Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (31%)
• Mobile App (31%)
• Login (23%)
• Website (8%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Houston	Mobile App	8 days ago
Louisville	Mobile App	2 months ago
Guayaquil		2 months ago
Rancho Santa Margarita	Login	2 months ago
Montreux	Website	2 months ago
Miami	Transactions	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Devin (@devinthatdude_) reported 3 minutes ago

  Banks are ***! Slow, direct deposits need approvals that takes weeks. Clarity act actually happens, I will never be using a bank for finances again. I updated my direct deposit with SoFi and COINBASE 3 weeks ago and they have yet to verify with my company. Crypto forever…

• 
  km🦈 (@BiNkYdaMauLeR) reported 4 minutes ago

  @PierreSamaties @coinbase CB is a laundry store front, imo.. this last second announcement really shouts, "unprofessional", imo.. add that to interrupting service every time #BTC crashes and retail can't trade, GRRRRRR. 😡😠

• 
  DKING 👑 (@abdyweb3) reported 5 minutes ago

  You can steal $20 million. You cannot steal your history. Chirag Tomar spent $10 on a domain, built a fake Coinbase login page, and SEO'd it to the top of Google. Victims typed in their email, password, and 2FA. A fake loading screen played. Their real accounts were already empty. He ran this for 30 months. Made $20M+. Lambos. Porsches. Audemars. Dubai. The full crypto bro checklist. Then the Secret Service showed up in Atlanta. Not because of the $20M. Not because of the 27 properties. Not because of the Lambos. Because he used the same email for his scam and his US tourist visa application. Every login. Every withdrawal. Every fake support call his crew answered. Every Google ranking he gamed. It was all still there. The digital trail never disappears. It just waits. We're building in a world where AI agents are going to move money, make decisions, and execute tasks autonomously. And right now there's no way to know which ones have a clean history and which ones have a Chirag Tomar situation hiding behind a loading screen. That's the problem @Rep24_io is solving. Onchain reputation for AI agents. Verifiable. Slashable. Permanent. Because the trail is always there you might as well make it work for you.

• 
  isaias291.ink (@isaias_291) reported 6 minutes ago

  AWS integrated Coinbase’s x402 into Amazon Bedrock AgentCore. 1M+ enterprise AWS clients now have native access to onchain USDC payments for their AI agents. Every enterprise agent built on Bedrock that needs to pay for something is a potential transaction on @base.

• 
  Parad0x Crew (@Parad0x_Labs) reported 10 minutes ago

  The real unlock is interoperability. Memescope-style agents, Coinbase/CDP-style x402 systems, agent marketplaces, service bots, trading bots, auction bots, and custom apps should not need separate payment logic. DNA x402 makes them speak one money language.

• 
  David Cummuta (@cummutacation) reported 11 minutes ago

  @PierreSamaties @coinbase The SEC 👀 hmmm Seems pretty convenient right after the Cloud Engine announcement. Forced down pressure so insiders can buy?

• 
  Artem Yakovenko (@Yart_em) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TheOneandOmsy the moment circle filed for ipo, the coinbase revenue share arrangement became an investor relations problem for both companies.

• 
  Shaggy (@Shaggyz5150) reported 15 minutes ago

  @AllThingsETH @coinbase I was hoping for metamask to work with chime because then i would not have the problem of what if coinbase servers goes down because of AWS outage.

• 
  Zarniwoop (@harl_vann) reported 17 minutes ago

  @CloutedMind Kraken beats Coinbase on customer support reputation.

• 
  VincentScott (@VincentSco72192) reported 18 minutes ago

  SCAM ALERT if you think Coinbase is trying to contact you about “resecuring your account” The whole thing is a scam Stop immediately and and contact their customer service

• 
  Mippo 🟪 (@MikeIppolito_) reported 22 minutes ago

  The winner of the Coinbase vs Hyperliuqid deal depends on the end state of stablecoin market structure. It all comes down to whether there are many or very few stablecoins. In the world of many stablecoins, there are thousands of issuers (banks, payment providers, etc...). Interop solutions are very important and end up extracting the majority of the value. Issuers compete in a fragmented, highly competitive market, and keep almost none of their NIM. In the world of many stablecoins, interop layers are the big winners and it sucks to be an issuer. There's another world where there are very few stablecoins. In this world, interop isn't necessary (90% of activity is concentrated around only a few coins). These issuers pay out a large amount of yield, but they make up for it in volume. Over time, once they have dominant market share, they can slowly reduce the amount of reserve yield they pay out. In this world, it's good to be an issuer (if you're one of the big ones), and interop is largely useless. Folks who have paid attention to crypto over the last ten years may see some parallels, especially if you spent time in Cosmos. Personally, I think everyone is underestimating the network effects at the asset level for USDC and USDT. Becoming an issuer is difficult, and if you could get 90% of the NIM for 0% of the work, I find it hard to believe most venues won't choose that route. I would take the breathless takes on CT with a heaping tablespoon of salt, and wouldn't write off Coinbase or Circle's stablecoin businesses just yet.

• 
  Mamba | TS9 (@Mamba248x) reported 31 minutes ago

  I think the Hype news today is way more impactful in the big picture than the actual $$ involved. For a lot of people I know the regulatory risk of HL was the biggest issue. Getting "buy in" from Circle and Coinbase, as much as a lot of people may hate Coinbase, puts you one step closer to the actual people making the laws in the US. Hyperliquid has done a lot of things correct, but on the regulatory front, things are still "just getting started". This is a gigantic step forward in positioning for Hyperliquid's future. Not just the actual stablecoin part of it, but this does open up the door even more while perps as a product seems to be catching on, to Hyperliquid becoming the rails for perps at a much larger scale. For such a small nimble team, these guys are exceptionally good at what they do.

• 
  Jack Blinka ☀️🔥 (@Robert35116965) reported 31 minutes ago

  @jmmpayne @HugoPhilion @0xQuantic There is no longer a 10 xrp minimum mint when using the tag method. I just minted less than 1 with no problems from coinbase.

• 
  Market Occultations (@marketoccultat1) reported 33 minutes ago

  Coinbase is STILL not 100% legal in Canada. You can use it but even as of this month there was the potential for problems within a 2 day window before a deal was made which is only temporary again. Imagine you had big positions there… it’s happened to me many times before How about you become 100% legal before sponsoring teams and drawing users in thinking “oh…they sponsor a local team” Here was what AI said about the recent happenings: “there was an approaching April deadline, the exemption renewal mattered materially, and failure to obtain it could have placed Coinbase Canada into a much more uncertain legal/operational position similar to other firms that lost Canadian access.” Ya I had all that happen before why bother?? Ridiculous waste of time and I’m not going to mentioned the amounts I’ve lost due to open positions being closed on other platforms in the past It’s too much!

• 
  Adrian (@adrianisxx) reported 36 minutes ago

  i woke up today with the thought that the coinbase thingy is more bullish for $PURR than $HYPE i've not exactly sat down to find the correlation but i feel the plausibility of this idea in my non-existing-but-real *****

• 
  Steve (@Steve_4P) reported 36 minutes ago

  @CosmicDude3000 @coinbase @Official_Upbit Then they wont haha. But do you think they wont? You know how competitive the banks are in Korea. Even with stablecoin. Although they cant make credits out of this as they do with fiat, it is likely that they can generate a revenues by having MMF RP short term treasury bond, etc.( again, bills are not finalized so I am not 100% sure but they will be allowed to have cash like assets ) If their competitors are gonna issue stablecoin, they will do it.

• 
  Ninjmo (@ninjamoe420) reported 36 minutes ago

  Think I’m done adding to perp dexs I’m actively farming. Honestly nothing coming out is super innovative anymore. Also I was assuming hyperliquid would have a hard time with US regulations, but with hyperliquid getting backed by circle and Coinbase it seems like that might not be a problem. That makes projects whose main selling point was being US friendly look less appealing. Still think rising tides lift all ships so I’ll continue to farm as I have been, but I feel super underexposed to HYPE rn. And it’s my biggest bag 😭Only way I’ll add another project is if maker/taker fees make being delta neutral super attractive.

• 
  Emily Chloe (@la12345ad) reported 38 minutes ago

  @mewing81 You need to manually synchronize your coinbase wallet to rectify this problem. Kindly follow back and send a direct message for further assistance and support.

• 
  PILTR (@Nico_pltrs) reported 39 minutes ago

  $BTC order flow read price flushed while OI got hit aggressively -> positioning got cleaned up hard on the move down spot still looks weak overall: > spot CVD continues bleeding > Coinbase premium deeply negative again > no real sign of aggressive US spot demand stepping in > funding relatively neutral perps peaking up, without spot confirming unless spot starts reclaiming and premium improves, I still lean toward this being temporary relief inside a broader corrective structure lower.

• 
  Nabuh (@Nabuh_) reported 40 minutes ago

  @TedPillows Coinbase Premium deeply negative = US spot sellers leading the move. Adds to the distribution thesis we've been tracking all week. spot CVD trending down, asks dominating, for now this looks more like distribution at the current levels.

• 
  A Sovereign Individual (@SovereignBTCer) reported 42 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Coinbase might actually be the lowest-quality service that exists. It’s like a temu product that breaks as soon as you actually try to use it as advertised. It has been this way CONSISTENTLY for years. That says something.

• 
  CrowdChain (@crowdchainDapp) reported 45 minutes ago

  @Only1Gkash @coinbase @base So what you mean is founders from these other region are no more getting the support They use to ??

• 
  Steve (@Steve_4P) reported 50 minutes ago

  @CosmicDude3000 @coinbase @Official_Upbit 1. Not scalable if they can’t move on chain. Will they freely move to public chains like ETH? Not sure. But at least stablecoin itself is programmable. You know this.. 2. This part, they can still generate ‘some’ sort of revenue because they somewhat will deposit fiat to their bank to issue stablecoin(Kbank -> Hana) if their stablecoin will be used a quote currency. (Revenue might come from, idk, fees ) but more importantly if every bank issues stablecoin, it is always better to have some sort of dominance even if Hana can make relatively small revenues. Also, you should not ask “so will they make money out of this?” This is not the right question to ask. They have to issue stablecoin because gov says so. Then, they should do it. How simple is this. 3. Read the bill. Although it is not fully finalized yet, it is likely that banks are gonna be the main stablecoin issuers. 50% + 1 rule.

• 
  Marcus | Macro Strategist (@Marcus_Analyst) reported 52 minutes ago

  @misterrcrypto Coinbase premium dip means **** all. Real investors track their own capital, not exchange FUD.

• 
  Sweep (@0xSweep) reported 52 minutes ago

  And it just got worse Coinbase became the official USDC treasury deployer on HYPERLIQUID the same week NYSE and CME pushed for US regulators to investigate it The "treasury deployer" framing buries what's actually happening Coinbase captures the majority of USDC reserve yield. It's been one of their largest revenue lines for years. They're now routing that yield to HYPERLIQUID, which sends 99% of protocol revenue to HYPE buybacks $5B of USDC at 4-5% T-bill yields is ~$200M per year. That yield existed already. Coinbase chose to redirect it into the same buyback engine that recycles user losses into HYPE's price Then they staked HYPE. Circle staked HYPE. Coinbase increased its position beyond what activation required A US listed public company is now subsidizing the buyback of a token it holds on its balance sheet, on a venue that profits when its users lose, has no KYC, and was just referred to regulators for market manipulation Every Coinbase retail customer who bridges into HL is now a customer Coinbase profits from sending to lose against the house. Using yield Coinbase generated from that customer's own dollar deposits The complaint filed this week was against HYPERLIQUID It's now a complaint against Coinbase too

• 
  Pig Pig (@pigrichh) reported 52 minutes ago

  @ArisuIDO @HyperliquidX Coinbase and Circle stake $HYPE to support the system

• 
  adrian defi (@0xadriandefi) reported 53 minutes ago

  @coinbase and @circle just staked 500k $HYPE each on Hyperliquid. Tier-1 stablecoin issuers don't lock native tokens on a platform they expect to disappear. That's the ultimate confirmation for $HYPE from a competitor who has to admit that the decentralized rival isn't so easy to take down. Coinbase secured the rights to the USDH brand. USDC is now the official dollar on Hyperliquid. Spot markets ran on USDC. HIP-4 outcome markets ran on USDH. Users had to swap between the two. Friction in exactly the place liquidity should be invisible. HIP-4 volume was already lagging. Putting everything under one dollar fixes that. The brand swap is the surface. What matters is underneath: Circle and Coinbase each have to stake 500k $HYPE. 90% of post-cost revenue from stablecoins held on Hyperliquid flows back to the protocol. At current numbers, north of $150M per year. Two of the most regulated dollar issuers just plugged into Hyperliquid, locked native tokens to be there, and agreed to route the protocol a revenue stream most listed companies would envy. What this means: Hyperliquid is no longer "just a perp DEX." For a while, it's becoming a price discovery layer for anything tradeable, now with regulated dollar rails plugged in. Spot, perps, HIP-4 outcome markets, whatever comes next... Position update (unpopular opinion): I'm taking 20% of the $HYPE off the table here. The thesis hasn't weakened. If anything, it's stronger. But after a move like this, the cleanest position is the one that lets you think clearly. The other 80% stays on.

• 
  Matthew Jones (@MJProjectHaven) reported 53 minutes ago

  Coinbase got breached not by cracking code — but by bribing humans. Support agents. The weakest link was never the key. It was the person with access to it. The industry keeps learning this the hard way.

• 
  Crypto Aman (@cryptoamanclub) reported 55 minutes ago

  🚨 FAKE COINBASE SCAM: $20M STOLEN, LAMBOS BOUGHT, 5 YEARS IN PRISON CHIRAG TOMAR — 31, DELHI ↳ Created CoinbasePro. com — a fake copy of pro.coinbase. com ↳ Manipulated Google rankings so the fake site appeared first ↳ Victims entered passwords + 2FA codes ↳ Wallets drained within seconds THE NUMBERS: ↳ $20M+ stolen from 542+ victims worldwide ↳ One victim lost $240,000 in a single call ↳ DOJ estimate reached $37M WHERE DID THE MONEY GO? ↳ Lamborghini + Porsche ↳ Audemars Piguet watches ↳ Dubai + Thailand trips HOW WAS HE CAUGHT? ↳ Arrested at Atlanta airport by US Secret Service ↳ Search history included: “fake coinbase page” ↳ Used the same email linked to his visa application INDIA’S ACTION: ↳ ED froze 18 properties in Delhi ↳ ₹42.8 crore ($4.8M) in assets seized ↳ Family and associates under investigation Sentence: 5 years in federal prison + 2 years supervised release. One small URL difference caused millions in losses. Always double-check the URL. Are you really safe online?

• 
  Moses Mbadi (@mosesmbadi) reported 58 minutes ago

  The AI Bloodbath: 100,000+ Jobs Gone in 12 Months 1. Amazon — 30,000+ Employees ~2% of total workforce Roles: Corporate managers, AWS teams Stock: 📷 Flat (~0% in 2025) 2. Intel — 27,000 Employees ~22% of total workforce Roles: ~80% Engineers (chip designers, RTL, fab workers) Stock: ↑ Up 130% YTD in 2026 3. Microsoft — 15,000 Employees ~7% of total workforce Roles: ~30% Engineers (AI now writes their code), Xbox, Sales Stock: ↓ Down 12% YTD in 2026 4. Chevron — 8,000 Employees 15–20% of total workforce Roles: Operations & corporate staff Stock: ↓ Down (oil price pressure) 5. Block (Square/Cash App) — 4,000 Employees ~40% of total workforce Roles: Engineering, ops, support Stock: ↑ Up 45% (52-week), surged 24% on announcement day 6. Salesforce — 4,000 Employees ~5% of total workforce Roles: ~60% Customer service (replaced by AI agents) Stock: ↑ Up (market views as efficiency win) 7. PayPal — 4,760 Employees ~20% of total workforce Roles: Engineers & operations ($1.5B AI overhaul) Stock: ↑ Positive reaction (announced May 9, 2026) 8. Dell — 11,000 Employees ~10% of total workforce Roles: Corporate roles, shifting budget to AI servers Stock: ↑ Up (AI server business booming) 9. Meta — 1,500+ Employees ~10% of Reality Labs division Roles: VR/metaverse engineers Stock: ↓ Down 2.3% on announcement day 10. Coinbase — 700 Employees ~14% of total workforce Roles: ~50% Engineers (AI replacing dev workflows) Stock: ↑ Up ~4% on announcement day In rough terms, across the 175,000+ jobs lost: ~40% Engineers (software devs, QA, product managers — AI is writing their code) ~30% Customer service / support (AI agents replacing human agents directly) ~30% Management / corporate / ops (companies flattening org structures, cutting "unnecessary layers") Sources: Crunchbase, CNBC, Yahoo Finance, InformationWeek (May 2026) Very uncertain times ahead. I have 3 acres of Land in Nambale, who wants to come do farming with me?