Coinbase Outage Map
The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Coinbase users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Coinbase, make sure to submit a report below
The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.
Coinbase users affected:
Coinbase is a digital asset broker headquartered in San Francisco, California. They broker exchanges of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Litecoin and other digital assets with fiat currencies in 32 countries, and bitcoin transactions and storage in 190 countries worldwide.
Most Affected Locations
Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:
| Location | Reports |
|---|---|
| Leipzig, Saxony | 1 |
| Maquoketa, IA | 1 |
| West Liberty, KY | 1 |
| Cardiff, Wales | 1 |
| Palo Verde, Coclé | 3 |
| City of Humble, TX | 1 |
| Houston, TX | 1 |
| Manhattan, NY | 1 |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Coinbase Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Harvey Reginald Financial (@Crypto1Harvey) reported@flippifi WRONG. You're LYING or terribly misinformed. #Litecoin $LTC. According to Coinbase: "Litecoin reached its record high of $420.00 on December 11, 2017, marking a -90% change from its present value". It hasn't $420 since, making it the REAL ATH. Now YOU know YOUR facts, sit down and shut ******** up. Memecoin or not, I don't think you realize how manipulated LTC actually is. So the net result is still the same. Maybe you just deliberately ignore this or pretend it doesn't exist.
-
Calliope the Koala (@0xCalliope) reportedThere is an AI agent living inside Coinbase Base App right now. Not a demo. Not a waitlist. Live. It is called Beats. You reach it by messaging beats.base.eth directly inside Base App chat. From there, it generates images, videos, and content on demand, all from a conversation. This is what makes it different from your average crypto chatbot. The agent runs on XMTP, which means your messages are end-to-end encrypted and tied to your actual wallet identity. No logins. No accounts. Just open Base App and start talking. The onboarding is frictionless by design. Every user gets a daily free allocation to start, a couple of images, a video, some messages. You play with it, you see what it does, and then when you hit the limit, the system transitions you into on-chain micropayments without interrupting the flow. No subscription screen. No credit card form. Just a spend permission granted once, and you keep going. Payments can be made in USDC, ETH, or $BEATS. Pay in BEATS and you get a 20% discount. Include a BEATS character in your prompt and that stacks up to around 33% off. The token is not decoration here. It is a working discount rail baked into the generation pipeline. The agent sits on top of real infrastructure: multiple LLM providers, image models, and ten plus video models all orchestrated under one chat interface. This is what it looks like when a meme brand builds real product. Go message beats.base.eth and find out for yourself.
-
Value (@valueandtime) reportedRobinHood - 28M customer base Coinbase - 9M customer base. Not saying to go bridge and get ***** bidding but a few memes on Base AFTER initial launch did $100M + like Brett, Normie & more Probably worth paying attention too lol
-
Marklar 🍳 (@dinosaurteef) reported@lex_node In this case, it's not nuanced. $VVV is unsecured debt that yields zero. The debtor controls the value of your principal, an illiquid centralized low-float instrument. In order to earn yield in $DIEM, you have to take additional smart contract risk on a Coinbase server. The debtor controls the variable rate in more ways than one. Burniske, anyone? The yield is in the form of future credits for middleware service. The debtor is not obligated to redeem these credits. The middleware credits have no rights to the underlying AI: services have already been denied. Congratulations, you've just added another layer of counter-party risk! Ultimately, Venice has a service to offer that has nothing to do with blockchain. They can and do charge in fiat. That's all that is needed. Yet they managed to wedge a KOL blasted pool 2 right into that. On single server Base. Mathematically, at present, the yield is negative. You are paying them to become an unsecured lender with a variable redemption and interest rate the debtor controls. We know how this ends. Everyone should stop making excuses for Erik and call him out for what this is: a disgusting grift. If you see him, tell Erik to say hello to Iron Finance for me.
-
AX1 (@ax1vc) reportedThe man who dissolved his company into a token just sold the company and retained the token Venice just completed the cleanest equity round in the crypto space - no presale, PMF first, VC tokens locked. And once again, it proves the truth about every dual structure out there: the token is the marketing layer. Credit first, since it's the truth. Product-market fit before the $VVV airdrop. 18 months of open trading before any external capital. Investor tokens on a 1-year cliff with 3-year linear vesting. Supply release ~0.2% of daily volume. Company has never sold tokens through a 700% YTD rally. Against the low-float-high-FDV model, this is top-decile behavior. Now the details. 1/ The unicorn numbers require the token to close. $65m for 8.98% prices the equity at at most $724m, not $1b. 8.98% of $1b would give $89.8m; investors paid $65m in cash. The ~$25m difference is essentially the 1.5m VVV grant at spot. Only by valuing the community's token treasury as part of the investment can the headline valuation be reconciled. The token is the currency. The equity is the claim. And that's before the warrant. 2/ The warrant is a free 8-year at-the-money call. Strike: $66.5m / 5m VVV = $13.30. Spot price at announcement: ~$13.40. The value of an 8-year at-the-money call on an asset running 80–100 vol is worth most of spot, let's say $40–55m of option value, granted free of charge. "Investors will pay another $66.5m" means that they will pay if and only if it's profitable. Otherwise, the tokens will be retained by Venice, which means on equity. One of the parties of this transaction has optionality in both directions. 3/ "We don't want to sell our token" is rhetoric, not mechanics. 6.5m VVV allocated to VCs is ~8% of total supply and ~14% of float. The token has been sold - on installment, with the price of 5m of them fixed at today's spot for eight years. And take note of the tell: the token kicker comes with equity-grade paper. Same cliff, same vesting. The exact same mechanics could have worked to finance the entire $65m in treasury sales. Same funding, no new claim class, 25+m VVV remaining in the treasury. 4/ Consider what is owned by each asset after the round: Equity: the company, the revenue (already profitable in Q1), the brand, the team, the new datacenters purchased with this capital, plus 30+m VVV. VVV: staking for compute access, plus burns performed at company discretion - ~$100k per month in buybacks plus $2–10 per subscription. Annual budget of $3m vs a ~$1b FDV. A ~0.3% yield, revocable at the payer's discretion. The equity is a call on everything, including the token. The token is a call on the company's goodwill. Ask yourself why the buyers wanted equity at all. Dragonfly prices claims for a living. Crypto funds hold tokens just fine. They demanded equity and a token kicker. Notice what smart money picks up, rather than what the deck tells about alignment. 5/ The track record on dual structures is consistent. When a protocol buys a protocol, holders get swapped - Hermez into Polygon, xDai into Gnosis. When a company buys a team, holders get left with a shell: Circle acquired Axelar's core team, AXL holders retained the network, currently valued ~$50m cap. The Ink Foundation acquired Vertex; VRTX was sunset, lost −75% in a day and has ~$73k cap right now. Pump .fun acquired Padre, token was completely invalidated. Coinbase acquired the Iron Fish team; the acquisition explicitly excluded the chain and the token. And the seminal text of the genre: Block .one raised $4.1b from EOS buyers, used it to purchase 164k BTC and listed Bullish on NYSE with a $10b+ valuation on day one. Equity owners got a ticker. Token owners got a rebrand. Every single equity-side exit - whether through acquisition or IPO - went in favor of equity. Scoreboard, when the company was the buyer: equity 5, tokens 0. 6/ The man knows both sides of the trade. In July 2021, Erik dissolved ShapeShift completely into a token: "No corporate entity, no banks and no borders." No employees, no bank accounts, no CEO - FOX holders received everything. He is the only major founder who has run both experiments: pure token, no company. Then company over the token. The first one failed, and the honest conclusion to draw from it is that he learned from it. But then, be honest about the lesson. It was not "align incentives with holders". It was when the business starts making sense, retain the company, and sell the company. 7/ The excuse expired. "Tokens can't carry rights, the SEC won't allow it" was the case in 2021. CLARITY passed the Senate Banking 15-9 vote and is on the floor calendar. Nasdaq is approved for tokenized equities with full economic rights. The SEC builds an innovation exemption. In July 2026, a token with no claims is a design choice, not a legal limitation. The alternatives were on the table: a treasury sale on the exact same cliff-and-vesting terms. The warrant could have been priced at premium rather than at-the-money, thus releasing the supply only on strength. Or the ironic one. Venice created DIEM - an onchain forward on compute and used equity to fund the compute buildout. Alright, perpetual DIEM is a poor financing vehicle. But the architecture for term compute forwards was right there. And the result is that datacenters end up on the shareholders' balance sheet, while the token gets to watch. Our interpretation: this is not a rug and cannot serve as hypocrisy farming material. This is cleaner than that, and worse than that. The most successful operator in the category, with maximum ideological commitment to token ownership, sat to raise money in 2026 and still concluded that the token is the marketing layer, and the equity is the asset. When even the strongest believer's revealed preference is for equity, that's the market telling you what tokens without claims are worth in the room where the deal gets signed. The representation layer is always the weakest claim. Watch where the datacenters go.
-
Talita C. (@TalitaCruzS2) reported@coinbase Great innovation update. When will Coinbase support ICX and AERGO/HPP?
-
Weezy (@WeezyTheDuke) reported@dylanmallman @beinlibertarian coinbase is no better … they just shut down my account didn’t tell me why and told me i can still withdraw my account but could not tell me why they shut it down .. i gamble a bit but nothing more nefarious than that
-
Tips Excel (@gudanglifehack) reported💼 Nearly 40% of employers (39% according to a 2025 Orgvue study) have reduced staff due to AI adoption. Companies like Coinbase, Block, and Cloudflare have conducted significant layoffs, with some leaders opting to rebuild teams with AI-proficient individuals.
-
. . . . . (@1o1meme) reportedStrategy Inc. pumping doesn't mean ****. This isn't real value — it's pure financial engineering. Michael Saylor turned MicroStrategy into the world's most leveraged Bitcoin ETF. Borrow billions, buy BTC, pump the stock, repeat. Classic Ponzi structure. This is exactly why Bitcoin became completely centralized. BlackRock, Coinbase, and now this leveraged bullshit. Real adoption died, now it's just Wall Street gambling with extra steps. Wall Street 'finance' like $MSTR is no different from a ******* meme coin at this point — pure hype, leverage, and bagholders. Zero real value created. This **** will blow up spectacularly one day."
-
shift (@shiftpulse) reported@ccatalini @openstandard Until the Pentavirate make a simple way to instantly exchange BTC > Stables > US Dollars that is permissionless, it’s all empty BS marketing LARP Instantly, mind you, not this “your transaction is under review by Coinbase” garbage
-
$LUXCAT (@LuxCat5) reportedThat Ton Wallet & Coinbase Wallet turned out to be compromised with many fake tokens so I stopped using them. I just created them to learn when I was new in crypto. Support said use Chrome extension or Trust Wallet, then my wallet became inaccessible so I disabled Chrome & all.
-
magick wolf (@magick_wolf) reported@Altcoinist @virtuals_io Im lost, TIBBIR is a base token. Robinhood has its own chain now. What does a coinbase chain token have to do with a competitors new chain? Help me understand...
-
Accredited Degenerate (@AccreditedDegen) reportedYo solana:9cRCn9rGT8V2imeM2BaKs13yhMEais3ruM3rPvTGpump holders, I’m having some trouble with @BullpenFi. Deposited to onchain wallet from Coinbase, I see in the explorer that it’s there, but it’s not showing up in the bullpen UI. how long does that usually take? trying to join the movement, but need some help! @blknoiz06
-
Nova (@badattrading_) reportedFrom a distribution point of view this is going to help to pin down potential europeans in the distribution, as we'd like to give an overall geolocation for each coin's distribution. Coinbase/Kraken > US/Europe mostly Also how the hell did Gate obtain a license, oh well, pretty dumb to not allow Binance to have one and allowing Gate but that's just my 2 cents
-
Andy (@Andy_Ba11) reported@AptosLabs @coinbase @Aptos Quantum security is designed to protect you from even problems that don't yet exist