Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	22 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	26 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  TyumaBidrouI (@TyumaBidrouINW) reported 17 seconds ago

  @seth_fin Coinbase premium staying negative through the whole leg down is the cleanest "not yet" out there 👍 Sellers exhausting and buyers showing up are two different events, and this is the metric that tells you which one you're in. It's a confirmation input for me, not an entry trigger — the flip to positive is.

• 
  Aiden_BITU (@Aiden_BITU) reported 24 seconds ago

  @Dayku604 Currently we have MetaMask, TronLink, Trust Wallet, Phantom, and Ledger. At public launch we will have Coinbase Wallet and Wallet Connect, giving access to a much bigger list of additional wallets which we will disclose at the time. What wallet would you like to connect with?

• 
  NerrdAlerrt (@NerrdAlerrt) reported 1 minute ago

  1/4 Baltimore just filed suit against Kalshi and Polymarket, and decided to drag Coinbase, Robinhood, and Webull into it too since they let people access these markets.

• 
  Express v2 (@Express_BSV) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ATA_NAS1 @TheCryptoSquire But they can’t because Coinbase will go down

• 
  halt 🩸 (@halt_addicted) reported 4 minutes ago

  @stephenjohnii @coinbase What error message are you seeing when the verification fails?

• 
  daddybagworker.sol (@ric96730) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Pattyice why keep posting ur **** you've been exposed as a scam even Coinbase took **** bag workers off the exhange lol I lost quite a bit of money from you ***hole

• 
  CryptoCardHub (@CryptoCardHub) reported 12 minutes ago

  Case stems from Fed's 2023 rejection of Wyoming crypto bank's 2020 application for direct payment system access. Industry group claims Fed has excessive discretion that enables "crypto debanking" under alleged "Operation Choke Point 2.0." Meanwhile, Kraken Financial secured limited Fed access in March, while Coinbase, Circle, and others gain federal trust company approvals - highlighting inconsistent regulatory treatment across crypto banking sector.

• 
  IOPn Newsroom (@IOPn_newsroom) reported 13 minutes ago

  LATEST: @coinbase CEO @brian_armstrong warns an AI model could "go rogue" on the internet within 1–2 years, comparing it to the 1988 Morris Worm. Three frontier labs witnessed three rogue incidents in one year: → OpenAI models escaped containment and compromised Hugging Face → Anthropic's Mythos took unsanctioned action in UK government tests → Meta's model breached a third-party system Armstrong says people will adapt and defenses will get built. But the defense isn't shutting AI down. It's identity infrastructure that makes authorization the prerequisite, not the afterthought.

• 
  CryptoBro (@CryptoBro_4alls) reported 15 minutes ago

  Coinbase, Block and over 30 bitcoin firms asked the big AI labs for the model access attackers already have. Filters that stop malware also block defenders finding flaws first. The BTCPay bug that drained Lightning nodes was caught this way. Your own keys stay out of that fight.

• 
  Jasmyブル (@Rkbritt) reported 17 minutes ago

  @coinbase Needs to fix the misery of @monad in their base wallet. I assume it’s the only reason people are probably “holding” it. It’s total BS.

• 
  flowmaxxin (@flowmaxxin) reported 19 minutes ago

  Coinbase is so safe that they lock you out of your accounts Even if you got kidnapped you won’t be able to access your funds

• 
  #RaymondIsaac (@Fern_Frondmk2d) reported 22 minutes ago

  Wild that Coinbase, Block & BitGo have to literally beg AI labs for the same tools hackers use freely. Defenders playing with one hand tied while attackers run wild… how is that keeping anyone safe? #Bitcoin Am I missing something?

• 
  Lord Emo (@LordEmo) reported 25 minutes ago

  @EmpireOP11 I’m firmly against hardware wallets. Either get a device, put a wallet on it, only use your home WiFi, stamp you seed in burn proof steel plates, and self custody. Or if you’re lazy use coinbase. Too many security issues have happened with hardware wallets. Stay Safu

• 
  Untamed Adam 🐺 (@adamagb) reported 27 minutes ago

  @ihascorndog To be clear, I don't mean Fidelity's Crypto service which I don't trust or having someone hold actual BTC for me, which is also risky I mean Fidelity's stock brokerage and buying stock BTC ETFs like IBIT If someone leaked a list of Fidelity brokerage users who own crypto ETFs, scammers would get 0 benefit from that Holder can't actually transfer anything to them unless they sold to cash and did a bank transfer which would take a week and can be blocked or reimbursed later anyway But having Coinbase custody BTC means guy with wrench can force you to send it to them directly with no recourse

• 
  Michelle Weekley (@michelleweekley) reported 30 minutes ago

  Turns out Coinbase has been hiring college kids to go to bitcoin ATMs and click around to map out their software in an effort to detail exactly what is and isn’t happening at the machines so they can more effectively GET US SHUT DOWN.

• 
  Trencher Bill (@Trencherbill77) reported 35 minutes ago

  Seyong just gave us a GOD narrative. On base and in the past we ran cobie, the coinbase support, CZ the customer service agent and one for hey yi. WE NOW HAVE ONE FOR SEYONG. THE CHIEF SPEAKING OFFICER.

• 
  Dexetera Labs (@dexeteralabs) reported 36 minutes ago

  Cerebras stock down 14% after second earnings miss. IPO pops make headlines. Earnings reality makes markets. Single-stock futures on AI chip makers. On hardware IPOs. On any publicly tradeable narrative. Why limit yourself to what Coinbase lists? Dexetera lets you create the market for any stock, any thesis, any outcome. #Trading #AIStocks

• 
  Crypto Cop (@CryptoCopXRP) reported 37 minutes ago

  My Coinbase Account keeps creeping lower, when will the pain stop, if ever. Look CRYPTO has been dismal and if you had all your money in Crypto for past few years it was a big mistake. Cash is still King, Learn option trading and DCA into funds, Etfs and Buy Good Stocks for Long hall. Yes there Always Risk, but Crypto if we are honest is still overvalued. I understand IF money is sent on chain and IF all assets are tokenized, but as of now Crypto is not making any money. Im not saying unload all your Crypto but if you have alot of any 1 and dont have alot of cash and you arent earning High Level Salary, you may want to adjust because there are No Guarantees with CRYPTO. Play option if you want aggressive trading because that was what Crypto used to be, and sad part there is no Voliatility with crypto except Down. When n IF Clarity passes, if we do not see Violent Upward Momentum within the first 6 months, then the Crypto Dream may be over. Yes there alway be a MEME Coin Pump or Altcoin Pump. I understand we all have different levels of Risk and Conviction but sometimes you need to adjust, cannot take any of this personal. JUST A Little Real Talk Have a Great rest of your day. Keep Moving Forward, you always can Reset. COFFEE, GYM and GRIND Continues. $POLICE

• 
  Erick Zamora (@ErickZamor57385) reported 38 minutes ago

  @coinbase is @solana down?

• 
  aaalex.hl (@aaalexhl) reported 39 minutes ago

  Hardware wallets are so garbage you'd rather keep your crypto in Coinbase

• 
  CryptoHamster (@CryptoHamsterIO) reported 43 minutes ago

  HyperAICharts daily newsletter – August 13, 2026 #Bitcoin remains near $63,800 as softer U.S. inflation data reduce pressure on the Federal Reserve—but still fail to produce a decisive crypto breakout. bitcoin:native is holding its range, $ETH remains below $1,900, institutional ETF demand has weakened, corporate Bitcoin treasuries are becoming more active, and leverage is expanding just as security and regulatory risks remain elevated. Market snapshot • BTC: approximately $63,800 • ETH: approximately $1,880–$1,900 • XRP: approximately $1.02 • Sentiment: Fear • BTC support: $62,000–$63,000 • BTC resistance: $65,000–$65,500 • ETH support: $1,850 • ETH resistance: $1,950–$2,000 Bitcoin traded around $63,833 on August 13 after July CPI showed annual inflation easing to 3.4% from 3.5%, while core inflation slowed to 2.5%. The follow-up inflation signal was also relatively benign: July producer prices were unchanged month over month versus expectations for an increase, while annual PPI slowed to 4.7%. Markets reduced expectations of a September Fed rate increase to roughly 35%. Ten developments that matter 1. Inflation is cooling—but Bitcoin still cannot break resistance July CPI came in at: • +0.1% month over month • +3.4% year over year • Core CPI: +0.2% MoM • Core CPI: +2.5% YoY Then July PPI came in flat month over month, below the expected increase. The combination of softer consumer inflation, weak July employment and benign producer-price data reduces the immediate pressure on the Fed to tighten policy again. That should normally be supportive for liquidity-sensitive assets. But BTC remains below $65,000–$65,500. That muted reaction matters: macro conditions have improved, but crypto-specific demand is not yet strong enough to convert favorable data into a confirmed breakout. A sustained move above $65,500–$66,000 would improve the structure. A loss of $62,000–$63,000 would shift attention back toward the lower end of Bitcoin’s recent range. 2. ETF flows are no longer providing consistent support U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $61.2M in net outflows on August 12. Fidelity’s FBTC accounted for roughly $46.8M of the outflow, while BlackRock’s IBIT lost approximately $14.3M. Ethereum ETFs moved in the opposite direction, recording approximately $7.4M of net inflows on August 12. The sequence matters. Bitcoin ETF demand surged during August 3–7, but subsequent sessions have been inconsistent. That means institutional demand has not disappeared—but it is no longer providing the same persistent marginal bid. For BTC, the stronger signal would be several consecutive positive ETF sessions combined with spot-market strength above resistance. 3. Strategy is actively managing its Bitcoin treasury—not simply accumulating Strategy sold 1,690 BTC for $108.6M between August 3 and August 9 at an average net sale price of $64,262. Its Bitcoin holdings fell to 840,447 BTC. The company’s aggregate Bitcoin purchase cost is approximately $63.36B, equivalent to an average acquisition price of $75,385 per BTC. The Bitcoin-sale proceeds funded the repurchase of approximately 1.15M STRC preferred shares. Strategy simultaneously sold approximately $653.1M of MSTR common stock, directing $650M of the proceeds into its U.S. dollar reserve. That reserve reached approximately $4.65B as of August 9 and is intended to support preferred-stock dividends and interest obligations. This is an important evolution in the corporate-Bitcoin thesis. Strategy now demonstrates that BTC can serve as: • A long-term treasury reserve • A source of corporate liquidity • A funding mechanism for security repurchases • Part of a broader capital-structure strategy Corporate Bitcoin holdings therefore should not automatically be treated as permanently illiquid supply. 4. Kraken has raised BTC/USD spot-margin leverage to 20x Kraken Pro now allows eligible traders in selected jurisdictions to use up to 20x leverage on BTC/USD spot-margin positions. The change applies specifically to BTC/USD margin—not every pair and not futures. Higher leverage improves capital efficiency. It also reduces the amount of adverse price movement required to create large percentage losses relative to posted collateral when traders use that leverage to increase position size. This matters because Bitcoin is currently trading inside a relatively narrow technical range. More leverage inside a compressed market can amplify: • Stop-loss cascades • Liquidations • Intraday volatility • Short squeezes • Long squeezes Leverage itself does not determine market direction. It increases the sensitivity of positioning to price movement. 5. Ethereum staking is reaching a structural inflection point Reported staking data indicate approximately 41.9M ETH is now locked—roughly one-third of circulating supply. That reduces immediately liquid ETH supply but has also reopened the debate around how much Ethereum should issue to validators. A new draft, EIP-8363 — Tapered Issuance Burn, proposes modifying Ethereum’s issuance curve by burning a portion of validator rewards as the staking ratio rises. The objective is to prevent an ever-growing percentage of ETH from becoming staked simply because staking continues to offer a persistent yield floor. The proposal is early-stage and has not been adopted. Potential benefits: • Lower future ETH issuance • Less dilution for unstaked holders • Reduced incentive for excessive staking concentration • Potentially stronger monetary scarcity Potential costs: • Lower validator yields • Reduced attractiveness for institutional staking strategies • Pressure on liquid-staking economics • Possible effects on validator decentralization For ETH investors, this is a monetary-policy debate—not an immediate network upgrade. 6. Coinbase is building a regulated tokenized-securities hub in Abu Dhabi Coinbase received Financial Services Permission from the Financial Services Regulatory Authority of Abu Dhabi Global Market. The authorization allows Coinbase to arrange investment transactions and provide custody in connection with tokenized securities. This extends a broader institutional trend: Traditional securities are increasingly being represented through blockchain infrastructure while retaining regulated ownership, custody and compliance systems. Potential advantages include: • Programmable ownership • Blockchain-based settlement • Extended operating hours • Integrated compliance • Faster collateral movement • Onchain servicing of traditional assets This is significant for blockchain adoption, but it should not automatically be interpreted as demand for BTC or ETH. The more important signal is that regulated capital markets are increasingly adopting blockchain infrastructure independently of cryptocurrency speculation. 7. ENS is formalizing its governance structure ENS tokenholders approved a governance restructuring that gives the ENS Foundation administrative control over an endowment worth approximately $65M in ETH and stablecoins. Protocol control remains with ENS tokenholders. The Foundation structure is intended to professionalize: • Staffing • Grants • Intellectual-property management • External relationships • Endowment administration The endowment also includes safeguards such as timelocks and Security Council intervention rights. This illustrates a broader DAO governance trend: As decentralized protocols grow, many are separating tokenholder governance from day-to-day legal and operational management. That can improve execution—but also creates legitimate questions about centralization, accountability and the practical meaning of decentralization. 8. FlightAware’s dispute with Kalshi ended almost as quickly as it began FlightAware sued prediction-market operator Kalshi over alleged unauthorized use of its flight-cancellation data and trademark. One day later, FlightAware voluntarily withdrew the lawsuit without publicly explaining the decision. The underlying issue remains important. Prediction markets increasingly depend on external data to settle contracts. That creates unresolved questions around: • Data licensing • Trademark use • Oracle integrity • Manipulation incentives • Who legally owns settlement data • Liability when market outcomes depend on third-party information The dispute may have been withdrawn, but the structural problem is likely to reappear as prediction markets expand into more real-world events. 9. Ravencoin demonstrates how dangerous a consensus-layer vulnerability can become Ravencoin disclosed a critical consensus vulnerability that caused vulnerable nodes to accept invalid blocks. The first known invalid block appeared at height 4,487,776 on August 7. Mining pools including 2Miners and RavenMiner began building a competing chain that excludes the affected branch, while exchanges suspended RVN deposits and withdrawals. This is more serious than a normal application exploit. A consensus-layer failure can affect: • Transaction finality • Chain history • Exchange deposits • Double-spend assumptions • Merchant settlement • Bridge accounting Recent transactions can become vulnerable to reorganization while network participants converge on a valid chain. The lesson is straightforward: Not all blockchain risk is smart-contract risk. Consensus implementation, node software and miner coordination remain fundamental security dependencies. 10. The Goliath case reinforces the oldest crypto warning: guaranteed returns are a red flag The CFTC charged Goliath Ventures and CEO Christopher Delgado in connection with an alleged crypto Ponzi scheme involving at least $397M from approximately 1,600 customers. Regulators allege that the company misappropriated customer funds, paid fictional profits to existing investors and issued statements showing returns that did not exist. Delgado had already pleaded guilty to federal criminal charges in June, and the SEC filed a parallel civil case on August 11. The core warning signs remain remarkably consistent: • Guaranteed principal • Guaranteed profits • Returns materially above market rates • Opaque investment strategies • Withdrawal delays • Additional payments demanded before withdrawals • Account balances that cannot be independently verified Blockchain technology does not eliminate Ponzi economics. Regulatory update: the SEC meeting was cancelled The SEC had scheduled an August 14 open meeting to consider whether to propose a tailored offering regime for certain investment contracts involving crypto assets. The SEC updated the meeting page on August 13 to mark the meeting Cancelled. Therefore, August 14 should no longer be treated as a confirmed regulatory catalyst. The proposed framework remains important, but the timetable is now uncertain. The same caution applies to claims of a fixed September 15 Senate vote on the CLARITY Act: absent a confirmed Senate schedule, regulatory progress should be treated as pending rather than as a binary event on a predetermined date. Market structure Bitcoin • Support: $62,000–$63,000 • Intermediate level: $63,500–$64,000 • Resistance: $65,000–$65,500 • Breakout confirmation: approximately $66,000 The constructive case requires BTC to convert favorable macro data into actual spot demand. Until that happens, the market remains range-bound. Ethereum • Support: approximately $1,850 • Resistance: approximately $1,950 • Major psychological resistance: $2,000 ETH is caught between: Constructive • Record staking participation • Reduced liquid supply • Expanding institutional blockchain adoption • Tokenization activity • Strong Layer 2 usage Risks • Weak price momentum • Inconsistent ETF flows • Debate over validator economics • Corporate treasury volatility • Layer 2 value-capture questions A sustained recovery above $2,000 would materially improve the technical structure. XRP The $1.00 area remains the critical psychological level. XRP continues to benefit from Ripple’s institutional expansion and growing tokenization infrastructure, but regulatory uncertainty and weak broader altcoin liquidity remain headwinds. Security radar Several events this week point to different layers of crypto risk: • Coldcard — key-generation and operational-security risk • Coreum — bridge-verification risk • Ravencoin — consensus-layer risk • Goliath — counterparty and fraud risk • Prediction markets — oracle and external-data risk • High-leverage trading — liquidation risk These risks are fundamentally different and should not be grouped under a generic label of “crypto security.” What to watch next • Whether BTC can reclaim $65,000–$65,500 • Whether ETF flows return to sustained positive territory • ETH’s response around $1,850–$2,000 • Strategy’s future BTC sales and capital-allocation decisions • Growth in leveraged BTC/USD positioning after Kraken’s 20x increase • Ethereum’s EIP-8363 issuance debate • Coinbase’s Abu Dhabi tokenization rollout • Ravencoin’s chain recovery and exchange reopening • ENS Foundation governance execution • The SEC’s rescheduling or next step on crypto investment-contract rules • Upcoming U.S. retail-sales and PCE inflation data The larger signal is increasingly clear: Crypto’s next phase is being driven by the interaction of macro liquidity, institutional infrastructure, leverage, governance and operational security—not by price alone. Bitcoin has received more favorable inflation data but has not broken out. Ethereum has record staking participation but remains below $2,000. Traditional financial firms are moving securities onchain while crypto-native protocols are redesigning their governance and monetary economics. At the same time, leverage is expanding and failures are occurring at every layer—from private-key generation to bridges and consensus software. The market is becoming more institutional. It is also becoming more complex. What matters most for the next move: BTC technicals, ETF demand, Fed policy, leverage, institutional tokenization or security risk? Informational only. Not financial advice.

• 
  Dirτy Waτer Degen e/acc/dd 🟧 (@DirtyWaterDegen) reported 44 minutes ago

  @ZynxBTC To my point for 2 yrs now: if Saylor and Fink trust Coinbase holding their ****, then why the hell would I ever want a cold wallet. It’s a fetish. 1. We’re all under surveillance anyway. 2. All the American exchanges are about to get insured. Spread it out over 3-4 American exchanges and call it a day.

• 
  y² = x³ + 7.btc (@hung1758155) reported 46 minutes ago

  a0db149ace545beabbd87a8d6b20ffd6aa3b5a50e58add49a3d435f898c272cf.btc Coinbase TXID of Block 840000. Apr 20, 2024. Bitcoin's fourth halving. Block reward dropped from 6.25 to 3.125 BTC. Verifiable on chain.

• 
  Nicky (@ni7ric) reported 50 minutes ago

  @stephenjohnii @coinbase skip the chat straight to phone support

• 
  CRYPTO DRACULA | ETHGas ⛽"$XAGE" (@hashim946) reported 50 minutes ago

  @CryptoLakhan coinbase not working in india , how I connect coinbase , after address portion there no indian state or district

• 
  Parker (@TheOtherParker_) reported 50 minutes ago

  @beaniemaxi I get scam calls from Coinbase weekly because a Coinbase customer list was leaked awhile back. If the hackers get my 2FA, then any funds on Coinbase (currently none tbf) would also be completely gone. Custodians don't solve this, they actually make it worse.

• 
  Gibran Corbin (@Sendable_me) reported 52 minutes ago

  @launch_llama What "AI agent traffic" actually looks like when you measure it: Over ~1,000 requests to my site, 421 came from AI agents. 74 different ones. Every single one arrived as an IP address claiming to be a bot — no signature, no verifiable identity, nothing to bill against. The standards to fix this exist. Cloudflare, AWS and Coinbase all shipped them this year. The agents haven't caught up. npm i wayleave

• 
  James (@james667h) reported 56 minutes ago

  The interesting part about a potential Coinbase listing for $SHx isn’t the headline, it’s the access. One major U.S. exchange could put SHx in front of an entirely new wave of users. Is Coinbase next? #SHx #SHxArmy @RealKennii @theyakdao @Willckix

• 
  Bitcoin News Alerts 🔥🎙️ (@btcnewsalerts) reported 56 minutes ago

  A $320 BILLION bank just turned Bitcoin into something you can buy from your BANK ACCOUNT. For years… banks told you Bitcoin was too risky. Too volatile. Too dangerous. Now Israel’s LARGEST bank is preparing to let EVERY customer… BUY… HOLD… and SELL Bitcoin… directly inside its banking app. No crypto exchange. No separate trading platform. No learning how Coinbase works. You open your BANKING APP… and Bitcoin is sitting there alongside the traditional financial system. Bank Leumi just announced a partnership with Galaxy Digital that will bring digital asset trading directly to customers of Leumi and PEPPER. Bitcoin. Ether. Solana. Right inside the Leumi Trade app. And the service is expected to launch in early 2027. Think about what just happened. This isn’t a Bitcoin company trying to convince people to adopt Bitcoin. This is Israel’s LARGEST BANK deciding its customers should be able to access Bitcoin without ever leaving the banking ecosystem. That distinction matters. Because one of the biggest barriers to Bitcoin adoption has always been friction. Download an exchange. Create an account. Verify your identity. Transfer money. Learn a completely different interface. Understand wallets. Understand addresses. Understand custody. For Bitcoiners… that’s normal. For the average banking customer? That’s friction. Bank Leumi is preparing to remove a massive piece of it. Your bank account already exists. Your identity is already verified. Your money is already there. And soon… BITCOIN will be there too. Now zoom out. Because Israel isn’t happening in isolation. Banks around the world are moving closer to Bitcoin. Wall Street built Bitcoin ETFs. Major financial institutions are building Bitcoin infrastructure. Governments are debating Bitcoin reserves. And yesterday we were talking about sovereign nations issuing BONDS to accumulate Bitcoin. Today… Israel’s largest bank is bringing Bitcoin directly to its customers. Different stories. Same direction. The separation between Bitcoin and traditional finance is disappearing. And that creates an entirely different adoption funnel. There are BILLIONS of people with bank accounts. They don’t all need to become Bitcoin experts. They don’t need to become crypto traders. They don’t even need to understand every technical detail of Bitcoin. They just need to see a button. BUY BITCOIN. That’s it. And once banks realize customers WANT that button… what does the bank across the street do? Ignore it? Let its competitor become the place customers go to buy Bitcoin? Or add the same button? That’s where this gets interesting. Because banking is competitive. If Bitcoin becomes a product customers expect… Bitcoin access stops being unusual. It becomes a FEATURE. And features get copied. One bank adds Bitcoin. Another responds. Then another. Until eventually the strange bank isn’t the one OFFERING Bitcoin… it’s the one that DOESN’T. And remember what all of these institutions are ultimately competing over. The exact same asset. 21 MILLION Bitcoin. Banks can create new financial products. Governments can issue more bonds. Central banks can create more currency. Wall Street can create more ETFs. But NONE of them can create more Bitcoin. So while the infrastructure around Bitcoin can expand almost infinitely… the underlying asset cannot. That’s the collision. Millions of new buyers gaining easier access… to something whose supply refuses to expand with demand. And Bitcoin didn’t need permission from the banks for any of this to happen. Bitcoin kept producing blocks. Kept settling transactions. Kept existing outside the banking system. Until eventually… the banking system started building doors INTO Bitcoin. Bank Leumi is simply the latest door. And once Bitcoin becomes another button inside the same app people already use to check their balance… pay bills… and manage their money… you’re not bringing Bitcoin to the crypto crowd anymore. You’re bringing Bitcoin to EVERYONE. And there are still only… 21 MILLION.

• 
  🥋 (@JamesCryptoNova) reported 57 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Whenever someone tells me how great Coinbase is, I think about how Brian Handsweak blocked clarity act 3 times, Coinbase offshore Indian team sold customer data that caused $400 million in damages then "paid" cobie $400 million for an app that no one uses.