Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Crypto Banter (@crypto_banter) reported 3 minutes ago

  🚨BRIAN ARMSTRONG: CLARITY ACT IS READY FOR FULL SENATE FLOOR VOTE! Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said the Clarity Act is ready for a Senate floor vote, calling it a true bipartisan compromise after thousands of hours of work. He argued the bill fixes the broken status quo, no federal framework allowing bad actors like FTX and pushing the industry offshore, with strong consumer protections and real law enforcement tools.

• 
  ElonGrantMe10K (@SVVK269) reported 4 minutes ago

  @sakshi_views @injective @coinbase It's makes injective easier to access to use

• 
  kepo (@kepochnik) reported 4 minutes ago

  everyone keeps asking what the next big chain after Arc is. GIWA might be it, and almost nobody outside Korea is paying attention yet what it is: GIWA is an Ethereum L2 built on the OP Stack, backed by Dunamu, the parent company of Upbit (Korea's dominant exchange, 13M+ users, #2 globally in cumulative spot volume 2020-2024) the pattern is familiar: Binance has BNB Chain, Coinbase has Base, OKX has X Layer. now Upbit has GIWA. when the biggest exchange in a country builds its own chain, that's usually not a small thing the setup: → announced Sept 2025, built with the Optimism Foundation → first-ever deployment on OP Enterprise "Self-Managed" tier (Upbit controls its own sequencer) → one-second block times, full EVM compatibility → testnet already processed ~100M transactions → private mainnet expected roughly Aug–Sept 2026 → core stack: GIWA Chain + wallet + KRW-backed stablecoin ecosystem important, so nobody gets misled: there's NO confirmed token. no confirmed airdrop. no confirmed incentives. anyone selling you "farm the testnet for the drop" is guessing. the funding numbers floating around ($143M, $1.2B) are Dunamu's, not GIWA's own raise so here's the actual play, and it's not mindless testnet clicking: GASOK, their builder competition, is live for MVP submissions July 1–31. this is the real opportunity. same way people who actually built on Arc early stood out, this is a chance to ship something real on a chain with serious backing before the crowd shows up if you're just farming faucet clicks hoping for a drop that isn't confirmed, imo that's a waste of time. if you're building, this is worth a look still very early. no guarantees on anything. but a chain with Upbit behind it is worth keeping tabs on.

• 
  Solomon (@iamalijandro) reported 6 minutes ago

  WHAT A DELISTING SIGNALS When Binance or Coinbase delists a token, it's usually for one of three reasons: low trading volume, regulatory pressure, or a breach of listing standards (security flaws, team misconduct). The immediate reaction is a panic sell-off; often 20–50% in hours. Liquidity dries up. For small tokens, it's a death sentence. But for larger, fundamentally sound projects with strong community and other exchange support, a delisting can be an overreaction and a long-term buying opportunity.

• 
  DeFi Warhol (@Defi_Warhol) reported 9 minutes ago

  This article from @FTI_US changes the question from “can this work?” to “how fast can institutions route capital?” Some context: Franklin Templeton manages $1.78 trillion in assets and has senior influence on derivatives policy (Sandy Kaul sits on the CFTC Global Markets Advisory Committee). Now, look at the facts: • Franklin Templeton has a multi-year agentic AI partnership with Wand AI. They tokenized 5 ETFs for 24/7 trading via wallets. • x402 Foundation launched in July with 40 backers including AWS, Google, Visa, Mastercard, Coinbase, Circle, Stripe, Solana, and Ripple – a payment standard designed to let agents pay directly • XRP Ledger crossed 1 million agentic transactions on July 21 • Stablecoins recorded $46 trillion of trading volume in 2024, exceeding PayPal by 20x and Visa by 3x. • ~30% of enterprises running AI agents by 2026; • Analysts project $3–5 trillion of agentic commerce by 2030, 15–25% of US e‑commerce driven by agents, and one‑third of enterprise software agentic by 2028. I read the causal logic like this: Agentic software needs programmable, real‑time settlement; digital wallets are the execution surface; tokenized assets and stablecoins are the inventory and settlement medium. Stablecoins already move at scale ($46 trillion in 2024), and x402 plus the XRPL agent milestone show the plumbing is no longer purely theoretical. This is ACTUAL institutional validation: a $1.78 trillion manager with a CFTC advisory presence publicly linking agents to wallets signals integration work between custody, compliance, and programmable money is underway. It raises two concrete implications: incumbents who can’t support agent-native, 24/7 settlement risk losing flow, and stablecoin/payment rails stand to gain massive transactional volume if agentic commerce follows the $3–5 trillion path projected to 2030. I read this as the moment the infrastructure narrative (x402, tokenized ETFs, wallets) and the adoption narrative (~30% enterprise agents) converge under institutional capital. I f adoption follows the projections, the distribution of settlement and custody could shift quickly; if it doesn’t, this remains an institutional pilot. I’ll judge by flows and deployments, not rhetoric.

• 
  FeeEdge (@Fee_Edge) reported 11 minutes ago

  The free fix first. Use limit orders instead of market orders. On Coinbase that moves you from 1.20% to 0.60% and halves the bill without leaving the app. Most people never do it.

• 
  Zack Finch (@HughMungusFinch) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cobie i haven't been able to login to echo in weeks. is coinbase supporting this product or sunsetting it?

• 
  Gail ****** (@gailcweiner) reported 14 minutes ago

  The story we keep telling about AI is a benchmark race. Which lab is ahead, which country is behind, who takes the frontier by year end. That's the story shaping the current push in Washington to sanction Chinese open-weight models, and it's the wrong one. A closed model gates capability behind who you are and where you sit. You need the subscription, the card, the credit history, sometimes the passport. An open model doesn't ask any of that. Good enough weights on modest hardware means the distribution of who gets to build stops mapping onto the distribution of existing wealth. That's the actual mechanism. Feudal systems run on the many needing the few for access. A model you can download and run yourself dissolves the dependency. The story that matters is a kid in Khayelitsha township in South Africa, with an open-source model on a secondhand laptop. No subscription, no card, no permission from a lab in San Francisco or Hangzhou. He uses it to fix something in how his neighbourhood actually works. It's not even the same category of thing the frontier crowd knows how to measure. The sanctions conversation keeps getting stuck inside the US-China frame, and it misses what a ban actually does. Coinbase already cut its internal AI spend by nearly half running Chinese open models in production. Microsoft has looked at doing the same with DeepSeek inside Copilot. Ban Kimi, DeepSeek, Qwen for American companies and Chinese AI development doesn't slow down. American companies get pushed onto pricier domestic alternatives, and the rest of the world, who nobody in Washington can sanction, keeps building on the free frontier-adjacent weights already sitting on Hugging Face. The kid in Khayelitsha was never going to be reached by an enforcement action anyway. He gets reached, or not, by whether the weights stay open and the compute stays cheap enough to get to him. That's the fight that decides who builds the next useful thing. A compound in the Valley is captured value. It makes the already-comfortable more comfortable. What gets built by someone solving a problem the Valley can't see, let alone price, is created value, and it compounds outward. The frame that only counts frontier capability was always going to miss this. It was measuring the wrong floor.

• 
  LeftTheChat  (@LeftTheChat2k26) reported 17 minutes ago

  $**** paired with $coin deployed on @bankrbot - connected with @coinbase

• 
  Liquidluck (@liquidluck_1) reported 21 minutes ago

  oh my god if only coinbase would do this type of **** @coinbase @brian_armstrong @jessepollak

• 
  Tommy Famous (@TommyBeFamous) reported 22 minutes ago

  $MON 💰 is officially locked in for my long-term portfolio through the 2028–2029 bull cycle! I am putting my research, capital, and reputation on the line because market makers don't position around high-performance parallel EVM infrastructure by accident. Arkham Intelligence entity tracking confirms DWF Labs managing secondary liquidity across tier-1 exchange deposit hubs like Coinbase, OKX, and Bybit as MON derivative open interest expands across major perpetual venues. Recent updates show development team Category Labs authorizing up to a $30M token buyback program, while CEX order books stack dense, unhit short liquidation clusters directly overhead above range support. When an elite market maker controls exchange liquidity pipes while retail shorters trade leverage backward, price doesn't breakdown…. it teleports upward to execute a violent short-squeeze. I am aggressively accumulating spot right here at the macro floor to front-run the upcoming expansion. Position early or buy higher later!

• 
  Mo | thebitcoinway.com (@Mtobwh) reported 24 minutes ago

  Unfortunately sometimes we receive texts. I keep advising you guys to take it off the exchange and don’t trust these institutions, they are cracking down harder. I just came off a call, a couple minutes ago with a client trying to get off coinbase as well and he had to verify his ID twice. @coinbase how about we let people buy and self custody without friction? For the people in the people in the US, use @River and thank me later.

• 
  𝙁𝙧𝙤𝙨𝙩 (@FroITIA) reported 28 minutes ago

  @coinbase quantum threats are a real problem for the long run

• 
  The Block (@TheBlockCo) reported 29 minutes ago

  THE BLOCK: The Securities and Exchange Commission has settled with Coinbase after the exchange sued the agency in 2024 for not complying with Freedom of Information requests. The SEC agreed to release two documents it had withheld as well as conduct a review of its records, according to a new court filing.

• 
  Iso Ledger (@JamesDula82) reported 30 minutes ago

  What is Project Eleven? Let's break it down Project Eleven is a security startup founded in 2024 by Alex Pruden, a former US Army Special Operations officer, built entirely around one mission: getting Bitcoin and other digital assets ready for the moment quantum computers can break today's cryptography, what the industry calls "Q-Day." They're the same firm you'd have seen referenced if you've followed Ripple's own quantum roadmap, they're doing this work network by network. In January, they raised a $20 million Series A at a $120 million valuation, backed by Coinbase Ventures, Castle Island Ventures, and Balaji Srinivasan among others, bringing their total funding to $26 million. Their stated goal is to become something like a "Palantir for post-quantum migration," building the readiness assessments and tools that let networks transition deliberately instead of scrambling once the threat becomes real. This week they shipped something genuinely new, and it directly answers a problem you should understand. If a quantum computer ever becomes powerful enough to break Bitcoin's signature math (or any other crypto), it doesn't just threaten new transactions. It creates a harder problem: how do you prove you're the real owner of an old wallet once an attacker can forge a valid signature for it too? Signatures stop being proof of anything. Project Eleven's answer, built with Jim Posen, lead developer of the Binius proof system, sidesteps signatures entirely. Instead, it uses a zero-knowledge proof built around your wallet's key-derivation path, the internal hierarchy standard wallets already use to generate every address from a single seed. You can mathematically prove you know the seed material sitting above your address in that structure, and that it actually produces your address, without ever revealing the seed or any private key. That proof can then authorize a migration transaction to a new, quantum-safe address. A forger who only cracked your exposed public key doesn't have that seed-level knowledge, so they can't produce the proof, even if they can fake a signature. The numbers are what make this more than a whitepaper exercise. On a standard MacBook Air, generating the proof takes 243 milliseconds. Verifying it takes 40 milliseconds. No GPU required, no trusted setup. That's roughly 200 times faster than an earlier unoptimized version of the same idea from earlier this year. Two honest limitations worth knowing. First, this only protects wallets built on the standard derivation structure (BIP-32), the one basically every modern wallet already uses. Second, and this is the detail that made headlines, it doesn't help Satoshi's own 1.1 million BTC, those coins predate this derivation standard entirely, so there's no compatible seed-path proof available for them, quantum-safe or not. Nothing here is live on any blockchain yet. It's an unaudited prototype that would need actual protocol-level adoption, the same kind of network amendment process you already read about in Ripple's own 2028 quantum roadmap, before it could protect a single real coin. But it's a concrete, working answer to a question that was mostly theoretical a year ago: not just how do we encrypt against quantum computers, but how do you prove ownership once encryption itself has already failed. ISO Ledger 🛡