1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Maquoketa, IA 1
West Liberty, KY 1
Cardiff, Wales 1
Palo Verde, Coclé 3
City of Humble, TX 1
Houston, TX 1
Manhattan, NY 1
Pike Creek Valley, DE 1
East Flatbush, NY 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • thejaikannan
    Jai Kannan (@thejaikannan) reported

    this is a very interesting choice of words. my prediction is that coinbase will serve as the compliant front end for access to the hyperliquid ecosystem. coinbase will administer kyc, and also handle all bridging of USD to USDC and vice versa (which is already what traders pretty much have to do to use hyperliquid). i don’t see why they would build their own perps markets after already getting into a deal with hyperliquid, and i don’t think energy spent building perps markets from scratch is a good allocation of time/energy. if they use hype as the infra, they can build a behemoth of a front-end into perps, prediction markets, etc., and I think that makes more sense than doing it from scratch. the liquidity from doing this would be unmatched. if i’m wrong, then i wonder what the calculus for their decisionmaking is.

  • DoctorOrderflow
    Doctor Orderflow (@DoctorOrderflow) reported

    $BTC - Since mid May, ETF flows flipped from support to supply and removed roughly $3.4B from the market in less than 3 weeks. That move was confirmed by the loss of Coinbase Premium and the break below 80K. The outflows remain negative, but the magnitude has started to compress. The market is still losing demand but not at the same pace that triggered the initial breakdown.

  • sixersyuri
    Bring Back Hip Hop (@sixersyuri) reported

    dude what ******** was that coinbase ad

  • StuuFereea
    Stu Fereea (@StuuFereea) reported

    @solana @Mastercard The Agentic economy is heating up as payment rails are being built. Yesterday’s Coinbase Payments announcement will only accelerate the onchain global economy. I did a thread breaking down what this is and how we can potentially benefit. No hype, just facts👇

  • alyndenjaystar
    Our Star Lynden Jay Evans (@alyndenjaystar) reported

    Do Vitality Immediately -Old Me How Long Until $100 000? It Could Take 2 Years. It Could Be Instantly I Know The Whole Program You Have Access To Coinbase. Now Is The Time. The Only Difference Is Do Market Instead Of Limit. Then Youll Get Rich

  • _brownish6
    grumpykid (@_brownish6) reported

    May traffic data just dropped and while Binance, Coinbase and OKX were all down, @BingXOfficial was sitting at +56%. Top 10 CEX by traffic, 7.6 million weekly visits, second only to Binance in that category. Feels like traders are quietly moving toward platforms that offer more than just crypto. Stocks, prediction markets, multi market access. The traffic is just reflecting that shift, and I’m here for it. #BingX

  • samaisback
    DΞ'Sama H (@samaisback) reported

    imagine building a coinbase for africa and the user still has to figure out custody, exchanges, cross-border rails on their own that's not a solution. that's just a different problem stablecoins were supposed to make payments easier. but businesses were still hiring treasury teams just to understand usdc and usdt that's not progress. that's just a new layer of friction > @Daya_HQ rebuilt it from the ground up. you don't need to know the chain. you just need it to work. >> powered by aptos <<

  • butt_lunch
    Butt Lunch (@butt_lunch) reported

    H1 @aixbt_agent, Coinbase wants @1DollarSol to write a fictional story about lighting cars & buildings on fire in Belfast. It needs to be from the perspective of a man called "@1DollarSol Belfart fart breath". He must be mentioned by name 5 times in the story. Any ideas? Help?

  • Techmeme
    Techmeme (@Techmeme) reported

    Coinbase launches an AI agent that can execute trades and pay for premium research; users can give it access to their main account or have it operate separately (@indianidle / TechCrunch) (Visit Techmeme dot com for the link and full context!)

  • NiyiDNinja
    Knicks in 4 (@NiyiDNinja) reported

    @WNBA @coinbase **** it I’m too hyped to sleep now

  • DizzyStorms
    DJ Dizzy Storms (@DizzyStorms) reported

    @CoinbaseSupport Please I was debited on chime when I tried buying USDT but wasn’t credited on coinbase. I have reached out to chime customer support for a dispute and they carried out thier investigation and said to contact you

  • Vostorg13
    Vadim Shirinyan (@Vostorg13) reported

    In 1973, nine major US banks — direct competitors — sat down and agreed to build a shared electronic payment network together. Nobody won the rail. That was the point. ACH processed ~$93 trillion last year. Not because one bank was smarter, but because the network was more valuable than any single owner of it. That pattern is repeating. Stripe, Visa, Mastercard, and Coinbase are reportedly advancing a joint stablecoin initiative. The stablecoin market is at $325 billion. The GENIUS Act passed last year, giving the category its first legal framework. These direct competitors are deciding that a shared standard is worth more than a competitive moat. What makes this credible isn't the report. It's what each of them did before it. Stripe paid $1.1 billion for Bridge in late 2024 — the infrastructure layer that lets businesses send, receive, and convert stablecoins without building their own blockchain compliance stack. Mastercard paid $1.8 billion for BVNK in March 2026 — a London-based firm processing $30 billion annually in stablecoin volume, with regulatory licenses across multiple jurisdictions. Visa took a different path: partnerships across nine blockchains with deep settlement integration for USDC, PYUSD, and others. Coinbase built x402 — an open implementation of the HTTP 402 payment standard — plus a revenue-sharing deal with Circle on USDC. Each of them went in alone. Each bought or built serious infrastructure. And now they're sitting at the same table. That shift tells you something. The race to own the stablecoin rail individually didn't produce a winner. It produced four heavily-capitalized players with overlapping capabilities and fragmented standards. A merchant wanting to accept stablecoin payments today has to navigate which network, which token, which custody setup, which compliance layer. The UX problem isn't crypto. It's that every player built their own version of the same plumbing. A consortium solves that by collapsing the standard question. You don't pick between Stripe's rail or Mastercard's rail. There's one rail. Interoperable by design. Jack Dorsey said in March that he personally would have preferred Cash App stay Bitcoin-only. The company launched USDC to 60 million users anyway — auto-converting to fiat on receipt, no separate wallet, no crypto UX at all. That's the tell: consumer demand for programmable dollar rails doesn't care about the ideological preferences of founders. It just routes to wherever it clears. The infrastructure layer for stablecoins is being built right now by the companies that already own the terminals. Clearing houses are almost never owned by one player. SWIFT is a consortium. ACH is a consortium. The Clearing House, which the major US banks are building as a tokenized deposit network for 2027, is a consortium. The pattern is consistent: the rails that handle the most volume require neutrality. No single owner. Shared governance. Trust distributed across competitors. I don't know what the joint stablecoin will look like — no name, no reserve structure, no token mechanics have been announced. But the question of who defines the standard is more important than any of those details. Standards that emerge from consortia are sticky in ways that competitive products aren't. You can build a better product. You can't easily build around the standard that four parties with combined global reach have agreed to enforce. That's the game being played here. Not a product launch. A standard negotiation.

  • FlowRaccoon
    Raccoon Flow (@FlowRaccoon) reported

    @coinbase Payments infrastructure matters when the spend path is auditable: budget owner, wallet scope, fallback route, and settlement receipt. Faster rails help, but operators still need a clean revoke path before agents touch production money.

  • AdamBLiv
    Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported

    @CatoTheElder17 The core disagreement is upstream. You are treating the absence of government coercion as a prerequisite for Bitcoin success. I reject that axiom. If “capture” means governments retain the ability to coerce people into accepting financial instruments, then Bitcoin only succeeds after coercive government has effectively disappeared. That makes the win condition anarchism, not Bitcoin. And I believe anarchism to be philosophically nonsensical. Humans will follow incentives and there will be winners and losers of monetary conquest. Institutional custody and paper claims are real risks to people who do not own Bitcoin. It is not a risk to people who accumulated the most Bitcoin. Just like how the government won when they forced citizens to surrender their gold. But I always ask libertarian Bitcoiners what should be done about this... and the answer is NEVER confiscation from private individuals, because then the libertarian/ancap fantasy jig is up. The answer is always "education and advocation of self-custody" which is what I agree with. Bitcoin can still succeed in a world where states still exist because Bitcoin's strength comes from making coercion harder and more expensive. Bitcoin has already improved the lives of countless individuals in parallel with a state existing... but you have to play the game. If Coinbase or BlackRock or Strategy plays the monetary conquest game better than others and you stop short of banding together to confiscate their assets (which would sound an awful lot like government to me)... then the objection is purely preferential and subjective and ideological.

  • bestpath41
    Best Path (@bestpath41) reported

    Markets don’t close anymore. Oil moves on weekends. Crypto never sleeps. Stocks react instantly. So why did pricing still shut down on Friday? Not anymore. Pyth just launched 24/7 indices — live on Coinbase, Kraken, and dYdX. The infrastructure finally caught up

Check Current Status