Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (15%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Buenos Aires	Sign in	3 hours ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	4 hours ago
Perpignan	Sign in	10 hours ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	3 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	3 days ago
Strasbourg	Glitches	4 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  mptechnology (@mptechnologyy) reported 15 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Fix the netcode! People not dying! Taking so many bullets since the update!

• 
  Ohio Treasure Trove (@OHIO_Trove) reported 3 minutes ago

  steam needs to refund anyone that requests it for battlefield 6, it has always had issues with crashing but now you cant even make it through one game/ I am sick of troubleshooting, i want a game i can play for $70.

• 
  !666! (@od6do9) reported 3 minutes ago

  @taveira2009OG @Antektw @BattlefieldComm Silk said same thing, does he have a skill issue too? Go back to cod kid

• 
  Mr.Samuels (@Mister_Samuels) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Just please REDUCE the bloom back to what is was in the BF6 Beta and increase ttk. That’s literally all yall need to do. This heavy bloom effect is the biggest issue with BF6, especially since it wasn’t like this in yall own beta!!

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please!!!!! fix this ******* grenade indicator. It’s literally impossible to play because of it...🤬🤬 This is the most irritating, most infuriating bug that has ever existed in the history of Battlefield.🤦

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 12 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. 🇪🇺 Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰 In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  🌑🕷️RiskE80🕷️🌑 (@RiskE80_) reported 12 minutes ago

  @clarityysix But then again I guess it is kindve a vague definition cuz there are games that are considered live service but have a similar content cycle like Borderlands (CoD, GTA Online, Battlefield) where they make a game, make new content, then make a new game eventually, repeat

• 
  RUNEWALKER (@GamerCyberpunk) reported 13 minutes ago

  @8biteric Battle passes! Unless its like halo infinite that let's you go to whichever pass you want at any point, but live service in general tbh used to love battlefield premium for example

• 
  Bmurphy (@Bmur3333) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Listen to me u bunch of ******* mentally handicapped *****. If u don't fix team balancing and TTD no one will be playing dis **** on 2 months time

• 
  Rob Lee (@RALee85) reported 25 minutes ago

  I made a similar point about this in some of our recent podcasts. Part of the problem with the assault regiments is how they were employed. They were ordered to conduct counterattacks with little notice to retake positions of questionable value that would likely be lost in the future because the brigades holding the front lacked the manpower. To conduct offensive operations properly on this battlefield, you need time to plan, conduct rehearsals, and set the conditions for employing armor. There also need to be clear objectives, supported/supporting relationship, and unity of command. If you don't have this time, offensive actions will likely fail and at high cost.

• 
  Tyler Frank (@mrtfrank007) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Bring back the SCAR-SV. Fix the interdictor

• 
  CasualSurvivor (@CasualSurvivor) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why doesn't the game start? Restarted my PC, relogged, checked steam servers and bf servers...no idea but the game won't start. Launcher works till it says "starting game" then closes itself without any error

• 
  Janusz Tydda (@JanuszTydda) reported 30 minutes ago

  @DavidSmuts A new dimension of cannon fodder. And at the same time, the problem of an aging population has been solved (at least on the direct battlefield). Apparently, this clip is generated by AI, but that doesn't mean it won't be possible soon.

• 
  Ambrigalist 🇩🇪 (@ambrigalist) reported 32 minutes ago

  @VeryBadSCAVR Played Rainbow six, Halo, Destiny, CoD, overwatch and Battlefield all had bigger hit boxes and some kind of aim assist. They should just give people a option to search for lobbys that accept aim assist aka "Arcade" games, and Advanced where tou actually need to aim. Aim assist Hardware has been getting out of hand and even softaim software and hardware can't be traced anymore. But aim assist should be disabled to not follow players enemys behind and trough smokes. I don't think aim assist is bad for shooters. SBMM after playing rounds I noticed, that I no longer play against people who use Hardware and software external game seetings to see in the dark and less lag switch users and ping abusers in lobbys.

• 
  John (@DownHomeJohn) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm Still need to fix the kill tally towards Ace rewards.

• 
  MezzWard (@MezzWard) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your POS game... every ******* week, every ******* update you manage to have your game files constantly getting messed up. When I search, "my PC keeps rebooting when launching Battlefield 6", and it comes up as a well known issue... yall are a joke of a company. Can'twait for @WARDOGS

• 
  Mohamed Ibrahim (@m_ibrahim_21) reported 37 minutes ago

  have been broken and defeated. The world has finally won its long and arduous battle over my soul. There is nothing to be done now except to walk the bloody battlefield and gaze upon my fallen soldiers... and weep.

• 
  Reecy21 (@Reecy211994) reported 37 minutes ago

  Hey Peeps, Sorry I am currently having technical issues so my Battlefield stream maybe cancelled if I cant fix the problem in time !

• 
  Reira (@reira_r2) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix the 3rd person jet camera, revert it or give us the option at least to use the originall jet camera.

• 
  Miad Maleki (@miadmaleki) reported 40 minutes ago

  (15/17) On "[sanctions] have mostly failed to effect the policy changes they were designed to drive." This is the essay's central conceptual error. Nate, my friend, you know should better. Sanctions are not a standalone instrument for producing "policy change." They are one part of a coercion toolkit that includes military credibility, diplomacy, allied enforcement, coalition-building, and a defined off-ramp. The piece first attacks sanctions for not doing what only the whole toolkit can do, then attacks the current campaign for using more of the toolkit; blockade, regional enforcement, secondary sanctions, snapback. Its own examples refute it. The 2003 nuclear pause happened under converging military pressure post-Iraq invasion plus economic pressure. The JCPOA was accepted under converging 2012 CBI/oil sanctions plus a credible military threat plus a snapback structure. 1988 happened under converging U.S. naval engagement plus a collapsed war economy plus battlefield defeat. The essay even concedes: "Pressure helped push Iran to temporarily pause its nuclear program during George W. Bush's administration and, later, to accept the JCPOA." That's a concession that pressure works. The rest is a redefinition of "work" as "regime collapse without other instruments," a definition no coercion theory has ever accepted.

• 
  Naoufal Houjami 🇺🇸 (@ForTexasHoujami) reported 41 minutes ago

  @RepJeffries You never served in a real battlefield and you're trying to look though by fighting the mosquitos and flying bugs. They keep installing unfit people in high positions with big mouth to distract people from their real problems.

• 
  Jabotinsky Jew (@CrazyVideosOnly) reported 43 minutes ago

  Rafael engineer Yossi Ben Yakov was analyzing trajectories when Hamas fired the first Qassam in 2001. The core problem was stopping a cheap $800 rocket with precision. Developers created the Tamir interceptor to solve this asymmetric threat. Each Tamir missile costs $50,000 to launch. The system achieves a 90% intercept rate today. This shifted the battlefield calculus entirely. Asymmetric terror lost its primary advantage. Cheap saturation no longer works. Israel secured its skies through technological application 🇮🇱

• 
  Straggler Liu | AI & Semis (@StragglerLiu) reported 44 minutes ago

  TSMC's AP7 facility tells you everything about the next AI bottleneck. P1 is an Apple WMCM line. P2 and P3 were supposed to be SoIC. They're now CoWoS. CoWoS demand killed SoIC capacity before SoIC even ramped. This is the physical reality of advanced packaging. Apple and NVIDIA aren't competitors in the traditional sense. They're competitors for the same cleanroom floors. The physical convergence, in three numbers. SoIC uses copper-to-copper hybrid bonding at 6-micron pitch. Interconnect density: 25,000 to 50,000 connections per square millimeter. Compare to standard microbumps at 600 to 1,000. SoIC is an order of magnitude denser. That's the vertical stacking solution. WMCM is horizontal: logic, LPDDR, and high-speed I/O side-by-side on the redistribution layer. RDL-first process. SoIC and WMCM are complementary, not substitutes. One does vertical. One does horizontal. Both require TSMC's most advanced packaging capacity. The capacity math that matters. CoWoS monthly capacity: 140,000 wafers by end-2026, 190,000-200,000 by end-2027. NVIDIA books over half. Mizuho: NVIDIA CoWoS allocation 630,000 wafers in 2026, 1,005,000 in 2027. WMCM: 60,000 wpm by end-2026, >120,000 wpm in 2027. Apple's line. SoIC: 10,000-15,000 wpm by end-2026. Morgan Stanley raised 2027 SoIC estimate to 45,000 wpm. Apple has booked 36,000 SoIC wafers for 2026, 60,000 for 2027 — almost entirely for Baltra AI server chip. NVIDIA's 2027 SoIC consumption: 120,000 wafers. That's 180,000 SoIC wafers of demand against 45,000 wpm of capacity. The math doesn't close. AP7 P2/P3 conversion tells you who wins today. TSMC converted P2 and P3 from SoIC to CoWoS because CoWoS demand exceeded expectations. CoWoS urgency is squeezing SoIC expansion. P1 remains Apple's WMCM line, but the SoIC capacity Apple needed for 2027 is now partially reallocated. The material signal confirms the convergence. Apple's M5 uses LMC liquid molding compound from Eternal Materials. This material was developed specifically for TSMC's CoWoS specifications. Apple is using CoWoS-grade materials to produce SoIC/WMCM chips. Same material. Same factories. Same equipment. Conflict is physical, not commercial. SoIC is the next battlefield — and it's capital-intensive. SoIC unit capex: $6.8-7.0 billion per 10,000 wafers of monthly capacity. Compare to CoWoS. The technical barrier is extreme. Equipment: Besi hybrid bonder, Applied Materials, Tokyo Electron. Taiwan wet process: 弘塑, 均华. NVIDIA's Rubin GPU: first chiplet design. Two compute chips + one I/O chip via SoIC vertical stacking, then eight HBM4 stacks via CoWoS. Apple's M5 Ultra already uses SoIC-mH. Both collide at SoIC in 2027. 2nm allocation already hints at the outcome. Apple has secured >50% of TSMC's initial 2nm capacity. NVIDIA's Rubin reportedly remains on 3nm. Apple dominates process. NVIDIA dominates packaging. Both are penetrating each other's territory. Apple needs NVIDIA-dominated CoWoS. NVIDIA needs Apple-dominated 2nm. This is mutual lock-in, not zero-sum. Four signals to track in the next 12 months. First, AP7 P2/P3 reallocation. Will TSMC convert P2/P3 back to SoIC as demand evolves? If not, SoIC capacity becomes the binding constraint earlier than expected. Second, SoIC yield. Hybrid bonding at 6-micron pitch is technically extreme. Unit capex of $6.8-7B per 10k wpm means any yield issue destroys economics. Yield curve is undisclosed. Third, WMCM ramp. 60,000 wpm by end-2026 and 120,000 wpm in 2027 are analyst estimates. AP7 P1 actual progress needs tracking. Any delay signals capacity constraints. Fourth, LMC supply. Eternal Materials is the sole CoWoS-spec LMC supplier. Both Apple and NVIDIA use the same material from the same supplier. Single point of failure. Conclusion. TSMC is expanding 2027 advanced packaging capacity from 1.3 million to 2.0 million wafers — a 53.85% increase. But demand is growing faster. CoWoS order visibility extends through 2027. AP7 P2/P3 conversion tells you which customer has more urgency today. The next 12 months aren't about who announces what chip. They're about four data points: AP7 P2/P3 reallocation, SoIC yield, WMCM ramp, and LMC supply. Those determine who gets the cleanroom floors.

• 
  oobie (@oobiewpb) reported 45 minutes ago

  $SPX $QQQ $IWM $NVDA $SPY DLMM EARLY-WARNING SHIFT — TUESDAY, AUGUST 25 — PREMARKETSTATUS: YELLOW — TECHNOLOGY IS ATTEMPTING A CHARACTER CHANGE There is one meaningful change from yesterday worth putting on the board. Monday finished with SPX at 7652.86, down 0.3%, while Nasdaq and Russell 2000 both lost about 0.8%. Technology was again the clear problem. This morning, that leadership is trying to reverse. QQQ has reclaimed roughly 710–711 in premarket trading, and semiconductors are participating in the rebound ahead of Nvidia earnings. Nvidia, Intel, Micron and Marvell are all trading higher early. That matters because yesterday's bearish confirmation depended heavily on QQQ continuing to lead lower. Right now, it isn't. SPX OPTIONS STRUCTURE Yesterday's closing gamma model still had: Gamma flip: 7713 Put wall: 7600 Call wall: 7900 Net GEX: approximately -$30.6B per 1% move SPX closed at 7652.86 — still well underneath that gamma flip. So the negative-gamma risk has NOT disappeared. But today's SPXW chain already shows substantial positioning around 7650. Tuesday open interest is approximately 1,589 calls and 1,678 puts at that strike. That makes 7650 an especially useful opening reference again. DLMM MAP 7600 — major downside gamma rail from yesterday's positioning.7650 — immediate decision.7670–7680 — first meaningful repair.7700 — major psychological/options battlefield.7713 — yesterday's gamma-regime transition. Here's what would constitute the next MATERIAL shift: SPX holds 7650 → reclaims 7670/80 → QQQ holds its premarket recovery → IWM participates → volatility does NOT expand.If that develops, yesterday's bearish gamma environment could become considerably less threatening because price would be moving back toward the regime boundary rather than away from it.The opposite sequence is equally important:QQQ loses 710/711 → SPX loses 7650 → attempted reclaim fails → IWM resumes lower → volatility expands. Then yesterday's negative-gamma thesis is back in control, with 7600 becoming increasingly relevant. The important change this morning is therefore NOT a new gamma number. It's QQQ. Technology spent Monday leading the market down. Tuesday morning it is attempting to lead it back up. That's an EARLY WARNING of a possible character change — not confirmation yet.I want price after 9:30 to prove whether this is genuine demand or simply an overnight reset. Trade the reaction, not the premarket move.

• 
  Kapt'n Krunch 🛠️⚓ (@KaptainKrunch97) reported 48 minutes ago

  I have my issues with the update as all Battlefield 6 updates go, many of them are issues they SHOULD'VE playtested and fixed before launching with them - but the great has outweighed the bad for me with this update, flying with @KnuteAutomata as my WSO has been some of the best Battlefield 6 moments I've had since beta/release. Please put the two-seater jets in more maps for all that is holy to us pilot mains.

• 
  JDPON Hazop (@Hazop1996) reported 49 minutes ago

  Everytime his crash outs appear on my tl I can perfectly picture that battlefield friends looking guy screeching and wailing

• 
  MetalByakko (@MetalByakko) reported 51 minutes ago

  @ReviewsPossum Not to mention there is also another problem. WHY IS THE QUEEN THERE? The Queen (who actually shouldn't be on the battlefield unlike some kings), is pretty powerful in chess because of how far she can move. Also if the king dies there is a huge disarray in the kingdom.

• 
  Yellow fruit (@EmersonAck74431) reported 52 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Atrocious game that has huge netcode and balance issues!

• 
  Trollaria (@Trollaria) reported 57 minutes ago

  @rustytatra Even battlefield 6 ai chat bot wouldnt ban for this long. And about performance. For sure it runs smooth on these days pc’s. Back then i often got DirectX error. Had only 3GB vram. If i had no rsi i had maybe played battlefield 1 more.

• 
  Ben Swann (@BenSwann_) reported 58 minutes ago

  THE SURVEILLANCE STATE IS HERE, AND IT’S BEING SOLD AS “SAFETY” The surveillance state is no longer a distant dystopia. It is here, marketed as public safety. The argument is always the same: “If you have nothing to hide, why worry?” But privacy is not reserved for people hiding something. It is a fundamental right in a free society, protected precisely because unchecked government surveillance is dangerous. Will Freeman, founder of DeFlock, is challenging Flock Safety’s expanding camera network. The fight surrounding Freeman, Flock CEO Garrett Langley, and the lawsuit known as Langley v. Freeman exposes the deeper issue: once surveillance infrastructure is built, who decides how it will be used, and where does it stop? Flock cameras are only one piece. Palantir’s technology can fuse satellite imagery, radar, cameras, sensors, and other data into a real-time operational picture. On a battlefield, that means tracking targets and building strike packages. But what happens when that same logic- identify, track, fuse, predict, act is turned on the public? Flock cameras. Facial recognition. License plate readers. Satellites. Data fusion. When those systems connect, they do not simply monitor cars. They create a map of human movement, and the architecture of a surveillance prison. Maria Zeee (@zeeemedia) joins me to break down the dystopian world these technologies are attempting to build.