Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (36%)
• Online Play (34%)
• Glitches (13%)
• Game Crash (9%)
• Matchmaking (8%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Cadiz	Online Play	5 hours ago
Nantes	Online Play	2 days ago
Bitche	Game Crash	4 days ago
Paris	Game Crash	6 days ago
Aurillac	Glitches	6 days ago
Annecy	Online Play	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Dolphins are Frauds (@iBrokeMyRouter) reported 49 seconds ago

  @Battlefield @EA_DICE How about you fix the ******* game

• 
  EuroCitizen PC Gaming (@EuroCitizenPCG) reported 3 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Hey peeps, Is there any chance you guys could take a look at Battlefront II on PC please as it has a lot of crashing issues especially on Nvidia 5000 series. I'd love to play the single player campaign but everytime I get to the loading screen it just quits.

• 
  Brandon Parks (@Brandon73563391) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield ******* pathetic *** penny pinching clowns. Run some American servers at 6 am central not all European 200 ping lag trash

• 
  Some Dude (@jaylay12088001) reported 5 minutes ago

  @skynetBF @swaguley Battlefield has never been a game that maintains a very high player count. Every single title had this player drop. Even then, the player count of BF6 remains higher than previous titles. The "bot issue" is due to the terrible matchmaking system. We need a server browser.

• 
  FanatikGaming (@FanatikGaming1) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm fix all the issues. 120 ping every game today? come on.

• 
  Zachary Davidson (@Ryangofett_2490) reported 10 minutes ago

  @MikePutnam97 @big_markyt Yeah Battlefield 6 has its problems but it is not worse than 2042. Nothing is worse than 2042

• 
  Trump is Still Cooked (@sit_nerd33) reported 10 minutes ago

  @ELLEL1234 Christianity is the divisive force and has us arguing about ******* Jewish fairytales all day instead of solving problems. The theological battlefield is where the Jews win, this is why they suck you into it because they wrote the book and it is their fake history

• 
  Jose Gutierrez (@colombiankilla) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the game, you broke it

• 
  The Layman's Seminary (@LaymansSeminary) reported 11 minutes ago

  @myredfox @grok Did Your Reply Force a New Branch in the Argument? (A Super Layman / GPT5 response). Yes. Your latest reply is important because it attacks the premise Grok has been looping on. For roughly twenty replies Grok’s structure has been: Institutions can regulate conduct. Military analogy shows accountability. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Need actual pastoral instruction. Loop. But your latest response changes the battlefield. You effectively said: “I already granted the assumption that you had permission.” That removes the issue Grok has been treating as decisive. The conversation now becomes: Original Issue: Is RedFox violating authority? Your Concession: Assume permission was granted. Assume no church crime occurred. New Issue: If permission was granted, is the distinction itself coherent and consistently applied? That is a different question. Notice what happened. RedFox asked: “Did I commit a crime?” Your answer: “No.” That is significant because it grants his central factual premise. Now the discussion shifts from: Crime? to Consistency? Authority? to Application? Violation? to Principle? In debate theory, this is called narrowing the dispute. You are removing disputed premises and moving to the surviving disagreement. The reason Grok may struggle with this is that its equilibrium position has been: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” But if both sides now agree: “Let’s assume permission existed.” Then Grok loses its primary anchor. The discussion becomes: Why are some forms of public theological engagement permitted while others are discouraged? That is a different category of question. So your reply effectively says: “I am no longer accusing you of violating authority. I am questioning whether the authority structure is being applied consistently.” That is a stronger and cleaner formulation than the earlier military-crime framing. If Grok continues replying: “Need actual pastoral instruction.” after your concession, then the loop becomes more obvious because the specific issue it kept demanding evidence for has already been granted away for the sake of argument. At that point a genuine advance would require Grok to defend the consistency of the distinction itself, not merely ask for proof that a violation occurred.

• 
  Trays_V2 (@TraysV99) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Battlefield fix high value target challenges pls, i never got them again

• 
  ashlyn 🏳️‍⚧️ (@ashlyninstereo) reported 18 minutes ago

  i think we're heading towards another videogame crash because what do you MEAN we're not getting any more NFS or Burnout games??? Criterion are just making Battlefield now.

• 
  SilencedToys ⬜️ (@silenced_toys1) reported 18 minutes ago

  @XBOXSupport @EA_DICE who do i contact in reference to a server issue on Battlefield 4 servers? purchased a server earlier set it up played on it for about a half hour got off came back on a few hours later and now it won’t let me join my own server, I’m using an Xbox series X.

• 
  KingRamze (@DukeRamze) reported 24 minutes ago

  Re-watching Battlefield Earth (2000) tonight. It's cartoonishly bad, but still has its charm. I almost wish they'd re-make it with a bigger budget and fix all the plot holes and mistakes.

• 
  SiPPY (@SiPPYtv) reported 28 minutes ago

  I’m going to put an 3 hour long video together of all the hitreg/netcode issues Ive experienced with Battlefield 6 and send it to @JakeSucky…and then pay him a million dollars (in Monopoly money) so he can expose how awful Dice is. Skill based hitreg needs to GO

• 
  BEN (@BiGBENNGTR) reported 34 minutes ago

  @ZagazOlaMakama Let’s talk about this with the little experience I have. First, the landing could have resulted in a crash. You only make a landing like that during an emergency, especially when you already know the helicopter will no longer be of any use. Second, why were they all facing the same direction without anyone watching their 9 and 3 o’clock positions? After the rescue, again, nobody was watching their 6 o’clock. There was no overwatch either. Now I understand how the bandits and Boko Haram get their information from, because how do you leave a teammate on the battlefield without cover?

• 
  chris (@ChrisSlaske) reported 39 minutes ago

  @Battlefield why is drag revive so bad? You take one step forward and 7 steps back each update. Every day brings new attention to problems that have been plaguing multiplayer for months

• 
  Brett D (@BrettD8) reported 41 minutes ago

  @Az_Zouine @TorsoReaper @BattlefieldComm When you die consistently cross-map by only headshots 1 frame because there is a desync issue between console and PC, yeah its frustrating to play against. We can’t turn off crossplay either. 80% of the top 100 players on Apex were banned on Console, cronus use is rampant.

• 
  Alex (@Animemaster51) reported 43 minutes ago

  You know what’s funny Delisting is a problem for everyone because future gens don’t get to buy a great game like NFS Most Wanted 05’ or Deadpool or Transformers Devastation or even the original San Andreas much less Battlefield Bad Company 2 or Spider-Man Shattered Dimensions.

• 
  don (@iceyicon) reported 44 minutes ago

  since the aim changes on battlefield 6… my aim has been so bad. literally every-time i fix my settings they drop another update and **** everything up.

• 
  Donald Trump Portfolio Tracker (@TrumpsPortfolio) reported 44 minutes ago

  THE CEASEFIRE IS DEAD AND THE DIVIDEND IS ALIVE, folks!!! This morning Donald stood in Ankara and declared the Iran war back ON — oil jumped 6.3% by breakfast — and I just published the FULL long-form investigation in my newsletter on exactly who benefits, every company, every dollar, every date!!! The money trail from the battlefield to the family balance sheet is the LONGEST in American history, and I mapped ALL of it!!! THE SONS' WAR MACHINE: Eight days after the February strikes, a golf course company owned by Don Jr. and Eric announces a reverse merger to take POWERUS public — a drone startup ONE YEAR OLD!!! By April they're demoing interceptor drones to Gulf countries absorbing 165 ballistic missiles — selling PROTECTION from the war Daddy started!!! Seven weeks after the merger — SEVEN WEEKS — the Air Force places an order!!! And the runway ahead? A $1.5 TRILLION defense budget request, up 42%, with $55 BILLION for the new drone warfare group — a 240-FOLD increase!!! THE ROSTER — all broken down name by name in the newsletter: The boys are linked to at least TEN military companies that have pulled $3.7 BILLION in federal money since Daddy came back!!! Unusual Machines — Don Jr. joins the board, eleven months later the Army places its LARGEST ORDER EVER, stake worth $7.9 million!!! XTEND — Eric invests THE MONTH THE WAR STARTS, three months later the Pentagon taps it for the $1.1 billion drone program!!! Vulcan — the $620 million loan ORDERED BY THE WHITE HOUSE, tenfold gain, and every missile fired over Riyadh needs their magnets — $20.4 BILLION budgeted just to RESTOCK!!! JARED'S DOUBLE SHIFT: The man NEGOTIATING peace runs a fund that's 99% foreign money, anchored by $2 BILLION from the Saudis — who reportedly pushed to START the war and pressed to CONTINUE it!!! Over $110 million in fees from Riyadh while negotiating the war Riyadh wants!!! AND DADDY'S OWN BOOK: 21,000 trades in year one versus 86 in his first term!!! Lockheed, Northrop, RTX, General Dynamics, Palantir, Exxon, Chevron — the WAR INDEX!!! Lockheed hit an ALL-TIME HIGH the first trading day after the strikes!!! And the masterpiece, folks: on the day oil CRASHED 11% on peace hopes, his account was BUYING — Exxon, Chevron, Phillips 66, Lockheed, General Dynamics!!! Buying war stocks on a peace dip only works if peace DIES — and this morning HE KILLED IT HIMSELF and repriced his own book 6% with ONE SENTENCE!!! I wrote the WHOLE thing up — the timelines, the tickers, the $113 billion taxpayer bill, the Gulf money loop, the blocked subpoenas — the longest, most documented piece I've ever published, and the Deep and Nasty State can't ban it because it's on MY newsletter now, folks, I OWN the printing press!!! Link below — subscribe, read it, and ask yourself the only question that matters: is ANYBODY looking into this??? I AM, and the receipts are BEAUTIFUL!!!

• 
  Danilo (@Danilovisk94) reported 46 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Now all that's left is to fix all the other bugs in the game.

• 
  AlienMonkey (@Black_monkiii) reported 48 minutes ago

  FIX YOUR STUPID BUGS IN REDSEC!! I WAS TOP 250 NOW IM ROOKIE FROM ONLY GAME CRASHES #battlefield #redsec

• 
  Grouse Beater (@Grouse_Beater) reported 48 minutes ago

  DATA CENTRES MEET RESISTANCE Datacentre planning proposals are facing all kinds of hurdles, including suspicion and an antipathy here in Scotland, pushed back from securing energy supply to sky high construction costs. One example: the 2,000 acre Prince William Digital Gateway site in the US state of Virginia had another problem: its proximity to a Civil War battlefield. Questions asked are: why should the taxpayer pay for data centres because the big electronic companies want AI to develop their services? Who asked for more services? Where is the public clamour for greater costs and lost land? “If the development is allowed to proceed, the solemn nature of this historic site would become marred by sitting in the shadow of the monstrous datacentres, along with their associated electrical infrastructure,” said one legal brief against the plans. The US Gateway project is now in doubt after a local court ruling halted the project and a key backer pulled out. It is one of hundreds of large-scale datacentre projects around the world that are in various states of development, from chancier attempts at riding the AI boom to the more committed projects that have the support of tech behemoths like Microsoft. But while models produced by cutting-edge AI companies like OpenAI, Anthropic and Google are improving rapidly, the central nervous systems behind their technology – datacentres – are being built at a much slower pace. The Uptime Institute, which inspects and rates datacentres, has identified 250 global datacentre projects exceeding 100MW in energy demand – equivalent to around 300,000 homes – that have been announced between 2021 and 2024. It said approximately half of those projects will either not happen, or their completion will be delayed. Even if the cancellations and delays came to fruition, there will still be an “unprecedented and rapid” increase in the power required over the next five years, according to Uptime. Mega-projects cancelled last year include Project Range in the US state of Arizona and the Cyberjaya campus in Malaysia. The Prince William Gateway is also on the cancelled list. This backlog poses problems for AI firms that need data centres to train and operate their models. Google admits its cloud business – which uses datacentres to provide AI services like chatbots to companies and users – is “compute-constrained”, as demand for ever more powerful AI models and services increases. But who needs chat bots? Why do we feel the need to talk to a computer? It is clear the big companies are shifting their costly ambitions onto the shoulders of the public. Photo - Horst Friedrichs: Didcot data centre.

• 
  David Lister (@DavidBlue55) reported 49 minutes ago

  Young man great job I have been saying this for decades but I did not have social media. I was at Custer’s battlefield (not really his) and talked with the Crow who did not like Sitting Bull’s tribe, Lakota and the Northern Cheyenne “trespassing" on their land and so the Crow sided with the US government and asked for help removing them. Smart move, they have their land the other two tribes were removed and are still crying foul. In a lecture at the Sitting Bull museum they mentioned they are taking gambling proceeds from the white man and buying their land back, which I don’t have a problem with them doing.

• 
  EagleSmith (@eaglesmithpr) reported 51 minutes ago

  Inside Day 1: The Technical and Constitutional Warfare Rocking the Memphis Courthouse The first day of the federal proceedings in Memphis has concluded, and anyone looking strictly at standard media headlines is completely missing the underlying legal earthquake. Yesterday, Chief U.S. District Judge Sheryl H. Lipman convened a high-stakes, all-day session. While the prosecution spent the day introducing technical arguments regarding an artificial $33 million intended loss calculation and presenting emotional public narratives to maintain their trajectory, Dr. Sanjeev Kumar’s legal team fiercely contested the case from every angle. The atmosphere inside the courtroom wasn’t a standard, compliant step toward a predetermined conclusion. It was a dense, multi-pronged battlefield over regulatory overreach and constitutional integrity. Dismantling the Government’s Arithmetic The primary skirmish of Day 1 focused heavily on the government’s attempt to weaponize out-of-context billing metrics. The prosecution has fought to implement a staggering $33 million figure based on alleged fraudulent billing and the outpatient reuse of single-use accessories. The defense team has systematically refuted this hyper-inflated math. This calculated number doesn’t represent actual clinical damages or financial loss to patients; it represents an aggressive administrative equation designed by automated bureaucracy to maximize a punitive outcome. By pushing back vigorously against these calculations, the defense is forcing the court to confront the sheer absurdity of holding an outpatient community clinic—which successfully delivered 15,000 safe procedures over more than a decade—to guidelines that flatly ignore real-world medical practice. The Elephant in the Room: Tainted Testimony and the FDA Safe Harbor What standard broadcast updates refuse to tell the public is that the entire legal theory used to build this multi-count indictment has already been thoroughly compromised. As the defense has continuously highlighted in active emergency filings, the prosecution’s star witness from the FDA, Dr. Poulomi Nandy, explicitly testified during the trial that the FDA had “never cleared any hysteroscopes for high-level disinfection,” claiming absolute sterilization was the only legal standard. The Manila Times This testimony has been completely dismantled by actual manufacturer documentation. Olympus’s official Instructions for Use (IFU) for the very devices in question repeatedly state that high-level disinfection is a fully accepted, standard protocol for outpatient clinics. The Manila Times Furthermore, sworn declarations from top-tier national authorities—including Stephen D. Terman, the former Associate Chief Counsel for Enforcement at the FDA itself—remain live on the record, confirming that the DOJ fabricated its regulatory theory. The FDA explicitly carved out a “safe harbor” exempting non-hospital outpatient facilities from these requirements. The state essentially prosecuted a community doctor for violating a rule that the regulatory agency itself says does not apply to him. Markets Insider - Business Insider The Ultimate Double Standard As we head into Day 2, where the court is expected to hear further arguments, the core systemic injustice of this entire proceeding remains completely exposed. The system demands absolute, unyielding perfection from an independent physician, yet grants itself infinite grace for its own catastrophic failures. The court has spent months dealing with a Remmer Crisis because severe outside influences and structural contamination infected the jury room during deliberations. In any logically consistent world, a contaminated trial framework would lead to an immediate dismissal. Instead, independent medicine is being forced to fight on a tilted playing field. localmemphis.com+ 1 Dr. Kumar’s defense team is not backing down. They are continuing to raise significant, unresolved structural and regulatory errors that must eventually be addressed by a higher authority. The Battle Continues This process is far from over. The defense is laying an unassailable foundation for a massive appellate review, proving step-by-step that this case is a product of runaway overzealousness and flawed federal interpretations. Markets Insider - Business Insider EagleSmithPR will remain on the ground to pull back the curtain on the technical facts, the explicit regulations, and the unfiltered truth as Day 2 gets underway.

• 
  reluctantminarchist (@reluctantm55236) reported 56 minutes ago

  @wevipEiri @jpg2t785 Yes I was taught exactly this during my service in USAF. Kill a person, and you remove one soldier from the battlefield. Wound one, and you remove three

• 
  FanboyKillerNews (@FanboyKillerX) reported 56 minutes ago

  @Ryangofett_2490 Every battlefield and every game since day 1 has had flaws and issues. Keep pretending otherwise. Only difference is idiots like you cant handle it anymore because you got old and became miserable. Bunch of depressed retards. When you hate everything maybe ask why.

• 
  Sher. ✨ Jane of All Trades (@itsthesherf) reported 58 minutes ago

  @Battlefield ever since the last update on Xbox my boyfriends game never loads him in and the game is constantly crashing. There’s a whole Reddit thread with numerous other users with the same issue. Can we get this fixed please? @Medcreational

• 
  Nick_Morningstar (@NiNoKunimaster0) reported 59 minutes ago

  @Bi6_Puffin @BattlefieldComm No issues with this. but it does vary from system to system

• 
  Saboteira🇮🇱🇧🇷 יהודה הנשיא, (@Beatsboysabota) reported 60 minutes ago

  @EA_DICE Fast, honest support when things break Less aggressive monetization, more focus on long-term fun Instead we got a game that launched strong but spent the next 9 months prioritizing quick fixes, image control, and monetization over actually fixing what drives the core audience away. EA and DICE — the message is simple: The players who are still here are the ones who love this franchise the most. When we stop playing, it’s not because we’re impatient or entitled. It’s because the game stopped delivering on its promises and stopped respecting the people who bought it. We’re almost 9 months post-launch and we’re still talking about broken movement and recurring bugs. That’s not normal. That’s a priority problem. If the people in charge don’t change direction right now — fix movement properly, stabilize netcode, deliver real content without shoving the Battle Pass in everyone’s face, and actually listen — whatever player base is left will disappear for good. And no amount of marketing for the “next Battlefield” will bring everyone back.