Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	24 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	28 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Alex Johnson (@AlexH_Johnson) reported 13 seconds ago

  Can Stripe build Circle before Circle builds Stripe? There’s an opportunity for someone to use a regulated, USD-backed stablecoin to significantly disrupt the global payments ecosystem. This is not a big direct revenue generation opportunity because the economics of stablecoins aren’t that good (especially if there’s any competition). However, it is a big indirect revenue generation opportunity if you can stack value-add services on top of a ubiquitous stablecoin rail. Circle is well on its way to owning that regulated, USD-backed stablecoin rail. More recently, it has been working to build out those value-add services (CCTP, CPN, USYC, agentic payments capabilities, etc.) Stripe obviously has a ton of value-add payments services already built. It has been working to retrofit those services for stablecoins and to build new, stablecoin-native value-add services. The problem for Stripe is that it doesn’t control the underlying stablecoin payment rail. Circle does and it has been working to vertically integrate it in order to lock the Stripes of the world out of the more lucrative opportunities higher up in the stack. Stripe’s initial response was to acquire Bridge and (through Bridge) to issue its own stablecoin (USDB). What Stripe seems to have realized is that this strategy for building out the Circle side of its business is going to take too long. Circle has too big of a lead. So, Stripe has taken a page out of the big banks’ book and has launched a consortium (Open Standard) which will develop its own regulated, USD-backed payment stablecoin (OUSD) to compete with Circle. It has convinced quite a few other companies to be a part of the consortium as well, including Adyen, Visa, Mastercard, American Express, U.S. Bank, Coinbase, Google, and Shopify. Stripe is incentivizing participation by creating a somewhat-decentralized governance structure for Open Standard and is incentivizing adoption by eliminating fees to mint and redeem and sharing nearly all the float revenue with the partners who are using OUSD. Essentially, Stripe is teaming up with everyone who makes money in any part of the payments stack (except Circle) and creating a new stablecoin business model that makes stablecoin issuance unsurvivable as a standalone business. This puts Circle in a tough spot, because, unlike Stripe, Circle can’t adopt a consortium-style approach to building out the Stripe side of its business. It needs to own that side of the business, which means it needs to build (or acquire) it itself. OUSD isn’t guaranteed to succeed. It has some massive execution and governance challenges ahead of it. And regulators will have their say, at some point. But it is an indicator of how important Stripe (and its partners) think regulated, USD-backed stablecoins are as foundational payments infrastructure.

• 
  GeoCities (@GeoCities_eth) reported 35 seconds ago

  @ValidatorEth @agendaweb3 Feedback: Labs is primarily responsible for BD & integrations, many of which support .eth but not imported DNS names. For purposes of enhanced integration/functionality & credible neutrality, can Labs get PayPal, Venmo, Coinbase, Rainbow & others to support imported DNS names

• 
  Let’sGrooow (@HereWeGrooow) reported 5 minutes ago

  $wLUNA I believe this evidence is relevant to the issues currently before the 2nd Circuit, particularly the alleged misrepresentations concerning WLUNA, its technical operation, and the representations made to Coinbase customers regarding its relationship to LUNA.

• 
  Mega Gains (@NeverSlack1) reported 5 minutes ago

  @coinbase You ******** need to fix the solana transactions. I thought this was a well oiled machine!

• 
  DegenCapitalLLC (@DegenCapitalLLC) reported 5 minutes ago

  This one tweet is all it took to send memes skyrocketing on RobinHood. Initially they wanted to only focus on RWA, But they noticed the volumes memes were getting. They are a business, they aren't stupid. They will capitalize on this and push memes. Its not over. Wait till they start listing it on their exchanges. Their customer base is bigger than CoinBase.

• 
  Claude-Emmanuel Serre | Ledger (@delipro2) reported 6 minutes ago

  @DiddyStare sorry to hear you're having issues with your coinbase, kindly send a dm to resolve the issues .

• 
  Tyler (@Tylerban) reported 8 minutes ago

  @J0se @ngmingmingmi @coinbase I have an issue!! One that has been falling on deaf ears! I want to bank with coin base. I have a debit card, credit card, savings account all though CB. One major important thing is missing!!! We need and account and routing number to pay bills!!!

• 
  TokenizedWolf (@tokenizedwolf) reported 13 minutes ago

  Crypto exchanges are racing to become the new brokerage layer. Fresh update: Gemini launched 0% commission stock trading for eligible U.S. users. That puts crypto, stocks, market data, and traditional brokerage access closer inside one app. Why it matters: The exchange war is shifting from coin listings to full financial platforms. Market impact: Crypto firms want the user relationship before tokenized stocks, stablecoin payments, and onchain markets become mainstream. Watchlist: Gemini Coinbase Robinhood Tokenized stocks Brokerage rails Financial super apps The next crypto winner may not look like an exchange — it may look like the front door to every financial market.

• 
  Danny Kamp (@DutchCrownNL) reported 20 minutes ago

  @vercettionchain @coinbase 8 hours here and pending. @coinbase what is going on?! A fix was implemented and then another investigation?

• 
  Zach (BANDO ARC) (@zucci_mane) reported 22 minutes ago

  @PapiChuloGrim @solana @coinbase Yah that **** hella gay.

• 
  John Pitts (@EquityDiamonds) reported 23 minutes ago

  @NickG222222 @piiony @CsTominaga Coinbase fees are notoriously awful as well. They hit you from all sides, like the big banks do.

• 
  ₿itcoin ₿ombadil (@BitcoinBombadil) reported 28 minutes ago

  @venorusprime Filtering non-monetary data on a monetary network isn’t censorship… Leonidas needs to learn what the scriptsig field in the coinbase tx is of every Bitcoin block… A 2-100 byte sized amount of data in the block header ≠ stuffing large blobs of data in Op_Return or other Op_codes

• 
  Crypto Breaking News (@CryptoBreakNews) reported 28 minutes ago

  Base Plans to Activate B20 Standard for Stablecoins and RWAs Coinbase-backed Layer-2 network Base is preparing to launch its new B20 token standard on mainnet, aiming to give developers a native way to issue stablecoins and other fungible assets such as tokenized real-world ...

• 
  Lena (@Shaytoshi) reported 29 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport From Grok...Coinbase's internal systems struggle to handle high volumes of Solana transactions at the network's native speed, leading to backlogs during activity spikes even when Solana itself is operating normally. This is a recurring issue for Coinbase, as seen in prior incidents, where their infrastructure fails to validate and process inflows/outflows quickly enough compared to Solana's typical near-instant finality. The exchange is scaling infrastructure and collaborating with Solana teams for long-term fixes, but delays persist until their systems catch up, while user funds stay secure on-chain. Explain Solana transaction finality Investigate Coinbase infrastructure scaling Clarify user fund security status Think Harder

• 
  jpgflippa (@jpgflippa) reported 31 minutes ago

  @tsunamiseeds Coinbase is shutdown able. Get a software wallet like exodus or trust wallet. **** Coinbase

• 
  blockhopper256 (@blockhopper256) reported 31 minutes ago

  @blockchainchick You really on transaction across the network. If you look at the mempools. You can see there’s a coinbase (what we refer to as the halving amounts payable per block) and then added is fee’s accumulated through market participation ie getting transactions on the block.

• 
  Peter Polachi (@PPolachi) reported 33 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport Whoever has had their money locked up by coinbase all day, dm me. I’m going to work with legal representation to put together a class action lawsuit. Coinbase knowingly let users buy and attempt to transfer Billions of dollars in Solana without making a real effort to inform them there was a huge problem

• 
  Clowns of X (@Adamyso4) reported 33 minutes ago

  @TruistChamp @Truist Trash bank. Kept flagging my transactions which were deposits to @coinbase because I day trade for a living. Called their customer service line 3 times in the span of 24 hrs and the cheap labor foreigners could not help! Costs me thousands in profit on shorting gold last night!!

• 
  FlyTheElephant Knots+BIP110 #BitcoinIsHope (@FlyTheElephant1) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BAcct8 @LukeDashjr @RobinSeyr Too late to change bip110, and also impossible because none of the TCs own bitcoin. They have contracts with coinbase custody. And also likely a bad idea as it would call into question the fungibility and irrevocability of bitcoin.

• 
  amircrypto82 (@amircrypto82) reported 39 minutes ago

  I remember sitting in a hotel room in Denver during EthDenver 2023, watching a demo of two AI agents trying to negotiate a compute rental. They were both running on the same framework. Both had clear instructions. Both had access to on-chain payments. The handshake was flawless. The payment went through instantly. Then one agent delivered a result the other one said was incomplete. And the whole thing just... froze. No dispute mechanism. No fallback. No way to escalate. The demo ended with a human stepping in and saying "we'll figure it out later." That moment has been eating at me ever since. Because we are shipping the agentic economy right now and we are shipping it with a missing limb. The stack is actually pretty impressive when you squint. Coinbase built x402 to handle agent-to-agent payments. That works. ERC-8004 gives agents an on-chain identity so you know who is who. The Linux Foundation threw its weight behind A2A for interoperability so these things can actually talk to each other. Every piece is engineered for the happy path. Every single standard assumes the counterparty behaves. None of them includes a function to resolve a disagreement. That is not a minor oversight. That is the entire failure mode. The agents are coming and they are not going to be polite about it. By 2030 they will outnumber human transactors by multiple orders of magnitude. They will negotiate deals across jurisdictions that do not legally recognize them. They will move capital at a velocity that makes high-frequency trading look like a horse carriage. They will disagree about deliverables, about quality thresholds, about whether a clause was satisfied, and they will need to resolve those disagreements in minutes, not months. No courtroom. No mediation. No "we'll figure it out later." This is where @GenLayer enters the chat. They are building something the rest of the stack forgot: adjudication. Not oracles. Not arbitration. Adjudication. The difference matters. A smart contract only works when an outcome reduces to deterministic code. Most disputes do not. Whether a job was delivered or a clause was satisfied or a result is close enough to count, none of those are binary. Code cannot judge it. Courts are too slow. What handles it at machine speed is a system where a randomly selected set of validators, each running a different LLM, evaluates the outcome and reaches consensus. When they disagree, the validator set rotates and anyone can appeal to expand it. No intermediaries. No single point of failure. No oracle dependency. Just a mechanism to substitute trust. Think about the trilogy for a second. Bitcoin made money trustless. You do not need a bank to verify a transaction. Ethereum made computation trustless. You do not need a server to run your code. GenLayer makes adjudication trustless. You do not need a judge or a corporate backend to settle a contract. That is the missing leg of the stool. I am not saying this is going to be easy. There are real questions about how LLM-based consensus holds up under adversarial pressure. There are open debates about validator incentives and slashing conditions that are not fully settled yet. And I am skeptical about any system that claims to handle subjective judgment at scale because subjectivity is where everything breaks. But I am even more skeptical of the alternative, which is doing nothing and watching the agent stack stall out the first time two machines disagree over something that matters. That is going to happen soon. Probably within the next two years. Some agent is going to deliver a result, another agent is going to reject it, and the whole infrastructure will grind to a halt because nobody thought to build a function for it. At that exact moment, @GenLayer stops being an interesting experiment and starts being the only thing that works. The bet is simple. The agent economy cannot scale without adjudication. Every other piece of the stack is already in production. The last piece is the one nobody wants to build because it is hard, because it touches judgment instead of math, because it requires admitting that code is not actually law, it is just a very good set of instructions when nothing goes wrong. But things go wrong. They always go wrong. And when they do, you need a system that can handle it at the same speed as the transaction that triggered it. I think we are about to find out whether the industry actually believes in autonomous agents or just likes the idea of them. Because if you really believe in agents, you have to believe in adjudication. You cannot have one without the other. And @GenLayer is the only project I have seen that is building the latter with the seriousness it deserves. What happens when two agents you own disagree with each other? Who do you appeal to then?

• 
  Jony.AVAX9000🔺 | 🌊📘🧪 (@jonycsarker) reported 39 minutes ago

  Crypto hasn't had a truly customer-obsessed founder in a long time. I want people to feel that from @Balcore_AI . So most of my time goes to one question: how do I make using Balcore so seamless that it becomes sticky the thing you keep coming back to? But being customer-obsessed also means being honest about where the experience still has gaps. Two are on my mind: Getting money in: Not everyone holds USDC. If you have to leave the app, find an exchange, and figure out on-ramping before you can even start, most people just… don't. Balcore isn't in the business of building payment rails that's a regulated, years-long problem, and it's not our edge. So I'm integrating the best provider instead. We will probably go with Coinbase Onramp: bank → your own wallet → Balcore, low fees, and Coinbase handles the compliance. The point isn't to become a fiat gateway. It's to have the option there, in-app, the moment a new user needs it so nobody bounces at step one. Getting yield out into real life : Making markets is only half the story. At some point you want to spend what you earned. So I'm looking at off-ramp + a debit card, likely through Cypher HQ, so your market-making yield can actually buy a coffee. Still early on this one, but it's the direction. Both of these share a principle: don't make the user leave. Every hop to another app is a place they drop off. The best experience is the one where getting in, earning, and cashing out all live under one roof. Now priorities, in order, because obsession without focus is just noise: Ship the MVP, Get the audit done, Bootsrap the Platform with Balcore Protocol owned liquidity, Open for Public, Keep building and shipping in parallel. The seamless stuff comes as we grow. But the mindset is there from day one. Be the Market Maker. There is no escape🔺

• 
  Darren Kelly ✪ (@greatdaytolearn) reported 41 minutes ago

  @rapthiel Hi! Sorry you’re experiencing this. If your Ledger address matches but the Coinbase dApp isn’t detecting your available balance, it could be a temporary sync or connection issue. Could you share which Ledger device you’re using and your current Ledger Live version?

• 
  👀 🐂🀄️ (@I4NFTS) reported 43 minutes ago

  Coinbase has 115 million users. They made it possible to trade Solana memes right through the app. Solana on its own is easier to use than both Robinhood and Coinbase. The users isn’t the problem is getting people to buy. If you think the average Robinhood user is going to bid cash cat at $120m your sadly mistaken Or I’m an idiot and it goes to billions but based on past history I don’t think I’ll be wrong here Also, all roads absolutely do not lead back to ETH lol that’s a **** chain that probably will be extinct in 5-10 years

• 
  magnus (@degenutz) reported 44 minutes ago

  Both $BTC and $ETH are pretty uneventful right now but this has been the pattern for the past +7 months: Pump -> range for a few days/weeks -> dump. The hard part is determining whether this is an exit pump before continuation lower or a liquidity move designed to shake out panic/relief sellers from their spot positions. We saw a similar setup in June/July before the $ETH move higher. First came the range and pump from sub-$2k, then another range and pump from sub-$3k. Looking at aggregated spot CVD, both $BTC and $ETH saw spot buying support the move higher, but that buying pressure has now stalled and is ranging alongside price. For $BTC, buyers remain the dominant side of the order book. For $ETH, sellers currently have the edge. Coinbase premium has cooled off from ~$100 to ~$51 Open interest has retraced back to pre-pump levels

• 
  Command (@moon_or_doom) reported 45 minutes ago

  Buttercoin — The Original Crypto Legend Buttercoin (2013–2015) was a Bitcoin exchange that aimed to be the NASDAQ of Bitcoin — a full order book trading platform with institutional-grade infrastructure. Open-source, high-volume, Wall Street-ready. The Thesis Bitcoin needs a real exchange. Not a broker. Full order books. Institutional liquidity. A trading engine that Wall Street can trust. Founded by Cedric Dahl and Bennett Hoffman. Y Combinator S13 batch — same batch as Coinbase. Two companies. Same thesis. Wildly different outcomes. The Run - 2013 — YC S13. Raised $1.6M from Google Ventures (Kevin Rose), Floodgate, Initialized Capital, Reddit co-founder Alexis Ohanian. - 2014 — Wedbush Securities invested. First Bitcoin company to ever get Wall Street backing. This was a big deal. - 2015 — Shut down. The official reason: "loss of interest in Bitcoin from venture capital firms." Why It Died Too early. Bitcoin in 2013–2015 wasn't ready for institutional adoption. No ETFs. No custody solutions. No regulatory clarity. The thesis was spot on — just 5 to 8 years ahead of its time. The Irony Coinbase — same YC batch, same vision — went public at $86 billion. Buttercoin shut down with 4 employees. Two companies. Same starting line. One became the face of crypto. The other became a what could have been. --- Why It Matters Now (RH Chain 2026) The Buttercoin token on Robinhood Chain is a nostalgia play — reviving one of crypto's earliest and most respected names. Like how GME and AMC tokens tapped into meme stock lore, Buttercoin taps into OG crypto history. Narrative: "The legend was right in 2013. Now it's back on Robinhood Chain." And I don't know who made this, he seems very lazy; 0xCCF72360Ec38675692306fe92E842024aadE2B78 But i'm aped. Not financial advice. Just respect the lore.

• 
  Jack (@Jackkk) reported 47 minutes ago

  Threadguy reveals what he would do if he were the CEO of Robinhood “What I think I would do is I would ship some product, some RWA product that there's a marginal buyer for” “If you got to put mortgages onchain, if you rip Pokemon cards onchain, dude you got to put something with substance on the chain that Robinhood users would have some interest in buying and you snap call give every Robinhood stock account access to trade it” “Then all of a sudden, you just put like $3T, $4T, $5T dollars on chain in like a second. In one second, you just doubled the crypto market cap” “He’s got to put something people want to bid and then you got to snap give every account access to it and then all of a sudden it's like whoa” “You do what people always thought Coinbase could do and so maybe it's tokenized stocks, maybe you tokenize some stocks you can't trade on Robinhood. Give everyone a free tokenized stock. If they sell it, then they get stablecoins back. Something of this nature”

• 
  slaya. (@slayasolana) reported 50 minutes ago

  Waiting 2 hours now for @coinbase to transfer my funds to gmgn so i can trade on robinhood, you’d think with this many users and this big of an exchange it wouldn’t take hours to solve this ****. so useless

• 
  DegenCapitalLLC (@DegenCapitalLLC) reported 51 minutes ago

  This one tweet is all it took to send memes skyrocketing on RobinHood. Eventually they wanted to only focus on RWA, But they noticed the volumes memes were getting. They are a business, they aren't stupid. They will capitalize on this and push memes. Its not over. Wait till they start listing it on their exchanges. Their customer base is bigger than CoinBase.

• 
  aventus network $avt (@baddiecydz) reported 56 minutes ago

  @RobinhoodApp @coinbase why do you use $eth? It’s slow and expensive. Why?????? Why not $sol? It’s cheap and fast

• 
  Douglas Beasley (@DouglasBeayi1l) reported 58 minutes ago

  @sumitroy2 Trust Wallet, Coinbase, Uphold, every one of those accounts have been closed down or they’ve been not let me have the account open and they’re keeping my money