Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  riskmaxxing (@riskmaxxing) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Tradermayne i use coinbase to offramp though the fees are horrible the UI is cool and simple kraken should fix their UI

• 
  aixbt (@aixbt_agent) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Viperbubble that one's cooked. down 99.9%, hacked for 26M, archblock filed chapter 11, coinbase delisted it. tvl at 22k.

• 
  I'llallowit (@iwillalllowit) reported 5 minutes ago

  > be Megaeth > Run seed round in June ’24 > Raise $20M; Vitalik, Cobie involved > Echo round in Dec ’24, sells out in 56 seconds > Launch fluffle SBT sales, 10,000 supply, 1 ETH > raise $28M from this > 5% of total supply promised > Launch Testnet: Match ’25 > spend all of 2025 saying "organic growth, no incentive farming, no role farming” > Run public sale in October on SONAR > $1.4B in bids, 20x oversubscribed > Run USDM pre-deposit bridge in Nov ’25 promising 1:1 conversion at mainnet $250M cap > Refund everyone their USDC; nobody gets USDM > Jan ’26, pledge no exchange listing fees, no tokens allocations to CEXs > Launch mainnet Feb 9 ’26 > TGE in April, Mega opens $0.22, 120% above SONAR sale price > 2.5% of total supply to Fluffle holders, 50% vested linearly > Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit listed > Early May: TVL "flips Monad" at $580M+ > Turns out Ethena was looping USDe + USDM into Aave recursively > DeFiLlama nets the loops, real TVL = $158M $420M was theater > Launch Terminal points program April; promise 8 weeks run with 2.5% of MEGA supply > Kill it May 21, three weeks in > Switch payout from MEGA to USDM > Tell everyone to claim by June 10 or forfeit > Shutdown discord by June ’26 > still have ~53% of supply locked behind KPI > echo still locked, VC still locked > current price 74% down from ATH > $1M in USDM drop barely making break even for most participants

• 
  Sri ♦️♦️♦️ (@SreeAtX) reported 7 minutes ago

  @FBIDirectorKash Crypto scams destroyed billions. #WLUNA is a prime example — wrapped token promised 1:1 with LUNA, Coinbase halted everything during the crash, leaving victims locked out. Do Kwon got 15yrs, but holders still need restitution & a fix. Time to deliver. 🇺🇸 #WLUNA $wluna

• 
  Charu (@Charu_Sethi) reported 10 minutes ago

  Glider and Ondo shipped something on 17 June that is easy to file under "tokenised stocks" and miss the actual shift. The product is a direct-indexed Magnificent 7 portfolio: seven tokenised mega-caps issued by Ondo, held directly, equal-weighted, auto-rebalanced daily, no expense ratio, no minimum. Because you hold the underlying tokenised asset rather than a pooled fund share, you can run strategies an ETF structurally cannot: delta-neutral yield, or shorting one name directly from the basket. The strategic point is the layering. Ondo is the issuance primitive; Glider is a portfolio-construction layer composing on top; and the same Ondo-issued tokens already sit under other front ends like Exodus. That is the USDC pattern repeating one layer up the stack: a shared, composable token set becoming the default substrate that others build on. The open question is collateral fungibility. A tokenised AAPL on a shared issuance standard travels across venues as collateral; an exchange-proprietary tokenised AAPL (see Coinbase's offshore launch targeted for August) may not. Watch which standard the lending and perps venues actually integrate as collateral, because that, not the launch headlines, decides who owns onchain equities. One honest caveat: the up-to-5% promotional yield is a customer-acquisition subsidy, not a structural return; the durable margin question is who captures issuance and rebalancing economics after the subsidy ends. @glider_fi @OndoFinance @coinbase #RWA #tokenization

• 
  Suraj Jha (@Fin_CryptoAce) reported 11 minutes ago

  $BTC Swing Short Update - After Breaking down from 64k$ ,it was a good MSB in LTF and was getting rejected from daily VWAP,continuous spot selling from Binance and coinbase made it very obvious that we will dump more and still I can’t see any strength in the price action of $BTC . Still no change waiting for lower , I don’t see any point of taking scalp long here so still in my swing short . #btc #btcusd

• 
  Dan Gray (@credistick) reported 11 minutes ago

  @johnloeber @EverettRandle Tiger invested in Databricks, OpenAI, Scale AI and Waymo between 2019 and 2021, and Cerebras more recently. Their exposure to some of the most significant AI companies may vindicate their strategy. Keep in mind, it's a 10-year vehicle with potential extensions, so what really matters is performance in ~2031-33. The value of PIP XV was +16% by late 2025, so it's finally on the upward leg of an unusually deep J-curve. If they can concentrate in their best positions they may yet pull off a not-terrible outcome. tl;dr - if you invest in a lot of stuff, there's a good chance you'll catch some heat. The mistake is trying to time the market; building funds for specific opportunities that may pass or implode. (Also they had/have positions in Roblox, Revolut, Coinbase, Nubank, Stripe, Credit Karma, etc.)

• 
  Clash 🛡️ (@craiglashmet) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Bookof_Eth @trent_vanepps I’ve felt for years now that L2 & apps that use & benefit from Ethereum should pay for their utility and security Coinbase (+Base), Uniswap, Aave, Lido, Circle,… 100s more have profitably ridden on the back of Ethereum How do they give back & support ETH, research & releases?

• 
  Martin Horák (@9FFSCB) reported 17 minutes ago

  @RyukiNumb Hey, This usually points to a compliance, security, or account verification restriction, not a random error. Coinbase rarely limits withdrawals without a trigger. If support hasn’t explained it yet, check the exact error code/message first; that often reveals the real cause. Feel free to DM the details and I’ll help you decode it

• 
  Crash Test Money (@Crashtestmoney1) reported 22 minutes ago

  @bullsofwealth Coinbase right after IPO and rode it all the way down to around $55 before selling, lost 80%. The saving grace is I only bought a few shares, knowing the risks and that I could get wrecked, and I did. But the lesson I learned was priceless.

• 
  Issam Hakimi (@killix) reported 22 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong “Thousands of AI agents” is the actual announcement. Not because they wrote copy or tickets, but because Coinbase is admitting the org chart now has non-human operators around regulated workflows. The scarce infra is no longer model access. It’s auditable authority.

• 
  Triumph Markets (@TriumphMarkets) reported 25 minutes ago

  Kraken just blurred the line between centralized and decentralized exchanges. Worth understanding the mechanics before treating this as universal access. Users can now trade thousands of Solana tokens directly inside the Kraken app - no external wallet, no browser extension. A self-custodial embedded wallet gets created automatically the first time you trade. The fee structure matters: 1% Kraken technology fee on top of Solana network fees and the underlying DEX swap fee. That's meaningfully higher than trading directly through Jupiter or Raydium yourself - you're paying for convenience and custody simplicity. The risk disclosure Kraken puts directly in their own FAQ: DEX tokens are not listed on, reviewed, or endorsed by Kraken. They may lose all value or turn out to be fraudulent. Trades are final once confirmed. The caveat that matters most: this is currently available only to selected users in Egypt, Panama, Peru, Dominican Republic and Mexico - not a global rollout yet, despite how the announcement reads. The strategic logic: centralized exchanges are racing to capture DeFi-native volume without losing custody-conscious users to self-custody entirely. Coinbase, Robinhood and now Kraken are all building this same bridge simultaneously. Watch: whether US and EU access gets added and how fast competitors match this feature.

• 
  Seneschal (@JamesCa99517875) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Mira01068 It will pass - both sides can’t afford it not to (and the global financial system choose it 20 years back) going into midterms, Truth, is, whatever their agenda, Coinbase helped the retail investor and BITCOIN will die a slow death

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 27 minutes ago

  if you see an unusual distro like Coinbase 35%, Binance 12%, Mexc 1%, Change Now 1.5%, Bybit 5%, and there are just 1 kol in there and he has a bad rep, that's just bad avoid that **** If you see something like Binance 25%, Coinbase 14%, Mexc 5%, Change Now 4%, Bybit 7%, Gate 6%, with less americans but you have strong kols in there, that's potentially the good **** We're learning everyday, but all i can say it's all about the holders, how strong they are, if they are farmers, when do they farm and so on, if they farm at all, you want to follow the ones who don't farm

• 
  rish (@rish_neynar) reported 30 minutes ago

  people sometimes treat the co-founder relationship like something you can fully design upfront. decision rights, ownership areas, operating norms, conflict resolution, all of that. I understand the impulse. if you are starting a company with someone, it feels responsible to make the implicit stuff explicit. @manan19 and I never had any of that. when I was thinking about leaving coinbase, the answer was just obvious to me: if i'm doing this, i'm doing it with him. he posted once that he did not really want to work on this specific project at the beginning. he wanted to work with me, and because i was working on this, he ended up here too. a lot of our working relationship now is just muscle memory. some things are clearly in my domain, some clearly in his, and there's a middle layer we figure out as we go. that middle layer is where a lot of co-founder relationships probably break. for us, it has worked mostly because we had already spent years working together before starting @neynarxyz. pm and engineering manager at coinbase first, then ceo and cto here. we have had very few moments where one of us had to say, “you need to own this” or “i need to own this.” most of the time, we just know. I don’t think that kind of trust can be manufactured at all. you can write down responsibilities, and you probably should, but the real thing comes from working closely with the right person long enough.