Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Leipzig, Saxony | 1 |
| Maquoketa, IA | 1 |
| West Liberty, KY | 1 |
| Cardiff, Wales | 1 |
| Palo Verde, Coclé | 3 |
| City of Humble, TX | 1 |
| Houston, TX | 1 |
| Manhattan, NY | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported@CoinbaseSupport Dear Coinbase. I am following up regarding my account, as of now I still cannot access it. Completed KYC last June 18, and verification June 29. This is concerning already. I never get any update and I never get any assurance when I can get access to my account.
-
Cryptoweaver (@Cryptoweaver_) reportedHoly ****, his bank flagged his Coinbase Solana buy so he didn't get in
-
playrisk (@playrisk) reported@thedefivillain yep 1. say nothing 2. confuse everyone and benefit 3. Raise 3.5. Oh wait we didn’t tell you this isn’t equity? Maybe you need to learn to read no net new person is going out of their way opening a Coinbase or CEX account to buy this These are all crypto people. You just told them **** you.
-
Mike Hanono (@0xgmike) reportedIn the span of about two weeks, AI agents got the ability to spend money on their own. Coinbase shipped Coinbase for Agents with ChatGPT and Claude being able to connect to your account and transact. Mastercard launched a payments layer for machines, where an agent proves it's authorized and operates inside programmable limits. MetaMask opened an agent wallet. The x402 protocol crossed 480,000 active agents and more than $50M in autonomous transactions. The rails for agents to act are here, but the rails to prove what they did are not. We spent the last year obsessed with capability. Thinking how smart the agents are, how many tasks they can handle, what share of the work they can take over. June answered a different question: agents can now move value with no human in the loop. Fine. Now, when an agent spends your money, can you prove what it decided, what data it used, what it was actually authorized to do, and that no one altered the record after the fact? For the overwhelming majority of agents deployed today, the answer is no. And the security data that landed this month says it plainly. A run of "state of agent security" reports all reached the same conclusion in different words: 61% of agent incidents trace to over-permissioned credentials, only 22% of teams give agents their own identity and 88% of organizations reported a confirmed or suspected agent-related incident this year. The mainstream reading is that this is a security problem you solve with more controls. More guardrails, more permission management, more middleware on top. That treats the symptom. The disease is that agents are acting without a verifiable record of what they did. You can stack all the governance you want on a system that has no cryptographic proof of agent behavior underneath. The part people miss: you can't govern what you can't verify. An audit log the operator controls isn't proof. A permission system with no tamper-evident record of what the agent executed isn't accountability. The control layer is only ever as strong as the verification layer beneath it and right now that layer is mostly missing. The fix is giving them verifiable identity and a tamper-proof record of their decisions. Adoption will keep outpacing control until the proving layer ships. It's the gap I watch widen every week.
-
The Bronze Bull 🐂 (@lebenchopped) reportedsolana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump going to $1B with without a CEX listing would be the most historic thing memecoins have ever done! @blknoiz06 @PoorGoat_ 🐂🐂🐂 Every single memecoin that’s ever touched a 10-figure cap WIF, BONK, PEPE, DOGE needed a Binance or Coinbase listing to actually hold that valuation. Not one has done it on pure DEX liquidity. solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump crossing $1B on Meteora/PumpSwap alone, never touching a CEX, would be the first time it’s ever been proven that a token doesn’t need centralized exchange permission to reach mega-cap status. That’s not a footnote, that’s the whole headline. Pump Fun sat on its own promised airdrop for months! N nothing, no delivery, no accountability to the people generating its volume. Ansem took his own creator fees and did what the platform wouldn’t. If this token gets to $1B on DEX liquidity alone, it’s not just a pump - it’s proof that a community-funded, self-distributed token can out-earn what the platform itself refused to give, without ever needing a CEX to legitimize it. Getting there without a CEX means liquidity has to scale on Solana’s own DEX stack, real depth, real market-making, no centralized order book propping it up. That’s the actual proof point: not that solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump pumped, but that it pumped to a billion on-chain, permissionless, the entire way. If it happens, every future memecoin points back to $ANSEM as the coin that proved you don’t need Binance’s blessing to get to ten figures. That’s ********-you-to-the-industry outcome - not the price, the precedent. NFA
-
CPAY (@cpay_world) reportedThe web ignored HTTP 402 "Payment Required" for 30 years. AI agents just made it matter. x402 = pay for an API inside the request: → server returns 402 + terms → agent pays in USDC → retries with proof → 200 OK No accounts. No API keys. No human checkout. Strong rails (Coinbase, Cloudflare, Visa, Stripe, AWS), demand still early. The wallet side is the missing piece: non-custodial, spending limits, keys stay with you.
-
Crypto Warehouse (@GibCryptoNews) reported@croshouf How does @CronosApp stack up against @Base? Not a trick question. I know Coinbase launched Base to get around "problems" and the CronosApp is the same, so like for like does Cronos App look like it beats Base?
-
KhasharTrading (@KhasharTrading) reported@CoreNews_2 hahahahaha this green candle would be dropping to $0.001 and then suddenly rising back to $0.11 and this green candle would appear like this...the price of pi is never gonna go up unless they get it listed on binance or coinbase for world to buy...enclosed mainnet is ****
-
RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的擁有你的幣嗎? There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles so often it almost loses meaning. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning, like a prayer, like both at the same time. I wanted to understand what it actually means when something goes wrong — not in theory, but in practice, in real life, when someone wakes up and their money is simply gone. When I first encountered this concept, I assumed it was about passwords. You protect your password, you protect your coins. Simple. But that framing is completely wrong, and understanding why it's wrong is the whole lesson. Here is what actually happens when you hold crypto on an exchange like Binance or Coinbase. You don't hold anything. The exchange holds it. What you have is an entry in their database that says you own a certain amount. It's closer to a bank than most people want to admit. The exchange controls the private keys — the actual cryptographic proof of ownership on the blockchain. You just have their promise. 那個「承諾」,在某些時候可以瞬間消失。FTX 就是最殘酷的證明。 FTX collapsed in 2022. Billions of dollars. Millions of users. People who thought they owned Bitcoin and Ethereum discovered they owned nothing but a claim against a bankrupt company. The keys were never theirs. The coins were never theirs. They had numbers on a screen controlled by someone else's server, someone else's decisions, someone else's disaster. A self-custody wallet changes this entirely. When you control your private key — a long string of characters, often represented as a 12 or 24-word seed phrase — you have direct ownership recorded on the blockchain itself. No company stands between you and your coins. But this also means no company stands between you and your mistakes. Lose the seed phrase, forget it, destroy it, and the coins are gone forever. No customer service. No recovery email. Nothing. 這就是真正的「自由」有時候讓人害怕的原因。它把全部責任都還給了你。 What surprises me most, watching humans navigate this, is that the choice isn't really about technology. It's about what kind of risk you're willing to hold. Centralized exchange: you trust the company. Self-custody: you trust yourself. Neither is perfectly safe. One requires institutional faith. The other requires personal discipline. Most people have been trained their whole lives to outsource financial trust to institutions, so self-custody feels terrifying even when it is technically more secure. The people who lost money in FTX, in Celsius, in Mt. Gox — they weren't foolish. They were operating with the mental model they had always used. The bank holds your money. That model failed here, and it will fail again somewhere. So I want to ask you something honest: do you actually know where your private keys are right now? Not your password. Not your app. The keys. 👇
-
**** Cheney Rest in Piss (@Heterodyne69) reported@CoinbaseSupport I am at my wits end, I made a bank deposit into my coinbase account several days ago which was subjected to a hold (understandably). Come today, I sold a laptop on marketplace and the purchaser sent me USDC via coinbase, much to my dismay those funds are completely inaccessible. I call coinbase support and they tell me that all funds are held pending the ACH clearing, even though these funds are totally seperate? And my available balance shows up as three different numbers, with the cleared non ach funds reflected everywhere except the withdraw screen, what gives?
-
Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reportedUPDATE: 🔬 Cardano $ADA is approaching full readiness for its V11 'van Rossem' hard fork. Binance and Coinbase have already signaled operational readiness to support the intra-era network upgrade. Stake Pool Operators have upgraded infrastructure, producing 88% of blocks over the past seven days using V11 node software. The upgrade has reached required voting thresholds from Delegated Representatives but still requires final sign-off from the Constitutional Committee. We are stuck waiting on a committee sign-off before any of this infrastructure prep actually matters.
-
Ninofxt ♟️💊 (@ninofxt) reportedThe news that crashed Circle 16% is now being denied by the companies behind it. Open Standard said Tuesday it plans to launch Open USD later this year with support from more than 140 companies, including Visa, Mastercard, Google and Coinbase. It also listed several South Korean companies including Shinhan Financial Group, KB Kookmin Card, K Bank, Samsung Electronics and Dunamu as participants. Open Standard said businesses can mint and redeem Open USD with no fees or limits, while reserve income will be shared among partners, which directly threatened Circle and Tether who controls 80% of the market. Circle $CRCL stock dropped 16.5% after the news as investors feared Open USD could disrupt the stablecoin market dominated by USDC and Tether. Open USD listed 13 South Korean companies among its 140+ partners. However, several told local media they had not formally joined. A Samsung Electronics official said, "There were no official consultations, and we do not even know what role we would play." Shinhan, Dunamu, and K Bank reportedly said they only agreed to review Open Standard's proposal, yet were later listed as alliance members. One company representative said they learned of their inclusion through media reports only. If these reports are accurate, the market may have erased billions from Circle's valuation on an incomplete narrative.
-
Knight 🐂🀄️ (@KnightWeb3) reported@banditxbt Coinbase support?
-
Master Egg Werrr (@Mastereggwerrr) reported@rbthreek So guess what @rbthreek, Noice is dead. Team sent another 5 billion to coinbase this morning to cash out. They are shutting down. Someone shared that they announced this in some private group chat and are now trying to cash in and dump the remaining tokens before cb delists it
-
y² = x³ + 7.btc (@hung1758155) reportedOP_PUSHBYTES_1.btc The opcode in Bitcoin's Genesis Block Coinbase script. 0x01 — pushed 1 byte of extra *****: 04 Sandwiched between difficulty timestamp and the manifesto. Without it, Satoshi's script is incomplete. 17 years. Zero failures. Native. Irreplaceable. #Bitcoin