1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Battlefield 6
Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: sign in, online play and glitches.

Full Outage Map

Battlefield 6 is a 2025 first-person shooter game developed by Battlefield Studios and published by Electronic Arts. Serving as the eighteenth installment in the Battlefield series, the game was released for PlayStation 5, Windows, and Xbox Series X/S on October 10, 2025.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

August 18: Problems at Battlefield 6

Battlefield 6 is having issues since 02:40 AM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

  • 42% Sign in (42%)
  • 29% Online Play (29%)
  • 14% Glitches (14%)
  • 8% Game Crash (8%)
  • 7% Matchmaking (7%)
  • 0% Hacking / Cheating (0%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Comuna 1 Online Play 1 day ago
Comuna 1 Online Play 1 day ago
Trévoux Sign in 1 day ago
Nidau Glitches 2 days ago
Villa Victoria Sign in 3 days ago
Santiago de Querétaro Sign in 3 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • unprisonplanet
    Shouty Pants (@unprisonplanet) reported

    @Teoyaomiquu You can't negotiate from a point of weakness... that's their problem right now. Battlefield gains (either side) are irrelevant now, it's about the economy

  • _EMERITUS_
    eme (@_EMERITUS_) reported

    @BattlefieldComm Why does only one jet have loadout options? This is really disappointing, I was hoping this update would be a good way to address the issues regarding the air vehicle sandbox, but it’s a little disappointing that the primary focus on the jets is to sell skins :(

  • IranNuances
    Iran Nuances (@IranNuances) reported

    IRGC Spox: IRGC acts as the arm and voice of the #Iran nation's power and speaks on the battlefield. Diplomatic affairs fall under other state bodies. Based on MFA confirmations, no talks are currently with US even in diplomatic sphere due to US' long history of broken promises.

  • ALAUDDINSHAHED
    talkingINTROVERT (@ALAUDDINSHAHED) reported

    @Battlefield bro, just give up. you guys dropped the ball. just kill the game and work on next one. the game ******* sucks. i get balck screen stuck issues. deployable cover isnt deplaoyable lol.

  • Ender_Chief
    Ender_Okada (@Ender_Chief) reported

    @_Tom_Henderson_ Battlefield 6 and RedSec right now. I don't know what happened to me with Marathon. I was loving it, and from one day to the next, I was bored. The same happened with Arc Raiders. I think the problem is that extraction shooters turn repetitive very quickly (at least for me).

  • StarshipAlves
    Starship ᐰlves 🚀 (@StarshipAlves) reported

    @GameSpot We are only negative towards ****** games and every clip I've seen of that game shows the player running through a battlefield, just moving forward and nothing happens to them. Looks like a boring game. Fix your **** and stop blaming the fans when you build crap games.

  • SpartanPsyche
    Leo | Phalanx Labs (@SpartanPsyche) reported

    The person who wants to be fit in six months is competing with the person who wants sugar in six minutes. Read that again. Because I think this explains a ridiculous amount of what people call a discipline problem. You want the body. You want the business. You want the clean brain. You want to stop smoking ****. You want to stop watching porn. You want to wake up early, train, focus, build something meaningful. I believe you. Trust me, I do. Thats not the problem.. The problem is not that those things aren't valuable to you. The problem is WHEN that value becomes available. Let me explain.. Behavioral science has a name for this - Temporal discounting. Very simply, the further away a reward is, the less psychological value your brain tends to assign to it RIGHT NOW.. $10,000 today feels different from $10,000 one year from now. A great body six months from now feels different from the taste of food sitting 20 centimeters away from you. A business doing $5M three years from now has to compete with the relief of closing your laptop and scrolling for an hour tonight. Fixing a porn problem and its effects in 90-100 days has to compete with a nuke of dopamine in the next video Thats the battle. Unfair, i know.. One side is abstract. Your Future. Imagined. The other side is RIGHT ******* THERE. You can taste it. Touch it. Click it. Smoke it. Open it. And receive the reward INSTANTLY I've seen this pattern over and over with clients. Guy has a very clear idea of who he wants to become. Smart guy too. Not confused. He can explain the exact consequences of his behavior. He knows what porn is doing to him. He knows what **** is doing. He knows the phone is destroying his attention. He knows staying up until 3AM is wrecking the next day. And then 11:47 PM arrives and suddenly all that intelligence disappears. Why? Did he become stupid at night? No. valuation changed. The future consequence is still there... but the immediate reward has moved closer. And as rewards move closer, they can become disproportionately more attractive. This is where the whole thing gets interesting. Imagine I offered you: $100 today or $120 in 30 days. Plenty of people take the $100. Fine. Now imagine: $100 in 365 days or $120 in 395 days. Same 30-day difference. Suddenly waiting doesn't feel nearly as painful. THAT is important. Because human beings don't always discount time in some perfectly rational straight line. Our preferences can change dramatically when the immediate reward gets close. Which means you can genuinely prefer your long-term goal at 9AM... ...and reverse the preference at 11PM when the short-term reward is sitting in front of you. This is why saying, “But you KNOW this is bad for you” is such a useless intervention. Of course you know that.. Knowledge isn't the variable failing. valuation is. Look at procrastination for an example,, Finish the proposal and maybe you make money next month. Open YouTube and you feel better in three seconds. Train today and maybe you look incredible in six months. Skip the gym and the discomfort disappears immediately. Don't gamble and your finances improve over years. Place the bet and uncertainty, anticipation and reward become available NOW. Don't smoke and eventually your head clears. Smoke tonight and the stress drops in ten minutes. The brain is constantly making these trades. Tiny auctions between present-you and future-you. And present-you has home field advantage. This is also why I dislike most advice around delayed gratification. People say: “Just think long term.” Okay genius. The whole problem is that the long-term reward is being DISCOUNTED. Telling someone to value it more doesn't necessarily change the machinery producing the valuation. You have to engineer the choice. This is where we do things differently. If an immediate reward keeps defeating a distant one, I don't want the distant reward fighting fair. I want to rig the game. Make the bad behavior slower. Add steps. Remove access. Create friction. Don't put yourself in the environment where the decision has to be made at full intensity. Then do the opposite for the behavior you want. Bring some of its reward FORWARD. Track the session. Score the day. Make progress visible. Attach immediate satisfaction to the action. Create social reinforcement. Have someone see the result. Turn a distant outcome into something your nervous system can feel TODAY. Because here's what you're missing... IF you want long-term behavior to survive, you need short-term reinforcement along the way. This is why streaks work. This is why visible progress works. This is why feedback works. This is why accountability can work. This is why measuring something can change the behavior itself. You're taking a reward that exists months away and creating evidence of progress NOW. The mistake is thinking discipline means repeatedly choosing the future over the present through brute force. Thats exhausting. And eventually present-you catches you on a bad day. Poor sleep. Stress. Argument. Boredom. Loneliness. Fatigue. Then suddenly the future is worth almost nothing and the immediate reward looks incredible. This is why environment matters so much. This is why systems matter. This is why behavioral engineering matters. You don't build a strong person by giving him access to every possible temptation and asking him to win 70 separate internal negotiations every day. Thats terrible and DUMB Better approach is asking.. What immediate rewards are repeatedly beating my long-term objectives? How quickly can I access them? What friction exists between urge and consumption? How distant does the reward for my GOOD behavior feel? And how can I bring some of that reward closer? Because once you see behavior through this lens, a lot of “lack of discipline” starts looking very different. You have to understand this, Its not just desire... You're fighting TIME. And if one reward arrives in six seconds while the other arrives in six months, you had better engineer the battlefield accordingly.

  • CAMIKAZE78
    CAMIKAZE78 (@CAMIKAZE78) reported

    Battlefield 6 Update 1.4.2.0 Thoughts: - Wake Island is 110% the best version of the map we have ever seen from a general flow perspective. HOWEVER, there are far too many attack boats. I believe Conquest has 10 in total and Escalation? 14. - Boat Guided AA missile is STILL broken and either gives pilots no warning, or too little warning to accurately counter. - The new jets remain the highlight for me, rocking these things with a co-pilot is going to lead to some cinema matches. Was WSO-ing for @SilkOCE most of the night and it was peak. - The TV missile in the WSO seat is INSANELY buggy. Randomly darts around the screen, sometimes veers randomly into water. When it hits, it HITS. But MAN was it buggy. - When sorted out with fixes and polish, the TV missile needs to be an option on the Attack Boats and Attack Heli's as an alternative to lock ons. - The new jets ONLY appear on Wake Island and Tsuru Reef in Carrier Strike - Seems like a bit of a wasted opportunity to have them on so few experiences across the game. - The lack of polish elsewhere in the game continues to be felt. I got tossed like a f***ing salad in a game by grenades with no indicator. Audio is still non-existent. - Pretty sure Carrier Strike is ONLY available on Tsuru Reef? Also a missed opportunity, not sure why Wake Island wasn't included in that to make the mode feel more fleshed out. - Your home base has no base-AA defense, which means you can spawn camp all aircraft spawns relentlessly. Feel like a CWIS needs to be active on the ships until the first breach has been made. Overall - Fun update, but MAN do we need to pivot to polish and longevity. There's certainly some gaps that have come to light since more players have gotten their hands on it, and everything being tied to limited events rather than being enduring content is still something I am not a fan of.

  • G_E_T_1
    GET (@G_E_T_1) reported

    Is it just me or is anyone else almost completely done with @Battlefield until they actually fix the game - hit detection and all the glaring issues - and make it battlefield again? We dont need more collabs and skins in the store( top gun) we need you to fix the game

  • multiplanet1
    Race 🕊️ (@multiplanet1) reported

    Elon Musk's second wife said he screams in his sleep. Talulah Riley described what nobody outside the bedroom ever saw. During the years when Tesla and SpaceX were both dying, Elon would wake up in the middle of the night screaming. Sometimes he would claw at her in his sleep. She said he was in actual physical pain from stress. Not metaphorical pain. His body was breaking under the load while his mind refused to put it down. She said she would watch him sleep and see his face still working through problems. Jaw clenched. Hands twitching. The companies followed him into unconsciousness. There was no off switch. There was no safe room. Even sleep was a battlefield. During the day he showed nothing. He walked into meetings and told everyone Tesla would survive. He stood in front of engineers and promised orbit. Then he came home and his body screamed the truth his mouth wouldn't say. People see the $200 billion and think he got lucky. They didn't see the man whose own wife watched him scream through the night for years and get up every morning and do it again. Everyone wants the outcome. Nobody wants the nights. The nights are the price. And the price is why almost nobody else has the outcome.

  • AyushKumar291
    Ayush Kumar Singh (@AyushKumar291) reported

    @weirdmaged64659 Still,they would had lost. Problem was Indian cavalry was very inferior. And,battles are won on the flanks. Alexander had smashed 2 of the greatest cavalry force of his time- Persians & Scythians.He had these units too in his army. Porus's 🐎 were routed ×2 on the battlefield

  • RadiantOpti
    Radiant Optimizer | FPS Boost & PC Tweaks (@RadiantOpti) reported

    @Lman_GR @Battlefield This is not your problem alone as others have also experienced the same problem for many months now but without an official solution being offered by EA. Your first step should be to turn off the XMP option in your BIOS settings because this has worked for some people. You could try repairing the EA Anti-Cheat.

  • TrunksInu
    LèTrunks (@TrunksInu) reported

    Your Facebook income has two levers: 1. Niche (finance, business, DIY = 10x more) 2. Audience (US/UK/CA = premium RPM) Most creators ignore both. Fix these two. Then watch the battlefield shift. 💰

  • LeeElter
    Lee (@LeeElter) reported

    @YoungBobRB Based on some of these replies, a lot of bloodthirsty ****** thugs are MAD that you now have a security team, and that it will be a lot harder to harm you now. But this is also a harsh indictment on today's society. You shouldn't need a security team to debate something as longstanding and common-sense as kicking undocumented or violent migrants out of the country. Responding to differing worldviews with automatic violence lines up with George Orwell's theory of "crimestop" which means "stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to an ideology, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought that is capable of leading in a heretical direction." The people who respond to ideological opposition with automatic violence are followers of some of the most evil, hateful and horrific ideologies in the world. They can slap any label on it: "communism", "fascism" — anything. But the underlying religion is power itself, in which the end justifies any means and methods necessary, however criminal and violent. They believe that there will always be a seat of power for them, where they will have the authority to order around slaves and sign off on the deaths of thousands at any given moment. But once things invariably go wrong, all the seats of power are filled, paranoia over "counter-revolutionary conspiracy" grows, and their imaginary "utopia" never materializes, factionalism will develop, and they can become their precious Party's "revisionist" or "treacherous" scapegoat at any time. Aspiring tyrants never think this possibility through, either because they don't want to or because they're confident it will never happen. But even then, there still are and always will be people out there who are genuinely motivated by a desire to better today's society, and truly want to put their ideas up for debate in pursuit of finding the best answers. In a world like this, it is people like you we need the most. Getting people to understand and develop a theory of mind from people whose viewpoints they do not share may well be our last hope of the next "debate" not taking place on a ruined battlefield. Good on you, and keep up the good work!

  • TaxRyder50806
    Ryder🤺Tax Miliky (@TaxRyder50806) reported

    @Thomas_Vera_ If Ivar had full use of his legs, the Vikings would’ve been in serious trouble. Bro was already terrifying without them give him mobility and he might’ve been an absolute nightmare on the battlefield. L

  • PvtRinzler
    Pvt_Rinzler (@PvtRinzler) reported

    @Battlefield Wait until the new players exp all the **** and broken things this game has to offer. I would be ashamed in 2026 working on triple AAA studion and not haven’t grenade indicator. You should all work on McDonalds in Stockholm.

  • TheMa78024
    Trump The Magnificent (@TheMa78024) reported

    @RoyalWins1 @Oilfield_Rando The problem is we have too many young people complaining about social security and Medicare. We should start a major war and bring back the draft so we can get rid of a few million of them on the battlefield that way we don't have to listen to them piss and moan about everything.

  • EmpireFiles
    The Empire Files (@EmpireFiles) reported

    Here’s how this is gonna work: You will fork over trillions in tax dollars for CEO bidding wars to fix this. They’ll develop some very expensive solutions. When deployed to the battlefield, opposing forces will quickly find a way around them. And the cycle will start over.

  • crying_bulo4ka
    Ноющая Булочка (@crying_bulo4ka) reported

    @TheInfamousEG A typical Battlefield moment. In almost 25 years of the game series' existence, they have not made a single game without problems with netcode and hit registration.

  • mrcauliman
    MRCΛULIMΛN (@mrcauliman) reported

    Sometimes I get caught up in ideas like AUGUR BATTLEFIELD. I coded the entire thing myself in three days. I don’t make anything from it. It’s just a cool new way to visualize the $XRP market. My problem is that when an off-the-wall idea gets into my head, I become laser-focused until it’s finished. Bigger priorities and much larger payoffs can get pushed aside while I bring that one idea to life. I try not to do that to myself, but I genuinely enjoy building these things for the community. Sometimes the payoff isn’t money. Sometimes it’s creating something that didn’t exist three days ago and watching people enjoy it.

  • Daykerpriest
    Daykerpriest🐉 (@Daykerpriest) reported

    The saddest part is that Robb thought winning on the battlefield would protect his family. He never realized that the most dangerous weapon in Westeros isn't a Valyrian steel sword, it's a broken marriage contract.

  • OutOfStockPod
    Hugo Lord 🇨🇦 (@OutOfStockPod) reported

    $ONDS raised full-year guidance to $525–550M and the stock dipped on it Its not a broken company, that’s a market that hasn’t caught up to a defense-tech backlog that’s exploding, insane growth, and huge potential to become a key player on the modern battlefield and national defense Im adding, not trimming. Long $ONDS NFA

  • TheInfamousEG
    🌹 The Infamous E.G.🌹 (@TheInfamousEG) reported

    @bchriss99 Everytime i go from overwatch to battlefield i feel how bad the problems are

  • Reece__scott
    Reece scott (@Reece__scott) reported

    @Battlefield I’ve played cod and this has a major hacking problem it’s the hacking I’ve ever seen your 4 a game at least and that’s every game wow they really don’t care it’s full a mean full of cheaters

  • USAI_Media
    USAI Media (@USAI_Media) reported

    @War_Radar2 This is where asymmetric defense becomes more important than platform symmetry. Taiwan does not need to match the PLA ship-for-ship or aircraft-for-aircraft to complicate an invasion. A large, distributed unmanned force can raise the cost of every stage of an operation: reconnaissance, beach approaches, logistics, air-defense suppression, troop movement, and resupply. But the headline number of drones is only part of the equation. The decisive questions are whether those systems can survive electronic warfare, maintain communications, find targets under contested conditions, disperse before launch sites are struck, and keep being replaced after the first wave of combat. That is why industrial capacity matters as much as inventory. A drone force that can be produced quickly, launched from many locations, and replaced faster than an opponent can destroy it creates a very different deterrence problem from a small number of exquisite platforms. Beijing would therefore have to plan not only for Taiwan’s existing defenses, but for a battlefield filled with cheap, mobile, disposable sensors and weapons. The strategic value is not in owning hundreds of thousands of drones. It is in making an invasion harder to predict, harder to suppress, and far more expensive to sustain.

  • Scottl1971
    Scott L. (@Scottl1971) reported

    @MihaiGingu Doctor testimonials describing repeated patterns of gunshot wounds to children (head/chest) are serious and deserve independent forensic investigation with chain-of-custody evidence, not slogans. Multiple volunteer surgeons have reported this; that alone doesn’t establish a formal IDF policy of deliberate sniping as opposed to the realities of dense urban combat against an enemy that embeds among civilians, uses human shields, and operates from civilian areas. Crossfire, misidentification, errors, and individual unlawful acts are all possible explanations that still require case-by-case proof. Anecdotes and X-rays from hospitals, while disturbing, aren’t the same as verified battlefield forensics or command-level orders. Both sides have strong incentives to shape narratives. Higher-quality, independently verifiable evidence is what’s needed if the goal is truth rather than moral theater.

  • DelbridgeMark1
    Mark Delbridge 🇺🇲🏴‍☠️ (@DelbridgeMark1) reported

    Jones left his legs on a battlefield in service of our country and this is what he gets in his DMs.

  • DecodeConflict
    Decode Conflict (@DecodeConflict) reported

    DON’T RETIRE THE WARTHOG. RETIRE THE BAD IDEA. The A 10 may be old, but soldiers on the ground do not care when an aircraft was built. They care whether it arrives, stays over the battlefield, takes punishment, and brings them home alive. The F 35 has an important mission. Drones also have a growing role. But neither replaces the reassurance of a rugged aircraft designed specifically to protect troops at close range. The Warthog proved its value again during Operation Epic Fury. Keeping it in service until 2030 was the right decision. Modernize the strongest aircraft and keep experienced crews ready. Retire the A 10 only when a real replacement can perform the entire mission in combat, not when someone promises it on a presentation slide. Decode Conflict Assessment

  • scalesofmauve
    ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍ ‍SUSIE. (@scalesofmauve) reported

    @L3G1SL4C3R4T0R @_hollowedknight attempts to maneuver through the shards and broken pieces of the box that contains the battlefield, Susie’s life was at stake whether or not she was willing to listen to them was irrelevant. The Dragon needed to stay alive, she needed to win! Her body moves in tandem with the ——

  • PembrokeOliver
    sebastian oliver pembroke (@PembrokeOliver) reported

    @visegrad24 This is actually clever as hell. Optical AI targeting gets wrecked by simple reflections. All that expensive drone tech and neural nets neutralized by foil and mirrors. The West still thinks money solves every battlefield problem.