Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (34%)
• Matchmaking (12%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (6%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Argences	Matchmaking	12 hours ago
Minneapolis	Sign in	1 day ago
Minneapolis	Sign in	2 days ago
Reims	Online Play	4 days ago
Pfaffenhoffen	Sign in	4 days ago
Americana	Glitches	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported 1 minute ago

  @GetCheatz @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE Buddy you can simply use a VPN to change regions lmao are you new to gaming? Exitlag shows the exact server I’m playing on. Besides just checking scoreboard ping can easily tell what server you’re playing on. Maybe you face hit regs issues on servers which are far way

• 
  Coin Shot ☁️ (@CoinSh0t) reported 4 minutes ago

  SOMEONE IS TURNING OLD SAMURAI NOVELS INTO PLAYABLE 3D WORLDS AND SELLING THEM FOR $2,000–$10,000 EACH. He drops the entire book into Kimi. In one pass, it pulls out every village, road, temple, battlefield, forest, weapon, color, and character route. Then Claude turns the map into a browser world. It writes the code, builds the scenes, tests the game, fixes broken logic, and runs parallel agents until the world actually works. The business model is stupid simple. Pick one cult fandom. Build the world. Charge $3–$5 for access. Even 3,000 fans turns one afternoon into $9,000–$15,000. The tool is still new, and almost nobody is using it for books yet.

• 
  Tim Koffer (@KofferTim) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Please fix the menu where you click which objective you want to spawn on. Its completely fkd

• 
  Ricki (@Rickixo) reported 6 minutes ago

  @vsdsad25496 @V42724309 @Battlefield Agreed. The lack of bushes, trees, and environmental detail is a major issue as well. That large white hotel building in the concept art looks at least 10 times better than the version we got in-game.

• 
  AEWBlog (@AEW_Blog) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA Battlefield 6 has to be the worst game I have played from the Battlefield series. Horrible graphics. SO MANY BUGS. Unplayable campaign with FULL of issues. Unplayable missions. I cannot finish missions. I cannot see my ammo, guns or selection options. It doesn’t prompt any interactions and subtitles all of a sudden have disappeared too. Just HORRIBLE experience.

• 
  Richard North (@ollieparrot) reported 13 minutes ago

  @thinkdefence With the development cycle as short as six weeks, it is a given that anything produced by the MoD under the current system will be obsolete by the time it enters service. Ukrainian troops compensate for this by having their own technicians in the field, as brigade level and lower, who can modify and even build drones while on operations. The chances are, though, that the technology will take us to AI-driven autonomous drones (both offensive and defensive), leading to a degree of stability, where each side neutralises the other. How exactly this will work out is impossible to predict but it is not unreasonable to expect that, within a decade (the lifespan of a SDR) the battlefield will look very different from what is does now. One can sympathise with planners, therefore, who have an almost impossible task. But if the expectation is that technological and operational volatility is to become a feature of the battlefield for the foreseeable future, then we need to restructure our forces - and the manufacturing interface and procurement system - to build-in flexibility and adaptability, to make sure they remain relevant.

• 
  vitor 🦅 (@DuffyMorgan_) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Pls fix the performance 😭🙏

• 
  Hsho (@hsho00om) reported 21 minutes ago

  @rsan99328 @BattlefieldComm Same issue with sniper when aiming with scoop.

• 
  Nicholas Drummond (@nicholadrummond) reported 23 minutes ago

  THE BRITISH ARMY AND THE DIP 🧵 ✅The British Army aspires to field a NATO reserve corps with two deployable divisions. Each division will have 2 or 3 brigades or a total of around 20,000 troops in each division. For an army of 73,000 this structure is entirely achievable. Within a NATO context such a contribution is credible and respectable. ✅ The British Army ideally needs another 7,000 regular troops and 10,000 additional reserves. Returning to the 2010 headcount cap of 82,500 is highly desirable, because it would allow sustainable unit rotations. At an average cost of £60K per regular soldier per annum and £10K per reservist, extra headcount would require an additional £520 million per year. ✅ The two divisions with 4 to 6 brigades would generate 4 combat units per brigades or 24 primary battalion sized groupings. Each division needs artillery, engineers, signal / intelligence, REME / logistics, and medical units to support them. There is nothing unreasonable about wanting this level of capability. Every other NATO member in Europe plans to be similarly configured. Ultimately, however. the issue is not force generation but ensuring the units we do have are properly equipped. ✅ The Army’s most critical capability gap is in artillery. It’s acquiring 72 Boxer RCH155 - enough for 4 regiments. It has 2 GMLRS regiments, but needs an additional 2-4. In particular, it needs to restore munitions stockpiles. This requirement implies an extra £1.7 billion beyond the £3 billion already allocated. ✅ In drone saturated battlefield environments, the Army needs to invest in air defence on an unprecedented scale to regain freedom of manoeuvre. This requires £2 billion in addition to the £800 million already allocated. ✅ The Army’s Bowman communications system is obsolete. Replacing this with a fully digitised architecture is already budgeted at £7 billion, but nothing has yet been approved or delivered. Without this investment, the much vaunted kill chain is only an aspiration. ✅ UAS, tactical cruise missiles, loitering munitions, and other aerial drones for surveillance and strike roles are here to stay. They need to be embedded across the force. That’s another £2 billion. ✅ Finally, another significant gap is combat vehicles to get to the fight and to manoeuvre. Under present plans, it is acquiring 623 Boxers, 148 Challenger 3, 589 Ajax, and 1,100 protected mobility vehicles. That’s around 2,460 vehicles. It needs twice this amount or an extra £10 billion. So, those are the Army’s most important priorities. A lot of what I have listed is already in the Equipment Plan. But it needs around £18 billion in additional funding over 9 years to deliver all this — that’s £2 billion per annum over current funding. Clearly, the Army is not going to get anything like the extra funding I have described, but now you know the scale of investment needed to deliver a minimum viable contribution to NATO. The need for this level of funding is what happens when you stop investing in defence for 30 years.

• 
  UniQue 🇳🇱 (@ThePollus) reported 23 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How are issues like the deployment screen jumping getting patched to live in the first place? Do you guys even test anything or just release a patch and see what happens after? Wtf is this quality control?

• 
  Priyanka Jha ( Proud Indian) (@PriyankaJha_) reported 25 minutes ago

  When a soldier dies on the battlefield, the nation mourns. But when an air warrior dies, we often move on too quickly. Five lives lost in the AN-32 crash. Behind every uniform was a family waiting for someone who will never return home. 💔🇮🇳 My Condolence. #AN32 #IAF #Assam

• 
  Major (R) In Pain (@spikeman785021) reported 27 minutes ago

  @A10TheHog I've never understood why we change a platform that has consistently dominated on the battlefield? The BUFF is a perfect example of: If it ain't broke, don't fix it. Just upgrade the technology it uses...

• 
  Steve in a Truck (@stevedeleeuw) reported 28 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Insane it literally takes weeks to fix ****. Maybe should not have laid everyone off

• 
  AndresGrimace (@AndresGrimace) reported 30 minutes ago

  @SPADtm Sure, but does it really matter? I have more problems with the people that compare AC8 to DCS, Battlefield and War Thunder.

• 
  brett ransome (@RansomeBrett) reported 30 minutes ago

  @TXWomenRESIST @_xXNovaXx_22 @GOP__Ls I watched the video, of course. And I don’t mind you calling me stupid. I’m not arrogant enough to be offended, like it seems you are. My question is who determines the lawfulness of an order? Is it privates? Majors? On the battlefield? Hey, we have a volunteer military. I have no problem with you telling soldiers who agree with you to resign their commission. No one is forcing them to serve. If they don’t want to take orders without question….quit.

• 
  Poison white (@poisonwhite18) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield PC players cronux player Grenade launcher for bobs op P90 ultra op Fix your trash game and remove crossplay with pc trash.

• 
  I_Pickle_YouYT (@I_Pickle_You) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SaidMilan7 @Luke86072210 2. Towards the end of the life cycle, the game still had flaws, thats unavoidable, but there were a lot of good aspects within the game and fewer flaws, battlefield 6 in current state mostly consists of flaws and issues, im not claiming the game wont or cant be good

• 
  alexisgenial (@alexisallseeing) reported 38 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Your multiplayer is a scam, the price is the same for countries with server (good service) and the countries without a server, 100 ping vs 10 ping, you still don't show the servers list for customers to be aware of - DON'T BUY THIS GAME IF YOUR COUNTRY DON'T HAS A SERVER!!!!

• 
  Shawn Chauhan (@shawnchauhan1) reported 41 minutes ago

  Iran just added Starlink to its list of military targets. Not a weapons system. Not a military satellite. A consumer internet network. This is the logical endpoint of dual-use infrastructure - when your product is critical enough to matter on a battlefield, it becomes a target whether you intended it to be one or not. Starlink powers drone operations. It keeps activists online during blackouts. It is the connective tissue for AI-driven military systems. The lesson for anyone building critical infrastructure: neutrality is not a permanent option. The more indispensable your product becomes, the more it attracts the attention of people who would rather it did not exist. Musk did not build a weapons system. He built something more valuable than one - and that is exactly the problem.

• 
  DoYou K Now The Brokeboi Insider (@wllmlew) reported 42 minutes ago

  @StephenMBlack82 @Shpeshal_Nick I’ll let you know. PlayStations refund policy is pretty much nonexistent. Their store even says you aren’t eligible for a refund if the game is simply downloaded (not even played) or streamed. I think Nintendo’s is similar but not positive. Xbox refund policy is similar to steam’s it all depends on how long you have the game and if it’s only been played a certain amount of time My brother bought battlefield 6 played for six hours on Xbox. After a month he requested a refund and got one. I bought Gollum (yeah I know, big LOTR fan) my console is set to auto download. Woke up the next day and read all about the issues the game was having (hadn’t played it). Tried to get a refund and nothing.

• 
  toecutter (@WayneSm72677522) reported 46 minutes ago

  @dissentpod @BattlefieldComm It's a on going problem with these incompetent morons and the reason for it is these fuckwits hire on DEI rather than actual skill these ******* clowns couldn't program air fryer

• 
  ARCOS (@falsewoodxt) reported 47 minutes ago

  @GetCheatz @BattlefieldInte @EA_DICE Bot comment. Content update is just fine. There are big maps in the game now and more coming up in next season as well. The game’s only really issue is not having a server browser. Everything else is fixed already

• 
  veselin.eth 🦇🔊 + ⚛️🧪 (@Veselinius_III) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Battlefield What the hell did you do to make the game so extremely laggy and unplayable?!? When will this be fixed?!?!?!?!? Multiple people in the same game tracked how are CPUs spike to 100% and from 20-25-30 ping it starts lagging and showing 200-300-400 up in the left corner?!? INSANITY!

• 
  D-EFFUGIUM (@deffugium) reported 50 minutes ago

  The Si Wong Desert Assault The operation began in secret. Orion Voss had spent years studying the Red Lotus' records and their failed attempt to end the Avatar Cycle. Most people focused on how close they had come to killing Avatar Korra, but Orion became interested in something else. He studied the Avatar State itself and the relationship between the Avatar and Raava. After years of research, he arrived at a terrifying conclusion. The Avatar could only truly be defeated while in the Avatar State. Thousands of The Broken Cycle supporters quietly gathered across the Earth Kingdom. Most thought they were joining a demonstration against the Avatar and the rising power of benders over regular people. Only a small group knew the real reason. This was never meant to be a protest. It was a trap. The objective was simple. Force Avatar Ongja into a battle large enough to trigger the Avatar State. Once he entered it, they would destroy him. Yet there was one problem. Water. The Broken Cycle had many dangerous fighters. Some were lightning benders who could strike from far away. Others were combustion benders who could destroy large parts of the battlefield. Sandbenders knew the desert better than anyone. Lavabenders could change the land itself. Vacuum benders could take away the air, and fog benders could turn the battlefield into a place of confusion and fear. But they lacked a bloodbender. Without one, restraining the Avatar long enough to execute Orion's plan would be nearly impossible. Then a mysterious waterbender appeared. Quiet. Calm. Unknown to almost everyone present. When asked why he wished to join the operation, he simply answered, "I can bloodbend." For the first time, Orion believed victory was possible. The assault started in the Si Wong Desert. Thousands gathered under the hot sun. The Broken Cycle supporters, including sandbenders, radicals, and extremists, all waited for the Avatar. The battle that followed became one of the largest conflicts since the Spirit Wars. Lightning flashed across the desert sky. Combustion blasts fell from far-off ridges. Lavabenders turned parts of the battlefield into rivers of molten glass. Sandstorms swallowed whole groups as sandbenders changed the dunes. Vacuum benders took the air from parts of the field, and fog benders made it almost impossible to see. At the center of the chaos stood Avatar Ongja. Even though he was outnumbered, the Avatar kept moving forward. One by one, he faced the Broken Cycle fighters. In the end, the Avatar State appeared, just as Orion had planned. But even that was not enough. He defeated the assassins and the army. Avatar Ongja survived. To everyone watching, it seemed like the Avatar had won completely. But no one realized that Orion never planned to win by strength alone. Every attack in the battle had a reason. The bloodbender kept the Avatar still. The vacuum bender made it hard for him to breathe. The combustion bender forced him to defend himself. The lavabender made the ground shaky. Each move was meant to push Ongja deeper into the Avatar State. The plan was never to kill him. The real goal was to break the paths that let Avatar energy move. By the end of the battle, the damage was already done. It was not to his body, not to Raava, and not even to the Avatar State itself. The real harm was to the spiritual pathways that connected them. The chi network that allowed Avatar energy to move safely through Ongja's body had begun to fall apart. No healer noticed it. No one in the White Lotus saw it. Even Ongja did not understand what had happened. Only Orion knew the truth. The Avatar had won the fight, but his biggest loss had already begun. Broken Cycle forces left the desert, and Orion watched from a distance and let himself smile for once. The attempt to kill the Avatar had failed, but the mission itself had worked. The world believed the Avatar had won, but Orion knew the truth. The real battle was just beginning.

• 
  TheRealOne (@BlackBoxGuy99) reported 51 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Bro tell me how to fix HUNG error getting it every 2nd map

• 
  Nick Vegas (@CTNickyVegas) reported 51 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix loading into to game with friends so you don’t have To SPAM invite hoping they get in . INEXCUSABLE, NON NEGOTIABLE. FIX IT NOW . All I hear is “NOT IN .” When loading into a game .

• 
  1+1 (@famousmanaz32) reported 52 minutes ago

  @bekeestitches Dude's healing factor can't fix his trauma even his dreams are a battlefield. Rogue didn't deserve that jump-scare claws though Classic

• 
  Battlefield Bulletin (@BFBulletin) reported 54 minutes ago

  @SNKYGamer @Nodone00 I remember reading a comment from Ganslinger43 (community manager) indicating Battle Pickups have been on 'ice' since there are still some issues with them that are difficult to fix. Battlefield Studios is currently testing some fixes in Labs, and they want Battle Pickups to be back in more modes when possible.

• 
  𝘊𝘰𝘳𝘳𝘪𝘯𝘦 (@OopsGuess) reported 57 minutes ago

  Chinese EVs gaining traction in Serbia The EU has consistently accused China of having excess EVS production capacity. But when people have multiple choices and still choose Chinese EVs, that is not “dumping,” that is value winning. Consumers do not buy ideology,they buy price, performance, design, reliability, range, technology, and after-sales service. During the gasoline era, nobody was rushing to buy Chinese cars, China did not cry about “unfair competition.” China learned, invested, upgraded, and waited for the next battlefield. Then Europe hesitated, Japan clung to the old engine, Legacy automakers protected yesterday’s profits. China took the EV transition seriously and pushed it to scale: batteries, supply chains, charging ecosystems, software, manufacturing efficiency, model variety, and price discipline. China did not steal a market Europe wanted, it mastered the market Europe was too arrogant to take seriously. Now Chinese EVs are competitive abroad, and suddenly the same people who spent decades preaching “free markets” have discovered a new word: “Overcapacity.” Please. It was not overcapacity when Western cars flooded China, it was globalization. It was not overcapacity when Europe sold luxury brands into every emerging market, it was consumer choice. But when China builds better, cheaper, faster, and at scale, it becomes a “threat.” So the real problem is not Chinese dumping, but it is that China stopped playing the role assigned to it. It stopped being the workshop at the bottom of the chain, it started building the future. And the old car empires cannot forgive that.

• 
  MERC subvert (@SubvertPlaysTCG) reported 58 minutes ago

  @gg_hazmatt @riftboundop Been considering a one-of Trinity Force just to force more attention to a certain battlefield but 4 energy to play it is a lot The idea being that the opponent has to respect the threat and spend resources to go deal with one battlefield Then you build up the other and re-equip and unless they have Ganking, it’s gonna be a problem when they’re stuck on the other side