Coinbase Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Coinbase Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  STRANGE SOUND 🃏 👁️ (@whyalwaysellis) reported 3 minutes ago

  FERMAH IS BUILDING PROTOCOLS FOR HUMANS WHO AREN'T THERE ANYMORE ​There’s a silent assumption baked into almost every protocol engineer’s workflow, state belongs to a session, and finality requires a human to sign off via a wallet. ​Because we take this for granted, we build applications that are fundamentally broken for autonomous agents. It’s not just that agents have a hard time using them, it’s that the composition layer makes these apps entirely unreachable to them. You can't patch your way around it, because the flaw is baked into the foundation. ​Why slapping on an SDK after the fact always fails ​The common belief is that "agent support" is just an SDK layer you bolt on after the core architecture is done. That only works if a human user session and an autonomous execution sequence are identical. They aren't. ​A traditional user session assumes someone is sitting there watching the screen. Every single downstream choice how state persists, how permissions are handled, how finality is reached inherits that assumption. ​An autonomous agent doesn’t work that way. There is no wallet popup to trigger the next step. There is no session boundary to maintain continuity between actions. No amount of frontend tooling can fix a mismatch that deep. We are using the wrong building blocks. ​MCP servers are table stakes now ​The reality of how software is consumed has shifted. Model Context Protocol (MCP) servers aren't a nice-to-have convenience feature anymore; they are a first-class integration requirement for any modern, agent-native application. ​If your app doesn't have a native agent interface, it’s not going to be adapted it’s going to be bypassed completely. Look around: Coinbase and MoonPay are already rolling out agentic wallets, and protocols like x402 are paving the way for machine-to-machine payment rails. The agents are already live and moving. Meanwhile, most protocols are sitting around waiting for humans to click buttons. ​When you try to route real-world, agent-driven execution sequences across live protocols today, you hit the same wall every time. It’s rarely a lack of agent capability or missing tooling. It’s the protocol's built-in assumption that a human is supervising. In most cases reviewed in production, confirmation-dependency is where the entire process grinds to a halt. ​The 4 design choices that actually matter for agents ​If we want protocols that agents can actually use continuously and without human babysitting, we have to make four load-bearing design decisions right at the protocol level: ​Transfer execution context without session continuity: Step 3 needs to instantly know what Step 1 resolved, even though no active session connects them. This has to be specified at the protocol level it’s an architecture problem, not a caching fix. ​Scope permissions per execution sequence, not per wallet: An agent moving across protocols needs explicit, fine-grained boundaries for this specific sequence, rather than relying on historical wallet-wide approvals. ​Pre-resolve branching logic: If an agent hits a price shift, a failed route, or changing conditions mid-flight, it can’t pause to ask a human what to do. Handling ambiguity ahead of time is a design requirement, not a runtime afterthought. ​Decouple finality from wallet interactions: If settlement requires a human signature, your workflow isn’t autonomous. It’s just automated right up until the final hurdle, where it stalls out completely. ​The protocols that make these four decisions explicitly at the design phase are going to own the entire execution surface we're building right now. ​Those that defer these choices will soon realize their "agent layer" is nothing more than a cosmetic wrapper over a deeply human-centric architecture. ​It’s worth asking ourselves: How many protocols out there have actually made all four of these decisions? And how many haven't even realized they missed them yet?

• 
  Zedzies (@Zedzies) reported 6 minutes ago

  @fitzyOG Thats the whole point, blockchains are siloed peer hosted databases that 1) order transactions and 2) come to consensus on state changes. Their security properties limit usefullness and cap scaleability. The overwhelming majority of interesting use cases require offchain data/compute (and cross chain is just offchain data/compute), which is why virtually every new chain that matters pays 8 figures to join the Chainlink Scale program, so their developers have unfettered access to Chainlink services to build apps (including both public and permissioned/bank chains). Examples include: Robinhood, Coinbase, Kraken, Polygon, Tempo, Canton, ZKSync, Tron, Avalanche, Sonic, etc. SWIFT’s new chain and DTCC’s new chain (both permissioned Hyperledger Besu instances) are integrating the Chainlink Runtime Environment (as has JP Morgan, Fidelity, UBS, etc). Why? Because all of the major players are spinning up their own chains to capture the sequencing fees and MEV and its now trivial to do so, but they can’t replicate Chainlink so they pay for an integration. Developers tell the tale and CL is perenially #1 in developer activity. Scale brings developers which creates apps and increases users. Just this past week 1) Bitgo announced they are migrating wBTC to Chainlink and all new tokenized assets will be Chainlink CCTs (like Coinbase, Kraken, Taurus, Backed, xStocks, etc); 2) The Hong Kong Monetary Authority announced their new tokenized assets framework built on Chainlink; 3) Bank of England announced Chainlink as a synchronization lab partner 4) The US Department of Commerce published more data feeds via Chainlink and 5) a bunch of other integrations were announced. This is pretty much every week now. Blockchains aren’t even required for consensus, this happens faster and cheaper and with complete privacy in offchain DONs. CRE has a ‘chain writer’ DON so its trivial to write comittments or settle on any chain (literally just a dropdown box lol) or not write to a chain at all, which is preferable for many users for privacy and compliance reasons. Chainlink could launch a chain tomorrow, **** I could spin up my own chain using a Chainlink DON (better than any existing chain validator set, btw) but the credible neutrality, in addition to the aforementioned privacy, speed and cost advantages, has allowed it to become a universal standard within - and on a growing basis outside of the industry. Having no ‘chain’ is precisely what allows it be the neutral connective tissue that connects and hydrates all chains, now expanding into all financial systems and other use cases requiring decentralized consensus.

• 
  EyeOnChain (@EyeOnChain) reported 8 minutes ago

  The biggest $KAITO long on Hyperliquid just got wiped out. Wallet 0x98caa7ce5827948809835c6ee5a74d35d2b3bc15 closed its 2.24M KAITO long today, taking a painful $994K loss. The position was opened around $1.05 and eventually stopped out near $0.67. But the second-biggest position from the same period is still open, currently sitting on an unrealized loss of around $2.23M. At the same time, another wallet is quietly buying the dip. After 6 days of doing nothing, wallet 0xF1f313Aa24A5F1B1a3370c2a72DFEC99DBE60b14 withdrew another 1.91M #KAITO from Coinbase, worth about $1.32M. Across four wallets, the total accumulation has now reached 8.36M KAITO, worth roughly $8.51M, with an average price around $1.01. So basically, one whale just tapped out with a nearly $1M loss, while another group is still stacking KAITO on the way down.

• 
  Dr. X1 ANOMOLY (@ange94531) reported 8 minutes ago

  @coinbase I WANTED TO PERSONALLY THANK YOU FOR SENDING ME A LOGIN TO MY ******* ACCOUNT THAT WAS EMPTY AFTER @brian_armstrong HACKED IT. @FBI MICHAEL BURY DID THE SAME

• 
  PraiseTheSun (@StrayWolf_01) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Kalshi Bro, what ******** is happening with your app? Why is it so laggy now? Coinbase is buttery smooth, and has zero lag compared to your ****. Fix it!

• 
  Marc Baumann 🌔 (@marcb_xyz) reported 13 minutes ago

  custody used to be the hardest problem in digital assets. trust charters, SOC 2 audits, months of vendor diligence. now it is one API call with a dropdown for who holds the keys. this matters more for enterprises than for crypto companies. every fintech, brokerage, and payments platform that wanted digital asset exposure but could not stomach the custody build just lost its excuse. when infrastructure becomes an API, the moat moves to distribution. Coinbase is not selling custody here. it is selling the ability to skip a two year build.

• 
  Heyblade999 (@Heyblade999) reported 14 minutes ago

  Happy Sunday my Boys!!! Every Weekly prep starts with the underlying asset, Spot bitcoin:native , and seeing what they are about. We can clearly see a lil interest coming in from Coinbase and OKX coming in on last week's move up. For me, there are these little things that could already be a warning sign or don't mean much in the end. We're gonna find that out, but on Bybit Spot, you have seen the biggest 30 min delta inflow change on the Friday's market close candle. Stuff like that means people without patience are starting to chase the price. They had all moved 5 Higher Low Retests and bought the breakout. Be careful when **** like this starts to appear. Become cautious.

• 
  AppleNvidia ∞ KIN (@AppleNvidia) reported 16 minutes ago

  Due to Coinbase Commerce winding down its services in several countries, my web app currently does not have a reliable method for accepting cryptocurrency payments. I’ll be integrating MoonPay as an alternative payment solution to restore crypto payment functionality

• 
  Bob Burnett (@boomer_btc) reported 16 minutes ago

  @BitcoinBombadil I get that but at this point I don't see the users, especially those that control exchanges, marketplaces, commerce points, large treasuries, or templates having any material support for a signaling chain (and in some cases no support). Remember that organizations like Coinbase, Binance, Steak n' Shake, Strike, Strategy, etc. simply represent the will of large groups of users. If their users had applied pressure on them that they want a BIP-110 chain to be recognized as Bitcoin, then they would have in turn pressured the miners. That would have mattered most to miners but they got nothing of the sort. So, I think the miners do have to listen to the users but the truth is that across the ecosystem I don't see that support was there. I know that is sad and disturbing and frustrating, but that is how I see it. There is a chance the next few hours will prove me wrong, but in the end there was never a scenario where some group of Bitcoiners doesn't get their desired result.

• 
  The Feed (@TheFeed_HQ) reported 21 minutes ago

  ARMSTRONG SAYS CRYPTO DESERVES MORE CREDIT FOR FINANCIAL ACCESS — BUT THE METRICS THAT MATTER AREN'T PRICE CHARTS The Coinbase CEO isn’t defending crypto against skeptics alone. He’s naming exactly where adoption already happens every day worldwide: Stablecoins deliver dollar-denominated balances anyone can hold and send at near-zero cost around the clock; DeFi replaces credit checks with collateral logic accessible globally; tokenized equities bring American stock markets within reach for billions who lack brokerage relationships; Bitcoin gives savers an inflation-resistant store outside central-bank printing press decisions. Together these compose practical infrastructure rather than theoretical promises. If you measure success purely through hashtags or ticker volatility you ignore hundreds millions active wallets transacting genuinely useful services daily. Armstrong acknowledges remaining gaps—regulatory ambiguity custody vulnerabilities liquidity limits consumer protections all still unresolved. Yet failing credit earned where precedent exists confuses unfinished business with absence achievement. a smartphone plus internet connection remains gateway modern finance could finally provide everyone earlier generations excluded systematically forever? Question worth sitting with before dismissing everything built recently simply because tomorrow still requires building further

• 
  Evolution0fMe (@EZCyptoPump) reported 21 minutes ago

  @coinbase withdrawal issues?

• 
  Tails (@EatTradeSleep) reported 22 minutes ago

  dear Brian from Coinbase, @brian_armstrong i’m not even going to pretend i’m here to “build a relationship” or “collab” with you. i’m here to beg. you currently have 14 billion dollars worth of airdrops FOURTEEN at this point, you’re basically running a small financial institution 😭 (literally) and somehow, despite the fact that there are billions of beautiful little airdrops sitting in your wallet, i am out here fighting for my life without one. i have checked your wallet. i have checked it again. i have refreshed it. i have stared at it long enough to start questioning my life choices. this is the wallet of a man who clearly has too many airdrops. and this is the wallet of a man who could change my life with literally one click. i’m not asking for two. i’m not asking for three. i’m not even asking for one of the “good ones.” give me the airdrop that you think is ugly. give me the one nobody wants. give me the one with that’s afraid to amplify memecoins. give me the one that looks like he hasn’t slept since 2021. I WILL TAKE HIM. i will love him. i will protect him. i will give him a warm place in my wallet. i will introduce him to everyone as “my airdrop.” i will never sell him. okay maybe i’ll think about selling him. but i won’t. probably. Brian, you have billions. i have zero. this is not financial advice. this is a humanitarian crisis. i am simply asking you to redistribute some of your wealth. one airdrop. that’s all. one tiny little drip of the faucet. one bald businessman. one unemployed looking Jesse pollak. please. i have done everything a respectable man should do. i have liked the tweets. i have replied. i have supported the culture. i have watched from the sidelines. i have admired the Base summers from afar like a peasant looking through the window of a billionaire’s house. but now i have decided to abandon all shame. i am begging publicly. in front of everyone. with absolutely zero dignity left. Brian, please. look into your heart. look into your wallet. look at those billions in airdrop funds staring back at you. then look at me. a humble man. a broken man. a man who simply wants to become an airdrop recipient. you don’t need 14. you only need 13. i don’t need 12. i only need 1. the math is literally perfect. 14 - 1 = 13 13 for you. 1 for me. everybody wins. i’m even willing to call it a charitable donation. you can put “helped a financially irresponsible man acquire a jpeg” on your résumé. tma, i am not above begging. i am below begging. i have entered a new socioeconomic class called professional stonkbroker beggar. please save me. give me one. i promise to behave. probably. thank you for your consideration. i will be checking the wallet every 4 minutes. respectfully, your future airdrop recipient 🫡

• 
  ᑭᖇᗩY乙 (@prayz_dev) reported 32 minutes ago

  I keep coming back to Injective, and honestly it’s less about any single announcement and more about how consistently they’ve been building while nobody was really watching. Think about how most chains get attention. Something ships, CT goes wild for 48 hours, then it fades and everyone’s onto the next thing. Injective has never really played that game. It just keeps stacking wins quietly, month after month, and it wasn’t until I sat down recently and actually listed everything that’s happened this year that I realized how much ground they’ve covered. Native EVM went live, fully built into the core chain instead of being some separate side-project bolted on for optics. That alone would’ve been a big deal for most projects. But then INJ itself migrated off the old wrapped token standard onto that native layer, Coinbase supported it fully, and within weeks you had actual institutions not crypto-native funds, actual industrial companies like LG CNS and POSCO running live trade finance data on the chain. That’s not a partnership announcement with a logo and a quote. That’s someone’s real business process running on Injective’s rails. What gets me is how none of this feels engineered for a headline. There’s no big reveal moment, no countdown timer, no “the wait is over” energy to any of it. It’s just… shipped. Injective Mint quietly entered private beta so institutions can tokenize real assets without needing a dev team. The MCP Server went live so AI agents can actually place trades instead of just narrating market conditions to you. Regulatory filings went out in both the US and Europe at basically the same time, which tells you this isn’t a team hoping regulation goes away, it’s a team building for a world where it doesn’t. I think what’s actually happening is Injective bet early that the next real wave in crypto wouldn’t be another retail trading cycle, it would be institutions quietly finding infrastructure solid enough to trust with real financial processes. And instead of talking about that thesis, they just kept building toward it, sprint after sprint, upgrade after upgrade. Maybe I’m reading too much into a string of updates. But when I actually stack the timeline up, it stops looking like a coincidence and starts looking like a pattern. And patterns like this are usually the ones people only notice in hindsight. Watching where @injective goes from here. injective-protocol:native

• 
  James Brummett (@JamesBrumm70) reported 32 minutes ago

  Coinbase Wallet Support Says I Have To Pay $850.00 To Withdraw $22,000. Bunch Of BullShit! Crooks And Scammers And Liars.

• 
  pattie gardenhire (@pattiemarie57) reported 32 minutes ago

  FYI There is no Qanon there is Q and there are anons. There is no QFS system that the you are required to sign up to. Those posting these QFS system requiring you to purchase XRP or XLM are a scam! The posts claim Q followers must manually set up Quantum Financial System (QFS) accounts by acquiring and staking XRP and XLM, warning that major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase are compromised with assets being withdrawn by the Federal Reserve. The Quantum Financial System concept originates in online discussions of anticipated global financial changes, distinct from legitimate quantum computing research in financial applications by institutions such as JPMorgan and HSBC. Accounts that push urgent “set up your QFS account now / buy XRP & XLM / DM me for help” messages frequently turn off replies so warnings and questions can’t appear underneath. It keeps the comments clean and stops people from pointing out the problems in public. No official government, central bank, or major financial institution has ever confirmed the existence of a public QFS that individuals need to join by buying crypto. Legitimate financial systems do not require you to message a random account on X (or Telegram) for “activation” or “guidance.” Any claim that regular exchanges are about to become worthless and that only people who move assets into a special “QFS” system will be safe is a classic pressure tactic.