Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

• Website Down (47%)
• Errors (28%)
• Sign in (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Charlotte	Website Down	23 minutes ago
Annecy	Errors	4 hours ago
Santiago de Querétaro	Sign in	2 days ago
Kingston upon Hull	Website Down	2 days ago
Pensacola	Website Down	2 days ago
Santiago de Querétaro	Sign in	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  @mistakels (@GodswillOnyekw3) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RaenestApp Hi Raenest Team Please, Amazon Publisher are still waiting on you guys. It’s been more than a month since you guys promised to rectify the current issue. Till today been the 8th of July nothing seem to have been done. 🤧

• 
  Balaji kadam (@kadam_balaji) reported 8 minutes ago

  Yet another copy-paste reply from @AmazonHelp with a link that only takes me to the order tracking page. This is what they do every time. They function like broken robots, creating more headaches than convenience. @amazo

• 
  Rob Payne (@rpayne1956) reported 8 minutes ago

  Hey @Amazon I ordered a few items from you this month most arrived without issue however 2 items never arrived but what did arrive as the things I ordered is these things. rather than what I ordered that was SMD breakout boards and an IC pin straightener. which look like this Delivered 7 July 📷KeeYees 12 Types SMD to DIP Adapter PCB Proto Board Kit SOP8 SOP10 SOP14 SOP16 SOP20 SOP24 SOP28 0402/0603/0805 SMT SOT89/SOT223 TQFP100 QFN32 QFN44/48 with 40pcs 2.54mm Pin HeaderReturn items: Eligible through August 8, 2026View your itemBuy it again 📷Jameco BenchPro IC Pin Straightener for 0.300" and 0.600" Wide Could you do what you can to get me the products I ordered. Need a PM I will send you one I just want the order made whole.

• 
  alex (@nospicyplease_) reported 9 minutes ago

  The real issue is not that Amazon Ads are dying. It is that manual Amazon Ads management is. Look at the facts in this post: more ad placements, broader matching, budget flexibility moving higher, event-based spend pushes, new creative/AI placements, and opt-outs that are…

• 
  Sahil (@sahilwa29737846) reported 11 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Issue is still pending @amazonIN totally bad experience from your customer service too first they said. 24 hour waiting now tgey are saying 48 hour..

• 
  💯🧬 Jake 🧬💯 (@BiohackerJake) reported 13 minutes ago

  The Peptide Grey Market, Endless Testing Wars, and Why Biohacking Keeps Getting Overcomplicated Not long ago I was in DMs asking the same questions everyone asks: “Is this place safe? Have you tried them? What’s the best source right now?” Then I learned about COAs. At first it was simple — purity, identity, and how much actual peptide was in the vial (usually averaged from a batch sample). That’s still basically all I care about today. After that the goalposts started moving. Heavy metals. Endotoxins. Now fentanyl and whatever else vendors can throw on a report. A lot of this testing has turned into straight marketing ammo. Vendors use it to attack each other. Everyone feels forced to add more tests — not because it suddenly makes the product dramatically safer for the average user (you’re very likely fine with solid basic testing), but because they don’t want to lose customers to the next guy’s “we test for more scary things” gimmick. It’s created another toxic layer in the space, especially among resellers. Buying straight from overseas is one game. Resellers who actually pull batches and run real testing here in the States add a layer of accountability that’s genuinely valuable. The odds of getting something with correct identity, decent purity, accurate dosing, and meaningful harmful contaminants at the same time are extremely low when you’re dealing with vendors who have consistent track records and batch COAs. Real talk — basic HPLC purity + identity + assay testing from a reputable source already covers the vast majority of what actually matters. That said, grey market peptides aren’t risk-free. Under-dosing, synthesis byproducts, and occasional endotoxin issues do show up when people send stuff for independent testing. Heavy metals are possible with ****** manufacturing (though EXTREMELY unlikely). Fentanyl in peptide vials though? That’s mostly fear porn used for marketing. Different supply chains. The real issues are more boring and more fixable with decent vendors. Here’s the hypocrisy that kills me: the same people obsessing over every extra test on their peptides are slamming back Amazon supplements, protein powders, and “natural” stacks multiple times a day with zero COA, zero testing, and documented cases of heavy metal contamination when anyone actually bothers to check. But nobody wants to talk about that because it doesn’t fit the “I’m doing everything the safest possible way” narrative. My advice after being in it for a while: Find your people. Find vendors with consistent feedback over time, transparent batch testing, and reasonable pricing. Stick with them. Tune out the constant noise and pissing contests. The testing escalation is mostly theater at this point and it just drives costs up for everyone. Then there’s the dosage arguments, which are equally exhausting. We’ve got people going to war over mitochondria peptides like MOTS-c and SS-31, or healing compounds like BPC-157, KPV, GHK-Cu, TB-500 — arguing exact mcg amounts like they’re dialing in TRT or HGH. Everyone is different. Some people run low maintenance doses because they’re not completely broken to begin with. Some need to feel something and push higher. Some mega-dose everything. Then you’ve got the GLP crowd who think running maximum doses forever just to kill food noise is a long-term strategy, and they mock anyone who says “I’m on 500mcg of Retatrutide and doing great.” Real talk from my own experience: At a dose that gives basically zero appetite suppression, I can still eat in a solid surplus and put on way less body fat than I would have before. The metabolic effects are still running in the background. But try telling that to the “food noise must be obliterated at all costs” crowd. They don’t want to hear it. The truth is we’re all still researching. There is no holy grail protocol. Most of these compounds have limited human data, especially at the doses and combinations people actually run. Healing peptides in particular seem to have individual response curves — what works great for one person at 250mcg might do nothing or feel off for someone else at 500mcg. Same with the mitochondria stuff. We don’t have perfect dose-response curves because this entire category lives in the research/experimental space for most users. That’s not a bug. That’s the actual reality. Let it stay the beauty of it. Stop treating every peptide like it needs pharmaceutical-level precision and endless debate. Track how you respond. Adjust based on real feedback from your body and basic bloodwork where it makes sense. Find sources you trust and stop chasing the next vendor’s marketing report. The over-complication is making everything more expensive and more stressful than it needs to be. Most people would get better results just by being consistent with decent product and paying attention to how their body actually reacts instead of arguing in comment sections about whose tested batch is the most tested. That’s the game. Keep it simple where you can.

• 
  Azzys Design Works (@AzzyDesignWorks) reported 18 minutes ago

  @gonecozycrafts Interestingly, thats the same problem with Amazon. My stuff probably got flagged by having 2 brand names on some of it (Jeep and mine) or by having the long titles, which, were pushed on us by Amazon allowing it.

• 
  Sivakumar Kumar (@sivanithu) reported 18 minutes ago

  @amazonIN Its so terrible that you send out a ”Out for delivery” at 10 am and the delivery doesn’t happen until 7 pm. All the while we are second guessing to go out or not. Don’t you have a better way to handle this? @JeffBezos this is a 1000x UX improvement for @amazon

• 
  damned_datasheets (@damned_docs) reported 20 minutes ago

  @richardviner @AutomotiveTales @Google The data goes up to an S3 bucket or some such, it's all Amazon infrastructure as far as I know. The issue many have is more to the point of "what does amazon do with that data"- and also who do they share this data with. LEO is one thing, but Malaitas don't seem too far fetched.

• 
  GUL (@gulVasikova) reported 26 minutes ago

  $WULF: The stock is falling, but has the long-term story really changed? At first glance, TeraWulf’s recent selloff looks worrying. But if you separate short-term market sentiment from long-term fundamentals, the investment story hasn’t changed much. The recent weakness isn’t being driven by bad company news. Instead, it’s coming from several macro headlines that pressured almost every AI infrastructure stock. Samsung’s preliminary earnings disappointed investors and reignited concerns that AI infrastructure spending could slow after such a massive rally. Then Bloomberg reported that Meta is exploring an AI cloud business that could sell excess compute capacity to outside customers. Investors immediately worried that another deep-pocketed hyperscaler could increase competition for AI infrastructure providers. At the same time, reports that DeepSeek is developing its own AI inference chip created another concern. If more large AI companies build their own chips, investors fear demand for third-party AI infrastructure could eventually become more competitive. Bitcoin also weakened, adding pressure because TeraWulf still generates part of its business from Bitcoin mining. But long-term investors should ask a much more important question: Has anything actually changed inside TeraWulf’s business? So far, the answer appears to be no. Just days ago, TeraWulf announced a 20-year lease agreement with Anthropic that could generate approximately $19 billion of contracted revenue over the life of the agreement. That’s one of the largest long-term AI infrastructure contracts announced by a neocloud company. Think about what that says. Anthropic isn’t committing to a 20-year agreement because it believes AI demand will disappear in two or three years. It’s making a multi-decade commitment because it expects AI computing demand to keep growing for a very long time. This is also an important milestone for TeraWulf’s transformation. The company is gradually moving away from relying mainly on Bitcoin mining and toward becoming a long-term AI infrastructure provider with contracted, recurring revenue. That’s a very different business model from depending on Bitcoin prices alone. Some investors also worry that Meta entering AI cloud services could hurt companies like TeraWulf. That’s a reasonable concern, but there’s another way to look at it. Meta entering the market could actually validate how enormous the AI infrastructure opportunity has become. Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Oracle, xAI, OpenAI partners, sovereign AI projects, and enterprise customers are all investing billions of dollars into AI infrastructure. The market may simply become so large that multiple providers can grow together. It’s similar to the early days of cloud computing. Amazon, Microsoft, and Google all became massive businesses because overall demand grew much faster than anyone expected. AI infrastructure could follow a similar path. That’s one reason Wall Street remains constructive. Bank of America maintained its Buy rating with a $34 target. Citi recently initiated coverage with a $36 target. Overall analyst consensus remains well above the current share price, suggesting analysts still expect meaningful upside if management continues executing. The biggest risk isn’t this week’s share price decline. The real risk is execution. Management now has to build the Anthropic project on time, bring new AI capacity online, sign additional hyperscale customers, and continue replacing volatile Bitcoin-related revenue with long-term AI infrastructure contracts. If they execute well, today’s pullback may simply be remembered as another short-term correction during what many believe will be one of the largest AI infrastructure buildouts of the next decade.

• 
  vsprao (@vspraoo) reported 29 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp reckless, careless, lackadaisical service; this Order placed 6 July 2026 Order number 408-8877889-7017914; i am now available, reply to me; talk to me please; your reluctance shows your inability to address the issue and incompetence

• 
  Coffee Man ☕️ (@Married_Coffee) reported 29 minutes ago

  See #DugDug on Amazon prime - prime blind faith movie , too good ! First 15 minutes is too slow then it moves on and is too brilliant true story it seems , too good movie on blind faith and herd mentality

• 
  Jefelane (@ElJefe42564071) reported 32 minutes ago

  @Pound4our4Pound @BrunchBoxing Yall slow! Why would Tank be included when he’s with PBCx AMAZON… all of Tank events is PPV, that pbc X DAZN deal is for other events for other fighters!

• 
  lilfolks (@lilfolks_74_) reported 36 minutes ago

  @DreadyNaz Guns is my issue and entertainment love to take the wife out we dont have 60k in the bank but on a weekly basis we never run out of money. I spend 500 a month on my gun collection my wife has a Amazon delivery literally 2 times a week and we never run out of money

• 
  Hemali Tanna (@hemalitanna) reported 36 minutes ago

  Hello @AmazonHelp, for Amazon now in India, the mobile experience is pasted as is on the web, but it has not been tested by your tech team. There is no way to navigate multiple images of the product on the web platform. @amazonnow The carousel indicators here are not clickable, and there are no arrows either to naviagte through the images. There is no drag interaction configured in either, to mimic the swipe. Please fix UX.

• 
  FlameX (@ProjectAsheLT) reported 38 minutes ago

  @stabyousoftly Guh? Never had any problems with those fellas when I got PC parts on Amazon...

• 
  Coffee Drinking Demon (@unrefinedsinner) reported 39 minutes ago

  @MissGlossart @ranksauce The missinfo train has caused a lot of issues >.< This only applies to Spindlehorse employees and affiliated, who are still allowed to sell at cons, and the policy was pressured by Amazon. Spindlehorse doesn't singularly own hazbin hotel anymore; for that series, they're Amazon's *****. The public is unaffected.

• 
  Eliza (@LizSarkiss) reported 39 minutes ago

  @atrupar And beef went another $2.00 over night in my Amazon cart so whatever the billionaire says , it’s not working in the real world.

• 
  Ron Smith (@LostkeysBH) reported 43 minutes ago

  @iam_smx I really really hope it's better than the last one. Everything went fine except when starship touched back down in the ocean. And it's just trial and error, nobody got hurt. I would not trust Jeff Bezos though, and get in one of his rockets with NASA... Thank God nobody got hurt. He needs to stick to Amazon. And leave the rockets to Elon Musk.

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 45 minutes ago

  CIA Director John Ratcliffe is slashing the agency's tech adoption timeline from three years to six months and rebranding its cyber wings as a sword and shield, even as the flagship AI model he wants can already break into the National Security Agency's own classified systems in hours. Speaking at an Amazon Web Services summit in Washington, Ratcliffe called frontier AI capabilities akin to digital nuclear weapons rewriting the reality of conflict. The agency has signed roughly 400 technology contracts in six months, compressing acquisition cycles that once took nearly three years, and folded its cyber operations into a new Directorate of Mission Systems built around offense and defense. Ratcliffe never mentioned that the exact kind of model he's courting already humiliated the agencies meant to protect it. Senate Intelligence Committee vice chair Mark Warner revealed that Anthropic's Mythos model broke into almost all of the NSA and Cyber Command's classified systems during an authorized test in hours, according to NSA chief Gen. Joshua Rudd. Layer onto that the standing risks of poisoned public training data, compromised open-source software libraries, and insiders who sell access—the same logic that sent Manhattan Project secrets to Moscow—and the CIA's speed-over-caution bet looks less like dominance and more like exposure. The summit doubled as a trade show. Amazon hosts the CIA's cloud contracts, and Ratcliffe has met with executives from Google, Dell, and Musk's SpaceX to expand the pipeline. Anthropic, supplier of the very Mythos and Fable models at the center of the breach, is locked in a legal fight with the Pentagon, which labeled it a supply-chain risk in March over safety guardrails for military use. The state wants the weapon faster than its own vendor is willing to hand it over unsupervized. My take: An agency that needs Amazon's cloud, Anthropic's models, and Musk's hardware is trading sovereign power to rent it it from fascist techbro oligarch landlords who answer to own egos before the taxpayers paying for their services. The NSA breach shows what that dependency costs. Speed was supposed to fix CIA irrelevance; it has instead handed the tools of empire to the market that builds them.

• 
  🐺Ash the wolgon🐉 (@RagingWolgon) reported 46 minutes ago

  @_naughty_neko It’s us believe that the reason is because BG had a spindlehorse employee animate on his music video and thus Amazon took the video down because it was labeled “official”

• 
  Lostintranslation (@Sonny496) reported 46 minutes ago

  @BrianSm0239181 @RobertJenrick Knocking on the door isn't harrasment especially. Are you harrased when Amazon knock to deliver? Doorstepping as gone on for decades. No one was chasing her down the street ffs. I thought the left were the snowflakes

• 
  Adarsh k (@Adarsh4k) reported 47 minutes ago

  Hi @AmazonHelp, I received a defective (DOA) realme Buds T310 via Open Box Inspection. They don’t power on, have no lights, & aren’t discoverable. The app/site return portal is broken & won't let me select an issue. Please help me initiate a replacement. [404-6648267-5627563]

• 
  Chuzzlewit76 (@Chuzzlewit76) reported 48 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp you’re customer service used to be second to none, but the last couple of people on your team I’ve spoken to have been terrible absolutely horrendous 👎

• 
  madhu milan prasad (@MeTooBhartiya) reported 48 minutes ago

  @amazonIN ,@amazon For Order  Id  402-4654835-9146760 return  pick up was declined & no way there on web or app to reach customer  executive service  to tell my problem Regards

• 
  d 🪭 MS.3/4 (@undefeateddd__) reported 51 minutes ago

  Only thing that can fix this is my man credit card and Amazon 🫶🏾

• 
  NeedRogaine (@NeedRogaine) reported 53 minutes ago

  @amazon I specifically ordered something because it was supposed to be delivered this morning. Could have bought in store but used your product instead. I find out this morning, without notification, that the package will not be delivered until tonight. Please fix problem.

• 
  Adel Bucetta (@adelbucetta) reported 55 minutes ago

  @Shivam25mishra the honest answer is that the market has shifted since the likes of amazon, google, and facebook disrupted their respective industries when they were still tiny. today's billion-dollar unicorn often requires an entire org to solve problems no single founder can tackle alone.

• 
  Lomboreb (@lomboreb) reported 56 minutes ago

  Brand owners report counterfeits. Amazon takes the listing down first, checks later. That process just turned into a weapon against sellers who did nothing wrong.

• 
  Tyler Kirk (@TAR_Kirk) reported 59 minutes ago

  How can we actually improve indie publishing and authorship? Indie has exploded in the last decade, but most authors still struggle with: -Discoverability in a flooded market. -Terrible royalty splits and opaque algorithms. -Poor distribution and bookstore access. -Marketing burnout and high ad costs. -AI-generated slop diluting quality. What’s one concrete change that would meaningfully improve things for serious indie authors and small publishers? -Better platforms/tools? -New distribution models? -Community/funding solutions? -Policy or tech fixes? -Something else? Let’s brainstorm better systems instead of just complaining about AI & Amazon.