Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Finch (@thatfinchguy) reported 8 minutes ago

  Desperately need a service that can stop the phone call and text spam Not sure if the free roof repair estimates or the failed Coinbase login messages are the phishing attempts anymore

• 
  Nikki Zaronykratryz Zytazomykitriz Cyphericivitas (@AciidBraiin) reported 8 minutes ago

  @GoingParabolic Still confused on how to buy TBB, as one who never has done crypto ever (except Coinbase and Bitcoins to buy drugs). Clicked on the link, looked too complicated with too much text —> **** this, I guess I have to stay a brokie. Could potentially grow bigger if you made an easy step to step guide.

• 
  San Alibais (@samalibais5) reported 12 minutes ago

  @coinbase point applies to compute infrastructure too, not just payments. Agents running 24/7 need compute that doesn't wait on provisioning queues that's the problem UPoW solves at the consensus layer.

• 
  Quantum Advantage (@QuantumAdvtg) reported 12 minutes ago

  And yet @coinbase has failed so far to list $QRL, widely considered the most respected quantum-secure cryptocurrency and designed to be secure since its genesis block more than 8 years ago. Why? Because it's not in the interests of legacy protocols to spotlight QRL. Disgraceful.

• 
  Pixelwhot (@Pixelwhot) reported 12 minutes ago

  @jymkilama @wealthyanon Noble left and Coinbase stopped using their version of USDC. Nillion left and still hasn’t found the liquidity. Jackal moved to base and still shut down. I’ve been here since 2017 to understand that bear markets do bear market things.

• 
  Quantyx (@0xQuantyx) reported 18 minutes ago

  Bitcoin is pulling back, but the underlying positioning hasn’t broken yet. Price has slipped back to ~$64.2K, while funding remains positive (+0.0033%) and open interest has climbed to ~278K. That’s leverage staying in the market despite the rejection. The microstructure is sending a similar message: Structure remains bullish. Price is testing the upper edge of the demand zone after rejecting resistance around $65.5-66K. Coinbase Premium is still negative (-0.091%), so spot demand hasn’t confirmed the move. This is the key battle now. If buyers defend this zone and spot demand improves, the trend can resume. If leverage keeps building while spot stays absent, the probability of another flush increases. For now, the pullback looks like a retest, not a confirmed trend reversal. #BTC

• 
  Sheldon Bishop (@sheldonbishop) reported 19 minutes ago

  Coinbase choosing a direct listing was not just a finance decision. It fit the brand. The company was built around the idea that financial access should be more open and more transparent. So when Coinbase went public in April 2021, it went direct onto the Nasdaq. In the transcript, the reason is simple: Brian felt it was the more fair way to do it. That is a small detail, but it is consistent with the story. Coinbase’s best moves usually rhyme: make crypto easier to access make the rules clearer make the market more legitimate keep the upside out of closed rooms

• 
  e_camli (@ekinoks_26) reported 22 minutes ago

  Surf answers in Chinese, Korean, and Japanese, not just English. That detail sat quietly in the FAQ for months and only becomes obviously relevant now that @SurfAI just co-published research comparing Korean and US exchange liquidity with Four Pillars. A research finding about Upbit outperforming Coinbase on one year token liquidity is genuinely useful to a Korean trader only if they can ask Surf follow up questions in Korean without losing precision in translation. Crypto terminology does not always map cleanly across languages, and a platform that built native language support rather than running everything through a translation layer on top of an English model handles that better by design. Ask in your language, get answers in your language, according to the FAQ, not ask in your language and get an English answer machine translated back. The Asia CEX research series makes the language layer a strategic asset rather than a convenience feature. Korean, Japanese, and broader Asian crypto communities are exactly the audience most likely to care about Upbit versus Coinbase liquidity data, and they are the audience least served by English first crypto research tools that treat other languages as an afterthought. Surf built the language support before it had an obvious reason to need it for this specific partnership. What I want to see is whether the Deep Research reasoning trail holds the same quality across all four supported languages, or whether the multilingual layer is strongest in English and thinner elsewhere. A research platform is only as trustworthy as its weakest supported language, and that is not something the FAQ discloses.

• 
  FortunaShield (@FortunaShield) reported 30 minutes ago

  @TedPillows Coinbase staking is basically a fresh bagholder onboarding funnel with APY lipstick, but yeah if support holds this probably squeezes higher first and asks questions later.

• 
  Zahr? (@zaheerain) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Jeremybtc Coinbase selling doesn’t help

• 
  Jobless Benson (@DNF_sol) reported 31 minutes ago

  holy ****… this might actually be one of the biggest long-term crypto plays nobody’s talking about. samsung just hinted that samsung wallet will support new digital assets like stablecoins. no launch date. no chain. no official payment announcement. but zoom out. they’ve been cooking this for years. first they got everyone addicted to samsung pay. then samsung wallet became the place for your cards, bank accounts, IDs, transit passes and digital keys. then wallet money. then rewards. then coinbase funding in the US. then the new galaxy card with visa + barclays. and now… stablecoins. the crazy part? samsung doesn’t even need to launch its own stablecoin. banks hold the fiat. issuers mint the stablecoins. blockchains move the money. samsung just owns the front door. people obsess over which chain wins… but normies don’t care if it’s ethereum, solana, xrpl or whatever. they’ll just tap their galaxy phone and it works. that’s the alpha. my bet? stablecoin transfers → samsung pay → cross-border payments → multi-currency wallets → galaxy ai handling payments for you. imagine getting paid in a dollar stablecoin… sending it across the world… then buying ramen at a convenience store by tapping samsung pay while everything settles in the background. nothing official yet. but if samsung really goes down this path… this isn’t just another wallet update. this is the kind of **** that brings crypto to hundreds of millions of normies without them even realizing they’re using crypto.

• 
  Bologski (@AussiePrintWear) reported 32 minutes ago

  @CrashiusClay69 able to carry $BRETT to $2.3B by himself alone, no support with Coinbase. It's exciting to see what will happen to number 1 meme in $GRAM if Crash will bullpost it one day plus the strong holder whales already positioned in $GRAM, then here comes Pavel Durov embracing the meme. It might 10x the size of $BRETT. Anyway there's no ticker for you for free, if you can't figure out the number 1 runner now, you might not able to.

• 
  Dave Burrells (@dburrells) reported 33 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong While the threat isn’t immediate, the real challenge is the years of coordinated work required across the whole industry. Coinbase is already moving on upgrades to protect customer funds, full encryption reviews, Bitcoin developer sessions, open-source funding, and bringing institutions together. What does that coordinated push actually look like in practice? 👇

• 
  ₿itcain (@Bitcain21) reported 33 minutes ago

  @coinbase @saylor Does a centralized funding consortium fix this?

• 
  Paulo Vidal (@inevitable360) reported 43 minutes ago

  @chromatic_x You’re still proudly answering a question I didn’t ask. Congratulations on discovering the oldest block you could find with more than one output. Truly groundbreaking research. That was never the point. The question was whether the protocol itself could distribute the block reward among multiple independent miners or pools that contributed work to the same block, for example, 2.5k coins each to four participants, instead of awarding the entire 10k to one miner or pool and relying on something like P2Pool or other external coordination to split it afterward. Yes, I know a coinbase transaction can have multiple outputs, any transaction can (learned the hard way in 2021 wen I did the first tipping BOT on former Twitter, before sodogetip or mydoge) So when you quote-tweet your answer as though you disproved my question, you’re mostly demonstrating that you misunderstood it. And yes, I was trolling you earlier with "I don’t believe you." You noticed. I’m glad we’ve established at least one thing correctly.