Battlefield 6 Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Battlefield 6 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Perma Banned ထ🔨 (@GiveMeBanHammer) reported 9 minutes ago

  I am going to put into post form what we have covered today...and the strange little chains I've noticed as we talked about the curious case of Patrick Soderlund and his recent role as an Executive Chairman of Nexon. I want to cover it in a series of key events in specific times intervals and I hope some of you will keep up with this. Before 2026: 1. Blue Archive struck with fair few stupid EN "Localizations" decisions, such as the Kikyou lines. Strong player feedback caused the lines to be changed and be more consistent with the JP and KR lines. 2. The controversial CdawgVA/Connor collab - again strong player complaints and feedback caused the collab to be changed to Mint Fantome and Remilia Nephys. Another good ending to another scandalous event. After 2026: When Patrick Soderlund became Executive Chairman 1. The next scandalous Blue Archive collab - involving an overt hater like Fobm4ster, and later Brandon, who came out defending Blue Archive Antis who frequently attack its players...they stuck around and continued with the collab despite player criticism. Odd change... 2. The massive gacha nerf that is now the biggest source of drama. Despite even more massive player complaints and backlash - the new gacha system formally took effect. Saving for 200 pulls is no longer sufficient to get the two featured banner characters, you have to save up for 400 pulls now instead to be safe. Blue Archive's producer made an "apology" post that doesn't really address anything and claims that the problem is just "communication process were insufficient", despite fact that most players understood properly what was communicated - and that the new system was worse. Now consider Patrick Soderlund's past decisions, from EA to Embark: 1. The Battlefield 5 disaster, his famous “don’t like it don’t buy it” moment when Battlefield fans and players complained about the direction of the game. 2. Scrapped the original pitch for Arc Raiders: massive PvE game that involved fighting giant machines and robots - in favour of the PvPvE extraction shooter bandwagon. Game had a honeymoon period but rapidly lost a lot of players after 3 months from release. Player feedback and requests continue to be largely ignored, especially mass requests for a PvE gamemode. What does this all mean? Again maybe I am being too ****** about this entire thing - but I have noticed that the timing of all these very subtle but noticeable changes surrounding Blue Archive. What was once a Nexon that still could change its mind especially in the face of large number of player feedback, now seems colder, more flippant and even outright ignoring feedback. Now I'm saying clearly this is all speculation - but by making such a simple timeline of key time intervals and the subtle differences in how Nexon handles decisions surrounding Blue Archive, both before and after Patrick Soderlund assumed an executive role...I really think getting this Ex-EA exec who has a reputation for mocking or ignoring player feedback - I do not think the changes are coincidence.

• 
  JohnWick (@Adam78932986) reported 10 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm After updating to Season 4, the game has input lag and freezes. When will this be fixed? It was perfect before.

• 
  𝕽𝖆𝖚𝖑 𝕭𝖆𝖚𝖙𝖎𝖘𝖙𝖆 (@aN22_x) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm connection issues need fixing The bullet recording code also needs fixing

• 
  Red slayer (@redslayerknows) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Kavorkian3 @BattlefieldComm Wi-Fi what are you talking about?. it’s server specific issues and I’m hard wired with a dedicated internet specifically for gaming. You have network function on then?

• 
  RallyCarDelta Gaming (@GameOverThirty) reported 16 minutes ago

  @axl99 Reading between the lines on Battlefield, I get the impression that money was no object. They hired anyone and everyone to get it over the line since the company needed it to be better than their previous couple of games (and EA had something of a drought when it came to live service hits). It hit, but they quickly realized the players sticking around after 3-4 months were more interested in traditional Battlefield, thus they cut down the team to primarily support that vision. That's my take, anyway.

• 
  EyesReye (@Luuk__058) reported 18 minutes ago

  @BattlefieldComm - Grenade timers. Flat 2-3 seconds upon hitting ground instead of variable timers / let us cook them - Other explosives triggering grenades. Problem on CQB maps where you often die to 'invisible nades' (no indicator because they explode early from a nearby explosion)

• 
  Mark McDaniel (@MarkSMcDaniel) reported 20 minutes ago

  @KTB_500 @USArmy @PeteHegseth I read the article, haven’t listened to the podcast. I will address just 4 points. Completely agree that armored (the author doesn’t like that term but there it is) formations must own their local airspace. This is the author’s strongest point and must be embraced. Every formation on the battlefield down to company level needs its own layered defense, and likely drone recon and strike capability. Organic. The good news is the armored force has a history of technical excellence, has platforms both current and future with the size and power output to incorporate the necessary technology, and is the only conventional ground organization with a heritage of integrating closely with organic air recon and strike platforms. Like 90% of the commentators on urban warfare, the problems of operating tank and tank-like vehicles in urban terrain are overstated. The fact that most people believe it doesn’t make it true. Most people in the armor community believe we need something that looks and smells like a light tank. One of our foremost thinkers succeeded in creating a requirement for one, it was built, and then discarded before any substantive experimentation could be done. Using Iraqi M1 results vs ISIS to evaluate the efficacy of the platform is simply childish. You could have given them T90s, ISVs, or AT-ST Walkers and they would have gotten about the same results. The discussion on Ukraine’s experience was little better. If you throw 1 battalion of any platform into that meat grinder you will take losses. The author implies a strawman where the 31x M1s were supposed to be invulnerable. I thought overall the author brought forth some important points that need to be addressed, but the effectiveness of the article suffered due to some choices.

• 
  David (@1Baph0met) reported 20 minutes ago

  @hasanthehun Battlefield wasn't bad. It's clear you're out of touch with gaming. DEI and live service everything is infact killing games.

• 
  Noctre (@NoctreSharp) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SutikyFingas @digitalfoundry Cloud gaming won't work for a lot of PC players - you need good, stable internet connection, even for singleplayer - Input lag makes it a terrible choice for competitive FPS games like CS, Fortnite, CoD, Battlefield - No/limited modding

• 
  TTV Master (@TTVMaster118408) reported 25 minutes ago

  @Battlefield You're game is so unfair here me a low level going up against level 315 450 while 90% of my team is ai like honestly can u fix your game

• 
  celticlegend (@celticlegend7) reported 27 minutes ago

  The Marine Corps just found a cheap answer to one of the most expensive problems in modern war. It takes a machine gun every Marine already knows how to use, the M240, and turns it into an Al-guided drone killer. The system is called Bullfrog, built by a Texas company called Allen Control Systems, and the Marines selected it this week to add teeth to their frontline counter-drone units. HOW IT WORKS Bullfrog is not a new gun. It's a robotic mount that uses artificial intelligence, computer vision, and precision robotics to turn an ordinary machine gun into a system that can detect, track, and engage drones on its own. The version the Marines chose is built around the M240, the 7.62mm machine gun that has been a fixture in the Corps for decades. The robotic station handles the hard part, spotting a small, fast-moving drone, tracking it, and calculating the shot. It's accurate to less than one minute of angle, a very fine degree of precision, and it uses passive sensors rather than radar, so it doesn't light up the battlefield and give away the unit's position. But it does not pull its own trigger without permission. A human operator always gives the final authorization to fire. The machine does the tracking and presents the solution. A Marine decides whether to take the shot. That human-in-the-loop design keeps it inside existing rules of engagement. WHY IT MATTERS: THE PRICE OF A KILL The reason this is a big deal comes down to money, and it's the same lesson coming out of Ukraine and the Middle East. A single attack drone can cost a few tens of thousands of dollars, sometimes far less. The interceptor missiles traditionally used to shoot them down can cost hundreds of thousands, even millions. That math is unsustainable. You cannot win a war spending a million dollars to destroy something that cost the enemy a few hundred. Bullfrog's answer is brutally simple. A well-aimed burst of machine gun ammunition solves the same problem for the price of the bullets. The company measures its cost per kill in the low tens of dollars. The M240 configuration fires 850 rounds a minute. FITTING INTO THE MARINE TOOLKIT The Bullfrog is being added to L-MADIS, the Marine Corps' lightest and most mobile counter-drone system, which normally rides on a pair of small all-terrain vehicles, one for command and control, one carrying electronic jamming gear. Jamming works well until it doesn't. Newer drones fly autonomously, without a radio link to jam. When electronic attack fails, the unit needs something that can physically knock the drone out of the sky. That's the gap Bullfrog fills, a kinetic backstop for when jamming isn't enough. The system is already in use or under contract with the Army, the Navy, US Special Operations Command, and allied forces including South Korea and the United Arab Emirates. The Marine Corps has requested more than $1 billion for its broader ground-based air defense effort in the 2027 budget, a measure of how seriously the drone threat is now being taken. WHY IT'S SMART The genius of it is that it doesn't reinvent anything. It doesn't create a new supply chain or a new weapon Marines have to learn from scratch. It takes a gun every Marine already knows how to feed, clean, and maintain, mounts it on a robotic station that never gets tired of watching the sky, and lets a human make the decision to fire. Familiar weapon. Cheap ammunition. Al doing the tracking. A Marine making the call. In a war where the sky is full of cheap threats, that combination is exactly what keeps a unit moving instead of pinned down waiting for something bigger and more expensive to come save them.

• 
  CalvZynisT (@CalvZynisT) reported 27 minutes ago

  I need an expert computer gaming nerd to come diagnose why I lag in battlefield 6. I have been gaming my whole life, kinda new to pc gaming but I ain’t that stupid. I can’t figure it out

• 
  Noha Hammoud (@HammoudNoh6102) reported 28 minutes ago

  @marklevinshow The entire world is already engulfed in wars and conflicts, yet the only issue you seem interested in talking about is “Arm the Iranian people.” At the very least, let Iran remain stable internally. We now know that these armed groups have been reported as receiving support from foreign intelligence agencies in an effort to overthrow the government. The state is taking action against armed groups operating within its borders. You should be advocating for peace, not fueling more hostility. If you’re going to call for arming anyone, call for arming Palestinians so they can defend themselves against the atrocities being committed against them. Call for strengthening the Lebanese Army so it can protect Lebanon and its people. Do you really want to turn one of the few remaining relatively stable areas into yet another battlefield? What kind of inhumanity and warmongering is that? What are you people made of?

• 
  @Coldly (@Just_Codly) reported 30 minutes ago

  Still paying for your AI video models one subscription at a time? Add it up before you defend it. Seedance is $30 a month on its own. Then you want the one that does faces, the one that does battle scenes, the one that does the slow cinematic crane shot. You are past a hundred dollars a month before you export a single clip. That is the trap nobody warns you about. No single model does everything. Each one is great at one shot and useless at the next, so you end up paying five bills to finish one video. There is another way to do it, and the people actually winning already switched. One platform, one login, every top-tier video model inside it. PixVerse. Seedance, Kling, Grok, the whole shelf, under one subscription. $8 a month at the low end. $24 for the plan serious creators run. $48 for all of it. Half of what the pieces cost apart, and one bill instead of five. Here is what that unlocks, in case the price alone did not land. A guy in his bedroom just pulled 15 million views on a war documentary he shot with no camera. Every soldier, every burning battlefield, typed into a box and generated. No crew. No location. Most viewers still think it was archive footage. His entire studio is that $24 bill. A year ago that film meant a crew and a budget with commas in it. He made it between a day job and dinner. The strange part is not that a fake documentary got 15 million views. The strange part is that his fake one and a real one now sit in the same feed, and nobody scrolling can tell which had a camera. You can keep paying five companies to stay behind. Or pay one, and be the guy with the camera nobody can find.

• 
  Swaguley (@swaguley) reported 31 minutes ago

  @TheInfamousEG @Eclipse_Ilx I never played BF2, I was 8 when it came out. My Battlefield training was on Star Wars Battlefront haha I don't have issues with drop shotting, as long as it's balanced and not spammy. Notice in the second clip how you had to hit the ground before you started firing again? That's just a normal jump peek, which I'm fine with. I am arguing against accurate in-air gunfire. As far as I know, they entirely patched out the ability to fire your gun in mid-air and dolphin diving as well