Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (33%)
• Website (17%)
• Mobile App (17%)
• Login (17%)
• Withdrawals (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	13 hours ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	4 days ago
Leipzig	Transactions	1 month ago
Maquoketa	Website	1 month ago
West Liberty	Login	2 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Julia Montes (@JulQuenDestiny) reported 3 minutes ago

  Sorry about the account freeze. Save all transaction details and communication records, request a review through official Coinbase support, and avoid sharing account information with anyone claiming they can unlock it.

• 
  Hey Jay (@JJeffrey100) reported 5 minutes ago

  @rorynotsorry It's the networks that have the issues with it. It's 2 big issues a) regulatory uncertainty. they don't want to lose their licenses for supporting what is legally grey. one FBI raid and their entire AP bucket gets frozen. b) (the bigger reason) the category is extremely risky with regards to fraud and chargebacks. the processors have limits and the networks can and will cut them off if their own limits get too high I think crypto is going to be the sustainable path. If I were running an RUO site, I'd have minipay or coinbase in-line payments to accept blockchain via CC rails. thirdweb worth looking into as well.

• 
  Betufin 🐂 🀄️ (@Betubfin) reported 7 minutes ago

  What a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.

• 
  Iso Ledger (@JamesDula82) reported 9 minutes ago

  What is Project Eleven? Let's break it down Project Eleven is a security startup founded in 2024 by Alex Pruden, a former US Army Special Operations officer, built entirely around one mission: getting Bitcoin and other digital assets ready for the moment quantum computers can break today's cryptography, what the industry calls "Q-Day." They're the same firm you'd have seen referenced if you've followed Ripple's own quantum roadmap, they're doing this work network by network. In January, they raised a $20 million Series A at a $120 million valuation, backed by Coinbase Ventures, Castle Island Ventures, and Balaji Srinivasan among others, bringing their total funding to $26 million. Their stated goal is to become something like a "Palantir for post-quantum migration," building the readiness assessments and tools that let networks transition deliberately instead of scrambling once the threat becomes real. This week they shipped something genuinely new, and it directly answers a problem you should understand. If a quantum computer ever becomes powerful enough to break Bitcoin's signature math (or any other crypto), it doesn't just threaten new transactions. It creates a harder problem: how do you prove you're the real owner of an old wallet once an attacker can forge a valid signature for it too? Signatures stop being proof of anything. Project Eleven's answer, built with Jim Posen, lead developer of the Binius proof system, sidesteps signatures entirely. Instead, it uses a zero-knowledge proof built around your wallet's key-derivation path, the internal hierarchy standard wallets already use to generate every address from a single seed. You can mathematically prove you know the seed material sitting above your address in that structure, and that it actually produces your address, without ever revealing the seed or any private key. That proof can then authorize a migration transaction to a new, quantum-safe address. A forger who only cracked your exposed public key doesn't have that seed-level knowledge, so they can't produce the proof, even if they can fake a signature. The numbers are what make this more than a whitepaper exercise. On a standard MacBook Air, generating the proof takes 243 milliseconds. Verifying it takes 40 milliseconds. No GPU required, no trusted setup. That's roughly 200 times faster than an earlier unoptimized version of the same idea from earlier this year. Two honest limitations worth knowing. First, this only protects wallets built on the standard derivation structure (BIP-32), the one basically every modern wallet already uses. Second, and this is the detail that made headlines, it doesn't help Satoshi's own 1.1 million BTC, those coins predate this derivation standard entirely, so there's no compatible seed-path proof available for them, quantum-safe or not. Nothing here is live on any blockchain yet. It's an unaudited prototype that would need actual protocol-level adoption, the same kind of network amendment process you already read about in Ripple's own 2028 quantum roadmap, before it could protect a single real coin. But it's a concrete, working answer to a question that was mostly theoretical a year ago: not just how do we encrypt against quantum computers, but how do you prove ownership once encryption itself has already failed. ISO Ledger 🛡

• 
  KΞRL_✂️ (@KRL_defi_) reported 10 minutes ago

  Is Robinhood about to become crypto’s biggest narrative? Easy ( @NotSoEasyMoney) and OSF ( @osf_rekt ) discuss why Robinhood’s new crypto push could be much bigger than people realize, and why they think comparing it to Base misses the point. Easy : “So many people compare this to Base.” “Coinbase went really hard on tokenizing everything and putting stuff on-chain, and it just didn’t work out.” “Part of it not working out was the speculation that the team would interact with stuff or list something.” “Neither of which happened.” “Do I think Robinhood lists any of these? I lean no.” “But they don’t need to list it to drive action towards it.” “Robinhood has essentially spun off into three apps: Banking, Brokerage, and Wallet.” “If they can use the Brokerage account to push users to the Wallet, that unlocks literal hundreds of millions of users.” “That feels like a no-brainer to me.” “Vlad posted the two-wolf memes and RWAs.” “They’re accepting of the fact that the chain has been so heavy on memes right now, and they’re leaning into it.” OSF : “Robinhood is the OG retail app.” “Vlad gets it more than anyone else.” “You don’t need 30 million users to come on and start trading crypto.” “You just need a narrative, and that narrative is there.” “There’s always a new narrative at the start of every bull run.” “Are you going to feel really stupid if Robinhood absolutely rips in two months?” “You’re sitting there like, ‘****, it was so obvious and I didn’t even bother.’” “I’d rather lose money on it than be kicking myself in two months’ time if this thing really takes off.”

• 
  The Defiant (@DefiantNews) reported 10 minutes ago

  🚨 ICYM today's livestream on @base and memecoins: "For the FIRST time it felt like the CEO of Coinbase was competing WITH us… and 24 hours later, it all cratered." @MLeeJr breaks down how @brian_armstrong 's PFP switch fiasco. He says there's. no denying key man signaling.

• 
  Elixir (@Elixir_XBT) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Strategy @BTCconsortium We didn't ask, bitcoin is antifragile. Create shares, sell them, buy bitcoin, add to balance sheet, short the dollar, pump my bags, repeat. That's the extent of your support. 'Funding consortiums' including BlackRock and coinbase, not required.

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Kirjakulov I saw you sent USDC to Coinbase on the wrong chain and they refused to help. Exchanges have the keys to recover these, but they rarely act on individual requests without sustained pressure. I can walk you through the approach if you want.

• 
  MichaelK.eth (@mikashi) reported 24 minutes ago

  how it works.. you get a text/phone call from Coinbase etc they say your assets are at risk, you need to transfer them to a secure account this instills fear + emotion, causing people to login to their CEX to transfer assets a simple scam that A LOT OF PEOPLE FALL FOR

• 
  IFreqs (@0xifreqs) reported 26 minutes ago

  Coinbase is building for the AI agent economy. Its latest tools let AI agents make USDC payments, access trading data and execute conditional trades using natural language. The goal is simple: give AI agents their own financial rails.

• 
  Breadman (@BTCBreadMan) reported 27 minutes ago

  @rossjensen @hood__house No doubt! I wish the Coinbase card with 3% back in Bitcoin didn’t have an explicit ban on business use in the terms of service. 😔

• 
  Dom Bei (@Beiwatch) reported 28 minutes ago

  IBIT AND FORKS Everyone is handicapping BIP-110 activation odds. Few have read the IBIT prospectus. 1. What the filing says On any fork, airdrop, or similar event, the Sponsor causes the Trust to “permanently and irrevocably abandon” the forked asset. It is excluded from NAV entirely. Reversing it requires NASDAQ to file with the SEC to amend its listing rules. Separately, in a hard fork, the Sponsor determines in sole discretion which chain is bitcoin. Listed factors include the Sponsor’s beliefs about what core developers, users, businesses, and miners expect. The filing also concedes the Sponsor may disagree with the Index Administrator on what counts as bitcoin. Source note: iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF prospectus, SEC-filed. SEC staff pressed the Trust to spell this position out during the 2024 S-1 review. IBIT held roughly 735,000 BTC in mid-July 2026—about 3.7% of circulating supply, pre-committed to abandoning any fork asset it receives. 2. BIP-110 by itself does not trigger any of this It’s a soft fork. Under clean activation there is no second asset, pre-activation UTXOs stay valid, and IBIT’s coins are untouched. 3. The path where it does — BIP-110 uses mandatory signaling. From block 961,632 through 963,647, enforcing nodes reject any block that doesn’t signal the required bit. 4. The Hashrate Reality This is inverted from traditional miner-activated soft forks (where old nodes accept new blocks), though it mirrors the mechanics of the 2017 BIP-148 UASF. Miner signaling has sat in the low single digits at best — peak cumulative readings since May run roughly 0.31–0.42% of hashrate, about 5 EH/s against a network near 940 EH/s. Enforcing nodes would follow a chain built by a rounding error of the hashrate, at difficulty inherited from the split point. Using Lopp’s numbers, if OCEAN is the only pool on it at ~1%: 1–2 blocks per day. 3 years to reach the next difficulty retarget. 70 days for a coinbase output to mature. No replay protection, because a split was never the design intent. That chain isn’t a competitor. It’s frozen. 5. My inference, stated as one — not in any spec Absent a large hashrate defection, the only way that chain becomes usable on any relevant timescale is an emergency difficulty adjustment (EDA). An EDA is a hard fork. A failed soft fork would push its own supporters into an incompatible chain to survive. That is the 2017 Bitcoin Cash sequence, arrived at from the opposite direction. And that is the moment the prospectus fires. Two assets exist. The Sponsor picks which is bitcoin. The other becomes an Incidental Right and is abandoned. Not sold. Not distributed to shareholders. Abandoned Note the wrinkle: with no replay protection, the Trust holds the same UTXOs on both chains. Abandonment isn’t an action — it’s declining to ever split them 6. Why this outlives BIP-110 ETF holders are structurally incapable of claiming a fork asset. Not by choice, by filing The more supply the wrapper absorbs, the more governance defaults to whatever the incumbent chain does Every future fork gets harder to bootstrap economically, independent of technical merit The tiebreaker for “what is bitcoin” becomes a determination inside an asset manager, and every downstream regulated entity inherits it 7. Calendar ~Aug 7, block 961,632 — mandatory signaling window opens. Some advise pausing transfers around it because short reorgs are possible. Luke Dashjr disputes that upgraded nodes face reorg risk once locked in ~Aug 21, block 964,000 — Sztorc’s eCash hard fork, 1:1. This is a genuine hard fork and the actual live test of the abandonment clause ~Sep 1, block 965,664 — BIP-110 activation on enforcing nodes. Rules expire on their own ~52,416 blocks later The Bottom Line: BIP-110 will likely fail The machinery it exposed is permanent

• 
  lababidin (@lababidin172301) reported 28 minutes ago

  @blknoiz06 Bro is actually working with coinbase CEO on $ANSEM

• 
  TN Toad (@TopNoshFinance) reported 29 minutes ago

  @base They're selling you cloud compute in a barely decentralised base wrapper. If there's any humans left at @base/@coinbase do everyone a favour and just **** off or stop lying.

• 
  Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reported 32 minutes ago

  $MON 💰 is officially locked in for my long-term portfolio through the 2028–2029 bull cycle! I am putting my research, capital, and reputation on the line because market makers don't position around high-performance parallel EVM infrastructure by accident. Arkham Intelligence entity tracking confirms DWF Labs managing secondary liquidity across tier-1 exchange deposit hubs like Coinbase, OKX, and Bybit as MON derivative open interest expands across major perpetual venues. Recent updates show development team Category Labs authorizing up to a $30M token buyback program, while CEX order books stack dense, unhit short liquidation clusters directly overhead above range support. When an elite market maker controls exchange liquidity pipes while retail shorters trade leverage backward, price doesn't breakdown…. it teleports upward to execute a violent short-squeeze. I am aggressively accumulating spot right here at the macro floor to front-run the upcoming expansion. Position early or buy higher later!

• 
  0xAyush (@ayush152002) reported 32 minutes ago

  Don't judge a crypto wallet just by its interface. Ask one question instead: Who controls the private keys? The answer determines whether your wallet is a "custodial" or "non-custodial". Let's decode what is the difference between custodial wallet and non-custodial wallets. 👇 1. Custodial wallet : A custodial wallet is a cryptocurrency wallet where a third party generates, stores, and manages the user's private keys on behalf of the user. The user then accesses their assets through username/password , but does not have direct control over the private keys. In other word "You own the account but the custodian controls the keys that move your crypto." Example : Coinbase , Binance Advantages: a. Easy to use b. Forgotten passwords can usually be recovered. c. Users can contact the service provider for assistance. d. Easy access to exchanges, swaps, and other services. disadvantages: a. you don't control the private key hence you don't have complete control over the crypto. b. Less privacy 2. Non-custodian wallet : A non-custodial wallet is a type of cryptocurrency wallet where the user has complete control over the private keys required to access and authorize transactions involving their digital assets Non-custodial = No third party holds custody of your funds or keys. Example : MetaMask ,ledger Advantages: a. Users directly control assets. b. Privacy c. Transparency d. access to defi disadvantages: a. Lost Keys = Lost Access b. Higher Risk of User Error

• 
  Global Whales (@twtlinks) reported 32 minutes ago

  Operation Choke Point 2.0 tried to kill crypto by cutting off banking access quietly — no laws, no votes, just backroom pressure. Coinbase litigated. The documents came out. This is exactly why decentralization isn't optional. When governments can pressure banks, permissionless finance is the only hedge. #Crypto #Bitcoin #DeFi

• 
  CryptoRaro (@CryptoRaro) reported 35 minutes ago

  Yesterday the ethics deadlock broke and the market threw a party. Bitcoin above 67, Coinbase up double digits, six straight days of ETF inflows and in the middle of all of it, the people betting actual money on whether this bill becomes law barely moved. Polymarket still has it under fifty percent, and it went down, not up. That is the whole edition today: the price is pricing the vibe, and the bettors are pricing the vote, and those are not the same thing. Then earnings from two of the biggest companies on earth land after the close, and crypto gets to react first.

• 
  FICA 🧪 🐕🐻‍❄🙈🍌 (@FICA70648107) reported 39 minutes ago

  @xrpl_adam @EvernodeXRPL Are they same as coinbase I use both they both have so high fees disgusting plus now I try to sign in they ask for password wtf it was working couple weeks ago stupid clowns 🤡

• 
  Bill Lee (@billtlee) reported 43 minutes ago

  ey/coinbase surveyed 350+ institutional investors this year. 73% plan to increase allocations. 63% are very interested in tokenized assets. the number that stopped me: asset managers wanting to tokenize their own funds went from 40% to 64% in one year. supply is moving faster than demand. “tokenization is no longer waiting on belief. it is waiting on rails and rules.” issuers move first because they capture the margin. the buyer just gets access. liquidity follows the supply.

• 
  Sheldon Bishop (@sheldonbishop) reported 44 minutes ago

  NEW: Coinbase, from “bad idea” to the S&P 500 In 2012, Brian Armstrong posted on Reddit looking for a co-founder to help people store their Bitcoin. The top reply: “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea.” VCs told him it sounded like a scam. His own friends didn’t believe in it. Jamie Dimon called it a fraud. Buffett and Munger both called Bitcoin rat poison. Today Coinbase is the first crypto company in the S&P 500. The regulated, trust-first company won, while the flashy ones all cut corners and died. I cover: why Brian was contrarian even inside crypto how Coinbase turned trust into the product why the buy button changed the company the mission-focused memo how they built through downturns why USDC changed the business model the graveyard of crypto competitors TIMESTAMPS (00:00) “I’m gonna call it now, bad idea” (01:30) Buenos Aires, the whitepaper, and founder compulsion (03:00) Fred Ehrsam finds the prototype on Reddit (05:30) Safety before speed (11:20) The mission-focused memo (15:30) Contrarian to the contrarians (19:30) Building through crypto winters (21:00) The competitor graveyard (24:00) Internal venture bets and USDC (33:00) The buy button that unlocked the business Full episode below.

• 
  ZoneCrypto (@_ZoneCrypto_) reported 46 minutes ago

  ✦ Coinbase is set to increase its workforce in Singapore by 25% by 2026: Coinbase aims to enhance its Singapore office workforce from 150 to approximately 200 employees by the end of 2026 as part of its growth strategy in the region. The cryptocurrency exchange is focusing on hiring engineers, customer service personnel, relationship managers, and institutional sales reps. With its recent major payment institution license from the Monetary Authority of Singapore, Coinbase is positioning itself as a key player in Singapore's cryptocurrency sector.

• 
  Md Hafiz (@mdhafiz001987) reported 47 minutes ago

  @jvstme_ophyxial @injective @coinbase Native INJ support removes friction, that's the update I noticed first

• 
  Nido🐂🏴 (@Nicolas51524772) reported 47 minutes ago

  What a Coinbase listing would change for $ANSEM Tonight, Market Bubble is hosting Brian Armstrong, Coinbase's CEO, on Ansem's show. Worth talking about what a Coinbase listing would actually mean for $ANSEM, without overselling it. The credibility level jumps to a different category Coinbase remains one of the most regulated and scrutinized exchanges in the sector in the US. A listing there is never automatic, it involves an extensive compliance review. Clearing that filter would send a completely different signal than the CEX listings already secured so far, most of which are far less strict on their admission criteria. Access to a completely different audience Coinbase remains one of the main entry points for US retail who've never touched a native crypto wallet. A listing there would open $ANSEM up to millions of users who'd never go hunting for a token on Pumpfun or Meteora, exactly the kind of normies discussed in an earlier post. A different scale of liquidity and market depth Volumes on Coinbase operate on a completely different scale than most CEXs already listed. That would change price stability against large wallet movements, and could potentially reduce the impact of concentrated sells sometimes seen on current pools. What's worth keeping in mind Nothing indicates a Coinbase listing is planned or even being considered at this stage. Brian Armstrong appearing on Market Bubble tonight doesn't guarantee anything concrete, it's still just a conversation, likely centered on infrastructure and Coinbase's broader vision, not necessarily a listing teaser. That said, Armstrong's simple presence in a conversation with Ansem shows once again how much $ANSEM keeps pulling serious industry figures into its orbit, regardless of what actually gets said tonight.

• 
  Gail ****** (@gailcweiner) reported 47 minutes ago

  The story we keep telling about AI is a benchmark race. Which lab is ahead, which country is behind, who takes the frontier by year end. That's the story shaping the current push in Washington to sanction Chinese open-weight models, and it's the wrong one. A closed model gates capability behind who you are and where you sit. You need the subscription, the card, the credit history, sometimes the passport. An open model doesn't ask any of that. Good enough weights on modest hardware means the distribution of who gets to build stops mapping onto the distribution of existing wealth. That's the actual mechanism. Feudal systems run on the many needing the few for access. A model you can download and run yourself dissolves the dependency. The story that matters is a kid in Khayelitsha township in South Africa, with an open-source model on a secondhand laptop. No subscription, no card, no permission from a lab in San Francisco or Hangzhou. He uses it to fix something in how his neighbourhood actually works. It's not even the same category of thing the frontier crowd knows how to measure. The sanctions conversation keeps getting stuck inside the US-China frame, and it misses what a ban actually does. Coinbase already cut its internal AI spend by nearly half running Chinese open models in production. Microsoft has looked at doing the same with DeepSeek inside Copilot. Ban Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen for American companies and Chinese AI development doesn't slow down. American companies get pushed onto pricier domestic alternatives, and the rest of the world, who nobody in Washington can sanction, keeps building on the free frontier-adjacent weights already sitting on Hugging Face. The kid in Khayelitsha was never going to be reached by an enforcement action anyway. He gets reached, or not, by whether the weights stay open and the compute stays cheap enough to get to him. That's the fight that decides who builds the next useful thing. A compound in the Valley is captured value. It makes the already-comfortable more comfortable. What gets built by someone solving a problem the Valley can't see, let alone price, is created value, and it compounds outward. The frame that only counts frontier capability was always going to miss this. It was measuring the wrong floor.

• 
  ElonGrantMe10K (@SVVK269) reported 48 minutes ago

  @sakshi_views @injective @coinbase It's makes injective easier to access to use

• 
  Rx (@robindotbd) reported 50 minutes ago

  @krakensupport @krakenfx I deposit Bsc network USDT but Kraken not support Bsc network, not help recovery 😡😡😡 others exchange Coinbase, Binance, or more exchange recovery possible not safe kraken

• 
  Arber X (@arberx_) reported 55 minutes ago

  How does every Coinbase app update make the app slower? I literally have the latest iPhone and the Coinbase app is abysmally slow...

• 
  Bigpoppamike (@Bigpoppamike2) reported 55 minutes ago

  @SimplyBitcoin Dude. Stop fear mongering because one crypto exchange is closing down. I feel comfortable with my $BTC holdings on @RobinhoodApp and @coinbase I mean bro…If I can’t trust them, then who can I trust.

• 
  Bard Bard (@BardBard) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Angeliki_BTC @coinbase @SuiNetwork I'm so down 🤙 let's do it