1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Office 365
  4. Outage Map
Office 365

Office 365 Outage Map

The map below depicts the most recent cities worldwide where Office 365 users have reported problems and outages. If you are having an issue with Office 365, make sure to submit a report below

Loading map, please wait...

The heatmap above shows where the most recent user-submitted and social media reports are geographically clustered. The density of these reports is depicted by the color scale as shown below.

Office 365 users affected:

Less
More
Check Current Status

Office 365 is an online productivity suite that is developed by Microsoft. Office 365 contains online and offline versions of Microsoft Office, Skype and Onedrive, as well as online versions of Sharepoint, Exchange and Project.

Most Affected Locations

Outage reports and issues in the past 15 days originated from:

Location Reports
Puteaux, Île-de-France 1
Valence, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Marseille, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 2
Saint-Malo, Brittany 1
Saint-Denis, Réunion 1
Réunion, Réunion 1
Saint-Paul, Réunion 1
Melbourne, VIC 3
Montpellier, Occitanie 2
Redruth, England 1
Cheltenham, England 1
Tewkesbury, England 1
Edmonton, AB 1
Stratford-upon-Avon, England 1
Bordeaux, Nouvelle-Aquitaine 1
Hobart, TAS 1
Brisbane, QLD 1
Aubagne, Provence-Alpes-Côte d'Azur 1
Southend-on-Sea, England 1
Mulhouse, ACAL 1
New York City, NY 1
Étampes, Île-de-France 1
Argenteuil, Île-de-France 1
Bristol, England 1
Dreux, Centre 1
Saint-Quentin-Fallavier, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes 1
Dunedin, Otago 1
São Luís, MA 1
São José dos Campos, SP 1
Ottawa, ON 1
Check Current Status

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Office 365 Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • UK_Daniel_Card
    mRr3b00t (@UK_Daniel_Card) reported

    like for example: if you defend an org you will likely have: A firewall/VPN server A router/switch A cloud hosted web server Microsoft office 365 Maybe an Remote Desktop Services (or VDI) Service Your daily world will not be full of zero days exploding inside ur VPN server (unless you have a fortinet :P /s) these are rare events. You will have: Phishing/AITM attacks Scams/BEC Identity Dictionary/Brute Force you will also have malware etc. on box IPS/IDS/EDR alerts for behavioural type stuff (most of these are false positives) so software vulnerabilities on the edge in terms of volume will likely not be ur daily grind! identity will.

  • callah32
    Mega Man (@callah32) reported

    @PaperBozz You’ll always have enterprise customers where as it makes more sense to rent (think Office 365) vs hire a team (and lofty capex budget) to mange compute on prem. Makes alot of sense to rent compute in other words, solves a problem plenty viable buisnenes model/service. Everything digital future.

  • xH4ngEm
    chris (@xH4ngEm) reported

    There's a question I get asked constantly by investors building individual accounts: how much of a single name is too much? Been sitting with this in the context of the Revere Gro and Rair exposure framework circulating around $MSFT positions. The model tries to map concentration risk across growth-rate sensitivity and rate-cycle sensitivity - not a bad starting structure. But I think it locates the problem slightly wrong. For a long-horizon value investor, risk management is not primarily about volatility. It's about permanent capital impairment. Those are genuinely different things, and conflating them leads to genuinely different mistakes. MSFT at current prices trades around 32-33x forward earnings. P/B north of 13. EV/EBITDA in the high 20s depending on the quarter. Not cheap multiples by historical standards - even for a business generating the FCF that Microsoft does. And the FCF is real: Azure margin expansion, Office 365 recurring, Activision slowly integrating. The capital allocation story holds up - disciplined buybacks, a growing dividend, R&D spend that's actually productive rather than defensive. ROIC consistently above cost of capital. The moat is not in question. But here's the thing about exposure management in individual accounts specifically: when you hold a concentrated position in a company priced for near-perfection, your margin of safety becomes structural rather than mathematical. You can't just point at the balance sheet and call it hedged. The Rair framing - rate-adjusted intrinsic return - is useful because it forces the right question: if the 10-year rises another 100bps from here, does this company's intrinsic value hold? For MSFT, probably yes. The business doesn't need cheap debt to function. It generates cash in almost any macro environment. The moat doesn't erode with rates. But position sizing is where individual investors chronically underperform. Institutions manage downside scenarios as a daily operational function. Individual investors size based on conviction - and conviction is not risk management. Conviction is the justification for taking risk. Risk management is the system of rules that governs how much risk you actually accept. Practical framework, after holding through multiple cycles: - If you can articulate the bear case (multiple compression, Azure growth deceleration, AI capex overhang not yet reflected in FCF) and still sleep at night at 10-12% allocation, that's probably the rational ceiling for a concentrated individual book. - If a 20% drawdown in this one name would materially alter your financial situation, you've crossed from investing into speculating on management quality and multiple expansion. The Revere Gro side of the concept is really just another way of saying: don't let a great company become a great risk by virtue of how much of your book it occupies. The business quality and the position size are separate questions that individual investors routinely collapse into one. Balance sheet analysis matters. FCF trajectory matters. They're inputs into a position-sizing decision - not substitutes for one. That distinction is the actual heart of risk management in individual accounts, and most frameworks bury it. Long MSFT. Have been for years. Never let it exceed 12% of the book regardless of how strongly I believe in the thesis. That ceiling is a feature.

  • pimplefresh
    Pimplefresh (@pimplefresh) reported

    @RihardJarc Half of its market value is office 365. So you can cut that segment in half, thus reducing its market cap by 25%. I think that segment's going to go down even more

  • 12Knocksinna
    Tony Redmond (@12Knocksinna) reported

    @GrittyBluDragon @Office365 All I can say is that I have used sensitivity labels for five or so years. They work unless something is broken. You could join the AIP network on Yammer (run by Microsoft) and ask the engineers direct.

  • riyaznriyaz
    Riyaz Shaikh (@riyaznriyaz) reported

    @Office365 I am very much frustrated and really very much disappointed with my account of Microsoft 365 account. I am got stuck in loop of authentication MFA For asking help also login required. And how could any one login if authentication is not working.

  • DomingoRoldan1
    PS5 “ RUNS ON XBOX GAMES” (@DomingoRoldan1) reported

    @AmericanTimdog @Grummz Just do steam,the problems it’s contents creator, staying quite and going to June show. We need to stop supporting content creators . Bring the whole house down. Am not subscribing to no office 365 , going full with google Gemini..I have GP till 2027 am done.

  • barimayawpoku
    Bɛrima Yaw Poku 🧠👁️👂🏾 (@barimayawpoku) reported

    @davibaah @Mr_GeorgeAddo @NITAGhana They don’t even dedicated servers built and managed by the gov. let alone have infrastructure to protect sensitive and critical data… tweaa… imagine NITA ( the nation’s IT branch using subscription of office365). What happened to on-premise and dedicated exchange server?

  • johncrickett
    John Crickett (@johncrickett) reported

    "GitHub's scale is unprecedented." No, it really isn't. GitHub: 150M total users. Office 365: 345M total users. Xbox: 500M monthly active users. Bing: 100M+ daily active users. The company that runs Office, Xbox and Bing can run GitHub. If reliability is slipping, that's a priorities problem, not a scale problem.

  • orcawhale
    Kyle Davis (@orcawhale) reported

    @ToddHagopian @Dream4Liberty @ChaseForLiberty They did not ask to spend $40k to tell them the system they built was broken instead of the $10k to fix it, lol. They did not ask Angela to hire Buchkovich so that there was no oversight, kill Burns' contract, then spend more than $100k killing the CiviCRM that money had just been spent on for Zoho, which is worse in every conceivable way. The destruction of everything that Moellman and Burns built happened at the end of 2023. Those IT costs listed are from the work to tear down Civi and Zoho, not the total IT costs. ONLY the intentionally doubled (because Angela, who never used Civi, decided it had to die) costs or TRIPLED costs (like with LPMail, Gmail, and Office365). I've been here 25 years, Todd. I watched what happened with the IS committee. You can be defensive about this, but you weren't the one being pointed at as a problem by Amanda or by me. You're taking facts personally, which isn't like you. Believe what you want.

  • najeeb775
    Md Najeeb Ahmed (@najeeb775) reported

    @MicrosoftHelps it's been 8 days since my office 365 outlook email is blocked by Microsoft apparently because of a technical issue which I have no clue about. Ticket already raised and after multiple follow up with the agent there is no response or progress. Ticket 260430003000.

  • NCarolinaTrader
    NorthCarolinaTrader (@NCarolinaTrader) reported

    @Marketintel_x @BrodyFord_ @business It’s crap. co-pilot’s worse performance is when you seek its assistance with other Microsoft software. You have better luck using Google to help with Microsoft Office 365 issues.

  • Scan_Speak
    ScanSpeak (@Scan_Speak) reported

    @cavemankin @MacRumors @waxeditorial MacOS side loads because it was grandfathered in from days before App Stores. If side loading doesn’t interfere with the integrity of iOS and is invisible to the users like me who have no interest, I have no issues. Apple native apps & Office365 is 90% of what I need.

  • undergroundlair
    Brian Teague 🐂 ⭕️ PBA 3 Berkeley (@undergroundlair) reported

    @nypost In all fairness to Microsoft, if the NASA Admin doesn’t set their Office 365 location to #outerfukingspace they might have an issue logging in.

  • cantliff9
    Jonathan Cantliff (@cantliff9) reported

    @madebygoogle @MicrosoftHelps Gmail app not working with Office 365 emails (again) Doesn't seem to want to load modern authentication Could someone look into this please

Check Current Status