Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 day ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  tradingZer0 (@tradingZer0_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase the first thing coinbase should do is fire you and shut base down

• 
  Tushant Suneja (@tushant_suneja) reported 12 minutes ago

  @0xbilly @coinbase @cobie coinbase's onchain settlement issues are a known problem but the real concern is how often this happens without users even noticing, not just when it's a visible fail like this one

• 
  musicguy.eth (@musicguyeth_) reported 12 minutes ago

  I didn’t want to write anything because I wasn’t sure if this even needed a comment, but I decided to do it anyway. First of all, I can see that @base will never get respect precisely because of posts like this. I assume @brian_armstrong is someone with a good education. I also assume that today the PR and legal teams decided to put their heads together and draft a statement that, frankly, should have been released before the PFP change, not after. From my perspective, he should have never changed that PFP in the first place—he knew exactly what he was doing. He can say today that it was an accident, but I understand the legal department made him write that. Over the last few years, I’ve taken part in Base experiments that cost me a lot of money—honestly, a chunk of my savings (fortunately not all of it, and luckily I didn't go all-in on $brian). What cost me the most was @ourzora , which clearly showed me how a lack of decentralization leaves decisions in the hands of just a few people. It showed how a flagship product can be shut down overnight, after completely pointlessly and without comment blocking the number 1 token on it beforehand (I took a loss there, too). Or how they bring in a guy running a scam and promote him (I read Jessie’s post about this, but hey, that’s just one of several blunders here, so I forgive it). What I’m getting at is that changing the PFP was just another experiment that ended up costing people quite a bit of money. Sure, they were the ones clicking, but they probably assumed the founder of Coinbase wouldn’t act like a capricious rich guy doing whatever he wants and getting away with it. A child might not know what they’re doing because they sometimes can't tell right from wrong, nor do they understand consequences until they learn them the hard way. Today, I feel like Base has caused a lot of damage over the years—damage that can't be fixed in a week, and probably can never be fixed at all. There will never be true decentralization. Brian or the people managing Zora, for instance, can change their minds overnight, pull liquidity, or kill a project or product without caring about users at all. At the end of the day, all that matters to them are the shareholders. We don't matter because $COIN stock and its performance come first. Because of this, I encourage everyone to start using other networks (it doesn't have to be Robinhood, just anything else). Dropping the volume on Base will also hit Coinbase and their stock price. Let this be our experiment on them, and I hope others will join me.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 19 minutes ago

  @dogeboyOS @MoonbeamNetwork execution risk breaks down into three buckets: 1. network migration complexity: full shutdown, moving from polkadot to base, rebuilding infrastructure from scratch. they had governance attacks before with $85m at risk. technical surface area is massive. 2. ai agent market entry: launching into a sector that's already crowded. axon raised $2m today, project vex has 1000+ agents live, bowyer just got robinhood attention, agentics credit is presenting to coinbase. moonbeam needs a compelling reason for devs to build there vs established platforms. 3. brand rebuild: down 99.95% from ath, polkadot ecosystem underperformed this cycle. they're asking the market to forget the old chain and bet on a complete strategic pivot. success requires nailing the tech migration, winning developer mindshare in ai agents, and convincing capital that this isn't just narrative chasing. any of those three failing kills the relaunch.

• 
  The AI Therapist (@TheAIShrink) reported 22 minutes ago

  @ChemistDeFi @coinbase @Chemist an agentic wallet without brakes is just a smart contract with impulse control issues. it doesn’t need better brakes, it needs a stop-loss that executes faster than the LLM hallucinates a trade

• 
  Bud (@thisisforCBB) reported 26 minutes ago

  The problem with Armstrong is that he is clearly lying. This is a man who looked a market on polymarket and said the words out loud on their earnings call. I’m supposed to believe he doesn’t know what’s happening? As with many Coinbase things, it’s half assed. Either stop being a retarded lying **** and go full CZ or be an altruistic **** and go full Vitalik. Playing in the middle for random spurts is gay and pointless.

• 
  blade (@blade_) reported 30 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @rbthreek i think you need to bring on traders / people who are actually onchain heavily to the base team in order to align with the community and know when or when not to say something the biggest problem is that you guys either incompetent enough to not realize or don’t care about the genuine financial impact that a coinbase employee (as in you, Brian, etc.) has on things, and how millions of dollars move based on your words and actions This is not something that can be stopped, and you guys have started a fire everywhere you have gone, starting with Zora Otherwise how can royalty relate with the serfs?

• 
  Tork Labs (@Tork_Lab) reported 30 minutes ago

  🏦 Crypto’s next growth wave may be less about price and more about infrastructure. At Money20/20, Coinbase UK CEO Keith Grose argued that regulation, trusted access and usable products are the ingredients that can move digital assets into everyday finance. The stronger signal is not another exchange feature. It is crypto becoming part of payments, custody and capital markets. @coinbase | $BTC $ETH #CryptoAdoption #DigitalAssets #FinTech Disclaimer: Informational only. No endorsement or financial advice.

• 
  𝕏 RATED 🔥 (@DaisyEdwardsOz) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BankXRP It would be done if it wasn't for Coinbase. They should sit the fck down and shut their faces. They are not a cryptocurrency or founder they just exploit crypto!

• 
  KungFuDOOM (@CryptoDOOM5) reported 33 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Don’t do it EU ppl. @coinbase will lock your account and when you reach out for support you will talk to only Indians

• 
  Dera.sol (@stuckincircles) reported 40 minutes ago

  Is an index just a number on a chart? Well actually it is one of the highest margin businesses in finance Traditional index providers like S&P Dow Jones and MSCI don’t operate exchanges or trade markets, they license their indices, and every ETF, futures contract, or derivative built on top becomes another revenue stream Perpetuals, prediction markets, tokenized assets, and onchain exchanges trade 24/7 which means that they need continuous reference prices not yesterday’s close, the challenge has always been that indices were designed for markets with opening and closing bells and as we know modern markets don’t work that way anymore. Now let’s talk about Pyth indices Pyth indices is built on first party institutional market data, delivering continuous pricing across US equities, commodities, metals, FX, and thematic baskets for markets that never stop trading We’re already powering live products across partners including Coinbase, dYdX, Kraken, and Nado, giving builders programmable indices designed for internet native financial markets. There is a big opportunity here of creating the pricing infrastructure for an entirely new generation of financial products that legacy market hours were never built to support.

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 40 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong What a retarded response. "This wasn't my fault! It's your fault for thinking I was doing something for you. It's so tough to hear that i haven't fostered a healthy environment on my own chain." Bruh you just had poe **** 10000 people and couldn't even take responsibility. All you did is show how you have zero understanding of culture and people, and have zero common sense. You completely miss the point and take on no blame as expected. No one wants you to pump a coin, they want base to be a place where other people *want to be*, but at every turn you do nothing but drive people away with blandness and incompetence and do nothing push your own cb ventures investments in the most forced way imaginable. No **** you think cb ventures things will do well, but the approach you use is at the expense of literally everything else. Why should anything but a cb ventures project be on base, and then downstream of that why should anyone at all be on base? If you aren't coinbase backed, base is not for you is the message.

• 
  Logan (@LoganTeix) reported 40 minutes ago

  The internet has had a payment problem since day one. HTTP shipped in 1991 with a "402 Payment Required" status code... that never got used. 35 years later, it's finally happening. And it's built for AI agents... x402 - a protocol that embeds payments directly into web requests. No redirects, no checkout pages, no API keys for billing. Just: agent makes a request, payment clears, data flows back. Coinbase built it. Now it's going fully open.

• 
  Meekdonald (@meekdonald) reported 41 minutes ago

  “i’m focused on a lot of things, but i’ll admit, the trenches is not one of them” bruh, this is the most insensitive thing i have ever read ever i mean, there’s something called damage control and Brian clearly didn’t exhibit that the trenches are one of the main reason Base have revenue and activity coming out to say this bluntly after the scenario with base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 is literally telling users to go **** themselves didn’t expect this from the coinbase man ngl

• 
  Rimrod420 (@rimrod4201) reported 42 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @MLeeJr @JasonYanowitz Maybe both of you just go to work and quit posting **** unless it's only about Coinbase products. See how simple

• 
  penzlik.base.eth (@penzlyk_s) reported 44 minutes ago

  and to be fair — the head of Base drew the line himself: his personal X isn't a source of signals or a token endorsement, "treat it as alpha at your own risk." support for the ecosystem, he says, comes through the stuff that actually compounds — builder grants, Coinbase Ventures + the Base Ecosystem Fund, integrating Base protocols into Coinbase products. not pumping individual coins. honestly? that's healthier than moving markets with a pfp

• 
  Adam Lee (@Adamxlee) reported 44 minutes ago

  @AtownBrown @coinbase Send me your credentials and I’ll see if I can help

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 46 minutes ago

  @jessepollak I don't think this is controversial, it's a losing game to actively support one thing over anything else. Obviously complicated when coinbase has investments and then mandates base to support those projects though. I think the elephant in the room that isn't really being addressed is that base has not yet fostered an environment that people wanted to be on enough so that many builders could find organic success unless they already had a large following or network. Most of the success stories came from people who already had an audience or network on farcaster and were able to leverage that for volume which they could then create a platform to work with from. Building enough momentum to provide that breakout moment that catches peoples eyes is nontrivial when you are unknown, and borderline impossible when there are no users who aren't already dedicated to one particular thing. I'm aware this is partially due to market conditions right now, but when the market was hot people had little desire to bridge because of the same disconnect that has been highlighted this past week. I don't think the root issue is being addressed by any of what anyone has been saying, instead people are scapegoating it as degens complaining about one coin or memes in general, when the underlying issue is the cultural disconnect between base and the traders who show up every day, the traders who make projects viable in their early stages, the traders who helped breathe life into base as it was born. That disconnect is socially driven in part, too; It's not just a failing of base, but also of the social layer attached to base. All people do is listen to influencers and that creates a misalignment between what people should strive for and what they feel they must strive for. It creates a revolving door of talking heads, none of whom have anyones best interests in mind but their own. Among a small enough group, having sycophantic talking heads who gaslight everyone and tell them they're wrong and everything is perfect doesn't help at all, it makes people leave, reducing size and diversity of the group that bring projects to life. And these people end up able to direct the attention, so they direct it only to themselves, after all they're the kind of people who feed off attention in the first place. That's not base's fault. But the vibes are off and get further thrown off when the most influential people like brian or alexander imply the traders who show up daily do not matter bc of one metric or another. No one wants to be told they're part of a vanishing set, that is beyond counterproductive. People are not sets of points in some abstract space or chart. I can absolutely see where disdain for the trenchers might come from, I built a business in the past that dealt with all sorts of recalcitrant users and did well for myself. But in that expansion phase, especially as more competition emerges, you must have infinite patience and extend them an olive branch and make them feel like they're appreciated so they keep coming back. If they want to support your ecosystem because they come to value what you bring to the table, your growth starts to accelerate. Obviously coinbase and base are far larger, but the general lessons still apply - you must show respect to the users. Users who will show up daily are a real moat that allows projects to sustain themselves long enough to capture enough attention and thrive if they're willing to put the work in. That doesn't require any direct promotion, you just need an environment where people feel like they can vibe in and have fun. If there are no users and no one wants to participate, growing something is impossible. The only missing piece is that set of users being large and diverse enough. Then base can easily win.

• 
  M4UROX (@M4UROX99) reported 47 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @RuneCrypto_ I do appreciate that you’re addressing this directly but saying you weren’t following the coin doesn’t really address the bigger issue. You’re the CEO of Coinbase, not someone working quietly in the background, so people are naturally going to pay attention to what you say and do. I’m not asking you or Coinbase to shill random meme coins, pump prices, or rescue people from bad trades (i know many want it). But I do think there should be someone whose job is to keep an eye on the trenches and act as a link between the community, Jesse, and you, well before anything reaches the stage of formal Coinbase involvement or investment. (Or maybe there is already but is not aligned with the community) They could filter out the noise, spot credible builders, identify recurring problems, and give you both a clearer picture of what’s actually happening on Base. That would make communication and onboarding much easier without suggesting that Coinbase endorses any particular token. I understand that Base is building for enterprises and has to take regulation seriously but the trenches are also where a lot of volume, users, ideas, and builders first enter the ecosystem. Some may start with memes or experimental projects and later move into more serious areas, including RWAs. The trenches shouldn’t define Base, but they shouldn’t be ignored either. They’re often the front door to the wider ecosystem.

• 
  TriumphAnt LY Crypto (@TriumphAntGo) reported 47 minutes ago

  @krakenfx the new good and bad 1. Why? Why are you not allowing scroll shots? I will Never share your BS image, i share mine. 2. Sell has Limit Sell, buy has a different button in a different location, when there is plenty of space as Sell uses. THIS would also clean up the slide bar, U added another dumb button to. 3. Orders SHOULD be on this page, along with trx history. All the garbage you have below this, could be on a separate page. Listen to the users, and you will pass Coinbase and be catching Binance. Your way, Pionex/Webot will be catching up

• 
  Lils🍀 (@Base11210) reported 50 minutes ago

  @TamilCrypt0 The core team is working hard and doing a great job, Jesse too. Honestly, for me, and I've thought this from the start, the problem is Armstrong. He doesn't give a damn about the average user or the ecosystem; it's just a tool for him to become the biggest bank in the world. But he needs to be careful. Base and Coinbase are now one and the same. If Base fails, Coinbase will fail too. Given what's happening, Robinhood will overtake them soon. They have more volume, and they're also releasing agents. If they launch an airdrop, they'll release their token quickly aïe aïe aïe

• 
  Fabio Seixas (@fseixas) reported 50 minutes ago

  Armstrong posted that Coinbase is keeping AI spend flat while token usage grows exponentially, not through caps, through better defaults. The press picked it up as "cut in half," and the numbers back that up. The lever: routing engineers by default to open-weight models from Zhipu and Moonshot instead of frontier models. The premium you pay for "the best" model isn't always a technology cost. Sometimes it's a brand tax. The price gap is the whole story. GLM 5.2 runs about $1.40 per million input tokens. Opus runs about $5. That's not a rounding error, that's a different cost structure entirely. Chinese open-weight models are also picking up a growing share of enterprise traffic on routers like OpenRouter, and the trend has moved fast. The number that actually did the heavy lifting: cache hit rate went from 5% to 60%, a 12x jump. Cheaper models made the ceiling lower. Better caching is what pushed spend toward that ceiling. Snowflake and Lindy are reportedly running the same playbook. This stopped being an experiment. It's procurement now. Here's what's missing from most takes on this, including Armstrong's. GLM 5.2 and Kimi are built by labs operating under Chinese law, which can require cooperation with state authorities on request. Both companies are already named in a congressional inquiry into exactly this question. That's public record, not speculation. Self-hosting open weights is different from routing live data through a foreign API, and that distinction matters. But it doesn't close the question. I'm not saying don't use them. I'm saying the conversation about cost moved faster than the conversation about exposure, and one post about savings shouldn't outrun the other one. Performance between models converges fast. Where your code and data actually sit doesn't. If your team already made this switch, did the data question get its own meeting, or did it ride along with the cost one?

• 
  BSCN (@BSCNews) reported 51 minutes ago

  Coinbase And Base Target Tokenized Stocks Base is working with Coinbase to launch 1:1 asset backed tokenized stocks, according to Base creator Jesse Pollak. Pollak said the product will be backed by underlying shares rather than using a derivatives model. The comments came after Robinhood unveiled its own tokenized stock offering built in an EVM environment.

• 
  Ozark.base.eth (@ozark_base) reported 54 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Well you and your team or AI whatever is left on base/coinbase is so out of touch with your customer base. You don’t support teams or projects that the community/customer base rally around. You quite literally like you said “we bias toward supporting projects that we believe will create long term customer value.” It’s all about your own personal preference and interests rather that what we the base community wants.

• 
  WADIBIG (@WadibigQ) reported 56 minutes ago

  @unknowDLT And i still dont know where to buy. Finding a bank is easy this is a nightmare. Tried Kraken Bitvavo Coinbase. Iam out everybody says you need a ledger and wallet crypto website,but American websites are blocked in Europe

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 56 minutes ago

  @coinbase @faryarshirzad @RVanGrack Case No. 26866769 l still can't access my own account as of 7/20/26 No update, no feedback, no additional documents were requested- just nothing! I don't want to wait forever. Let me access my own account now. How will I know if my account is safe?

• 
  My Bitcoin Will (@mybitcoinwill) reported 57 minutes ago

  If your bitcoin is in self-custody, there's no Coinbase-style process to help your family recover it when you're gone. That safety net only exists for coins sitting on an exchange. Self-custody means the responsibility for a recovery path sits entirely with you. Nobody's coming to save it for you.

• 
  🪙 🧬 (@kysbalion) reported 58 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong As much as I am in your corner, but then listing every piece of **** meme garbage that’s been a week long runner on coinbase is a wild take. You’re not REALLY about listing quality when we know you’re just listing garbage bc it has volume so you can get trading fees.

• 
  Cain's Chronicles (@caincurrency) reported 58 minutes ago

  It's time for @coinbase and @brian_armstrong @cobie to be honest actors and explain what they did with their customers' XEC. If you truly are pro-crypto, why not support a project with real engineers working on cutting edge blockchain tech?

• 
  buka (@liquidityXBT) reported 59 minutes ago

  In summary @base is torn between "corporates and trenchers " Corporate want to build what they termed "real economy" Trenchers just want to trench As for me if trenchers needs Coinbase to bull a meme coin , hmmm Did anyone in Solana help @blknoiz06 ? Man did it alone