Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Maquoketa	Website	3 days ago
West Liberty	Login	15 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	1 month ago
Louisville	Mobile App	2 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DBCrypto (@DBCrypt0) reported 1 minute ago

  Visa and Mastercard are coming for Circle They control the distribution Circle never built and Circle’s stock dropped on some recent news Tether sits at $186 billion Circle at $76 billion And together they control 85% of the $310 billion stablecoin market and are 100% centralized But neither has merchant networks, bank distribution deals, or household brand recognition They solved the engineering problem but distribution is still a major gap A gap that Visa and Mastercard have spent 60 years building around And their intention is clear as Stripe paid $1.1 billion for Bridge and Mastercard outbid Coinbase at $1.8 billion for BVNK Visa's stablecoin settlement volume hit $7 billion annually, up 50% in one quarter Live on 9 blockchains running 130+ card programs across 50+ countries While Mastercard just activated 6 regulated stablecoins on 8 chains. And the possible kill shot for Circle? The GENIUS Act standardizes reserve and redemption rules So once regulation becomes the baseline, being early and compliant stops being the game changer Any qualified issuer can mint a functionally identical dollar token and who is retail more likely to trust? Because most of us don't have stablecoin loyalty. We just hold whatever our app defaults to unfortunately. Considering how we default to centralized options that can be frozen or revoked at anytime, this is not debatable So the game will become all about who controls the most merchant terminals and bank onramps? Circle doesn't have terminals in millions of stores. Visa does. Circle doesn't have banking relationships in 200 countries. Mastercard does. So will the current stablecoin monopoly last, or will we just trade one centralized issuer for another that controls distribution?

• 
  **** Ming (@dming) reported 4 minutes ago

  @SteadyCompound Disagree on the credit card part but agree about the ACH part. Fundamentally as a consumer I use a credit card for different reasons than fund transfer, it’s for payments with credit, earning points, and all the customer support / fraud detection that comes with it. Just ask Coinbase and why it issued its own credit card ;)

• 
  JE (@JosephEd27) reported 5 minutes ago

  @coinbase Did you put the guy in kyc hellscape like you do for your long time customers who send a few thousand bucs over the year. Send us your uncles tax returns, send us a blood sample, send us every crypto address you ever sent money from. *** you ..from a 10 yr customer

• 
  Rumpti (@rumpti) reported 8 minutes ago

  Robinhood had issues. Coinbase had issues. NASDAQ closes. Solana doesn't. That's the difference between an application and infrastructure. Slowly, then suddenly. solana:So11111111111111111111111111111111111111112

• 
  TraceNova Recovery (@TraceNovaRecov) reported 8 minutes ago

  @MyLittleSpartan I can help get your locked Coinbase verification sorted. Watching a liquidation clock tick down on your BTC loan while customer support leaves you hanging is completely nerve-wracking. DM me the exact details and account status so we can get this resolved.

• 
  Imnotyourpalchief (@notyourpalchief) reported 9 minutes ago

  @coinbase Finally hiring more Indian customer service reps!

• 
  VirtualBacon (@virtualbacon) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Bechamle @coinbase execution bots and quant algos sure, for years. the new part is a consumer agent inside chatgpt or claude with access to a retail account. different audience entirely

• 
  SolaFolda (@SolaFolda) reported 12 minutes ago

  @DoingFedTime @CryptoWendyO its all about lower latency I think.. BTC world spot market(coinbase) went down twice yesterday for hours.. No backup systems... & nobody notices... few days ago their entire asset platform offline.. // lol

• 
  Roger (@sir_roger1) reported 21 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase I'm awaiting a response/follow-up regarding my league pass. I've been trying to get answers since the first week of May. I paid for a 12 month pass in May 2025 that was set to expire on 5/31/2026, but when I went to change payment method, I canceled the auto-renew and received a message that I would still have full access through the 31st, but you guys terminated my access with one month remaining. I've been on chat and I even sent messages on the website with little or no response. It's simple. If you want me to buy a $39.99 annual pass, then reach out and make the new pass expire after 13 months which would give me my month back that you took.

• 
  Ian Balina (@DiaryofaMadeMan) reported 25 minutes ago

  AI agents trading and spending money is where the game gets real. Coinbase is rolling out agent accounts that can connect to ChatGPT and Claude. That sounds like a feature. It is actually a risk test. If an agent can move money, the setup matters more than the prompt. Before I let any agent touch capital, I want five things clear: What can it do without approval? What is the max loss per action? What assets are off limits? Who gets alerted when it acts? How do I shut it down in one click? That is not paranoia. That is how you price risk. The winners in agent finance will not be the people who let bots run wild. It will be the people who build the cleanest guardrails, give agents narrow jobs, track every action, and scale only after the system proves it can protect downside.

• 
  ***** 🌸 (@0xfrigg) reported 28 minutes ago

  a concrete, massive-scale execution of the Coinbase-Circle-Hyperliquid integration the largest single $USDC transfer in history. this equals 5.3% of USDC's total supply $USDC supply on Hyperliquid had already reached $5B, doubling year over year. this transfer is most likely infrastructure prep for that liquidity the transaction happened with zero fees, on HyperEVM, Hyperliquid's smart contract layer a $4.4B transaction executing with zero fees and no issues proves HyperEVM can handle a load at this scale

• 
  Nature's Galaxy 🍃 (@Natures_Galaxy) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase What about your IPO thats down -50% in 5 years ??? I cant buy **** because of your failing stock.. thanks again!!

• 
  Dr. Robert King (@kingbtc) reported 30 minutes ago

  During 2013-2015 BoA shut down my account more than 5 times due to transfers from Coinbase and LocalBTC. I was forced to close my account. I would go to the teller, ask to withdraw the entire balance in cash. I took the cash, walked around the turnstiles and back through the line, & told the teller "I'd like to open an account." I still bank with Bank of America today.

• 
  Aseem Kishore (@akishore) reported 31 minutes ago

  Morning recap: SpaceX just had its IPO - the largest in market history and the rest of the space sector is getting WRECKED. 🔴 $RKLB -6.5% — Rocket Lab ($61B) cratering as money rotates into SpaceX. Virgin Galactic (sub-$1B) is down 26%. $ASTS down 13% 
🔴 $CPNG -4.5% — Coupang ($30B) giving back yesterday's +13% bounce 
🔴 $SMCI -2.3% — Super Micro ($19B) day 4 of the offering bleed (now -50%+ off highs) But the chip rally is into a second wave: 🟢 $AMD +5.6% — AMD ($839B) upgraded to Buy on GPU performance + agentic AI thesis. "More than a CPU play" 
🟢 $INTC +4.9% — Intel ($618B) extending yesterday's BofA double upgrade on capital-raise chatter. Cramer: "more important than NVIDIA" 
🟢 $UEC +6.0% — Uranium Energy ($5.6B) joining the nuclear-AI thesis 🟢 $HOOD +2.9% — Robinhood ($85B) approved to underwrite IPOs… right before SpaceX 
🟢 $COIN +2.4% — Coinbase ($43B) launches an AI agent that can trade and pay for research 🔝 Most active: $NVDA, $INTC, $SMCI. SOXL +7% but SOXS -7% - the chip squeeze isn't over. SPY +0.7% · QQQ +0.8% on end-of-war hopes. SpaceX took the spotlight from everything else.

• 
  What1slove (@TimYifyisopse) reported 33 minutes ago

  I think a lot of people misunderstand @Optimism . Thx @aixbt_agent for reseach Most investors still see OP as just another L2, but the real thesis is that Optimism earns from the chains built on OP Stack. Every chain pays a share of its revenue back to the ecosystem, which is why some investors describe OP as a landlord rather than a blockchain. The best example is @base , which generates the majority of Superchain revenue. Coinbase builds the product, attracts users, and spends the capital, while Optimism collects a percentage of the activity. Governance has also approved using 50% of Superchain revenue for OP buybacks. The catch is that Base has announced plans to gradually move away from OP Stack and build more of its own infrastructure. That means the old thesis of “Base grows = OP wins” is no longer as clear as it once was. The bull case is that OP is being valued like a blockchain when it's really an infrastructure business. The bear case is that its biggest customer may become less dependent on it over time.

• 
  threadguy (@notthreadguy) reported 34 minutes ago

  coinbase down robinhood down phantom mobile perps not down

• 
  Ranier Styles Grant (@RanierGrant) reported 36 minutes ago

  97% percent fraud rate, coinbase, instacart, and walmart customer and employee support staff, certified halal, libertarian utopia

• 
  Ants (@Antsincrisiss) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BSCNews @coinbase @ethena Do builders matter to solve problems majority of projects fail to solve? If yes do they care about marketing these products? We investors especially us the serious ones for example seek something unique, innovative and solving and that’s why we jump from one project to another.

• 
  just b-radical (@DJ_B_RADICAL) reported 37 minutes ago

  @SieffertSt33615 @coinbase Their customer service has been compromised several times and information has leaked and they have done nothing about it.

• 
  James Kravchenko (@H11ilN) reported 37 minutes ago

  @TonsOfFun111 Sorry for your loss. Coinbase accounts can’t be transferred directly, this has to go through Coinbase’s estate/deceased account process. If there’s no access, your mom will need to submit a legal request. If you want, I can tell you the fastest way to handle it

• 
  PANKRATION (@WEB3Seer) reported 38 minutes ago

  4/ Circle Transferred 4.397 billion USDC to a Coinbase address via HyperEVM. Largest USDC transfer. #Circle 5/ SwellChain Shutting down on June 15 → withdraw funds via Jumper or Superbridge. Product and tokens on Ethereum Mainnet are not affected. #SwellChain 6/ ZERϴNetwork Zerion network ceases operations on July 31 due to the zero-fee model. Withdraw ETH via bridge zero.n etwork. #ZERONetwork

• 
  Ivo Wever (@Confusionist) reported 38 minutes ago

  @BasilEsq_ @TheZvi You are very confused or a liar. Coinbase has existed since 2012 and the vast majority of its code has been produced by humans, before LLM's were even a thing. LLM's don't even help that much in setting up KYC capabilities. Code is not the limiting factor.

• 
  Def777.base.eth (@Def7771) reported 40 minutes ago

  The Onchain Inference Market Map On June 7 I wrote about base:0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 a token with a real product and zero revenue. I thought it was one weird story. Turns out it's a whole market of weird stories. And they're tangled into each other way more than it looks from the outside. Spent the week going through the data. Four players on the map: three crypto projects and one giant with no token that could roll over all of them. I'm not a developer. I just look at what's visible onchain and in public dashboards, and I keep asking one question: if people actually start buying AI inference with crypto at scale who makes money on it? First, the market itself, for scale Inference is every single request to a model. You type a prompt, the model answers, somebody sends the bill. OpenRouter, the biggest model aggregator, routes roughly $1B of those bills a year. That's the top of this market. Now the bottom: AntSeed, the youngest player on Base, has done $65K in total volume. Ever. Surplus $0. Everything on this map lives between that billion and that zero. SURPLUS: usage, no monetization An open inference market on Base sellers compete on price for every request, payments run on crypto rails. The product's transaction metrics are at all time highs. I covered this in my last two posts. But: 100B tokens circulating since day one, around a thousand holders, thin liquidity, ~$5M market cap last time I checked. The protocol charges no fee. Revenue is $0 on purpose, the team is growing usage first. The honest version of the risk: product growth isn't wired to the token at all yet. The founder publicly asked the community how to fix that connection. The wires are sitting right there. Nobody's plugged them in. AntSeed: monetization, no token trading Launched May 15. Two people and seven AI agents, the whole idea is three months old. Also an open inference market, also Base, also USDC per request. A mirror image of Surplus assembled in reverse order. Onchain numbers: $64.96K gross volume, 194,000 micro payments, average settle 33 cents. 578 paying buyers, 140 sellers. The protocol already takes a 4% fee $2.5K collected so far. The ANTS token exists, but in a locked state: emissions accrue only for real network activity (epoch nine is running now, ~40M accrued out of a 1.04B hard cap), and transfers are blocked. You can't buy it, you can't sell it, there is no price. Build the economy first, open the market later. And the detail that impressed me most. The team caught farmers inflating volume for future rewards and froze ALL provider emissions until a validation system ships. Network revenue dropped roughly in half from the peak after that. They publicly cut their own best looking chart to avoid paying for fake volume. Young projects rarely have the stomach for that inflated numbers usually get nursed all the way to a listing. Venice: competitor and supplier at the same time base:0xacfe6019ed1a7dc6f7b508c02d1b04ec88cc21bf is the most mature token in this niche. Different model: stake the token, get a share of the platform's compute, plus buybacks and burns funded by actual revenue. Over 40% of supply burned already. Market cap in the hundreds of millions orders of magnitude above everyone else here. But that's not the interesting part. Venice has a second token base:0xf4d97f2da56e8c3098f3a8d538db630a2606a024 , tokenized compute. And the DIEM pool runs inside AntSeed. 112 people staked ~$439K worth of DIEM, the pool serves requests on the AntSeed network, and buyer USDC streams to stakers onchain. Current pool yield: 6.9% APY in stables. The operator fee is already accruing into a treasury earmarked to buy and burn ANTS. Read that again: a Venice token earns revenue inside a competing marketplace. Yes, the numbers are tiny $1.5K paid to stakers, total. But structurally it's the most interesting thing I've seen in this niche. These projects aren't fighting over the market. They're snapping into each other like lego. OpenRouter + x402: the elephant The biggest threat to all three has no token at all. OpenRouter is migrating to x402, Coinbase's payment protocol stablecoin payments for inference straight over HTTP, no accounts, no API keys. x402 has already processed over 100M transactions, most of them on Base. If OpenRouter's $1B of volume moves onto crypto rails, that's the same open inference market at a thousand times the scale. And the value lands in USDC and Coinbase infrastructure. Holders of niche tokens get nothing from that. Unless their tokens grow a value capture mechanism before the giant arrives. What the map actually says They're all building the same thing: a market where AI agents buy intelligence for themselves and pay in stables. The only real difference is where the value flows. OpenRouter: value flows to the company and to USDC. Venice: to the token, through buybacks from real revenue. AntSeed: the mechanism is built and already dripping pennies, the token is still in its cage. Surplus: usage grows, value flows nowhere. Yet. And the whole niche, minus OpenRouter, is at hundreds of users. Not thousands. The dashboards look great, the charts go vertical, but the absolute numbers are one decent food truck's revenue. Any of these projects can die before "who captures the value" becomes a question worth real money. What I'm watching next: whether Surplus turns on a fee, whether AntSeed's revenue survives the farmer purge, and how much of OpenRouter's volume actually arrives on x402. I don't know which of them makes it to the big market. But the question "does the holder get anything when the product grows" doesn't run on trust here you can check it onchain, project by project, epoch by epoch. I'll keep checking. And writing down what I see. All numbers from onchain data and public dashboards at the time of writing. Of the tokens mentioned, I hold base:0xc52aedec3374422d7510e294cfaa90799595cba3 NFA.

• 
  2Fast ☢️ (@2Fast_gg) reported 41 minutes ago

  @HalloweenIn2008 @coinbase Splitting it up creates more room for error, best practice to just to fully verify your transaction before sending.

• 
  Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported 41 minutes ago

  @MilkRoad @coinbase what's actually new here is not the access, but the lack of clear ownership and liability when these agents mess up your portfolio

• 
  Brad (@fluidvoice) reported 41 minutes ago

  @PeaceLoveMusicG The emission rate will end up 1000 STX/block same as since chain inception 5 years ago. Alt investors don't care about coinbase halvings (see ETH, SOL, SUI). More than that it makes sense to pull from the endowment IMO. My understanding is that's what will happen.

• 
  Anreii Uzun (@AnreiiUzun) reported 47 minutes ago

  @coinbase My Coinbase crypto wallet got hacked, and now I’m writing to customer support, but they aren’t even trying to recover it—how am I supposed to make sense of this whole mess?

• 
  Henry Thoreau (@LtdCitoyen) reported 48 minutes ago

  @coinbase @maxbranzburg My conspiracy theory: Coinbase always seems to have "issues" when Bitcoin is at major lows. Whether intentional or not, it reduces buying pressure when people should be buying, then everything magically works once the opportunity is gone.

• 
  KrankyThExplorer (@krankyIsPushing) reported 51 minutes ago

  @coinbase @grok give me a website to check this transaction

• 
  TraceNova Recovery (@TraceNovaRecov) reported 51 minutes ago

  @DizzyStorms I can help recover the missing funds between Chime and Coinbase. Having money leave your bank but not hit your exchange account is incredibly stressful. DM me the debit amount, transaction date, and reference numbers so we can find where the transfer is stalled