1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Amazon
Amazon

Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems detected

Users are reporting problems related to: website down, errors and sign in.

Full Outage Map

Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

June 11: Problems at Amazon

Amazon is having issues since 11:40 PM AEST. Are you also affected? Leave a message in the comments section!

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

  • 45% Website Down (45%)
  • 29% Errors (29%)
  • 25% Sign in (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Ione Website Down 5 minutes ago
Newark Errors 32 minutes ago
Xalapa de Enríquez Sign in 4 hours ago
West Springfield Website Down 4 hours ago
Westerville Errors 5 hours ago
Montauban Website Down 10 hours ago
Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • AkshayWP
    Akshay Tikoo (@AkshayWP) reported

    @AmazonHelp Already did. I'm already in touch with your team. Please review my last 4-5 calls and find out why your executives kept making false assurances. I was even promised callbacks at fixed times, but no one called. Let's see if the issue gets resolved this time.

  • Arjun_Arora
    Arjun Arora (@Arjun_Arora) reported

    I had ordered two T-shirts from Amazon under Order No. 403-1663205-8880365 on 06-06-2026. However, I received only one T-shirt, and the item delivered is completely different from what I had ordered. Kindly look into this issue and do the needful. I expected better from Amazon

  • americansublime
    American Sublime (@americansublime) reported

    @Kalshi I think Jeff is right. He's part of the problem though, as Amazon is laying off employees already.

  • BadCapitalVC
    Arjun Malhotra (@BadCapitalVC) reported

    Zepto filed its DRHP this week. A few interesting bits: - Ad revenue grew from ₹49cr to ₹1,636cr in two years. Qcomm is going towards the same tension as Amazon. Once brands pay for placement, what ranks highest is partly about who paid, not just what's best for the buyer. - Marketing cost per order fell from ₹33.75 to roughly ₹1 last quarter. The money draining out is going into capacity they've built ahead of demand. And demand catching up to capacity is a far easier problem to have than capacity chasing demand. - Orders per store per day went from 1,325 to 2,140. Most of a dark store's cost is fixed, so the blended numbers should improve on their own as the store base ages - Median delivery time went up, from 10.6 to 12.3 mins. Slower deliveries usually mean batched ones, which usually mean cheaper ones. This could be an attempt at cost discipline ahead of the IPO

  • valentino_18892
    Donna Valentino (@valentino_18892) reported

    @texas2build I feel your pain; trying to get the photo project for Father's Day for stepson done. THE PRINTER ONLY CAME WITH 6 SHEETS OF PHOTO PAPER. F*ING DANDY! Okay, I just ordered from Amazon 160 sheets & 3 printer cartridges, calm down!* Office Depot has them, 3 miles away, but out.

  • way4422
    Durham lad (Bow) (@way4422) reported

    Has anyone got any codes for free movie 🎬 TV 📺 series apps for fierstick that work, the ones I had amazon took them down, I had cinema hd and HDO movies 🎬 both gone now

  • shanilgd
    Shanil G D (@shanilgd) reported

    @AmazonHelp Matter is already mentioned in the tweet. Already messaged in private multiple times. Issue not solved. Thats why its repeating

  • StarsBoysfan
    SBF (@StarsBoysfan) reported

    @AmazonHelp But it’s ok, that the driver was just down the street from my house, was not delivered, and the reason given was completely false. The item clearly was at the carrier facility and went out for delivery at 3:24AM.

  • MightGu05407027
    Might Guy (@MightGu05407027) reported

    @sokyu_5 @MikeyNohMore You do realize the whole complaint was that she looks generic. Then you give me this response that pretty much validates that. She's not even an Amazon, she's supposed to be a gladiator. It's fine to like it but I don't understand having a problem with the point.

  • moka274651
    OLex (@moka274651) reported

    @imidnightsrain All series had bad ratings this week and all of them are 1 seasons. Yeralti people are more experienced in advertising and how the things works they cutted series way early not to cloese with downfall. Also people watch Eşref Ruya on Amazon prime, for me that was also a problem

  • ant0ni0_r0mer0
    Antonio Romero (@ant0ni0_r0mer0) reported

    I just redesigned Amazon ads for Nike - in under 10 minutes. One product photo. 7 high-converting listing creatives. No agencies. No weeks. No $10k+ invoices. This is AI that: → scans customer reviews at scale → studies competitor listing visuals → identifies conversion gaps → builds a clear creative structure → generates Amazon-ready images What used to take agencies weeks and massive budgets, now happens before your first coffee. For Amazon brands, there are only two paths: 𝘖𝘗𝘛𝘐𝘖𝘕 1: Ignore it. Keep paying for slow turnarounds and recycled “strategy decks.” 𝘖𝘗𝘛𝘐𝘖𝘕 2: Use it. →Launch faster. →Test more creatives. →Win on speed and clarity. This is how a single product photo becomes: • Hero image • Benefit-led infographics • “Why X?” comparison visuals • Trust & social proof panels • Lifestyle + pack shots • Conversion-focused secondary images All aligned. All brand-safe. All Amazon-optimized. I've put together a guide that breakdowns this entire process . Want free access? Comment "AGENTS" below and I’ll DM you. (Make to follow me following)

  • danalcoe
    Dana L. Coe (@danalcoe) reported

    @TonyLaneNV He's wearing an Amazon logo. I don't care if he is "third party" that logo means he's Amazon's problem.

  • CAChirag
    CA Chirag Chauhan (@CAChirag) reported

    Lot of interesting POVs coming on Zepto’s IPO. The bear case on Zepto is quick and easy. They are harping on the fact that they are losing money on every order. The bull case starts one layer deeper, and with some nuance. They are looking at Ad revenue. It is almost pure margin. No extra dark store, no extra rider, no extra inventory to add. It sits on top of orders that already exist, and it flows into Zepto's NRV, which was ₹8,134 Cr in Q4 FY26. To see where this goes, anchor it to the best version of this model, which is Amazon. In 2025, Amazon's ad business did $68B in revenue, up 21.8% YoY. But here is the part people miss. Even at that size, ads are still only ~8.8% of Amazon's total revenue, and it peaked at 9.36% in Q2, slowly moving towards 10%. That small, high-margin slice is what quietly funds Amazon's thin-margin retail business. Zepto is running the same playbook, just much earlier. As its ad share of NRV moves towards that ~10% Amazon zone over the next 4-5 quarters, almost every rupee of that ad revenue is profit. Now add densification on top of this: - 1,139 dark stores - 2,140 orders per store per day, up from 1,425 orders just a year back - And cost per order going down from ₹93 to ₹42. So two things are happening at the same time. Cost per order is falling, and high-margin ad revenue is rising as a share of the mix. When both move together, profitability looks pretty close to the reach for Zepto. Will the strategy behind this model convince the public investors? What do you think?

  • 6nopsis
    Filmspree (@6nopsis) reported

    @Idarabasimi This is really terrible. This kind of charger can harm kids when the parents are not home. Amazon should do better. Let me send you my address so you send it to me.😒

  • Junglr_LLC
    Elizabeth Greene (@Junglr_LLC) reported

    Most Amazon ad “failures” aren’t failures. They’re just unproven hypotheses. Here’s where sellers go wrong. They launch keywords expecting instant clarity. Then panic when early data looks messy. But early performance is not truth. It’s noise. The real job is simple: Start with a solid hypothesis from keyword research. Then let the market test it. But here’s the part most people skip. You need enough impressions first. Without volume, clicks don’t mean anything. Without clicks, conversions are just guesswork. Once you get enough data, patterns show up. Some keywords will prove you right. Some will quietly prove you wrong. That’s not a problem. That’s optimization. The goal isn’t to make every keyword work. It’s to find where your product actually belongs in the market. Less guessing. More testing. Better decisions backed by real data.

  • PhilipPages
    Philip Pages (@PhilipPages) reported

    i never shut up about small churn improvements because the math has a PR problem only the Amazon Primes of the world get. cut churn from 11% to 10% and you didn't improve LTV by 1%. you improved it by 10%. and it compounds the better you get: 5% to 4% churn = 25% more LTV. even tiny wins count. 4% to 3.8% is still a 5% LTV bump. that's why failed payments matter so much. a small lift in recovered payments goes a LONG way. it's why Spotify and HBO Max treat every fraction of a point in churn like it's worth millions (it is). they hire whole teams to squeeze out an extra 0.1% by going all-out on failed payment recovery. when merchants come to us relying on Stripe's one-size-fits-all recovery, Redux's custom setups usually recover enough long-term subs to drop monthly churn from 10% to 8%. sometimes that alone flips CAC:LTV from negative to positive. most founders have no idea.

  • Banana_ana_1000
    Ana 🏳️‍⚧️ -TADC SPOILERS- (@Banana_ana_1000) reported

    Before anyone mentions it, I know that glitch has sponsors, BUT these "sponsors" Amazon and Netflix specifically have deals with them to host their shows it's not really i direct money thing, and they have epic games (unreal engine) which they animate they're shows in.

  • saxenagaurav268
    Gaurav saxena (@saxenagaurav268) reported

    @AmazonHelp But I faced obligations in office due to delivery in odd hours. Who will address this issue?

  • MuellerNadia
    ⊹ᡣ𐭩 𝓝𝓪𝓭𝓲𝓪 ⁶𓅓ᡣ𐭩⊹ (@MuellerNadia) reported

    Lmaoooo @Motion_Report really said "lemme go grab mah 2018 Spotify algorithm research to debate 2026 Drake numbers" 😭😭😭 Ngg didn't just travel back in time ONCE. He made TWO trips. 2018 to 2024 to argue against 2026😳🙄 Dont he slow....Get with the times 2018: "Algorithm pushes Drake" 2026: Drake's fans broke THE algorithm. 2026: Drake crashed Spotify, Apple Music AND Amazon simultaneously...within minutes of each other. Go sit ya butt down and find newer sources TO HATE WITH

  • shabeeb2255
    Shabeeb (@shabeeb2255) reported

    @AmazonHelp Hey, today is not working day for you? No one called.. No response from your side..

  • Alex_Fairfax06
    Alex Fairfax (@Alex_Fairfax06) reported

    Aside from the fact that this universalism is poisonous Christian nonsense, mass migration is literally one of the most powerful tools of the capitalist billionaire class. They love it. The Tory party’s biggest donors all pushed for more of it because they love cheap labour. Amazon tracks its own warehouses by ethnic diversity and tries to promote more of it for their own stated reason that more ethnic diversity reduces employee solidarity and chances of unionisation. If you support mass migration not only are you supporting essentially a slow genocide against your own people, you’re directly supporting the billionaire capitalist class who import cheap labour - people who will never in their lives be net taxpayers and pass the costs onto you.

  • noop_dev
    Boris Chuprin (@noop_dev) reported

    @DHLGlobal The issue is that you can't choose what Amazon or eBay uses. Where I have a chance, I always explain to sellers that DHL is a hellish company and I want anything else but DHL.

  • abhay14122001
    Abhay (@abhay14122001) reported

    @AmazonHelp There is an issue on x chat, can we connect on mail ??

  • MZohaibKhan92
    Zohaib Khan (@MZohaibKhan92) reported

    $SPCX lists tomorrow. June 12. $135/share. $1.75 trillion valuation. $75 billion raise. Largest IPO in history. More than double Saudi Aramco's 2019 record. Everyone's excited. I'm not. Here's the problem nobody wants to say out loud. SpaceX 2025 revenue: $18.7 billion. Net loss: $4.94 billion. You're paying $1.75 trillion for a company losing $5 billion a year. That's 94x revenue. Apple trades at 8x. Amazon trades at 4x. The rockets are real. The Starlink story is real. The valuation is a fantasy built on hype. The most respected independent valuations sit well below the offer price. Bulls see $2.5T by 2030. Bears see fair value at less than half today's tag. Hyped IPOs retrace 20–40% in the first 90 days. History is clear on this. The business is great. The price is not. Are you buying $SPCX at open tomorrow — or waiting for the hype to cool? Not financial advice. Do your own research.

  • Greenbackd
    Tobias Carlisle (@Greenbackd) reported

    This chart is a concentration risk indicator. It doesn't predict when a rotation happens, but it shows the market is as lopsided as it's been since the dot-com bubble, which historically has been a poor setup for mega-cap outperformance going forward. 1. We're approaching dot-com era concentration levels. This is a warning sign historically. Extreme concentration has preceded major drawdowns. 2. The "Mag 7" effect is real and measurable. A handful of stocks (Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Alphabet, Tesla) have driven nearly all S&P 500 returns. Most stocks have underperformed. 3. Equal-weight and small-cap may be poised to outperform When these ratios mean-revert (as they always have), it tends to be violent. The 2000–2013 period saw the equal-weighted index massively outperform the cap-weighted one. 4. Passive investors are more exposed than they think Buying an S&P 500 index fund today means ~35%+ in just 7 stocks, far more concentration than most investors realize. 5. The ratio is still elevated but slightly off peak Both lines appear to have ticked down recently from their highs, which could signal the early stages of rotation, but it's too early to call definitively.

  • AnastasiiaGons1
    Anastasiia (@AnastasiiaGons1) reported

    I forgot to cancel my Spotify Premium free subscription. No email reminded me I would be charged when my free subscription ended. I was charged today and my refund request was denied. Good news: I can use something I paid for but don’t need and won’t use for the whole month. Guys, never fall for this. I had similar issues with Canva and got a refund. I had this issue with Code Academy yearly subscription and got a refund. I bought the wrong movie version on Amazon, started watching, realised it was in English, got a refund and bought the right version. At the moment I’m having money troubles, so it hurts most. But I’ll remember this and never come back. 👀

  • sujkumar1981
    Sujeet Kumar (@sujkumar1981) reported

    @AmazonHelp Dear Abrar, order details already shared thru DM yday. Seems nobody checked that. Delivery was scheduled yday post 6.30pm but agent came early. Since nobody was at home, he marked as del failed. From then am struggling to get my deliver. Explained this issue several times

  • badbirb
    Hello Chicken (@badbirb) reported

    @DangerousThinkg I heard an anecdotal story from a friend who worked at Amazon that they had a massive outage caused by someone unplugging cables in one of the key routers because they were writing a support manual and they were walking through the various cases. Apparently caused quite a scramble of engineers trying to figure out what happened and took half a day to resolve.

  • investindigital
    Ash Ghaemi (@investindigital) reported

    Ed Zitron is lying to you about AI. Not because AI isn’t in a bubble because it is a bubble. Not because OpenAI and Anthropic’s numbers shouldn’t be questioned. They absolutely should be. He’s lying because he knows how startups work and is pretending he doesn’t. Every serious startup looks insane before it works. - Amazon looked insane - Tesla looked insane - Spotify looked insane - Uber looked insane - Airbnb looked insane - Shopify looked insane - SpaceX looks insane All massive burn, horrendous financials and no clear path to profit. Then one day the thing hits escape velocity and suddenly everyone pretends it was obvious. AI has real problems: - Token costs too high - Enterprise deployments nightmare - AI still hallucinates - Most AI apps are slop cannons - Dario could be SBF 2.0 - Fear mongering narrative The bubble will pop The internet was a bubble too. The bears were right about the market and wrong about the technology. That’s what Ed Zitron is doing now. He bootstrapped an audience by being the AI mega-bear, and now he’s financially incentivized to keep feeding them doom. AI is overhyped, expensive, and hard to deploy. AI is also obviously transformational. All these things are true. The early internet was slow, expensive, tough to deploy, and didn't make sense to the masses. Porn and instant chat was one of it's earliest use cases. Now look at it. Here's why Ed Zitron is lying to you about AI:

  • CatholicCat8
    cat (@CatholicCat8) reported

    put up a post at 4 am about how sammy was out of colozopine …. he doesn’t take colozopine he takes olanzapine .. … he has tried so many drugs at 4am i can’t tell the difference.. took down the post 🙄…i switched his pharmacy to amazon so it gets delivered … waiting 🫩