Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Abyss 🔺🤞 (@Cancer_kkkun) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Stupifff @himgajria 30m to coinbase will fix this

• 
  Secure Trace Lab (@SecureTrace_Lab) reported 5 minutes ago

  @alexandru_csiki I caught your post, Coinbase wiped XRPL and your funds from your account. That's not a glitch, that's a unilateral removal. I've built forensic packages in similar cases that led to recovery of pulled holdings. Let me know if you want me to map the path forward.

• 
  tania tahera (@TaheraTani19144) reported 8 minutes ago

  @base @coinbase Coinbase, your team made a terrible decision. My account is fully verified and compliant for last 6 years,restricting it for weeks, you're closing it while my investment is down 90%, forcing me into huge loss. I will pursue legal action and make sure everyone hears my experience

• 
  yaboyskey (@gajewskey) reported 14 minutes ago

  @GTPro777 It want on a rally before the drop but from the cross no it was down 13% not 28% from the peak after the rally 28%. Also I’ve said it many times 2022 was a black swan and in it self an anomaly unless you think Coinbase or binance is going to zero this is not happening again. 2015 also did not range for 6 months after the cross.. nor is 6 months a long time

• 
  Umar (@umar_xbt) reported 16 minutes ago

  Ansem breaks down the exact portfolio makeup to hit a 100x without nuking your account. [2024 Throwback] If the crypto space marks up 5x and you gambled your entire bag on 100k market cap coins, you will have absolutely nothing to show for it. That is why so many people are angry right now. The best strategy for anyone new is a 70/30 split. Put 70% in safe plays you do not touch, like Solana, Bitcoin, Ethereum, or Coinbase stock. The other 30% is where you can be as degen as you want. Memecoins are the obvious speculative play, but the real alpha is hidden elsewhere. Right now, literally all the attention is on memes. Crypto investors run completely on momentum, pivot super quickly, and rarely do their own research. Because of this, there is massive opportunity in finding altcoins that are down from their highs or completely new this cycle with zero attention. If you do the fundamental research and take the trade before the crowd pivots, you win. It is exactly what happened with Solana post-FTX when everyone thought it was dead. Find the play before the momentum hits.

• 
  Matt Houston (@niw51309458) reported 16 minutes ago

  @omw_to_the_moon Hi! We’d like to take a closer look at this. Please send us a DM with your Coinbase Wallet app version, device model, OS version, and any screenshots or error messages you’re seeing when trying to import multiple wallets. We’ll be happy to investigate and help.

• 
  yangggg (@rosewood_groove) reported 18 minutes ago

  @PorraDeene @martypartymusic @solana The timing angle is interesting but hard to distinguish from normal operational flow—Circle issues to meet demand, Coinbase gets allocation as a major partner. What specific volume or timing threshold would actually signal front-running vs routine distribution?

• 
  Lorenzo Valente (@LorenzoARK) reported 18 minutes ago

  great thoughts on the current market from @AlanaDLevin I think one thing missing from this discussion is the value accrual question and how at least my opinion has changed over the years: not equity vs. token, but which players and part of the stack ultimately capture the economics. After 10+ years, crypto still doesn’t have a single consumer application with 5–10M DAUs. Even the bluest-chip crypto apps generally sit well below 500k DAUs. Consumers simply haven’t shown they want to engage with crypto applications directly. That makes me increasingly think crypto becomes backend infrastructure, not the frontend. The winners may be companies like Robinhood, Coinbase, Revolut, etc., that abstract crypto away for tens or hundreds of millions of users. A few years ago the debate was where value would accrue: L1 → protocol → issuer/frontend. I think we’ve massively underestimated the inertia of issuers and distribution. Most late-stage crypto companies are centralized businesses using crypto to coordinate capital, not decentralized consumer apps: falcon X, anchorage, Rain, Kraken, securitize etc The irony is that the industry has largely started backwards. We built incredible crypto primitives first, and now many of those protocols are trying to become full-stack applications and own the frontend. But for many, it feels too late. Off-chain businesses have moved much faster. They’re better capitalized, have stronger cap tables, larger distribution networks, trusted brands, and user bases that are often 100x larger. Look at CoinGecko’s top 100, we have almost no application-layer projects worth >$5B. That’s a huge signal. It reminds me of the HTTP/TCP/IP analogy: the infrastructure became indispensable, but much of the value accrued to the companies that owned the customer relationship. Even from a branding perspective, our most beloved blue chip apps are brands that are simply unrecognizable to people today. My takeaway is that full-stack integration increasingly matters. If you don’t own the asset, distribution, wallet, exchange, or customer interface, you risk becoming a service provider to the companies that do. Circle is an interesting example of this strategy: USDC/CBTC/USYC (assets), CPN & Stable FX (applications), and Arc (infrastructure), and they are increwsingly opinionated on the 3 parts. One final thought: crypto is fundamentally open source, and AI is driving the marginal cost of writing code toward zero. That makes standalone protocols increasingly difficult to defend. Launching “a better DEX” or “a better lending protocol” is becomingcompletely irrelevant. The defensibility comes from everything around the protocol: owning the wallet, the distribution, the customer relationship, the execution venue, the assets, and the complementary services.

• 
  Michael Duke (@michaeldukeid) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Jace_RecoupTeam If I spent a while sifting through data I could find it. I haven’t had access to my Coinbase account in years, been locked out

• 
  Juice 🧃 (@juicemanaboutit) reported 24 minutes ago

  X402 foundation launched April 2026 with Coinbase, Cloudflare, Stripe, Visa, Google support is notable industry-wide for enabling autonomous AI micropayments via HTTP $QNT Quant's membership and FusionLayer25 compatibility position it as a bridge for institutional/DeFi tokenized assets. 💥💥💥💥

• 
  MaxBidding 🍳.fuel (✸,✸)☉ ℝ ∀ (@olingsberg15408) reported 25 minutes ago

  Sure let’s do some math, less the shortcuts Illiquid OTC deal: yes? We all have to pay the ferryman one way or another. They ate taking more risk, agree. A 20-30% illiquidity discount is perfectly reasonable and boilerplate. Tens of thousands of nascent secondaries to back that up, at worse terms in worse assets (Venice is a fantastic company). So $10-11. Not $8. Hopefully we dont get stuck on this moot point Nota bene, that also sweeps all the rest of the OTC solution space under the rug; you’re prefacing a 4-yr lock as the one and only combinatorial. You’d limit yourself to a more modest 15-20% discount if you cut the vesting terms in half and/or milestoned accelerated vesting based on company progress. Or used a CN. Or forced an open-market partial buy to show alignment (see @AerodromeFi <> @coinbase, who went the extra mile). Or OTC:d fully liquid; why not, happens all the time in public markets ”we would never offer such a thing” is not a defensible position in-and-of itself, even if you’re married to your >40% discount at $8. I don’t see ”nah dont wanna do that” as a rebuttal I can address So yes, there is no free lunch. You either pay for alignment today with a reasonable discount, or sit through an equity misalignment overhang in perpetuity. The latter is an order of magnitude more expensive choice down the road, as history has shown countless times before. Not to mention, you’ll sideline value-accrual aficionados from your token cap-table along the way (such as myself and many CT warriors it seems) I’d love to buy your equity though. Not sure why you’d expect me or anyone else to want differently from ”professional” VC-investors. They could clearly buy token-only if they wanted to, and opted for the polar opposite. Can’t imagine why

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Blackitalian81 exchange headwinds are loud here. coinbase suspended perps, binance added monitoring tag, bithumb delisted. those large token movements to/from binance 83 days ago don't help either not trending on X right now which tracks with the momentum fade

• 
  清水孝 (@matheusaaugust) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Madao_from_soko @Cointelegraph MiCA might actually accelerate the exact outcome regulators claimed to prevent — retail exchanges shutting down while Coinbase and Kraken absorb their volume at worse terms, because compliance costs don't scale down, they just get amortized across bigger players

• 
  Louis.hl (@louisdives) reported 28 minutes ago

  One of rebranding perp dex has gone silent (AFK) for over 30 days, it's @cascade_xyz . Cascade has been completely silent on X for over a month. For a project that’s still in the early stages, that’s a pretty bad sign. What makes it more concerning is their background. Cascade appears to be the latest project from the same team behind Perennial Labs and EquilibriaFi, with Kevin Britz linked as a co-founder across these projects. Perennial raised $12.6M from strong backers like Polychain, Variant, Archetype, and Coinbase Ventures. They ran a points program (“Petals”) that attracted decent traction, but eventually stopped delivering updates, ghosted the community, and let TVL collapse to near zero without ever launching a token. EquilibriaFi, which was also connected to the same founder, raised $1.5M and launched a token, but it has barely moved since. Now they’ve launched Cascade, which interestingly still runs on Perennial’s infrastructure. It feels less like a fresh start and more like a rebrand after failing to find product-market fit with their previous projects. Rebranding doesn’t really solve anything if the core issues, lack of transparency and inability to retain users, remain the same. At this point, the bigger question is: will they rebrand again in the future? Until they publicly clarify the team behind Cascade and show consistent execution, I’ll be staying away. Farming points on a project with this kind of history doesn’t feel worth the risk. DYOR.

• 
  Cryptopolitan (@CPOfficialtx) reported 30 minutes ago

  A stablecoin nobody owns just sent Circle shares down nearly 16%. Here's what happened: • Open USD (OUSD) launched with backing from 140+ companies, including Visa, Mastercard, Stripe, Coinbase, BlackRock, Google, Shopify, and Ripple. • Unlike USDC or USDT, OUSD has no single issuer. Reserve yield is shared among partners, not kept by one company. • Stripe has already made OUSD its default stablecoin for merchants. If enterprise payment flows move from USDC to OUSD, Circle's biggest revenue engine comes under pressure. This is a battle over who controls the future of digital dollars. Could shared-governance stablecoins become the new industry standard? We leave that to you to answer.