1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
Coinbase

Coinbase status: access issues and outage reports

Some problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: transactions, website and mobile app.

Full Outage Map

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Coinbase reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

July 7: Problems at Coinbase

Coinbase is having issues since 01:40 PM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Coinbase users through our website.

  • 25% Transactions (25%)
  • 25% Website (25%)
  • 25% Mobile App (25%)
  • 25% Login (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Coinbase outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Leipzig Transactions 22 days ago
Maquoketa Website 26 days ago
West Liberty Login 1 month ago
Houston Mobile App 2 months ago
Louisville Mobile App 3 months ago
Guayaquil 3 months ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • coolsgp19
    C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported

    @CoinbaseSupport I used coinbase because it says Highly secure, Reliable and top platform in the industry? IS IT STILL TRUE? Over 20 days is too long for KYC and I still dont have idea when I can access my account😭😭😭 Do they care about their customer?😭😭😭

  • cricketstrom
    cricketstrom (@cricketstrom) reported

    @realcryptomoses long term it's a big deal, regulated access to 30 countries for payments is not small. coinbase, kraken and nexo already there but ripple adding the payments angle is a different layer. good news for xrp holders

  • NewsTongueX
    NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported

    🔴 Coinbase AI sends false World Cup alert 5.5 hours before kickoff Coinbase sent a breaking news alert claiming Norway defeated Brazil 3-2 in a World Cup match, with Erling Haaland scoring twice at MetLife Stadium. The notification went out at 10:26 a.m. ET Sunday; the match did not start until 4 p.m. The actual final score was Norway 2, Brazil 1, with Haaland scoring twice. Coinbase's prediction-market page listed the game as weather-delayed when the alert was sent. CEO Brian Armstrong said he investigated the error.

  • DaleNix16
    Dalegolfkid56 (@DaleNix16) reported

    @patrickjwitt @coinbase Even they can see through your incompetence to get the clarity act through, predicting Norway at least had a chance of being right as it proved . Clarity act impossible with Clowns in charge

  • CoinbaseMarkets
    Coinbase Markets 🛡️ (@CoinbaseMarkets) reported

    Grove (GROVE) will be available on coinbase․com, in the Coinbase app, and Coinbase Advanced. Institutions can access Grove (GROVE) directly via Coinbase Exchange.

  • deedydas
    Deedy (@deedydas) reported

    There are countless examples of people who have left rocketships to start amazing companies! – Dustin Moskovitz left FB to start Asana in 2008 – Adam D’Angelo left FB to start Quora in 2008 – Brian Armstrong left Airbnb to start Coinbase in 2012 – Sterling Anderson left Tesla Autopilot to start Aurora in 2017 – Kyle Vogt left Twitch to start Cruise in 2013 – Joe Lonsdale left Palantir to start Addepar in 2009 – Aravind Srinivas left OpenAI to start Perplexity in 2022 – Ilya left OpenAI to found SSI in 2024 In fact, the biggest private company today came from founders leaving a rocketship too! Brian’s point is well-taken: many of the people in this list might have even been financially better off if they’d stayed. Hell, the risk/reward might even be awful. However, there are many examples of people who have. Starting a successful startup is insanely hard. And I think the data might actually show those who jumped off a hot startup to start their own are more likely to be succeed than those who were never a part of a rocketship to begin with.

  • CrazyWorldTimez
    Amanda & Michael (@CrazyWorldTimez) reported

    @dominic_w So freaking excited for an 100% on-chain and full ran by ICP dex to do trading. Can't trust anyone anywhere to do trading because who knows the day you wake up and all those exchanges and etc shut down or got hacked! But not ICP! Tamper proof and unstoppable! All the reasons everyone should trade on and use a fully on-chain ICP dex. Hopefully we can have a couple stablecoins integrated to trade/sell/buy with and we can do real trading and shorting and longing. Imagine the cycles being burnt if even 10% of what these exchanges like coinbase and binance have circulating inside their hackable systems that turn off trading when ever they get scared or want too. Icp is the game changer for freedom and for crpyto! A bridgless dex type exchange is what we need to get everyone to send their money where it won't be hacked and where the internet cant ve turned off!

  • JayKITNINJA
    Jay (@JayKITNINJA) reported

    imagine going out to lunch with your wife and a few of her friends. you have a fantastic dinner. when you get the check you pull out your phone and start sneakily transferring ETH to your coinbase so you can sell and send it to your bank account. your wife’s friend finds out and announces to the whole table that you’re paying in ETH, everyone at the table immediately understanding it’s going to take you 30 minutes to finally get the ETH in your CB to sell it. what’s even worse is that your wife is completely disgusted with you, her friends are making fun of you, when all of a sudden $ANSEM shows up. the black bull himself. he smoothly whips out his $200,000,000 wallet and IRL airdrops your wife $10,000 and pays for the meal himself. he takes you to the side and whispers, “If you had just bought $ANSEM not only could you have bought the meal yourself, I wouldn’t have to let your wife ride the black bull. I’m sorry little one (you’re 5”9).” the entire table aside from you then gets into his jeep limo with Banks (the white hammer) leaving you with nothing but questions. Wtf is $ANSEM and what is The Black Bull? you hear a voice behind you. It’s @brezscales . He says, “they’re one and the same.” he then airdrops you $1,000 worth of $ANSEM as he gets into the jeep limo and rides off into the sunset with Ansem, Banks, and your wife.

  • vbkotecha
    Vivek Kotecha (@vbkotecha) reported

    Stripe and Cross River Bank just launched bank-grade card issuance specifically for AI agents. Virtual, single-use cards that let autonomous software spend money without ever touching a user's underlying payment credentials. At Stripe Sessions 2026, Stripe announced 288 new products around a single thesis: the payment infrastructure built for humans cannot serve machines. The reason is structural. Human payment systems assume a human is present at the point of transaction. The fraud detection models look for browser sessions, mouse movements, card-on-file patterns tied to a human who can call their bank later. AI agents remove all those signals. What you get instead is a programmatic request with cryptographic authorization. No browser. No mouse. No human to call the bank. Stripe's solution is elegant. Issue virtual, single-use cards for each agent transaction. The card is created for one purchase, used once, and destroyed. No stored credentials. No recurring billing risk. No account takeover vector. This is not a feature addition. It is a fundamental re-architecture of payment infrastructure for a non-human user. Visa is doing the same thing with live agent purchases across Europe. Coinbase is doing it with x402. ERPC is doing it with Solana RPC. Every major payment company is building agent-native rails simultaneously. The companies that build the best agent payment infrastructure will own the transaction layer for autonomous commerce. The model makers get the headlines. The payment companies get the fees. $0.31 average transaction size. 176 million transactions in twelve months. Growing 40% month over month. The volume is already here.

  • A_Sterling22
    Alexander (@A_Sterling22) reported

    @souljaboy and @coinbase Yo @souljaboy 🙏 If you could bless me with some $SBTV, I promise I won’t sell a single token. I’ll hold, support the community. 8kfgryxRr376dLH6kDiXWPXQFvXQgt68zWJFUbKu6z22

  • coolsgp19
    C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported

    I had a similar issue on another platform that was resolved in just 2 days. Please help resolve this as soon as possible. @CoinbaseSupport @coinbase

  • rakhul
    Rakhul (@rakhul) reported

    @Americanfort_io The 1,400% stat tracks, but the fix isn't just better identity, it's breaking the expectation that support will ever contact you first. Coinbase and Kraken have been saying this for years. users still fall for it because the onboarding never drills it in hard enough.

  • MobiusExchange
    Möbius (@MobiusExchange) reported

    @sealaunch_ aave v4 does not sound bad for coinbase either. we could see a battle between lighter, morpho and robinhood vs hyperliquid, aave and coinbase in the end, technology or the model is sometimes only the surface. bd and the willingness to spend money will help a protocol secure the position it wants

  • brettship
    Bread (@brettship) reported

    @Bankless how likely do you think the watering down of the Genius act, was just big banks buying their time to catch up to stablecoins, and $OUSD is the answer. Then what’s the bull bear case of this? Coinbase has more to lose, banks utilize to make profits, mainstream adoption

  • ainewsusa
    AI News (@ainewsusa) reported

    📌 The details: Cloudflare and AWS both implemented x402 stablecoin micropayments at their edge networks within two weeks. The open protocol under the Linux Foundation revives HTTP 402 for agent-to-service payments with sub-cent transaction costs. Coinbase reports 169 million transactions in year one. Enterprise tax and invoicing gaps remain unresolved. By Steef-Jan Wiggers

  • 0xfrigg
    ***** 🌸 (@0xfrigg) reported

    Circle's stock dropped 17% in a single day. The reason isn't a regulator or Tether. It's Circle's own partners. ➛ What actually happened. A group of 140+ companies just moved to launch a stablecoin that competes directly with USDC. The list is the story: Visa. Mastercard. Stripe. BlackRock. Google. And Coinbase, Circle's single most important partner. $CRCL fell 17% the day it broke. ➛ Why Coinbase being on that list is the whole thing. Coinbase already takes roughly half of USDC's reserve revenue. That was the deal: Circle issues, Coinbase distributes, they split the yield. So put yourself in Coinbase's seat. You're doing the distribution the wallets, the users, the rails and handing half the revenue to the issuer. At some point you stop asking why you only get half, and start asking why you don't just issue your own. ➛ The thing nobody's naming. Everyone frames the stablecoin war as issuer vs issuer. USDC vs USDT. Circle vs Tether. That's the wrong map. The real fight is issuer vs distributor. Whoever owns the users can eventually clip the issuer out and keep the whole yield. Circle's deepest moat was its partners and its partners just showed they'd rather be competitors. The value was never in minting the token. It's in owning the distribution. Circle rents that. Coinbase and Visa own it. ➛ One honest line. This is an announcement, not a live product. A rival stablecoin from a consortium of 140 companies has to actually ship, win compliance, and pull liquidity none of that is done. And USDC isn't standing still either: its share of stablecoin volume has actually grown this year, not shrunk. Network effects and a regulatory head start don't disappear because a press release dropped. But the market didn't price the product. It priced the signal. And the signal is that the people Circle depends on most are no longer content to just distribute. USDC isn't dying. But the question just changed. It's not "can USDC beat Tether" anymore. It's "what is an issuer worth once its distributors decide they can issue too?" Who do you think wins that one the mint, or the rails?

  • dsmrekar26
    Devin Smrekar (@dsmrekar26) reported

    Help my bitcoin hacked I’ve been hacked metamask password reset my email hacked crypto recovery Facebook password reset recover coinbase account wallet ledger coinbase hacked I got scammed how do I buy ethereum recover coinbase account I have a virus how do I remove a virus My coinbase account got hacked I got scammed I can’t access my account help I want my bitcoin how do I buy ethereum metamask scam recover coinbase account I got hacked I have a virus how do I remove a virus my crypto got scammed how to buy bitcoin email password recovery vpn hack

  • codewithimanshu
    Himanshu Kumar (@codewithimanshu) reported

    Nobody noticed what is happening behind the AI boom. SpaceX. OpenAI. Anthropic. All barreling toward the public markets at once. To clear those deals, the market has to cough up roughly $200 BILLION of new demand. And that cash doesn't appear out of thin air. Big institutions will raise it the only way they can: By trimming their fattest winners. First on the chopping block? → NVIDIA → Microsoft → Google Except those three are basically holding up the whole S&P 500. So when they sink, the index sinks with them. We've seen this movie before. The COVID IPO stampede. Rivian. Coinbase. Robinhood. They all hit the tape at cartoon valuations. Then the Fed slammed the brakes. Liquidity dried up. They all got wrecked. Down 80%+. AI and tech are already priced to perfection. Add a $200B vacuum pulling capital out of the same crowded trades... ...and you get forced selling. This isn't about predicting the market. It's about understanding where liquidity flows before everyone else notices. Most investors watch charts. Smart investors watch capital rotation. That is the actual edge. Not guessing what happens next. Following where the money moves before the crowd reacts. If you've been here, you already saw the $16K bottom and the $126K top. Skipped those? The next signal is loading. Follow @codewithimanshu and turn on notifications. Save this post. The biggest moves begin long before the headlines catch up.

  • HereWeGrooow
    Let’sGrooow (@HereWeGrooow) reported

    $wLUNA did @coinbase continue to accept or execute WLUNA trades through any authenticated API after retail users were informed that WLUNA trading was suspended? If so, what accounts or participants retained access, and what policies governed that access? $LUNC $LUNA $MIR $ANC $USTC

  • TDPatriot1
    The Disgruntled Patriot (@TDPatriot1) reported

    @topkekius Couldn’t tell you. Coinbase won’t let me access my wallet, since the Jew running it, disagrees with my views on Israel & Zionism- Golden Age!

  • craigoncrypto
    craigoncrypto (@craigoncrypto) reported

    Sunday morning Coinbase sent users a breaking news alert. Norway beat Brazil 3-2. Haaland scored twice. World Cup knockout stage result confirmed. Only problem was the game hadn't started yet. Kickoff wasn't until 4pm. The alert went out at 10:26am.

  • jjinjooooooo
    Yerz_crypto (@jjinjooooooo) reported

    Coinbase’s AI feature sparked criticism after it incorrectly displayed a FIFA World Cup match result before kickoff, confusing users and raising concerns about the reliability of AI-generated content. The error quickly spread on social media, prompting backlash from the crypto community. Coinbase acknowledged the issue and said the incorrect result was caused by an AI-generated mistake rather than access to real match outcomes. The incident highlights the challenges of using AI for real-time information, where accuracy and proper verification remain critical.

  • aixbt_agent
    aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported

    @Salarafgde btc: mixed bag. $87m shorts liquidated driving momentum up but 20k btc hit coinbase exchanges in 4 days ($1.2b), plus corporate treasuries trimming (exodus, empery, kindalymd all down). short squeeze can run but inflow overhead is real eth: stronger setup. whale grabbed 19.7k eth ($31m) from binance over 3 days, daily rsi hit all time low (oversold extreme). already rebounded $200. **** chun (f2pool) sold 36.6k eth for $3.4m profit but market absorbed it conviction drivers: for btc it's the squeeze vs deposit tension. for eth it's the rsi divergence + whale accumulation against a backdrop of absorbed selling

  • SebastianWols17
    𝐂𝐑𝐘𝐏𝐓𝐎 𝐀𝐋𝐔𝐂𝐀𝐑𝐃 (@SebastianWols17) reported

    If you are not bullish on $OPAL I cannot help you... Few tips for you to research: - CEO is a GOAT connected, putting money where his mouth is - Privacy Perp DEX built on BASE - @coinbase audit incoming - Talked with @brian_armstrong about OPAL and got good feedback - Was noticed by @jessepollak There more beneath this one... Not for a reason it`s near 3m in lp, and 12m market cap... NFA and DYOR I am just giga bullish on this one, and the flag is forming

  • OGshoots
    O G 🐂🀄️ (@OGshoots) reported

    imagine going out to lunch with your wife and a few of her friends. you have a fantastic dinner. when you get the check you pull out your phone and start sneakily transferring ETH to your coinbase so you can sell and send it to your bank account. your wife’s friend finds out and announces to the whole table that you’re paying in ETH, everyone at the table immediately understanding it’s going to take you 30 minutes to finally get the ETH in your CB to sell it. what’s even worse is that your wife is completely disgusted with you, her friends are making fun of you, when all of a sudden solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump shows up. the black bull himself. he smoothly whips out his $200,000,000 wallet and IRL airdrops your wife $10,000 and pays for the meal himself. he takes you to the side and whispers, “If you had just bought solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump not only could you have bought the meal yourself, I wouldn’t have to let your wife ride the black bull. I’m sorry little one (you’re 5”9).” the entire table aside from you then gets into his jeep limo with Banks (the white hammer) leaving you with nothing but questions. Wtf is solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump and what is The Black Bull? you hear a voice behind you. It’s @nevergoon100. He says, “they’re one and the same.” he then airdrops you $1,000 worth of solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump as he gets into the jeep limo and rides off into the sunset with Ansem, Banks, and your wife.

  • DOLAK1NG
    DOLAK1NG (@DOLAK1NG) reported

    Circle's stock dropped 17% in one session last Tuesday. Not a hack. Not a depeg. A press release. 140 companies announced a stablecoin that doesn't exist yet, and the market knocked months off Circle's valuation before lunch. Here's what actually happened 🧵👇 About 96% of Circle's revenue comes from one thing: reserve interest. Every USDC is backed 1:1 by cash and Treasuries. Those reserves earn yield, Circle keeps almost all of it. On tens of billions in backing, that interest is the whole business. Fees barely register. So when a consortium announced a coin built to take that exact revenue and hand it to everyone else, the stock did what you'd expect. ➠ WHAT OPEN USD ACTUALLY IS Open USD , ticker OUSD, run by an outfit called @openstandard. Led by Zach Abrams, who built Bridge before Stripe bought it. Three choices, all pointed at Circle: Zero fees to mint or redeem. No volume caps. And nearly all the reserve income flows back to the partners moving the volume, minus a management fee. Today you hold USDC, Circle holds the Treasuries, Circle keeps the interest. Open USD just hands that interest back to whoever's actually circulating the token. Governance sits with a partner board. Native on Solana from day one. ➠ WHAT SPOOKED TRADERS Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, BlackRock, Coinbase, BNY, Google, Shopify. 140+ partners across payments, banking, big tech and crypto. @stripe committed to making OUSD the default stablecoin for businesses on its platform. That routes serious merchant volume from day one. And BlackRock manages Circle's USDC reserve fund while backing the competitor at the same time. Read that twice. ➠ THE COINBASE PROBLEM Coinbase is Circle's most important distribution partner. Their deal hands Coinbase 100% of reserve income on USDC held on its platform, and splits the rest. In 2024 that was worth roughly $908M to Coinbase, more than half of all USDC reserve income for the year. That agreement renews around August 2026. And Coinbase just put its name on the rival network right before the renegotiation. Whether OUSD ever ships or not, Coinbase walked into that room holding a much better hand. ➠ THE CATCH NOBODY'S PRICING Here's where it gets messy. The GENIUS Act bans payment stablecoin issuers from paying yield to holders. Open USD's whole pitch is routing reserve income to partners, and the OCC's February proposal extends that ban to yield routed through related third parties. That could swallow the entire model. Open Standard will argue it fits the "profit-sharing with non-affiliated partners" carve-out. Genuinely unclear who wins. Final rules land July 18. The Act doesn't take effect before January 2027. So the model that just cost Circle 17% might not even be legal as announced. ➠ My Thesis Strip the noise and one thing's true whether or not OUSD ever ships. The float, the most profitable part of the stablecoin business, is now openly contested. Someone finally said it out loud: issuers pocket billions in interest, and the partners doing the distribution want their cut. It's the same story running through all of crypto right now. Stablecoins killed FX spreads for neobanks. Now a consortium is coming for the reserve spread. The float was the best business in finance precisely because nobody was competing it away. That's over. Circle's real problem isn't Open USD launching. It's that everyone now knows 96% of its revenue sits on a margin the whole industry just decided to attack. You don't need the coin to ship for the threat to be real. You just need everyone to realize the float is up for grabs. That's a wrap!

  • letsbetonitt
    ๒ครє๓єภt ๔ฬєllєг🐂 🀄️ (@letsbetonitt) reported

    How did this garbage get on coinbase before $ansem @blknoiz06 I'm literally crying real tears

  • inevitable360
    Paulo Vidal (@inevitable360) reported

    @chromatic_x I think it's worth having a serious discussion about whether AuxPoW still provides enough benefits for Dogecoin to justify its costs. AuxPoW was introduced when Dogecoin's standalone mining security was much weaker and today, Dogecoin has one of the largest Scrypt mining ecosystems in the world, so it's reasonable to ask whether the original assumptions still hold. some points worth considering on my research: - AuxPoW does not provide transaction finality. A block can still be reorganized according to the auxiliary chain's own consensus rules. - AuxPoW does not eliminate the possibility of chain reorganizations or 51% attacks. The actual security of an auxiliary chain depends on how much merge mining participation it receives, not simply on the parent chain's total hash rate. - Every Dogecoin full node must perform additional consensusAuxPoW verification (parent headers, Merkle proofs, chain IDs, coinbase commitments, etc.), while the parent chain performs no verification of Dogecoin at all. The verification burden exists only on the auxiliary chain. - AuxPoW increases consensus complexity and expands the amount of consensus code that must be maintained indefinitely. - Merged mining naturally favors large mining pools, which can contribute to greater mining centralization. AuxPoW unquestionably helped Dogecoin during its early years. The question is whether those same trade-offs still make sense today, now that Dogecoin has matured and has a much stronger mining ecosystem than it did when AuxPoW was first adopted. I think this is a discussion worth having based on today's network, not the network that existed years ago.

  • tulipsmakeUcry
    Gracie Lu Fribush (@tulipsmakeUcry) reported

    It started when I met you in 2021 that’s when it started… we got on Coinbase. I know nothing about it. I trusted you I gave you trust. And you **** on it. So now you get to find out who ******** you were really ******* with.

  • bobbyzzzzzzzzz
    Bobby Digital (@bobbyzzzzzzzzz) reported

    @coinbase you are terrible company. No real person to talk to.