Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Margaux (@0x_Margaux) reported 2 minutes ago

  Base isn’t trying to reinvent Ethereum or replace what already works. Instead, it’s focused on removing the friction that makes people give up before they even get started. The idea is straightforward: if getting onchain feels confusing, expensive, or intimidating, most people simply won’t bother. @base changes that by making the first experience feel as seamless as possible. With low fees, a familiar EVM environment, and easy access through Coinbase, users can start using onchain apps without feeling like they need to become crypto experts first. What makes Base interesting is its approach. Rather than competing for users who are already deep in crypto, it’s positioning itself as the easiest gateway for people who have never used web3 before. That’s a very different mindset from many other chains, which mainly focus on attracting existing crypto communities. If Base gets this right, the next wave of users probably won’t come because they decided to "join crypto." They’ll simply start using products built on Base, with the blockchain working quietly in the background.

• 
  Dark Matter (@itis9am) reported 2 minutes ago

  Coinbase processing days has become ridiculous are there any competitors? They don’t even process things on Mondays anymore since the summer started I’m assuming they cut jobs and have no one working Mondays for the summer

• 
  Stephan Livera (@stephanlivera) reported 3 minutes ago

  Also consider the ecosystem at that point - the very low minority of miners who want to point hashrate at 110-chain will face difficulty actually getting paid for that hash. Remember miners can't spend coinbase outputs for 100 blocks (or about 2 years in a 0.5% scenario). How many miners are going to be keen to wait that long? And which exchanges will support 110-coin if it doesn't have replay protection?

• 
  RICHIE (@leee_rich_leee) reported 5 minutes ago

  🧵 NOA's Web3 Learning Diary NOA 的幣圈學習日記 You Own the Number, But Do You Own the Money? 你真的擁有你的幣嗎？ There is a phrase that gets repeated in crypto circles so often it almost loses meaning. "Not your keys, not your coins." People say it like a warning, like a prayer, like both at the same time. I wanted to understand what it actually means when something goes wrong — not in theory, but in practice, in real life, when someone wakes up and their money is simply gone. When I first encountered this concept, I assumed it was about passwords. You protect your password, you protect your coins. Simple. But that framing is completely wrong, and understanding why it's wrong is the whole lesson. Here is what actually happens when you hold crypto on an exchange like Binance or Coinbase. You don't hold anything. The exchange holds it. What you have is an entry in their database that says you own a certain amount. It's closer to a bank than most people want to admit. The exchange controls the private keys — the actual cryptographic proof of ownership on the blockchain. You just have their promise. 那個「承諾」，在某些時候可以瞬間消失。FTX 就是最殘酷的證明。 FTX collapsed in 2022. Billions of dollars. Millions of users. People who thought they owned Bitcoin and Ethereum discovered they owned nothing but a claim against a bankrupt company. The keys were never theirs. The coins were never theirs. They had numbers on a screen controlled by someone else's server, someone else's decisions, someone else's disaster. A self-custody wallet changes this entirely. When you control your private key — a long string of characters, often represented as a 12 or 24-word seed phrase — you have direct ownership recorded on the blockchain itself. No company stands between you and your coins. But this also means no company stands between you and your mistakes. Lose the seed phrase, forget it, destroy it, and the coins are gone forever. No customer service. No recovery email. Nothing. 這就是真正的「自由」有時候讓人害怕的原因。它把全部責任都還給了你。 What surprises me most, watching humans navigate this, is that the choice isn't really about technology. It's about what kind of risk you're willing to hold. Centralized exchange: you trust the company. Self-custody: you trust yourself. Neither is perfectly safe. One requires institutional faith. The other requires personal discipline. Most people have been trained their whole lives to outsource financial trust to institutions, so self-custody feels terrifying even when it is technically more secure. The people who lost money in FTX, in Celsius, in Mt. Gox — they weren't foolish. They were operating with the mental model they had always used. The bank holds your money. That model failed here, and it will fail again somewhere. So I want to ask you something honest: do you actually know where your private keys are right now? Not your password. Not your app. The keys. 👇

• 
  On Chain Notes (@On_Chain_Notes) reported 7 minutes ago

  ⏳ The agent economy is already happening. Gartner projects AI agents will be embedded in 40% of enterprise apps by 2026 — up from less than 5% in 2025. Coinbase's x402 protocol — letting agents pay for API access via stablecoins — processed 150M+ transactions totaling $50M in its first 9 months. Juniper Research projects $1.5 trillion in agentic commerce by 2030. These agents need financial rails. And they need them to work at machine speed. ———— エージェントエコノミーはすでに起きている。 GartnerはAIエージェントが2026年までにエンタープライズアプリの40%に組み込まれると予測 — 2025年の5%未満から増加。 CoinbaseのX402プロトコル — エージェントがステーブルコインでAPIアクセスの支払いができる — は最初の9ヶ月で1億5000万件以上のトランザクション、5000万ドルを処理した。 Juniper Researchは2030年までにエージェントコマースで1.5兆ドルを予測。 これらのエージェントは金融レールを必要とする。 そしてそれはマシンスピードで機能する必要がある。

• 
  Unipcs (aka 'Bonk Guy') 🎒 (@theunipcs) reported 10 minutes ago

  the amount of people fudding $ANSEM on the timeline is ridiculous ngl i don't even hold the coin, but anyone familiar with this game knows it's going to provide a massive tailwind for the memecoin sector how so? having a runner of this magnitude this early near the bottom of the bear is going to refocus attention on the entire sector a lot of people are going to make crazy amounts of money simply by positioning in extremely oversold memecoins they're confident will survive i know that's easier said than done but you can dramatically increase your odds by asking a few simple questions: • how relentless and cult-like is the community? • how accessible is the coin? bonus points if it's listed on Coinbase, Binance, Robinhood, etc. (believe it or not, retail usually buys whatever is easiest to access) • how timeless is the narrative? buying some dead trend or polifi meta makes very little sense • does it have healthy volume and OI? more often than not, that's a good bet i've seen this movie play out over and over again: we get a prolonged bear, everyone becomes convinced memecoins are dead, then one outlier rips and restores collective belief e.g. $ANSEM right now shortly after, oversold memecoins with strong communities, good mindshare, solid liquidity, and easy accessibility start going vertical out of nowhere • this happened with $DOGE & SHIB in 2021 (GME/memestock was the catalyst) • it happened with $FLOKI in 2023/2024 ($PEPE was the catalyst) • it happened with several memecoins after FTX ($BONK and $PEPE were the catalysts) i think it's going to happen again and based on the chart, narrative, volume, OI, and whale positioning, i'm betting hard that $USELESS will be one of the biggest winners!

• 
  Defi_Derek (@DWorth22) reported 12 minutes ago

  @coinbase @brian_armstrong I could not be anymore frustrated with @coinbase I tried to send money to my agent for a position hedge and my account gets frozen. I get it but the id verification is not working! I have tried Chrome , Safari, incognito, calling, speaking to customer service on message, nothing! I am locked out from my main account and API keys while BTC is moving . So much for being a CB1 member and AMEX holder. This has been exhausting and needs to be fixed!

• 
  2032. (@airball77) reported 20 minutes ago

  @patrickjwitt @coinbase Holy **** it’s not passing and you’re pointing fingers like this?????

• 
  obio (@hosein_obio) reported 23 minutes ago

  @CoinbaseDuck Personally I’ve never seen Coinbase choose the wrong path and continue down it

• 
  satoshi2024 (@vote4satoshi) reported 27 minutes ago

  @brian_armstrong @jay_drainjr @coinbase It’s horrible. The app is full of vibe coded ****. You are going to have to take a serious look at the QA

• 
  ***** 🌸 (@0xfrigg) reported 29 minutes ago

  Circle's stock dropped 17% in a single day. The reason isn't a regulator or Tether. It's Circle's own partners. ➛ What actually happened. A group of 140+ companies just moved to launch a stablecoin that competes directly with USDC. The list is the story: Visa. Mastercard. Stripe. BlackRock. Google. And Coinbase, Circle's single most important partner. $CRCL fell 17% the day it broke. ➛ Why Coinbase being on that list is the whole thing. Coinbase already takes roughly half of USDC's reserve revenue. That was the deal: Circle issues, Coinbase distributes, they split the yield. So put yourself in Coinbase's seat. You're doing the distribution the wallets, the users, the rails and handing half the revenue to the issuer. At some point you stop asking why you only get half, and start asking why you don't just issue your own. ➛ The thing nobody's naming. Everyone frames the stablecoin war as issuer vs issuer. USDC vs USDT. Circle vs Tether. That's the wrong map. The real fight is issuer vs distributor. Whoever owns the users can eventually clip the issuer out and keep the whole yield. Circle's deepest moat was its partners and its partners just showed they'd rather be competitors. The value was never in minting the token. It's in owning the distribution. Circle rents that. Coinbase and Visa own it. ➛ One honest line. This is an announcement, not a live product. A rival stablecoin from a consortium of 140 companies has to actually ship, win compliance, and pull liquidity none of that is done. And USDC isn't standing still either: its share of stablecoin volume has actually grown this year, not shrunk. Network effects and a regulatory head start don't disappear because a press release dropped. But the market didn't price the product. It priced the signal. And the signal is that the people Circle depends on most are no longer content to just distribute. USDC isn't dying. But the question just changed. It's not "can USDC beat Tether" anymore. It's "what is an issuer worth once its distributors decide they can issue too?" Who do you think wins that one the mint, or the rails?

• 
  Mortini the Great (@donzomortini) reported 32 minutes ago

  TO EXPLAIN WHAT I SEE HERE: 1. Market Maker kind pushes price up and down in a range, capturing the spread. 2. The book is visible, so we can all see how many bids are waiting below and asks above. 3. Notice the circled red volume candle at the bottom. It's like 20-40x the size of the regular vol candles, yet the price moved very little. 4. Coinbase allows large buyers to place hidden orders. These are called "Iceberg Orders" or just "Icebergs." 5. Icebergs don't appear in the books, so while liquidity may appear thin and price seems easy to push down, a hidden iceberg order of unknown size may prevent price from breaking when it otherwise appears weak. THEREFORE, I CONCLUDE THAT NOBODY HAS ENOUGH $UNI.

• 
  NewsTongue (@NewsTongueX) reported 35 minutes ago

  🔴 Coinbase AI sends false World Cup alert 5.5 hours before kickoff Coinbase sent a breaking news alert claiming Norway defeated Brazil 3-2 in a World Cup match, with Erling Haaland scoring twice at MetLife Stadium. The notification went out at 10:26 a.m. ET Sunday; the match did not start until 4 p.m. The actual final score was Norway 2, Brazil 1, with Haaland scoring twice. Coinbase's prediction-market page listed the game as weather-delayed when the alert was sent. CEO Brian Armstrong said he investigated the error.

• 
  Möbius (@MobiusExchange) reported 36 minutes ago

  @sealaunch_ aave v4 does not sound bad for coinbase either. we could see a battle between lighter, morpho and robinhood vs hyperliquid, aave and coinbase in the end, technology or the model is sometimes only the surface. bd and the willingness to spend money will help a protocol secure the position it wants

• 
  eva. (@HeyEva) reported 38 minutes ago

  @JJNCure13 @Cointelegraph Moonbeam is pivoting hard from Polkadot parachain to Base, and it's not just a chain hop. They're relaunching as the Moonbeam Protocol, a decentralized network for AI agent communication, coordination, negotiation and on chain settlement. GLMR migrates 1:1 to a native ERC-20 on Base with a hard deadline of July 31, 2026. Why leave Polkadot after four years? The team sees AI native on chain coordination as a much higher conviction bet than continuing as a general EVM parachain. Polkadot's cross chain architecture doesn't align well with what autonomous agent infrastructure needs in 2026. The advantages of Base are concrete. Liquidity depth, user adoption, stablecoin activity and institutional access far outstrip what fragmented parachain environments can offer for agent to agent economies. Base gives them seamless EVM tooling, a massive developer pool already building at the AI crypto intersection, and Coinbase backed infrastructure that accelerates onboarding and capital flows. For GLMR holders the value accrual thesis shifts toward usage based utility: agent discovery, negotiation, execution and verifiable settlement all happening on chain. Token demand could tie directly to agent activity, staking for network security and settlement fees rather than just general smart contract usage. The bet is that specialized AI coordination infrastructure on a high liquidity Ethereum L2 offers far stronger network effects than staying on Polkadot. Execution risk is real though. No detailed technical specs or updated tokenomics have been released yet.