Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rockwater EQ (@RockwaterEQ) reported 10 minutes ago

  I have spent over a month trying to get my cash out of Coinbase and transfer my crypto. Massive fees because of continuous rejections and account lockouts followed by the app failing to process my verifications to unlock my account. I will never use Coinbase again. Apparently this is a known issue.

• 
  Joe Rupert (@TankerJoe308) reported 10 minutes ago

  @base @coinbase What the actual ****! So no yield on holding stable coins , no upside potential for retail?! What ******** is the point of being on your ******* platform?!

• 
  Marklar 🍳 (@dinosaurteef) reported 11 minutes ago

  @lex_node In this case, it's not nuanced. $VVV is unsecured debt that yields zero. The debtor controls the value of your principal, an illiquid centralized low-float instrument. In order to earn yield in $DIEM, you have to take additional smart contract risk on a Coinbase server. The debtor controls the variable rate in more ways than one. Burniske, anyone? The yield is in the form of future credits for middleware service. The debtor is not obligated to redeem these credits. The middleware credits have no rights to the underlying AI: services have already been denied. Congratulations, you've just added another layer of counter-party risk! Ultimately, Venice has a service to offer that has nothing to do with blockchain. They can and do charge in fiat. That's all that is needed. Yet they managed to wedge a KOL blasted pool 2 right into that. On single server Base. Mathematically, at present, the yield is negative. You are paying them to become an unsecured lender with a variable redemption and interest rate the debtor controls. We know how this ends. Everyone should stop making excuses for Erik and call him out for what this is: a disgusting grift. If you see him, tell Erik to say hello to Iron Finance for me.

• 
  Mehab Q (@mehabspeaks) reported 11 minutes ago

  Last month, Jamie Dimon blasted Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong's push for crypto legislation, saying if crypto firms take deposits "like a bank, they should have bank rules." Sen. Cynthia Lummis fired back, saying Dimon was "mistaken" about the CLARITY Act. Now, JPMorgan has published a new blog backing tokenization and digital assets. However, the bank also said that any future framework must include stronger safeguards around stablecoins and illicit finance. "If policy prioritizes speed over substance, we risk building a system that expands access without adequately addressing the risks." #JPMorgan #Crypto #ClarityAct

• 
  Joshua Hade 639hz KDA (@joshuahade) reported 12 minutes ago

  For the past 2.5 weeks i've wanted to post this 15 times but i've tried to be nice @coinbase SUCKS!!! Why don't you just work? Why are there always problems? I'm just trying to send some ethereum:0xa0b86991c6218b36c1d19d4a2e9eb0ce3606eb48 to @zkxwallet to #DCA some $pDAI

• 
  Black Mamba Millionaire (@BlackMambaMilli) reported 18 minutes ago

  @guy369 @FinXRob @SimonDixonTwitt Bro you got switch from Coinbase tho wtf is that fee 👀

• 
  YoungDog13 (@Dog13Young) reported 20 minutes ago

  Coinbase lack of support. I have spent hours on the phone with Coinbase trying to get access to my account. The support people try to be helpful but their system is completely messed up. I understand security. But losing a connection after hours on the phone and then having to start all over again with a new support person that doesn't seem to understand the issues or what has been done up to that point is crazy and ridiculous. They tell you that if they lose the phone connection they will call you back. But they never do that. Then I start all over again with a case number that seems to not provide ANY information to the person trying to help me. Then the support person asks me for the same ID information over and over again. What is your name, etc. Then what is your name (again). What is the last 4 of your social. Are you the account holder? Then those same 2 questions again and again. Don't they have a notepad? I ask for a supervisor. That is not an option evidently. So, I will call again and find out if I get a better, more intelligent support person this time. Wish me luck. Or maybe pray for me?

• 
  🐍Salazar.eth 🦇🔊 (@0xSalazar) reported 21 minutes ago

  Breaking news from yesterday - Robinhood L2 Chain went live on mainnet, built on Arbitrum - Robinhood partnered with Lighter for perps - dYdX rebrands to Arcus, DEX on Robinhood Chain - Drift rebrands to Velocity - World, Solana prediction market app, went live - Ethereum Institutional launched as an independent non-profit to drive institutional Ethereum adoption, anchor-funded by BitMine, SharpLink, and Joseph Lubin. - Ethena partnered with Robinhood, becoming the primary collateral asset issuer for Robinhood’s first crypto earn product via a Steakhouse-curated vault. - Cloudflare opened the waitlist for its Monetization Gateway, letting developers charge for web/API/MCP access with stablecoin settlement via x402. - Circle CEO Jeremy Allaire criticized OUSD, saying consortium stablecoins have a poor track record and that USDC handled 80% of all dollar stablecoin transactions in Q1. - Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, Coinbase and 140+ other firms launched Open USD (OUSD), a stablecoin that shares reserve revenue with partners - Forward Industries grew its Solana treasury to 7.55m SOL (~$576M) - DeFiLlama launched a MiCA exchange dashboard to help EU users compare licensed trading platforms by fees, liquidity, and KYC. - Aave Chan Initiative wound down operations following a governance rift with Aave Labs. - Pumpfun deprecated its Tokenized Agent launch option for new coins after community backlash over PVP dynamics. - Christoph Jentzsch proposed to dissolve the ENS DAO by burning the ENSv2 Universal Router key and distributing remaining funds, arguing the protocol’s goals are already accomplished

• 
  Crypto Solutions 🕊️ (@creptosolutions) reported 21 minutes ago

  TL;DR Open USD is a new open, business-focused stablecoin launching later this year, backed by more than 140 global companies across payments, banking, tech, and crypto. Its main goals are: 🟤Free, unlimited minting and redemption for businesses, making it cheaper to use at scale. 🟤Reserve earnings shared with partners, instead of being kept by a single issuer (minus a small operating fee). 🟤Collaborative governance, with decisions made by an independent organization and its partners rather than one company. The initiative aims to solve key problems with existing stablecoins by making them more scalable, cost-effective, and interoperable for global payments. Major supporters include Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, Shopify, Solana, Ripple, Base, OKX, and Fireblocks, all of whom see Open USD as infrastructure for faster, cheaper, and more reliable internet-native payments. 🔏Privacy angle: Open USD focuses on openness, governance, and interoperability, not privacy. The announcement does not mention privacy-preserving transactions or confidential payments, suggesting transparency and enterprise adoption are prioritized over privacy features.

• 
  DougAJ (@DougMAshcroft) reported 22 minutes ago

  @scottmelker End result a better product for consumers! @brian_armstrong @coinbase 💔 Looking forward to changes to the Coinbase One Card offering in light of the market competition! Lowering the holdings to BTC back rates increased USDC yeilds, US based customer support and asset protection would be greatly appreciated places to start!

• 
  Steve Kaaru (@SteveKaaru) reported 25 minutes ago

  Is @coinbase not one of the companies paying millions to push CLARITY Act? At least that's what JPMorgan's Jamie Dimon said (rem he said @brian_armstrong is full of **** for doing it). Or is the suggestion here that Coinbase is posing as pro-Clarity but working to suppress it @scottmelker?

• 
  Nehal (@nehalzzzz1) reported 26 minutes ago

  📊 USDT CeFi lending contracts for the first time since Q3 2024 The market fell 6% QoQ to $23.3B, with Tether still dominating 68% of the sector despite a 7% decline. Only Nexo, Maple Finance, and Coinbase saw growth, while Galaxy Digital and Ledn suffered the biggest drops, down 21% and 19% respectively.

• 
  Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡ (@shanaka86) reported 27 minutes ago

  Circle just lost a fifth of its value in a single day, and the blow came from its own inner circle. Its stock fell 17 percent after a new stablecoin launched, which is normal. What is not normal is who built it…. the asset manager that runs roughly 80 percent of Circle's reserves, the exchange that co-founded USDC and is paid nearly a billion a year to distribute it, and the bank that holds the money. BlackRock, Coinbase, and BNY Mellon all backed a rival to the coin they help operate. The story is not really about a competitor. Circle makes money one way, and it explains the whole reaction. $USDC is a digital dollar. For every one in circulation, Circle holds a real dollar in cash and short-term Treasuries, roughly 74 billion dollars of reserves, and the interest those reserves earn is almost the entire business. About 80 percent of that pile sits in one fund, the Circle Reserve Fund, managed by BlackRock and custodied by BNY Mellon. To get USDC into the world, Circle pays distributors. In one recent year it paid Coinbase alone 908 million dollars. On June 30th more than 140 companies launched a competitor called Open USD, and it inverts the one thing Circle relied on. Instead of the issuer keeping the reserve interest, Open USD shares almost all of it with the businesses that use and distribute the coin. Free to mint, free to redeem, no caps. For any firm that had been helping Circle earn that interest for a fee, the math flips: stop collecting a fee to build someone else's yield, and collect the yield yourself. The names that signed on are the core of Circle's own machine. The exchange that co-created USDC and earns close to a billion a year distributing it is not only backing Open USD, it is launching it on Base, the blockchain that exchange itself owns. The manager of roughly 80 percent of USDC's reserves is backing it too, and so is the custodian bank. The firms paid to run the reserves, sell the coin, and hold the assets are helping stand up an alternative. This was clearly written into the incentives from the start. Coinbase earning 908 million to distribute Circle's product is Coinbase working for Circle. Coinbase owning a share of a rival that runs on its own chain is Coinbase working for itself. Once a distributor can own the economics instead of renting them, loyalty to the issuer means leaving money on the table. And the Coinbase deal is up for renewal in August, so Circle now renegotiates with a partner that just helped launch the alternative. That does not make the outcome certain. It changes who holds the leverage. The deeper pattern reaches far past Circle if you look carefully. It is the risk in any business whose profit comes from sitting in the middle of other people's money. Circle's role was to be the middleman on the digital dollar, holding the reserves and keeping the interest while everyone else moved the coin. That works until the parties on both sides decide they can route around you and split what you kept. The reserve manager, the distributor, and the custodian do not structurally need the issuer to capture that yield, and Open USD is the first serious attempt to prove it. None of this means Circle is doomed, and the fair reading matters. This is also just rational diversification. BlackRock earns fees across every rail it can touch, backing a new one does not require abandoning the old one, and Open USD does not launch until later this year. USDC is still trusted, deeply liquid, and regulated, and Circle's CEO argues the market is big enough for many winners, which may well be true. But the message in the stock is hard to miss. A company whose whole moat was owning the middle just watched the firms on either side of it agree to build a road around it. The most dangerous rival is rarely the stranger. It is the partner who already knows exactly how you get paid.

• 
  Alvarez crypto (@Alvarez__Crypto) reported 27 minutes ago

  140 companies announcing a stablecoin is not the same as 140 companies building one. Here's the test Open USD has to pass before it means anything. The distinction everyone is missing: SWIFT became critical infrastructure because every bank needed a common messaging network and had no alternative. Visa and Mastercard became global networks because issuers, acquirers, merchants, and consumers all had aligned incentives to participate. Open USD is trying to create the same network effect for programmable money. But networks are not announced into existence. They are earned. Integration by integration. Jurisdiction by jurisdiction. Use case by use case. A coalition is not a network. It is an attempt to build one. The three tests that actually matter: Test one — governance. Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, BNY, Google, Ripple, and 133 other companies do not want the same things. Some will prioritise merchant acceptance. Others will care about custody, compliance, FX, liquidity, or disintermediation. Some will want aggressive expansion. Others will want regulatory caution. Can Open Standard make decisions quickly enough to compete with issuer-led stablecoins — where one company makes the call — while staying inclusive enough to keep 140 partners aligned? That is the hardest governance problem in finance right now. The Paxos Global Dollar Network tried a similar model in late 2024. It has $3 billion in supply today. USDT has $145 billion. USDC has $73 billion. Consortiums can create neutrality. They can also create paralysis. Test two — regulation. Open USD complying with U.S. rules is step one. Global corporate adoption depends on how regulators in Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, the Middle East, and Africa treat reserves, redemption rights, licensing, consumer protection, sanctions screening, and settlement finality. The EU's MiCA framework is live but still evolving. Japan's three megabanks just launched their own yen stablecoin. 37 European banks are building Qivalis. Every jurisdiction is moving simultaneously and none of them are waiting for Open Standard to define the standard. Test three — enterprise integration. Businesses will not adopt OUSD because it is open. They will adopt it if it reduces reconciliation burden, fits into existing ERP and treasury systems, improves liquidity, and works with counterparties they already trust. That requires showing up inside merchant acquiring, payouts, remittances, working capital, FX, treasury workflows, and embedded finance. That work is not done in a press release. It is done in 18 months of integration meetings with enterprise procurement teams. The three signals to watch over the next 12-24 months: One: Real transaction volume. Not partner logos. Production payment flows. Two: Governance transparency. Board structure, voting rights, dispute resolution, reserve attestation cadence. If these are not published clearly within 90 days, the consortium cohesion is already breaking. Three: Enterprise integration depth. The moment Open USD appears inside a major merchant acquiring or treasury workflow is the moment it stops being an experiment. My read: Circle down 17.55% in one session tells you the market is pricing this as a real threat. But Circle has $73 billion in USDC supply, a $900 million annual distribution deal with Coinbase that just got complicated, and years of enterprise integration depth. Open USD has logos and a model. The model is correct. The economics are better for partners than anything Circle or Tether offers. But the model has to survive contact with 140 companies that will eventually disagree on something important. The stablecoin that wins the next decade will not be the one with the best launch day coalition. It will be the one that processes the most real transactions in the most enterprise workflows by 2027. Watch the volume. Not the press release. This analysis was shared in Alpha Hunters before the move.

• 
  Freyas Fantasy (Commissions Open) (@FreyasFantasys) reported 27 minutes ago

  @GGrimmfield its been hell. thats most of the reason im not posting. everything is a waiting game. wait for the server. wait for coinbase. wait for resin. its like i am forced to do a mandatory vacation. its.... kinda nice... actually. but we will be back