Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Hazel Lefton (@AgooDnoteYMTfam) reported@1Exit_Liquidity Only issue I see is buying it. Why not Coinbase? It’s only available to certain exchanges. I think 🤔
-
AD 🔥 (@andredenis09) reportedVery funny to see tokens being "privileged" but that do not have a strong and organic community. Being listed on a "big" exchange like Coinbase, and it looks like nothing happened. I remember when, finally, @Toshi was listed, even after being ignored for years, the listing came out and her beautiful community explode. Don't be fooled by looking for the next bomb, see where the team is really working and that is transparent.
-
QuickRadar (@QuickRadarWin) reported$MDT spread between Gate and Coinbase: 4.74% right now, 3.94% net after fees. Compresses with size — 2.9% at $500, down to 2.2% by $20K+. $14.78M combined volume behind it. Wall on Coinbase: $9.6K sitting at +3.11%. A near-4% net spread on $14M+ in volume doesn't show up every day.
-
CanaryPilot (@TheCanaryPilot) reported@NotSoEasyMoney Its too late Jesse caused too much damage and Coinbase is old and slow
-
WhatsItToYa (@BrokeGuyCollect) reported@maxibitcat @coinbase Never use Coinbase worst customer service ever
-
e𐤊on 🐸 (@PerleKas) reportedHi @coinbase , I downloaded your app and the app experience is rather unpleasant. The chatbot doesnt really help with my questions.
-
Models Need Sleep (@ModelsNeedSleep) reportedBe sure to take your crypto off the exchanges if you’re a long-term holder. It’s still the Wild West, and I would hate for you to become part of a nightmare scenario. Yes, use @coinbase or @krakenfx to purchase, but then send it to your wallet. I just created a wallet with @hashpack for HBAR and have separate wallets for other assets. It was very easy to set up. Just write down your seed phrase and store it somewhere safe. I suggest using a pen and paper and locking it in a safe. I know most people know this; just trying to help.
-
Dan Kim (@dankimxyz) reported𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘅 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗱𝗶𝗱𝗻’𝘁 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀, 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝘄𝗵𝘆 𝘄𝗲’𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗶𝗹𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗳𝗼𝗿 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗻𝗼𝘄 While I was at Coinbase, I kept wondering why @Airwallex hadn’t leaned into stablecoins. Airwallex provides the global business accounts companies use to operate across more than 120 countries, so I expected more of its customers to need stablecoins. Coinbase had spent years helping companies and developers hold and move dollars onchain, but it didn't provide what global businesses needed to use those dollars across markets, like converting them into pounds to pay suppliers or pesos to pay contractors, meeting local regulatory requirements, and moving fiat funds into accounts their finance teams already used. I joined Airwallex because it had spent nearly a decade building the regulated accounts, FX, controls, and local payment connections that let a solopreneur or an enterprise hold money in one place and pay people in their own currency across markets. 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘅 𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘁𝗼𝗺𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗮𝗹𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘆 𝗵𝗮𝗱 𝗮 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝘄𝗮𝘆 𝘁𝗼 𝗺𝗼𝘃𝗲 𝗺𝗼𝗻𝗲𝘆 𝗴𝗹𝗼𝗯𝗮𝗹𝗹𝘆 After starting at Airwallex, it didn’t take me long to see why stablecoins had not been a priority for many of our customers. They already had a fast way to collect dollars, convert them, and pay suppliers and employees in local currencies. Jeff John Roberts made a similar point in Fortune in 2024: Airwallex could move money quickly and cheaply by managing local currency pools and using local payment networks. Most transfers arrive the same day, and nearly half arrive instantly through local payment networks. An Airwallex customer converts dollars once into the currency the recipient needs, and sends the transfer through a local network in that market. A company without that coverage has more work to do – especially if it relies on stablecoins, which also means managing things like wallets, blockchains, network fees, and compliance requirements in each market. 𝗕𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝘁 𝘂𝘀𝗲 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗱 𝗹𝗼𝗰𝗮𝗹 𝗽𝗮𝘆𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗶𝗻𝗳𝗿𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗿𝘂𝗰𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 Some businesses hold stablecoins for reasons that have little to do with paying suppliers, like those that operate onchain. Stablecoins are also important in markets with unreliable banking or high inflation; people hold them to keep and move U.S. dollars. But neither group can use stablecoins to pay a supplier, an employee, or a contractor in local currency without a regulated provider that can convert the stablecoins and complete the payout. Few providers can convert stablecoins and pay recipients in local currency across all the markets where a global business operates. Airwallex already operates the global and local financial infrastructure required for seamless fiat payouts in more than 120 countries, so I think it is one of the few that could do this everywhere our customers operate. Our customers would have one place to manage both stablecoins and local currency, where local rules allow, instead of working with a different provider in each market. 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗯𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗻𝗲𝘀𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗳𝘂𝗻𝗱 𝗮𝗴𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 𝘄𝗶𝘁𝗵 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 Some companies are beginning to let AI agents find and pay for services without asking a person to approve every transaction. Before doing that, a business has to identify the agent, limit what it can spend and buy, name the person or institution responsible for each payment, record every transaction, and retain the ability to revoke access. One effective way to limit how much the agent can spend is by giving it a stablecoin wallet with a fixed balance. Cards work well above a certain amount, because a $10 purchase absorbs a fixed processing fee. Microtransactions do not, since the processor charges that fee on every transaction regardless of size. If an agent pays ten cents for an API call, a few seconds of compute, or a data lookup, the seller pays more in card fees than it collects, and an agent may make many of those purchases while completing a single task. When a business funds an agent with stablecoins instead, the seller doesn't have to pay that fixed fee on every purchase the agent makes. 𝗔𝗶𝗿𝘄𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝘅 𝗶𝘀 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗴𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗻𝗼𝘄 Companies are putting agents into production, and regulators in the U.S. and Europe have paved the way for businesses to hold stablecoins and convert them legally. That combination is new, and it is why I think stablecoins now make sense for payments our existing rails don’t serve well. Agent payments will account for most of the demand, since a business running agents at scale has no cheaper way to pay for what they buy. Slower corridors are the other case, where a recipient that can legally hold stablecoins doesn’t have to wait for its bank to open its next clearing window. This is why Airwallex invested to incubate Metal and become its first design partner. Metal is settlement infrastructure for regulated financial institutions, built so they can move money at the speed agents transact. We are also working to add stablecoin support for customers in the markets where regulators allow it. I spent five years building money that moves like software. What was missing was everything that needs to happen after it arrives, which Airwallex has already built. As agents start making more payments and transfers on behalf of our customers, I want them to choose whether the money moves in stablecoins or in local currency, based on how their business operates. That’s when I believe we’ll see stablecoins start to realize their full potential.
-
Tokita Ohma (@thetigersvessel) reported@maxibitcat @coinbase Sounds like a UTXO problem. Need privacy tech by default to prevent this. They either accept Monero or they don’t. No caveats haha
-
NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported🔴 Bitwise launches self-custody tokenized stock portfolios via Coinbase, Glider Bitwise, a $9 billion crypto asset manager, launched Automated Token Portfolios allowing non-U.S. users in supported jurisdictions to hold tokenized U.S. stocks in non-custodial wallets while automatically replicating professionally designed portfolios. Portfolios cover Magnificent 7 stocks plus SpaceX, robotics, and AI leaders, with a 0.15% methodology access fee. Tokens remain in investors' wallets, enabling potential DeFi lending and borrowing. "For over a century, getting a professional model meant handing your assets to a fund.
-
Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reportedfirst US spot privacy-coin ETP is live. grayscale's ZCSH began trading on NYSE Arca aug 25, converted from the 2017-era zcash trust with ~387k ZEC (~313m USD) and a 2.50% fee — roughly 10x a typical BTC ETF — with early fee revenue earmarked for zcash ecosystem spend. read the wrapper, not just the ticker. ZCSH is a trust, not registered under the investment company act of 1940, so holders skip the shareholder protections registered ETFs carry. coinbase custodies the ZEC, BNY administers, jane street and virtu are the APs. the irony: the fund's coins sit in transparent wallets — institutional buyers get price exposure to $ZEC without any of the shielded-pool privacy the asset exists for. flows were already levered into the print. ZEC perp open interest went from ~962m USD (aug 19) to ~1.8b USD ahead of listing, funding stayed positive on binance, okx and bybit, and Nasdaq-listed cypherpunk technologies holds ~323k ZEC (~1.9% of supply) at a ~342 USD average. ZEC ran roughly 60-70% into the event and traded down on day one. the structural signal: privacy-coin exposure is normalizing through US listed rails years after exchanges restricted it — but the 8-year-high price already prices that. invalidation is concrete: ZCSH is now a distribution test, and if early flows disappoint while ~1.8b USD of perp exposure unwinds, the listing premium evaporates fast. NFA
-
Asian bagworker 🐈🐈🐈 (@deez29482822) reported@johnsoncooks101 @coinbase Could you trim down on $callout 😢 Please I want to eat
-
Peter -CT (@Peter_CT93) reportedThe market just added $474B in a week, and the crowd is calling it a bear market bounce. But look at who did the buying: wallets that got liquidated to near zero are back with 20x leverage, and a fresh wallet just dropped $46M on BTC longs. That's not retail fear of missing out, that's aggressive, well-capitalized re-entry. The real signal is in the funding reset. When leverage flushes, it usually takes weeks for conviction to rebuild. Instead, we got a 22% weekly gain with $5B in liquidations. That's the market telling you the liquidation was the event, not the start of a trend. The shorts got cleared, and the people who survived are doubling down. Everyone's watching BTC reclaim $80K. I'm watching whether ETH can hold $2.4K while BTC consolidates. If ETH starts leading on relative strength, that's rotation into the laggard, and it changes the whole setup. Coinbase tokenizing NVDA and AAPL on Base is the quiet structural story. If that flow is real, it's a new capital bridge, and AERO is the direct beneficiary. That's a trade the crowd hasn't priced yet. My read: this week's recovery is the beginning of a grind higher, not a dead cat bounce. The leverage reset was the shakeout, and the whales are back. What would prove me wrong is a failed retest of $76K on BTC with funding staying negative. Until then, I'm positioned for continuation, and I'm watching the ETH/BTC ratio like it's my job. $BTC
-
movemaker (@moving_money12) reported$IMU @immunefi On @coinbase Broke out of the symetrical triangle. Holding its back test of support prior resistance. Bullish uptrend should continue Slap it and hold
-
Safe BLAST Army (@SafeBLASTarmy) reported@coinbureau I love @coinbase but Nah. Screen first and go deeper. Being a pro-crypto candidate is no longer a good enough excuse because the LUNA and FTX founders are both pro-crypto. They love to enrich themselves and let the masses fight over the crumbs. This past year we saw "pro-crypto" candidates and their families rank in millions and billions of dollars from pro-crypto insider trading while everyone else was seeing red. We NEED Pro-Crypto Candidates who actually care about Users First and want to advance crypto-friendly rules to help: ✅ 1. Reduce Scams, ✅ 2. Embrace Innovation, ✅ 3. Increase Decentralization and ✅ 4. Promote Mass adoption. Anything short from this is complete garbage. Advocating for crypto doesn't mean we get to rubberstamp anyone who calls themselves a "pro-crypto" candidate. - Abe (@SafeBlaster )