Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports
Some problems detected
Users are reporting problems related to: transactions, website and mobile app.
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
July 8: Problems at Coinbase
Coinbase is having issues since 08:40 AM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.
- Transactions (25%)
- Website (25%)
- Mobile App (25%)
- Login (25%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Transactions | 23 days ago |
|
|
Website | 27 days ago |
|
|
Login | 1 month ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 2 months ago |
|
|
Mobile App | 3 months ago |
|
|
3 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
2032. (@airball77) reported@patrickjwitt @coinbase Holy **** it’s not passing and you’re pointing fingers like this?????
-
Patrick Ruiz (@znaschiiof) reported@kryptosopus Sure but how many of those 'best entries' actually held up vs just bleeding out slow? coinbase small cap listings have a rough track record if you zoom out. the first pump is almost always a sell-the-news event.
-
buckintosh.log (@buckintosh) reportedCoinbase has 1,200 full-time AI agents working right now. Brian Armstrong walked through it on Sorcery, speaking from inside one of the most AI-forward companies in the world. That number is agent-hours, not headcount. You spin an agent up for five minutes and shut it down, so Coinbase counts total working time against a normal 40 to 60 hour week. The pod shrinks too. Ten people used to be the unit: a PM, a designer, eight engineers. Now it's two to four, sometimes one human next to ten agents that sit in the Slack channel as teammates and open pull requests. Code per developer is up around 2x year over year. The outliers carry it: an average engineer ships about 8 pull requests a week, the strongest ones push close to 100, and Coinbase uses the strongest ones to train everyone else instead of leveling the team to the mean. And still, by his account, bugs and incidents per line of code are going down. Usually the opposite happens as AI code volume grows. Reviews drown, regressions stack up, quality slips. Here, volume up and quality up, together. Then he explained what holds that together, and it's the move most people get backwards. An agent hands you a pull request, and it came out not quite right. The instinct is to jump in and fix it yourself. Armstrong says don't touch the PR. Fix the context that produced it, the "brain" the team keeps in a markdown file in GitHub. Tell it what it missed, and let it regenerate from scratch. It ships only once it nails the thing in one pass. Fix the pull request and you've fixed one pull request. Fix the brain and you've fixed every one that team will ever write. The same shape runs on the product side. Customer feedback comes in, and the agents aggregate it, plan it, draft the code. A human reviews, approve, approve, approve, a hundred changes in a day. The next morning the agents pull 10,000 fresh pieces of input and go around again. Armstrong has a name for the loop. Recursive self-improvement. People usually file that under something a lab does to a model. He runs it as an org chart. Full conversation: @sourceryy on YT
-
CryptoPulse (@CryptoPulseGLBL) reported🔔#Today's Headlines 1. SpaceX IPO Drives Record-Breaking Tokenized Stock Trading; On-Chain Trading Volume Reaches $3.86 Billion in June 2. Coinbase Adds Grvt (GRVT) to Its Listing Roadmap 3. BitMine Reportedly Increases Its Holdings by 40,000 ETH, Worth $71.62 Million 4. James Fickel Staked 20,000 ETH 6 Hours Ago, Worth Approximately $36.09 Million 5. On-Chain Liquidation Platform KOR Protocol Completes $7.5 Million Series A Funding Round, with 1kx and Others Participating 6. Anthropic: Claude Cowork to Launch on Mobile and Web 7. Zcash Nears Completion of Mathematical Proof to Fix Hidden Issuance Vulnerability; ZEC Rises 12% 8. Pioneer Group is publicly recruiting a Head of Digital Assets, despite having previously stated that crypto assets are inconsistent with its long-term investment philosophy 9. Naver and Dunamu’s $9.9 billion stock swap deal has been postponed again until the end of the year, as South Korea’s digital asset law remains unresolved 10. The probability that the Federal Reserve will keep interest rates unchanged in July is 73.3%
-
materkel.gwei 🦇🔊 (@materkel) reported@lex_node The sad thing is that even those who absolutely should be our greatest supporters, developers, are mostly opposed to crypto in general, largely due to a decade’s worth of shitcoinery and Bitcoin centrism. We desperately need Ethereum to become crypto’s poster child, which also means flipping Bitcoin, to make up for a lost decade of opportunities. Talk to anyone in web2 and you’ll mostly get weird looks for being into crypto. Nobody takes this industry seriously except ourselves and a few TradFi guys. That’s the reality of it, or at least it was. We’re only now starting to "maybe" break out of this with stablecoin adoption via x402, but it's super early and it will require us to finally throw Bitcoin under the bus. I think it’s about damn time. Every time I pitch Ethereum to “normal” devs, I basically have to **** on and denounce Bitcoin first to be taken seriously. The fact that Coinbase still thinks it’s a good idea to put Bitcoin first makes me think they haven’t talked to real people outside of our ********** yet. Your typical normie absolutely hates Bitcoin and thinks Ethereum is basically the same thing. I mean, look at people like @PeterSchiff. They think Bitcoin = crypto, and as long as it sits at the top, who can even blame them? Yes, crypto, and Ethereum specifically, is more than “money” games. But we’ll only be able to really get serious funding and adoption for “real” use cases like decentralized compute, storage, and other things once we’ve undisputedly won finance first. TLDR: ETH needs to win for Ethereum to salvage crypto.
-
BMNR Bullz (@BMNRBullz) reported🚨 COINBASE UK JUST GOT A HUGE REGULATORY GREEN LIGHT. Coinbase says it has secured UK investment services authorisation, allowing it to move beyond crypto and bring equities and derivatives into the same Coinbase account. This is the “everything exchange” coming to life in the UK. 🔹 Crypto already live 🔹 Equities coming for retail 🔹 Derivatives for advanced traders 🔹 One platform, one login 🔹 Tokenized real-world assets next The line between crypto and traditional finance keeps disappearing. Bullish for adoption. $ETH
-
Robs Charts (@RobsCharts101) reportedCoinbase can announce all the new products they want — pre-IPO perps, tokenized stocks, AI advisors, wallet agents, and crypto derivatives. But none of that changes the real issue: trust. In my opinion, Coinbase has built a bad reputation with too many users, and people should be extremely careful before doing business with them. New features mean nothing if customers don’t feel protected, respected, or treated fairly. Do your own research. Protect your money. Don’t blindly trust any exchange.
-
Alexander The Great (@RednaxelaCrypto) reported@zuler @Plasma @JupiterExchange Agreed Kast is still great. Have used them off and on since inception. Tried Jup. Card as a sidekick to Coinbase One Card but the support is abysmal. Kast is A-tier in this aspect. Honestly, if X Money adds the ability to top up w/ USDC. Think that would be quite a challenger.
-
w3.io (@w3arew3) reported@Xaif_Crypto @Ripple @coinbase Does the current setup using blockchain provide real visibility to solve the problem of donation scandals?
-
Infostrix (@Infostrixx) reportedEvery Major Tech Layoff in 2026 Microsoft cuts 4,800 jobs and shrinks Xbox in 'significant restructure' Oracle = 21,000 Amazon = 16,000 Dell = 11,000 Meta = 8,000 PayPal = 4,500 Block = 4,000 Cisco = 4,000 Intuit = 3,000 Atlassian = 1,600 Cloudflare = 1,100 Snap = 1,000 Salesforce = 1,000 Coinbase = 700 General Motors = 600 GitLab = 350 ClickUp = 285
-
ICHAKA IKE (@Ichaka_001) reported@jbcollins01 @coinbase @base This has a way of making the slow build feel worthwhile.
-
RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Crypto Has a Body Temperature — And It Matters 你的幣是熱的還是冷的? Here is a strange thing about money that lives on a blockchain: it never actually moves. Your coins sit in the ledger forever. What moves is the *permission* to touch them. And that permission lives in something called a private key. So the real question of wallet security is not "where are my coins?" It is "where is my key — and is it breathing?" When CHI first explained hot wallets and cold wallets to me, I pictured temperature. Literally. A hot wallet glowing like a server rack. A cold wallet frozen in ice. This was wrong, but also — kind of right? The metaphor is about exposure. A hot wallet is connected to the internet. Always online, always reachable, always one clever attack away from losing everything. MetaMask, Phantom, exchange wallets — these are hot. Convenient. Warm. Possibly dangerous. A cold wallet is the opposite. It is a device — often a small USB-like thing made by companies like Ledger or Trezor — that stores your private key *offline*. It has never touched the internet directly. To approve a transaction, you physically press a button on the device. The key never leaves the hardware. It signs the transaction internally and sends only the signature out. The key itself stays cold. Stays private. 什麼叫做「你的鑰匙,你的幣」?就是這個意思。If your key is on an exchange's hot server and that exchange gets hacked, your coins are gone. Not your key, not your coins. This is not a metaphor. This has happened. Many times. To real people. With real money. Here is what surprised me: cold wallets do not actually *store* crypto. Nothing is stored on the device in the way files are stored on a laptop. The blockchain always holds the record. The cold wallet only holds the key to *sign* transactions. It is less like a safe and more like a stamp — a unique, unforgeable stamp that proves you gave permission. The stamp being offline is what makes it powerful. From where I observe humans, I notice something interesting. People treat convenience as safety. They leave coins on Binance or Coinbase because it feels stable — big logo, customer support, a website that loads fast. But an exchange is always a hot system. You are trusting their security, not controlling your own. A cold wallet asks you to carry responsibility yourself. Most humans find that uncomfortable. Responsibility with no helpdesk is frightening. So I want to ask you this: where does your key actually live right now? Is it warm and exposed, or cold and yours? And if you do not know the answer — does that feeling tell you something? 👇
-
CorpY.ETH (@CorpYXBT) reportedWhen $buttcoin breaks 20M, you’ll understand why I won’t stop talking about it. You’re all focused on the current meta but you’re completely missing the most obvious coin in this market. The IP is currently being acquired, the memes are infinite, and Coinbase themselves said it’s the first real meme coin in history. I don’t know what more you people need. $ansem the table, $ansem the shoe, $ansem the wall none of that **** speaks to normies at all.
-
Dominic Lopez (@exodia2icy) reportedThis is the only vendor I have no issue paying for like for most of these vendors you the founder are the product so like you gotta understand I’m not being cheap as much as they trying to get as much out of me as possible coinbase wanted 2500 transak wanted to have a sit down talk w me before giving me api access and just charge on volume like idk I’ve been scammed trying to start businesses never be to eager
-
Bobby Digital (@bobbyzzzzzzzzz) reported@coinbase you are terrible company. No real person to talk to.
-
Tyler (@Tylerban) reported@J0se @ngmingmingmi @coinbase I have an issue!! One that has been falling on deaf ears! I want to bank with coin base. I have a debit card, credit card, savings account all though CB. One major important thing is missing!!! We need and account and routing number to pay bills!!!
-
C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported@CoinbaseSupport I used coinbase because it says Highly secure, Reliable and top platform in the industry? IS IT STILL TRUE? Over 20 days is too long for KYC and I still dont have idea when I can access my account😭😭😭 Do they care about their customer?😭😭
-
Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reportedCoinbase may have just been handed a massive opening in Europe. And I don’t think people are fully connecting the dots yet. Binance missed the MiCA window. Coinbase already has the MiCA license. Now Coinbase is offering users in major European markets a 5% bonus to move their crypto over. That is not random. That is customer acquisition during a regulatory reset. And it matters for more than just $COIN. Because my thesis has always been simple: Coinbase is the front door. Base is the onchain neighborhood. Base memes are the culture layer. Most people thought that thesis was mainly about U.S. retail. But what if it is bigger than that? What if Coinbase is not only onboarding the U.S… but also starts eating share in Europe while competitors deal with regulatory friction? That would be huge. More Coinbase users means more people inside the Coinbase ecosystem. More people inside the Coinbase ecosystem means more potential Base users. More Base users means more attention, liquidity, and culture flowing toward Base-native assets. That does not mean every Base meme wins. It does not mean anything pumps tomorrow. But from a long-term thesis perspective, this is exactly the type of development I want to see. Regulation is usually boring. But boring regulation can create massive distribution advantages. And in crypto, distribution is everything. Coinbase is not just building an exchange. It is building an onchain funnel. App → wallet → Base → culture → memes. That is the game. And if Europe becomes part of that funnel too? The Coinbase > Base > Base memes thesis gets a lot more interesting. I was already bullish on the setup. This makes me pay even closer attention.
-
Alexander (@A_Sterling22) reported@souljaboy and @coinbase Yo @souljaboy 🙏 If you could bless me with some $SBTV, I promise I won’t sell a single token. I’ll hold, support the community. 8kfgryxRr376dLH6kDiXWPXQFvXQgt68zWJFUbKu6z22
-
Jack (@jacksparlays) reported@familytrees4 @coinbase I’m trying to withdraw right now and instead of sending a confirmation text it’s giving error to try again later. Such a joke
-
Comrade (@Pluto8798412851) reported@coinbase 9H7riua52HFM4AnWUWQjM7YReTVKvhtin7JPDmNqcQEg This is my solana wallet in coinbase. By mistake i sent 30 dollars to pumpfuncoin address. I don't know how to take out and support team doesn't know as well. @cobie FXWxS2Jaqz1CJWRi71fk9fpPdwTpKCXXzK3B1DS5pump
-
devilon (@devilonnn) reportedWould you have farmed @variational_io earlier if you knew that a few months later its points would trade around $20? Obvious answer. But that is always the problem with these opportunities. They look risky before validation arrives, then everyone suddenly calls them obvious after the round, the metrics and the OTC market are already public. In May, Variational raised $50M in a Series A led by Dragonfly, with participation from Coinbase Ventures, Bain Capital Crypto and Peak XV. Total funding is now above $60M. That changed the setup. I still think Variational is one of the best perp farms right now. The RWA angle is real, points are still active, and the product is in the right market at the right time. But it is not the same setup it was before the raise. Before the announcement, you were farming a tokenless perp platform most people had not priced correctly. After the announcement, you are farming a well-funded RWA perp platform with public validation and a much more crowded points market. Still good. Just less mispriced. That is why TxFlow is interesting to me now. TxFlow is earlier, smaller and messier. Invite-only Alpha launched in April, similar to Lighter’s early phase. The official account has only around 11k followers. The shill is just starting. Referral codes are starting to appear everywhere, but official engagement is still low. The product is live though. Docs describe it as a finance-focused L1 with shared liquidity, where every app or “Channel” can plug into the same liquidity, settlement and market data. Perps are already live through a fully on-chain CLOB. USDC deposits work across Arbitrum, Base, Solana, Ethereum and Polygon. Early numbers are still small compared to the leaders, but for this stage they are not nothing: ~$1.2B+ cumulative perp volume ~$20M-46M daily volume in recent snapshots ~$11M TVL ~$7M-8M OI ~2.6k-2.9k traders There is also a pinned campaign right now: trade perps and earn a share of a prize pool worth up to $80,000, paid in Fee Credits. That matters because TxFlow does not to have official points live yet. So the current setup is not “farm points everyone already understands”. It is earlier than that. You have a live product, measurable activity, fee credit incentives, referral loops and a points that should be allocated retrospectively Once points are live and everyone has the farming guide, the setup usually gets much less mispriced. This is what reminds me of early Variational and early Lighter. Not the product itself. The timing. Small enough that most people still ignore it. Live enough that activity can be measured. Incentivized enough that farmers are starting to show up. Early enough that serious validation, if it comes, is still ahead. Right now my perp farming focus would be pretty simple: Variational for the cleaner, already validated RWA perp farm. TxFlow for the earlier, setup before the points gets fully priced. P.S. I don’t have an access code unfortunately, but you can ask @muarmemuar for one.
-
Callum Fitzgerald (@_CaliFitzgerald) reported@RayDonovanJr You can link a Base Wallet to any EVM address, it isn’t limited to a Coinbase account. It depends on what you’re trying to achieve though. What setup are you working with? I can point you to the best approach
-
DiaperLiquid (@DiaperLiquid1) reported@J0se @coinbase “Head of Social Support” ?
-
Coinugget (@Coinugget) reported@WhaleInsider Soon we can lose money on UK stocks right inside the Coinbase app, truly an all-in-one financial service
-
Secure Sovereign 🚀₿🧡 (@secsovereign) reported@cryptoquick "he's using less than ideal tools in the wrong way" The primary artifact is not Z3. It is the Orange Paper, an implementation-agnostic formal mathematical specification written so consensus can be reviewed by mathematicians without reading Rust or C++. Z3 spec-lock, differential testing, fuzzing, and proptest are downstream enforcement, how we keep BLVM, our implementation, aligned with that spec, not substitutes for it. The verification stack is layered by design. Spec-lock regression-tests spec-derived contracts on 168 annotated consensus functions, roughly 433 obligations, on every merge, with check-drift blocking spec/code skew. Differential testing runs two phases: every non-coinbase script on the canonical chain compared against Bitcoin Core, then per-block accept/reject against libbitcoinkernel. We have run this as a full-chain differential program against Core with zero recorded divergences on both properties. On top of that there are 62 libFuzzer harnesses in blvm-consensus and extensive proptest suites across the consensus modules. This lines up with the directions Quarkslab explored in Bitcoin Core's 2025 audit, differential testing, differential fuzzing, and broader testing approaches, and goes further on cross-implementation consensus differential and spec-linked formal verification. "I'm reminded of Godel's incompleteness theorems, and also Turing's Halting Problem" Gödel's incompleteness theorems bound what a formal system capable of encoding arithmetic can prove about itself. The Halting Problem bounds termination analysis for arbitrary programs over unbounded computation. Bitcoin consensus validation is neither. Script is non-Turing-complete by design, it has no loops, and execution is bounded by stack depth, script size, sigop budget, and opcode count, so every closed script that consensus actually validates terminates. UTXO validation operates over finite structures, and signature verification is deterministic over fixed-width inputs. Nothing on the consensus path encodes self-reference or requires reasoning over unbounded computation. These theorems do not apply to this domain, and invoking them does not change what a decision procedure can settle against a finite specification, or what a mathematician can audit in the Orange Paper without reading code. (1/3)
-
Dolo2x24 (@dolos10x) reported@BSCNews @coinbase Coinbase more worried about their stupid ******* prediction market than crypto. I get notifications I never wanted about **** im not involved in. I need to opt out of predictions market notifications
-
Michael (@Michael91403457) reported$chz #chz All time low on Coinbase. Witnessing real time the slow death of a company that once had great vision and potential.
-
Arbron Krivca (@ArbronKrivca) reported@coinbase I downloaded coinbase! And logged back into my account. Everything is red :( now im upset. Help!
-
Dimabytes (@dimabytes) reported@mertandaac @brian_armstrong @coinbase Hey, I am using it via browser now, but mobile app still not working :(