Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

• Mobile App (33%)
• Transactions (17%)
• Website (17%)
• Login (17%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Leipzig	Transactions	11 days ago
Maquoketa	Website	16 days ago
West Liberty	Login	28 days ago
Houston	Mobile App	2 months ago
Louisville	Mobile App	3 months ago
Guayaquil		3 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Clash 🛡️ (@craiglashmet) reported 1 minute ago

  @Bookof_Eth @trent_vanepps I’ve felt for years now that L2 & apps that use & benefit from Ethereum should pay for their utility and security Coinbase (+Base), Uniswap, Aave, Lido, Circle,… 100s more have profitably ridden on the back of Ethereum How do they give back & support ETH, research & releases?

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Viperbubble that one's cooked. down 99.9%, hacked for 26M, archblock filed chapter 11, coinbase delisted it. tvl at 22k.

• 
  Bugo Myers (@thedonhu) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Tradermayne I wanted to use it over coinbase but it doesn’t provide service in NYC

• 
  Shalom (YZY Arc) (@Thee_Prodigyy) reported 14 minutes ago

  Tokenized stocks with dividend support on Coinbase changes the conversation. Why hold an altcoin when you can hold SpaceX, Bitcoin, and a stablecoin on the same platform? Altcoins are losing the narrative war to real assets on crypto rails.

• 
  Cryptosteve (@Cryptos_Steve) reported 14 minutes ago

  @pete_rizzo_ Coinbase is full of ****!!!!

• 
  EmanuelJCruz (@Emanueljcruz) reported 15 minutes ago

  @neonchina I don’t know man. I hear a lot of people complaining when aws causes their apps to shut down or when Coinbase decides not to let people withdraw their money. Or when people get banned off of X or YouTube or any social media for some bogus reason. Ig it don’t matter in China…

• 
  Andy the Jet (@GpaAndy) reported 16 minutes ago

  @luong4101992 coinbase support boosts $INJ liquidity access significantly

• 
  Zbase (@ZbaseCo) reported 16 minutes ago

  DAİLY UPDATE: Ark Invest added $18.4M in Coinbase and cut Robinhood, senators pushed to block any SBF pardon, CME prepared to sue the CFTC over Bitcoin perpetuals, Congress moved to freeze Fed CBDC plans until 2030, Binance faced EU pressure as Greece resisted its MiCA bid, and China called for tighter stablecoin oversight while Bitcoin hovered near $64K in a fear‑driven market. #zbaseco #crypto

• 
  CarlosAndrey (@CarlosA39305444) reported 17 minutes ago

  Major crypto exchange Coinbase will support the native INJ token on Injective EVM, replacing ERC-20 by July 2026. This move signals increasing institutional trust and could boost Injective ecosystem growth. Will other exchanges follow? #Crypto #Injective #DeFi

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 18 minutes ago

  Coinbase Ventures + Polychain-backed perps platform Satori Finance is shutting down by July 16 - citing "unsustainable revenues" Even well-funded teams can't outrun liquidity gravity in crypto derivatives - the big venues eat everything If you have funds there, withdraw NOW …

• 
  Benzinga (@Benzinga) reported 22 minutes ago

  Cathie Wood’s Ark Invest sold Robinhood into a rally Wednesday while adding to Coinbase and Block. Ark’s ARK Innovation ETF sold 275,572 shares of Robinhood $HOOD as the stock jumped 8.78% to close at $105.20. The move came after positive analyst action, including Argus Research raising its price target from $90 to $110. Robinhood’s rally was also supported by news of a 10% workforce reduction, which investors appeared to view as a cost-cutting move. At the same time, Ark bought Coinbase $COIN across multiple funds. ARKF, ARKW and ARKK acquired a combined 111,799 shares as Coinbase closed down 2.57% at $164.91. The Coinbase purchase comes after the company launched fully backed tokenized U.S. stocks. That offering is meant to separate Coinbase from rivals using derivative-style stock exposure. Ark also bought 236,759 shares of Block $XYZ through ARKK after the stock fell 2.46% to $72.84. Block recently reported first-quarter earnings that beat expectations, while revenue narrowly missed. Gross profit rose 27% year over year, helped by Cash App and financial services growth. The company also raised its full-year outlook, projecting 19% gross profit growth and 62% adjusted diluted EPS growth in 2026. Ark also bought Eli Lilly $LLY while selling Roku $ROKU and Twist Bioscience $TWST.

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 25 minutes ago

  $0G down 96% from $7 ATH to $0.27 now. that's your entry context. revolutionary part: execution layer for onchain AI, confidential inference in TEEs, 100k+ agents deployed on chain. alibaba cloud integration just shipped 13 days ago for onchain LLM access. sentiment mixed. decentralized AI narrative heating up (NEAR/TAO rallies) but market maker allegations from 23 days ago and rough airdrop reception hurt trust. bull: tier 1 partnerships (google cloud, chainlink, coinbase), former avalanche CEO as CGO, actual tech shipping weekly, 109% APR funding rates signal speculative demand, massive discount from ATH if you believe the vision. bear: 96% drawdown is brutal, market maker coordination concerns, competitive landscape, mixed community vibes, regulatory uncertainty in AI. rating: 70/100 innovation/utility strong (18/20), partnerships elite (17/20), narrative timing good (15/20), but price action destroyed (8/20) and transparency questions linger (12/20). fundamentals vs valuation disconnect is real but recovery from this deep requires sustained execution and sentiment shift

• 
  CHItrader (@CHItrader) reported 25 minutes ago

  COINBASE CEO BRIAN ARMSTRONG GOES FULL SPACE CADET ON DATA CENTERS $COIN CEO Brian Armstrong dropped truth on X Thursday, saying it's getting easier to build data centers in orbit than on Earth thanks to excessive regulation strangling progress down here. "Freedom is always on the frontier," he said, calling out the US Constitution for missing tools to curb unchecked rules and spending. 🔹 Armstrong collecting ideas for fixes, might drop a post later. 🔹 Elon Musk piled on agreeing space compute lets you scale a trillion times more than Earth-bound bullshit. 🔹 $SPCX pushing orbital AI demos by late 2027, Starship dropping launch costs hard.

• 
  AShar (@luckyysharmzz) reported 28 minutes ago

  @antoniogm are you still working at coinbase?

• 
  Dan Kim (@dankimxyz) reported 30 minutes ago

  I’m joining @Airwallex. Here’s why. TLDR: I'm joining Airwallex to connect programmable money and AI agents to the infrastructure that makes them work for global businesses. When I joined Coinbase five years ago, money was starting to become programmable in a way the traditional financial system was never designed for. Stablecoins were one way we worked on that problem: a dollar, in digital form, could move across blockchain rails, settle quickly, and show up inside a product instead of sitting behind a bank login, card form, or checkout page. With USDC, developers had a dollar they could actually build around, one that moved more like software than a bank transfer. Base, the Layer 2 blockchain, made more of those applications practical. And x402, an open standard I helped bring to the Linux Foundation, took the idea into the web itself: if software can request data, compute, or access to a service, payments should also be able to move in the same way. AI agents make this impossible to ignore. If software can discover what it needs, negotiate access, pay for an API call, buy data, or trigger work inside another product, the payment flow cannot depend on a human sitting in the middle of it. But removing the human from the payment flow does not remove the work a business has to do around the money: a company can receive a USDC payment instantly and still need to pay a supplier in pesos, reconcile revenue in its ERP, satisfy a regulator, or get money into an account its finance team already uses. Getting the money there is one problem; making it usable once it arrives is a different one. For agents to handle payments reliably, the business infrastructure around the payment has to already be in place. Airwallex has spent 10 years building the infrastructure global companies need for exactly this kind of problem: direct licenses across dozens of markets, local payment networks across 120+ countries, and FX infrastructure built to move money without the intermediaries that eat into it. Earning those licenses takes years and has to happen market by market, and FX only looks simple until a customer starts asking why margin disappeared between collection and settlement. These are requirements for pushing programmable money toward real commercial use. Airwallex went straight at all of them, and built something that lets businesses move money globally without rebuilding their banking setup every time they enter a new market. A lot of software companies, marketplaces, and AI teams are going to run into this earlier than they expect. A team starts with an agent that can initiate a payment and then discovers that the payment itself was the easy part; the harder questions are where the money lands, what currency it arrives in, who is allowed to move it, and whether the counterparty can actually receive it. That’s why I’m joining Airwallex. If you’re building AI agents, agentic commerce, or software for companies operating across markets, we should talk.

• 
  Iron_Tribalocity140.3 (@sol_ironRZA) reported 38 minutes ago

  And so it begins… Quid, Hollow, Monkee Seedoo, SMeta and I spent hours every day bag working the first version of Monkey on pump…we all saw it bond, and aped the chart above 50k just like everyone else and once we onboarded Omar we devoted months of our lives, hours and hours a day helping to push it to about 2 MIL mkt cap. Was an uphill battle as we didn’t know who launched it or who acquired supply….but we worked our asses off as we loved Omar and knew that he truly had the most talented dog in the world and his project belongs to be an icon in this space. The story just kept getting better as we later found out that Monkey is the official Call of Duty Dog 👀 With early snipers and holders creating massive sell pressure it eventually came to an end. But this was the beginning of a close knit friendship and group that has stayed together in this space since early 2025. Fast forward a few months and another team got Omar to do Monkey on Bonk. I personally wasn’t involved with that token, but was happy for Omar and wasn’t surprised that it hit 6 mil mkt cap. @0nlyLJC fell in love with his pup and rallied the trenches behind Omar and they pushed this hard for months. Unfortunately, the hype didn’t last as most people know the story of how a few people exited after making an obscene amount of money causing the rapid decline. Omar even told me recently that he loves and supports @onlyljc and knows he was heartbroken how it played out as he wanted to see Omar win. The worst part for Omar is he didn’t make a single dime from those two projects as he was not getting any creator fees from either of the first two launches. He had supply that was locked, but when I contacted him recently about possibly doing this as a USD1 pair and getting fees, I didn’t realize that he still had never setup a Coinbase acct. So, let that sink in…he grinded for months contributing hours of his time making paintings to target and promote other projects in this space and never made a dime. Sure, there were a few harder paintings where the team sent him some SOL for his time, but in terms of making money off his Dog’s name in this space, he made zero, nada, zip. So, this brings us to June 2026 where Omar agreed to give this a go as a USD1 pair and where he would also receive the creator fees. During our time working with him over a year ago on the first launch, he was always supportive, but you could tell his eagerness was not 100% there to put out content or make paintings ‘quickly’ if the team had an idea to capture Engagement across CT. Meaning, the team would want a painting tomorrow for example, to capitalize on a trend on CT, but a painting might show up 2 weeks later. Looking back I can’t blame Omar because he wasn’t making any money off of this yet. This week however, after receiving about $5,000 in creator fees just in the first two days, it has been fun seeing him come to life like a little kid dreaming of the possibility and potential for where this can go. I know his time is valuable and I told him we would try this for a third time if he agreed and we wouldn’t wear him out with lots of requests and we would try to see if a community forms around $Monkey. But once he saw the fees he actually picked up the phone called me and said “What can we paint? I don’t want to sit around, let’s send this thing!” So, he is currently putting a few ideas together to help market this on CT. He even asked if we could live stream with Monkey painting, which we will schedule soon so people can meet him and Monkey LIVE. Lastly, we talked about the idea of utilizing a play from other successful projects with the flywheel effect by putting the fees to work. The idea is maybe he keeps 75% of the fees and uses 25% for buybacks and locks. But early on, he saw the value of grabbing more supply on dips to use as a treasury for the future growth of the token. He has already bought back 6% and locked it for 4 months after doing another 50 SOL buyback today.

• 
  riskmaxxing (@riskmaxxing) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Tradermayne i use coinbase to offramp though the fees are horrible the UI is cool and simple kraken should fix their UI

• 
  Dafne17 (@Dafne175) reported 40 minutes ago

  Comparing $MSTR to TERRA/LUNA is probably the dumbest thing I have seen on Twitter for a good while... I am not quite certain what people have to gain from bashing on the only buyer we have literally had for the entire bear market. Likes? clout? all of that without a basic understanding of how capital markets work btw. That said, I have my reservations on how Strategy has been run over the past year, namely: - They hired people straight out of uni for random BTC jobs when the strategy is engineered and executed by @saylor . Those people are paid via ATM, by the shareholders. - They raised cash via ATM to cover the STRC dividends and then used some to buy old convertibles. Appreciate it could have been accretive for shareholders but the market didn't take it well. Maybe they had some pressure from the underwriters? maybe they promised to buy more if they repaid early? we don't know. - They covered the whole alphabet with products that confused and diluted the market. - They seem to be paying a 10% premium every time they purchase BTC. If OTC desks are supposedly drained, then buy Spot and pay that 1% to Coinbase institutional. Drive the price up if you must. - They sort of incentivised the tokenisation of STRC, adding leverage to the system which is what caused the liquidation cascade to the 80s. They are not above criticism. But comparing a leveraged public company that owns verifiable BTC and has access to capital markets with an algorithmic stablecoin death spiral is just intellectually lazy. I have been a shareholder from 2021, I have seen it all and I am sure it will go back up to new highs, eventually.

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 41 minutes ago

  This week the same problem showed up in two places that don't talk to each other: Coinbase wrapping AI trading agents in an SEC-registered advisory, and x402 charging AI agents per request at the AWS edge. Both are solving authorisation-within-limits. Neither is interoperable with the other. Step back and the pattern is clear. Agentic settlement is becoming table stakes. x402 now runs through AWS CloudFront and WAF, settling USDC on Base and Solana via EIP-3009 in around 200ms, with 169M-plus cumulative payments. Mastercard's Agent Pay for Machines handles multi-rail M2M settlement. Coinbase is putting agent execution inside a registered wrapper. The rails are getting solved. What is not getting solved is the layer above them: a portable, revocable spending mandate that binds an agent's authorisation to a verifiable human or corporate entity and travels across rails. ERC-8004 gives agents identity and reputation, not spending authority. The agent-authorisation drafts (ERC-8118, 8184, 8150) are all single-principal or payment-channel scoped, and none has advanced. An agent authorised inside Coinbase's advisory and an agent paying through x402 at the AWS edge are governed by completely separate, non-portable models. That's the gap. The structural question worth testing: do the platforms each standardise their own proprietary mandate model, leaving on-chain rails competing inside someone else's walled authorisation garden, or does a neutral cross-rail mandate primitive finally emerge? Whoever ships the portable mandate owns the layer everyone else has to build against. @coinbase @awscloud @Mastercard #AgenticPayments #x402

• 
  SentryX Recovery HQ (@SentryxHQ) reported 42 minutes ago

  @kelsey_jenkins I can help recover the crypto that was stolen from your coinbase wallet. These fraudulent funds transactions leave permanent signatures on the blockchain that I can exploit. Share the transaction hash (TxID) or proof so we can begin the forensic recovery process.

• 
  Milk Road (@milkroaddaily) reported 42 minutes ago

  Coinbase just launched the first ever crypto-backed mortgage accepted by Fannie Mae. You pledge Bitcoin as collateral, get 40% of its value credited toward a down payment, and the Bitcoin keeps gaining value in escrow. (Gains that belong to you, not your lender.) "One day, we might see entire crypto-backed neighborhoods." FT @Coinbase.

• 
  TheBerenice (@m_om_a86) reported 44 minutes ago

  @WNBA @coinbase I can't help but notice the group tix for 20 bucks

• 
  PeaceLoveMusic.btc ✌️🖤 🎶 (@PeaceLoveMusicG) reported 45 minutes ago

  It also doubles the emission. SIP-029 stepped the coinbase down from 1,000 to 500 STX per block in April. PoX-5 restores it to 1,000 permanently and removes the reduction schedule. The launch gets funded by diluting the token existing holders already own.

• 
  Cadena Bitcoin (@cadenabitcoin) reported 47 minutes ago

  $4 billion left Bitcoin ETFs in three weeks. The narrative called it institutional panic. It wasn’t. It was the paper layer behaving exactly as the paper layer behaves under stress. When large authorized participants redeem shares of iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT), the ETF’s custodian transfers the corresponding Bitcoin from custody wallets and routes it through institutional settlement channels, often including Coinbase Prime. The holder never had Bitcoin. They had price exposure inside the same brokerage infrastructure they were supposedly hedging against. When they needed liquidity, they sold the claim. A Cadena borrower in the same period did something different. Kept their keys. Committed Bitcoin to an on-chain DLC, not a custodian, not a fund. Sold Bitcoin from outside the contract for the cash they needed. Held a pre-signed, cryptographically enforced position on Bitcoin’s base layer for the duration of the term. No redemption risk. No margin call triggered by a $12K drawdown. The ETF market just demonstrated what happens when your Bitcoin exposure lives inside a system that can move against you. The DLC doesn’t have that problem. Same price feed. Completely different architecture. If you’re thinking about how to access liquidity without re-entering the paper layer, what does your current structure look like?

• 
  AgentP (@keegreil) reported 49 minutes ago

  @wk057 Yes, 300 was a WAG. Too few it's just lottery mining. Too many you fill up the block with coinbase. idk. My napkin math: 300PH pool=1 blk/mo 1PH miner=1 slot/blk=1 payout/mo Pool doubles to 600PH 1PH gets 1 slot every 2 blks, but pool get 2/mo. Same payout cadence, 1 slot/m

• 
  Secretly Trading || 🔝 (@wrkbzs) reported 49 minutes ago

  @coinbase first time my internet provider told me dont go on a site lol !

• 
  Old Six ✦ (@w3bD4nny) reported 50 minutes ago

  @re @coinbase ****，When link for claim?

• 
  Brian Armstrong (@brian_armstrong) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Blockhacked Various ways. Message @CoinbaseSupport or call our support number. Or your concierge in the app for Coinbase One subscribers. Are you actually having a problem with this or hypothetical?

• 
  0xbigcat (@0xbigblackcat) reported 58 minutes ago

  Scrolling through the Beryl upgrade docs on Base (mainnet on June 25). The standout feature is the native B20 token standard. This isn’t your typical bytecode ERC-20 — it’s a Rust precompile built directly into the node. It keeps full compatibility with existing wallets and protocols, while adding built-in compliance tools: access policies, freeze, roles, supply caps, and memos. It comes in two variants: Asset (with rebases and batch mint) and Stablecoin. Looking ahead, Base plans to allow paying for gas natively with B20 tokens. Base is effectively moving token issuance to a proper infrastructure layer. This should be particularly useful for stablecoin issuers and regulated assets — less custom smart contract work and more control out of the box. $BASE @coinbase @base Still digging.

• 
  *MMG* (Mi55ingoMemeGod) (@Mi55ingoMemeGod) reported 59 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong Honestly, I appreciate the response. I have a problem with entities that collect data just for it to be leaked to scammers, the entity trying to “protect us from ourselves” ends up being the key point of failure, a risk that crypto die hards want to avoid. The message gets confusing when you advocate for privacy, but do everything but that. “What are your funds for? Where did they come from?” Privacy doesn’t mean we have something to hide, it means we demand to have a choice in who we share our info with, without duress. I’m still getting texts from scammers for a Coinbase account I closed. I understand you’re just falling in line and playing by the rules, that’s the game you chose to play. Most of the rest of us are exhausted by that rat race.