Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bordeaux	Matchmaking	1 day ago
Bron	Online Play	2 days ago
Madrid	Online Play	2 days ago
La Trinité	Game Crash	7 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	8 days ago
Persan	Sign in	9 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  no_one (@cessiefdc) reported 16 seconds ago

  Apparently, there are now defenders and some duo accounts dismissing the concerns as coming from “lonely Nani fans,” when even fans who support both artists were among those who noticed the implication and expressed disappointment. The person who actually made the original post has already acknowledged that implication herself. She clarified that it wasn’t her intention, recognized that the timing and framing could have made it come across differently, deleted the post, and apologized. We took her word for it. It really could have stopped there. But apparently, some people still want another fandom war—mocking the fans who were hurt, reducing their feelings to being “lonely,” and even requoting an account that has already been listed by fans in the RNB because of its history of posts against Nani just to validate their argument. You don’t have to agree with how people interpreted the original post. But when even some duo fans saw the same implication, perhaps consider that there was context you personally didn’t see instead of immediately mocking everyone who did. And honestly, this is part of the problem with certain duo spaces today. Supporting both shouldn’t suddenly disappear when one side expresses a legitimate concern. If your first instinct is to invalidate those fans while amplifying an account with a history of targeting the very artist they’re defending, the imbalance becomes quite obvious. We know where your heart is, and that’s okay. Everyone is allowed to have a favorite. You don’t have to pretend otherwise or hide behind a duo label to justify dismissing the other side. The original poster listened. Fans explained why they were hurt. She apologized. That should have been an opportunity to close the issue, not an invitation for everyone else to open another battlefield. Neither artist asked for this. Stop creating more conflict around them over something the people actually involved were already trying to resolve. 🤍

• 
  McMfog (@McMfog) reported 1 minute ago

  @mamamurlox @Aurora_verdit The fandom of this show drives me insane, there’s never any accountability for what the women are doing. Daemon the wife slayer literally unleashed caraxes on two children. We all saw it in 4k. sir Rodrick Dustin kills a kid that’s sitting down. Ormund keeps the kids on the front lines. You are god damn right I’m turning on all of them into ash. The children are dead because they kept them on the battlefield. In a show where everyone is a piece of ****, some broken abused addict is somehow the villain. I s2g man

• 
  Make Germany Great Again (@Great_GER_Again) reported 3 minutes ago

  critical battlefield, with Iranian-aligned Shiite militias deeply embedded in the country’s security system. If those three networks were substantially weakened, Iran’s regional position would be dramatically worse. But here is the problem for Washington: This alliance does

• 
  Retrosport Gaming (@Tom2kvals) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Every first games since weeks . Happily i never have problem in my second game . Such a pleasure to wait in the worst lobby ever for no reason . Oh if you could open maps when they are 50 people waiting could be a good idea

• 
  Enders (@EndersFPS) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield You can't fix it, it's happened for as long as I've played Battlefield and certainly before that as well. Custom servers may help a bit simply because it bypasses match making

• 
  Shmuck (@lShmuckll) reported 9 minutes ago

  @MikeMumbelz @vekostuggle @Dexerto Battlefield 3 and 4 never had problems getting people on team deathmatch and **********. BF6 has lacked player count since a few months after launch. By giving players absolutely lack luster content.

• 
  Ka'ren Mkrtchyan (@mkr_kar) reported 9 minutes ago

  @bscholl The battlefield isn't the issue lol, thats not all that decides outcomes of wars

• 
  Vit (@DLVittorio) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield The problem is 99% of the current player base never experienced a classic Battlefield match, and they have literally no idea what your discussion means. They’re so used to this chaos and garbage mechanics that think this is what Battlefield means

• 
  Jouni Hulkkonen (@JouniHulkkonen) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Rottweiler_Red9 @golgothic99 @Battlefield M433 deletes SMG:s just fine up close. So does the NVO. Also SMG:s should be SMG:s and should win up close vs AR:s so what's the problem?

• 
  Leah Hoopes (@hoopes_leah) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Joeoltmann Joe, govern yourself accordingly You just publicly stated that you “don’t really care” what I did or did not do, and then, without missing a beat, declared that I “was not the woman that did the work.” You cannot claim ignorance of the record and simultaneously appoint yourself the authority on it. Pick one. You don't know what I did because you weren't there. You didn't conduct our investigations. You didn't participate in my communications. You didn't recruit the witnesses. You didn't do my leg work. You didn't prepare my court filings. You didn't sit beside me while evidence was being developed. You didn't give my testimony. You weren't involved in the relationships I established with attorneys, investigators and organizations. You weren't there for the work that preceded the people you now defend. So you are in absolutely no position to tell the public who “did the work.” And calling me a “nasty woman” and an “entitled queen” doesn't cure those facts. Those are insults from a man who just admitted he doesn't know the underlying facts. I challenged your position with facts. You answered by attacking my character. That tells me everything I need to know. I never claimed to be the only whistleblower, the only investigator, or the only person who contributed evidence. In fact, my entire argument is that every person who actually developed evidence matters because the truth requires an accurate chronology. You and others are the one trying to erase people from that chronology while admitting you don't care enough to learn it. That is precisely the problem I have been talking about. This isn't about me needing recognition from you or anyone, Joe. I couldn't care less about your approval. It is about protecting evidence, witnesses, investigations, court records and the people who can authenticate what actually happened. You want to disagree with me? Fine. Bring documents. Bring dates. Bring testimony. Bring court filings. Bring the complete chronology and put it against mine. But don't walk onto a battlefield you weren't standing on, announce that you don't care what happened there, and then start issuing orders about who did the work. You don't have the factual foundation for the authority you're pretending to exercise. Facts will always win and they matter. 6 years of contemporaneous documentation, because I knew this day would come. Preserve your communications buddy.

• 
  WAR MACHINE (@TTV_WAR_MACHINE) reported 16 minutes ago

  @nirot_ You should see Conquest in Battlefield if you’re not familiar with it. Large scale Dom with more capture points. Same issue. Guys going for the furthest flags all the time and it completely ***** up the map flow.

• 
  Jeremiah Knight (@iamrjknight) reported 17 minutes ago

  That’s a really helpful analogy, brother. I like the emphasis because newer believers can easily assume that every disagreement means someone has left the faith altogether. We really are called to contend for the gospel, but not to turn every secondary issue into a battlefield. Romans 14 gives us room to disagree on matters where Scripture does not bind every conscience in exactly the same way, while Ephesians 4:3 tells us to be “diligent to preserve the unity of the Spirit in the bond of peace.” And I think your harmony picture works especially well because harmony is not everyone singing the exact same note. There can be real distinction without disorder. The important thing is that we are still singing the same song, centered on the same Christ, under the authority of the same Word. Of course, some doctrines are foundational and cannot simply be treated as different harmonies. But among believers who confess the same gospel, we should be very careful not to turn secondary differences into reasons for unnecessary division.

• 
  Madz (@Madz_UK) reported 21 minutes ago

  @djxgam1ng @Battlefield Probably just got unlucky and got put into a game that just changed maps. Or it was a matchmaking error. All maps added are free.

• 
  El Hsn (@Rugerbat) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield meh i lost the faith in ea for them to fix the game, it's unplayable in the current state, right when golmund launched was at a prime state but had to be tweaked specially on the inf side and vehicle side, its imposible to enjoy it anymore

• 
  PenguinFriendForever (@PenguinFriendF2) reported 27 minutes ago

  Penguin says this is in memory to all of those who has been left alone at the beach due to the boat issues in Battlefield 6 🫡👉🌹 Such issues has led to that Penguin primarily spent time playing Hagental Base this far in Season 4, instead of the naval action. Patrol boat only having 2 seats?

• 
  Edu🇵🇦 (@EduACede3) reported 30 minutes ago

  @JuanIgnacioGV Marvel Spider-man Battlefield 1 Control Alan wake 2 RE 2 o 4 Remake Crash Bandicoot PS4

• 
  jaheim🇹🇿🥷 (@TZsfinestt) reported 32 minutes ago

  psyche is the battlefield. But general audiences expect the superhero formula: hero, villain, spectacle, massive third act. So when that gets replaced by psychological conflict, there’s a disconnect. They say it’s boring, there’s no punchy punchy.

• 
  ROTTWEILER_RED95 (@Rottweiler_Red9) reported 34 minutes ago

  @golgothic99 @Battlefield The only 3BTK gun that is a broken is the SCW-10. The rest are perfectly fine, apart from the AK-4D which since the last patch had its movement ADS spread increased, which combined with the 514rpm rof, makes it borderline useless.

• 
  Molly O’Shea (@MollySOShea) reported 36 minutes ago

  Neros CEO @soren_ma calls out companies who left Ukraine after finding out their products didn't work: "There's very few defense tech startups that have a meaningful amount of equipment deployed in Ukraine." "A lot of companies unfortunately would rather develop on a test range in California and then just put their head in the sand when the thing doesn't work in the battlefield." "It's a clear trend I've observed." "A lot of companies tried to go over or had stuff sent over, and then the first time around it didn't work, and instead of persisting and saying, 'We're gonna fix the stuff that didn't work and try again and try again,' just ended up walking away."

• 
  Jason (@cameded) reported 41 minutes ago

  @orangejuicefan1 @Pirat_Nation but cod has done the same thing for years now. it’s certainly not just a battlefield issue it’s a dev issue. they think it’s required for a “refreshed” season or whatever tf they wanna name it but it’s so stupid.

• 
  Phantomepics (@phantom3112) reported 41 minutes ago

  Does anyone else have the same problem in Battlefield 6, where you navigate through the menu and when you go back to start a game. The start screen is blank and have to restart the game. @EA_DICE

• 
  Ryan (@Hoskins1st) reported 41 minutes ago

  @EndersFPS BF6 wasn’t even supposed to come out until this year. So give it time. The game was released a year early. Also pretty much every Battlefield was trash for the first year or two and everyone seems to have forgotten that, but they fixed them in time. So let’s hope they fix it.

• 
  Smart Pig (@SmartPig2150) reported 43 minutes ago

  Ok. Here is legit my biggest problem with BattleField 6. My biggest singular problem. Here goes: Match Inconsistency. I don't mean between matches, I mean one match, start to finish. I can start an escalation match, go 15-1. Climb to 30-5. We're on match point. Then, out of nowhere, I can't win a gunfight to save my life. 1v1, 3v1 my favor, not a single one. We end up losing the match 2-3., and I'm 33-20. It also happens in reverse. Start the Match, I'm getting my *** beat. I'm maybe 12-11(its rare I go neg anymore but I'm not a god so it does happen), and the other team is at match point. SUDDENLY I can't LOSE gun fights. Even fights I know for a fact I should not have won(I got caught off guard, I turned on em, it was 3v1 my disadvantage). We end up winning 3-2. Sometimes it turns into a back and forth slug fest over match point and thats kinda fun but still, this pattern persists. And I think its artificial, and I don't like it. I want to win FAIRLY. I want to LOSE FAIRLY TOO. It doesn't feel like thats happening. My "hard fought" Victories are cheap and hollow, and my Brutal Defeats feel like theft. I'm not amazing at the game. This season I'm better than last season. The improvement is there. But I can't tell if its because the game is boosting me or if its holding me back anymore.

• 
  Leah Hoopes (@hoopes_leah) reported 47 minutes ago

  @Joeoltmann Joe, government yoursel accordingly You just publicly stated that you “don’t really care” what I did or did not do, and then, without missing a beat, declared that I “was not the woman that did the work.” You cannot claim ignorance of the record and simultaneously appoint yourself the authority on it. Pick one. You don't know what I did because you weren't there. You didn't conduct our investigations. You didn't participate in my communications. You didn't recruit the witnesses. You didn't do my leg work. You didn't prepare my court filings. You didn't sit beside me while evidence was being developed. You didn't give my testimony. You weren't involved in the relationships I established with attorneys, investigators and organizations. You weren't there for the work that preceded the people you now defend. So you are in absolutely no position to tell the public who “did the work.” And calling me a “nasty woman” and an “entitled queen” doesn't cure those facts. Those are insults from a man who just admitted he doesn't know the underlying facts. I challenged your position with facts. You answered by attacking my character. That tells me everything I need to know. I never claimed to be the only whistleblower, the only investigator, or the only person who contributed evidence. In fact, my entire argument is that every person who actually developed evidence matters because the truth requires an accurate chronology. You and others are the one trying to erase people from that chronology while admitting you don't care enough to learn it. That is precisely the problem I have been talking about. This isn't about me needing recognition from you or anyone, Joe. I couldn't care less about your approval. It is about protecting evidence, witnesses, investigations, court records and the people who can authenticate what actually happened. You want to disagree with me? Fine. Bring documents. Bring dates. Bring testimony. Bring court filings. Bring the complete chronology and put it against mine. But don't walk onto a battlefield you weren't standing on, announce that you don't care what happened there, and then start issuing orders about who did the work. You don't have the factual foundation for the authority you're pretending to exercise. Facts will always win and they matter. 6 years of contemporaneous documentation, because I knew this day would come. Preserve your communications buddy.

• 
  Battle(non)sense | Chris (@BattleNonSense) reported 49 minutes ago

  @DLVittorio @Battlefield That does apply to quite many. However they are clearly those who do see the problems, but they are unable to take the next step and understand why those problems showed up and accept what needs to change to improve the situation and fix the issues they complain about.

• 
  StarPlatinum (@StarPlatinum_) reported 50 minutes ago

  The downfall of $BONK explained: - launches on Solana on December 25, 2022 - immediately after the FTX collapse - community token built to bring activity back to Solana - 50% of the supply is distributed to the community - 297K wallets Late 2023: BONKbot - BONKbot becomes one of the strongest products connected to the ecosystem - allows users to trade Solana tokens directly through Telegram December 2023: the explosion - Coinbase listing - Binance listing - BONK becomes one of the biggest memecoins on Solana 2024: expansion - OKX adds BONK spot and perpetual trading in January - BONKrewards introduces locking and rewards for BONK holders - BonkSOL expands the ecosystem into liquid/staked SOL November 2024: the peak - BONK reaches an ATH of $0.00005825 on November 19 - market cap reaches $4B at the peak And another major product was coming. 2025: BONK fun - launches as a Solana memecoin launchpad - part of the economic model directs fees toward the BONK ecosystem including buyback/burn mechanics - reaches a 55.2% share of Solana token launches - processes $540M in volume - facilitates 175K token launches - generates $34M in fees for a period, BONK’s ecosystem was beating Pumpfun on its own battlefield 2025- 2026: the decline - BONK fun revenue becomes dependent on launchpad speculation - BonkSwap fails to become a major Solana DEX - BONKrewards eventually displays “No new staking deposits available” - BonkSOL loses part of the TVL it previously attracted The problem becomes increasingly obvious: BONK built products. But owning BONK was not the same thing as owning equity in those products. Then things get much worse. June 30, 2026: the malicious proposal - a governance proposal appears inside BonkDAO - the proposal seeks control of 4.426T BONK from the treasury instead of exploiting a traditional smart contract vulnerability, the attacker targets governance itself July 6: the DAO attack - the malicious proposal passes - 4.426T BONK is transferred from the treasury - the transfer happens just 49 seconds after voting ends stolen BONK is valued at $20M The attacker effectively bought enough influence to make the DAO authorize the transfer. July 18: attacker tokens start moving - 400B BONK is reportedly transferred to Coinbase Late July: - another reported 1.186T BONK is moved toward centralized exchanges - 3.2T BONK reportedly remains in the related wallet August 7: mixed news - Bithumb removes BONK from its watchlist - Upbit announces it will terminate BONK trading support September 7, 2026: - Upbit is scheduled to terminate BONK trading support at 15:00 KST - withdrawals are expected to remain available for a limited period afterward one of the exchanges that helped BONK expand in Korea is now preparing to remove it Today: - BONK market cap sits at $217M - down 39% the last 30 days - down 95.8% from its price ATH market cap collapsed from $4.04B to $217M A total of $3.8B in market value has disappeared from the peak

• 
  The Antagonist (@fransthelion315) reported 50 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @EA @EA_DICE yall have 24 hours to put these game modes back and ******* leave them. How u gona advertise something and then remove it? Fix it bruh .

• 
  FinalBoss.io (@FinalBoss_io) reported 55 minutes ago

  400 hours and Steam still said yes. Good. If you buy Battlefield through Rush, Squad Deathmatch, and King of the Hill, then those modes getting stripped out of Quick Play is not a minor playlist tweak. It’s the product changing after the sale. "It’s still in Portal" is doing a lot of corporate heavy lifting here. A mode hidden in the server browser with half-dead lobbies is not the same thing as supported matchmaking. Live service keeps using the word support when downgrade is the more honest term. If publishers can quietly remove the reasons people bought the game, refunds shouldn’t require a support miracle. They should be automatic.

• 
  Gaurav Tomar (@talkwithgt) reported 57 minutes ago

  After a decade dominating the corporate battlefield, the cold truth slammed into me. Out of every 100 people, 60 are dead weight. They’re not working. They’re not grinding. They’re just floating, doing the bare minimum while collecting a paycheck. And those same mediocre 60? They’re the ones softly programming the other 40 who are actually putting in the blood and hours, telling them to “keep going,” “stay loyal,” “be patient,” and that success will somehow magically arrive if they just keep sacrificing. They need the hard workers to keep believing that lie. Because if the 40 ever woke up, the 60 would have nowhere left to hide.

• 
  medoyid_ua (@LetsArmUKR) reported 59 minutes ago

  @CasetaBosque Every truck burned in Luhansk is a supply line that never reaches the front. The 8th Regiment keeps proving that logistics is the real battlefield, and moscovia keeps losing it. Drones didnt just change the war, they turned Ukraines lack of an air force into a non-issue.