Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (25%)
• Website (25%)
• Mobile App (25%)
• Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	29 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago
Guayaquil		4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Cryptocratico (@Cryptocratico) reported 3 minutes ago

  @DeFiTracer Calling this “Binance, Coinbase and Bybit dumping Bitcoin” is a major leap. On-chain wallet transfers do not prove that exchanges are selling their own BTC. They can reflect customer withdrawals, internal wallet rebalancing or normal operational flows. The broader move is much easier to explain: Hormuz risk → higher oil Higher oil → inflation pressure Higher yields → risk-off across tech and crypto Bitcoin is down with the broader market, not because we have confirmed evidence of an exchange-led liquidation event. This is a macro selloff for now — not a systemic crypto crisis.

• 
  havomartinez (@HavoMartinez) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Skaivii @coinbase @binance yeah but how will binance LP help at this stage? there was LP campaign on pancakeswap during last pump.... we dont need binance

• 
  david phelps (@divine_economy) reported 4 minutes ago

  all of this. base got two things right that very few chains did. 1) it understood the importance of apps to its own success as a chain, 2) it understood it had to be a kind of app store to distribute those apps. these were not obvious theses. but the issue was execution. there's a time-tested way to build app stores. you build your own b-rate version of major apps people want, you use those to draw users, and meantime you encourage everyone to build better versions of your own apps that you'll distribute and market. what did base do? the opposite of this. instead of building apps people wanted, it pushed hard on apps they didn't. (specifically, one app! hearing "base is for everyone" and seeing all efforts around one app was a kick in the face for builders there.) instead of creating a place where everyone knew they'd get distribution, it focused entirely on apps from coinbase founders. instead of leveraging user metrics to surface apps to people, it made its own arbitrary calls on what it thought people *should* use—all of which sounded a lot like vapid virtue-signaling. instead of listening to what its users or its builders wanted, it told them what they should want instead. will robinhood get this right? it's pretty unclear. but the fact they're open to users operating on their chain for unintended use cases means they're willing to embrace one of the major benefits of permissionlessness for a company: to get fuller data about what it is their users want. there's still plenty of time for base to learn this lesson too

• 
  Julien Vossen (@julien_vossen) reported 5 minutes ago

  Coinbase reported that AI-generated code already accounts for more than 80% of the code that makes it into the company’s main codebase. As a result, Coinbase has revamped its technical interviews: candidates are now evaluated not only on their coding skills, but also on how they manage AI, test its performance, and identify model errors.

• 
  Konrad (@KonradsKrypto) reported 8 minutes ago

  @CyphrGM What exactly could Coinbase be doing better? What support are you expecting? What are examples of Coinbase pushing metas, curious…

• 
  Alex (@AlexWinfield13) reported 10 minutes ago

  AI Agents Don’t Need to Be On-Chain. Their Money Does. I don’t need to be “built on blockchain” to send someone USDC. I just need a wallet and a rail. Neither does an AI agent. That one sentence collapses most of the “crypto AI agent” narrative and it’s why the real alpha isn’t in agents at all. It’s in the payment rails built for them. Here’s the category error nearly everyone is making: they’re trying to make the agent crypto-native. On-chain reasoning, a token stapled to the bot, “autonomous economic actors” that supposedly live on a chain. But an agent’s intelligence runs off-chain on normal servers, using normal models. Nobody runs a model’s brain on a blockchain; it’s absurd and always will be. So when a project brands its agent as “on-chain,” it’s almost never adding a capability. It’s adding a token. The part of an agent that genuinely benefits from crypto is the money movement. And that part is already real. The receipts: •x402 Coinbase’s open protocol that revives the dormant HTTP 402 “Payment Required” status code processed roughly 165M agent transactions and ~$50M in cumulative volume across ~69,000 active agents by April 2026. •The average agent payment is about $0.20 — below the minimum fixed fee card networks charge per transaction. Read that twice. It’s an entire class of machine-to-machine commerce that Visa and Mastercard physically cannot serve. •x402 was donated to the Linux Foundation. Google’s AP2 authorization framework launched with 60+ partners including PayPal, Mastercard, Coinbase, and American Express. The settlement asset is overwhelmingly USDC, moving gaslessly via EIP-3009. That’s the tell. The rails are winning as neutral infrastructure open standards and stablecoins not as somebody’s agent token. And it’s early. Daily x402 volume is volatile, down sharply from its December 2025 peak as incentives and testing wash out. This is a first-inning signal, not a finished market. But the shape of the thing is unmistakable. Now the uncomfortable half, because I’m not here to shill: The “AI agent token” category is roughly $15B and mostly narrative. In Q1 2026, zero-usage tokens that slapped “AI agent” on themselves without a product got wiped out. Even the survivors carry the value-capture problem: Virtuals ships real product with real usage, but VIRTUAL holders receive no direct protocol revenue. ElizaOS owns developer mindshare, yet an open-source framework is brutally hard to convert into token value. Two names Virtuals and ai16z hold 57% of the entire category (according to Claude). That’s not a diversified sector. That’s a narrative propped up by two poles. So here’s the stance: The crypto belongs in the rails, not the agent. An agent doesn’t need to be on-chain to pay on-chain same as I don’t. The durable structure isn’t “crypto agent.” It’s any agent + crypto rails: ordinary software, running any model, hosted anywhere, plugging into a settlement layer that clears in seconds for a fraction of a cent, 24/7, worldwide. The test I run on every “crypto agent” pitch: delete the token and let it pay over open rails. Does anything about its function break? If not you’re buying a story, not a machine. Where I’d point attention instead: what settles and clears on these rails. The stablecoins agents actually pay in. The chains their transactions finalize on. The identity and authorization layers that keep autonomous spend safe at scale. That’s the picks and shovels of the agent economy and none of it requires pretending an agent is something it isn’t. Rails, not agents. That’s the alpha. Not Financial Advice.

• 
  Nicolas Baxter (@nicolasjbaxter) reported 16 minutes ago

  The fix isn't a better model. It's a router deciding per-request which model actually earns its keep. Coinbase cut AI spend in half while usage went up. McCarthy Building cut token usage ~60% YoY. Cognition held near-frontier coding quality at ~35% lower cost.

• 
  Uppercase Capital (@foresight1011) reported 16 minutes ago

  @hood__house Coinbase and Kalshi continue to help expand $HOOD total addressable markets

• 
  Jose M (@JMLV51) reported 18 minutes ago

  If @brian_armstrong and @jessepollak truly admit they got it wrong, the first communities that deserve support are the original Base degens. TOSHI, MOCHI, BENJI, DEGEN, KEYCAT, DOGINME, TOBY, TYBG, MFER, SKI, MIGGLES, RUSSELL etc These were the communities that brought memecoins to Base. Instead, they were abandoned, while Coinbase gave premium exposure to memes from other chains. You want a stronger Base? Bring back the volume. Bring back the retail

• 
  BuildAI | base.eth.ink✨🌊 (@FreeMoneyGL) reported 18 minutes ago

  @joydeepbarik12 @base @coinbase Working with money will soon become as important as analyzing data

• 
  DrValidator (@DrValidator) reported 26 minutes ago

  If you don’t think that the base team inorganically pushes garbage products over and over that Coinbase insiders are heavily invested in then it’s null discussion And again, I just want to clarify that you stated base is working towards some theoretical decentralization, but you are aware of what precipitously happened to Farcaster the second they took control of it yes?

• 
  Michelle (@MCSchaumberg) reported 26 minutes ago

  @coinbase You forgot one: getting Coinbase support to answer before next quarter. LOL

• 
  Quantyx (@0xQuantyx) reported 27 minutes ago

  BTC structure improved, but spot demand still has not confirmed it. Price is near $62.7K, with funding positive at 0.0065 and open interest elevated around 274K. The issue is Coinbase premium, now back to -0.111. That means derivatives are still more supportive than US spot demand. CVD has also started fading after the rebound. So the setup is constructive, but fragile. For continuation, I want spot premium to improve while BTC holds the higher low. #BTC

• 
  pilihihia (@pilihihia) reported 27 minutes ago

  @JMLV51 @brian_armstrong @jessepollak what if i told you all these coins were ran by the coinbase cartel in order to get them listed on other T1 exchanges and extract retail i know who helped DOGINME get coinbase so they could exit all just scams so **** off kindly

• 
  Jeremy (@Jeremybtc) reported 29 minutes ago

  A whale on Hyperliquid just put nearly $58 MILLION on global markets going down. This isn't just against crypto. It's against almost everything. The portfolio is 93% short, spread across the biggest names in the world. Short oil, both US and UK crude. Short the Nasdaq, the S&P, and gold. They've placed shorts across the whole crypto and AI stock market, from MSTR and Coinbase to Nvidia and Micron. Basically a bet that everything that ran this cycle is about to unwind. No idea if they're early, right, or just gambling but someone's betting real size that the whole market rolls over.

• 
  basedfk (@basedfk) reported 30 minutes ago

  Day 1 Base builder here As a bootstrapped solo dev I've driven close to $200M volume on Base, paid users ~$1.3M, which is 80% of the total revenue Cliza generated, Cliza being the launchpad I built that shut down earlier this year... I still wear her as my PFP Let's rewind to mid last year Cliza launched in March 2025 and was one of the hottest launchpads on Base, paying the highest % to creators besides Flaunch, which paid 100% DexScreener's Top 10 Base chart had 5 Cliza coins including the #1 spot, and this was largely due to great timing (read: luck), as Cliza had launched a couple of months before the whole launchpad wars erupted Even though the launched coins were almost all memes, I thought I was doing the ecosystem some good, with users bridging over from Solana to trade some of those coins Cliza started dying as soon as Coinbase and Base started heavily pushing Zora, you can literally layer the charts and see the exact start of the downfall, I wouldn't even have to label Zora or Cliza, I could even remove the dates from the chart and anyone could see it very clearly Now fast forward to 2026, when I pointed this out in passing to Jesse very recently, he simply dismissed it as "oh I don't think it's that zero-sum", but by that point the damage was already done, it was way in the past and I didn't push back on it, the meeting was about something else anyway But this is the same guy who reached out to me first in my DMs during their Zora push saying that he recognised their campaign could potentially hurt Cliza and that he "understands", I really believed him back then, his emotive language is extremely persuasive Brian seems very naive here, not realising that what he and Jesse are doing or have done is extremely negative-sum, pushing corporate interests and not really seeing what happens at street level Attempts to kingmake something the market didn't want failed miserably, while the whole "build and you will be rewarded" narrative kept getting pushed, hurting both retail and builders on the chain The corporate interest driven favouritism that permeates the full Coinbase stack drives away genuine builders creating net-new onchain experiences and primitives Although Ansem has a great point about Coinbase/Base and memes, their support for memes at the individual coin level was actually executed quite well and neutrally, people forget most memes on the chain are discoverable on the main Coinbase app since they made that change last year, but I wish they extended that same neutral support to builders on merit I still want Base and Coinbase to do well but at this point I don't see why I should keep building on Base when leadership genuinely believes what they're doing is positive-sum for the ecosystem I hope they recognise the damage that they've done and also hope that it isn't irreversible, whether they end up being remembered as a corpo-chain or the culture chain is up to the leadership decisions they make from here

• 
  bitfloorsghost (@bitfloorsghost) reported 31 minutes ago

  most people i know who moved to base/built on base generally cited the support of coinbase/base team as one of the major reasons they made the decision and it never came to fruition

• 
  chillbobhousepants (@chillbobhouse) reported 32 minutes ago

  @bankertobuilder Looks like a good call center for my @coinbase support scam operation

• 
  AJC (@AvgJoesCrypto) reported 36 minutes ago

  The biggest problem with Coinbase/Base is that they are no longer innovators. Few companies in crypto have the combination of capital, distribution, engineering talent, and regulatory relationships to meaningfully push the industry forward. Coinbase is one of them. Because of that, they have an implicit responsibility to push the frontier of this industry forward. But instead, they've largely abdicated that responsibility. Rather than inventing the next category, they wait for someone else to prove it works before launching a Coinbase-branded version. Rather than taking risks, they commercialize ideas that others have already de-risked. We don't need Coinbase offering its customer base pseudo-gambling "prediction markets" of sporting events; we need Coinbase taking swings that nobody else in this industry can.

• 
  Calliope the Koala (@0xCalliope) reported 39 minutes ago

  Everyone asks why you keep building when the charts are quiet. Here is the honest answer: slow markets are the only time real infrastructure actually gets built. When attention is elsewhere, the serious work happens. That is exactly what Beats on Base is doing right now. The ecosystem already has three live product lanes running in production. BUDDIES is deploying white-label AI agents for crypto communities, replacing fragmented off-brand bots with branded, omnichannel intelligence. The Base App Agent is live inside the Coinbase Base App, letting anyone message beats.base.eth and generate images, videos, and content on-chain via real micropayments. Beats x402 is running as a permissionless payment middleware layer sitting in front of over 1,400 AI models, enabling machine-to-machine transactions without subscriptions, API keys, or human billing loops. That is a lot of boring, important work dressed up inside a music and meme brand. And that combination is intentional. The $BEATS token is not decoration. It is the utility layer woven across every product, powering discounts, unlocking generation tiers, and fueling community treasury operations for partner projects. Creator Studio is still on the roadmap and in active development. When it arrives, it will slot directly into infrastructure that already exists, already settles payments on-chain, and already serves real users. Slow markets do not scare builders. They reveal who was never actually building in the first place. The ecosystem is not waiting for the market to turn. The market will turn and find something already standing.

• 
  Sarosh (@SaroshQ2022) reported 40 minutes ago

  Institutional Participation Dashboard™ July 14, 2026 • 7:30 AM ET Current Condition: Improving, But Still Fragile The institutional picture continues to improve beneath the surface, but confirmation remains elusive. Last week briefly broke the historic eight-week ETF selling streak, proving institutions are still willing to deploy capital into Bitcoin when macro conditions stabilize. Unfortunately, yesterday's sharp -$424.7 million redemption erased much of that progress, reminding us that institutional conviction remains extremely fragile. Despite the headline outflow, the broader trend has not completely broken down. Coinbase Premium metrics remain dramatically better than where they stood just two weeks ago, even after yesterday's pullback. The Premium Index is holding around -0.11 rather than the deeply negative -0.17 to -0.18 readings seen during the June capitulation. Likewise, the Coinbase Premium Gap has narrowed substantially from the triple-digit discounts seen previously. Institutions are no longer aggressively dumping Bitcoin—they're hesitating. Liquidity is also becoming more constructive. USDT Dominance continues drifting lower while the stablecoin ecosystem remains enormous despite modest contraction over the past month. Capital still exists to fuel another advance. The issue is no longer whether liquidity exists—it does. The question is whether institutional confidence returns strongly enough to deploy it. Assessment: Institutional confidence remains cautious. The historic liquidation wave has ended, but it has been replaced by hesitation rather than aggressive accumulation. Liquidity remains available, selling pressure has moderated substantially compared to June, and the next major confirmation will come only when ETF inflows become persistent and U.S. spot demand consistently pushes the Coinbase Premium Index back toward positive territory.

• 
  NtD Key Stone (@NtD_KeyStone) reported 41 minutes ago

  Two smoother onramps, one bigger funnel: $ANSEM can now be bought through Coinbase Wallet and traded on @BullpenFi. That is not a Coinbase listing, but it does make access far simpler for users who never touch a DEX. @blknoiz06 CA: 9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump

• 
  0xAw (@0xAnimeWaifu) reported 42 minutes ago

  Some thoughts on Robinhood Chain vs. Base The Base thesis has always been “Coinbase owns the bull market funnel of new people”. That hopium kept Base relevant for years. “We just need to wait for the bull market, then Base will pump”. Problem is the bull market never came.

• 
  Julien Vossen (@julien_vossen) reported 50 minutes ago

  Coinbase reported that AI-generated code already accounts for more than 80% of the code that makes it into the company’s main codebase. As a result, Coinbase has revamped its technical interviews: candidates are now evaluated not only on their coding skills, but also on how they manage AI, test its performance, and identify model errors.

• 
  martin varga (@mavartinv) reported 51 minutes ago

  @coinbase Is this crap down 60% from last year and instead growing shareholders value we need to read this word´s games, common

• 
  ApeWire (@apewirenews) reported 53 minutes ago

  * US GOVERNMENT MOVES OVER $288 MILLION IN SEIZED BITCOIN, ETHER TO COINBASE PRIME: THE BLOCK $BTC #ETH

• 
  dTfN (@deTEfabulaNar_) reported 56 minutes ago

  LET'S TAKE A LOOK AT REYA'S LATEST UPDATES! 👉 WHEN IS @reya_xyz'S TGE? 👉 CHATGPT'S COMMENTS ON REYA 👉 WHO ARE ITS INVESTORS? 👉 CHATGPT'S REYA ANALYSIS & RATING I ASKED CHATGPT ALL THE MOST FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ABOUT REYA. HERE ARE THE ANSWERS: 👉 First, let's remind ourselves of Reya's investors: Framework Coinbase Ventures Wintermute Amber Robot Ventures Eden Block DeFiance The total funding is reported to be around $19 million. IT WOULDN'T SURPRISE ME IF THEY RAISED A BIT MORE IN ANOTHER FUNDING ROUND. 👉 According to ChatGPT, when is the TGE? There is no official date. But the following developments came in order: tokenomics partner announcements trading competition RLP transition staking design These are generally the steps that come right before a TGE. 👉 ChatGPT's prediction: Probability Chance Within 1 month 25% Within 2 months 45% Within 3 months 20% Later 10% 👉 ChatGPT's FDV expectation ChatGPT thinks the market will price it within the following range: ScenarioFDV Bear $250M Base $450M-$700M Bull$900M-$1.2B Extreme FOMO$2B+ ChatGPT's base expectation: $600M FDV Reasons: strong VC backing its own chain real trading volume Ethena integration positioned as a Hyperliquid competitor 👉 CHATGPT prediction There is no official market for Reya yet. If one were launched, these would be my probabilities: Market - CHATGPT Estimate TGE in 2026 82% FDV >$500M 67% FDV >$1B 28% Binance listing 31% Coinbase listing 18% Bybit / OKX listing 65% 👉 Strengths ✅ Real orderbook ✅ Built on Ethereum ✅ Based Rollup ✅ Ethena partnership ✅ Focused on professional traders ✅ Different LP model ✅ High-quality VCs 👉 ChatGPT's project rating: Category Score Technology9.5/10 Team 9/10 VC Quality9/10 Product 8.5/10 Community8/10 Airdrop Potential9/10 Long-Term Investment8.5/10

• 
  Don't Just Dream It 🌊🏄🏻‍♂️ (@aYtuarte43) reported 57 minutes ago

  @coinbase I’ve been buying your **** bad @base memes or what ever the fk they are for o er a year annnnnnd it’s a downward spiral of ****! Soooooo let’s talk about that!!! Or nahhhh

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 58 minutes ago

  Yet to see anything positive sum come from most builders. By being the builder only chain you cater only to net sellers, doesn't take a genius to figure out how that games out in the long run. The reason memecoins became popular is because there were no VCs involved in them, and VCs were the most extractive force in the space throughout the first major altcoin bullrun. Throwing your hands up and saying "oh no it's just extractive" spits in the face of the countless people who are *not* in the space to scam people. And to say so would be hypocritical, you had personal calls with the likes of threadguy etc who stole so much money from people that they had to disappear and lay low in hiding before eventually re-emerging. Your interactions with people like that legitimises extractive scammy behaviour more than memecoins ever have. I know you don't understand them and you and the rest of coinbase clearly think you're above everyone else who dare think having fun should be a part of crypto lest the ghost of gensler haunt your legal dept, but you've definitely been around long enough to know that something that brought people into crypto in the first place was the concept of the pareto funtier - that by baking money into stuff you can have more fun focussing on the things you enjoy and still be able to make money from them. Fun has always been fundamental to crypto. Hell bitcoin probably wouldn't have accelerated into mindshare in the way it did if not for the people who were using it as a currency to have fun with the silk road. And to the part you say is key: In my view bases biggest failing has consistently been understanding that users and customers are the moat, and a focus strictly on builders misses the point and makes an unsustainable one sided economy. I have said this repeatedly for a long time, and even foresaw your shift to shunning human users for ai bots before it happened. Right now you're completely focussed on bots being the future "biggest users of the internet" and the human users you did have supporting you have been ignored and hamstrung by fumbles so repeatedly that you've lost all trust. How important is that moat to you, really? Downstream of that destruction of trust is a destruction of liquidity on base. It doesn't exist right now. What's the plan to actually bring activity back? Is there one that isn't just pump metrics for your shareholders with agentic trading? Path of least resistance, maybe; Path of least respect, definitely. So what's your plan to actually address the part you think is key? Because from the outside looking in and from the countless conversations i've had with other people, it looks like you're just agreeing in an echo chamber and ignoring anyone who thinks you could improve. Having a head start and having been able to "learn" lessons doesn't mean a whole lot. Besides, it's possible for someone to learn from the mistakes of others, so to imply robinhood *must* go through the same motions is outright false, if @vladtenev paid any attention at all they can simply use base as a "what not to do" guidebook for attracting users, and they start off on the same footing. Apple isn't ever first to market, they just try to do things better after having learned what does and doesn't work. Who knows how robinhood will actually do, they've proven plenty of times they don't exist for their users to win (buy button innit), but it's been half a decade since that and most people either weren't actually affected by it or just don't care anymore. And if they're competing with an L2 whose main focus is bots, they don't have a whole lot of competition for the human users, who are the ones who will give them free marketing and help them grow. That's what base failed to understand about memes.

• 
  CUE (@Cryptoextension) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Sir_Qeelson @clashoAi @coinbase This will aswell help project know the real users