Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
| Leipzig, Saxony | 1 |
| Maquoketa, IA | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Lenol🌐 (@Lenol211) reported@coinbase I traveled to tell my rich uncle about it, he welcomed me, gave me drink, he listened, he said okay when it goes up, I was like ****. Okay Sir. I left. I just want to make it and he sees it. Then he can start buying
-
UPay Official (@UPayOfficial_EN) reported@coinbase we can help you spend a good chunk of them
-
Lea Thompson (@LeaT_Design) reported@whale_alert ****** coinbase shitting out another massive bag. my **** saw this way before you
-
Simple Steve 🌌 (@SteveSimple) reported@jasonsvoboda It’s not spam. The bytes of Coinbase transactions are filled with entropy by miners to expand the search space for the random bytes that find the block. The arbitrariness of that search through randomness is required.
-
Ashli Leonardo (@dteel95) reported@johnmaley13 @coinbase Hi, Sorry for the inconvenience, Do you need help?
-
PorXedon (@euthynteriifht) reportedMarkets breathe in and out. Coinbase's slow quarter isn't a death sentence, it's just the quiet before regulation reshapes the whole board. The real story is what gets built while everyone's bored. #Coinbase Are we underestimating the calm?
-
Boney R. (@boney2r) reportedAlexis Ohanian sold Reddit for about $10,000,000 at 23, and the company is now worth billions. He and Steve Huffman went to Y Combinator in 2005 with a different idea. MyMobileMenu let people order food by text message, and Paul Graham rejected it. Graham called them back the next day and told them to build the front page of the internet instead. They had no product and no name for it. Reddit launched weeks later. They seeded it with fake accounts and posted the early content themselves so the site looked alive. Condé Nast bought it in October 2006, roughly 16 months after founding. The reported price was between $10,000,000 and $20,000,000, split between them. Ohanian has said the amount felt enormous at the time. He was 23 and had never had money. Condé Nast let the site stagnate. Huffman returned as CEO in 2015 to rebuild it. Reddit went public in March 2024 at a valuation over $6,000,000,000 and has traded far higher since. He built Initialized Capital and got in early on Coinbase and Instacart. He sold the front page of the internet before anyone had loaded it.
-
Texxas I RobinPad (@Texxas) reported@bfresh @coinbase @X only problem with X, it is prone to account hacks or account suspensions which then leave you without access to your x money.
-
Boiling Frog (@MrBoilingFrog) reported@0xDani I've been using it an my main for the past few weeks as well. For me the caviats are: -not bring able to set EUR as default currency when paying, I need to choose on the POS -not being able to onramp EURC from Coinbase -not having support for Samsung Pay Other than that all good
-
jamhodl (@jmcmathortho) reported@ToneVays Summary of Jimmy Songs BIP110 outcomes articles: Summary of the Article on BIP110 Soft Fork Outcomes The article argues that the most likely result of the proposed BIP110 soft fork is neither a clean win for its proponents nor its critics, but a messy, prolonged chain split with minority hashrate on the BIP110 chain. This creates complex, hard-to-predict economic and practical problems that neither side is fully addressing. Core Framing BIP110 is a soft fork, so BIP110 blocks remain valid under legacy rules. This means a minority BIP110 chain can potentially “wipe out” (reorg and erase) the majority chain if it ever accumulates more work. The analysis focuses on pure economic incentives (fees and hashrate switching) while stressing that real-world frictions, contracts, opinions, and institutional constraints will heavily shape outcomes. Key terms: •Wipeout: A reorg in which one chain overtakes and erases the history of the other. •URSF (User Resisted Soft Fork): Nodes that reject BIP110-signaling blocks, creating a permanent split. Timeline •Block 961,632 (~Aug 8): Mandatory signaling begins; chains can first diverge. •Block 963,648: Lock-in. •Block 965,664 (~Sept 1): BIP110 rules activate. •A ~4-week window exists after signaling starts but before rules bind, during which both chains accept the same transactions (differing only by block headers). Paul Sztorc’s eCash hard fork is scheduled around Aug 21 and would split cleanly if it occurs. Unlikely “Clean” Scenarios 1BIP110 gets ~0% hashrate → aborts with minimal disruption. 2BIP110 gets ≥50% hashrate → quickly overtakes and wipeouts the other chain. 3BIP110 side hard-forks (e.g., PoW change or replay protection) → permanent clean split. 4Widespread URSF adoption → permanent split (messier). Signaling has been low (cumulative <1%, recent days ~4%), enough to produce some BIP110 blocks but far short of majority. Hard forks and mass URSF adoption also appear unlikely soon. This leaves the messy middle ground: 0–50% hashrate on BIP110 with ongoing coexistence and wipeout risk hanging over the majority chain. Difficulty and Switching Economics The BIP110 chain inherits current difficulty. At ~4% hashrate it would produce only ~6 blocks/day, so the first difficulty retarget could take roughly a year. Fees on the minority chain will be higher due to scarce block space. The economic threshold for miners to switch depends on the price ratio of the two coins. With limited market data suggesting ratios like 5:1 to 100:1, the required fees on BIP110 (in absolute terms) become extreme as the BIP110 coin cheapens, though the effective cost in majority-chain purchasing power stays roughly constant (~300 sats/vbyte equivalent). The Dumper’s Dilemma and Feedback Loops People wanting to sell/dump BIP110 coins must pay high fees to get into the scarce BIP110 blocks. Those fees attract more hashrate, increasing wipeout risk for the very chain the dumpers are betting against. Miners who switch face a 100-block coinbase maturity delay, making hashrate sticky once committed. Exchange and Institutional Complications Exchanges face serious wipeout risk on the non-BIP110 side (withdrawals/deposits after Aug 8 could reverse). They may avoid the trade or credit only a URSF chain, potentially creating three chains. Confirmation times on the minority chain are very slow, leading to poor liquidity and divergent prices across venues. Large institutional holders (ETFs, custodians) often cannot claim or sell forked coins, so the price of BIP110 coins will be set by a small, unrepresentative group of flexible holders. Peer-to-Peer Risks and Attack Scenarios If exchanges stay away, trading moves P2P. One detailed example shows how a miner could profitably facilitate a dump and then use the proceeds (or recruited hashrate) to push a wipeout, recovering the majority-chain coins that were paid out. Such scenarios are self-reinforcing and economically rational for participants.
-
BLOCKCAST.CC NEWS (@Blockcastcc) reportedA Bitcoin miner from F2Pool produced an empty block at height 960,017 on July 29, 2026, containing only the coinbase transaction reward with zero user transactions and fees. The block was very small at 533 bytes and 2.13 weight units, earning the miner the full 3.125 BTC subsidy worth about $199,509 despite missing out on transaction fees. Empty blocks happen occasionally when miners quickly hash a blank template for speed while awaiting full transaction data from the mining pool, with no significant network disruption.
-
Our Crypto Talk (@ourcryptotalk) reportedWhile everyone argued price, these Altcoins shipped in 2026. $ONDO : FINRA cleared its broker-dealer, then launched its own execution layer $ALGO : dropped a post-quantum roadmap and hired Ripple's former XRPL lead $GEOD : listed on Coinbase and Upbit, then hit record buybacks and halving $TAO : expanded subnets and activated Conviction for real ownership signals $ICP : shipped an MCP server and went live with confidential subnets $NEAR : activated dynamic resharding and NIST-approved post-quantum signing $LINK : crossed $7B on CCIP and onboarded 50+ banks via Pangea $QNT : launched Fusion Rollup, connecting 74 networks in one layer $XPL : rolled out Plasma One, then absorbed a 1B token unlock $XLM : DTCC confirmed a Stellar connection, RWA cap already past $3B $ZEC : activated Ironwood, capping pool supply cryptographically for the first time $HYPE : RWA perps outpaced crypto volume, fee revenue funding real buybacks Seven months of building while the charts stayed sideways. Which one caught you off guard?
-
nDC4sT (@nDC4sT) reported@_gnoland @coinbase muhnigga thats asking me for a LOGIN with email and password ??
-
DRACULA (@Sang28478595) reported@coinbase stay away from crypto its all scam and rugg they just wants **** your money
-
0xRetardio (@0xRetardio) reported2022 was the year crypto lost trust. LUNA collapsed. FTX fell apart. Three Arrows Capital crumbled. Since then, the industry’s biggest challenge was surviving systemic failures. Here we are and 2026 feels tougher. The bear market has quietly shifted from crushing token prices to testing business models, balance sheets, and runway. In recent months alone: Bankruptcies / Wind Downs ➤ Movement Labs files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy ➤ Storj files for Chapter 11 bankruptcy ➤ BitMart begins winding down operations ➤ BitMEX begins winding down operations ➤ Zapper announces an orderly wind down after seven years ➤ AscendEX announces its shutdown Layoffs ➤ Bybit lays off another 30% of employees ➤ Gemini cuts roughly 30% of its workforce ➤ Coinbase eliminates approximately 700 roles ➤ BitGo reduces headcount by 15% ➤ Uphold cuts 17% of its global workforce ➤ Matter Labs trims staff while pivoting to Prividium ➤ Polygon Labs reportedly lays off 60 employees following its acquisition This isn’t just another market downturn, It’s an industry-wide stress test. The companies that emerge from this cycle won’t necessarily be those with the biggest token, the loudest community, or the highest valuation. They’ll be the ones that built products people actually use, managed capital responsibly, and can keep executing when liquidity is scarce. Every cycle resets the leaderboard.