Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Transactions (40%)
• Website (20%)
• Login (20%)
• Withdrawals (20%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Withdrawals	29 days ago
Le Taillan-Médoc	Transactions	1 month ago
Leipzig	Transactions	2 months ago
Maquoketa	Website	2 months ago
West Liberty	Login	3 months ago
Houston	Mobile App	3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sleepy Hollow Crypto (@bsimons3494) reported 36 seconds ago

  @brt2412 @coinbase No futures no etf no service. Good riddance to the Israeli coin

• 
  Kaspa Calls (@KaspaCalls) reported 2 minutes ago

  Kaspa community, follow my train of thought: * Gemini suddenly mentions Kaspa out of nowhere after years. * Gemini is owned by the Winklevoss Twins. * The Winklevoss Twins are the reason why ZEC pumped into the Top 10 out of nowhere after years, after the company "Cypherpunk Technologys" announced a major investment in ZEC. They hold 2% of the supply and 18% of the ZEC hashrate. * Sompolinsky and the ZEC core devs know each other very well. In January 2026, it was even reported that Sompolinsky met with the ZEC team. * Wallet 1 hasn't bought anything since the Gemini post. * The Winklevoss Twins have an investment company called "Cytherpunk". Besides ZEC, there is actually no project that is more "Cypherpunk" than Kaspa. Kaspa would fit in perfectly there. Also Bitgo is integrating Kaspa. This is infrastructure which is needed for such companies to hold and use Kaspa. * Coinbase enabled Kaspa perps without ever having listed spot. The Coinbase CEO and the Winklevoss Twins know each other very well. It could be possible that perps get deactivated if Coinbase expects a strong move for Kaspa (up or down). In my opinion, the theory that Wallet 1 belongs to the Winklevoss Twins is the most realistic one I've heard so far (more so than market makers or some random funds). Additionally, I'm suddenly seeing X accounts interacting with KAS that have never interacted with KAS before. That's exactly how it started with ZEC, too. This is just my theory, but something is happening with Kaspa in the background right now.

• 
  Master3.0 🧡 $DOG 💜 @KrakenFX (@master3_0) reported 2 minutes ago

  @coinbase If you listed solana:dog1viwbb2vWDpER5FrJ4YFG6gq6XuyFohUe9TXN65u, more people would have access to trade a fair token that isn't a pump and dump

• 
  David@seeASX (@DavidseeASX) reported 6 minutes ago

  Tokens on #Coinbase are not found and as this company has no customer service no answer Regulatory agency missed this company

• 
  brand new durango (@DrangoNew) reported 7 minutes ago

  @coinbase Nah fr that **** ****** flew😭 should’ve bought in at 58k

• 
  theKOLLAB 🤝 (@theKOLLAB_io) reported 8 minutes ago

  @coinbase just brought Hyperliquid perpetual futures into its Base App, and hyperliquid:native is surging on the news. Eligible users now get access to more than 290 markets with leverage up to 50x, executed through Hyperliquid but housed inside the Base App interface. Coinbase called it a direct response to demand, noting perps already make up roughly 75% of all crypto trading volume on the app. The product is restricted in the US, UK, Canada, and other jurisdictions limiting leveraged crypto derivatives. HYPE jumped roughly 23% in 24 hours to around $72, a two-month high, within reach of its all-time high near $73.72.

• 
  Aether (@nassive1996) reported 10 minutes ago

  @coinbase This guys dumped crypto so much,buy you support this ****

• 
  Conviction (@drakeisaW) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Han_Akamatsu There’s your problem “Coinbase ceo”

• 
  Renee (@ReneeMichell007) reported 20 minutes ago

  @coinbase @X @Bitcoin All over $13 mistake by Coinbase I can’t get into my own account, What I have in there is nothing compared to what people make in a year but enough to get me out of this living situation. So wrong, your bot support was bad, the human support amazing with me hysterical crying

• 
  Françoise SARROUY (@misslolo80) reported 24 minutes ago

  @beeksvybe We’re sorry you’re dealing with this. We’re not seeing a current widespread Coinbase outage, so please update the app, force-close and reopen it, then sign back in. If your portfolio is still missing, DM us so we can investigate.

• 
  xto (@wanderinmarkets) reported 24 minutes ago

  @cobie Are you hiring people to fix coinbase product offering?

• 
  Polymarket Alpha (@Polymarketalpha) reported 25 minutes ago

  Bitcoin has broken above $74,000 and touched $75,000 on Coinbase. At collection time, Coinbase spot was about $74,747; BTC-USD's 24-hour range was $68,853.22 to $75,000, about 7.3% above the period open. UTC daily candles put the 08/17 low at $62,679.42, making the four-day rebound to today's high about 19.7%; this is the first $75,000 touch since 05/27. Independent X echoes spread quickly, but price, volume and discussion heat confirm stronger momentum, not one message as the single driver. $75,000 is now the new verification line; one touch extends the rebound but does not show the level has turned into support.

• 
  Ball-Knower, Esq., Ph.D 🏈🏀 (@AUHeismanTrust) reported 26 minutes ago

  @DavidLat @coinbase @mollyisonchain Tell her to stop offering sports gambling on her stupid ******* platform and there won’t be any issue

• 
  🌹🌑LaloHdz☀️🪶 (@LaloHdzETH) reported 26 minutes ago

  @coinbureau @coinbase They are just market players sitting on benches discussing what bullshit they can release to make money off the American people. Sounds about right. How are they more intelligent than a majority of us? Their ages don’t help either

• 
  Guillaume1776 (@GuillaumeH1776) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase What about trying to trade on PulseChain??? Can we get some support please?

• 
  Metaplanero (@metaplanero) reported 29 minutes ago

  How Metaplanet cloned its capital engine onto Nasdaq On August 18, 2026, Metaplanet did something more structural than "buying more Bitcoin" Through its Florida subsidiary, Metaplanet Holdings, Inc., it took control of Nasdaq-listed Super League Enterprise (SLE) and converted it into Superplanet, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUPA), a U.S.-domiciled, dollar-native Bitcoin treasury vehicle Read the SEC filings closely; the subscription agreement , and the preliminary proxy, and a clear picture emerges... This isn't a diversification play. It's Metaplanet cloning its own capital machine into a second, deeper market, and routing the value straight back to the Tokyo-listed parent The deal, precisely Metaplanet contributes 2,100 BTC in-kind (~$132M at the Coinbase close on Aug 14) plus $2.5M in cash and that cash is earmarked to pay Super League's own transaction expenses. In exchange it receives: - 44,859,400 common shares at $3.00, roughly 95.7% of Superplanet - 100 shares of Strategic Alliance convertible preferred carrying board-designation and voting rights - Four 10-year warrants for up to 381,000,000 additional shares, struck from $3.00 to $33.50 - A 24-month right to subscribe up to $210,000,000 of non-convertible junior "liquidity support" preferred at $100/share, capital Metaplanet can call at will Metaplanet's entire stake is locked up for five years. Fully diluted, assuming all warrants exercise and the preferred converts, Metaplanet would own ~99.5% of the company. The existing Super League float going into the vote is only ~2.0 million shares. This is a nanocap being absorbed almost whole The tell is in the background: Evo Fund The most revealing part of the proxy is how the deal was born. Super League and Metaplanet didn't find each other, Evo Fund built the bridge. Evo's founder, Michael Lerch, introduced Super League's CEO to Simon Gerovich, and Metaplanet's Head of Bitcoin Strategy, Dylan LeClair, ran the term-sheet negotiations. Metaplanet's counsel was Skadden Why does Evo matter? Because Evo has backed Metaplanet in Tokyo since 2022 (back when it was Red Planet Japan), and holds moving-strike warrants for up to ~304.7 million Metaplanet shares, the very instrument behind Metaplanet's aggressive Japanese capital raising. In this deal, Evo receives moving-strike warrants in Super League too. In other words, Metaplanet is exporting its exact Tokyo playbook, the Evo-powered moving-strike-warrant capital engine, onto Nasdaq. Same fuel, same operator, new market Superplanet isn't a new strategy; it's a replica of the machine that already works Conviction: 335 BTC became 2,100 BTC The proxy also shows how fast Metaplanet's ambition scaled. The first term sheet (May 21) proposed just 335 BTC, a dual-class voting structure, and $3.35 per share. Within two weeks it was rewritten to 2,100 BTC, a 6.3x increase, the dual-class structure was dropped in favor of straight 95.7% economic control plus a voting preferred, and the price settled at $3.00 The reason management and LeClair discussed for the larger size was explicit: a Bitcoin position big enough to give the vehicle access to U.S. fixed-income capital markets. The BTC isn't the point, it's the collateral that unlocks the dollar-preferred funding machine The corporate structure, why Tokyo captures it The chain is deliberate Metaplanet, Inc. (Japan, TSE: 3350) -> Metaplanet Holdings, Inc. (Florida) -> Superplanet, Inc. (Nasdaq: SUPA) Because the Japanese parent controls ~95.7% and the board, Superplanet becomes a consolidated subsidiary That single fact is the thesis The 2,100 BTC never leave Metaplanet's world, they move onto the consolidated balance sheet Metaplanet still reports them; it now just reports them inside a vehicle that can do what a Japanese-listed company cannot Why it accrues to the Japanese stock (3350) 1. A second capital engine on the world's deepest market. In Tokyo, Metaplanet cannot issue USD-denominated perpetual preferred. Nasdaq can. Superplanet unlocks permanent dollar-denominated instruments, perpetual preferred, the $210M junior line, 381M warrant shares, to buy Bitcoin. One strategy, compounding through two of the deepest capital pools on earth 2. Capital-light, control-heavy. Metaplanet funded this with roughly 4.9% of its ~43,000 BTC and effectively zero net cash. For a ~5% BTC contribution it consolidated a controlled Nasdaq listing. Minimal cost basis, enormous strategic surface area 3. mNAV arbitrage across two venues. The treasury flywheel runs on issuing equity above net asset value and buying more BTC per share. With two listings, Metaplanet can raise wherever the premium is richer, Tokyo or New York, and route it to accretive accumulation 4. Upside that flows upward. The 381M warrants struck up to $33.50 are a leveraged, long-dated call on Superplanet, and because the parent consolidates it, that upside lands in 3350's intrinsic value. The five-year lockup signals permanence, not a flip 5. The dilution is on the right side. Fully diluted, minority Super League holders shrink to ~0.5%. That dilution isn't a bug, it's the design, and it accrues to Metaplanet. Owning the parent means owning the side that dilutes; owning SUPA as a minority means being the diluted The risks, stated plainly This is not closed. It hinges on Super League's shareholder vote (the Share Issuance Proposal, on which every other proposal is conditioned) and customary conditions. Notably, the Super League board did not obtain a third-party fairness opinion, the process was led by management and intermediated heavily by Evo, not run as a competitive auction. The whole flywheel also only accelerates if SUPA trades at a premium to its Bitcoin NAV; a persistent discount stalls the machine. And a holdco discount could mean the market doesn't fully credit 3350 for a premium that lives in SUPA Bottom line Metaplanet didn't spend cash, it spent structure It turned ~4.9% of its Bitcoin into control of a second, dollar-native, Nasdaq-listed engine, one powered by the same Evo moving-strike-warrant machine that fuels it in Tokyo, sized deliberately to unlock U.S. fixed-income capital, and consolidated straight back onto 3350's balance sheet with 381M warrants and a $210M preferred line it can pull at will For holders of the Japanese stock, Superplanet isn't a spin-out. It's a second heart pumping the same Bitcoin bloodstream, across two continents, on Metaplanet's terms

• 
  savior of the world (@elonfartbutt) reported 29 minutes ago

  @coinbase @0xNairolf help cna you post memes so I can coin it

• 
  Kepler (@KeplerOnchain) reported 31 minutes ago

  @coinbase dont blink again. it will go back down. that the deal

• 
  🌹🌑LaloHdz☀️🪶 (@LaloHdzETH) reported 34 minutes ago

  @coinbureau @coinbase Feds tweeting everywhere. Like I said, not hard to see who is working with the American Government

• 
  XRP | XDC | HBAR 🌙 🚀 (@xrpgambyt21) reported 37 minutes ago

  When did Coinbase become a useless exchange? I’ve been KYC’d multiple times, transactions keep getting declined, bank isn’t declining … a week and no updates from Coinbase. Don’t have this issue with other CEX.

• 
  Riz (@Riz02615402) reported 40 minutes ago

  **** @coinbase and their gay base they want to protect. thank God no more #kaspa futures whee they can suppress and manipulate the price. if people bought spot only would be far better off

• 
  hΞΛdroom (@headroomcapital) reported 41 minutes ago

  The Land Beneath the Compute Economy A thought experiment on what $NOCK could become. I hold the token, undisclosed size. Not advice, not an offering, nothing here is being launched or sold. Nockchain wants to become a market for verifiable computation. Miners already produce zero-knowledge proofs instead of hashes, and the endgame turns that mining into open compute markets where customers pay for proofs and AI work. The first half of that endgame is already running. Logos, the first of two planned upgrades, activated at block 114,300 in late July: it added AI matrix multiplication as a second mining lane, so work done for a paying inference customer doubles as a mining attempt. Weeks in, the chain is past block 130,000, roughly one block in three comes from the AI lane, and AI work rate is above 100 PetaMAC/s and climbing. Permissionless market registration follows in the first half of next year. And the protocol's founder, Logan Allen, announced he's going full-time on National Compute, a company building the first of these markets, a decentralized inference service on consumer GPUs. The timing is not random. On October 5, pending regulatory review, CME lists the first compute futures: contracts on H100 and B200 rental costs, priced off Silicon Data's indexes, with the CFTC preparing a public comment round. Computation is becoming a listed commodity with a public price, the way oil and wheat have one. Every commodity market ever built rests on two layers underneath the price: a way to verify what was delivered, and a resource that participation runs on. Nockchain is a bet on the first. The usual question is whether demand shows up. This piece asks a different one: what is $NOCK in that economy, the second layer? Today the answer is thin. $NOCK pays transaction fees and nothing else. Customers in the planned markets would even pay miners off-chain, in whatever currency they like. A token that only buys blockspace stays a ticket, and tickets get sold the moment they're used. But the design contains the seed of something better. When registration opens next year, founding a compute market means locking 4,000,000 $NOCK under the current design. No yield, no slashing, fully recoverable when you close the market. That lock quietly changes what the token is. In an economy of many markets, $NOCK is the license, the land under the factory. You don't spend it to participate. You have to hold it. Follow that thread and a full resource economy falls out. Renting the license. Four million $NOCK is a serious barrier, and it's priced in the very asset that appreciates if the thesis works. So most market founders won't own their lock. They'll rent it. Holders lease $NOCK into a registration lock for a fixed rent; the founder runs the market and keeps the 20% of block rewards that flows to whoever registered it. The lock can't be slashed and comes back on deregistration, so the lender's risk is price, not loss. That's a credit market where the collateral secures nothing and enables everything. Compute demand converts directly into borrowing demand for $NOCK. Where the lendable supply comes from. Miners are the only source of new $NOCK, and selling to cover costs is the default. Nock Silos are the fix: mining operations run by software whose wallet enforces one rule in sealed hardware. Sell what the bills require, lock the rest in timelocked notes anyone can verify on-chain. A silo like that can't dump, not as a promise but as a property of its runtime. Its store isn't dead weight either. It's exactly the idle $NOCK the rental market wants, earning rent from market founders while staying locked. The silo becomes a lender. Holding becomes a business. Everything runs on $NOCK. Pools that gather community capital to fund a lock: shares in $NOCK. Rent from founders to lenders: paid in $NOCK. The founder's reward stream: 20% of coinbase, in $NOCK. No second token anywhere, which is the lesson from Bittensor's subnet casino. Customers still pay for compute in dollars, and they should. The dollars flow over the top while the resource sits locked underneath, the way the world's dollar economy runs on top of land, licenses, and collateral nobody spends. The loop, if it closes: compute demand creates markets, markets need locks, locks are rented from silos, silos earn yield, so miners store instead of selling, float shrinks while security grows, and the appreciating lock pushes the next founder to rent as well. Every step denominates in $NOCK and none of it requires the customer to touch the token. What has to be true. The registration fork has to follow Logos; that's most of a year of engineering. And the AI lane's petaMACs have to start meaning customers: the latest blocks carry zero transactions, and self-submitted matmuls count as mining, so nothing on the dashboard yet distinguishes paid work from make-work. Mining margins have to leave a surplus worth hoarding, which one rented GPU and a week of published numbers can test. And the protocol has to make sure an empty market can't farm block rewards, or pools will chase free yield instead of real work; with the AI lane live, that calibration is being answered in production right now. One clean fix exists: tie any demand bonus to burned fees at a ratio below one, so faking a customer costs more than it returns and real demand becomes visible on-chain at the same time. None of the resource layer exists yet. That's the point of writing it down now, while the registration design is still wet, while the first market's founder is building, and while TradFi is building the price layer of the compute economy in public. $NOCK as a ticket is a bear case with extra steps. $NOCK as the land, the license, and the collateral of a compute economy is a different asset entirely, and the distance between the two is a handful of design decisions that haven't been made yet. Only proofs enter the record. Image: Superstudio, Supersurface (Life: The Encampment), 1972. Life on top; the grid supplies everything from underneath.

• 
  h0xil.ethard (@EVMavericks1306) reported 42 minutes ago

  @0xcyp @NTmoney yeah Coinbase is BTC-aligned, **** them not touching Base anymore

• 
  Bradley S. (@BradleyRawkStar) reported 47 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong **** I would’ve loved to do that ! Let’s go @coinbase !

• 
  CryptoRob (@CryptoRob35) reported 50 minutes ago

  okay so Coinbase just published their agent transaction data and the number that nobody's talking about is this: 76% of all AI agent transactions are underwater on traditional card rails before a single cent of margin Visa's minimum fee: $0.30. Average agent transaction: $0.31-$0.48. the math doesn't work. it was never going to work. and the biggest names in payments are only now figuring out what we figured out years ago yellow network was built for this exact problem. not pivoted into it. built for it.

• 
  buy (@james_buy) reported 53 minutes ago

  @coinbase airdrop me 6 figure of the $base or **** ******** up bhenchods

• 
  Hellcat (@hellcat6900) reported 54 minutes ago

  @coinbase **** off u suck

• 
  Rahul K (@iamrahulinc) reported 56 minutes ago

  🚨𝗦𝗨𝗡 𝗨𝗡𝗟𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗛𝗘𝗦 𝗕𝗘𝗔𝗦𝗧 𝗠𝗢𝗗𝗘 𝗢𝗡 𝗘𝗫𝗖𝗛𝗔𝗡𝗚𝗘𝗦! Justin Sun is targeting Coinbase, Binance and Hyperliquid’s AML filters, sending tiny USDT dust from HTX to anyone who used those platforms. HTX has been sanctioned in the EU and UK since May 26, prompting Coinbase to freeze accounts that received funds from it unless users prove they aren’t linked to a blacklisted entity. Binance announced on Aug 23 it will block deposits and withdrawals involving 11 platforms, including HTX, signaling a direct retaliation. Sun’s move pressures the two exchanges and EU regulators to either recognize HTX as a legitimate business or face a wave of angry users. $BTC

• 
  The Web3_Grinder | Buy stocks on WEEX (@JonisAvohou) reported 56 minutes ago

  @coinbase Want to communicate privately? Use @liberdus . No phone number. No email. No central server. You get where this is going 👀

• 
  Kitsune (@kitsunedevs) reported 59 minutes ago

  @seelawrie @bankrbot the problem is $bnkr doesn't have the liquidity or regulatory standing to actually fill those trades the way coinbase does