Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ademan555 | CTV FFS (@Ademan555) reported 3 minutes ago

  @JGMontoyaS @LukeDashjr @Roughnecks110 If they want a lower bound on the block's creation date they should just include the latest Bitcoin block hash in the BCashJr coinbase, EZ. Way more reliable and harder to forge than headlines, too.

• 
  BitMula (@PnL_Lucci) reported 4 minutes ago

  @coinbase Fix the $trencher dex etc, what are you even doing?

• 
  0xDavide (@0x_Davide) reported 6 minutes ago

  🪂If you're farming/waiting for these airdrops: Polymarket, Base, Soneium, Ink Chain and Robinhood Chain, you should definitely read this thread so you don't be disappointed. The first thing you should keep in mind is that, to date, there is no company in the world that is both listed on NASDAQ and has an on-chain token. By "on-chain token", I don't mean a synthetic or derivative (tokenized stock), but a governance token (which would then lead to the airdrop). There are companies listed on NASDAQ that own tokens (StablecoinX invested in $ENA, TAO Synergies invested in $TAO, Hyperion in $HYPE, etc.), but they are not direct issuers. They are separate entities and simple investors. There is one special case: Circle, which is listed with $CRCL but issues fiat (USDC) on-chain, so this is no exception either. Let's analyze each case one by one. POLYMARKET In this case, the founder of Polymarket has often spoken about both $POLY and a NASDAQ listing. The two are contradictory and will not both happen. The interesting thing could be a NASDAQ listing and an airdrop of the tokenized $POLY token (which could also be used to place predictions). There would be a single issuance. BASE CHAIN Coinbase, Base Chain's main incubator, is listed on NASDAQ with $COIN. Base has consistently denied launching a governance token until last year, but over the past year it seems to have been exploring the possibility. "Base Verify On Chain" does not indicate the launch of the $BASE token. It's a third-party infrastructure that anyone can use for anti-Sybil checks. Could Base Chain launch a token? Yes, if it can separate itself from Coinbase as an entity, meaning no KYC related to Coinbase, and possibly no exchange marketing. If you think about it, this makes sense: if $BASE is added to $COIN and they belong to the same entity (Coinbase), what should an investor invest in? It would be capital dilution between the two assets. SONEIUM CHAIN The Soneium chain was founded by Sony Group and Startale. Sony Group is already listed on the stock exchange with $SONY. What are the chances of Soneium launching its own token? I believe it would be possible using Startale (which is a separate entity from Sony related to Web3). INK CHAIN Here, the discussion is almost similar to Base/Coinbase because Ink Chain is incubated by Kraken Inc. (an exchange). However, there is a fundamental difference: Kraken is not listed on NASDAQ. Curiously, the exchange has been preparing an IPO for years. In this case, the same argument applies: if Ink manages to become a decentralized entity from Kraken, both a governance token ($INK) and Kraken's listing on NASDAQ are possible. Otherwise, both will not be possible. However, a governance token is much more likely here, given that there are ongoing points campaigns (both on-chain and on Kraken itself, but that's not a problem). ROBINHOOD CHAIN In this case, the discussion can be quickly closed: there will be no airdrop and no governance token. $HOOD is Robinhood's stock. The chances of a governance token are zero because the chain belongs directly to the Robinhood broker. $HOOD shareholders receive a portion of the revenues the chain generates (more precisely, the chain is a layer 2 built using Arbitrum Orbit technology via the Arbitrum Nitro stack). However, if you use the chain (primarily focused on RWA and especially memecoins), we can't rule out random airdrops from external entities (memecoin airdrops or for RWA traders). In this case, the airdrop will come from a third-party platform like Arcus (but don't get your hopes up too high, because a portion of the airdrop will go to DyDx users), Sheriff Exchange and possibly any third-party platform deployed on the Robinhood chain.

• 
  kimcĦi.ℏ/acc (@HederaKimchi) reported 7 minutes ago

  @coinbase Team..... add Hedera USDC support!!!

• 
  Andrew Ryan (@AndrewRyan09) reported 7 minutes ago

  @cmsholdings "Coinbase trying to pull in suckers via 6.5% interest is probably the right call" "Coinbase stealing their customer's assets is probably the right call" "SBF offering FTX to Binance was probably the right call" There were no warning signs, riiight?

• 
  VBA (@VBA1billion) reported 10 minutes ago

  You know what's actually dumb? Calling someone stupid before understanding the asset they're talking about. @Inquisitio didn't say pWBTC is backed 1:1 by Bitcoin. He presented a market thesis: Could a finite forked copy of WBTC on PulseChain eventually discover enough demand to approach—or even exceed the market value of its Ethereum counterpart? You can disagree with that. I don't treat parity as guaranteed either. But laughing at the possibility isn't an argument. Here's the funny part: Even Coinbase recognizes Wrapped Bitcoin (PulseChain) as the forked WBTC created at PulseChain's launch, with roughly 154,410 fixed snapshot tokens. Coinbase doesn't support trading it. Fine. THE MARKET DOESN'T NEED COINBASE'S PERMISSION TO PRICE AN ASSET. That's the part outsiders keep missing about PulseChain. We watched worthless-looking fork copies develop markets. We watched liquidity form. We watched assets people said were “fake” acquire actual prices. Does that prove $pWBTC reaches BTC parity? NO. Does it prove you shouldn't confuse “I think this is unlikely” with “this is impossible”? ABSOLUTELY. Crypto history is a graveyard full of confident people explaining what could never happen. So instead of calling Cicero dumb… bring the math. bring the liquidity argument. bring the market-cap argument. bring the mechanism. Then we'll have a conversation. Until then: YOU'RE NOT DEBUNKING THE THESIS. YOU'RE JUST LAUGHING AT SOMETHING YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND. ⚡ $pWBTC #PulseChain #thepeopleschain

• 
  doug funnie (@cryptoklotz) reported 12 minutes ago

  >be me >initiate a small transfer of sol from coinbase to an onchain wallet, same wallet i've transferred to many times >coinbase: "hey we think this is a scam attempt, we need you to upload your ID, voice, and face right now to confirm" >i do all of that, and they say "not good enough" >i try the transfer again from the mobile app, and they're like "**** it, go for it man lol you're good"

• 
  Campshot 🫡 (@JCampy) reported 13 minutes ago

  Coinbase is a major reason why CLARITY won’t pass Their entire enterprise should sit all the way down, and zip the lip

• 
  Spike (@spikedownbad) reported 14 minutes ago

  @0xVerso @_gas404 Why ******** would you drain and off-ramp to a personal cex that’s dumb af Just message Coinbase they basically Feds anyways

• 
  Cypher (@CryptoCypher7) reported 14 minutes ago

  @theunipcs When a chain pops off for whatever reasons, it's always hot and everything is sending for the first few weeks to months. RH only reminds me of Coinbase with Base. Questionable things will happen and eventually the hype will draw down. Only time will tell tho.

• 
  Hüseyin Örskaya (@orskyai) reported 23 minutes ago

  @coinbase Regulators are gonna have a field day when they realize you've just turned the entire S&P 500 into a 24/7 casino for retail gamblers. The volatility won't even be the problem; it's the liquidity trap waiting to snap shut.

• 
  Fawaz Malik (@fawazmalik95) reported 23 minutes ago

  @FinXRob @Bitkey when are you guys expanding payment methods besides coinbase or atleast launch block ecosystem apps in Canada 🇨🇦 I only see moonpay and coinbase I am trying to delete coinbase app so I can use apps from block ecosystem or allow kraken exchange too

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 25 minutes ago

  The SEC’s enforcement action against Coinbase ($COIN) is the most useful live template for how U.S. securities law applies to a domestic crypto exchange. The complaint, proceeding in the Southern District of New York, alleges Coinbase operated as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker, and clearing agency, and that its staking-as-a-service program was an unregistered offering of investment contracts. Unlike offshore cases that turn on jurisdiction, this one accepts Coinbase is a U.S. entity and tests whether the activities themselves fit the statutory definitions. Legally, the fight turns on whether listed tokens and the yield promised on staked assets satisfy the Howey test: money invested in a common enterprise with profits expected from the efforts of others. The court’s decision letting the bulk of the SEC’s claims survive a motion to dismiss means the agency’s “crypto securities ecosystem” theory gets a full trial record. That matters for every U.S. venue because a final ruling on bundled functions—exchange, broker-dealer, clearing—could force separation of custody, execution, and settlement in ways the equity market has lived with for decades. For market participants, the signal is that registration walls are not a styling choice. If Coinbase ultimately has to register one or more functions, or spin off staking, the cost model for every U.S. exchange shifts. I read the case as slow-motion structural reform: not a ban, but a forced migration toward broker-exchange-custody separation. Not legal advice. #SEC #蓝V互关

• 
  K 💫 (@Kudsstar) reported 27 minutes ago

  @coinbase Instead of trying to get tons of influencers, why not have a site you can submit an entry via social media and pick randoms? You can then pick 5 - 10 influencers for the eyes. But what's the point of the same people being invited to the same things

• 
  bitfloorsghost (@itstheghost) reported 27 minutes ago

  im sure coinbase will deal with this reasonably and no innocent users will lose access to their accounts for reasons beyond their control