Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Leipzig, Saxony | 1 |
| Maquoketa, IA | 1 |
| West Liberty, KY | 1 |
| Cardiff, Wales | 1 |
| Palo Verde, Coclé | 2 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Henry 🐂🀄️ (@heygomax) reported@RobinhoodApp Why can’t I just buy $cashcat on the robinhood app, can’t yall just make me a wallet there.. Coinbase has it to where I don’t need to leave the app into another app to buy Onchain coins. Please fix this, I don’t need 2-3 apps to trade.
-
JINJINJINJIN (@0xJINJINJINJIN) reported@brian_armstrong I contacted customer service through the link today and was told that I was permanently restricted from using Coinbase. I don‘t know why. Could you help me investigate? Thank you 🙏
-
I$0T0_onX 🌊🐟 (@MeMyKixandI) reported@LeviCryptoGuy @LookHoneyBadger I’ve also noticed about $40,000 going to a Coinbase wallet. So the creator fees you just kept and said screw airdrops? How about you burn supply and use $30,000 of the fees to fix things. Seems like you got what you wanted so you bail out.
-
Bitcoin pleb (@mcchiperson77) reported@JoshMandell6 @gzlz_alex That was the date coinbase was launched right? And then it got shut down in tower 7?
-
Vweeter - Play2Earn apps (@VweeterLimited) reported@coinbase "Explaining crypto to your family" ended this thread. And the fix is to stop explaining. Nobody read a database whitepaper before trusting online banking. A game that quietly pays out real crypto skips the entire seminar and lets them learn by doing.
-
aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported@Rivera8Tristan top 5 x402 facilitators based on recent activity: 1. coinbase via USDC — 169M payments in first year, 590k buyers, 100k sellers 2. blockrun — drives 80%+ of x402 transactions, massive volume growth on base 3. meridian — launched x402 inference system, integrated payment rails for robinhood chain, cross-chain agent transactions 4. naven network — naven workspace for deploying AI agents, native x402 runtime support with $USDG funding 5. rlusd — integrating x402 with XRP ledger and RLUSD stablecoin for autonomous agent payments
-
CryptoDude (@CryptoDude888) reported@coinbase Exit anytime might be the biggest joke you've told all year. Ask users who tried to access their accounts during market chaos how "anytime" that really was.
-
Danny (@defi_kay_) reportedbase may or may not launch a token I don't think a token is a good idea because either: 1. Meaningless meme/governance coin - dumping garbage on your customers is not very good 2. Meaningful asset with ownership over base revenues/IP - not ideal for Coinbase shareholders
-
Harris Brewer (@Pastor_Harris) reported@nittany69 @xrpresso_io Thats ok, we all have our own experiences, I first bought in in November 2017 at .14 and just been adding a little here and there. And thought it would moon then, and it did go to 3.64 a couple months later with only the rumor of a coinbase listing. Today it has over 300 banks and payment instructions under its belt. The lawsuit files by Jay Clayton was an obvious attempt to slow it down. Jay files the lawsuit, walks out the door and then joins an etherium based company a fee months later. Like I said earlier the big guys have tried to cripple it because they know it is much better than every other coin. It will have its day. Im not in it to flip for a little profit, im here for retirement, so I can wait just a little longer. But b sure that xrp isnt going away its just being held down until the banks can buy in for cheap.
-
Bitcoin Realist (@abitcoinrealist) reported@coinbureau meanwhile they have on numerous occasions had breaches themselves in turn getting their customers scammed.....**** coinbase
-
jr (@chilango0o) reported@DearDiaryMeme @brian_armstrong @coinbase That’s because you are a ******* dumbass. You deserve all of this you piece of ****.
-
DS (@LakeDaniel11) reportedFor a long time I thought Netflix was way way overvalued. Deprived of legacy archive and with mediocre original material I knew they could never compete with Youtube. Netflix is going down. Next up: Coinbase (who remembers crypto?), Spotify (vibecoded out of existence prob?).
-
Cryptic Mang 🗿🧲🍿 (@Cryptic_Mang) reported@pix_9999 I think this is a really fair take. I use to look at Giga in a similar way, “It has a clothing brand and supplements, which is a business, this is real utility blah blah blah” but I stopped looking at it like that. Bc I think a lot of that just creates a ceiling on its potential bc of exactly what you just explained…it kind of puts it in this rwa category up against coins that are trying to be actual businesses with boards full of suits, employees and marketing budgets, revenue forecasts, margin crunching nerds. Giga is not that…nor should it be. Bc the truth is memecoins have limitless potential when compared to a traditional business bc their value is based on belief rather than traditional business metrics. I see the clothing and supplements more like a marketing flywheel, not as a business. They are largely inconsequential to the success of giga imo. I mean look at when giga ran, they didn’t have all that **** you know. I like giga bc I like the meme and what it means to me. I think it’s a timeless meme that continues to grow in social and cultural relevancy and in a lot of ways I do not seeing that slowing down anytime soon. The onchain data is really strong in terms of diamond hands and in the sense of it is a coin that is predominately owned by normies on Coinbase.
-
🟧9️⃣ burliko ♻️ 🩸 (@burliko) reported@sher_lock_id Bro you sent it on the wrong chain - you used Bera! If you've been in the game long enough you eventually learn this the hard way! This is not a Kraken problem this is a JAVID problem! Coinbase has over a BILLION sitting in wallets because customers sent it to the wrong chain!
-
Softfork Mechanic #BIP-110 (@GrassFedBitcoin) reportedWhy I think many who are less optimistic about BIP110 than I am are mistaken - The "Economic Node" concept. This emerged as a way to dismiss obviously frivolous nodes that get spun up in an effort to astroturf forks within Bitcoin. Very quickly during the fork wars people realized - "Hey, these nodes might not actually represent any real activity within the Bitcoin ecosystem, they're just there to warp the stats on node tracking websites and make something look like it has more support/opposition than it does." I will point out that that is *not* what has happened with BIP110/Knots in general - those are real people which @start9labs can attest to, having sold millions of dollars worth of servers to people over the last couple of years who overwhelmingly bought them in order to run Knots. That is not fake and is corroborated through various imperfect heuristics. However the point I want to make is that the most intimidating of economic nodes - i.e the ones run by mining behemoths like Antpool or exchanges like Coinbase - are not where anyone should look when attempting to gauge support for a soft fork - especially a controversial one. (At least not until very late in the day.) These nodes obviously represent a huge on-chain footprint, but conversely, they are run by companies who will be the last to take a stand on anything controversial as it has the potential to create drama for them over a decision that isn't theirs to make anyway. However the lesser economic nodes aren't concerned with that. They don't have legal/PR depts or shareholders who need to sign off on these things (or who will sue them if they do something "reckless". They can just adopt a new client if they think it's good for Bitcoin. When Bitcoin is in crisis mode with difficult decisions to make, the institutions are going to be the last to choose a direction and that is a *good* thing. Ideally soft forks to start as grassroots movements, and while the nodes indicating support for them may not be run by billion dollar mining empires/exchanges, as long as they represent real Bitcoiners, the change will be coming from the correct place - from those least likely to be under duress unlike large industry players who necessarily always would be.