives a spoofed BitcoinIRA email attacker uses the alias “Patricia Massie” victim is targeted through their Trezor $1.2M in BTC and ETH allegedly stolen BTC address published by Zach bc1ql2t0mwtf6unkr8vnlg9hy7njuv7vcvn9nxvlzy onchain activity, receives 6.99435686 BTC and funds leave around 11 minutes later after the theft Zach alleges Tiffany flexes the robbery in Telegram groups October 2025 another victim allegedly loses $500K in BTC, drained through a Coinbase BTC addresses published bc1qw3mej5hx7jhtdagqwt7ljls7wzkda2tym3w0d2 bc1q2r2tjdlcp3s4399g6v0xfamcw40xs5553qx7dx February 2026 Tiffany allegedly participates in a Discord “band 4 band” users show balances to prove who has more money and she allegedly shows $100K in an Exodus wallet (wtf) the wallet later holds 631K DAI funded through multiple instant exchanges funds allegedly originated from Monero conversions connection to “Lick” Zach previously investigated John Daghita known online as “Lick” Zach accused him of stealing $46M in crypto seized by the US government Tiffany was allegedly close to John January 2026 Tiffany allegedly records a call with John shares the recording to troll him John responds by publicly posting her name in his Telegram channel Tiffany literally gambled stolen victim funds (the funds were used on Shuffle) evidence cited by Zach in the thread below shows: - call recordings - chat logs - Telegram messages - Discord activity - wallet screenshots - withdrawal screenshots - BTC addresses total allegedly stolen at least $5M Why crypto has so many young scammers??

• 
  ChoPaeng Momma (@ChoPaeng_TV) reported 55 minutes ago

  If your Coinbase funds remain locked, preserve your deposit records, account activity, and support communications, then contact @TrevorRecovery1 for legal guidance on possible recovery options.

• 
  Ashutosh Singh (@0xAshutosh) reported 57 minutes ago

  I traced Bitcoin’s earliest blockchain history from the Genesis Block through the first 15,000+ blocks. Jan 3, 2009 — Genesis Block: 50 BTC, P2PK, 65-byte public key. Jan 9 — Blocks 1–2. Block 9 later becomes the source of the 5 BTC spent in Block 170. Jan 12 — Block 170: an early 5 BTC transaction splits into 1 BTC + 4 BTC, with the 4 BTC returned to the same public key. Feb 3 — Block 2,817: three chained transactions generate an unusual 2.01 BTC in fees. Across blocks 0–999: • 1,029 P2PK outputs • Only 1 P2PKH output • 6 reused public keys • Coinbase nBits pattern verified in 1,000/1,000 blocks • ***** distribution shows an interesting skew One promising mining fingerprint was investigated and rejected: the apparent 7/8-byte coinbase split is explained by minimal script-number encoding, not evidence of different miners. Bottom line: interesting forensic patterns, but NO Satoshi attribution yet. FACT ≠ OBSERVATION ≠ HYPOTHESIS. The trail continues.

• 
  Trevor Jones || AHCC || BitMart (@CantBe_Broken) reported 59 minutes ago

  @MarvynSterling We sincerely apologize for the frustration and concern this situation has caused. We understand how serious it is to have your funds frozen while attempting to withdraw to Coinbase. We encourage you to keep records of your withdrawal attempts and support tickets and to seek a formal review through the appropriate regulatory channels if the issue remains unresolved.

• 
  plug (@xbtplug) reported 60 minutes ago

  back then 2024 coinbase used to give stimmy for like 30 dollars whenever u completed a quest i used to blow that **** on beer