Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rabbit (@theblackorchard) reported 17 seconds ago

  Stubbornness EX Summoned as the hero and her cheat skill was STUBBORNNESS ranked EX and the system literally could not quantify it because every time it tried to measure her willpower the *metric* overflowed and crashed. The demon general Noctharis hit her with a spell that should have erased her from existence and she just stood there with her hair smoking going "no." "WHAT DO YOU MEAN NO." "I mean NO. I'm not being erased today. I have LAUNDRY." The technique bounced. The system error log filled with "CANNOT RESOLVE: TARGET REFUSES OUTCOME." The Noctharis sat down on the battlefield and put his face in his hands because you cannot fight someone whose response to oblivion is a chore list. - Tails from the Trashcan

• 
  Archangel Michael (@LaughsInCrusade) reported 3 minutes ago

  Every @EA_DICE dev deserves to be publicly flogged for their broken *** game

• 
  Kamil 🇵🇱 (@_KMCR_7) reported 3 minutes ago

  It’s good to know history; you can learn a lot from it. Even in marketing. In the mid-70s, Pepsi had a problem: They were stuck as the forever #2. Even though they were sure Pepsi tasted better. Coca-Cola owned the heritage, the category, and had a stronger brand. Pepsi couldn’t win on brand love. So they changed the battlefield. And started the famous Pepsi Challenge. They put two unmarked cups on a table and let people decide based on taste alone. Most chose Pepsi. The result? Pepsi gained significant market share, closed the gap with Coca-Cola, and forced the leader into a defensive spiral that eventually led to New Coke (which was a big failure). It shows that if you fight a bigger brand, you need to force the conversation onto the one dimension where you actually win.

• 
  Aisha Mehta (@AishaMehtabn) reported 5 minutes ago

  If you want inbound leads without posting every day, learn to systematize brand building. We used to think brand building required daily effort. Then we realized the world rewards predictable systems. Sadly, most founders don’t have the leverage. Here’s the brand-building framework that’s helped our clients generate $2M+ in pipeline: Contrary to popular belief, brand building isn’t about going viral. It’s about consistency, not luck. Done right, every post compounds and the decision to reach out becomes their idea, not yours. The AUTOMATE framework helps you do that in five steps: 1. Account Architecture Most founders start posting without a strategy (when they shouldn’t). Real strategy means mapping your ICP, competitors, and hooks upfront. It means starting with questions like: - Who do we want reading this? - What pain do they wake up with? - What authority gaps exist in their space? Your only job here is to understand the battlefield before you fight. 2. Understand Patterns Now analyze what already works. “We found your top-performing content is when you talk about X and Y. Is that right?” When they say “Yes, exactly”, you just earned their trust. They’ve seen the pattern in their own words. The system should come after you’ve confirmed the signal, not before. 3. Test Engineering This is where you experiment fast. Assume other approaches have already been tried. So do things like: - Have you A/B tested hooks? - What formats got the most replies? - Why do you think engagement dropped? Your goal is to find the winning angle AND surface why past efforts stalled. This sets up the next step. 4. Automate Execution Volume beats perfection - but only when the system is proven. Use the winning patterns you just discovered to build a content engine that runs on its own: “We had a client with the same problem. Posted sporadically, felt stuck. Then we implemented one system that doubled their inbound leads in 30 days.” Stories let them picture themselves in the solution. 5. Track & Optimize Lastly, frame continuous improvement as the missing piece: “Your goal is 10 inbound leads/week. The problem is you have no system. You’ve tried posting manually. The missing piece is [our engine]. Here’s how we’ll do it in [timeframe].” Then finish up with “Does that sound like what you need?” This makes you a partner in their growth. To them, you’re not selling - you’re solving. Ultimately, brand building isn’t about being loud. It’s about being systematic. Let systems do the heavy lifting. And don’t forget the money is in the inbound.

• 
  Brig P S Gothra (Retd) (@gothratipu) reported 7 minutes ago

  IDHAR UDHAR KI BAAT 144 — COLGATE, XEROX... AND SOLDIER Brig PS Gothra (Retd.) "Saab, Paytm kar ke WhatsApp kar dena," my car cleaner said about renumeration after cleaning my car. I smiled. In one sentence he had unknowingly narrated the history of modern branding. He neither expected me to use Paytm nor insisted that I send him a WhatsApp message. The money could go through PhonePe, Google Pay or BHIM. The message could be an SMS. It didn't matter. The brands had quietly swallowed the products. Growing up in Punjab, I suffered from the same confusion. I genuinely believed The Tribune was another word for an English newspaper. Likewise, every photocopy was a Xerox. Every digging machine was a JCB. Every instant noodle was Maggi. Every rugged four-wheel drive was a Jeep. Then came Close-Up. One of the cleverest advertising campaigns of my youth asked, _"Kya aap Close-Up karte hain?"_ Notice the brilliance. The advertisement wasn't asking, "Do you use Close-Up?" It was trying to make Close-Up replace Colgate in everyday language. It won market share. But it lost the dictionary. Even today, after brushing with Sensodyne, Dabur Red or Pepsodent, mothers still ask, "Colgate kiya?" That is branding at its finest. Or perhaps...at its most dangerous. Because sometimes branding does something it should never do. The company spends decades building a brand, only to discover that the brand has become so popular that it loses its own legal identity. Few people know that Escalator, Thermos, Cellophane and, in several countries, even Aspirin were once protected brand names. Their success became their undoing. People began using them for every moving staircase, every vacuum flask, every transparent wrapping sheet and every painkiller. The trademarks became common nouns. Ironically, the companies that created them gradually lost the exclusive right to those names. Success had become a legal liability. It erases identities. Recently, I heard a gentleman point towards a camouflage-clad man and proudly tell his son, "Beta, soldier ko salute karo." The gentleman meant well. But the man wasn't a soldier. He belonged to another uniformed service. An honourable profession. A demanding profession. But not soldiering. That made me wonder. Have we become so fond of borrowing prestige that we now borrow identities as well? Camouflage uniforms. Military-style rank badges. Combat terminology. The word soldier generously distributed to almost anyone wearing disruptive-pattern clothing. If branding succeeds by replacing one word with another, are we now trying to replace professions as well? A surgeon would not like to be called a physician. A judge would not like to be introduced as a lawyer. A pilot would object if someone called him a driver. Because every profession has its own qualifications, responsibilities and traditions. Then why should soldiering be any different? A soldier is not defined merely by camouflage. Nor by boots. Nor by medals. Nor by rank. He is defined by something far less visible. Unlimited liability. When a young man joins the Army, he signs a covenant unlike almost any other profession. The nation may one day order him towards danger rather than away from it. He cannot negotiate. He cannot resign on the battlefield. He may be required to lay down his life to complete the mission. That willingness is not stitched onto the uniform. It is stitched into the oath. Perhaps that is why soldiering has always occupied a unique place in every civilisation. Not because soldiers wear camouflage. But because they accept consequences that most professions never will. Another thought crossed my mind. Colgate became a generic word because it was too successful. I only hope soldier never becomes one. Some names are brands. Some names are professions. And a few...must remain sacred. Jai Hind. For other blogs click link in comments

• 
  Yogogo (@yoyofightthee) reported 8 minutes ago

  @viviglittr @JaegerTwice That’s fair. I will say, I do mostly agree on the Toya getting back up thing. Although part of that (at least in-universe) is because the plan to take down Toya was a REALLY flimsy one, as Shoto was basically on his own with his only advantage being his ice and new move. It felt like the story sometimes just made it so some plans were worse than others to contrive a reason for things to play out in this way. As for Toya’s fate, tbh it depends. The overall issue with Toya’s ending is the tone deafness and trying to have its cake and eat it too (this applies to the Todoroki family ending as a whole tbh). Just the concept of him being kept alive creates inherent problems. The idea is that Toya is being kept alive specifically to gain what he wants before death, a chance to speak with his family. The issue however, is that the circumstances of Toya’s condition now flat out contradict that sentiment. He can barely speak, only able to sputter out and cough a few sentences for a few minutes before being stored away again. Maybe if we got to see some of these visits and what exactly Toya would get out of them, then this writing would actually come together, but as it is, it’s a blatant discrepancy that isn’t addressed by the narrative. And as a result, the bittersweet feeling is completely ruined. And the fact that the family have this smiley scene right after really just makes it seem like the story is at best rushing things unnaturally, and at worst implying they’re 100% okay with what’s happening to Toya, which doesn’t suit their characters (and that’s of course not taking into account that there ARE absolutely ways to at least try and save him that the series is continently glossing over to contrive this ending). If the story wasn’t going to go into detail in this epilogue, then Toya likely should have just died on the battlefield in a similar manner to Toga, in that he gets to say everything he wanted to, have the soba exchange, and then possibly die with a sense of peace. Obviously it would need to be reworked a bit, but I just don’t see the merit in keeping him alive if it’s going to be THIS cruel and apathetic. Plus, it allows the Todofam to actually have scenes mourning Toya which the series is utterly devoid of (which is incredibly odd since I think part of what makes Toga’s aftermath work so well is that we dedicate time to Uraraka grieving her. Deku and Shigaraki don’t get enough either but they at least get more to work with, especially when compared to Toya). That, or if we REALLY want to keep Toya alive to die a slow death, then it’s possible to just, give him a normal hospital bed and contrive it so they were able to heal his wounds just enough for him to not be preserved in a tube (take them restoring Spinner offscreen for example). Or if we REALLY want to keep the tube for whatever reason, then give him a weird sci fi wheelchair thing and allow him to at least spend the rest of his days with his family in a way that’s actually substantial. Obviously I’m mostly spitballing here, but the core point I’m making is that as is, Toya’s ending fails on an in-universe and narrative level due to how little it does. It wants to hold him accountable for his actions in a way that would ideally kill him, but it also wants him to gain some kind of peace to maintain the bittersweet narrative it’s going for, but since it’s unable to fully commit to either, what we get is a narratively confused mess that feels inherently bleak while just pretending not to be, which COULD come together if the story actually showed the merits of it, but of course that doesn’t happen.

• 
  Antonio Falconieri (@AULaw24) reported 17 minutes ago

  @NajjiiMalik You do realize that these larger American drones, in addition to being persistent over designated airspace are specifically designated as pretty much expendable resources. The more contested the airspace gets the more expendable they become, but the United States doesn’t stop using them merely because they’re going to lose them quite frankly, even though they’re more expensive than they should be, as is everything the United States buys, they are relative bargain. But the current most commonly used model models are completely obsolete and I don’t think losing them as any great tragedy. America has a lot of weapons acquisition and retention policies that are clearly coming to light right now and creating massive problems for the US military, but this really isn’t one of them. The United States, despite being accused of being so far behind in modern battlefield drone warfare (which it is) pretty much invented the concept. 20 years ago the word “drone“ or “drone strike“ with synonymous with American military power and reconnaissance.

• 
  Shadrach (@sbagiah) reported 17 minutes ago

  The P-Square saga is proof that success doesn’t always preserve relationships; sometimes, it magnifies what was already broken. When money, family and ego collide, even love can become a battlefield. Some wounds don’t bleed. They simply change people.

• 
  Jose Marti 🎗️ (@MartiYl87) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Nenphus @BF6Updates Apparently to improve matchmaking but their neither fix the **** and modes are gone lol yeah the current situation of battlefield.

• 
  InfantryDort (@infantrydort) reported 28 minutes ago

  Readiness It seems we all unanimously agree that the better commander is the one who tells the truth. Why then, do we promote the ones who don’t? We should all know the reason. Because it’s comfortable to live in a lie. This is a great technique honestly, lying. If you’re a careerist who only cares about advancement. The problem is that it falls flat once a formation is put to the test. Combat has a way of exposing all flaws. But what happens if you don’t go to combat during your command? I guess you luck out then. You avoid the test. It’s a gamble that often pays off. We want the commander who tells the truth because we need to count on his word to make our own plans as his superiors. If he reports 90% efficiency and shows up to the battle exposing 60%, well that’s a problem. Because I’ve calculated in redundancy and even by my most aggressively pessimistic views of his capability, he still fell short. Now people are going to die. And he may not have been a liar per se. But he was incompetent and didn’t know about his own unit. Either is unfit for command. I started on X talking about tactics and leadership. Now I’ve come full circle to just telling the truth. Because every battlefield effect rests on our ability to do this. GWOT caused us to over inflate everything. If you need proof, look no further than the Afghan Army we said would hold after being propped up for two decades, it folded in days. If I were Army Chief of Staff for a day, I’d be taking advantage of this period where we aren’t embroiled in a ground war to recenter this truth telling culture that has atrophied so far. It’s not even complicated, you can just order units to leave garrison and come back. Checking their reported readiness percentage and comparing it to whatever returns to the motorpool. A test, if you will. Then you can have hard conversations like: “General (or Colonel) X, you reported your formation at 82%. After a simple maneuver to the range and back, testing your fleet, you clocked in at 58%. The delta is unacceptable. Thank you for your years of dedicated service to the nation, but it is no longer required.” @KTB_500 and I talk about this frequently. I think it is a fine COA for GEN LaNeve to consider. And it will ruffle many feathers. Oh well.

• 
  Neon Nike (@Johnny_Boombox) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Battlefield how about you fix your servers already.. 15 matches being out in empty servers or total upside down..

• 
  Epithelial Atronach (@DaedalusIV) reported 31 minutes ago

  @ExoGhost It’s kind of always been this way though to some degree. With dolphin-diving in Battlefield, b-hopping in CS, slide-canceling in CoD. I’ve never had much of a problem with it - pattern recognition, adaptation, and satisfaction when their technique doesn’t work.

• 
  UntamedTruth (Official) (@TheUntamedTrut1) reported 32 minutes ago

  There are a lot of smaller accounts (10k and below) posting, reposting, supporting larger accounts in the comments sections, making/sharing memes and videos, and only seeing a 1-2% follower/impression ratio when posting. FWIW, I see that ratio in some larger accounts too. Why? One can only speculate, but lack of content, context, or quality is not the issue in most cases. Especially when it happens on multiple platforms. If I had to throw a dart blinfolded at this, it would come back to if the majority of the content was advertiser-friendly or not. And if the content revolves around 5GW, anti-establishment truths, and exposing lies...well...most advertisers don't like that and social media platforms are a business. So there's that. And although I understand the frustration of being lucky to see the 2% ratio, I hate to see someone leave the battlefield. Especially when we see accounts with a similar number of followers averaging a 20%+ follower/impression ratio with violence or p*rn as their main content. Because it sells. If you see this brother, this means your job is not done. Hopefully you take a break, reset, and we see you back in action. 👍

• 
  Tim Matula (@timmatula) reported 33 minutes ago

  @GeorgeRoush George, I think the next battlefield isn’t the same as the old one. The reality is that if something is connected to the internet, our agencies can access it—all of it. Access has never been the hard part. Once we have the data (and we already have more than anyone could ever begin to comprehend), the real challenge begins: finding the needle in the haystack—the signals that actually matter and are actionable. We already possess all the data we need. AI is starting to make that needle-hunting problem more manageable, but our adversaries are right there with us, doing exactly the same thing. It’s not planes and battleships anymore.

• 
  taylor ✨ (@padataytay) reported 33 minutes ago

  At this point, spntwt is not a family, it’s a battlefield. And it’s the dumbest ******* war. Some of y’all are so delusional as to believe this is the most pressing issue at hand when it’s really not that serious. Go out and touch grass, I beg you.