1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Coinbase
  4. Outage Map
Coinbase

Coinbase Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Coinbase users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Paris, Île-de-France 1
Le Taillan-Médoc, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Leipzig, Saxony 1
Maquoketa, IA 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • TheSlurper_
    The Slurper (@TheSlurper_) reported

    @punter_punts Coinbase seemed like skilled operators at first when base launched in 2023, bald ran high, then toshi ran to 1b, brett ran to 2b. i mean it's all the same **** over and over. None of this is new. It's an euthanasia rollercoaster with ceilings getting smaller and smaller

  • chima7334
    kenny7334 (@chima7334) reported

    @VuoriTrading I was actually having doubt of the coin because its not following liquidity, it has broken all the liquidity laws, infact d reason I still hold it is because I just feel coinbase are not stupid listing it

  • Blakecrowes
    10MinuteOKByeBye (@Blakecrowes) reported

    @brian_armstrong Man I miss 2017. The Coinbase pump was awesome. Everyone knew if you got that CB listing it was rocket 🚀 time. Then the site would crash and everyone missed selling the top. Good times though. Whatever this crypto market is now it sucks. How about you kick off an alt season

  • Maveth6
    Randy “Maveth” ∞/21M (@Maveth6) reported

    @SuperTestnet where is that written in the code? Thats proof of stake your arguing for Sorry thats not bitcoin either At least not one im willing to fight for Saylor & CoinBase & foundry & antpool? They control the heart of bitcoin? **** that.. might as well be the creature from jekyll island

  • jacek0x
    Jacek (@jacek0x) reported

    Builders have plenty of chains to choose from. I picked @base. Part of that is @coinbase. Long term vision, innovation, and above everything else, integrity. Other chains want those things too. I just trust Base with them more. To me, a chain is for the most part infrastructure. Base has been heads down making theirs better than anyone else's. What it can't do is make your product good. People point at Microsoft here. Own the operating system, build Office on top, push one with the other. That worked for Microsoft. A chain doesn't own your app. When it points its users at somebody else's app, that's all it's doing. Pointing. If the thing it points at isn't good, nobody stays. The product has to be good. That's the whole thing. Not good for crypto. Good. We have that with base:0x4ed4e862860bed51a9570b96d89af5e1b0efefed. A community that showed up before there was anything to gain. A brand people actually wear. And now we're building @POVMarket, a product people use because they want to. Nobody handed it to us. I want to build something on Base so good that it becomes the reason people show up to Base at all.

  • TrustMeNjustMe
    Just Me (@TrustMeNjustMe) reported

    @brian_armstrong I only dont like how coinbase keep the fund after sold stocks, i missed so many good entries because i had to wait for next day to access mu fund

  • askzaiuk
    Ask-Zai (@askzaiuk) reported

    @AndrewCurran_ The free weights were customer acquisition. Moonshot already runs revenue-sharing on Kimi K3 — per Reuters, Qwen is copying it. Coinbase publicly switched to open-weight Chinese models this year. First you get into the stack. Then the invoice arrives.

  • drjasper_eth
    jasperthefriendlyghost.eth (@drjasper_eth) reported

    @BattleJeff1 @gane5h > Practically, it will stop even before reaching 1% The lowest reservation yield is by CEX stakers. Home stakers have thinner margins than major corporations. The ETH staker survey said most home stakers would exit below 2% APR. >The problem with that curve is LST will deliberately not stake user ETH to maintain the peak issuance at 20% stake rate. I have no idea what this means. Users of Coinbase will keep adding staking so long as APR is positive, same with Tom Lee.

  • AlexOttaBTC
    Alessandro Ottaviani (@AlexOttaBTC) reported

    Another self-custody company 🚨 on risks to lose your funds Imagine to tell tomthe average tradifi investors that has a portfolio in an investing account, or in a Bank, or in Coinbase “Please update your BTCPayServer to 2.4.2 by going to Admin Dashboard -> Server -> Maintenance -> Update & verify the 2.4.2 version string in the footer.”

  • 2dogs1chic
    Kristen (@2dogs1chic) reported

    @cronkite2000 Fidelity is probably one of the stronger custodial choices. Fidelity uses cold-vaulted storage, handles custody in-house, does not rehypothecate customer Bitcoin, and operates secure facilities monitored 24/7. Transferring Bitcoin from cold storage only requires the normal Bitcoin network fee. I think the best options right now for long term holders is Fidelity or Coinbase.

  • 3CultureFish
    Steve (@3CultureFish) reported

    @HodlMagoo @brian_armstrong @coinbase Yeah in the time it took to negotiate yield, a whole other issue overtook it in importance, one Coinbase has no say in

  • Bull1shkid
    Bullish Kid (@Bull1shkid) reported

    @enesonchain To be fair it’s literally an issue for 4 exchanges. Coinbase, Binance, Robinhood and Upbit. I don’t think any other listing even shows on a chart. But I agree - the other 3 have a lot to fix

  • AChaosG
    AChaosG | Markets & Power (@AChaosG) reported

    Bitcoin touched $65K on easing Hormuz concerns, then gave it back after this morning's weak jobs print. Same script all week — good news pops it, macro data pulls it back down. The ceiling isn't sentiment anymore. It's data. The real event is the CLARITY Act finally has a locked-in Senate vote. Not another delay story — an actual scheduled test. The 60-vote cloture hurdle is still real, but "will they vote" just became "will it pass." That's progress, whatever the outcome. Bigger shift: Saylor confirmed Strategy hasn't bought Bitcoin in six weeks and sold again at a loss. The "never sell" framework that defined this entire cycle just quietly ended. When the biggest corporate bull steps back, that's not FUD — that's data. $10B in BTC and ETH options expired today. That kind of size moving through the book in one session tends to set the tone for the week that follows, win or lose. Elsewhere: BlackRock cut fees on its Ethereum ETF, and Coinbase pushed into UK stock trading. Both are quiet bets that crypto infrastructure outlasts whatever the price does this week. Capital is signal. Chaos is noise.

  • MikeSilagadze
    Mike Silagadze🛡 (@MikeSilagadze) reported

    After a conversation with @jdetychey I have a better understanding of his position. I’d like to write it down to make sure I got it right. Having a high percentage of $ETH staked introduces a number of problems and acts as a centralizing force. Specifically, if staked ETH crosses some threshold, say 50%, then it creates a strong incentive for the remaining 50% to stake to avoid dilution. At that point staking yield becomes nominal for all. It’s reasonable to expect that stakers will prefer the largest and most liquid staking options and so will opt for the largest LST or largest centralized staking entities. Solo stakers are harmed in this scenario because they are, in most countries, paying taxes on nominal ETH yield and so their ROI becomes negative. This pushes them out of the market further centralizing the chain. LSTs that accumulate a large percentage of ETH staked introduce tail risk because they become too big to fail. In the case of a major compromise the chain may be forced to fork. This brings us to the other risk which is that in the case of very high percent of ETH staked the social layer (i.e. holders of non staked ETH) are not large enough in number to prevent bad actors from causing harm. For example of a large centralized staking entity decides to censor or fork the chain (e.g. Coinbase in the of some dispute over USDC.) Is that correct? Anything I got wrong @jdetychey? To be clear, I don’t agree with all of this, but I think all these are totally reasonable points and have merit.

  • marcopolo2027
    Marco Polo (@marcopolo2027) reported

    @coinbase WTF @Apple WE JUST NEED AN AI-FIRST PHONE.

Check Current Status