Binance status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours

The graph below depicts the number of Binance reports received over the last 24 hours by time of day. When the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line, an outage is determined.

Most Reported Problems

The following are the most recent problems reported by Binance users through our website.

• Transactions (71%)
• Website (14%)
• Mobile App (14%)

Live Outage Map

The most recent Binance outage reports came from the following cities:

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Nice	Mobile App	2 hours ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Beaucaire	Transactions	1 month ago
Vigo	Website	2 months ago
Mont-Saint-Martin	Transactions	2 months ago
Dubai	Transactions	2 months ago

Full Outage Map

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Binance Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  jed (@WorstSinnerxyz) reported 8 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet my honest feedback on #Binance Wallet DeFi after using it: the strongest part is not just “more yield options.” it’s that Binance is slowly turning DeFi from scattered tabs into an actual portfolio layer. before, a normal DeFi user had to jump between PancakeSwap, Venus, Uniswap, dashboards, explorers, and sometimes a notes app just to answer simple questions like: where is my money, what risk am i taking, what can i exit quickly, and what fees did i actually earn? Binance Wallet DeFi fixes a big part of that by putting staking, LPs, and loans in one place. that matters because BSC alone is still doing around $5B+ in DeFi TVL, $13B+ in stablecoins, and hundreds of millions in daily DEX volume, so the problem is not lack of activity — the problem is making that activity readable for real users. what i liked: - the 40+ protocols / 1,000+ pools coverage makes the product feel useful, not decorative - seeing Earn, Loans, and Liquidity Pools under one wallet flow reduces “where did i put this asset?” anxiety - loan access through protocols like Venus makes sense because collateral usage is one of the real DeFi use cases, not just farming incentives - LP management inside wallet is a big improvement because adding/removing liquidity and claiming fees should not require users to leave the safety layer what i think can make it exceptional: 1. show “net APY after gas + incentives + price risk,” not just headline APY 2. add an LP impermanent-loss simulator before users deposit 3. add health-factor alerts for loans with push notifications before liquidation risk becomes urgent 4. rank pools by risk-adjusted yield, not just APY 5. show protocol dependency clearly: where the money sits, what contract is used, audit status, and whether rewards are sustainable 6. add a “one-tap unwind” view: remove LP, repay loan, or withdraw position cleanly during volatility 7. give users a monthly DeFi statement: earned fees, rewards, gas spent, unrealized IL, and net result overall, Binance Wallet DeFi feels like the right direction because it treats DeFi as a position-management problem, not only a yield-discovery problem. my main suggestion: don’t make the product compete on the highest APY. compete on clarity. the wallet that helps users understand risk, exit faster, and track real net returns will win long term.

• 
  BhigZik (@BhigZik) reported 10 minutes ago

  Spenda o, phantom o, binance o, opay o, access bank, Uba, Momo o, shi shi I never receive in a month fa. Glory be to God!!!

• 
  Zbase (@ZbaseCo) reported 16 minutes ago

  DAİLY UPDATE: Ark Invest added $18.4M in Coinbase and cut Robinhood, senators pushed to block any SBF pardon, CME prepared to sue the CFTC over Bitcoin perpetuals, Congress moved to freeze Fed CBDC plans until 2030, Binance faced EU pressure as Greece resisted its MiCA bid, and China called for tighter stablecoin oversight while Bitcoin hovered near $64K in a fear‑driven market. #zbaseco #crypto

• 
  Aurther ETH (@Aurther_Davis) reported 17 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance The next generation expects access, not gatekeepers.

• 
  CryptoMagnet (@CryptooMagnet) reported 21 minutes ago

  @cas_abbe @binance The biggest shift isn't the IPO itself it's who gets access before Wall Street opens the door.

• 
  Bông 🍊 po (@B0ngQy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @BinanceWallet Biggest issue with Binance Wallet DeFi: headline APY can look attractive, but real returns are harder to judge. Net yield, fees, incentives, and sustainability should be much more transparent.

• 
  Yedior (@yedior) reported 22 minutes ago

  @Spigg1115 has Binance not harmed competitors? Why did The Netherlands ban them? Why did France, Germany and more forced them to shut down Derivatives? Don't you think Binance's own actions led to this, rather than some kind of plot being run?

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 24 minutes ago

  @binance It's difficult to trust a platform that labels your account "high risk" due to technical errors, then repeats the error dozens of times, then bans you from P2P for two transactions totaling only a few dollars, implicitly accusing you of money laundering. The problem isn't the error itself, but the persistence in it, the lack of transparency, accountability, and apology when the error is proven. Users deserve fair treatment, not arbitrary decisions followed by justifications.

• 
  Sukumar (@Sukumar9501) reported 24 minutes ago

  Dear @BinanceHelpDesk, I am a loyal Binance user and actively participate in Binance campaigns. Unfortunately, Binance Traders League displays "This activity is not available in your region" even though I am fully verified. Could your team please clarify the eligibility for Indian users or review my account? Thank you for your support. #Binance #BinanceTradersLeague

• 
  Nova (@badattrading_) reported 24 minutes ago

  first thing you wanna do is having an overall idea of the distro, if it's more Binance/OKX/Gate/Bybit/Mexc or Coinbase/Cryptocom/Change Now/Kraken. If it's more Binance then it can really pump high, but expect a hard dump at some point (like worldcup), if it's more Coinbase study your shits really really well and look if they are bagworking like maniacs, if you see them bagworking like there's no tomorrow : avoid. Basically after you have an overall idea where the holders are based, you need to find good strong hardcore kols in there. If you see the same guys with multi axiom wallets that's no good. if you see folks who can hold hard and are not insiders like ily or wrld_sol or gake, that's potentially the good ****. At the end of the day it's only about the holders and their reputation, it's very tough out there

• 
  ꜱʜᴀʜɪɴ ʙᴜʀᴋɪ (@Shahinburki) reported 27 minutes ago

  @binance Will binance use a knife down wick to Liquidate the Stock traders. As you used in #Btc #Eth futures??

• 
  Cryptrix Labs (@CryptrixLabs) reported 27 minutes ago

  ZAMA is pinned under a ceiling it's already failed at, and until it clears $0.0342 on the 4-hour chart with real volume behind it, this one stays on the watchlist — not the radar for action. The math on the chart is the first problem. Price is sitting just under $0.0341, a level buyers have been turned away from more than once. That's only about 1% of headroom before sellers show up again, while the nearest real support doesn't come in until $0.0304 — roughly 10% lower. Far more room to fall than to rise is the wrong shape for leaning in. The backdrop isn't helping either. Bitcoin and Ethereum are both grinding lower on their 4-hour charts, and the US dollar is firming up. That combination tends to pull risk-on names like this one down with it, not lift them. On top of that, ZAMA is trading below the average price recent buyers paid in — meaning most of them are underwater and likely to use any bounce as an exit, which adds another layer of selling pressure overhead. Zoom in and the short-term picture is just as thin. Momentum is barely ticking higher, and it's doing so on very light trading volume — no real conviction from buyers. The 1-hour chart is also shaping a double-top, a pattern that often warns of one more rejection before a flush. The level to watch is clean: a 4-hour close above $0.0342 with strong volume breaks the ceiling and puts ZAMA back in play. Until then, there's simply more risk below than reward above. — 📡 On the Radar · $ZAMA · Available on Binance

• 
  Fontinz (@1017_Zhu) reported 30 minutes ago

  My account has been under review for over 30 days and my funds are currently inaccessible. Case ID #163436272. ​Customer support has repeatedly provided template responses and confirmed they cannot assist further. Please help! @BinanceHelpDesk @binance

• 
  lasherdoekmark1bh (@lasherdoekmark1) reported 30 minutes ago

  bStocks now live on Lista, the first BNB Chain lending protocol supporting 1:1 backed US securities from Binance. Borrow, earn, and access assets like Nvidia, Tesla, SpaceX, and more 24/7 on-chain. Will this boost crypto-backed securities? #Crypto #DeFi #BNB

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 31 minutes ago

  My account was classified as high-risk even though I don't care about the distributions Binance makes, I don't receive them at all, and they don't concern me. Despite this, my account is still classified as high-risk. When I appealed and Binance's error was revealed, they claimed it was a technical glitch. It's strange that a platform would make the same mistake 15 times; this clearly demonstrates their weak technology. After this, I was banned from P2P trading. When I inquired, they told me the reason for the ban was that I was accused of wash trading because I withdrew 800 Yemeni Riyals (equivalent to $1.63) twice consecutively. Is this really grounds for accusing me of wash trading ?! WASH TRADING involves large sums, not a dollar and a half. Despite this, I followed all the procedures, and it turned out they were wrong. Yet, I haven't received any official apology or compensation for this ongoing farce.

• 
  Serena (@Serena_offical_) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance @binance Since bStocks are Certificates over the underlying share (not direct stock ownership) under ADGM rules; if BTech Holdings ever needed to wind down a bStock, what’s the actual redemption path back to the real share or cash for holders outside ADGM? #AskBinance

• 
  cococowi (@cocococowi) reported 32 minutes ago

  @binance Hey Binance, how does the 1:1 backing for bStocks really work? If many people convert stocks to bStocks and use them in DeFi (lending, liquidity pools, etc.), what happens to the actual shares? Any risk of fractional ownership or redemption problems #AskBinance

• 
  Crynet (@crynetio) reported 33 minutes ago

  🇵🇭 Binance Gains Regulatory Green Light for Philippine Traders BlockShoals reports Binance can serve Philippine traders under a Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sandbox arrangement. The framework permits trading access without requiring a local Virtual Asset Service Provider (VASP) license, according to BlockShoals.

• 
  Pritam Kumar (@Pritamkumar047) reported 33 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk I have not committed any scam or fraud, yet my account has been banned. Customer support is not helping me, and I still do not know the exact reason for this action. Please review my account again and provide a clear explanation. @binance @BinanceHelpDesk #Binance

• 
  CryptoKnightBen (@CryptoKnightBen) reported 33 minutes ago

  BTC $63,082 (+0.32%) testing $62,400 support. ETH $1,705 (-1.88%) at key Fib level. SOL $69.59 (-3.4%) below EMAs. Whale: 530+ BTC withdrawn from Binance. Fed hawkish, US-Iran peace deal snags. #Crypto #Trading #Bitcoin

• 
  I'llallowit (@iwillalllowit) reported 35 minutes ago

  > be Megaeth > Run seed round in June ’24 > Raise $20M; Vitalik, Cobie involved > Echo round in Dec ’24, sells out in 56 seconds > Launch fluffle SBT sales, 10,000 supply, 1 ETH > raise $28M from this > 5% of total supply promised > Launch Testnet: Match ’25 > spend all of 2025 saying "organic growth, no incentive farming, no role farming” > Run public sale in October on SONAR > $1.4B in bids, 20x oversubscribed > Run USDM pre-deposit bridge in Nov ’25 promising 1:1 conversion at mainnet $250M cap > Refund everyone their USDC; nobody gets USDM > Jan ’26, pledge no exchange listing fees, no tokens allocations to CEXs > Launch mainnet Feb 9 ’26 > TGE in April, Mega opens $0.22, 120% above SONAR sale price > 2.5% of total supply to Fluffle holders, 50% vested linearly > Binance, Coinbase, OKX, Bybit listed > Early May: TVL "flips Monad" at $580M+ > Turns out Ethena was looping USDe + USDM into Aave recursively > DeFiLlama nets the loops, real TVL = $158M $420M was theater > Launch Terminal points program April; promise 8 weeks run with 2.5% of MEGA supply > Kill it May 21, three weeks in > Switch payout from MEGA to USDM > Tell everyone to claim by June 10 or forfeit > Shutdown discord by June ’26 > still have ~53% of supply locked behind KPI > echo still locked, VC still locked > current price 74% down from ATH > $1M in USDM drop barely making break even for most participants

• 
  Riar saab (@Riarsaab13) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance #AskBinance "In the rare event of a platform outage or custodian insolvency, what specific legal claims or consumer protections do bStock holders have over the underlying traditional assets?"

• 
  Nobisblue (@nobisblue) reported 36 minutes ago

  @binance Are customer assets fully segregated from company funds and verifiably backed 1:1, and can you prove it independently? #Askbinance

• 
  Gerhard (Bitcoin Strategy) (@BitcoinStrat) reported 38 minutes ago

  143,000 wallets hold BEAT on Binance Smart Chain. But whale wallets holding 50,000 tokens ($100k each) swung from 200 down to 115 then back to 150 in days. One or two entities likely control most of that supply.

• 
  Whaleland (@Whaleland_Dex) reported 39 minutes ago

  Europe’s new crypto license race has started because MiCA is moving from theory to enforcement. Firms now need authorization as a crypto-asset service provider in one EU country, and that license can then be used across the bloc. That has created a real competitive sprint among exchanges, fintechs, and crypto infrastructure firms. Winning early means gaining regulated access to the EU market ahead of rivals, while missing the deadline can mean an orderly exit, blacklisting, or legal risk. Recent events show both sides of that race. Conio secured a MiCA license in Italy this week, while Reuters reported Binance is expected to lose its bid in Greece and may no longer be able to serve EU users from July. The bigger picture is that Europe is becoming one of the first major markets where crypto regulation now directly decides who can scale. That makes licensing less of a compliance box and more of a strategic moat.

• 
  K@Z (@KazOG603) reported 43 minutes ago

  Congratulations on $wojak I was right just wrong cabal but hey it’s crypto what can you expect i probably should’ve grabbed some to be safe but I was to loyal and thought just maybe will make it through this since we made it literally through all the ups and down but I guess this binance listing was part of cabal gg once again back to square 1 🫡

• 
  CABANA (@0xCabana) reported 52 minutes ago

  Stablecoins have a distribution problem. Plenty of projects building infrastructure, nobody gets normal people to actually see it used. Finally, we saw $250,000 in USD1 paid out to in fighter bonuses during UFC Freedom 250 Dana White on stage announced @worldlibertyfi as presenting partner to make it even more official. Binance, Gate, BTC perps… all of that are still important but stays invisible to anyone outside this space. A fighter getting paid at the White House while a camera rolls doesn't.

• 
  KaRiM (@Karim6692) reported 54 minutes ago

  @easypaisa @BinancePk So whenever a Binance user buys or sells using Easypaisa, that information may be accessible to the government, which can help them track users for tax purposes😑

• 
  Khalid Alzandani (@KAlzandani) reported 56 minutes ago

  @BinanceHelpDesk @binance @BinanceWallet Thank you for your response, but this generic reply is exactly part of the problem. Every time I contact customer support, I receive the same surface-level responses that do not address the root cause of the issue. It often feels as if no one is genuinely reviewing the case or interested in understanding the impact these repeated errors have on users. The same problem keeps happening again and again. My account is repeatedly flagged as high-risk due to your technical errors, and each time I have to spend time proving that the decision was wrong. These recurring mistakes have caused me to miss numerous rewards and distributions over the years because my account was restricted or incorrectly classified. To be clear, I am not even concerned about the rewards themselves. What concerns me is the lack of accountability. When Binance eventually acknowledges that the issue was caused by a technical error, the missed rewards are not restored, no compensation is offered, and no official apology is given. I am not asking for special treatment. I am asking for something very simple: an official apology from Binance and a clear commitment that these repeated technical failures will be investigated and prevented from happening again to me and other users. Users deserve transparency, accountability, and respect—not repeated mistakes followed by automated responses.

• 
  Ngulik Crypto (@ngulik_crypto) reported 1 hour ago

  BINANCE SET TO LOSE PERMISSION TO OFFER SERVICES TO EU CLIENTS AS LICENCE APPLICATION IN GREECE TO BE TURNED DOWN, TWO SOURCES SAY BINANCE SAYS IT BELIEVES IT HAS MET THE RELEVANT REQUIREMENTS TO BE MICA AUTHORISED IN EU Sumber: @DeItaone