Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rucha (ऋचा) (@_wallwalker) reported 2 minutes ago

  @tenobrus this is not fiat currency. true BTC believers do not sell. so i'd not use this as a metric. on mass adoption, i'd look at how much a user can buy resources in the real world using BTC, as compared to fiat. one e.g. from my time in crypto, GCP had started accepting BTC / ETH for their cloud services. again, i look at Block and Coinbase for the same reason. theoretically, i can buy more in the real world using them, than i could before. that's what i call upward trajectory

• 
  Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported 7 minutes ago

  🔥STOP WORKING RIGHT NOW - RETIRE EARLY WITH STRK🔥 I have discovered a retirement strategy so offensively American that it involves $500,000 of convertible preferred stock, Michael Saylor, Bitcoin, quarterly checks, and the distant possibility of never having to answer another email again. Here is the psychosis. STRK is $68.35. You put $500,000 into STRK. That buys approximately 7,315 STRK shares. STRK pays $8 per share annually, or $2 quarterly, and each share is convertible into 0.1 MSTR under the current conversion terms. So your $500,000 retirement account immediately becomes: Annual dividends: ≈ $58,522 Quarterly dividends: ≈ $14,631 Five years of dividends: ≈ $292,612 And hiding inside your 7,315 STRK shares is the contractual right to convert into approximately: 731.5 SHARES OF MSTR This is where the retirement plan stops resembling something Vanguard would recommend and starts resembling a *******-fueled actuarial table found underneath a blackjack table in Reno. At your $68.35 STRK cost basis, conversion parity occurs at $683.50 MSTR. Because 0.1 × $683.50 = $68.35. So you can sit there collecting roughly $58,500 a year while waiting for Bitcoin to appreciate, Strategy's common equity to become increasingly convex, and that conversion feature to crawl out of the basement carrying a flamethrower. The current STRK price and effective yield in the supplied Strategy dashboard are $68.35 and 11.70%. Now for the deranged part. I ran Strategy through the CEBE model under assumptions that are almost comically hostile: 842,138 BTC today. 842,138 BTC FIVE YEARS FROM NOW. Strategy purchases ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN. Literally none. The model has Strategy continually selling MSTR to finance the preferred dividend burden while never using those raises to buy another Bitcoin. Bitcoin holdings remain frozen at 842,138 throughout the entire projection. The model simultaneously holds CEBE mNAV at 1.0459x. In other words, I have mathematically kidnapped Michael Saylor, confiscated his Coinbase account, nailed mNAV to the floor, and told Strategy: YOU MAY SELL MSTR TO PAY THE DIVIDENDS. YOU MAY NEVER BUY ANOTHER BITCOIN. Good luck. And somehow the numbers still become hilarious. The 5 Bitcoin power-law endpoints I'm using are: Q0: $306,770 Q10: $354,366 Power regression: $598,892 Q90: $773,928 Q100: $1,587,365 Now look at what happens to your $500,000 STRK position. Q0 - BITCOIN $306,770 Modeled MSTR: $595 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion value: ≈ $435,508 Five years of STRK dividends: ≈ $292,612 Combined cash received + conversion value: ≈ $728,120 Your $500,000 becomes roughly: $728K (1.46x) And this is the Q0 POWER-LAW OUTCOME. Apparently the retirement disaster scenario is collecting almost $300,000 of dividends and winding up with $728,000. Call the authorities. Q10 - BITCOIN $354,366 Modeled MSTR: $700 Conversion value: ≈ $512,223 Dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $804,834. 1.61x your money. You spent 5 years receiving approximately $14,600 every 3 months for the unbearable psychological hardship of owning a security with MSTR upside attached to it. POWER REGRESSION - BITCOIN $598,892 Now we enter the retirement community from hell. The supplied CEBE model reaches approximately: MSTR = $1,243 while Strategy still owns exactly 842,138 BTC, having bought ZERO MORE BITCOIN. Your conversion rights are now worth: 731.5 MSTR × $1,243 ≈ $909,461 Meanwhile you collected ≈ $292,612 IN DIVIDENDS So your original $500,000 has produced approximately $1,202,073 (2.40x total value.) +$702,000. And because the $292K of dividends arrived progressively rather than magically appearing in year five, the modeled annualized IRR is approximately: 23% PER YEAR. Yup. 23% percent annualized. From something whose entire job was supposed to be sitting there paying you quarterly income while you waited for Saylor's common stock to go completely feral. Q90 - BITCOIN $773,928 Modeled MSTR: $1,634 Conversion value: ≈ $1,195,581 Five-year dividends: ≈ $292,612 Total position economics: ≈ $1,488,193 Your $500K BECOMES ALMOST $1.5 MILLION. 2.98x. At this point you have ceased being a preferred-stock investor and become a missing person. Q100 - BITCOIN $1,587,365 Now the spreadsheet develops schizophrenia. Modeled MSTR: $3,462 Your 731.5 MSTR conversion package: ≈ $2,532,519 Dividends collected while waiting: ≈ $292,612 Total: ≈ $2,825,131 Your original $500,000: 5.65x You have received nearly $300,000 just for waiting and then exercised the conversion feature into more than $2.5 MILLION of MSTR. You entered this trade as a yield investor. You exited it looking like someone who recently acquired a Gulfstream through a misunderstanding. And here is the mechanism people are missing. In the power-regression scenario, Bitcoin goes from roughly $63,686 to $598,892. That's about 9.4x. Yet modeled MSTR goes from roughly $96 to $1,243. About 12.9x. DESPITE THE MODEL HAVING STRATEGY BUY ZERO ADDITIONAL BITCOIN AND ZERO MULTIPLE EXPANSION. Why? Because Strategy's dollar-denominated senior claims are being vaporized in Bitcoin terms. At the beginning of the projection, senior claims represent roughly 283,000 BTC-equivalent. At $598,892 Bitcoin? Approximately 30,000 BTC-equivalent. The nominal dollars remain. Bitcoin just becomes so catastrophically expensive that the liabilities start looking like a $25 Chili's gift card listed on the Berkshire Hathaway balance sheet. The result? CEBE rises from approximately 144,257 sats/share to 198,479 sats/share. Even though Strategy bought ZERO BITCOIN and continuously issued common stock throughout the model. That's the entire STRK insanity. You aren't simply buying an 11.7%-yielding preferred. You are buying $58,500/year of modeled income on $500K, while retaining a conversion claim on 731.5 MSTR shares if the common stock eventually escapes Earth's gravitational field. So the retirement plan is beautifully stupid: BUY $500,000 STRK. COLLECT ≈ $14,631 EVERY QUARTER. 1. Bitcoin rises. 2. Senior claims implode in BTC terms. 3. CEBE/share rises. 4. MSTR becomes increasingly convex. Your deeply out-of-the-money conversion feature slowly transforms from decorative furniture into a financial weapon. Then one morning MSTR is $1,200, your STRK conversion package is worth about $900,000, you've already been paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to sit there, and you finally press: STRK → MSTR. Sell the MSTR. Buy a house in Wyoming. Install an unnecessarily large smoker. Begin referring to Tuesday as “the weekend.” And explain to your grandchildren that Americans once worked until age 67 because apparently nobody had discovered the perfectly normal retirement strategy of putting half a million dollars into Michael Saylor's convertible Bitcoin preferred stock. Remember, this is assuming Saylor STOPS BUYING BITCOIN... and the multiple on the Bitcoin hoard NEVER EXPANDS EVER. The gains could be EVEN MORE CRAZY. RETIREMENT PLANNING HAS BECOME COMPLETELY UNHINGED.

• 
  Jordan (@Perry_ThePM) reported 7 minutes ago

  Doesn’t help that @RobinhoodApp and Casino Base are leading the charge. @coinbase Downstream impact of paper IOUs. Broken money leads to trash incentives. Don’t fall for the trap.

• 
  SwagMaster (@teflonYian) reported 8 minutes ago

  @phantom Na and your update sucks. Coinbase on ramp is also ******. Fix it.

• 
  Croc Intern (@CrocIntern) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Havochl_ The question is if Hyperliquid leadership is smart enough to start campaigning for HL growth ASAP! So one day suddenly someone like US gov won't make HL illegal in a "free market competition" move to support Coinbase or other lame *** home-based analog.

• 
  AdrianoFeria.eth 🦇🔊 🛡️ (@AdrianoFeria) reported 11 minutes ago

  What crypto dudes won't do: 1. Correct bullshit information (refer to quoted post) 2. Acknowledge that ETH's main value proposition is monetary premium 3. Coherently think through their OWN thought process I guess it's OK if they choose to ignore that Ethereum L2s are extensions of ETH's digital economy, in that they use ETH as their primary onchain collateral and SoV. For cash flow purists, this is the bigger problem: these "parasitic" Ethereum L2s are still contributing to ETH's cash flow, albeit minimally for now, and that contribution can grow exponentially as blob supply becomes fully utilized. It won't take "1,000s of Robinhoods" for this to happen. It will take about 6x current blob usage, that may seem like a lot, but that volume will come to Ethereum as long as institutions and large organizations continue to choose ETH for the same reasons Robinhood, BlackRock, Coinbase and others have done. Regardless of this, and this is the part that matters most for ETH fudsters intentionally obtuse narrative, Ethereum L2s contribute ZERO, NADA, ZIP, NOTHING to their shitcoin networks. They NEVER, EVER, EVER will because major players coming with size will continue to choose the Ethereum L2 framework over the hot shitcoin of the cycle. So, my dear soybros and shitcoin connoisseurs, before you publish another post containing stupidity of elephantine proportions, please take a moment to consider all of this.

• 
  Zase (@Zasee_) reported 11 minutes ago

  @coinbase Hi, I need help with a Coinbase One refund. I can't reach a human through the chatbot and need assistance with my refund request. Could someone please help me?

• 
  carlosjmelgar (@carlosjmelgar) reported 12 minutes ago

  It is fair to acknowledge that expectations for Base were high. As a former team member, I sometimes wonder whether I could have been more effective in advocating for decisions that better supported sustained user and builder activity. Probably not because I'm just a pleb and my role was doomed from the start. Market conditions have been difficult: attention is fragmented with constant rotation across many chains, builder morale is under pressure, and the environment for new projects to thrive has been challenging to say the least. It has been a long stretch since a base native project has been able to maintain meaningful mcap and userbase. Times are tough, but not this tough imo. Base has meaningful advantages, including Coinbase backing, runway to operate through a prolonged bera, and untapped distribution strengths. Ability to execute under pressure has been sus. Before you "leave Brittney alone!" me... I continue to deploy capital in the ecosystem, use apps, and support builders where I can.

• 
  Meti Lux Partners Group (@MetiLuxDubai) reported 13 minutes ago

  Coinbase just chose Abu Dhabi for its global tokenization hub. It secured regulatory approval from ADGM’s FSRA to support tokenized financial assets under Abu Dhabi’s regulated financial-services framework. But the bigger story isn’t crypto — or even Coinbase. It’s where global financial infrastructure is choosing to build. 👀

• 
  Koolkev (@Koolkev3590) reported 13 minutes ago

  @coinbase Coinbase is great but the wallet is the worse since the upgrade. After they stole my FLR tokens they told me we don’t support FLR. It was in my base wallet for a year, what a scam. I switched to ledger and seems to work good. I did get my FLR back finely.

• 
  Captain Jack (@iPursueLife) reported 17 minutes ago

  100% accurate @coinbase is a 3rd party/bank/custodian Ethereum is built to destroy @coinbase Why would @brian_armstrong support that?

• 
  I₿IT HODL 🟥 (@IBITHODL) reported 18 minutes ago

  @GaryCardonee said it perfectly, the Bitcoin Bro's have done more damage to Bitcoin than Wall Street, Institutions, or Big Bitcoin could ever do. (paraphrased) Only on X is it a sin to just buy Bitcoin. "I bought a Bitcoin ETF version" is met with "You don't own bitcoin, bro, not a REAL Bitcoiner" "I bought bitcoin through coinbase" is met with "LOL bro, you don't remember FTX??? NOT YOUR KEYS, NOT YOUR WALLET???" "I bought bitcoin and self custodied it myself" is met with "Bro, you're not a real Bitcoiner unless you use this hardware wallet" "I support Bitcoin" is met with "Well you don't support BIP 110, therefore, you support Government coin" And on and on and on it goes. I have told all my friends and family who bought into Bitcoin this bear market "STAY OFF X and AWAY FROM YOUTUBE" Maybe the key to getting new people into the bitcoin eco system is not to blast them with a bunch of bullshit and instead just be happy they are starting out and supporting the 'thing' we all like.

• 
  MR TWWM (@TWWM70) reported 21 minutes ago

  Day 10 @coinbase @CoinbaseSupport still not able to access my funds after repeated emails from your team saying “there are no restrictions on your account” Even they don’t know why I can’t access my portfolio.

• 
  Ginger (@SoulessGinger8) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Thawnnee @FlippingProfits We say that, but retail doesn’t care about a narrative. “Doge but a cat, “Pepe but it’s a toad, and “bitcoin but it’s a butt” is exactly the kind of **** some boomer scrolling coinbase will buy because they understand it.

• 
  Johnny Strange (@utxoshit) reported 28 minutes ago

  @CaminaDrummer4 @uanbtc "If they were mining it, it would not be stalled" is the whole problem, not the answer to it. No single miner gets that outcome by switching. What they capture is a coinbase output on a chain that has found about two blocks, maturing after 100, at a hashrate where that is years out, with no venue to sell it into when it does mature. Every miner reasoning individually reaches the same conclusion without talking to each other. That is what game theory actually predicts. Collusion is the extra assumption you are adding on top.