Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  WillMoraes (@entabike_mtb) reported 5 minutes ago

  @OlenaRohoza 35% of Ukraine's territory conquered, and you talk about not achieving victories on the battlefield? What is your problem?

• 
  The Lou (@stl_william) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield yall need to fix your broke *** game! All these glitches after an update is stupid af

• 
  𝐎𝐅 𝐁𝐀𝐓𝐓𝐋𝐄𝐅𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐓 (@OfBattlefront) reported 8 minutes ago

  ㅤ Raiden went farther than anyone else, he searched every place Shinei would normally go. when he found nothing, he started over and He crossed the battlefield once. Then again. And again. Every ruined street, every collapsed trench, every broken road. He retraced them all, refusing to believe he'd overlooked something. ㅤ

• 
  Eddie McNade (@EddieMcNade) reported 10 minutes ago

  Why do i have to relaunch BF6 like 3 Times before i get a Server thats not 100+ Ping? Top Scores full of 200 Ping players. Half of the Lobby Console Players.... Your Matchmaking sucks. Your Lag Com sucks. The Balance Sucks. Yes the Gunplay is better now. And its way more fun. But actually getting on a Server is pain! Why is it taking you ages to give access to persistent Servers... they ARE in the game! Stop gatekeeping stuff like this for future Roadmaps! I just want to pick a Server and play for hours! Why is this not fixed. DICE PLEASE! Give us Mouse Only Persitent Servers for people that actually want to compete against other Mouseplayers too! Or may i remind you that you promised me a great PORTAL mode, wich actually still does not even have all maps and modes in it! I really love the Patch, but its such a hard sell at this point! I love Battlefield, but its just so frustrating what you did to this great game!

• 
  🇺🇸 DigitalWarrior on BlueSky (@DigitalWarfare1) reported 10 minutes ago

  @SweetFnLucifer I say Letitia James but would no problem with smith. I would take Elias off the voter disenfranchisement battlefield tho

• 
  Biorelations (@biorelations) reported 11 minutes ago

  FREYJA INSIGHTS "Give him 15 minutes of peace when he gets home. No questions. No tasks. No problems to solve. And he will give you the rest of the evening. That's how you build connection — without chasing connection. Just give him the 15 minutes — and he will give you everything else." Most women do the opposite. The moment he walks through the door — they're already talking. Already asking. Already needing something. And he shuts down. Not because he doesn't love her. Because he just came back from the battlefield. And he has nothing left — yet. 15 minutes. That's all it takes. The woman who understands this gets the man fully present. The woman who doesn't keeps wondering why he's always distant. In Freyja we teach women to understand how a man actually recharges — and how to work with his nature instead of fighting it. Have you ever tried giving him silence first — and been surprised by what came after?

• 
  Jaynit (@jaynitx) reported 13 minutes ago

  Alex Karp reveals why he believes American enterprises have completely lost trust in the frontier AI labs "Something has gone completely wrong. The basic view among enterprises in this country is, I'm going to chill lax and waste my time with tokens, I'm going to get no value, and they're going to get my IP" "Just to say enterprises are unhappy with the frontier labs is to say I'm welcome at the Berkeley faculty. There's a level of discomfort and loss of trust" "Every single enterprise I deal with, these people are livid. They're paying for tokens that create no value. These people are stealing the weights and alpha of my business" "These models have been completely irresponsibly oversold" "If it was so valuable, let's say I can make you a billion dollars tomorrow, wouldn't I say I'll make you a billion and I want 30%? Why are they charging for tokens if it's so valuable?" "The reason everyone is chillaxing with bad financials and growth with losing money is the client refuses to pay the true cost" "What aligns me with Nvidia, and I think is what technical customers want, is control over their compute, their models, their data stack, and their alpha. They want to know they own the means of production" "We need to rebuild trust. That trust is going to happen where everyone gets to ask and answer basic questions. Who owns the data? Where is it cached? Are the prompts secure? Is this being transferred to you?" "Everyone who uses LLMs on the battlefield runs on top of our ontology" "In the classified context, when the Department of War goes to you and says I need this application, do they get to control the weights, or do you get to control the weights?" "Are we really going to outsource the battlefield of this country to the consensus view in Silicon Valley? That is effing insane" "They're creating a wealth tax that does not help the poor. It just punishes" "This is the voice of American business that is being channeled through me. It is absolutely a problem for this country"

• 
  Mark Fett (@SrMark_Fett) reported 17 minutes ago

  I mean, could be fun, specially if you pair with some friends and give some accurate map coordinates to work from That being said it wasn’t really a problem for plenty of games tbh, from memory both battlefield 3 and 4 and Farcry 5 have fps mortars

• 
  υɴcoммoɴ (@UncommonXX) reported 20 minutes ago

  @FocusBF Something to keep in mind: - 2026 tech vs 2010s tech - 720p vs 4k tech - live service menus are for live service games hence why BF3 menu is clean for it being properly dlc related - niche gaming has niche content, ex. portal As a Battlefield Vet. DICE won’t change it due to EA.

• 
  PaulsCorner-VerseQuest (@TNTJohn1717) reported 26 minutes ago

  while still having a doctrinal home. Third John’s doctrinal home is Church Age local church life. It addresses how believers should walk in truth, love in truth, receive faithful brethren, support the Lord’s workers, and resist proud men who hinder the truth. This is why the book is so useful for pastors, teachers, Bible students, and ordinary believers sitting in the pews. Church trouble is not new. Proud men are not new. Slander is not new. Gatekeeping is not new. Casting out faithful people in the name of authority is not new. The Holy Ghost put 3 John in the canon because Church Age believers would need it. The local church is supposed to be a pillar and ground of the truth, according to 1 Timothy 3:15, but whenever truth is present, the devil looks for an entrance. Sometimes he attacks from outside. In 3 John, the trouble is inside the walls. Chapter Two: The Elder Stands Where the Battle Is John calls himself “the elder,” and that is significant because local church battlefields require tested spiritual oversight. The elder is not writing from a throne of religious vanity. He is not acting like a pope, prince, or owner of the saints. He is writing with aged discernment, apostolic truth, and pastoral care. That is the right kind of authority for a church battlefield. The wrong kind of authority wants preeminence. The right kind of authority serves truth. John’s authority strengthens Gaius and exposes Diotrephes. Diotrephes’ influence protects himself and harms the brethren. There is the difference between Bible authority and religious control. An elder who stands where the battle is must be able to identify the real issue. Many church conflicts are deliberately clouded by personalities, rumors, hurt feelings, side conversations, and religious language. Diotrephes could have claimed he was protecting the church. He could have said he was guarding local autonomy. He could have accused the brethren of being outsiders. He could have made Gaius look rebellious for receiving those whom he refused. But John sees through the fog. The real issue is preeminence, malicious words, refusal of faithful brethren, forbidding others, and casting people out. A faithful elder does not let the proud man define the battlefield. That is needed now. The Church Age is full of men who can manage meetings but cannot discern spirits, men who can run programs but cannot smell pride, men who can quote leadership books but cannot handle Diotrephes. John is not that kind of elder. He is not neutral between the faithful and the abusive. He is not confused between charity and compromise. He is not intimidated by the local church boss. When the battlefield appears, the elder stands in truth. That is what church leadership is supposed to do. It is not supposed to protect the institution at all costs. It is supposed to protect truth, brethren, testimony, and the honor of the Lord Jesus Christ. Chapter Three: Fellowship Is a Battlefield Third John shows that fellowship is not a harmless social category. Fellowship is a battlefield because whom you receive and whom you refuse says what truth you are standing with. Gaius receives faithful brethren. Diotrephes refuses them. John commands, “We therefore ought to receive such, that we might be fellowhelpers to the truth.” That word “such” is important. It does not mean receive everybody who owns a religious vocabulary. It means receive those who went forth for His name’s sake and took nothing of the Gentiles. Fellowship in 3 John is not blind hospitality. It is truth-governed charity. Second John and Third John must be read together if a man wants balance. Second John says not to receive the false teacher who brings not the doctrine of Christ. Third John says to receive the faithful brethren who go forth for His name. There is no contradiction. The same Bible that closes the door on heresy opens the door to faithful servants. The same truth that rejects antichrist doctrine

• 
  Arachnomancer 😷 9x💉🕸 ️🕷️🌵 (@WithSpiders) reported 26 minutes ago

  @cocomarvgrows completely ignoring the fact that tens of thousands of people are dying on the battlefield. Most people probably wouldn't have a problem with that. But I am not "most people." I find the idea of completely tuning out the horrors of our time and pretending everything is fine 2/3

• 
  Bugenhagen (@OtisDri14185268) reported 29 minutes ago

  @CAMIKAZE78 I really hate the state of battlefield ever since the very first update, so much so that I went back to call of duty warzone. Battlefield isn't battlefield at this point, they are trying for a cod/bf hybrid and its just not working (for me). I feel the game will never recover 😒

• 
  N8D (@USN8D) reported 32 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm BF6 is just a placeholder FPS till something better drops. Game is dead, broken and riddled with third party software in anything competitive. EA/Dice should just hang it up. The last decent thing created was BF3 and 4.

• 
  Constance (@Constan63413921) reported 34 minutes ago

  @Jerusalem_Post Diplomacy with the Islamic Republic was built on a false premise: that the regime had a solvable dispute with the West. It does not. Its hostility is not transactional; it is ideological, constitutional, and central to its identity. Negotiations could manage tempo, delay escalation, exchange prisoners, or create temporary pauses, but they could never resolve the underlying conflict because the regime’s survival narrative depends on anti-Americanism, anti-Israelism, revolutionary expansion, and permanent confrontation. So the real question is not: “When does diplomacy stop being a path to resolution?” The real question is: “Why did Washington keep pretending diplomacy with Tehran was designed to resolve a conflict that the regime itself needs in order to survive?” That is the strategic error. Diplomacy became a mechanism for stabilizing the Islamic Republic, not changing its behavior. It gave Tehran time, legitimacy, cash flow, and breathing room while allowing Western governments to avoid the harder conclusion: this is not a normal state seeking a bargain. It is a revolutionary regime using talks as a battlefield. The regime did not enter diplomacy to end the conflict. It entered diplomacy to manage pressure, divide its enemies, buy time, and survive.

• 
  boob inspector (@bygonezbygonz) reported 35 minutes ago

  @Battlefield ******* 30 guys sniping and only 1 flag captured, fix your ******* game