Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Outsider (@AlbinSalkic) reported 5 minutes ago

  @WesOlesen @LauraLoomer @netanyahu Money is a huge problem, but even worse is American youth giving their lives on battlefield for Israel interests.

• 
  Xiǎobǎihé (@Suhyeem) reported 6 minutes ago

  The battlefield analysis room was quieter than ever before. More accurately, it was a state where "human reactions to uncertain information were beginning to lag." No one was panicking. Instead, judgment itself was delayed by a step. I understood this delay instinctively. The screen still displayed three layers of overlapping battle situations. Layer A: Engagement occurred Layer B: No engagement occurred Layer C: Unobservable However, this morning, the boundaries between them had become even more blurred. The layers were no longer parallel. They were permeating each other. One report was beginning to contain the "prerequisites" of another report. That is, the "engagement occurred" layer contained interpretations of "no engagement," and traces of engagement were mixed in with "no engagement." I blurted out, "This isn't integration, is it?" The chief engineer nodded immediately. "Yes. It's erosion." Erosion. That word was the most appropriate. Instead of the realities existing side-by-side while maintaining their boundaries, they were beginning to seep into each other's interiors. At that moment, a new change appeared in the F-35 attrition log. 《Attrition: Assessment Pending》 Pending. At first glance, it seemed like an ambiguous record. But the reality was the opposite. The state of not being determined itself was registered as the official status. I said, staring at the terminal, "It's not that determination has disappeared, but that not being determined has become official." No one denied it. Rather, everyone was beginning to understand that this was the closest explanation to reality. At that moment, the monitoring system issued another warning. 《Observation Layer Synchronization Rate: Increasing》 The screen changed. A new structural diagram was displayed. Not the conventional layers. "Distribution Map of Observer Groups." I held my breath. What was depicted there wasn't a battlefield. It was a network of who was adopting which reality. Neither nation nor military. Each individual observer holds a different "version of reality." And the terrifying thing was that they weren't clashing. Not clashing, but coexisting. The chief engineer said softly. "This isn't war anymore, it's a state." I repeated those words to myself. A state. In other words, there's no end, no beginning. A structure that simply exists. At that moment, part of the screen automatically updated. 《Undetermined Battlefield: Expanded》 I slowly leaned back in my chair. Undetermined Battlefield. It was no longer geography or time. It was the very field of information itself, refusing to be determined. And then I realized. This war isn't just endless. The concept of ending is already inapplicable.

• 
  asmarino ደጀና💪🇪🇷 (@azmarinoss) reported 8 minutes ago

  @LJeganu No question 100%. If this the problem for them why they are silent when they see the pp massive preparation for war? Why d9 you silent for ongoing war in amhara, Oromo, and other Ethiopian? Even do you think not preparation for war save Tigrayans if pp create war with Eritrea? Wehere do you think the Battle ground if pp strat war for annex Assab? And what choice you see the Tigrayans ppl at all? question—100%. If this is really their concern, why were they silent while PP was openly preparing for war? Why stay silent about the ongoing wars in Amhara, Oromia, and other parts of Ethiopia? Do they honestly think ignoring military preparations would protect Tigrayans if PP started a war with Eritrea? Where do they think the battlefield would be if PP tried to annex Assab? What realistic choice would ordinary Tigrayans have in that situation?

• 
  🧚‍♀️✨ Pixie Storm Studios ✨🧚‍♀️ (@PixieStrmDesign) reported 11 minutes ago

  I’m currently working on a memoir about my life with an Eating Disorder. It’s called Bone Deep. This is chapter 1: The Beginning of Hunger One of us had to die, and I was convinced it would be me. I didn’t always have the words for it. Back then, it didn’t feel like a life-or-death battle. It felt like discipline. Like control. Like I had finally figured something out that other people hadn’t. But even as a little girl, something in me was already unraveling. I remember standing in front of the mirror, turning sideways, then forward again, studying my body like it was something separate from me—something to fix. I didn’t know where the voice came from, the one that told me I was too much. Too soft. Too big. Just… too. It was quiet at first. Easy to ignore. Then it wasn’t. The thoughts settled in early, embedding themselves into the way I saw everything. Food became numbers before it ever reached my mouth. Movement became something to earn, not something to enjoy. I learned, without realizing I was learning, that smaller meant better. Smaller meant safer. Smaller meant worthy. I counted almonds like they were sins. Five meant control. Six meant failure. There was comfort in the numbers. They gave me rules, and rules made the world feel less chaotic. If I followed them perfectly, nothing bad could happen—or at least, that’s what I told myself. I don’t remember the exact moment food stopped being nourishment and became a battlefield. There wasn’t a single turning point, no dramatic shift. It happened slowly, quietly, the way shadows stretch across a room without you noticing. But I do remember the silence. It followed me everywhere. At the dinner table. At school. Lying in bed at night, staring at the ceiling while my stomach ached and my thoughts ran in circles. I became tight-lipped, careful. Every bite calculated. Every choice measured. I remember staring at my plate, doing the math before I allowed myself to take a single bite. Adding, subtracting, bargaining with myself. If I eat this, I won’t eat later. If I skip that, I’ll be okay. It didn’t feel dangerous. Not yet. In the beginning, it felt like I had found something that worked. Something that quieted the noise in my head—the constant hum of not-enough. Hunger became something I could measure, something I could win against. And winning felt good. There’s a kind of high that comes with control, with denying yourself and calling it strength. With watching the numbers go down and believing that means you’re doing something right. For a while, I held onto that feeling like it was proof that I was okay. But control is deceptive. It doesn’t announce when it starts slipping away from you. What began as something I chose slowly became something that chose me. The rules multiplied. The numbers mattered more. The space food occupied in my mind grew until it crowded out everything else. It wasn’t just about eating anymore—it was about fear. Guilt. Obsession. It was about being good enough in a way that always felt just out of reach. Food wasn’t just food anymore. It was a test I was always failing. And the strangest part is, from the outside, it didn’t always look like anything was wrong. I smiled when I was supposed to. I said I had already eaten. I pushed food around my plate in ways that looked convincing enough. I learned how to disappear in plain sight. No one saw the calculations happening in my head. No one heard the voice that never stopped talking. No one felt the exhaustion of fighting a battle that followed me everywhere I went. By the time anyone might have noticed, I was already in too deep.

• 
  TygerSparky (@tygersparky) reported 11 minutes ago

  My take on the recent controversy concerning the Sony Playstation decision to no longer produce discs for their systems starting in 2028. Of course everyone is allowed to hold any opinion they want to on this move. I realize that your current opinion would likely be shaped based on your current buying preferences. But I would say that anyone defending this move or who is complicit and okay with Sony doing this is simply another example of someone focusing on the environment one step in front of them instead of actually looking to the future and seeing the inevitable outcome of this decision. I'll be up front, I have been buying things digitally for years. The last disc-based game I bought was The Witcher 3 on the Xbox One. But for me, that is because I don't look as fondly at modern games as I do games from my childhood. Given that, I still appreciate the option of having a disc copy of the game. If there was a game I absolutely fell in love with today, I would want to own a physical disc version of it. I have about 150 Xbox 360 discs and 125 PS2 discs, not to mention PS1 and Nintendo carts/discs in my current collection. For those like Asmongold and others who actually see no problem with this change, I would point to two past games in the current market to see exactly why having a physical option is absolutely superior. First: Battlefield Bad Company. This game was originally released on the PS3/Xbox 360 less than 20 years ago. However, EA delisted this game from digital storefronts in 2023, just 15 years after release. If you don't have an account that currently owns the game, you can't (legally) play a digital copy of this game. However, you can still go out and find a disc copy of the game and enjoy the awesomeness of that single-player story. Second: GTA San Andreas. If you have an original Xbox disc of GTA:SA from 2005, you can pop it in an Xbox or even an Xbox 360 and actually play the original game, complete with the original soundtrack of the game. If you put that same disc in an Xbox One or Series console, you will instead be forced to play the 2014 remaster mobile port which has updates to the game and the soundtrack. Some people consider this remaster to be an inferior version of the game because of these updates and changes. But thankfully, the original game is preserved on the disc and is still playable on original hardware. Another argument that I have heard is that most games come out with Day One patches. However, having a patch on release day doesn't mean that there isn't a playable version of the game on the disc already. It might have some unintended bugs, but if there is a playable form on the game on the disc, that is obviously infinitely better than not having any form of it available except in digital format where you are, again, at the mercy of the corpo storefronts if they allow you to download a copy of the game (even if you paid for it). And even then, it is still a modified version of the original game. There is absolutely no good argument from a consumer's perspective for a company to stop physical disc production. The benefit is completely and totally for the corporation. They save money, DO NOT pass that savings on to the consumer, and get an even tighter grip of maintaining full rights over the distribution and access of their games and content. They can take away that access at any time and offer their customers no compensation. Sony, and any other company who decides to go this route, absolutely deserves any backlash and revenue drop they get from these decisions. And I hope that their bottom line actually feels the pain of going this route. If I wanted to be discless and have zero options, I would move to PC. At least then I have access to the operating and file systems and can actually backup whatever version of a game I am playing for preservation. Not to mention, I have control over the hardware in it and can get the exact look and play of a game that I want. Convenience and nostalgia are why I continued to play my games on my Xbox. But with these systems becoming even more like just a pre-built PC in a box, they are doing little to nothing to actually give me a reason to continue to invest in their platform. Taking away the physical option is one more nail in their coffin. And don't get me started on this push for cloud-based game streaming. I'm 100% out on that. And a happy July 4th to everyone in the U.S.

• 
  BiffBifford™ 🇺🇸 (@TBifford) reported 11 minutes ago

  @AlexKau74366366 Patton was built to fight. It's a shame a car accident took him out instead of the glory of dying on the battlefield. Patton did not die in combat. On December 9, 1945 (months after the war ended), he was involved in a low-speed car accident in Germany while on a pheasant hunting trip. His Cadillac collided with a U.S. Army truck. He suffered a broken neck and was paralyzed from the neck down. He died 12 days later from a pulmonary embolism (blood clot) in a hospital in Heidelberg.

• 
  big_markyt (@big_markyt) reported 12 minutes ago

  @tboe012 @EA_DICE I've deleted it twice since release, considering doing it a third time and leaving it alone as it's not enjoyable. I agree on gunplay too, some of the lads I played with yesterday were struggling with lag issues, too, going as high as 400 ping

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 12 minutes ago

  The Genealogy That Put the Devil on Notice Key Passage: Matthew 1:1 — “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” Introduction Matthew does not begin his Gospel the way a modern religious professor would begin it. He does not begin with a theory, a debate over sources, a committee translation note, a dead German’s opinion, or a paragraph apologizing for believing the Bible. He begins with a record. He begins with a name. He begins with a title. He begins with paperwork. “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” That is not decoration. That is not filler. That is not a dry list for people who like ancient ancestry. That is the Holy Ghost walking into the courtroom of history, slamming the documents on the table, and saying, “Here He is. Here is the King. Here is the promised seed. Here is the legal heir. Here is the One the devil has been trying to stop since Genesis 3:15.” Before Matthew gives you a sermon, a miracle, a parable, a healing, a rebuke, or a resurrection scene, he gives you the line of the King. Why? Because authority matters. A throne requires a right. A covenant requires a seed. A promise requires fulfilment. A kingdom requires a King with credentials. The devil knew enough Bible to know a seed was coming. He knew God had said in Genesis 3:15, “And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed.” From that moment forward, history became a battlefield over a bloodline. Cain rises against Abel. Pharaoh kills Hebrew male children. Athaliah tries to destroy the seed royal. Haman wants the Jews exterminated. Herod slaughters babies in Bethlehem. Satan has never been confused about the importance of the line. He may have better dispensational sense than half the seminaries in America. He knew there was a promised seed, a promised nation, a promised tribe, a promised house, a promised throne, and a promised King. So when Matthew opens with “Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham,” he is not giving us a polite Jewish introduction. He is giving the devil formal notice that all his efforts failed. The seed came. The King arrived. The promises survived. The throne has an heir. Hell could not corrupt the line, erase the covenant, cancel the prophecy, or stop the virgin birth. That is why this opening verse is so powerful. Modern scholarship wants to pick at Matthew like a buzzard picking bones in a ditch. They want to argue about literary arrangement, theological shaping, source criticism, redaction, and all the other fancy names men invent when they do not want to bow their knee to the Book. But the real issue in Matthew 1:1 is not whether some professor likes the structure. The issue is authority. Jesus Christ has the right to rule because God promised Abraham a seed and David a throne. He is not an intruder, not a usurper, not a religious philosopher, not a Jewish accident, not a moral reformer, and not a vague spiritual symbol. He is “the son of David” and “the son of Abraham.” That puts Him in direct connection with the land promise, the nation promise, the blessing promise, the throne promise, and the kingdom promise. Matthew opens like a legal document because heaven is presenting the rightful King to Israel, and before the first chapter is finished, the Holy Ghost has already put Satan, Rome, Herod, the Pharisees, the Sadducees, the scribes, and every Christ-rejecting system on notice. Chapter One: The First Verse Is a Royal Summons Matthew 1:1 says, “The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.” The first word after the phrase “the book of the generation” is not Moses, not Adam, not Israel, not Joseph, and not Mary. It is “Jesus Christ.” That is the center. That is the subject. That is the Person every name in the list is serving. Men read genealogies backward, looking for famous ancestors. God writes this genealogy forward, aiming

• 
  Brandon Tseng (@brandontseng2) reported 15 minutes ago

  There's nothing like V-BAT and Hivemind. Jammed GPS, jammed comms is the standard on the battlefield; it is the hardest problem to solve and largely remains unsolved by so many despite the rhetoric and claims. We operate everyday on the battlefield in jammed conditions. I couldn't be more proud of @shieldaitech engineering and operations teams.

• 
  VAAVE Gaming (@VAAVEgaming) reported 16 minutes ago

  With the servers being down, no. With multiplayer games that’s a whole other issue which is why the “Stop Killing Games” movement has started. So there’s people fighting for that. I’m a single player gamer outside of Battlefield so that doesn’t apply to me and we understand the server issue. My single player games will still be playable so I’m not sure what you’re getting at with that reply. With the Battlefield: Bad Company 1 & 2, Battlefield 3 servers down I can still boot up my physical copies and play the campaigns. Also with Battlefield Hardline. Just played the Medal of Honor campaigns recently on PS3 too. Go talk to the “Stop Killing Games” people about online only games

• 
  Milk Vessel Pilot (@trueliberal1848) reported 17 minutes ago

  Today (July 3) 163 years ago: After failed attacks on both Union flanks on July 2, General Robert E. Lee resolves to attack the Union center, which was nearly broken by the troops of major generals Lafayette McLaws and Richard Anderson in the ****** of July 2's fighting. He orders Lieutenant General James Longstreet to assume command of a motley collection of two divisions, many of whose brigades were badly mauled on the fighting of July 1, augmented by the three fresh brigades of the division of Major General George Pickett, which arrived late last evening after a hard march to the battlefield. About 12,000 men have been assembled for the attack, which will cross 3/4s of a mile of open ground, several fenced-in roads, and ascend a gentle slope toward the Union line, formed by a stone wall on Cemetery Ridge.

• 
  John Preston (@JohnGPreston) reported 18 minutes ago

  Read up on @DARPA's "Rads to Watts" program this morning. The pitch is straightforward: power cells built from Strontium-90 separated from nuclear waste, running for decades without recharging. It is trying to solve one of the most basic problems on the modern battlefield. Drone batteries die. Persistent ISR gets interrupted. Long-duration autonomous missions get cut short by power constraints no amount of procurement reform fixes. $3.37 million contract, 10 watts per kilogram target, prototype due at @PNNLab by early 2027. The feedstock is 100,000 metric tons of waste sitting at 52 domestic reactor sites the federal government already pays billions in lawsuits to not deal with. If the numbers hold at field scale, the power constraint on persistent ISR and long-duration autonomous systems looks very different by 2030. Very interesting!

• 
  Divyan Shah (@thedivyanshah) reported 21 minutes ago

  (9/16) Then I&M Bank entered the centre of the story. I&M relied on security over Cape Holdings through a debenture structure. Cape was later placed under administration. That changed the battlefield completely. The issue was no longer just whether Synergy had won. It was whether Synergy could collect.

• 
  Seiber Saiban (@SeiberSaiban) reported 23 minutes ago

  @TopCutPodcast @ChaoticMeatball These are the common casual pics. I'm more surprised there isn't a CoD or a Battlefield on there, but I guess Two Weeks and Felony part V are what give them their pew pew fix. I'm not against these games, but this is just a can of chef boyardee in the greater gamer buffet.

• 
  υɴcoммoɴ (@UncommonXX) reported 23 minutes ago

  @FocusBF Something to keep in mind: - 2026 tech vs 2010s tech - 720p vs 4k tech - live service menus are for live service games hence why BF3 menu is clean for it being properly dlc related - niche gaming has niche content, ex. portal As a Battlefield Vet. DICE won’t change it due to EA.