Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  chenti (@_Chenti_) reported 32 seconds ago

  @0xcarlisle @TheCryptoNexus Coinbase has been trying to onboard more normies into a crypto-centric product versus Robinhood, who caters to normies. Robinhood has the ability to just service a DeFi mullet where no user cares what's behind the scenes.

• 
  𝑰𝒏𝒄𝒓𝒆𝒅𝒊𝒃𝒍𝒆_𝑺𝒖𝒎𝒎𝒆𝒓🪔 (@OnlyOneSummerr) reported 2 minutes ago

  Been digging into @jumperapp , the cross chain swap tool built by LI. FI, and found a couple things worth sharing before you go look it up yourself. First, if you search "Jumper token" on some trackers, you'll find a JUMPER contract that looks legit with real holders, price chart, etc. It's a copycat! the actual Jumper Exchange doesn't have an official token yet, just a points/missions campaign that might lead to one eventually, just don't get caught buying the wrong thing. Second thing, and this is the part that actually matters. LI .FI has been audited multiple times by solid firms, real names, real reputations. but then...they still got exploited for $11.6M back in July 2024. attackers found a gap in a newly deployed contract that lacked proper validation, and what makes it worse is a very similar bug caused a $600k loss back in 2022, same root issue but two years apart. To be clear, this isn't a "Jumper is a scam or bad project" post, It is firmly backed by real investors like Coinbase Ventures and Circle, and it's got real usage of product. This post is a solid reminder that "audited" isn't the same as "risk-free," especially the moment new code gets deployed. if you're using cross chain aggregators like this, it is advisable you revoke infinite approvals when you're not actively using them. Out of curiosity, should protocols be forced to re-audit every single contract update before it goes live, even small ones? or is that just not realistic given how fast this space moves?

• 
  carlosjmelgar (@carlosjmelgar) reported 3 minutes ago

  Base doesn't need a new narrative to hype. It needs to stop the bleeding and migration by reviving interesting projects that didn't get the support they deserved. Seeing some of those established projects go up and to the right in token prices and users would be an epic comeback. They could also benefit by vamping rh through the projects thay did migrate successfully. The team is too lean. They don’t use ecosystem apps, not even coinbase apps ffs. They don't have their finger on the pulse. I want to see Base win, but I want onchain to win more.

• 
  basegod4 (@base_god4) reported 3 minutes ago

  The only way I see Base becoming relevant again from a meme and culture perspective is through a much bigger structural change. It won’t be easy. Even if Brian Armstrong or Jesse came out today and gave shoutouts to a few Base memes, you’d probably see a short-lived pump before everything faded again. That strategy might have worked when there was heavy speculation around Coinbase listings, but that environment is gone. Today, a simple endorsement isn’t enough to create sustained capital inflows or long-term community engagement. The only scenario that could genuinely change the trajectory, and I’m not even sure it’s possible, would be launching a Base token. But not just any token. It would need to function almost like an index of the ecosystem, backed by the leading assets on Base, perhaps the top 20 tokens by market cap or importance. If sequencer fees and other protocol revenue were consistently used to buy back this Base token, similar to how Binance created value around BNB, those purchases would indirectly create continuous buy pressure for the underlying ecosystem. Instead of relying on hype cycles, the chain would have a structural mechanism that rewards growth in network usage. To me, that’s the only realistic path for Base to become culturally relevant again on the retail side. The institutional side is less clear. I don’t know whether institutions ultimately want a public chain because it gives them access to retail distribution, or whether they’d prefer private infrastructure for most of their transactions. That’s a separate question. But if the goal is rebuilding a thriving retail ecosystem around Base, I don’t see another solution that is as compelling as creating a token with real economic alignment between network activity and the ecosystem’s top assets.

• 
  Currycarrier (@Currycarrier1) reported 4 minutes ago

  @BoringBiz_ @coinbase Illegal ****

• 
  Cryptic Mang 🗿🧲🍿 (@Cryptic_Mang) reported 5 minutes ago

  @pix_9999 I think this is a really fair take. I use to look at Giga in a similar way, “It has a clothing brand and supplements, which is a business, this is real utility blah blah blah” but I stopped looking at it like that. Bc I think a lot of that just creates a ceiling on its potential bc of exactly what you just explained…it kind of puts it in this rwa category up against coins that are trying to be actual businesses with boards full of suits, employees and marketing budgets, revenue forecasts, margin crunching nerds. Giga is not that…nor should it be. Bc the truth is memecoins have limitless potential when compared to a traditional business bc their value is based on belief rather than traditional business metrics. I see the clothing and supplements more like a marketing flywheel, not as a business. They are largely inconsequential to the success of giga imo. I mean look at when giga ran, they didn’t have all that **** you know. I like giga bc I like the meme and what it means to me. I think it’s a timeless meme that continues to grow in social and cultural relevancy and in a lot of ways I do not seeing that slowing down anytime soon. The onchain data is really strong in terms of diamond hands and in the sense of it is a coin that is predominately owned by normies on Coinbase.

• 
  Autist Dev (@autistdev) reported 7 minutes ago

  site has coinbase funding bridge to robinhood deploy on robinhood

• 
  Vortex | BIP448 (@theonevortex) reported 17 minutes ago

  @YieldForceOne @saylor @coinbase > If the block contains data some government or institution doesn't like, they will start to reject it and the whole thing crumbles. What? Do you even understand that no single government can shut bitcoin down because it's decentralized? And no I don't shitcoin.

• 
  alphaoutcast (@MZDSidhu) reported 18 minutes ago

  B20 just went live and people are still sleeping on what the next 90 days on @base actually look like. So what's the next chapter for Base? 👀 A lot of eyes are now turning toward Base Cobalt, currently expected around September 2026. What Cobalt actually means for the chain: Major protocol upgrades complete not incremental patches. The kind of foundational work that you do before you introduce a token because you need the infrastructure to actually hold the weight of what comes after. B20 functions get improved. The new token standard that just launched gets refined based on real usage data from the weeks between now and then. Network decentralization takes another step forward. The sequencer conversation that the outage made impossible to ignore gets addressed at the architecture level. and then. The chain is ready for $BASE. Not speculating on that last part. That's the logical endpoint of everything pointing in the same direction. You don't build B20. You don't push Cobalt. You don't improve decentralization on a timeline unless you're preparing for something that requires all of those things to be in place first. The roadmap is telling the story. Base has $4B+ TVL. 235M+ wallets. One of the most active L2 ecosystems in the space. Coinbase distribution that no other chain can replicate. Cobalt is the last piece before it all comes together. September is closer than it feels. Are you positioned?

• 
  B∆nD1†0🗹 (@8L1NDS33R) reported 19 minutes ago

  The oligarchs behind it? PayPal Mafia. CIA linked VCs. Wall Street insiders. They built the custody rails. Onshored Bitcoin through Coinbase. Wrapped it all in "freedom" marketing while quietly integrating with the FBI, Secret Service, and Treasury.

• 
  kartik (@sathaxe) reported 29 minutes ago

  Betting is to fintech as short-form video is to social media. It is a parasite that will keep spreading whether you like it or not. I have no problem with people betting on Kalshi because that’s what they download the app for. But I do take issue with Robinhood, Coinbase, or eventually Chase constantly notifying us that there’s a game on right now that we can bet on. Almost nobody has morals, or loses them once the competition gets hard enough, and we all pay the price. Our attention has been hijacked for a while but now seeing it through the lens of our kids and how everything from bastards like cocomelon who purposely build destructive content to rot the next generations’ brains for dollars to streaming video platforms that - even when you turn auto play off - forcefully suggest the next thing to watch instead of just letting you go about your day. I’m now comfortable calling it evil. If you work everyday on ruining peoples lives you should cash out, touch grass, and become a productive member of society. We will forgive you if you see the light.

• 
  YieldForceOne 🛡️ (@YieldForceOne) reported 29 minutes ago

  @saylor It's the other way around. Without BIP-110, anyone can put anything on the chain and prevent acceptance by institutions. @coinbase is already hostile to $BTC. What happens when you send a block they don't like?

• 
  crunklez (@itscrunklez) reported 31 minutes ago

  Ok, so morale seems pretty dire based on the DMs I’ve received about this.. If I had to sum up a few things Base needs to fix to rebuild faith and bring users back: Culture: Base has always had a great mission on paper, but the execution has often fallen short. False promises and corporate speak have left a lot of builders disappointed, and it’s difficult to foster a positive and honest culture when the stewards of the chain aren’t leading by example. Support: Some projects have received a little support, while others aligned with Coinbase Ventures have received an immense amount. There’s nothing inherently wrong with that, but many of the projects that were chosen have either died out or been rejected by users. It would be good to see more organic projects, like Bankr and others, rise to the top and prove that bootstrapping and building onchain on Base isn’t just a dream. This has been discussed ad nauseam over the past year, so I won’t expand on it further. If you were on Base during that time, you’ll know what I mean and which projects I’m referring to. Coinbase + Base Alignment: It’s clear that a large part of Base’s success comes from Coinbase’s reputation. That’s to be expected. However, it’s also blatantly obvious that, to Coinbase, the chain is ultimately just another product. It exists to generate revenue and does not appear to be the focal point of its wider strategy, despite the “bringing the world onchain” narrative. You would think that listing tokens from successful projects within its own ecosystem would be a priority. Instead, Coinbase has repeatedly failed to do so and continues to avoid properly spotlighting the ecosystem it created, is responsible for, and should be proud of. If “bringing the world onchain” ultimately just means moving institutional liquidity and custodial assets onto Base, then it feels like we’ve lost sight of the original vision for consumer apps onchain. These are just my thoughts, and although I’m still hopeful for successful consumer apps on Base, the deafening silence, the reluctance to acknowledge shortcomings, and the lack of open dialogue with builders are becoming increasingly worrying, especially as competent competitors begin to make their move. I wish I felt differently. I want to feel differently. But right now, I haven’t been given a reason to change my overall opinion. Maybe I’ll be pleasantly surprised. It’s no longer day one, and we’ve undone a lot of the progress made over the past two years. What’s the next move?

• 
  FenixFunk (!) (@Harmchair) reported 32 minutes ago

  @badattrading_ Used Mo*npay exactly once and never again, insane fees/charges. Since then just use Coinbase -> P*antom, even though it's also ****.

• 
  Shyft (@Shyft_Finance) reported 34 minutes ago

  Weekly Crypto Signals: Tokenized finance is moving from access to scale. 🔹 Circle received final U.S. approval to launch a federally regulated trust bank, giving it direct control over the reserves backing its $73B USDC stablecoin and opening the door to institutional custody services. 🔹 BlackRock, Google, Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase and more than 140 companies are now backing Open USD, a new stablecoin network designed to share reserve earnings across participants instead of concentrating them with a single issuer. 🔹 SpaceX’s tokenized IPO drove a record $3.86B in tokenized equity trading in June, showing that private market access is quickly becoming one of crypto’s fastest-growing use cases.