Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Rhianna ریانا (@Rhianna_1989) reported 6 seconds ago

  @DMBrookfield @FuriousManiati @AdamKinzinger Reducing civilian harm is a valid concern. But saying, “they know how, so just do it” ignores the structural reality of the battlefield and the need to actually dismantle an embedded armed group- not just manage its growth. “Planners know how to reduce civilian casualties” mitigation exists (warnings, precision targeting, timing, etc.). But none of those eliminate the core constraint: Hamas operating in dense civilian infrastructure. Every military that’s fought in similar environments (Mosul, Raqqa) still saw high civilian casualties despite using those same tools. So the issue isn’t lack of knowledge, it’s the nature of the battlespace. “The response drives the threat, so it’s impossible to neutralise it” Yet but that’s only half t the equation. Hamas’ capability isn’t just sentiment, it’s material infrastructure Those don’t disappear through restraint alone. If you don’t degrade that capability, the threat persists regardless of public sentiment. Proportionality in the law of armed conflict isn’t about matching casualties, it’s about whether expected civilian harm is excessive *relative* to concrete military advantage. You can argue specific strikes fail that test, but broad claims of disproportionate without case by case analysis aren’t really how the standard works. On revenge- of course emotions exist in any war. But operationally, the targeting focus (launch sites, tunnel networks, commanders) aligns directly with military objectives, not random or purely retaliatory violence. That distinction absolutely matters. And again you’re arguing there’s a better approach, but the only alternative you’ve suggested (more ground ops / hearts and minds) has historically resulted in longer conflicts and often higher total civilian casualties ***in dense urban insurgencies****. Link me Adam’s article and I’ll have a read. Thanks, David.

• 
  Aidenn- (@aidennC9) reported 3 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Fix the crackling audio

• 
  Ouch HORSEMAN (@OuchHORSEMAN) reported 8 minutes ago

  Why does Portal have so much lag. It is so bad I have to quit all the time. #bf6 #battlefield #battlefield6

• 
  Mary (@mary1585dva) reported 8 minutes ago

  April 27 was supposed to be sentencing day. Instead, the Court paused on its own, citing complexity and unresolved issues. That pause matters. Guo warned: the battlefield between the CCP and America is inside the U.S. If America fails to expose the ***** money linking the CCP to the DOJ, FBI, law firms, and courts, no American is safe. This was never just one man’s fight. In year ten, the Movement has forced America to confront the CCP’s shadow over its justice, sovereignty, and freedom. When America wakes up, everything has just begun. #MilesGuo #NFSC #TakeDownTheCCP

• 
  IngersTV (@ingers831) reported 8 minutes ago

  How hard is it in 2026 where you cant join a game with your friends without the game crashing or not allowing you to join the party! @Battlefield @BattlefieldComm @EA_DICE 🤬🤬 FIX YOUR GAME!!!!!!

• 
  Mayor Chris Nunneley (@CeoNunneley) reported 11 minutes ago

  @revishvilig That wasn't a great way to phrase what is going on. His claim is that AI has changed everything, so no large territorial gains will be made in the future by any army. A better way to look at AI is that it has 2 primary battlefield uses: target selection and drone automation. Kiev rarely uses AI for target selection. Same for Moscow. Autonomous drones are harder to hack or jam. None of the above impacts large gains or losses in territory. It's just a narrative or excuse for the current stalemate in Ukraine by both sides. In other wars in Africa, Gaza, Lebanon, Venezuela, et al, armies can make extremely large territorial gains each day/week. Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon both use FPV and Shaheed drones, yet Combined Arms fighting by Israel wins the way in both. Iran is the inventor and leading manufacturer of Shaheed drones, yet its drones have no impact on American or Israeli war efforts. The problem isn't drones, but overall tech and strategic competence. Even if a mere regional player like Egypt wants to roll 1,000 tanks across 1,000 miles of enemy territory, neither Yemen nor Iran could stop it, much less be competitive against the USA or Israel. Other wars in Africa show similar points. Both sides use drones, yet armies still cover scores of miles per day in entirely 3rd World battles. Thus, the stalemate in Ukraine comes from leadership, organizational, and tech weaknesses of the two warring sides there. ...not from "AI."

• 
  Satellite (@Satellite1xy6x) reported 13 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm Also, you retards cant even fix the yellow dots in menu screen. ****** wake up to yourselves.

• 
  brurb (@brurb124) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Battlefield If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. Golmud is a vehicle-centric map, it has 5 tanks per side. some of those open spaces were there for a reason

• 
  David Rejl (@Davidrejll) reported 20 minutes ago

  @JHochderffer @smdcapital Weakness? Tesla literally has their patents opened. You know why? Because they're not ******* like all other companies laying mines on the battlefield. There won't be just one robot on the market. Just like there isn't one phone brand. There will be many companies doing the same ****. Copying every move Elon does. But ultimately, people still buy iPhones, you know why? Because they like the brand and don't believe a single word that comes out of the chinese communists' mouth. And that's good. Optimus will play a huge role in Tesla's Future. Creating a loop, where these robots will need 0 human interaction. They will mine materials, self driving cars will transport then to the factories, where more robots build more of themselves. They will also build solar panels and deploy those. Creating a loop, where electricity and labor becomes so cheap, anyone can own anything and get any service they want. At that point, money becomes pointless, where the real currency Is computation and power. Tesla has all the pieces for such future, others don't come EVEN close.

• 
  Verteller Barach 🕳️- EN/ES Vtuber (@vertellerbarach) reported 21 minutes ago

  @IOnlyLift4Leva There's a moment right after this where the dude falls into that sea and then he gets pulled out, his suit is fix, and goes through some portals into another battlefield, maybe that was him getting "Jefuty" to another worldline after the previous one falling

• 
  Lúcio MⒶnfredi 🏴 (@luciomanfredi) reported 21 minutes ago

  One of the biggest, potentially fatal problems facing the left today is its belief that technology is the enemy's weapon, when in fact technology is the battlefield.

• 
  morticia (@evanescent_ser) reported 21 minutes ago

  u threw me out everyday as if I'm their prey. I didn't even feel pretty. it made me feel worse than a pile of carcass in front of hungry predators. u kept doing that until I became ur shield for every delicate problem in ur job. I learnt sm fr that n I nv left the battlefield.

• 
  thetacticalshooterGB (@thetacticalGB) reported 22 minutes ago

  @T0TALfps Well thanks for taking my battlefield 6 experience away from me over the past 13 yrs you banned my account for enhance in-game abilities weapon and item I dont know even know what that all means I leaning difficulties problems let alone even doing something like

• 
  Gordan Asblast (@DanielClevelan1) reported 23 minutes ago

  @wolfsnk737 @BattlefieldInte It absolutely is, it's BEEN a live service since Battlefield 3. ****, even BF2 had ******* live service expansions and ****. It's BEEN a live service for DECADES. It's actually quite the opposite, it's that they had a poor foundation and poor live service to match it.

• 
  RustyTatra🇨🇭 (@rustytatra) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Bronn865359 That 13 year old game was pure fun today. It was slow, it was stable, it had persistant servers and squads and much better maps. Only problem was the vehicles. Too much. Battlefield 6 goes down exactly the same path. Don't know why DICE thinks we need constant action.