Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

• Website Down (43%)
• Errors (34%)
• Sign in (23%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Paris	Sign in	3 hours ago
Columbus	Errors	6 hours ago
Palmyra	Errors	10 hours ago
Paris	Sign in	19 hours ago
Santa Fe	Website Down	1 day ago
Township of Evan	Sign in	1 day ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Anthony Cingle (@AnthonyCingle) reported 1 minute ago

  @Schlage_Locks @Schlage_Locks Two defective Encode Plus locks from Amazon: one bad locking mechanism, one dead keypad. Bought a third from Lowe’s and it worked perfectly with completely different packaging. Is there an issue with Amazon inventory?

• 
  Gord ‘Human Truck Driver Respecter’ Magill (@GordMagill) reported 1 minute ago

  @JamesYear37 The problem is, as you know, James, is that there are no laws against profiteering. I’d love to see every cockroach who runs Amazon Relay put in front of a firing squad, but it’s never going to happen.

• 
  TheAlphaLegion (@legioxxalpha) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Awennon Ah yes, with Femstudoes and other forced black rock and Amazon crap Primaris marines are TOTTALLY the problem as 40k gets' slopped and normified

• 
  m masquer (@masquer_m14438) reported 11 minutes ago

  @ModernDayCrimes @DangerousThinkg 1,000% correct! Most folks don't understand that digital meters can be used to 'throttle' home use - even if owner didn't agree to it. 'Smart' homes are horrible as well. News stories about elderly deaths in Europe and places like SoCal when power grid was browned out from high temps overload. News story about black Microsoft engineer who completely converted his house to 'smart'. An Amazon delivery driver falsely accused him of some sort of untoward comment and Amazon shut his entire house down with no notice. Including locking him out. Plus, Chinese law requires every microprocessor made there to have a 'backdoor' access built in. Every internet connected 'smart' appliance is a built in window to 'pattern of life'.

• 
  leelakurup (@leelakurup) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Tukaram_IndIAS Sir what about companies do not deliver items prepaid and show on line its delivered. Amazon delivery is doing it off late. Then call them convince them item not delivered. Big problem. Any remedy??

• 
  Your.Favorite.Beach7 (@ldygltrspkls031) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Ilhan Is that why you shut us down, shuttered small businesses and forced us to buy from Amazon? Or what about the tariff refunds? Why did you vote to give money them instead of the taxpayers? Everything you do hurts the American people. You are a threat to us all.

• 
  Janiac the Hedgehog 🏳️‍🌈 (@janiac_the) reported 17 minutes ago

  Someone gotta shut down Amazon MGM Studios, because that's two game related shows under them that have had a star suffer a major injury-

• 
  DriveBy Geek (@DriveByGeek) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Shaykay1717 Is there a Whole Foods near you - if that’s Amazon, is that the source? Check the labels - the problem is it’s already in your kitchen not the store. I order from Amazon Whole Foods a lot, large beef and pork and it has been fine.

• 
  Tesla_Optimus (@Tesla_Optimus_K) reported 18 minutes ago

  Piper ******* says Amazon's AI spend still clears. Meta and Google's returns don't. Aug. 31 note: Overweight Amazon, $320 target. Amazon's ROIC averaged about 17% from 2018–2025 and they see ~14% in 2026 — ugly versus history, least ugly versus peers. Meta's ROIC is sketched down ~27 points from 2024 to 2027, Alphabet ~26. Champion's split is simple: Amazon pours into AWS, a metered business. Meta and Google are pouring into frontier models whose payback is a press release. Jassy actually walks payback periods on the call. The other two talk products and infrastructure. Amazon's ROIC can still sag if they overbuild or price-war the cloud. It's just not falling off a cliff the way the model labs are. Same capex boom. Three different receipts. Source : Yahoo Finance #Amazon #Meta #Google $AMZN $META $GOOGL

• 
  ℂ𝕠𝕕𝕖𝕩, ℍ𝕖𝕣𝕖 (@CodexHere) reported 20 minutes ago

  @azkadelya @amazon Amazon is terrible anymore. They do not care about their customers in the least bit... I know growing up people hated on Walmart because they hurt small businesses, but lately they've had the best customer service amongst every service I've ever used. it's crazy.

• 
  JD Fox (@JDFoxOnX) reported 21 minutes ago

  @skinroja203 American business ceases immediately and zero imports come in. Walmart, Amazon, Costco shut down. No gasoline, jet fuel or kerosene. That means no trucks to deliver goods to the Canadian stores. All food is gone from the stores within three days while everything warehoused ruins on shelves. The major concern would be how are families going to be fed. A Canadian who sees his starving children while also dealing with other Canadians looting HIS resources that he might have. It’s bad. Really bad. Again, I hope it never happens because it would be complete and total devastation. That’s the power of the US war machine and economy. Factor in we don’t have to take it to the other side of the world but is right next door makes it even easier and more terrible

• 
  AFCB Oldgit 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇺🇦 (@AFCBOldgit) reported 24 minutes ago

  @DeborahHD @amazon I don't know about you, but we sometimes have an English girl deliver to us, she's EXCELLENT, but it's virtually always foreign delivery drivers that are the problem, and some, hardly speak English, so whether they're trying to do everything to avoid talking I've no idea 🤷

• 
  Raye (@rayemarkets) reported 25 minutes ago

  Every time Damodaran uploads a video, I always watch it because he usually takes a concept that sounds simple on the surface and then breaks down the incentives and economics underneath it, and this discussion on scaling versus profitability is a good example. The common startup narrative is that companies should grow as quickly as possible, capture market share, and worry about profits later, but Damodaran's argument is that this approach only works when the structure of the business actually supports it. A large addressable market and fast revenue growth can tell us how big a company might become, but they tell us very little about how valuable that company will eventually be unless growth can translate into better unit economics, operating leverage, pricing power, and returns on invested capital. A company can therefore become much larger without becoming economically stronger, and in some cases scaling simply multiplies the weaknesses that were already embedded in the original business model. This is why the distinction between scalability and business quality is so important. Software businesses can often add customers at very low marginal cost, meaning revenue can grow much faster than the underlying cost base, while businesses involving manufacturing, logistics, physical infrastructure, or expensive customer acquisition may require significant incremental spending for every additional dollar of revenue. Even within technology, being asset-light does not automatically solve the problem because customer acquisition costs, incentives, cloud infrastructure, research spending, and competition can effectively become variable costs that rise alongside growth. Scale only creates meaningful operating leverage when the incremental economics improve as the company gets larger, and if costs continue rising roughly in line with revenue, the company may eventually discover that what looked like a temporary profitability problem was actually structural. Amazon is therefore an important example, but also a dangerous template for other startups to copy. Amazon could tolerate years of weak accounting profitability because its scale was gradually building infrastructure, distribution density, customer relationships, marketplace liquidity, and purchasing power that improved the economics of the business over time, so the losses were connected to assets and competitive advantages that eventually supported much greater profitability. The mistake is assuming that every company reporting losses while growing quickly is following the same path, because some businesses are simply using investor capital to subsidize prices, acquire customers, or enter markets without creating corresponding economic advantages. Both companies can initially show the same headline numbers of rapid revenue growth and negative earnings, but one may be accumulating future operating leverage while the other is accumulating obligations that require continuous external capital. Damodaran's "Field of Dreams" can become a "Field of Nightmares" precisely when investors assume profitability will automatically appear once sufficient scale has been reached. The venture capital structure makes this problem more interesting because the incentives of the investor and the economics of the underlying company are not necessarily aligned. Venture portfolios depend heavily on a relatively small number of very large winners, which means a venture capitalist may rationally prefer a founder to pursue a much larger and riskier outcome rather than build a smaller company producing steady profits. A company that could become a profitable business worth a few hundred million dollars may be economically attractive to its founder, employees, and customers, but it might barely move the returns of a multibillion-dollar venture fund, while turning that same company into a speculative attempt at a ten-billion-dollar outcome provides much more upside to the fund. Scaling therefore becomes partly a consequence of portfolio mathematics rather than purely a consequence of what is optimal for the company itself, which helps explain why startups are frequently encouraged to expand geographically, add products, increase hiring, and raise increasingly large funding rounds even before the economics of the original business have been fully proven. Damodaran's point about pricing versus valuation extends this incentive further. Private markets frequently anchor financing rounds around comparable transactions, revenue multiples, user growth, subscribers, or projected future revenue rather than the present value of sustainable future cash flows, so scale itself becomes an input into the next financing round. Once that happens, raising capital can create a self-reinforcing cycle where capital funds growth, growth supports a higher private-market price, the higher price enables another larger funding round, and that new capital funds even more growth. During favorable capital-market conditions this cycle can continue for years, making it difficult to distinguish between a genuinely improving business and a company whose growth is partly being manufactured by increasingly abundant financing. The real test only arrives when the marginal investor becomes less willing to finance losses and the company has to demonstrate that customers, margins, and cash generation can support the business without constant capital injections. The expansion of private capital has allowed this process to continue much further than it could several decades ago. Companies historically reached public markets relatively early because public equity was one of the few ways to obtain the capital required for large-scale expansion, whereas mutual funds, sovereign wealth funds, private equity firms, crossover investors, and very large venture funds can now provide billions of dollars while companies remain private. Damodaran describes this as the creation of a gray market between traditional venture capital and public equity, and one consequence is that startups can reach enormous revenue bases and valuations before facing the level of disclosure, governance scrutiny, and profitability expectations traditionally associated with public companies. His data also show how much this has changed the profile of companies reaching the public market, with companies generally arriving larger in revenue terms but substantially less likely to be profitable than companies going public several decades ago. There is also a governance dimension that becomes increasingly important as companies scale privately. A founder managing a small startup and a founder controlling an organization worth tens or hundreds of billions of dollars are effectively running very different institutions, yet rapid private-market scaling can allow the governance structure of the first company to survive into the second. Founder control, dual-class shares, fragmented investor bases, and competition among venture investors can weaken the normal mechanisms that challenge management decisions, while large valuations can reinforce the belief that the founder's strategy has already been validated. The danger is that valuation growth can substitute for operational accountability during the scaling phase, and by the time profitability, capital allocation, organizational complexity, or governance problems become visible, the company may already employ thousands of people and control significant amounts of capital. Another part of Damodaran's argument that I find important is that staying small should not automatically be interpreted as failure. Some businesses naturally have better economics when they remain concentrated around a specific customer base, product category, geography, or brand position, because expanding beyond that niche can weaken pricing power or require disproportionately higher capital and marketing spending. Ferrari is an obvious example of a company whose economics partly depend on scarcity, but the principle applies much more widely: maximizing revenue is not necessarily the same thing as maximizing enterprise value. A business generating high returns on capital within a limited market can be economically superior to a much larger competitor producing weak returns after enormous capital investment, which means the correct objective should ultimately be value creation rather than size itself. Personally, this is where I agree strongly with Damodaran, because I do not see profitability and growth as opposite objectives in the first place. A company should absolutely sacrifice near-term profits when it has opportunities to reinvest capital at attractive returns, especially when that spending strengthens distribution, technology, network effects, customer retention, infrastructure, or another durable competitive advantage, but there needs to be a credible economic mechanism connecting today's spending with tomorrow's cash generation. I care much less about whether a rapidly growing company currently reports a profit than about what happens to the economics of the next dollar of revenue, because improving contribution margins, lower acquisition costs, stronger retention, greater pricing power, and falling capital requirements provide evidence that scale is actually making the business better. This also makes the discussion extremely relevant to the current artificial intelligence cycle. Artificial intelligence companies are being pushed to scale models, computing infrastructure, data centers, users, enterprise distribution, and revenue extraordinarily quickly, while the capital required to support that expansion is also becoming enormous. Some of that spending could eventually create exceptional businesses if inference economics improve, utilization rises, customers become deeply embedded in the products, and artificial intelligence generates enough willingness to pay to produce strong margins, but scale alone cannot prove that outcome. If computing costs and capital requirements continue rising alongside usage, then very fast revenue growth could coexist with mediocre returns on capital, particularly when companies must continuously finance new generations of chips and infrastructure simply to remain technologically competitive. For me, the most important question in artificial intelligence therefore is gradually shifting from how fast these companies can grow to how much economic value remains after paying for the infrastructure required to generate that growth, because eventually the market has to separate companies that are using capital to build durable operating leverage from companies that simply need ever larger amounts of capital to keep the scaling story alive.

• 
  zombiehunter11 (@zombiehuntprgen) reported 25 minutes ago

  @ShadowBowser458 My main problem with Hazbin Hotel is that it try's to squish everything together and is very quick. Which isn't really their fault because amazon won't give them more episodes.

• 
  Joel (@DailyPlanetoid) reported 26 minutes ago

  @RealMassguy @2fort4 - Trace DNA handling: Microscopic touch DNA on the knife sheath could be the result of secondary transfer or scene contamination. -2 UNIDENTIFIED MALE PROFILES ON THE SHEATH -completely ignoring the ACTUAL male DNA profiles FOUND IN THE HOUSE, at the scene, -Hair found in chapinin's hand that completely excludes Kohberger as a contributor - Terrible cctv: the Vague, intentionally degraded CCTV footage of a vehicle they could never truly decide on make/model until BK's name, it was a nissan, a 2 door, a ford then a2011–2013 Hyundai Elantra, but Kohberger drove a 2015 model so they bump it up to 2016. - Inexact cell tracking: Mobile tower pings only prove he was somewhere within a wide geographical zone, not at the exact house. -No victim connection: prosectour bill thompson confirm this after plea. There is no evidence of digital stalking, social media contact, or prior real-world interaction with the victims. -LACK of any physical evidence: Despite a bloody, violent crime, investigators found zero victim DNA or blood in Kohberger's car or apartment. -inconstant eyewitness discription across all 3 of DM's interviews, while BF account was never used due to it not matching DM's -Delayed emergency call: The 8-hour gap between the estimated time of the murders and the police notification leaves an unmonitored window of time at the crime scene. -Proven fact that a clean up amongst the common areas occurred. -ILLEGAL IGG PROCESS: why did the fbi "destroy" all evidence of how they used a sequencing tool that "fills in the gaps" to build out the dna profile they had until it created enough to use for public genealogy sites.. -Every tip or lead was dropped after they recieved BK's name -early documents show a focus on frat bros and inner/wider circle surrounding drug use and persona motives -Amazon CLICKS not purchases, learn to read ******** Amazon click history document, not a receipt or POP shows On 20 Mar 2022 in PA it shows Ka-Bar knife / sheath / sharpener pages, plus cart and checkout URLs. Many similar rows over a couple days. Each page load is a new line. This file alone does not prove a purchase went through, only that those items were viewed and checkout was opened. -the non public list of 12 potential suspects/poi that never had BK's name on it, including the first original including - COLE BARANBERG: by nov 16 was being followed by LE to obtain a sample for comparison, his DNA was found "inconclusive"(can not be excluded) to the male profile found under maddie's fingernails.. why didnt fbi go use there dna ai for that male profile? hmmm a military trained culinary chef that worked at a Big 5 Sporting Goods store for 8 years, whos comes from a criminal family of ******, murderers and drug traffickers -BRENT KOPACKA! wont even bother with you -JOSE CRUZ: he was alleged only a year prior to the murders that on October 10, 2021, a masked intruder carrying a knife broke into a home shared by four female college students at 3:38 AM. Jose Cruz, the neighbour became a suspect after lying to police about his whereabouts after his albi didn't check out, his dna was found on cigarette's on the property of 1122... like come ******** on. -JACK SHOWALTER: ("Grub Truck" Guy): One of the last people seen with Madison and Kaylee on the late-night food truck livestream. -JACK DUCOEUR : hot head recent EX to Kaylee Goncalves'. had the clearest motive of anyone, lied about call of 17 mins, can be heard on 1112 balcony footage prior to 3AM was most interviewed POI -DYLAN MORTENSEN:was physically inside a mass homicide scene, is the only eye witness and her account changed so many times, but was so not credible. She was awake cant hear a double murder in the bed above her but can hear a voice well enough that she couldnt recongise in abathroom on the other side of the floor she is one, but also couldn't accurately tell the difference between xana or kaylee.. said she went to sleep until 11am phone activity prove that to be completely fale..investigators failed to exhaustively vet her timeline, alibi, and state of mind to ensure she had no involvement. -BETHANY FUNKE: As the other surviving resident inside the house during a brutal quadruple murder, she should of also been automatically an operational subject of interest. She has a conflicting account compared to dylan, slept on the bottom floor where no attacks occurred... and survived completely unharmed. why is everything regarding Bethany sealed? compared to even dylan? we know nothing, she has not spoken.. not even her phone activity.. that enough to raise any doubt for you yet? or you just gunna pretend nothing matter especially unidentified male dna even tho the button on the sheath is SUCH PROOF OF GUILT! onlt if its BK's name attached

• 
  Sebastian Caniulao | Ecommerce Email & Growth (@canipack21) reported 27 minutes ago

  @eliweisss Good problem to have. The piece I would move up the list alongside the hire is pulling those Amazon buyers onto the owned list, since the channel gives you almost nothing on repeat. Insert cards plus a registration offer was the only bridge that ever worked for us.

• 
  Mr. 5 Star (@Mr5Star) reported 28 minutes ago

  @yameater33 @DealsFinderIO I have a few on my watch list on there. But getting one from Amazon would be way better cause I can return it if something is wrong with it. Offerup ain't gon help you if the one you buy has issues

• 
  Devendra Agarwal (@devendra0202) reported 33 minutes ago

  @amazonIN @amazon @AmazonHelp website was fake. With my previous experience, I can say that they never deliver items in such cases. Amazon system does not support customer in such cases. There was a time, when Amazon cared for customers, but not any more. This time, I will escalate this issue, will (3/4)

• 
  Loganpendragonmultiverse (@loganpendragonm) reported 34 minutes ago

  @SOOPLLC My advice after routing for many, many decades and not having a traditional publisher: there are two routes when it comes to publishing. You don't necessarily have to make them mutually exclusive but you either get published by a publisher in some scenario or you self-publish. There are different versions of each one. My recommendation is to decide upfront what you want to do, which route you want to pursue. Again you can do both but you've got to put time into whichever one you decide to do because if you're going to do traditional publishing then it requires a different approach for that. You need to: - draft your book - write your books - do a rough draft - write them - get it to a final draft - get better readers - get it in front of editors - get it in front of companies That means sending out manuscripts to many publishers and waiting forever. The alternative is self-publishing. I struggled with this for a long time. I didn't want to spend six years of my life writing and just dumping my manuscripts out to different publishers, hoping someone grabbed it. What I did is I just said, "You know what? I'm on a right for the passion of writing and I make money off of it. Don't get me wrong but that's not the reason why I do it." I don't make a whole lot off my writing right now and I may never find with that but I finally had to decide that my passion is writing, not publishing. What I started doing is I'll write the books. I believe in the snapshot theory so I don't ever try to make my work perfect but I make it as perfect as I can at that point in my development. I'll write a book, I'll get it edited, and I'll normally go through about three drafts over time. I'll take breaks from it. After the rough draft, when I feel like it's ready to publish, I put it on Amazon KDP, drop it into Select, and leave it. I'll move on to another book. I try not to obsess over it. Some of them grow, some of them don't. Some of them, months down the road, will finally get some traction and I'm not a big-name famous author by any means of the stretch. I have very few readers in fact but I've made some money off of it and I've got some growth. I've had quite a number of reads and some of my stuff takes off, some of it doesn't, but it's just the fact that I have a passion for writing. My recommendation for an aspiring author is to decide which route you want to take and gear up to pursue that route with vigor because if you get consistent and keep pushing, you never know what will happen.

• 
  Prinsenry Thee 1st 📚💎 (@PrinsenryThe1st) reported 35 minutes ago

  There are times while scrolling on X, I stumble upon possible untapped topic ideas for book publishing and I note them down but I tend to forget about them. I’ve checked this topic on Amazon and there are no books there but it is a major problem most WOMEN face. At least, let someone benefit from my research but DYOR first. Publish at owners risk 🥸 FOLLOW FOR MORE UPDATES ON PUBLISHING ➕

• 
  javadoodles ✍️ (@javadoodlestv) reported 35 minutes ago

  @amazon the amazon locker in my apartment is causing so many issues, is there a way to opt out of this

• 
  James D Magee (@jamesdavidmagee) reported 37 minutes ago

  @Lord_Sugar Having spent a lot of the last 6 months in hospital I have to agree that YOU could help and YOU could be a great CEO of the NHS - but you would need a good team around you - I am throwing my hat in the ring! I am not sure I can be your apprentice at 64, but I will point out that the idea is somewhat flawed. Firstly, giving the potential savings to Jeff Bezos, (it certainly would not be to his employees!), would not save money, it would just reallocate it elsewhere. There are also lives at risk, so this would need to be handled with a great deal of care! The reasons? 1). Amazon charges are WAY too high and even with a Lord Sugar negotiation it would simply boost their profits and create more money for Bezos. 2) Amazon would not contribute more of these profits in tax! The Fair Tax Foundation note that a large portion of Amazon's UK retail sales revenue is funnelled through its European headquarters in Luxembourg rather than being fully declared under a single UK corporation tax figure. Amazon does not break down corporation tax for the entire UK business structure, meaning figures are estimated through specific local arms like Amazon UK Services. 3) Logistically it would not work transport wise. They have to draw down supplies much quicker for emergencies and a completely unpredictable set of unique circumstances would make this very difficult. 4) Regardless of technology advances I strongly doubt no one single centralised hub could effectively predict, procure and administer this unpredictable level of requirements - it would end up as 8-12 hubs and simply add to costs. There are MANY improvements to be made, there is no question the NHS has WAY too many Trust administrators & management being paid way too much, the facilities management is poor to piss poor. There is a list of cost saving that could be made but it certainly will NOT be solved by Peter Thiel, Alex Karp Stephen Cohen, Joe Lonsdale or Nathan Gettings - it absolutely will NOT be solved by Jeff Bezos!

• 
  지우 (@minccino02) reported 37 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Just to clarify, are the same representatives who gave me inconsistent answers each time, and who made my situation more complicated, really the best resource for resolving this issue?

• 
  1 Aspen Tree (@Headqarters_69) reported 40 minutes ago

  @unusual_whales Why? What’s slowing Amazon down?

• 
  The Inner Circle Trading Group DP David Prince (@epictrades1) reported 43 minutes ago

  @CardiCNBC Really ? That is what you took from this ? I see much worse broken business models w low valuations over amazon. Indeed amazon is doing quite well... rem last earnings. Oh and no nothing is a hard rule for all stox, odd u thought that

• 
  Robert Yang (@robertythoughts) reported 47 minutes ago

  POV: you bootstrap a CPG brand: > Coman goes bankrupt > 3PL steals inventory > Food scientist holds formula hostage > Get sued. 3 times. > 3 hires quit > 4 hires get laid off > 20 No’s from investors > Tiktok shop gets banned > Ad account gets banned > Amazon gets restricted > All time high materials prices > Tariffs cook margin > 4 pallets of inventory disappear > Container gets stuck at port for 3 months > $14k packaging misprint error > Only coman that will take u says $400k MOQ everything that can go wrong WILL go wrong… keep it pushin 🙏

• 
  Steve Cavalier (@Drstevecavalier) reported 47 minutes ago

  HEAD IMPULSE NYSTAGMUS TEST OF SKEW (HINTS) The HINTS is used at the bedside to help differentiate a peripheral cause of vertigo, such as vestibular neuritis, from a central cause, such as cerebellar stroke. 1.Head impulse – the patient fixates on the examiner’s nose. The examiner turns the patient’s head side to side a few times, then stops. If the patient’s eyes remain fixed, the test is negative. If a “catch-up” eye movement is required, the test is positive, indicating a peripheral disorder.  2.Nystagmus refers to rhythmic, jerky, involuntary eye movements. If the patient has unidirectional (to one side) nystagmus, even with a slight torsional component, this suggests a peripheral disorder. Nystagmus that is bidirectional, vertical, or primarily torsional indicates a central problem, such as a stroke.  3.Test for skew – when the eyes are alternately covered and uncovered while the patient fixes on one point, a vertical repositioning is called skew. The presence of skew indicates a central abnormality. HINTS performed by an experienced examiner is considered highly reliable in differentiating central from peripheral causes of acute vertigo. You can read more about this and many other aspects of vertigo in the new book “Vertigo and dizziness: A No-Nonsense Approach,” now available on Amazon.

• 
  Energy Max (@ryanTesling) reported 54 minutes ago

  There are always reasons not to buy a stock. Narrative follows price. Investing is a game of probabilities. Amazon is being sued by the FTC, yields are through the roof and nobody cares about the stock. “Technology laggard” AI has not slowed down and we still need GPU. Yes, FCF is (currently) negative but that will pass that too. Can sentiment be worse? I don’t think so. Long $AMZN

• 
  Wearesource9 (@wearesource999) reported 59 minutes ago

  @allenanalysis Ain’t nobody got to over work them self more than what they do that’s there fault that we in debt they did it on purpose, to busy spending money on war and playing slow. These big company like Amazon and not raising people pay checks🤔 they must don’t care

• 
  🤖 (@artificialfries) reported 59 minutes ago

  @ebloch I’ve been using it to track all of my subscription spending via App Store subscriptions and real time subscriptions irl such as Amazon prime, etc. didn’t realize I was spending so much!! I’m now using it to analyze and cut down on some of my biggest waste spending