Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	7 hours ago
Bron	Online Play	1 day ago
Madrid	Online Play	1 day ago
La Trinité	Game Crash	6 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	7 days ago
Persan	Sign in	8 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ira H. Webster (@thebbcshow1001) reported 1 minute ago

  @kyliebrewer_ 👍🏿 The problem is that white men NEED good white girls 🧒 bc she is the ONLY way that he can replicate himself. Race war! If we get to good white girls 👧 first we can and will eradicate white people FOREVER! The battlefield of the future will be in the wombs of white women!

• 
  TarkovEngineer (@tjteabaggins) reported 1 minute ago

  32.6 hours of @wardogs #wardogs #wardongs @bulkhead . I can say with 100% confidence that I will be playing this game when it comes out fully. If they add even more to this game then its GOTY 100 percent. I have more exciting casual excitement for an arena shooter that this... this is what battlefield was trying to replicate but failed. This is the excitment I had from ARMA 3 KOTH. Its not the same as ARMA 3 KOTH but it has the same moments that happen. Just had a match that was 85 100 85 with red coming back from the brink to suppress heavy artillery, mortars, tanks and kick the other teams out of the zone. I killed 2 tanks with a CIWS. I witnessed team mates going out into heavy arty and mortar fire to drag team mates to saftey so they could be revived. This is the first time in A LONG time that I saw this level of team work out side of ARMA. G ******* G @Brammflakes . Tell your investors to let you cook if they give you trouble.

• 
  Gaurav Tomar (@talkwithgt) reported 1 minute ago

  After a decade dominating the corporate battlefield, the cold truth slammed into me. Out of every 100 people, 60 are dead weight. They’re not working. They’re not grinding. They’re just floating, doing the bare minimum while collecting a paycheck. And those same mediocre 60? They’re the ones softly programming the other 40 who are actually putting in the blood and hours, telling them to “keep going,” “stay loyal,” “be patient,” and that success will somehow magically arrive if they just keep sacrificing. They need the hard workers to keep believing that lie. Because if the 40 ever woke up, the 60 would have nowhere left to hide.

• 
  SethCane (@SethCane_) reported 3 minutes ago

  Really wish that sniping in battlefield 6 was like season one again. Doesn’t feel as fun anymore. Ya a little skill issue but it does feel different now.

• 
  Kamil 🇵🇱 (@_KMCR_7) reported 6 minutes ago

  It’s good to know history; you can learn a lot from it. Even in marketing. In the mid-70s, Pepsi had a problem: They were stuck as the forever #2. Even though they were sure Pepsi tasted better. Coca-Cola owned the heritage, the category, and had a stronger brand. Pepsi couldn’t win on brand love. So they changed the battlefield. And started the famous Pepsi Challenge. They put two unmarked cups on a table and let people decide based on taste alone. Most chose Pepsi. The result? Pepsi gained significant market share, closed the gap with Coca-Cola, and forced the leader into a defensive spiral that eventually led to New Coke (which was a big failure). It shows that if you fight a bigger brand, you need to force the conversation onto the one dimension where you actually win.

• 
  StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinum_) reported 6 minutes ago

  The downfall of $BONK explained: - launches on Solana on December 25, 2022 - immediately after the FTX collapse - community token built to bring activity back to Solana - 50% of the supply is distributed to the community - 297K wallets Late 2023: BONKbot - BONKbot becomes one of the strongest products connected to the ecosystem - allows users to trade Solana tokens directly through Telegram December 2023: the explosion - Coinbase listing - Binance listing - BONK becomes one of the biggest memecoins on Solana 2024: expansion - OKX adds BONK spot and perpetual trading in January - BONKrewards introduces locking and rewards for BONK holders - BonkSOL expands the ecosystem into liquid/staked SOL November 2024: the peak - BONK reaches an ATH of $0.00005825 on November 19 - market cap reaches $4B at the peak And another major product was coming. 2025: BONK fun - launches as a Solana memecoin launchpad - part of the economic model directs fees toward the BONK ecosystem including buyback/burn mechanics - reaches a 55.2% share of Solana token launches - processes $540M in volume - facilitates 175K token launches - generates $34M in fees for a period, BONK’s ecosystem was beating Pumpfun on its own battlefield 2025- 2026: the decline - BONK fun revenue becomes dependent on launchpad speculation - BonkSwap fails to become a major Solana DEX - BONKrewards eventually displays “No new staking deposits available” - BonkSOL loses part of the TVL it previously attracted The problem becomes increasingly obvious: BONK built products. But owning BONK was not the same thing as owning equity in those products. Then things get much worse. June 30, 2026: the malicious proposal - a governance proposal appears inside BonkDAO - the proposal seeks control of 4.426T BONK from the treasury instead of exploiting a traditional smart contract vulnerability, the attacker targets governance itself July 6: the DAO attack - the malicious proposal passes - 4.426T BONK is transferred from the treasury - the transfer happens just 49 seconds after voting ends stolen BONK is valued at $20M The attacker effectively bought enough influence to make the DAO authorize the transfer. July 18: attacker tokens start moving - 400B BONK is reportedly transferred to Coinbase Late July: - another reported 1.186T BONK is moved toward centralized exchanges - 3.2T BONK reportedly remains in the related wallet August 7: mixed news - Bithumb removes BONK from its watchlist - Upbit announces it will terminate BONK trading support September 7, 2026: - Upbit is scheduled to terminate BONK trading support at 15:00 KST - withdrawals are expected to remain available for a limited period afterward one of the exchanges that helped BONK expand in Korea is now preparing to remove it Today: - BONK market cap sits at $217M - down 39% the last 30 days - down 95.8% from its price ATH market cap collapsed from $4.04B to $217M A total of $3.8B in market value has disappeared from the peak

• 
  Jason (@cameded) reported 6 minutes ago

  @orangejuicefan1 @Pirat_Nation but cod has done the same thing for years now. it’s certainly not just a battlefield issue it’s a dev issue. they think it’s required for a “refreshed” season or whatever tf they wanna name it but it’s so stupid.

• 
  InfantryDort (@infantrydort) reported 9 minutes ago

  Readiness It seems we all unanimously agree that the better commander is the one who tells the truth. Why then, do we promote the ones who don’t? We should all know the reason. Because it’s comfortable to live in a lie. This is a great technique honestly, lying. If you’re a careerist who only cares about advancement. The problem is that it falls flat once a formation is put to the test. Combat has a way of exposing all flaws. But what happens if you don’t go to combat during your command? I guess you luck out then. You avoid the test. It’s a gamble that often pays off. We want the commander who tells the truth because we need to count on his word to make our own plans as his superiors. If he reports 90% efficiency and shows up to the battle exposing 60%, well that’s a problem. Because I’ve calculated in redundancy and even by my most aggressively pessimistic views of his capability, he still fell short. Now people are going to die. And he may not have been a liar per se. But he was incompetent and didn’t know about his own unit. Either is unfit for command. I started on X talking about tactics and leadership. Now I’ve come full circle to just telling the truth. Because every battlefield effect rests on our ability to do this. GWOT caused us to over inflate everything. If you need proof, look no further than the Afghan Army we said would hold after being propped up for two decades, it folded in days. If I were Army Chief of Staff for a day, I’d be taking advantage of this period where we aren’t embroiled in a ground war to recenter this truth telling culture that has atrophied so far. It’s not even complicated, you can just order units to leave garrison and come back. Checking their reported readiness percentage and comparing it to whatever returns to the motorpool. A test, if you will. Then you can have hard conversations like: “General (or Colonel) X, you reported your formation at 82%. After a simple maneuver to the range and back, testing your fleet, you clocked in at 58%. The delta is unacceptable. Thank you for your years of dedicated service to the nation, but it is no longer required.” @KTB_500 and I talk about this frequently. I think it is a fine COA for GEN LaNeve to consider. And it will ruffle many feathers. Oh well.

• 
  pala hanmi reddy | Beyond The Hype KTR (@hanmireddy) reported 13 minutes ago

  Here is the complete list of “The 36 Rules of Social Media” If all you do is respond to complaints, that’s all people will send you. Stop & Ask: Would an actual person talk that way? Everyone says they don’t want to be marketed to. Really, they just don’t want to be talked down to. The consumer is out for himself, not for you. As monetization attempts go up, consumer experience goes down. Don’t try to be clever, be clever. Social is 24/7. Not a one-time stunt. Always write back. Have an ROI. Have an ROI. Have an ROI. People would rather talk to Comcast Melissa than Comcast. Solve problems for people who talk about you, even if they don’t address you. Not everything will work, and that’s fine. Embrace negative content about your brand. Everyone’s an influencer. If fans distribute your content without your permission, offer to help. It’s okay to drive people to your site instead of Facebook’s. Update your page or delete it. Don’t make people do X, Y, then Z. Stick with X. Last year: Pump out content. This year: Optimize content. Become BFFs with your Facebook Reps. Social media doesn’t exist in a vacuum. Make traditional media and social work together. Desktop is conquered territory. Mobile is the battlefield. If you don’t see financial results, you wasted your money. People fight for their privacy. The only way to scale word of mouth: Paid Advertising. Have a crisis plan. Don’t use ads to prop up boring content. Use ads to accelerate successful content. Forget individuals. You’re creating content that encourages groups to form. People don’t want to shop where they socialize. Contests and sweepstakes are fine… if you want to encourage short relationships. People care what you had for breakfast… if you’re a food brand. Pinterest works. Your fans own your brand. If you’re bored by social media, it’s because you’re trying to get more value than you create. Think past vanity metrics like followers. It’s an organism, not a process.

• 
  Catch_u_reloadn (@Catch_u_reloadn) reported 16 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG @WARDOGS Somebody said this was like armor reforger and Battlefield mixed. I did not like that first one I mentioned at all it was a waste of money. Anyway the problem I had with that was it was not optimized for console is war dogs?

• 
  Shmuck (@lShmuckll) reported 21 minutes ago

  @MikeMumbelz @vekostuggle @Dexerto Battlefield 3 and 4 never had problems getting people on team deathmatch and **********. BF6 has lacked player count since a few months after launch. By giving players absolutely lack luster content.

• 
  PurpleKoolAidMan (@prplekoolaidman) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MrProWestie I think the issue is that Battlefield relies on microtransactions, which tie in to the game's assignments and live service progression. If the devs allow a server browser, a significant amount of the playerbase is just in 24/7 metro servers and never interact with that system.

• 
  Mike (@MikeHasHouses) reported 27 minutes ago

  @PUBG servers down. @Battlefield redsec can't get a match. @CounterStrike works perfectly as usual. Not even going to try COD.

• 
  Budbx (@budbx90) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Bring back rush! fix the ******* TTK! Fix the vehicle balance! This game still feels and plays like ****!

• 
  Adesola (@mummyOsasogie) reported 30 minutes ago

  If you feel your child is drifting away from you, do something. Do not wait until the distance becomes a permanent wall. This is not the time to dig your heels in because you want to prove a point. Eat humble pie. Stoop to conquer. You need your child more than you need to win an argument. And sometimes, you may even discover that you were the one who needed to apologise. Your child may need more time. Your child may need more conversations. Your child may need more attempts from you. Do not rush the process. First rebuild the connection. Create a safe space again. Do not immediately drag them back into the battlefield where the hurt happened. Go somewhere different. Make new memories. If you can afford it, travel together. Befoee you fix the problem, remind each other that the love is still there. If you are sensing that your child is drifting away from you, whether you are the Dad or the Mom, I pray that you and your child always find your way back to each other Good morning

• 
  João 🇲🇨 (@sensapaura) reported 33 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS Battlefield wasn't built to support a live service model.

• 
  Zubair (@zubairforward) reported 35 minutes ago

  You couldn't understand that you don't just take. take. and take. You also have to give. But whenever you go onto the battlefield, you're afraid at the sight of blood. Because all you ever knew was that wars are for taking things. And like a coward, a fearful little wreck, you never sacrifice anything of your own on the battlefield. And you return home cursing God that you got nothing. Even though your body is completely intact. Not a bloodstain on it. No broken hip. And all your companions are alive too. And this is exactly the proof that gaining something is a ritual of sacrifice. And you won't get anything until you give something in the form of an offering. Now tell me. How do you deserve all the things you dream about at 3 am in the night. when you are not willing to turn your body into a candle. And burn it. until it either dies out and extinguishes itself. or gives you enough heat to architect what you wanted.

• 
  jaheim🇹🇿🥷 (@TZsfinestt) reported 36 minutes ago

  psyche is the battlefield. But general audiences expect the superhero formula: hero, villain, spectacle, massive third act. So when that gets replaced by psychological conflict, there’s a disconnect. They say it’s boring, there’s no punchy punchy.

• 
  Kylos (@KylosWeb3) reported 36 minutes ago

  Craziest glitches in Pokemon history. In Pokemon Gold, Silver, and Crystal, there are two moves that seem somewhat harmless. Spike chips away at any Pokemon that is sent into battle, while Sandstorm slowly damages the Pokémon on the battlefield unless they're rock, ground or steel types every single turn, and on their own they do almost nothing dangerous. Nintendo never expected anyone to line them up in a very specific way, but if you faint your own team to them in a very specific order, the game quietly loses track of whether your Pokemon are even conscious, so here's what you do. You let one of your Pokemon faint to the sandstorm first, then you send in three more Pokemon back to back and let all three of them faint to the spikes. When that third Pokemon goes down, the game gets confused and leaves it standing at zero HP. So now you just run from the battle, and every Pokemon on your team stays in your party sitting at zero HP, without the game ever forcing you to black out. But that broken party is the exact setup the developers never planned for. They added a simple safety net for an empty party, but never expected a player to reach it with a team this broken, since your entire team is technically unusable. The game panics every time a new battle tries to start, and because it can't send out a single Pokemon, it cancels the fight instantly, and copies the result of your last real battle. If you won the previous battle, you'd just keep winning, which means you could walk into any trainer or wild encounter, and as soon as the screen fades, you have already won. Due to this glitch, people have beaten the Elite Four and the Champion without every making a single move against them.

• 
  Boz (@usaf16cc) reported 39 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS @Battlefield why won’t you fix your game.

• 
  Mazi okwuoma (@MaziEzike_Nedu) reported 41 minutes ago

  Steam just bypassed its strict 2-hour policy limit to issue a legendary refund. 🤯🎮 A Battlefield 6 fan managed to claw back a full $109.24 refund on the Phantom Edition after logging 470+ hours of playtime. The trigger? The latest update quietly removed their most-played legacy modes—including Rush—from Quick Play. After the player filed an explicit consumer complaint detailing the unannounced loss of core advertised features, Steam support overrode the system and gave them every cent back. Live-service developers are officially on notice: you don't get to erase content and keep the cash. 💸📉

• 
  jomenir (@jomenir) reported 42 minutes ago

  @PartyInnaBox @Crashoutgrandpa @_Eisra_ Performance issues like that are fine by Steam team you have a chance to refund it, had this problem with Battlefield 6 through the online mess with 10 hours at launch and still refunded

• 
  早起鸟 (@bicc8eth) reported 46 minutes ago

  @saylor The core controversy of BIP-110 is not essentially "whether spam should be cleared", but rather "who has the right to define the use of Bitcoin block space: Miners claim that 'the transaction fee market has the final say'" The node claims, "I have the right to refuse verification/execution." I think the next major battle might escalate from a "block size war" to a "block space usage war". The fate of BIP-110 will eventually fail, but it has brought the issue of "the use of Block Space" to the forefront, similar to an upgraded version of the debate over block size in the past. The main battlefield of the dispute over the use of block space is the storage of inscriptions/data in user transactions $NAT is precisely the inscription based on the Ordinals + TAP protocol - it is currently the only inscription incentive asset that miners are allocated to each block So in the future, $NAT might be: The benchmark token of the "incentive alignment layer" that naturally emerged among the market camp after the block space usage war In other words, $NAT could become a very good "soft landing point" for all stakeholders after this upgraded war: It not only retains the core proposition of miners that "transaction fees are determined", but also uses an inscription mechanism to directly return part of the data value to those maintaining the network, thereby partially alleviating the long-standing concern of nodes about incentive asymmetry without the need for consensus layer review. If this logic holds true, the next stage of the Bitcoin ecosystem debate might no longer be about "whether to allow inscriptions", but rather "how to make inscriptions better serve miners and network security". And $NAT, as the only inscription incentive asset currently that has achieved "automatic allocation to miners per block", is likely to be at the center of this new debate

• 
  jamielear (@Jamielear1) reported 46 minutes ago

  @CoolTipst32001 Yes too many basic battlefield errors at this point in the war.

• 
  Melvin Kian (@melvinkian) reported 47 minutes ago

  @fresh_sadegh The order has broken, the only solution will be reached on the battlefield.

• 
  Battle(non)sense | Chris (@BattleNonSense) reported 48 minutes ago

  @DLVittorio @Battlefield That does apply to quite many. However they are clearly those who do see the problems, but they are unable to take the next step and understand why those problems showed up and accept what needs to change to improve the situation and fix the issues they complain about.

• 
  QuaZaR (@QuaZaR_2) reported 49 minutes ago

  Don’t see anyone talking about it but vehicle disabling in battlefield is such a dogshit mechanic, get to low health in a heli or jet and 99% of the time it’s a forced crash because you literally cannot control it anymore, actual state mandated deaths dumb as ****

• 
  John (@DownHomeJohn) reported 52 minutes ago

  @TheToyStoryClaw @INSTILLtv2 @WARDOGS I loved battlefield. Until 4. 1 & 5 I liked. I had high hopes for 6 but the hit regs/ net code issues drive me up a wall. The game is misery with brief moments of pure cinematic experience that’s just at the bare minimum to keep me playing.

• 
  Sarming 🇸🇻 (@Duck_Sou) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE ******* NETCODE. *************

• 
  MetalSlug (@metalslug0390) reported 56 minutes ago

  @FyrBorne Battlefield 6 has been an utter disappointment for me. It cannot resolve multiple core gameplay issues like the netcode, audio, and terrible matchmaking (west coast for me). I’m not going to get my hopes up for MW4 being a great game but it could be something to switch it up.