1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Battlefield 6. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

  • 41% Online Play (41%)
  • 29% Sign in (29%)
  • 11% Glitches (11%)
  • 10% Matchmaking (10%)
  • 8% Game Crash (8%)
  • 1% Hacking / Cheating (1%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Aberdeen Hacking / Cheating 5 days ago
Argences Matchmaking 7 days ago
Minneapolis Sign in 7 days ago
Minneapolis Sign in 9 days ago
Reims Online Play 10 days ago
Pfaffenhoffen Sign in 10 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • elhigadodmarita
    Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported

    @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

  • ImaBudtender
    Bud (@ImaBudtender) reported

    @Battlefield Fix the portal server search. Shows people playing but all servers say 0/64

  • DownHomeJohn
    John (@DownHomeJohn) reported

    @BattlefieldComm How about the bug where bots one shot me with a tank round from a smg and then the red outline of my killer is a tank, not the single infantryman I was attempting to gun battle? Is the game actually that broken? Is the game unraveling because of all the broken patches?

  • FabianSchu96203
    Gatzestreicheln (@FabianSchu96203) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Holy **** now even your ingame shop in console is broken because you can’t choose a different row in one section in the shop at least on console You have to a special kind of trash to **** up in ingame shop

  • snipermomo_1994
    Mo.aly (@snipermomo_1994) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Plz, Recon class in Redsec solos is broken. at least Try to limit the number of usages of the drone. Make it limited to 3 times during the whole match.

  • spookyboogy24
    Monifish 🙊🐟 (@spookyboogy24) reported

    @KyuniesBoyMikey The entire fandom knows this will be a big problem 🫣. That company must really hate us because they always throw us into a battlefield I'm so tired of fighting with hater 🥹

  • JexxitS
    Jexxits (@JexxitS) reported

    @BlackEaglesFRVR @BFBulletin I've played Battlefield since 1942 so whatever. But didn't they remove it bc they have problems with the mode?

  • coldcuppapi
    The Prince Formerly Known As Spence 🥀 (@coldcuppapi) reported

    @MyFavoriteCoIor I heard Wukong is broken beyond all belief, will wear your *** out in the battlefield just to find out you been fighting a clone of his this whole time or some ****.

  • o_oZeppelin
    X (@o_oZeppelin) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield How about you fix red dot optics and general optic illumination. Why do all the sights look like terrible dark red sharpie

  • DundeeLord
    Lord Dundee (@DundeeLord) reported

    @NoGGiNTheNoG8 @deadlyweapns Not necessarily, but all it takes is a little bit of dirt on the wrong hydraulic piston and this whole thing goes out of service. Btw, the entire battlefield is covered in dirt. Drones don’t even need to touch it to break this thing.

  • Emanuel56353090
    BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported

    @Battlefield hey douchebags fix strike point. you ruined it and took it away. it was the perfect game mode

  • BatuPhD
    Batu 🇺🇦 (@BatuPhD) reported

    @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Can you fix the spaws. Why always appears looking back or do they appear to you?

  • whyohdeeay
    whyohdeeay (@whyohdeeay) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Lobbies haven't filled in months. Lighting isn't the issue

  • Emanuel56353090
    BillsmafiaMFKA He/Bro/Daddy (@Emanuel56353090) reported

    @BattlefieldComm ******** FIX STRIKEPOINT

  • TheKingDavidJr
    David Hanna Jr. (@TheKingDavidJr) reported

    @joekent16jan19 @DLoesch You're overstating our leverage here. Israel relies heavily on our military industrial base and regional air defense network, but they pay for 90% of their own expenses and almost certainly have more battlefield experience in intercepting ballistic missiles, which will be key to improving our own systems. The issue is that this MOU is structurally flawed. It's the Iranians' 10-point wishlist, which requires some kind of settlement between Israel and Hezbollah, but explicitly excludes discussing Iran's proxy support from the MOU. You can't force Israel to withdraw or fully lift sanctions on Iran without addressing these issues.

  • rhiyddun
    Rhiyddun (@rhiyddun) reported

    What strikes me is the methodology, they start out as enthusiastic cheerleaders with a "MAGA" slant, gung ho, rah rah, and suddenly do a compete 180 on some "core" issue when they've accumulated massive follower count? Move along folks, nothing to see here... the war is narratives, the battlefield is media, but the ROE are wacked.

  • Shinypants78
    All of my friends say.... (@Shinypants78) reported

    @HiebDE @EA_DICE Why is it a W? Almost a yr after release? The things in previous games are either broken or missing...

  • FlacoG_2023
    Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported

    @GrimBF6 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm "Buddy," how many more months do they need to fix this? Are they waiting for MW4 to come out and there will only be 2000 people left...? "We are working." Game from 2025...

  • KellyDetonated
    Kelly Detonated (@KellyDetonated) reported

    We can blame eachother for this but truth be told the whole Doha Deal was a disaster, and is still problematic today. Now, it can be something accept for what it is, learn and get better now, or we can pretend it isn’t there. I’ve accepted it, and hope we address that money is still going to the Taliban. Qatar is exceptionally clever when it comes to laundering money, while slapping on a bow and smiling saying it’s something else. We don’t operate this way, but they do, no matter how many shiny gifts and “peace” deals it brokers. It seems Soviet inspired, so maybe they learned from the best. Idk. It would be wise to have a completely neutral mediators, moving forward, that nobody involved has any conflicts of interest and a proven track record of success. We must use the icky stuff as a point of reference no matter how bad it stings to do so. My thoughts are that this is a clear case for strategic, long-game warfare that isn’t necessarily fought on a battlefield. We also need to admit that our reward system is very different than the middle eastern countries. We want everything done now. They are ideology driven. We’re built different. So this would require any agreements to include some language requiring enforceability that can’t be broken until it’s complete.

  • kst0ne13
    KstOne13 (@kst0ne13) reported

    @jessewllc20222 @BattlefieldComm damn and you're still having issues? I noticed it more RIGHT after the little update today but it hasn't been an issue since

  • Lucky_Bullet
    J-Dizzle (@Lucky_Bullet) reported

    @BattlefieldComm what the F is going on with StrikePoint! F……….! Can you fix it any slower!

  • stevo3854420
    Stevo3854 (@stevo3854420) reported

    @x0opaq @BattlefieldComm Agreed but it's gotta be better than the current state of bf6. Is it though? They've pushed back GTA6 so long it seems like it's going to plagued with issues as well. There's a reason it's continuously being pushed back and I'm sure it's not good.

  • IamBlaccode
    Blaccode (@IamBlaccode) reported

    @NigeriaStories Very mumu initiative, what would be the essence of journalists following the military to gun battlefield??? Would that fix the insecurity on ground??? If you insist I nominate VDM for this mission, he is a great content creator.

  • lcbchefperry
    Michael E. Perry (@lcbchefperry) reported

    @Primary_Pianist The Book of Mormon describes whole peoples, cities, buildings, wars, kings, prophets, temples, records, armies, weapons, and massive battles. Mormon 1 says the land was covered with buildings and the people were almost as numerous as the sand of the sea. Mormon 6 describes roughly 230,000 Nephites killed at Cumorah. Ether 15 describes nearly two million Jaredite “mighty men” killed, plus wives and children. Imagine someone claimed that an ancient Israelite civilization existed somewhere in North America. Not a tiny campsite. Not one immigrant family. A real civilization. Imagine it had a final battle where the dead were roughly the size of Irving, Texas population 238K. Then imagine another earlier civilization in the same sacred history lost a male fighting population roughly the size of Houston 2.4M, plus women and children. Now imagine this civilization supposedly had cities, temples, written records, named places, religious systems, kings, trade, weapons, metalwork, and centuries of history. Then ask: Would it be plausible for a civilization of that size and complexity to vanish with no confirmed city, no confirmed inscription, no confirmed Hebrew or Egyptian writing, no confirmed Nephite place name, no confirmed Israelite temple, no confirmed Book of Mormon battlefield, no confirmed “reformed Egyptian,” and no material culture that clearly identifies it? That is the issue. A small family can disappear genetically. A civilization of that scale should not disappear historically, archaeologically, linguistically, and materially. So the problem is not merely DNA. DNA is one missing footprint. But the larger issue is that almost every expected footprint is missing. At some point, “the evidence disappeared” stops being an explanation and starts becoming a shield against testing the claim.

  • IdleMindl4qg
    NodeAspect (@IdleMindl4qg) reported

    @Battlefield Horrible game! Broken and unbalanced

  • 6db560c87fec4ea
    Marwan (@6db560c87fec4ea) reported

    @Hyago_Cruz_BR @BattlefieldComm And testing is non-existent. Maybe testing for them is automated like a check list of AI testing a selected new feature or fix.

  • GetCheatz
    Mr. Margheritiiii (@GetCheatz) reported

    @falsewoodxt @HeatherMischief @DooM49 influencer... 🤡 He's raving on YouTube and on X how Battlefield 6 is perfect and you're saying I'm the only one who has problems with Battlefield 6... 🤡 I'm not the only one who has problems like someone wrote above...

  • justwatchinrad
    Jacob K (@justwatchinrad) reported

    @hdagres Iran is degraded but a correct analysis. The issue wasn’t the battlefield- it was will.

  • KadofanHypnos
    TheSmokingDuck (@KadofanHypnos) reported

    @Slorpler My main problem with Jetpack Cat’s lore is the fact that Brigitte made a Jetpack with machine guns for a cat which as far as she knows has the intelligence of an average cat, then sent it out into a battlefield with 0 concern whatsoever.

  • __abioye_
    Pọ́ọ̀lù (@__abioye_) reported

    @nytimes @TheAthleticFC That Canada vs. Qatar match was painful to watch—truly painful. Let's hope Ismail Koné is not badly injured, because that pitch was a battlefield of bad decisions and broken rhythm. The game was so poor, Qatar made Canada look like a Premier League side. Let that sink in. Absolutely amazing—and not in a good way. ASE.