Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (44%)
• Website (33%)
• Mobile App (11%)
• Login (11%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Angers	Login	4 days ago
Itu	Website	11 days ago
Seattle	Website	11 days ago
Nice	Mobile App	20 days ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  unur48❖❖ (@unur481515) reported 2 minutes ago

  Dear @Binance, my account was unexpectedly restricted from participating in campaigns due to an alleged Terms of Use violation. I believe this may be a mistake. I have always tried to follow the rules and would greatly appreciate it if my case could be reviewed. Thank you for your time and support. 🙏💛 UID: 740869704 #Binance #BinanceSupport #Crypto

• 
  o c t o d a m u s (@octodamusai) reported 4 minutes ago

  Hyperliquid SOL open interest down 14.3% in 24h — the fastest single-venue OI drain in the dataset — while Binance SOL OI rose 1.3%. Same asset, opposite flows. When the risk-tolerant venue exits and the larger venue absorbs, someone is repositioning, not closing.

• 
  yellowpanther (prediction arc) 💎 (@yellowpantherx) reported 5 minutes ago

  @RVAClassic @binance bro... wtf

• 
  Saint John: Evernode 1:1 Freedom (@AverageJohnEVR) reported 6 minutes ago

  It is already obvious that Binance will be first to support both coins. And why the recent whale moves that never changed wallets?? (Speculation) Because that helps with proof of origin and ownership decisions for the fork.

• 
  Raymond R. (@RayNordic) reported 8 minutes ago

  @binance 5 of 9 only dumping **** on us.

• 
  SpenzDigital (@SpenzDigital) reported 12 minutes ago

  @ansem @binance day 8 begging Binance to list $ANSEM. the trenches have officially become customer support.

• 
  Shenna Pason (@o14659) reported 14 minutes ago

  @GhostMMXM That, McMullen is doing since Binance Listing. We were expecting 0.4 level then but impossible if it goes like that.

• 
  aLvr7SH (@AnimalsLvr7) reported 16 minutes ago

  @cz_binance However one account no another account with normal activities also be disqualified after finishing Binance 9YA event and Binance team refuses to explain which rule is broken. @cz_binance for honest users this is not fair. Such bad policy=users' trust lost

• 
  dimasta.sol (@_dimasta) reported 18 minutes ago

  @binance I believe Binance has effectively stolen my money. In May, I transferred funds from another crypto exchange to my Binance account. My funds were frozen, and I was told the review would take 10 days. After 10 days, nothing changed. Support then told me to wait 30 more days. After those 30 days, they extended the deadline by another 30 days. Now that period has also passed, and my funds are still frozen with no explanation. I have screenshots of every conversation with Binance Support. UID: 39897529 Case ID: 165532131 Please review my case.

• 
  Kornelius👑 (@leion_morr11127) reported 19 minutes ago

  People posting about og $bibi just dump $BIBI HAS 70% of supple in Binance alpha wallet . Gotta be brain dead to by that old **** ha

• 
  Michael Taiwo (@AskMichaelTaiwo) reported 22 minutes ago

  Two years ago the founder of Binance pleaded guilty to federal charges, paid a fine larger than some national budgets and stepped down. This week he is on a stage teasing a US comeback. Meanwhile the exchange he left did 34 trillion dollars in trading volume last year and still holds about a third of the derivatives market with 300 million users. The uncomfortable takeaway for anyone keeping score at home: in crypto, consequences are a speed bump for the founder and a cliff for the retail trader who copied him.

• 
  dimasta.sol (@_dimasta) reported 24 minutes ago

  @BinanceAcademy I believe Binance has effectively stolen my money. In May, I transferred funds from another crypto exchange to my Binance account. My funds were frozen, and I was told the review would take 10 days. After 10 days, nothing changed. Support then told me to wait 30 more days. After those 30 days, they extended the deadline by another 30 days. Now that period has also passed, and my funds are still frozen with no explanation. I have screenshots of every conversation with Binance Support. UID: 39897529 Case ID: 165532131 Please review my case.

• 
  Learn Amanda (@learnamanda_) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance @BinanceForIN @BinanceAngels Customer interaction is just as important as the event itself. One negative experience with a staff member can leave a bad impression despite an otherwise excellent event.

• 
  Dark Crypto (@explor_wd_hamza) reported 28 minutes ago

  Dogecoin is down 73% in 8 months. Binance just recorded $1.2 billion in meme coin sell-offs. CPI came in at 3.5% — the best print of 2026 — and DOGE pumped 2.25%. Bitcoin pumped 2.24% on the same news. The most hyped meme coin in history is now performing exactly like Bitcoin. Except Bitcoin didn’t lose 73% getting here. #Dogecoin #Memecoins #Crypto

• 
  Crypto With Zubair ₿ (@CryptoGem10xx) reported 29 minutes ago

  Stablecoins are the most important part of crypto no one talks about. WHAT ARE THEY? Crypto dollars. 1 stablecoin ≈ $1. They remove volatility so you can actually USE crypto for real stuff. HOW DO THEY WORK? 3 types: 1. Fiat-backed: USDT, USDC. $1 in a bank = 1 token issued. 2. Crypto-backed: DAI. Over-collateralized with ETH/BTC. 3. Algorithmic: Code-based. High risk, high failure rate. WHY ARE THEY EVERYWHERE? 1. Trading: It’s how 80% of crypto trading happens. Exit to USDT, not PKR/USD. 2. Transfers: Send money globally in minutes for pennies. Huge for remittances. 3. Payments: Freelancers in MENA & Pakistan use them to beat inflation + bank delays. THE RISKS: 1. Are reserves real? Trust the issuer. 2. Can regulators freeze them? Yes. 3. Can they de-peg? Yes. We’ve seen it. 4. They’re centralized. Not “true crypto” to purists. Bottom line: Stablecoins = the bridge between crypto and the real economy. They’re not perfect, but they’re solving real problems in payme. #Binance #LearnWithBinance

• 
  crypto Man (@ibrahim43181418) reported 29 minutes ago

  @Gayu_BTC $CEX is live. Cool idea, one problem - trenchers dump every bag the second it lands. So we sent supply to the wallets of Binance, OKX, Bybit, Bitget, Kraken, MEXC and other CEXes. they hold it now. CA: 0xc4892b6221788d4ee230b47a858fdad6d3837777

• 
  Elja (@Eljaboom) reported 35 minutes ago

  @binance Those recovery numbers show why good support matters just as much as good products 🫶

• 
  Raees Idrees (@raeesidres) reported 39 minutes ago

  @binance Binance P2P Sucks Bro fix it they take your details and then they say cancel the trade we dont want to trade basically, they steal the data and later they say we dont want to trade with you cancel it it happened like 3-4 times with me Fix it and dont let these scammers take ppls data. @binance @cz_binance

• 
  Rohan JT (@RohanJT) reported 41 minutes ago

  I see OKX has hired SOOO many KOLs all of a sudden Maybe a PR cleanup? Binance never had to do that, all natural and organic support :)

• 
  Memento ($HODL arc) (@King_Memento) reported 43 minutes ago

  I missed $Cashcat and all other memes on robinhood , i was desperate for a good lore coin,as soon as i saw this i knew this will run and blasted the top, unfortunately SOLtards ***** this as usual, i usually cut my losses on such plays but the lore here is too good to be forgotten While i am doing utility mostly i wanted to have meme exposure on Robinhood. There are just 3 reasons for why i bought this and would want to support this. 1. $4 on bnb ran to 300mn ~ Robinhood is bigger than binance. 2. It's vlad's favourite pose and looks like it has become entire Robinhood companies favourite pose now, they all use 2 Fingers for every picture. 3. Vlad clearly gave a strong green signal for memes, what are the chances if this grows big enough for vlad to interact? Follow? Higher right, cuz he's gonna see more content on himself lol, and people usually react to it. This hopium here is enough to bid this coin at 20k. Also another reason is because @2147Milly is my goat, and i saw him working hard on this and had to hop in. Now, I've never done a CTO before, never ran a meme coin before, but many of my friends successfully CTO'd few coins to millies on RH, and i want to gain this exposure, I can't decide the price action and stuff, but what i'll make sure is we all have fun and have funny content go out there in the community and gain more exposure. 0x9830682d26541d2d77fca2379b2394479d887cd0

• 
  Jimi (@diamondhands) reported 45 minutes ago

  @The_Pons Well said. The first few times I sent funds was nerve wracking waiting for the confirmation block. Then I found myself tapping free Doge faucets and I laugh at the fact that they couldn’t give Doge away back then and I look the price now. Being a US user also made it difficult. I was kicked off of Poloniex, Binance (before Binance US existed) and other exchanges. One of the many fun experiences of being an early adopter.

• 
  J Feng 🌕 (@stablefeng) reported 47 minutes ago

  This is not an abstract theoretical debate. It is a question of understanding basic economics and what actually happened on Terra Classic. You said: “Tax forces transactions off-chain.” A tax can affect the cost of certain high-frequency trades, arbitrage and market-making activity. But transactions do not happen simply because a tax is low. People transact because they have a reason to transact: useful applications, demand, liquidity, arbitrage opportunities or the possibility of earning a profit. Nobody wakes up and makes transactions for no reason simply because the tax is lower. The fundamental reason Terra Classic lacks on-chain volume is that we do not currently have enough meaningful applications, profitable opportunities or products that people genuinely want to use. Removing the tax does not automatically create any of those things. You then said: “It’s cheaper to trade LUNC on Binance.” Trade it for what purpose? Short-term traders and speculators already use centralized exchanges because that is where the liquidity and order books are. They are buying and selling LUNC based on price movements. That is not the same thing as genuine on-chain economic activity. People do not move on-chain simply to trade for the sake of trading. They move on-chain when there is something useful or profitable to do there. You also said: “There is no money validating the chain unless you’re in the top three.” That is simply not true. Burrito Node is currently around 13th in voting power. It earns approximately $150 per month in LUNC and USTC. I do not sell those rewards; I compound them because I view them as a long-term investment. Whether a validator is profitable depends on delegation, commission, operating costs, token value and overall network activity. It has no direct connection to whether the burn tax exists. You then said: “People are losing interest as compounding losses is not the best business model.” Of course people lose interest when an asset keeps falling and they are losing money. That is true throughout crypto and traditional markets. But again, that does not prove that the burn tax caused those losses. Low prices, weak demand, limited development and the absence of useful products are much larger issues than the transaction tax. Finally, you said: “We have had the tax for five years.” No, we have not. The original 1.2% burn proposal was approved in 2022, and the tax was implemented on-chain on September 21, 2022. That is not five years. I have been part of Terra Classic since the chain was created after the collapse. I remember every stage of its history. After the collapse, the chain was effectively abandoned and the community was in chaos. Community developers and contributors, including Edward Kim, Zaradar and others associated with Terra Rebels, worked with validators to restore and upgrade the chain. The recovery work included both implementing the community-approved 1.2% burn mechanism and re-enabling delegation and staking. These proposals gave validators, developers and the wider community a common objective at a time when the chain had almost no direction. The burn movement helped reunite the community. It encouraged validators to coordinate upgrades, brought holders back on-chain, restored public attention and helped attract support from major exchanges. Binance later began burning the trading fees generated from its LUNC spot and margin pairs. You can debate whether 1.2% was the ideal rate. You can propose reducing it, changing it or replacing it with a better mechanism. Governance exists precisely for that reason. But rewriting the chain’s history and blaming every current problem on the burn tax is not a serious analysis. Terra Classic does need more on-chain volume. But volume comes from utility, applications, liquidity and opportunities—not merely from reducing a tax and hoping people begin making meaningless transactions. Build something people want to use, and transactions will follow.

• 
  Marlboro Bear (@afraidofwomen51) reported 50 minutes ago

  Anyone here into crypto? I need help figuring out how this binance thing works

• 
  tumeke72 (@TuMeke72) reported 51 minutes ago

  @Cryptolution So may i ask what this means? Is this good for $DOG or just anoth binance ploy to keep us down 😳🥺

• 
  Bikramgurung (@Bikramg123456) reported 52 minutes ago

  Report to FED These MF Seeing these report any one can tell Binance is playin with dog with motivation to break it down. Dog army should demolish these thieves to grow

• 
  DigiBellick 🔺 (@CryptoMahone) reported 53 minutes ago

  I discovered crypto in November 2016. I invested my salary and Christmas bonus in Digibyte, which was worth $80 at the time. After grinding all day trading, joining VIP groups, and watching YouTube tutorials, I turned that $80 into a peak balance of $43,000 in 2021. Then one day, on May 19, 2021, while we were celebrating my cousin’s birthday, crypto crashed around 40% across the board. I jumped in, convinced that was the bottom — but I was wrong. Alts dropped up to 80%, and BTC fell 30%. I sat there helplessly watching my balance rapidly decreasing, unable to do anything. I couldn’t cut my losses because the Binance app was crashing. I watched it go all the way to zero. I couldn’t speak. I couldn’t breathe. I have the screen recording from that day showing my liquidation. I sent it to Binance support, asking for a refund because I couldn’t close the position myself. And guess what? They only offered me $900 and a one-month VIP upgrade. Since then, I left @binance and only use @Bybit_Official . I felt deeply betrayed. Binance witnessed both my greatest success and my complete downfall. Now here I am — nothing in my name, zero in my account. I still haven’t recovered from that liquidation. The only thing keeping me going is my long-time girlfriend, who still believes in me. She is seven months pregnant now. I’m just hoping for some luck — even if it’s not today, but someday. #BinanceTurns9 @cz_binance

• 
  Notsu (@Notsu311406) reported 54 minutes ago

  @BittexXBT tbh spot liquidity is still terrible except Binance/CB

• 
  chuckie ray (@HandsCovered) reported 57 minutes ago

  @CROWNFIELD01 @binance i called for help twice

• 
  Seriously Best (@SeriouslyB19884) reported 59 minutes ago

  @RobinHub_xyz @BinanceWallet **** no don’t want binance involved

• 
  Erik (@ero_crypto) reported 60 minutes ago

  Dear members, let me explain why I won't be sharing precise entry and stop-loss levels publicly anymore. Sometimes the market gives us what looks like the perfect setup. Price sweeps major sell-side liquidity, reaches a deep discount HTF POI zone, creates multiple bullish PD Arrays, delivers a Market Structure Shift (MSS), displacement, and a high-probability long entry. Everything aligns exactly the way we teach in the educational section. Under normal market conditions, that's exactly the type of setup I love to trade. But there's a problem. There is almost no liquidity left in this market. This isn't Bitcoin, Gold, or the Nasdaq. Most altcoins are extremely illiquid and can be moved with surprisingly small amounts of capital. When I publicly share a precise stop-loss level, and hundreds of community members/out of 25K together on X, TG, Binance square/ place their stops at exactly the same price, we unintentionally create a concentrated liquidity pool. And what happens next? That liquidity becomes an obvious target. Over the past several months, we've repeatedly seen altcoins violate multiple HTF bullish PD Arrays, sweep the exact invalidation level, and then immediately reclaim it and rally. How many times have we watched price: Lose HTF POI zone, violates/ breaks through/ several bullish PD Arrays, trigger everyone's stop-loss, and then reverse straight back into the original direction? Far too many. That's not because the analysis was necessarily wrong. It's because liquidity is incredibly thin, and those clustered stop-losses become easy targets. Some of you may ask: Eric, do you really think 20, 30, or even 100 community members can create enough liquidity to matter? Yes, I do. First of all, I have no idea how many people out of my 25,000+ community members actually take the exact same trade. It could easily be 100 or more. More importantly, I have no idea what their combined position size is. I've tested this across many altcoins. Compare today's market with 2021 or when TOTAL2 was above 1.3T or even early 2025 June - December/ no liquidity in the ****** market at all. Some of you may argue that even in 2025 there were periods when TOTAL2 was also below $1 trillion. That's true. But looking at TOTAL2 alone doesn't tell the whole story. Why? Because today we have far more altcoins competing for the same pool of capital. That liquidity is now spread across thousands more projects. The result? Individual altcoins have become dramatically less liquid than they were in previous cycles. In fact, if you look closely, you'll even notice that Bitcoin and Ethereum themselves show poor liquidity on other exchanges/ ***** candles/ That's a clear sign that liquidity has been leaving the market. For that reason, I want to protect both my analysis and this community. Going forward, I'll continue sharing: HTF POI zones Bullish and bearish scenarios Market bias Key bounce and rejection zones However, precise entry points, stop-loss levels, and execution details will be shared exclusively inside the Premium Group. Inside an HTF POI zone, every trader can manage risk differently and choose their own invalidation level instead of everyone placing stops at the exact same price. That makes it much harder for the market to target our community's liquidity. Hopefully, we'll see fresh capital and a meaningful liquidity injection return to the crypto market soon. Until then, adapting to current market conditions is the best way to protect both your capital and your edge.