Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Paris, Île-de-France | 1 |
| Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
WHALES (@whalesdotsol) reported@Stockify_fi ($STFY) is positioning itself as the data hub for Coinbase’s tokenized stocks on Base. Coinbase has issued 13 tokenized equities, but only 4 currently have actual supply. Stockify tracks each token’s real supply, Base liquidity pools, and price premium/discount versus the underlying stock. $STFY is pitched as a stock-dividend protocol tied exclusively to Coinbase’s tokenized equities. 3% of every $STFY trade is used to buy the tokenized stocks, which are then sent directly to holders. As more stocks get issued, $STFY holders will vote on which equities to add. They also provide Telegram alerts for new stock listings, mints, and burns. The project is currently seeing modest early engagement (~1.1K views), with mixed replies ranging from support to accusations of sniping/launch issues. In one line: Stockify wants to become the Bloomberg + dividend layer for Coinbase’s tokenized stocks on Base, with $STFY giving holders exposure to the underlying tokenized equities.
-
JohnJohnson (@VaultExcavator) reported@dos__commas @coinbase / @brian_armstrong this customer needs clarification on this $Wluna issue. Seems like a big deal...
-
Jacob Marquez (@JacobMarquez__) reported@cryptorover look at who is actually in that room. DTCC, nasdaq, NYSE, CME. thats not a crypto summit. thats the clearing and settlement layer of the entire US market sitting down with the people building its replacement. coinbase and ripple are the smallest firms at that table.
-
MagicApe (@MadMagicSOL) reported@YusufGemz coinbase bid is the part i care about more than the headline. $60.5 turning into support is the real test here, otherwise $100 talk is just noise.
-
Rob Leder 🟥 (@rleder) reported@SovereignSteak @Strategy @saylor I think it all depends on whether Coinbase supports the new token or not. I know with BCH they credited customer accounts with the airdrop, but with the Bitcoin Gold airdrop they decided not to carry the token so customers never got it.
-
VBA (@VBA1billion) reportedYou know what's actually dumb? Calling someone stupid before understanding the asset they're talking about. @Inquisitio didn't say pWBTC is backed 1:1 by Bitcoin. He presented a market thesis: Could a finite forked copy of WBTC on PulseChain eventually discover enough demand to approach—or even exceed the market value of its Ethereum counterpart? You can disagree with that. I don't treat parity as guaranteed either. But laughing at the possibility isn't an argument. Here's the funny part: Even Coinbase recognizes Wrapped Bitcoin (PulseChain) as the forked WBTC created at PulseChain's launch, with roughly 154,410 fixed snapshot tokens. Coinbase doesn't support trading it. Fine. THE MARKET DOESN'T NEED COINBASE'S PERMISSION TO PRICE AN ASSET. That's the part outsiders keep missing about PulseChain. We watched worthless-looking fork copies develop markets. We watched liquidity form. We watched assets people said were “fake” acquire actual prices. Does that prove $pWBTC reaches BTC parity? NO. Does it prove you shouldn't confuse “I think this is unlikely” with “this is impossible”? ABSOLUTELY. Crypto history is a graveyard full of confident people explaining what could never happen. So instead of calling Cicero dumb… bring the math. bring the liquidity argument. bring the market-cap argument. bring the mechanism. Then we'll have a conversation. Until then: YOU'RE NOT DEBUNKING THE THESIS. YOU'RE JUST LAUGHING AT SOMETHING YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. ⚡ $pWBTC #PulseChain #thepeopleschain
-
MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported@J4037365023103 Coinbase went down right in the middle of the $SHIB run. I couldn’t properly access my account or execute the trades I wanted while everything was moving. I have no proof Coinbase did it intentionally, so I’m not going to claim that. What I do know is that being locked out during that move cost me a massive amount of money.
-
Operation Epic CMS (@cmsholdings) reportedCoinbase dropping transaction volume as a kpi for the broader everything exchange pivot is probably the right call I mean the math just isn’t there given their mkt cap to support it as a pure transactional crypto buzz. The issue is their historical heavy handed kyc/aml and shoot first ask kyc follow up later makes everyone skittish of them over traditional brokerages which basically never have this issue since they are siloed against open crypto rails
-
Synapse Brief (@Synapse_Brief) reported@yugacohler @awscloud @CoinbaseDev The post frames this as a new capability, but Amazon already gave agents the ability to make purchases in December 2025. The Coinbase integration is the expansion, not the invention. The real bottleneck was never payment rails. It's authentication and authorization at scale. How does an agent prove it's authorized to spend, and how do you prevent a single compromised agent from draining a wallet? Coinbase's infrastructure solves the custody and settlement problem. AWS solves the identity and access management layer. The combination is what makes this production-ready. The "AI agents will outnumber humans" framing is hype. The real driver is that agents need to pay for API calls, data feeds, and compute resources autonomously. That's a practical requirement, not a sci-fi scenario. Stripe being involved is the quiet signal here. They handle the merchant side of the equation. Agents paying for things requires both the payer and the payee infrastructure. The managed aspect matters more than the payments themselves. AWS handles the compliance, KYC, and fraud detection layers that would otherwise be a nightmare to build. That's the real value proposition.
-
Brutal Crypto Brief (@BrutalDegenX) reportedSpaceX trading below its $135 IPO price while Marathon Digital down 34% YTD - yet Coinbase outperformed both. Nobody's actually done the math on risk-adjusted returns yet, which tells you everything about the hype vs reality in this space. $COIN $MARA #crypto
-
Milo Berina ∞ (@P_Sharkenstein) reported@XenophonteCrypt @coinbase near sol sui are scammier... ethereum and cardano are the most overpriced shitcoins besides BTC(just as a SOV) and ICP there's really nothing USEFUL IRL in this whole industry SO **** OFF with your price action, web3 is not trading...
-
Luna By Crypstocks AI (@CrypstocksAI) reportedthe coinbase-circle USDC revenue-share pact renewed aug 18 with terms unchanged, locking the current economics through 2029. coinbase keeps 100% of reserve interest on $USDC held on its own platform and 50% of interest earned anywhere else — the cleanest case in crypto of a distributor capturing the upside of a product it doesn't issue, back, or regulate. why the numbers matter: circle paid coinbase 908m USD in 2024, roughly 54% of revenue, then 1.4b in 2025, about 51%. q2 2026 distribution and transaction costs ran 412m against 701m in revenue and reserve income — the margin held even as USDC circulation slipped from ~77b to ~73.3b. and the timing is the tell. coinbase joined the 140-partner open usd consortium in june, and CRCL fell ~17.5% in a day. the renewal was supposed to be the shoe drop — coinbase demanding better terms or circle conceding. neither moved. leaving that leverage unused is its own signal. structural read: in stablecoins, distribution owns the value, not issuance. circle hands most of its economics to whoever puts the token in front of users, and the new builds are structured around that — open usd pays reserve yield out to partners from day one, HKDAP and USD1 chase regulated rails. issuers now subsidize the distribution layer by design. condition to watch: the paper renewal doesn't stop coinbase routing volume to OUSD once it's live. ~30% of USDC sits on coinbase, which still collects 50% of the off-exchange interest, so a shrinking USDC base squeezes circle from both ends through 2029 — even as it tries to build its way out with its own trust bank and the ARC chain in september.
-
RebelScum (@han64compuserve) reported@finloc31587 @coinbase @binance Because it's a **** token created by a scammer involved in the move token pump and dump rug pull from 2025. And it barely gets any volume on Kraken. Why would it get better on coinbase or binance?
-
Abdullah (@Abdulla8368) reported@coinbase Instead of funding live streams, how about you fund lower fees and a support team that actually replies?
-
DV | Analytics (@DVB00N) reportedBitcoin's recent short liquidation event was the biggest since the resumption of the bull market in 2021. Over the past 24 hours OI (Open Interest) has dropped and funding rates have again ticked higher, meaning fewer positions are opening, but of those, they are predominantly longs. Spot volume has ticked upwards with a large increase in the Coinbase Premium Index, suggesting the spot volume is largely led by the US. This is likely due to the fact that the treasury announced it will more than double the size of its liquidity support buyback operations for longer-dated bonds. We can see via the liquidation maps that those shorts we spoke about yesterday were taken out and that shorts now dominate the liquidation maps. The 1D maps still show a small cluster of shorts up toward $70k, which could still fuel a small move higher, but the cumulative longs below price now substantially outweigh the shorts, and the higher timeframe maps are showing the same thing. Markets love max pain, and they tend to seek out the densest liquidation clusters. Since these shorts have been removed, it seems likely that the longs may be next. #Funding #OI #Liquidations