Dropbox Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Dropbox Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  glitterandspit (@Glitterandspit) reported 1 minute ago

  Dropbox down. Computer updating. I have a free day I suppose.

• 
  Joe Murgia (@TheUfoJoe) reported 1 minute ago

  "There truly is a kind of pushback and a resistance to provision of information that even ODNI is asking for." ~Nolan (Who's resisting sharing of info. with ODNI?) 🛸 New: Nolan Comments on Skywatcher, and More 🛸 Three Nolan quotes... "...a shared realization that the data that even we're being given right now from the government is insufficient." There was an attempt to, "go out into the field and see if we could cause the attraction of some objects. There was some, let's call it, activity, but not enough that I would consider enabling to publish [a paper]." (If scientists were there for the alleged luring/baiting event that @RepEricBurlison has spoken about, would that be enough data for a paper?) "I think we're being listened to. Whether the people who are listening to us are going to be able to be responsive is another question." ~~~Full Clip Transcript~~~ @GarryPNolan: "Look, as scientists, whether we're philosophers, psychologists, material scientists, biologists, theorists, etc., we need data. And so, you know what I've been watching happen, at least around the [UAP Advisory] Council itself is, I think, a shared realization that the data that even we're being given right now from the government is insufficient. "And I don't blame, for instance, ODNI for that. And it has been explained to us, several times over, some of the so-called methods and sources issues that are around this. And also, that a lot of the data that we want to have access to, to do the kinds of analyzes that we would want to do, simply were never collected at the time. Or, in some cases it seems, if they were there, they're no longer there. But, you know, that sounds conspiratorial, so I'm not gonna go down that route. "But I agree with what Avi is saying, is that, rather than looking retrospectively, we need to start to plan prospectively. We could go forever relitigating past issues and who said what, where, and when. As opposed to, well, let's just do it now. Let's just do it to the future. "And so, for instance, because it just comes up many times on Twitter, is...although I can't talk about all of it about Skywatcher... Is, you know, that was an attempt, at the time, to take matters into our own hands in a semi-military, semi-academic fashion to, basically, go out into the field and see if we could cause the attraction of some objects. "And, you know, there was some, let's call it, activity, but not enough that I would consider enabling to publish. Believe me, if it was, I would have done it...already be putting that paper together. But there were lessons learned from that. "But I think, the other thing about the council is, what they're beginning to see is, I think, that there truly is a kind of pushback and a resistance to provision of information that even ODNI is asking for. Now again, that doesn't mean it's a conspiracy. It just means that I think everybody is coming to terms with the fact that it's not just, snap your fingers and you know somebody gives you a a Dropbox link and you can download everything. "So, you know, I'm happy seeing people now come up to speed, and I'm happy seeing, let's put it this way: a level of, let's call it, frustration that is driving us to ask for more. And I think we're being listened to. Whether the people who are listening to us are going to be able to be responsive is another question."

• 
  DFIR Radar (@DFIR_Radar) reported 1 minute ago

  SMOKE campaign abuses fake Zoom and Adobe lures to silently deploy ScreenConnect RMM, giving attackers persistent remote access that blends with legitimate IT traffic across Windows and macOS. - Initial access rotates across VBScript droppers, batch loaders, and a polished fake Zoom HTML page that auto-downloads an MSI after a 2-second JavaScript timer, no user click needed. Payloads were hosted on a WsgiDAV staging server at 207.174.0[.]143:8080 with open directory listing exposing 15 files. Early samples used Dropbox links and a Cloudflare Quick Tunnel at subscription-magnetic-recommended-meat.trycloudflare[.]com to bypass domain reputation filters. - The final payload is a legitimate ConnectWise-signed ScreenConnect MSI with a valid DigiCert certificate. Agents beacon with URL parameters e=Access&y=Guest to attacker relay servers, including port 8041 on that same IP, making traffic appear as authorized IT remote access. - The attacker pivoted mid-campaign from a 9-step Defender destruction sequence (disabling AMSI, killing WinDefend, adding C:\ as an exclusion, stripping Zone.Identifier) to a stealth loader containing a hardcoded 180-second sleep with a source comment explicitly stating it breaks Elastic EDR correlation windows. Direct evidence of testing against commercial security products. #DFIR_Radar

• 
  Agbaje Automation. (@digital_ab98389) reported 6 minutes ago

  Cut manual data entry time by 80% with one n8n workflow: trigger on new CSV in Dropbox, parse, map to Google Sheets, flag errors, alert Slack, log runs. Automate, reduce errors, save hours. DM me for demo.

• 
  wigsandtea (@wigsandtea_) reported 7 minutes ago

  Ariana Grande reveals hackers allegedly stole 45 unreleased songs in 2023 alone, including “Fantasize”, “White Tee” and “that b*tch is mine,” in new lawsuit. She also claims they allegedly stole a photographer's Dropbox login details and hacked the phone of one of her producers: “The hackers created a Gmail account and internet domain impersonating the photographer and tricked the technician into sending Grande’s materials to them.” (via @THR)

• 
  Fougars (@fougars67) reported 9 minutes ago

  @GaleTRogersJr @vaNlabs Three replies and you still have not answered the actual question: how does Leadpoet revenue accrue to alpha holders? V440 is not a permanent top-32 cartel. There is no hard cutoff and the threshold is dynamic. Dropbox is piloting Leadpoet, not “signed as a customer.” The fact that everyone sold the announcement candle is precisely the point. The business may have value, but the token has not demonstrated durable value capture. Sorry your bags are down bad, but insulting me does not fix the alphanomics.

• 
  chimeno (@chimeno) reported 10 minutes ago

  And Dropbox was just an ftp server

• 
  Andree Chao (@AndreeChao) reported 11 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport Can not sign in it’s broken.

• 
  Ed Giansante (@edugiansante) reported 14 minutes ago

  86% of small businesses still haven't fully integrated ai into their operations. which is funny, because the tools are already here. they're everywhere. there's probably one open in another browser tab right now, quietly waiting to change your life. Goldman Sachs surveyed small businesses and found that only 14% have fully integrated ai into their operations. i don't think the other 86% are anti-ai. they're busy. they're cautious. and they probably don't want to add “company-wide ai transformation” to the list of things they need to worry about before lunch. honestly, fair. @paulg said something recently that I keep coming back to: "If the world is going to get turned upside down, the safest place to be is in a small, fast-moving company that can easily change direction." small companies should be the ones moving fastest. but most are still waiting for someone else to go first. someone else to test the tool. someone else to write the playbook. someone else to promise that nothing will get weird. @clairevo nailed the real blocker: "the blocker is never tools or intelligence. human systems, human problems." i've spent 15 years watching this happen. At Dropbox. At Wix. At Zynga. Now at Persona. different tools. different eras. same pattern. a team finds a new tool. everyone gets excited. someone schedules a kickoff. three weeks later, everyone is back in the old spreadsheet. not because people are stupid. because changing how people work is uncomfortable. and buying software is much easier than changing behavior. i've seen the same thing with community-led growth. i used to pitch community to executives who had every tool and dashboard money could buy. they'd nod. they'd agree it worked. then they'd return to the comfortable world of automation, sequences, and dashboards that made everyone feel productive. last year, i ran 86 events as a team of one and built $3M in pipeline. the secret was not a magical growth hack. it was showing up. knowing the 15 people in the room by name. listening carefully. creating a space where people could actually trust each other. not exactly the kind of thing you can solve with a 47-step workflow. ai adoption and community adoption have the same problem. the tools work. the ideas work. the uncomfortable human part is where things usually slow down. sitting with your team and figuring out what should change. trying one workflow instead of redesigning the entire company overnight. leading people through something new instead of sending a Loom video and hoping everyone feels inspired. the 86% aren't waiting for better ai. they're waiting for change to feel a little less scary. so start small. pick one annoying workflow. try one new thing. make it 10% better. then do it again. the tools are here. the next step is still a very human conversation. and, unfortunately, probably a meeting.

• 
  Jens Kristensen (@JensKri20101733) reported 16 minutes ago

  Suggestion for @adamhfry, ChatGPT Consumer Product Lead: The new Google Drive integration made me wonder: why not take the same idea one step further and support local Windows files directly? No Google Drive. No OneDrive. Local storage, controlled ChatGPT access. A file should not have to be stored in the cloud at all. Cloud has done enough damage already. Cloud = Hell. There is an important distinction between cloud computing and cloud storage. Cloud computing means that ChatGPT performs the processing on OpenAI’s servers. Cloud storage means that documents are permanently stored with Google, Microsoft, Dropbox, or another cloud provider. The first may be a practical consequence of ChatGPT’s current architecture. The second is not. A much cleaner model would be: Local disk / NAS → temporary, explicitly authorized ChatGPT access → processing → result returned to local disk / NAS. For example, a user could right-click: G:\Project\Analysis.docx and select “Open with ChatGPT”. ChatGPT would then receive controlled access to that file — or perhaps to a user-authorized folder such as: G:\ChatGPT\ The user could specify whether access should be read-only or read/write. Original files could be protected, and output could automatically be written to a designated local \output folder. Then instructions could be as simple as: “Edit only section 17. Preserve all formatting.” “Analyze all documents in G:\ChatGPT\Project X.” “Compare these three PDFs.” “Edit Analysis.docx, but do not modify the original. Save the result in \output.” DOCX, XLSX and PPTX are not fundamentally unsuitable for this. They are largely ZIP containers containing XML files. The harder problem is preserving complex formatting, images, tables, comments, undo/versioning and accurate rendering. A local “ChatGPT File Bridge” for Windows could solve the access problem without requiring users to move their working files into Google Drive or OneDrive. The AI processing itself would not necessarily be local. Files, or the relevant parts of them, could still be transmitted to OpenAI for processing. But storage and file management could remain entirely local: local file → controlled ChatGPT access → processing → result back to local disk / NAS. No Google Drive. No OneDrive. No permanent cloud storage. No manual upload/download cycle. The user retains control over the file structure, filenames, versions, backups, applications and physical storage location. “Google Docs inside ChatGPT” is technically interesting. But “Local Files inside ChatGPT” would be the real game changer for the traditional Windows PC workflow. And OpenAI would not need to invent another file system. Windows already has a perfectly good one.

• 
  Alchemist - τ (@SubnetSummerT) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Dropbox piloting @LeadpoetAI is worth slowing down on. Dropbox spends around $370m a year on sales and marketing. That's the budget Leadpoet is now piloting inside. For context, SN71's entire market cap is about $4m. The annual sales budget of one pilot customer is roughly 85x the value of the whole subnet. Leadpoet doesn't need to win the budget. Capturing even a fraction of a percent of enterprise sales spend at companies like this is meaningful revenue. And revenue is where the flywheel starts. Usage burns alpha. Burn supports the token. Stronger emissions attract better miners. Better miners produce better leads. Better leads win more budget. Repeat. @webuildscore (SN44) showed what happens when a subnet ties real commercial usage to its token. Leadpoet is running the same playbook against enterprise sales budgets, which are measured in hundreds of millions per company.

• 
  Tom Alder (@tomaldertweets) reported 21 minutes ago

  In 2009, Dropbox founder Drew Houston took a meeting at Apple HQ thinking it was about a partnership. Steve Jobs opened with an offer to buy his company. Houston, still in his 20s, turned down 9 figures on the spot. Jobs pushed back with a warning: "You're a feature, not a product." If they wouldn't sell, Apple would build a direct competitor themselves. They wouldn't sell. Apple shipped iCloud. A phenomenally successful product, but it didn't kill Dropbox. Dropbox had quietly built the best customer acquisition loop in software history: → Give a friend an invite, you both get free storage. When Apple made the acquisition offer, Dropbox had around 2 million users. By January 2010, 4 million users. By April 2010, users were sending 2.8 million invites a month. 1 every single second. Dropbox's growth curve went ballistic after the Apple discussion: → 50m users by 2011 → 100m users by 2012 → 500m users by 2016 In 2017 they became the fastest software company in history to reach $1 billion ARR. Today: 700m+ registered users and $2.5b a year in revenue - sitting a fraction behind 850 million+ iCloud users. - 🎁 P.S. I turned Dropbox's referral playbook into a free guide - comment "Dropbox" and I'll send it to you.

• 
  M.Ellis (@MEllisPhotograp) reported 23 minutes ago

  @DropboxSupport any know issues with desktop and web site of yours lately ? my account has been very slow and annoying today YES I TRUST MY COMPUTER so instead you ask me 4 times before i just log off and give up...

• 
  Chase (@Chase_Commerce) reported 23 minutes ago

  the full $1 UGC video stack, every tool and every cost, top to bottom: layer 1: research tool: claude cost: a $20 subscription (or even free) it pulls the top performing UGC in your niche, breaks down the hooks and structure, and writes ready to film scripts. spread across hundreds of videos this rounds to pennies a clip. replaces: a creative strategist doing 3 hours a day layer 2: finding the winners to study tool: meta's ad library, free optional: atria or foreplay if you want the longest running ads surfaced faster cost: $0 to a small monthly fee you're looking for content that's been live for months, because longevity means it's making money. layer 3: filming tool: HourlyUGC cost: $25 to $35 an hour she films a clip every 30 to 60 seconds off a script, so 40+ clips a session. that's under a dollar a clip just to film. replaces: a $400 to $600 per video agency layer 4: editing tool: capcut, plus editors you hire directly cost: $3 to $7 an hour, 20 to 30 finished videos a shift adds a dollar or so per clip. the whole thing runs off one documented template so every editor produces identical output. layer 5: storage and handoff tool: google drive or dropbox cost: basically nothing creators upload raw footage, editors pull from it, finished clips go to a shared folder. that's the entire pipeline. total fully loaded: $1 to $3 a finished video, at whatever volume you staff for. nothing hidden in that number, and you own every clip outright instead of renting access to it. the stack is boring on purpose, and boring is why it scales.

• 
  Jaclyn Forero | UGC & Paid Social Strategist (@jaclynforero) reported 24 minutes ago

  “We need more UGC.” Do you? Or do you currently have 46 videos of attractive women standing in beige kitchens holding your product and saying: “I’m literally obsessed.” Because those are two very different problems. More creators ≠ more creative strategy. You can hire 10 creators, get 30 videos back, and still end up with a very expensive Dropbox folder full of… basically the same ad wearing different earrings. The part that actually matters happens before anyone presses record: Customer research. Different angles worth testing. Hooks that aren’t all “POV: you finally found…” Scripts that provide structure without making a normal human sound like they’re reading the terms and conditions. Casting creators for the concept instead of just asking, “Does her house look expensive?” Enough B-roll that the editor doesn’t have to perform a small miracle in Premiere Pro. And then — this part is apparently controversial — looking at the performance data and using it to decide what to make next. Recently, I led creative strategy for a top medical-grade-skincare brand's paid social campaign across research, concepts, scripting, creator direction, and post-production. Some of the winning creative generated approximately 2.3x ROAS during testing. My biggest takeaway: UGC works a lot better when you stop treating creators like content vending machines and start treating the entire thing like a creative testing system. Anyway, if your current UGC strategy is “hire more people and hope one of them accidentally makes a winner,” I have some thoughts.