Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Erick (@Erickschultz11) reported 24 seconds ago

  @mattvanswol We trust institutions to investigate wrongdoing fairly, yet repeated scandals have left many people questioning whether similar failures are treated the same way. Some see accountability being shaped by power, ideology, reputation, fear, or institutional self-protection. Others argue that different cases simply involve different facts, evidence, and constraints. The problem is not necessarily that institutions are acting in bad faith. They may genuinely believe they are applying consistent standards, weighing evidence carefully, protecting due process, avoiding prejudice, or balancing competing social concerns. The deeper issue is that much of this reasoning is often invisible to the public. When decisions are opaque or difficult to scrutinize, people cannot easily distinguish between responsible judgment and narrative management. As trust declines, disagreements spread beyond the events themselves. People begin disagreeing about which sources are credible, which facts matter, and which institutions can be trusted to evaluate the evidence. The result is a crisis of legitimacy. The question is no longer just whether accountability is being applied fairly. The question becomes who gets to decide what happened, how that decision was reached, and why everyone else should trust it. The way forward is not to choose one victim narrative over another. It is to make the process itself more transparent, more consistent, and more open to scrutiny. Every case should be examined through the same questions: who was harmed, who caused the harm, who enabled it, who ignored it, who benefited from silence, and what incentives may have protected the failure? But even that requires something more. We must be willing to apply the same standards of evidence and skepticism to our own preferred narratives that we apply to those we oppose. Without that, accountability becomes another battlefield for competing stories rather than a search for truth. The real challenge is not simply rebuilding trust in institutions. It is rebuilding trust in the processes by which institutions, evidence, and public judgments are evaluated in the first place.

• 
  Libertad_24 (@FlacoG_2023) reported 3 minutes ago

  @GrimBF6 @Millitings @BattlefieldComm "Buddy," how many more months do they need to fix this? Are they waiting for MW4 to come out and there will only be 2000 people left...? "We are working." Game from 2025...

• 
  worpweep (@weepworp) reported 7 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I hit a truck with 5 rpgs today and it didn't ******* die. Thats a problem.

• 
  Marwan (@6db560c87fec4ea) reported 7 minutes ago

  @CallieSue1109 @Battlefield And that took them many days to fix

• 
  Faith Under Pressure (@DeenRatio) reported 8 minutes ago

  @JoeyMannarino The world is still paying the price for ideas that belonged to a seventh-century battlefield. The problem is not just what criminals do. The deeper problem is when people can point to religious texts and find justification for those actions.

• 
  X (@o_oZeppelin) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield How about you fix red dot optics and general optic illumination. Why do all the sights look like terrible dark red sharpie

• 
  Gabriel K (@EGabrielK) reported 9 minutes ago

  @GokTurk_01001 @Emrulla48879475 @hermes_z You are talking about technical issues for a plane under development produced by an industry that hasn't produced anything similar and compare it against an airplane from a superpower that based its battlefield dominance in air power and has fought in hign intensity conflicts. 🤡

• 
  Mαr Mounier 🌐 (@elhigadodmarita) reported 10 minutes ago

  @mhfmvc Dear brother, I deeply appreciate the candor of your analysis. You present a position of impeccable logical rigor within a closed system, yet you commit the very error of those you criticize: you reduce the Mystical Body of Christ to an administrative problem to be solved at a desk. You employ the sedevacantist thesis to denounce the ‘inconsistency’ of others, but to what does your position lead in practice? To a total atomization where every believer becomes their own Pope, awaiting a restoration that, by your own premise, is humanly impossible. Absolute sedevacantism ultimately manifests as a form of quietism: since you posit that there is no authority, there is no mission, and therefore nothing to do but await the apocalypse from the comfort of one’s home. And that is the very triumph of the ‘sect’ you so adamantly oppose! They need not persecute you if you have already excluded yourself from the combat. Furthermore, you accuse me of caring only for ‘externals’ rather than doctrine. On the contrary: precisely because I am concerned for doctrine, I understand that the Church is NOT a corporation whose legal validity is automatically annulled by the errors of its managers. Remember that the history of the Church is a record ad infinitum of Popes who have been weak, erratic, or deeply questionable, without that signifying that the Holy Spirit has abandoned the sacraments or the apostolic succession. The fact that you require the entire ‘protocol’ of history to be flawless to believe in the validity of the hierarchy reveals that your faith depends on bureaucratic perfection, not on divine Providence. Then, you criticize the SSPX for its ‘inconsistency,’ yet in practice, they are the rearguard trench of a war you have already declared lost. Is the SSPX position perfect? No. But the ‘purity of doctrine’ you demand is, at this historical juncture, a LUXURY that does not permit the building of a single chapel, the formation of a single priest, the protection of the Tridentine Mass, or the salvation of a single soul from destruction. The SSPX, conversely, for all its limitations, is fighting the war, taking bullets, missiles, and bombs. They remain in the field because they know that the General on the line is CHRIST and the fortress to be defended is HOLY. Finally, you argue that it is ‘utterly inconsistent’ to recognize the Pope while rejecting the Council. Brother, it is entirely Catholic to acknowledge the historical facts-that Rome is occupied by an anti-theology-and, simultaneously, to maintain that Christ has not abandoned His Sacred Spouse, but has allowed a trial of purification where Tradition remains the only guiding thread. Do you prefer the theoretical purity of self-destruction? So be it. I prefer the resistance in the trenches, with all its wounds, abuse, suffering, and contradictions, for as long as the occupation lasts. But we must not leave the enemies of the Church an easy path. Remember: being Catholic is NOT for the cowardly. To be a militant Catholic, one MUST BE BRAVE. I understand your position perfectly, but we have been pushed into a FRONTAL war, and doctrinal purity is useless if it merely becomes a shroud to bury the cause of Christ. The ‘inconsistency’ of which you accuse me is not a weakness; it is my refusal to let the enemy dictate the rules of my own surrender. No. If the Church is to be defended, we must step directly onto the battlefield. And we do not care about appearing with pressed and perfumed uniforms. All we care is: we are under fire, and we MUST save lives—and souls. Even if there are only twelve of us.

• 
  TheCreatorNyvlem (MLVNS) (@TheCreatorOneM) reported 14 minutes ago

  @obviouslyhud @BattlefieldInte @Battlefield Wtf is the problem? Just a extra mode you can play or not play

• 
  Jeffrey’s Aura Farm (@HolyMulletMan) reported 14 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm @Battlefield Did you guys fix Strikepoint???

• 
  Kołdrian (@ten_na_chmurce) reported 18 minutes ago

  Mistfall Hunter is, first and foremost, an extraction RPG. Yes, it borrows some soulslike flavor: slower combat, dodges, limited resources, danger around every corner and dark fantasy presentation. But after around two hours with the demo, I would not call it a proper soulslike. It is more of a PvPvE extraction game with fantasy loot runs and a few soulslike ideas stitched into the combat. And honestly, that concept is not bad. The loop of entering a zone, looting everything you can, wondering if another player is nearby, and trying to escape with your stuff does create tension. Even solo, you can feel the pressure. I played as a sorcerer, and PvP was actually easier than I expected. I fought mostly rogue-style players, probably Shadowstrix, and using AoE skills, monsters, and positioning against them worked pretty well. I did not lose a PvP fight, but I also did not feel like the combat was especially deep. The combat has some interesting limits. You cannot just spam attacks forever because your energy or mana has to regenerate. Dodging also works through a limited dash system, with three dashes that recover over time. On paper, that gives the fights some rhythm. In practice, I often felt like I missed not because my aim was bad, but because the game decided the hit did not count. Sometimes the visual effect of a spell looked bigger than its actual hitbox. Maybe that is just a demo issue, but in an extraction game where every mistake can cost you loot, this matters a lot. Technically, though, I have to give the game credit. I played on mobile 5G internet and still had around 30–50 ms most of the time, which is genuinely good in my case. I only had one short moment where the game felt like it had not fully loaded the server or had a sudden FPS/ping issue, but outside of that it was very smooth. No serious lag, no constant stuttering, no big technical disaster. That is a strong point. Visually, Mistfall Hunter is fine, but not amazing. It has that Unreal Engine look, with some decent views, but also some rough character movement, sliding animations, strange hair and clothing rendering, and places where I could look under assets or textures. As someone who also builds maps, that kind of thing always bothers me. I know why developers hide objects behind other objects, but I really do not want the player to see the trick. The atmosphere is harder for me to praise. It feels like a mix of Slavic and Nordic dark fantasy filtered through a more Asian fantasy style, but I did not really feel the weight of dark fantasy here. It is *****, full of monsters, ruins and loot, but more “designed to look dark” than actually heavy or oppressive. I skipped most of the dialogue because nothing really pulled me in. The world is okay. The mood is okay. But “okay” is basically the problem. Character creation is actually in a good spot. You choose from several classes, including Mercenary, Sorcerer, Blackarrow, Shadowstrix, Seer and Withered Knight, then pick from multiple male and female looks and customize things like hair, eyes, makeup, scars, tattoos, voice and skin tone. I like character creators that let me feel like I made my own hero without trapping me for an hour before the game even starts. This one is enough. And yes, of course the breast physics are already there in the character selection screen. Classic. Weirdly, that might be one of the smoother animations in the demo. The bigger issue for me is progression. You loot a lot. Really a lot. The inventory fills up quickly, and after two hours I still was not sure which items were actually useful and which were just there to be stockpiled. You can send companions on expeditions, craft better items, and some crafting takes 12 hours, which may be a balancing choice for this type of game. I do not have enough experience with extraction games to judge that fully, but it felt slow. Maybe there is base development later, maybe not, but I got tired of returning to the same battlefield and doing quests before I reached the point where the system truly opened up. So where does that leave me? Mistfall Hunter has a good concept. A dark fantasy extraction RPG with some soulslike flavor sounds interesting. The solo experience has tension, and I can imagine it being much more intense in a trio, where every fight, escape and ambush probably feels more alive. But after around two hours and a few expeditions, I felt more curiosity than excitement. I do not think I will come back to it. It is not really my type of game. Still, I would not completely dismiss it. If you enjoy extraction games, PvPvE tension, fantasy loot runs and slower combat built around limited resources, it might be worth watching. For me, based on the demo: 5.5/10. Not bad. Not pointless. Just not convincing enough yet.

• 
  Stevo3854 (@stevo3854420) reported 20 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm I hope you guys realize your expiration date is Oct when cod mw4 releases unless you fix the insane amount of issues that persistently plague this broken game and it's absolutely stupid ranked scoring system and squad rules.

• 
  Nick Calandra (@nickjcal) reported 21 minutes ago

  Look no further than the Battlefield franchise for a great example of how spending more and more didn't lead to better games. It led to rushed out unfinished games that took years and more money to fix, and then to get the franchise back on track even more money to do it "right".

• 
  ارمانی مار خور شہادت یار🇵🇸🇵🇰 (@Gum_naam143) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Intl_Mediatior Sir, don't you think that this is all a game plan and its effect will not only last until the battlefield, but can put any country in trouble in every way?

• 
  vitor 🦅 (@DuffyMorgan_) reported 26 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm There's a lighting issue when we use the first person on vehicles, did you guys already fix that or no?