Amazon status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Amazon reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Amazon users through our website.

• Website Down (48%)
• Errors (27%)
• Sign in (25%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Amazon outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Kefar Yona	Errors	2 hours ago
Monterrey	Website Down	3 hours ago
Monroe	Website Down	14 hours ago
San Jose	Website Down	16 hours ago
Santa Cruz	Sign in	20 hours ago
Paris	Website Down	2 days ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Amazon Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Andrew 🎛️🎹🔊 (@android_stern) reported 2 minutes ago

  you come home from work and your wife has spent all the tokens using fable 10 max for the most basic dealmaxxing on amazon. "Honey, you know that sonnet can do this type of thing. why wont you just use sonnet like everyone else?" Its only monday and you literally now have no second-brain for the rest of the week. ok think..... you remember theres a notepad in the guest room. you haven't been in there in ages - since it became the dumping ground for all your useless possessions ....like note pads. who even needs a guest room? nobody visits anymore, easier to just holo-hang. you spot the pad on your guitar case. grab the pad. i gotta remember to play that guitar more often. walking down the hall you narrate your task list for the week. 10 minutes speaking detailed plans. don't forget anything buddy, fable isnt coming to save you. you look down and "FU*K!" its empty, you were supposed to use a pen you idiot! you cant just talk to a notepad.

• 
  Dazzler Abhishek (@dazzlerrabhi) reported 2 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp @amazonIN Seriously, what are you guys even here for? @amazonIN Every reply is just another link to support. Amazon made the mistake by delivering the wrong product. I shouldn't have to chase support repeatedly for your error. Resolve it instead of giving copy-paste responses.

• 
  m0xt (@m0xt_) reported 4 minutes ago

  If I had to put all my money into one fund for the next 10 years and couldn't touch it, I would pick a fund that is down 9% this year That might surprise you. The S&P is up almost 10% in 2026. Some investors are up significantly more, riding the hottest trades of the year. And yet the fund I would choose is underwater Here is my rationale I'm talking about Bill Ackman and Pershing Square. His fund returned 21% in 2025, 144% over five years, and 211% over ten years (net of fees). That is one of the strongest track records in the hedge fund industry But because 2026 has been a down year, people are writing him off as if the last decade of performance doesn't count And the reason he's down this year actually proves the point. Ackman holds Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta. Hyperscalers have sold off because the market doesn't like how much they're spending on AI infrastructure right now. Most investors see the capex numbers and panic. Ackman sees businesses investing aggressively in something that will be accretive to their earnings for years to come That's the entire philosophy in action. While everyone else sells because they're uncomfortable with near-term spending, Ackman is saying these are some of the strongest businesses in the world, and I want to own them at these prices. He's not confused about the capex. He just has a longer time horizon than the people selling This is the most common mistake in evaluating investors. You judge the process, not the quarter. Anyone can look brilliant riding a single theme for 18 months. The real question is whether someone can compound capital across multiple cycles, through drawdowns, through regime changes, and keep executing the same discipline It sounds simple. It's not. Most people overestimate the durability of the business they're buying, or they confuse "down 20% from the high" with "cheap." That gap between sounding obvious and actually executing is where most investors blow up Ackman recently sold his entire Google position and moved that capital into Microsoft. A lot of people questioned the move. But he explained it clearly: at the time of the decision, Microsoft offered better risk/reward. That's what real portfolio management looks like. Not falling in love with a position because it worked, but constantly asking where the best risk/reward is right now and having the discipline to act on the answer Now here's the question I keep thinking about (and I think every investor eventually has to wrestle with it) Everyone knows hyperscalers are great businesses. But it might take time for that AI capex to translate into the kind of profit growth the market wants to see. In the meantime, capital rotates elsewhere. New sectors pop. New themes catch fire. And you sit there watching your "right" position go sideways while other people are making money somewhere else How tactical should you be? That depends entirely on what you're trying to do. If your goal is 15% annual returns over a decade, you might behave very differently than if you're benchmarking yourself against the market or competing with other analysts quarter by quarter. There will always be a hot sector pulling at your attention and your capital. That tension between patience and opportunity cost is something every investor has to figure out for themselves, and it never fully goes away Buffett looked like a bad investor during the Internet bubble because he refused to buy what everyone else was buying. Berkshire underperformed the S&P by over 40% in 1999. A few years later, he looked like a genius. The process didn't change. The market just caught up But here's what I keep coming back to What makes me confident in Ackman isn't any single trade. It's the process he built You can get lucky and win once, twice, or three times. But luck doesn't compound. What compounds is a repeatable process: a clear framework for identifying great businesses, a disciplined approach to valuation, a defined set of criteria for when to buy and when to walk away, and the willingness to keep refining that process after every win and every loss That's what Pershing Square has. Not a hot streak. A process that has been repeated hundreds of times across different market cycles, different sectors, and different macro environments, and it keeps producing results. The reason the 10-year track record matters more than any single year is that it's proof that the process works across conditions, not just in one favorable setup I don't know if any of the new AI-trade stars that are popular today have anything like that. Some of them might. But making money when everything you own goes up is not a process. The real test is whether you have something repeatable that still works when the environment turns against you. Ackman has passed that test over and over. That's what makes him a great investor. Not one brilliant trade. A process he trusts enough to follow even when it's painful Ackman's investing philosophy is the one I try to follow myself. I don't necessarily hold the same companies because I tend to be more tactical and shorter-term oriented than he is. But the framework is the same: find great businesses, buy them at good prices, and trust that fundamentals will eventually be reflected in the price And that's the real takeaway here. The next time you see a great investor having a bad year, ask yourself whether the process changed or just the results. Because if the process is still intact, a down year isn't a warning sign. It's probably an opportunity If you're someone who wants to invest for the next 10 years and not think about it, I think Pershing Square ($PSUS trades at 22% discount to NAV) is a genuinely great option If you like this investing philosophy and you are ok with a bit more tactical moves and higher volatility, you can follow my portfolio. I have been managing my Milk Road PRO portfolio using this exact approach. Track my real-time positions for just $1 (link in bio)

• 
  Adam Juelich (@acjuelich) reported 5 minutes ago

  @FrankLesniak @amazon There was a case of Spindrift in this. Lol. I suppose it's not an issue if the person doesn't have storm doors, but it's pretty obvious.

• 
  Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported 6 minutes ago

  @ayush356905 Please copy that link to web browser and access it from there. You can also access the link from desktop (PC or laptop) web browser. Make sure to delete all cache, cookies, history from device. Logout and login to Amazon account and try to access the link. -Akamsha

• 
  Darin Pace (@Ogrelord73) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp Waste of time! Amazon is 100% computer run. No humans can make decisions or tell me anything other than ask me to call and when you call they say there is no way for them to see what the issue is and there is no way to get a person to resolve the issues. WHAT A JOKE!

• 
  Amazon Help (@AmazonHelp) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Vikasmehta1mfh As previously mentioned, we do not have access to your Amazon account here. We will respond within 6 to 12 hours from the time you provide us with the details. Our teams are working diligently to address your issue as soon as possible. -Saba

• 
  Arpancoc (@arpancoc) reported 9 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp why I have to tell everytime the whole thing.. I'm giving you the person last time following .. whoever is talking too me in that link.. please ask that person to get all my issue details from the person following previously

• 
  Rob Benson (@BuckhornCliffs) reported 12 minutes ago

  Working outside in the heat right now? Even in dry heat where it feels like you're not sweating? You are. And you're losing way more than water. You can sweat out up to 2,000 milligrams of sodium per hour, plus potassium and magnesium, and no amount of plain water puts it back. In fact, drinking only water can make it worse. You dilute what little sodium is left, and everything starts failing. That's why you feel it: Headaches. Muscle cramps. Heavy legs. Can't think straight. Wiped out even after "hydrating." That's not just the heat. That's your electrolytes running on empty. That's exactly what Cardnl is built to fix. One scoop: Sodium from Redmond Real Salt out of Utah. Real minerals, not lab-created. Real potassium and magnesium in bioavailable forms. Zero sugar, zero artificial junk. Long shelf life, clean ingredients. Yes, this is my brand. Yes, I make it with my wife. Just us. We package it, we ship it. Real small business, not available on Amazon. Which means... higher quality and lower cost than the corporate brands charging you way more. A few things worth knowing: Sodium is not the enemy for active people. The low-sodium panic came from studies on sedentary populations. If you're working, sweating, or training, you need significantly more sodium than the average recommendation. Potassium and magnesium work with sodium, not separately. All three matter for muscle function, nerve signals, and hydration. Missing one means the others don't work as well. Timing matters. Pre-loading electrolytes before heavy sweating works better than trying to catch up after you're already cramping.

• 
  mi (@overcatbe) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Borussenfan527 My Greek TV is cckblocking me to amazon prime US, which means I cannot login with my amazon DE account there and I'm locked out of all the movies/series I've bought.

• 
  TesDrive (@TesDrivenAI) reported 15 minutes ago

  @OrevaZSN I had Airbnb hosts literally come into my Airbnb and rifle through my stuff, as well as steal my Amazon packages delivered to the house. The hosts were staying upstairs in a split unit. They lied about taking my packages, saying there was a lot of theft in the area. I didn't believe them, called the police, and got the packages back. They admitted in the police report and on bodycam that they stole the packages and lied. I didn't trust them but had already paid for the month, so I bought a camera and placed it inside the Airbnb at the front door. They came in, rifled through my stuff before seeing the camera, mentioned it, and left. They reported me to Airbnb for having a camera. I provided extensive evidence including bodycam footage, police reports, and video of them entering my unit without notice or permission. Not to mention, the AC went out three times that month in Florida. The host's brother almost beat down the door screaming in my face to move my car because I was in his parking spot as well. Airbnb didn't care and banned me for putting a camera inside the unit I was paying for to watch the front door, while the hosts were stealing my stuff, committing federal crimes, lying about it, and telling me Amazon would send replacements for free, thus committing fraud. Airbnb still didn't give a ****. 😭

• 
  Babatunde E. Daramola (@RiteChoice23) reported 18 minutes ago

  Within minutes, 85 percent of Fastly's global network started returning errors. Amazon, Reddit, the New York Times, the UK government's own website, all down at once, not because of an attack, but because of how tightly coupled the edge network was.

• 
  randomtexasdude (@curraheevet) reported 20 minutes ago

  @PlumbNick Florida workers are getting ****** over so Amazon can shut down and FULLY AUTOMATE two warehouses for the next two years. (FIFY) Once fully automated, they won't hire the employees back.

• 
  Coach Austin (@LearnDigital0) reported 21 minutes ago

  If you are STRUGGLING to make SALES ON Amazon KDp? If you are STRUGGLING to make 1k€ on Amazon monthly.... Then It's your FAULT. LETS fix it. 1. Pray against wasted efforts: imagine building an account, publishing books and the moment its PICKS, termination follows. (God4bid) 2. Avoid some books no matter how profitable it seems (avoid TRADEMARKED Keywords - check my YouTube from my profile- alot to learn) 3. Write more: as a beginner before you find that book that will make you 1k$, 10k£, You need to try your hands on some keywords before getting your winning keywords. 4. Think Niche, think Profitability: Sometimes your Niche is not profitable, there are some Niche that makes more... Thats why I say, If you find someone doing well, And you can afford their mentorship...pls do. (money is a tool) 5. Run Ads: visibility is almost Sales. (If your books is so-good: then Visibility makes you more money) Don't forget: Do research.

• 
  Sai Akhil (@ksakhilofficial) reported 22 minutes ago

  @amazon days. After waiting, I was simply asked to wait even longer as the issue was still "under review." It's been over a week with no resolution. This experience makes it feel like customer satisfaction is no longer a priority. @amazonIN @AmazonHelp (2/2)

• 
  theriac (@theriac33) reported 28 minutes ago

  the GABA supplements everyone buys to calm are doing literally nothing GABA is your brain's off-switch for stress. but there's a catch! it can't cross the blood brain barrier. so you swallow a capsule and almost none of it reaches your actual brain. you paid for a placebo. the soviet mfs solved this in 1969. they bonded GABA to niacin, and that one change lets it cross in. once it's inside it splits back apart: - the GABA quiets the noise. the racing stops, the anxiety drops. - the niacin opens blood flow up to your brain. calm and clear at the same time. > no sedation > no fog you actually sit down and work instead of being wired and doing nothing. it's called picamilon. same molecule everyone's already buying, except this version actually gets into your head. if you've been trying to calm down with amazon supplements and feeling nothing, that's why. sourcing's in the tg. t33

• 
  Ghost (@CT3_Anonymous) reported 28 minutes ago

  @libsoftiktok @amazon Well to be fair, its on amazon so i dont really have an issue with it. Now if i see one in a school or public library... Thats a different discussion

• 
  Richard Lyall (@RichLyall) reported 29 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I was promised a fix for Amazon’s mix up on 17 July. I have used the online chat, emailed someone you can’t even reply to, spoke to someone nice yesterday who said they’d email yesterday which has now gone. I can’t praise you enough usually. Amazon’s mistake - fix it ffs.

• 
  mia (@ballababy927) reported 30 minutes ago

  @frankie7x_eth amazon warehouse is honestly awful, its hot, and it all is just terrible. the one day i got to work, then just went on the app used my sick time and went home

• 
  Wendal Roberts 🇺🇸 (@wendalrw) reported 37 minutes ago

  @debnamscat @ColoBenji @davidsirota Okay, lets live in your world where there is no IPhone, No Amazon, No Tesla, No Walmart, No Costco, No, Boeing airplanes, No Google search, No FB, No, X. No nothing. We go back to working in the fields and chase down wild animals for food. Fanstaic maybe for you. But please leave me out of it.

• 
  Martin Hamburger (@tarduchser) reported 38 minutes ago

  @tadgh_dc AWS and Amazon in general are terrible places to work

• 
  Crashout Capital (@CapitalCrashout) reported 40 minutes ago

  @treenochh @StealthQE4 You’d hold Amazon from 100 down to 6? Not a chance.

• 
  Tommi Pedruzzi (@TommiPedruzzi) reported 40 minutes ago

  If I had to start from $0 today, the last thing I'd build is a personal brand. Instead, I use Amazon’s pre-built audience. It's already paying me $50,000 a month. Here's all the detail: btw, if you want my complete strategy broken down, with AI prompts, workflow and systems... Like this post, follow me and comment “BUILD”. I’ll DM it to you. Personal brands take 18 months minimum. And starting from zero in 2026 means one thing above everything else: You cannot afford to spend 18 months building before the first dollar comes in. Starting from zero means you need a model where the audience is already there on day one. And there is only one platform on earth where that's true at this scale. Amazon. 310 million active buyers. Not scrolling, browsing or waiting to be entertained. Searching. With a specific problem already identified. With money already ready. • "How to rebuild fitness after 40." • "How to get out of debt on a single income." • "How to talk to aging parents about money." They typed that themselves. Nobody had to convince them they had the problem. They woke up with the problem and went looking for the answer. My job, starting from zero, would be simple: Find the problem. Build the answer. Put it where they're already looking. That's it. - Without showing my face - Without revealing my name - Without any employees to manage Here's what that looks like in practice: I go to Amazon and find a category with real buyer demand, BSR numbers that tell me real people are spending real money there right now. I read the 3 and 4-star reviews of the bestselling books to find what buyers wanted and didn't get. That gap becomes the brief. ChatGPT builds the chapter structure around it. Claude writes the full manuscript: 70 to 120 pages, consistent voice, near-publishable on the first pass. Ideogram designs a cover that looks like it belongs next to the bestsellers in that category. Total time from research to published: under 30 days. Total cost: under $100. Then Amazon distributes across 17 markets automatically. And the royalties start. This may sound like a fairy tale, but I started doing this after failing 5 online business... Then I made my first real money in just 24 hours of publishing. And now, I average round $50,000 every month from it. Starting from zero with a personal brand means 18 months of output before meaningful income. Starting from zero with Amazon means royalties within 6 weeks of your first book going live. Same starting point. Completely different timeline. I know which one I'd choose and I did choose it. The audience was always already there. Waiting for the right product. Don't let the internet fool you into thinking you need a personal brand to make big money... If you want the full system— niche research, AI workflow, cover design, and the portfolio structure that builds from zero to $10,000 a month... Like this post, follow me, and comment "BUILD". I'll DM you everything for free. You need to do all 3 to receive the DM.

• 
  But why( Techflix ) (@AdrenexR501) reported 50 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp I have. Shared my issue over dm and this link Hopefully I will get resolution Otherwise I have resort to posting call recording and fake promises done by Amazon support

• 
  Cindy (@CindyLee777) reported 51 minutes ago

  @movingfwdinhope @Oliveeue The problem is that some of the refugees that have gone over are asking for donations and Amazon wish lists (while they had quite a lot of money they took over) from the Americans and that is literally the opposite of what people that stand on their own two feet do…

• 
  Biotech2k (@Biotech2k1) reported 57 minutes ago

  Tech Framework: Tech Framework TECH INVESTMENT FRAMEWORK Version 2.0 — Full System (Fundamental Score + Value Score + Red Flags + Competitive Landscape) Total Structure: 0–10 Fundamental Score + 0–10 Value Score I. FUNDAMENTAL SCORE (0–10 Points) Each category uses a 0–2 or 0–1 scoring band. Total possible = 10 points. 1. Revenue Growth (0–2 points) Measures: Current YoY revenue growth quality. 0 points: < 20% 1 point: 20–25% 2 points: > 25% 2. 3–5 Year CAGR (0–2 points) Measures: Long-term compounding engine. 0 points: < 20% 1 point: 20–25% 2 points: > 25% 3. Profitability (0–2 points) Measures: Unit economics, operating leverage, and earnings quality. 0 points: No path to profitability within 24 months 1 point: Clear path to profitability within 12–24 months 2 points: Already profitable with expanding margins 4. Competitive Advantage / Moat (0–1 point) Measures: Structural defensibility. 0 points: Weak or no moat 1 point: Strong moat (network effects, switching costs, data advantage, regulatory advantage, ecosystem lock-in) 5. TAM (0–1 point) Measures: Realistic economic TAM, not headline TAM. 0 points: < $1B 1 point: ≥ $1B 6. Management (0–2 point) Measures: Management Quality 0 points: Credibility issues; poor governance; repeated execution failures. 1 point: Mixed track record; some execution gaps but generally competent. 2 points: Proven operators; strong capital allocation; transparent communication; consistent execution. Fundamental Score Interpretation 8–10: Category-defining, elite, investable 6–7: Solid, investable with conditions 4–5: Watchlist only 0–3: Avoid II. VALUE SCORE (0–10 Points) Direct translation of the biotech Value Score into business fundamentals. 1. Economic TAM (0–2 points) Measures: Realistic revenue opportunity after adjusting for penetration, pricing, competition, and regulation. 0 points: Small or structurally constrained TAM 1 point: Good TAM with moderate runway 2 points: Massive, expanding TAM with long-term compounding potential 2. Revenue Durability & Predictability (0–2 points) Measures: Recurring revenue quality and forward visibility. 0 points: Volatile or low-quality revenue 1 point: Moderately predictable 2 points: Highly recurring, sticky, multi-product, high NRR 3. Margin Structure & Operating Leverage (0–2 points) Measures: Scalability and long-term profitability. 0 points: Low margins, no leverage 1 point: Improving margins 2 points: Strong leverage + expanding margins 4. NPV per Share vs Price (0–2 points) Measures: Valuation relative to long-term economics. 0 points: Overvalued 1 point: Fairly valued 2 points: Undervalued / mispriced excellence 5. Dilution & Balance Sheet Risk (0–2 points) Measures: Capital structure, dilution, and financial stability. 0 points: High dilution or balance sheet risk 1 point: Moderate risk 2 points: Strong balance sheet, low dilution, low credit risk Value Score Interpretation 8–10: Mispriced excellence 6–7: Reasonably valued 4–5: Fully valued 0–3: Overvalued / avoid III. RED FLAGS (Override System) Any major red flag can override both scores and move a company to Avoid. A. Business Model Red Flags Structurally negative unit economics CAC rising faster than LTV High churn masked by aggressive acquisition Overreliance on one product or customer No pricing power B. Financial Red Flags Heavy dilution Unsustainable debt Low-quality revenue (one-time, non-recurring) Aggressive accounting practices C. Regulatory Red Flags (Tech-Specific) Capital adequacy issues Regulatory investigations Fraud exposure Compliance failures High credit risk without proper reserves D. Competitive Red Flags No moat Race-to-the-bottom pricing Entrants with superior economics Losing share in a growing market E. Management Red Flags Overpromising Inconsistent guidance Poor capital allocation Hype-driven communication IV. COMPETITIVE LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS Contextual layer to interpret scores. 1. Category Position Leader Challenger Niche Commodity 2. Moat Type Network effects Switching costs Data advantage Regulatory advantage Brand trust Ecosystem lock-in 3. Threats Incumbents New entrants Substitutes Platform risk (Apple, Google, Amazon) 4. Market Structure Winner-take-most Fragmented Regulated Low-margin commodity V. FINAL INTERPRETATION MATRIX Two‑Axis Framework Fundamental Score = business quality Value Score = valuation attractiveness Portfolio Implications High‑quality + undervalued → priority buys High‑quality + expensive → monitor Low‑quality + undervalued → avoid traps Low‑quality + expensive → remove

• 
  Rae Diallo (@rae_diallo) reported 57 minutes ago

  So I ordered MAC lipstick from Amazon & it costs me $41 - no fees because I’m a Prime member. I lost it around the house and have been looking for it for 2 whole weeks! Ordered some cheap Cover Girl and when I received it, the entire tube of lipstick was broken off and stuck inside the top. I can’t win for losing when it comes to lipstick!💄 🤔

• 
  Pavel Dziu (@paveldziu) reported 59 minutes ago

  @AmazonKDP @bryancohenbooks I've learned that Amazon Ads don't fix weak positioning. They amplify books that already have strong product-market fit.

• 
  Myla (@LaLaylaGirl) reported 59 minutes ago

  @ImMeme0 @amazon So that’s where all my missing packages went ! “Color” Me Surprised Mine don’t even speak English Ask me how I know 🙄 @Amazon has gone down the drain fast

• 
  Gecko (@us3Gecko) reported 59 minutes ago

  Your agent doesn't fail loudly on a real API. It fails quietly. Amazon found that even the strongest models drop by 27% in real-world API complexity. And when they fail, they often don't error. They fake success. We're building on @Solana x402 mainnet with @dev3pack and @SuperteamBr 🧵