Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Buenos Aires	Sign in	2 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	2 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	2 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	4 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	5 days ago
Strasbourg	Glitches	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Reluctantly Present (@ReluctantlyPre1) reported 17 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Can we fix the camping on carriers? I refuse to play that mode.

• 
  Julian Waller 📖 (@JulianWaller) reported 1 minute ago

  Happy to state plainly that I'm going to need a *lot* more on how tactical nuclear weapon employment fits into the picture here. It doesn't match the pattern of horizontal escalation, it's not anywhere close to a doctrinal next step under any escalation model, there are no sudden battlefield losses or fundamental threats to the inviolability of the state, 'we need to shake ourselves out of stagnation seems entirely disproportionate, and it would be obviously destabilizing to both friendly foreign relations and domestic audiences. I have no problem withholding judgment or doing the 'analyst must just sit and wait' thing. But I'm really not convinced by the chatter.

• 
  Strict Snipes (@StrictSnipes) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ganjagrunt @corrcomm @GregAbbott_TX We honor every single Texas service member that’s lost their life on the battlefield.. idk what you’re on about.

• 
  JDPON Hazop (@Hazop1996) reported 8 minutes ago

  Everytime his crash outs appear on my tl I can perfectly picture that battlefield friends looking guy screeching and wailing

• 
  WorldMonitor (@1NightmareFuel) reported 8 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Battlefield is better overall and cod is for children hence the slop skins and their downgrade in grit from world at war to airsoft looking maps, but battlefield also has issues.

• 
  Wilmer Pichardo (@WilmerAPichardo) reported 11 minutes ago

  @REALISTIK_YT @BigfryTV No other customer service business does this…. Is too much. You can only do so much for “First Person Shooter” games and at the end is just that First Person Shooter. Maybe Call of Duty should go the Battlefield and GTA route and give us a game every 5 years

• 
  so사rceeee. (@sourceeeezz) reported 12 minutes ago

  -battlefield 6 has dead content support, and fundamental issues still havent been fixed. -arc raiders is the same, but even worse, cuz they decided to remove wipes. (3/?)

• 
  William John G. Balderama (@WJGBalderama) reported 12 minutes ago

  @nothanksfrankie My guess is that the XM30 will ultimately win. It’s a little sad to see the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle being replaced, but there’s only so much you can do with upgrades before you eventually run out of space, weight capacity, electrical power, and room for additional systems. More importantly, today’s battlefield demands a level of protection that the original Bradley was never designed to provide—particularly against drones and loitering munitions. The Russo-Ukrainian War has made it painfully clear that counter-drone capability and survivability against persistent aerial threats have become essential requirements for any modern armored fighting vehicle. I’m particularly familiar with the software that went into the BFV system. I was actually hired by United Defense in 1999, a few years after my retirement, so I had some firsthand exposure to the technology and the evolution of the platform. That gives me a bit of a personal connection to the Bradley and makes seeing it eventually replaced somewhat bittersweet. I do see it being relegated for service with the reserves so we will still see it before it finally gets mothballed.

• 
  The Ancient One (@TheOnesAncient) reported 14 minutes ago

  The problem with the Corp system is that if the Crop’s themselves don’t have enough troops they can’t fight by themselves or turn areas of the battlefield. So at minimum you need three devisions of four brigades

• 
  UNALIENABLE RIGHTS (@F1sT) reported 16 minutes ago

  I truly don’t know what ********’s going on at Infinity Ward. These ******* bums copied battlefield. They even copied the ****** visual, acuity problem that never existed in Call of Duty®. I’m surprised we don’t have ******* classes that are violated with restrictions. They copied everything else. And they did a ******* terrible interpretation too. That’s the problem I have this **** is retarded.

• 
  UNALIENABLE RIGHTS (@F1sT) reported 18 minutes ago

  These are the two biggest signs code was stolen from #Battlefield6: they didn’t even bother to change the code in their ******* copy-paste stolen game. Allegedly #CallOfDuty is a copy-paste of BF6, and I suspect there may be some stolen code. But default classes in a casual battle royale that are exactly the same as Redec Casuals, and on top of that the dude never had a visual acuity or enemy detection problem—that’s straight from Battlefield 6.

• 
  Ivan7G (@Ivander777) reported 20 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Both. But I've actually been playing Battlefield 6 more lately. That's because in COD there are things like time to kill, and if your TV/monitor has more response lag than others, you lose gunfights that were previously impossible. First frame rate (FPS) is very important in COD so you can keep up with the good players even if you are one of them. Before, I could do nukes and MOAB with my phone's internet, but nowadays, even aiming first, I lose certain gunfights that shouldn't be possible with an ethernet connection on the PS5 or PC. A lot is happening these days.

• 
  Kelski (@kelskiYT) reported 21 minutes ago

  @CableVT IMO that **** never got old, especially since they were a rarer moment in the combat loop H5 variety was cool, but Reach and 4 having contextual direction based assassinations was the best system (Kinda like how Battlefield does it) I don't need 100 different assassination animations, just give me the option to do it Also they added a setting to toggle them anyways so the accident problem was solved. They 100% deserve to come back to Halo

• 
  Woz Griffiths (@wozgriffiths) reported 22 minutes ago

  @TruthFairy131 Yes the globalist want white family men on the battlefield. Then allow new arrivals to kill and **** all the women and children. Then the jews will bomb the lot to dust and takeover the world. Problem is, it ain't happening. The minute they declare war we're coming for them!!

• 
  Shlippi (@realshlippi) reported 24 minutes ago

  @fourboxesdiner @RealGunLobbyist I totally get wanting to push the issue considering the wins we have been getting, but we (the 2a community) needs to be strategic about it. To use a metaphor, this is a battlefield, and we have to make proper use of the circumstances and tools available to push forward and fight the enemy. If you push too far forward too quickly, you could get ambushed, or not have appropriate supply lines to support it. The losses incurred from one of those mistakes could hinder or make impossible future avenues of attack that could have a substantial benefit for winning. Personally, I want the NFA and GCA done away with, but we currently do not have a workable way of doing so. We want as many metaphorical supplies and munitions available as possible when that particular battle arrives, and to make that happen, we need to set up the groundwork for it.

• 
  GhostGaming (@GhostGamingG) reported 27 minutes ago

  @KontrolStyleTV @Battlefield completely missing the point. It's a problem, everybody knows it's a problem except you apparently.

• 
  LiCHtsLiCH (@Barbaneth) reported 28 minutes ago

  @volcaholic1 Well don't let it get you down. The vast majority are just dog piling, it's good for your revenue stream, but disassociate yourself from it. One of the problems of fame. But please don't let it get you down. Nothing wrong with having a point of view, and even though I may disagree with the science of it, doesn't make it a valid fear. In alot of instances, well most, I fully agree with you, if what you say is true, we are in for one hell of a ride. More importantly, it seems that a large chunk of the cause is actually an abscence, which, in all likelyhood, from a scientific pov, we are headed for more extremes, which is just fine. This is far from unexpected, and certainly something we can deal with. Beyond that, if you can think of it as grace, this good weather, we have summarily wasted it, which is far more frightening. Rather than becoming more prepared, we have become less prepared. Emergency stations set up 20 years ago, gone into disuse, suddenly called upon by inexperienced place holders like the Covid emergency response team. Bear in mind, this is a lack of experience cause by a lack of event. Like battlefield soldiers who have never seen combat. A sense of readiness is paramount to a quick response, and you are the literal tip of the spear when it comes to a sense of motivation and concern that people should have. Maybe pivot your approach to one of preparedness, rather than the cause. The cause isn't the point, mostly beause we can't do anything about it, and partly because it may not be the cause. So how would you outline a response beyond or integrating existing emergency protocols? Even going over the material requirements for triage encampments, set up for disaster recovery, and logistics resource acquisition and communication could seriously mitigate a Katrina response that 3 days in was "what do we do?".

• 
  Lt Gen H S Panag(R) (@rwac48) reported 30 minutes ago

  @dperi84 That is factual. Real issue is cost effectiveness in times of less than $500 drones. Have you heard of Javelin in Ukraine wef 2023? In 2022 it was the mainstay. Now, one more weapon on battlefield. In my view the deal is to keep defence ties going.

• 
  Tired Ⓐf Bun (@GeneFrienby) reported 31 minutes ago

  @ArieliteAi I largely agree, but do think there is some cross over on its impact for gaming. Gacha is worse imho, but like the new battlefield was built as a live service as an example. Despite selling so well initially, it's live service nature lead to it being a commercial flop

• 
  Tye Jak (Eternal Heel Arc) 🖤🐅 (@TyeJakTV) reported 32 minutes ago

  @K4kirigaya @Battlefield Main issue with bullet drop for snipers is that their velocity is surprisingly low for the game, which makes the drop feel more impactful. Longer to get to distance makes drop more apparent. The longest range sniper somehow has less Velocity than the mini Scout.

• 
  Bootstrap Bill (@WillDaBeast_69) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ******* black screen bug. Fix the ******* grenades. Fix the ******* new sniper being a total meme gun. Thx

• 
  Reira (@reira_r2) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix the 3rd person jet camera, revert it or give us the option at least to use the originall jet camera.

• 
  Daniel Faria Sampaio (@DanFSD) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Luuk__058 @BattlefieldComm First they need to fix matchmaking. Plenty of people playing Ranked on S. America but for some reason they throw us into N. America servers. When this happens, we're left we no choice but to enable such VPN tools in order to slightly improve latency, which benefits all parties

• 
  ShinzosGhost (@ShinzosGhost) reported 42 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 My biggest problem with @Battlefield is your choices as a console player are either languish in PC sweat lobbies getting spawn killed or turn off Crossplay and every other match is filled with bots.

• 
  GI Joey (@GI_Joey_) reported 42 minutes ago

  @MrProWestie Still doesn't fix the SBMM and CHEATER issues mate. Come on, be honest, like you did years ago...about Battlefield 3, 4, 1 and 5. Rightnow you sound like someone who's being "bribed". Be honest again! Be the "Westie" you was...and tell us what the real problems are of MW4! 👊

• 
  LO NA GO (@otaku_D_sa) reported 52 minutes ago

  Dear PlayStation Team Do you think you’re safe? In the early 90s, Nintendo owned this industry. They were bigger than Sony ever was in gaming, until the first PlayStation arrived and took the market out from under them. And the reason was simple: Nintendo stopped listening… They clung to cartridges while the world moved to discs, they protected their traditions instead of evolving, and the developers walked. Square took Final Fantasy VII to PlayStation, and that single move decided the entire generation. Nintendo’s throne collapsed, and it took them more than a decade to recover and only by leaving your battlefield entirely and building their own. So don’t assume Xbox can’t pull your developers and your future exclusives away from you. Don’t assume a new platform can’t appear and do to you exactly what you did to Nintendo. The only thing protecting you is the loyalty of the players you already have…. and loyalty…. is not permanent. It’s earned every generation. So listen to your players. Listen now, while the problems are still small enough to fix. Every complaint you ignore today is a player you lose tomorrow, and you will not notice they’re gone until it’s too late to bring them back. Companies don’t fall overnight. They fall slowly, while ignoring messages like this one

• 
  CasualSurvivor (@CasualSurvivor) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why doesn't the game start? Restarted my PC, relogged, checked steam servers and bf servers...no idea but the game won't start. Launcher works till it says "starting game" then closes itself without any error

• 
  Jared (@The_Scrinn) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your ******* rockets for **** sake

• 
  Big Brain AI (@realBigBrainAI) reported 57 minutes ago

  Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp on why almost every company buying AI is getting nothing back for it: Karp's diagnosis is short and unkind: "The classic Silicon Valley way up until recently was just buy some large language model and have a nice chat with it, and that really doesn't create any actual enterprise value." That's the whole failure mode. A model gets procured, a chat window appears, nobody's revenue changes. His alternative starts with a definition he says Palantir arrived at years before the rest of the market: "We were years ahead for lots of reasons of anticipating what operational AI would mean. Meaning AI where you make more money or your revenue goes up and your costs go down." Two lines on the P&L. Nothing else counts. Karp claims the numbers follow from that. "We have a thriving commercial business. It grew 71% last quarter. And we're at a very pretty significant scale." He also flags something rarer in the sector: "We make money on our money, which is unusual in software. People have growth but no profitability. We have a lot of both." So why does the same underlying technology produce nothing at most companies and revenue at his? Karp says the answer is "a little more technical," and it isn't the model: "Our platforms are built to use large language models and machine learning in a way that is actually operationally effective. We had a relatively privileged insight into how you would do that and built this thing called an ontology which manages large language models in a way where they become crazily useful both commercially and actually on the battlefield." The ontology is the missing layer. A model on its own doesn't know what your business is made of. Something has to translate between the two before the model can touch anything that matters. What it gets used for is deliberately unglamorous. Karp lists underwriting, acquisition of real estate at scale, construction at scale, and supply chain management — "anywhere where you have volatility." He picks out one problem specifically: "Understanding the true cost of inputs into your enterprise, which is super hard to do at scale, especially if things are shifting or there's disruptions." And the larger version of the job: "reimagining your business into a digital as opposed to a non-digital business." Then he moves from the technology to the thing he actually treats as the differentiator — who carries the risk that none of it works: "Our claim to fame really is we absorb the risk of creating value." He contrasts that with how enterprise software is normally sold, in language he flags as the vulgar version: "The way you're taught to build a software company is your customer thinks they're getting laid but they're getting effed." Palantir's internal reframing: "We used to internally say no, we're in the mutual pleasuring business. Both sides should be happy." In practice that means the vendor is on the hook for the outcome, not just the licence: "We absorb the risk of value creation. So like you will make more money, your enterprise will work better. That's been a bonanza and we're pretty much alone in doing that in the world." Karp doesn't claim it's all his own execution. He credits the moment too: "The truth is we're also riding the back of the fact that this is just an American revolution." Underneath the specifics, he also frames the commercial work as secondary to something else. Asked what matters most, his first answer isn't revenue at all: "The most important thing we've done for you is help establish dominance on the battlefield with the DoD and stop hundreds of terror attacks."

• 
  nolawhereelsetogo (@angrynolasports) reported 60 minutes ago

  @freakofxeets Why fix what isnt broke? Madden. NBA. COD. Battlefield. Fallout. The money makers haven’t changed either. People Want pick up and play.