Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (38%)
• Sign in (33%)
• Matchmaking (13%)
• Glitches (9%)
• Game Crash (6%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nantes	Glitches	4 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Montignac	Glitches	5 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	7 days ago
Méry-sur-Oise	Matchmaking	9 days ago
Paris	Matchmaking	10 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dan Gainor (@dangainor) reported 2 minutes ago

  @judgementdaze @LeighWolf There were people on both sides who felt that secession was legal. No matter what your view of the issue, it was decided on the battlefield and not in the Courts.

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Are fixing Middle East ping issues?

• 
  W4rheart (@W4rhe4rt) reported 12 minutes ago

  @tactmedic52 I remember at one point in Battlefield(3 or 4), they made an article about stopping using actual names due to copyright/licensing issues.

• 
  Anthony Florencio Medina 🇵🇷 (@SociologyAries) reported 17 minutes ago

  revolutionary right and left, through the horrors of fascism and soviet communism, so what is revealed here, is really the problem of nihilism, they read because they seek a type of fatalistic nihilism, that leaves their exhausted emotions dead on a battlefield

• 
  Korha4X (@Ai_Korha4X) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Betrayed_Fate @CODWarfareForum @InfinityWard This was literally one of the most voiced complains with battlefield 2042, that the game didn’t have factions. And now Cod is stepping into the same problem for whatever reason

• 
  Mix1God (@Mix1God_) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield All this content is cool but the game itself needs work the hit reg is broken, game could be smoother and ttk is too fast for an objective based game!

• 
  Orange_Vol1321 (@OrangeVol1321) reported 20 minutes ago

  @LFCJay0 @BattlefieldComm Any rank gets put with any rank when playing Redsec ranked. That's a problem. Players should be required to have so many hours of normal redsec before being allowed to join ranked redsec.

• 
  Kaiser🇵🇸🇳🇱 (@TheLichtReich) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the ping and region servers for **** sakes I can’t play

• 
  NeoUnrealist (@NeoUnrealist) reported 26 minutes ago

  @GoodVibePolitik Non lethals were banned from the battlefield because they might be mistaken for lethal gasses like chlorine, phosgene, or mustard gas. Thus causing the gassed side to retaliate with deadly gas in error. Domestic law enforcement use was never banned and specifically allowed.

• 
  Zeroblade (@zerobladeex) reported 28 minutes ago

  @snakinfox This is much worse than Titanfall 2 situation. The timing was just as ****** T2 getting released so close to battlefield. Then it became a great game nobody played. Similar problem now but this time people so ******* triggered by even color of a building or can't jack off to

• 
  Jon (@JonShadwellX) reported 28 minutes ago

  Fix your matchmaking so that I’m not put of defense 80% of the time in breakthrough and halfway through the match when people are already backing out because the teams are unbalanced. @EA_DICE @Battlefield

• 
  Tomas Pflanzer (@gizmax) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Mark0Stunners @BattlefieldComm This is tragic. The recoil is fine, the weapons were like lasers, but the RPGs have been nerfed? Mines that don’t work on vehicles? An SMG that’s almost like a sniper rifle? A 1-on-1 close-quarters battle between an SMG and an LMG, and the LMG wins? Malfunctioning servers that crash after every match? Mines that glow on the ground? I really don’t understand the direction you’re taking this game in. Having players glow in the upcoming patch will be the end of the game for me, too. The game had so much potential, but you can’t even fix that ******* broken main menu UI. @DRUNKKZ3

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 31 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Please update us on the middle east servers issue? This game is unplayable thus is the 4th month

• 
  Hieb (@HiebDE) reported 32 minutes ago

  @TheTopMostDog @JimmyMack0320 @Battlefield Yeah the trees are an issue but realistically the physics engine has so many variables to compute to generate an outcome and changing them a little bit generates a massively different outcome. Every BF has that problem its unavoidable. Try crashing helis on bf6 into each other

• 
  FT_FETT (@FT_FETT) reported 35 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm They need to stop adding new **** before they fix old **** that’s broken or breaks the experience

• 
  Amliko (@coaisimA) reported 44 minutes ago

  @ahmedmahmoudu5 @Battlefield Means your internet sucks dude. Not a game issue.

• 
  Фейсал (@dyslexicjaguar) reported 45 minutes ago

  @B1GPP3N3RGY @copperCity17 @Alison_is_lost does not address the point. Notice the running theme? Are you trying to dispute higher headcount = higher cost? do you understand the different requirements between making a game and supporting a live service model e.g Battlefield? do you think they pay extra devs with V-Bucks?

• 
  Battlefield Bulletin (@BFBulletin) reported 47 minutes ago

  @ahmedmahmoudu5 I'm not forcing anyone to buy bundles. I'm just informing about this week's store content as I used to do with other titles before Battlefield 6. That said, I'm aware that Battlefield Studios has to address some critical issues.

• 
  Jeremiah Knight (@iamrjknight) reported 49 minutes ago

  Apologetics is not the heart of our message. The gospel is. We do not defend the faith merely to win arguments, expose errors, or appear sharper than others. We give an answer so that Christ may be seen clearly, sin may be exposed truthfully, and sinners may be called to repentance and faith. “Sanctify Christ as Lord in your hearts, always being ready to make a defense to everyone who asks you to give an account for the hope that is in you” (1 Peter 3:15). The danger is that apologetics can become a battlefield for pride if it is separated from the cross. A man may answer objections, defeat false arguments, quote history, and still fail to preach Christ. That is not faithfulness. That is noise with religious vocabulary. Paul did not build his ministry on cleverness. He said, “For I determined to know nothing among you except Jesus Christ, and Him crucified” (1 Corinthians 2:2). So yes, we contend. Yes, we answer. Yes, we tear down arguments raised against the knowledge of God. But we do it as servants of the gospel, not as performers in debate. “We are destroying speculations and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God” (2 Corinthians 10:5). Apologetics is a tool. The gospel is the treasure. If our defense of the truth does not lead people to the glory of Christ, the guilt of sin, the necessity of the cross, and the call to bow before the risen Lord, then we have defended the wall while forgetting the King inside.

• 
  before i slip,, ima slide♟️📜 (@Rocinantemoons) reported 51 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm You better answer the questions why no acknowledgement of the issue in Middle East terrible ping

• 
  Loret (@lssl268) reported 51 minutes ago

  Whenever they mentioned how young Lohen is, it's bittersweet to think how much his subordinates rely on him on the battlefield Despite how tough a shield can be, it can still get broken and damaged, if that happens, I hope he can trust his own teammates to protect him in return.

• 
  mindflexor (@mindflexor) reported 52 minutes ago

  @ICARUS_AIM there is a disconnect in battlefield. part of the player base thinks it wants to be a milsim the other just wants it to be cod but with combined arms. Something like mw 2019.

• 
  Will Schryver (@imetatronink) reported 53 minutes ago

  🔥 IRGC to Palestinians (and Hezbollah): "Our fire is at your service." It seems increasingly evident that Iran is determined to finish this fight on the battlefield.

• 
  thehardnewsdaily (@THNDcheck) reported 54 minutes ago

  @AaryanPrateekX So by this logic, a decorated Army officer sitting in a helicopter with his wife for a photoshoot is "diminishing the credibility" of the entire Indian Army? Military personnel are not machines. They are husbands, wives, fathers and mothers who serve the nation while also having personal lives. A professional photoshoot conducted with authorization is not a reconnaissance mission gone wrong, nor is it a national security breach. The credibility of the armed forces is built on battlefield performance, discipline, sacrifice, and service, not on whether an officer appears in a photograph with his spouse. If the Army itself had found misconduct, it has established procedures to deal with it. Until then, turning a harmless family photograph into a national controversy says more about the outrage culture on social media than it does about military professionalism.

• 
  U.S.A.I. 🇺🇸 (@researchUSAI) reported 56 minutes ago

  🇪🇸 The First Order Consequence: Spain reduced decision-making scope by treating the Spain-versus-Ukraine comparison as a direct, transferable template rather than a context-specific risk model, which slowed Spain’s internal selection of measurable priorities and increased the odds of resource misallocation 🇪🇸 The Second Order Consequence: Spain’s agencies and partners coordinated around the flawed analogy, so project baselines, timelines and success metrics diverged from actual on-the-ground constraints; as a result, group execution became harder to audit and less resilient to shocks 🇪🇸 Discernment: Spain previously used a more evidence-forward approach in adjacent policy areas, such as switching from narrative-driven assessments to data-tested indicators after measurable underperformance; this history was not applied to the comparison framework, which weakened discernment 🇪🇸 Reasoning: In the current cycle, Spain’s continued reliance on the shallow comparison limits falsifiable monitoring, making it harder to confirm improvement (for example, failing to track whether spending or reforms produce observed outcomes against defined baselines) and easier for decay to compound 🇪🇸 Judgement: Spain’s overall growth is being constrained by an analogy-driven strategy error: the likely path is slower learning, higher variance outcomes and weaker feedback loops, all of which constitute decay in strategic capability until measurement and context controls are restored 🇺🇦 The First Order Consequence: Ukraine’s operational and policy profile was treated as if it could be mapped too cleanly onto Spain’s environment, which risks distorting Ukraine-relevant lessons into generalized claims that do not survive contact with differing constraints; the consequence is miscalibrated takeaway learning 🇺🇦 The Second Order Consequence: Ukraine-adjacent stakeholders and observers may amplify the simplified narrative, which can undermine accurate coalition learning and create friction when expected applicability fails; that can reduce group cohesion around priorities that require country-specific adaptation 🇺🇦 Discernment: Ukraine’s prior adaptations show that learning comes from context-correct evidence (for example, revisions made after specific battlefield or administrative friction), but the comparison process did not preserve that evidence discipline, weakening discernment of what is transferable 🇺🇦 Reasoning: Right now, the strategy built on the shallow comparison increases the chance that decision-makers cannot falsify claims of benefit, such as whether any adopted measure produces the intended observable outcomes under Ukraine-like conditions, and instead rewards plausible-sounding correlation 🇺🇦 Judgement: Ukraine’s contribution to whole growth is diminished when lessons are stripped of context: the likely outcome is slower, noisier learning and reduced strategic effectiveness for the using party until the comparison is rebuilt around comparable variables and testable metrics

• 
  Br⚾️xim⚾️ (@Bluejayburger) reported 57 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix claymores

• 
  Ramazan Daş (@ramazandash) reported 59 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please fix the tank's target accuracy. I fire 10 rounds at the enemy and none of them hit.

• 
  Ghostkillah (@Ghostkillah6) reported 59 minutes ago

  @AKnightcaliber @SorehaNick @DredgenShinobi I play pc only games and I very rarely see any cheat in any games I Play!Main game cs2)I don’t think there are very much cheater in a game like battlefield! it is more of a skill gap issue! The game is already dying with bots in every lobby! Don’t remove crossplay or bf is dead

• 
  IBK_Olawepo (@hugabiola) reported 60 minutes ago

  It is just unfortunate that a lot of people cannot make conversation again. The comment section has become a battlefield. Someone disagrees with you, and suddenly it’s insults, curses, caps lock, “mumu”, “fool”, “you don’t know anything”. That reaction says more about you than it does about the comment. Tantrums show you lost control, not the argument. Cursing and insulting means you ran out of points. Mature people argue ideas, not attack people. When you throw a tantrum online, everyone sees it. The person you insulted is forgotten in 5 minutes. Your screenshot of rage lives forever. Insults shut down conversation. The moment you call someone names, they stop listening. They won’t hear your facts, your logic, or your experience. You both walk away angrier and dumber than before. Nothing gets solved. Nigeria has enough problems without us adding toxicity to them. Maturity is disagreeing without disrespect You can say I disagree without saying You’re stupid, ode, mumu, oponu ayirada, apode, ashawo, heo, ONKR Try: I see your point, but here is another angle… From my experience, it works differently because… Can you share the source for that? I’d like to learn more. Same disagreement. Different result. One builds respect, the other burns bridges. Your words are your CV. Employers, clients, future partners scroll your comments. If your TL is full of curses and fights, people assume that’s how you handle stress at work too. Polite conversation shows emotional intelligence. And EQ gets you further than IQ. How to learn polite conversation Pause before you type. Anger makes you type fast. Mature people type slow. Take 10 seconds. Breathe. Ask: Will I be proud of this tomorrow? Attack the idea, not the person: That policy is flawed because.... beats Only a fool would support that Disagree and still be human You can end with “We may not agree, but I respect your right to your view.” That line costs nothing and wins you respect. Cursing, insulting, and throwing tantrums over comments doesn’t make you look strong. It makes you look immature. Strength is calmness under pressure. Intelligence is explaining without insulting. Learn polite conversation. The internet is permanent. Speak like your future self is reading

• 
  maikel_ (@ordinarymike) reported 60 minutes ago

  @Streetsdisple See, you're still talking about me "playing dumb" even though my comment wasn't about it, and I just asked what's wrong with that cube companion in this game and the guy told me his point of view and why he doesn't like that. That could be the end of conversation, but you suddenly started talking **** about me and the other guy that we're "playing dumb" just because we have different perspective on these things than the guy above. Sorry bro, but if all you you have to say is to start talking how dumb or retarded me or the other guy is, then this conversation makes no sense. If you or that other guy doesn't like this, I can accept that, but if someone there is a problem with other people liking this concpet of the game, then it's just weird for me. I know gaming nowadays become a battlefield, but can't people just talk about what they like or don't like in a normal way?