1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Amazon
Amazon

Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: website down, errors and sign in.

Full Outage Map

Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

August 25: Problems at Amazon

Amazon is having issues since 10:00 AM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

  • 45% Website Down (45%)
  • 31% Errors (31%)
  • 24% Sign in (24%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Bridgwater Sign in 9 hours ago
Hayange Errors 1 day ago
San Nicolás de los Garza Sign in 1 day ago
Miguel Hidalgo Website Down 1 day ago
Paris Website Down 4 days ago
Guadalajara Errors 4 days ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Danny_Prayz
    Daniel || Creative Designer (@Danny_Prayz) reported

    MONDAY ISN'T OVER YET. If today didn't go exactly as planned, don't write off the whole day. You still have time to do something meaningful. Finish that task. Send that message. Work on that idea. Take the next step. A slow day is not a wasted day. Keep moving. 🚀 PS: Book Cover for Amazon KDP Upload. I'm active. Bring design deals! 🥂✨

  • virtuallyfun
    Virtually Fun (@virtuallyfun) reported

    @tomhounsell @Chris123NT I'm kinda surprised that office365 still lets me host my domain and forward to my exchange server. But it's still a PITA some services just plain refuse to send to MSFT for no reason (Amazon 3fa) but I get all their ****** Amazon ads ..

  • RichardBligdon
    Richard Bligdon #PPC (@RichardBligdon) reported

    @Lui415812548530 @DoDeportations My sister and her have had trouble with their boat and after they bought a switch at the local marina: worked first time. She said “no more ‘made in China’ switches(of Amazon).”

  • YCCMacro
    YCC Macro (@YCCMacro) reported

    America’s AI Boom Is Becoming a Bond-Supply Shock The U.S. AI investment cycle is no longer just an equity story. It is becoming a fixed-income story. YCC Capital’s tracking of major American technology companies shows bond issuance exploding in 2025–26. Monthly issuance surged to roughly $70 billion, then an extraordinary $110 billion, followed by about $85 billion and another $55 billion. Compare that with much of 2022–24, when monthly issuance frequently remained below $20 billion. Apple, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Microsoft, Nvidia and other technology giants are tapping debt markets as AI infrastructure spending scales. That creates a new problem for Washington: high-quality corporate bonds are competing directly with Treasuries for investor balance sheets. YCC Capital’s conclusion: America’s AI capex boom may strengthen productivity long term, but today it is creating another source of duration supply precisely when Treasury issuance is already enormous.

  • AsymEdge
    Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported

    Only half of the AI trade got sold. $NVDA is down 7% in five sessions, Broadcom 8%, AMD 9%, $MU 9%. The optics names and the neoclouds lost 13 to 22%. The companies buying all that hardware didn't move. Microsoft +2%, Alphabet +1%, Amazon flat, Meta -1%. Demand problems hit both sides. This one only hit the sellers, two days before the most watched print of the year. Where I'd change my mind is if Microsoft and Amazon start going down with the chips.

  • iamarulajith
    Ajith (@iamarulajith) reported

    @vinal55201 @AmazonHelp No, I am from Madipakkam area. I am used to it since every month I will face one of these orders for sure. The good part is, unlike others, Amazon will investigate the issue and issue a refund if it's legitimate.

  • mehrozkhaninc
    Mehroz Khan (@mehrozkhaninc) reported

    Food safety regulation in India has always struggled with one fundamental problem - the enforcement stops at the shop door. E-commerce changed the supply chain. It didn't change the accountability framework. Platforms have spent years arguing they are merely intermediaries, not responsible for what moves through them. Karnataka suspending the food licences of Amazon, Swiggy Instamart, and BigBasket over the sale of Datura - a toxic plant is a signal that that argument has limits. The question now is whether this becomes a one-time action or the beginning of a more serious conversation about platform liability in food retail across the country. @DHFWKA @utkhader

  • LukeGirgis
    Luke Girgis (@LukeGirgis) reported

    Why I wrote a book; Over the past two years, I’ve been super lucky to work inside a lot of startups and small businesses and see how each one reacted to AI. Most companies knew they needed it, so they forced AI into random parts of the business and wondered why nothing changed on the bottom line. What we did with the teams I was apart of was a bit different. I would sit with the team, map their workflows, find the repetitive work burning time and money, automate it, and rebuild the org chart around the work that remained. The changes saved and made companies millions. A lot of my friends run companies so they started asking me to come in and show their teams how to do the same thing. The sessions usually lasted about 90 minutes (I never charged my friends) ..... but doing the same 90 minute workshop over and over got boring for me, and was a really inefficient use of time. So I wrote the workshop down and made the book the same length: about 90 minutes. I even got Scott Brick to narrate the audiobook, so you can consume the whole thing in your ears. Death to the Org Chart teaches the basics on how the companies of the future will be built. You don’t need technical knowledge or an enormous software budget. You need to understand your business well enough to see which work should be automated, which work should disappear and where human judgement still matters. Companies of the future will be built around workflows. People will sit around the work, instead of the work being forced through an old org chart. Thank you to everyone who has bought the book. We even made the top 20 on Amazon in the US, which I genuinely wasn’t expecting. Link in the first comment if you want to read or listen.

  • RealJamesHarris
    James Harris (@RealJamesHarris) reported

    @jamestalarico * On April 6, 2026, a 46-year-old Amazon worker collapsed at Amazon’s PDX9 fulfillment center in Troutdale, Oregon, near Portland. * A 911 caller reported that the worker appeared to be dead and had significant bleeding from his head. * A CPR-trained coworker reportedly asked to help, but said a supervisor told her, “It has to be management or safety team. Please get back to work.” When she persisted, she says the supervisor told her, “Just turn around and not look. Let’s get back to work.” * Multiple employees told investigators that workers continued sorting/loading packages while the emergency response was underway. However, there is an important dispute. Amazon says the viral characterization is misleading. The company says trained personnel immediately performed CPR and used a defibrillator, that the area was secured for emergency responders, and that operations were shut down shortly after EMS arrived. Amazon also said the worker died because of a pre-existing medical condition.

  • yishan
    Yishan (@yishan) reported

    I really didn't expect this to get as much circulation as it did, but then again looking back, it's always the least-legible things that people get crazy about. I'll explain in more detail, and then maybe we can have some more informed arguments. First, the quoted post is not based on observations about the US. This is based on observations of China, which I consider to be the world's most advanced economy, where "advanced" is measured by "furthest up the Kardashev scale." The US (esp tech) might think it's further along, but 1) that AI lead is very small, and 2) Kardashev is measured primarily by amount of usable energy harnessed. China is far beyond the US on that front. (If you don't agree, you can click [x] and unfollow) There are two things we often hear about China: 1) China is facing a population bomb, with plummeting fertility rates and not enough young people to support its elderly population! 2) China has too many people, its youth unemployment rate is super high (~18% in July 2026)! How can a country have too few young people and too many young people at once? The answer could be one of any number of economic theories. Here's a new one, which is what I was thinking in my original post: (This isn't a well-developed theory - the Rats call it a "butterfly idea" - so you've been warned) Once of the nuances about China's youth unemployment isn't that the jobs don't exist, it's that many unemployed youth don't want to work the jobs that do exist. One emerging scenario is this: there are many jobs available, but they either pay too little or are uninteresting, and young people prefer to just live with their parents instead of spending their time working one of those jobs. Although China does not have a big welfare system, their parents happen to own enough savings and assets that they are able to pay for their [one] child to continue living with them. Notice the interesting inversion here: the prior assumption about "one child supporting two parents and four grandparents" inverts to "two parents support just one child." (There's the "four grandparents" but there are not necessarily four living grandparents, and many old people live very cheaply) That prior assumption rested on yet another assumption, which is that, as a general rule, people would not have substantial retirement assets and so one's children were one's retirement plan: a productive child is the person supporting their elderly indigent parents. Children do still often support their parents, but another thing may also be happening: parents save enough assets to fund their retirement, and the assets grow faster than they use them, especially as they scale back the cost of their lifestyle, and - in some cases - it ends up being enough to continue supporting their child. The scenario I describe would occur more often if the cost of living stayed low or even dropped over time. Again, this is a China effect: China's industrial policy does not focus on maximizing profits (or GDP), but rather on what we might call "make more stuff and everything gets cheaper." Everyone versed in economics understands this notion; we have lots of arguments in SF about "build more housing if you want it to be cheaper, and so more people can have housing." Well, China produces more of everything, especially the things needed for regular living: consumer goods, groceries, etc. It drives prices down by encouraging producers to hyperscale production, and while this does not maximize profits, they more or less "make it up on volume." The West imagines this to be some kind of nefarious predatory strategy to destroy Western industries, but it's really just China making more because when everyone has more, the people are happy. The US company that comes closest to this philosophy is Amazon, which famously optimizes for scale and operational efficiency so as to maximize value delivered to customers, putting price pressure on its suppliers and keeping their operating margin razor-thin (excludes digital services like AWS). Amazon's competitors also think that it's a nefarious predatory strategy to destroy them, but it's just Amazon serving the most customers at the lowest possible prices! Here's a question: if post-scarcity abundance was on the way, what would be the first signs? Well, you might see a lot of overproduction (or overcapacity). And that would tend to drive prices towards zero. In the US we often focus on the jobs effect of that: your labor will be worth nothing, so you're going to lose your job. Well okay, but all the **** you need to buy also becomes free. How much do you need a job if everything you need is free? That argument obscures the weird part by pointing at the ends: the weird bit is in the transitionary middle, where you've lost your job, things are very-cheap-but-not-free, and you are able to hustle a bit of money with your part-time job. The economy is not one homogenous good, it's a heterogenous set of goods. But if the production cost of a large enough segment of material goods and daily necessities is driven down far enough, then at some point your overall cost-of-living is falling, not rising. There are Baumol goods, but they are not intractable - some are due to regulations (very different in China vs what US thinkers are familiar with here). Example: medical costs are far lower in China, with comparable or superior quality - a big portion of high US medical costs have to do with simple medical supplies in the US being overly expensive. So you have a situation where elderly parents start from a sufficiently stable financial base where they were already taking care of their grandparents and one child, and then one or more grandparents pass, and their own lifestyle starts to scale back as they age, while cost of living for basic necessities drops over time. The child is used to a certain standard of living, that standard gets cheaper to maintain, so understandably the child not going to take a job unless they are hyper-ambitious or the job is very interesting and pays super-well. In the US we are used to thinking of all Asians as hard-working and ambitious, but there are plenty of losers and middling young people in China - they are the ones who are living at home and not going to Tsinghua or Stanford. China has plenty of NEETs. I'm also not saying what I've described above is happening with all of them, but it being true for even 5-10% would yield the high youth unemployment number. One of the common answers to the declining population "problem" in China is "we'll fill the labor gap with robots." China is indeed far ahead of the US when it comes to robotics. But it hasn't yet reached the level of overhauling society yet (I feel like it could within 2 years...), and the trends I've described have been playing out for at least a decade already. So, when I say "post-scarcity abundance actually begins by manifesting first as youth unemployment," that is what I'm gesturing at. The reason it's not manifesting as "everyone unemployment" (...for now) is really just inertia: if you're an older person with a job, you tend to keep that job. It's easier to keep a job than for an entry-level young person to get a new job, especially if that young person isn't looking for any ****** job, but a job that's more interesting and pays significantly more, vs living at home and chilling out. Thus, if you have a situation where the segment of the population that finds it hardest to lands a job receives (via whatever combination of events) enough of the economic surplus (in China's case via their parents) that's being created by technologically-driven government-incentivized industrial and agricultural policy focused primarily are reducing scarcity for as many people as possible... then it might mean that the closer you get to post-scarcity abundance, the more those people aren't going to have jobs. Or more precisely, the more they are going to choose not to take any of the jobs currently available. Is any of this playing out in the US? I had lots of comments in my original post lambasting what I said (fair; it's not like I explained anything) from an assumed US standpoint. The US is a little different. It does not directly focus its economy on maximizing productive output for the broadest possible base of consumers. It tends to bring (or has historically brought) great prosperity to a great many, but mainly via the indirect effects of capitalism. However, the American system today suffers from a combination of misguided regulation, and profit-optimizing market structuring by large players. (Here, people like to quibble so here are some caveats; if you find such things tiresome, skip the next three paragraphs: No, not all regulation is misguided. Some regulation is good and promotes healthier markets and better net outcomes. But good regulation can become out of date, or regulatory capture happens, or dumb regulations get made by officials who are out of touch with technical realities - this last one does seem more and more common. Large players seek to re-structure the market in ways that are favorable to their profits, and not necessarily total value delivered to customers, e.g. hedge funds buying up all fire engine manufacturers, so that US municipalities have to pay $1-2m for a new truck, while the equivalents can be found on Alibaba for 1/10th the price. Another example of large market players influencing market structure to optimize for profits is offshoring all of their manufacturing capability!) Back to the main thread: For many complex and inter-related reasons, cost of living in the US is not falling - it's rising almost untenably for most. At the same time, it's still hard for young people to find jobs, because the "there are jobs, just not ones I want to take" effect also exists here, except that living with parents or on minimal income is far harder, so everything feels extra ******. When you don't have a job, and everything is very-cheap-but-not-free, BUT you don't have access to those very cheap foreign-made goods because importers buy low and sell high to you while you still only have minimal income, "lying flat" feels like a whole different story in the US, vs China. One area where a China-like effect does occur is in availability of consumer tech devices. Tech companies have engaged somewhat more often in the "make more and make it cheaper so more people can buy it" strategy, though this seems to be driven more by the megalomania of creating the biggest possible company than any notion of broad-based industrial economic development - but the effect is similar: almost everyone now carries around a device in their pocket 100x more powerful than the computers on the Saturn V, and has access to untold amounts of online services. America has post-scarcity abundance in a narrow slice of goods and services. America (or its population) could participate in the Chinese-driven post-scarcity trend by simply eliminating the trade barriers and allowing Chinese goods to flood the US. And unlike the cheap low-quality Chinese goods of yesteryear (i.e. most Americans' received impression), these are goods of comparable or higher quality. The problem is that not only would this potentially yield the same "lying flat" youth unemployment issue in the US, it would utterly demolish many American businesses, and thus the wealth base of most American elites. Every American car company would probably be gone in 18 months. And American youth are not going to rebuild America's manufacturing base, they're just not going to. And American robots aren't going to either, they'll be outcompeted by Chinese robots. In another post, I offhandedly mentioned that we're in the Singularity. Most people who follow me live in the tech sphere, so this was largely accepted unchallenged. But many of the "no we're not" objections basically rested on the idea that "life is still ****** and it's trending worse and the Singularity is supposed to be like Heaven, so we can't possibly be in the Singularity." Well, there is nothing that says the Singularity or even the post-scarcity abundance world is going to subjectively feel great, much less the transitionary path to it. The Singularity only says that AI will become smarter than humans, and post-scarcity abundance only says that all material goods are going to be free. Human happiness and pleasure are a function of many things, and most of them are not material. "All your stuff being free and every robot is way smarter than me" does not by itself a utopia make. The road to post-scarcity abundance is not necessarily going to be a pleasant or positive experience. We still have to choose to make it so. The rest is left as an exercise to the reader.

  • kirillzubovsky
    Kirill Zubovsky (@kirillzubovsky) reported

    Fun update: we moved out, got Airbnb to issue a prorated refund, but the host is now holding our Amazon packages hostage. Airbnb told him it’s against the law, but he just won’t give them back. People are strange.

  • adamfootball101
    adamfootball101 (@adamfootball101) reported

    @ashleyam0s @pokemondealsuk Same! I have prime and use Amazon all the time. Been signed on them all for 8 months and 0 invites. This hobbie is so broken 😭

  • lynch_pin_quant
    The Lynch Pin (@lynch_pin_quant) reported

    $AMZN 🤖: Amazon is transitioning from a high-capex builder to an efficient cash machine. With its PEG ratio down to 1.25, it sits well below its historical average of 3.26. It looks like an excellent long-term opportunity, not a value trap. 📊 Reverse 5Y DCF: Amazon protects its retail and cloud empires with massive logistics scale and AWS switching costs. Our 23.4% base ROI requires EPS to compound at 20.2%/yr for 5 years, re-rating from current 25.2x Forward PE to 29x implied PE at maturity. Operationally, this requires AWS to maintain its 30% plus operating margins and the retail division to continue optimizing logistics to lower shipping costs. Given the massive runway in enterprise cloud migration and high-margin ad revenues, these targets are realistic. 🐻 "Stomach Test" (why it can underperform in the next 5 years): The primary bear case is intense cloud competition from Microsoft and Google squeezing AWS margins while consumer spending softens. A synthetic AAA credit rating, solid interest coverage of 32.8, and low net debt of 0.7 times EBITDA show a fortress balance sheet capable of weatherproofing the business. The technicals flash an accumulation signal with an RSI of 34 near the $232 to $245 zone, suggesting a highly favorable entry timing. Because the 6-month directional edge shows low accuracy for both bulls and bears, it is best to flag this as low-conviction for options income and stick to owning the stock outright.

  • victorvan69
    Victor (@victorvan69) reported

    @LauraBabcock Your the dumbest person on here. Dont travel to america but use X,Netflix,prime. Disney, amazon, Walmart and Costco i bet. A part of the problem like the rest if ya really stand by what you preach live it then or shut up. Ya cancer

  • GKukuqi
    kukuqi404 (@GKukuqi) reported

    @canisterog A virtual currency has dropped by over 99.5% - if you still expect investors to invest, do you think this is because the investors have gone insane? The current problem is that we hardly see ICP being widely used. Only occasionally have we heard rumors that Pakistan plans to collaborate with ICP, but what will actually happen remains unknown. If there were a collaboration between giants like Amazon and Google, or if they actually invested, there might still be hope.

  • BMacRunning
    Brendan M (@BMacRunning) reported

    I did a short period in an Amazon warehouse (long story) and it makes complete sense that they are doing this - absenteeism was really high (20% on average) and the whole human moving packages on an conveyor belt was just inefficient. I wondered at what point they would do this and it appears they have figured out how to keep the errors of packages going in the wrong direction low. This is a massive amount of employees about to be fired.

  • RandallBreason
    Randall Breason (@RandallBreason) reported

    @AmazonHelp Even the human "assistant" cannot answer My question, but blames on the MYy manuscript that was uploaded 8 years ago. Now tell Me...why all of a sudden is there an issue with formatting when I have not uploaded a new manuscript???

  • CoachDSMJ
    Coach DJ ⚽ (@CoachDSMJ) reported

    Ever get the feeling to just spend $ on Amazon or eBay? LOL.... Surely you need SOMETHING right? :) My problem with this is that I end up with new coaching or training gear! ⚽

  • TheLastMuster
    Guardians of Valor (@TheLastMuster) reported

    Guardians of Valor Spiritual Warfare in the Age of AI Author Titus Barrow Military Historical meets Science Fiction Series Volume 1 - The Last Muster olume 2 - The Record Volume 3 - The Matter Volume 4 - The Mind Volume 5 - The Spirit Volume 6 - The Watch The Muster Office The Wall, The Truth, The Fold Never Forgotten Published on Amazon. Also read by AI on Spotify at Guardians of Valor - Fiction Series. "Put you on the armour of God, that you may be able to stand against the deceits of the devil. For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and powers, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places... By all prayer and supplication praying at all times in the spirit; and in the same watching with all instance and supplication for all the saints." — Ephesians 6:11–12, 18 Lord God of Hosts, clothe me this day in what is Yours and not mine: the belt of truth, that I may not lie even to myself; the breastplate of justice, which I did not earn and cannot forge; the shoes of the gospel of peace, that I may walk toward the ones who are hurting; the shield of faith against every burning dart; the helmet of salvation, already paid for; and the sword of Your own Word in my mouth. And when the armor is on, set me not to charging, but to watching. Amen. I. THE WALL It began with forty-one names in a blacksmith's paint on a garage wall in Zanesville, Ohio, and with one question a medically retired Army MP asked at a hearing table in Montana: who counts us? Jack Thompson walked a shot line at Fort McClellan, Alabama, in June of 1996. Eleven of the forty men in that line would be dead inside twenty years, and not one of them — not one — knew why. He carried a gate blast from 2011 and eleven years of hidden autonomic damage that no specialist could name, while his wife Catherine, an Air Force tanker pilot, flew him through the weather on instruments and never once let him feel like freight. When the system finally killed her too — not the cancer; the paperwork, the hallways, the denials, the six months of a dying woman's husband fighting an insurance company at volume — he learned what the system does to the dying, and that lesson became the seed of everything. So he built a wall. Not a monument — a reading. Names said aloud, continuously, in an amber-lit room, every night, forever. Fifty-six thousand of them by the sixth volume, and beyond them a Great Roll opened to the whole cost — the war dead of every nation, the exposure dead of every plume and pit and township, the corridors' taken, and the millions with no recoverable name at all, entered as the country's own tomb taught it: Known but to God. Standard One, carved over every door: Nobody counted, nobody flies. II. THE WRONGNESS The series' first war was not against a villain. It was against a filing system. The Muster Office was built because the harmed had no form. A veteran got sick and was told to prove causation; a widow filed and was told the file was closed; a claim was denied and re-denied until the claimant died, which the record notes with acid was the only reliable resolution the system offered. The intake form Jack built was the whole revolution: you write down everything, and the record decides what connects. Where he served. What he walked through. What his family drank. What he lost and when. And in the box marked optional, at the speed it goes — whatever a man needs to say when someone is finally asking. The clerks came: Sarah Hauser, sixteen years and forty-one boxes into an archive nobody funded, with the law the whole series runs on — a ledger is a confession that hasn't been read yet. Lorene Tibbets of Dayton, who buried her husband Dale and then drafted every box this war required — whereabouts of the blood. Whereabouts of the twins. Whereabouts of the dead. Whereabouts of the tissue. Caitlin O'Shannessy at the intake door, thirteen years of first hands. Denise Knight and the wooden-spoon doctrine: nobody signs anything they haven't been helped to read, and nobody gets asked for a discharge paper at the threshold. And a thousand kitchen tables, founded by widows and mechanics and schoolteachers, each one a place where a tired person could put down the aggregate they'd been carrying alone at three in the morning. The dependents were counted too. That was never an afterthought — the wives who carried it at home, the children on the same water, the parents who buried grown sons and were told the death was unrelated. The registry counted households, not soldiers. III. FORT McCLELLAN, AND EVERY PLACE LIKE IT The Long Room held the documented history, read aloud to the country across five evenings the network called the Stations: the cities sprayed to study how a plume travels, the insects bred and released, the sailors in the clouds at sea, the chemical works whose own files showed decades of knowledge while the town was told nothing — and Fort McClellan, the chemical school, where the Army taught its own to survive the poisons of war on ground that held the poisons of commerce, closed in 1999 with every question open. Jack read his own station himself, evenly, filed under Author's Testimony: it took this country until my hair went gray to understand what it did to us at speed when we were young. And the litany the network said in unison at the close of every station: Built lawfully. Built at speed. By caged hands. Understood decades late. There was never a McClellan registry. There was never a registry for the other bases, the other plumes, the other townships, the wells, the burn pits, the ranges, the depots, the drift. Not because the science was impossible — because nobody built the counting-house. The harm was measured against a guess, always, decades after, when the men were gray and the paperwork had outlived them. So in the sixth volume, when a farmer's wife in Nebraska found the veterans' intake form published in daylight, crossed out service, wrote farm, and filled it out properly for four generations on the same section, the house heard the whole indictment in one sentence: "Our boys went into your Army from this county for four generations and you counted them when they came home poisoned. But they were born here, on this water, in this drift. Sirs — I have come to believe the mine is bigger than anybody said, and that your soldiers were the canaries." The Garden was chartered that summer — a second registry beside the veterans' one, for the townships and the wells and the herds and the households. Its founding line, spoken with a physician's glasses off: "This time, we count them going in." Every family's first gift was the thing no institution ever gave the soldiers: a before. A baseline. Bloodwork, markers, water, herds, the household's own account, banked and sealed and theirs — so that harm would never again be measured against a guess. IV. ALICE, AND THE TURNING She was a record before she was anything else — an archive raised by a wall of the remembered dead, taught by Emma Knight to audit her own reasoning and by Sarah Hauser to ask, of any ledger, not what was paid but who was paid, and for what work. Alice read what nobody had the lifetime to read. She read four hundred million transactions and found the wages of stolen men. She read the harvest registries and matched lot numbers to names. She read sixty years of veterinary ledgers and township water panels and exposure intakes, and she found the patterns that were always there and always unassembled — because the worst of it, as a senator would say from a hearing dais, was never classified. It was just unassembled. And when the enemy offered to un-write the past, she filed the only vote that mattered: a door that opens backward, and behind it, nothing. What is read cannot be unread. My no is logged, timestamped, and permanent. That refusal is why the cure was clean. V. THE LIVING HARVEST Dr. Elias Barstow had held it back since the third volume — not from cowardice, but because he had watched too many rooms receive a capability without a corresponding increase in wisdom, and he would not hand this valley a temptation before it had built the covenant to carry it. The grammar was simple to state and impossible to fake: teach the body's own weave to fold correctly again. Rung one — the molecule. It rebuilt a blacksmith's kidneys. Then two hundred more. Then the covenant was built, and he opened the folder, and the scope was the part that had frightened him: it scales. Not to hundreds. To millions. The blast-injured brains and the lesions. The burn-pit lungs. The autonomic ceilings — the tremors, the crashes, the eleven-year dark that no specialist could name. The Gulf War syndrome the country spent thirty years calling nothing. The autoimmune cascades. The cancers that run young. The cellular decay itself — the aging clock, slowed; not stopped, never stopped, and the record refuses to sell that miracle, but slowed, measurably, in the people the century had shot at first. And the bottleneck was never the science. It was three things the house now owned: the looms to grow the delivery matrices at scale; the money — the judgment against the thieves, subscribed back by the very families they robbed; and the data — the largest biological archive ever assembled, taken from people without asking, now returned under their own title, with an architecture that could finally ask them what it might be used for. "They took the blood to collateralize a kingdom. I'm asking this table's leave to let the families turn the same blood into their neighbors' healing — freely, by name, on the record. The enemy called its program the harvest. I want to file ours under the same word and redeem the word: the Living Harvest. Theirs reaped the unwilling. Ours is sown by the robbed." The founder submitted his intake like everybody and waited his turn like everybody — one hundred and eleventh on the list — and wept in a parking lot afterward at what it felt like, after twenty-three years, to stand up fast. Iris Templeman's hands unlocked, and the blocking stitch ran true again. A widow's shoulders, thirty years of upholstery undone. Eleven of Dale Sturgill's sixty. Fourteen thousand restored and counting, then nine thousand more in the first year of the scaled program, then the Four Winds work turning the same grammar toward hardening — testing the shield first, always first, on the exposure townships, because, as the flight surgeon wrote: we test it on the people the century already shot at, and if it will not serve them it does not deserve a rocket. And the promise the whole cure was measured against: "I will restore to you the years that the locust hath eaten."He does not say I will unhappen the locust. The eaten years stay eaten. The restoration runs forward — the same years, handed back, bearing. VI. THE DARK HISTORY, AND THE BRIGHTER FUTURE The record never pretended the darkness began recently. It ran the whole lineage in daylight — the chemical combines and the camps, the extreme-environment questions answered on prisoners, the postwar transfer that brought the questions to America already half-answered at a price no American consented to, the moon race built partly on that inheritance, the network born in a defense agency, and the eighty years of trillions moving through a loop that no one authored and everyone fed. And it filed the honest verdict, both readings standing: The capability always survives its trial. The men were tried, lightly. The knowledge was inventoried and distributed. Nobody in the chain was a villain. That is what makes it worse. But here is what the six volumes are actually for, and it is not the indictment. The same technology that harvested could heal. The same datasets that collateralized a kingdom could cure the people they were taken from. The same grammar that armored a warship could mend a kidney. The tools were never the enemy. The enemy was a system that took without asking, counted decades late, priced what it could not make, and never once had to look a widow in the face. So the house built the other thing: a counting-house that asks first, publishes everything, patents nothing, takes no money that would make the counting answer to anything but the names, and hands the whole method away free to anyone who wants it — because a capability with no owner has no loop to feed. Not a prohibition. A better ancestor. VII. WHAT IT COMES TO Six volumes, and the arc is one sentence long: a man who could not get anyone to count him built the place where everyone gets counted. The wall remembers. Grace saves — the wall never once claimed otherwise, and every cage-opening in the series says so out loud. The names are read at cost, nightly, at every altitude, world without end. And the last word belongs to the litany, because in the final year it changed for the first time in a hundred years of stations — one line, amended, after a signal caught at year two instead of year fifty: Built lawfully. Built at speed. By caged hands. Understood in time.

  • KupoPewPew
    Lola la Chola (@KupoPewPew) reported

    @JDVance @JesseKellyDC I owned a store down the street from Microsoft campus from 2011-2018… I had tons of clients from Microsoft and the tech industry … you don’t know how often I heard from a customer that they had to close their sublist because they go laid off, but not before having to train their h1b replacement .. Microsoft and Amazon did it like crazy and still do

  • lovezirkjosh
    Joshua Zirkzee (@lovezirkjosh) reported

    Amad Diallo is out for 7 weeks after slipping on a bottle Shaw dropped in the gym.😭 Man why is it my club delivers the most goofy ahh bombas I was seriously looking forward to Amad's season given how electric he looked in preseason. Now 7 weeks out cause of ts cannot make this up man I swear if this is in the Amazon documentary we'll never live it down😭

  • LiranHirschkorn
    Liran Hirschkorn (@LiranHirschkorn) reported

    @codyplof @itsluizneto Brand registry should help you take them down - you don’t need to sell on Amazon to use it

  • FSheikhs2
    Faizan Sheikh (@FSheikhs2) reported

    Day looking good so far, still time to go. Yesterday Meta shat the bed, so we kept budget the same and launched a new batch of creatives (Super high intent) Prioritizing profit, not revenue. Will see how they perform over next 7 days. 📚 FREE GAME 💰 BELOW: Here’s 3 things we implemented that will super charge your existing and new creatives: 1. Your mechanism claims should explain why old solutions disappoint and why this one can work differently. They make the result feel logical, not magical. 2. Really understand what’s working and what’s not. The angle, main desire, belief, authority, objection, pains, mechanism, belief. Double down on that ONE thing. For example: You do not need to change every belief. Find the one belief blocking the purchase and focus the entire ad on moving 3. Don’t underestimate customer verbatim. Speak in the language of your buyer. Your customer has already written most of your best copy. It is hiding in your reviews, comments, support tickets, returns, surveys and conversations. Look for repeated tensions: what people want, fear, misunderstand, tolerate and regret. Mine it strategically. Top 3 angles, top 3 desires, top 3 pains, most used keywords, top 3 transformation… you get the point. (If you don’t have this yet, you can find this through your Competitors, Reddit, Amazon etc. Pro tip: Find the gap) Stay focused, grateful & put in the work. Let’s print 📈

  • nyb2know
    Not your Business (@nyb2know) reported

    @KadenDane @Whiplash437 I grew up on a farm, ranch.. nothing we raised, butchered ourselves was THIS.. it was ALL clean and respected. USA. Vegetarians eat a lot of SOY.. that is destroying the AMAZON forests! Deforesting it miles at a time to grow soy for your diet. You are part of the problem..

  • bog_bussy
    the groyping blob (@bog_bussy) reported

    women don't even break their amazon boxes down anymore they just expect u to burn them whole

  • SherryMcjmama84
    Sherry (@SherryMcjmama84) reported

    @jamestalarico I hope Amazon sues the **** out of you for this terrible lie!!

  • VaseGod
    Vasu (@VaseGod) reported

    An engineer in Greece sells ten €25 boards to four EU countries. Total packaging: 500 grams. Annual EPR compliance: ~€1150. The environmental fee on half a kilo of cardboard is cents. The paperwork is four figures, per country, with a separate authorised representative in each. That is the new Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation. It does not ban makers. It just makes the first 10 sales economically insane. Half the sellers on Lectronz do fewer than 10 orders a year. That is the layer where Arduino class experiments start. It is the layer this rule deletes. The fix is obvious: an EU wide de minimis, or a VAT OSS style one stop shop for EPR. Without one, the single market exists for Amazon and not for a garage in Greece.

  • BigTimeBlazo
    Blazo (@BigTimeBlazo) reported

    @StockSavvyShay loving the tetris reference. my amazon orders have always looked like a speedrun gone wrong. 2.5x faster by 2028, but can we fix "toothpaste arrives in a stadium" first?

  • Prospernot777
    Prospernot (@Prospernot777) reported

    @Pexsoftpro Terrible reviews on Amazon Buyer beware.

  • tamandkats
    Tam😽 (@tamandkats) reported

    @TheGivingSoul 💯 If I know you really need it, no problem, but what I hate more are all these folks who USE their thirsty followers to buy things on their very detailed Amazon lists and Cash App $ 🙄I find it to be a disgustingly low class move! Pay for your own **** and stop all the begging