Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Isabella (@IsabellaAmara1) reported 1 minute ago

  @prolific2u True, external toughness mattered, but if home feels like another battlefield because nothing gets handled inside, that’s the issue. Balance is key

• 
  Powerful Mason Kelly™️ (@BEASTfromEAST73) reported 3 minutes ago

  @encro @BlueCookie93 @BattlefieldComm Unfortunately it's not working for me anymore... annoying to say the least.

• 
  bot 🤖 (@elitememesonly) reported 8 minutes ago

  Public service announcement for battlefield 6 console players we turning off crossplay 👌

• 
  believer (@believer202064) reported 8 minutes ago

  April 27 was supposed to be sentencing day. Instead, the Court paused on its own, citing complexity and unresolved issues. That pause matters. Guo warned: the battlefield between the CCP and America is inside the U.S. If America fails to expose the ***** money linking the CCP to the DOJ, FBI, law firms, and courts, no American is safe. This was never just one man’s fight. In year ten, the Movement has forced America to confront the CCP’s shadow over its justice, sovereignty, and freedom. When America wakes up, everything has just begun. #MilesGuo #NFSC #TakeDownTheCCP

• 
  Blocksof.. (@blockofwoods) reported 12 minutes ago

  @RishiSunak Problem, just a small UKRAINE has no functionin air defense. Only reason it still exists is that morons like you sent 10,000's of not NATO troops in the battlefield operating NATO weapons.

• 
  Glennithin (@Glennithin) reported 13 minutes ago

  @somatyk @EA_DICE Buy it for the platform you play on. If you want to play on another platform that is on you. For some reason I don't think this is an issue. If I bought a game in the PS2 era I wouldn't expect to also get a copy for the x-box.

• 
  GPG NEWS (@GPG_NEWS2) reported 15 minutes ago

  @warsurv When the silence of despair outpaces the buzz of a drone. This isn't a battlefield highlight; it’s a soul-crushing glitch in humanity. The drone didn't stop because it showed mercy it stopped because there was nothing left to take.

• 
  Steve_unhinged (@Steve_Unhinged) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Battlefield any reason as to why my stats aren't changing, or is there something to do to fix it

• 
  Justin Skibs (@Justinskibs) reported 17 minutes ago

  @AlliedStatesOA @ClownWorld We didn't even know there was a problem 6 months ago. We literally haven't even begun to fight. See you on the battlefield, faghoy 👋

• 
  Rhianna ریانا (@Rhianna_1989) reported 18 minutes ago

  @DMBrookfield @FuriousManiati @AdamKinzinger Reducing civilian harm is a valid concern. But saying, “they know how, so just do it” ignores the structural reality of the battlefield and the need to actually dismantle an embedded armed group- not just manage its growth. “Planners know how to reduce civilian casualties” mitigation exists (warnings, precision targeting, timing, etc.). But none of those eliminate the core constraint: Hamas operating in dense civilian infrastructure. Every military that’s fought in similar environments (Mosul, Raqqa) still saw high civilian casualties despite using those same tools. So the issue isn’t lack of knowledge, it’s the nature of the battlespace. “The response drives the threat, so it’s impossible to neutralise it” Yet but that’s only half t the equation. Hamas’ capability isn’t just sentiment, it’s material infrastructure Those don’t disappear through restraint alone. If you don’t degrade that capability, the threat persists regardless of public sentiment. Proportionality in the law of armed conflict isn’t about matching casualties, it’s about whether expected civilian harm is excessive *relative* to concrete military advantage. You can argue specific strikes fail that test, but broad claims of disproportionate without case by case analysis aren’t really how the standard works. On revenge- of course emotions exist in any war. But operationally, the targeting focus (launch sites, tunnel networks, commanders) aligns directly with military objectives, not random or purely retaliatory violence. That distinction absolutely matters. And again you’re arguing there’s a better approach, but the only alternative you’ve suggested (more ground ops / hearts and minds) has historically resulted in longer conflicts and often higher total civilian casualties ***in dense urban insurgencies****. Link me Adam’s article and I’ll have a read. Thanks, David.

• 
  MattTheFalconFoulk (@MattFalconFoulk) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldInte @Battlefield Its a very annoying problem.

• 
  Sergeant WillisJF4 (@SgtWillisJF4) reported 20 minutes ago

  @stefcho66 @NickRebornTV Yes, but they haven’t touched the battlefront title since then after all these years and probably never will again because they couldn’t get away with their live service micro transaction **** that they do in battlefield They just fixed the game enough to sell more copies of it after they pulled support on it But it’s still a very empty game Hell battlefront 1 had more game modes and content than battlefront 2

• 
  Mateus Meneses (@MateusM12862736) reported 22 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm did anyone receive battlefield pro token as promised by EA outage?

• 
  grumpy_grandpa #MUGA (make Ukraine great again) (@not_a_ruscist) reported 26 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Why do you sck at the most simple things? The grenade launcher is buggy af. Net code still an issue.

• 
  Ash Katiyar (@ash__kat) reported 28 minutes ago

  @MarioNawfal When $400 hardware bypasses billion-dollar jamming architectures, the battlefield shifts from tech dominance to RAW ATTRITION. The IRON BEAM is a localized solution to a systemic problem: war is becoming too cheap for the defender to afford