Amazon status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Amazon (Amazon.com) is the world’s largest online retailer and a prominent cloud services provider. Originally a book seller but has expanded to sell a wide variety of consumer goods and digital media as well as its own electronic devices.
Problems in the last 24 hours
The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Amazon. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.
- Website Down (45%)
- Errors (29%)
- Sign in (25%)
Live Outage Map
The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Sign in | 10 hours ago |
|
|
Website Down | 18 hours ago |
|
|
Errors | 1 day ago |
|
|
Errors | 1 day ago |
|
|
Errors | 1 day ago |
|
|
Sign in | 1 day ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Amazon Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jac (@bernese02) reported@CotswoldLadyB @thewhitecompany I ordered three large plastic storage boxes with lids from Amazon. They came in a cardboard box with zero pakaging. All three were smashed on one side. I had the same with a bottle of shampoo at Christmas - a fairly expensive bottle broken, rattling around in a too-big box.
-
Akansha Jain (@Akanshajain05) reportedi was researching viral AI products for my last company and cluely was the most surprising case i found the real story is wild and every founder and marketer needs actually to understand it so let me tell you what actually happened in march 2025, a 21-year-old columbia student named roy lee got suspended for building an AI tool to cheat on tech interviews. amazon rescinded his job offer. harvard rescinded his admission. he posted the whole story on x, it went viral, and within two months he had $20.3M in the bank ($5.3M seed from abstract and susa, then $15M from a16z) it became the most viral AI launch of 2025 with the launch tweet doing 13M views in a week but the interesting part is what happened after the money hit the bank they spent $19M of the $20.3M raised on marketing i.e 93% of every dollar, lit on fire to buy attention. > 60+ content creators on full retainer. > 700+ video editors clipping content 24/7 (per sf standard) > roy lee posting dozens of times daily, embracing controversy, turning company parties and his personal lifestyle into marketing content. the result was over 1.2 billion social impressions in 6 months. 100K signups so ~22K paying subscribers (reverse-engineered from the real ARR) now do the conversion math: 1.2B impressions → 100K signups = 0.008% conversion 1.2B impressions → claimed $7M ARR = $0.0058 of ARR per impression SaaS benchmark is 2-5%. they were ~250x below the floor. on nov 5, 2025 roy himself told techcrunch "viral hype is not enough" on march 5, 2026, lee posted a thread on X admitting that the $7M ARR figure he'd given TechCrunch in June 2025 was inflated then came a series of other things (not relevant for this tweet) so the real lesson here is simple: > a viral launch is not user acquisition > a billion impressions is not retention > $20M raised is not a $20M business the slideshow format works. that part is true. but the format was the visible 10%. the $19M budget was the invisible 90%. and anyone selling you "here's how to replicate cluely" without telling you about the budget is scamming you. all that said credit where it's due. roy lee at 22 years old raised $20M, built a 73-person company, and is ahead of 90% of similarly-funded AI startups that already shut down cluely is genuinely one of the most studied marketing operations of the last 5 years. the strategy is worth studying. just study the whole thing.
-
Janet (@janmonort) reportedAmazon has a problem. They don't know what kind of studio they want to be. After the Motu flop and this, I don't think they'll ever be considered a great contender studio. Looking at all their upcoming projects, not one screams box office success.
-
Debjyotisame (@Debjyotisame) reported@AmazonHelp Link not working again
-
Evelynn~•°•▪︎☆ (@Just_a_Bunnii) reportedWhats that like, Amazon position but the dudes lying down and its like *************** but she's *between* his legs riding him?!
-
Shelpid.WI3M (@Shelpid_WI3M) reported🚨 THE AI BOOM IS BEING PAID FOR WITH DEBT, NOT PROFITS. THAT NEVER ENDS WELL. Read that again slowly. Alphabet Google's parent just issued a 100-year bond that doesn't mature until February 2126, part of a roughly $20 billion borrowing drive to fund its AI buildout. A company is taking on debt that outlives everyone reading this, betting that artificial intelligence pays off across the next century. And here's the unsettling part: investors didn't flinch. The raise pulled in around $100 billion in orders. They're sprinting to hand over money that won't come back for 100 years. That's not quiet confidence. That's desperation wearing confidence as a costume. Look at what the entire Mag7 is doing right now. The 2026 capex numbers being thrown around are staggering: Amazon → roughly $200B in capex, up sharply year over year Microsoft → around $190B, with Azure capacity already stretched thin Google → about $185B, now partly funded by century-long debt Meta → roughly $135B, with free cash flow under heavy pressure Combined, that's hundreds of billions this year alone and analysts are projecting the four biggest spenders could push toward $1 trillion a year as this race accelerates. Almost none of it is funded by today's profits. It's funded by debt and a promise about tomorrow. We've seen this movie before. The dot-com companies were right about the internet. They were just a decade early and most were bankrupt before the vision paid off. Amazon fell around 95%. Microsoft lost roughly 65%. Intel got cut by about 80%. "Too important to fail" turned out to be the most expensive phrase of that entire era. Now here's the kicker: the Mag7 makes up roughly 30% of the entire S&P 500. So when the debt math finally breaks, this won't be a tidy tech correction. It'll be an index-wide event that drags down everyone holding a passive fund. This doesn't mean it all unravels tomorrow. But when it does, you'll want to have seen it coming. Follow now, notifications on. I'll keep you ahead of it.
-
hnm19 (@ogal_c) reported@HistorianUSA1 @amazon so you're allowing drivers to get out of their trucks and bend down and pray to Satan five times a day????
-
KStef13 (@kjstef1213) reportedUltimately it comes down to "so what?" Because no one in power will do anything about it. They are entrenched in a system that owes its loyalties to anything other than "We The People". They laws are corrupt, written by a select few (then handed off to the gov't flunky), to benefit that same select few. Anything they claim to fight is pure theater. Anyone who disagrees in action instead of just words, is eliminated via the voting booth or worse... One of millions of examples of the corruption: During covid shutdowns, amazon and walmart had direct inputs into the wording of the regulations spewed out around the country that somehow only allowed shopping through them. Pure croney capitalism. The Constitution? Obsolete. They have figured out how to outsource all of their tyranny to private companies and use that to violate the entirety of the Bill of Rights. We are tax slaves, and they are going to suck us dry and toss the corpse into a ditch when they are done with us. They do not care that they are parasites that will die without a host, they are just going to suck and suck and suck. This assumes the best-case outcome. There might be a demonic/evil intent that is considerably worse. Looking at the UK and the grooming gangs, or the US and Epstein, it is not out of the question.
-
Shrike Decil (@Shrike_DeCil) reported@Jringo1508 In scientific/technical writing, the danger is passing out from exhaustion reading, parsing, analyzing for the edit pass. The third pass where you detect a duplicate clause is particularly "How did this even happen?!? Again ... s l o w e r" It makes me wish so desperately that Amazon "just" had highlights go back to the author with a nudge of specificity: "Red means there's an error here." Glossing over the error in casual reading is directly anti-training for actual editing. Sigh.
-
Naeem Aslam (@NaeemAslam23) reported🚨 🇺🇸 AMAZON DROPS OPENAI FILM AS $50B AI DEAL OVERRIDES HOLLYWOOD RISK Amazon MGM dropped “Artificial,” Luca Guadagnino’s nearly finished film about Sam Altman’s 2023 OpenAI firing and return. The move follows Amazon’s $50bn solana:PreweJYECqtQwBtpxHL171nL2K6umo692gTm7Q3rpgF partnership, while the $40m project is now being shopped elsewhere. The issue is brand conflict. Big Tech wants AI profits, not studio releases that anger strategic partners. $AMZN stays tied to cloud and AI infrastructure upside. Media credibility takes pressure when business alliances shape what gets released.
-
Deriv.com (@Derivdotcom) reportedAmazon just went from Nvidia customer to Nvidia problem. 😱 - Amazon is reportedly exploring external sales of its custom #AI chips, turning an in-house cloud advantage into a product! - Its broader chip business is already running above $20B annually, and Jassy says it could look closer to $50B if sold like a standalone supplier. - Nvidia still leads, but the AI chip market may be getting more competitive. Source: Nasdaq, Reuters, Bloomberg
-
Socorro Mondejar (@montego56577) reported@JeffBezos Thanks Jeff for teaching me something Elon Musk didn't and I need to stop wasting time and money. I did not like working for Amazon and I was terrible at my job there. I'm not meant to climb the corporate ladder.
-
Prasad (@phantomblr) reported@JeffBezos @amazonIN @AmazonHelp Your aps haslve become **** off late. Unwanted permissions, difficult to navigate,stupid ai help bot,issues navigating to realtime agent support. And to top it, prime doesn't play audio on external speakers earc. Pathetic.
-
Exasperated of Ulster (@exasperatedNI) reportedJohn. You seem very confident that everyone wants to consume BBC content. Therefore you’ll be standing squarely behind the move to a monthly voluntary subscription for the BBC? We already have to login to iplayer and the bbc website. Most people have smart tv’s so it won’t be an issue for them to login to the BBC app to consume your content. You know. Just how Netflix, Disney+, Amazon, Paramount etc work. Yes?
-
boAt (@RockWithboAt) reported@JaideepNegi10 Amazon: Login into Amazon - Go to your order - Click Invoice (drop-down)- Invoice 1 or Payslip 1 / Warranty. -Adi (2/2)
-
Barnesy🇺🇸🇺🇲 (@Itzbarnesy) reported@JeremyVineOn5 Sound like Starmer after Axel rakabunda with Amazon selling knives. The people are the problem pretty simple. Use some critical thinking
-
Carnelian🇺🇸🦖 (@carnelianpagan) reportedThe health insurance industry really is broken. I realized this when I sought treatment for eczema. The medication I was prescribed was the same as over the counter hydrocortisone cream, only three times the price. I could purchase the same thing off Amazon for 7 bucks.
-
XRP_WealthFlow (@XRP_WealthFlow) reportedLooking at Amazon's monthly chart, it reached an All-Time High (ATH) of $5.6 in 1999 before crashing down to its bottom at $0.28. Afterwards, it could only manage a lackluster rebound to around $2.9—a 50% retracement from its ATH—and eventually failed in its attempt to break the ATH again in early 2008. To make matters worse, it got hit by the broader negative catalyst of the Global Financial Crisis, suffering the humiliation of a whopping 65% plunge from its local high. At this point, gripped by extreme fear, Amazon’s retail investors couldn’t take it anymore. They threw in the towel and dumped their holdings in waves—declaring what we call a massive "Capitulation." However, almost as soon as the retail investors handed over their bags, Amazon staged a fierce V-shaped recovery. Finally, in September 2009, it smashed through its previous ATH of $5.6. Only the investors who endured that hellish, 10-year-long box range from 1999 to 2009 got to taste Amazon’s devastating, one-way mega-bull run. If you had bought in around $1.9 during that 65% crash and held until now, you would be looking at a staggering return of about 16,000% based on the current ATH of $280. Of course, the number of investors who actually diamond-handed Amazon for this long is extremely small. Right now, XRP’s monthly chart shares a spine-chilling resemblance to Amazon’s chart back then. After hitting its ATH of $3.3 in 2018, it established a bottom at $0.11, and subsequently retraced exactly 50% to the $1.6 level before stalling. It attempted to break the ATH in July 2025 but failed, and has now been pushed back down to the $1.1 range—a roughly 67% drop from its high. Just like Amazon’s historical chart, the fear and fatigue among retail investors have reached an absolute peak. If the market gives just a little more correction here, we will likely see the final capitulation volume flood the market. There is a clear reason why XRP mirrors Amazon so perfectly—from the 10-year period trapped in a box range below its previous ATH, to the precise "shakeout strategy" designed to strip retail investors of their tokens right before the massive bull run. Ripple Labs CEO Brad Garlinghouse once noted in a media interview: "Ripple is to cross-border payments what Amazon was to books in the early days. And we’ll go beyond books." Amazon started out as an online bookstore, expanding its scale by leveraging infinite virtual space, and has now become the "Everything Store" and a massive tech titan. Similarly, Ripple Labs is executing an ambitious plan to use XRP not just as a SWIFT alternative for cross-border remittances, but to transfer all high-value data—including stocks, real estate, commodities, and bonds—as seamlessly and quickly as information travels across the internet. Brad claims that the XRP Ledger (XRPL) aims for decentralized finance (DeFi) without the intervention of centralized financial institutions. But my view is different. Because XRP will essentially act as the "water" flowing through the plumbing of the global financial system, Ripple Labs will interact with massive tier-1 banks and institutions to monopolize all asset markets, ultimately achieving "hyper-centralization." The words that market makers spit out to the public are always different from the grand narrative they hold in their hearts. We must accurately capture that core essence and refuse to be swayed by short-term price fluctuations. It doesn't matter whether the price of XRP is at its ATH of $3.3, $1, or if it temporarily dips to $0.7. Right now, the whales and market makers are simply gaslighting retail investors, drilling the mindset into their heads that "XRP is destined to be a cheap penny coin under $3 forever." Look at Amazon’s monthly chart attached here. Retail investors riding minor waves through short-term trading can never capture these kinds of historic returns. Look at the macro trend right now, buy XRP, and hold it long-term within the grand cycle!
-
David Hannaman (@DavidHannaman) reported@RightScopee No, not at all. Because even though I down own a Tesla, or pay for a Starlink subscription, or even a X subscription, I think the products he produces are amazing. I buy a lot from Amazon, and even though I don’t care for the man I’m happy Bezos built the company.
-
Ding **** Trader (@vtrader1982) reported@OnePlus_IN The company is shutting down the stores and service centres! Never buy from Amazon.
-
Mark Wells (@Invisible_one19) reportedConsider that all problems that need money could be fixed for just a little less profit: The Scale of Profit:Amazon's annual operating income has surged to over $36 billion.Disney’s consistently clears $12 billion annually. The Cost of the Fix:Closing the local data hub tax subsidy gap nationwide costs around $3 billion to $5 billion a year. The Impact:If the government shaved just 5% to 10% off the top of these massive corporate profit margins through a targeted infrastructure tax, it would generate tens of billions of dollars.That is more than enough to fully fund the physical network, eliminate consumer internet surcharges, and pour massive, stable revenue directly into the Social Security Trust Fund. Best of all? Amazon pays $0 in dividends, meaning everyday investors lose no cash income, and Disney's dividend is so heavily buffered it wouldn't even have to move. The pure unabated greed of corporate America will destroy America. #CorporateAccountability
-
Duan (@Duan_TheD) reported@AmazonHelp Yet again your chat closed an active chat, which means I have to reexplain myself yet again... Also, thanks for your 1% "compensation" for YOUR error, and ill-advise on an over $2000 order...
-
Bellevue WA Crime, Scanner, and Public Safety News (@BellevueWACrime) reported6/18 7:41 am - DV at The Illahee Apartments between siblings, probable cause was established for DV Assault 4 10:11 am - reported stolen vehicle, a 2026 black Chevrolet Equinox taken from the 17730 block of se 58th Pl, taken sometime overnight 12:43 pm - DV at Shell on Main St, man was trying to prevent a female from leaving, then they both left in a bmw together There was a theft at downtown Safeway, a bag of goods were stolen, male left on foot into downtown park, Kemper security asked to watch their cams and locate him, Kemper security eventually tracked him to the transit center 1:16 pm - disturbance at the August Wilson Place Apartments with a female subject being verbal in the leasing office, refusing to leave 1:35 pm - burglary at the Aventine Apartments, RP was watching through a live camera, sees a known subject (ex) in the apartment without permission, female subject has current felony warrant, warrant out of Thurston County 1:37 pm - disturbance in the bridle trails valley creek park, male shouting profanities at people 1:42 pm - theft at Barnes and Noble Crossroads Mall 2:30 pm - disturbance at Hampton Greens Apartments, subject in a verbal with management, caller was subject herself Lots of traffic accidents including a vehicle vs school bus (with children on board) 6:22 pm - assault at the Kamber Ridge Apartments, female subject left in a grey Mercedes, victim also female and uncooperative with call taker 7:07 pm - assist at the Amazon building on 110th Ave NE for a female with her pants down to her ankles Physical DV at Lincoln Square South at a bar, parent vs son 7:22 pm - QA at 145th Pl SE & SE 24th for a male standing on the side of the road holding a butcher knife
-
T (@xxtrinbrowniee) reported@PopBase manny jacinto and thomasin mckenzie in the same show?? amazon said let me fix everything
-
haresh chetnani (@hchetnani) reported@OracuraSupport your AI Cust care executive is of no help. I have a serious issue re OC200 bought from Amazon on 11/6. Nobody seems to be respond. Have sent a mail top. Pl note it is expensive piece of equipment lying idle
-
The Freed Mind (@MindTrapMaven) reported@PeterDiamandis But no one should be lifting and sorting Amazon packages if it can be helped. The problem is that people still need to eat
-
SellerForge.ai (@SellerForgeAI) reportedAmazon's restock limits aren't arbitrary. They're calculated using your IPI score, sales velocity in the past 90 days, and available FC capacity in your region. If your limit drops suddenly, check for aged inventory first—units sitting 181+ days drag your IPI down fast, and Amazon penalizes slow-turn SKUs harder than most sellers realize. The fix isn't asking for more capacity; it's cleaning up what's already there.
-
CJ Gupta (@CJGupta18) reported@AmazonHelp Thats exactly the problem they will again come at a different time and i might not be thr can u pls pls pls call and tell them to reattempt today i’ll stay here all day
-
Ashley Wright (@ashley_wright) reportedThe uncomfortable truth about TikTok Shop: Most brands aren't actually ready for it. Nobody says this out loud because it sounds like the platform's fault when it isn't. Agencies won't say it because it kills the pitch. Brands won't say it because it means admitting the gap is internal, not external. The platform punishes slow decision-making. A creator needs an answer the same day, not after three rounds of internal approval. A product takes off in a livestream and inventory needs to move within hours, not after next week's planning meeting. Most brands have built systems for stability, not speed, and that works fine on Amazon but falls apart here. Accepting this means building a team that can move at the platform's pace instead of looking for a better creator strategy. This isn't a knock on any brand. Most brands were built for a slower pace of decision-making than TikTok Shop demands.
-
Cope Jaxon (@Cope_Method) reportedIf you not working today, I hope that Amazon package you been waiting on gets DELAYED. Happy Juneteenth.