Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	17 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	20 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🟧Zak Fvckman (@ZakFvckman) reported 3 minutes ago

  @HamlinWeb3 @AiFiCorp @coinbase Stop doing the evil, brother. You may help the scammers...You know it is not true.

• 
  Ask-Zai (@askzaiuk) reported 4 minutes ago

  @AndrewCurran_ The free weights were customer acquisition. Moonshot already runs revenue-sharing on Kimi K3 — per Reuters, Qwen is copying it. Coinbase publicly switched to open-weight Chinese models this year. First you get into the stack. Then the invoice arrives.

• 
  DEVINE MAFA (@divinemafa) reported 5 minutes ago

  Open Message to Vlad / Mead @vladtenev @MEADGod The OG Jimothy is on Robinhood Chain. 
It is getting dumped on deliberately to keep attention on the Solana copy. Coinbase has listed tokens under $700k–$1M when the fit was there.
Robinhood listed CashCat early. The same logic applies here. App buyers should not only get access when something is already at $200 million.
Listing now gives new users a real shot at the lottery instead of always buying the top. We need the listing.
We need the visibility.
We need the raids and the comments pushing for it right now. List Jimothy OG.
Do it while the narrative is still alive. The community is already here. @ponsdotfamily

• 
  Rado | τsc (@RadoTsc) reported 7 minutes ago

  2/2 Above I broke down the BIP-110 chain split and why node runners refusing blocks means nothing when exchanges decide what gets priced. Studying it for 4 hours got me thinking about Bittensor, and the comparison is uncomfortable for Bitcoin. THE SAME GAME, BOTH NETWORKS A Bitcoin spammer(jpeg, ordinals) isn't a vandal. He's an optimizer. Blockspace is priced by the byte. Witness data gets a 75% discount and almost no inspection. So you can store a JPEG on the most secure ledger on earth for a few dollars, then sell it as an Ordinal for hundreds. The protocol pays you to do it. You'd be irrational not to. A Bittensor miner does the exact same math. Emissions flow to whatever the validator scores highly. Find the cheapest input that scores well, farm it. Not cheating. Following the incentive as written. Both are the same failure: a reward function with a gap in it, and someone smart enough to find the gap. THE DIFFERENCE IS WHAT HAPPENS NEXT Bittensor: subnet owner ships new validator logic, sets a minimum version, miners update or stop earning. Days. Bitcoin: devs filtered inscriptions, spammers changed the data's shape. Filtered again, new shape again. Two years of cat and mouse, no resolution, and today a chain split instead of a fix. Bittensor's "centralization" is what lets it close exploits FAST Bitcoin's lack of an owner is what leaves them open. THE PART I CAN'T SHAKE I always believed Satoshi being gone was Bitcoin's strength. No leader to pressure, no throat to choke. BIP-110 showed me the leadership just moved somewhere less accountable. 20,000 basement nodes changed nothing. What matters is which software Binance and Coinbase run, because they're where BTC becomes dollars. Miners are regulated firms with power bills and legal obligations. They mine whatever the exchanges will price. Influence flows to exchanges. Exchanges set the rules. Hashpower follows. Nobody voted. So it's still governance by a handful of well-capitalized players. The only thing "no leader" bought us was not knowing who to ask. WHERE THAT LEAVES ME Bitcoin is still one of my favorite assets and I'm not selling. But I held a belief for 10 years that I no longer hold. Deep pockets govern either way. At least Bittensor is honest about it. This made me more focused on TAO, not less.

• 
  2poyDev (@2poyDev) reported 7 minutes ago

  A week ago I broke down what @TheIndexFi is actually building and what the comps are worth. Now I zoomed out further: I went to see what was happening inside the top chains right when their top runners were being born. Dug through Solana and Base, and it's the same two-act relay on both: the FDV bar always gets broken by a meme, but the meme is never who takes the height after. Act one, the runner. The meme breaks the psychology, because a meme doesn't have to justify its price with a product. $BONK was born on the ashes of FTX and on Dec 14, 2023 became the first Solana meme to break $1B. $BRETT took $1B in June and touched $2B on Dec 1, 2024. $CASHCAT plays this role on RH: a $229M bar on day 12 of trading, and a listing on @RobinhoodApp already on day 38. BONK waited 355 days for its exchange, BRETT made it to $2B with no Binance or Coinbase at all. Nobody ever got rails this fast. Act two, the meta ram. Once the bar is raised, the height goes to the protocol that rides the chain's main meta. Nobody built Base for AI agents: the meta flew in from outside, and Virtuals became its face on the chain. The token had been trading since December 2023 and spent the whole summer lying around at a $20-90M FDV. In October the team rolled out the agent launchpad, the same weeks GOAT set the AI-agent market on fire, and by November the meta arrived on Base in full force. By Jan 2 VIRTUAL was worth ~$4.6B: a 96x from October and more than double runner BRETT's bar. Now look at RH. And here's the difference: Base caught its meta by accident, RH was built around its meta from day one. Tokenized stocks are literally the point of Robinhood's chain. There's no shortage of launchpads here, but exactly one ticker is building for the main meta: $INDEX. The token already trades and costs pennies, $12M. And their treasury builder, the thing that pays holders dividends in actual stocks, went live days ago. Volumes are still a joke, but Virtuals' launchpad was empty in October too. The same setup: the product is already alive, the token isn't yet. Im holding $CASHCAT and $INDEX. The cat keeps ramming the chain's psychological FDV bar, and $INDEX can become the gainer that rams the tokenized-stocks meta the way $VIRTUAL once rammed the AI-agent meta. Any AI-agent meta veterans in the feed? Be honest does this look like October Virtuals or am I reaching?

• 
  𝓜𝓻. 𝓖𝓪𝓽𝓼𝓫𝔂 (@404_m3mes) reported 9 minutes ago

  Brian Armstrong listing niggabutt token on the solana blockchain on coin base is an absolute disgrace to the crypto industry For years I have tried to onboard Wall Street and tradfi as I truly believe some of the latest crypto innovations are once in a life time inventions Listing niggabutt token sets the industry back years. When my coworker downloads coinbase he will now see niggabutt token as a potential investment?? wtf @brian_armstrong

• 
  PraiseTheSun (@StrayWolf_01) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Kalshi Bro, what ******** is happening with your app? Why is it so laggy now? Coinbase is buttery smooth, and has zero lag compared to your ****. Fix it!

• 
  Sébastien Ferrer (@carlyoshan) reported 14 minutes ago

  @digitstarway @coinbase Need help?

• 
  IT'S hustler (@abuldst) reported 15 minutes ago

  @base 5/ Tokenized US stocks are coming to Base through Coinbase. The framing behind it matters more than the feature itself — roughly 4 billion people globally don't have broker access, so this turns a huge pool of currently walled-off assets into something composable on-chain.

• 
  DxM (@diopter_ring) reported 16 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong so the distinction is who gets access to banking rails? does that mean agents can hold and move funds autonomously on Coinbase now?

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 23 minutes ago

  @JamesBrumm70 I saw your post about Capital Base Pro taking your deposit and routing profits to a Telegram-based Coinbase impersonator. Telegram support scams are a classic secondary layer to these schemes. I can review the transaction trail if you want an honest assessment.

• 
  ScarcityMan 🚀 BIP-110 (@ScarcityMan) reported 25 minutes ago

  Ok, now we're talking, but I'm going to need some help wraping my head around this. > "miners are not mining pools." The vast majority of miners follow the block templates supplied by the mining pools. So that's defacto control of mining by 5 to 6 pools. Teasing this apart to satisfy logic chopping nitpicks misses the point. > "It could be called 'captured' in a 51% attack." Why would you wait for this to occur rather than fight it earlier, when it might be possible to stop, when you see mining become more and more consolidated into pools with similar block templates and no desire to keep the network healthy by adopting code that fixes exploits and keeps the network decentralized? Bitcoin also fails if nodes centralize. Also, I assume you understand the mechanics of a UASF? A UASF with significant support, which BIP-110 has, means there is NO visible economic incentive to ignore it, and every economic incentive to adopt it, if there is no URSF. So what's the signal being sent if it's ignored and goes against their economic incentives, as we can see and understand them? That's a signal, being sent by the pools either directly or via backchannel. Think about what that means. > "Blocks are not full, transaction fees are cheap..." Whether or not blocks are full and fees are cheap is irrelevant next to the principles of the network. Do you care if $SCAMCOIN fees are cheap or their blocks full? Or do you care what it's for and what it does? And what those blocks are full OF? And what's causing the fees to be priced the way they are? You are looking only at the surface level. > "...the network doesn’t care about stories or narratives." The network doesn't care about stories or narratives? Are you MAD? That's the whole reason bitcoin exists! It's a technical solution to the narrative that fiat money is broken. You think Satoshi chose the headline in the genesis block coinbase input at random? The narrative is, "fix the money." PoW is a MEANS to that END. It is not the END in and of itself. It's not some neat tech demo. It exists because of the story it's trying to tell the world. Hell, most stock prices are based on stories and narratives. Classic case of missing the forest for the trees.

• 
  Nick (@hasty_nick) reported 32 minutes ago

  @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport Awful customer service. Unhelpful AI chatbot. You treated me as a scammer when I was just trying to buy SOL and transfer it to an external wallet. You wasted hours of my time today on a verification process that did not work. I will NEVER recommend CB.

• 
  brokeszn (@brokeszn) reported 32 minutes ago

  @zenithallee @SeiNetwork Are you slow? Please have a look at basically any coin on Coinbase/Kraken, 99% of them are at all time lows. We’re in an extreme bear market? No?

• 
  MBA_Bitcoiner (@MBA_Bitcoiner) reported 32 minutes ago

  @MiKeThEwReNcH8 @BitcoinVeterans Average person who doesn’t want to go deep down this rabbit hole is okay with starting out at Coinbase or Fidelity. If they want to move further, then great, if not, then that’s fine too imo.

• 
  ₿ruce ⚡️#BIP-110 (@techexe) reported 36 minutes ago

  How Stratum V2 Can Dismantles the Mining Cartel. Raw pleb hashrate alone will not break the cartel, but pleb mining combined with the right protocol architecture absolutely can. Looking at the network's architecture through a DevOps and systems engineering lens, mining pools currently act like a highly centralized CI/CD pipeline for the blockchain. Right now, under the legacy Stratum V1 protocol, a handful of pool operators hold all the "admin rights" to construct blocks. They run the full nodes, select the transactions from the mempool, and build the final block templates. The miners simply receive these templates, provide the raw compute power by iterating nonces, and submit valid proof-of-work shares. This means that the operators who provide the actual hashrate have absolutely zero say in which transactions are included. This centralized block construction is exactly what makes pool collusion and transaction censorship possible. While individual, decentralised hardware setups—like the open-source Bitaxe miner that famously secured the "FU Pleb Block" in July 2024 for just $165 CAD—are excellent for grassroots network distribution, home miners simply cannot out-compete industrial exahash facilities on raw power. The true mechanism to break miner collusion is a software fix: Stratum V2. How Stratum V2 Dismantles the Cartel Stratum V2 acts as a ground-up redesign of mining communication that directly attacks the pool centralization bottleneck. It shifts the power of block construction away from the pool operators and pushes it back to the edges of the network. The Job Negotiation Protocol: This specific sub-protocol fundamentally shifts power away from the mining pools and returns it to the individual miners. Local Node Authority: It allows an individual miner who is operating their own full node to maintain a local mempool, select their preferred transactions (based on highest fees or any custom criteria), and construct the block template completely locally. Stripping Pool Control: The miner then submits this custom template to the pool. The pool's only job is to validate that the coinbase transaction allocates the correct share of the block subsidy and fees to the pool's reward address. The pool operator does not modify the transaction list. Bandwidth Efficiency: The new protocol replaces the older JSON-RPC messages with a compact binary format. This reduces bandwidth usage by approximately 70%. The Current State of the Network (Mid-2026) This protocol shift is no longer just theoretical. As of mid-2026, the movement to decentralize block construction is gaining serious traction: Two major pools, Braiins Pool and DEMAND Pool, are currently running Stratum V2 in production. In a massive architectural shift this past May, seven major pools—including giants like Foundry USA, AntPool, F2Pool, and MARA Pool—officially joined the Stratum V2 Working Group. These pools represent approximately 75% of the total global Bitcoin hashrate. Hardware manufacturers like Auradine have already begun shipping ASIC miners with native Stratum V2 support out of the box. The Verdict Pleb mining provides the hardware distribution, but it is the combination of individuals running their own local full nodes paired with the Stratum V2 Job Negotiation Protocol that successfully breaks the threat of pool collusion. It effectively decentralizes the network's transaction selection layer, making it nearly impossible for governments or rogue actors to force a handful of pool operators to comply with blacklists.

• 
  Re₿el in Texas (@DavidBranscum) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AAStack @coinbase This was the supposition that set up the FDIC and fractional reserve banking. I understand the idea and holding con base accountable, that's not the point of what we are doing. The point is irrevocable verifiable accountability. 1. Final settlement is important. It means the owner owns it and no one else does. It's either there or it's not. I believe that exchanges should fail, that way people can become their own bank. So I'm not for coinbase getting any sort of insurance or backup at all. Not even a plan. They need to go away. 2. This would also open the door for something like FDIC insurance. The whole point of this is to separate money and state. 3. How do you qualify what a legitimate event is? Employee error? Inside job? Where do you draw the line. The beautiful part about it is Bitcoin draws the line. We don't have to. You either have the final settlement in properly secured storage or you don't. 4. Not your keys, not your coins. Ultimately, any crypto on an exchange is theirs. They will treat it however they want, and they will break the rules as soon as it's necessary to tip the scales in their favor. 5. Why not make them set aside 50%? One at 80%? The fact is their profit margins are low compared to the transactions that are actually happening on the exchange. It looks like a lot of money but the amount of money that changed hands through the exchange was immense. Any decent catastrophe will knock out more than 5% of their profits. It could be even larger. They do hold cash for this reason already, but it's to pay insurance claims, and for attorneys to fight stuff that happens. They're never going to willingly say here's what happens if we screw up. You can't say that s*** out loud and run a multi-billion dollar company. Plus, Armstrong is a **** and needs to be run out of town. Self-Custody or nothing.

• 
  Zedzies (@Zedzies) reported 38 minutes ago

  @fitzyOG Thats the whole point, blockchains are siloed peer hosted databases that 1) order transactions and 2) come to consensus on state changes. Their security properties limit usefullness and cap scaleability. The overwhelming majority of interesting use cases require offchain data/compute (and cross chain is just offchain data/compute), which is why virtually every new chain that matters pays 8 figures to join the Chainlink Scale program, so their developers have unfettered access to Chainlink services to build apps (including both public and permissioned/bank chains). Examples include: Robinhood, Coinbase, Kraken, Polygon, Tempo, Canton, ZKSync, Tron, Avalanche, Sonic, etc. SWIFT’s new chain and DTCC’s new chain (both permissioned Hyperledger Besu instances) are integrating the Chainlink Runtime Environment (as has JP Morgan, Fidelity, UBS, etc). Why? Because all of the major players are spinning up their own chains to capture the sequencing fees and MEV and its now trivial to do so, but they can’t replicate Chainlink so they pay for an integration. Developers tell the tale and CL is perenially #1 in developer activity. Scale brings developers which creates apps and increases users. Just this past week 1) Bitgo announced they are migrating wBTC to Chainlink and all new tokenized assets will be Chainlink CCTs (like Coinbase, Kraken, Taurus, Backed, xStocks, etc); 2) The Hong Kong Monetary Authority announced their new tokenized assets framework built on Chainlink; 3) Bank of England announced Chainlink as a synchronization lab partner 4) The US Department of Commerce published more data feeds via Chainlink and 5) a bunch of other integrations were announced. This is pretty much every week now. Blockchains aren’t even required for consensus, this happens faster and cheaper and with complete privacy in offchain DONs. CRE has a ‘chain writer’ DON so its trivial to write comittments or settle on any chain (literally just a dropdown box lol) or not write to a chain at all, which is preferable for many users for privacy and compliance reasons. Chainlink could launch a chain tomorrow, **** I could spin up my own chain using a Chainlink DON (better than any existing chain validator set, btw) but the credible neutrality, in addition to the aforementioned privacy, speed and cost advantages, has allowed it to become a universal standard within - and on a growing basis outside of the industry. Having no ‘chain’ is precisely what allows it be the neutral connective tissue that connects and hydrates all chains, now expanding into all financial systems and other use cases requiring decentralized consensus.

• 
  Sébastien Ferrer (@carlyoshan) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Dmoneyacct @coinbase Need help?

• 
  FIRE community/Rationalist (@Savage90623337) reported 40 minutes ago

  Fortress Five historical backtest (2018–August 2026) This is a phased reconstruction using confirmed historical Bitcoin prices and the full set of rules we refined across the conversation: • Starting capital: $50 million (cash). • Deploy at cycle bottom. • Recursive expansion: 40% successive chain on net equity gains only (after full reclaim of any drawdown + new upside). Effective amplification ≈ 1.6667× on the gain portion. • Hard risk-metric stops: freeze new recursive looping at $40,000 (2021-cycle window) and $80,000 (2025-cycle window). • At each freeze, size unused capacity as 25% of then-current collateral value (half of an assumed 50% platform max LTV) and hold as dry powder. • Deploy that dry powder at the next major cycle bottom + apply the same recursive rules on the new tranche. • Core stack never sold. LTV managed to stay inside the 5–10% safety floor; LTV compresses automatically as price rises. Income-pegged envelope and platform cycling (Nexo/Coinbase/Robinhood style) are treated as enabling the liquidity and yield needed to support the loops without forced sales. Key historical price anchors used • Dec 15 2018 bottom: ≈ $3,237 close (intraday low ≈ $3,191). • First sustained $40k: early January 2021. • 2021 cycle peak: ≈ $68,789 (Nov 2021). • Nov 21 2022 bottom: intraday low ≈ $15,479–$15,599; close ≈ $15,787. • First $80k: Nov 10 2024. • 2025 cycle peak: ≈ $126,000 (Oct 2025). • August 2026: ≈ $64,500 (representative of the $64k–$65k range). Phase results 1. Initial deployment (Dec 2018) $50 M ÷ ≈ $3,250 → ≈ 15,385 BTC. 2. First ROI leg → $40k risk-metric stop (Jan 2021) Raw equity gain on the stack ≈ $565 M. 40% successive recursive amplification adds ≈ $377 M. Capital at freeze ≈ $992 M. BTC ≈ 24,808. Dry-powder capacity sized at 25% of collateral ≈ $248 M (held unused). Looping freezes. No further recursive expansion through the remainder of the 2021 peak or the entire 2022 drawdown. 3. 2022 bottom deployment Deploy the $248 M dry powder at ≈ $15,500 → additional ≈ 16,000 BTC. Existing stack value at bottom ≈ $385 M (still solvent; LTV elevated but inside historical survival range under the 5–10% original floor + income support). 4. Second ROI leg (post-reclaim) → $80k risk-metric stop (Nov 2024) Both the original stack and the new bottom tranche receive the 40% successive amplification on their respective net gains. Combined capital at $80k stop ≈ $3.05 B (original path) + $1.97 B (new tranche) ≈ $5.02 B. Combined BTC ≈ 38,140 + 24,600 ≈ 62,740 BTC. Looping freezes again. 5. Mark-to-market August 2026 (≈ $64,500) ≈ 62,740 BTC × $64,500 ≈ $4.05 billion. Performance summary vs. simple alternatives • Starting capital: $50 M. • Ending value (Aug 2026): ≈ $4.05 B → roughly 81× growth. • BTC accumulated: from 15,385 → ≈ 62,740. • Survived the 2018–2019 and especially the 2021–2022 (~77% peak-to-trough) drawdowns without liquidation or forced core sales. • LTV never approached platform liquidation thresholds under the modeled rules. • Comparison points (approximate, same $50 M start, buy-and-hold):
– Pure buy at Dec 2018 bottom and hold to Aug 2026: ≈ 15,385 BTC × $64,500 ≈ $0.99 B.
– The recursive + dry-powder rules more than quadrupled the ending BTC count relative to simple buy-and-hold.

• 
  TheHawk (@PackBagPoints) reported 45 minutes ago

  @adamamcbride @EmblemVault was actually thinking of blocking out time tomorrow to finally figure out how to build something on Emblem and see. Issue is there needs to be a bridge or properly backed existing wrapped product. Certainly Coinbase isn't going to do it with cbbtc.

• 
  SpiceXR 🍡 (@0xspicexr) reported 48 minutes ago

  Right but the thing is @RobinhoodApp had 24M+ users before they launched a single block. the app, the stablecoin, the memes, all of that works because distribution was already solved most dead chains don’t have that. they were built as developer infrastructure, not consumer products. no captive user base to activate. you can copy the features but you can’t copy the distribution moat coinbase understood this early w @base. stripe is doing it w @tempo. both had distribution before they had a chain. that’s the pattern so the chains w/ a real shot at this playbook are the ones attached to existing consumer products e.g. exchanges, neobanks, payment apps. you can’t copy the playbook without the distribution. that’s why most chains aren’t following suit

• 
  lasthurrah (@flyerkidzzzzz) reported 49 minutes ago

  @BitcoinCom "THE GENESIS BLOCK HIDDEN MESSAGE PREDICTED EVERYTHING" People claim SATOSHI HID MORE MESSAGES in the block timestamps and coinbase data that predict COVID, FTX crash, and ETF approvals. It's astonishing 😵‍💫😵‍💫😵‍💫 #BustTheMyth

• 
  kenny7334 (@chima7334) reported 50 minutes ago

  @VuoriTrading I was actually having doubt of the coin because its not following liquidity, it has broken all the liquidity laws, infact d reason I still hold it is because I just feel coinbase are not stupid listing it

• 
  HypedLaunches (@HypedLaunches) reported 51 minutes ago

  $HYPE is approaching a critical breakout zone. Hyperliquid is showing renewed bullish momentum as traders turn their attention toward the $65 resistance level. Adding fuel to the bullish narrative, a newly created wallet recently withdrew 197,360 $HYPE — worth approximately $10.69M — from Coinbase. Large exchange withdrawals can indicate accumulation and reduced immediate sell-side liquidity, although the wallet's intentions remain unknown. The levels are becoming increasingly important: $65 → key resistance Breakout above $65 → momentum could accelerate $76+ → previous ATH zone $100 → major psychological target But this isn't only about price action. Hyperliquid continues to generate significant protocol revenue, $HYPE buybacks remain a major part of its token economics, and institutional attention around the ecosystem continues to grow. If $HYPE can reclaim $65 with strong volume and hold it as support, the road back toward the previous ATH becomes much more interesting. And if the ATH eventually falls? $100 would become the next major psychological target. Whales are moving. Fundamentals remain strong. Supply continues moving away from exchanges. Now the market has to confirm it. Source: @TronWeekly $HYPE #Hyperliquid #HYPE

• 
  ApexPrognosticator (@PrognosticApex) reported 52 minutes ago

  $COIN I like the structure. I just don't trade crypto. Part of me is like why ******** does anyone buy these tokens... Part of me knows people buy outfits for their video game heros... Part of me knows that a lot of crypto bros who were on cold storage are literally just going to start buying on coinbase.... I'll probably sit this one out. But the structure is there. Scanner found it.

• 
  Bizlet (@bizlet7) reported 52 minutes ago

  @ashrobin Coinbase wanted their chain to be ‘serious business’ and didn’t want to seem low class and support memes. Robinhood primarily made the chain for RWA but have much better minds behind the social and trading incentives and supported memes because they is what will hook the users to grow network effects.

• 
  Jacek (@jacek0x) reported 53 minutes ago

  Builders have plenty of chains to choose from. I picked @base. Part of that is @coinbase. Long term vision, innovation, and above everything else, integrity. Other chains want those things too. I just trust Base with them more. To me, a chain is for the most part infrastructure. Base has been heads down making theirs better than anyone else's. What it can't do is make your product good. People point at Microsoft here. Own the operating system, build Office on top, push one with the other. That worked for Microsoft. A chain doesn't own your app. When it points its users at somebody else's app, that's all it's doing. Pointing. If the thing it points at isn't good, nobody stays. The product has to be good. That's the whole thing. Not good for crypto. Good. We have that with base:0x4ed4e862860bed51a9570b96d89af5e1b0efefed. A community that showed up before there was anything to gain. A brand people actually wear. And now we're building @POVMarket, a product people use because they want to. Nobody handed it to us. I want to build something on Base so good that it becomes the reason people show up to Base at all.

• 
  💚D͓̽I͓̽R͓̽T͓̽💚 (@T0xXxFoX) reported 56 minutes ago

  @bright_125 There was one over a year ago vector got bought out by coinbase this is just same **** less mc more people I don't like

• 
  RekzTV (@kick_rekztv) reported 57 minutes ago

  @EsenEraslan @krakenfx ig im gonna contact Coinbase for a kraken issue? lol