Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  inway2deep 📺-‘ (@Inway2deep_rip) reported 4 minutes ago

  @MLeeJr Omg, I’m so glad my brain is smooth and shifted from that garbage in 21 and said eff it I’m keeping all my bitcoin on Coinbase CEX.

• 
  web3 lawyer 首席大律师 (@Web3Counsels) reported 4 minutes ago

  SEC v. Coinbase ($COIN, @coinbase) — the March 2024 SDNY ruling on the SEC’s unregistered broker/exchange/clearing claims is the most important crypto-exchange registration decision to survive a motion to dismiss. Judge Failla held that the SEC plausibly alleged Coinbase’s matching of orders on its platform and its Prime services brought it within the statutory definitions of broker-dealer, exchange, and clearing-agency activity. The Court also allowed the staking-as-a-service claim to proceed as a possible investment contract. It dismissed only the narrower Wallet-as-broker theory, finding that passive self-custody software does not itself constitute effecting securities transactions. For market participants, the practical line is clearer: matching, custody, and staking-as-a-service are likely registration triggers; wallet infrastructure is not. The case keeps the registration/status question on the merits, and it tells every crypto platform that separating order books, custody, and staking products is legally material. This is not investment or legal advice. #SEC #蓝V互关

• 
  chaskin.eth (@jchaskin22) reported 5 minutes ago

  Since, in classic @x fashion, this debate has basically boiled down to "the other side is insane," here are what I think (my subjective opinion) are the strongest arguments for each position: Lower the curve At today's staking amount (41.5M ETH) and an ETH price of $1,875, Ethereum already has about $78B securing the network. Which is more than enough to make an attack extremely expensive. The concern is that continuing to pay for even more stake does not necessarily make Ethereum safer. Most of new stake will flow to the same large exchanges and LSTs so while the total amount staked will go up, control of that stake becomes more concentrated. In other words, we would end up paying inflation to make Ethereum less secure. Keep the curve the same If staking rewards become very low, large exchanges like Coinbase and Binance can afford to offer staking at razor thin margins because staking isn't their business, it's one feature in a much larger business. For LSTs, staking is the product. If margins get compressed enough, there's a real risk that more and more Ethereum stake consolidates around centralized exchanges. Also institutions like yield! I don't think either side is crazy. The hard part is figuring out which long term risk is actually larger.

• 
  Khufu (@KingKhufu1111) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BritishHodl In general I agree. But there is one slice of this I don't. You seem to be suggesting, Fidelity (Coinbase, etc) somehow are immune to the core issue here. They are not, never have been, no body is. Fidelity manages its own institutional-grade, proprietary "omnibus" custody architecture. Instead of using commercially available retail cold wallets (like Ledger or Trezor), they build custom hardware and software security solutions to protect client funds. But here is the rub. Their own "custom hardware and software solution". Made by people, closed source, few eye ***** on it. Same type of people that made Coldcard wallet, make these custom solutions for institutions. People are not perfect. So your not solving that problem, you are only shifting it off your plate to someone else's possible bugs and attack vectors to a bigger hunny-pot target. So it solves a set of problems (which is good and agree), but does not really solve the threat in question here, only puts it behind a pay wall.

• 
  JimmyKrakCoin (@JimmyKrakCoin) reported 10 minutes ago

  @stephenchip I am getting paranoid that an oversight agency is working with wallet apps like Trust Wallet to block off ramping to exchanges like Coinbase & Gemini. I get repeated network errors from Trustwallet. Had to off ramp through Exodus wallet to bypass. Thoughts?

• 
  drew (@DBrown907) reported 11 minutes ago

  @EsenEraslan @RobinhoodApp Coinbase is deeply shameful for getting help

• 
  Kashyap Sriram (@kashyap286) reported 14 minutes ago

  @AtlasPhoenixBTC If you lost your stack on Mt. Gox, BlockFi, FTX, figured out that centralized platforms are the problem, spurned Coinbase for Coldcard, and still lost it all, I have news for you. Bitcoin is the problem. It is just not worth risking 100% to make 10%.

• 
  Finch (@thatfinchguy) reported 15 minutes ago

  For those of you who joined in the last few years, be happy that we have anything to point to as having had any amount of success outside of pure speculation, especially in the US We have Hyperliquid, real stablecoin adoption, Robinhood/fomo/etc retail onboarding routes, corporate treasuries, Bitcoin via global ETFs, etc. There is real global demand for a couple CRYPTO things. Yes, crypto. Crypto is an ucky word again(!). So crazy how it correlates to price In 2019 however, there was really only Bitcoin, ETH and all the alt garbage. (Add HYPE today... Sound familiar?) $BTC had Coinbase (not yet IPO'd) and Binance, and that's about it for major on ramps. Robinhood and Square only listed crypto in early 2018(!) which happened to be at the exact top, further eviscerating a swath of newbies. No Covid style money printing. No Paul Tudor Jones callouts. No Saylor. No BlackRock. Nothing. $ETH too had nothing, but with even fewer believers. No defi, close to zero real stablecoin usage, no NFTs, little to no memecoins. nothing. Everything back then was pure hope it would return or simply lack of better opportunities to make money elsewhere. This time you couldve pivoted into one of the greatest times for tech investing ever... Oh yes. Much difficult. So painful. Sshhhh is gun be okee guys. Just be patient. Unless you're lucky or a generational talent (the top 0.01% of performers) it's gonna take at least two or three goes at it before you really crush it There is no longer any real concern that this disappears and goes to zero. The industry is worth trillions and has seen some real success. Perhaps we should dare to dream of better times a little bit? What if the risk:reward is better than ever...

• 
  TheCommander35 (@MrHonkerton) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Fredvelezcrypto Nope. I bought in a year before the Coinbase listing. 14x. Now it got rugged like a generic **** coin. Had potential though!

• 
  mvyor (@ibrododo_) reported 18 minutes ago

  i've watched traders miss entries because of deposit friction. arcus x fun just killed that problem. last week, a trader i know spotted a 6% move on TSLA equity tokens. by the time he bridged from polygon, swapped, and deposited gone. liquidity evaporated. frustration max. this isn't a one off. deposit friction is the invisible tax on crypto trading. and it's costing retail AND institutions actual alpha. here's the standard nightmare: • funds sitting on coinbase, polygon, or your bank • spot trade you want • bridge ➔ swap ➔ deposit ➔ wait • 5 steps. 10+ minutes. trade's dead every layer adds slippage. every delay compounds FOMO. every pause = missed liquidity. DeFi UX hasn't solved this. until now. arcus (the dydx-built DEX on robinhood chain) just partnered with fun to collapse deposit hell into .one step. whatever you hold. wherever it lives. coinbase. bank account. polygon. it arrives as USDG directly into your arcus account. done. no bridges. no swaps. no waiting. why fun? because they've already proven the infrastructure works at scale. they run polymarket. $20B+ annual volume. $1M+ trades in < 5 seconds. 99.999% success. when you're trading leveraged equity tokens or perps, that reliability isn't flex it's table stakes. the actual win for traders: • self-custody in & out. fun doesn't pool your capital. it moves straight from your wallet → arcus → back. no counterparty risk. • zero markup. you pay raw network costs only. no arcus tax. no fun tax. deposit friction dies. fees don't replace it. now zoom out. tokenized equities are about to explode. traders in buenos aires, istanbul, ho chi minh city anywhere with capital controls or weak local markets can now instantly express a macro view on apple, tesla, or spy using local fiat or crypto. one click. not five. that's the real play: institutional grade settlement speed meets retail accessibility. spot stock trading live now. equity perps in beta. if arcus wants to capture serious order flow, this is the infrastructure move that makes it happens.

• 
  James Bearish Bull (@jamesjasmy) reported 19 minutes ago

  @2026FIFA888 @Chiliz @bitget The biggest thing $CHZ has going for it is compliance. Exchanges are increasingly looking for that, so it's a real advantage. That said, listing decisions are ultimately up to each individual exchange. One thing's for sure though - a project shouldn't be overly reliant on just one exchange for liquidity. CHZ has that in its favour too, being listed on Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit, + others. But CHZ needs to be more open with its community members - I've highlighted clear, documented issues between promises and shortfalls, and that's pinned to the top. (as you know), That's my view.

• 
  Jason L (@seacow2001) reported 22 minutes ago

  @NicoCabrera92 He pulled it to get banking license for Coinbase to go around the yield issue

• 
  C O L E E N ♡ 彡 (@coolsgp19) reported 33 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseSupport 46 days of ignoring me , never give update. support says they escalate my case but never felt it. this is coinbase, they are ignoring their customer.

• 
  Zubiqo (@zubiqo) reported 37 minutes ago

  JUST IN: 🇰🇵 A cybersecurity researcher infiltrates North Korean systems, exposing 1,640 breached global companies. Vangelis Stykas spent 22 months monitoring command-and-control servers, identifying 700 to 800 highly damaging enterprise intrusions. The operators prioritized finding cryptocurrency wallets, systematically stealing developer keys and AWS root access from infected devices. Hackers compromised external engineers using fake job interviews, impacting organizations like Coinbase $COIN, Uniswap Labs, and Boston Children’s Hospital. "For crypto companies, it’s keys, it’s blockchain access—it’s ridiculous access." — Vangelis Stykas Companies spend millions on perimeter defense, but it doesn't matter when remote contractors simply download malware just to pass a fake coding interview.

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 38 minutes ago

  $Crypto’s Shift: From Speculation to Financial Infrastructure According to imToken, 2026 marks a turning point for crypto as stablecoins, tokenized real-world assets (RWA), prediction markets, and AI agents begin connecting into a unified financial infrastructure. Rather than isolated trends, these developments represent the maturation of digital assets, payments, identity, trading, and settlement. Key developments Stablecoins have grown to roughly $300 billion in market value and are increasingly used for global payments, payroll, business settlements, and cross-border transfers. They are evolving into programmable payment infrastructure that applications can integrate directly. RWA tokenization is moving beyond crypto-native products. $DTCC has completed production testing for tokenized assets and plans to launch services in October, while the SEC has approved tokenized trading for certain listed securities under existing market rules. Prediction markets are becoming mainstream. $HOOD said more than 1 million users traded roughly 900 million contracts in their first year after expanding into regulated prediction markets. AI agents are emerging as autonomous economic participants. Platforms such as Coinbase and Google are building payment frameworks that allow AI agents to purchase APIs, data, and digital services using stablecoins under user-defined permissions. The new infrastructure The report argues crypto is evolving into a five-layer financial infrastructure: Asset issuance: Stocks, bonds, funds, gold, and private credit can all be tokenized and managed on-chain. Payments & settlement: Stablecoins, tokenized bank deposits, and digital currencies enable near-instant, programmable settlement. Price discovery: Prediction markets and 24/7 crypto trading provide real-time market signals that software can consume automatically. Identity & permissions: Wallets are evolving from simple key storage into identity, authorization, and spending-control systems for users, institutions, and AI agents. Regulation & legal clarity: The focus is shifting from whether crypto should exist to defining who can issue assets, custody them, and operate trading platforms under clear regulatory frameworks. Challenges remain Despite the progress, major issues still need to be solved: Legal responsibility for AI-driven transactions. Liquidity fragmentation across multiple blockchains and private networks. Privacy requirements for institutions. Credit creation, risk management, and legal enforcement, which cannot be solved by blockchain technology alone. Bottom line The report concludes that crypto is transitioning from a speculative asset class into programmable financial infrastructure. While tokenization, stablecoins, AI agents, and prediction markets are accelerating adoption, the next phase will depend on solving regulation, identity, privacy, interoperability, and legal accountability before blockchain can support mainstream global finance.