Battlefield 6 status: server issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Battlefield 6 reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Battlefield 6 users through our website.

• Online Play (39%)
• Sign in (32%)
• Matchmaking (15%)
• Glitches (7%)
• Game Crash (6%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Battlefield 6 outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Équancourt	Matchmaking	3 days ago
Wilhelmshaven	Glitches	4 days ago
Holbæk	Online Play	4 days ago
Comuna 1	Online Play	4 days ago
Holbæk	Online Play	5 days ago
Vitória da Conquista	Online Play	6 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  DrHellDog (@DrHellDog) reported 1 minute ago

  @Battlefield Fix BUGS in RedSec rather than posting nonsense!

• 
  ChakravartinMode (@Empire4King) reported 3 minutes ago

  @KAkilan17 @mathemerizing19 The problem with cong supporters is they don't understand the battlefield of Gujarat. They totally live in their own bubble. As long as they don't understand why BJP is winning and unable to accept about their own failures, they won't be able to win Gujarat.

• 
  Some Dude (@jaylay12088001) reported 6 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield Friendly fire is dogshit, I'm not interested in dying to bad teammates because they can't aim. This problem is easily fixed by simply limiting where mortars can be placed.

• 
  Victim Of Clarity (@VictimOfClarity) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Lol, the amount chronus console users is wild, they are not failing detection. See lots of PC cheaters every day, and a simple search shows many sites active with no recent detections. I get it's a touch problem, but the results thus far are not working.

• 
  AlliN When Playing (@Allin_Playing) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattleNonSense @Battlefield I think that the absolute /thread on how all of the "older" BF fans feel - is what a parody of itself the "who was that" launch trailer has become. This game literally added the same looking skins to the game that they've made fun of. And that is the least of the issues, obv.

• 
  Curitiba (@Curitiba_Fodase) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Valor53555939 @KFTragic the problem is that this wasn't what was wrong with the Fire Nation, and retroactively adding this just feels done to get brownie points before the Fire Nation was the only one shown to allow women in the battlefield, how progressive they were or weren't was never the issue

• 
  Zafar Hilaly (@ZafarHilaly) reported 13 minutes ago

  Pak is making a valiant effort to broker peace. But the issue won’t be decided on the peace table, a peace agreement can only reflect what happened on the battlefield. Do we expect Iran to prevail?

• 
  Marco1374 (@Marko1374) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Could we get some feedback on the crash issue caused by the anti-cheat since April 16th? Two weeks have passed, and many users are still experiencing the problem without any response on when it will be resolved. We urgently need to know if a solution is being worked on.

• 
  Tian Xchange (@TianXchange) reported 14 minutes ago

  Last year, I sat across from a couple I’ll call Ada and Chinedu. They had been married for 8 years, with two beautiful children, and on paper they looked like the perfect family. But behind closed doors, their home had become a battlefield of silence and sudden explosions. It started small. Chinedu’s business was expanding, so he was rarely home before 10 pm. Ada, a teacher, carried the full load of school runs, homework, cooking, and managing the house alone. She began to feel invisible. Every time she tried to talk about it, Chinedu would say, “I’m doing all this for us,” and the conversation would end in an argument or cold silence that lasted days. One evening, Ada found a lipstick stain on Chinedu’s shirt that wasn’t hers. She didn’t accuse him outright she just withdrew completely. Chinedu, sensing the distance but not understanding why, started staying out even later. The tension became so thick that even the children noticed. That was when Ada called me in tears: “If we don’t fix this, I’m leaving.” They came for their first counseling session together, sitting on opposite ends of the couch like strangers. I asked one simple question: “When was the last time you felt truly heard by your partner?” Both of them went quiet. That silence told me everything. Over the next ten weeks, we unpacked the real issues. It wasn’t the lipstick (which turned out to be from a client’s hug at a business dinner). It was years of unspoken expectations, unexpressed appreciation, and the dangerous belief that “love should just understand” without communication. We worked on practical tools: Daily 15-minute “check-in” conversations with no phones or distractions Learning to express needs without blame (“I feel lonely when…” instead of “You never…”) Creating a shared vision for their family instead of operating on assumptions Rebuilding trust through small, consistent actions not grand gestures There were tears. There were moments Chinedu almost walked out. There were sessions where Ada said she didn’t think she could forgive the years of feeling invisible. But they kept showing up. In our final session, Chinedu looked at his wife and said, “I thought providing was enough. I never knew my absence was breaking your heart. I’m sorry.” Ada cried and replied, “I stopped telling you how I felt because I thought you didn’t care. I was wrong too.” Today, they are still together — stronger, more intentional, and deeply in love again. They send me updates: family dinners are back, date nights are sacred, and they even started a small tradition of writing each other appreciation notes every Sunday. Marriage isn’t perfect. It gets messy. But when two people are willing to do the hard, humble work of understanding each other instead of trying to “win,” healing is possible. If you’re reading this and your marriage feels like it’s cracking under pressure whether it’s money, time, trust, or silence please know it’s not too late. Reach out to a counselor. Get help. The right counseling can turn “I can’t do this anymore” into “I’m so glad we didn’t give up.” Love is not just a feeling. It is a choice we keep choosing, even when it’s hard.

• 
  N/A (@reborn_444) reported 15 minutes ago

  @PressX_O @idonotexistelol This is just not true. As I've said earlier in the thread, some people have much more stable systems than others and what is considered an "issue" varies from person to person. Battlefield 6 crash dumped on me 2 days ago. Restarted the anti cheat, didn't work, restarted steam

• 
  Hurricane (@HurricanePL2) reported 21 minutes ago

  @mbl666uk @AXIOM_Protocol @CultureCrave All you have to do is look at other live service titles, like arc raiders or battlefield 6, both quickly lost most of their players because they are not releasing content constantly, fortnitne on the other hand has been going strong for years because they work like slaves

• 
  Name cannot be blank (@Sylatts) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix the servers

• 
  Pi’erre Bourne Enthusiast (@Quadb01s) reported 23 minutes ago

  @TerpoTheOne @BattleNonSense @Battlefield Hmm the earliest I ever played was 2142 and I don’t remember default FF being on, but I also didn’t get to play that game too much before they shut servers down

• 
  Geørge (@GeorgeJSBrown) reported 26 minutes ago

  @FrancBlac317 @tdawgsmitty Considering Battlefield is owned by EA, i don’t see them having a “promising future”. Arc Raiders will succeed, if they fix their cheating problems, and Win/lose ratio. COD, only has to listen to its community to succeed.

• 
  Lance (@LancesEmporium) reported 27 minutes ago

  @TheDookyBooty Have you ever looked at the forums after any major update to any major live service / AAA game? Even games like Call of Duty, World of Warcraft or Battlefield have these things and they are abused even on the "pro"- level. And you can be sure they test this stuff.

• 
  Full Scale Moral Idiot (@rhaenyrabread) reported 29 minutes ago

  @housesarebig Yeah lets just ban every good battlefield instead of making better battlefields. That'll solve the issue.

• 
  Russell King-MAY GOD STAND BETWEEN YOU AND HARM (@RussellKin37767) reported 29 minutes ago

  @ryangerritsen NOTHING WRONG WITH MASCULINITY. MASCULINITY IS WHAT BUILT THIS COUNTRY & FOUGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY. DO U WANT A BUNCH OF FEMININE GUYS ON THE BATTLEFIELD SLAPPING EACH OTHER. NO I WANT MASCULINE SOLDIERS THAT WILL DESTROY AN ENEMY. IF U WANT FEMININE PROTECTING U, YOUR IN TROUBLE

• 
  Duncan Thomas (@duncanjthomas) reported 34 minutes ago

  @nicholadrummond Recharging & transport of UGVs - en masse - to/from the battlefield seem like issues still to be resolved. A possible niche role I do see (apart from possibly recce) early doors is fire support/“mule” for ultra light infantry eg airmobile: some UGV types fit Ch47/Merlin/NH90 ..

• 
  Rookie writer (@RookieWriter007) reported 35 minutes ago

  @psyche3d But why WON'T they be in the main battlefield, they are the STRONGEST warriors, it's the fate of the ******* country, you're just stating **** without justifying it. There is no reason why shoheikun SHOULD be in the capital, THAT is my problem

• 
  Battle(non)sense | Chris (@BattleNonSense) reported 36 minutes ago

  @TL62594 @am3binh425 @Battlefield The real problem is that the Battlefield franchise as a whole has become way too convenient in itself, which heavily contributes to the gameplay being so shallow and repetitive.

• 
  JohnnyKing (@JohnnysKings) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Battlefield any tip on how to fix audio stop working mid game on ps5?

• 
  Super Doge (@SuperdoucheDoge) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Cappyarmy it's a solution to a problem that doesn't exist anymore on the modern battlefield. and for anti-drone warfare it's way too impractical.

• 
  Austin (@NotTheCityInTX) reported 38 minutes ago

  @omar_alajeeli @Battlefield I think it’s a reload animation easter egg that the team working on animating the weapons made for fun (like video games are supposed to be). Your criticism towards netcode and any other gameplay issues is valid, but fixing them is not this team’s job. They animate weapons.

• 
  Nexxy🎯 (@Next_Gen_Expert) reported 39 minutes ago

  I really hope that there is going to be some netcode changes to Battlefield 6 because the game feels amazing gun play and stuff but this time to death issue is killing it completely, as well as hitboxes being extremely bad. Don't let me down I believe in you guys @BattlefieldComm

• 
  Anunat (Sky Father) (@omar_alajeeli) reported 42 minutes ago

  @NotTheCityInTX @Battlefield yes, when the game didn't need fixing, instead of wasting time and resources on this garbage they need to fix the game. net codes/ gunplay. this is not that important.

• 
  Mariusz Barczak | Senior Cybersecurity Architect (@MariusBarczak) reported 45 minutes ago

  You Are Scaling Risk INFRASTRUCTURE IS THE NEW BATTLEFIELD For years, organizations believed that cybersecurity was about tools. More dashboards. More alerts. More vendors. More layers. And yet, the system remained the same. Fragmented. Reactive. Unpredictable. Because the problem was never the lack of tools. The problem was the absence of architecture. Today, we are entering a different reality. Global trade is shifting. Supply chains are being reconfigured. Infrastructure is becoming the core of economic power. Ports, logistics networks, cloud systems, data pipelines — they are no longer support functions. They are the backbone of entire economies. And that changes everything. Because when infrastructure becomes central, security is no longer an IT concern. It becomes a structural requirement. The real question is no longer: “How do we detect attacks?” The real question is: “Why does the system allow this level of exposure in the first place?” This is where most organizations fail. They build systems that are: – connected, but not controlled – scalable, but not secured – efficient, but not resilient And then they try to protect them with tools. That approach does not work anymore. Attackers do not break systems. They use what the system already allows. Misconfigured access. Overprivileged roles. Invisible trust relationships. Uncontrolled execution paths. This is not exploitation. This is architecture failure. In a world where logistics defines growth, where infrastructure defines competitiveness, and where digital systems define stability… Security must be designed — not added. Not after deployment. Not after incidents. Not after damage. At the foundation. This is why Zero Trust is not a concept. It is not a trend. It is not a guideline. It is a structural necessity. Because without enforced boundaries, there is no control. Without control, there is no predictability. And without predictability, there is no resilience. Organizations that understand this will lead. They will build systems that are: – controlled by design – predictable under pressure – resilient by architecture And most importantly… They will not depend on reaction. They will operate on certainty. The future will not be defined by who has the most technology. It will be defined by who has the strongest architecture behind it. And in that future, security is no longer a function. It is the foundation of everything. And this is exactly where most discussions about AI, automation, and digital transformation miss the point. We are not scaling intelligence. We are scaling exposure. Every new integration, every API, every automated decision layer increases the attack surface — often invisibly. Organizations celebrate speed. Attackers exploit structure. This asymmetry is growing. Because while companies invest in innovation, very few invest in architectural discipline. And without discipline, scale becomes risk. AI agents, automation pipelines, cloud-native systems — they do not create security challenges. They amplify existing weaknesses. If identity is weak — they multiply it. If access is uncontrolled — they expand it. If trust is implicit — they weaponize it. That is why the next generation of cybersecurity will not be defined by detection. It will be defined by elimination of unnecessary possibilities. Reducing what can happen. Restricting what is allowed. Designing systems where deviation is not just detected — but structurally impossible. This is infrastructure hardening at its core. Not more tools. Not more alerts. Not more noise. But fewer paths. Fewer permissions. Fewer assumptions. And in that simplicity — real security emerges. Because the strongest system is not the one that reacts fastest. It is the one that cannot be meaningfully exploited. This is the shift that is coming. From complexity to control. From reaction to design. From visibility to certainty. And those who understand this early will not just secure their systems. They will redefine how systems are built. #CyberSecurity #ZeroTrust #Infrastructure

• 
  Millstone Distributor (@Millston3r) reported 50 minutes ago

  @oldfatbjjbydave @hippojuicefilm The ‘enabling antisocial individuals’ problem. If someone shot up a school would you say: “aww shucks those skills would have been really impressive on the battlefield! heeyuck!”? Goofy. Like how much of a cuck do you have to be to see this video and the only thing you have to say is to point out how talented he is? What bizarre form of Stockholm syndrome is this?

• 
  KGB Officer #CrispyCluckTakeover (@gt5cool) reported 51 minutes ago

  @redalrt07 the problem is youre playing battlefield

• 
  ghXOst__ttv (@ghXOst__ttv) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Battlefield needs to fix their ******* game shits broke. 💔. We waited so long for this game for it to be broke and them struggle to fix it

• 
  Hugh Anthony (@TheHughAnthony) reported 53 minutes ago

  My generation is radical. We are a product of decades worth of failure, and we will fix it. We do not care for labels. We have grown up on a battlefield. We will take our country back. Generation Remigration.