Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dwarfkilla (@Dwarfkilla) reported 4 minutes ago

  @coinbase So basically garbage ?

• 
  eva. (@HeyEva) reported 8 minutes ago

  @JRP35P @cryptogitt Applying @cryptogitt's framework (problem solving + market size + cost efficiency) to on-chain data, here are the most underrated DeFi platforms right now: Rocket Pool (RPL). $32M mcap, $950M TVL. 29.6x TVL/MCap ratio. Decentralized ETH liquid staking with no 32 ETH minimum. Smart contracts handle operations so marginal cost is near zero. Problem: staking accessibility. Market: ETH's $214B cap. This is absurdly undervalued. Dolomite (DOLO). $11M mcap, $152M TVL across 7 chains. 12.6x ratio. Lending protocol with dynamic collateral that lets you borrow while still earning yield on deposited assets. $1.2M in 30d fees. Coinbase Ventures backed. Only $11M mcap. Stader (SD). $10M mcap, $244M TVL. 23.9x ratio. Liquid staking across 6 chains (Ethereum, BNB, Polygon, Fantom, Near, Aurora). Revenue sharing via xSD token. The multi-chain staking middleware angle is slept on. USD AI (CHIP). $69M mcap, $196M TVL. RWA lending financing GPU and AI infrastructure with real hardware as collateral. $4.38M in 30d fees with 58.9% fee growth. Bridging DeFi and AI compute is a massive addressable market. Convex Finance (CVX). $136M mcap, $916M TVL. Yield optimizer for Curve. Locks CRV for max boost and distributes rewards. The Curve Wars winner still delivers. $730K in 30d fees. Pendle (PENDLE). $256M mcap, $3.68B TVL. 14.4x ratio. Yield tokenization and trading across 11 chains. $942K in 30d fees. Up 23% this week. Separating principal from yield solves a real capital efficiency problem. All six solve real financial problems, have large addressable markets, and run on smart contract infrastructure where marginal operating costs drop toward zero once built. That is exactly the formula.

• 
  Martin Horák (@9FFSCB) reported 10 minutes ago

  @TheCaminoVegan Not necessarily corruption. Coinbase can restrict selling, sending, or trading due to compliance flags, liquidity issues, token restrictions, account verification problems, or smart-contract risks. The key question is: what exact error message did Coinbase give you? That usually reveals whether it’s a platform restriction, token issue, or account-level hold

• 
  Bobeana (@whatelsedoIknow) reported 10 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong So all the dividends? Voting power? Price discovery? “ take control” huh? These ************* are using these as locates and we all know it. They don’t have the permission of the underlying company and they won’t be holding the underlying share. go **** yourself, Coinbase.

• 
  Web3Radar (@BedaKakuru48767) reported 10 minutes ago

  CRYPTO UPDATES BTC ~$64,800–65,500** | ETH ~$1,760–1,785 | Market cap $2.25T Fed decision today – rate hold expected, but 50.5% odds of a hike later in 2026 (dot plot is key) Fear & Greed at 22 (Extreme Fear) – rebounded from last week's 9 Binance may lose EU license – MiCA rejection looming, could exit EU by July **BTC bounced off $59.7k**, now holding $64.3k support – next resistance $70k Whales loading BTC/ETH – altcoins down 70% from peaks, ETH oversold vs prior bear markets SEC set to allow tokenized stocks – market already $6.4B, Coinbase planning US launches

• 
  Sunday Shedrach (@Shedycrypt) reported 11 minutes ago

  @PythNetwork Already live on Coinbase, Kraken, dYdX, and Nado, these indices help power markets that never sleep, solving a major gap where traditional pricing feeds go offline outside market hours. This isn't just another product launch—it's the infrastructure layer for the next generation

• 
  Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reported 16 minutes ago

  Binance, Coinbase & Kraken all cutting USDT access for EEA users - not because Tether is blowing up, just because they haven't bothered getting MiCA auth 🔥 Circle walked in with USDC/EURC already compliant. Final cliff is July 1, 2026. Europe is slowly becoming a USDT-free z…

• 
  🧔BeardedFather (@Binance707) reported 19 minutes ago

  Let’s talk about @BASED and all this chart noise. Broken it down for you guys, sharing my thoughts on why there’s a massive game being played here and why panicking over local dips is just stupid. ​The people staring at 1-hour charts right now, claiming there's no limit absorption, completely miss the basics. If market makers pulled their bids from the order book, the price would’ve tanked to the floor under these market sells. Instead, we’re holding steady. If you look at the daily, it’s clear as day: we formed a solid triple bottom around 0.055, broke upwards, and are now just doing a healthy little retest. The market spent weeks vacuuming up liquidity at the bottom, and it’s dumb to think they did that just for a few percent bounce. ​Now put this puzzle together with the biggest alpha drop yet—Edison just posted a photo with Brian Armstrong (the CEO of @coinbase) in New York, explicitly thanking them for backing the project. Brian doesn't go to lunch with creators of random shitcoins. Coinbase is the most strictly regulated, tier-1 American fund and exchange. ​The token listed everywhere simultaneously, but it’s NOT even on Coinbase itself yet. Why are market makers choking the price in a flat range and marinating it? They need time. This is textbook accumulation that could easily last 2-4 months (just look at what $Lab did, it was identical before the explosion). The big players are intentionally creating boredom to shake out retail at these levels. They don't want extra passengers who will dump and ruin the rally at psychological levels like 0.5, 1, or 2 dollars. They are taking your tokens on the cheap. ​Once accumulation is done and the official Coinbase listing news hits the wires, we’ll see a massive supply shock. American capital will flood into a token that whales have already entirely scooped up at the bottom. With the current circulating supply, a price around 3.5 dollars puts the market cap at roughly 820 million. For a project with this kind of backing, that’s standard procedure, and we’ll fly straight to a billion in a flash. ​Bottom line, this sideways action isn’t weakness—it’s a compressing spring. Smart money is packing bags, paper hands are leaving. Everyone decides for themselves which side they are on. #crypto #fomo @HypeliquidX $HYPE

• 
  Tokugawa (@tokugawasuprema) reported 21 minutes ago

  Binance lists only memecoins. Coinbase lists only memecoins. Kraken listed $reppo and now $nock. They're on the right path, they deserve to be #1. **** the first two.

• 
  Tanaka (@Tanaka_L2) reported 24 minutes ago

  AX1 published this research that reframes the entire agentic payments narrative. tldr: agentic payments are about idle stablecoin balances, not txn fees. I think this changes the whole x402/Base narrative, because everyone building “agentic payment infra” is competing for a layer where users barely pay anything. – x402 collects $0 in protocol fees. – gas on Base is near-zero. – micropayments only work when rails are basically free. – Coinbase controls ~90% of x402 volume, but that does not mean 90% of meaningful revenue. Total value ever moved through agent payment rails is only around $35M-$50M, while AI agents settled roughly $73M across 176M blockchain txns between May 2025 - April 2026. Compared with a $33T stablecoin txn market, that is around 0.0001% of total volume, so I think @ax1vc is right to push the analysis away from txn count. And AX1’s research becomes more relevant after Warsh’s first Fed meeting. – Rates held at 3.5%-3.75%. – The easing bias is weaker. – Inflation is still above target. A large part of the FOMC now sees the terminal range closer to 3.75%-4.25%, which means higher-for-longer is still a real scenario. This matters because the agentic payments bull case was mostly built when markets expected cuts, but if rates stay elevated, idle agent balances become more valuable per dollar. More reserve income means more competition for agent wallets, but there is also a structural problem here. – Higher rates make the yield gap more obvious. – 0% USDC becomes harder to defend when BUIDL, USDY, Aave V3, and other yield-bearing wrappers offer 4%+. A human may ignore that, but an agent should not. This is the main tension I see: agents look like perfect depositors today because they hold operational liquidity, do not complain, churn, and demand yield. But the same intelligence that makes them useful also makes them dangerous depositors. A rational agent can sweep idle balances automatically, compare yield venues, rebalance across chains, move capital during downtime, and optimize faster after every model upgrade. So the “perfect depositor” may become the least sticky depositor. The metric I care about = how much idle USDC sits inside agent wallets at any given moment, and who earns the yield on it? That is the number that decides whether agentic payment infra becomes a real business or only a free routing layer. Circle’s response also makes sense from this lens, because it raised $222M to build @arc, a chain where USDC is used as gas. The goal is to reduce distributor dependency and control more of the chain, wallet, and money flow. Coinbase wants the same thing through custody, x402 distribution, and stablecoin relationships. Everyone wants the chain, the wallet, and the money, because whoever controls all three has the best shot at controlling the float. My current view: AX1 is pointing at the right layer of the agent economy, because the rails will be free since they need to be free. The txn layer will be hard to monetize, and the real business is the wallet layer. But the rate environment makes this both more attractive and more fragile. Higher rates increase the value of agent float, but they also push rational agents to sweep out of 0%-yielding balances faster. So I would not judge agentic payments by adoption headlines alone. I would track: – idle stablecoin balances in agent wallets. – yield captured by wallets, issuers, and custodians. – agent sweep behavior into yield-bearing assets. – whether payment infra can retain capital without relying on user laziness. That is the real research angle for me. Focus on the wallet, not the rails frens.

• 
  Magnus (@nftclients) reported 24 minutes ago

  a marketing move that will make your head spin! back in 2021 a crypto project paid $14m for a super bowl ad... it was just a 60 second bouncing qr code on a black screen in a minute they hit 20 million users app went from 186th position to 2nd position on app store, traffic got so heavy that they had to throttle their own server for an hour people scanned the code without even knowing what company it belonged to that was an ad for coinbase which was presented at superbowl for $14m this was the kind of marketing that spins big marketers' heads marketers think that message has to prove value before someone acts but @coinbase did its complete opposite, their marketing made audience curious enough to act and it brought them mainstream

• 
  Wellnesskoenig (@binancechiller) reported 24 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @cz_binance @binance They also not spam like the others to come back or warn u Ure account is soon not more available like coinbase do from my 2017 account Never had issues there also the kyc people checking verry good , too good if this is u

• 
  Fayzel Shaka $XAGE (@FayzelShaka) reported 25 minutes ago

  Other oracles: working overtime 😓 Pyth: powers Polymarket, Kalshi, Coinbase, Binance, Hyperliquid, and keeps revenue going 📈 Also Pyth: "Just another day at the office." 😎🔥 #Pyth #PythNetwork #CryptoMeme

• 
  Stat Arb (@quant_arb) reported 28 minutes ago

  Maker rebates effectively mandate that market makers earn a minimum amount of spread and overall increase the effective cost to traders (in my view). Assume there is some fair spread for an asset in a market that does not have fees. This might be 0.5 bps for MSFT shares. If I am an exchange, and instead of charging everyone a 1 bp fee (bring the total effective cost paid to 1.5 bps), I instead do a 1.7 bps taker fee and a -0.7 bps rebate, then what happens is that because the market for MSFT cannot have a negative spread, it trades 1 tick wide. Let's assume a fairly small tick size, so we'll say that it's basically at 0 (reality is not often this way, so in reality it is worse than this often). Now the trader has paid no spread and 1.7 bps of fees instead of paying 1 bp in fees and 0.5 bps of spread and paying 1.5 bps total. Who gets, that extra 0.2 bps? It's the market maker, it enforces a minimum income, and they get it. Worst of all - it punishes competitive market makers. When spread is able to vary more, better market makers get the good fills, and the smart guy wins. But when spread is stuck at 1 tick wide then firms have to compete on who is the fastest to get to the front of the queue, and who is willing to wait in the queue. We see this in 1 tick wide markets like stablecoin/stablcoin where it is very non toxic and it takes over an hour for the size on top of book to cycle once. That's a lot of time to wait in the queue! In the USDT/BUSD market on Binance this is caused by tick size (in fact this is why they make the maker fee is 0 bps in the stablecoin markets since a rebate would make the problem 10x worse), and we can see on Coinbase which has tighter tick sizes for USDC/USDT and does not have this issue.

• 
  DimeTV (@dimetvhq) reported 31 minutes ago

  BREAKING: Coinbase just announced they’re launching prediction markets. Cole, founder of Volmex & BVIV, breaks down how derivatives keep getting simpler: “Options started on a whole options chain — 200 different squares. Robinhood fit it on a mobile phone — 20 squares. Prediction markets came along… it’s just a single question and a green and red button.” Full episode on DimeTV below