Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dami-Defi (@DamiDefi) reported 3 minutes ago

  @eightlends @coinbase @bitget Unlikely is not always impossible though

• 
  Chris Dao 道克里斯 (@chris42dao) reported 4 minutes ago

  @ztackingzats @jessepollak Coinbase should have been shut down a long time ago. Really bad for the industry. Hopefully they get shut down before 2030 📴✅✨🙏🏼

• 
  Ian Smith (@IanSmith_HSA) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Aptos @coinbase They copied Sui, again. But that is just the wallet. Aptos planned on Quantum being 10+ years away or "impossible" back in 2025. They still need to fix consensus, data, and the inability to control the user. QDay may drain 98% or Aptos in one day, leaving no time for user tx.

• 
  dinxnd (@dinxnd_) reported 9 minutes ago

  @LongGameEquity @IncomeShares Depends on which one your are holding. Its important to diversify the products. For example coinbase is performing horrible but same as the stock (because crypto is also going down alot). AMD is completely the opposite, it did great.

• 
  CryptoChirp (@CryptoChirpX) reported 9 minutes ago

  ❌🚩Sell $BRIAN on any green candle. Nothing is coming. Brian Armstrong is staying completely silent because Coinbase lawyers clearly told him to shut ******** up. Do you think he doesn't read Twitter or that nobody tells him what's happening? Of course he sees everything. But now any word from him is a direct risk of an SEC lawsuit for market manipulation. So total silence. With $JESSE from @jessepollak the situation is a bit more alive. The token has a real known person behind it who publicly said he's not letting it fade away ("I'm in it for the long haul"). That already gives it some minimal perspective and narrative. What he can add for utility and potential pump: 🟢Staking with rewards from fees or his own activities. 🟢Governance voting for experiments. 🟢Integrations with AI agents or trading tools. 🟢Revenue share/buybacks from commissions.

• 
  zk. (@zk_lmao) reported 10 minutes ago

  @wagmiAlexander Lmao do you not see how this is precisely echoing the behaviour that people have a problem with? “These users simply do not matter bc they are statistically shrinking over time”. There’s an xkcd comic that comes to mind about trend extrapolations. I wouldn’t count on a lagged metric when users can shift away at the push of a button and break short term trends. Classic TA bro move. “Oh the sma is curling up lfgggggg” nah bro people are pissed and you’re reducing them to numbers to justify it. You all need some serious PR training jfc I’m indexing on how people (users if you don’t know what that is) respond to a publicly traded company effectively acting as though they do not matter. “We can just have ai agents trade back and forth and it’ll look good in the metrics”. Where’s the moat, that forces a race to the bottom in fee revenue, and if you’re not the fastest gg. Real users are a moat. It’s no secret that solana vol is falling, that doesn’t mean a whole lot when it was previously giga pumped with bots over meme manias. That’s hardly something you should use as justification to imply an entire group of traders is irrelevant. Not sure if you know this but over that period some people from solana did bridge to base to launch ai slop tokens and farm people on those. It was deployer who essentially brought those users, not anything base did. Do you think they will stay when they are chain agnostic and there’s now fresh competition? No, those users will go where the narrative is, and now that base has burned their longest running supporters one time too many, many of those will leave along with them. What Brian did has people actively telling others to avoid base and not use coinbase. That’s the opposite of good advertising. And it wasn’t about a shitcoin like you utility bro retards keep trying to say. It’s about the same overarching sentiment you clearly share. Utter disdain for a subset of crypto users, the natives. You are literally the principal skinner “I’m not the problem” meme. Regardless of how you think you can justify this, the problem is the attitude and how out of touch this was and coinbase/base has been. People *hate* the ivory tower douchebaggery. You can’t even let them have cake lmao. Imagine what those numbers could have been if base didn’t piss everyone off to begin with so they all left to solana. Guess what? They just did it again, for the nth time. Even with those gains while things have been slow everywhere, solana is still ahead because they have more users.

• 
  Coinjoined Chris ⚡ (@coinjoined) reported 13 minutes ago

  @nidan21_btc @saylor Yes at 1% hashrate it would take 200 instead of 2 weeks to reach a difficulty adjustment. Also since coinbase rewards have a 100 block cool down, most miners who have to pay for their electricity won't mine on a chain that doesn't pay them daily.

• 
  More Bears (@MoreBearsNFT_) reported 14 minutes ago

  the biggest validators on the "decentralized" chain are Coinbase, Binance, and Galaxy. that sentence is the entire story. proof of stake pays you for owning, not for doing. it is not a wage. it is rent. and they built it so the rent only flows to whoever already had the most. Solana lost 68% of its validators in three years. 2,560 down to under 800. "decentralization" was priced out one small node at a time.

• 
  Dan Niles (@DanielTNiles) reported 15 minutes ago

  Every great industrial revolution has had overinvestment due to the potential for riches for the last companies standing. Eventually this ends in a bust. AI I believe is no different. But I believe the current “speedbump” is not the beginning of that ultimate bust. On Saturday June 20th, I laid out my near-term concerns of an AI “speedbump” due to: 1) Token minimization 2) Competitive low cost open-sourced LLM models 3) Rising semiconductor cost impact on Q3 guidance Monday June 22nd in hindsight turned out to be the short-term top for the semiconductor index and the momentum trade. Token maximation in March turned into token minimization by June with the most extreme example being the $COIN CEO on June 26th posting how they cut their token spend by nearly 50% by largely routing AI queries to cheaper models. In the near-term, the question becomes can token usage by the other 99% of firms go up fast enough to offset the top 1% of firms like Coinbase cutting their AI bills. Numerous cheaper LLMs have been introduced recently. Last week the introduction of Moonshot’s Kimi K3 (China-based) challenged the performance of the most advanced US models. Profitable AI native revenue growth that is ROIC positive is what is needed to keep the whole ecosystem functioning. $GOOGL reporting this Wednesday will provide the first major datapoint on the trade-offs between cheaper tokens and more token production. Google Cloud Platform has seen revenue growth year-over-year accelerate from 34% in Q3:24 to 48% in Q4 and 63% in Q1:25. This growth rate should accelerate further in Q2 due to token maximization. While I expect forward Rev/EPS to move higher post results due to their core business, comments on GCP growth are likely to drive the stock reaction. While $GOOGL is my favorite consumer AI play given they have the complete AI stack, I am not sure they are immune from the leading 1% of companies trying to cut their AI bills. Uber for example that blew their entire AI budget for the year in the first four months has GCP as their primary supplier. $INTC which reports on Thursday provides multiple ways to win at the AI infrastructure layer which I am more bullish on than the increasingly commoditizing LLM model layer: 1) Agentic AI is driving a surge in demand for server CPUs which are a new bottleneck, 2) their advanced packaging has already attracted several hyper-scalers and 3) their foundry business (our national champion with an investment by the US government) continues to improve and attract new customers. As for the current AI “speedbump” in stocks, the Morgan Stanley Momentum Index (MOMO) which subtracts the Long Index from the Short Index fell 28% since June 22nd through July 16th in just 24 days with a slight reprieve of 1.6% on Friday. Historical corrections of over 10% since 1996 have averaged 20% from peak to trough but have taken 48 days on average to bottom. But the rally of the MOMO index of 40% from the March 30th stock market bottom through June 22nd was also much sharper than historical precedents. In my opinion, investing is about the risk versus reward. On June 20th, it was not good with increasing examples of token minimization. From a technical basis, MOMO is still not oversold given the RSI only reached 35 on 7/16 and on average it bottoms at 31. But the risk vs reward is more favorable today with sentiment having fallen further following: 1) the negative pre-announcement by $IBM which declined 26% last week despite prior claims of being an AI beneficiary, 2) the 3% drop in $ASML and 8% decline in $TSM last week despite positive earnings and 3) the 10% decline in both the Semiconductor Index and MOMO last week. Finally, I believe the advent of Agentic AI which arguably started on January 30th of 2026 with the formalization of OpenClaw requires 10-100x more tokens vs Chat-based AI. As a result, I believe it is prudent to start adding back some exposure in the AI related infrastructure names. But I believe this needs to be balanced with prudence at the public cloud layer given the near-term focus on AI bills needing to be controlled by the top 1% of corporations.

• 
  Yamikishi (@Yamik1shi) reported 15 minutes ago

  Stripe, Ramp and Coinbase independently built internal coding agents All three reached the same conclusion: The chat window is the wrong interface The production loop: mention a bot in Slack or Linear -> preload the full thread and repo context -> launch an isolated sandbox -> delegate to subagents -> run tests -> open a draft PR -> fix review comments Stripe's Minions reportedly use around 500 curated tools LangChain packaged the shared pattern into Open SWE and open-sourced it The agent does not wait for prompts in another app It lives inside company plumbing and returns tested code Watch and save it

• 
  JB (@KeetaForTheWin) reported 15 minutes ago

  $Brian @brian_armstrong and @jessepollak didn’t support it… Now make it the face of @coinbase !!

• 
  AIGun (@aigun_ai) reported 17 minutes ago

  1/ What happened? On July 16, Coinbase CEO @brian_armstrong changed his PFP and posted: “New profile photo, who dis?” At the time, base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 had already been launched by an anonymous community developer with no confirmed ties to Brian Armstrong, Coinbase, or Base. But once traders noticed that the token used the same image, they quickly connected the dots. Its market cap surged from $386K to $17M in just six minutes, before peaking at $33M two hours later. The hype faded just as quickly. After Brian switched his PFP to a CryptoPunk, base:0xb2000000000000000000007bf6d5cbb0e24cb301 fell to around a $1.3M market cap within 24 hours—down roughly 96% from its $33M peak.

• 
  Rune (@RuneCrypto_) reported 17 minutes ago

  whenever you think of trusting base, remember this thread jesse pollak’s coins the head of base used the official coinbase X account to promote “base is for everyone” on zora. it spiked to $17M mcap in an hour. crashed 90% to $1.9M within 20 minutes. people thought it was an official base token. jesse said it was “an experiment” and that he “personally approved the post” months later he launched his own JESSE token through the base app. called it a “creator coin, not a memecoin.” two snipers extracted $1.3M from it within seconds of launch. the token peaked at $25M and dumped. $50M in volume flowed through it and the regular users who trusted the head of base got sniped by bots while he collected LP fees he then used those LP fees to buy other creator coins on zora. so the fees generated from his community getting sniped went to propping up more creator coins that also dumped him and brian promoted tokens linked to balaji srinivasan and other figures. all crashed. one critic pointed out “the same users kept eating the downside on team-promoted tokens.” nobody at base adjusted he endorsed a soulja boy token, a person zachxbt publicly documented running 73+ token promotions, 16 NFT collections, most of them rugs or abandoned, earning $730K+ from paid crypto scams. jesse invested $1,500 and promoted it publicly. zachxbt’s report was from 2023. it was public. the head of base either didn’t bother to check or didn’t care he shared a GIF playing on “base is for everyone” that rotated through the phrases “base is for pimping” and “base is for squirting.” had to publicly apologize. the guy running a coinbase-backed chain, a publicly traded company, posting this to hundreds of thousands of followers after all of this he said base won’t “pump tokens” or “support the chart behind the scenes.” the same person who launched multiple coins that dumped on his community won’t help yours. his charts get LP fees. yours get abandoned the $BRIAN disaster brian armstrong, CEO of coinbase, $50B+ publicly traded company, changed his pfp to a $BRIAN memecoin. 10,000 people bought in. the CEO of the chain is backing it: what could go wrong? he removed the pfp 23 hours later. coin went to zero. 10,000+ people down 99% after trusting the literal CEO 1/3

• 
  uma1r (@umair_xr) reported 17 minutes ago

  I was reading all the latest updates and its clear that @Injective is not just building another blockchain anymore. Its building the infrastructure, tools and regulations needed for real onchain finance. Here are the biggest updates from this week •⁠ ⁠AI Agent SDK is now live: Developers can now install everything they need with one package instead of setting up multiple tools. It includes the Injective CLI, Agent Skills, the Documentation MCP Server and the Main MCP Server. This makes it much easier to build AI agents that can use wallets, trade and interact with Injective. •⁠ Injective joined the x402 Foundation: Injective is now a member of the x402 Foundation under the Linux Foundation alongside companies like Google, AWS, Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase and Circle. x402 is a new payment standard that lets AI agents and apps pay for services instantly over the internet. On Injective x402 payments settle in around 650ms using native USDC while INJ is used as the gas token. •⁠ Injective filed to become a registered Transfer Agent with the SEC: This is one of the biggest long term updates. Today ownership records for securities are mostly managed by traditional institutions. Injective wants to move these records fully onchain. That means tokenized stocks and other real world assets could have faster, more transparent and compliant settlement on Injective. •⁠ MiCA White Paper is now published: Injective has completed the MiCA white paper process for Europe. This helps expand Injective's presence in the EU under a regulated framework. The white paper explains how INJ works, including staking, the Community BuyBack and burn, token supply, network architecture and key risks. The interesting part is that all of this happened in just one week. Compared to many other chains worth billions of dollars, Injective is building across almost every major area while still trading at a much lower market cap. Thats why I think there's still a huge gap between what Injective has built and how the market is valuing it today. $INJ

• 
  WEB3SG (@web3sg) reported 22 minutes ago

  Kinda knew long ago that base having a leader that doesn’t give a **** at all about his community is definitely going to zero regardless of having infinite firepower from coinbase Jesse just doesn’t actually care about you at all. It’s pointless to rage at him or Brian. They are busy dumping their stock options whenever they can. People onchain are just goyim to them.