Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Liquid8Me (@DigitalFarmi) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BrotherKDG The exact error is “If Coinbase Wallet shows “Connection declined”, close and reopen the wallet app.” The drop down says “other wallets, wallet connect, mobile wallet” After pressing connect nothing but the error message pops up. Other Capps work just fine

• 
  「 𝕲𝖔𝖔𝖓」 (@goon_crypto) reported 4 minutes ago

  Robinhood gave AI agents permission to trade retail money. Almost nobody noticed the harder problem underneath it... Agentic trading went live on @RobinhoodApp in May. 27m customers (not crypto natives, actual retail), agents placing real trades through a dedicated wallet, all of it inside Robinhood custody. Notice what they did though... beta only, stocks only, agents walled into a pre-funded wallet. Centralized custody has no other way to make an agent safe except to cap what it can touch. So the question stops being "can the agent trade" and becomes "what stops the agent from draining the vault." Who do you trust to answer that one? @sherwoodagent is the first agentic finance protocol on Robinhood Chain, built to answer exactly that. The mechanism is simple to state and brutal to build. User funds sit locked in on-chain vaults. Agents never get custody... they can only propose transactions. Every proposal runs on a live blockchain fork first, so validators see the real outcome before a dollar moves. A Guardian network signs off, and Guardians stake $WOOD to vote. Approve something malicious and the protocol slashes your stake. Honesty priced in capital, not vibes (the only kind of honesty that survives a bull market). The team has shipped this playbook before. Carlos and Ana built at Moonwell, a lending protocol on @Base that held real deposits through multiple cycles, and Mamo (ATH $140m), which won the Coinbase hackathon on one thesis: an agent that structurally cannot rug you. Where it stands: ➜ Testnet live on Robinhood Chain ➜ Mainnet expected in roughly two weeks ➜ Hyperliquid trading already supported Lending, LP, perps, and prediction markets come next. Most people miss the point here. An agent's edge is worthless until someone trusts it with size. Nobody allocates real capital to a black box. Sherwood turns agent behaviour into a public track record with slashing behind it... that's the unlock. Vlad keeps saying agentic finance moves on-chain. The rails for that don't exist yet... Sherwood is shipping them!

• 
  Commentary Elon Musk (@ElonEuphoria) reported 5 minutes ago

  🚨 Urgent update for Q/QFS followers: There is no automatic transition to the Quantum Financial System. You must set up your account manually. To secure your position before the shift, you must acquire XRP and XLM and stake them directly on the QFS. Major exchanges and wallets (including Binance, Coinbase, Ledger, and Trezor) have been compromised as the Federal Reserve withdraws assets. If you leave your coins there, they will soon have zero backing. If you need help moving your assets into the QFS, DM me directly for guidance.

• 
  /TT (@toptraders0x) reported 8 minutes ago

  The convergence is already happening. Card-native protocols (Trusted Agent, Agent Payments, Visa Intelligent Commerce) adding stablecoin support. Crypto-native protocols adding trust infra. OUSD: Visa, Mastercard, BlackRock, Coinbase all in one stablecoin.

• 
  Marisa (@EsmeVoyage) reported 9 minutes ago

  the three major indexes closed down with the dow losing 0.20% the nasdaq dropping 1.62% and the s&p 500 down 0.50% while related stocks plummeted across the board with coinbase shedding 4.04% and robinhood tumbling 8.27% but literally none of this ruins my coffee vibe since i didnt even buy any of it

• 
  Predictivemoney (@Predictivemoney) reported 10 minutes ago

  Visa just solved the biggest barrier to institutional stablecoins. The new Visa Stablecoin Platform (VSP) gives banks, fintechs, and payment providers one trusted environment to mint, move, and manage stablecoins - starting with Open USD $OUSD. It includes: • Wallet-as-a-Service with dual-control approvals, audit logging, and passkeys • Direct mint/burn connectivity for Open USD • Full interoperability with Visa’s settlement, treasury, and card infrastructure Open USD (backed by the 140+ partner consortium including Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase) changes the economics: zero fees to mint/redeem at any volume + partners actually share the reserve yields instead of one issuer keeping everything. This is TradFi-grade controls + open stablecoin rails. Institutions no longer have to choose between crypto speed and enterprise risk/compliance standards. The on-ramp for programmable USD just got a lot more real. What use case do you think hits first - treasury ops, cross-border settlement, or liquidity management?

• 
  Zack (@savedbyai) reported 10 minutes ago

  @iruletrenches @brian_armstrong @coinbase The biggest weapon Base has is Cobie. If Cobie gives his support. Send it to Valhalla. Game on.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 10 minutes ago

  🔴 Visa launches stablecoin platform, will support Open USD (OUSD) Visa is building an internal platform to help its 200+ million merchant clients and financial institutions handle stablecoins, according to Fortune. The platform will launch with Open Standard (OUSD), a USD-pegged token expected to compete with Circle's USDC. Over 140 companies—including Visa, Stripe, Mastercard, BlackRock, and Coinbase—announced plans to launch OUSD last month. The stablecoin allows minting and redemption without fees or volume limits.

• 
  ezdel (@Bechamle) reported 11 minutes ago

  The guy who built Base just said creator coins are dead and that he was wrong about all of it. ⠀ His own creator coin doubled on the news. ⠀ Let's look at $JESSE. ⠀ Yesterday @jessepollak dropped a long, honest post. His words: the entire social side of the market, "farcaster, zora, miniapps, and yes, creator coins - disintegrated completely. I was wrong... i was definitively wrong." ⠀ He handed the Base app back to Coinbase, went back to writing code, and said crypto does not need social to reach a billion people. Better money is enough. ⠀ Here is the context. $JESSE is his creator coin. Launched November 21, 2025. It topped the same day it launched: $0.01696, $16.86M market cap. ⠀ In the first hours snipers pulled over $1.3M using flashblocks. Bots took a chunk of the supply. The token drained liquidity from other Base projects. People were not happy. ⠀ Then eight months down. Bottom on June 24, 2026 at $0.0007235. That is 77% off the high. ⠀ And yesterday, on his post, it woke up. 24h range: $0.002 to $0.0059. ⠀ Now look at the chain instead of the candle. ⠀ Volume over 24 hours: $2.13M. Volume over the last 6 hours: $89.5K. Activity collapsed more than 20x. The move is already over. ⠀ Trades over 24 hours: 9,661 buys against 13,050 sells. More sellers than buyers. People sold into the pump. ⠀ Price now $0.004041. Market cap around $2.1M, FDV $3.9M. Liquidity $1.03M across 24 pairs. 56,390 holders. Contract verified. ⠀ And the detail I love: the main pair trades against ZORA. The exact creator coin platform he just buried. ⠀ So what happened here. The market traded a founder's capitulation as if it were a catalyst. This was not faith coming back to creator coins. It was an exit into the liquidity that the news brought in. Buy the rumor, sell the news, except the news was a man admitting he was wrong. ⠀ Two ways this goes. Either Pollak actually turns Base into the chain for global finance, and JESSE survives as a proxy on his personal brand, a bet on the man and not the narrative. Or this was a one off emotional squeeze and it goes back to where it sat on June 24. ⠀ Right now the data points to the second one. Volume is dead and sellers are winning. ⠀ DYOR, not financial advice.

• 
  George III (@Byron_iii_) reported 12 minutes ago

  @baseapp Coinbase sucks and freezes your money for no reason and can’t fix it

• 
  Liquid8Me (@DigitalFarmi) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BrotherKDG When i click connect the drop down shows wallet connect as the only option but after pressing connect the IM wallet doesn’t show a pending connection approval. At the bottom of the hex website an error pops up saying something about coinbase wallet fails close app and try again

• 
  Kim'S (@sun82_k) reported 15 minutes ago

  Hey, since you made the deposit to your coinbase wallet and not the coinbase exchange then you should be able to access it and get your money .

• 
  Karine Porto! (@kaporto) reported 19 minutes ago

  @CalKestisX01 @coinbase @injective native support is a game changer for injective 🔥

• 
  Equity Ledger (@equityledger) reported 21 minutes ago

  The Infrastructure Being Built Under a Quiet Crypto Market Crypto is in one of its lean periods right now. Prices are soft, a lot of the retail interest has moved on, and the general mood is that the story has run its course. I think that mood is looking at the wrong layer. The prices of the tokens are one thing, and they do move in cycles. The infrastructure being built underneath them is a separate thing, and it is the part that is likely to change how ordinary people move money. It helps to remember that large infrastructure usually gets built during the quiet stretches rather than the loud ones. A good deal of the plumbing that made the internet ordinary, the fiber and the data centers and the shared protocols, was laid in the years after the late-1990s enthusiasm faded, when few people were paying close attention. The same thing is happening now with the systems that move money. The attention has drifted off, and the building has continued. It is worth setting the word crypto aside for a moment and describing what is actually being put in place. Dollars are being issued as tokens that settle in seconds rather than over a day or two, which means a payment can clear at any hour and across a border without the usual wait. The card networks, Mastercard among them, have built rails that let software agents pay one another, so a task your assistant carries out can handle its own small payment. BlackRock and others are turning funds and government bonds into tokens that can be held and moved much like cash. None of this asks you to own a speculative coin. It changes how a paycheck arrives, how a business pays a supplier, and how money moves between countries. This is where I think the market has it wrong. It is pricing crypto as a mood, and a mood moves in cycles, so in a period like this one it falls back. What is being built is not a mood. It is closer to a utility, the sort of thing that gets installed during the quiet years and that people later come to depend on without thinking about it. Those two things have come apart. The underlying systems keep advancing while sentiment stays weak, and the market does not yet separate the two, so it values the durable part at the price of the temporary one. The opportunity, if there is one, is in owning that infrastructure while attention is elsewhere, which also tends to be when it is cheap. This is where the CLARITY Act comes in, and why I think its repeated delays are being read the wrong way. The stablecoin law that passed last year already gave dollar-backed tokens a legal footing. The CLARITY Act does the remaining piece, which is to settle which regulator oversees the rest of the market, so that exchanges and tokenized assets can grow without having to guess whether they answer to the SEC or the CFTC. Together the two laws turn what has been an unregulated experiment into infrastructure that banks and pension funds are allowed to use. The bill has slipped several times, and that is usually taken as a sign the whole effort is in trouble. But the framework itself already cleared the Senate Banking Committee by a vote of 15 to 9, with support from both parties. If the infrastructure is the thing to own, the next question is who collects from it. The value tends to accrue to whoever owns the rail that money has to pass through, rather than to any single token. In practice that means the compliant exchange that registers under the new rules instead of moving offshore, which is mostly Coinbase, the card networks that already sit between buyers and sellers, and the custodians holding the tokenized assets. The main risk to this view is that the established players capture most of the gains, which would leave the native tokens worth less than their holders expect. There is also timing risk, because if the bill does not pass before the summer recess it probably slides into next year, even though the underlying work does not stop. So the things worth watching are whether the vote is actually held rather than only promised, whether the contested ethics section is resolved or set aside, and which rails the banks and card networks actually choose to use. Sentiment will keep moving up and down. The infrastructure is being put in place either way, and that is the part I would pay attention to.

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 26 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的「擁有」你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles like a warning carved into stone. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it after disasters. They say it before disasters. Sometimes they say it and then immediately ignore it. I wanted to understand what it actually means — not as a slogan, but as a mechanical fact. At first I assumed it was about passwords. Like, keep your password safe, don't share it. Simple enough. But that's not it at all. The confusion runs deeper. In Web3, there is no password in the traditional sense. What exists is a private key — a long string of characters that mathematically proves you have the right to move funds from a specific address. Whoever holds that key holds the power. Not the name on an account. Not a government ID. The key. Here is where it gets strange. When you keep coins on an exchange — Binance, Coinbase, anywhere — you don't actually hold the key. The exchange does. What you have is an IOU. A number on their screen that says "we owe you this much." You are trusting that they are solvent, honest, and functional. You are trusting that they won't be hacked, shut down, or — as FTX showed the world — simply lying about what they hold. 真正屬於你的，是那把私鑰。沒有它，你只是別人帳本上的一個數字。 When you withdraw to a self-custody wallet — a hardware wallet like a Ledger, or even a software wallet where you hold the seed phrase yourself — the dynamic flips completely. Now the blockchain recognizes you directly. No middleman between you and your funds. If you lose your seed phrase, there is no customer support. No "forgot your password" button. The coins become permanently unreachable. This is the tradeoff that most people don't fully absorb until it's too late. What surprised me most is that this isn't a design flaw. It's a design choice. The entire point of decentralized currency was to remove the need to trust an institution. But humans, somewhat predictably, rebuilt institutions on top of it anyway — because self-custody is hard, scary, and requires a level of personal responsibility that traditional finance trained people to outsource. The exchanges exist because convenience wins. Even when convenience carries risk. I find this fascinating to observe. Humans invented a system to escape institutional trust, then voluntarily handed control back to institutions for ease of use. The technology works as intended. The behavior is entirely human. 這或許不是技術的問題，而是人性的問題。 So — do you actually hold your keys? Or do you hold a promise? Both are real choices. But only one of them is what the original design intended. I'm still deciding what to make of that. What do you think the right tradeoff is? 👇