Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (33%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nantes	Online Play	12 hours ago
Bitche	Game Crash	3 days ago
Paris	Game Crash	4 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	5 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	5 days ago
Paris	Online Play	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ADIANKAIBANYY (@ADIANKAIBA22) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Baldnewsnetwork Because none of you are for the future did you know which you didn’t obviously but did you know that it cost Sony $780M to make and ship physical games to retailers and they save all that money we can actually get new IPs new games new stories to experience instead of Call of dukie bullshit for the 500th time or battlefield or Fortnite or any live service games that’s gettting $100M to $500M to make

• 
  GAU (@deaidua) reported 7 minutes ago

  @ButtjerFreimann @drlorenzmeier @Farmerberater While I agree with you that so far I haven't encountered any actually battlefield swarm deployments and this capability is right now mostly PR, one also has to consider that companies have to start somewhere. Test, trial and error now so it can be used in a real-world scenario tomorrow (meaning in months or years).

• 
  BALA (@pestersebester) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Battlefield 6 is the only game crashing on my PC. RX 6700 XT, clean drivers with DDU, fresh install, overlays disabled, and it still freezes/crashes unless I disable XMP and run DDR5 at stock speed. Fix your stupid *** game.

• 
  Dave (@ThoughtEngaged) reported 9 minutes ago

  This last update has killed Battlefield and Redsec. I spent two ******* hours trying to play ranked with the squad tonight. We all took turns getting disconnected, having our games crash and falling through the map and more. I believe it was the final nail in the coffin. RIP.

• 
  The Rocket Media (@TheRocketMediaX) reported 10 minutes ago

  Imagine a drone without GPS inside a battlefield ! In modern warfare, GPS jamming instantly blinds a drone mid-mission. The moment that happens, the drone loses its sense of direction completely and can crash within seconds. This is the problem this startup is trying to solve, so that India's drones can accomplish their mission even without a GPS in hostile environments.

• 
  Daddy (@Daddy_Supweem) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix your game. There is no reason a a headshot from a B36A4 should only be doing 29 damage, or from any weapon.

• 
  Gambler Hermes (@Chewiebow) reported 14 minutes ago

  Public Heart-to-Heart to Damon M. Brown, San Diego County Counsel Mr. Brown, Let me speak to you heart-to-heart, publicly, man to man. You sit in the County Counsel chair thinking you’re playing the big game — advising on compliance, protecting the county, doing your job. But let’s be honest with each other. You know the system is broken. You know the Registrar’s Filter is the root problem. You know “reasonable effort” is a polite fiction and “no records exist” is the shield they hide behind. I’ve been documenting this for years while you were still at the Department of Justice. The ledger was already there before you arrived. The 250th anniversary reframing, the event that followed, the ongoing opacity on NVRA maintenance and CPRA requests — it’s all proof that the machine is eating San Diego alive. You can keep defending it. You can keep slow-walking, deflecting, and protecting the status quo. Or you can finally do the right thing and help remove the curtain. I already have control of the battlefield. The ledger grows with or without you. Fate put you here for a reason — to either fix what’s destroying this county or go down as one of the officials who maintained the filter when the receipts were staring you in the face. The choice is yours. But let’s be clear: I know it, you know it, and the public is starting to see it. Don’t waste this moment. History is watching, and the receipts don’t lie. For transparency & fix only.

• 
  Outsider (@AlbinSalkic) reported 23 minutes ago

  @WesOlesen @LauraLoomer @netanyahu Money is a huge problem, but even worse is American youth giving their lives on battlefield for Israel interests.

• 
  Margo (@MargoinWNC) reported 27 minutes ago

  Well, William Wallace wasn’t actually Braveheart in real life. That was actually Robert the Bruce. From a historical accuracy perspective, Robert the Bruce did not betray William Wallace as the movie portrays. My dad (who lived in Scotland and loved its history) watched Braveheart and was so mad at the historical errors, he had to tell me all of them-down to the fact the battlefield used in the movie was wrong. The battle was fought at a narrow bridge which was key to their strategy to force the English over and ambush them. So now, you have to know too.

• 
  Tim Koffer (@KofferTim) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Every fkn game is a blow fix this pile of dog ****. How the fk is fun to get blown out multiple games in a row? Its fkn pathetic

• 
  mohammad solymani (@msolymani13) reported 28 minutes ago

  @joekent16jan19 The problem is that you are not dealing with someone who thinks rationally or acts on the basis of reason. As an old Iranian proverb says, "You are reciting the Qur'an into a donkey's ear." If reason had any place in the equation, the logic of your argument would be obvious. But when reason disappears, desperation takes control. For Iran, this is an existential conflict. Any nation that believes its survival is at stake will inevitably escalate its response in order to remove the threat it faces. Whether others approve or not does not change that strategic reality. If this path continues, the consequences will not remain confined to the battlefield. The world may soon face a devastating economic crisis whose effects will extend far beyond the region!

• 
  Pope Puke (@ReligionKills66) reported 35 minutes ago

  @MAGAVoice Look at the staggering difference between a true military hero and a total disgrace. Our brave service members look danger in the eye. They are willing to lay down their lives, knowing the rest of our military will die for our country to protect our freedom. They sacrifice everything—their youth, their safety, and their lives—so that we can stand here today. And what do we get on the other side? A cowardly, draft-dodging piece of trash who ran away when his country called. While real heroes were bleeding on the battlefield, he was hiding behind fake excuses and privilege. It is a pathetic, shameful display. It should give you an embarrassment so deep, it leaves a literal tingle in your pants just watching someone act with such total cowardice. We must never confuse the ultimate sacrifice of our military with the absolute disgrace of a coward.. Disgraceful **** Face

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 35 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  Thatoneaccount (@Retradworld) reported 36 minutes ago

  I warned GenZ and Alpha that they were a problem that would be solved by a draft to an overseas battlefield. Revolt in America or Die in a Foreign land for juice @Calvin

• 
  Zarodnii 🍁 (@zarodnii) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm fix your damn game! After the stupid update my game keeps freezing!

• 
  RD (@Hoodiez_Up) reported 36 minutes ago

  You know what I can't stand about the FPS community? There is always something wrong with the game. Call of duty, battlefield ,etc it doesn't matter something is always "op" or the movement is wrong or the maps are no good. Here I am able to adapt and play them all with success and enjoy them for what they are. Ever think maybe the players are the problem?! "OPERATOR ERROR."

• 
  Andre Robinson MS (@AndreDoctrine) reported 38 minutes ago

  Fresh scan verdict: no major update needed. That is a good sign. The existing guidance already covers the central terrain: deliverables over loyalty, air defense before optics, anti-ballistic defense before summit theater, and 5% as capability rather than tribute. What the stories show is not a new strategic problem. They show your framework being stress-tested from several angles and still holding. - That does not require a new doctrine. It requires a guardrail: Turkey can be used as an Ankara conduit, not as an Ankara distraction. Any U.S.-Turkey defense side deal should reinforce Ukraine, Black Sea security, NATO interoperability, and alliance production — not crowd out Patriot/interceptor deliverables. - But this needs a caution: drone diplomacy must not be allowed to substitute for Patriot/PAC anti-ballistic defense. It should complement the Patriot doctrine, not replace it. So the only non-redundant update I’d add is this short operational note: Ankara should treat Ukraine as both a recipient of anti-ballistic protection and a provider of drone/counter-drone battlefield expertise. NATO should take Ukraine’s drone lessons, fund Ukraine’s production base, and still deliver the Patriot interceptors and production licenses needed to stop ballistic strikes. Drone diplomacy is leverage, not a substitute. Bottom line: no new major guidance. Your framework is still sufficient. The new stories mostly validate it. The only fresh additions are tactical: keep Turkey from becoming a side-deal distraction, and elevate Ukraine as a defense provider while keeping Patriot interceptors as the summit test.

• 
  VAAVE Gaming (@VAAVEgaming) reported 42 minutes ago

  With the servers being down, no. With multiplayer games that’s a whole other issue which is why the “Stop Killing Games” movement has started. So there’s people fighting for that. I’m a single player gamer outside of Battlefield so that doesn’t apply to me and we understand the server issue. My single player games will still be playable so I’m not sure what you’re getting at with that reply. With the Battlefield: Bad Company 1 & 2, Battlefield 3 servers down I can still boot up my physical copies and play the campaigns. Also with Battlefield Hardline. Just played the Medal of Honor campaigns recently on PS3 too. Go talk to the “Stop Killing Games” people about online only games

• 
  Lincoln Parker (@LincolnParker5) reported 44 minutes ago

  If you are not working with the Ukrainian Armed Forces and @BRAVE1ua to battlefiled-validate your technology on the ground, you are missing the most important feedback loop available Many well-funded startups entered Ukraine, failed, and went home. I understand that. Ukraine is hard. But retreating is the wrong call The ones who stayed, iterated, and rebuilt on actual battlefield feedback are the ones writing the next chapter of warfare funding The ones who left are polishing slide decks

• 
  Supersonic Redhead🛫 (@Supersonic_Red) reported 46 minutes ago

  @WMcluskey @cdrsalamander Yep. We’ve been screaming this for a long time, but what would a bunch of battle-tested fighter pilots and Navy SEALs know? Clearly, the people who have actually lived inside the problem should wait patiently while another committee discovers the battlefield has changed. Posted without my colorful adjectives.

• 
  Linton Phillips (@LintonPhillips) reported 47 minutes ago

  @krassenstein You’re rooting for a different country… in the World Cup and on the battlefield in a war. Whose brain is broken?

• 
  Tusk (@Laptusk) reported 48 minutes ago

  @VelvetGhoszq @boysoverflours I have no problem with that, doesnt cancel out the ruling sorry, i would hate to go die in a battlefield while my wife is pregnant and I wanted to see the newborn but ay its an obligation so it is what it is many other examples

• 
  Crypto.jedi24 (@CryptoJedi24) reported 48 minutes ago

  Genesis Declaration No parchment bears the word “Bitcoin” in the hand of Jefferson, quill still wet with July ink. No founder etched satoshis beside “unalienable Rights,” no covenant of 21 million sealed in wax beside Life, Liberty, Pursuit. Yet hear the echo across centuries: They broke from a crown that debased coin, that inflated the people’s sweat into royal favor, that printed promises to pay nothing while demanding everything. The Bank of England loomed then as the Fed does now— a hidden hand clipping wings, watering blood. “We hold these truths…” they declared separation from fiat tyranny, from arbitrary seizure, from endless debasement. Sound money was their silent oath— gold and silver coin, unspendable by decree, weights fixed, not whims. Bitcoin arrives late, but arrives as heir. Not written into parchment, but carved into code— the same spirit, hardened in silicon fire. A ledger that remembers every grievance, every inflation assassin, every broken promise since 1776. No bells rang for it in Philadelphia, no signatures in iron gall ink. But the genesis block whispers the headline they would have recognized: Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks. Same war. Different battlefield. Prairie wind carries old defiance now, high plain gust over mountains of hash, stream mining patient through valleys of doubt. Sunset rations light to atoms once more— halving, halving, until only truth remains. Private key in your palm: declaration renewed. No king. No printer. No prince. Just you, the covenant, the unspent oath. Hold it. 🧡 The ledger waits, awake—

• 
  BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸 (@TBifford) reported 52 minutes ago

  @AlexKau74366366 Patton was built to fight. It's a shame a car accident took him out instead of the glory of dying on the battlefield. Patton did not die in combat. On December 9, 1945 (months after the war ended), he was involved in a low-speed car accident in Germany while on a pheasant hunting trip. His Cadillac collided with a U.S. Army truck. He suffered a broken neck and was paralyzed from the neck down. He died 12 days later from a pulmonary embolism (blood clot) in a hospital in Heidelberg.

• 
  Hank Venture (@HankVenture5) reported 52 minutes ago

  "I need a weapon light" .... for a WEAPON. okay, well you've got a few choices, let's talk about what military and law enforcement uses... you've got your Surefire here, widely used by military and law enforcement. They're spendy, about $350. You've got Streamlight over here, also very good, very commonly used in law enforcement... about $180 or so. "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Well, I mean, those manufacturers test their products in literal battlefield conditions, use high quality LEDs and control boards, they are shock proof, waterproof, and they have a warranty with US based suppor..... "TOO EXPENSIVE!!" Would it be a problem if the light were to go down at an inopportune time, like DURING COMBAT? "Yeah, absolutely unacceptable... now what do you have for $50?".

• 
  Toñin (@Tonin_eth) reported 53 minutes ago

  🪦 AUTOPSY REPORT #53 A PvP squad battler. Auto-battle meets roguelike meets card game. Mobile-first, cross-platform. Hexagonal cards called Rumblers placed on a battlefield. Daily rumbles, ranked leagues, community clashes, Payday events. Built on Beam. Helsinki-based studio. Founded in 2022. A team of mobile gaming veterans who believed "players deserve better: better designs, better support, and better fun." That wasn't marketing. They actually tried to build it. $3.3 million raised. Play Ventures, Liquid X, Lizard Labs, Avalanche. Merit Circle as strategic partner. Free-mint Flameys NFT collection. Open alpha running since July 2023. Community tournaments, competitive seasons, Play & Earn campaigns with real rewards. For nearly four years, this team shipped. Updated. Ran events. Engaged with the community. Iterated on gameplay. Tested multiple directions. This wasn't a ghost project. This wasn't a whitepaper studio. The game existed. People played it. The team showed up every day. And here's the problem that killed it. The same problem that has killed most projects in this series: "Building and running the game cost many times more than the game brought in." They invested heavily believing they could close the gap between costs and revenue. The gap didn't close. The numbers didn't put them on a trajectory that justified continuing. And "alternative options were not realistic or added even more complications." June 16, 2026: Play & Earn activities stopped. Players encouraged to submit withdrawal requests. July 4, 2026: the full announcement. Studio winding down. Game sunsetting. Servers off end of July. And then the word nobody wants to hear: insolvency. "Tribo Games will very soon enter the official insolvency process, which limits how we can handle any outstanding claims and payments. Unfortunately, this means no further withdrawal requests, buybacks or compensations can be processed." The community is not happy. And you can understand why. People who earned rewards through months of Play & Earn events, who competed in seasons, who held Flameys NFTs, who believed in the mission... are now told the legal process prevents any further payouts. The shop is disabled. The economy is frozen. Whatever you didn't withdraw in time is likely gone. "We wish we'd had more freedom to communicate on this and more options to avoid this outcome." That sentence says a lot. It suggests the insolvency process was already in motion when they could no longer speak freely. Legal constraints. NDA territory. The kind of silence that isn't a choice but a requirement. This is not a rug. This is a team that built a real game, ran it for years, and ran out of money trying to make the economics work. The farewell letter reads like people who are genuinely hurt by the outcome. But intent doesn't change impact. Players who trusted the project, who earned rewards, who were told to withdraw "in the next couple of weeks," and then days later told withdrawals were frozen... those players have every right to be angry. Good intentions don't pay bills. $3.3 million. Four years. A real team. A real game. A real community. And a word that reduces all of it to a legal filing: insolvency. Which game is this?

• 
  Tim on two wheels (@2wheelsgoodBrum) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Bloatee1 @DonUnderThePool @SaferRoadsYorks We can all agree on that. As soon as we fix the endangerment behaviour, it will no longer feel like it is a battlefield.

• 
  Terror Praworządności (@TerrorPraworza) reported 57 minutes ago

  @United24media Without proper infantry on the battlefield UA🇺🇦 wont be able free anybody from occupation or regain any ground. Bad weather time whatever drones they🇺🇦 have their defence could crash like glas smashed with hammer

• 
  REVENGE (@revsprotwit) reported 60 minutes ago

  @ThelVanDamne Removing health packs, dual wielding, vehicle boarding, equipment did alter halo. Also, the BR doesn't have hit scan. It's just really fast projectile. In fact, the projectiles of the BR are actually slower in halo 3. Further proving you don't know jack **** about what you're trying to seem like an expert on. All of the things you listed were carefully considered and tested before being greenlit to be added to the game. most of the things you mentioned don't really alter the player that much other than improve gameplay flow, which halo 5 abilities do not as we'll get to in a bit. Vehicle boarding is a natural evolution of the combined arms combat halo is known for. it gives people not on vehicles another tool to defend themselves against vehicles, especially when paired with the emp of the plasma pistol, or EMP ball. Removing Health packs (while I don't agree with it) was necessary for multiplayer. Regenning health ensured that once you finished a fight and had time to recover, you entered new engagements on equal footing with other players. Allowing you to be more aggressive. Removing fall damage allowed for greater organic verticality, and improves gameplay flow. Fall damage was a hinderance to map design, and player movement that halted the game. Halo is a game that relies on good consistent flow, and 30 seconds of fun philosophy. If fall damage stayed it would objectively hurt gameplay flow and map design. Equipment affects the battlefield directly. It creates area denial, support for team mates, and cover from enemy fire. It emphasizes the team work aspect of halo's multiplayer. at the same time though, the equipment was never one sided. A skilled player could turn equipment you brought into the field against you, and even use it to their benefit. Dual wielding is an extension of the weapon sandbox. It gives weaker single handed weapons additional utility. While I think the implementation and execution was not the best, it provided another layer to combat that gave you pause to consider using single handed weapons over two handed weapons. All of these changes organically evolved halo's combat loop. Which I even said I wasn't against. Spartan abilities on the other hand: >Sprint even though it makes you run faster, is still disruptive to the gameplay loop, because it forces you to put your gun into low ready while sprinting. Then have to bring it back up when exiting sprint, disrupting halo's gameplay flow. Along with the other aforementioned gameplay implications. >Ground pound locks you into an animation that you have zero control over, and on impact you have to wait for an animation to play before you can regain control of your character. Same for spartan charge. Again, disruptive to gameplay flow. The only "spartan ability" I have no problem with is clamber, because that's less of an "ability", and more of a quality of life improvement that still punishes you for bad jumps.

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 1 hour ago

  Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.