Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Battlefield 6. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.
- Sign in (43%)
- Online Play (28%)
- Glitches (14%)
- Game Crash (8%)
- Matchmaking (6%)
- Hacking / Cheating (0%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Online Play | 3 days ago |
|
|
Sign in | 4 days ago |
|
|
Online Play | 4 days ago |
|
|
Sign in | 5 days ago |
|
|
Sign in | 7 days ago |
|
|
Online Play | 7 days ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Battlefield 6 Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Conaire (@TheNotoriousCOB) reported@PalmyrPar The only problem is I feel the gameplay falls off after act 2. The “sneaking through a battlefield” gameplay of the first 2 acts is so good, but you get none of it in the final 60% of the game
-
PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reportedkeeps a special apostolic strategy from becoming a universal command used by stingy churches to starve faithful labourers. Why, then, did Paul decline Corinthian support? First Corinthians 9:12 gives one reason: “we have not used this power; but suffer all things, lest we should hinder the gospel of Christ.” Second Corinthians 11:12 adds another: Paul intended to “cut off occasion from them which desire occasion.” False apostles were watching for anything they could twist against him. Paul therefore removed financial suspicion from the battlefield. He would rather sacrifice his right than let greedy counterfeits turn his liberty into ammunition. That is mature Christianity. The flesh asks only, “Am I entitled to this?” Grace asks, “What will exercising this right do to the testimony?” Paul understood that a legitimate liberty can sometimes be surrendered for a greater spiritual purpose. Christian liberty is not the freedom to insist upon yourself; it is the freedom to lay something down when Christ’s interest requires it. The strongest proof that a man possesses a right is sometimes his willingness not to use it. Paul’s refusal to burden Corinth also separates shepherding from exploitation. Second Corinthians 11:20 had exposed false leaders who could “devour you” and “take of you.” Paul operates in the opposite direction. He does not approach Corinth wondering how much value can be extracted from them. His next phrase tells us exactly what he wants, and it is not their wallet. “for I seek not yours, but you:” This is the heart of the verse: “for I seek not yours, but you.” Few sentences expose false ministry more quickly. Paul distinguishes between what people possess and the people themselves. He is not primarily seeking Corinth’s money, resources, influence, labour, property, or usefulness to his own reputation. He wants the Corinthians spiritually. He seeks their restoration, growth, obedience, doctrinal stability, purity, and usefulness to Christ. That does not mean material giving has no spiritual place. Philippians supported Paul, and he received their generosity gratefully. Yet even there Paul wrote in Philippians 4:17, “Not because I desire a gift: but I desire fruit that may abound to your account.” Paul could receive the gift while caring more about the giver’s spiritual fruit than the money entering his hands. That is the difference between ministry and merchandising. A hireling sees souls attached to resources; a shepherd sees resources as tools for helping souls. The phrase also confronts modern religious celebrity culture. A ministry can begin using people without ever asking directly for money. Followers can become numbers proving influence. Testimonies can become advertising material. Volunteers can become unpaid machinery feeding a brand. Congregations can become audiences whose chief function is making the leader feel important. Paul says, “I seek not yours, but you.” He wants people brought under Christ, not people brought under Paul as personal property. This principle is especially important because Paul had genuine authority. If anybody could have exploited apostolic status, Paul could have done it convincingly. Yet he refuses to convert authority into ownership. First Corinthians 3:5 asks, “Who then is Paul, and who is Apollos, but ministers by whom ye believed?” Ministers are servants, not masters of the saints. Christ purchased the church with His blood; no preacher gets to behave as though the flock came with his name on the title deed. There is also a salvation-and-service distinction here. Paul is not seeking Corinth so he can become their saviour. Christ alone saves. Paul had already written in 1 Corinthians 3:6, “I have planted, Apollos watered; but God gave the increase.” His pastoral desire concerns their spiritual welfare after the gospel has reached them. A faithful minister can care intensely about souls without confusing that care with the saving work only Christ can accomplish.
-
yes i know, no i yes, yes no yes (@tulsidaskhan170) reported@CeraGibson Saw some **** tweeting here about how they used to play the battlefield (a war game btw) as a kid without any thoughts and how growing up and going back to the game made them realise its “problems” which was basically people getting shot in a WAR game.
-
Andrew Lydiard (@andrewlydiard) reported@grvmpss @Tremourx47 @BattlefieldComm It's been that way for months. It's not like we didn't use it for that time. It's not a **** you, it was a free item that wasn't terribly difficult to obtain. You didn't purchase anything. This is better for the health of the game (albeit lightly so given other issues).
-
Silver (@SilverSypitzki) reported@jane_ethan12 ChatGPT: Why did the IDF destroy and damage so many buildings in Gaza? Whatever one’s view of the legality or proportionality of Israel’s actions, it is important to understand the military reasoning the IDF has given for the enormous amount of destruction in Gaza. Gaza is an exceptionally dense urban battlefield, with Hamas and other armed groups operating a large underground tunnel network beneath and alongside civilian infrastructure. The IDF has repeatedly reported finding tunnel entrances, command centers, weapons storage facilities, explosives and booby-trapped buildings in residential areas. From a military perspective, this created several serious problems. Tunnels: Tunnel entrances were frequently located inside or underneath buildings. Destroying the structure above or around a tunnel could be necessary to expose, collapse or neutralize the underground network and prevent fighters from using it to infiltrate Israeli forces. Booby-trapped buildings: Israeli ground forces repeatedly encountered houses and other structures containing explosives, hidden charges and prepared ambushes. Entering such buildings could put soldiers at extreme risk. In some circumstances, destroying a building from a distance was considered safer than sending troops inside. Sniper and observation positions: Tall buildings provide an enormous tactical advantage in dense urban combat. They can be used for observation, sniper fire, directing attacks and monitoring the movement of troops. Removing such positions can therefore be an important part of protecting advancing soldiers. Weapons and rocket infrastructure: The IDF has reported weapons depots, rocket-launching positions, weapons-production facilities and military command infrastructure inside or adjacent to civilian buildings. Once a civilian structure is being used for military purposes, it can become directly relevant to military operations. Creating safe movement corridors: In some areas, Israeli forces had to clear routes through extremely dense urban environments. Buildings close to military positions could provide concealed firing points or places from which explosives could be deployed. Demolishing structures could therefore be used to reduce the risk to troops and make movement through an area possible. Preventing Hamas from returning to cleared areas: In some operations, destruction was also intended to remove underground infrastructure and military positions that could otherwise be reused after Israeli forces had moved through an area. None of this means that every destroyed building necessarily contained Hamas infrastructure, nor does a military explanation by itself establish that every individual attack was lawful or proportionate. But it does explain why the destruction was on such an extraordinary scale. The central military reality Israel faced was that the battlefield was not simply a collection of buildings. It was a dense urban environment in which military infrastructure, tunnels, weapons, explosives and combat positions were frequently located within or beneath civilian areas. For Israeli soldiers moving through these areas, leaving buildings standing could sometimes mean leaving behind potential sniper positions, observation posts, booby traps, tunnel entrances or concealed fighters. Understanding that military logic is essential to understanding the scale of the destruction — even for people who ultimately reach different conclusions about whether particular operations were justified or lawful.
-
RedWhiteandBlue (@fulltankss) reported@NoToMisogyny @Ainemba92293842 Who fixes your car? Who built the house you live in? Who constructed the roads and bridges. Who fixes the power lines? Who fights and dies on the battlefield for your freedom. You aren’t worthy of a man with that attitude. I wouldn’t fix your car or house or anything.
-
Kate from Kharkiv (@BohuslavskaKate) reportedSTUBB: Putin is not winning this war, and won't win. Ukraine has, de facto, already won this war. It’s as simple as that. Putin made colossal mistake by invading Ukraine in the first place. He underestimated Ukrainian army, its response. He overestimated his military capacity, or we wouldn't be 4.5 years into this war with the losses he's suffered. Putin also underestimated unity and support of the West. You know, we’re still here, and we’re not going away. There seems to be a lack of honest people around Putin who can tell him about real situation on the battlefield. And that's the problem. I mean, Putin will not win this war. That’s why I think it would be good to stop the killing.
-
Natsu Milk Drinker|BRAVELY REMASTER STEAM🏳️🌈💕 (@NoCureForEvil) reportedBall and Gun ****** need to get off yhat dogshit FPS/sports ****. Play your 2nd game instead of rotating around Halo, Battlefield, , NBA/madden and COD. Maybe that'll fix your attention span and jealousy issues towards RPGs actually being good. 😭✋🏿
-
panopticon (@harrypanopticon) reported@ghostof_bb Labor fans hate that the truth is recorded as it makes them defenceless regardless if evidence is admissible or not. They know the truth is recorded. No spin. They desperately try with putting up posters in government buildings linking it to privacy of staff. But the issue is if breached and the truth is recorded, it also becomes evidential that recording was justified and required. This will become a complete battlefield, especially as the biggest party who breaches privacy is our government.
-
KILL_J0HN091 (@GAMER_1411) reported@Battlefield Fix the damm audio bug/mix/blend where lobby BGM AND MULTIPLAYER OR REDSEC PLAY BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. Ita fking annoying
-
Orlando Victor (@OrlandoVictor54) reported@lavitx Whatever side of the debate we’re on, I think the important part is to stay curious, look at reliable evidence, question assumptions, and avoid turning environmental issues into another ideological battlefield. 🌍 We all have an interest in leaving a healthier planet behind us.
-
The Vector Brief (@vectorbrief) reportedNBA 2K27 IS TURNING THE VIRTUAL HARDWOOD INTO A HIGH-STAKES BATTLEFIELD The annual dance of sports titles usually brings incremental, barely noticeable tweaks. But with the latest shifts in NBA 2K27, Take-Two is finally addressing the mechanical bloat that has plagued the franchise for years. By overhauling both offensive spacing and defensive reactivity, they are clearly trying to solve the "meta" problem where one or two cheese moves define the entire competitive scene. It is a desperate attempt to keep the hardcore player base from jumping ship. Realism is often the enemy of accessibility, yet here we are watching developers trade arcade-style flash for granular, physics-based control. If these adjustments land, the game might actually reward basketball IQ instead of just exploiting engine glitches. We are watching a billion-dollar legacy title fight for its relevance in an era where gamers have zero patience for recycled code. Will tighter defensive logic finally kill the toxic three-point spam culture? Source: IGN $TTWO
-
Michael Brasher (@2ndMississippi) reportedToo Tired to Run Richmond, Kentucky, and the six weeks a total victory bought Richmond, Kentucky - 30 August 1862 There is a kind of victory so complete it becomes its own kind of warning, and Richmond, Kentucky was that kind. Kirby Smith did not know it yet, standing in the dust south of town on the morning of the 30th, listening to his guns open on a line of Indiana farm boys who had never heard a shot fired in anger. He knew only that the position in front of him - Mount Zion Church, a screen of raw troops under Mahlon Manson - was there to be broken, and that breaking it would open the whole of the Bluegrass like a door swinging wide on an empty room. The Federals had no business holding that ground and everyone on both sides of the line understood it. Bull Nelson's Army of Kentucky was ninety-day men, farm hands in uniform three weeks, stiffened by a scattering of veterans and not much else. Charles Cruft would say afterward that it was fifteen thousand veterans falling on sixty-two hundred citizens who did not know what war was. The arithmetic was closer to even than that. Smith brought something near sixty-five hundred himself, but the arithmetic was not the point. Cleburne's men had fought at Shiloh. Manson's men had fought nowhere at all. Smith reached the field a little after seven that morning and did what a soldier who has read the ground correctly always does: he refused the obvious blow and reached for the flank instead. A straight push up the Old State Road would have cost him men he could not spare this deep into hostile country with Heth's division still coming up behind him. So he sent Churchill's brigade under Thomas McCray west, down a hidden farm track that would come to be called, in the modest way these things get named after the fact, Churchill's Draw. Cleburne held the front and waited. It was in that waiting that the day's cruelest single moment fell, and it fell on Cleburne himself. A ball through the face, teeth lost, the jaw shattered, the man carried from the field at the exact hour his judgment was most needed. Smith's report called it a wound that cost him, at the moment of crisis, one of the most gallant, zealous, and intelligent officers of the army. He did not say it to flatter a subordinate. He said it because it was true. McCray came out of the draw onto Manson's exposed right at the moment Manson himself was shifting weight the other way, toward pressure on his left that he mistook for the main blow. A general is supposed to know which flank is being tested and which is only being teased. Manson did not. The line at Mount Zion folded inward from both ends at once, the way paper folds when you press two corners toward the middle. It did not hold. What followed was not one battle but three, fought over the same six miles of pike in a single afternoon, each one shorter and more hopeless than the last. The Federals rallied at White's Farm and lasted perhaps half an hour before that line went too. They rallied a third time on the edge of Richmond itself, at the cemetery, with Nelson now on the field in person and something near twenty-two hundred men in the ranks, some of them still fresh, most of them already broken in spirit if not yet in body. Smith formed three brigades into a single line more than half a mile across and sent them forward across open ground into what he himself, in the flattest sentence in his entire report, called a magnificent position manned by an enemy who outnumbered him. His men were too exhausted to run. They walked. They carried it in fifteen minutes. Nelson took a ball in the thigh and got away in a cornfield and borrowed clothes. The general fled the field his own army had just ceased to exist defending, and he did it dressed as somebody else. Manson did not get away. He rode into the arms of John Scott's cavalry, which had spent the day exactly where a good cavalry commander puts himself when infantry is doing the killing — across the roads the beaten army would have to use to escape. Scott's report used the word ambuscade, and it was not an exaggeration. A column of some five thousand fleeing men and nine guns rode into a fire that rolled down the line from one end to the other, and what did not fall surrendered entire. Scott called it a ten-acre lot full of prisoners. It was very nearly the whole Union command. Two days later Smith rode into Lexington to find no one there to stop him, and told the crowd that gathered that his army came not as invaders but as liberators. On the third of September Confederate soldiers raised their flag over the capitol at Frankfort, the only Union state capital a Confederate army would ever hold, and church bells rang, and Smith wrote home that he believed twenty-five thousand Kentuckians would take up arms once rifles could be found for them. They did not come. Kentucky's hearts were with the Confederacy, he wrote later, but her blue-grass and her fat cattle were not. Bragg was two days gone from Chattanooga by the time Richmond was fought, marching toward Munfordville by way of Sparta and Glasgow instead of toward Smith. The junction that was meant to crush Buell between two Confederate armies never came. Perryville came instead, in October, a tactical draw dressed as neither victory nor defeat, and after it Bragg turned south for Cumberland Gap. Smith had no choice left but to follow him home. Richmond had been as complete a battlefield victory as the war produced on either side. Nearly a whole Union army went into the ground or into a Confederate prison camp in a single afternoon. It bought Kirby Smith six weeks in Kentucky and nothing more. The men who died getting it right at Mount Zion Church and White's Farm and the Richmond Cemetery never knew that the campaign their deaths had opened would close again before winter. Kentucky would still be Union ground. ****************************** Graphics: 1) Major General Kirby Smith; 2) Brigadier General Patrick Cleburne; 3) "Cannae in the Bluegrass State" by Keith Rocco - Battle of Richmond, KY; 4) Tactical Map - Battle of Richmond
-
Dustin Paine (@grizzgolf) reported@BattlefieldComm Zero issues fixed.
-
DJ North (@KarmaKarhu) reported@ENOLODIEA @Battlefield King of the Hill second challenge was crazy too. It's only 2 out of 5 but 6,000 score in a match was way too much. Almost never saw it, either side. Problem cause every other challenge isn't in line.
-
car_run_jah (@car_run_jah) reported@Zingoorr I don't think Arya getting the kill was the problem. It's how the kill happened we spent 8 seasons building up this guy and what a threat he posed only for him to take to the battlefield and have his story end so anticlimactically like it was rushed or sum.
-
Hoseki (@BerasFigaro) reported@Papan01art @adeleke37686 They fixed the manga with this, because for the longest she was the worst character in bleach nothing but making problems for the main cast by simply being present where she shouldn’t the battlefield, a healer should know their role and when to appear. Thank god they fix that..
-
Lt Gen H S Panag(R) (@rwac48) reported@dperi84 That is factual. Real issue is cost effectiveness in times of less than $500 drones. Have you heard of Javelin in Ukraine wef 2023? In 2022 it was the mainstay. Now, one more weapon on battlefield. In my view the deal is to keep defence ties going.
-
𝐵𝑖𝑙𝑏𝑜 𝑇𝐵𝑎𝑔𝑔𝑖𝑛𝑠 (@BilboTBaggins85) reported@Mallowed LMFAO, Battlefield has it's ****** issues, but god damn this looks wholly unfun.
-
Voice for the truth (@voiceofztruth) reported@benshapiro @benshapiro forget about the Hareidim. Do you believe it’s ok to force people to fight on the battlefield or be conscripted to service against their will? It’s hard for me to digest.
-
Comrade (@ISHOLA_26) reported@LawalVic That’s the terrifying part. 😭 Sentry actually going all-out would be a completely different fight. The moment he stops holding back, the entire battlefield is in serious trouble. 💀⚡
-
enricoo42sant (@YbBarcaynadamas) reported@BattlefieldComm In battlegield hardline on pc since yesterday we can't play dlc map or had dlc content fix it @BattlefieldComm
-
! (@imlilpec) reported@RavenSoftware ngl I love yall but yall better fix up with warzone after this beta we not asking for too much we want a game just like mw3 warzone is it too much to ask? Cus yeah this warzone ain’t looking like warzone its looking like battlefield redsec
-
Mɪss Bʟᴜᴇ. (@_aoaoaozaki) reported@SaberCobalt @AVENGEDHISTORY @SCR1PTEDW0NDER — attention drawn to the long-ranged fighters, the whole battlefield dynamic would shift like a game board tipping sideways. “This is trouble… one’s inexperienced, the other is a Servant.” She pushed the thought aside and moved. Starbow blazed ahead of her, a streak of —
-
Jared (@The_Scrinn) reported@Battlefield fix your ******* rockets for **** sake
-
SyndromeStoned (@SyndromeStoned) reported@BattlefieldComm Have had a real problem connecting to my favorite hard-core servers over the last 2 days
-
Probably_Undesirable (@cbts2026) reported@OffGuardian0 In a sea of outrageously good OG takes, this is a rather bad one. Strip away the ‘killer robot’ hyperbole and what lies underneath? IDF operates (Gaza since 2023) Lavender (AI kill-list generator based on phone data, WhatsApp groups, proximity signals) and The Gospel (marks buildings for bombing). A Where’s Daddy? (tracks targets to their homes.) Error rate reportedly 10%. ‘Sorry.’ Palantir’s Maven is the Pentagon’s primary AI operating system. Karp - ‘Maven takes very valuable LLMs and makes them actually lethal and useful in the battlefield.’ An autonomous weapons market that’s valued at $20b in 2026, projected to reach $30b by 2030. This shouldn’t be monitored or restricted? Yes there’s currently ‘a human in the loop’ - on Lavender they spent about 20 seconds per target rubber stamping AI recommendations. But what’s the alternative to not placing restrictions on autonomous weapons? And this is the public-facing tip of the iceberg.
-
Farlans (@farlansangel) reported@IMJasonRhode fix the bugged sound. especially warzone. footsteps are just not there. sound effects way to loud even with turning down. it feels like i have wartapes from battlefield on. maybe this is battlecod?
-
OSINTDesk (@INDOSINTDESK) reportedWar is back on. One-month lull broken. US hit IRGC launchers on Larak Island. Iran answered with ballistic missiles and drones on 2 US-hosted bases in Jordan. King Hussein and Muwaffaq Salti (Azraq). Jordan: 8 missiles intercepted. Squeeze Hormuz, and US bases become the battlefield. 🇮🇳🔥
-
Illuminaughty (@mariemonsterr) reported2nd sector in Cairo Bazaar is ridiculous. The attacking team HQ is the same HQ area in the 1st sector & enemies have access to the previous objectives. Last sector there's only 1 way to b if enemy takes b. Could've fixed that but fixed something not broken. @Battlefield