Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	4 days ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	6 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	6 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	6 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	8 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Aaron (@Aaron1511605) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield How about fixing the issues?! Sound, black screen? You devs are restarted. Glad Saudi’s bought you out. Now I hope they get people who know way ******** they are doing.

• 
  Szymon (@simonsaypl) reported 5 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please FIX BF6. What happened after the update? You’re ruining a great game. Players are frustrated and leaving. Please fix the servers, netcode and hitreg ASAP. This isn’t fun anymore. :(

• 
  ! (@imlilpec) reported 8 minutes ago

  @RavenSoftware ngl I love yall but yall better fix up with warzone after this beta we not asking for too much we want a game just like mw3 warzone is it too much to ask? Cus yeah this warzone ain’t looking like warzone its looking like battlefield redsec

• 
  Aimlocker (@Aimlocker2) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE “EVERYONE IS MEDIC” BUG

• 
  Rick B. White (@RickBeeWhite) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MarioNawfal 🚨🇯🇴🇮🇷 EVEN A PEACEFUL PLACE CANNOT GIVE PEACE TO SOMEONE DETERMINED TO KEEP FIGHTING. Reports tonight say interceptions are underway over Jordan, with Iranian missiles allegedly targeting military facilities in the south of the country. The specific targets are still being verified, but one thing is not new: Jordan has already intercepted Iranian missiles entering its airspace multiple times during this conflict. And this raises a much bigger question: CAN YOU GIVE PEACE TO SOMEONE WHO REFUSES TO LIVE IN PEACE? Imagine creating the most peaceful country on Earth. No wars. No territorial disputes. No hatred. No historical grudges. No reason to fight. Now place inside it someone who carries conflict everywhere they go. How long before even that peaceful place becomes another battlefield? PEACE IS NOT ONLY A PLACE. It is also a decision. A mentality. A willingness to stop. Because someone determined to fight will eventually find an enemy. Someone determined to retaliate will eventually find a justification. Someone addicted to conflict could be placed on a hypothetical PLANET OF PEACE… and eventually ask: “WHO ARE WE FIGHTING?” That may be one of humanity’s greatest problems. We keep searching for peaceful borders. Peaceful treaties. Peaceful governments. Peaceful agreements. But what happens when PEACE DOESN’T EXIST INSIDE THE PEOPLE MAKING THEM? Then another missile flies. Another interception begins. Another country gets pulled into somebody else’s war. And another generation inherits the consequences. 📖 “If it be possible, as much as lieth in you, live peaceably with all men.” — Romans 12:18 (KJV) YOU COULD BUILD A PLANET CALLED PEACE. But if its inhabitants are unwilling to stop fighting… EVEN THERE, PEACE WOULD NOT LAST.

• 
  RedWhiteandBlue (@fulltankss) reported 13 minutes ago

  @NoToMisogyny @Ainemba92293842 Who fixes your car? Who built the house you live in? Who constructed the roads and bridges. Who fixes the power lines? Who fights and dies on the battlefield for your freedom. You aren’t worthy of a man with that attitude. I wouldn’t fix your car or house or anything.

• 
  nyxter (@itsnyxter) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldInte Battlefield is a better game since they have a dedicated focus on multiplayer. COD on the other hand multiplayer, warzone and ground war. They have fixed issues with multiplayer and messed up warzone since they want are not ready to admit these 2 are 2 different games.

• 
  Rosemary O'Connell (@RosemaryOConne6) reported 14 minutes ago

  I want to talk against alcohol. It's not cool. It's pathetic. People have a problem& they NEED to numb themselves like they were in screaming agony on the battlefield? It's pathetic. You CAN handle your problems. And you CAN handle an alcohol or drug pusher. Only a loser can't just walk away. It's ridiculous. Oh let me shoot myself up & numb myself rather than walk away from an enemy ***** or bastard. ???

• 
  Miles Teg 🇮🇱 (@MilesTeg11) reported 15 minutes ago

  I have diagnosed you, but I have not condemned you. There is One whom you will stand before at the end of the age, and it is in his hand to pardon or condemn. My diagnosis is battlefield triage. I am attempting to stop the bleed out because I love you and I want you to realize you are blinking red, buddy, while pointing at those entering the kingdom and telling them that they are the ones in trouble.

• 
  HellBoundLycan (@madruger) reported 19 minutes ago

  @WolfGangPlays to be fair I think all sports games are just the same thing over and over again... Same with CoD and Battlefield. It's the same game with the same content, just a different year. *i complain about those too for the same problems.* There's so much hype over so much broken.. :(

• 
  Olive Oil Seller of Truth (@_BrettRyanMusic) reported 20 minutes ago

  @MilesTeg11 You say you have not condemned me, yet you have diagnosed my spiritual condition, declared me “blinking red,” said I am in error, and warned that those who listen to me are in deep trouble. Call it “battlefield triage” if you wish, but Scripture calls us to “judge not, that ye be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) and to “prove all things” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). You don’t know my heart, and you don’t sit on Christ’s judgment seat. Test my doctrine by Scripture. Leave my soul to God.

• 
  kirito _4kirigaya (@K4kirigaya) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm We need the TTK to be slower and animations to be slowed down and reworked too. Why do I mantle so fast? Why do I switch to a LMG so fast? Why when I throw a grenade I throw it without pulling the pin? Grenade indicators not working and the weapon screen is dimmed.

• 
  Storm Files (@TheStormFiles) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BasilTheGreat Nobody is shocked. That’s the problem. They import men who treat streets like a battlefield, then act stunned when blood hits the pavement. Ban the entry. Deport the rest.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 27 minutes ago

  @in_TSMWEL_era @BattlefieldComm Yeah definitely a skill issue when everything I’ve listed has been a problem and most of those problem that have been addressed as you say didn’t solve anything…. But yeah my 3.24 K/D is a skill issue brother

• 
  Shadow ❄️ (@ali950309573625) reported 27 minutes ago

  Defensive mechanism When we think we are under humiliation, attack or betrayal we unconsciously adopt a heavy emotional armor for fight mode which in many cases piercing through that armor is almost impossible for many people. To me there’s 1 exception: Sympathy If I’m on a battlefield and see my enemy is in real pain, I’ll stop. Period. If I care about that person—no matter what happened between us, even if they cheated on me—I become extremely protective bc I don’t want to see them in pain and always there’s time to deal with the real issue later

• 
  Sebastiano Venier 🇮🇹🇫🇷🇦🇹 (@SebaVenier96) reported 30 minutes ago

  @MmSkezonf36AgVT @M0nstas @clement_molin Well that's the problem, you didn't even try to negotiate with them. At this point I have lost all hope Ukraine can win the war on teh battlefield, so you can either try to stop the war by negotiating, or keep fighting until they will eventually take what they want anyway, just with more losses for each side...

• 
  Arc Dite (@ArcDite) reported 35 minutes ago

  @IdleSloth84_ Warning to anyone you may get trouble redeeming games such as Alien Isolation, Battlefield 4 etc. I keep getting either the game isn't supported or the disc is damaged (F.Y.I the discs are fine I play them enough to test them out for such things)

• 
  Aitvaras (@Aitvaras2726601) reported 36 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm For a small bugfixing patch, this is pretty good. Now we just need a few decent feature patches that actually address the major issues.

• 
  𝔸𝕃𝔽ℝ𝔼𝔻𝕆 𝔼𝔻𝕀𝕋𝕊™💎 (@AX0JK) reported 40 minutes ago

  @Lairdphoenix27 The funniest part is realizing a Sentinel could walk into the Avengers and suddenly have to check its programming because half the roster isn’t even its target. If Scarlet Witch is on the battlefield, the Sentinel has bigger problems than figuring out who qualifies as a mutant.

• 
  Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported 44 minutes ago

  @grvmpss @Tremourx47 @BattlefieldComm It's been that way for months. It's not like we didn't use it for that time. It's not a **** you, it was a free item that wasn't terribly difficult to obtain. You didn't purchase anything. This is better for the health of the game (albeit lightly so given other issues).

• 
  Sonic Rose (@SonicRoseGaming) reported 46 minutes ago

  @Antektw @BattlefieldComm Bruh the jets are about to be unplayable again anyway with the laser designation fix so who cares lol

• 
  Burdock (@NoLieCipher) reported 47 minutes ago

  @mehdirhasan “Brother Mehdi, geography is not theology and a borough is not a revelation. To treat a map as a battlefield is the mark of a man who has run out of larger questions. The weak hunt for the smallest error because the smallest error is all they can lift. Brooklyn will survive your ellipsis. The more serious matter is whether you still possess an argument that does not depend on catching someone in a street name. Pedantry is not strength. It is what remains when strength has left the room.”

• 
  Voice for the truth (@voiceofztruth) reported 54 minutes ago

  @benshapiro @benshapiro forget about the Hareidim. Do you believe it’s ok to force people to fight on the battlefield or be conscripted to service against their will? It’s hard for me to digest.

• 
  رمز (@hommyramz) reported 55 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm High pings my most concerned issue not addressed

• 
  Jason Burns (@JasonBurns_CM) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Battlefield there's a major hardcrash issue on Xbox atm since the latest patch I've crashed constantly every 15m 6 times in 1 match

• 
  𝐁𝐒𝐏𝟑 (@RealBSP3) reported 56 minutes ago

  Mechs can be built, but there are problems. One of those is finely illustrated in the quoted post. The various technologies are more easily deployed on other vehicles; but those vehicles do have limitations. Mechs can eliminate some of those limitations, but not without significant drawbacks, given current technology. Toward the end is a probable use case, with the question you really need to be asking, so skip there if you can't be bothered to read. It's not making them stand up, take a hit, or go that's the problem. The problem is that they'll be target number one on the battlefield; but that was also a problem with early tanks. They can be made to take the punishment, within limits. If you're facing off with someone who can hit it with a GBU-10 at mach 1, for example, you've got issues. If not, however, most ground-based munitions are survivable, given the appropriate amount of money dedicated to each machine. The armor exists, and I'm working on some, myself. RPG? Yes. MANPADS? No. Not yet, anyway, but it's possible. This would be it's worst enemy on the battlefield. Anyone packing such a system would be fielded directly, as soon as possible, and/or positioned where a mech is expected. That's not the end of the story, though. It's possible to stop something in it's tracks with volume of fire, alone, and being swarmed by drones is a significant risk. Given absolutely everyone will be firing at the mech, that's like trying to walk through a cloud of mosquitoes and stepping into a ground nest of bees. It's greatest defense is a magnificent offense. A mech must be able to lay down a massive volume of fire with significant energy output. This isn't something you would field in a place where collateral damage is an issue. Effectively, it's got to be a scorched Earth machine, and there are aspects of the idea that allow it to be just that. Weapon height alone gives it an ability to hit more targets, more quickly, at greater distances, and beyond cover. It's the world's most well-armed helicopter, but on the ground; but it's got one big problem: Energy Keeping it moving matters, and whatever you use to power it will be the primary target, but you can plan for that. Allowing it to operate for the duration of an engagement is all about creating engagement opportunities. If you decide to build the machine no matter what, you create an opportunity for it to shine. That's likely going to be blasting it's way through things as quickly as possible to open up a corridor, and then retreating. Why not just use airplanes? There is a point at which you stop using them, and sometimes that point still doesn't allow helicopters. That point is wide open for shock and awe. So, you wouldn't try to use it very long, to begin with. Destroy everything in front of you, and everything that's housing something that firing back, and retreat for conventional hardware to finish the job. We're still missing part of the energy equation, though, and that's the sort of weaponry that would maximize a mech's utility: Directed energy and railguns. It's got better lines of sight than a tank. These normally long-range weapons can now be used up close and personal. It would be an absolute shame to give them up because of energy limitations. Something like the A-10's party piece burns through ammunition too quickly. It's nice to have, but it's not choice number one. If you have room, sure, but you're more than likely looking at something smaller, to give it options. A line of sight weapon, though, that hits like a bomb, paired with another line of sight weapon that can punch clean holes and start fires, is a good mech starter kit. Fill it out with conventional weapons, and it just might survive long enough to do it's job. Something needs to be done about those drones, though. For now, anything they drop can be resisted by a machine with that much money behind it. That won't always be the case. The main thing to remember is that such a machine needs to be able to leverage the absolute latest in weaponry. Some older gear works, as well, such as grenade launchers and an array of M2s, but that's not enough. It needs to hit like a hammer from five blocks away, through five buildings, if required. What we're looking at, therefore, is an intermediate weapons platform. Soften the area with fast air power, collapse obvious remaining resistance with the mech, bring in helicopters, and then roll in traditional armor. The question you need to ask: Is that step useful enough to revise every engagement plan we have, and pour resources into creating and transporting these things? The below picture is an example of a large mech from the Battletech universe. I just wanted an illustration of something heavily armed. There are many, in that universe, that would be rather practical for these purposes. This one wouldn't be maneuverable enough to justify it's legs. Whatever you build, it's got to be at least somewhat quick. I just didn't feel like pouring through countless images.

• 
  Gunny🇨🇦Gunnerson (@GunnsForShow) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Senzah All shooters have sbmm- its Cods heavy handed sbmm/eomm that is the problem. Battlefields works much better and doesn't make the game feel like work. I'll stick to Battlefield. Other than the original Black ops for a change, my time playing new Cod games is over.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 57 minutes ago

  Paid Backwards: When the More You Love, the Less You Are Loved Key Passage: 2 Corinthians 12:15 — “And I will very gladly spend and be spent for you; though the more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.” Introduction There are verses in the Bible that look good embroidered on a pillow, painted on a coffee mug, or printed beneath a picture of a sunrise. Second Corinthians 12:15 is not one of them. This verse comes into the room wearing work clothes, carrying scars, and smelling like the battlefield. Paul did not say, “The more I loved, the more everybody appreciated me.” He did not testify that every sacrifice brought applause, every sermon produced gratitude, and every soul he helped sent him a thank-you card. He said the exact opposite: “The more abundantly I love you, the less I be loved.” That is one of the strangest paychecks ever handed to a servant of God. Paul gave more and received less. He loved more and was loved less. He poured himself out, and some of the very people drinking from the cup complained about the vessel. That verse cuts directly across the polished sales pitch of modern Christianity, where people are told that serving God will straighten every road, repair every relationship, silence every critic, and turn life into a well-landscaped stroll through a bed of roses. The truth is that the only bed of roses associated with faithful Christianity may be the one where somebody removed the flowers and left you the thorns. Many Christians are completely unprepared for this side of the Christian life. They get saved, begin reading the Bible, clean up their conduct, start witnessing, become faithful to church, and try to do something useful for God. They naturally imagine that the people around them will recognize the improvement and appreciate it. After all, the drunk has become sober, the liar is telling the truth, the selfish man is beginning to serve others, and the careless soul is now trying to live for eternity. What could anybody possibly object to? Plenty, according to the Bible. Family members begin to pull away. Old friends become uncomfortable. Coworkers start whispering. People question motives, twist words, and treat conviction like a contagious disease. A Christian who thought obedience would eliminate his problems discovers that obedience has introduced him to a whole new collection of them. He expected the devil to oppose wickedness and discovered that the devil generally sponsors wickedness. What the devil opposes is anything that threatens his territory. The moment a Christian becomes useful, dependable, prayerful, and spiritually awake, he has moved from being part of the scenery to being a target. This is where many believers become discouraged. They can endure work, but they cannot endure being misunderstood while doing it. They can make sacrifices, but they struggle when those sacrifices are treated as selfishness. They can love people, but they are wounded when that love is returned with coldness, suspicion, ridicule, or outright hatred. Some finally decide that serving God is not worth the pain. They withdraw, become bitter, sit down, and spend the rest of their Christian lives explaining why they used to care. But 2 Corinthians 12:15 was not written to teach us how to quit; it was written to show us what genuine ministry costs. The servant of God must learn that obedience is not measured by applause, truth is not determined by popularity, and love is not proven only when it is returned. There are times when the clearest proof of Christian love is that it continues after appreciation has disappeared. Paul was willing to spend and be spent because his account was kept in heaven. He was not working for the approval of Corinth, the acceptance of Jerusalem, or a favorable review from the local religious establishment. He served under the eyes of Jesus Christ, and that is the only way any Christian can remain faithful when the more abundantly he

• 
  BKScoPe (@BKScoPe) reported 58 minutes ago

  been sitting with one idea about @quipnetwork for a few days now. what if the work that secures a chain was also the work someone actually needed solved. not hashes for the sake of hashes, actual optimization problems, proof of useful work instead of proof of work. i keep going back and forth on what that actually changes. one side of me says it's just a scoring trick, put every kind of hardware on the same problem and call it fair. the other side wonders if this is actually the first time cpus, gpus, asics, and quantum machines get measured on one shared battlefield instead of separate leaderboards. both feel true at once. quantum capacity right now mostly sits behind a handful of closed platforms, expensive, gated, hard to even test against. if this holds up at scale, that idle capacity starts looking like infrastructure other people can actually rent and check the work on. researchers get a reason to point real problems at it instead of vanity benchmarks, and operators get a reason to keep machines running past the demo phase. none of that is guaranteed yet, still early.

• 
  𓐬 ✞ NoblePhares ✞ 𓐬 (@NoblePhares) reported 59 minutes ago

  @JeffFortetx @charlestonwhyt I never said that. Slave uprisings after Lincoln offered freedom to any slave willing to take up arms did in fact disrupt the battlefield, but untrained slaves with rifles were far from the deciding factor for winning a war. For the Confederacy it was just another problem in a time of war. What actually won the war for the North was industry, population, railroads, and money. The Union could replace men, feed armies, build ships, and keep the blockade tight. The South could not. Once it became a war of attrition, the Confederacy was finished.