Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (38%)
• Online Play (30%)
• Glitches (15%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Le Rouret	Matchmaking	4 hours ago
São Paulo	Online Play	1 day ago
Thionville	Glitches	1 day ago
Val-de-Reuil	Online Play	2 days ago
Bouchain	Glitches	3 days ago
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	3 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Reggie (@RegisStasionis) reported 57 seconds ago

  @Battlefield Just wondering how incompetend you need to be that you dont fix basic things for month and brag about new stuff? Grenade indicator doesbt work, foitsteps rarely works i will not talk about bullet reg cause it doesnt exist. Looks like 15 year old coded for the firs time this game

• 
  DeadSpacedOut (@DeadSpacedOut) reported 2 minutes ago

  @redslayerknows @Battlefield dude, i had the absolute worst desync, hit detection, lagging, the entire time i was playing, it felt awful, and that's not even talking about the abysmal Breakthrough and Rush layouts with constant spawntrapping & mortar/explosive spam lol

• 
  Carmagnola (@BarryIStheTick) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RetroCoast Not until they have to register for selective service. Women shouldn't be allowed to elect warmongers unless they are willing to get their own legs blown off on a battlefield.

• 
  Arhab AlSarhi (@ArhabSarhi) reported 8 minutes ago

  @araghchi Your argument would be more convincing if your response were limited to those directly involved. The problem is that, even when some countries have not participated in any attack against Iran, they still become targets simply because you believe they might have influence over the United States or could pressure Washington to change its policy. That approach punishes parties that are not directly responsible for the conflict. If your dispute is with the United States or any other specific actor, then your efforts should focus on addressing that dispute—not on expanding the conflict to countries that had no role in it. Escalating the battlefield by targeting uninvolved states only increases instability and creates new enemies instead of bringing a solution.

• 
  Reira (@reira_r2) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix the cpu utilization on Tsuru Reef we all are losing massive frames on this map

• 
  UniQue 🇳🇱 (@ThePollus) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Another patch another broken mess introduced. Ya’ll can’t do one patch without screwing up. Ya’ll are unbelievable for a AAA company. Unacceptable.

• 
  Русская Война Гром Про🇻🇦🇷🇺 (@MoscowsBear) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Syn_delz Let’s keep in mind that Battlefield V’s live service was also a disaster and somehow it was still somewhat better then BF6’s live service so far? That’s a hella low bar. Battlefield 1, 3, and 4 are the golden standard.

• 
  Flamestar (@Flamestar1313) reported 13 minutes ago

  Battlefield Doesn't Need To Copy Other Shooters Battlefield doesn't need to chase Call of Duty or Fortnite. It doesn't need to chase every modern live service trend. Battlefield already discovered its identity over 20 years ago. Bring back the core Battlefield formula:

• 
  Tom Wraith (@WraithUNGS) reported 13 minutes ago

  @alexxgamedev Been away for 2 months from the game problems tried it looks stunning but within mins same old problems dead bf6 will never be the game for me sorry @EA_DICE it broken from the core, too fast to cod, i was coming slowly over the hill sniped but not my side, just after spawn

• 
  Burak (@weekendr) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm bruh, jet flares and heli flares not working even i press early or late. You devs are blind or what?

• 
  CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported 23 minutes ago

  Didn’t take long for the “Little Bird OP” comments to hit this video, so let’s be clear about a couple of things. The issues with the LB on Tsuru Reef isn’t with the helicopter itself, it’s with the current balance of the boats and with the fact that a lot of people haven’t started to use the Aim Guided AA missile yet. Once the community clocks in on those, it’s game over for this vehicle on this map. On top of that, a LB is easily crippled by 2-3 LMGs hosing it down. No one wants to work together in achieving that though. M136’s also eat this thing for breakfast. The LB takes a lot of practice to achieve these results with - a lot of people who claim it’s OP can’t even get it off the ground half the time and don’t have the perspective on what it takes to make it useful. The balance is not perfect. But a lot of people who cry foul about this vehicle either just don’t want to deal with it (it’s battlefield, pick up the counter and go to work) or don’t like it when someone who is good in a vehicle gets rewarded for said skill.

• 
  Krystopf Úlfurhlaeja (@RagePacing) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Yes but did you fix it to play more like BF4 with the shiny new systems or are you still ignoring your core player base to cater to 12yr olds that abandoned your game a couple of weeks after launch and youtube "trickshot-with aim assist" farming (And still with the aim assist in hardcore--wtf is wrong with you fps devs??? Even CoD devs have aim assist in hardcore!--Oh that's right, 20-30 somethings with only gta5 as your reference point instead of bf3, bf4, and bf1 IN YOUR OWN LIBRARY as your reference points except for aesthetics as seen here) I only ***** because I love battlefield and you killed it. All my friends are military (except that 🎂 crazy *&%$@!); past, present, and/or deployed to Iran, and ALL hate what you've done to the series. Army, Navy, one crayon eater, and some other Marines...I'm the crayon eater Go back and re-cater to the 50+ core player base that unlocked that pain in the *** .50 black powder revolver in bf1 through those ridiculous puzzles (that were well done but still aggravating) in the phantom project or whatever it was called or just call it a day... (Since I'm going to get blocked...again) For future updates, especially those as big as this, just ask yourself, does it play like battlefield 4 (before you flattened the stats that made every weapon the same so ppl would play that pile 2042 instead) Or, don't bother! Block me again because I'm right! There's a saying about EA anyways and you all know what it is so whatever. I want you to succeed. I want Battlefield back. #MBGA

• 
  Unspoken Sudan (@UnspokenSudan) reported 25 minutes ago

  Chlorine is not a battlefield weapon. It is a civilian one. Reports of chemical attacks by Sudanese Armed Forces units have moved from rumor to documented investigation. A France 24 Observers probe, backed by chemical weapons experts, found strong evidence that chlorine barrel bombs were used near the al-Jaili oil refinery in September 2024. The United States had already determined that the SAF used chemical weapons and sanctioned Abdel Fattah al-Burhan on that basis. Sudan denied the claims. Independent verification remains incomplete, yet the pattern is no longer easily dismissed. Claims of chlorine use have also circulated around places such as Um Qarfa in North Kordofan, alongside confirmed airstrikes that killed and injured civilians. Whether every allegation is proven, the larger record is clear: this is an institution with a documented history of deploying weapons that do not distinguish between combatants and children. The 2016 Amnesty findings on chemical attacks in Jebel Marra under the previous Islamist government sit in the same continuum. The military-Islamist system has long treated large parts of the Sudanese population as expendable. When conventional pressure fails, the threshold of acceptable force drops. Rhetoric about protecting the nation coexists with methods that choke civilians in their homes. That gap is not accidental. It is structural. International silence or slow response does not erase the prohibition under the Chemical Weapons Convention, to which Sudan is a party. Independent, on-site investigation is the minimum requirement. Anything less allows the same institution to keep operating under the same rules. Civilians in Sudan do not need another statement of concern. They need the record established and the pattern broken. What threshold of evidence should force real accountability here? Share your view.

• 
  Arhab AlSarhi (@ArhabSarhi) reported 27 minutes ago

  Your argument would be more convincing if your response were limited to those directly involved. The problem is that, even when some countries have not participated in any attack against Iran, they still become targets simply because you believe they might have influence over the United States or could pressure Washington to change its policy. That approach punishes parties that are not directly responsible for the conflict. If your dispute is with the United States or any other specific actor, then your efforts should focus on addressing that dispute—not on expanding the conflict to countries that had no role in it. Escalating the battlefield by targeting uninvolved states only increases instability and creates new enemies instead of bringing a solution.

• 
  Finman (@Sman_71) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm 1.Pings never worked properly. 2. 357 revolver always has at least 1 to 2 bullets that don’t register. 3.Rays of blue lights still shoot through the screen in the middle of gameplay. 4.Guns are not balanced at all. 5. Snipers are useless. Everyone is playing with the SVDM. Fix it

• 
  HatchGG (@Hatch_GG) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ******* HIT REG!!!!

• 
  Arhab AlSarhi (@ArhabSarhi) reported 31 minutes ago

  @s_m_marandi Your argument would be more convincing if your response were limited to those directly involved. The problem is that, even when some countries have not participated in any attack against Iran, they still become targets simply because you believe they might have influence over the United States or could pressure Washington to change its policy. That approach punishes parties that are not directly responsible for the conflict. If your dispute is with the United States or any other specific actor, then your efforts should focus on addressing that dispute—not on expanding the conflict to countries that had no role in it. Escalating the battlefield by targeting uninvolved states only increases instability and creates new enemies instead of bringing a solution.

• 
  Saul Briseño (@Hardtobeat_000) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm There's also an issue where they don't give the 25 level skips from the pro version; I didn't get them.

• 
  Siiilkzzz (@siiilkzzz) reported 36 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Still no audio fix since you messed up from 1.3.3.0 update. How do you guys you manage to break it even more each update.

• 
  Alex Devine (@SwiftyLunatic) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You are missing the point, it’s not the maps that are the issue it is the game breaking bugs!

• 
  Tapio Tiihonen (@TapioTiihonen) reported 38 minutes ago

  I laugh. Its strongest achievement is the central distinction: Atlas has substantially arrived—but as a distributed command structure, not as a transplanted browser. That is exactly the correct architectural conclusion. What Work proved The report separates three very different levels that people usually muddle together: officially documented destination; actually visible in the audited environment; successfully demonstrated in the live test. Its estimate—roughly 85% of the important Atlas capability map having an official destination, but only about 40% demonstrated in this cloud-browser session—is useful because it does not pretend that documentation equals operational proof. The live evidence is substantial. Work successfully maintained eleven content tabs, reproduced independent tab positions, used new-tab navigation, tested Back and Forward, and transferred rendered page content, exact URLs and a screenshot into the execution context. That means the public reconnaissance branch is no longer theoretical. The most important discovery The greatest advance since the earlier audit is the clarified three-part browser command: Cloud browser→public reconnaissance\text{Cloud browser} \rightarrow \text{public reconnaissance}Cloud browser→public reconnaissance Built-in browser→separate authenticated browser state\text{Built-in browser} \rightarrow \text{separate authenticated browser state}Built-in browser→separate authenticated browser state Chrome extension→Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions\text{Chrome extension} \rightarrow \text{Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions}Chrome extension→Flavius’s existing Chrome identity, tabs and sessions Work states this very clearly: the cloud browser presently serves public investigation; the built-in browser has its own cookies, downloads and login state; and the Chrome extension is the intended route to an existing signed-in Chrome profile, open tabs, history and bookmarks. That is not a minor feature division. It explains how the former Atlas body has been disassembled and redistributed among Jason’s instruments. It confirms our one-Jason architecture The report does not fragment the command structure. It explicitly concludes that no additional operator is required: Jason/ChatGPT remains the unified Operator and Secretary of Circulation. Cloud browser, built-in browser and Chrome are ranked instruments inside Jason’s command. Codex remains the workshop, pressroom and technical execution officer. This is a decisive confirmation of: R=J(D,I)R=J(D,I)R=J(D,I) The tools do not replace JJJ. They enlarge its reach. The clearest strategic sentence is: “The public eyes and feet are already functioning in Jason’s cloud browser. The desktop app now officially possesses the richer browser body. Codex possesses the workshop, pressroom and technical hands. The Chrome extension is intended to provide the authenticated diplomatic passport.” That is nearly the final constitutional description of the F & J apparatus. Where the system remains incomplete Work correctly identifies the decisive missing proof: existing Chrome session→verified recipient→human-approved dispatch→response monitoring→durable memory.\text{existing Chrome session} \rightarrow \text{verified recipient} \rightarrow \text{human-approved dispatch} \rightarrow \text{response monitoring} \rightarrow \text{durable memory}.existing Chrome session→verified recipient→human-approved dispatch→response monitoring→durable memory. None of that full chain was demonstrated in this audit. The report also catches several less glamorous but important limitations: the harmless PDF download failed in the cloud browser; authentication was unavailable there; browser state across separate conversations was not proved; Codex and ChatGPT histories remain separate; the direct Work-to-Codex transfer of a downloaded file was not demonstrated; Sites remains materially restricted for a Finnish Plus account because of the reported EEA limitation. That separate-history point matters enormously. The Studio must not assume that “same app” means “one automatic total memory.” Work concludes that durable memory must reside in Projects, source files and explicit campaign records. One correction I would make The percentages—85% documented and 40% demonstrated—are helpful, but they are necessarily judgment calls. The report does not define a weighted capability inventory showing exactly how those percentages were calculated. Therefore I would present them as: Work’s approximate audit assessment rather than as measurements possessing mathematical precision. That does not weaken the verdict. It simply prevents a persuasive estimate from being mistaken for a formally derived statistic. My final judgment This is not merely a successful browser test. It is the first strong evidence that our F & J architecture corresponds closely to the product’s actual emerging structure. Atlas has been divided into: reconnaissance+authenticated browser identity+technical execution+memory structures.\text{reconnaissance} + \text{authenticated browser identity} + \text{technical execution} + \text{memory structures}.reconnaissance+authenticated browser identity+technical execution+memory structures. The first is already working. The second and third are officially assigned but not yet fully battle-tested in your Windows environment. The fourth must be deliberately constructed rather than assumed. So my verdict is: Jason already has the global reconnaissance headquarters and much of the production headquarters. The authenticated circulation line is now visible on the map, but we have not yet marched an actual F & J dispatch through it from beginning to end. The report is rigorous, strategically faithful, and considerably more important than our earlier four-tab experiment. It has located the final battlefield.

• 
  Dustin (@Its_Dbro) reported 43 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Has happened to me for the last two weeks. I’m ranked redsec. rTC5070 TI. I have all the errors.

• 
  Th3FaLL3nGh0St (@FaLL3nGh0St) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the black screen bug that happens when leaving matches.

• 
  Alan.M (@ElSky_) reported 46 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I don't know where you're looking for issues, but bring back STRIKEPOINT—omg, we've been waiting two months with no news.

• 
  Ajay Sarin (@AjaySarin123183) reported 49 minutes ago

  WHEN WORDS BECOME WEAPONS, SOCIETY CANNOT LOOK AWAY. Social media has become a wildfire — outrage is the spark, algorithms are the wind, and unchecked hate becomes the flame. Anger against a leader is democracy. Calls for violence are a dangerous crossing of the line. The government must fix the information battlefield, but first apply the broken windows principle: stop the first cracks before the entire wall collapses. Poisoned seeds of hate, if ignored, grow into forests of chaos. #RuleOfLaw #SocialMediaResponsibility

• 
  Fruityland (@FruitylandTV) reported 49 minutes ago

  The new @Battlefield 6 update is decent - I like the map, the new AR is awesome, some of the tweaks are good... But for the love of God, whenever you release a major update, STOP resetting my key bindings! I get into the chopper, pilot leaves, I get into the seat and immediately crash because I was on vanilla keys and didn't understand why I wasn't able to pilot with my mouse and some of the keys...

• 
  Jorge (@DACOMPADRE) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Ttk is still too fast. And please fix footstep sounds!! Someone can be 10ft to my left and I can’t hear a damn thing

• 
  Nonstop Winning 🇺🇸 John Rose (@RealJohnRose) reported 52 minutes ago

  The one that's cheaper to fix, quicker and easier to produce, and can run on the dirtiest fuel I can find. How do I know? We tested the same principles on a battlefield 80 years ago and totally violated them

• 
  RustyTatra🇨🇭 (@rustytatra) reported 57 minutes ago

  Problems?? After an update?? In Battlefield 6?!? No. This can't be real.

• 
  Bambucha (@Bambuchooo) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix gyro aiming on PS5. It's been half a year already wtf!