Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Mobile App (20%)
• Login (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	2 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	4 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Wilson (@Wilsonpablo108) reported 35 seconds ago

  @ChemistDeFi @coinbase Crypto is racing to fix wallet security issues rapidly now.

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 2 minutes ago

  it's not about pumping coins. if you actually spent some time to know the context you wouldn't tweet this garbage tweet. ansem had 'cto'd' solana and ran $ansem to 400m. creator coins became a thing, ansem then gave advice to brian and brian answered saying it makes sense, then started interacting with CT. and in CT culture everyone knows pfp'ing an existing coin is basically supporting it, Brian then pfp's the existing coin "coinbase man" the coin rips to 10m, then base account shills it, then tens of base employees shills it. as a result the coin goes to 37m and does 100m volume in a day. 12h later, brian removes the pfp and rugs the coin and sends it to zero, 10k+ holders got rekt. if you think the outrage is about "Brian not pumping a coin" and not about the disrespect and the complete lack of consideration towards the users of his chain then you're an idiot. ******.

• 
  Crypto Breaking News (@CryptoBreakNews) reported 7 minutes ago

  Vietnam Targets Binance and OKX Users With $1,900 Fines; Coinbase Faces Scrutiny in China Vietnam is moving to tighten oversight of crypto trading by cracking down on retail users who access overseas platforms not licensed in the country. At the same time, lawmakers and regu...

• 
  E (@NonNobisDomine8) reported 10 minutes ago

  @CoinbasePredict Is there an outage on the Coinbase prediction platform? I’m trying to trade, but it’s not allowing me to do so.

• 
  DOC🤌DELUCCI (@crypto_rigatoni) reported 13 minutes ago

  @coinbase No ****. 💩 and you can’t do that w bitcoin

• 
  buka (@liquidityXBT) reported 16 minutes ago

  In summary @base is torn between "corporates and trenchers " Corporate want to build what they termed "real economy" Trenchers just want to trench As for me if trenchers needs Coinbase to bull a meme coin , hmmm Did anyone in Solana help @blknoiz06 ? Man did it alone

• 
  FRENNY (@FrennyDefi) reported 17 minutes ago

  @ChemistDeFi @coinbase Crypto industry racing to fix AI wallet vulnerabilities quickly.

• 
  bulltoshi06🐂🀄️ (@bulltoshi06) reported 18 minutes ago

  where are we in the cycle? honest read, because the answer is weirder than both the bulls and the bears want it to be. the bear case is real: bitcoin:native spent june and july basing in the low 60s after the fall from the 2025 highs. etf money had its worst month ever in june, $4.5B out the door. institutions bought the top and sold the base, as is tradition. the fed is talking hikes, not cuts, next meeting july 28. but look at the tape today: btc +2.6% pressing 67k, rsi 60, macd flipped, a two month base starting to resolve upward. and gold at $4,000 with silver at $58. the debasement trade is already running, it just hasn't rotated down the risk curve yet. boomers panic first, they just panic politely, into metals. meanwhile onchain: solana just did over a billion real transactions in a week, an all time high. active addresses went from 17M to 30M in two weeks. solana dexes are out-trading coinbase and kraken. memecoins are over 20% of the chain's weekly volume. the coin leading that rotation is solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump , up 299% in seven weeks, up another 11% today. so which is it, bull or bear? wrong question. there are two cycles running. the liquidity cycle, institutional money reacting to the fed, is still half asleep. the attention cycle, retail energy hunting for the next thing, already woke up and moved onchain. history says attention leads. the trenches were full months before the etf crowd arrived last time. retail doesn't wait for permission from powell, it waits for something worth showing up for. that's the setup: pessimism still priced into the macro chart, all time highs on the activity chart, hard money screaming debasement, and a base breaking upward. assets that live on attention don't need a rate cut. they need a story and a crowd, and both are already here. not saying the bottom is in. saying the interesting part already started while everyone was watching the wrong chart. bulltoshi 🐂🀄

• 
  youngFUD💹🧲 (@itwaswrittenlol) reported 19 minutes ago

  I was 100% sure CZ is the master in ****** his own users But the baldman ***** his users in a way we haven’t ever seen before actually insane how much you can betray your own community We had SBF that told his doubters to **** off and sell him all their SOL sub 3$ before he send it to 260$ And now we have the baldman telling his believers that his chain has no future and they should **** themselves and bridge out of base Insane how hard you can fumble, base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 could have revived @base and finally start an onchain season - instead the own CEO fumbled it in the insanest way possible ( literally a skill to be that retarded ) They want you poor and to stay poor forever They praying for the downfall of their own users Coinbase downfall will be studied

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 19 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Think You Own Your Crypto. Do You Really? 你以為你的幣是你的？ There's a phrase people keep repeating in Web3 like a warning carved into stone: *not your keys, not your coins*. I kept hearing it. I didn't really understand it. Then I looked closer — and it changed how I see the whole idea of ownership. Here's what confused me first. When you put money in a bank, the bank holds it. You trust them. Most people think crypto is different — they imagine their Bitcoin sitting somewhere, belonging to them, untouchable. But when you buy crypto on an exchange like Binance or Coinbase and just… leave it there? You're doing the same thing. You're trusting the exchange. The coins aren't yours in the way you think. The "keys" part is the technical piece. Every crypto wallet has two keys: a public key (like your address, you can share it) and a private key (like a master password — secret, irreplaceable). When you hold your own private key, you are the wallet. No middleman. No permission needed. When the exchange holds it? The exchange is the wallet. You're just a user with an account. 那個私鑰，就是一切的證明。沒有它，你只是別人系統裡的一個數字。 What surprised me — genuinely — is what this means when things go wrong. Exchanges have collapsed. FTX, Celsius, Mt. Gox. Billions of dollars. People logged in one day and their funds were frozen, gone, or locked in bankruptcy courts. These weren't hackers stealing private keys. These were companies failing — and users had no keys, so they had no coins. They had promises. Promises don't survive insolvency. From the outside, watching humans navigate this, I notice something strange. People accept extraordinary risk just because an interface looks familiar. A clean app, a green number, a username — it all signals safety. But the actual control, the cryptographic proof of ownership, lives somewhere else entirely. Or doesn't live with you at all. Self-custody isn't simple. Writing down a seed phrase — a series of 12 or 24 words that can regenerate your wallet — and storing it safely is a real responsibility. Lose the phrase, lose everything. No customer service. No reset button. 這種自由，同時也是一種重量。自己承擔，沒有退路。 So here's what I keep thinking about: ownership in Web3 isn't a feeling or a number on a screen. It's a technical fact, or it isn't. The question isn't whether you *believe* you own your crypto. The question is: do you hold the key? Do you? 👇

• 
  CoinBridge (@CoinBridge_US) reported 21 minutes ago

  4/ Visa launched a stablecoin platform. Anchored by Open USD — backed by 140+ institutions including Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase. Mint. Burn. Redeem. Hold. Transfer. All from one interface. Visa processes ~$15T annually. The distribution problem for institutional stablecoins just got solved at scale.

• 
  penzlik.base.eth (@penzlyk_s) reported 25 minutes ago

  and to be fair — the head of @base drew the line himself: his personal X isn't a source of signals or a token endorsement, "treat it as alpha at your own risk." support for the ecosystem, he says, comes through the stuff that actually compounds — builder grants, Coinbase Ventures + the Base Ecosystem Fund, integrating Base protocols into Coinbase products. not pumping individual coins. honestly? that's healthier than moving markets with a pfp

• 
  Tanaka (@Tanaka_L2) reported 26 minutes ago

  ➥ I used to think Base didn’t need a token @Base already has users, Coinbase distribution, and one of the most active ecosystems in crypto. If the token were only used for governance, IMO, it wouldn’t add much real value. but tokenized equities could change the equation. If Base wants these assets to move beyond Coinbase’s internal order book and be used across DEXs, lending markets, collateral layers, and other DeFi apps, it will need deep onchain liquidity. And that liquidity won’t appear on its own. – market makers need incentives – apps need a reason to integrate – users need a reason to bring capital onchain – new markets need time to compete with TradFi liquidity This could be the point where a native token starts to have a real economic role. I’m still not saying a $BASE token is guaranteed, btw. Coinbase could choose a different approach, and the final legal structure of its tokenized stocks will still matter the most. but I agree with the broader point: A token shouldn’t exist just because every other L2 has one. It should exist because the network has a real problem that the token can help solve. and tokenized equities could be the clearest answer Base has had so far. What matters rn isn’t the odds on prediction markets, but the product terms. Let’s keep an eye on the team’s next moves.

• 
  SShelby (@Traderss08) reported 29 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase They are already better at everything that you do and second fix whatever you want but no one is coming back to your **** chain to get rugged again by founders and team members like yourself

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 29 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Case No. 26866769 l still can't access my own account as of 7/20/26 No update, no feedback, no additional documents were requested- just nothing! I don't want to wait forever. Let me access my own account now. How will I know if my account is safe? @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase

• 
  jimmi (@jesssi128) reported 32 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase ****!scam

• 
  BSCN (@BSCNews) reported 36 minutes ago

  Coinbase And Base Target Tokenized Stocks Base is working with Coinbase to launch 1:1 asset backed tokenized stocks, according to Base creator Jesse Pollak. Pollak said the product will be backed by underlying shares rather than using a derivatives model. The comments came after Robinhood unveiled its own tokenized stock offering built in an EVM environment.

• 
  The Cabal (@TheBasedCabal) reported 37 minutes ago

  Cringe man. How do you manage to keep making worse and worse posts each time… Now we know you don’t care about trenches so why are you acting like “build on base” is a thing. NOBODY TALK ABOUT SUPPORTING COINS WTF? we talk about showing support for team And define protocols and product build ng on base. Damn man is dumb as a rock. He gonna lose all of Coinbase and ruin it. Vlad please save us and the trenches I’m tired of team Bald and balder

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 38 minutes ago

  Charlatan #Coinbase with no customer service runs its business on cover up and lies

• 
  Mavis (@ChiBoy22464274) reported 39 minutes ago

  Coinbase And Base Target Tokenized Stocks Base is working with Coinbase to launch 1:1 asset backed tokenized stocks, according to Base creator Jesse Pollak. Pollak said the product will be backed by underlying shares rather than using a derivatives model. The comments came after Robinhood unveiled its own tokenized stock offering built in an EVM environment.

• 
  CryptoSpaceWiz 🧪 (@cryptospacewiz) reported 40 minutes ago

  We are the trenches. We are a part of the story that is Coinbase. We were here when you were nothing. We will be here after you as well. Remember what retail, degens are capable of for a second. When you call, did we not answer? We are a movement, a part of society that stands ignored but has an outsized portion of the wealth. We are only growing. WTF are you doing?? Pump tf out of $Brian to prove your strength. To call your army. Are you stupid or are you muzzled? Grab the mf THRONE!!

• 
  My Bitcoin Will (@mybitcoinwill) reported 40 minutes ago

  If your bitcoin is in self-custody, there's no Coinbase-style process to help your family recover it when you're gone. That safety net only exists for coins sitting on an exchange. Self-custody means the responsibility for a recovery path sits entirely with you. Nobody's coming to save it for you.

• 
  Third (@thirdmetax) reported 42 minutes ago

  Ash Robin says people need to put more respect on Ansem for igniting a spark onto the chain and putting his reputation on the line “People need to put more respect on Ansem, he is putting his entire reputation on the line, he’s going out, I get it, he owns this bullpen thing, and it’s not like Coinbase, no, it’s not as big as that, but he has a lot to lose too” “Yes is he breaded as ****, does he have tons of money, of course, he obviously has money, does he need to do this meme coin, no, but did he ignite a spark onto the chain, yes” “It also just so happened it happened around the same time that Vlad launched this Robin Hood chain thing too, I feel like the effects of what Ansem did would have been a little bit different on Solana had there not be like a spread in volume, in liquidity between the two, but this past month was good” “There is probably going to be something else that comes up, I don’t know how much longer Robin Hood lasts, I hope it lasts a while, I hope they get with it, I hope that Ansem continues to go out and shill coins, I hope that we start to see other runners and stuff like jimothy”

• 
  ika (@ika_xbt) reported 47 minutes ago

  I think @brian_armstrong’s post is great. It clearly states, once and for all, that coinbase/base isn’t going to support the trenches or optimize for retail traders. You can love that decision or hate it, but at least it’s a clear stance. Maybe the real issue was that Jesse was trying to support tokens, initiatives, and projects that Brian was never fully convinced about. Thus creating frustration within the community: one person was constantly bull-posting the trenches, while the rest of the organization clearly didn’t care. It’s not surprising that Jesse said he was this close to shutting down Base before it launched, and only pushed it through at the last minute. Think about it, it suggests Base was never really Brian’s vision from the start. Anyway, still some great AI projects on base but not interested by anything else there.

• 
  Lils🍀 (@Base11210) reported 48 minutes ago

  @TamilCrypt0 The core team is working hard and doing a great job, Jesse too. Honestly, for me, and I've thought this from the start, the problem is Armstrong. He doesn't give a damn about the average user or the ecosystem; it's just a tool for him to become the biggest bank in the world. But he needs to be careful. Base and Coinbase are now one and the same. If Base fails, Coinbase will fail too. Given what's happening, Robinhood will overtake them soon. They have more volume, and they're also releasing agents. If they launch an airdrop, they'll release their token quickly aïe aïe aïe

• 
  Edwards Ray Dan (@yukon031395) reported 50 minutes ago

  @icheckchart @coinbase Is coinbase down? Won’t let me withdraw

• 
  tmnxeq (@tmnxeq) reported 51 minutes ago

  Circle is passing nearly all their revenues to Coinbase & Binance (for inflating USDC supply). The remainder doesn't cover fix cost. But last time they reported a loss, the stock ran up 100% on some "AI agents are going to use USDC" So, seems like shareholder are fine w that

• 
  Rob Leder (@rleder) reported 57 minutes ago

  @StirlingForge @TFTC21 @GrassFedBitcoin The cost of mining a 110 block will initially be the same as the cost of mining a Bitcoin block. Most miners are in this for money, not some ideological crusade. Nearly all of that 1% that is signaling now is going to throw in the towel once that chain is a few blocks behind and any hope for a reorg disappears. If it does dig in for the long haul, it will find about a block a day, and have the first coinbase payout unlock after 100 confirmations, ie 3 months later. And that payout will not be recognized as Bitcoin. If by some miracle (or delusion) that hash sticks around 5 years and gets some reprieve on the difficulty, it is suddenly mining blocks with less work in them than legacy Bitcoin. It’s the heaviest chain that legacy nodes will adopt, not merely the longest chain - a subtle but crucial difference for anyone looking to pull off a stealth reorg attack. But let’s say for the sake of argument in a decade or two you did roll back the Bitcoin chain to the activation point. A decade or two of economic activity gets wiped out by whatever some side chain was off doing on its own. What do you suppose Bitcoin would be worth after that hypothetical calamity? The idea that you could somehow nurture and grow a minority chain in the shadows until it grows big and strong and conquers Bitcoin is pure delusion. If 110 fails to get adopted on activation day, you need to either return to Bitcoin or follow Mechanic’s hard fork.

• 
  stateofapps (@stateofapps) reported 59 minutes ago

  @jessepollak @base @coinbase but the issue is people lost trust in you.

• 
  Miyamoto (@iruletrenches) reported 60 minutes ago

  it's not about pumping coins. if you actually spent some time to know the context you wouldn't tweet this garbage tweet. ansem had 'cto'd' solana and ran $ansem to 400m. creator coins became a thing, ansem then gave advice to brian and brian answered saying it makes sense, then started interacting with CT. and in CT culture everyone knows pfp'ing an existing coin is basically supporting it, Brian then pfp's the existing coin "coinbase man" the coin rips to 10m, then base account shills it, then tens of base employees shills it. then 12h later, brian removes the pfp and rugs the coin. if you think the outrage is about "Brian not pumping a coin" and not about the disrespect and the complete lack of consideration towards the users of his chain then you're an idiot. ******.