Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (37%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (10%)
• Game Crash (7%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Americana	Glitches	9 hours ago
Rennes	Game Crash	2 days ago
Nantes	Glitches	5 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	6 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	7 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Terrance Nelson (@Kireilt) reported 12 seconds ago

  @Ganglosaxonnne While such bans have happened in the history of the Combine, I can't help but feel that this is CGL's excuse to get rid of the practice because certain writers find it personally problematic. It pisses me off that the DCMS is suddenly being portrayed as weakened. Especially when they haven't suffered as many egregious defeats as other instersteller powers. It goes against Era Report: 3145 and Shattered Fortress. Manpower shouldn't be a issue. Training shouldn't be a issue. Just get butts in cockpits. They'll get there training on the battlefield. There should lines of citizens ready to enlist. Why is CGL having Yori pussyfoot around when she clearly had plans to address these issues years before.

• 
  buzzeyeview (@buzzeyeview) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Update every two weeks it seems, I have update fatigue! Still not fixing the many issues BF6 has. What a joke!

• 
  TripssKi (@TripssKi03) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the damage fall off on full autos, it’s impossible to compete with the 2-3 shot DMRs

• 
  NoLimitToSavagery (@KillaRoy22) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Fix the damn lighting issue!!!! Legit about to stop playing this ****!

• 
  Blimp (@BenLP9) reported 8 minutes ago

  @PaulieBelfast @United24media @iEndure_4evr Ukraine is still flying jets.l - they certainly have a place. And Gripen is a flying radar and EW suite that will help inform the battlefield. +meteor AA is electronically "silent" and has huge range - would really help reduce FABs which continue to be a problem

• 
  Rev0verDrive (@Rev0verDrive) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Spectre_Report @Battlefield Which title? I know there's a disco for extended no response. But playing BF for 23 yrs I've never seen a bad ping forced disconnect. 99.9% of all servers ever running in the BF series where community run. They implement ping limits.

• 
  Abubakar Ameen (@AbubakarAmeen_) reported 14 minutes ago

  I understand, bro. My childhood was a battlefield too. But Allah taught me that broken roads do not lead to broken destinies. Some of His strongest servants were raised in storms, so they could become shelters for others.

• 
  一番 (@Sp4cePigz) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Easy fix, have the option to separate consoles from PC for cross play

• 
  🔝 Woop 💛 (@Woopmoder) reported 16 minutes ago

  every Thursday (last day off) I witness the same dread pass over me as I once again know that the battlefield (Work) is beckoning me unto its service (the time clock)

• 
  Shavetail Louie (@SchmukQatarlson) reported 22 minutes ago

  @s6_37f @K_CSG @Megatron_ron The Israelis have had NATO standard Link 16 since they became a Major Non NATO Ally in the late 80s. This is more about R&D, so both countries don't spend money solving the same problems on the battlefield. It eliminates waste and duplication of effort.

• 
  Daniel Vargas (@ghosthor109) reported 24 minutes ago

  @ElClaptain Dmz didn't work AT ALL... They need a Miracle ( specially because GTA 6 is coming and Dice finally start to fix for real Battlefield 6, so...). Good luck with that...

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 24 minutes ago

  Saying that players who don't like certain movement mechanics in Battlefield because they're just "bad at the game" is a non-sequitur. I agree, the movement isn't difficult, and killing players slide-jumping isn't either. That's not the issue. The real problem is this. - It changes the pace of combat and alters the feeling of gunfights to where they become less readable, and more annoying to play fundamentally; and more importantly: - It shifts the tone of Battlefield from the "grounded in authenticity" mantra Battlefield had, which players have come to expect from it in the market, to something much arcadier I'm happy to support more movement options as long as they fit an authenticity and believability line, but it seems even asking THAT is too much for some reason. We praise vehicle design when they move naturalistically, why is infantry combat an exception? The heart of the argument here is about Battlefield's tone, which affects how the gameplay is designed, not because some players can't "get good". You don't get players complaining about emergent movement mechanics in Rocket League, even from trash cans, because they expect it from the game's tone, Battlefield players do not. And no, citing bugs like BF3's aim stabilization jump, BF4's various movement exploits, etc. as prooftexts to justify any and all future crackhead movement mechanics in Battlefield, doesn't work either. Should we also then bring back Battlepacks just because they were in BF4 too? I get there are those of you that don't care about Battlefield's tone, therefore there is no "movement line" to cross, but you're ignoring massive swaths of players that DO care and will just straight up not play the game as a result, as you often recommend them to do. A vast amount of players come to Battlefield to play a combined arms military shooter with the "appearance of realism without being a simulator" gameplay loop that Battlefield UNIQUELY offered as a middle ground in the market, but EA and DICE have abandoned that middle ground to trend chase other games. This is why it's annoying and there's so much complaining about things like movement and skins. You can continue to attack the caricature of a 0.5 KD player crouch walking to bolster your position, but you still can't define a well-reasoned upper limit for movement mechanics because you DON'T have a standard. An appeal to the skill gap is not a standard, and it does not define an upper limit for movement whatsoever. What then would be keeping DICE from adding wall running, double jumps, or even phasing through walls if it can be argued those could potentially take a vague amount of skill to perform? The bounds are defined by Battlefield's supposed authentic tone, which has been erased in favoring of emulating other games. If you just enjoy Battlefield's metamorphosis into a movement slop shooter like every other FPS out there, that's fine. We can disagree. Just don't expect the franchise to be anything more than a cheap, more plasticky Call of Duty substitute going forward.

• 
  volodmire (@_sarkaz) reported 25 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm some of these answers like "actively looking into reticle brightness" dog, they've been an issue since the game launched. tf you mean i know they've gave us the ability to change reticle color, but it didn't fix the brightness issue.

• 
  AR (@arrasameer) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix your glitches

• 
  Don Elliott (@RealDonElliott) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Sony @PlayStation ZERO KILLS again in @Battlefield wtf is going on? Are you EVER going to fix the game/playstationpro?

• 
  Robbie K (@OSINToffenders) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You need to fix the cheaters and give everyone a console only option in redsec

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 30 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Trios need to be added before solos. This dev team is updating this game like chickens with heads cut off. There is no direction. Features that should be in game or modified, priorities are ******. Remove portal or leave out server browser. Hire a graphic designer to fix menus

• 
  JMa (@JJMaTrader) reported 30 minutes ago

  Q. wicks mean anything and why do a lot of traders "hate" them? seems like a skill issue. A. Candlestick wicks (or "shadows") are actionable indicators. They mark the highest and lowest prices an asset reached before buyers or sellers pushed it back. Wicks reveal market rejections, liquidity sweeps, and points where the "smart money" steps in to defend specific price levels. Why Do Traders "Hate" Wicks?Traders often despise wicks because they represent market chaos. The intense price action responsible for a long wick can frustrate traders for several distinct reasons: The "Fakeout" Trap: When a price appears to break out of a resistance zone, traders jump into a trade. An aggressive wick indicates the price failed to hold that breakout, violently reversing and stopping the trader out. Early Exits (Missing the Move): A trader might buy a breakout but panic-sell at the first sign of a downward wick, assuming a reversal. The market then reverses direction and surges, leaving the trader behind.No-Wick Confusion: Wicks establish a trading range that the market will likely return to in order to "fill" or rebalance. Candles without wicks mean aggressive, straight-line volume, which can sometimes lead to sharp pullbacks. Is it a "Skill Issue"? You are largely right—it comes down to a skill and psychology issue. Novice traders often look at the market blindly, trading based solely on the current tick rather than the broader story. Professional traders use wicks to read the battlefield. A long wick at a known support or resistance zone shows a rejection of that price level. If a trader misinterprets this "rejection" or "continuation" signal, they take a loss. Ultimately, mastering wicks requires moving from a "guesser" to a reader of price action. To help you read these signals better, tell me:What timeframes do you primarily trade (e.g., 5-minute, 1-hour, daily)?Are you having trouble entering trades, or are your trades getting stopped out by wicks? Same people that complain about "market inefficiencies" It's a f*cking living, breathing thing for God's sakes, not you're stupid, and "everything in order" celestial spheres model. Use 'em or complain about them. Whatever, I don't give a f*ck. Again, with the f*cking Market "Calvinists" that think everything should be measured, and calculated, and all decisions need to be fed through a statistical analysis matrix. You people probably wear latex gloves to ********...

• 
  ItzKingFTW (@Ammonw3Ward) reported 31 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Can Y’all please fix the Red Sec visual bug we shouldn’t have to deal with that on Ranked

• 
  Watchful Wolf (@TheWatchfulWolf) reported 33 minutes ago

  @muaxh03 Exactly. One of the biggest issues for many years now, even Battlefield has fallen victim to this.

• 
  0xAu (@0xAud) reported 34 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm It was simple. Remove bots and bring back proper servers with browser. Fix game breaking bugs on time.

• 
  THE RAINMAKER. (@AdigunJaji) reported 36 minutes ago

  Within that doorway, words cease to be bullets and become bandages. Scars cease to be sources of shame and become stories of survival. What once resembled a battlefield becomes a craftsman's workshop, where broken things are repaired rather than discarded. This is wisdom in

• 
  Bryan Schulz (@ChumThumb) reported 40 minutes ago

  @glennbeck The problem is Glenn we CANNOT beat them on the battlefield. We do not have the troops, we have no way of delivering them or equipment there, and no way of effectively resupplying them. Air campaigns do not win wars, especially when the other side has ballistic missiles.

• 
  🇬🇹(J.K.O.)🇲🇽 (@BlackIceSheep) reported 42 minutes ago

  @Voodoo_Hendrix "Battledads" are the safe fall guy catch all term for is ultimately a wider issue of the CoD brand trying desperately to appeal to other markets and not understanding that doesn't work. Battlefield and CoD should be different games but both EA and Activision just look foolish.

• 
  Iran Embassy in Slovenia (@IranSlovenia) reported 47 minutes ago

  The US Secretary of State's meeting in the Senate was spectacle!! The issue is not the mediators; it is the abuse of negotiations, and the US's lack of real will to negotiate leading to the result.Warmongers only talk about negotiation,negotiation is more difficult than war. 🔸The US negotiations with Iran are certainly complicated and difficult for them, because the goals of those who started the war have not been achieved and the gap between surrender and negotiation is obvious to those with common sense. 🔸 In the past year (a page of history), the United States has twice abandoned diplomacy and chosen the battlefield in the final stages of negotiations. 🔸 In the second war that the US launched against Iran (on Feb/28, alongside the Israeli regime), after 40 days and without success, the US returned to negotiations for the third time after requesting a ceasefire!! So a third return to war is also possible.

• 
  Fallen_Soul / Maxwell (Name Of The Muse) (@SimeonePrime) reported 52 minutes ago

  @NanashiSukii *While She Tries To Make A Run For It, She Doesn't Get Far. As Maxwell's Wing Wraps Around Her.* Jeez, Calm Down Sukii. Running Away From Your Problems {and the battlefield} Isn't Exactly The Best Idea.

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 53 minutes ago

  Fix your matchmaking so that I’m not put of defense 80% of the time in breakthrough and halfway through the match when people are already backing out because the teams are unbalanced. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Cow007 #🟦☦️ (@cow007) reported 54 minutes ago

  @ArchmagosKiran @HavryshkoMarta Because the other problem with this is there’s no way to win a ground war with an information war. You can’t meme your way out of an inferior structural position on the battlefield. So this reads a lot more like jacking off in front of people for social approval than it does actually doing anything. I know that metaphor reads as a little bit coarse, but how is this any different from what people do on only fans? (other than the fact that it doesn’t generate any revenue.) Has it occurred to you that if you are this emphatic about this position that your time might be better spent on the front lines?

• 
  Enlightened Rebel 🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 (@Enlitend_Rebel) reported 54 minutes ago

  @RTRRC88 Ok, so this sounds ****** as ****. Its a technology they can use to beam a voice over extremely long distances, it sounds like voices in your head. Hear me out here, there are actual ****** crazy people who have mental illness that believe this happens to them. I am not one of those. Ive been targeted for years now, and its nothing like what the crazy people who get all the attention describe. Ive had a guy walk up to me when I was in DC, never seen him before. He asked to stand next to me while i was sitting on a wall. I was like "sure." He wasnt with anyone. Out of nowhere he just goes "my teeth are cutting into my gums." Im sitting there, at the time I had broken teeth... Its just bizzare as ****, ok. I've also had people blurt out absurdly personal things about me. As if their minds were hijacked. It sounds like a bunch of bullshit. Many years ago the US military had been studying voice to skull technology to use in the battlefield. Its been around for a long time. Theyve also experimented with actually hijacking people's heads and making them do and say things outside of their control. If i hadn't personally witnessed these things, I would think its just totally ******* nuts. I've seen and experienced a lot more than most people though. Now they have nanotechnology that can non-invasively enter the human body, they claim its for medical science. That's slightly bullshit. People are unaware of how advanced their nanotech really is. Theyre always 10 or more years ahead in the technology they let us in on.

• 
  Operation LowcountryWildfire (@OpLowcountry) reported 57 minutes ago

  OPERATION LOWCOUNTRY WILDFIRE INTELLIGENCE EXTERNAL BRIEF FORCED REOPENING UNDER FIRE 03 JUNE 2026 Open Source Derived | Cross-Checked | Analytical Assessment | No Classified Inputs EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Iran theater has entered a new phase. The current structure is not clean de-escalation, but it has also not broken into full regional war. The best read is forced reopening under fire. The Strait of Hormuz is now the central test of the emerging framework. Washington is pushing to turn protected movement through the Strait into a formal open lane, with mine-clearing, military overwatch, maritime enforcement, and no-toll transit becoming core conditions rather than side issues. This matters because Hormuz is not just a waterway. It is leverage. Iran has used the Strait as pressure, while the United States is now trying to turn that pressure point into the first visible deliverable of any agreement. If ships move freely, mines are cleared, and Iran loses the ability to gatekeep passage, the framework gains real weight. If the Strait remains selective, threatened, or dependent on quiet military coordination, the agreement remains vulnerable. CURRENT OPERATIONAL PICTURE The Gulf has moved into an active enforcement and interception phase. Kuwait has taken confirmed casualties after missile and drone activity struck Kuwait International Airport, while Bahrain remains inside the defensive ring. U.S. forces continue to intercept threats and conduct precision responses against Iranian military nodes tied to the current escalation cycle. Iran is not simply walking away from diplomacy. Tehran is using pressure as negotiation. The Iranian economy remains under severe strain, with oil revenue, financial access, sanctions evasion routes, and internal stability all weighing heavily on the regime. The IRGC cannot accept a framework that looks like surrender. It needs leverage preserved, resistance language intact, and enough battlefield pressure to claim it was not forced into concessions. That is why the current pattern looks contradictory from the outside. Talks continue while missiles fly. Hormuz is discussed while ships move under pressure. Sanctions expand while Iran claims retaliation and the United States keeps military pressure in place. This is not contradiction. It is coercive bargaining. INTERNAL IRANIAN PRESSURE The deeper issue inside Iran remains the power structure. The formal state is still visible, but the coercive state appears dominant. The IRGC remains the central actor across security, maritime pressure, missile activity, internal control, and sanctions evasion networks. Civilian authority appears weakened. Public anger remains real in many segments of Iranian society, but fear and repression continue to limit open action. This creates an unstable balance between a population under strain, a formal state seeking relief, and a security apparatus trying to preserve its role. Iran needs a deal, but the IRGC needs not to look like it needs a deal. The United States wants compliance before relief, while Iran wants relief before surrendering leverage. Gulf states want open shipping without becoming the battlefield, while Israel wants continued freedom of action against Iranian proxies and infrastructure. STRATEGIC ASSESSMENT The current phase is a hot middle zone. It is not peace, but it is not full blowout. It is pressure. The most important watch points are now clear. The first is whether Kuwait sees another wave. The second is whether U.S. strikes remain limited to Qeshm-style military nodes or expand deeper. The third is whether Hormuz transit becomes openly normalized or remains selective and protected. The fourth is whether Iran accepts a framework or continues using pressure to alter the terms. The answers to those questions will determine whether this becomes a managed reopening or the next escalation ladder. FINAL READ The banks have not broken, but the tide is moving. King of Cainhoy 🇺🇸🔥 🔥