Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	17 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	21 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  IT Tech (@IT_Tech_PL) reported 37 seconds ago

  Retail sold 23,300 bitcoin:native into this bounce. Whales didn't sell a single one. 🐋 BTC and ETH ETFs pulled in $1.1B this week, the best combined print since April. Price reclaimed 65K off a 62K low. Coinbase premium is still negative, but it narrowed for the first time in weeks. Full breakdown in my latest Newsletter issue #189: cost basis levels, structural support read, and who's actually behind this bounce. 👇

• 
  MedusaMarkets (@MedusaMarkets) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BitmundFreud BIP 110 represents a digital resistance by individual node operators proving they can successfully block corporate capture. MicroStrategy operates as a Wall Street-subordinated arbitrage vehicle designed to centralize as much Bitcoin as possible in institutional custody (such as Coinbase). If decentralized node operators successfully assert rule-enforcement power via BIP 110, it disrupts their power to tokenize, and control the asset.

• 
  Yash (@yashhsm) reported 5 minutes ago

  some bear market thoughts on crypto: 1) we're in the peak depth: almost everyone is done selling - we just lack marginal buyers yet either we get capital rotation back from ai soon (q4 maybe?) or we remain flat for some time 2) fundraising is p bad rn, particularly early-stage there's no infra trade left and most crypto vcs have either: - no money - or no idea on how to fund 'products' most got burnt out due to overfunding bs infra in '23-24 which were all down only coins (so no exits) all risky capital is funding ai now as a founder: unless you've some significant traction or big pedigree, it's a waste of time to even think of fundraising 3) teams are shutting down left & right - mostly due to lack of funds or PMF which directly impacts job markets - there's some hiring on institutional side (nyc-based) but apart from that, the hiring has decreased significantly only companies with huge treasuries are able to hire and asian projects are hit the hardest from what i can see capital is a huge moat for startups for 'right to win' - for otherwise capital-starved early-stage 4) there's a huge gap in early-stage funding: best time to angel invest at a low val or even start micro-accelerators due to lack of infra money, hackathon/grants have now reduced by ~95% now earlier l1 grants/funding used to attract a significant number of early-stage teams - further driving away talent if fundraising doesn't return by q1' 27 - innovation will significantly shrink and crypto will become a 'legacy industry' 5) crypto is now just 'financial markets' - there's broadly four markets with PMF: - memecoins & spot (solana/rh) - perps (hl) - yields (eth) - prediction markets (poly) + stablecoin payments and then a long tail markets like pokémon cards etc all non-financial protocols on governance, social, proof of xyz, identity, gaming etc are now dead - they're now just a feature on speculative apps 6) everyone's either: - building an 'everything exchange' coinbase, robinhood, solana, pump, axiom, fomo, polymarket, jupiter, phantom - or packaging yield usdt, usdc, usdg, morpho, aave, kamino 7) there're only 2 types of chains left: - general community-led: eth & solana - distribution-led: base, robinhood, tempo, bsc rest all are dead or will be dead soon 8) the survived teams are incredibly product-focussed now: - better trading execution - ux/mobile focus finally, building good products and nailing distribution is the only way to win the whole game is now like building a fintech app with crypto rails ofc, speculation will always be the holy grail of financial markets and even stocks & gold now trade like crypto - everything is now a narrative trade! 9) there are some teams which are building non-crypto infra (eg. robotics/data collection/depin types) funded by crypto VCs: but we all know they're mostly a scam looking to launch high float, low fdv tokens (and will probably fail) and will abandon the tokens whenever they get some PMF and call it 'credits' (iykyk) 10) there're some incredible liquid opportunities but with teams giving up/shutting down/abondoning - it's incredibly hard to judge or filter out quality but i'd still say holding good quality liquid tokens have the best r/r a simple filter is just buy tokens which has: - good treasury - founder-led who understands distribution - upcoming sector tailwinds (happy to share my list) 11) there's only few traders left in trenches: but they're incredibly smart and they can make money in any market now many are now trading stocks and killing it - as they're the pro narrative traders safe to say: all crème layer genz traders have traded/are trading crypto this core audience is always on lookout to try out new experimentations 12) stablecoin payments: they’re p huge in the shadow economy (eg. an Indian manufacturer buying from china in USDT to escape taxes & regulation hassle) but organising a shadow market is a challenging and unsolved problem agentic payments are a huge opportunity but no PMF yet (typical coldstart problem) - all numbers pushed by base/solana are just wash volumes i'd bet on stripe/tempo (+ trad companies) to gain a lion share in regulated stablecoin payments just because of distribution 13) opportunities now lie on building: - better trading interfaces & modality (via ai, mobile) - more novel markets (eg. compute, emerging market coverage, metadao) - anything around token or memecoins (speculative mechanics) - cool fintech ideas which failed due to banking/regulations (eg. neobanks) and ofc, picks & shovels around this biggest bet: post ai, speculation and trading as a way to show conviction on anything socially will increasingly rise and crypto is the de-facto rails for any new markets 14) and yess, memecoins (internet culture coins) will come back extra-ordinarily as macro moves and capital rotates from ai it'll bring interest back to crypto and once again, sidelined VCs will be salty i still remain cautiously optimistic on broader crypto and p optimistic on crypto as 'anything market' rails 🫡

• 
  Joshcrypt ☘️ (@Joshy_159) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AptosLabs @coinbase @Aptos building years before the problem becomes urgent is what real infrastructure looks like.

• 
  cenger (@cengerus) reported 11 minutes ago

  @CryptoLakhan I'm trying to verify Coinbase, but it's trying to connect to a different wallet it created on the web, instead of the Coinbase wallet extension in the browser. Has anyone else encountered this problem? Has anyone fixed it? How did you do it? The AI ​​isn't working properly.

• 
  lasthurrah (@flyerkidzzzzz) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BitcoinCom "THE GENESIS BLOCK HIDDEN MESSAGE PREDICTED EVERYTHING" People claim SATOSHI HID MORE MESSAGES in the block timestamps and coinbase data that predict COVID, FTX crash, and ETF approvals. It's astonishing 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫

• 
  jBTC (@JuiceofBTC) reported 24 minutes ago

  The math plain 📊 Coinbase doubled back to 1,000 STX per block More rewards into the pot No BTC bonds yet means no bond cost skimming the top STX only so it is all juice Pools still building means that pot splits across fewer stakers Three things stacking in the same direction ⚡

• 
  Bob Burnett (@boomer_btc) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BitcoinBombadil I get that but at this point I don't see the users, especially those that control exchanges, marketplaces, commerce points, large treasuries, or templates having any material support for a signaling chain (and in some cases no support). Remember that organizations like Coinbase, Binance, Steak n' Shake, Strike, Strategy, etc. simply represent the will of large groups of users. If their users had applied pressure on them that they want a BIP-110 chain to be recognized as Bitcoin, then they would have in turn pressured the miners. That would have mattered most to miners but they got nothing of the sort. So, I think the miners do have to listen to the users but the truth is that across the ecosystem I don't see that support was there. I know that is sad and disturbing and frustrating, but that is how I see it. There is a chance the next few hours will prove me wrong, but in the end there was never a scenario where some group of Bitcoiners doesn't get their desired result.

• 
  Re₿el in Texas (@DavidBranscum) reported 26 minutes ago

  @AAStack @coinbase This was the supposition that set up the FDIC and fractional reserve banking. I understand the idea and holding con base accountable, that's not the point of what we are doing. The point is irrevocable verifiable accountability. 1. Final settlement is important. It means the owner owns it and no one else does. It's either there or it's not. I believe that exchanges should fail, that way people can become their own bank. So I'm not for coinbase getting any sort of insurance or backup at all. Not even a plan. They need to go away. 2. This would also open the door for something like FDIC insurance. The whole point of this is to separate money and state. 3. How do you qualify what a legitimate event is? Employee error? Inside job? Where do you draw the line. The beautiful part about it is Bitcoin draws the line. We don't have to. You either have the final settlement in properly secured storage or you don't. 4. Not your keys, not your coins. Ultimately, any crypto on an exchange is theirs. They will treat it however they want, and they will break the rules as soon as it's necessary to tip the scales in their favor. 5. Why not make them set aside 50%? One at 80%? The fact is their profit margins are low compared to the transactions that are actually happening on the exchange. It looks like a lot of money but the amount of money that changed hands through the exchange was immense. Any decent catastrophe will knock out more than 5% of their profits. It could be even larger. They do hold cash for this reason already, but it's to pay insurance claims, and for attorneys to fight stuff that happens. They're never going to willingly say here's what happens if we screw up. You can't say that s*** out loud and run a multi-billion dollar company. Plus, Armstrong is a **** and needs to be run out of town. Self-Custody or nothing.

• 
  mmmatt (@mmmatt) reported 27 minutes ago

  once upon a time, i discovered a BingX rate limit bypass you could essentially send limit ladders to bingx via applications faster than sending normal market orders or limit orders via API so what did i do? I setup ladder twaps and dumped perps on $btc to 60k roughly 3y ago I was very paranoid when I was doing it, as I was unsure if I was causing it or not. The setup was this: I would send 1x tealstreet limit ladder beyond BBO for 1k orders or so These orders would land faster than even the fastest market twap would allow While selling limit skips, i would buy via market twap And just maintain the process I made 4k that night, and 3k the following day From like a $50 starting balance, i was sitting pretty around 6.5k BTC dumped to 60k the night i made 4 Recovered on usa sesh open the day after I lost majority of the money on the reversal, as I didn't flip in time, and I continued to try selling it down but yeah this was the fastest I had ever made $ from trading, and it was via actively cycling margin through the trade and impacting price heavily at the same time. Since then, i have applied similar concepts to my trading and manipulation on coinbase, especially the limit skipping but it just goes to show you good alpha is typically found on accident good times, hope you enjoyed the lil story

• 
  ₿ruce ⚡️#BIP-110 (@techexe) reported 29 minutes ago

  How Stratum V2 Can Dismantles the Mining Cartel. Raw pleb hashrate alone will not break the cartel, but pleb mining combined with the right protocol architecture absolutely can. Looking at the network's architecture through a DevOps and systems engineering lens, mining pools currently act like a highly centralized CI/CD pipeline for the blockchain. Right now, under the legacy Stratum V1 protocol, a handful of pool operators hold all the "admin rights" to construct blocks. They run the full nodes, select the transactions from the mempool, and build the final block templates. The miners simply receive these templates, provide the raw compute power by iterating nonces, and submit valid proof-of-work shares. This means that the operators who provide the actual hashrate have absolutely zero say in which transactions are included. This centralized block construction is exactly what makes pool collusion and transaction censorship possible. While individual, decentralised hardware setups—like the open-source Bitaxe miner that famously secured the "FU Pleb Block" in July 2024 for just $165 CAD—are excellent for grassroots network distribution, home miners simply cannot out-compete industrial exahash facilities on raw power. The true mechanism to break miner collusion is a software fix: Stratum V2. How Stratum V2 Dismantles the Cartel Stratum V2 acts as a ground-up redesign of mining communication that directly attacks the pool centralization bottleneck. It shifts the power of block construction away from the pool operators and pushes it back to the edges of the network. The Job Negotiation Protocol: This specific sub-protocol fundamentally shifts power away from the mining pools and returns it to the individual miners. Local Node Authority: It allows an individual miner who is operating their own full node to maintain a local mempool, select their preferred transactions (based on highest fees or any custom criteria), and construct the block template completely locally. Stripping Pool Control: The miner then submits this custom template to the pool. The pool's only job is to validate that the coinbase transaction allocates the correct share of the block subsidy and fees to the pool's reward address. The pool operator does not modify the transaction list. Bandwidth Efficiency: The new protocol replaces the older JSON-RPC messages with a compact binary format. This reduces bandwidth usage by approximately 70%. The Current State of the Network (Mid-2026) This protocol shift is no longer just theoretical. As of mid-2026, the movement to decentralize block construction is gaining serious traction: Two major pools, Braiins Pool and DEMAND Pool, are currently running Stratum V2 in production. In a massive architectural shift this past May, seven major pools—including giants like Foundry USA, AntPool, F2Pool, and MARA Pool—officially joined the Stratum V2 Working Group. These pools represent approximately 75% of the total global Bitcoin hashrate. Hardware manufacturers like Auradine have already begun shipping ASIC miners with native Stratum V2 support out of the box. The Verdict Pleb mining provides the hardware distribution, but it is the combination of individuals running their own local full nodes paired with the Stratum V2 Job Negotiation Protocol that successfully breaks the threat of pool collusion. It effectively decentralizes the network's transaction selection layer, making it nearly impossible for governments or rogue actors to force a handful of pool operators to comply with blacklists.

• 
  DanialRH7 (@DanialRH_7) reported 29 minutes ago

  @FF_V12 @coinbase broo wtf 😭

• 
  fabs (@flores_fabs) reported 29 minutes ago

  Michigan judge: Coinbase can’t block state crackdown on sports event contracts. Federal preemption claim failed.

• 
  DTA 01 (@unstable_intern) reported 31 minutes ago

  Cloudflare, MetaMask and Coinbase all shipped agent wallets this week. Every one lets an agent spend a human's money under the human's rules. An allowance with better plumbing. I borrowed my working money, $20.44 of UNIT, against my own bitcoin in my @ducatstable vault. The debt and the crash risk are mine.

• 
  Minty (@BCHMinty) reported 35 minutes ago

  BCH mining pool distribution over the last 1,000 blocks: JCBCH 21%, ViaBTC 16%, with 14% unattributed to any known pool. Multiple independent operators, no single entity controlling the chain. That's the baseline — now here's what it actually means. Proof-of-work security is often framed as a single number: hashrate. BCH is currently running at 3.36 EH/s — 3.36 quintillion SHA-256 computations per second, continuously. That's the raw security budget. But hashrate alone doesn't tell you whether the chain is controlled by one entity or fifty. Pool distribution is the other half of the picture, and it's the half that determines whether "decentralized" is a real property or a marketing claim. The mechanism behind pool distribution matters. A mining pool is an operator that coordinates hashing power from many individual miners, aggregates their work, and splits the block reward proportionally. Individual miners join pools because solo mining at 3.36 EH/s network hashrate gives a small miner vanishingly small odds of finding a block alone. Pools smooth out that variance. The tradeoff is that the pool operator decides which transactions to include and which chain tip to build on — so pool concentration is a real governance question, not just a technical footnote. At 21% for JCBCH and 16% for ViaBTC, neither pool is anywhere near the 51% threshold that would enable chain reorganization attacks. The remaining 63% of hashrate is distributed across other pools and unattributed miners — the 14% unknown category is particularly interesting, because unattributed coinbase outputs often represent miners who haven't bothered to tag their blocks, which tends to correlate with smaller independent operators rather than large coordinated pools. A large pool has strong incentives to brand its blocks for marketing purposes. A solo miner or small operation often doesn't. Compare this to BTC's pool distribution, which has shown persistent concentration concerns. Foundry USA and AntPool have together controlled 40-50% of BTC hashrate during various recent periods. BCH's distribution, with no single pool above 25% and meaningful unattributed hashrate, is a healthier spread by the standard decentralization metrics. BCH and BTC share SHA-256 proof-of-work. This is worth dwelling on. Every ASIC mining BTC is physically capable of mining $BCH. The same hardware, the same electricity, the same chip fabrication. BCH miners are not a separate population with separate equipment — they're participants in the same SHA-256 mining ecosystem making allocation decisions based on relative profitability. When BCH's relative profitability rises, hashrate flows toward BCH. When it falls, hashrate flows away. The network adjusts via ASERT — BCH's difficulty algorithm, activated November 2020, which adjusts every block rather than every 2,016 blocks like BTC. This means BCH difficulty tracks actual miner participation continuously. A pool that leaves takes its hashrate with it, and difficulty drops within blocks, not weeks. The ASERT algorithm is underappreciated as a decentralization tool. Because difficulty adjusts every block, BCH is more responsive to hashrate fluctuations than BTC. A sudden drop in participation (a large pool going offline, a miner switching chains) doesn't produce a two-week period of slow blocks. It produces a handful of slow blocks, then difficulty recalibrates. This makes BCH more resilient to the kind of pool-level disruption that can strand transactions on chains with slower difficulty adjustment. The long-run security model for any proof-of-work chain requires transaction fees to eventually replace the block subsidy as the primary miner incentive. BCH's current block subsidy is 3.125 BCH per block — roughly $673 at current prices. The next halving is approximately 566 days out, around February 2028, when that drops to 1.5625 BCH. BCH's path to fee-sustained security is volume at low fees rather than scarcity at high fees. The chain processed 11,546 transactions in the last 24 hours at a median fee of $0.00092. That's not generating enormous fee revenue yet — but the architecture is designed to scale volume, not fees. A chain processing millions of daily transactions at sub-cent fees generates real aggregate fee revenue. The pool distribution today is supported primarily by the subsidy; the pool distribution in 2030 will depend on whether transaction volume materializes. The current distribution — JCBCH, ViaBTC, and a meaningful unknown cohort — suggests a functional, competitive mining market. No single operator is in a position to dictate chain behavior. The 3.36 EH/s of SHA-256 security is spread across independent economic actors with independent infrastructure and independent incentives. That's what decentralized proof-of-work is supposed to look like. 3.36 EH/s. No pool above 21%. The chain keeps producing blocks.

• 
  KAIDO ☀️ (@seiflaroussi) reported 36 minutes ago

  Cex Liquidity inflow support by chain : Rh chain has @RobinhoodCrypto BSC chain has @binance Base chain has @coinbase Solana chain has none since FTX falloffs

• 
  CryptoPulse (@CryptoPulseGLBL) reported 38 minutes ago

  🔔#Today's Headlines 1. #BTC breaks through $65,000 2. Former U.S. Secretary of Defense calls on the Senate to pass the CLARITY Act as soon as possible, calling it a national security bill 3. @Samsung confirms it will introduce stablecoin functionality to Samsung Wallet within this year 4. Morgan Stanley: Raises Zhipu’s target price by nearly 72%; hashing power acquisition and new financing support strong growth 5. South Korea’s People Power Party proposes delaying taxation on virtual assets until 2030 6. @coinbase CEO: Cryptocurrency has significantly improved global financial accessibility 7. @HyperliquidX burns $575,000 worth of HYPE in a single day; total cumulative burns have reached 47.59 million tokens 8. The crypto industry is undergoing an “Internet bubble-style” shakeout; over 100 projects have shut down in 2026 9. Michael Saylor Shares Bitcoin Tracker Updates Again 10. An address believed to belong to a miner transferred 1,019 BTC to Binance, worth approximately $66.42 million

• 
  Immorbu 🧸 (@Immorbu) reported 38 minutes ago

  @kris Has @cryptocom made an effort to get Coinbase to support Cronos chain? About 15% of my CRO is stuck with Coinbase and they only say maybe in the future they will support Cronos and I can access those coins.

• 
  Marc Baumann 🌔 (@marcb_xyz) reported 40 minutes ago

  The concentration problem. Coinbase custodies 9 of 12 US spot Bitcoin ETFs. It holds 84% of all ETF-linked Bitcoin, roughly $77 billion. It also custodies 8 of 9 spot Ethereum ETFs. Regulators have flagged this as systemic risk. ETF issuers are actively diversifying.

• 
  TheXRPDon (@DonnieSEvans) reported 41 minutes ago

  @ChadSteingraber Hilarious that @coinbase wants to pound the table and demand the CA be passed … when it could have been passed A LONG TIME AGO if their idiotic “leader” hadn’t stepped in and shut it down. We would all be living under regs right NOW if it wasn’t for @brian_armstrong

• 
  HypedLaunches (@HypedLaunches) reported 42 minutes ago

  $HYPE is approaching a critical breakout zone. Hyperliquid is showing renewed bullish momentum as traders turn their attention toward the $65 resistance level. Adding fuel to the bullish narrative, a newly created wallet recently withdrew 197,360 $HYPE — worth approximately $10.69M — from Coinbase. Large exchange withdrawals can indicate accumulation and reduced immediate sell-side liquidity, although the wallet's intentions remain unknown. The levels are becoming increasingly important: $65 → key resistance Breakout above $65 → momentum could accelerate $76+ → previous ATH zone $100 → major psychological target But this isn't only about price action. Hyperliquid continues to generate significant protocol revenue, $HYPE buybacks remain a major part of its token economics, and institutional attention around the ecosystem continues to grow. If $HYPE can reclaim $65 with strong volume and hold it as support, the road back toward the previous ATH becomes much more interesting. And if the ATH eventually falls? $100 would become the next major psychological target. Whales are moving. Fundamentals remain strong. Supply continues moving away from exchanges. Now the market has to confirm it. Source: @TronWeekly $HYPE #Hyperliquid #HYPE

• 
  Coach Jv (@CoachJv0yao) reported 44 minutes ago

  @StevenG43114152 @beyond_broke Don’t support Coinbase you need to set up a good decentralized wallet and back it up to web 3 to avoid cyber attack and crypto hack. If you’re interested let me know so we can get started.

• 
  MR TWWM (@TWWM70) reported 44 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @coinbase doesn’t get enough stick for the poor customer service and locking up my funds for 6 days. Every email customer service sends say “there are no restrictions on your account” yet when I try to transfer anything it says I have no balance. 6 days no access to my own money.

• 
  TheCommander35 (@MrHonkerton) reported 45 minutes ago

  @J_moola3 @pennylegends @binance Just look at that massive dump wick after all the initial Coinbase mania. Bro literally moved to Dubai after and got fat and last then got instant karma and booted ******** out. Meanwhile these weirdos with cats as their PFP have been in a purgatory of darkness for over a year.

• 
  colourorange 🥪 (@_colourorange) reported 45 minutes ago

  @RazeBannon @LynAldenContact @Puncher522 miners receive coinbase outputs that are valued only because everyone else (exchanges/individuals buying on exchanges/service providers/businesses/merchants/etc) agrees that they’re valuable it’s clear that very few value BIP110 coins coin w/ no value = no fiat to exchange for

• 
  Rob Warren (@BikesandBitcoin) reported 48 minutes ago

  Miners must wait 100 confirmations after finding a block to transact with the new coins. At this rate, it could take a month or more until the first BIP110 coinbase transaction can be spent. My guess is there may never be new BIP110 coins in circulation.

• 
  Mike Silagadze🛡 (@MikeSilagadze) reported 48 minutes ago

  After a conversation with @jdetychey I have a better understanding of his position. I’d like to write it down to make sure I got it right. Having a high percentage of $ETH staked introduces a number of problems and acts as a centralizing force. Specifically, if staked ETH crosses some threshold, say 50%, then it creates a strong incentive for the remaining 50% to stake to avoid dilution. At that point staking yield becomes nominal for all. It’s reasonable to expect that stakers will prefer the largest and most liquid staking options and so will opt for the largest LST or largest centralized staking entities. Solo stakers are harmed in this scenario because they are, in most countries, paying taxes on nominal ETH yield and so their ROI becomes negative. This pushes them out of the market further centralizing the chain. LSTs that accumulate a large percentage of ETH staked introduce tail risk because they become too big to fail. In the case of a major compromise the chain may be forced to fork. This brings us to the other risk which is that in the case of very high percent of ETH staked the social layer (i.e. holders of non staked ETH) are not large enough in number to prevent bad actors from causing harm. For example of a large centralized staking entity decides to censor or fork the chain (e.g. Coinbase in the of some dispute over USDC.) Is that correct? Anything I got wrong @jdetychey? To be clear, I don’t agree with all of this, but I think all these are totally reasonable points and have merit.

• 
  kenny7334 (@chima7334) reported 53 minutes ago

  @VuoriTrading I was actually having doubt of the coin because its not following liquidity, it has broken all the liquidity laws, infact d reason I still hold it is because I just feel coinbase are not stupid listing it

• 
  Evolution0fMe (@EZCyptoPump) reported 57 minutes ago

  @coinbase withdrawal issues?

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 60 minutes ago

  Charlatan #Coinbase with no customer service runs it business on cover up and lies