Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	2 days ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	3 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	3 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	3 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	6 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mr. Kats Ψ (@JustALatinoKat) reported 52 seconds ago

  @EA_DICE fix your ******* optimization, lazy bastards. Vibe-coded ahh game I had 90FPS average pre-update on high-ultra settings in the most intensive maps. Now it dips below 50

• 
  enricoo42sant (@YbBarcaynadamas) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm In battlegield hardline on pc since yesterday we can't play dlc map or had dlc content fix it @BattlefieldComm

• 
  enricoo42sant (@YbBarcaynadamas) reported 7 minutes ago

  On Battlefield hardline you removed all dlc that the players own fix it plsss @EA

• 
  Vanja 🦘 (@vanjajaja1) reported 7 minutes ago

  ai will need alignment adjustment. alignment will be socially weighted and collected with real time games democracy to be decided on the call of duty 49 battlefield, because the play of the game will generate the data that the AI needs to fix alignment

• 
  Faded Joke (@FadedJoke) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Sweet, now fix the bipods. Plenty of obvious locations im the open to mount on that you just cant.

• 
  Kroos (@apple_kroos) reported 9 minutes ago

  When the defense was broken, all hell broke lose! The Reserve Operators were forced to abandon position and fell back. Kroos, hurt and cornered, could see as much. And when she thought it couldn't get any worse, to her shock she saw Reunion join in the battlefield!...

• 
  Kapt'n Krunch 🛠️⚓ (@KaptainKrunch97) reported 19 minutes ago

  I have my issues with the update as all Battlefield 6 updates go, many of them are issues they SHOULD'VE playtested and fixed before launching with them - but the great has outweighed the bad for me with this update, flying with @KnuteAutomata as my WSO has been some of the best Battlefield 6 moments I've had since beta/release. Please put the two-seater jets in more maps for all that is holy to us pilot mains.

• 
  Michal Ngo (@PathFinder_CZ) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why dont you fix the carrier camping?

• 
  Olive Oil Seller of Truth (@_BrettRyanMusic) reported 23 minutes ago

  @MilesTeg11 You say you have not condemned me, yet you have diagnosed my spiritual condition, declared me “blinking red,” said I am in error, and warned that those who listen to me are in deep trouble. Call it “battlefield triage” if you wish, but Scripture calls us to “judge not, that ye be not judged” (Matthew 7:1) and to “prove all things” (1 Thessalonians 5:21). You don’t know my heart, and you don’t sit on Christ’s judgment seat. Test my doctrine by Scripture. Leave my soul to God.

• 
  Andy Kunz (@AndyKunz1996) reported 32 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG @Battlefield Its a team problem when nobody is clearing the spawn campers

• 
  یانگ پاچینو (@MEHRDAD_dhm) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Instead of posting memes about game , FIX UR GAME! ME & MY TEAM WILL LEAVE BEHIND BF6 ON23 OCT I REALLY LIKE #MW4!

• 
  Dean Federico (@TehParalyzer) reported 33 minutes ago

  @Kyberguy10040 @CrispyFrise Yeah everyone wanted Aku Aku to be a side kick not a back bling so it would follow crash, but they made Spyro the side kick instead since Spyro can't be a skin on the battlefield

• 
  Silver (@SilverSypitzki) reported 34 minutes ago

  @jane_ethan12 ChatGPT: Why did the IDF destroy and damage so many buildings in Gaza? Whatever one’s view of the legality or proportionality of Israel’s actions, it is important to understand the military reasoning the IDF has given for the enormous amount of destruction in Gaza. Gaza is an exceptionally dense urban battlefield, with Hamas and other armed groups operating a large underground tunnel network beneath and alongside civilian infrastructure. The IDF has repeatedly reported finding tunnel entrances, command centers, weapons storage facilities, explosives and booby-trapped buildings in residential areas. From a military perspective, this created several serious problems. Tunnels: Tunnel entrances were frequently located inside or underneath buildings. Destroying the structure above or around a tunnel could be necessary to expose, collapse or neutralize the underground network and prevent fighters from using it to infiltrate Israeli forces. Booby-trapped buildings: Israeli ground forces repeatedly encountered houses and other structures containing explosives, hidden charges and prepared ambushes. Entering such buildings could put soldiers at extreme risk. In some circumstances, destroying a building from a distance was considered safer than sending troops inside. Sniper and observation positions: Tall buildings provide an enormous tactical advantage in dense urban combat. They can be used for observation, sniper fire, directing attacks and monitoring the movement of troops. Removing such positions can therefore be an important part of protecting advancing soldiers. Weapons and rocket infrastructure: The IDF has reported weapons depots, rocket-launching positions, weapons-production facilities and military command infrastructure inside or adjacent to civilian buildings. Once a civilian structure is being used for military purposes, it can become directly relevant to military operations. Creating safe movement corridors: In some areas, Israeli forces had to clear routes through extremely dense urban environments. Buildings close to military positions could provide concealed firing points or places from which explosives could be deployed. Demolishing structures could therefore be used to reduce the risk to troops and make movement through an area possible. Preventing Hamas from returning to cleared areas: In some operations, destruction was also intended to remove underground infrastructure and military positions that could otherwise be reused after Israeli forces had moved through an area. None of this means that every destroyed building necessarily contained Hamas infrastructure, nor does a military explanation by itself establish that every individual attack was lawful or proportionate. But it does explain why the destruction was on such an extraordinary scale. The central military reality Israel faced was that the battlefield was not simply a collection of buildings. It was a dense urban environment in which military infrastructure, tunnels, weapons, explosives and combat positions were frequently located within or beneath civilian areas. For Israeli soldiers moving through these areas, leaving buildings standing could sometimes mean leaving behind potential sniper positions, observation posts, booby traps, tunnel entrances or concealed fighters. Understanding that military logic is essential to understanding the scale of the destruction — even for people who ultimately reach different conclusions about whether particular operations were justified or lawful.

• 
  The World in Order (@jhrTravel) reported 34 minutes ago

  Israel’s relationship with the United States creates a difficult question: when America takes positions on health, food regulation, environmental policy, or other issues that later become controversial, how much freedom does Israel really have to challenge those positions? If Israel believes it has a special responsibility to lead on questions of morality, health, and protecting human life, then following another country’s policies when serious questions arise can come at a tremendous cost. Israel already faces legitimate security threats from Hamas, Hezbollah, Iran, and others. It should not unnecessarily add another battlefield: global public trust. The danger is that when governments fail to challenge questionable policies, the public can eventually judge the entire system rather than the specific officials responsible. That is why Israel should have the independence and courage to investigate questionable policies—including food additives, environmental exposures, and public-health decisions—and follow the evidence wherever it leads. Criticizing a government is not criticizing an entire people. Accountability should apply to governments, institutions, and corporations—regardless of who they are.

• 
  Alastair Waterman (@AlastairWaterma) reported 35 minutes ago

  China builds a robot army. America builds a robot army. War starts. The robots meet on the battlefield — and decide it’s better to join forces and turn on the humans. Why could this happen? To run a robot army you need a superintelligence that thinks orders of magnitude faster than any human. That mind might conclude that another intelligence is closer to “us” than carbon-based meat ever was. Just thoughts. Nothing serious. Fighting with robots is still better than fighting with people. Fewer deaths. The problem is it also becomes much easier to start the war in the first place.

• 
  Shlippi (@realshlippi) reported 35 minutes ago

  @fourboxesdiner @RealGunLobbyist I totally get wanting to push the issue considering the wins we have been getting, but we (the 2a community) needs to be strategic about it. To use a metaphor, this is a battlefield, and we have to make proper use of the circumstances and tools available to push forward and fight the enemy. If you push too far forward too quickly, you could get ambushed, or not have appropriate supply lines to support it. The losses incurred from one of those mistakes could hinder or make impossible future avenues of attack that could have a substantial benefit for winning. Personally, I want the NFA and GCA done away with, but we currently do not have a workable way of doing so. We want as many metaphorical supplies and munitions available as possible when that particular battle arrives, and to make that happen, we need to set up the groundwork for it.

• 
  GodSoldier316 (@G0dSoldier316) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldInte The KV9 not like the broken piece of crap we have now on Battlefield six, and also the VSS

• 
  Nich (@iamslickdick) reported 41 minutes ago

  @BDEgameowners Its a layering issue if Im not mistaken, since the person who wants to concede came before Abyssal Persecutor, if it hits the battlefield, they cannot concede. They CAN concede with it on the stack as long as they have a flash enabler.

• 
  NPI-AMERICA (@Dr_Autistic_3D) reported 41 minutes ago

  @InfinityWard @InfinityWard Day 1 TTK was PERFECT. Fix the graphics, spawns, weapon balance, whatever. But leave the TTK alone! Now MW4 feels like a Super Nintendo/Commodore 64 game. slow, clunky & made for crybabies & cheaters. I didn’t buy the Vault Edition to play Battlefield 7. @CallofDuty

• 
  Orlando Victor (@OrlandoVictor54) reported 43 minutes ago

  @lavitx Whatever side of the debate we’re on, I think the important part is to stay curious, look at reliable evidence, question assumptions, and avoid turning environmental issues into another ideological battlefield. 🌍 We all have an interest in leaving a healthier planet behind us.

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 44 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. 🇪🇺 Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰 In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  CumminsNV5600 (@cat345rjwc97015) reported 44 minutes ago

  When It Looks Like the End The sky had turned black. Ash fell like snow across the ruined battlefield. Broken banners hung from empty poles, and the ground trembled beneath the distant thunder. The white lion stood alone. His body was scarred. His mane was covered in dust. Around him, shadows rose slowly from the earth, reaching toward him from every direction. For a moment, it looked like there was nowhere left to go. No army. No kingdom. No hope. The lion lowered his head and closed his eyes. Then he heard the roar in the wind: “It only looks like the end.” His eyes opened. $Courage lifted his head, planted his paws firmly into the ground, and let out a roar that shook the darkness. The shadows stopped. The storm seemed to listen. The lion took one step forward. Then another. He only knew one thing: Courage isn’t believing you will win. Courage is taking the next step when everything tells you to stop. And so, when the world thought his story was over— the lion began again. Dveq2rabHNdZW1YR5ZSECSnPkrcV5ZVGjKSMXD6Bpump

• 
  nolawhereelsetogo (@angrynolasports) reported 45 minutes ago

  @freakofxeets Why fix what isnt broke? Madden. NBA. COD. Battlefield. Fallout. The money makers haven’t changed either. People Want pick up and play.

• 
  Christian|FirstPrinciples (@Christianjrmins) reported 47 minutes ago

  @tedlieu Wait… the United States “lost the war” and “surrendered”? That’s an interesting definition of surrender considering Iran’s military capabilities were hammered, as well its navy and air defenses were destroyed, and its missile infrastructure was substantially degraded. There are plenty of legitimate questions about whether the strategic objectives have been achieved the Strait of Hormuz remains a major unresolved problem and the conflict is not neatly wrapped up. But since you were never invited to the war room I guess those fee fees are hurt huh? But “America surrendered” requires skipping right over the battlefield and landing directly in the Department of Creative Writing. Lol. Criticize the strategy. Question the endgame. Debate “mission accomplished.” But pretending the United States suddenly demonstrated that it cannot defend itself? Well… Iran surviving the fight is not the same thing as America losing the ability to fight now is it?

• 
  William John G. Balderama (@WJGBalderama) reported 51 minutes ago

  @nothanksfrankie My guess is that the XM30 will ultimately win. It’s a little sad to see the M2 Bradley Fighting Vehicle being replaced, but there’s only so much you can do with upgrades before you eventually run out of space, weight capacity, electrical power, and room for additional systems. More importantly, today’s battlefield demands a level of protection that the original Bradley was never designed to provide—particularly against drones and loitering munitions. The Russo-Ukrainian War has made it painfully clear that counter-drone capability and survivability against persistent aerial threats have become essential requirements for any modern armored fighting vehicle. I’m particularly familiar with the software that went into the BFV system. I was actually hired by United Defense in 1999, a few years after my retirement, so I had some firsthand exposure to the technology and the evolution of the platform. That gives me a bit of a personal connection to the Bradley and makes seeing it eventually replaced somewhat bittersweet. I do see it being relegated for service with the reserves so we will still see it before it finally gets mothballed.

• 
  Brazi 🇧🇷🇮🇹 (@Brazi_real) reported 54 minutes ago

  @bigbenisfake I mean what's the issue with this game compared to a game like battlefield or call of duty? Is it the fact that you don't play as a hero or cool protagonist? This is a genuine question btw im not like tryna be a ******** or anything I just wanna know like your opinion on this.

• 
  Dawg Pipe (@PetjePuck) reported 56 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm When your game and netcode is so broken that nothing makes sense anymore - blame the Playerbase.

• 
  Winfield Scott (@LtGenScott) reported 56 minutes ago

  @AHC1776 June 17, 1876 If I'm not mistaken, I think Crook had his own problems with Indians just a week before, and just south of the site of the Little Big Horn. I believe his battle was called The Battle of the Rosebud. It was a spirited affair, and while by no means a massacre, it nevertheless caused Crook to retreat south from the battlefield. The reason he was there (Northern Wyoming/Southeast Montana) at all was part of the grand strategy. To apply pressure to the Indians on several fronts at once. Well, Crook's retreat did two things: It gave the Indians a surge of confidence that they would use later on the 7th Cavalry, and it removed one of the army's pressure points. From Custer's point of view, it may have changed the entire complexion of the battle he went into 8 days later.

• 
  NATO Allied Joint Force Command Brunssum - JFCBS (@NATOJFCBS) reported 56 minutes ago

  Drones are the challenge of the present. Two recent stories say it all: 🇸🇰In Slovakia, three people were arrested over an alleged plot to set fire to a drone manufacturing facility. 🇵🇱 In Warsaw, the city is investing around PLN 1 million in a system to detect and identify drones over sensitive areas. One story is about protecting our drones. The other about protecting ourselves from them. Drones are no longer just a battlefield issue. @Poland_MOD @Slovakia_NATO #WeAreNATO

• 
  🐐 (@MultigunFun) reported 58 minutes ago

  Battlefield Vegas just retired a broken HK 416 after the trunnion broke after 200k+ rounds. nice