Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (42%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (7%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
La Trinité	Game Crash	2 days ago
Lyon	Online Play	4 days ago
Persan	Sign in	4 days ago
Metz	Sign in	4 days ago
Lyon	Matchmaking	5 days ago
Aubais	Online Play	7 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Nev Rhea (@NevRhea) reported 1 minute ago

  @RollingHedge This snippet of his latest drop, despite being in the section of the interview with Pete Blaber, is applicable to anything, even the Farage inner circus itself: 《[...]It’s this disconnected chain of command … trying to make decisions and solve problems and then injecting those decisions and those solutions into the battlefield. And guys who can see everything, hear everything, know what the right thing to do [i.e those on the ground] — are, you know, nothing more than gnomes who have to obey these mindless orders from the starship.[...]》

• 
  Clim3x (@clim3x) reported 4 minutes ago

  @DrChrisEvansMD @SilkOCE @EA_DICE I changed it back to Lime. No issue as it's unique enough with the tag I was in a competitive team BNut / Battlefield Nut since BF1942 and VNut / VeteraNuts since "retirement" Nut = No use talking Will they think Nut is an innuendo too? Can't be Nuts about Battlefield anymore

• 
  Unlikely Intentional 🔞 (@UnlikeIntention) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Hoenn_Boi Crazy how Garon, Ryoma and Anankos could have won their respective wars if they just figured out they should spread broken glass all over the battlefield to take out Corrin and Azura.

• 
  Sunny Ray (@sunnyray) reported 8 minutes ago

  the first ai heist in bitcoin just made bitcoin stronger last week an attacker drained over $100 million in bitcoin from thousands of coldcard hardware wallets. nobody was phished. no device was stolen. no cryptography was broken. a five year old bug in the firmware told the device to skip its hardware randomness chip.... and use a predictable software substitute instead. that made seed phrases guessable. searchable. offline. here's the part everyone is missing. the bug sat in open source code for five years. thousands of human eyes passed over it. then someone pointed an ai at the codebase.... and found the needle in the haystack. coinkite even admitted they ran one of the best ai models over their own code a few weeks earlier. it found nothing. the attacker's ai did. and after the hack? someone asked claude to review the same code. it found the flaw in eight minutes. you're watching an arms race begin in real time. think about what that stolen bitcoin actually is. it's a bounty. a nine figure advertisement telling every hacker on earth that ai plus open source code equals payday. right now they're pointing models at every wallet, every exchange, every piece of bitcoin infrastructure that exists. sounds terrifying, right? flip it. the defenders have the same models. every bitcoin company on the planet just got the loudest wake up call in the industry's history. continuous ai audits are becoming table stakes. red teams that never sleep, scanning code around the clock, patching before attackers strike. this is an immune system activating. bitcoin gets attacked first because bitcoin is worth attacking. it's pure digital capital.... the highest value, most liquid prize on the internet. that's not a weakness. that's the reason bitcoin's security evolves faster than anything else. your bank runs on code too. so does your power grid, your hospital, your government. they just haven't been stress tested by the smartest adversaries on earth yet. bitcoin is the canary, the proving ground, the foreshadow of what's coming for every system that holds value. and the lessons are already compounding. multisig across multiple devices. dice rolls for entropy. verify, don't trust.... even your hardware. the protocol itself never blinked. not one satoshi moved without a valid signature. every attack that doesn't kill bitcoin becomes part of its immune memory. sixteen years of this. every scar a lesson, every breach a stronger antibody. the ai wars have begun and bitcoin is the first battlefield. the systems forged here will protect everything else later. so the question isn't whether ai makes bitcoin less safe. it's this.... when the machines come for the rest of the financial system, which network will have already survived them?

• 
  LtMcGuganfps (@TheRobbieBlair) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The single BEST thing y'all could do is to stop forcing crossplay 10s of thousands of us will not play with crossplay on Crossplay destroys the experience. From great fun to garbage with the flip of that switch Ping from 38 to 100 Constant light glitches Constant lag issue

• 
  Brig P S Gothra (Retd) (@gothratipu) reported 11 minutes ago

  IDHAR UDHAR KI BAAT 144 — COLGATE, XEROX... AND SOLDIER Brig PS Gothra (Retd.) "Saab, Paytm kar ke WhatsApp kar dena," my car cleaner said about renumeration after cleaning my car. I smiled. In one sentence he had unknowingly narrated the history of modern branding. He neither expected me to use Paytm nor insisted that I send him a WhatsApp message. The money could go through PhonePe, Google Pay or BHIM. The message could be an SMS. It didn't matter. The brands had quietly swallowed the products. Growing up in Punjab, I suffered from the same confusion. I genuinely believed The Tribune was another word for an English newspaper. Likewise, every photocopy was a Xerox. Every digging machine was a JCB. Every instant noodle was Maggi. Every rugged four-wheel drive was a Jeep. Then came Close-Up. One of the cleverest advertising campaigns of my youth asked, _"Kya aap Close-Up karte hain?"_ Notice the brilliance. The advertisement wasn't asking, "Do you use Close-Up?" It was trying to make Close-Up replace Colgate in everyday language. It won market share. But it lost the dictionary. Even today, after brushing with Sensodyne, Dabur Red or Pepsodent, mothers still ask, "Colgate kiya?" That is branding at its finest. Or perhaps...at its most dangerous. Because sometimes branding does something it should never do. The company spends decades building a brand, only to discover that the brand has become so popular that it loses its own legal identity. Few people know that Escalator, Thermos, Cellophane and, in several countries, even Aspirin were once protected brand names. Their success became their undoing. People began using them for every moving staircase, every vacuum flask, every transparent wrapping sheet and every painkiller. The trademarks became common nouns. Ironically, the companies that created them gradually lost the exclusive right to those names. Success had become a legal liability. It erases identities. Recently, I heard a gentleman point towards a camouflage-clad man and proudly tell his son, "Beta, soldier ko salute karo." The gentleman meant well. But the man wasn't a soldier. He belonged to another uniformed service. An honourable profession. A demanding profession. But not soldiering. That made me wonder. Have we become so fond of borrowing prestige that we now borrow identities as well? Camouflage uniforms. Military-style rank badges. Combat terminology. The word soldier generously distributed to almost anyone wearing disruptive-pattern clothing. If branding succeeds by replacing one word with another, are we now trying to replace professions as well? A surgeon would not like to be called a physician. A judge would not like to be introduced as a lawyer. A pilot would object if someone called him a driver. Because every profession has its own qualifications, responsibilities and traditions. Then why should soldiering be any different? A soldier is not defined merely by camouflage. Nor by boots. Nor by medals. Nor by rank. He is defined by something far less visible. Unlimited liability. When a young man joins the Army, he signs a covenant unlike almost any other profession. The nation may one day order him towards danger rather than away from it. He cannot negotiate. He cannot resign on the battlefield. He may be required to lay down his life to complete the mission. That willingness is not stitched onto the uniform. It is stitched into the oath. Perhaps that is why soldiering has always occupied a unique place in every civilisation. Not because soldiers wear camouflage. But because they accept consequences that most professions never will. Another thought crossed my mind. Colgate became a generic word because it was too successful. I only hope soldier never becomes one. Some names are brands. Some names are professions. And a few...must remain sacred. Jai Hind. For other blogs click link in comments

• 
  zexirrr (@zexirrr4495) reported 15 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix crossplay on Xbox

• 
  Rainbow Rogger 🐴🦈 | GerVTuber (@RainbowRogger) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Yesterday was the first time I throw a controller cause auf your stupid random spread. This destroy stiff and my Boyfriend are are the only thing that holds me on you. Hope you get your *** up and fix your stuff....

• 
  Morty (@IITheOneandOnl1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Please fix the grenade indicator, getting blown up by invisible grenades is actually Hella annoying.

• 
  Bart (@bartk1e) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the bugs!!!

• 
  Effortlesss (@Effortlesss_) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Matching takes no more than 5 seconds EVER time I matchmake just to throw me into empty lobbies constantly… fix the fkn game already it’s been broken since release. Multiplayer is unplayable rn.

• 
  Jean (@JeanTVx) reported 23 minutes ago

  Might be weird request @WARDOGS but is there any possibility that accessibility options could be added like minimap size. My vision isn't the best and most of the time I find it fairly hard to see the needed info on the minimap. Having the same issue with battlefield 6.

• 
  Asya ❀˖° ꕤ˖♡ SEEING ARI 8.15 (@nightlyroutines) reported 24 minutes ago

  @canary_khan @WHAATEVEN i guess the issue is the fact that on a battlefield when fighting other giant robots with guns, she’s literally NOT protected. and she looks like she would fly out of the cockpit at any moment 😭

• 
  Hurricane (@hurricane1926) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Ask Genshin impact what happened with kernel level anti cheat in 2022.. one mistake and you are done. Also, the anti cheat is not working and they, dice/EA games, are lying about the cheat attempts because there are not even so much people playing this game lol.

• 
  Gbenga Samuel-Wemimo (@GbengaWemimo) reported 29 minutes ago

  Some men spend all day making decisions, solving problems, dealing with deadlines, managing employees, running businesses, protecting people, fixing situations, or carrying responsibilities that nobody else sees. When they get home, they don't want to brace themselves for another battle. They want to exhale. They want to know that the person they're building a life with isn't another source of unnecessary stress. That doesn’t mean there won’t be disagreements, bills, kids crying, and household chores to handle. It simply means the relationship itself isn’t another battlefield.

• 
  War Alerts (@WarNewsGlobal) reported 32 minutes ago

  @sentdefender A decoy drone carrying explosives? That sounds less like a simple navigation error and more like a messy battlefield problem.

• 
  Cass 💜🔞 (@perfectcrimes_) reported 32 minutes ago

  @WolfBeils He's never been bad, people just had a skill issue. I remember being forced to only him in a challenge run (until everyone else was reclassed appropriatly) and he was a savior at every turn. Will never diss my King of the Battlefield!

• 
  Jouni Hulkkonen (@JouniHulkkonen) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The issue with the matchmaking is that it is trying to compensate way too hard with just a few players. Like i'll be playing with my friend and i get a team who is just afk and never plays the obj, meanwhile i am always trying to get to an obj and my team is just afk.

• 
  DemizeFPS (@DemizeFPS) reported 37 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Pulling players from others regions with high ping doesn't improve match quaility lag polarization needs to be tune where players high ping cant force deysnc or heavily favor for compensation.

• 
  Kwamisika (@Kwamisika1) reported 39 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Just bring back all the game modes...honestly never had an issue with squad deathmatch matchmaking...only very late in the kightbit would take more time but was worth the wait regardless ...barely had an issue...bring it back or lose vets

• 
  Chris Gill (@ATasteOfZen) reported 40 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Spending half our playtime backing out to the lobby because the game refuses to take our whole squad in is getting tedious, 9 months in. Still pleading for this issue to be fixed.

• 
  Sumit Bishnoi (@BodySumit81060) reported 42 minutes ago

  @ndtv Parliament isn't a battlefield for egos—it's where the nation's problems should be solved. India deserves debate, not deadlock. 🇮🇳

• 
  DETROiiT TRiiCK (@detroiittriick) reported 44 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm The TTK is indeed fast and has been an issue since launch. All we want is a fair balanced TTK like BF4, BFV & BF2042. If I get shot from behind or from the side, I should have the ability to react and return fire and not die in 1 frame like what’s happening right now.

• 
  Yen- Ting (@YenTing39) reported 47 minutes ago

  The drill focused on a real battlefield problem: getting forces into position quickly before an enemy can act.

• 
  Resilience (@hiResilience) reported 50 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm BLACK SCREEN BUG FIX WHEN?????

• 
  nAtEdAwG (@natedawgg46) reported 53 minutes ago

  @Rapha_828 @MrProWestie No one will care if it does, the trust is already severely broken with the community and way past the chance of being repaired by the Devs. Players won't buy the next battlefield. I think I'm headed down that path too.

• 
  Larry Roe (@RoeR68678) reported 56 minutes ago

  @sentdefender You throw enough money at any problem and fix it. It isn’t a matter of accelerating the production, it’s a matter of meeting the needs of the future battlefield, and not wasting millions on a one shot solution.

• 
  KontrolStyle (@KontrolStyleTV) reported 60 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix something, let's break 10 other things. Gl with the game, server browser may not save this game after all.

• 
  Anjan Dukh Bhanjan (@YehLoKalloBaat) reported 60 minutes ago

  @VarunKrRana But atleast you morons are talking about it. Till yesterday there was no issue at all but the moment RG talked about it you all sanghi chomus have come to the battlefield to defend the fraud govt

• 
  The Psycho Analyst (@TheRealBirnbaum) reported 60 minutes ago

  $PLTR FCF run rate just about to hit $5B. Everyone who called this “dangerously” overvalued, or that it would trade sideways for or crash within the next five to ten years, or that it couldn’t sustain its growth was speaking from a place of total ignorance about the company. They instead depended on generalized mean reversion that had zero relevance to world-class businesses. At 50% sustained growth $PLTR should trade at at least 100X FCF. This would only be fair value. If sentiment gets ahead of itself we could see 200X. I told you $PLTR is a trillion dollar business and could one day be the biggest company in the world. Everyone said I was crazy. Meanwhile, $PLTR is monopolizing the data layer in an age where data is quite literally the most valuable resource. Whether we’ve reached AGI is debatable. Whether optimizing AI requires data is not. You can think of $PLTR as the CUDA of digital twins. Their lead is far too big to be overtaken. Microsoft dominates enterprise with a basic OS. $PLTR is building the OS for 21st century enterprise, and even fewer understand this than those who understood Microsoft’s dominance in 1995. You simply cannot run a large enterprise without $PLTR and expect to compete. You will lose to the competitor who can literally see the battlefield as if it were a recipe for a BLT.