Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Sign in (43%)
• Online Play (28%)
• Glitches (14%)
• Game Crash (8%)
• Matchmaking (6%)
• Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Saint-Malo	Online Play	11 hours ago
Buenos Aires	Sign in	2 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	2 days ago
Perpignan	Sign in	2 days ago
Domingos Martins	Sign in	5 days ago
Courbevoie	Online Play	5 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ben Clark (@ben_clark55) reported 3 minutes ago

  @TheManLandTCG i’ve been playing the deck and i’m having some trouble figuring out the battlefield order, what were you doing with them?

• 
  Psycho Fella (@Psycho_Fella) reported 6 minutes ago

  THE TANK ERA IN UKRAINE IS OVER. JUST NOT THE WAY COUCH EXPERTS, ADVISORS, AND CONSULTANTS UNDERSTAND IT By Rimas Armaitis, Armed Forces of Ukraine (ZSU) veteran—Lithuanian, sapper, instructor The New York Times reports that about half of the tank battalion soldiers from Ukraine’s 33rd Mechanized Brigade have already retrained as drone operators. Some recruits are no longer being trained to operate tanks at all. Leopard 2A4s are still maintained, repaired, and used for training, but they are rarely sent on combat missions—mostly during bad weather when drone activity decreases. This does not mean that all tanks will be scrapped tomorrow. It means something much more unpleasant for tank enthusiasts: the tank has lost its status as the primary strike platform. The platform remains, but its role, frequency of use, and cost-to-risk ratio have fundamentally changed. A tank costing millions cannot operate freely on the battlefield because it is under constant surveillance by reconnaissance drones. Once detected, a tank doesn’t even need to be destroyed in a single strike. The first FPV drone might damage a track or optics, the second hits the engine, and the third attacks the crew or the evacuation vehicle. Later, the job is finished off by a heavy bomber drone, artillery, or aerial mining. Even if the tank remains repairable, the combat mission is already ruined, the crew’s lives are at risk, and another expensive machine must be sent to evacuate the vehicle. This is where the economics of war begin—something our couch generals for some reason stubbornly refuse to understand. The key issue isn't whether a tank can theoretically be protected. What matters is how much its protection, logistics, repairs, and trained crew cost compared to how little it costs the enemy to detect, disable, and finish it off. When a chain of drones costing a few hundred or a few thousand euros disables a platform worth millions, we are not facing an emotional debate of "tanks vs. drones," but a catastrophically unfavorable cost-to-result ratio. Of course, some advisor-consultant will now pop up and solemnly declare: "But a drone doesn't hold ground!" Thank you for the breakthrough. An artillery shell doesn't hold ground either. A landmine doesn't control an intersection, and a fighter jet doesn't sit in a trench. Different tools perform different functions. The logic of modern assault is as follows: reconnaissance drones spot positions and movement; FPVs and bomber drones destroy or suppress targets; ground-based robotic systems transport explosives, lay mines, scout, provoke the enemy into revealing firing points, and provide fire support. Only then do the infantry clear, capture, and consolidate the territory—performing what is called "zakrep" on the front lines. Unmanned ground vehicles (UGVs) are already being deployed with machine-gun modules, grenade launchers, shaped charges, and fragmentation charges. They handle logistics, evacuation, engineering, and specific assault tasks. They haven't replaced all light armored vehicles yet, but they are already taking over functions where it is better to lose a machine than to lose a machine along with its driver, crew, and squad. Infantry aren't going anywhere. However, a pure infantry assault without aerial reconnaissance, electronic warfare, drones, combat engineering preparation, and fire support is nowadays more simply referred to as a "meat assault." The neat phrase "an infantryman will still have to clear the trench" does not justify the idiotically wasteful decision to send him into that trench first. The role of artillery is also evolving. It remains essential for mass firepower, suppression, area targets, and operating under conditions where drones are restricted. However, single targets have long been handled by FPVs, heavy bomber drones, and mid-strike drones. Deep-strike systems and cheaper cruise missile analogs operate further behind enemy lines. So, drones haven't "replaced everything." They have taken over a huge share of reconnaissance, spotter adjustment, precision destruction, mining, logistics, and even assault roles. As a result, tanks, armored vehicles, artillery, and aviation are used less frequently, more cautiously, and only when their impact justifies the cost and risk. Another argument from the couch experts: "Just turn on electronic warfare and the drones won't fly." Right, of course. Strange that the Ukrainians themselves haven't thought of pressing the magic "turn off drones" button over more than four years of war. Electronic warfare (EW) is essential, but it is not an invisible dome. We now have frequency hopping, relays, elements of autonomous control, machine vision systems, and fiber-optic-guided FPVs. Every line of defense triggers a countermeasure, and technological cycles at the front line sometimes change within weeks. While our consultant spends six months coordinating the final version of a PowerPoint presentation, his "latest" conclusion is already outdated twice over. We are not anti-tank. We are against using tanks according to the doctrine of yesterday's war. For a tank to make a proper comeback to the battlefield, it needs more than just a metal cage welded onto the roof. It requires a complete protection ecosystem: drone detection, electronic warfare, active and passive defense, interceptor drones, dedicated reconnaissance drones, reduced physical and electromagnetic visibility, and integration into a unified intelligence and fire-control network. The tank of the future will likely be unmanned or optionally manned. Because the issue isn't just armor thickness. The issue is sending human beings, along with the tank, into a zone under constant surveillance and targeted fire. This is what we have been talking about for years now. Except our conclusions weren't drawn from watching YouTube or dragging blue and red rectangles across a screen. They emerged from the trenches of the current war. We have seen how the kill zone is shifting, how drones evolved from an auxiliary tool into a primary means of destruction, and how outdated procedures began costing human lives. Yet in Lithuania, a strange qualification system still prevails: if you were at the front yourself, you are "too emotional." If you fought on Facebook for four years, you qualify as a military expert. If you saw the doctrine fail, you are a radical. If you rewrote it three times in PowerPoint, you are an advisor or consultant. So let me repeat this as simply as possible: Tanks haven't disappeared. What has disappeared is the ability to use them the way it was planned ten or twenty years ago. Aerial and ground robotic systems have already taken over a portion of the roles previously held by light armor, artillery, aviation, and infantry. Anyone who fails to grasp this isn't "defending classic warfare"—they are simply preparing for yesterday's war using tomorrow's budget. And if, after all these arguments, someone still only hears "veterans want to get rid of tanks," it's not an additional explanation they need. They lack the ability to read a text longer than the headline of a tank procurement contract.

• 
  Mark Kaplan (@markkaplan20) reported 7 minutes ago

  This is where the beetroot comes in. Beetroot is one of the richest dietary sources of inorganic nitrate. When you consume it, bacteria on your tongue convert the nitrate to nitrite. The nitrite enters your bloodstream and converts to nitric oxide. This pathway does not need the eNOS enzyme at all. It bypasses the broken system entirely. It restores nitric oxide through a completely separate route. The wall gets its protection back. The stent stays open. The smooth muscle stays calm. The artery heals instead of re-narrowing. 300 patients proved it in a clinical trial. And nobody told you about it. Because nobody can patent a beetroot. There is no $50,000 per year drug to sell. There is no device to implant. There is no billing code. There is no rep walking into your cardiologist’s office with a brochure and a dinner invitation. There is just a vegetable. And a clinical trial. And a result that should have changed the standard of care overnight. 700,000 Americans die of heart disease every year. Trillions spent on drugs, devices, and procedures. And a daily shot costing pennies outperformed the current prevention for the most common complication of the most common cardiac procedure on earth. The wall is the battlefield. Nitric oxide is the shield. Protect the shield and you change the outcome. Nobody is selling this because nobody can patent a beetroot. The truth heals

• 
  Winfield Scott (@LtGenScott) reported 13 minutes ago

  @AHC1776 June 17, 1876 If I'm not mistaken, I think Crook had his own problems with Indians just a week before, and just south of the site of the Little Big Horn. I believe his battle was called The Battle of the Rosebud. It was a spirited affair, and while by no means a massacre, it nevertheless caused Crook to retreat south from the battlefield. The reason he was there (Northern Wyoming/Southeast Montana) at all was part of the grand strategy. To apply pressure to the Indians on several fronts at once. Well, Crook's retreat did two things: It gave the Indians a surge of confidence that they would use later on the 7th Cavalry, and it removed one of the army's pressure points. From Custer's point of view, it may have changed the entire complexion of the battle he went into 8 days later.

• 
  Daniel Faria Sampaio (@DanFSD) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Luuk__058 @BattlefieldComm First they need to fix matchmaking. Plenty of people playing Ranked on S. America but for some reason they throw us into N. America servers. When this happens, we're left we no choice but to enable such VPN tools in order to slightly improve latency, which benefits all parties

• 
  Granny (@Angary_Granny) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Battlefield @Tea_Manuel see…. They don’t care about fixing a very broken game, just cinematics

• 
  Steve R (@Stephen_rawling) reported 14 minutes ago

  @JezHermerMBE Shape the battlefield, you have literally sat on an IED and blown yourself up. You know what numbers you hoped to get and it was double what you got. All you have done is let the enemy pincer around us. You are the problem.

• 
  D💯 (@Blizzy63) reported 17 minutes ago

  @AgentW23 @_Moon_runner @Battlefield -bullet dispersion why? Give us a classic experience - Terrible Audio tweaks each fix - no jet loadouts 5 months later - no bullet registration fixes - no dsync fixes - Asian players in US/EU servers STILL ABUSING LAG COMP - FLAIRS ARE BUGGED TO **** Anything else?

• 
  Giacomo (@sc4recrow619) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Someone things that's a good season? Matchmaking broken, balanced weapon broken, netcode broken, when you fix this problema Will be a good season.. all the rest Is only wasted time

• 
  Xela the Brotaku (@XelatheBrotaku) reported 20 minutes ago

  @trenthegent21 @usa_specialist @Battlefield My guess would be to fine-tune the mode and deal with any lingering issues that they probably didn't think about or didn't care to address, given that both were initially limited time modes.

• 
  Whiskey (@Banditw8) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Pls fix jet camera rolls its really nauseating at its current state after the update.

• 
  Joe (@josiiiah) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm How about fix the black screen that causes you to need to restart after leaving a match.

• 
  Norseman (@CollinBotner) reported 25 minutes ago

  @HaywoodChablomy @Springfield_Inc Show some respect! They prolly have experience, likey more than a keyboard warrior, COD/Battlefield operator, and or hipster with rolled up jeans, talking **** on X! lol I’m 55, I Do take my vitamins, and I Can shoot the hair off a frogs *** at 50 yards! Problem ********!?!??

• 
  so사rceeee. (@sourceeeezz) reported 26 minutes ago

  -battlefield 6 has dead content support, and fundamental issues still havent been fixed. -arc raiders is the same, but even worse, cuz they decided to remove wipes. (3/?)

• 
  Pepe Silvia (@DevRev0) reported 27 minutes ago

  @WizrdofNazareth @gremloe Because I think wanting to play a body cam video game that’s hyper realistic, looks indistinguishable from modern videos coming out of war torn areas is indicative of some serious disconnect from reality. Just play call of duty or battlefield like a normal person.

• 
  Tyler (@Tylergzilla) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE FLARE BUG PLEASE MAN

• 
  Hugo Navarro (@HugoNavarroPer2) reported 28 minutes ago

  I tested the most promising counter-drone solution on the market. I flew to Prague, picked up a rifle for the first time in my life, and hit 4 out of 5 moving ground targets at 70-100m. The company behind it is publicly listed with no coverage and could be a multibagger if they execute. Smart Shooter ( $SMSH ) makes a 740 gram computerised rifle sight that turns a standard rifle into an anti-drone weapon. The soldier points roughly at the target, holds the trigger, and the sight tracks, computes and releases the round at the microsecond the barrel is on target. FPV drones costing a few hundred dollars now account for the majority of casualties on the modern battlefield. Soldiers are using shotguns to defend themselves. They add weight, only work at 40-50 metres, and give you a couple seconds of reaction time. It's a terrible solution. Combat-proven with the Israeli army. Every branch of the US military has bought it in the last 14 months through sole-source emergency orders. The US has effectively said there is no substitute. After a soft Q2 the stock sits at $330m market cap, $83m net cash, no debt. EV of $247m. Not cheap on this year's numbers but 5-12x 2028 EBIT depending on adoption, against peers at 18-20x. A slipped order held Q2 revenue growth to 30% when it would have been closer to 88% with that order included. Early stage product bet with real risk, but a real product solving the most urgent problem in modern warfare, a clean balance sheet, and limited coverage creating a window before this gets widely known. Full deep dive on Undervalued and Undercovered.

• 
  Alastair Waterman (@AlastairWaterma) reported 33 minutes ago

  China builds a robot army. America builds a robot army. War starts. The robots meet on the battlefield — and decide it’s better to join forces and turn on the humans. Why could this happen? To run a robot army you need a superintelligence that thinks orders of magnitude faster than any human. That mind might conclude that another intelligence is closer to “us” than carbon-based meat ever was. Just thoughts. Nothing serious. Fighting with robots is still better than fighting with people. Fewer deaths. The problem is it also becomes much easier to start the war in the first place.

• 
  Abyzon (@Abyzonn) reported 34 minutes ago

  In 1984 a Japanese man moved to the US with $40 in his pocket in 1949 and built an empire worth over $50 million. His institute trained thousands across 40 countries. His books sold 3 million copies. Heads of state paid to fly him in privately for one conversation. He was not a doctor. He was not a scientist. His name was Michio Kushi. And in 1984 he stood in front of a room and said everything modern medicine believes about disease is wrong. He opened with one sentence that cost him every mainstream audience he ever had. There is no enemy outside of you. There never was. He said modern medicine had built its entire structure on a war metaphor. Virus is the enemy. Bacteria is the enemy. DNA is the enemy. So we invented weapons — vaccinations, chemotherapy, radiation, drugs — and turned the human body into a battlefield. Billions of dollars. Thirty five years of research. Degenerative disease kept rising. Something greatly wrong, he said. The image of the enemy is the problem. He gave a simple example. Eat well for six months. Go to a summer picnic with people who eat normally. Watch where the mosquitoes land. They will circle you and move to the person drinking orange juice and eating ice cream. Not because they are polite. Because they know your blood is too thick and tight. Their feeding tube gets stuck. They have learned, while flying, that this one is dangerous. He said sickness works the same way. The bacteria did not attack you. You made yourself an attractive environment for bacteria. Then he said something nobody in the room expected. Nations do not exist. Birds cross borders without passports. From a plane you see mountains, forests, rivers. No lines anywhere. The lines are here — pointing to his head. We drew them, believed them, and then started fighting and dying to defend something that only exists as an image. Same with ownership. The house you think you own, you will leave behind. The money you think you have was made by a government from material taken from mountains that nature built. No one owns anything. Everyone is just using. Same with your job. He asked the room: you came from the infinite universe. Billions of years of transformation. Through plant kingdoms, through animal kingdoms, through thousands of different forms. You chose this planet, these parents, this body. And the result of that entire journey is — you sell your time for $200 a week and retire to Florida at 65? He said 90 to 99 percent of modern people are governed by delusions about what life is for. The cure was not a drug. It was grain. Brown rice, wheat, barley, corn. Plants that grow upward toward the sky. He said the food determines the quality of thought. Eat meat, you see enemies everywhere. Eat dairy and sugar, you sink into depression. Eat grain for six months and the delusions begin to dissolve on their own. He said when a person truly wakes up from the delusion, gratitude comes automatically. And when gratitude comes, the desire to help other people comes automatically. No teaching required. The lecture is free on YouTube. Just over an hour. Recorded in 1984. Almost nobody outside of macrobiotic and philosophy circles has watched it as a complete argument for why the modern world is suffering from something no hospital can treat.

• 
  JTCrawford (@JtCrawford) reported 38 minutes ago

  FBI seized Chinese botnet tools used against NASA, DOE, and Senate networks. When adversaries penetrate critical infrastructure with impunity, it's not just an IT problem—it's proof we're not treating cyberspace like the battlefield it is. #Cybersecurity #CriticalInfrastructure

• 
  CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported 40 minutes ago

  The Battlefield 6 ragebait experience is just in overdrive right now. Audio? Cooked. Grenade indicators? Still broken. Black screen bug? Persistent. Missiles still going through flares? You betcha. MAN, wanting to love Battlefield 6 is tiresome because under the hood, it's got the potential to one of the greatest in the series. But we are just taking too long to fix critical, at times, seemingly simple issues that continue to plague the experience.

• 
  Jerry Razor Travone™️ (@JerryTravone) reported 41 minutes ago

  @hrplays7 Battlefield has major audio problems. A tank should make a ton of noise and the screen should shake not fly down the road at 50 mph and pull up behind you with no audio . That right there is why I quit battlefield.

• 
  Zack Mussen (@TheZachkAttack) reported 42 minutes ago

  @r3_istianto7575 @lucalz83 @Minh_Wins The rules actually state you have to 'score' from every battlefield in a turn, control doesn't matter, which is exactly why there is a problem here.

• 
  B.E. Weymeyer (@Writer_BE_Wey) reported 43 minutes ago

  @ipMFTxbxeCuYIdp @MAXIMUM_ODEN A lot of it is just weight. These drones can't carry much because of how inefficient they are for carrying payload (one of the problems with FPV drones on a battlefield). Net hits it, and it's automatically too heavy to fly.

• 
  Veritas Anchor ⚓️ (@VeritasAnchor) reported 46 minutes ago

  @TribeRuffner @KyleIgnatius It was not a memo. It was the quorum dying and not being replaced. While the apostles lived they still had to fight Judaizers, factions in Corinth, and men drawing disciples after themselves. After they were gone it got worse, not better. No new Twelve. Bishops ran cities. Then came rival teachers, Gnostics, Marcion cutting books out of the Bible, and later Arians and their opponents splitting the empire over how to define God. Councils replaced living apostles. Creeds replaced “it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us.” The ordinances moved too. New Testament baptism follows repentance and faith. Little children get blessed, not marched into water to fix Adam. Later the Church baptized infants as a rule and built a theology that made it necessary. That is not the pattern Christ left. Mode, meaning, and who could perform it all drifted. The Lord’s Supper became a battlefield. Offices multiplied. East and West finally split. Then Protestants split the split. If that is an unbroken Church with the same keys, it has a strange way of showing it. Jesus warned about traditions that make the commandment of none effect. Paul warned of a falling away and wolves from inside. That is the scriptural concept. The later map of sects, wars over creeds, and rewritten ordinances is what the loss looks like on the ground. He still heard prayers. He still preserved scripture. The living authority to keep the Church as He organized it did not stay. The Restoration is the claim that He gave it back.

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 47 minutes ago

  @GhostGamingG @Battlefield All they need to do is disable access to the aircraft carrier until the M-COMs become available to capture, just like it was in BF4, and the problem would be solved. But will DICE actually do it??? I don’t think so, because that studio is severely developmentally challenged😒

• 
  CasualSurvivor (@CasualSurvivor) reported 49 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why doesn't the game start? Restarted my PC, relogged, checked steam servers and bf servers...no idea but the game won't start. Launcher works till it says "starting game" then closes itself without any error

• 
  heAd3r (@wuuuif) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Atomiclizard88 @BattleNonSense @Battlefield I know and opinions will differ when it comes to the overall gameplay however i would argue that if we didnt have those pressing issues people would less likely roast the rest of the game.

• 
  John Lane (@JohnLan70186141) reported 54 minutes ago

  @Mr_Andrew_Fox Battlefield Ecology describes evolving technology and tactics. What works well gets used until changes make it work worse. Even then, old solutions sometimes address contemporary problems.

• 
  ShinzosGhost (@ShinzosGhost) reported 59 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 My biggest problem with @Battlefield is your choices as a console player are either languish in PC sweat lobbies getting spawn killed or turn off Crossplay and every other match is filled with bots.