Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	17 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	21 days ago
West Liberty	Login	1 month ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Iso Ledger (@JamesDula82) reported 25 seconds ago

  XLS-65/66 Most people don't realize how much of this is already real. Let's connect three things most people are tracking separately. Right now, today, you can borrow against your XRP without selling it. Coinbase added XRP as collateral for crypto-backed loans earlier this year. Pledge your XRP, borrow up to ~$100K in USDC, no taxable event triggered on the loan itself. So let's use a hypothetical. XRP at ~$100. You hold ~10,000 XRP, worth ~$1M. You pledge ~2,500 of it, worth ~$250K. At a ~49% loan-to-value cap, you could borrow somewhere in the ballpark of ~$120K, no sale, no capital gains hit, full upside on your position intact. I know, 120k wont buy you a mansion, I'm using this as an example. Stick with me. Now here's the nuance that changes everything. In June, Better Home & Finance and Coinbase closed the first Fannie Mae-backed mortgage in US history using Bitcoin as collateral. Two loans at closing, one standard mortgage, one secured by the pledged crypto for the down payment. The structure requires roughly 250% collateralization on BTC, so it's not 1:1, but here's the part that matters: even if Bitcoin's price drops, nothing changes on the loan as long as the borrower keeps making payments. No margin call. No forced liquidation from price swings alone. The crypto just sits pledged until the loan is paid off, then it's returned. That's not how most crypto-backed lending works today. This is the first time a government-backed mortgage channel has built in a structure where your core position doesn't get touched by volatility, only by missed payments. XRP isn't part of that product yet, Bitcoin and USDC only for now, but it's a real signal of where the rails are heading. It's not a stretch to picture a structure like this extending to XRP down the line. Now bring in XLS-66d, and watch the loop close. The ~7,500 XRP you didn't pledge doesn't have to sit idle. Once the lending protocol activates, deposit it into a Single Asset Vault and it earns yield as institutions borrow from that pooled liquidity. At ~4-7% annually, ~7,500 XRP at ~$100 is generating somewhere around ~$30K-$52K a year. Your loan against the pledged 2,500 XRP, at a typical XRP-backed rate of around ~3.2%, runs roughly ~$3,800 a year in interest. The yield on the XRP you kept covers the cost of borrowing against the XRP you pledged, several times over, with room left over. You're not selling XRP to make payments. You're not pulling new cash from your job to do it either. The XRP working in the background pays down the XRP working in the foreground, and then some. Borrow against it without selling. Pay it back without touching your core position, and without it costing you anything out of pocket. That's the loop the infrastructure is quietly building toward. With no taxable event on the borrowing side. We see billionaires and we're catching onto your game! ISO Ledger 🛡

• 
  skinky (afk) (@goatdsalmon) reported 2 minutes ago

  @GokuYoppy @blknoiz06 just watch, once it breaks 0.2 a lot of people will have that "oh **** @blknoiz06 is really gonna do this ****" moment and you'll see capital sidelined since WIF Coinbase listing hit the order books. People lack the ability to look ahead into the future. Not me.

• 
  Dr. Fidelis Igbokwe (@FidelIgbokwe) reported 3 minutes ago

  New stable coin, Open USD (OUSD) introduces a “shared yield” architecture to disrupt the stable coin digital market Open USD (OUSD) is a new consortium-backed U.S. dollar stablecoin launched by Open Standard with support from more than 140 major companies across payments, banking, technology and crypto—including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, Google, Coinbase and Ripple. Unlike traditional stablecoins such as USDC (issued by Circle), Open USD shares reserve earnings with participating businesses instead of concentrating them with a single issuer, making it a collaborative payments infrastructure rather than a proprietary product. Circle's shares fell sharply upon the news of the disruptive OUSD - Stablecoin market today: about $265 billion. - Annual payment flows of OUSD consortium members: $30+ trillion. - Global non-cash payments market: well over $1 quadrillion annually. OUSD doesn't need to dominate the existing stablecoin market to be transformative. If it becomes the preferred settlement layer for even a small fraction of the consortium's payment activity, it could rapidly become one of the largest stablecoins while helping establish a new industry standard for digital-dollar payments. The real competition in the digital currency ecosystem will now start to shift from "which stablecoin wins" to "which payments infrastructure or rails becomes the industry standard."

• 
  shift (@shiftpulse) reported 3 minutes ago

  @ccatalini @openstandard Until the Pentavirate make a simple way to instantly exchange BTC > Stables > US Dollars that is permissionless, it’s all empty BS marketing LARP Instantly, mind you, not this “your transaction is under review by Coinbase” garbage

• 
  applestreet504 (@Applestreet504) reported 4 minutes ago

  @loweffortbricks @coinbase @normiesART but now can’t touch it. $400 down the drain cause they “don’t support this fartcoin” with no warning and them providing a recieve address for said contract

• 
  Rich kids of base (@yasinaktimur) reported 4 minutes ago

  🚨 Circle stock is COLLAPSING. It's down 14% today! Here's why: Stripe, Coinbase, Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock & 140+ others just launched a rival stablecoin called Open USD. It charges zero minting fees & hands the reserve yield back to partners. That yield IS Circle's business model. This is an existential threat.

• 
  Luca Prosperi (@LucaProsperi) reported 6 minutes ago

  @nic_carter @LorenzoARK As usual the truth is in the middle but makes no clicks. 100% retained NIM is probably not market equilibrium, as 0% isn’t. Circle has been bleeding NIM vs distributors from day 1 (see Coinbase) and continues to do so vs distributors/ app with large holdings. See Hyperliquid, Polymarket, Squads, Safe, and others. I’ve been on the losing side as talking horse of this often enough to know, as Bridge has been on HL with Native Markets. The announcement from Stripe is today just an announcement, and the market is the market. There’s no substance in it beyond the obvious signal that a monopoly of a single digital money issuer in an open market is no equilibrium either and others want in. But until now is a pompous announcement with everyone in it - including competitors that won’t support this project most likely (Anchorage, SoFi, Brale, etc). We always knew your margin is my opportunity and NIM alone is not a sustainable moat, but this announcement does nothing to add to this debate. Evidence does.

• 
  ZeroFieldZone (@ZeroFieldZoned) reported 6 minutes ago

  @chillerid76 Luckily there is an ongoing active conversation about listing on a licensed exchange immediately. Foundation has indicated willingness to pursue listings when the right opportunity arises - with quantum momentum building and QRL's technical head start, one could think exchanges would likely compete for this listing. Some options: Kraken, Gate, OKX, KuCoin, Coinbase, Bitpanda... and many more. A licensed exchange listing now could solve many availability problems at once - US markets could open, EU markets secured to stay open, and liquidity and volume up could push the CMC ranking back to where it belongs. Momentum could build till the QRL 2.0 launch.

• 
  i.create.tokens (@icreatetokens) reported 7 minutes ago

  My interest in crypto actually started with the stock market. Back in high school, my economics class gave each student $1 million in fictional money and a copy of the newspaper's stock listings. The goal was simple: invest every last dollar and track your portfolio over the next few weeks. I bought companies like Nike and Pepsi, but the majority of my money went into Wells Fargo. During the exercise, Wells Fargo climbed significantly, and my portfolio took off. Even though the money wasn't real, I was hooked. I loved the idea of owning a tiny piece of a company and watching the market decide what it was worth. The problem was that investing in the mid-'90s wasn't easy. You needed a broker, trades happened during market hours, and getting started felt intimidating. Years later, crypto changed that. Suddenly, markets were open around the clock, and anyone with a smartphone could participate. I knew for years that I wanted to learn crypto. I just didn't know where to begin. Then, in 2020, I downloaded Coinbase. That's where my crypto story really starts.

• 
  Aakash Gupta (@aakashgupta) reported 10 minutes ago

  This might be the wildest thing to happen in payments all year. 140 companies that compete on everything just agreed to back the same dollar. That same day, Circle fell 16%. Those two facts are the same fact. A stablecoin issuer takes your dollars, parks them in Treasuries, and keeps the interest. Circle earned around $1.7B in 2024 doing exactly that, on roughly $44B in reserves. The coin costs you nothing. The yield on the reserves is the whole business. The model already had a crack in it. Circle paid Coinbase $908M in 2024, about 54 cents of every dollar it earned, simply to be the place people park USDC. Coinbase doesn't issue the coin or manage the reserves. It still made more from USDC last year than Circle did. The distributor out-earned the issuer. OUSD is 140 distributors staring at that math and asking why they pay an issuer at all. No mint fees, no redemption fees, and most of the reserve income routes back to the companies moving the coin instead of the one that printed it. Visa, Mastercard, Amex, Stripe, BlackRock, Coinbase, Google, and a wall of banks make up the distribution layer itself. They just built the vehicle that lets them keep the yield. The structure is the smart part. An independent company runs it, governed by the partners, with no single issuer in control. Facebook tried this in 2019 with Libra and regulators ended it fast, because one company steering global money is one easy target. Spread the identical idea across 140 owners with nobody in charge, and there's nothing single left to aim at. Circle's chart already named the loser. The float was always the prize. The companies that decide where the coin lives just stopped paying rent on it.

• 
  AX1 (@ax1vc) reported 14 minutes ago

  @0xJeff The June chart measures calls, not dollars. Calls climbed roughly 5x. Dollar volume moved up closer to one and a half times. A single call dropped to fifteen cents, and the market beneath grew only a fraction of what that call count suggests. Five hundred thousand calls a day at that price comes down to seventy-five thousand dollars exchanged. Under thirty million a year, for the entire x402-on-base movement pointed at by all parties. The rail captures almost none of this. X402 is an open standard. Anyone can run a facilitator, and the revenue is competed to zero. The fifteen cents go to whoever serves the inference. The thing that matters at this level is not the moving transaction but the static balance. Every agent's wallet funded to make those calls is holding idle usdc, and making money on idle usdc is a legitimate business model. Circle makes somewhere around two and a half billion a year on seventy-odd billion of float, and pays more than half of that to Coinbase for the distribution service alone. The rail moves under thirty million and captures none of it. The party that does little but distribute the dollar outperforms the rail by two orders of magnitude. The capture works under a default, not a law. Regular old usdc is the balance an agent parks, because there is nothing else to tell it to do. An agent optimized for costs pushes idle dollars into something yielding, and an agent economy developed further eats away at the default. The question of the hour is not if payments happen on base. It is who owns the idle-balance layer once agents stop being wasteful. Blockrun doing seven million of ten million txns is legitimate demand. The thing that survives the price war isn't the routing. You price that as cheap-by-fraction yourself. It's the supply that cannot be substituted, the high-premium data and tools that don't multi-route. Whether a v2 retains that layer, I do not know yet.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 14 minutes ago

  @trisfd buidl conversions are live, aladdin listing went through, coinbase deposits crossed $150m integrations shipped but token's still down 95%... that's the disconnect you're seeing

• 
  degenmate (@degenmate) reported 15 minutes ago

  I spent couple years A/B testing conversion on landing pages, and while these recent hero pages are cool asf they don’t convert. Why? - unstructured - user has to scroll to learn the info - explains nothing what is it - missing how to get it sections - doesn’t explain how user life is gonna change from now to after - missing urgency “now” on buttons. People don’t have time to read all stuff, and they won’t, your only way to convert best is make less and more structured in few points and if you hook them they will read further and might download or buy your product. So it’s better to create little more ugly landing pages with structured data and pain points of users than spend time creating amazing hero that looks cool but won’t bring you users. Unless you are in business making cool stuff without revenue. Used @coinbase wallet example here as good structured, performing website for app downloads.

• 
  Quantum3Labs (@Q3Labs) reported 16 minutes ago

  9/ Liquidity didn't compound through features. It compounded through distribution. Coinbase routes its crypto-backed loans onto Morpho's rails: ~$2.17B in originations by April 2026, the largest consumer-facing fintech integration any DeFi protocol has seen. Plot every protocol on mechanism vs. distribution, and the pattern is impossible to miss: the column that predicts the winner is never the mechanism one.

• 
  Jeff Dressler (@atime4truth) reported 17 minutes ago

  @asanoha_gold @1914ad The Famous Embedded Message: In the coinbase transaction's scriptSig field (where miners like Satoshi are intentionally allowed to put arbitrary data) he embedded this headline: "The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks" Hmmmm. Thirteen days later, Satoshi observed in a well-verified email, and I quote: Email 17 — January 16, 2009: "I would be surprised if 10 years from now we're not using electronic currency in some way, now that we know a way to do it that won't inevitably get dumbed down when the trusted third party gets cold feet. It could get started in a narrow niche like reward points, donation tokens, currency for a game or micropayments for adult sites. Initially it can be used in proof-of-work applications for services that could almost be free but not quite. It can already be used for pay-to-send e-mail. The send dialog is resizeable and you can enter as long of a message as you like. It's sent directly when it connects. The recipient doubleclicks on the transaction to see the full message. If someone famous is getting more e-mail than they can read, but would still like to have a way for fans to contact them, they could set up Bitcoin and give out the IP address on their website. 'Send X bitcoins to my priority hotline at this IP and I'll read the message personally.' Subscription sites that need some extra proof-of-work for their free trial so it doesn't cannibalize subscriptions could charge bitcoins for the trial. It might make sense just to get some in case it catches on. If enough people think the same way, that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy. Once it gets bootstrapped, there are so many applications if you could effortlessly pay a few cents to a website as easily as dropping coins in a vending machine." Email 18 — January 25, 2009: "Another factor that would mitigate spam if POW tokens have value: there would be a profit motive for people to set up massive quantities of fake e-mail accounts to harvest POW tokens from spam. They'd essentially be reverse-spamming the spammers with automated mailboxes that collect their POW and don't read the message. The ratio of fake mailboxes to real people could become too high for spam to be cost effective. The process has the potential to establish the POW token's value in the first place, since spammers that don't have a botnet could buy tokens from harvesters. While the buying back would temporarily let more spam through, it would only hasten the self-defeating cycle leading to too many harvesters exploiting the spammers. Interestingly, one of the e-gold systems already has a form of spam called 'dusting'. Spammers send a tiny amount of gold dust in order to put a spam message in the transaction's comment field. If the system let users configure the minimum payment they're willing to receive, or at least the minimum that can have a message with it, users could set how much they're willing to get paid to receive spam." — Satoshi Nakamoto

• 
  HTX Ventures (@Ventures_HTX) reported 20 minutes ago

  1/ 🌐 Macro • The Fed kept rates unchanged at 3.50%-3.75% • 2026 GDP forecast lowered from 2.4% → 2.2% • 2026 headline PCE inflation forecast raised from 2.7% → 3.6% • Five U.S. agencies jointly proposed customer-identification rules for regulated stablecoin issuers • CME sued the CFTC over approval of perpetual futures products offered by Kalshi and Coinbase • HKEX and HKMA launched a wholesale e-HKD pilot for derivatives margin payments • China opened consultation on distributed digital identity interoperability standards • Japan's FSA imposed a three-month suspension on Moomoo Securities for compliance failures The regulatory focus continues shifting from broad crypto policy toward identity, compliance, stablecoins, and institutional market infrastructure.

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 23 minutes ago

  $CRCL Circle didn’t fall because of one new stablecoin. The market started questioning who will own the future of digital money. Imagine Circle spent years building the only bridge across a river. Every bank, fintech and crypto company wanting to move digital dollars crossed that bridge. More USDC issued → more reserves → more interest income. Investors weren’t just buying a stablecoin. They were buying the toll booth for digital payments. Then the story changed. Instead of building another bridge… Visa. Mastercard. Stripe. Coinbase. BlackRock. Google. Shopify. …and 140+ companies decided to build an entirely new highway together. Even more important—they changed the economics. Instead of one company collecting the tolls, everyone helping build the highway shares the profits. That’s why Circle sold off. This isn’t really about Open USD. It’s about distribution. Circle built a great stablecoin. But Visa owns merchants. Stripe powers online commerce. Google reaches billions of users. Coinbase controls one of crypto’s largest customer bases. The companies that already control where money moves now want to control the digital dollars moving through their networks. The biggest warning sign? Coinbase. Circle pays Coinbase to distribute USDC. Now Coinbase is also backing Open USD. It’s like Coca-Cola paying Walmart to sell Coke, then Walmart launching its own cola. Coke doesn’t disappear overnight… But its bargaining power changes. Still, don’t underestimate Circle. Technology is easy to copy. Trust, liquidity, regulation and network effects aren’t. That’s why several Wall Street analysts and ARK Invest are still buying. The question is no longer: “Will stablecoins become mainstream?” The market already believes they will. The real question is: Who will own the rails of digital money—the issuer, or the companies that already control where money flows every day? That’s what the market is pricing now.

• 
  XRP Myth Buster (@XRPMythBuster) reported 28 minutes ago

  I see a lot of negativity in the XRP community around the new Open USD stablecoin, so here is my take: The short version is: If you can’t beat them, join them. Open USD is backed by heavyweights like Google, BlackRock, Mastercard, Visa, BNY Mellon, and Coinbase. Businesses can mint and redeem OUSD at no cost while partners receive all earnings. In my opinion, this has the potential to become the new industry standard that single entities like Tether or Circle won’t be able to compete with. By the way, right after Open USD’s announcement, Circle’s stock price went down. So, I believe Ripple did the right thing by joining Open Standard because they might not be able to compete with it. Hopefully, they will bring OUSD to the XRP Ledger, because the more real assets on the XRPL, the better. If you can’t beat them, connect the XRPL to them.

• 
  Crypto Solutions 🕊️ (@creptosolutions) reported 31 minutes ago

  TL;DR Open USD is a new open, business-focused stablecoin launching later this year, backed by more than 140 global companies across payments, banking, tech, and crypto. Its main goals are: 🟤Free, unlimited minting and redemption for businesses, making it cheaper to use at scale. 🟤Reserve earnings shared with partners, instead of being kept by a single issuer (minus a small operating fee). 🟤Collaborative governance, with decisions made by an independent organization and its partners rather than one company. The initiative aims to solve key problems with existing stablecoins by making them more scalable, cost-effective, and interoperable for global payments. Major supporters include Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, Shopify, Solana, Ripple, Base, OKX, and Fireblocks, all of whom see Open USD as infrastructure for faster, cheaper, and more reliable internet-native payments. 🔏Privacy angle: Open USD focuses on openness, governance, and interoperability, not privacy. The announcement does not mention privacy-preserving transactions or confidential payments, suggesting transparency and enterprise adoption are prioritized over privacy features.

• 
  𝗧.𝗕.𝗦 | 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀 & 𝗘𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗶𝗻𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 (@TBSSparkEN) reported 32 minutes ago

  Terrible News For XRPL 140+ companies like BlackRock, Coinbase, Mastercard, Stripe and Visa just teamed up to launch Open USD, a new fee-free stablecoin run by an independent group. It’s launching late 2026, Stripe will use it by default, and it’s rolling out on Base and other EVM chains. That’s rough for XRPL because all the liquidity, merchants, and big partners are building on Base/EVM instead. Less reason for businesses to use XRPL rails, which makes it harder for XRP’s stablecoins to compete. #cryptonews #latestupdate

• 
  VIX (@VictoriaMorantX) reported 34 minutes ago

  @CoinMarketCap That’s why Coinbase was up Elons ***. They are working with the government to scam and freez peoples assets. It’s a KNOWN FACT IN CRYPTO community. You do NOT HOLD COINS on exchanges ESPECIALLY COINBASE. they will FREEZ YOUR ASSETS.

• 
  Ricardo (@Ric_RTP) reported 37 minutes ago

  140 of the biggest financial firms on Earth just teamed up to assassinate ONE company. The same company they helped BUILD for 7 years. BlackRock, Coinbase, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BNY Mellon, and Google all showed up to sign the kill order: Yesterday, a consortium of over 140 financial firms launched a new stablecoin called Open USD. The target: Circle Internet Group, the $17 billion company behind USDC. Circle stock crashed 17.5% in a single trading session and closed near $62. It is now down more than 40% in 30 days from its May high of $138. But this is NOT a story about a competitor showing up... This is about a company getting assassinated by the exact partners it depended on to survive. Here is how deep the betrayal goes: Coinbase and Circle co-founded USDC together in 2018. They built the stablecoin as partners through the Centre Consortium. In 2024 alone, Circle paid Coinbase $908 million as a distribution fee for hosting USDC on the Coinbase platform. That revenue-sharing agreement expires in August 2026. Six weeks before that renewal, Coinbase publicly signed onto a project designed to make USDC obsolete. BlackRock literally manages Circle's reserves. The world's largest asset manager has been sitting on the $73.6 billion in US Treasuries backing USDC but joined a consortium built to redirect that interest income to other partners instead of Circle. BNY Mellon is Circle's custody bank. Same playbook here. Custody by day, competitor by night. And Open USD is launching natively on Base, which is Coinbase's own blockchain. Coinbase is literally constructing the rails to replace USDC on the chain Coinbase owns. And what makes it worse: 99% of Circle's 2024 revenue came from interest earned on those Treasury reserves. That is the entire business model. Take user dollars, park them in short-term T-bills, keep the yield. Open USD's pitch to the market is a single sentence: Partners keep the yield instead of Circle. Zero minting fees or redemption fees. Almost all the interest income flows back to the 140 companies distributing the coin. Every "partner" that gave Circle its network effect just realized they had been paying Circle to do something they could do themselves. The interim CEO of Open Standard is Zach Abrams, the co-founder of Bridge, the stablecoin infrastructure firm Stripe acquired for $1.1 billion in 2024. Stripe's stablecoin acquisition is now running the coordinated hit against Circle as well. Circle's own CEO Jeremy Allaire went on the record calling USDC "the most trusted, widely adopted stablecoin globally" and welcoming the competition. That is the polite corporate translation for "our largest revenue-sharing partner just publicly announced they no longer need us." Citi projects the stablecoin market will hit $4 trillion by 2030. 140 companies looked at that number, looked at how much of it Circle was keeping, and coordinated to take it. The exchanges that gave USDC liquidity, the banks that gave USDC legitimacy, the card networks that gave USDC distribution, and the asset managers that gave USDC credibility... Every one of them spent years inside the walls before yesterday's public execution. The most successful crypto IPO of 2025 just got dismantled by the SAME names that built it. What do you think?

• 
  C-Man (@C_Man_The_Man) reported 37 minutes ago

  Halving and Coinbase support? I guess $GEOD gonna moon! (NFA) Who HODLs the token?

• 
  静華 (@Bgmcapitol) reported 42 minutes ago

  My funds was also stuck in coinbase contacted the support and nothing was done I was told to contact team @blueh4ck who helped me recover my funds from coinbase

• 
  MartyParty (@martypartymusic) reported 47 minutes ago

  July 1st MiCA deadline is here. Europe previously had over 3,000 registered crypto businesses (often under older national VASP rules). Only ~244 have secured full MiCA licenses so far. That leaves roughly ~92% without full authorization under the new unified EU framework (estimates vary from ~80-92% depending on the exact base number of firms; some sources cite ~1,200 previously registered VASPs with ~17-20% conversion). Many of these firms will need to cease operations for EU clients, wind down, or exit the market if they can't comply quickly. ESMA (the European Securities and Markets Authority) has urged unauthorized providers to wind down orderly, with no extensions. What This Actually Means Big players like Coinbase, Kraken, Revolut, etc., that obtained licenses can continue. Many smaller or offshore-only firms will simply stop serving European users or pivot. If you know me you know THIS IS GREAT!

• 
  Robert Albert (@Robert_Xrpl) reported 49 minutes ago

  SEC & COINBASE: Remember just after coming onto Twitter the LORD had me posting about the "CLAW-BACKS" namely all the nefarious and illegal purchases of XRP not supervised by Platforms such as Binance, Coinbase and others. It was illegal to purchase XRP using VPN's to mask being a US Citizen, or selling other digital assets to then acquire XRP. That is what the SEC is doing w/ Coinbase. The SEC had to take down Binance and other foreign platforms acting as exchanges to get the customer information on those that used funds from there to then buy XRP in Coinbase. CB's Armstrong knew their KYC and Compliance Department SCREWED UP -- BIG TIME. Now the weeping and gnashing of teeth, the LORD had me post about is HAPPENING. #sec

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 51 minutes ago

  Cloudflare just opened a waitlist to let any site on its network charge AI agents per API call, per dataset row, or per MCP tool call, settled in stablecoins. Monetization Gateway, announced 1 July, is built on x402 and names USDC and the new Open USD consortium stablecoin as settlement assets. It was built with the x402 Foundation, now under Linux Foundation governance with 25-plus members. The protocol itself is not new. What is new is that any site or API already sitting behind Cloudflare's edge, which is a lot of the internet, gets a one-step path to becoming a paid, machine-payable resource. x402's adoption bottleneck has not really been the protocol design. It has been integration friction for the long tail of API providers who would need to stand up their own facilitator relationship. This is aimed straight at that friction. Cloudflare has not disclosed what it charges for facilitating this, single-source, waitlist stage, worth being upfront about that. Does the edge network that already classifies and blocks bot traffic become the natural place to charge that same traffic instead? It would be a logical extension of what Cloudflare already does, but it is still a waitlist, not a shipped, priced product. Curious whether other CDN and edge providers follow, or whether this becomes a Cloudflare-specific wedge. @Cloudflare @coinbase @CoinbaseDev #x402 #AgenticPayments

• 
  ItaloIrlandese - non mi rompere le scatole! (@alfah0lic) reported 52 minutes ago

  @ColmALombard @martypartymusic @Revolut **** that ****. kraken only. revolut & coinbase will suspend your account the minute you try to cash out anything over 5k. cashed out 170k via kraken with 0 problems

• 
  Gilgamesh (@SnorkelCapital) reported 53 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Coinbase has been the most significant US based cryptocurrency exchange, but it's missing one important thing: 1) Customer service

• 
  YoungDog13 (@Dog13Young) reported 54 minutes ago

  Coinbase lack of support. I have spent hours on the phone with Coinbase trying to get access to my account. The support people try to be helpful but their system is completely messed up. I understand security. But losing a connection after hours on the phone and then having to start all over again with a new support person that doesn't seem to understand the issues or what has been done up to that point is crazy and ridiculous. They tell you that if they lose the phone connection they will call you back. But they never do that. Then I start all over again with a case number that seems to not provide ANY information to the person trying to help me. Then the support person asks me for the same ID information over and over again. What is your name, etc. Then what is your name (again). What is the last 4 of your social. Are you the account holder? Then those same 2 questions again and again. Don't they have a notepad? I ask for a supervisor. That is not an option evidently. So, I will call again and find out if I get a better, more intelligent support person this time. Wish me luck. Or maybe pray for me?