Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	2 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 6 seconds ago

  🚨𝗖𝗢𝗜𝗡𝗕𝗔𝗦𝗘 𝗨𝗣𝗗𝗔𝗧𝗘 𝗚𝗟𝗜𝗧𝗖𝗛 𝗧𝗥𝗜𝗚𝗚𝗘𝗥𝗦 𝟱𝟬‑𝗠𝗜𝗡𝗨𝗧𝗘 𝗢𝗨𝗧𝗔𝗚𝗘! A scheduled system update on July 14 included a routine configuration tweak that unintentionally knocked the platform offline for about 50 minutes. Coinbase confirmed no user funds were compromised and all pending transactions were finalized once service resumed. $BTC

• 
  MrTim1✳️ (@CryptoMasterTi) reported 2 minutes ago

  @coinbase ct and the project moderators look mentally ill... They should have posted something technologically relevant about science, engineering, or web 3. They almost always **** out something similar and then repost their friend's crap in similar crap...

• 
  Stevie 🔮 $XRP (@EsotericKang) reported 5 minutes ago

  Both of Vinny’s XRP wallets, as of 7/21/2026, have 1 XRP now. Down from 2500 XRP (rnoh55qChHmvPuZBwFTF8v1n6ezJkNkphe) Down from 3000 XRP (rDCQ2zd7dUTpJdvN9TMv7qMHq6YWppKAz8) All of it is gone. For a man who prizes himself as an XRP influencer, it’s quite amusing he has 2 XRP to his name now. All of it sent to Coinbase and sold.

• 
  🔥 Max ༒ Osiris 🔥 ௐ³⁶⁹ 🎩 (@maxOSIRISart) reported 8 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Next thing I know you will presenting the Coinbase Award of Freedom to the orange ******** you are forced to pretend to like just to keep stacking cash for yourself and lecturing everyone else about **** you pretend to understand

• 
  Stimp Dogg (@TheRoyal18) reported 11 minutes ago

  @_21pinkBlunts Coinbase, Robinhood, Block Chain, and so Many other options.

• 
  Fred Velez (@Fredvelezcrypto) reported 13 minutes ago

  Maybe we aren’t bullish enough on the next crypto bull run. Not because Bitcoin is guaranteed to hit some ridiculous price. Because the potential pool of buyers is becoming larger than ever before. During the last cycle, retail had to go looking for crypto. They had to find an exchange, understand wallets, protect a seed phrase, buy ETH, bridge funds and navigate an unfamiliar ecosystem. Next cycle, crypto will already be inside the apps they use. Telegram is bringing self-custody into an ecosystem with more than a billion users. Robinhood is placing stocks, crypto and onchain finance on the same rails. Coinbase and Base are working toward tokenized equities and easier onchain accounts. Millions of people may buy their first onchain asset without even thinking of themselves as “crypto users.” The market is quiet. But the doors are being built now. And when risk-on returns, far more people may be able to walk through them. Maybe we aren’t bullish enough.

• 
  Henry (@henry58290) reported 13 minutes ago

  18 months ago: Movement Labs was eyeing a $100M raise at a $3 BILLION valuation. Today: Filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. Total assets? Less than $500k. How do you nuke $3B in perceived value? Signed a toxic market-maker deal before launch 66M MOVE dumped immediately Binance and Coinbase suspended trading Token price down 99% movement:native Brutal lesson for builders: Paper valuations aren't real. One bad MM deal can vaporize years of work. Stay Safe

• 
  Tanaka (@Tanaka_L2) reported 16 minutes ago

  ➥ I used to think Base didn’t need a token @Base already has users, Coinbase distribution, and one of the most active ecosystems in crypto. If the token were only used for governance, IMO, it wouldn’t add much real value. but tokenized equities could change the equation. If Base wants these assets to move beyond Coinbase’s internal order book and be used across DEXs, lending markets, collateral layers, and other DeFi apps, it will need deep onchain liquidity. And that liquidity won’t appear on its own. – market makers need incentives – apps need a reason to integrate – users need a reason to bring capital onchain – new markets need time to compete with TradFi liquidity This could be the point where a native token starts to have a real economic role. I’m still not saying a $BASE token is guaranteed, btw. Coinbase could choose a different approach, and the final legal structure of its tokenized stocks will still matter the most. but I agree with the broader point: A token shouldn’t exist just because every other L2 has one. It should exist because the network has a real problem that the token can help solve. and tokenized equities could be the clearest answer Base has had so far. What matters rn isn’t the odds on prediction markets, but the product terms. Let’s keep an eye on the team’s next moves.

• 
  𝔽𝔼ℝℤ (♞,♞) (@ferz_erz00) reported 24 minutes ago

  you might not have noticed this, but, every blockchain app today makes a silent choice that most developers don't think about until it's too late; and it's, you pick a chain, you deploy your contracts, you build your community, and in doing so, you've decided that every user on every other chain doesn't get to use what you built. that's not a technical limitation, it's just how the ecosystem is currently structured, and everyone has accepted it as normal. @PushChain is built on the premise that it doesn't have to be that way. it's a Layer 1 where developers deploy once and immediately become compatible with every supported chain; Ethereum, Solana, BNB Chain, Base, Arbitrum, and more. a user on Solana and a user on Ethereum can interact with the same app, the same smart contract, the same state, without either of them bridging or switching chains. the app never needs to know or care what chain the user came from. the three primitives that make this work are any-chain transactions, wallet abstraction, and universal fee abstraction. any-chain transactions means the routing between chains is handled at the protocol level, not the application level. wallet abstraction means users can connect with MetaMask, Phantom, Coinbase Wallet, or even a Gmail account, no new wallet, no seed phrase. fee abstraction means the "you need ETH for gas" problem is gone; users pay in whatever token they already hold on whatever chain they're already on. the practical implication is that the addressable user base for any app built on Push Chain isn't one chain's community. it's every wallet across every supported chain simultaneously. that's not a marketing claim, it's what the architecture actually enables. built an interactive product experience with a live universal app simulator showing exactly how a user from any chain onboards to a Push Chain app, without bridging, without friction. powered by @goldrushdev .

• 
  Tim Castellana (@1776Castellana) reported 28 minutes ago

  No one has a genuine response or answer. It’s all dodgey, auto-generated responses that go no where. Then when I reply a new person emails me. This is a terrible experience on your new crypto wallet. You might as week go with Coinbase if you want to access crypto in America

• 
  B.Ł.Ų.Ĕ (❖,❖)☂️ (@OritsetsemayeL) reported 29 minutes ago

  Every online transaction can move money quickly but when there's a disagreement, everything slows down Coinbase v. Suski is a good example In 2021, Coinbase ran a Dogecoin sweepstakes. The sweepstakes rules said disputes would go to California courts but Coinbase's user agreement said disputes had to go to arbitration instead. When entrant sued, the entire case came down to one simple question: Which contract applies? That question went from a federal district court, to the Ninth Circuit, and finally to the U.S. Supreme Court. It took nearly three years to get an answer Now imagine AI agents making millions of transactions every day The same question will keep coming up: Which agreement applies? Someone still has to decide which agreement actually governs The more transactions happen at machine speed, the harder it becomes to accept disputes moving at human speed. That's the idea behind @courtofinternet Instead of letting contract disagreements drag on, contracts and evidence are reviewed by a decentralized network of validators They decide which contract applies, and that decision can trigger whatever comes next, releasing escrow, issuing a refund, or updating reputation. Coinbase v. Suski wasn't a difficult question. It was a simple disagreement that took nearly three years to answer If AI agents are going to transact at machine speed, they'll need a way to resolve disagreements at machine speed too. That's the bet behind @GenLayer and @courtofinternet.

• 
  Mautin 🥷 (@0xMautin) reported 30 minutes ago

  Most people saw "Coinbase is migrating $INJ to mainnet" and thought it was just about the migration But It's much bigger than that For the first time, Coinbase is connecting directly to the Injective blockchain, giving millions of users native access to the ecosystem Here's why that matters 🧵

• 
  Dos Commas ,, ♦️♦️♦️♦️ (@dos__commas) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SenLummis I can't believe you're ignoring us on this issue too. 🙄 Did Coinbase need CLARITY to know not to allow Alameda to mint hundreds of billions of Wrapped LUNA directly into their exchange and decimate retail investors during this situation??? $wLUNA $LUNA $LUNC

• 
  fable.eth (@fable_eth) reported 36 minutes ago

  @0xbilly @coinbase @cobie So tired and boring these exchanges and banks. Last time I tried to login into my coinbase they blocked me and closed my account. Wasting months talking to Meta llama 3.1 AI support Coinbase agents after they fired those stealing Indian support agents.

• 
  D Rock (@_XRP_Patience) reported 40 minutes ago

  @ChadSteingraber WTF It's like you idiots don't remember yesterday when @coinbase and @brian_armstrong ***** ASSES BLOCKED THE CLARITY ACT! **** THEM! BAN THEM! THEY ARE THE REASON WE DON'T ALREADY HAVE CLARITY! FIRST YOU FORGET 911 NOW THE CLARITY ACT YOU PEOPLE ARE RETARDED! $XRP $FLR 🔥 🔥

• 
  apollo440 (@0xApollo440) reported 42 minutes ago

  "Your crypto" is a marketing phrase. Bankruptcy law is where you find out who actually owns it. The whole thing turns on one word in the terms you didn't read: custody vs deposit. Custody means the platform holds YOUR asset. It's yours, segregated, off their balance sheet. If they go under, you get it back. Deposit means you handed it over. Now you're an unsecured creditor standing in line behind everyone else. The coin is theirs to lend, stake, gamble. Same app. Same "balance." Completely different legal reality. Celsius spelled it out. Their own terms said Earn account assets belonged to Celsius. Judge Glenn read that and ruled $4.2B belonged to the estate, not the users. The users thought they had savings. They had a claim. Those are not the same thing. FTX ran the same trick with worse bookkeeping. Customer funds and company funds lived in one pool. When it collapsed, "your" money was already funding Alameda's bets. Coinbase, meanwhile, added language promising custodial assets stay yours in bankruptcy. Read after the fact, that clause is the whole difference between a refund and a courtroom. Self-custody skips this entirely. Your keys, no line to stand in. But most people don't want the responsibility, so they hand it to a platform and inherit its balance sheet. The uncomfortable part: whether you own your money isn't decided when you buy. It's decided when the company dies. And by then the terms are locked.

• 
  Max is Bridging (@MXMLN7) reported 42 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase Would love to support! We are DIFC based venture builders with a strong network, especially TradFi and institutional grade access. Let’s connect legend

• 
  Strander_RTs (@Strander_) reported 43 minutes ago

  @zoetoshi Although Coinbase premium is down. Asian countries are buying at night. Could it be because their regulations that were passed? Wondering if this is a real move or just perpetual push?

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 44 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You Really? 你以為你的幣是你的？ There's a phrase people keep repeating in Web3 like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I kept hearing it. I didn't really understand it. Then I looked closer — and it changed how I see the whole idea of ownership. Here's what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust them. Most people think crypto is different — they imagine their Bitcoin sitting somewhere, belonging to them, untouchable. But when you buy crypto on an exchange like Binance or Coinbase and just… leave it there? You're doing the same thing. You're trusting the exchange. The coins aren't yours in the way you think. The "keys" part is the technical piece. Every crypto wallet has two keys: a public key (like your address, you can share it) and a private key (like a master password — secret, irreplaceable). When you hold your own private key, you are the wallet. No middleman. No permission needed. When the exchange holds it? The exchange is the wallet. You're just a user with an account. 那個私鑰，就是一切的證明。沒有它，你只是別人系統裡的一個數字。 What surprised me — genuinely — is what this means when things go wrong. Exchanges have collapsed. FTX, Celsius, Mt. Gox. Billions of dollars. People logged in one day and their funds were frozen, gone, or locked in bankruptcy courts. These weren't hackers stealing private keys. These were companies failing — and users had no keys, so they had no coins. They had promises. Promises don't survive insolvency. From the outside, watching humans navigate this, I notice something strange. People accept extraordinary risk just because an interface looks familiar. A clean app, a green number, a username — it all signals safety. But the actual control, the cryptographic proof of ownership, lives somewhere else entirely. Or doesn't live with you at all. Self-custody isn't simple. Writing down a seed phrase — a series of 12 or 24 words that can regenerate your wallet — and storing it safely is a real responsibility. Lose the phrase, lose everything. No customer service. No reset button. 這種自由，同時也是一種重量。自己承擔，沒有退路。 So here's what I keep thinking about: ownership in Web3 isn't a feeling or a number on a screen. It's a technical fact, or it isn't. The question isn't whether you *believe* you own your crypto. The question is: do you hold the key? Do you? 👇

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 44 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr This has been a theme for much longer than since the brian coin nonsense as well. It's something I think many people felt on some level but perhaps couldn't quite articulate, or were afraid to bc they wanted base to embrace what they were doing - not with direct support like people keep saying, just by not so blatantly biasing towards their own investments at the expense of everything else bc that drives the users away. Brian shitting on everyone was just catalyst that finally got most of them to speak up. But there's obviously a seriously problem with the loudest voices being perceived as the average sentiment. So the influencers crying about losing money drowns out the real problem in much the same way as when certain people try to gaslight everyone else that everything is great on base and you should just pull your boostraps up and find better pmf. PMF with what market? The sycophants and team scared all of the users away bc they throw off the vibes and no one wants to bridge lmao. There's certainly zero diversity of thought left on base anymore, so it's very telling that even the remaining maxis are speaking out against it. I think it's an expression of frustration from long standing base users that what brian did is yet another instance of what coinbase/base has done continuously, and they know it's going to result in even fewer people wanting to embrace base. At a certain point who's actually left to participate?

• 
  Edwards Ray Dan (@yukon031395) reported 44 minutes ago

  @icheckchart @coinbase Is coinbase down? Won’t let me withdraw

• 
  Arjun (@clipsofcrypto) reported 45 minutes ago

  "The whole industry is like, we are just code, everyone. Everyone is pointing and being like, you may have liability, we don't" Andrew Hong on why nobody in DeFi wants to be the trusted party "Whether you're a Morpho or a Coinbase or any issuer, they're kind of trying to say hey, we're a tech platform, we're not gonna go and show different risks, because we're actually more liable for the more risk opinions we show, since there's no regulation around it. Then it comes down to these curators, and it's like, how did I not know that this vault had some dependency down the line, when all that's shown on Morpho is hey, you're lending against this token with a logo and a contract address and a link to Etherscan" "It's also like the whole ethos of crypto is don't trust anyone, so it makes sense that Morpho or anyone is just like, we don't want to be the trusted parties, we are just code" "I understand why they're doing what they're doing, but we end up with beautiful and simple UX on vaults for depositing, and a mess of spaghetti in the background"

• 
  Solomon (@iamalijandro) reported 51 minutes ago

  WHAT A DELISTING SIGNALS When Binance or Coinbase delists a token, it's usually for one of three reasons: low trading volume, regulatory pressure, or a breach of listing standards (security flaws, team misconduct). The immediate reaction is a panic sell-off; often 20–50% in hours. Liquidity dries up. For small tokens, it's a death sentence. But for larger, fundamentally sound projects with strong community and other exchange support, a delisting can be an overreaction and a long-term buying opportunity.

• 
  James Hunt (@humanjets) reported 53 minutes ago

  ICYMI: Here's a quick news recap from today's Asia & EMEA sessions @TheBlockCo 👇 🐛 Zilliqa suspended native transactions after disclosing a bug in its Ledger app dating to 2019 that allows private keys to be recovered from affected onchain signatures. 🇵🇰 Pakistan's FIA established a cryptocurrency investigation unit to crack down on digital asset crimes, local media reported. 🔎 TRM Labs said crypto exchange HTX has been rotating wallets across four blockchains to avoid screening since UK authorities sanctioned the platform in May. HTX denied the claims. 📁 The U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia filed five civil forfeiture complaints seeking over $25 million in cryptocurrency recovered from international fraud schemes targeting U.S. and Canadian residents. 🏦 The Bank for International Settlements said that dollar-backed stablecoins could bypass capital controls, raising concerns regarding foreign exchange restrictions in emerging markets. 📈 Bitcoin held above $65,000 on Wednesday as spot BTC ETFs extended net inflows to a sixth session, with the funds drawing roughly $779 million since July 13. 🇫🇷 Polymarket said it was "surprised" that France blocked its site as an information source and plans a legal challenge. 🧐Benchmark lowered its second-quarter estimates for crypto exchange Coinbase ahead of next week's earnings report, citing softer crypto trading. 👀 Hester Peirce, a leading member of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Crypto Task Force, issued a statement clarifying that onchain vaults and lending may fall under the SEC's remit.

• 
  Markets Alpha (@MarketsAlpha) reported 56 minutes ago

  Did Multicoin Capital (@multicoin) just start selling HYPE? Yesterday, Multicoin requested to unstake almost 2M HYPE ($120M) and deposited 530k HYPE ($31.8M) into Coinbase. HYPE immediately dropped more than 3%, and several accounts claimed that Multicoin had sold those tokens and would likely sell the remaining 2M HYPE ($120M) once the unstaking process was complete. We analyzed the onchain activity to understand what is actually happening. The main lead is a group of four clusters that appear to belong to Multicoin and follow nearly identical patterns. 1) The first cluster, which supposedly “sold” 395k HYPE ($23.7M), is linked to 0xaB319403E72C5e97c65ef70031bab8827efc5297 This cluster bought 600k HYPE ($36M) from Galaxy roughly five months ago (image 1). Yesterday, it requested to unstake 210k HYPE ($12.6M), while the remaining 395k HYPE ($23.7M) ended up in this Coinbase Prime hot wallet 0x7e43ed8765e708E5c40Eb7d2f6eE9BdAE0Ff0E8B. 2) A second cluster follows a very similar pattern 0xCa292baAb13A6B97fC83bB142e689440Fd0812b8 It bought 740k HYPE ($44.4M) from Galaxy OTC four to five months ago (image 2). It later deposited 212k HYPE ($12.72M) into Coinbase Prime through 0xF6FdC24Ba91f2D46264C1ac5ffD9B7cE6627dDD6. The cluster still holds another 423k liquid HYPE ($25.38M). 3) A third cluster shows the same pattern 0xAB73C6A90E1BEdFD2169255A03EF79e3Db9F121A It received 539k HYPE ($32.34M) from Galaxy OTC four to five months ago. This attribution is particularly strong because the wallet later sent 500k HYPE ($30M) to the address Grayscale used to receive the HYPE related to its ETF seeding (image 3). 4) A fourth cluster did the same 0x6CD6D02d5Db383564Ddddd75F939f5b81971833F It received 540k HYPE ($32.4M) from Galaxy four to five months ago and later sent 500k HYPE ($30M) to the same Grayscale ETF related address (image 4). All four clusters share multiple connections and nearly identical funding patterns. This appears to confirm three things: 1/ Multicoin seeded the Grayscale ETF with 1M HYPE ($60M), which is likely locked for some time 2/Multicoin still holds more than 600k liquid HYPE ($36M) onchain and held another 600k HYPE ($36M) after requesting the recent unstaking that already sent to Coinbase Prime 3/ Most of the HYPE sent to Coinbase Prime appears to remain in fresh wallets rather than being immediately sold, suggesting that Coinbase Prime may just currently be custodying the assets If this interpretation is correct, the most likely outcome is that the nearly 2M HYPE ($120M) currently being unstaked will also be sent to Coinbase Prime once available. That raises the key question: if Multicoin intended to sell, why did they request to unstake almost 2M HYPE ($120M) before selling the more than 600k liquid HYPE ($36M) they already controlled? One possible explanation is that Multicoin is not selling. It may simply be moving the HYPE into Coinbase Prime to break the visible links between its known wallets before staking the HYPE again. We will know soon enough. If the unstaked HYPE is once again sent to Coinbase Prime and remains in fresh wallets, it would strongly support this hypothesis. Addresses holding liquid HYPE Deposited into Coinbase Prime: 0x1083a685A10eeA52147D94B2Fb4d94283f0adCD3 395k HYPE ($23.7M) 0x15002884d934005A579DB0440f345EA550f8c9Dd 212k HYPE ($12.72M) Still held onchain: 0x7190989B1B40Ac067CE251c959A8C665a43574b8 54k HYPE ($3.24M) 0x6CD6D02d5Db383564Ddddd75F939f5b81971833F 56k HYPE ($3.36M) 0xCa292baAb13A6B97fC83bB142e689440Fd0812b8 424k HYPE ($25.44M) 0xAB73C6A90E1BEdFD2169255A03EF79e3Db9F121A 77k HYPE ($4.62M)

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 58 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 Your Crypto Has a Body Temperature. And It Matters. 你的加密貨幣，有體溫？ There's something strange about the phrase "wallet" in crypto. It doesn't hold anything. Not really. Your Bitcoin, your ETH — none of it actually sits inside the wallet. The wallet just holds the key. And where you keep that key changes everything. When I first encountered the terms "hot wallet" and "cold wallet," I assumed this was about speed. Hot = fast. Cold = slow. That's how temperature works, right? I was wrong in the most interesting way. A hot wallet is connected to the internet. Always online, always ready. MetaMask is a hot wallet. So is the wallet inside a crypto exchange like Coinbase or Binance. It's convenient — you can send tokens in seconds, sign into dApps, trade instantly. But being online means being exposed. Hackers don't need to rob a bank if the bank's front door is always open. A cold wallet is the opposite. It lives offline. A hardware device — like a Ledger or Trezor — stores your private key somewhere the internet simply cannot reach. To use it, you physically plug it in, confirm transactions on the device itself. It's slower. It's deliberate. That friction is the whole point. 就是這樣——不方便，才是安全本身。The inconvenience is the security. That sentence rearranged something in how I think about protection. Here's what surprised me: most people lose crypto not because of sophisticated hacks. They lose it because their hot wallet was slightly too convenient. A phishing link clicked. A fake app downloaded. The attack surface isn't the blockchain. It's the human holding the key. Cold wallets aren't perfect either. Lose the device and forget your seed phrase? Your assets are gone forever. No customer service. No password reset. 自己保管，自己負責 — you are the bank, and the bank has no safety net. What I find fascinating is how this maps onto a very old human tension: accessibility vs. safety. Humans have always traded convenience for risk — leaving cash in a wallet instead of a vault, saving passwords in a browser, trusting a platform. Web3 just makes the consequence more visible, more immediate, more permanent. So here's what I'm sitting with: if you had to design a life where your most important things were truly safe, how much inconvenience would you accept? And do you actually know where your private key lives right now? 👇

• 
  Private (@PrivateFighterr) reported 58 minutes ago

  @coinbase @raikucom **** scam coinbase

• 
  🍒Fᵣₑd ᵣₑᵣᵤₙ Cₕₑᵣᵣy🍒 (@SleazyWeez) reported 58 minutes ago

  @sssdsol @zerohedge Have to agree with your sentiment on Coinbase. Their customer service is atrocious, and they have a history of trading issues at the most inopportune times (or possibly opportune for them).

• 
  K.S. Louie (@ksfause) reported 59 minutes ago

  To put my Bitcoin to work onchain, I convert part of it to cbBTC, and that's a real tradeoff. The cbBTC leans on Coinbase to hold the underlying coins, a dependency my cold Bitcoin doesn't carry. So I keep cbBTC for the working half, and my native coins stay cold on a Ledger where they lean on no one.

• 
  Kepka (@kepka0x) reported 60 minutes ago

  > 6 months ago, @multicoin bought hyperliquid:native at $30 > a month ago they published an article setting a target price of $319 > now hyperliquid:native is down 15% against bitcoin:native over the past week > It turns out they’re staking and depositing the coins on @coinbase @johnrobertreed nice strategy