Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  NPI-AMERICA (@Dr_Autistic_3D) reported 15 seconds ago

  @InfinityWard @InfinityWard Day 1 TTK was PERFECT. Fix the graphics, spawns, weapon balance, whatever. But leave the TTK alone! Now MW4 feels like a Super Nintendo/Commodore 64 game. slow, clunky & made for crybabies & cheaters. I didn’t buy the Vault Edition to play Battlefield 7. @CallofDuty

• 
  Kate from Kharkiv (@BohuslavskaKate) reported 3 minutes ago

  STUBB: Putin is not winning this war, and won't win. Ukraine has, de facto, already won this war. It’s as simple as that. Putin made colossal mistake by invading Ukraine in the first place. He underestimated Ukrainian army, its response. He overestimated his military capacity, or we wouldn't be 4.5 years into this war with the losses he's suffered. Putin also underestimated unity and support of the West. You know, we’re still here, and we’re not going away. There seems to be a lack of honest people around Putin who can tell him about real situation on the battlefield. And that's the problem. I mean, Putin will not win this war. That’s why I think it would be good to stop the killing.

• 
  ＧＨＯＳＴ (@Adam9110) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Fix game....

• 
  LiCHtsLiCH (@Barbaneth) reported 6 minutes ago

  @volcaholic1 Well don't let it get you down. The vast majority are just dog piling, it's good for your revenue stream, but disassociate yourself from it. One of the problems of fame. But please don't let it get you down. Nothing wrong with having a point of view, and even though I may disagree with the science of it, doesn't make it a valid fear. In alot of instances, well most, I fully agree with you, if what you say is true, we are in for one hell of a ride. More importantly, it seems that a large chunk of the cause is actually an abscence, which, in all likelyhood, from a scientific pov, we are headed for more extremes, which is just fine. This is far from unexpected, and certainly something we can deal with. Beyond that, if you can think of it as grace, this good weather, we have summarily wasted it, which is far more frightening. Rather than becoming more prepared, we have become less prepared. Emergency stations set up 20 years ago, gone into disuse, suddenly called upon by inexperienced place holders like the Covid emergency response team. Bear in mind, this is a lack of experience cause by a lack of event. Like battlefield soldiers who have never seen combat. A sense of readiness is paramount to a quick response, and you are the literal tip of the spear when it comes to a sense of motivation and concern that people should have. Maybe pivot your approach to one of preparedness, rather than the cause. The cause isn't the point, mostly beause we can't do anything about it, and partly because it may not be the cause. So how would you outline a response beyond or integrating existing emergency protocols? Even going over the material requirements for triage encampments, set up for disaster recovery, and logistics resource acquisition and communication could seriously mitigate a Katrina response that 3 days in was "what do we do?".

• 
  China pulse 🇨🇳 (@Eng_china5) reported 6 minutes ago

  China is watching every move. Taiwan tried to make its air defenses harder to find by moving Tien Kung-3 and Patriot systems to temporary positions during Han Kuang-42. The problem? Every new position becomes another target to map. Chinese satellites, drones and electronic intelligence are turning Taiwan’s mobile air-defense network into a constantly updated battlefield map—tracking launchers, radars, command posts and support nodes. You can move the missiles. You can’t hide them from an intelligence network watching from above.

• 
  🌑🕷️RiskE80🕷️🌑 (@RiskE80_) reported 10 minutes ago

  @clarityysix But then again I guess it is kindve a vague definition cuz there are games that are considered live service but have a similar content cycle like Borderlands (CoD, GTA Online, Battlefield) where they make a game, make new content, then make a new game eventually, repeat

• 
  EcstasyDesignz (@EcstasyDegen) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Coachie01 I knew someone was going to question Ivar. His intelligence is more strategic than the others. Put them in a battlefield situation rather than a heist or prison, and suddenly Ivar becomes a very serious problem.

• 
  GhostGaming (@GhostGamingG) reported 16 minutes ago

  @KontrolStyleTV @Battlefield completely missing the point. It's a problem, everybody knows it's a problem except you apparently.

• 
  Norseman (@CollinBotner) reported 17 minutes ago

  @HaywoodChablomy @Springfield_Inc Show some respect! They prolly have experience, likey more than a keyboard warrior, COD/Battlefield operator, and or hipster with rolled up jeans, talking **** on X! lol I’m 55, I Do take my vitamins, and I Can shoot the hair off a frogs *** at 50 yards! Problem ********!?!??

• 
  James ⚜️ (@SisterDogmata) reported 19 minutes ago

  @HobbyFawx @Majorcheeks117 Your hypothesis would be correct, Sisters are promoted not only because of exemplary service and battlefield skill, but because of unyielding devotion to the Emperor, an especially pious nature, knowledge of their Order, communication skills, etc

• 
  @simandant (@simandant) reported 20 minutes ago

  @RupertLowe10 Military veterans deserve absolute respect, but the idea that a background in battlefield command is the primary qualification to reshape British law is absurd To fix our unwritten constitution, we don't need a single institutional mindset; we need a functional Parliament

• 
  Tyler Frank (@mrtfrank007) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Battlefield Bring back the SCAR-SV. Fix the interdictor

• 
  Orlando Victor (@OrlandoVictor54) reported 24 minutes ago

  @lavitx Whatever side of the debate we’re on, I think the important part is to stay curious, look at reliable evidence, question assumptions, and avoid turning environmental issues into another ideological battlefield. 🌍 We all have an interest in leaving a healthier planet behind us.

• 
  Big Brain AI (@realBigBrainAI) reported 26 minutes ago

  Palantir co-founder and CEO Alex Karp on why almost every company buying AI is getting nothing back for it: Karp's diagnosis is short and unkind: "The classic Silicon Valley way up until recently was just buy some large language model and have a nice chat with it, and that really doesn't create any actual enterprise value." That's the whole failure mode. A model gets procured, a chat window appears, nobody's revenue changes. His alternative starts with a definition he says Palantir arrived at years before the rest of the market: "We were years ahead for lots of reasons of anticipating what operational AI would mean. Meaning AI where you make more money or your revenue goes up and your costs go down." Two lines on the P&L. Nothing else counts. Karp claims the numbers follow from that. "We have a thriving commercial business. It grew 71% last quarter. And we're at a very pretty significant scale." He also flags something rarer in the sector: "We make money on our money, which is unusual in software. People have growth but no profitability. We have a lot of both." So why does the same underlying technology produce nothing at most companies and revenue at his? Karp says the answer is "a little more technical," and it isn't the model: "Our platforms are built to use large language models and machine learning in a way that is actually operationally effective. We had a relatively privileged insight into how you would do that and built this thing called an ontology which manages large language models in a way where they become crazily useful both commercially and actually on the battlefield." The ontology is the missing layer. A model on its own doesn't know what your business is made of. Something has to translate between the two before the model can touch anything that matters. What it gets used for is deliberately unglamorous. Karp lists underwriting, acquisition of real estate at scale, construction at scale, and supply chain management — "anywhere where you have volatility." He picks out one problem specifically: "Understanding the true cost of inputs into your enterprise, which is super hard to do at scale, especially if things are shifting or there's disruptions." And the larger version of the job: "reimagining your business into a digital as opposed to a non-digital business." Then he moves from the technology to the thing he actually treats as the differentiator — who carries the risk that none of it works: "Our claim to fame really is we absorb the risk of creating value." He contrasts that with how enterprise software is normally sold, in language he flags as the vulgar version: "The way you're taught to build a software company is your customer thinks they're getting laid but they're getting effed." Palantir's internal reframing: "We used to internally say no, we're in the mutual pleasuring business. Both sides should be happy." In practice that means the vendor is on the hook for the outcome, not just the licence: "We absorb the risk of value creation. So like you will make more money, your enterprise will work better. That's been a bonanza and we're pretty much alone in doing that in the world." Karp doesn't claim it's all his own execution. He credits the moment too: "The truth is we're also riding the back of the fact that this is just an American revolution." Underneath the specifics, he also frames the commercial work as secondary to something else. Asked what matters most, his first answer isn't revenue at all: "The most important thing we've done for you is help establish dominance on the battlefield with the DoD and stop hundreds of terror attacks."

• 
  Tyler (@Tylergzilla) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Battlefield FIX THE FLARE BUG PLEASE MAN