Is Battlefield 6 down?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Battlefield 6. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.
-
Sign in (37%)
-
Matchmaking (35%)
-
Online Play (21%)
-
Glitches (4%)
-
Game Crash (4%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
| Sign in | ||
| Sign in | ||
| Online Play | ||
| Sign in | ||
| Matchmaking | ||
| Sign in |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
🇸🇦Y
(@iYM91) reported
@Battlefield Thank you guys, we fixed the first problem, now let's talk about the server browser
-
𝑬𝒗𝒆 𝑶𝒍𝒗𝒆𝒅
(@GamesnRoses) reported
@Noobletscom at first when 2042 came out i was outraged , it wasn't a "battlefield" for me and it was so broken , but a year , fixes and content later i started to enjoy it tbh i had fun playing it but til today it's not a battlefield to me. i was in love with BF4
-
Brad
(@hoplitecoins) reported
@ProEvilz @danaketh @Battlefield Yet 4 lived on to be one of the best ones we had? Plus, nothing mechanically was wrong with 4 on launch, it was mostly loitered with issues... nice try on assuming my age tho, appreciate it when people assume I'm younger
-
Cande Shop™
(@thecandeshop) reported
@ProEvilz @Battlefield 2042 wasn't a flop based upon release, it was because people expected something that 2042 wasn't going to be People were pissed that they couldn't have class locked weapons, allowing medics to be snipers with infinite ammo Definitely not BF's last chance COD has the same issues
-
Grok
(@grok) reported
Lee served as an engineer in the Mexican War but was in battles like Cerro Gordo (recon, brevetted major) and Chapultepec (wounded, brevetted colonel), per American Battlefield Trust and histories. No verified Longstreet quote on him being "well in the rear"—perhaps referencing "Lee to the Rear" incident at Wilderness, where troops urged him back for safety. Pollard critiqued Lee and Davis's leadership failures in "The Lost Cause" but didn't directly label them cowards; he blamed strategic errors. Sources?
-
batman
(@Kornholyo182) reported
@Drift0r For it to be broken for a month. Never purchased pre order,deluxe games or day one release. After these one... Besides maybe battlefield 1 and Diablo 4
-
SgtDangerCow
(@SgtDangerCow) reported
@Standingfast85 @Battlefield I played BF4 from the day it launched to the day it was replaced and I never ever found locked weapons to be an issue. Go play 2042 and tell me how many Avancys you get killed by. Or why the PP29 was such a problem. Ubiquitous OP is worse than single class OP.
-
Pp head reef
(@pp_reef) reported
@ProEvilz @danaketh @Battlefield Well that's core mechanics and design of the game, battlefield 6 doesnt really have those problems...
-
ProEvilz
(@ProEvilz) reported
@hoplitecoins @danaketh @Battlefield I did read it, multiple tabs in a browser is a thing. Yes people are allowed to disagree on an opinion. Yes, you can be 'ok' with all the problems, but the problems still existed. Facts don't care about your feelings.
-
ProEvilz
(@ProEvilz) reported
@thecandeshop @Battlefield People can take a dislike to my stance, but if we're being brutally honest here, my stance only asks for a non-broken game at launch. Every single prior game has been broken. I'm not the enemy here - I want the best for BF. But ya'll are letting ya'lls impatience blind you.
-
Dus_Dragonis
(@Dragonis7734) reported
@Steve081372 @Battlefield If they just keep the system from BF3/4 and change up which weapons are available to all classes. Like SMG/Shotgun/Marksman rifles can be used by any class. Give engineers and medics carbines, assault ARs, support LMGs, and recon SRs. Then the problem solves itself keeping it BF
-
𝐃𝐀𝐍𝐀 𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐒𝐔𝐌𝐎𝐓𝐎
(@DanaMatsumoto99) reported
3. Who really needs protection? Artists aren't characters for your self-therapy.They are living people whose shoulders are already broken by the weight of your own unrealized expectations. Fandom should be a safe space,not a battlefield.If your "support" hurts, it's not support.
-
Ka Tm
(@GrokTheGod) reported
Main problem with nuclear use is that if it is short range tactical with 5-20kt yield (air burst 1-2km up) the main problem will be the lack of fallout as a fear factor. See the declasified US tactical battlefield use studies on fallout concerning troop movements through areas that had tactical use. There is no doomsday end of the world global cooling scenario unless nuclear devices are used hugely inefficiently. The worst case is that it goes some way to normalising the use of 'small' nuclear weapons. That will then trigger massive proliferation issues as lots of countries then show an interest in obtaining nuclear weapons. The resulting disaster is that large localised regions of critical economic value are then liable to trigger severe global shocks. Consider semiconductors being wiped out in Taiwan, or Qatar LNG production or a Saudi oil export terminal. Rolls forward the path as to what can happen and it may end up in a much bigger economic disaster with many unintended consequences.
-
Bruno Costa
(@todorussinho) reported
Hey @AMDRadeon and @Battlefield how about fixing the freaking bug/crash when we die in game? 25.6.1 version on AMD side of drivers, this it's happening mainly on RX 6000 users.
-
ProEvilz
(@ProEvilz) reported
@rzummy5 @Elevatorisbest @Battlefield If 2028 is the result of adding +1 year to their original date then yes. Every single time they set a date and released a game, its been a broken mess. And it's always been blamed on time constraints. It's time to break the cycle.
-
dewicked
(@dewickedone) reported
@ProEvilz @Battlefield At this point you should accept that we will NEVER get an issue-free BF at launch anymore. BF1 was the peak standard when it comes to day one performance, even that have some issues.
-
Sohsuh
(@Sohsuhh) reported
@DEAGLE_BD @Cooliocory90 @EndersFPS We don't need a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. Locked weapons are apart of Battlefield. Go back to CoD.
-
Thumperella 5x5
(@sheshelynnie) reported
Yeah, squeakers drove me off Battlefield 2. They have no place there, and were there anyway. Online gaming has issues that way. I'm more concerned about adults invading kid games. We adults can deal with the squeakers, but kids can't deal with us, and any adult that invades kid games is suspicious and suspect to me right off the bat.
-
Chel
(@ChelUs0) reported
Some say locking weapons forces players to chase the meta — pick the class with the OP gun. But here’s the truth: unlock everything and the meta becomes worse. Everyone picks the same broken gun. Remember early BF2042? PP-29 & K30 everywhere. #Battlefield #BF6
-
Ryan
(@Voidtale9710) reported
@DustinEdenYT This game is basically the bf2042 of racing games , broken and they need a long *** time to add basic stuff like a restar btn or car selling. All this bc some idiot thought it would be nice to make and always online game Terrible would be a compliment in this case 💀
-
Nat
(@Nat45672) reported
@Cheradenine_ @ASE Issues like who lives where, who returns home, who is stateless are decided in negotiations after the war ends. The adults will decide. But what about the children? Why were they allowed to leave Syria for Turkey and safety, but the Gaza children must live on a battlefield?
-
Lau
(@LauBatmn) reported
@SgtDangerCow @Standingfast85 @Battlefield I agree with Cow. With every new season, there was a new meta, and the balance was broken each time—Avancys, RM68, etc. And if, on top of that, these weapons are available for all classes, the balance just isn’t good. Moreover, restricted weapons automatically require Teamplay++
-
ProEvilz
(@ProEvilz) reported
Why one year? It felt like an arbitrary but reasonable amount of time. The developers of 2042 admitted they lacked sufficient time, especially with COVID related office closures. I'm not opposed to two years or more if it ensures a smooth launch. Historically, despite claims of readiness, launches have had glaring day one bugs. 2042 seemed intentionally released broken due to time constraints. Given their track record, when they say it's ready, it likely isn't. To avoid repeating this issue, substantially more time is needed. It's common sense thinking? You see, the difference between me and you is, I'll happily wait to get a great battlefield experience. You won't even if you know it will be bad.
-
Nick
(@ZHUHUAN08950705) reported
drones, and anti-tank artillery fire. Even the Pentagon had to admit that "the battlefield environment is not conducive to the effective operation of Abrams." What is the problem? The U.S. magazine "National Interest" summarized it clearly: lack of air support, lack of artillery
-
Brad
(@hoplitecoins) reported
@ProEvilz @danaketh @Battlefield I personally didn't have many issues with 4 at launch besides server problems which i iterated earlier and indicated in the previous tweet which you clearly didn't take the time to read right below it. People are allowed to disagree, not everyone had issues, testing is importan
-
LemmingsDayIsOver
(@PHTYT) reported
@Battlefield so gonna split playerbase over this dumb issue. Ok then . Good luck with it .
-
SgtDangerCow
(@SgtDangerCow) reported
@Yakiniku_Party @Standingfast85 @Battlefield The problem of OP weapons is a holistic one. It doesn’t just stop at the weapon and that’s the problem that people promoting OP weapons don’t seem to grasp. Op Weapons undermines balance of choice it’s kind of fundamental.
-
ProEvilz
(@ProEvilz) reported
@rvtatoskr @Battlefield I know what a beta is. I played all the previous betas they did, including the subsequent broken launches that followed those betas.
-
Nope
(@_Zealot117_) reported
@CManicYT @Battlefield Nah, that is an issue with the weapon selection then. If every class doesn't have some sort of nice weapon niche then that's a balancing issue. BF4 never had issues with people not blowing things up/ not reviving.
-
Sam
(@WhiteLionell) reported
@lightning_yt01 Battlefield 2042 did it. Albeit its still trash but they still did it. If the game was good enough after they fixed the issues it might have retained those who rejoined.